Latest / World Ablaze with George Fontes / Cenk Uyger and Hasan Piker Banned, Riots In The UK, and Free Speech Protection

Transcript

Cenk Uyger and Hasan Piker Banned, Riots In The UK, and Free Speech Protection · World Ablaze with George Fontes

• 0:00
  Welcome back to another world ablaze.
• 0:07
  This episode is being recorded June 3rd,
• 0:10
  2026.
• 0:12
  Today, we're going to talk about a few things.
• 0:15
  Firstly,
• 0:16
  Cenk Uygur and Hassan Piker have been banned from the UK.
• 0:20
  Both individuals claim that the UK is only doing so at the behest of Israel and
• 0:25
  that the UK has bent the knee to the Israeli government.
• 0:28
  It's the Jews,
• 0:29
  the Jews who hate Cenk Uygur and Hassan Piker, and the reason why they can't step foot in the
• 0:37
  United Kingdom. Now, that being said, Cenk Uygur is a very prominent podcaster, founding member of
• 0:44
  the Young Turks. Hassan Piker is a very, very popular live streamer. Both have been extremely
• 0:51
  critical of Israel, this is true, but maybe to a degree that is a bit obsessive and maybe on the
• 0:58
  border of possibly inciting violence against Jews, that is to be debated. But regardless,
• 1:05
  I'm going to discuss whether or not they are being singled out and if it really is the Jews,
• 1:10
  as I will go over a list of individuals who have also been banned from the UK. And guess what?
• 1:17
  Wasn't because of the Jews. So this will also lead us into our next topic, free speech. What is it?
• 1:25
  how is it protected? What is protected? What exactly is protected free speech? And who does
• 1:33
  that protection apply to? Now, that being said, it's very important to distinguish that since we
• 1:40
  were talking about the banning of Cenk Uygur and Hassan Piker, that the UK doesn't really have a
• 1:46
  free speech amendment like the USA does. Not same constitutionally whatsoever.
• 1:54
  Their free speech is conditional and not necessarily granted.
• 2:00
  So we have to understand what it means when we're talking about free speech and how it
• 2:06
  applies to different parts of the world.
• 2:08
  America is very lucky to have the First Amendment and to have it protected to the degree it
• 2:13
  is, but it still doesn't excuse all speech.
• 2:16
  And it doesn't give free reign to any individual to say necessarily anything they want.
• 2:24
  So we're going to touch on that a little bit.
• 2:27
  And it's going to be a probably, well, it's going to be a little eye-opening, I think.
• 2:31
  I think it's going to be a little eye-opening.
• 2:32
  And then what we're going to do after that is we're going to discuss a heinous act that
• 2:39
  happened back in December 2025, a murder of an individual.
• 2:43
  This murder has become racial.
• 2:47
  This murder was because a man, a Sikh, was,
• 2:54
  stabbed an individual five times, resulting in their death.
• 2:57
  Now, the circumstances around this are precarious, to say the least,
• 3:02
  because the person who killed or stabbed the victim,
• 3:08
  his brother actually called emergency services,
• 3:11
  and in doing so, made sure that they claimed that the reason he was stabbed
• 3:16
  was because, well, he was racist.
• 3:20
  This resulted in the police showing up.
• 3:22
  they apprehended the victim, of course, because he was being racist,
• 3:26
  even though he was lying on the floor bleeding with five stab wounds.
• 3:31
  So what did the UK police do?
• 3:33
  Well, of course, they made sure he was subdued on the ground,
• 3:38
  put in handcuffs, and ignored his pleas.
• 3:41
  As he was stating he couldn't breathe, how he stated he was stabbed five times.
• 3:45
  And the police themselves said, well, we don't believe you.
• 3:48
  so the end result the person literally died in handcuffs and it's come out that the uk while
• 3:56
  the police there that apprehended the victim actually made a statement saying well he was
• 4:01
  gonna die anyway so fast forward now that new body cam footage comes out pretty much revealing
• 4:11
  everything I just said, as well as a phone call that was very, well, let's just say,
• 4:18
  didn't really support the narrative.
• 4:22
  There's rioting in the streets, uncontrolled rioting.
• 4:26
  People of UK are pissed, and rightfully so.
• 4:30
  And this goes against the narrative that people like Piers Morgan have been pushing, that
• 4:35
  there's no problems, there's no racism, there's no brown versus white, there's no
• 4:40
  good for thee, but not for me situation. Actually, you can even reverse that. Good for me, not for
• 4:48
  thee also. Go either way, I guess, depending on what we're talking about. But regardless,
• 4:53
  regardless, Keir Starmer isn't making things any better. It looks like the politicians realize the
• 5:00
  people have reached their boiling point. They have crossed that red line. At least, well,
• 5:07
  at least the UK has crossed the red line in regards to the native people of the United Kingdom.
• 5:13
  God forbid they're white. And so this is where the racial tangent comes in because it was a
• 5:20
  white person who was stabbed and killed. It was a Sikh of darker complexion. And of course,
• 5:27
  there's been this longstanding issue in the UK of immigration, primarily that of, well, Muslims
• 5:34
  who seem to be getting preferential treatment.
• 5:37
  Now, this is very important to distinguish that Sikhs are not Muslims.
• 5:39
  So let me go ahead and get ahead of that conversation
• 5:44
  because Sikhs are not Muslims.
• 5:46
  But regardless, with everything going on,
• 5:49
  people no longer see the difference.
• 5:51
  And so here we are.
• 5:53
  The UK is in trouble.
• 5:56
  All trust is gone.
• 5:58
  The government is in trouble as far as the people are concerned.
• 6:02
  that people are demanding actual real justice, fair and equal justice.
• 6:07
  And I believe they deserve that.
• 6:10
  Well, before we get there, let's go ahead and give a shout out to my brother on his last episode,
• 6:17
  which I actually enjoyed.
• 6:18
  He broke down the Dave Rubin debate.
• 6:21
  Dave Rubin went into a jubilee where he was surrounded by about 20 something liberals.
• 6:27
  Now, the issue with Dave Rubin, as my brother pointed out, is the guy is, well, he's not really a debater.
• 6:34
  Smart guy, but he's not quick on his feet.
• 6:37
  He missed a lot of cues.
• 6:39
  He didn't rebut anything very well, but not necessarily his fault.
• 6:45
  It's just he's not built for it.
• 6:46
  So understandable.
• 6:48
  My brother broke it down very well, though.
• 6:49
  So I encourage you to go ahead and listen to that episode.
• 6:52
  I'm going to leave that link in the show notes so you know exactly where to find that.
• 6:56
  It's a good listen.
• 6:57
  Manu did a good job breaking down the JCPOA.
• 6:59
  He did a good job breaking down relations with Iran.
• 7:02
  I have a few other things to add, but you know what?
• 7:04
  I think my brother did well enough that I'm just going to leave that alone, and I'm just
• 7:07
  going to push you his way to listen to that episode.
• 7:10
  And with all that being said, it's time to move on to my show.
• 7:15
  So here we go.
• 7:16
  So let's get into Cenk Uygur.
• 7:19
  Let's get into Hassan Piker.
• 7:22
  Let's see what happened here.
• 7:23
  And for those who don't know who they are and you're watching the video, this is Cenk Uygur and Hassan Piker.
• 7:31
  Hassan Piker on the left, Cenk Uygur on the right.
• 7:34
  I believe Hassan Piker is actually Cenk Uygur's nephew.
• 7:39
  Now, both of them are very controversial in their own way.
• 7:43
  Not so much Cenk, but as of late, he has become very, very obsessed with Israel, to say the least.
• 7:51
  Now, where does that leave Cenk?
• 7:53
  Well, that leaves Chank in the situation he's in, where the UK decided, I don't know if we want you here.
• 8:00
  You sound a little unhinged, maybe crazy.
• 8:03
  Sounds like the things you're saying could possibly incite violence against a people.
• 8:09
  Maybe not the exact words, but definitely, well, let's just say you get the gist of it, right?
• 8:17
  And so let's go ahead and read a little bit about what this headline was.
• 8:22
  Let's expound on it.
• 8:25
  So here we are from ground news.
• 8:27
  UK blocks Hassan Piker,
• 8:28
  Cenk Uygur from SXSW London Talks.
• 8:33
  The British Home Office has banned
• 8:35
  prominent left-wing US commentators
• 8:37
  Cenk Uygur and Hassan Piker
• 8:39
  from entering the United Kingdom,
• 8:41
  canceling their electronic travel authorizations
• 8:43
  just ahead of scheduled appearances.
• 8:47
  The government justified the entry ban
• 8:49
  by stating that the presence of both men
• 8:51
  may not be conducive to the public good, emphasizing that the decision was based strictly on
• 8:58
  an assessment of potential risks to UK society rather than specific political positions.
• 9:05
  Uyghur and Piker strongly criticized the decision on social media, claiming they were barred at the
• 9:11
  behest of Israel for their outspoken public criticism of Israeli government and its military
• 9:17
  actions in Gaza. According to reports, British officials specifically flagged concerns that their
• 9:24
  rhetoric risks exacerbating anti-Semitism, highlighting instances where Uyghur claim
• 9:30
  the U.S. government is controlled by pro-Israeli lobbying groups like AIPAC. The travel restrictions
• 9:36
  force the cancellation of multiple high-profile events, including their planned sessions at SXSW
• 9:44
  London Festival this week and Uyghur scheduled address at the Oxford Union Debating Society
• 9:50
  on Friday.
• 9:53
  Now, of course, in Cenk Uyghur fashion, he definitely has something to say.
• 9:58
  Of course, he would.
• 9:59
  I would.
• 9:59
  So would you.
• 10:00
  If a country banned you, you would definitely rebut it.
• 10:03
  You would have a statement to make.
• 10:04
  So here's Cenk.
• 10:05
  Here's Cenk talking about why he thinks he's banned.
• 10:08
  And of course, to no one's surprise, it was the Jews.
• 10:12
  It was Israel.
• 10:14
  But you listen for yourself.
• 10:16
  So here's Cenk Uygur.
• 10:17
  I am a serious risk to public order.
• 10:22
  So words are a serious risk to public order.
• 10:24
  And the words are, hey, Israel seems to have inordinate power in America, in the government and the media, and apparently in the UK and the government and the media.
• 10:35
  And so those are words so dangerous that the public order will break down.
• 10:40
  And so you do.
• 10:41
  And I can't believe that they missed the irony of how dare you say that any government is
• 10:45
  controlled by Israel.
• 10:46
  We're banning you for criticizing Israel.
• 10:49
  Well, thank you for proving my point and for also proving that you haven't really thought
• 10:55
  this one through very much, have you?
• 10:56
  I'm not sure what Cenk thinks is something that needed to be really thought through.
• 11:01
  For one, again, you know, as I stated earlier, the laws in the UK regarding free speech and
• 11:08
  your right to say whatever you want are definitely different.
• 11:11
  Also, in both countries, the USA and the UK,
• 11:15
  you're not a citizen of that particular country.
• 11:19
  It doesn't mean that even the laws in place extend to you
• 11:23
  without any kind of justification for them to extend to you.
• 11:28
  There's certain things you can say even in the US as a citizen
• 11:32
  that is questionable as a non-citizen.
• 11:35
  even a non-citizen who is living already within the borders of the United States of America.
• 11:41
  And we're going to get to that a little bit later. Now, Chang feels hurt. I get it. He feels it's an
• 11:47
  attack and a front against him. But the man himself literally has become a bit unhinged. Look,
• 11:54
  the UK government has made the statement. They do not feel that he's a good person to have there.
• 12:00
  like his actions, his mannerism, who he is, what he believes, his personality,
• 12:07
  the rhetoric spewing out of his mouth is not good for the UK.
• 12:13
  Cenk, you don't get to make the decision.
• 12:15
  The country in which you are trying to travel to makes those decisions.
• 12:21
  You're a public figure.
• 12:23
  Every damn thing you have ever said is out there online.
• 12:26
  Do you think that the UK might have, I don't know, a little bit of a justification here?
• 12:33
  Like they're already going through a bunch of stuff.
• 12:35
  They've been having riots, left and right, or at least protests.
• 12:40
  They have an issue with some of the native people of the UK and those Muslim immigrants,
• 12:49
  which is ongoing contested.
• 12:52
  You have the murder of a white man by a Sikh individual which was grossly mishandled by police all because they couldn believe the victim
• 13:05
  and get help in time,
• 13:07
  so he wouldn't die in handcuffs.
• 13:10
  Oh, and they let the murderer go, right?
• 13:13
  There was that too.
• 13:14
  So if you're a person, Shank,
• 13:18
  that is known for talking
• 13:23
  about a certain group of people in a country
• 13:28
  where there's a decent population, basically, of Jews in the UK,
• 13:32
  and you're going there, and your only message is,
• 13:36
  these people are bad.
• 13:38
  These people need to go.
• 13:40
  These people need to be held accountable.
• 13:43
  These people are genocidal.
• 13:49
  These people rule the world.
• 13:51
  These people are evil.
• 13:52
  I mean, basically, Cenk has said that everything that is bad in the world is because of the Jews.
• 14:01
  Don't believe me?
• 14:02
  Well, I'm going to play a little bit of a compilation that I found here.
• 14:07
  And this compilation is interesting because these aren't all the greatest hits of Cenk saying very derogatory or negative things about Jews or the Israeli government.
• 14:18
  But it is interesting because it's kind of a then and now.
• 14:23
  It's interesting to hear how he flipped the 180 and changed his position on Israel or Jewish people.
• 14:30
  Now, he'll constantly claim, well, I have no problem with Jews.
• 14:33
  I just have a problem with the Israeli government.
• 14:35
  But he kind of talks out of both sides of his mouth.
• 14:38
  And it's interesting for him to criticize the Jews.
• 14:40
  But to this day, he still hasn't admitted or accepted the Armenian genocide, which killed millions of people.
• 14:47
  but that's a discussion for another episode so chank chank huger here you are here you are
• 14:58
  flip-flopping and then ramping it up and really leaning into it in fact we got both you and your
• 15:07
  cohort anna kasparian from the young turks check this out oh who do you think is really the one
• 15:15
  responsible. They always say the Jews because they think, oh, they're the puppet masters.
• 15:19
  There's anti-Semitic tropes, et cetera. Right. And it's obvious that they control us.
• 15:24
  And now Trump is out here like a puppet. Yes, I said puppet. You could suck it.
• 15:28
  By the way, puppet master is word for word what the Nazis used to say about Jewish binoculars.
• 15:36
  OK, puppets for Israel, puppet regimes, Israeli puppet.
• 15:39
  An extremely offensive anti-Semitic post on Facebook.
• 15:43
  This is deeply, deeply anti-Semitic.
• 15:47
  They control us.
• 15:47
  They control our government.
• 15:49
  Israel controls our government.
• 15:51
  So get a load of the poster.
• 15:53
  It says, vote no on Matt Lesser.
• 15:55
  And it has a picture of him looking greedy with large eyes.
• 15:59
  So why put a money-grubbing picture of someone on a flyer like that?
• 16:03
  Yes, we're going to surveil everybody.
• 16:07
  Everyone will be on their best behavior.
• 16:09
  Yes.
• 16:10
  Oh, you guys like your money.
• 16:11
  Abby, you can't get any more anti-Semitic than this.
• 16:14
  Okay.
• 16:15
  Own me more money.
• 16:16
  You owe me more money.
• 16:17
  Give me money.
• 16:18
  Give me $310 billion isn't enough.
• 16:19
  The Jews own the media, right?
• 16:20
  So that's the anti-Semitic trope.
• 16:22
  This is a control of our media by Israeli forces.
• 16:27
  The root of all of these theories is always the Jews control the world.
• 16:31
  That's the excuse the Israelis are using to control our entire government and most of our
• 16:37
  media.
• 16:38
  and saying the Jews have been disloyal. It doesn't get any more anti-Semitic than that.
• 16:44
  Forces inside America that are loyal to Israel. Every single trope used to attack Jews in history,
• 16:52
  anti-human trash, demons spawn. You think you're God's chosen people
• 16:57
  when you act like absolute demons. These tropes lead to anti-Semitic attacks. There are real
• 17:04
  consequences to it. We live in a country that is ruled and controlled and manipulated by the
• 17:10
  nation state of Israel. The media is often controlled. We're gonna surveil everybody.
• 17:16
  You owe me more money, give me money. Our country is occupied by the Israelis.
• 17:19
  Puppets for Israel. Loyal to Israel. They control us. They control our government.
• 17:23
  You've manipulated all of our politicians. You bought them through AIPAC.
• 17:26
  People as evil as this exist in this world. Israel is the Jewish state,
• 17:31
  the greatest state of all.
• 17:33
  APAC is evil.
• 17:35
  Evil.
• 17:36
  Every single one of them lies to you on purpose.
• 17:39
  No, I'm not going to let you filibuster, bitch.
• 17:41
  Israel is our top enemy.
• 17:44
  Enemy.
• 17:45
  Cut off the goddamn funding.
• 17:49
  So, again, a shout out to Canary Mission.
• 17:55
  You can find their content on X at Canary Mission.
• 17:59
  They're the ones who put that video together.
• 18:00
  Just want to make sure that they get credit for it.
• 18:03
  So wasn't that interesting to hear Chank and Anna at one point defending Israel, defending Jews, and then suddenly the flip-flop?
• 18:13
  I mean, this is a result of the narrative being pushed mostly on social media, not really in the real world.
• 18:20
  And this, like I said before, this narrative, this train is just rolling and just steamrolling over everybody.
• 18:29
  I mean, I don't even think the people who pushed the narrative and created this rhetoric
• 18:33
  can even get off the train themselves.
• 18:35
  Like they're just leaning into it.
• 18:36
  And what was interesting about that video is you can hear the before and after.
• 18:41
  And if you're not watching the video version of this podcast, I suggest you do it because
• 18:46
  in the audio version, it might be a little hard to distinguish, you know, what's then
• 18:50
  and now.
• 18:51
  Although if you are listening, you can tell like here's support and here's defense.
• 18:54
  And then here's Israel's evil and they're demonic.
• 18:57
  They're not the real people.
• 18:58
  their demons. Israel must die. Right? So that's basically everything. Yeah, that was my real
• 19:07
  voice, by the way. Sorry for that. And Annex Sparion is unhinged, man. She seems like she's
• 19:14
  possessed herself. And then at the end, you see Chank just going off the rails. We must have found
• 19:20
  Israel. Israel must be cut off. We got to get rid of them. Like, what are you going to do?
• 19:26
  So maybe, again, that video wasn't even all the greatest hits.
• 19:34
  I mean, it wasn't even all the greatest hits.
• 19:36
  Trust me, there's other stuff.
• 19:38
  I just didn't have time to pull up, by the way.
• 19:40
  I'm busy.
• 19:41
  Sorry.
• 19:43
  But the reality is, even in that clip, you can see in the progression and how they react and respond, how they feel.
• 19:51
  it's like yeah I think the UK may have felt a little threatened by your presence even by
• 19:59
  Hassan Piker's presence and I didn't pull any videos up of Hassan Piker the guy's not worth
• 20:03
  my times but that way he's a Marxist he hates the West he hates America you can look him up if you
• 20:11
  want I just hope that he doesn't sway you with this smooth talking voice or whatever it is that
• 20:18
  people find fucking attractive. The guy's horrible, but go ahead and do your own research
• 20:25
  on that guy. I guarantee that if you listen to my show, you're a patriot. You love the West. You
• 20:29
  don't want to see our civilization fall. And if that is all very true, which I'm assuming it is,
• 20:35
  if you're a listener of the show, that you're not going to enjoy Hassan Piker,
• 20:41
  but it's interesting to hear his rhetoric as well. So let's dive into,
• 20:46
  Do you have a right, Chank?
• 20:50
  I mean, do you have a right to respond the way you did to the UK?
• 20:54
  Like, to this day, this has already been about a week.
• 20:57
  The guy is still whining.
• 20:58
  He's still whining.
• 21:00
  The UK doesn't have a right.
• 21:01
  Free speech.
• 21:02
  They're only doing this because of Israel.
• 21:05
  Whatever, Chank.
• 21:06
  So here's a breakdown I did.
• 21:09
  You guys know lately I've loved doing my assessments, doing the research.
• 21:12
  But I'm going to promise this to you guys.
• 21:14
  last episode was heavy and I know it was heavy, man. It was data driven. So I'm not going to go
• 21:22
  extremely deep as I could, but I'm going to definitely hit all the bullet points so we can
• 21:28
  get our point across. Bullet point, get the point across, right? So here we go. Here's my assessment
• 21:34
  I put together using the good old help of AI. So let's talk about the United Kingdom. Let's talk
• 21:41
  about what they think is justifiable in revoking someone's visa or stopping someone from coming
• 21:48
  into their own sovereign nation or their country.
• 21:51
  Let's talk about how they view free speech, how they view you as a person and whether
• 21:56
  or not you contribute anything to their society or if you're going to be a hindrance or even
• 22:02
  someone who might manipulate people or incite violence.
• 22:07
  And again, remember, we're talking about the United Kingdom, not the U.S. of A.
• 22:13
  Very important distinction there.
• 22:15
  So here we go.
• 22:17
  Number one, the non-conducive test.
• 22:20
  So the home security may exclude any foreign national if the president is deemed not conducive
• 22:29
  to the public good, which is exactly what they said about Cenk Uygur and Hassan Piker.
• 22:35
  And so here's the broad scope here.
• 22:40
  This assessment will consider an individual's character, conduct, and association.
• 22:48
  Now, in Cenk's case, association with Hassan Piker may be the one thing that, well, put
• 22:54
  Cenk on the list, but I don't believe that's all.
• 22:57
  As I go ahead and read more, you're going to see how Cenk himself was viewed as someone
• 23:03
  that is not conducive to the public good of the UK.
• 23:07
  But again, the assessment considers an individual's character, conduct, and associations.
• 23:14
  Also, there's no conviction required.
• 23:16
  A person does not need to have a criminal record to be excluded under these grounds.
• 23:21
  Also, there's the preventative application.
• 23:24
  So basically, the UK government has the power to use preventative measures to stop potential
• 23:31
  harm or threats to the UK society before they occur, meaning they can stop you from stepping
• 23:40
  foot on their sovereign land if they think that your presence is going to be a detriment
• 23:46
  to their society.
• 23:49
  So those are the non-conducive tests.
• 23:54
  Those are what they use to determine what type of person you are and whether or not they
• 24:00
  should let you in.
• 24:01
  But there's also the matters of what are considered unacceptable behavior and extremism.
• 24:08
  So the UK government identifies unacceptable behavior as the use of any medium.
• 24:14
  So that's writing, podcasting, broadcasting and radio, television, painting.
• 24:20
  I mean, whatever.
• 24:21
  It doesn't matter.
• 24:21
  Whatever medium you use could be writing, blogging, whatever you use, whatever you use.
• 24:26
  they can identify anything you use that could be criticized by the UK government to be determined
• 24:37
  to be unacceptable behavior or extremism. So here's some of the bullet points of how they
• 24:49
  would come to a conclusion that your behavior is unacceptable.
• 24:55
  So if in using any medium, you provoke, justify, or glorify terrorist violence, well, that
• 25:04
  right there applies to Hassan Piker for sure.
• 25:06
  Not so much Cenk Uygur, I don't think, but definitely to Hassan Piker.
• 25:11
  Whether or not your medium, any medium you use, fosters hatred that could lead to inter-community
• 25:19
  violence. Now, that,
• 25:22
  Chank, that can
• 25:23
  definitely apply to you. I mean,
• 25:25
  from the video I just played,
• 25:27
  your continuous,
• 25:29
  insistent
• 25:30
  hatred
• 25:32
  for Jews and Israelis
• 25:35
  is, I mean, it's a bit much, man. You're unhinged.
• 25:38
  Now, he will argue
• 25:39
  until he's out of breath and passes out
• 25:41
  that he doesn't hate Jews or Israelis,
• 25:43
  but he hasn't said
• 25:45
  really much that
• 25:46
  is in a positive light.
• 25:49
  especially not for quite some time.
• 25:51
  I mean, in that then and now video,
• 25:53
  it got to a point to where
• 25:54
  all it is is an obsession with it the Jews It the Jews fault The Jews did this The Jews did that
• 26:05
  It's the Jews,
• 26:06
  right?
• 26:07
  Okay.
• 26:08
  That's how you sound,
• 26:09
  Cenk.
• 26:09
  You sound on Hangeman.
• 26:11
  And so that type of talk,
• 26:13
  that position can definitely come across as something that is not conducive to
• 26:19
  the public good,
• 26:20
  as in it could incite violence within the community.
• 26:27
  Okay, so here's another point they use.
• 26:29
  Promote an extremist mindset.
• 26:31
  Well, that's definitely Hassan Piker.
• 26:33
  So promoting an extremist mindset is defined as ideologies based on violence,
• 26:40
  hatred, or intolerance.
• 26:42
  Well, there you go, Chank, that's you.
• 26:44
  That undermine fundamental rights or liberal democracy.
• 26:50
  And so here's the legal recourse.
• 26:52
  For non-visa nationals, there is generally no right of appeal against an exclusion decision.
• 27:00
  While decisions can be challenged through judicial review, cases involving sensitive national security information are heard by Special Immigration Appeals Commission, where evidence may remain confidential.
• 27:14
  Okay, so after reading all of that, like the reasons the UK can determine that you're a detriment to their society, that you shouldn't be able to step foot on their sovereign soil because they believe you're just going to stir shit up and cause problems.
• 27:32
  chank believes that he is being singled out that he himself only because he's just asking questions
• 27:41
  and criticizing israel that he himself is is him alone and only him and his nephew are being
• 27:50
  targeted by the government of the uk but that's not the truth you see there are many people who've
• 27:57
  been banned from entering the UK.
• 28:00
  And not every reason has been because of Israel.
• 28:04
  And I'm going to read some of those names.
• 28:06
  There are some high profile exclusions that just happened within the last year
• 28:11
  between 25 and 26.
• 28:13
  And there are others that were banned for basically, again, not hating Israelis
• 28:20
  or Jews, but for being Russian nationals, for being hateful to Palestinians,
• 28:27
  and Islam, like Islamists, Muslims.
• 28:32
  So no, it's not just about the Jews.
• 28:34
  It's about you.
• 28:36
  You as an individual.
• 28:39
  Do not contribute anything to the UK.
• 28:42
  You are deemed as somebody
• 28:44
  that they just don't want to have around.
• 28:47
  So let's read some of these high-profile exclusions.
• 28:52
  Let's read some of the other names here
• 28:53
  that have been banned in the UK for various reasons.
• 28:57
  So here we go. Here's some high-profile exclusions.
• 29:01
  Of course, being recent 2026, we have Hassan Piker and Shank Ugar.
• 29:05
  Now, Hassan Piker has been banned because of reported pro-Hamas comments,
• 29:11
  sympathy for Hezbollah, and Houthis, potential to exacerbate anti-Semitism.
• 29:18
  I guess that kind of supports the anti-Semitism
• 29:21
  where it's all Israel that kept us out of the country.
• 29:24
  Same goes for Cenk Uygur, but mostly because of allegations of propagating anti-Semitic tropes, framing Israeli actions as genocide and barbaric.
• 29:35
  But, you know, there's also Kanye West because he had a string of anti-Semitic rhetoric, racist and pro-Nazi comments.
• 29:47
  Valentina Gomez, she's an influencer, political influencer.
• 29:52
  Why was she banned? Because of anti-Islamic rhetoric, not anti-Israeli rhetoric. It's the
• 30:01
  Jews rhetoric. Not I hate the Jews rhetoric. It's because she was anti-Islamic, which included
• 30:07
  burning the Quran, which she did in a video and posted on X. I think it was last year she did that.
• 30:15
  Then we have this Dutch activist. I'm not going to be able to pronounce her last name. So Ava,
• 30:18
  I'll just say her first name.
• 30:20
  She was promoting conspiracy theories
• 30:21
  deemed not conducive to the public good.
• 30:25
  Okay.
• 30:26
  So there that is again,
• 30:27
  that statement conducive to the public good.
• 30:29
  The United Kingdom has decided
• 30:30
  that Ava was promoting theories
• 30:35
  that were not conducive to the public good.
• 30:37
  Same thing they said about Cenk Uygur,
• 30:39
  but instead he himself as an individual
• 30:41
  is just not conducive to the public good.
• 30:44
  Okay.
• 30:44
  Then we got Dominik Tarchinski,
• 30:47
  Polish MEP, whose ideological views described as far right, I guess, extreme.
• 30:54
  So he was banned.
• 30:56
  There was Itamar Ben Gavir, Israeli minister.
• 31:00
  Oh, my God.
• 31:01
  Is this an Israeli minister?
• 31:03
  Someone from Israel who's banned, Shank?
• 31:04
  I guess it wasn't really just about criticizing Israel, was it?
• 31:08
  Because Ben Gavir, the Israeli minister, was inciting settler violence against Palestinians.
• 31:16
  which included
• 31:20
  acid freeze. Also
• 31:22
  goes for another person who is another
• 31:24
  Israeli minister,
• 31:26
  Bezalel Samatrich.
• 31:28
  I don't know if I pronounce that correctly,
• 31:30
  but you guys get it. It's up on the screen. You can read it.
• 31:32
  Also inciting settler
• 31:34
  violence against Palestinians and includes
• 31:36
  acid freezes.
• 31:39
  So, so far, just in that
• 31:40
  short list, Chank, there's individuals
• 31:42
  who were banned because of
• 31:44
  other reasons not criticizing Israel.
• 31:46
  In fact, there are Israeli ministers
• 31:48
  who were banned from
• 31:50
  entering the UK.
• 31:52
  So maybe, I don't know,
• 31:54
  maybe there's something else there, Cenk.
• 31:56
  Maybe there's something else. Let's keep
• 31:58
  going here.
• 32:00
  So here's the case
• 32:02
  of Cenk Uygur
• 32:04
  and Hassan Piker. The exclusion of
• 32:06
  Uygur and Piker
• 32:07
  was significantly influenced by submissions from
• 32:10
  advocacy groups, including UK lawyers from Israel.
• 32:12
  the campaign against anti-Semitism and the community security trust.
• 32:16
  Piker specific citations describe Hamas as a thousand times better than Israel and allegedly
• 32:22
  denied October seven atrocities.
• 32:25
  Uyghur specific citations claims that Israel controls America through donations and historical
• 32:29
  interview with David Duke, meaning he actually had one of the leaders of the KKK or the guy
• 32:38
  on his show and actually interviewed him,
• 32:41
  which I'm not really sure there's a big deal
• 32:44
  about interviewing someone to see what they're about.
• 32:46
  So I would have to go back and watch that interview myself.
• 32:49
  But in general, I mean, you saw the video I played earlier
• 32:54
  and where Cenk Uygur was completely unhinged
• 32:58
  in his hate against the Jews and the Israeli government.
• 33:03
  I mean, to the point where he looked like he was going to blow up.
• 33:06
  Like he was just like, ah, Israel, like it was pretty bad.
• 33:10
  So I don't think Chank did himself any favors.
• 33:15
  I mean, and that's the thing with the internet, like for anybody,
• 33:18
  like any one of us, any one of us in who's a creative,
• 33:24
  who's in media, right.
• 33:25
  Including myself, like any one of us with a podcast,
• 33:29
  a broadcast, a smodcast, like, I don't know, whatever,
• 33:32
  any of us are, whatever we say is out there.
• 33:34
  so you're either going to stand by it or you're not okay and when you're grifting it catches up
• 33:42
  to you because you're going to get caught saying things you may not truly believe
• 33:46
  but later are going to be used against you because you can say well you know i i changed position i
• 33:51
  didn't really like it was a thing back then right it was just what people said like that's not what
• 33:55
  we do anymore well we're in a new age man you can't do that and if you're going to change positions
• 34:03
  as quickly as Cenk Uygur has
• 34:05
  and Anna Kasparian, his cohort,
• 34:08
  you should be able to come out
• 34:11
  and give the reasons why.
• 34:13
  Now, Cenk, to his defense, has.
• 34:15
  He questions the alleged genocide in Gaza.
• 34:20
  Anna Kasparian, I guess, the same.
• 34:22
  But the Cosa claims of Israel controlling the world,
• 34:26
  that all the bad things in the world
• 34:27
  are because of Israel,
• 34:28
  that Israel controls America,
• 34:32
  God, now they control the UK.
• 34:34
  They control all Western nations.
• 34:37
  That type of talk is tiring.
• 34:39
  And it can stir shit up, Chank.
• 34:42
  And I think the more that we look into this,
• 34:45
  the more I think about it.
• 34:47
  You know, I was going to read some more names,
• 34:48
  but here's the thing.
• 34:50
  I don't think it matters.
• 34:51
  I don't think it matters.
• 34:52
  It doesn't matter who else has been banned
• 34:54
  because there's a long list of people in the UK
• 34:57
  who have been banned for anti-Islamic positions,
• 35:01
  for being Russian nationals,
• 35:07
  for being parts supporting terrorism.
• 35:10
  I mean, it's not people who necessarily hated Israel
• 35:13
  that were banned.
• 35:14
  They were banned for many reasons.
• 35:15
  They were banned because the UK, again,
• 35:18
  didn't feel their presence was conducive
• 35:21
  to the public good.
• 35:23
  And so where does that leave us, Cenk?
• 35:25
  Well, where that leaves us is
• 35:26
  maybe you're just a piece of shit.
• 35:29
  Maybe, maybe.
• 35:30
  I mean, I'm not saying it.
• 35:31
  Maybe the UK feels that way.
• 35:33
  Maybe I am saying it.
• 35:36
  Anyway, maybe you're just a piece of shit.
• 35:40
  Maybe there's that.
• 35:41
  Maybe they just don't like you.
• 35:43
  Maybe your actual presence due to your rhetoric,
• 35:46
  to your attitude, how you act,
• 35:48
  how you conduct yourself is not conducive to the public good.
• 35:53
  Period.
• 35:54
  You and your nephew, Hassan Piker,
• 35:56
  you guys are just, you're not good people, man.
• 36:00
  That's just all there is to it.
• 36:01
  And sure, you can hate me and your fans are going to attack me.
• 36:06
  But recently, you know, I've been taken and I don't give a fuck attitude when it comes
• 36:11
  to social media.
• 36:13
  Mostly on X.
• 36:14
  And, you know, hey, I'm ready to go, Chank.
• 36:19
  I'm not scared of any of you guys.
• 36:21
  I'm going to do a sling word.
• 36:22
  So here's the deal, Chank.
• 36:25
  It sucks that you were banned.
• 36:28
  Well, it doesn't suck.
• 36:29
  Hassan Piker was banned.
• 36:30
  I mean, that guy had it coming.
• 36:31
  But as far as you, Chank,
• 36:32
  look, I think you're smarter than you're acting.
• 36:36
  Stop being a piece of shit.
• 36:37
  That's all there is to it.
• 36:38
  Just stop.
• 36:39
  You're better than this, man.
• 36:40
  You're more intelligent than this.
• 36:43
  So why don't you take some time off,
• 36:47
  center yourself, come back to reality.
• 36:49
  And I'm not saying not to ask questions.
• 36:51
  I'm not saying not to be critical of the Israeli government
• 36:53
  because, I mean, we all should question
• 36:56
  some of the things they do.
• 36:58
  Hell, I question some of the things the United States government does.
• 37:01
  I'm, you know, American citizen here.
• 37:04
  Not everybody can say their government is perfect.
• 37:09
  I mean, all governments do some pretty horrendous shit.
• 37:13
  And yeah, sure, we should ask questions.
• 37:16
  We should hold Israel accountable for some of the things they've done.
• 37:19
  But they're not the devil or the demon you're trying to make them out to be,
• 37:24
  Chank.
• 37:25
  You're obsessed, man.
• 37:26
  You're unhinged.
• 37:27
  you need some help.
• 37:30
  You need some help.
• 37:31
  And as far as you being banned from the UK,
• 37:34
  I mean, I think the UK just felt you were a piece of shit.
• 37:36
  That's it, man.
• 37:37
  I mean, sorry.
• 37:37
  Do better.
• 37:39
  Apologize.
• 37:41
  Get back in their good graces
• 37:42
  if you feel that your presence in the UK is that important.
• 37:47
  That's it.
• 37:48
  And with that, I think we're going to move on from this.
• 37:50
  I mean, I'm not sure there's really much more to say.
• 37:52
  We're going to move on.
• 37:54
  We're going to move on.
• 37:55
  All right.
• 37:56
  So now that I've talked about acceptable behaviors, a bit about free speech, like what you can say, what you can't in the UK, and what the UK government can determine is, well, acceptable in terms of your character and your person and your associations to be able to enter the United Kingdom.
• 38:18
  Let's talk about free speech.
• 38:20
  Let's talk about First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America.
• 38:26
  And so I put this summary together and I don't think I was going to read it all, but I don't want this podcast to get too lengthy.
• 38:37
  So I'm going to try to go through this as quickly as possible.
• 38:44
  And again, hit all the bullet points, but let's start here.
• 38:47
  So here's the architecture of American free expression.
• 38:52
  So under the First Amendment freedom of speech is the baseline default rule prohibiting the government from restricting expression based on its message ideas or content
• 39:07
  This protection encompasses spoken words, written works, online posts, art, and video games.
• 39:13
  So right away, you can see the big contrast between how the United States of America
• 39:20
  handles freedom of expression and free speech versus that of the United Kingdom.
• 39:25
  And so what is protected free speech?
• 39:28
  Like, that's the question.
• 39:29
  Everybody just thinks any speech is protected.
• 39:31
  And for the most part, it sounds like it is, but there is nuance.
• 39:35
  There's always nuance.
• 39:36
  And so let's go through some of that.
• 39:39
  So core protected free speech, right?
• 39:41
  Or I'm sorry, core protected speech.
• 39:45
  Political speech receives the fullest and most urgent application, especially during political
• 39:50
  campaigns, as it is essential to a functional republic.
• 39:55
  This includes harsh criticism of the government, symbolic speech.
• 40:00
  So expressive conduct, nonverbal conduct intended to convey a message is protected.
• 40:06
  Key examples include wearing black, armbands to protest war, burning the American flag,
• 40:13
  which I personally don't agree with.
• 40:15
  And I don't believe that should be protected under free speech whatsoever.
• 40:18
  Okay.
• 40:19
  But it could also be like a silent play.
• 40:21
  What if someone puts a mini drama, a street drama together without any words?
• 40:26
  They're acting out a scene or something that portrays something that they're protesting against.
• 40:31
  That also would be expressive conduct.
• 40:35
  Wearing a pin, right?
• 40:38
  A pin that represents something that is in protest of whatever it is you're in protest of.
• 40:44
  Just saying, these are examples of expressive conduct.
• 40:47
  You're not using words, but you're still expressing yourself.
• 40:51
  There's also commercial speech. While historically subject to intermediate scrutiny, recent jurisprudence has moved toward heightened protection for advertising and commercial transactions, nearing the level afforded to political speech.
• 41:10
  there's also offensive and low value speech so protection extends to entertainment vulgarity
• 41:17
  blasphemy and speech found to be offensive or hateful so this is usually things we'll find in
• 41:23
  music like rap music for example gangster rap black metal and we're talking about blasphemy
• 41:30
  these are these are things that are protected mostly like in music movies also and there's also
• 41:38
  the right not to speak, which is also protected. So this includes the right to refuse to salute the
• 41:44
  flag or recite the Pledge of Allegiance. I personally am against those, but I can see where
• 41:53
  that protection comes in. And so who's protected? That's the other question. Well, here's his
• 42:00
  protective. Corporations, which I don't agree with. I don't know why corporations are deemed
• 42:05
  or given the same rights as an individual when it's really not.
• 42:09
  It's a fucking business, but whatever.
• 42:11
  So corporations are protected regardless of corporate identity,
• 42:14
  which includes unlimited spending on independent campaign advertising.
• 42:19
  Non-citizens.
• 42:21
  Now, this one we're going to get into a little bit later.
• 42:24
  Because they are and they aren't.
• 42:27
  There's a duality here.
• 42:29
  So non-citizens invested with rights,
• 42:32
  wants lawfully entering and residing in the U.S.,
• 42:37
  though rights are precarious during entry or deportation.
• 42:43
  And there becomes that situation where it's like,
• 42:47
  they do, but they don't.
• 42:50
  So non-citizens kind of walk a fine line,
• 42:52
  depending on how aggressive our government wants to get
• 42:55
  in enforcing the laws.
• 42:57
  Students have rights.
• 42:59
  So rights are maintained at school.
• 43:01
  unless the speech materially and substantially disrupts the educational process.
• 43:08
  And public employees, protected when speaking as citizens on matters of public concern,
• 43:15
  balanced against the government's interest as an employer.
• 43:20
  And so where's the exceptions, right?
• 43:23
  What's not protected?
• 43:24
  Like, what are the categorical exceptions?
• 43:28
  What speech may not be protected?
• 43:32
  Well, here we go.
• 43:33
  So here's these categorical exceptions to free speech.
• 43:38
  The Supreme Court recognizes narrow categories of speech that receive lesser or no constitutional protection.
• 43:45
  So yes, there is some speech that doesn't get any constitutional protection.
• 43:49
  Obscenity, hardcore pornography meeting the three-pronged Miller test.
• 43:53
  Okay.
• 43:55
  Child pornography, which of course should never get any protection, but visual depictions of actual children and sexual acts absolutely should never get any kind of protection.
• 44:04
  There's the incitement to imminent lawless actions.
• 44:09
  Now, basically, if you're inciting violence, if you're a shit stirrer and you're trying to get people to commit violent actions, then that is not protected.
• 44:20
  Also, there's fighting words.
• 44:21
  So personally abusive words likely to provoke immediate violence from the hearer.
• 44:28
  So like if you're antagonizing someone, intentionally goading them, trying to get a reaction out of them, harassing them to the point that they do react, those words can be used against you in a court of law, as they say, and does not necessarily afford you protection under the Constitution.
• 44:47
  True threats.
• 44:48
  So statements intended to place a victim in fear of bodily harm or death.
• 44:53
  So like basically death threats.
• 44:55
  Defamation.
• 44:56
  So false statements of fact, libel, or slander that damage reputation.
• 45:03
  Speech integral to criminal conduct includes fraud, perjury, and blackmail.
• 45:09
  And then there's the national security concern.
• 45:11
  Well, this one should be very obvious.
• 45:13
  So disclosure of classified information or military secrets that threaten human life or safety.
• 45:22
  And then as we move down, we're going to go ahead and talk about the rights of non-citizens.
• 45:29
  Because this is where free speech, and everybody thinks free speech is free to all and afforded to all.
• 45:35
  But there is a bit of a thin line here when it comes to non-citizens.
• 45:40
  They are protected.
• 45:41
  you do get protection under the First Amendment, but only to a degree.
• 45:47
  So here's the fragility of rights for non-citizens.
• 45:52
  The First Amendment rights of non-citizens are heavily dependent
• 45:55
  on their legal status and geographical location.
• 45:59
  So basically, are they in the country or out of the country?
• 46:03
  Are they already residing in the United States of America
• 46:05
  or trying to enter the United States of America?
• 46:09
  So here's the rights of lawful residents.
• 46:11
  lawful residents including green card holders are invested with constitutional rights they can engage
• 46:19
  in political protests publish literature and express public opinions the government generally
• 46:26
  cannot criminally punish a non-citizen for speech that would be protected for a citizen
• 46:32
  but here's where the duality comes in here's where the restrictions come in there's something
• 46:41
  called the plenary power and so despite general protections the plenary power doctrine allows
• 46:49
  the government to regulate immigration and non-citizen conduct with broad authority
• 46:54
  So here's what they can do.
• 46:57
  Political participation.
• 47:00
  Federal law prohibits foreign nationals, excluding lawful permanent residents, from making campaign contributions or expenditures.
• 47:09
  These include even minor costs like printing flyers.
• 47:13
  Encouraging illegal immigration.
• 47:15
  So under Hanson versus United States 2023, the government can criminalize speech that encourages or induces unlawful entry or residence.
• 47:28
  So anybody who's calling for people to invade the US, basically like, hey, come on in.
• 47:34
  Don't worry about just rush the borders.
• 47:37
  Just go ahead and set up camp.
• 47:38
  Go ahead and live here.
• 47:40
  Doesn't matter.
• 47:41
  Fuck the law.
• 47:42
  Just come all you guys.
• 47:44
  Come on.
• 47:45
  You can't do that.
• 47:46
  So that's not protected.
• 47:48
  There's the terrorism and association.
• 47:51
  So any non-citizen may be excluded or deported for associations with groups deemed terrorist organizations, even if such associations are protected for citizens.
• 48:05
  So here's a case where association with terrorists or terrorist groups doesn't necessarily protect you as it would a U.S. citizen.
• 48:16
  And even a U.S. citizen is going to get in trouble for that as well.
• 48:20
  All right.
• 48:20
  So there's also the status of undocumented immigrants.
• 48:23
  So this remains, this is one of those gray areas.
• 48:26
  This is one of those areas where it's kind of like that fine line, like where is the line really?
• 48:33
  Where do we enforce this and where do we not, right?
• 48:38
  So this remains a legal gray area.
• 48:40
  The DOJ has argued that those never legally admitted
• 48:45
  lack the substantial connections to the national community
• 48:48
  required for First Amendment claims,
• 48:51
  while scholars argue the amendment is a limit on government power
• 48:55
  that is supply to everyone in U.S. territory.
• 49:00
  so non-resident aliens outside the u.s. have no constitutional or statutory rights regarding
• 49:07
  entry and where this this this this gray area comes into being are those who did enter
• 49:15
  who are already here they still get afforded protection but that's there's a there's a point
• 49:24
  where the DOJ feels that, well, they don't really have enough legal standing here.
• 49:34
  And we're never, ever accepted by the U.S. government to be a legal resident.
• 49:39
  So therefore, they don't really get that First Amendment protection.
• 49:45
  And then here's the Mandel standard.
• 49:48
  If an exclusion burdens a U.S. citizen's rights,
• 49:54
  e.g., for example, the right to hear a foreign speaker,
• 49:59
  the government must provide a facially legitimate and bona fide reason.
• 50:07
  Courts typically will not investigate if this reason is a pretext for discrimination.
• 50:14
  And then, so let's move on to speech that,
• 50:18
  could get you deported.
• 50:19
  Speech that's based on grounds for deportation.
• 50:22
  And then after this, I'm going to start wrapping this up.
• 50:25
  Again, I don't want to get too deep in the weeds on this.
• 50:27
  I think my point is getting across, right?
• 50:30
  So speech based on grounds for deportation.
• 50:32
  The government has historically used political viewpoints
• 50:35
  and speech as grounds for removal,
• 50:38
  a practice facilitated by the ruling in Reno versus AADC in 1999,
• 50:43
  which stated that unlawful present non-citizens generally cannot assert selective enforcement as a defense.
• 50:52
  Historical and modern grounds.
• 50:55
  So ideological advocacy, past deportations targeted anarchists, so Turner versus Williams,
• 51:01
  and communist party members.
• 51:03
  So there's also national security interests.
• 51:06
  So under the Immigration and Nationality Act, the INA,
• 51:09
  the Secretary of State can deport individuals whose beliefs are deemed adversarial to the foreign policy and national security interests of the United States.
• 51:21
  This was cited in 2025 regarding students and pro-Palestinian protests.
• 51:27
  And that's an important one.
• 51:29
  Because if you're someone who's here in the United States of America, if you're an immigrant,
• 51:35
  and you're someone who sides with foreign adversarial governments or groups,
• 51:45
  i.e. terrorists, enemies of the state, basically,
• 51:50
  then you can be deported.
• 51:54
  You don't get protection under the First Amendment.
• 52:00
  All right, let's move on to retaliatory removal.
• 52:03
  So activists and journalists have been targeted for deportation
• 52:07
  following public criticism of government agencies like ICE.
• 52:10
  Notable cases include Ravi Ragbir, Maru Mora Villapando,
• 52:18
  and journalist Emilio Gutierrez Soto.
• 52:23
  And then there's the fraud and misrepresentation.
• 52:25
  representation. So emissions or lies on visa applications are often used as grounds for
• 52:30
  removal. Of course they are. So with that being said, it's like everybody wants to cry free speech,
• 52:40
  free speech, free speech. And yes, we have that. U.S. citizens are afforded free speech.
• 52:47
  Legal residents are afforded free speech protection. Even those who aren't legal but
• 52:53
  are on American soil, U.S. soil, get some free speech protection.
• 52:59
  But as I read, legal residents or non-citizens, but they're legal residents still, them, those
• 53:08
  people, and people who are not legal residents but are still here on U.S. soil, don't get
• 53:18
  the full protection of free speech.
• 53:20
  you see there is always going to be a bar by which your speech will be measured
• 53:27
  if it's if it's in support of terrorist groups if if you are siding with or supporting enemies of
• 53:36
  the state as in it could be other countries terrorist groups organization gangs then your
• 53:44
  your speech can be used against you again in a court of law or maybe not even a court law i mean
• 53:49
  They could just deem that, hey, you're out of here.
• 53:51
  You're getting deported.
• 53:53
  So there is a fine line to where your free speech is actually free.
• 53:57
  There's also a fine line as to which type of speech is afforded protection under the
• 54:03
  First Amendment.
• 54:05
  And so I think people got to realize this.
• 54:07
  I think people got to understand that you can only say so much until the law kicks in,
• 54:13
  until the government can deem you're kind of a threat to the US or whatever you're saying.
• 54:19
  is non-conducive to the public good, right?
• 54:22
  Non-conducive to the public good.
• 54:24
  And that is something that people don't understand.
• 54:27
  They just think free speech, free speech, free speech.
• 54:29
  First Amendment, First Amendment.
• 54:29
  They just throw that around.
• 54:31
  We're very lucky to have the First Amendment.
• 54:33
  The United States of America is very, very generous
• 54:37
  in granting free speech protections to political speech,
• 54:43
  to even burning the American flag.
• 54:44
  But what you say, if your speech becomes an incitement of violence, if it becomes that which supports terrorists against the United States, if you're trying to overthrow and assert the government through your words and you're rallying people to back you up and actually do so, those things are not protected.
• 55:08
  because you're literally challenging the sovereignty
• 55:12
  and the laws of the United States of America.
• 55:16
  You're not just expressing yourself.
• 55:20
  So people got to understand,
• 55:22
  your free speech protection will only go so far.
• 55:26
  And we live in an age where everybody thinks
• 55:28
  because you can say whatever you want in a podcast
• 55:30
  for the most part.
• 55:31
  You can say whatever you want on social media.
• 55:33
  Like everybody's gotten used to being a keyboard warrior
• 55:36
  and just hiding behind the fact that they can hide their identity, right?
• 55:42
  They love that they can hide their identity.
• 55:44
  I think I said hiding behind hiding more than once.
• 55:46
  But anyway, people love that they can hide their identity
• 55:49
  and say whatever they want, and there's no real consequences.
• 55:52
  Nobody catches up to them and puts them in their place.
• 55:54
  They just talk shit.
• 55:56
  They just talk shit, and they talk, and they talk,
• 55:59
  and there's no reprisal.
• 56:02
  There's no reprisal.
• 56:03
  So they think that eventually that this actually is afforded to them in the real world and enter paid protesters and students who back Hamas, for example, free Palestine people who don't even really care about Palestine.
• 56:19
  They're just part of some movement.
• 56:20
  It's the thing to do, right?
• 56:22
  But they're also supporting a terrorist organization.
• 56:25
  So it goes beyond just freeing the Palestinians.
• 56:27
  They're more or less supporting a terrorist organization.
• 56:31
  And no, they're not freedom fighters.
• 56:33
  They're terrorists.
• 56:34
  They're funded by the Iranian regime.
• 56:39
  I mean, they're literally proxies, literally proxies of Iran.
• 56:44
  They're terrorists.
• 56:46
  So those people don't necessarily get the First Amendment protection of free speech.
• 56:52
  They just don't.
• 56:54
  So something for everybody to very much consider.
• 56:57
  and in considering this,
• 56:59
  maybe consider where you stand.
• 57:01
  Are you pro-American?
• 57:04
  Are you anti-American?
• 57:05
  If you're anti-American,
• 57:07
  if everything you're saying,
• 57:08
  you actually really do believe
• 57:10
  and it represents who you are,
• 57:13
  maybe it's time for you to find a new country.
• 57:15
  I mean, I heard the UK is,
• 57:17
  oh wait, they do reject people for certain speech.
• 57:20
  Nevermind.
• 57:22
  Yeah, well.
• 57:24
  Australia?
• 57:25
  Oh.
• 57:25
  So anyway, there's other places for you to go.
• 57:28
  That's all I'm saying.
• 57:29
  If this is truly how you feel.
• 57:31
  I think you should be very lucky.
• 57:34
  You should be counting yourselves.
• 57:37
  I mean, you should have gratitude.
• 57:39
  Let's just say that.
• 57:39
  You should have gratitude to the country you live in,
• 57:42
  the United States of America,
• 57:43
  for affording you First Amendment protection
• 57:45
  so that you can express yourself.
• 57:47
  Look, if you're frustrated with the government,
• 57:48
  you can criticize it, right?
• 57:50
  But you can't incite violence.
• 57:52
  You can't rally a people together
• 57:53
  to tear the government down
• 57:55
  because you don't agree with their foreign policy
• 57:58
  and you don't agree with the fact
• 58:01
  that they're a democratic republic
• 58:04
  because you want to put a communist Marxist government
• 58:08
  in place, for example.
• 58:09
  Sorry, that's not protected.
• 58:10
  Your actions won't be protected either.
• 58:12
  You are then an enemy of the state.
• 58:14
  You are then becoming a domestic terrorist.
• 58:18
  And there are laws against that as well.
• 58:21
  All right, everybody.
• 58:22
  time for our last topic of this episode.
• 58:26
  And that is the murderer of a young individual,
• 58:32
  Henry Novak, in the United Kingdom.
• 58:36
  His murder in December of 2025
• 58:39
  has sparked massive protests and riots recently,
• 58:44
  actually, as of today and just a few days ago of this recording.
• 58:48
  due to new evidence,
• 58:51
  body cam footage that has been released.
• 58:55
  There's a lot surrounding this case.
• 58:57
  Now I'm not going to deep dive into this case,
• 59:00
  by the way,
• 59:01
  I just didn't have the time for it,
• 59:03
  but I wanted to go over a little bit of it.
• 59:07
  Just give a,
• 59:08
  you know,
• 59:08
  just do a broad overview because I believe this really touches on the
• 59:14
  powder keg that is the United Kingdom right now.
• 59:16
  and even possibly most of the Western world.
• 59:21
  As racial tensions, I believe, are coming to a head,
• 59:25
  I think the whole white versus brown thing is finally working.
• 59:31
  And what I mean by working is it's a narrative
• 59:33
  and it's been a rhetoric that's been pushed over and over and over
• 59:37
  by so many so many who are in control Like the average person on the street doesn care But when the system works against you to the point that it obvious there
• 59:51
  preferential treatment, when rapists are let go, they walk,
• 59:57
  don't spend any time in jail.
• 1:00:00
  When robbers are given a slap on the wrist to just go back out and do it
• 1:00:05
  again when a group of individuals can gang up on a young woman and beat her to the point that her
• 1:00:12
  eye socket is fractured, her jaw's broken, and they walk to do it again to another victim.
• 1:00:20
  We have an issue. We have a real fucking problem. And the only people making this a brown versus
• 1:00:29
  white issue are the governments in charge.
• 1:00:33
  They're the ones who are making it racial.
• 1:00:36
  When all anybody wants is just to live in peace and want equal justice applied to all,
• 1:00:44
  like hence equal justice.
• 1:00:45
  They want justice applied to everyone.
• 1:00:47
  The same, equally, regardless of where you come from, regardless of your color.
• 1:00:52
  It doesn't matter.
• 1:00:53
  But the powers that be, for some reason, they don't want that.
• 1:00:59
  they want to keep driving this wedge of division.
• 1:01:02
  And to what end?
• 1:01:03
  I don't know.
• 1:01:04
  I don't know what it is all about.
• 1:01:06
  Are they looking for the collapse of Western civilization?
• 1:01:10
  Because in this modern day and time,
• 1:01:12
  the world we live in,
• 1:01:13
  especially in 2026,
• 1:01:15
  hell for the last,
• 1:01:16
  going back to 2019,
• 1:01:17
  at least there's been nothing but a wedge driven between people,
• 1:01:22
  between people's skin color,
• 1:01:25
  between people's cultures.
• 1:01:27
  and let's just be honest, some cultures are incompatible,
• 1:01:32
  but it doesn't mean we have to hate them and who they are as an individual.
• 1:01:38
  Like if you're not imposing your will on me, I won't impose my will on you.
• 1:01:42
  We can just have mutual respect and that's fine,
• 1:01:44
  but that's not the age we live in.
• 1:01:47
  So let's talk about Henry Novak.
• 1:01:50
  Let's talk about why the native people of the United Kingdom,
• 1:01:56
  And yes, yes, for all those who don't believe it's true, there are white people who are native to land and hence the United Kingdom.
• 1:02:05
  And so let's go ahead and read a little bit of this story.
• 1:02:11
  And let's discuss further what happened.
• 1:02:14
  All right.
• 1:02:15
  From the New York Times, murder case in which police handcuff victim fuels outrage in Britain.
• 1:02:20
  The authorities in Britain are investigating police officers who handcuffed a student, Henry Novak, while he was dying in a case that has been increasingly politicized.
• 1:02:30
  So this was written June 2nd, 2026.
• 1:02:33
  So this was just yesterday the story was written.
• 1:02:35
  Yesterday of this recording of this episode.
• 1:02:38
  the British Home Secretary told Parliament on Tuesday that she fully supported the country's
• 1:02:44
  police watchdog in investigating why several officers handcuffed a college student while he
• 1:02:49
  lay dying in a murder case that shocked the country Henry Novak 18 was stabbed by Vikram
• 1:02:55
  Digwa 23 in December of 2025 after the two men had a brief interaction in Southampton a city in
• 1:03:03
  southern England. Mr. Digwa, who was Sikh and stabbed Mr. Novak with a religious knife he was
• 1:03:09
  carrying, was found guilty of murder and sentenced to life in prison with a minimum term of 21 years
• 1:03:15
  on Monday. Mr. Digwa lied to the police at the scene of the murder, repeatedly falsely claiming
• 1:03:22
  that he had been the victim of a racist attack. Police officers arrested and handcuffed Mr. Novak
• 1:03:29
  for about a minute, according to the judge who sentenced Mr. Digwa,
• 1:03:33
  before they realized he was severely injured and began administering first aid.
• 1:03:38
  Now, let me stop that right here because I have a video I'll show you
• 1:03:42
  where it didn't appear that they were trying to administer any first aid.
• 1:03:45
  In fact, they were questioning Henry Novak,
• 1:03:49
  literally saying they didn't believe he was stabbed,
• 1:03:51
  as in he was making it all up.
• 1:03:53
  and so here okay so police body camera footage released on monday after the sentencing showed
• 1:04:01
  mr novak lying on the ground saying i can't breathe and telling officers repeatedly that
• 1:04:05
  he had been stabbed one police officer he heard saying i don't think you have mate all right so
• 1:04:11
  there it is in the story uh the independent officer uh or office of police conduct which
• 1:04:17
  examines reports of police wrongdoing confirmed it is investigating the police officers actions
• 1:04:22
  the case has been increasingly politicized online with the right wing i hate why do i say right wing
• 1:04:28
  the right wing well you think that the right and the left will agree with some kid getting stabbed
• 1:04:34
  five times and the police not administering any help and saying they don't believe you
• 1:04:38
  because some guy accused him of being racist the guy's bleeding on the ground but it's a right
• 1:04:44
  wing thing to be concerned. Okay, whatever.
• 1:04:51
  Talk about politicization. I mean, this piece right here just politicized it.
• 1:04:57
  Oh boy. Well, anyway, I think you get the point. So there was a case of a person who was murdered,
• 1:05:06
  who wasn't helped, who wasn't believed,
• 1:05:09
  all because the victim, Henry Novak,
• 1:05:12
  was accused of being racist,
• 1:05:15
  that the person who stabbed him
• 1:05:17
  was doing so under self-defense
• 1:05:20
  because he was racially attacked.
• 1:05:24
  A person who was carrying a knife
• 1:05:26
  that any normal citizen of the United Kingdom can't carry,
• 1:05:30
  it's illegal to have any weapon, by the way,
• 1:05:31
  whether it's a knife of the kind that the assailant was carrying,
• 1:05:37
  a gun, any weapon.
• 1:05:40
  But this person had religious exclusion
• 1:05:44
  because he claimed that the knife,
• 1:05:46
  the certain knife he was carrying was part of his religion,
• 1:05:48
  the Sikh religion in and of itself.
• 1:05:50
  And I want to make that clear.
• 1:05:51
  Just because the guy has a turban and he's Indian
• 1:05:54
  doesn't mean he's necessarily Pakistani Muslim because he's not.
• 1:05:58
  Sikhs are a whole different deal.
• 1:05:59
  They're a different religion.
• 1:06:00
  And it's surprising because Sikhs in general are very good people, true Sikhs, Sikhs who really practice the religion, are all about peace and equality and justice.
• 1:06:13
  And so this person that committed this crime, this murder, was just a bad person.
• 1:06:19
  And I don't think should ever be used as a justification or means to basically hold all Sikhs accountable and go after all Sikhs.
• 1:06:29
  Because Sikhs themselves, for the most part, are very good people within the community.
• 1:06:33
  They contribute.
• 1:06:34
  And I'm not pandering here, people.
• 1:06:36
  I live around a lot of Sikhs.
• 1:06:38
  I've done business with a lot of Sikhs.
• 1:06:41
  specifically where I live in the Central Valley of California,
• 1:06:43
  I'll tell you right now, a huge Sikh community,
• 1:06:45
  and they've all been good people.
• 1:06:47
  They've all been hardworking.
• 1:06:48
  They all love the United States of America.
• 1:06:49
  And I'm sure in the case of the United Kingdom,
• 1:06:52
  Sikhs in general love the United Kingdom.
• 1:06:54
  They're very patriotic people.
• 1:06:56
  So this is a case of one bad hombre,
• 1:06:58
  one bad person who decided to kill a white guy.
• 1:07:02
  And that's where not just the politicization comes in,
• 1:07:05
  but the racism comes in.
• 1:07:07
  So where does this lead us?
• 1:07:08
  What happened?
• 1:07:09
  well in light of all this in light of all the new evidence and everything that's been going on
• 1:07:15
  we have nothing but riots on the streets the people of the uk have become
• 1:07:21
  pissed they reached a limit because they have constantly been in a state where their government doesn administer justice equally where preferential treatment seems to be given to what is deemed minorities
• 1:07:35
  In the case of the United Kingdom, there's definitely tension between those who would be considered native people of the UK or UK citizens and Muslim immigrants for the most part.
• 1:07:51
  And now we have this.
• 1:07:53
  where a young white man, 18 years old, was killed and died in police custody,
• 1:07:59
  being handcuffed because the police didn't want to believe him.
• 1:08:03
  Police wanted to take the side of the person who stabbed him
• 1:08:07
  because the person who stabbed him claimed racism.
• 1:08:12
  I was racially attacked.
• 1:08:13
  And because it was considered a racial attack,
• 1:08:16
  that white person could do nothing right.
• 1:08:18
  That white person was the instigator.
• 1:08:20
  and by all means, if this was true,
• 1:08:23
  sure, he'd be the instigator, of course.
• 1:08:27
  But at the same time, Henry Novak was pleading.
• 1:08:30
  He couldn't breathe.
• 1:08:31
  He was stabbed, literally stabbed.
• 1:08:33
  And again, five times he was stabbed.
• 1:08:36
  And the police just sat there for a minute or more,
• 1:08:41
  not even looking at his body.
• 1:08:44
  They weren't looking at his body,
• 1:08:46
  looking for wounds, nothing.
• 1:08:47
  They're just like, I don't believe you.
• 1:08:49
  Yeah, whatever.
• 1:08:50
  They're getting cuffed.
• 1:08:51
  But anyway, here's the reaction.
• 1:08:53
  Here's the videos.
• 1:08:55
  Here's one video here of the riots going on.
• 1:09:20
  All right. Here's another one here. Got another angle for you.
• 1:09:32
  Here's another angle of the riots here going on right now.
• 1:09:38
  You can see the police are just moving in and pushing the people back.
• 1:09:41
  They strike first.
• 1:09:43
  It looks like the people of the UK can do nothing right.
• 1:09:47
  They almost have no rights.
• 1:09:48
  And again, it seems that there's definitely a two-tier justice system that gives preferential treatment to immigrants, to Muslims.
• 1:10:02
  In this case, I guess a Sikh.
• 1:10:06
  Although, honestly, being a Sikh is not necessarily preferential treatment.
• 1:10:14
  I mean, Indians have been living in the UK for years.
• 1:10:19
  In fact, the British colonized India at one point and ruled over India.
• 1:10:25
  And so British culture is extremely, extremely ingrained into Indian culture.
• 1:10:30
  And there are Indians in the UK with a long lineage living in the UK.
• 1:10:36
  So Sikhs themselves are not bad.
• 1:10:38
  So I hope that I'm not coming across as trying to target Sikhs because I personally am not.
• 1:10:46
  But it's at the point now that the threshold has been crossed.
• 1:10:50
  People in the UK, all they see is color at this point.
• 1:10:54
  Exactly what has been pushed across the world, the narrative of white versus brown,
• 1:11:01
  is finally coming to fruition because all anybody sees is color now.
• 1:11:06
  they don't care that the person is Sikh and not Muslim.
• 1:11:10
  They don't care that the person is or could be,
• 1:11:13
  I don't know, I didn't read into it,
• 1:11:14
  but let's say a native of the UK
• 1:11:17
  whose family's lineage has gone back hundreds of years, whatever.
• 1:11:22
  And I'm not sure that's the case.
• 1:11:23
  I'm just trying to make a point here, an example,
• 1:11:26
  that we're now at the point in the UK
• 1:11:28
  where it's all about white versus brown, me versus you.
• 1:11:32
  Because the white man, the white woman,
• 1:11:34
  the white person, the native people of the UK seem to have, I mean, no recourse, no rights.
• 1:11:42
  They seem to be going to jail for tweets or Facebook posts or asking questions and for
• 1:11:49
  just trying to hold their government accountable. And sure, we can tie this back to,
• 1:11:56
  you know, what we're talking about earlier in the show with Cenk Uygur and Hassan Piker.
• 1:12:01
  It's like, well, they were denied.
• 1:12:04
  You're right.
• 1:12:05
  We can make the argument.
• 1:12:06
  The UK government also wasn't very nice to them,
• 1:12:10
  but they're not UK citizens, so whatever.
• 1:12:13
  The law doesn't apply to them regardless.
• 1:12:16
  And they literally do incite in their own way
• 1:12:19
  while they're shitsters, say that.
• 1:12:22
  And so the people of the UK,
• 1:12:24
  I mean, if this is not a sign that change has to come,
• 1:12:31
  that the government actually has to look out for its own people
• 1:12:35
  and represent its own people, I don't know what to tell you.
• 1:12:37
  I don't know what to tell you.
• 1:12:39
  The UK has been in trouble for a long time,
• 1:12:42
  and the people are fed up.
• 1:12:45
  And this here is an important thing to discuss
• 1:12:47
  because I can see this happening in the United States of America.
• 1:12:51
  there are many in the United States of America that feel the same way,
• 1:12:56
  that there's a two-tiered justice system,
• 1:12:58
  that there is preferential treatment to what is considered, again, air quotes, minorities.
• 1:13:03
  There's preferential treatment to immigrants.
• 1:13:06
  There's preferential treatment to people of color.
• 1:13:10
  There are many people in the United States that feel this way too.
• 1:13:13
  And am I saying it's the right way to feel?
• 1:13:15
  No.
• 1:13:16
  But if all actions, all actions when it comes to enforcement of law, to enforcement of policies, to enforcement of social media, platform posts, like people getting deplatformed, their reach being restricted, etc.
• 1:13:31
  if it all comes down to and is centered around the color war here,
• 1:13:37
  the war between white and brown,
• 1:13:41
  then yeah,
• 1:13:45
  these frustrations are going to boil over and eventually we're going to start
• 1:13:51
  seeing what we're seeing in the UK and maybe even worse.
• 1:13:58
  So yeah,
• 1:14:01
  How do we hold our government accountable?
• 1:14:04
  How do we get them to do what is representative of the people?
• 1:14:09
  And when it comes to the United States of America,
• 1:14:10
  I mean, we're a nation of many races,
• 1:14:13
  many cultures that have come together
• 1:14:15
  to create the culture of the United States of America,
• 1:14:17
  which is beautiful, right?
• 1:14:18
  I think it's great.
• 1:14:22
  So in the United States, I can't say,
• 1:14:25
  you know, it's just about white versus brown,
• 1:14:28
  but don't make it white versus brown.
• 1:14:31
  Make it a matter of right versus wrong.
• 1:14:38
  That's all this should be.
• 1:14:39
  Justice should be administered equally.
• 1:14:43
  The letter of the law applied to all.
• 1:14:47
  This should never be about color.
• 1:14:49
  This should never be about race.
• 1:14:50
  This should never be about culture.
• 1:14:52
  It should be about the law of the land being applied equally to all.
• 1:14:56
  protection for one group
• 1:14:59
  should be applied to all groups
• 1:15:01
  it's the government that's creating the separation
• 1:15:05
  not the people
• 1:15:06
  the average person wakes up going to work to earn a living to pay the bills that they need to pay so they can live in this world that we all created as humans We not trying to separate ourselves
• 1:15:19
  We're being told to separate ourselves
• 1:15:21
  through the actions or inactions of our governments,
• 1:15:25
  through the media, through those that pull the strings.
• 1:15:31
  The people of the UK deserve better and need better.
• 1:15:35
  better. It's an old culture. And yes, yes, the white people in the UK are native to that land,
• 1:15:42
  regardless of the narrative you want to push. They deserve better. Those people have fought
• 1:15:48
  long and hard to be there. They have welcomed other cultures into their land. And together,
• 1:15:56
  they've all built a very distinct culture that is that of the United Kingdom.
• 1:16:00
  And they're frustrated.
• 1:16:03
  They don't want to lose that culture.
• 1:16:05
  They don't want to lose who they are.
• 1:16:08
  But the government is ignoring them
• 1:16:10
  to the point where the government will take sides
• 1:16:16
  of a vicious attacker and assailant
• 1:16:20
  claiming the white person was being a racist
• 1:16:22
  and attacking them racially
• 1:16:24
  to where the police don't even help.
• 1:16:28
  Don't even help.
• 1:16:29
  you know I have that video
• 1:16:31
  I have to show you
• 1:16:33
  I'm going to show you the footage of the police
• 1:16:36
  at the scene
• 1:16:38
  and what they did to Henry Novak
• 1:16:40
  let me blow this up
• 1:16:48
  put the hand in the cuff mate
• 1:16:50
  Yeah, I'm...
• 1:16:50
  I'm not fucking...
• 1:16:52
  I'm not free!
• 1:16:55
  I'm not free!
• 1:16:57
  Can we get a round of what I do in case?
• 1:17:01
  I'm going to fuck.
• 1:17:05
  I'm not free!
• 1:17:09
  Sandy's been stabbed so let's just check him.
• 1:17:11
  Where do you think you've been stabbed?
• 1:17:13
  In the face?
• 1:17:14
  Oh no, but we have to check, don't we?
• 1:17:16
  No.
• 1:17:17
  In the face?
• 1:17:19
  just get these back off get their details on that hold on hold on oh no we have to check don't we
• 1:17:25
  we have to check don't we don't we should we check maybe he said he's been stabbed should we
• 1:17:31
  should we check him should we hmm maybe maybe he can't breathe well ignore that he might have been
• 1:17:40
  stabbed i don't know i'll keep hold of him
• 1:17:43
  keep you on your side mate you gotta retrieve them
• 1:17:51
  same time i'm keeping him on his side
• 1:17:54
  we were sat up when we had him here but he didn't like it at what point are they
• 1:17:59
  going to administer first aid
• 1:18:00
  seriously like what is going on here this guy got stabbed he was laying on
• 1:18:09
  the ground they got there not moving holding himself claiming he can't breathe and that he
• 1:18:16
  was stabbed you got multiple people there you're gonna tell me that not one of them after the guy
• 1:18:23
  has actually been cuffed he's been cuffed a while now not one of them can check for wounds
• 1:18:27
  for blood i mean if you're stabbed blood is pretty easy to spot
• 1:18:33
  what in the fuck is going on here what is going on here you see this is the reason the people of
• 1:18:44
  the uk are writing when this body cam footage came out everyone was like what the fuck what
• 1:18:49
  the actual fuck like you could hear you could hear the victim on the floor who's being accused of a
• 1:18:55
  racist attack the police being nonchalant about the situation you hear the lady in the background
• 1:19:01
  Do you think we should check for one?
• 1:19:04
  Is there ones?
• 1:19:05
  I don't know.
• 1:19:06
  Maybe we should check.
• 1:19:08
  Seriously?
• 1:19:09
  Maybe?
• 1:19:09
  Possibly?
• 1:19:11
  Well, he claims he was stabbed in the face.
• 1:19:13
  Should we maybe possibly do our jobs, administer first aid,
• 1:19:19
  like actually see if this guy's bleeding out?
• 1:19:21
  Should we do that?
• 1:19:22
  Maybe?
• 1:19:24
  Hmm.
• 1:19:24
  things like this
• 1:19:28
  is why the people of the UK
• 1:19:31
  feel the way they do
• 1:19:33
  this is why
• 1:19:38
  the unproportionate
• 1:19:43
  administration
• 1:19:45
  or administering of
• 1:19:46
  justice
• 1:19:47
  it's unproportionate
• 1:19:49
  it's not equal
• 1:19:50
  and it's not fair
• 1:19:51
  this is why
• 1:19:54
  The people of the UK feel the way they do.
• 1:20:00
  This is exactly why.
• 1:20:02
  And this we've seen in the United States of America as well.
• 1:20:07
  We've seen it.
• 1:20:10
  But it's dismissed because the guy's white.
• 1:20:13
  It's dismissed because it's not the thing.
• 1:20:16
  It's not the social pillar we want to stand on
• 1:20:23
  and protecting the minority.
• 1:20:25
  This is a white guy.
• 1:20:26
  Well, he's not a minority, so whatever.
• 1:20:29
  That's the feeling people have.
• 1:20:30
  Whether they meant it or not,
• 1:20:32
  this is how it's coming across.
• 1:20:35
  It's coming across that way here
• 1:20:37
  in the United States of America
• 1:20:38
  and in the United Kingdom.
• 1:20:40
  The Western world is under attack.
• 1:20:45
  The Western world is under attack.
• 1:20:47
  We're facing a war of colors,
• 1:20:50
  which I thought we were over racism,
• 1:20:52
  but apparently the powers that be will not let it die.
• 1:20:57
  I mean, we're in an age where I don't think people walk out the door and say,
• 1:21:02
  fuck that white guy or fuck that black person or look at that Indian.
• 1:21:06
  I mean, there's some people that probably do,
• 1:21:08
  but I don't think it's the majority whatsoever.
• 1:21:12
  I don't think people are going out of their way to make it a point
• 1:21:15
  to make a person of another color's life miserable.
• 1:21:19
  I think it's just all rhetoric and narratives that are just being driven into our head,
• 1:21:25
  into our skulls, through scrolling social media every day.
• 1:21:29
  And I think people are starting to believe the narrative.
• 1:21:32
  You know, like we're going backwards as a society here.
• 1:21:36
  We're going backwards.
• 1:21:40
  Well, that was grim.
• 1:21:43
  That was grim.
• 1:21:45
  With that, I'm going to end the show, everybody.
• 1:21:47
  I appreciate you listening.
• 1:21:50
  I appreciate you guys subscribing.
• 1:21:52
  I really do.
• 1:21:53
  Listen, go to my YouTube, get me to 500 subscribers.
• 1:21:56
  I've noticed a few people have gone to the YouTube channel already
• 1:21:59
  and have started subscribing.
• 1:22:01
  Let's bring that thing to 500.
• 1:22:02
  We're almost there.
• 1:22:04
  Remember to follow me on X, Substack, Instagram, all of them.
• 1:22:08
  You can see the handles down there at the bottom of the screen.
• 1:22:10
  If you're not watching, you're listening.
• 1:22:12
  My handle is at fontsablaze.
• 1:22:15
  F-O-M-T-E-S
• 1:22:16
  Ablaze
• 1:22:17
  all one word
• 1:22:18
  and as always
• 1:22:20
  have yourself a great day
• 1:22:22
  Devils hide behind
• 1:22:26
  Redemption
• 1:22:27
  Honesty
• 1:22:28
  is a one way
• 1:22:29
  gate to hell
• 1:22:45
  Bye.