Latest / The Vault: The Epstein Files / Mega Edition: Where Does David Boies Fit Within The Epstein Story? (4/25/26)

Transcript

Mega Edition: Where Does David Boies Fit Within The Epstein Story? (4/25/26) · The Vault: The Epstein Files

0:00
Speaker 1: What's up everyone, and welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles.
0:04
David Boys, lawyer for Virginia Roberts and Annie Farmer, has
0:09
given his first interview since Glainne Maxwell has been sentenced,
0:14
and in this interview with The Independent, he talks about
0:18
how the other people who were involved in all of this,
0:23
and as we all know, there were a lot of
0:25
other people involved in all of this, how they should
0:28
be held responsible now that Maxwell has been And for me,
0:34
there is no other way that this should go. When
0:40
you have as many people involved on a day to
0:42
day basis as we had involved with Jeffrey Epstein and
0:47
Glaine Maxwell. There is no way anyone can convince me
0:52
that this isn't a rico case and that there aren't
0:55
other people who shouldn't be brought in. We have all
1:00
of the names Virginia has given us already, and David
1:04
Boys and company they've handed all of that information over
1:08
to the Feds. They did that in twenty fifteen, so
1:11
it's not like the Feds didn't have this information, like
1:14
they were waiting for somebody to come forward and clue
1:17
them in on what happened. We all know what happened,
1:22
and the FBI drop the ball like it has many
1:26
many times before when it comes to severe, serious sexual
1:30
assault investigations. Just take a look at how they're on
1:34
the hook right now when it comes to Larry Nasser.
1:38
This is something that has been pervasive within the FBI.
1:43
They might not want to address it, but it's very
1:46
clear for everybody else who's paying attention that the FBI
1:50
really has dropped the ball time and time again here.
1:55
And if they don't go after this the way they should,
1:57
and they don't go after all these other people, well
2:00
it's just another fumble, isn't it? All? Right? Today? Our
2:05
article is from The Independent, and the author of this
2:09
article is Bevin Hurley. Headline Virginia Roberts lawyer on prosecuting
2:15
powerful abusers. There are many people involved in this beyond
2:19
Maxwell and Epstein. Virginia Roberts attorney tells Bevin Hurley, the
2:25
rich and powerful implicated in the Epstein Maxwell Maxwell's sex
2:29
trafficking ring deserve to be brought to justice one hundred percent.
2:35
And if there isn't a grand jury panel impaneled right now,
2:39
then I don't know what they're doing. Because there's as
2:43
much circumstantial evidence out there to arrest people like endyke
2:48
and Cohn and Sarah Kelln Vickers, as there was to
2:53
bring in Maxwell. So what are they waiting for and
2:58
why have they waited this long? When power else? Attorney
3:03
David Boyce received the news that Glainne Maxwell had been
3:07
sentenced to twenty years in federal prison for child sex
3:10
trafficking last week, he allowed himself a wry smile. It
3:14
was very satisfying, mister Boyce told The Independent in his
3:17
first interview since the sentencing. This was an important step.
3:21
There's no doubt this was an important step, a huge step.
3:26
It sends a message too, right, but it only matters
3:30
if the follow through continues. What do you think whoever's
3:35
out there engaging in human trafficking right now is going
3:38
to see the sentence that Glaine Maxwell got or that
3:42
r Kelly got and say to themselves, oh, well, this
3:45
isn't worth it. We're just gonna We're gonna stop, because
3:48
that's not gonna happen no matter how harsh the sentence is.
3:53
This needs to be a message to the people who
3:55
were involved. And the only way that this message can
3:58
truly be sent like they say they want to send
4:01
it is if they bring in the rest of these people.
4:06
But he also felt a lingering sense of unfinished business
4:10
about the many wealthy and powerful figures who have not
4:13
had to answer for their roles in Jeffrey Epstein and
4:16
Maxwell's decades long pyramid scheme of abuse. I get it.
4:21
I understand now. Obviously, I'm nowhere near as close to
4:26
all of this as David Boyce is. Dude's been in
4:29
the trenches fighting against Epstein and Maxwell four years now.
4:34
But I understand what he means with the unfinished business
4:37
part because I feel the same way here on this podcast.
4:40
There's a lot of unfinished business, and all of these
4:43
people like Indyke and Kahn and Vickers especially, they definitely
4:49
need to be brought in because if not, then what
4:54
has really been accomplished. Besides, you know, bringing Maxwell to justice,
5:00
which is great, don't get me wrong, as I've said
5:02
a million times, definitely a huge part of fixing the problem,
5:07
but it takes a little bit of the shine and
5:09
the laquer off of it if you don't follow through
5:12
it the next step. Mister Boys has for decades been
5:17
one of America's best known litigants, famously but unsuccessfully representing
5:23
the Democratic Party candidate Al Gore in a case against
5:26
George W. Bush to settle the contested two thousand presidential election.
5:31
The eighty one year old represented Annie Farmer and Virginia
5:35
Roberts in civil lawsuits against Epstein and Maxwell. I remember
5:41
when all of that was going on in two thousand
5:43
and you had the whole battle Royale about the hanging
5:47
Chad and the armies of lawyers and the lawsuits and
5:51
all of the days it took to get the election
5:53
locked in. And still there's a lot of people who
5:56
don't even believe that those election results were what the
6:01
In twenty fifteen, he handed over their entire civil file
6:05
to the Justice Department in the hopes they would investigate
6:08
and prosecute Epstein, Maxwell and some of the dozens of
6:12
other rich and powerful associates named and identified by miss
6:17
miss Roberts. And this should this should have happened back then.
6:21
All of those people who were directly implicated by Virginia Roberts,
6:26
especially considering she went on record and stated those names,
6:31
those people should all be looked at under the world's
6:35
largest microscope. Every one of them should be brought in
6:39
put under oath, and they should all have to testify
6:42
about their relationship with Epstein, and that includes guys like
6:45
Bill Richardson. Because everything we've heard from Virginia leading up
6:52
to this point has been at least some of the
6:55
foundational basis for these convictions, and we've seen what's happened
6:59
to people when there's been defamation lawsuits as well, those
7:03
people end up getting charged afterwards. She has shown that
7:10
she's to be believed, at least in my opinion, So
7:15
when she's pointing her finger at these other people, why
7:18
should I believe that they weren't involved, especially considering that
7:21
you can put the receipts together and the paperwork to
7:26
put them in Epstein's presence a whole bunch of times.
7:31
So all of those people, every last one of them,
7:35
should be brought in. And if this was a Rico
7:38
case like it should have been, they all would have
7:40
been brought in. But so far only three people have
7:45
been held criminally liable. They are Epstein, who died by
7:49
suicide in prison in twenty nineteen, allegedly aged sixty six
7:54
while awaiting trial for sex trafficking, his close friend Jean
7:58
Luke Brunel seventy six, who in February hanged himself in
8:01
a Paris jail where he had been held for a
8:04
year on suspicion of rape of miners and trafficking of
8:07
miners for sexual exploitation. And Maxwell convicted in New York
8:12
on five sex trafficking counts in late December and jail
8:15
for twenty years at her sentencing on June twenty eighth.
8:19
But you know, it's just a coincidence that Brunell and
8:22
Epstein both suffered the same fate. Huh. Now with Brunell
8:26
doesn't seem as odd the matter of his death. Again,
8:32
I'm not an expert on French lockups or French prisons,
8:37
so I'm certainly not somebody who would sit here and
8:40
tell you with any confidence one way or the other. Oh,
8:43
I'm certain that xxx or X occurred in that French jail.
8:47
I have no idea. Looks to me like Brunell probably
8:52
killed himself. Now is that one hundred percent certain? Man?
8:56
Is anything one hundred percent certain in this case besides
8:59
the fact that these people are scumbags. But with Epstein, boy,
9:04
oh boy, they're sure. Is a lot there the cameras,
9:07
our TAGLIONI I won't beat a dead horse. But you
9:10
get my drift. There are many people who are involved
9:15
in this beyond Maxwell and Epstein and Brunel. Mister Boyce
9:18
told The Independent sex trafficking could not have gone on
9:21
remotely at the scale at which it went on, or
9:24
for the duration that it went on, without the collaboration
9:28
and cooperation of a lot of additional people. These people
9:32
too should be brought to justice. But as time goes
9:35
on and the prosecutors don't do anything, I think the
9:38
chances that actually happens diminishes. Look, he's not wrong, he's
9:43
not wrong. He's just given you the truth. We all
9:45
want to hope and pray that the prosecutors are going
9:48
to move forward and that the co conspirators are going
9:51
to be brought to justice, but we also know that
9:56
the reality that we live in, there's little of that
9:59
to be had. Many of the famous names who flew
10:05
on Epstein's so called Lolita Express private jet have come
10:09
out during civil litigation and at Maxwell's trial. They include
10:13
Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, and Prince Andrew. The two former
10:17
US presidents have adamantly denied any knowledge of Epstein's crimes,
10:21
while Prince Andrew settled a civil sexual assault case with
10:24
Miss Roberts for a reported seventeen million in February, they
10:28
say fourteen million here. That's not the right number. But
10:32
there are many names who have remained out of the
10:34
public eye, their identities hidden in sealed files at the
10:39
Justice Department. A lot of the materials from the are
10:42
twenty fifteen sixteen civil actions which the government got are
10:46
still sealed to the public. Mister Boyce said these kinds
10:50
of records should not be sealed. He is one hundred
10:53
percent correct about that, especially in this case. If there
10:56
is any elect official or anyone who's taking or has
11:00
taken public money involved in any lists such as this,
11:03
they should be outed right away. They generally fall into
11:08
two categories, mister Boyce says. They are Epstein and Maxwell
11:12
lieutenants who are involved in recruiting, grooming, and supervising the
11:16
survivors that were trafficked. And then there are the other
11:20
people who the survivors were trafficked to, which include a
11:23
lot of rich and powerful people around the world. Mister
11:26
boys added, they're all heavily protected by cadres of lawyers
11:31
and pr consultants and political consultants, and you've got to
11:35
have a prosecutor who is really committed to the cause
11:37
of sex trafficking, that is prepared to take that group on. Well,
11:41
if there's any prosecutor out there who has that courage,
11:46
you better believe that there are plenty of us who
11:49
are ready to take the fight to these people. And
11:53
if you have any kind of interest in later on
11:56
political office, this is a surefire away to get yourself alone.
12:00
You go after people like Epstein's associates, you are definitely
12:05
going to get the attention of people who are paying attention,
12:10
and those votes, boy, they'll sure pour in. Imagine that campaign.
12:14
I'm the man or a woman who put away Jeffrey
12:17
Ebstein or Epstein's associates. I mean, I continued the case
12:22
when no one else wanted to do it. My career
12:24
could have been ended, you know, YadA YadA, YadA, YadA.
12:27
But there's no one out there that wants to do it.
12:29
Why what are all of these prosecutors so scared of? Again,
12:34
it comes back to the SDN Y right, Like I
12:36
always say, the folks over at the SDNY, they run
12:40
around and they talk about how they're the greatest at this,
12:42
they're the greatest at that. They bring in all these convictions, well,
12:46
where are they at. They bring in convictions if it's
12:50
you know, people like maybe Khalif Browder or your cousin,
12:54
But when it comes to these rich and powerful people
12:57
like Glenn Dubin, like Les Wexner, like Alan Dershowitz, these
13:01
people don't get brought to justice. That's only for peons, right,
13:05
the children of never like us. Mister Boyce said, many
13:10
of the survivors were easy to ignore, as Epstein and
13:13
Maxwell deliberately sought out vulnerable girls, often from single parent
13:17
households and difficult financial circumstances. Some had already suffered sexual abuse.
13:24
More names are coming out all the time. The question
13:27
is whether that results in people being brought to justice.
13:30
I'm a little pessimistic at this point. Yeah, he's not
13:35
the only one, and he has all rights to be
13:37
because it is a cause for pessimism. You would think
13:42
that when they had the chance here with Maxwell, they
13:45
would have really extended the scope of what they were
13:48
going for. But they didn't do it. And at the time,
13:52
I've said a million times it's very concerning to see
13:56
the small scope of what their charges are. And then
14:00
come time for sentencing and the trial people are all
14:03
shocked that a bunch of names weren't named. Well, if
14:06
you were paying attention, you knew that this case was
14:09
crafted in that manner. But now that Maxwell has been
14:14
hammed up and they've had a successful prosecution here, you
14:18
would think that they'd smell some blood in the water
14:21
and they'd go harder in the paint. But that is
14:23
not the case. During tuesday sentencing, Judge Alison Nathan named
14:29
former Epstein associates Sarah Kellen as a knowing participant in
14:33
the criminal conspiracy. The judge says this, and you mean
14:37
to tell me there's no prosecutors sitting around right now
14:40
stuffing their face full of expensive lunch food from Manhattan
14:45
in the SDNY that wants to go after these people
14:48
or after Sarah Kellen Vickers. Why is that mss Kellen
14:54
was identified by survivors at Maxwell's trial as having booked
14:58
them for massages with Ebste at his Palm Beach mansion.
15:02
The defendant Maxwell was Epstein's number two and lady of
15:06
the house, Judge Nathan said during the sentencing. At some
15:09
point Kellen took over some of the defendant's duties, but
15:13
even after that time, the defendant retained her leadership position,
15:17
as evidenced by Carolyn's testimony. Yeah, that's how it broke down.
15:23
She was the number two. I always break it down
15:26
in terms like the mafia. You have Epstein, he's the boss,
15:30
you have Maxwell the underboss, and John Luke Brunell. Well,
15:33
that was the Conziglieri. And underneath all of them are
15:36
the capos. And Sarah Kellen Vickers is as much of
15:40
a capo as Mike Francisis was. Carolyn was one of
15:47
the four survivors who testified at Maxwell's trial, and was
15:50
only identified by her first name. Miss Roberts's claim she
15:54
was trafficked to have sex with Harvard University law professor
15:58
Alan Dershowitz. The allegation has not been proven, and Professor
16:02
Dershowitz adamantly denies it or any knowledge of other offending.
16:08
And he is not the only one, right Dershowitz certainly
16:11
isn't the only one, But he's certainly one that had
16:14
the finger pointed at him. But has that affected him, No,
16:17
of course not. We saw mister I kept my underpants on.
16:20
Has he lost any status or prestige? Has anyone kicked
16:23
in his door? Stole his cell phone so they can
16:26
go through records. None of that happened. Instead, the naked
16:30
volleyball player of Martha's Vineyard finds himself in the spotlight
16:35
once again, defending Donald Trump, this time so another person
16:41
who has been credibly accused here has not had to
16:44
answer any kind of serious questions from people in authority
16:48
when it comes to what they're being accused of. In
16:54
twenty nineteen, Miss Roberts sued Professor Dershowitz for defamation and distress,
17:01
and he sends countersuitor. The case is ongoing. Professor Dershowitz
17:05
told The Independent in an interview he had visited Epstein's
17:09
home in Palm Beach and his private island, Little Saint James,
17:12
and never seen any young or naked women. It was
17:15
a deep, dark secret. Everything he did in part in
17:19
a part of the house which was off limits to anybody.
17:21
He said, nobody knew any of this. Nobody would have
17:24
associated with Epstein if we had known any of this.
17:27
Bro shut up, you're over there getting massages by who
17:31
the hell knows who at his house. Mister I kept
17:34
my underpants on, Dershowitz, and we all know what massage
17:38
was synonymous for over in the world of Epstein. So
17:42
Dershowitz is another one, and I'm glad he's going to
17:44
get outed here in this defamation case. Dershowitz said he
17:49
saw pictures on the walls of the Palm Beach Manchin
17:52
of the Billionaire with famous people including Bill Clinton and
17:56
Fidel castro h a man accused of sexual crime, and
18:00
the dictator Fantastic company. He had me on the wall.
18:05
I was one of the famous people, and believe me,
18:07
I was fully dressed. You know, he likes he makes
18:10
a joke of it, like anyone thinks he's funny, like
18:13
his old ass is a comedian or something. Bro. The
18:16
only thing funny is that you think people actually believe you.
18:19
That's what's funny. He said he believed Maxwell's sentence and
18:23
conviction was unjust. Of course he did Birds of a
18:27
Feather and all right. Mister Boyce claimed it was stretching
18:31
credulity for anyone in Epstein's orbit to maintain they couldn't
18:35
have known what was going on. Everybody who was associated
18:39
with the survivors has heard reams of testimony about how
18:42
obvious it was what Epstein was doing. Survivor after survivor
18:48
and law enforcement officers have testified how there were all
18:51
these topless girls at the swimming pool and naked pictures
18:54
of girls around the house. It was not something that
18:57
people could miss, No, it wasn't. He had pieces of
19:00
chess pieces carved into the likeness of his employees naked
19:04
and shit. He had pictures of gross ass, stank ass,
19:08
Gallaine Maxwell's busted ass all over the walls, naked and shit.
19:12
What do you mean you missed it? Mister Boy's chairman
19:16
and managing partner at Boys Schiller Flexner typically charges up
19:20
to two thousand dollars an hour for his services, but
19:23
he and fellow managing partner Sigared McCauley represented miss Roberts
19:27
free of charge throughout their pursuit of Maxwell and Epstein.
19:31
And that's great, that's good that they did that, But
19:34
in reality, we know that they also did it to
19:37
help their own profile. They know that moving forward, this
19:40
is good for them. They win this case against these people, bang,
19:44
they're gonna make a ton of dough. And the same
19:46
goes for a prosecutor. And that's why it's so crazy
19:49
to me that not one of these prosecutors, even a
19:52
junior prosecutor hasn't stepped up to the plate and said, look,
19:55
give me that whole entire case load and let me
19:57
slam these fools in court. On Tuesday, Miss McCauley read
20:04
a survivor impact statement from Miss Roberts which she described
20:07
Maxwell as a wolf in sheep's clothing. You could have
20:11
put an end to the rapes, the molestations, the sickening
20:13
manipulations that you arranged, witnessed, and even took part in.
20:18
You could have called the authorities and reported that you
20:21
were part of something awful and she didn't. Right, And
20:24
if you don't do that, then what you're complicit? Oh?
20:28
I was scared. I was held against my will. Okay, Well,
20:31
what happens when Epstein is gone from your life and
20:33
you still have not come forward. Speculation that Maxwell could
20:38
flip on her former associates in order to receive a
20:41
reduced sentence has never eventuated. Her brother, Ian Maxwell told
20:46
The Sunday Times in January that she had no plans
20:49
to pursue a plea deal or offer up information about
20:53
who else was involved. Maxwell has maintained her innocence and
20:56
plans to appeal the verdict and the sentence. The Independent
21:00
contacted the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of
21:03
New York to ask if it plans to prosecute anyone
21:07
else in relation to the conspiracy, and, if not, whether
21:11
it would unseal any records related to the case. Public
21:14
affairs chief Nicholas Biassi declined to comment. Oh, of course,
21:19
that's what they'll say. Oh, it's an ongoing investigation. You
21:22
can't have any of these files. You know, you the taxpayer.
21:25
So if this is not an ongoing investigation still and
21:29
they're not going after the co conspirators, they need to
21:31
turn over and unseal every file that they have and
21:36
then let's see what's what My guess is. Unfortunately, folks,
21:40
they won't do either. All right, that's gonna do it.
21:44
If you'd like to contact me, you can do that
21:46
at Bobby Kapuci at ProtonMail dot com. That's bo Bby
21:51
c ap u Cci at ProtonMail dot com. You can
21:56
also find me on Twitter at Bobby underscoresp Ucci. The
22:02
link that we discussed can be found in the description box.
22:07
What's up everyone, and welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles.
22:12
David Boys, the lawyer for several of the survivors of
22:16
Jeffrey Epstein has turned over their billing to the court
22:21
and they're asking for a whole bunch of money from
22:24
this settlement. David Boys revealed that he was billing the
22:29
survivors two thousand, one hundred and ten dollars an hour. Now,
22:34
chew on that number for a little while, folks, and
22:37
think about it. How many people out there are making
22:40
that in a whole month, and this guy is charging
22:44
that for one hour worth of legal services. Now, of
22:48
course they have it wrapped up as, oh, we're doing
22:50
this out of the kindness of our heart. We're gonna
22:53
help the survivors because we care about them. Meanwhile, they're
22:57
taking thirty percent of the settlement that the survivors received
23:01
from Deutsche Bank, So you need to take a full
23:05
thirty percent, No homie hook up here, No, hey, we're
23:08
gonna knock off ten to fifteen percent for all the
23:11
bullshit you ladies have went through already. Nah, none of that,
23:15
because remember, for everybody involved in this, it's all about
23:18
getting rich, and it seems like everybody has gotten rich
23:22
directly on the back of the suffering of these women
23:26
and it's pretty gross. Honestly, you would think that enough
23:30
is enough for some of these lawyers, right, David Boys,
23:33
I'm sure he has plenty of money, but nah, we
23:36
need to get that full thirty percent because I need
23:39
an extra few million. Add that to the fact that
23:43
the US Virgin Islands took what one hundred and five million?
23:47
The American government took over one hundred and ninety million
23:50
in taxes. So what does that leave these women with?
23:54
Certainly not as much as they should be getting. That's
23:56
for damn sure. Today we have an article from Reuters
24:00
and the headline David Boys reveals two thousand, one hundred
24:05
and ten dollars billing rate and Deutsche Bank bank fee bid.
24:09
This article was authored by David Thomas. Leading litigator. David
24:14
Boys hourly billing rate is now two thousand, one hundred
24:18
and ten dollars. His law firm told to judge weighing
24:21
attorney fees in a class action lawsuit brought by survivors
24:26
of the late financier you mean pedophile Jeffrey Epstein against
24:30
Deutsche Bank. So if they're getting this much here, how
24:33
much are they going to get from that JP Morgan lawsuit? Well,
24:36
I'll tell you how much. Thirty percent of two hundred
24:39
and ninety million dollars, Well, i'll tell you how much.
24:42
If they're doing the same exact rate, they're looking at
24:45
clearing about eighty seven million dollars from the JP Morgan lawsuit.
24:49
So if you add both of those up, you're looking
24:52
at what one hundred and ten twenty million dollars roughly
24:56
when all is said and done. And look, I'm not
24:58
saying they shouldn't get paid for the work. They most
25:01
certainly should. They did a lot of work here. They
25:03
did a lot of studies, they did a lot of
25:05
you know, leg work, all of that. But one hundred
25:08
and ten million dollars worth of work here, I don't
25:11
know about all that, folks. And I know, personally speaking,
25:15
there's no way that I'd collect all that money while
25:18
these women were getting the short end of the stick.
25:21
Once again, and we know that that's the case. How
25:24
many of these women had the brinkstruck really back up
25:27
on their lawn besides Virginia, not very many of them.
25:31
And how about the women that never even came forward.
25:35
All this money being spread out to all these people
25:38
like lawyers and the government and the US Virgin Islands.
25:43
All these people that don't deserve one single cent, Well,
25:47
the lawyers deserve to get paid, but all those other people,
25:50
they don't deserve any of this money. Meanwhile, everybody is
25:54
stuffing money in their pockets. Hand over fist. Boys and
25:58
other lawyer's rates were disclassed in a fee petition his firm,
26:02
Boys Schiller Flexner filed Friday in Manhattan Federal Court. Plaintiffs'
26:07
lawyers in the case are asking the court to sign
26:10
off on twenty two and a half million dollar fee award,
26:13
representing thirty percent of seventy five million dollars settlement that
26:18
was approved in June. The hourly rate figure places Boys,
26:22
whose firm handles plaintiffs and defense side work, in still
26:27
rarefied realm of attorneys who charge upwards of two thousand
26:31
dollars an hour. Last year, he disclosed an hourly rate
26:35
of one thousand, nine hundred and fifty dollars as counsel
26:38
to plaintiffs in a federal privacy lawsuit against Google. Law
26:43
firms typically increase their rates every year. A spokesperson for
26:47
Boy Schiller did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
26:53
The Deutsche Bank lawsuit was led by a woman identified
26:56
as Jane doe I, a Boy's client, who said Epstein
27:00
sexually abused her from two thousand and three to twenty
27:03
eighteen and accused Deutsche Bank of missing red flags of
27:07
his misconduct. Meanwhile, the bank denied the claim. They might
27:11
have denied the claim, but they sure did pay out
27:13
a whole grip of dough. JP Morgan Chase in June
27:18
also agreed to pay about two hundred and ninety million
27:21
dollars to settle a similar class action lawsuit by Epstein victims,
27:25
who were also represented by Boys and others. The fee
27:29
petition in that case is due by October fifth, and
27:32
the plaintiffs could ask for fees as i as thirty
27:35
percent or eighty seven million dollars. Eighty seven million dollars,
27:41
so that means only two hundred and three million dollars
27:44
are going to go to the Epstein survivors. And it
27:47
sounds like a lot of money, and it is. There
27:49
is no doubt it's a lot of money. My point is,
27:53
why are these other entities getting so much of it now?
27:57
There is nothing wrong with these lawyer's collecting some money.
28:01
It's their job, right They should get paid for their work.
28:04
Nobody should be out here doing work for free unless
28:07
that's something you agree to. But when we're talking about
28:10
hundreds of millions of dollars in lawyer fees, I find
28:13
that to be as crazy and ridiculous as anything in
28:16
the whole world. And it shows you that if you
28:19
don't have do there is no way in hell that
28:21
you're gonna make the legal system bend to your advantage,
28:25
no chance whatsoever. Because if you're in trouble, do you
28:29
think that Boys and Chiller are showing up to help
28:32
you out? Hell? No. The only reason they showed up here,
28:35
let's be very honest, is because they knew that there
28:38
was a pot of gold at the end of this rainbow.
28:41
That's why they got involved, Not because you know, they
28:44
wanted to take down Jeffrey Epstein. I mean that might
28:46
have became part of it, but initially, if you don't
28:50
think this was about profits for people like David Boys,
28:53
you've lost the plot. Hourly lawyer rates reaching two thousand
28:57
dollars were practically unheard of just to decade ago, but
29:01
more recently they have steadily been creeping above that mark.
29:04
For some elite attorneys and We know that the lawyer
29:08
that Prince Andrew hired, Andrew Brettler, we know that he's
29:11
charging that kind of dough too. So I'm guessing that
29:14
most of the lawyers in this realm, that's what they're
29:17
charging these days, and that is crazy. The US last
29:21
year unsuccessfully objected to a two four hundred and sixty
29:25
five dollars hourly rate charged by Hogan levels ap Pellet.
29:29
Veteran Neil Coutell in a high stakes bankruptcy case involving
29:33
a Johnson and Johnson subsidiary. Covington and Berling said last
29:38
year in a filing that senior partner's top rate at
29:41
that firm was two thousand, five hundred dollars an hour.
29:45
So unless your bill gates, forget it, you're not gonna
29:47
get one of these firms to work for you. Now, unless,
29:51
of course, they're gonna get some money at the end
29:53
of it. Perhaps if there's some kind of class action
29:56
lawsuit they think they can win, Yeah, maybe they'll get involved.
30:00
But for most of us, this kind of legal help
30:03
is so far out of the realm of possibility that
30:06
it might as well only exist on Mars. Boys co
30:10
founded his firm in nineteen ninety seven. The same year,
30:13
he was hired by the US government in its anti
30:16
trust battle with Microsoft Court, boosting the firm's reputation as
30:21
a litigation powerhouse. He later represented Vice President Al Gore
30:26
in the US Supreme Court battle over the two thousand
30:29
presidential election recount. More recently, Boys faced criticism over his
30:35
work for Harvey Weinstein, the former Hollywood producer convicted of
30:39
rape in twenty twenty and felled blood testing startup Doranos.
30:44
Imagine this guy was out here working for Harvey Weinstein. Now,
30:48
I get it. That's your job, right, you got to
30:51
be a defense attorney, But you're certainly not some champion
30:55
of people who have been assaulted by Epstein or anyone else.
30:59
You didn't do this because you were concerned about society
31:03
or what this did to these women. Did it because
31:06
you were looking for that payday. And I don't think
31:08
there's any debate about that. If it was the case
31:12
of I want to help promote justice, wouldn't you be
31:15
out there in the community helping all kinds of people
31:18
who are downtrodden, who had no money for legal counsel.
31:22
But that's not what they're doing, right. I mean, maybe
31:25
they have some junior lawyers out there doing that, but
31:27
for the most part, lawyers like this, they look for
31:30
cases that they know they're gonna collect a gigantic king's
31:35
ransom at the end of it. And David Boyce and
31:38
the rest of the lawyers involved here, they were certainly
31:41
aware that they were on the hook or on the
31:44
line to get themselves a nice payday when all of
31:48
this was said and done. And hey, that's great, But
31:51
how come everybody is getting more money than the survivors.
31:55
That's the question that everybody should be asking, because I
31:58
have no idea how the people who were actually abused
32:01
end up getting less money than lawyers and you know,
32:04
the estate and everybody else involved. It's all absurd. All
32:09
of that money, or the vast majority of it, should
32:12
have been earmarked for the women, and then a nice
32:15
portion of it should have been put aside for women
32:18
who come forward later on with their claims. But that
32:22
didn't happen. And the women who didn't come forward, the
32:24
women who were abused and who have never said anything, well,
32:28
there's not going to be any kind of dough for
32:29
them if they do decide to come forward and bring
32:32
a complaint against the estate. And that's because all this
32:36
money has been divvied up between lawyers, between the estate,
32:39
between the federal government, and a few crumbs were tossed
32:43
to the survivors. But hey, David Boys is going to
32:46
get another yacht out of the deal, So I guess
32:49
everything's a okay, all right, everybody that's going to do
32:52
it for this one. If you'd like to contact me,
32:55
you can do that at Bobby Kapuci at ProtonMail dot com.
32:59
That's Bo Bby capu Cci at ProtonMail dot com. All
33:05
of the information that goes with this episode can be
33:08
found in the description box. What's up everyone, and welcome
33:12
back to the Epstein Chronicles. According to a new article
33:17
from Law three sixty, one of Jeffrey Epstein's survivors, Sarah Ransom,
33:24
has filed a grievance against her former lawyer, David Boyce,
33:27
alleging that he mistreated her while representing her in a
33:31
civil case against Epstein, Glaine Maxwell, and three of their
33:35
alleged co conspirators. Now, right off the bat, that's pretty
33:41
gross on its face. Right. If that is the case,
33:45
then that's a pretty gross misconduct and a pretty disgusting
33:50
way to go about your business. You see, I've never
33:53
really been a big fan of lawyers in the first place. Folks,
33:56
and especially you get high profile lawyers. They're all smarmy,
34:00
all of them. They're all looking for They're looking for
34:03
a payday, right, That's what they all want, And that's
34:06
basically what was going on here, according to this grievance
34:10
filed by Sarah Ransom. So why don't we just dive
34:14
into this article and try and unpack it and see
34:17
what's what This article is from Law three sixty headline
34:22
David boys faces grievance complaint over Epstein case. This article
34:29
was authored by Lucia Osborne Crowley, a survivor of Jeffrey
34:36
Epstein's sex trafficking ring, has filed a grievance against her
34:40
former lawyer, David Boyce, alleging he mistreated her while representing
34:44
her in a civil case against Epstein, Gallainne Maxwell, and
34:48
three of their alleged co conspirators. So again, looks real
34:52
bad right off the jump, right, How could you, as
34:55
a lawyer misrepresent somebody who's already been abused? Sarah Ransom
35:01
told Law three sixty exclusively in an interview before the
35:04
August nineteenth filing, that she feels betrayed by Boys, the
35:08
chair and managing partner of Boys Schiller Flexner, LLP, and
35:13
his firm, so that's everybody who was working on the case.
35:17
Her complaint, filed with New York's Attorney Grievance Committee, covers
35:21
conduct by Boys and other members of the legal team
35:24
he led while representing her from twenty sixteen to twenty twenty,
35:30
so over the span of four years while Sarah Ransom
35:34
was pursuing justice for the abuse she suffered. She says
35:38
in this complaint that her best interest was not being
35:41
represented by this law firm. Among the allegations, she claims
35:47
Boys and his legal team pressured her into giving a
35:50
deposition to help Virginia Roberts case against Maxwell, and did
35:54
not properly represent Ransom's interests in her own case, which
35:59
the Boys Schiller team guided to settlement. Roberts is also
36:03
a survivor of Epstein's sex trafficking scheme and has settled
36:07
lawsuits with Maxwell, Epstein's former girlfriend co conspirator General all
36:11
Around Scusbag, since convicted of procuring girls for the late
36:15
financier pedophile and Prince Andrew, the Duke of York, settled
36:19
a civil sexual abuse claim brought by Roberts in early
36:23
twenty twenty two. Boys mistreated me, and I feel completely
36:28
betrayed by him, Ransom said. And you should never feel
36:31
like that, right. You should never feel like an afterthought,
36:34
or like your case doesn't matter to your lawyer, or
36:36
that they're trying to manipulate your situation to help somewhere else.
36:41
That should never be the case. Ransom's current lawyer, James
36:47
Marsh of Marsh Law Firm, PLLC, helped Ransom prepare the
36:51
formal complaint to the Attorney Grievance Committee detailing Boy's alleged misconduct.
36:57
Sarah has always been her own best advocate, and she
37:00
has always been incredible at fighting for justice, Marsh told
37:03
Law three sixty. I agree with that fully. All of
37:06
these survivors who came forward and confronted these people have
37:10
always been their own best advocates. It's just about getting
37:13
the word out right, amplifying what they already have to say.
37:17
How many times do I say it? Don't go to
37:20
a reporter or anyone. Listen to what these survivors have
37:23
to say. If you want to know what really happened,
37:25
because that's the road map to get you where you
37:28
want to go. Ransom had little personal contact with Boys,
37:34
interacted mostly with other attorneys at Boys Schiller. She confirmed
37:37
the law three sixty. She spoke to him once over
37:40
the phone and met him in person when she addressed
37:43
the court in relation to Jeffrey Epstein's death in twenty nineteen.
37:47
Despite the limited interactions, she holds him responsible for the
37:51
alleged misconduct. Hey, look, at the end of the day,
37:55
what do I always say, personal responsibility? Right, If you're
37:57
the boss, it's no different than at the dog. If
38:00
you're the big boss, you're the head honcho over here
38:02
at the law firm. When the shit comes down, you're
38:05
gonna be the one who's taking a big bite of
38:07
the sandwich. And I don't blame her for her holding
38:11
him responsible. If she feels like that and she feels
38:13
like she was wronged, I take it straight to the top. Two.
38:16
Of course, you're mad at whoever you were working with,
38:19
But you know i'd be mad at the man who's
38:21
in charge. When I had my car accident, I didn't
38:24
work with the guy who runs the law firm. I
38:27
had one of his associates managing my case. But if
38:30
shit would have went sideways, I would have held him responsible.
38:33
And I'm sure it's you know, the same sort of
38:35
situation here, amplified by about fifty million, Right, You're gonna
38:40
hold people responsible that are part of the company, especially
38:44
the person who's running the company. We are surprised and
38:52
disappointed if the statements attributed to miss Ransom accurately reflect
38:57
what she has said. A boy Schiller spoke person said,
39:01
those statements are not accurate and are inconsistent with the record,
39:05
including what she has publicly said and written in the past.
39:09
We have great sympathy for what miss Ransom has endured
39:12
and we wish her well. I mean, those are pretty
39:15
words in all but obviously Miss Ransom's feel in some
39:18
kind of way, and she feels like she was wronged
39:22
and that the law firm in general, led by David Boyce,
39:26
didn't represent her best interest, not in the least. Boys
39:32
Schiller's dedication to helping shut down Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking
39:36
ring and to finding justice for survivors has involved the
39:39
battles spanning nearly a decade and an incredible resource commitment
39:43
by the firm. That includes thousands of pro bono hours
39:46
by our attorneys and staff. The spokesperson continued, it always
39:50
comes down the money, right, And I said that from
39:52
Jump Street, with all of these lawyers, oh pro bono,
39:55
this pro bono, that, well, it all comes down to
39:57
the dough. They're not doing it from the kindness of
39:59
their heart. They're doing it because they feel like they
40:01
can get some shine for their law firm. And that's fine, right.
40:05
As long as you represent the best injuries of your clients,
40:08
then it's all good. That's how it's supposed to work.
40:11
I did this great job for you, and in turn
40:14
I can use that to springboard my career further into
40:17
the stratosphere. But if your client is feeling like she
40:21
has not been represented correctly, especially in something as serious
40:25
as this, I think that's a big problem, folks. I
40:28
really think that's a problem. The firm said it has
40:32
not been given a copy of the grievance and has
40:35
not been able to review it legally. Under New York
40:38
State's ethical rules, we are prevented from responding to many
40:41
details in this article. We ask Miss Ransom's counsel for
40:45
permission to do so. In order to correct factual inaccuracies,
40:49
and they have not responded. The spokesperson said, so that's
40:52
a bunch of legal ees, right. I have no idea
40:54
that it's going to be. You know, the law firms
40:56
going back and forth about he said, She said, what
40:59
can I release? You know how it gets with lawyers,
41:02
becomes a whole giganticcesspool of court filings and they'll come
41:06
in a flurry. So we'll just have to stay on
41:08
top of them and see see what happens. Right. Ransom
41:14
told Law three sixty that when she first engaged Boys
41:17
in his firm, Boys instructed her that they would only
41:20
represent her in civil case against Epstein, Maxwell and alleged
41:24
co conspirators Leslie Groff, Sarah Kellen, and Natalia Malashev. If
41:29
she agreed, agreed to give a detailed deposition in Robert
41:33
civil case against Maxwell, that's completely ridiculous. If that's the case.
41:40
If that's the case and Boys and Schiller did that,
41:43
that is completely out of line. You should never leverage
41:47
one of your one client to do something for another
41:50
client to try and you know, benefit monetarily. That's absolutely insane.
41:56
And if that occurred, then Boys and companies gonna have
41:59
to answer for that. I did not want to give
42:03
that deposition, but I was told I had to or
42:06
they wouldn't represent me. Ransom said she believes the law
42:10
firm did this to boost settlement chances for their other client,
42:13
Virginia Roberts. Yikes. That is a pretty powerful statement there
42:19
by Sarah Ransom. And you know what she feels strongly
42:23
about it, strongly enough that there's this grievance here right,
42:28
strongly enough that she's talking about it and bringing it
42:30
up and not sitting on it. So again, this is
42:33
serious stuff here, folks, very very serious stuff, and gonna
42:37
be some choppy legal water for Bose to, I mean
42:41
boys to navigate. Graff, Kellen, and Malashev all worked for
42:48
Epstein and have been accused, including in Ransom's lawsuit, of
42:52
enabling his sex trafficking scheme. I did not want to
42:56
give that deposition, but I was told I had to
42:59
or they wouldn't represent me. Ransom said she believes the
43:02
law firm did this to boost settlement chances for their
43:05
other client, Roberts. Yikes. And look, I gotta tell you,
43:09
I have no reason not to believe what Sarah Ransom's
43:12
saying here, why would she come out and just make
43:14
these statements, right, So we'll have to see what the
43:18
response is by Boys and company. But boy, oh boy,
43:21
not looking good, not looking good at all. That's a
43:25
clear conflict of interest, Ransom said, yeah, it certainly is.
43:31
Ransom's grievance also brings up threats to the privacy of
43:34
her two thousand and seven deposition as part of another
43:37
case the firm brought on behalf of Roberts, this time
43:40
against Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz. Roberts has accused Dershowitz of
43:45
sexually abusing her while she was being trafficked by Epstein,
43:48
and to suit him for defamation after he responded to
43:52
these allegations by calling her a certified, complete, total liar.
43:56
So that has been going back and forth now in
43:58
the courts for quite some time. And we all know
44:01
the allegations Virginia has made against Alan Dershowitz, and they've
44:06
been battling it out in court with this defamation case
44:09
that's been separate from the other stuff. So there's a
44:11
lot to unpack there for those of you who might
44:14
be new to the case. Certainly a lot going on
44:20
while Ransom's grievance says Boys Boyce Schiller asked the court
44:24
to unseal the deposition, court records indicate it was Dershowitz
44:27
in twenty twenty who pressed the court to unseal all
44:30
confidential evidence produced in Roberts versus. Maxwell. At that time,
44:36
Boyce Schiller had already been disqualified from representing Roberts in
44:39
the Dershowitz case since its attorneys could be called upon
44:43
to testify as part of the underlying allegations in the
44:46
case according to a court order, So Chuck Cooper is
44:50
in charge of this portion of the case now for Virginia,
44:53
and as far as the lawyers from Boys Schiller, well,
44:57
they could be called to testify by Dershowitz because he
45:00
was suing Boys as well. Oh the tangled web we weave.
45:08
Other attorneys for Roberts were on board with at least
45:11
disclosing records that directly concerned Dershowitz. However, before making its
45:15
decision on the bid to unseal records, the court asked
45:18
the Jane Does which included Ransom, to register any objection.
45:23
Ransom added that Boys Shiller, who were her attorneys at
45:26
the time, did not inform her about the unsealing attempt,
45:29
nor that she she would have to file an objection
45:33
to protect her deposition. So basically, she's saying that they
45:37
outed her without her permission, a deposition that was supposed
45:40
to be kept secret. They basically used her deposition and
45:44
her statement under oath that she thought was private to
45:47
help bolster Virginia's case. That's what she's saying here, and
45:53
that Boys and Schiller were negligent. Ransom was informed by
46:00
another Epstein survivor, Maria Farmer, and had to approach Boys
46:04
Schiller to ask what was going on and how they
46:06
could help her file an objection. According to emails seen
46:09
by Law three sixty, this is absurd and absolutely terrible
46:13
work on behalf of Boys and Schiller. They let me
46:19
down greatly by saying they couldn't represent me in my
46:21
objection to the unseiling. Ransom told Law three sixty they
46:25
never inform me until literally right at the last moment,
46:28
when it was highly unlikely I could find legal representation
46:31
and file emotion in time. That's that's low too, that's garbage.
46:37
It's typical lawyers shit though, right, I mean the whole
46:41
legal profession smarmy is held to me. And I've said
46:44
it a million times on here about lawyers like Gloria
46:47
Allred and her daughter, and you know every one of
46:52
these lawyers really that you see that come on TV
46:54
and they have this smug look on their face and
46:57
it's just it's all bad. It's all about money, right.
47:00
They call accident lawyers ambulance chasers, but really that's what
47:04
all of these people are after. They're all after trying
47:06
to secure that bag. Oh how can I make some
47:08
more money for myself. The court did end up granting
47:14
an extension to the Jane Does, which gave Ransom time
47:17
to secure a new representation in August. On August twenty fifth,
47:21
twenty twenty, a letter that followed Ransom's current lawyers, Robert
47:25
Lewis and Marsh Marsh excuse me urge the court not
47:28
to grant disclosure of the materials and that Ransom should
47:32
not now be forced to endure further emotional turmoil by
47:35
being pulled unwillingly into another round of heated litigation with
47:40
its attendant public feeding frenzy. So basically, she's saying she
47:44
wanted nothing to do with it. She wanted some privacy
47:46
she gave the first deposition, and she didn't want this
47:49
one to get yanked into the new litigation. Do you
47:52
blame her? I mean, come on, how much can one
47:54
person take, especially when you feel like you're not even
47:57
being represented. It was one hundred percent my understanding that
48:03
my deposition would be kept confidential. They promised me it
48:06
would be hidden, Ransom told Law three sixty. They knew
48:10
that deposition had sensitive material about my private life and family,
48:14
which I was incredibly embarrassed about. Is horrible, man. You
48:18
shouldn't be outing people, especially if it's your client, right
48:22
if they say to you, look, I don't want this
48:24
to get out there. There's a reason it's sealed in
48:26
the first place. Why are you working to get that
48:28
unsealed if it shouldn't be, and especially if it doesn't
48:32
pertain to getting actual justice. US District Judge Louretta Presca
48:39
in September twenty twenty ultimately granted Dershowitz's request to access
48:44
sealed materials in the Maxwell case that reference Dershowitz, which
48:48
could could be made public if the case heads to trial.
48:52
Ransom takes issue with actions beyond the deposition and the
48:57
disclosure controversy. So it really looks like she's being saying
49:01
that she's being pulled into something that has nothing even
49:03
to do with her, and she's being used basically as leverage.
49:07
And it's you know, her confidential deposition that she gave
49:12
under oath that was supposed to stay sealed. So I, honestly,
49:16
I don't blame her for feeling like she's been stabbed
49:19
in the back here. If I was in her shoes,
49:21
I'd feel the same way, honestly. Among her chief concerns,
49:28
she argues that she is disturbed by a photo of
49:31
boys at a dinner with Bill and Hillary Clinton. Well,
49:34
that's a shaka rubbing shoulders with them. Why should that
49:37
shock anybody? Again, folks, remember all of these high profile lawyers,
49:42
they're all part of the so called elite. Right. Every
49:45
now and then, an enemy of an enemy is your friend.
49:47
They'll end up showing up and you know, going after
49:50
a guy like stank Ass, Harvey Weinstein or Epstein, And
49:53
that's great, but remember what you're dealing with. Remember the
49:56
scorpion and the frog story we talked about yesterday, same thing.
50:00
It's just in their nature. The photo was originally circulated
50:06
in twenty eighteen, after Ransom had agreed to be represented
50:10
by Boys and Schiller. Ransom says that she considers the
50:13
personal relationship a conflict of interest because Epstein allegedly used
50:17
his friendship with Bill Clinton to encourage girls to join
50:21
his circle. Well, what do you know, somebody else coming
50:24
out and saying it to all those people who keep
50:26
asking me why I bring up Bill Clinton, here's your
50:29
reason right here. These girls want answers, and these girls
50:34
themselves once again, I don't bother going to the middleman.
50:38
I listen to what these girls have to say, what
50:40
these ladies have to say, and that's what I base
50:43
my opinions on, following the evidence to wherever it leads us.
50:49
And according to multiple survivors, one of the biggest catches
50:55
for Jeffrey Epstein was his relationship with Bill Clinton. He
50:58
used that to ulster his trafficking. That's what these ladies say.
51:07
Juliette Bryant, another survivor of Epstein's sex trafficking ring, told
51:12
Law three sixty that she met Epstein when she was
51:15
in Cape Town with when he was in Cape Town
51:17
with Bill Clinton. This gave him credibility. She is telling
51:20
you that not me, all right, Juliette is telling you
51:25
that the fact that Bill Clinton was with him gave
51:28
him credibility and that led to the abuse, or played
51:32
a part in it at the very least the enabling
51:34
of it. Ransom says that despite Boys' well known work
51:39
on behalf of the Clinton administration, ensuing Microsoft and representing
51:44
former Vice President Al Gore in the fallout over the
51:47
two thousand presidential election, the connection never occurred to her.
51:51
I mean, it makes sense, right, Could that be a
51:54
conflict of interest? Could you be trying to protect your
51:56
buddy Bill Clinton? Still? Is that what's going on? Look?
52:00
I don't know, but we need to get to the
52:02
bottom of it. I don't know how many times I
52:04
have to say it here on this podcast. Scorched Earth
52:07
policy anyone involves with these people, trying to help them out,
52:12
trying to enable them, trying to whitewash what they did.
52:16
It's not gonna fly, and eventually the truth is gonna rise. Ransom,
52:24
who also alleges she was asked to put her name
52:26
to an op ed written by another attorney who works
52:29
closely with Boys, John Stanley Pottinger, titled how David Boyce
52:33
saved me. Pottinger, also a high profile attorney, served as
52:37
Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights during the Nixon and
52:40
Ford administration. It runs deep. Look, if you're one of
52:44
these high profile lawyers, chances are you were running the
52:47
hollowed halls of one of these Skelly ass places we
52:51
always talk about, Harvard or Yale or one of these
52:54
other places where you know, the fancy lads go to
52:57
get educations. Ransom agreed to say she had written the piece,
53:04
but said she felt as though she couldn't say no.
53:06
According to the Grievance, Potinger did not respond to her
53:10
request for confirmation or comment. I don't really know what's
53:14
going on there. I mean, that's a lot, right, and
53:18
if that's how Sarah feels, then people need to take
53:20
it seriously. The piece was published under Ransom's name in
53:26
The New York Times on November fifteenth, twenty seventeen. I
53:31
feel that they used me, Ransom told Law three sixty.
53:34
That's absolutely brutal to read, really brutal to read. As
53:38
if these ladies haven't suffered enough, they have to get
53:41
revictimized by the lawyers, by the government by It's crazy.
53:48
Ransom's claim is not the first time Boys has been
53:50
accused of crossing ethical lines. Actress Rose McGowan claimed he
53:54
helped former client Harvey Weinstein cover up sexual misconduct allegations
53:58
by hiring an Intel Diligen's firm to collect information on her,
54:02
and he has also been separately accused of hiring that
54:05
firm to suppress a New York Times story on Weinstein.
54:09
Wherever the money goes, that's where these lawyers are going
54:12
to follow. It's all about the money, the money, the money.
54:18
How much money can this client pay me? Notice, none
54:21
of these people, none of these big shot lawyers, were
54:23
running down to Riker's Island to see if Khalif Browder
54:27
needed some representation. Under the terms of the settlement that
54:35
Boys Schiller secured for her ransom is not allowed to
54:37
disclose how much he received, but she told Law three
54:40
sixty she is not happy with the outcome and felt
54:43
pressure to accept the settlement in the wake of an
54:46
attempted suicide so terrible. A lawyer should never pressure their
54:50
client into taking a lesser amount if the client feels
54:53
like the lawyer should go get more, my man, tie
54:56
on your lawyering shoes, your stupid ass bow tie and
55:00
get to work. I was in no fit state to
55:06
make a decision like that, and I would not have
55:08
accepted that settlement if I had understood that I wasn't
55:12
being properly represented. Emails seen by Law three sixty also
55:16
showed that lawyers at Boys Schiller helped Ransom delay a
55:19
deposition in the wake of her suicide attempt and injuries
55:23
because she was not in a fit state to give evidence. Well,
55:27
if you're not in a fit state to give evidence,
55:29
how are you in a fit state to accept a settlement?
55:33
That seems to be a bit counterintuitive. No, However, she
55:39
was also asked to accept the settlement in that state,
55:42
according to photos and emails seen by Law three sixty. Look,
55:46
it's not looking good for Boys and Schillers here, of folks,
55:49
Boys and Chiller certainly not looking good at all. Pottinger
55:56
advised Ransom to settle the case at an early stage
55:59
to keep cost According to an email scene by Law
56:02
three sixty, to keep costs down? What does that even mean?
56:06
How about we pursue these people to the ends of
56:08
the earth, and who cares how much it costs? We
56:13
are just on the verge of racking up larger costs
56:15
as the case comes closer to trial, and there will
56:17
be more depositions, more travel, the retention of expert witnesses,
56:21
and the like, Pottinger wrote, But right now neither side
56:25
has accumulated big costs, which suggests this suggests this is
56:29
the time to settle. If settlement is a possibility now,
56:33
I don't even get it. Okay, but only if it's
56:35
in your client's best interest, And according to Sarah, she's
56:39
saying that that's not the case. Ransom now believes that
56:44
Boys and his firm did not have her best interest
56:47
in mind when running her civil litigation. In twenty twenty,
56:51
Ransom expressed this view to Brad Edwards, an attorney who
56:54
was working alongside Boy Schiller on her case, in an
56:56
email scene by Law three sixty. I no longer want
57:00
to be represented by Boys and Shiller, Ransom wrote, I
57:03
understand this is complex, but I don't feel they have
57:06
worked in my interest or the other survivors. In his
57:11
reply to that email, Edwards declined to take over her
57:14
representation but encourage Ransom to voice her concerns to Boys
57:19
and Shiller. Edwards did not respond to Law three sixties
57:22
requests for comment. Ransom is represented by Robert Lewis and
57:26
James Marsh of Marsh Law Firm PLLLC. Always disappointing when
57:32
you hear stuff like that, huh. And as as far
57:35
as Brad Edwards goes, I wonder why he wouldn't take
57:38
her case over. Maybe some kind of conflict of interest
57:40
or I'm interested to see how all involved parties respond,
57:46
because these are pretty serious accusations here, and Sarah Ransom
57:51
should certainly not be manipulated or used as a piece
57:54
on the chess board. Her case should be just as
57:57
important as anyone else's, and her lawyer should be pursuing
58:01
her interests first. So let's see what comes to this one, folks.
58:05
But seems to me that we're just at the very
58:08
beginning here. All right. That's gonna do it for this episode.
58:12
If you'd like to contact me, you can do that
58:14
at Bobby Kapuchi at proton mail dot com. That's b
58:18
O B B y c A p U c c
58:21
I at proton mail dot com. You can also find
58:24
me on Twitter at b O B B y underscore
58:28
c A p U C c I. The link that
58:32
I discussed can be found in the description box.