Latest / Kvetch & Release / 610 CKTB| The Whiskey War is Past: Canada’s Asymmetric Arctic Nightmare is Now
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: Right now, though another regular run Tuesday, a good peal
- 0:02Speaker 1: of our's former newspaper publisher and broadcaster John Litkey is here.
- 0:06Speaker 1: Good morning John.
- 0:08Speaker 2: Good morning Jeane.
- 0:09Speaker 1: Dude. I have to tell you you hit it out
- 0:12Speaker 1: of the park last Tuesday, tying Donald Trump and his
- 0:16Speaker 1: policies to Hollywood movie scripts and TV shows. I can't
- 0:19Speaker 1: tell you the number of people who came up to
- 0:22Speaker 1: me listen to the show and said, man, this lid
- 0:26Speaker 1: Key guy Like I started thinking about what he was saying,
- 0:30Speaker 1: and people were telling me, what about this policy? Doesn't
- 0:33Speaker 1: it sound like you know this TV show and that Oh,
- 0:36Speaker 1: so you really did it last Tuesday. That was fantastic.
- 0:39Speaker 1: Now you're on this morning and I think you're going
- 0:42Speaker 1: to hit it out of the park again. You have
- 0:44Speaker 1: a whole theory around Greenland, So explain this to me.
- 0:49Speaker 3: Well, there is a really great South Park episode that
- 0:52Speaker 3: I want to start things off with, and it is
- 0:56Speaker 3: the nineteen ninety six the Great Red Wings up against
- 0:59Speaker 3: the Pee Wee hockey team in South Park and it
- 1:04Speaker 3: is just it is brutal. The Red Wings are playing like.
- 1:09Speaker 2: It is the nineteen ninety six.
- 1:10Speaker 3: Stanley Cup Finals and they just tear apart. These kids,
- 1:15Speaker 3: they put them into the boards. There's teeth, butter popping out,
- 1:19Speaker 3: blood everywhere. It is just the stuff of like as
- 1:22Speaker 3: a kid growing up watching TV, that's the cartoon you
- 1:25Speaker 3: want to watch. It was great, And that's kind of
- 1:28Speaker 3: like what's happening right now with the United States and
- 1:31Speaker 3: their conquest for Greenland. Quite frankly, it's this situation where
- 1:37Speaker 3: it's a completely asymmetric power base and it is not
- 1:42Speaker 3: the type of war that we're actually used to when
- 1:45Speaker 3: it comes to Greenland, the Hans Island. It was actually
- 1:49Speaker 3: a disputed territory for many, many years, and what we
- 1:53Speaker 3: had Canada and Denmark were both fighting over it, and
- 1:57Speaker 3: it was called the Whiskey War because it was the
- 1:59Speaker 3: most gentlemanly war that ever occurred. We would show up,
- 2:04Speaker 3: we'd take down their flag. We'd leave them a bottle
- 2:06Speaker 3: of Canadian club. They'd show up, they'd take down our flag,
- 2:09Speaker 3: They'd leave us a bottle of schnapps.
- 2:11Speaker 2: And this went on for.
- 2:13Speaker 3: Decades, decades, and it all actually just was resolved a
- 2:17Speaker 3: couple of years ago in twenty twenty two, where we
- 2:19Speaker 3: just sort of decided, you know what, this is kind
- 2:21Speaker 3: of sailly let's just draw aline right down the middle
- 2:23Speaker 3: of this piece of rock that nobody lives at, and
- 2:26Speaker 3: that can be the end of it. And wouldn't that
- 2:28Speaker 3: be great if that was the situation that we were
- 2:31Speaker 3: dealing with right now When it comes to having a
- 2:33Speaker 3: conversation about, you know, territorial acquisition by the United States. Instead,
- 2:39Speaker 3: it's like we're all living in Donald Trump's nightmarish land
- 2:43Speaker 3: where I don't know. I just I read a Globe
- 2:46Speaker 3: mail story today about how we're actually drafting up plans
- 2:50Speaker 3: for a military invasion of the country by the United States,
- 2:53Speaker 3: and our strategy was, well, we're pretty much going to
- 2:56Speaker 3: be the Taliban because we don't really have an armed
- 2:59Speaker 3: forces that can defend against the US, so we just
- 3:03Speaker 3: envision a bunch of skirmishes by individuals. And it's just like,
- 3:06Speaker 3: what world are we living in right now?
- 3:08Speaker 1: Gene, Yeah, no, kidding. Well, the thing I don't understand, John,
- 3:11Speaker 1: is that there is a military base, a US military
- 3:15Speaker 1: base in Greenland, and the folks in Greenland are saying, well,
- 3:19Speaker 1: you know what, you know, put a million soldiers here, Like,
- 3:21Speaker 1: we don't mind build a couple more bases. We just
- 3:24Speaker 1: don't want to become US citizens. I think that's reasonable.
- 3:28Speaker 2: Well, and this is the thing.
- 3:29Speaker 3: The US agreement with Denmark allows for an unlimited number
- 3:35Speaker 3: of troops to be stationed there, for putting missiles there,
- 3:39Speaker 3: for stationing any military assets. They've got a completely open
- 3:42Speaker 3: door policy. So yeah, I mean, we're just again, I
- 3:48Speaker 3: keep saying this week after week after week, we're heading
- 3:51Speaker 3: towards where might makes right. And that's a very scary
- 3:55Speaker 3: situation to be in because it allows for other players
- 3:59Speaker 3: on the or in stage, you know, China, Russia to
- 4:03Speaker 3: continue their territorial extansionist quests. And if the US can't
- 4:08Speaker 3: be relied upon as being that you know, moral arbiter,
- 4:13Speaker 3: the scales of justice on the global scene. I mean,
- 4:17Speaker 3: I don't want to envision what this world looks like
- 4:19Speaker 3: that we might be moving into because the US has
- 4:22Speaker 3: been that force for democracy, for stability for a very
- 4:25Speaker 3: long time, and I don't want to see a US
- 4:28Speaker 3: that can act like Russia with immunity.
- 4:31Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, here's the domino effect. If the United States
- 4:35Speaker 1: takes Greenland, however they do it, then why can't China
- 4:40Speaker 1: take Taiwan? And I'm sure China would argue, well, if
- 4:44Speaker 1: you do that, you know, for teed we're going to
- 4:46Speaker 1: do this. And you know, for as long as I
- 4:48Speaker 1: can remember, the United States has always said that if
- 4:51Speaker 1: China takes Taiwan, which they claim they own, it could
- 4:56Speaker 1: cause possibly World War three. So I mean, what's the difference.
- 5:02Speaker 3: Well, and this is what's scary.
- 5:03Speaker 2: And we know that the US.
- 5:05Speaker 3: Has built in self defense mechanisms for Taiwan if there
- 5:10Speaker 3: is a Chinese invasion. Primarily all of the chip factories
- 5:13Speaker 3: have already been as I understand it, pretty much outfitted
- 5:17Speaker 3: for demolition upon an invasion because they don't want that
- 5:20Speaker 3: technology to be exported and stolen by the Chinese government.
- 5:26Speaker 3: It's creating a very uneven playing field. Where can I
- 5:30Speaker 3: understand what Trump supposedly wants screenland for right, you don't
- 5:34Speaker 3: want Russia moving in, you don't want China moving in.
- 5:37Speaker 3: It makes more sense for it to remain in the
- 5:39Speaker 3: Western world. But there's ways that we can get to
- 5:42Speaker 3: that without having to have these you know, territorial conquests conversation.
- 5:47Speaker 1: Yeah, but let's listen to what you're dealing with. In
- 5:50Speaker 1: his letter to the Norwegian president over the weekend, complaining
- 5:55Speaker 1: that the Nobel Committee, well, he blamed the government he
- 5:58Speaker 1: doesn't even know how the Nobel Peace Price is handed out.
- 6:01Speaker 1: He blamed Norway for not giving him the Nobel Peace Prize,
- 6:04Speaker 1: and then he went on to say that, you know,
- 6:06Speaker 1: Denmark's only claimed to Greenland as they landed a boat there,
- 6:09Speaker 1: and he actually went on, I mean, just like a
- 6:12Speaker 1: petulant child, Well, we landed boats there too. We got
- 6:15Speaker 1: boats that go there too, claiming that you know, if
- 6:17Speaker 1: you've got a boat that's gone there, the place can
- 6:19Speaker 1: be yours. I mean that the logic and the arguments
- 6:22Speaker 1: behind this whole thing are so absurd. I'm just waiting
- 6:26Speaker 1: to wake up and I'll go, oh, yeah, of course,
- 6:28Speaker 1: it was just a dream.
- 6:31Speaker 3: You know. There was a really good show called The
- 6:34Speaker 3: Circus that was on Showtime I believe, Yes, yes, which
- 6:38Speaker 3: and it showed the Trump administration term one and all
- 6:42Speaker 3: of the inner workings of just how you know, much
- 6:45Speaker 3: of a cluster what it was, quite frankly.
- 6:47Speaker 2: Yeah, And it was a really entertaining show.
- 6:50Speaker 3: And then Biden came in and I stopped watching the
- 6:52Speaker 3: show because I don't need to watch a procedural drama
- 6:55Speaker 3: about a you know, relatively competent administration. That's kind of boring.
- 7:00Speaker 3: For TV quite frankly. So we had those four years
- 7:03Speaker 3: of a little.
- 7:03Speaker 2: Bit of an interlude there was. You know, it wasn't
- 7:06Speaker 2: great four years quite frankly overall. But I didn't sign
- 7:09Speaker 2: up for this new reality. I mean, the era of
- 7:13Speaker 2: polite Arctic diplomacy is dead, and being an ally is now.
- 7:16Speaker 2: It seems conditional, and it seems that if the superpower
- 7:19Speaker 2: wants to get it, they get to have it. And
- 7:22Speaker 2: this friendly game of whiskey Wars is something that just
- 7:25Speaker 2: is going to be relegated to the past.
- 7:26Speaker 1: And yeah, my verse might is that I'm so glad
- 7:29Speaker 1: you brought up that whiskey war thing. I've read about
- 7:32Speaker 1: that years ago. Hey, listen, I'm asking all my guests
- 7:35Speaker 1: all week long this one question I've got about. I've
- 7:37Speaker 1: got about ninety seconds left in your opinion. What is
- 7:43Speaker 1: our prime Minister's new world order? What's the new world Order?
- 7:48Speaker 3: Oh gosh, with this question, Jean, what a ridiculous scandit.
- 7:53Speaker 3: I don't understand this new era of Canadian strategic blunders.
- 7:58Speaker 2: Quite frankly.
- 7:59Speaker 3: Maybe he's just looked things through a banker's lines, But
- 8:01Speaker 3: I don't think we need to be posing up with China.
- 8:03Speaker 3: I don't think we need to be posing up with
- 8:05Speaker 3: powder like what is going on here? Quite frankly, these
- 8:07Speaker 3: are not the good guys on the world stage. And
- 8:10Speaker 3: I get it we've lost our traditional ally the United States.
- 8:12Speaker 3: They're going off on their own wayward way. But I
- 8:15Speaker 3: mean we could cuddle up with, you know, the Europeans
- 8:17Speaker 3: instead of going to dictatorships, quite frankly, And it really
- 8:21Speaker 3: doesn't help when he actually says new World Order? What
- 8:26Speaker 3: the heck like talk about like handing it over to
- 8:28Speaker 3: the opposition?
- 8:29Speaker 1: No kidding, Well, get out the tinfoil hats. I mean,
- 8:33Speaker 1: I'm asking everybody and nobody can. I always say to people,
- 8:36Speaker 1: explain it to me, Like I'm twelve, and this whole
- 8:38Speaker 1: New Order thing. I haven't had one really good answer yet.
- 8:42Speaker 3: Well maybe we'll get it from the government, but I'm
- 8:44Speaker 3: not keeping my.
- 8:45Speaker 1: Fingers scross for all right, great talk into every Tuesday, John,
- 8:48Speaker 1: You always hit it out of the park. But my
- 8:50Speaker 1: friend will do this again next Tuesday.
- 8:52Speaker 2: Looking forward to it.
- 8:53Speaker 1: All right, there he goes John Letke, a former newspaper
- 8:56Speaker 1: publisher and broadcaster. He has the best ideas, we have
- 8:59Speaker 1: the best fellow and guests on this the show, don't
- 9:01Speaker 1: we so much fun