Latest / Uphoff on Media Podcast / Goals Are for Losers. Systems Are for Winners
Transcript
- 0:01SPEAKER_00: Hey, it's Tony.
- 0:03SPEAKER_00: I read James Clear's Atomic Habits in 2018,
- 0:07SPEAKER_00: and it gave me a narrative and a framework for something I've been practicing
- 0:10SPEAKER_00: but had not named.
- 0:12SPEAKER_00: Goals are great.
- 0:13SPEAKER_00: Everybody has a goal, though.
- 0:15SPEAKER_00: And goals without the systems to achieve them are a fool's mission.
- 0:19SPEAKER_00: Goals and systems need to work like a flywheel.
- 0:24SPEAKER_00: As many colleagues and friends can attest,
- 0:26SPEAKER_00: I became a bit of a zealot for defining goals and aligning them with the systems
- 0:31SPEAKER_00: to achieve them.
- 0:32SPEAKER_00: I also became a zealot,
- 0:33SPEAKER_00: some might suggest too much so at times,
- 0:35SPEAKER_00: of challenging managers as to whether they simply had a goal but no system or
- 0:40SPEAKER_00: an elegant articulated system without a goal.
- 0:44SPEAKER_00: Flywheel, flywheel, flywheel people.
- 0:47SPEAKER_00: Agentic AI is highlighting the need to get your flywheel right as your systems
- 0:52SPEAKER_00: or lack thereof will increasingly become automated.
- 0:55SPEAKER_00: In this episode titled Goals are for Losers,
- 0:58SPEAKER_00: Systems are for Winners,
- 0:59SPEAKER_00: I break down how to align the right goals and systems to create and manage
- 1:04SPEAKER_00: the flywheel in your business.
- 1:06SPEAKER_00: The post on Uphoff on Media on Substack includes a framework you can download
- 1:10SPEAKER_00: and use in your business.
- 1:12SPEAKER_00: Okay, let's get to work.
- 1:19SPEAKER_00: Goals are for losers, systems are for winners.
- 1:21SPEAKER_00: You need both.
- 1:22SPEAKER_00: Agentic AI is about to expose the goal setters who never built the system and reward
- 1:28SPEAKER_00: the operators who did.
- 1:30SPEAKER_00: That line has been a founder gospel for a decade.
- 1:33SPEAKER_00: Scott Adams actually coined it and James Clear's Atomic Habits turned the idea into a movement.
- 1:39SPEAKER_00: It's also about half right, though.
- 1:41SPEAKER_00: A goal without a system is hope without a deadline.
- 1:44SPEAKER_00: You know where you're headed and nothing on the ground tells you when you're drifting.
- 1:48SPEAKER_00: A system without a goal fails more quietly,
- 1:51SPEAKER_00: consistent activity that feels like progress and runs straight past the point
- 1:55SPEAKER_00: where it stopped mattering.
- 1:57SPEAKER_00: The two aren't rivals, they're a flywheel.
- 1:59SPEAKER_00: The goal sets the direction, the system checks your position against it.
- 2:04SPEAKER_00: The correction closes the gap and every correction teaches you something that makes
- 2:08SPEAKER_00: the next one faster.
- 2:10SPEAKER_00: Remove any piece and the wheel stops.
- 2:13SPEAKER_00: Most of the operating rhythms I've inherited as an incoming CEO were missing the correction.
- 2:18SPEAKER_00: OKRs got relabeled the system.
- 2:21SPEAKER_00: So did the weekly cadence on the dashboard.
- 2:23SPEAKER_00: None of it changed.
- 2:24SPEAKER_00: It just got a better name.
- 2:26SPEAKER_00: A real system and a goal with a calendar invite look identical in the board deck.
- 2:31SPEAKER_00: They only diverge when the numbers come in wrong.
- 2:35SPEAKER_00: The test is what happens when the number comes in wrong.
- 2:38SPEAKER_00: One question separates them.
- 2:40SPEAKER_00: When reality diverges from the plan,
- 2:42SPEAKER_00: does someone with the authority to act change course before
- 2:45SPEAKER_00: the next scheduled review?
- 2:47SPEAKER_00: Or does everyone wait for the meeting?
- 2:50SPEAKER_00: If the answer is, we flagged it and we'll revisit it at the QBR, you don't have a system.
- 2:55SPEAKER_00: You have a goal with a calendar invite.
- 2:57SPEAKER_00: The rhythm is decorative.
- 2:59SPEAKER_00: The feeling of discipline without the function of it.
- 3:02SPEAKER_00: Does your operating rhythm generate decisions or reports?
- 3:06SPEAKER_00: On the post on Uphoff on Media,
- 3:09SPEAKER_00: here's a framework you can download and use as a diagnostic tool in your business.
- 3:15SPEAKER_00: I learned this at Information Week before I had words for it.
- 3:19SPEAKER_00: I was recruited from Ziff Davis to CMP Media to take over Information Week.
- 3:23SPEAKER_00: It was a struggling $15 million brand losing money dead last in a field
- 3:27SPEAKER_00: of seven IT titles on both ad pages and readership.
- 3:32SPEAKER_00: The goal came first and we made it impossible to miss.
- 3:35SPEAKER_00: TTL, take the lead on the sign off of every email, voicemail and meeting.
- 3:40SPEAKER_00: The system came next,
- 3:41SPEAKER_00: four pillars, people,
- 3:43SPEAKER_00: product,
- 3:44SPEAKER_00: process and performance applied to every function from sales to editorial
- 3:48SPEAKER_00: to audience development.
- 3:49SPEAKER_00: Not a scoreboard,
- 3:51SPEAKER_00: a diagnostic each team used to find what was holding it back
- 3:54SPEAKER_00: and change what it did next.
- 3:56SPEAKER_00: Three years later,
- 3:57SPEAKER_00: Information Week was a $175 million business running at 50% margins and number one
- 4:02SPEAKER_00: in readership.
- 4:03SPEAKER_00: The goal never got smaller to make the system easier to run.
- 4:06SPEAKER_00: The system existed to serve the goal.
- 4:10SPEAKER_00: Look, losers have goals too.
- 4:12SPEAKER_00: Two companies that had everything except the correction, Friendster.
- 4:17SPEAKER_00: The goal grow faster than anyone.
- 4:19SPEAKER_00: It had the social network idea years before Facebook.
- 4:22SPEAKER_00: The missing system,
- 4:24SPEAKER_00: engineers wanted to fix buckling infrastructure,
- 4:27SPEAKER_00: but leadership kept shipping features because grow faster won every argument.
- 4:31SPEAKER_00: The cost, ad pages took 40 seconds to load and MySpace took the market.
- 4:38SPEAKER_00: WeWork, the goal, become the biggest workspace company on earth.
- 4:42SPEAKER_00: The missing system,
- 4:43SPEAKER_00: nothing could force a correction when the unit economics broke
- 4:46SPEAKER_00: and governance kept one person's desk out of reach.
- 4:50SPEAKER_00: The cost,
- 4:51SPEAKER_00: by the 2019 IPO filing,
- 4:53SPEAKER_00: $47 billion in lease obligations sat against $4 billion in committed revenue.
- 4:59SPEAKER_00: The pattern,
- 5:00SPEAKER_00: both had a goal you could say out loud,
- 5:02SPEAKER_00: neither built the systems that would force them to notice and act
- 5:05SPEAKER_00: when reality stopped agreeing with the plan.
- 5:09SPEAKER_00: Agents will run the system.
- 5:11SPEAKER_00: Someone still has to design it.
- 5:13SPEAKER_00: Agentic AI collapses two costs that used to hide a weak operating rhythm,
- 5:18SPEAKER_00: the cost of execution and the time it takes, a signal to reach a decision.
- 5:22SPEAKER_00: When agents do the work continuously, the quarterly check-in becomes an hourly one.
- 5:27SPEAKER_00: The flywheel spins at machine speed whether or not you built a correction into it.
- 5:32SPEAKER_00: Hand an agent a goal without a system and it will hit the goal.
- 5:36SPEAKER_00: Give a demand generation agent an MQL target and it will deliver the MQLs.
- 5:41SPEAKER_00: It will also fill your sales team's calendar with people who are never going to buy
- 5:46SPEAKER_00: and do it faster than any human team could.
- 5:49SPEAKER_00: That's Friendster's mistake automated.
- 5:52SPEAKER_00: The system version gives the same agent a target and a loop.
- 5:56SPEAKER_00: Watch MQL to opportunity conversion by source.
- 5:59SPEAKER_00: Throttle the sources that decay,
- 6:01SPEAKER_00: escalate to a human when conversion drops below a set threshold.
- 6:05SPEAKER_00: The goal stays human.
- 6:07SPEAKER_00: The correction runs around the clock.
- 6:08SPEAKER_00: It's the loop I described in the post-loop engineering applied to the operating model itself.
- 6:14SPEAKER_00: The market is already sorting this out.
- 6:16SPEAKER_00: Gardner predicts more than 40% of agentic AI projects will be canceled by the end
- 6:21SPEAKER_00: of 2027,
- 6:22SPEAKER_00: citing escalating costs, unclear business value, and inadequate risk controls.
- 6:29SPEAKER_00: Read that list again.
- 6:30SPEAKER_00: It describes goals without systems.
- 6:33SPEAKER_00: When execution gets cheap,
- 6:35SPEAKER_00: the scarce skill is designing the loop,
- 6:38SPEAKER_00: what the agent measures,
- 6:39SPEAKER_00: what it can correct on its own,
- 6:41SPEAKER_00: what threshold pulls in a human and what pulls the plug.
- 6:45SPEAKER_00: That's systems level thinking, and it's a different muscle than setting ambitious targets.
- 6:50SPEAKER_00: The goal setters who never built a correction mechanism are about to get exposed
- 6:54SPEAKER_00: at machine speed.
- 6:55SPEAKER_00: The operators who did are about to compound faster than anyone in their market.
- 7:01SPEAKER_00: Hire and promote the loop designers.
- 7:04SPEAKER_00: You find them in the interview.
- 7:05SPEAKER_00: Ask, walk me through a time when a plan you were running turned out to be wrong.
- 7:10SPEAKER_00: Goal-driven candidates describe how hard they pushed to hit the number anyway.
- 7:15SPEAKER_00: Systems thinkers describe what they changed and how fast.
- 7:18SPEAKER_00: You keep them by what you reward.
- 7:20SPEAKER_00: Praise someone for hitting a number while ignoring three warning signs,
- 7:23SPEAKER_00: and your best people learn to bury the signal.
- 7:26SPEAKER_00: Reward the one who flagged the problem early and changed course,
- 7:29SPEAKER_00: even when the quarter came in softer.
- 7:31SPEAKER_00: And you give loop design real weight.
- 7:34SPEAKER_00: Whoever designs correction into your organic workflow should report to whoever owns
- 7:39SPEAKER_00: the outcome, not sit buried in IT.
- 7:43SPEAKER_00: Whether you're building it, running it, or funding it.
- 7:46SPEAKER_00: Building it,
- 7:46SPEAKER_00: if your last three systems reviews ended with,
- 7:49SPEAKER_00: let's keep an eye on it, you have goals with better branding.
- 7:54SPEAKER_00: If you're running it,
- 7:54SPEAKER_00: give the correction mechanism teeth before you hand the workflow to an agent.
- 7:59SPEAKER_00: Automating a rhythm nobody acts on just multiplies the theater.
- 8:03SPEAKER_00: If you're funding it, an operating cadence tells you a founder shows up.
- 8:07SPEAKER_00: Ask what changed the last time the number came in wrong.
- 8:11SPEAKER_00: Call them goals, systems, OKRs, Or TTL.
- 8:16SPEAKER_00: None of it works unless something notices when the number comes in wrong
- 8:19SPEAKER_00: and pushes back, whether that's a person in a QBR or an agent at two in the morning.
- 8:26SPEAKER_00: The goal gives the flywheel direction.
- 8:28SPEAKER_00: The correction gives it speed.
- 8:30SPEAKER_00: Build only one and you don't have a flywheel.
- 8:32SPEAKER_00: You have a story you tell your board about one.
- 8:37SPEAKER_00: Well, that's the episode.
- 8:38SPEAKER_00: If you found this useful, please do one thing.
- 8:40SPEAKER_00: Follow the Uphoff on Media podcast on Apple or Spotify and leave a rating.
- 8:44SPEAKER_00: It's the single best way to help another operator find this one.
- 8:48SPEAKER_00: I'm Tony Uphoff, back at it next week.