Latest / Pod Save America / "OK, Groomer."
Transcript
- 0:21Speaker 1: Welcome to Pod Save America. I'm Jon Favreau.
- 0:23Speaker 2: I'm Dan Pfeiffer.
- 0:24Speaker 3: On today's show, Democrats navigate immigration, student debt relief, and
- 0:27Speaker 3: gas prices with an eye on the midterms. Wisconsin Democratic
- 0:31Speaker 3: Party Chair Ben Wickler joins to discuss the strategy behind
- 0:34Speaker 3: some of the big wins in his state's local elections
- 0:36Speaker 3: this week. And later, we'll talk about how the MAGA
- 0:39Speaker 3: wing of the Republican Party has taken to calling everyone
- 0:41Speaker 3: who doesn't agree with them a pedophile. But first, more
- 0:46Speaker 3: guest announcements for our upcoming live shows. On May 5th
- 0:49Speaker 3: in Chicago and May 6th in St. Louis, we'll be
- 0:52Speaker 3: joined by Hysteria host Alyssa Mastromonaco.
- 0:55Speaker 1: How great is that?
- 0:56Speaker 2: So good.
- 0:56Speaker 1: So exciting. Tickets are on.
- 0:58Speaker 3: Sale now for these cities and more. Get yours at crooked.com
- 1:02Speaker 3: slash events. Another exciting development. Ira and Louis let me
- 1:08Speaker 3: be a guest host on Keep It this week.
- 1:11Speaker 1: How about that?
- 1:11Speaker 2: How did that happen?
- 1:13Speaker 1: I don't... I think... I think we forced them.
- 1:17Speaker 2: Okay.
- 1:18Speaker 1: No, I got an invitation. So it just happened. And
- 1:21Speaker 1: you know what? It was great. We talked about the Grammys.
- 1:23Speaker 1: We talked about Bruce Willis, Sarah Palin, Elon Musk.
- 1:26Speaker 2: I saw the... show notes on that and did you
- 1:29Speaker 2: i didn't take he was either bruce willis or grammys
- 1:31Speaker 2: expert so i was sort of surprised you got sarah
- 1:33Speaker 2: palin yes i understand why that happened.
- 1:36Speaker 3: Dan i did some prepping i did some prepping for
- 1:38Speaker 3: keep it i went we i watched die hard again
- 1:40Speaker 3: because emily hadn't seen it i watched the grammys on
- 1:44Speaker 3: sunday the entire grammys so yeah i was deep into
- 1:46Speaker 3: it and.
- 1:47Speaker 2: When you got the invitation were you concerned it was
- 1:48Speaker 2: a trap and that's.
- 1:50Speaker 3: What i said to them i replied and thought it
- 1:51Speaker 3: was a track because it came on april fool's day
- 1:54Speaker 3: oh interesting i Which would have been a great prank.
- 1:56Speaker 3: But anyway, I did it.
- 1:57Speaker 1: It was fun.
- 1:58Speaker 3: New episodes of Keep It Drop every Wednesday wherever you
- 2:00Speaker 3: get your podcasts. Shirley Ralph was also on that episode.
- 2:04Speaker 3: Way more important than me. It was a fantastic episode.
- 2:06Speaker 3: Go check it out.
- 2:07Speaker 1: All right. Let's get to the news.
- 2:09Speaker 3: On Tuesday's pod, we talked about the very happy news
- 2:12Speaker 3: that Katonji Brown-Jackson will be the next Supreme Court justice.
- 2:15Speaker 1: I believe the vote was just held today, Thursday. 53-47.
- 2:19Speaker 3: She's heading to the Supreme Court. But today we're going
- 2:23Speaker 3: to talk about three developments in Washington on issues that
- 2:26Speaker 3: will be a bit more challenging for Democrats as we
- 2:28Speaker 3: approach the midterms. Immigration, student debt, and gas prices.
- 2:32Speaker 1: Lucky you, Dan.
- 2:32Speaker 3: You don't get the happy Ketanji Brown-Jackson episode. You get
- 2:36Speaker 3: this pile of shit.
- 2:37Speaker 2: Everyone, I think, has an allotted amount of news luck.
- 2:40Speaker 2: And I think I used my entire balance for 2022
- 2:44Speaker 2: with the Madison Cawthorn orgy party.
- 2:47Speaker 3: Yeah, you know, But this morning we woke up and
- 2:49Speaker 3: there is a great Washington Post interview with Donald Trump
- 2:52Speaker 3: that we will talk about. So that's just that's for us.
- 2:54Speaker 1: Yeah, that's for you. That's for you.
- 2:55Speaker 2: Thank you, Donald Trump. Thank you.
- 2:57Speaker 1: All right.
- 2:58Speaker 3: Let's start with immigration, which is back in the headlines
- 3:00Speaker 3: after the 10 billion dollar bipartisan covid funding deal we
- 3:04Speaker 3: were talking about on Tuesday fell apart the next day
- 3:07Speaker 3: over the Biden administration's decision to end a Trump era
- 3:11Speaker 3: pandemic rule known as Title 42. which has allowed both
- 3:15Speaker 3: administrations to turn away asylum seekers at the border for
- 3:19Speaker 3: public health reasons. Senate Republicans wanted to vote on an
- 3:22Speaker 3: amendment that would reinstate Title 42 as part of the
- 3:25Speaker 3: COVID funding. Chuck Schumer said no, and now the bill
- 3:28Speaker 3: can't pass. Meanwhile, the combination of Title 42 ending and
- 3:33Speaker 3: a spring surge of migrants at the border has drawn
- 3:37Speaker 3: Republicans to Fox News cameras like a Cawthorn to a
- 3:40Speaker 3: Coke orgy.
- 3:43Speaker 4: Texas is providing charter buses to send these illegal immigrants
- 3:49Speaker 4: who have been dropped off by the Biden administration to
- 3:52Speaker 4: Washington DC.
- 3:55Speaker 2: Now the leading paper in Washington has as a slogan,
- 3:57Speaker 2: democracy dies in darkness. Joe and Kamala want darkness on
- 4:01Speaker 2: the disaster that they have created. What we are seeing
- 4:05Speaker 2: is a systematic attempt by the Biden administration to essentially
- 4:09Speaker 2: destroy our southern border and empower the cartels.
- 4:13Speaker 5: This is going to cause massive injury to migrants, cartels empowered,
- 4:17Speaker 5: Americans endangered, fentanyl pouring across our border, all because the
- 4:21Speaker 5: Secretary refuses to do his job. This is an unexcusable
- 4:26Speaker 5: dereliction of duty by the Secretary of Homeland Security. It
- 4:29Speaker 5: is an impeachable act.
- 4:31Speaker 3: I have to say that I think Ted Cruz really
- 4:34Speaker 3: swerved out of his lane to try to hit the
- 4:36Speaker 3: Washington Post in that.
- 4:39Speaker 2: Darkness.
- 4:39Speaker 1: What was he doing there?
- 4:41Speaker 3: What do you think about Biden's decision to end Title 42?
- 4:44Speaker 2: He should have done it a long time ago. Any
- 4:47Speaker 2: policy that was authored and pushed by Stephen Miller is
- 4:50Speaker 2: a policy that a Democratic president should not have. I
- 4:53Speaker 2: think it was about a year ago. We had Dara
- 4:55Speaker 2: Lind of ProPublica, the immigration reporter on. I interviewed her
- 4:58Speaker 2: and she talked about the fact that a year ago,
- 5:02Speaker 2: that policy, a lot of people thought that policy should
- 5:04Speaker 2: go away because it was it did make a lot
- 5:06Speaker 2: of sense. There were obviously very serious moral questions about it,
- 5:08Speaker 2: substantive questions, legal questions. And so getting rid of it
- 5:11Speaker 2: was the right substantive decision without a question. But it
- 5:15Speaker 2: comes with some real political risk, as we're about to
- 5:17Speaker 2: talk about.
- 5:18Speaker 3: I think for all the reasons you just cited, that's correct.
- 5:22Speaker 3: I would also add just for public health reasons, right?
- 5:24Speaker 3: There's absolutely at this point, no public health rationale for
- 5:28Speaker 3: expelling asylum seekers, as every country in the world has
- 5:32Speaker 3: now demonstrated. Even the most restrictive masked places like South Korea,
- 5:37Speaker 3: a lot of those East Asian countries, like the most
- 5:40Speaker 3: effective way to handle Omicron right now is with vaccines, boosters,
- 5:43Speaker 3: and treatments. And that will significantly reduce the severity of
- 5:48Speaker 3: your inevitable exposure to Omicron. And the idea that with
- 5:53Speaker 3: all of the transmission that's happening, not just in the
- 5:55Speaker 3: United States, but all over the world, some rule about
- 5:59Speaker 3: expelling asylum seekers at the border is going to somehow
- 6:02Speaker 3: curb transmission is preposterous at this point.
- 6:05Speaker 2: I mean, we should just note at the absolute rank
- 6:10Speaker 2: hypocrisy of the Republicans who have downplayed the pandemic from
- 6:15Speaker 2: the beginning. They have said that accused Democrats of overhyping it,
- 6:20Speaker 2: using it as a way to control people, and then
- 6:21Speaker 2: turning around and using the pandemic as a way to
- 6:25Speaker 2: treat migrants terribly is a bunch of hypocritical bullshit.
- 6:29Speaker 3: So the politics here, as you mentioned, are complicated by
- 6:32Speaker 3: the fact that nearly every Senate Democrat who's up for
- 6:34Speaker 3: reelection in 2022 has criticized Biden's decision to end Title 42.
- 6:39Speaker 3: Mark Kelly, Maggie Hassan in New Hampshire, Raphael Warnock in Georgia.
- 6:45Speaker 3: The first two, Kelly and Hassan, just introduced a bill
- 6:48Speaker 3: today with three other Democrats and six Republicans that would
- 6:51Speaker 3: prevent the Biden administration from ending Title 42. Why do
- 6:56Speaker 3: you think they're against it?
- 6:58Speaker 2: The fact that they are against it says something very
- 7:00Speaker 2: alarming about what they're seeing in their polling. And it
- 7:05Speaker 2: is the thing that really scares the shit out of
- 7:07Speaker 2: me about not necessarily the issue of title 42, but
- 7:10Speaker 2: just how scared Democrats are and what people's internal polls
- 7:14Speaker 2: are telling them is that Mark Kelly is a moderate.
- 7:17Speaker 2: He is from a very immigration sensitive state. I don't
- 7:20Speaker 2: agree with what he's doing there, but I like him
- 7:24Speaker 2: being upset about this makes some measure of political sense.
- 7:27Speaker 2: I don't agree with it, but I can see you
- 7:28Speaker 2: get there. Raphael Warnock is not a moderate. He is
- 7:31Speaker 2: not someone who naturally just like their first instinct of
- 7:35Speaker 2: political trouble is to side with Republicans or criticize the president.
- 7:39Speaker 2: He's not from a border state unless he's concerned about
- 7:42Speaker 2: people from Florida, which is, I think, a very legitimate
- 7:44Speaker 2: concern in a lot of ways. And so it tells
- 7:48Speaker 2: me that people are in sort of a near state
- 7:52Speaker 2: of panic about and looking for ways to diss themselves
- 7:56Speaker 2: from the president on an issue that Republicans believe is
- 7:59Speaker 2: very powerful for them. And I think the approach they're
- 8:01Speaker 2: taking is very problematic in a lot of ways, but
- 8:04Speaker 2: it says that people are very, very concerned and they're
- 8:08Speaker 2: starting to like lash out in ways that are going
- 8:10Speaker 2: to be unlikely to be constructive, I think.
- 8:13Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean, we don't know what their private polling
- 8:15Speaker 3: is saying, but we do know what the public polls
- 8:17Speaker 3: are saying. Morning Consult polled this this week. 56% of
- 8:22Speaker 3: all Americans oppose Biden's decision. And that is the largest
- 8:26Speaker 3: backlash against any Biden policy that Morning Consult has tested
- 8:30Speaker 3: in the last two years. This is the most unpopular
- 8:32Speaker 3: thing that he's done. I do think, you know, whether
- 8:36Speaker 3: you're Mark Kelly or really whether you're any senator, and
- 8:39Speaker 3: of course, Kyrsten Sinema is also on this on this bill,
- 8:42Speaker 3: along with Mark Kelly and the other vulnerable Democrats. I
- 8:46Speaker 3: think people I think they are concerned about a very
- 8:48Speaker 3: real challenge, which is a surge of migrants and asylum
- 8:52Speaker 3: seekers at our southern border that has in the past
- 8:57Speaker 3: and in May again this spring overwhelmed our already overstretched
- 9:01Speaker 3: immigration and asylum system. So you have thousands of people
- 9:04Speaker 3: in these border communities who can't get their asylum applications
- 9:07Speaker 3: processed in time, who can't get the help that they
- 9:09Speaker 3: need if they've just been fleeing from other country because
- 9:11Speaker 3: we just don't have the resources to handle that many
- 9:15Speaker 3: asylum seekers. And the number is, of course, has been
- 9:18Speaker 3: growing every single year. So that is a real challenge.
- 9:23Speaker 3: But Title 42 is not the way to deal with
- 9:26Speaker 3: that challenge because Title 42 is about a public health.
- 9:30Speaker 3: It's using a public health reason. to turn away asylum
- 9:36Speaker 3: seekers because our immigration system can't process them fast enough,
- 9:39Speaker 3: which is just a mess. That's a policy mess right there.
- 9:41Speaker 3: And what really needs to happen is to fix our
- 9:44Speaker 3: immigration system so that it is orderly, so that people
- 9:48Speaker 3: who are fleeing violence in war-torn countries can apply for
- 9:53Speaker 3: asylum and get asylum here and not have to wait
- 9:57Speaker 3: around for a year because there's not enough asylum judge
- 10:00Speaker 3: or courts and then everyone's hanging out in border communities.
- 10:03Speaker 3: There is a problem at the heart of this. It's
- 10:05Speaker 3: just not what Republicans demagogue or what Title 42 is for,
- 10:10Speaker 3: which is all about public health. So it's almost like
- 10:12Speaker 3: this whole Title 42 thing is like a stand-in for
- 10:15Speaker 3: an immigration system that has been broken for far too long.
- 10:17Speaker 3: in which Republicans will not help Democrats fix. Because there
- 10:21Speaker 3: is a plan to fix immigration that Joe Biden has,
- 10:24Speaker 3: that Barack Obama had too, that would give a pathway
- 10:26Speaker 3: to citizenship for undocumented immigrants and make sure that the
- 10:29Speaker 3: border is secure and orderly as well. Republicans don't want
- 10:31Speaker 3: to have any part of this because they want to
- 10:33Speaker 3: demagogue the issue. How does COVID funding get done now?
- 10:36Speaker 2: Great question, John. It seems like a real paradox because
- 10:43Speaker 2: Republicans won't support it without Title 42. And Democrats may
- 10:48Speaker 2: not support it with Title 42. So what I think
- 10:50Speaker 2: will probably happen here is, and it sort of depends
- 10:54Speaker 2: on what Republicans demand, are they demanding inclusion of the
- 10:58Speaker 2: Title 42 provision, or are they demanding a vote.
- 11:01Speaker 1: On the Title 42 provision?
- 11:03Speaker 2: Because this could go two ways, right? There could be
- 11:05Speaker 2: a situation where they're going to have a vote. It's
- 11:07Speaker 2: very clear that if there is a vote, that enough
- 11:10Speaker 2: Democrats would join with Republicans to add that to the bill.
- 11:13Speaker 2: That seems like that is definitely going to happen. It
- 11:15Speaker 2: is possible. What I think one way out here that
- 11:18Speaker 2: Schumer may be working on is looking for a Democratic
- 11:21Speaker 2: alternative to the Republican policy. So there will be a
- 11:24Speaker 2: re-institute Title 42 amendment from one of the horrendous people
- 11:29Speaker 2: whose voices we just listened to. And then there's a
- 11:32Speaker 2: Democratic alternative that maybe puts in place, maybe delays the decision,
- 11:36Speaker 2: puts in place some steps that have to go in
- 11:39Speaker 2: effect before that can happen. Republicans vote for theirs, Democrats
- 11:42Speaker 2: vote for theirs. Maybe we Neither of them pass, and
- 11:45Speaker 2: then we get the bill. But it has to get done,
- 11:47Speaker 2: and there's bipartisan support to get it done, so they're
- 11:48Speaker 2: going to have to figure something else out here.
- 11:51Speaker 3: Yeah, one hint may be in the bill that they
- 11:54Speaker 3: introduced today, that bipartisan group of senators, because I guess
- 11:57Speaker 3: that bill says it will prevent Biden from lifting Title 42, quote,
- 12:02Speaker 3: without a detailed plan to stop an expected surge of
- 12:06Speaker 3: migrants at the border. So perhaps there's some kind of
- 12:09Speaker 3: plan that they can all work out. that shows that
- 12:12Speaker 3: we're ready to deal with the spring surge of migrants
- 12:15Speaker 3: at the border that will placate enough Republicans and Democrats.
- 12:20Speaker 3: And I also think that could be the answer because
- 12:22Speaker 3: when you look at the Republicans who are on this
- 12:24Speaker 3: bill with the Democrats, they are not the most extreme
- 12:26Speaker 3: Republicans in the caucus who probably want this issue to
- 12:30Speaker 3: demagogue Democrats with. I'm sure all Republicans want this issue
- 12:33Speaker 3: to Democrat, but at least the Republicans that are on
- 12:36Speaker 3: this bill seem like they could be open to working
- 12:39Speaker 3: out a solution where, Department of Homeland Security just says,
- 12:42Speaker 3: here's our plan.
- 12:43Speaker 1: Here's our resources. Here's what we're going to do.
- 12:44Speaker 2: That is a classic. It's a classic thread the needle
- 12:47Speaker 2: legislative move. We're going to say that we oppose this thing,
- 12:51Speaker 2: but we'll let it go if you send us a plan.
- 12:53Speaker 2: There are people in the government whose whole job is
- 12:55Speaker 2: to write these plans and send them to the Senate.
- 12:58Speaker 1: Fun.
- 12:59Speaker 3: Sounds like a good time. Republicans are overjoyed, of course,
- 13:01Speaker 3: that immigration is back in the headlines. How should Democrats respond?
- 13:05Speaker 2: Not like this, John. I think the problem with... I
- 13:10Speaker 2: want to stipulate, as you pointed out, that there are
- 13:13Speaker 2: substantive concerns here. And I think that those are sincere.
- 13:16Speaker 2: So I'm not suggesting that this is all panic. But
- 13:20Speaker 2: in some of the messaging on this, thus far from
- 13:23Speaker 2: this group of senators and other moderates out there, is
- 13:27Speaker 2: what we are doing is accepting the premise of the
- 13:30Speaker 2: Republican argument. Like we are immediately accepting things are terrible
- 13:34Speaker 2: and this is going to make it worse and you
- 13:36Speaker 2: should be scared. And once you accept the premise of
- 13:38Speaker 2: the argument, you've already lost. So I think the way
- 13:41Speaker 2: to approach this is– and you can have a position
- 13:43Speaker 2: and I think this alternative bill is a good way
- 13:47Speaker 2: to get there– is to go on offense and also
- 13:50Speaker 2: talk about the things that you were doing and Republicans
- 13:52Speaker 2: are stopping you from doing to fix this problem. And
- 13:55Speaker 2: that Republicans want to use the issue to divide Americans
- 13:59Speaker 2: to be able to put in place this agenda that's X, Y,
- 14:02Speaker 2: and Z that keep tax cuts for the wealthy– cut Medicare,
- 14:06Speaker 2: all of those things. So you have to reframe the
- 14:09Speaker 2: issue on gun offense as opposed to restating the premise
- 14:11Speaker 2: articulated by your opponents.
- 14:14Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean, and also Republicans are the ones with
- 14:18Speaker 3: extreme positions on immigration. Make them own those positions. You know,
- 14:22Speaker 3: like I would say that Republicans are demagoguing this issue
- 14:25Speaker 3: to win an election. And if they take power, they've
- 14:27Speaker 3: told us what they're going to do. They're going to
- 14:28Speaker 3: deport dreamers. They're going to deport children who lived in
- 14:30Speaker 3: this country their entire lives. And they are going to
- 14:33Speaker 3: cut back on legal immigrations. Remember that during the Trump years,
- 14:37Speaker 3: it went from Republicans wanting to stop undocumented immigrants from
- 14:41Speaker 3: coming to this country to actually cutting legal immigration. People
- 14:45Speaker 3: who are doing everything right, who are going through the process,
- 14:48Speaker 3: they wanted to end that as well. Tag them with
- 14:50Speaker 3: that position because it's not a popular position. Deporting dreamers
- 14:53Speaker 3: is not a popular position. And then, you know, Cecilia Munoz,
- 14:56Speaker 3: who worked on immigration in the White House with us,
- 14:58Speaker 3: as she always says, Democrats should be the party of
- 15:02Speaker 3: fixing the problem. There is a broken immigration system. We
- 15:05Speaker 3: want to fix it. We want to make sure that
- 15:06Speaker 3: people who come to this country have a path. People
- 15:09Speaker 3: who are in this country have a pathway to citizenship
- 15:11Speaker 3: that we legalize dreamers and that, you know, we have
- 15:14Speaker 3: an orderly immigration system. That's that's the most popular position.
- 15:18Speaker 3: And that's where the position that a lot of Democrats hold.
- 15:20Speaker 3: They should be proud of it and they should talk
- 15:21Speaker 3: about it. President Biden took another big action this week
- 15:24Speaker 3: when he extended the moratorium on federal student debt payments
- 15:27Speaker 3: through August 31st. The administration also announced that whenever payments resume,
- 15:32Speaker 3: borrowers would be given a fresh start that will automatically
- 15:36Speaker 3: eliminate delinquency and default. So when I asked Ron Klain
- 15:40Speaker 3: about Biden canceling student debt during our interview last month,
- 15:43Speaker 3: he said that they'd make a final decision before the
- 15:45Speaker 3: moratorium ended on May 1st or before whatever date the
- 15:50Speaker 3: moratorium is extended to, which is now August 31st. Why
- 15:53Speaker 3: do you think they decided to extend the moratorium instead
- 15:57Speaker 3: of just canceling debt? And why do you think they
- 16:00Speaker 3: picked August 31st?
- 16:02Speaker 2: I think it is pretty clear based on reporting we've read,
- 16:05Speaker 2: sort of reading between the lines in that conversation with
- 16:07Speaker 2: Ron from a few weeks ago, that there is real
- 16:10Speaker 2: division in the White House about the substantive, political, and
- 16:16Speaker 2: I think also legal arguments around canceling student debt. And
- 16:22Speaker 2: I think they should cancel it. I think that is
- 16:24Speaker 2: the right thing to do. That is clear that there
- 16:25Speaker 2: is not unanimity in the White House. The president has
- 16:28Speaker 2: always been more conservative on this than a lot of
- 16:30Speaker 2: people he ran against. I think even for people who
- 16:32Speaker 2: are for it, and I think a lot of really
- 16:35Speaker 2: smart legal people have made a lot of really smart,
- 16:38Speaker 2: solid arguments about why he has the authority to do it.
- 16:42Speaker 2: But in the end of the day, a rigged Republican
- 16:44Speaker 2: Supreme Court is the arbiter of whether he has that power.
- 16:50Speaker 2: I can see a situation where in the White House,
- 16:51Speaker 2: you're trying to make a decision about whether you do this,
- 16:53Speaker 2: and you do it, and people are excited about it.
- 16:56Speaker 2: Maybe they make some financial decisions based on it. And
- 16:58Speaker 2: then six months later, Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh, et al.,
- 17:05Speaker 2: nix it. And so what I think is August 31st
- 17:08Speaker 2: makes no political sense, because why would you kick a
- 17:12Speaker 2: very important, tough decision to right before the midterms? The
- 17:15Speaker 2: only reason I think, I guess the substantive reason would
- 17:18Speaker 2: be this is a conditions-based policy. Theoretically, it's because of
- 17:22Speaker 2: the pandemic. And in a conditions-based policy, you should check
- 17:25Speaker 2: in every few months to see if the conditions that
- 17:28Speaker 2: you use to put in place the policy still exist.
- 17:31Speaker 2: It's hard to square– like the Title 42 thing, this
- 17:35Speaker 2: is not really about the pandemic because you can't argue
- 17:39Speaker 2: that we've completely recovered from the pandemic, but also we
- 17:41Speaker 2: have to keep this policy in place. The reason we
- 17:42Speaker 2: have to keep the policy in place is because the
- 17:44Speaker 2: cost of college and student debt is a gigantic disaster
- 17:47Speaker 2: for this country and for so many people. I assume
- 17:50Speaker 2: the delay here is because of this division in the
- 17:54Speaker 2: White House. There is this ongoing– policy debate. And this
- 17:59Speaker 2: is how policy gets made in the White House. And
- 18:00Speaker 2: sometimes it's very messy is this is sort of the
- 18:03Speaker 2: deal they came up with. So, you know, some people
- 18:04Speaker 2: who think it's a bad idea, people think it's a
- 18:06Speaker 2: good idea and you kind of just split the difference
- 18:09Speaker 2: and it's August 31st and now they're just going to
- 18:11Speaker 2: have to deal with this all over again in two months.
- 18:14Speaker 2: But maybe it's hoping some people buy time in the
- 18:17Speaker 2: process to get to cancellation before the election.
- 18:21Speaker 1: Yeah.
- 18:21Speaker 3: I mean, so here's the deal with the moratorium. So,
- 18:24Speaker 3: you know, Biden's the first president where no one has
- 18:27Speaker 3: no one who has a federal student loan has paid
- 18:30Speaker 3: anything during the whole course of his presidency. So this
- 18:33Speaker 3: what is now that moratorium is not completely free. And also,
- 18:38Speaker 3: you know, I think some people think that the student
- 18:41Speaker 3: debt relief is about like sticking it to the banks
- 18:43Speaker 3: or the colleges. But in this case, that's not true
- 18:46Speaker 3: at all, because this is only about federal student loan debt.
- 18:49Speaker 3: So the person that we're the entity that we're sticking
- 18:53Speaker 3: it to is the federal government. Which is fine, but
- 18:56Speaker 3: it's about $ 4 billion a month to have a blanket
- 18:59Speaker 3: moratorium like they're doing. Biden, when he was running, promised
- 19:03Speaker 3: something a little more specific, which is canceling up to $ 10, 000. Now,
- 19:08Speaker 3: Democrats like Elizabeth Warren, a lot of other Democrats want $ 50, 000.
- 19:10Speaker 3: I'd love $ 50, 000 to cancel $ 50, 000 in debt. I think
- 19:14Speaker 3: that's a good idea, but Biden's promise during the campaign
- 19:17Speaker 3: was never about $ 50, 000.
- 19:18Speaker 1: In fact, he rejected it. It was about $ 10, 000. Fine.
- 19:20Speaker 3: So why don't we get $ 10, 000 debt cancellation? Honestly, If
- 19:24Speaker 3: you want to be targeted and help the people who
- 19:25Speaker 3: need it most, canceling up to $ 10, 000 in debt is
- 19:29Speaker 3: probably better than a moratorium, which like 73% of all
- 19:33Speaker 3: student debt payments come from the top two income quintiles
- 19:37Speaker 3: right now. So if you're just doing a moratorium, the
- 19:39Speaker 3: benefit actually accrues to the wealthiest borrowers and not to
- 19:44Speaker 3: some of the people who probably need the help the most.
- 19:46Speaker 3: If you cancel up to $ 10, 000 in student debt just permanently,
- 19:50Speaker 3: and don't keep extending the moratorium, you're going to help
- 19:52Speaker 3: more people who actually need the help. So I don't understand.
- 19:58Speaker 3: And on the Supreme Court thing, I'm like, try it.
- 20:00Speaker 1: Just try it. If they knock it down, they knock
- 20:02Speaker 1: it down.
- 20:03Speaker 2: I mean, that's like if we were sitting in the
- 20:04Speaker 2: White House, that's the argument I would make in there.
- 20:07Speaker 2: I do understand why people... And we dealt with this
- 20:10Speaker 2: with a lot of executive actions that Obama took, right?
- 20:15Speaker 2: That there was this risk. And is that a huge–
- 20:18Speaker 2: because ultimately, if you do it and it gets struck down,
- 20:22Speaker 2: you haven't helped a single person. And you're taking this
- 20:26Speaker 2: theoretical political blow. And it's like there is– I think
- 20:28Speaker 2: that is a reasonable debate about which is better. I
- 20:31Speaker 2: think it is worth noting also that Biden in the campaign,
- 20:34Speaker 2: his strong preference articulated over and over again was to
- 20:37Speaker 2: do it legislatively.
- 20:39Speaker 4: Right.
- 20:40Speaker 2: And that's why I get a little annoyed when all
- 20:43Speaker 2: the legislators just tweet out the hashtag at Joe Biden,
- 20:47Speaker 2: cancel student debt. I recognize Joe Manchin is not for this,
- 20:51Speaker 2: so that is a problem, but they haven't really tried either.
- 20:55Speaker 2: They act as if they have no ability, particularly the
- 20:58Speaker 2: leadership of the Senate. Chuck Schumer loves to tweet, cancel
- 21:01Speaker 2: student debt at Joe Biden. Even on the day Joe
- 21:04Speaker 2: Biden announced the moratorium, he tweeted that at him. And
- 21:07Speaker 2: it's like, Do you have a bill? Have you tried
- 21:09Speaker 2: to pass that bill? Are you arguing for it in there?
- 21:11Speaker 2: Are you working Joe Manchin to try to see if
- 21:12Speaker 2: you can get something done? Like you have, you have
- 21:14Speaker 2: agency here too. And so activists, others tweeting at Joe Biden,
- 21:19Speaker 2: I'm for that. If you're the Senate leader, like at
- 21:22Speaker 2: least acknowledge that you have tried and failed or try
- 21:24Speaker 2: and fail publicly and show that.
- 21:27Speaker 3: I still think on the legal front, just from a
- 21:29Speaker 3: purely political standpoint, like Would Joe Biden rather people say, hey,
- 21:36Speaker 3: why didn't you ever try to cancel our debt? Or
- 21:38Speaker 3: would he rather people say, Joe Biden tried to cancel
- 21:40Speaker 3: our debt, and then this right-wing court decided to strike
- 21:42Speaker 3: it down.
- 21:43Speaker 1: Fuck those people. Wouldn't you want that?
- 21:44Speaker 2: Yeah, I think that is the better argument. I just
- 21:47Speaker 2: have heard many people make the opposite argument in those meetings.
- 21:52Speaker 2: And I'm sure that someone is making those arguments in
- 21:53Speaker 2: those meetings.
- 21:54Speaker 3: Yeah. So Democrats in Congress also grilled a bunch of
- 21:57Speaker 3: oil company executives this week over high gas prices. Their
- 22:00Speaker 3: argument was that oil company profits are soaring because of
- 22:03Speaker 3: the war in Ukraine, but oil company executives are using
- 22:05Speaker 3: those extra profits to enrich themselves and their shareholders instead
- 22:09Speaker 3: of helping people who can't afford higher gas prices. What'd
- 22:12Speaker 3: you think of that hearing? And is this something that
- 22:14Speaker 3: could move the needle for Democrats?
- 22:16Speaker 2: I mean, what congressional hearing does not move the needle, John? Look,
- 22:21Speaker 2: I think it's great they had the hearing. It's the
- 22:23Speaker 2: right thing to do. From a substantive perspective, it's the
- 22:26Speaker 2: right thing to do. From a political perspective, there was
- 22:28Speaker 2: this very famous hearing in the 80s, I think, where
- 22:32Speaker 2: they brought all the heads of the tobacco companies before
- 22:35Speaker 2: the committee. Our old friend Phil Shalero helped organize that
- 22:38Speaker 2: for Congressman Waxman. Everyone's been trying to recapture that magic
- 22:42Speaker 2: in hearings for the last 30 years or whatever. Obviously,
- 22:46Speaker 2: most people won't see the hearing. Most people won't read
- 22:48Speaker 2: about the hearing. But it is a data point in
- 22:52Speaker 2: trying to make the argument that one of the reasons
- 22:56Speaker 2: for high gas prices is corporate greed. And so I
- 23:00Speaker 2: think it's great they did it. And I think what
- 23:02Speaker 2: the next step is to communicate to people, excerpts from
- 23:05Speaker 2: that hearing, moments from that hearing, to help buttress that argument.
- 23:09Speaker 2: Because I think that is our, more so than Putin's
- 23:11Speaker 2: price hike, I think corporate greed is our best argument
- 23:16Speaker 2: for the midterms on gas prices.
- 23:19Speaker 3: Happens to also be true, whatever Larry Summers might say. Again,
- 23:24Speaker 3: The argument here is not like, oh, the oil companies
- 23:27Speaker 3: are the reason that gas prices are high.
- 23:29Speaker 1: We realize it's a commodity. We realize there's a world
- 23:31Speaker 1: market here, all that bullshit.
- 23:33Speaker 3: Their profits are at record highs right now. And what
- 23:37Speaker 3: they're doing is just buying back stock and just like
- 23:40Speaker 3: reaping the rewards themselves. And at a time where prices
- 23:43Speaker 3: are high and people are having a hard time filling
- 23:45Speaker 3: up their tank, then yeah, whether it's a windfall profits
- 23:48Speaker 3: tax or whether it's at least at the very least,
- 23:52Speaker 3: taking away the taxpayer subsidies we give to oil and
- 23:55Speaker 3: gas companies right now. At least do that at a
- 23:58Speaker 3: time where they are making record profits when gas prices
- 24:01Speaker 3: are this high. Take away their subsidies, maybe use the
- 24:04Speaker 3: subsidies to give Americans a rebate check for gas.
- 24:06Speaker 1: I don't know. Do you fucking pass some legislation?
- 24:10Speaker 2: I mean, I think it'd be great if the House
- 24:12Speaker 2: passed something that obviously the Senate is not going to
- 24:14Speaker 2: pass that and Republicans would filibuster whatever, but it would
- 24:17Speaker 2: be good. It'd be a good vote to have.
- 24:20Speaker 5: Yeah.
- 24:20Speaker 3: I wonder if you could get Joe Manchin in the
- 24:22Speaker 3: reconciliation bill, if you could get him on board with,
- 24:24Speaker 3: you won't get him on board for a windfall profits
- 24:26Speaker 3: tax for oil companies and fossil fuel industries, but I
- 24:28Speaker 3: wonder if you could get him on board for getting
- 24:30Speaker 3: rid of the subsidies.
- 24:31Speaker 1: You might be able to.
- 24:32Speaker 2: I don't know. I'm sure he has an articulated position
- 24:35Speaker 2: on this because.
- 24:36Speaker 1: It's- Yeah. That if you asked him about it would change.
- 24:39Speaker 2: It's a class.
- 24:40Speaker 6: Yes.
- 24:41Speaker 2: It just depends on what moody is when he bumps
- 24:43Speaker 2: into Manu Raju in the breakfast line.
- 24:45Speaker 7: Yeah.
- 24:47Speaker 3: So Democrats clearly want midterm voters to know that they're
- 24:49Speaker 3: doing everything humanly possible to bring down costs. Here's a
- 24:52Speaker 3: new ad from the House Majority PAC that was released
- 24:54Speaker 3: this week.
- 24:55Speaker 7: Two years ago, we were in crisis. Democrats rescued the economy.
- 25:00Speaker 7: The biggest single year gain on record. 7.9 million new jobs.
- 25:05Speaker 7: A record drop in unemployment. Now Democrats are working to
- 25:08Speaker 7: lower costs, tackling gas prices by releasing a million barrels
- 25:12Speaker 7: of oil per day from our reserves. And they just
- 25:14Speaker 7: passed a $ 35 a month cap on insulin. Democrats are
- 25:18Speaker 7: getting things done to create jobs and lower costs. House
- 25:22Speaker 7: Majority PACs responsible for the content of this ad.
- 25:25Speaker 3: Democrats deliver! What do you think of that ad? And
- 25:30Speaker 3: what else do you think Democrats should do to go
- 25:32Speaker 3: on offense against the Republicans?
- 25:33Speaker 2: I mean, it was missing the hashtag Democrats deliver. So
- 25:36Speaker 2: huge oversight on that part.
- 25:37Speaker 1: No, I think it's a good ad. That was the spirit.
- 25:41Speaker 2: I think it's a good ad in the sense that
- 25:45Speaker 2: when Democrats do things, they have to pay to tell
- 25:49Speaker 2: people they did those things. Otherwise, they're not going to know.
- 25:52Speaker 2: None of the voters that we need to reach because
- 25:54Speaker 2: they are less engaged with politics than the already decided voters,
- 25:59Speaker 2: many of the listeners of this podcast, have no idea
- 26:01Speaker 2: these things happen. They're not going to watch the newscasts
- 26:03Speaker 2: that are going to cover them. The newscasts aren't really
- 26:06Speaker 2: going to cover them that much anyway, so you've got
- 26:07Speaker 2: to pay to tell them. So I think that is
- 26:09Speaker 2: the exact right thing to do. Like, this isn't your
- 26:11Speaker 2: closing argument ad in any way, shape, or form. It is,
- 26:17Speaker 2: you know, you often start in a, you have to
- 26:20Speaker 2: think of ad campaigns as a long process to tell
- 26:23Speaker 2: a larger story. And you often start with what you
- 26:25Speaker 2: did in your positives to build credibility with voters to
- 26:30Speaker 2: then make the case against the other side and to
- 26:32Speaker 2: inoculate yourself. So I think this is a good ad.
- 26:34Speaker 2: You can tell because Allie Lapp, who's the founder of
- 26:36Speaker 2: the House Majority PAC, tweeted it out that this is
- 26:40Speaker 2: the House Majority PAC telling Democrats who they have limits
- 26:44Speaker 2: in how they can communicate with them because they're a
- 26:46Speaker 2: super PAC. Talk like this, right? It's not just for voters.
- 26:49Speaker 2: It's for the members of that caucus to say, talk
- 26:52Speaker 2: like this. Talk about costs. Talk about the things you did.
- 26:54Speaker 2: If you talk about the things you did, these are
- 26:56Speaker 2: the things we would highlight. So I think in that sense,
- 27:00Speaker 2: it's a good message and worth doing, and I'm glad
- 27:02Speaker 2: they're doing it.
- 27:04Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean, for a million reasons that we've talked
- 27:06Speaker 3: about before, economic messages tend to not break through the
- 27:12Speaker 3: clutter these days. Culture war issues, Donald Trump issues, legal issues, COVID, everything.
- 27:18Speaker 3: Economic issues, people struggling with costs and what Democrats are
- 27:21Speaker 3: going to do about it. It's a tough one to
- 27:23Speaker 3: break through these days. And so I think you need
- 27:25Speaker 3: ads like that just to, you just need to do
- 27:27Speaker 3: that over and over again. And I do think like
- 27:31Speaker 3: the one, I don't, I mean, they couldn't have included
- 27:33Speaker 3: everything in this ad, but the other way that Democrats
- 27:36Speaker 3: really need to go on offense is I'd like to
- 27:37Speaker 3: see some ads where it's not just like, here's what
- 27:39Speaker 3: Democrats are doing. Democrats have delivered and here's what we're
- 27:42Speaker 3: doing to bring down costs.
- 27:43Speaker 1: It's, oh yeah.
- 27:44Speaker 3: And by the way, if Republicans take over Congress, they
- 27:47Speaker 3: said that what they want to do is raise taxes
- 27:49Speaker 3: on a hundred million people and take away your health insurance.
- 27:53Speaker 3: Seems like it's an important thing to mention. And the
- 27:56Speaker 3: reason they're doing this is because they want to have
- 27:59Speaker 3: that money so that the rich and powerful and the
- 28:02Speaker 3: oil companies and the 1% can keep their tax breaks
- 28:05Speaker 3: that they got from Donald Trump.
- 28:07Speaker 7: Yeah.
- 28:08Speaker 3: And the way that they're going to deal with the
- 28:11Speaker 3: government's finances is let the rich people keep their Trump
- 28:14Speaker 3: tax breaks, let the oil companies keep their tax breaks,
- 28:18Speaker 3: but raise taxes on $ 100 million Americans and take away
- 28:21Speaker 3: their health insurance.
- 28:22Speaker 1: That's the choice in the election.
- 28:24Speaker 2: And I have no doubt that that is sitting on
- 28:27Speaker 2: a hard drive at the House majority pack right now.
- 28:30Speaker 2: But you have to establish some credibility as a messenger
- 28:34Speaker 2: that you have in order to say that they have
- 28:36Speaker 2: opposed all these things. I understand the imperative to say
- 28:39Speaker 2: that you delivered on these things first.
- 28:41Speaker 1: Yeah.
- 28:42Speaker 3: The other midterm challenge Republicans have to contend with is
- 28:45Speaker 3: Donald Trump. We say this almost every week now, but
- 28:47Speaker 3: that's only because Donald Trump is physically incapable of shutting
- 28:50Speaker 3: the fuck up. Every time he opens his mouth, says
- 28:53Speaker 3: crazy shit. Case in point, the interview he did with
- 28:56Speaker 3: the Washington Post's Josh Dossey this week from Mar-a-Lago. Here
- 29:00Speaker 3: are some highlights. This is the highlight of the piece.
- 29:03Speaker 3: On the January 6th insurrection, quote, Trump said he deserved
- 29:06Speaker 3: more credit for drawing such a large crowd to the
- 29:08Speaker 3: Ellipse and that he pressed to march on the Capitol
- 29:11Speaker 3: with his supporters, but was stopped by his security detail. Quote,
- 29:16Speaker 3: Secret Service said I couldn't go. I would have gone
- 29:19Speaker 3: there in a minute. The crowd was far bigger than
- 29:21Speaker 3: I ever thought. But you see very few pictures. The
- 29:24Speaker 3: fake news doesn't want to show pictures. But this was
- 29:26Speaker 3: a tremendous crowd. So Trump's only regrets are that he
- 29:30Speaker 3: didn't get to storm the Capitol and didn't get enough
- 29:33Speaker 3: credit for bringing together all those insurrectionists. That's his big
- 29:38Speaker 3: regret from January 6th. Do you think that's the best
- 29:41Speaker 3: thing to say when you're being investigated for your role
- 29:44Speaker 3: in inciting a violent insurrection against your own government?
- 29:47Speaker 2: Not the best thing for Donald Trump to say, but
- 29:49Speaker 2: it is the best thing for us that he said it.
- 29:51Speaker 1: So that is good.
- 29:52Speaker 2: And I say that as people care about democracy and
- 29:54Speaker 2: people who have to put out a podcast twice a week.
- 29:57Speaker 2: And so thank you, Donald Trump, for feeding the content
- 29:59Speaker 2: gods at the absolute last minute and giving us this gift.
- 30:03Speaker 2: I think this whole thing is so great. You may say,
- 30:07Speaker 2: why was Donald Trump talking to Josh Stassi at Mar-a-Lago? Oh,
- 30:11Speaker 2: because Josh Stassi had either crashed or been invited to
- 30:14Speaker 2: a movie premiere that Donald Trump was hosting at Mar-a-Lago
- 30:19Speaker 2: for a film about how Mark Zuckerberg stole the election.
- 30:22Speaker 2: True story.
- 30:23Speaker 1: In all.
- 30:24Speaker 2: Of the Star Wars bar freaks of Trump world all
- 30:30Speaker 2: showed up. It was their, I guess, their version of
- 30:34Speaker 2: the White House Correspondents Center.
- 30:35Speaker 1: I do not know.
- 30:36Speaker 2: I mean, it's just, I highly recommend everyone read Josh
- 30:38Speaker 2: Dossi's story from Wednesday that was about, I think it
- 30:41Speaker 2: was a Wednesday that was about this completely insane, embarrassingly
- 30:45Speaker 2: sad event. But I also just want to note that
- 30:49Speaker 2: Donald Trump has told many big lies about But the
- 30:52Speaker 2: biggest lie may be the idea that he wanted to
- 30:54Speaker 2: walk one mile from the White House to the Capitol.
- 30:58Speaker 1: Yeah, that was not going to happen.
- 31:01Speaker 2: That's not because of the Secret Service.
- 31:02Speaker 1: That guy's like 20 years past being able to walk
- 31:05Speaker 1: to the Capitol.
- 31:05Speaker 2: Doesn't walk when he golfs.
- 31:10Speaker 1: Maybe he wanted to take a golf cart.
- 31:11Speaker 2: I just had this vision of him in the front
- 31:15Speaker 2: in a golf cart with some MAGA flags on it.
- 31:17Speaker 1: Just leading the way.
- 31:18Speaker 3: QAnon shaman riding shotgun.
- 31:22Speaker 2: And riding like seven miles, driving seven miles an hour
- 31:24Speaker 2: as people amble behind him because the golf cart is
- 31:26Speaker 2: so slow. It's great.
- 31:29Speaker 1: What an asshole.
- 31:31Speaker 3: Were there any other gems in that episode? And that
- 31:33Speaker 3: story that you found particularly noteworthy?
- 31:35Speaker 1: Either story.
- 31:36Speaker 3: The Wednesday story is great, of course, about the party itself,
- 31:39Speaker 3: about the Zuckerberg film. But also just the interview with
- 31:42Speaker 3: Josh Dossi that he does is wild.
- 31:45Speaker 2: I mean, this is not the biggest issue in the world,
- 31:47Speaker 2: but in the article about the film premiere, in his
- 31:51Speaker 2: remarks introducing the film, Donald Trump talked about how excited
- 31:56Speaker 2: he was to have a new film to screen because
- 31:57Speaker 2: he was bored of screening Citizen Kane and Titanic all
- 32:00Speaker 2: the time.
- 32:00Speaker 1: I saw that.
- 32:02Speaker 2: Like, he's a huge Titanic guy.
- 32:04Speaker 1: What do you mean? A huge Citizen Kane guy? Really?
- 32:08Speaker 1: Donald Trump's getting into the classics now?
- 32:09Speaker 2: That I understand because he's an old, old man who
- 32:13Speaker 2: thinks that nothing that happened after the pass of the
- 32:16Speaker 2: Civil Rights Act is good. So, like, that's probably where
- 32:18Speaker 2: his interest in film stops. But Titanic? Like, is he
- 32:23Speaker 2: into the Kate Winslet, Leonardo DiCaprio love story? Does he
- 32:26Speaker 2: stand on the Truman Balcony and scream, I'm the king
- 32:28Speaker 2: of the world? Like, it's just... I found that notable.
- 32:31Speaker 2: That is the part of the story that's not getting
- 32:32Speaker 2: enough attention, in my opinion.
- 32:34Speaker 3: Yeah, he's got a lot of thoughts on whether Jack
- 32:37Speaker 3: could have made it onto that raft.
- 32:39Speaker 1: That's his big thing. Yeah, it's wild.
- 32:41Speaker 3: And by the way, like, again, we've been talking about this.
- 32:45Speaker 3: I do think he continues to put more pressure on
- 32:49Speaker 3: the Justice Department and Merrick Garland to charge him. It's
- 32:53Speaker 3: just daring them at this point. Like, Oh, the insurrection
- 32:57Speaker 3: that all my staff said, no, he didn't want people
- 32:59Speaker 3: to go to the Capitol.
- 33:00Speaker 1: He was blah, blah, blah.
- 33:01Speaker 3: Oh, I would have gone with them. Yeah, I would
- 33:02Speaker 3: have gone with them to the Capitol where they stormed
- 33:04Speaker 3: the Capitol and tried to obstruct Congress from certifying the
- 33:07Speaker 3: election that I just lost. I was trying to go.
- 33:09Speaker 3: And by the way, didn't I draw a big crowd
- 33:12Speaker 3: of insurrectionists to Washington? Shouldn't I get some credit for
- 33:14Speaker 3: all the fucking insurrectionists I brought to the Capitol that day?
- 33:18Speaker 3: It is just daring people. Daring them to indict him.
- 33:22Speaker 2: The other thing that's great is his daughter went to
- 33:25Speaker 2: Capitol Hill to testify, I assume under oath, about the
- 33:28Speaker 2: president's views on this. And he immediately does an interview
- 33:34Speaker 2: with the Washington Post to possibly contradict everything she just
- 33:38Speaker 2: said under oath.
- 33:39Speaker 1: That'd be cool.
- 33:40Speaker 2: Dad of the year over here.
- 33:41Speaker 1: All right.
- 33:43Speaker 3: When we come back, Dan talks to Wisconsin Democratic Party
- 33:46Speaker 3: Chair Ben Wickler.
- 33:56Speaker 2: Yesterday, Wisconsin held local elections races for school board, city council,
- 33:59Speaker 2: and mayor, and we were thrilled to say Democrats held
- 34:02Speaker 2: their own. Joining us now to talk about it is
- 34:04Speaker 2: the chair of the Democratic Party of Wisconsin, Ben Wickler. Ben,
- 34:07Speaker 2: welcome back to Positive America.
- 34:09Speaker 6: Thanks so much, Dan. Always great to be with you.
- 34:12Speaker 2: So, Ben, I don't know how much news you've been
- 34:14Speaker 2: reading recently, but Democrats really need some good news, right?
- 34:18Speaker 2: And so tell me why what happened in Wisconsin last
- 34:21Speaker 2: night should make Democrats feel good.
- 34:24Speaker 6: Republicans... think they have a secret weapon, a magic silver
- 34:29Speaker 6: bullet in the form of divisive, race-baiting, fear-mongering attacks on
- 34:37Speaker 6: teaching history accurately and on trans kids to sweep school
- 34:40Speaker 6: board races and ladder up to governor's races across the country.
- 34:44Speaker 6: And they put it to the test all over Wisconsin
- 34:47Speaker 6: this Tuesday, and it flopped. Republicans won in places where Republicans...
- 34:53Speaker 6: already have the majority of the votes. And in the
- 34:55Speaker 6: purple and the blue areas, their school board candidates came
- 34:58Speaker 6: up far short. We swept school board races from Eau
- 35:01Speaker 6: Claire in western Wisconsin to Appleton in northeast Wisconsin, and
- 35:06Speaker 6: even in some red communities like Holman, Wisconsin and Sparta, Wisconsin.
- 35:10Speaker 6: We won the school board races there after a huge,
- 35:14Speaker 6: well-funded Republican push that included both official party organizing and
- 35:19Speaker 6: right-wing talk radio and dark money ads often in these
- 35:21Speaker 6: local races. what we saw is that if you stand
- 35:24Speaker 6: up strong for public education, you organize hard and you
- 35:28Speaker 6: have candidates that are proudly talking to voters about their values,
- 35:33Speaker 6: you can win in these races. And that speaks volumes
- 35:36Speaker 6: about what can happen up ballot as well in November.
- 35:39Speaker 2: Can you maybe help explain to our listeners why, who
- 35:43Speaker 2: don't live in Wisconsin, are very obviously concerned and interested
- 35:46Speaker 2: in defeating Ron Johnson, in winning Wisconsin in the presidential election?
- 35:49Speaker 2: Why Fighting and winning these school board races matters for
- 35:53Speaker 2: those larger statewide and federal races.
- 35:56Speaker 1: Absolutely.
- 35:57Speaker 6: So the first big thing is that if Republicans have
- 36:02Speaker 6: people in local office, those people can actually affect the
- 36:04Speaker 6: lives of the people in their school districts and their schools.
- 36:07Speaker 6: And of course, local government. we're going to talk about
- 36:10Speaker 6: the sort of broader political implications, but it matters enormously
- 36:13Speaker 6: in people's lives. So in my view, it is always
- 36:15Speaker 6: worth voting and organizing for local offices, even just by
- 36:20Speaker 6: the very fact that local office saves people's lives. That said,
- 36:24Speaker 6: Republicans think of these offices as opportunities to chip away
- 36:31Speaker 6: Democratic advantages, you know, a ballot. They want to have
- 36:34Speaker 6: people who can become local spokespeople for Republican causes who
- 36:37Speaker 6: can go on right-wing talk radio and blast. In Wisconsin,
- 36:40Speaker 6: we have a governor who was a former teacher. Tony
- 36:43Speaker 6: Evers is the education governor here. He was a science teacher,
- 36:46Speaker 6: school superintendent, the state superintendent of public instruction. If Republicans
- 36:50Speaker 6: can grab education as an issue the way that they
- 36:53Speaker 6: are so proud to have done in Virginia, they think
- 36:56Speaker 6: that that is their way of going after the core
- 36:59Speaker 6: strength of Tony Evers. And the reality is, Republicans have
- 37:04Speaker 6: the biggest glass jaw in the world on education that
- 37:07Speaker 6: Rebecca Clayfish, their front runner for governor massively cut school budgets.
- 37:11Speaker 6: We had a teacher crisis. They not only assaulted teachers unions,
- 37:14Speaker 6: they also just stripped away funding from school districts around
- 37:17Speaker 6: the state and Wisconsin rankings in, you know, the U
- 37:20Speaker 6: S news school rankings plummeted as a result. And now
- 37:23Speaker 6: they're back in the top 10 under governor Evers. So, uh,
- 37:26Speaker 6: when voters were looking at these races, they look at
- 37:29Speaker 6: these Republican candidates using the exact same issues that statewide
- 37:32Speaker 6: candidates like Rebecca Clayfish are running on, these attacks on
- 37:36Speaker 6: trans kids and these totally BS claims about the way
- 37:39Speaker 6: that history is being taught at our schools. And they
- 37:43Speaker 6: thought they were on offense, and it fell flat with
- 37:45Speaker 6: actual voters who were not already in the bubble. And
- 37:48Speaker 6: that tells us something really powerful about about messaging, about
- 37:52Speaker 6: whether Republicans have this kind of secret weapon here. What
- 37:56Speaker 6: we did, we used this framework called the race class narrative,
- 37:58Speaker 6: where we said, why are Republicans trying to divide people?
- 38:01Speaker 6: It's because they're massively cutting school budgets and they want
- 38:04Speaker 6: to turn us against each other so they can come
- 38:06Speaker 6: after our public schools. And we helped make these things backfire.
- 38:10Speaker 6: At the same time as we elected school board candidates
- 38:12Speaker 6: across the state, voters passed big increases in school funding
- 38:15Speaker 6: and school referenda in most communities across Wisconsin and this
- 38:19Speaker 6: is an area of strength. We should not get scared
- 38:21Speaker 6: and stop talking about education. We should stand for our
- 38:24Speaker 6: values on education and go after the Republicans for what
- 38:26Speaker 6: they're trying to do, which is profoundly unpopular.
- 38:29Speaker 2: In your messaging, how much was offense and how much
- 38:31Speaker 2: was defense?
- 38:33Speaker 6: There was, it was a mix. A lot of it
- 38:36Speaker 6: is defense in the sense that it's not, it's not,
- 38:39Speaker 6: you know, countering point by point what Republicans are saying.
- 38:42Speaker 6: It is introducing people to our candidates and what they
- 38:44Speaker 6: stand for. Um, So there was less going after individual
- 38:49Speaker 6: Republicans and ripping apart their claims. There was a lot
- 38:52Speaker 6: of making sure that every Democrat knew that there were
- 38:54Speaker 6: actual champions on their side who they could vote for
- 38:57Speaker 6: and turn out for. And I think one of the
- 38:58Speaker 6: things that's really important in midterms, differently from presidential campaigns,
- 39:02Speaker 6: but frankly, important in presidential too, is that we shouldn't
- 39:06Speaker 6: assume that people know who our candidates are or what
- 39:08Speaker 6: their values are. You actually have to make the case
- 39:10Speaker 6: for your people. And a lot of the kind of
- 39:13Speaker 6: The studies I've seen, it races up and down the ballot,
- 39:16Speaker 6: is that if you talk about your candidates, what they
- 39:19Speaker 6: stand for, what they want to do, and whose side
- 39:21Speaker 6: they're on, and whether they can actually deliver, that moves
- 39:25Speaker 6: people a lot. Most of what the general public and
- 39:28Speaker 6: certainly swing voters and Republican voters learn about Democrats, they
- 39:32Speaker 6: learn from Republicans because Republicans have such a big noise machine.
- 39:36Speaker 6: You write powerfully about this and I'm grateful for it.
- 39:39Speaker 6: In Wisconsin, there are 81 right-wing talk radio stations and
- 39:41Speaker 6: they crank out misinformation constantly about Democrats. So if you
- 39:45Speaker 6: actually lay out what you're for, and do it in
- 39:47Speaker 6: a way that draws a clear circle that includes you
- 39:50Speaker 6: and the voters and not the Republicans, that can go
- 39:53Speaker 6: a long way towards defining what the playing field, what
- 39:56Speaker 6: the races are about. And once you do that, then
- 40:00Speaker 6: you also want to push Republicans out of the circle
- 40:02Speaker 6: of common sense and trust and make clear that they
- 40:04Speaker 6: would break their promises to voters and that they are
- 40:06Speaker 6: against the things people stand for. But you have to
- 40:08Speaker 6: plant a strong flag and make a case for yourself
- 40:11Speaker 6: as a first step so that you actually have a
- 40:13Speaker 6: two-way fight in these battles.
- 40:14Speaker 2: What I thought was interesting about what you said is saying,
- 40:16Speaker 2: who they're fighting for, whose side they're on, because that's
- 40:18Speaker 2: one of the most important parts of messaging because it is,
- 40:21Speaker 2: it is a positive message, but it is an implicit contrast, right?
- 40:24Speaker 2: Which is like, we sort of sometimes divide messaging into positive.
- 40:28Speaker 2: These are the things I do. These are things I've done.
- 40:30Speaker 2: And then negative messaging, which is, is why this person's bad,
- 40:33Speaker 2: but ultimately it's a narrow, everything positive and negative messages
- 40:35Speaker 2: is a message about why you, why not them, your,
- 40:39Speaker 2: why your values are good and correct for the moment,
- 40:41Speaker 2: why theirs are not. And so I think that's great.
- 40:43Speaker 2: Another part of what was on the ballot last night
- 40:47Speaker 2: was the big lie. Wisconsin is ground zero of the
- 40:50Speaker 2: big lie. Ron Johnson is one of the biggest proponents
- 40:53Speaker 2: of the big lie. Your really wonderful state Republicans have
- 40:58Speaker 2: been pushing the big lie. They continue to push it.
- 41:00Speaker 2: They are very clearly and explicitly setting the stage for
- 41:03Speaker 2: using similar tactics in 2024 with the hopes of being
- 41:06Speaker 2: more successful than they were in 2020. Was there anything
- 41:09Speaker 2: from the or the peril of a big, of the
- 41:15Speaker 2: big lies of political message in Wisconsin. For sure.
- 41:19Speaker 6: And it is a mixed, is a mixed report card.
- 41:22Speaker 6: So I want to be really upfront about that. And
- 41:24Speaker 6: I think it's critical for, for folks to recognize that
- 41:28Speaker 6: this is an active thread. It's an organizing principle on
- 41:31Speaker 6: the right. It does fuel base energy on the right.
- 41:34Speaker 6: At the same time, it can be a source of
- 41:37Speaker 6: tremendous energy on our side. And so, um, I look
- 41:40Speaker 6: at a few different races when I think about what
- 41:42Speaker 6: we learned. My favorite one was in De Pere, Wisconsin,
- 41:46Speaker 6: a 25,000-person city in Brown County near Green Bay, where
- 41:51Speaker 6: Kelly Rue is one of the alders. She was an
- 41:54Speaker 6: incumbent alder who was also a fraudulent elector who claimed
- 41:59Speaker 6: to represent the voters of Wisconsin as an elector in 2020,
- 42:02Speaker 6: cast her fake electoral college vote for Donald Trump at
- 42:07Speaker 6: the same time as I was elsewhere in the Capitol
- 42:09Speaker 6: casting my actual elector vote for Joe Biden very proudly.
- 42:12Speaker 6: And she was subpoenaed by the January 6th committee, and
- 42:15Speaker 6: then she decided to run for re-election as an alder
- 42:17Speaker 6: in De Pere. And Pamela Gantz, who's a real estate
- 42:21Speaker 6: agent and a poll worker, ran against her on the
- 42:24Speaker 6: basis of, you know, we shouldn't have conspiracy theorists who
- 42:29Speaker 6: choose who the clerks are who administer our elections. Now,
- 42:32Speaker 6: They both talked a lot about local issues. There were
- 42:34Speaker 6: a ton of roads and bridges and the kinds of
- 42:37Speaker 6: local issues that make up a big part of these races.
- 42:40Speaker 6: But there was also this democracy element. And Pamela Gantz
- 42:43Speaker 6: welcomed support from the Democratic Party. We were proud to
- 42:46Speaker 6: work with her on mail and organizing. And she crushed.
- 42:49Speaker 6: She won by a double-digit percentage margin. And Kelly Rue
- 42:55Speaker 6: lost in that election.
- 42:56Speaker 1: So that was great.
- 42:58Speaker 6: At the same time, in Green Bay, in the city
- 43:01Speaker 6: council race, the right has been on fire attacking the
- 43:04Speaker 6: mayor and the city council over their giant heap of
- 43:08Speaker 6: lies about whether the 2020 election was free and fair.
- 43:11Speaker 6: And they have this constant flood of stuff. The Dick Uline,
- 43:15Speaker 6: the Stop the Steal funder, right-wing billionaire actually had TV
- 43:18Speaker 6: ads on and cable TV in Green Bay attacking the
- 43:21Speaker 6: city council. And a group of pro-big lie candidates defeated
- 43:26Speaker 6: some non-big lie candidates. Now, it was a more complicated picture.
- 43:30Speaker 6: And you know, a lot of voters were sick of
- 43:32Speaker 6: partisanship in general. Some of the incumbents took a no
- 43:34Speaker 6: partisan pledge. So we actually couldn't, we couldn't, you know,
- 43:37Speaker 6: we couldn't make in kind and direct contributions to support them.
- 43:41Speaker 6: Some of the no, some of the nonpartisan folks lost
- 43:44Speaker 6: and some of them won. Some of the folks who
- 43:46Speaker 6: worked at the Democratic Party lost and some of them won. And,
- 43:49Speaker 6: you know, not every Republican won in those races, but
- 43:51Speaker 6: it's now essentially six Republicans, two kind of moderate Republican
- 43:56Speaker 6: independents and four more progressive candidates who It's pretty split.
- 44:02Speaker 6: And the key, key, key thing now in Green Bay
- 44:05Speaker 6: is the mayor, Eric Genrich, who is great, who believes
- 44:08Speaker 6: in democracy, who's up in 2023, again, before 2024. And
- 44:12Speaker 6: so my lesson from that is we need to stay
- 44:15Speaker 6: in the fight on this thing. And the fact that
- 44:17Speaker 6: Republicans have been incessantly messaging and hammering, we can't let
- 44:20Speaker 6: it go unanswered. We have to be able to keep
- 44:23Speaker 6: communicating about the fact that this election is real and
- 44:26Speaker 6: people are trying to steal our democracy from Why? In
- 44:28Speaker 6: order to give themselves power and then rip people off
- 44:30Speaker 6: regardless of their politics or their race or where they live.
- 44:34Speaker 6: Republicans are trying to lock in control so that they
- 44:37Speaker 6: can keep shoveling money to people like Ron Johnson and
- 44:40Speaker 6: his billionaire backers. And that's a message I think that
- 44:45Speaker 6: can be really powerful in November in 2023 and in 2024.
- 44:48Speaker 2: We're obviously looking at a lot of political headwinds for
- 44:52Speaker 2: Democrats this year, inflation, just sort of the historical snapback
- 44:56Speaker 2: after presidential elections. The so much of what's going to
- 44:59Speaker 2: be what's going to happen in the midterms is going
- 45:01Speaker 2: to happen in Wisconsin as the party chair. How are
- 45:05Speaker 2: what strategies you're putting place either organizing or messaging or
- 45:08Speaker 2: whatever else to try to counteract those headwinds to ensure
- 45:10Speaker 2: that we can defeat Ron Johnson? We can reelect Governor
- 45:13Speaker 2: Tony Evers and win all the other races you talked
- 45:15Speaker 2: about here.
- 45:17Speaker 4: The.
- 45:17Speaker 6: The stakes are enormous, and the environment is tough. So
- 45:20Speaker 6: Wisconsin was a tipping point election in 2020 and 2016.
- 45:23Speaker 6: It's the only state where four of the last six
- 45:26Speaker 6: presidential elections came down to less than one percentage point.
- 45:29Speaker 6: And those enormous stakes weigh on people pretty intensely. And
- 45:33Speaker 6: what they tell us is that we have to do
- 45:35Speaker 6: everything all the time, year-round, statewide. We have to do
- 45:39Speaker 6: persuasion and turnout. We have to experiment with new tactics
- 45:42Speaker 6: and do stuff that's proven. We have to communicate at
- 45:44Speaker 6: every available time. channel and medium and language. We operate
- 45:49Speaker 6: now in English and Spanish and in Hmong. We have
- 45:51Speaker 6: about 50,000 person Hmong population in the state of Wisconsin.
- 45:56Speaker 6: But I think the central pieces to the strategy are,
- 45:59Speaker 6: first of all, find every Democratic voter and make absolutely
- 46:02Speaker 6: sure that they vote. And part of that is making
- 46:05Speaker 6: sure people who voted by mail in 2020 get absentee
- 46:08Speaker 6: ballots now and vote before election day so that we
- 46:10Speaker 6: can focus our volunteers and our energy on the people
- 46:13Speaker 6: who have not yet voted. If you have half your
- 46:16Speaker 6: votes cast before election day, it's like you double your
- 46:18Speaker 6: field organization on election day because you're chasing half the
- 46:21Speaker 6: number of people. So absolutely blow the roof off in
- 46:24Speaker 6: terms of organizing for turnout, but then simultaneously make sure
- 46:28Speaker 6: people know how absolutely awful and radical people like Rebecca
- 46:32Speaker 6: Clayfish are, how extreme and out of step with Wisconsin
- 46:35Speaker 6: voters and people like Ron Johnson. And then thirdly, define
- 46:38Speaker 6: organizations are, well, accurately communicate. People like Governor Tony Evers
- 46:44Speaker 6: get it, they're on people's side, and they can actually
- 46:46Speaker 6: deliver the goods. And Evers is like the most non-political
- 46:51Speaker 6: human being you'll ever meet. He's literally like the science
- 46:54Speaker 6: teacher that you love and trust from high school or
- 46:56Speaker 6: middle school, if you're lucky enough to have that person.
- 46:58Speaker 6: And he has actually helped their schools, paved enough roads
- 47:01Speaker 6: to drive to Denver and back from Wisconsin to And
- 47:06Speaker 6: gotten Wisconsin's unemployment rate down to a historic low by
- 47:09Speaker 6: investing a billion dollars in small businesses in rural and
- 47:12Speaker 6: urban Wisconsin alike. He has a really clear record that
- 47:16Speaker 6: reflects his values, which reflects the fact that he gets
- 47:19Speaker 6: what people are going through. And the Republicans running in
- 47:21Speaker 6: this election are profoundly radical. If you go back to
- 47:25Speaker 6: 2010 and you look at the races where Democrats won,
- 47:27Speaker 6: that was a Republican wave year. It was really tough.
- 47:31Speaker 6: And Wisconsin, that's when Scott Walker and Ron Johnson swept in.
- 47:34Speaker 6: But look next door to Minnesota. The Democratic governor, Mark Dayton,
- 47:37Speaker 6: won by under 10,000 votes, but he won. And Harry
- 47:40Speaker 6: Reid won in the Senate race in Nevada against Sharon Engel,
- 47:44Speaker 6: an extreme radical. They made those elections about the specific
- 47:47Speaker 6: people involved, a choice between the actual Democrat and the Republican.
- 47:51Speaker 6: They made it not just like a competition of what
- 47:55Speaker 6: the national talking points were, but about the actual humans,
- 47:59Speaker 6: a choice between these people. Who's on your side? Who
- 48:02Speaker 6: gets it? what are the local issues that you can
- 48:04Speaker 6: deliver on? And we're going to localize this race, building
- 48:09Speaker 6: on the extraordinary things President Biden has delivered and enabled
- 48:12Speaker 6: us to do in Wisconsin, but we're going to make
- 48:14Speaker 6: sure that people actually understand who these people are, what
- 48:16Speaker 6: they stand for, and whose side they're on, and then
- 48:19Speaker 6: turn out every voter we can find. That's the kind
- 48:22Speaker 6: of core of the recipe for us. And we've seen
- 48:24Speaker 6: it work even in really tough environments, and we just
- 48:27Speaker 6: saw it work in cities all across Wisconsin in these
- 48:31Speaker 6: local elections. So it is full steam ahead and impossibly
- 48:34Speaker 6: high stakes. And I feel really good about the energy
- 48:37Speaker 6: driving our side.
- 48:38Speaker 2: So Ben, for our listeners out there who want to
- 48:40Speaker 2: help you put in place that strategy, how can they
- 48:42Speaker 2: do that?
- 48:44Speaker 6: Delighted by that question.
- 48:45Speaker 2: I can't believe you let me get to the last
- 48:46Speaker 2: question before the call to action. I thought you were
- 48:48Speaker 2: just going to do it on your own. So I'm pleased.
- 48:52Speaker 6: I'm smiling ear to ear for people not watching on
- 48:56Speaker 6: video right now. So You can go to wisdems.org, that's
- 49:00Speaker 6: W-I-S-D-E-M-S dot org slash volunteer and sign up and we
- 49:05Speaker 6: will put you to work. If you're in Wisconsin, you'll
- 49:07Speaker 6: knock on doors. If you're anywhere else, we want you
- 49:09Speaker 6: to call people's phones. There's so much to do. There
- 49:12Speaker 6: are hundreds of thousands of people who have their IDs
- 49:15Speaker 6: on file to get an absentee ballot who did not
- 49:17Speaker 6: vote in 2018, who voted for Biden. by mail in 2020.
- 49:21Speaker 6: Let's call all those people until they get their absentee
- 49:23Speaker 6: ballots now. So there's a ton to do on the
- 49:26Speaker 6: volunteering side. And then become a monthly donor, which is
- 49:30Speaker 6: my favorite kind of donor in the universe. If you
- 49:32Speaker 6: go to wisstems.org slash donate and click make it monthly,
- 49:37Speaker 6: that allows us to budget all the way through election day.
- 49:39Speaker 6: And literally the biggest budgetary decision I'm going to make
- 49:43Speaker 6: is whether to move organizing hires earlier in the year.
- 49:47Speaker 6: If you start earlier, you can build neighborhood teams that
- 49:50Speaker 6: become self-running organizing operations in communities around the state. If
- 49:55Speaker 6: you hire someone in August or September, it's too late
- 49:57Speaker 6: to build teams. You can't do that kind of work.
- 49:59Speaker 6: So my goal is to know that we'll have the
- 50:01Speaker 6: funding to keep people on staff and expand the team
- 50:03Speaker 6: as much as we can, as early as we can,
- 50:05Speaker 6: And you listening right now with your power to give
- 50:08Speaker 6: a monthly donation can make that possible. So we want
- 50:11Speaker 6: your time and your treasure. Donate and volunteer. And we
- 50:14Speaker 6: want your talent when you're doing either of those things.
- 50:16Speaker 6: And with all that, we're going to blow the historic
- 50:21Speaker 6: midterm trends out of the water and demonstrate what's possible.
- 50:25Speaker 2: Ben McClure, always great to talk to you. You always
- 50:26Speaker 2: make us feel a little bit better, a little bit
- 50:28Speaker 2: more inspired. And so everyone, go to wisdems.org and help
- 50:31Speaker 2: Ben win Wisconsin. Thank you.
- 50:33Speaker 1: Thanks so much, Dan.
- 50:43Speaker 3: All right, before we go, the hottest new trend among
- 50:45Speaker 3: Trump Republicans right now is calling.
- 50:47Speaker 1: People they don't like pedophiles.
- 50:50Speaker 3: The latest craze started when Republican senators on the Judiciary Committee,
- 50:53Speaker 3: like Josh Hawley and Ted Cruz, spent much of Katonji
- 50:56Speaker 3: Brown Jackson's confirmation hearing accusing her of going soft on
- 50:59Speaker 3: pedophiles despite her objectively mainstream sentencing record. Then Marjorie Taylor
- 51:06Speaker 3: Greene got in on the act after learning that Susan Collins,
- 51:09Speaker 3: Lisa Murkowski, and Mitt Romney would support Judge Jackson's nomination.
- 51:12Speaker 3: She tweeted that the three Republicans are, quote, pro-pedophile. Then
- 51:17Speaker 3: she went on television and said this.
- 51:19Speaker 8: The Democrats are the party of pedophiles. The Democrats are
- 51:22Speaker 8: the party of princess predators from Disney. The Democrats are
- 51:26Speaker 8: the party of teachers, elementary school teachers, trying to transition
- 51:32Speaker 8: their elementary school-aged children and convince them they're a different gender.
- 51:36Speaker 3: So this isn't just Marjorie Taylor Greene, Republican pundits like
- 51:39Speaker 3: Molly Hemingway, Benny Johnson, Candace Owens have all started calling
- 51:43Speaker 3: everyone they don't like pro-pedophile. What's going on here, Dan?
- 51:47Speaker 3: Are they just trying to lock up the QAnon vote?
- 51:50Speaker 3: I feel like they already have it.
- 51:51Speaker 2: Yes, they have the QAnon vote.
- 51:54Speaker 1: Are they worried they're not going to show up at
- 51:55Speaker 1: the polls, the QAnon folks, vote for Republicans?
- 51:58Speaker 2: The issue here is that these are the worst fucking
- 52:00Speaker 2: people in the world. They are gigantic, historic assholes in
- 52:05Speaker 2: desperate need for attention, for attention. relevance, for profit, for
- 52:09Speaker 2: political power. And this is what is alarming about this
- 52:12Speaker 2: is this is the incentives of the attention economy, of
- 52:16Speaker 2: the outrage algorithms. It's the world Mark Zuckerberg built, which
- 52:20Speaker 2: is the best way to get people to talk about you,
- 52:23Speaker 2: to get your tweets to go viral, your Facebook posts
- 52:26Speaker 2: to go viral, is to say something so out of
- 52:29Speaker 2: the mainstream, so outrageous that people react to it. And
- 52:32Speaker 2: what happens is someone says something, And then gets attention.
- 52:36Speaker 2: And then everyone else says that. So now he gets
- 52:37Speaker 2: less attention. And there are diminishing returns for that level
- 52:40Speaker 2: of outrage. And so you've got to be more outrageous.
- 52:42Speaker 2: And so by this time next week, you're not going
- 52:44Speaker 2: to get the attention you want from calling someone a pedophile.
- 52:46Speaker 2: So you're going to be something more extreme than that.
- 52:49Speaker 2: And that is what is going on here. I mean,
- 52:53Speaker 2: this is the inexorable path of conservative politics in the
- 52:58Speaker 2: age of social media.
- 53:00Speaker 3: And of course, as many have now pointed out, There
- 53:03Speaker 3: was a Republican lawmaker in Tennessee, a state legislator, who
- 53:09Speaker 3: recently said to introduce a bill that it's an anti-gay
- 53:14Speaker 3: marriage bill here in 2022. And he basically wanted to
- 53:20Speaker 3: create an institution for people to get married who didn't
- 53:23Speaker 3: want their marriage to be like the same as marriages
- 53:27Speaker 3: between gay people. I don't know how that works, but
- 53:30Speaker 3: that was his fucking bigoted bill that he introduced. And
- 53:34Speaker 3: in the bill, he did not include an age limit
- 53:39Speaker 3: on when you can get married. And Democratic legislators in
- 53:43Speaker 3: Tennessee brought that up and say, well, where's the age
- 53:46Speaker 3: limit in the bill? And he said, oh, it's just assumed. Well,
- 53:51Speaker 3: then why isn't there a specific age limit in the
- 53:55Speaker 3: bill about granting people the right to get married?
- 53:59Speaker 1: Didn't know.
- 54:00Speaker 3: Now, Marsha Blackburn, who questioned Katonji Brown Jackson about her
- 54:06Speaker 3: sentencing record, didn't bring this up, even though that's the
- 54:08Speaker 3: state that she represents during the hearings. And then after
- 54:12Speaker 3: a big fuss over this, finally, someone got someone got
- 54:15Speaker 3: them to put an age limit in this in this bill.
- 54:18Speaker 3: But like the idea that Republicans are going around, some
- 54:21Speaker 3: Republicans are going around accusing people of being pro pedophile
- 54:25Speaker 3: or soft on on on on child abuse. Particularly, and
- 54:29Speaker 3: it's not just Democrats they're going after, now they're going
- 54:32Speaker 3: after their own.
- 54:33Speaker 1: Susan Collins, Mitt Romney for voting for Katonji Brown-Jackson. It
- 54:38Speaker 1: is absurd. It is absurd.
- 54:39Speaker 2: You know who they're not going after? Matt Gaetz, who
- 54:42Speaker 2: is reportedly under criminal investigation for sexual misconduct with a minor.
- 54:47Speaker 1: Remember Roy Moore?
- 54:48Speaker 2: Yeah, who many of them supported and campaigned for? Ginny
- 54:51Speaker 2: Thomas's favorite Senate candidate?
- 54:53Speaker 1: Remember Republican House Speaker Denny Hastert?
- 54:56Speaker 2: Mark Foley?
- 54:58Speaker 1: How many? I mean, it's, you know.
- 55:00Speaker 3: Now, how seriously do you think we should take this?
- 55:02Speaker 3: Because I do think, you know, accusing people of being
- 55:06Speaker 3: soft on child abuse, of being pro-pedophile is, you know,
- 55:10Speaker 3: it didn't just happen recently. It is a tried and
- 55:13Speaker 3: true tactic among the extreme right here in this country
- 55:18Speaker 3: and autocrats, right-wing autocrats in other countries. Orban did this
- 55:23Speaker 3: in Hungary. Putin has done this in Russia. There's a
- 55:26Speaker 3: long history of some right-wing extremists accusing their opponents and
- 55:32Speaker 3: autocrats accusing their opponents of being soft on child abuse.
- 55:36Speaker 3: This has a history, and part of it is dehumanizing
- 55:40Speaker 3: your opponent because you try to say the worst thing
- 55:43Speaker 3: you could possibly say about them, which is that they
- 55:45Speaker 3: abuse children.
- 55:47Speaker 2: I do not believe that a quote-unquote persuadable voter will
- 55:51Speaker 2: hear Marjorie Taylor Greene or other people say that Democrats
- 55:54Speaker 2: are the party of pedophiles and find that believable. I
- 55:57Speaker 2: don't think there's probably a single person who is an
- 55:59Speaker 2: available voter to Democrats to believe that. But the danger
- 56:03Speaker 2: here is not political.
- 56:04Speaker 1: It's actual.
- 56:06Speaker 2: Because what you were doing, and this is why so
- 56:10Speaker 2: many of the people that you list have done this
- 56:11Speaker 2: in history, you're right, is to dehumanize people. It is
- 56:14Speaker 2: to spark violence and retribution against them. And this is
- 56:20Speaker 2: not liberal panic. It's not trying to make this into
- 56:23Speaker 2: more than it is. We know that this can happen
- 56:25Speaker 2: because of what happened due to the Pizzagate conspiracy theory,
- 56:29Speaker 2: which was the conspiracy theory that's at the core of QAnon,
- 56:33Speaker 2: that there was a DC pizzeria where there was a
- 56:36Speaker 2: basement that Democrats and Hollywood elites and others, including the Clintons,
- 56:39Speaker 2: were using for child sex trafficking. Now, that is obviously
- 56:43Speaker 2: not true. The pizzeria doesn't even have a basement. But
- 56:45Speaker 2: someone who believed it showed up at the pizzeria with
- 56:49Speaker 2: an assault rifle. And fortunately, no one got hurt. But
- 56:55Speaker 2: that can and will happen again. Someone is going to
- 56:58Speaker 2: get hurt because of this. It could be a teacher.
- 57:00Speaker 2: It could be someone just walking down the street. And
- 57:02Speaker 2: it's because of this dehumanizing language. It is deeply, deeply dangerous.
- 57:07Speaker 2: And there is no one in the Republican Party with
- 57:09Speaker 2: the political credibility or the moral authority to stand up
- 57:12Speaker 2: and say, stop.
- 57:15Speaker 3: Haven't heard from Kevin McCarthy on this one. Kevin McCarthy,
- 57:18Speaker 3: very upset when Madison Cawthorn said that maybe Kevin McCarthy
- 57:22Speaker 3: and other Republicans were attending Koch orgies.
- 57:24Speaker 1: Very upset about that.
- 57:26Speaker 3: Didn't hear him say anything about Marjorie Taylor Greene saying
- 57:28Speaker 3: that Democrats are the pro-pedophile party or didn't even come
- 57:32Speaker 3: to the defense of his fellow Republicans in the Senate
- 57:34Speaker 3: who she accused of being pro-pedophile. So that's what you're
- 57:38Speaker 3: getting from Republican leadership. But yeah, no, it is dangerous
- 57:42Speaker 3: and that It is an attempt to potentially justify political
- 57:46Speaker 3: violence because your opponents are sexually abused children. That's what
- 57:52Speaker 3: they're trying to do. And it's pretty, pretty gross. Anyway,
- 57:57Speaker 3: that's that.
- 57:59Speaker 2: Republicans are bad.
- 58:01Speaker 3: Yeah, just in conclusion, Republicans are bad. Thank you so
- 58:05Speaker 3: much to Ben Wickler, who was good. who did some
- 58:08Speaker 3: great work in Wisconsin this week, for joining the pod.
- 58:11Speaker 3: That's a happy note that everyone should think about and
- 58:14Speaker 3: get people to work really hard ahead of the midterms
- 58:16Speaker 3: because they had a number of big wins in Wisconsin
- 58:18Speaker 3: this week. So, you know, and again, Katonji Brown-Jackson is
- 58:21Speaker 3: the next Supreme Court Justice. So we end on a
- 58:23Speaker 3: high note.
- 58:23Speaker 2: Yep, and thank you, Donald Trump, for saying more crazy shit.
- 58:26Speaker 1: Of course, as always, as always. Have a good weekend, everyone.
- 58:30Speaker 1: We'll talk to you next week.
- 58:31Speaker 2: Bye, everyone.
- 58:36Speaker 3: Pod Save America is a Crooked Media production. The executive
- 58:39Speaker 3: producer is Michael Martinez. Our senior producer is Andy Gardner Bernstein.
- 58:43Speaker 3: Our producer is Haley Muse, and Olivia Martinez is our
- 58:45Speaker 3: associate producer. It's mixed and edited by Andrew Chadwick. Kyle
- 58:49Speaker 3: Seglin and Charlotte Landis sound engineer the show. Thanks to
- 58:52Speaker 3: Tanya Sominator, Sandy Gerard, Hallie Kiefer, Ari Schwartz, Andy Taft,
- 58:56Speaker 3: and Justine Howe for production support. And to our digital team,
- 59:00Speaker 3: Elijah Cohn, Phoebe Bradford, Milo Kim, and Amelia Montooth. Our
- 59:03Speaker 3: episodes are uploaded as videos at youtube.com slash crookedmedia.