Latest / Stuff You Should Know / Three Innovations We Need Right Now

Transcript

Three Innovations We Need Right Now · Stuff You Should Know

0:00
Speaker 1: Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera.
0:03
Speaker 1: It's ready. Are you welcome to stuff you should know
0:08
Speaker 1: from house Stuff Works dot com? Hey, and welcome to
0:15
Speaker 1: the podcast. I'm Josh Clark. With me is Chuck Bryant
0:18
Speaker 1: with his beautiful juke brug. It's still beautiful. Yeah, So Chuck,
0:24
Speaker 1: how you doing? Uh? Well? So are you? I'm pretty good?
0:26
Speaker 1: I'm pretty good into everyone out there listening. If it
0:29
Speaker 1: sound like I'm talking a little fast, that is because
0:32
Speaker 1: Chuck literally has a stopwatch here to keep you from
0:34
Speaker 1: talking to what's in this podcast? I kid you not. Yeah,
0:38
Speaker 1: in a cat of Mine tales. Yeah, we could very easily.
0:42
Speaker 1: I shouldn't say we, I could very easily traps into
0:45
Speaker 1: I guess long windedness as a euphemism I should use yeah,
0:49
Speaker 1: Chuck says, yeah, he's his head um, and so to
0:53
Speaker 1: combat that, Chuck has the stopwatch. So, Chuck, let's talk
0:56
Speaker 1: about some innovations that we need and why look at
0:59
Speaker 1: you so proud? Uh? Yeah, Josh? You know there are
1:03
Speaker 1: the world is in trouble in some ways, and big
1:07
Speaker 1: innovations and big innovators come along and correct things and
1:10
Speaker 1: change all that and that's what we need, buddy, we
1:12
Speaker 1: can We've named three here, there are many more. Yeah, agreed,
1:15
Speaker 1: And what do you think about blogging? Yeah, and thank
1:18
Speaker 1: you for reminding me. I would like this is especially
1:20
Speaker 1: I would like to call out to the blog and
1:22
Speaker 1: get you folks on the Friday recap when this comes out,
1:25
Speaker 1: because we have only uh named three kind of pie
1:29
Speaker 1: in the sky innovations that could help the world, and
1:31
Speaker 1: there are many more. And I'd like to hear what
1:33
Speaker 1: people have to say to Chuck. So that's the call out.
1:36
Speaker 1: Nice Chuck, So you want to get started on this? Yes,
1:40
Speaker 1: you got your you got your stopwatch going? Yes, okay, alright,
1:46
Speaker 1: so Chuck, let's do teleportation. I wish we could, my goodness.
1:49
Speaker 1: So do I have you ever been on like a long,
1:51
Speaker 1: long road trip? Yeah? I like road trip. So so
1:54
Speaker 1: on the way right, on the way back, on the
1:57
Speaker 1: back is awful. Right. What if you could just drive
2:00
Speaker 1: to a place, say, you know, like a subway station,
2:05
Speaker 1: which is a good idea. Uh And instead of getting
2:07
Speaker 1: on a subway, you just go through some sort of
2:10
Speaker 1: teleportation portal, so at a teleportation station. Nice, Yeah, they
2:15
Speaker 1: should call it that. I think they will probably did
2:17
Speaker 1: you on this term spend around since oh wow, you
2:20
Speaker 1: did some extra extra research in Yes, an American writer
2:24
Speaker 1: and paranormal investigator named Charles Fort wrote it in his
2:27
Speaker 1: book Low for It's one of my heroes. You know
2:29
Speaker 1: that really yeah forty times. Well, he had a book
2:32
Speaker 1: called low within a post exclamation point at the end
2:36
Speaker 1: l O w or l O l okay, and apparently
2:39
Speaker 1: that's where he first used the word teleportation. Fantastic, So, yeah,
2:43
Speaker 1: that would be awesome, and it's not exactly impossible, No,
2:47
Speaker 1: it's not. Thanks to the magic of quantum physics, we
2:50
Speaker 1: could conceivably teleport ourselves. Indeed, I guess the way that
2:55
Speaker 1: it's starting to look more and more is like we
2:57
Speaker 1: would be facts. Yeah, exactly. That's a good way to say.
3:00
Speaker 1: Instead of source, what what you're doing is you're recreating.
3:04
Speaker 1: You would be recreating every cell in your body and
3:07
Speaker 1: copying it, and that first edition would have to be destroyed. Though.
3:12
Speaker 1: This one of the keys, right, that is the key
3:13
Speaker 1: I didn't quite get to the bottom of y aside
3:15
Speaker 1: from you know, very rapidly overpopulating the earth. But yeah,
3:20
Speaker 1: I got the impression that as far as quantum mechanics goes,
3:24
Speaker 1: you would the original would have to be destroyed before
3:27
Speaker 1: transmission or as it was being scanned. And then basically
3:32
Speaker 1: it takes these particles and atoms and everything. It doesn't
3:37
Speaker 1: actually transport the atoms. This is this is the big distinction.
3:41
Speaker 1: Like all teleportation as far as science fiction goes, generally,
3:44
Speaker 1: UM has to do with actually physically moving the atoms
3:48
Speaker 1: through the air and then recreating them elsewhere. Uh. Much
3:52
Speaker 1: like images on television. Right, as you've seen Willy Wonka
3:57
Speaker 1: Chocolate factory, right, much like that. That's not the case.
3:59
Speaker 1: In stead, what we would need to do is basically
4:02
Speaker 1: scan us what makes us us. All the information about
4:08
Speaker 1: where you know one of the cells in your liver
4:11
Speaker 1: is um, about where you know every your genetic makeup,
4:16
Speaker 1: everything for absolutely every part of you, including stuff we
4:21
Speaker 1: haven't nailed down yet, would have to be analyzed and
4:24
Speaker 1: then sent and then it could be recreated in the
4:27
Speaker 1: first one was destroyed. There's a big problem with this,
4:30
Speaker 1: well uh, namely, we're too complex of of beings to
4:35
Speaker 1: do that. Well. Sure, but also if you subscribe to
4:37
Speaker 1: any kind of Judeo Christian or any kind of religious idea,
4:43
Speaker 1: um uh, you would have a big problem because basically
4:47
Speaker 1: you've just been destroyed and all the information about you
4:50
Speaker 1: has been transferred. And if you believe the soul is
4:52
Speaker 1: some sort of if it's extant and an externality that's
4:56
Speaker 1: not part of your body, that it's it's something beyond that,
5:01
Speaker 1: can that be recreated? Yeah that's true. But let's say
5:04
Speaker 1: most people who are working on uh teleporting us don't
5:08
Speaker 1: subscribe to any ideas of the sult right, Okay, so
5:10
Speaker 1: let's just go with that assumption. Let's just say phy physiologically,
5:14
Speaker 1: what are some of the challenges. Well, they have actually
5:17
Speaker 1: teleported uh atoms and UH photons. Did you know that
5:22
Speaker 1: they've sent adams a distance of about half a meter
5:26
Speaker 1: and they sent some photons over tens of kilometers. Yeah,
5:30
Speaker 1: pretty impressive, it is. And I know that there's one
5:33
Speaker 1: really smart guy out there, Charles Bennett, who was a
5:37
Speaker 1: really smart scientist. He uh he said that in principle
5:41
Speaker 1: that teleporting humans does not actually violate any fundamental laws
5:45
Speaker 1: of physics. No, they used to think it violated Heisenberg's
5:47
Speaker 1: uncertainty principle because we were talking about scanning and once
5:51
Speaker 1: you get down to the sub atomic quantum level, um
5:55
Speaker 1: you're you're you're dealing with quarks, little pieces of matter
6:00
Speaker 1: and um other non material stuff. Uh that when you
6:05
Speaker 1: analyze and when you observe them, when you measure them,
6:08
Speaker 1: the the more accurately you measure them, the more likely
6:12
Speaker 1: you are to disrupt their behavior until you can't get
6:14
Speaker 1: an accurate measurement anymore. They figured out a way around this, right, Uh,
6:19
Speaker 1: where you're talking about quantum entanglement. Yes, that is Uh.
6:23
Speaker 1: Einstein actually called that spooky action at a distance, except
6:28
Speaker 1: he said in German, it probably sounds cooler in German,
6:30
Speaker 1: although spooky is pretty cool. Basically, it's two separate particles
6:35
Speaker 1: behaving as if it's one particle, even though they're separated
6:40
Speaker 1: by a great distance. Right, Well, they were together at
6:42
Speaker 1: one point in time. They become entangled, like there's their superpositions,
6:45
Speaker 1: their states become entangled. And then yeah, after they're separated,
6:50
Speaker 1: the behavior of one is the same as the behavior
6:53
Speaker 1: of another, and they they can't they shouldn't be influencing
6:57
Speaker 1: one another anymore. Right, But Bennett's that that's not even necessary.
7:01
Speaker 1: If you were to figure out how to teleport an
7:04
Speaker 1: entire human, he said that quote, the teleported person would
7:07
Speaker 1: end up slightly different, but not in a biologically important way.
7:11
Speaker 1: So well, chuck um there there are some Think about
7:16
Speaker 1: what you just said, you're you're reproducing something that's not
7:18
Speaker 1: biologically different. Think about your mood, the mood d'ine right now,
7:22
Speaker 1: that's all a series of chemical reactions, So we have
7:25
Speaker 1: to analyze down to that level where else should come
7:27
Speaker 1: out on the other end, like maybe insane or very
7:30
Speaker 1: depressed or ready to kill. I mean, there's a lot
7:33
Speaker 1: of information that would have to be scanned to accurately
7:36
Speaker 1: reproduce you as you were before the scanning started. But
7:40
Speaker 1: let's say we can do that, right. What What are
7:41
Speaker 1: the benefits of teleportation? Why do we need this? And
7:43
Speaker 1: since this is all pine in the sky and pipe
7:46
Speaker 1: dream type of stuff, let's say we can teleport. That
7:48
Speaker 1: would save time? Yes, time is money. How would you
7:52
Speaker 1: love to not um commute to beam yourself to work
7:55
Speaker 1: every day? That would be crazy. Work days would be shorter.
7:58
Speaker 1: That means you could save energy at at the workplace.
8:01
Speaker 1: I know I get a lot more work though when
8:03
Speaker 1: a telecommute. Yeah, and teleporting, imagine that you could save
8:08
Speaker 1: on you were talking about transportation of goods and jets
8:12
Speaker 1: and big barges. Maybe if you could teleport your goods
8:15
Speaker 1: then you wouldn't have to you know, fly things halfway
8:18
Speaker 1: around the world. Yeah, that might be a good thing. Yeah,
8:21
Speaker 1: I think there's a lot of benefits to teleportation. What
8:23
Speaker 1: else you got, that's all? You don't have some Brady
8:26
Speaker 1: bunch as any uh plotline that you can dream up here? No, no,
8:32
Speaker 1: because the original is destroyed. That's where all the comedy lives. Yeah,
8:36
Speaker 1: you're right, yeah, when there's duplicity or multiplicity, except there
8:40
Speaker 1: wasn't that much comedy there. Yeah, Michael Keaton Wolf. Yeah.
8:44
Speaker 1: So Chuck, um, pressure, stop watch, let's clear it out again.
8:48
Speaker 1: Let's clear it out. So, I mean, trust me, folks,
8:50
Speaker 1: we could do an hour on teleportation. But we could,
8:52
Speaker 1: but we just stopped making sense after a little while.
8:54
Speaker 1: Next because you couldn't understand us, but because we're dumb.
8:57
Speaker 1: So what's the number two? Josh ready? Yes, okay? Number
9:00
Speaker 1: two is a universal language? Chuck, consider this, how much conflict, war,
9:06
Speaker 1: misunderstanding and just general strife, nationalism, isolationism, fascism, all of
9:12
Speaker 1: this stuff, How much of it is the result of
9:15
Speaker 1: this unphysical border we call language. Right, They say that
9:20
Speaker 1: the Devil's greatest creation was language. Really yeah, miscommunication, absolutely, dude.
9:26
Speaker 1: And you know what, you're right, if there was an
9:27
Speaker 1: international language, if everyone spoke the same language, I don't
9:30
Speaker 1: think it would make us some big you know, it
9:32
Speaker 1: would make us all the same. So lay thot years
9:34
Speaker 1: a rest folks. No, most of the people I've I've
9:37
Speaker 1: read who are talking and thinking about universal language is
9:41
Speaker 1: saying like, this is not meant to supplant native languages.
9:44
Speaker 1: It's just you know, if you're at home, you're let's
9:47
Speaker 1: say you're in America, you're speaking English like Chuck and
9:50
Speaker 1: I speak English to one another. But if we went
9:53
Speaker 1: to give a seminar on podcasting in Norway, we would
9:57
Speaker 1: use the international language. Interesting you bring up Norway because
10:01
Speaker 1: some folks say that Norwegian might be a good start. Well,
10:05
Speaker 1: they used to, and they used to think that nineteen eleven.
10:07
Speaker 1: At least that's true. Yeah, go ahead. Some people have
10:10
Speaker 1: thought about this over the years and they think that, uh,
10:13
Speaker 1: you should probably create a new language with another language
10:16
Speaker 1: is a basis. But it probably shouldn't be one of
10:18
Speaker 1: the big boys either, because it would give that that
10:20
Speaker 1: nation too much of a leg up. Oh yeah, you
10:24
Speaker 1: said from now on English is the universal language. Everyone
10:28
Speaker 1: who speaks English should be like, damn straight, yeah, yeah,
10:32
Speaker 1: you'd have to create your own language if you want
10:33
Speaker 1: a universal language. And I know you're dying to talk
10:36
Speaker 1: about Esperanto, Chuck. I had only vaguely heard of Esperanto
10:39
Speaker 1: before and didn't really know the nuts and bolts of it.
10:42
Speaker 1: But um, actually Ben Bolan, the creator of one of
10:45
Speaker 1: our soon to be released podcasts, a conspiracy podcast called
10:49
Speaker 1: Stuff They Don't Want You To Know It. Yeah, looking
10:52
Speaker 1: forward to it. Um, he was telling me about Esperanto
10:55
Speaker 1: and basically, in the nineteenth century, a guy named L. L.
10:58
Speaker 1: Zamenhoff came up with this idea that we need a
11:02
Speaker 1: universal language that would promote tolerance and quality, that kind
11:05
Speaker 1: of thing, avoid war again specifically, I think he said
11:08
Speaker 1: that was one of his aims. And yeah, he was
11:10
Speaker 1: definitely a pacifist. You know. He also tried to come
11:12
Speaker 1: up with a um uh, neutral religion that's all that
11:17
Speaker 1: called Hamaronism. Maybe that's why I didn't take something all
11:22
Speaker 1: right now, I guess. But he was twenty seven, he
11:25
Speaker 1: was at the tender age of twenty seven, and he
11:26
Speaker 1: created a universal language. He did and basically it sounds
11:30
Speaker 1: a lot like it's a romance language kind of it's
11:35
Speaker 1: kind of like a broken romance language. Yeah, it's it's
11:37
Speaker 1: independent in and of itself. So while he did borrow
11:40
Speaker 1: from others, they say it's they don't describe it as
11:42
Speaker 1: a as a mix, like a potpourri of other languages
11:45
Speaker 1: just mixed together right now. They it's structurally similar to
11:50
Speaker 1: um non European languages than European ones. I mean, it's
11:54
Speaker 1: very much phonetic, and it's it's spelled the way it
11:57
Speaker 1: sounds supposed to be pretty easy, very easy. There's the
12:00
Speaker 1: sixteen rules of Grammar and pronunciation to it, and that's it.
12:03
Speaker 1: Because I mean, you think about English, you know you've
12:06
Speaker 1: got like good, better, best, Where the hell did better
12:10
Speaker 1: and best come from? We started out with good, you know,
12:13
Speaker 1: like where does that come from? And apparently English is
12:15
Speaker 1: one of the most difficult languages to learn that. Yeah,
12:18
Speaker 1: I would say so, because of all the little problems
12:20
Speaker 1: like that. So I think what Zomanoff was on the
12:23
Speaker 1: trail of it. I think anybody has created a universal
12:25
Speaker 1: language is to get away with all the get get
12:28
Speaker 1: rid of all the all the foibles, the weird things
12:30
Speaker 1: that make a dialect or language, so unique inconsistencies. One
12:35
Speaker 1: of the other problems is is that's actually a structural approach.
12:39
Speaker 1: There's also a symbolic approach. Yeah, I like that one.
12:42
Speaker 1: The symbolic approach is like we call mother mother for
12:46
Speaker 1: no good reason. It's a symbolic word, you know, it's
12:49
Speaker 1: not like the word cuckoo, where you know, cuckoo is
12:52
Speaker 1: the sound that a cuckoo bird makes. That's very structural.
12:57
Speaker 1: But this, this symbolic words probably have even more difficulties
13:03
Speaker 1: than a universal language um that was built structurally. Because
13:09
Speaker 1: what a language is is it's a world view of
13:10
Speaker 1: a culture the people who share that language. Right, So
13:14
Speaker 1: how do you get the entire world to agree on
13:18
Speaker 1: you know, the meaning of mother, right? Well? Mother is
13:21
Speaker 1: probably an easy one. But let's say the meaning of happiness.
13:25
Speaker 1: Let's pick on happiness, right, Well, you can't. That's the problem,
13:29
Speaker 1: and that's probably why there never will be a universal language.
13:31
Speaker 1: That's not necessarily true. Also, I think that most I
13:35
Speaker 1: think every single language universal language attempt and there's been some.
13:39
Speaker 1: Did you read about idiom neutral Russian one that sounded
13:44
Speaker 1: like it got pretty close? Wow, what do you mean
13:46
Speaker 1: by clothes? Solo than Esperanto. Two million people speak Esperanto today,
13:50
Speaker 1: That is true. Have you been on a learning It's
13:53
Speaker 1: a website for dedicated to teaching Esperanto. It's got the
13:58
Speaker 1: tutorials and everything in there, so if you want to
14:00
Speaker 1: learn Esperanto. And Chuck is right, there is actually a
14:02
Speaker 1: thriving little community of Esperanto speakers. And there's also two
14:09
Speaker 1: movies that have been shot entirely in Esperanto. We're gonna
14:13
Speaker 1: talk about one. What I was feeling. Johnny Depp did
14:16
Speaker 1: one of him? No? No, no, uh, Bill Shatner, Oh yeah,
14:20
Speaker 1: that's right. There is a nineteen movie called Incubus, and
14:25
Speaker 1: the whole thing is filmed entirely in Esperanto. William Shatner
14:28
Speaker 1: speaks Esperanto, or at least he spoke the lines from
14:31
Speaker 1: that movie. Yeah. No, it rang a bell that I
14:34
Speaker 1: heard he was he learned it. Yeah, he knows esperanto.
14:37
Speaker 1: You know, worked with sat Did he speak Esperanto? TI like,
14:41
Speaker 1: Oh my god, that explains so much. I just thought
14:44
Speaker 1: he was having a stroke. He's a nice guy though. Yeah,
14:46
Speaker 1: he's a little puffy, sure, but it was for a
14:49
Speaker 1: TV commercial. He was he was into it. Oh, I'm sure. Yeah,
14:52
Speaker 1: Like he really gave it his bringing, every bring, everything
14:54
Speaker 1: he did. I was impressed because sometimes commercial actors are
14:57
Speaker 1: kind of like, go through the motions, we'll chuck, let's
14:59
Speaker 1: talk about it. What's the uh what? What's What are
15:02
Speaker 1: the benefits of universal language besides war avoidance or anything
15:05
Speaker 1: like that. I would say economically, it would be easier
15:07
Speaker 1: to communicate and negotiate contracts and uh broker deals and
15:13
Speaker 1: trade and stuff like that with you. Oh, definitely, And
15:15
Speaker 1: I think we need it. We're becoming more and more globalized.
15:18
Speaker 1: We're interacting with one another more and more. You basically
15:20
Speaker 1: can't be an isolated country anymonger if you want to
15:23
Speaker 1: stay afloat, it would save time. Plus, also, think about science,
15:27
Speaker 1: I mean, why does science use Latin. It's an agreed
15:29
Speaker 1: upon universal language. What if there was an uh, there
15:33
Speaker 1: was a real universal language that scientists could more easily
15:36
Speaker 1: communicate their ideas with one another their findings. Well, yeah,
15:39
Speaker 1: and I saw that um in one of the articles
15:41
Speaker 1: we read for this. Some some of the old school
15:44
Speaker 1: Russian scientists used to not like to have to publish
15:47
Speaker 1: in German, which I think at the time was what
15:50
Speaker 1: most German and French and German and French, and then
15:52
Speaker 1: a lot of ts for you Russian. Yeah, and a
15:54
Speaker 1: lot of students either um today have to read these
15:58
Speaker 1: things in a translated form that may not be quite
16:00
Speaker 1: accurate or you know, not read it at all. And
16:04
Speaker 1: time check you one to go into number three? Yes,
16:08
Speaker 1: to clear out your your stopwatch there. Okay, all right,
16:13
Speaker 1: you're ready and go go. This one is Chuck's favorite one.
16:18
Speaker 1: He picked this one. Are we ready? Yeah? Okay, Chuck
16:20
Speaker 1: picked this one. I think it's a good idea to Chuck.
16:22
Speaker 1: What is the third innovation that we need right now?
16:25
Speaker 1: Innovator is what we need? We need Chuck, just spun it. Yeah,
16:31
Speaker 1: we need a human, we need another Einstein, we need
16:34
Speaker 1: another Newton, we need another Tesla to come along, just
16:39
Speaker 1: not another Edison. Yeah, and Josh, some people might say,
16:44
Speaker 1: when it comes to innovators, you're probably thinking in the
16:47
Speaker 1: world of science, which is appropriate, and uh, a renaissance
16:51
Speaker 1: scientist maybe where you need to to start your search. Sure, Chuck,
16:55
Speaker 1: we found this article about renaissance scientists and how actually
16:58
Speaker 1: in the United States and the higher educational system that
17:02
Speaker 1: the cards are stacked against any of these people actually
17:04
Speaker 1: being produced that very much that we have to just
17:06
Speaker 1: basically hope that one comes along, and if it does,
17:09
Speaker 1: it's gonna be a total fluke, you know, because the
17:11
Speaker 1: idea is that in order to be a true innovator, Uh,
17:15
Speaker 1: then you have to be a whole brain scientist, definitely.
17:18
Speaker 1: And the graduate system that we have today, they said,
17:20
Speaker 1: the undergraduate system does a pretty good job of it. Well, yeah,
17:23
Speaker 1: I just think about all the different kinds of classes,
17:25
Speaker 1: the core classes, and then you know, I took biology
17:28
Speaker 1: for no good reason. Statistics I hated stats. Oh it's awful. Uh.
17:34
Speaker 1: But the whole brain thinkers are the ones that have
17:36
Speaker 1: the more well rounded approach. So not only are they
17:39
Speaker 1: are they a brilliant a physics mind, but they can
17:42
Speaker 1: understand the human side of maybe how to apply that,
17:44
Speaker 1: and that's what's missing a lot of times. Right. So
17:46
Speaker 1: Mills and no Tino, I think wrote this this, this
17:49
Speaker 1: opinion piece we found in Forbes. Um that basically you're saying, like, yes, yes,
17:53
Speaker 1: undergrad we have it. It's great. Same generally with high school,
17:57
Speaker 1: middle school, grade school, UM, kids are exp oose to
18:00
Speaker 1: all these different fields of study. The problem is it's
18:04
Speaker 1: geared generally towards funneling them one way or another. And
18:07
Speaker 1: this becomes most evident when you get to grad school
18:10
Speaker 1: big time, where if you're a doctoral student and you
18:12
Speaker 1: need money, you better come up with a a an
18:16
Speaker 1: incredibly specific, unique and specific idea or field of research
18:21
Speaker 1: that you're going to go into. It's all geared towards that.
18:24
Speaker 1: And like you said that, as you as you go
18:26
Speaker 1: forward an education, the path gets narrower and narrower until
18:30
Speaker 1: you're literally, yeah to where you may be researching one
18:34
Speaker 1: thing for your career and maybe you'll come up with innovation, innovation,
18:38
Speaker 1: that way to change the world. But my money is
18:41
Speaker 1: on a whole brain thinker. Well, yeah, or at least
18:43
Speaker 1: somebody who can take all these various fields of research
18:47
Speaker 1: or all this various research data and put it all together,
18:52
Speaker 1: because research is just research until you apply it. So, Chuck,
18:55
Speaker 1: is there anybody on the horizon? Is there anybody we
18:57
Speaker 1: should be keeping an eye on? May who? There's a few?
19:01
Speaker 1: I know some people might say the first answer that
19:04
Speaker 1: comes to my via Stephen Hawking, but did a little research.
19:07
Speaker 1: And while Hawking is no slouch, there are some in
19:10
Speaker 1: the physics community that think Hawking gets a lot of
19:13
Speaker 1: attention because he's generated a lot of attention through his
19:15
Speaker 1: books and uh maybe through his disability has garnered a
19:20
Speaker 1: lot of attention. So certainly not to knock anything he's done,
19:24
Speaker 1: but within the physics community, I don't know if he's
19:26
Speaker 1: as high on the list of some of these other
19:27
Speaker 1: guys and gals. Guys and gals, I love that there's
19:31
Speaker 1: so much smarter than I. I'm calling him guys and gals,
19:34
Speaker 1: these dudes and chicks. Ed Whitton is one of them. Okay,
19:37
Speaker 1: you ever heard of Ed? I He is a physicist,
19:42
Speaker 1: specifically a mathematical physicist, and studies at Princeton. He's gotten
19:47
Speaker 1: the MacArthur Genius Grant. He's won the Fields Medal, which
19:51
Speaker 1: is the highest uh medal or honor you can get
19:53
Speaker 1: in math. So he's he's he's been called the next
19:57
Speaker 1: Isaac Newton. But he works with theory, which I know
20:00
Speaker 1: you're you're not a big fan of. I have one
20:02
Speaker 1: word about string theory? What's that? Boo boo? Yeah? So
20:06
Speaker 1: he's up there. And then there's a guy, a dude
20:09
Speaker 1: named Murray gell Man. Have you heard of him? Tell
20:12
Speaker 1: us about him? Okay? Uh MGM is I like to
20:16
Speaker 1: call him. He's a prominent scientist and once again he
20:20
Speaker 1: won the Nobel Prize in Physics in nineteen nine for
20:24
Speaker 1: his work with the theory of elementary particles. And he
20:27
Speaker 1: is the one that came up with cork the quirk.
20:31
Speaker 1: So he's no slouch. No, he's not a slouch. I mean,
20:33
Speaker 1: to predict the existence of a theoretical particle and then
20:37
Speaker 1: have it confirmed. Not a pretty smart guy. And then
20:40
Speaker 1: you know, some people might say folks like Bill Gates,
20:42
Speaker 1: who uh, he's not a physicist or a mathematician. But
20:46
Speaker 1: he has a high emotional intellect, a very high emotional
20:48
Speaker 1: intact and ellect, and a lot of money and a
20:52
Speaker 1: true visionary and a guy that likes to spread his
20:55
Speaker 1: money around to good causes nowadays. So I don't know
20:58
Speaker 1: what got into him, or if he was always this
20:59
Speaker 1: way and he was just really focused on Microsoft, but
21:02
Speaker 1: I gotta tell you, I like this repackaged Bill Gates. Yeah,
21:05
Speaker 1: he's very generous guy. Apparently more than half his fortune
21:08
Speaker 1: he's invested outside of Microsoft. It's fantastic. So if you're
21:11
Speaker 1: talking about an innovator, I mean, you can only really
21:13
Speaker 1: do good if you're if you're trying to help your
21:15
Speaker 1: fellow man, right, well, yeah, or if it's a happy
21:19
Speaker 1: byproduct of your evil deeds like Oppenheimer. No, that's the
21:24
Speaker 1: reverse of that. So, Chuck, there's three innovations. You said
21:28
Speaker 1: we could do a lot more. I'm kind of glad
21:30
Speaker 1: we did. But uh, I am interested as well. Thank
21:34
Speaker 1: you for turning off the stop by. I too am
21:36
Speaker 1: interested to see what our listeners who go through to
21:39
Speaker 1: the blogs think too. There's certainly some uh. I mean,
21:42
Speaker 1: we were talking if we were just on pipe dream time,
21:46
Speaker 1: like a food pill where you could just drop some
21:49
Speaker 1: water on it would create a meal. Sadly, that was
21:51
Speaker 1: one that we considered talking about, right, and he said
21:55
Speaker 1: it's called the vitamin, and I felt kind of stupid. Yeah,
21:58
Speaker 1: so you know we're not talking about which jetson type
22:00
Speaker 1: of stuff. I mean real attainable things like teleportation. Yeah,
22:05
Speaker 1: it's right there, right there. It's facing people so who
22:09
Speaker 1: all speak the same language Esperanto and Chuck, I guess
22:13
Speaker 1: it's time for a listener mail, right. Indeed, Yes, Josh,
22:18
Speaker 1: we're gonna call this a walk around the world listener, Marail,
22:22
Speaker 1: I have three quickies from different parts of the world,
22:25
Speaker 1: and we're gonna read them right now. Okay, you don't
22:27
Speaker 1: actually have to walk though, right, you're gonna first one
22:31
Speaker 1: is from Australia. Get a. My name is Nicola and
22:34
Speaker 1: I'm a student from Melbourne. I am finally seeing you
22:37
Speaker 1: an email after months of NonStop listening. I just want
22:39
Speaker 1: to say thank you for putting metric conversions in your
22:41
Speaker 1: more recent shows. I've been confused by your measuring method.
22:45
Speaker 1: Imperial is it called? Also, I must confess I love
22:47
Speaker 1: how you guys say Australia, especially how you pronounce it.
22:53
Speaker 1: Would you say it again on the air for me, Chuck, Australia, Australia,
23:00
Speaker 1: thanks a million. And that is from I won't say
23:02
Speaker 1: your biggest fan, because that's what everyone says. I will
23:04
Speaker 1: call myself a committed fanatic. Actually that sounds It's way
23:07
Speaker 1: better than slightly creepy if you asked me Nicola. So Nicola.
23:11
Speaker 1: This one is from Luca and Serbia. Luca says, I'm
23:15
Speaker 1: writing about Nicola Tesla. He said that he was Austrian.
23:18
Speaker 1: That is not true. He was an ethnic Serb. Wait
23:20
Speaker 1: a minute. Our last one was our last listener was
23:24
Speaker 1: Nicola from Australia, and now Luca from Serbia. Is writing
23:27
Speaker 1: about Nicola Tesla. How about that this is crazy? It's crazy,
23:31
Speaker 1: so he says that is not true. He was an
23:33
Speaker 1: ethnic Serb who was born in today's Croatia, which was
23:36
Speaker 1: part of Austria, so he's not what you would consider
23:40
Speaker 1: today Austrian. He's although I'm sure Luca just said he
23:44
Speaker 1: was born in Austria, so Croatians like to say he
23:48
Speaker 1: was Croatian. But he's a Serb because his father was
23:50
Speaker 1: an Orthodox priest and Croatians are Catholics. So that is
23:54
Speaker 1: from Luca. And then my final favorite from China. Remember
23:59
Speaker 1: al Jane, Uh, this is great. I'm just gonna read
24:03
Speaker 1: it as it stands here, and we should go ahead
24:05
Speaker 1: and tell y'all we're not making fun. I love broken English.
24:08
Speaker 1: I think it's adorable and when people make the effort
24:10
Speaker 1: it really you know, gives me a good feeling. There
24:13
Speaker 1: you go, Chuck, Well, I'm a loyal fan of stuff.
24:15
Speaker 1: You should know. You guys always make me laugh and
24:18
Speaker 1: when there have some weird words that I don't know,
24:21
Speaker 1: I will hear it repeatedly. So I am a hard
24:24
Speaker 1: working fan of your program. I got an interesting topic.
24:28
Speaker 1: I think why you guys don't talk about the Internet
24:31
Speaker 1: censorship and how to skip it because in my country, China,
24:35
Speaker 1: people can't access the YouTube and interestingly, I even can't
24:40
Speaker 1: access your blog, so we're banned in China. I know
24:43
Speaker 1: I blogged about it. Uh, this is the American Life
24:46
Speaker 1: podcast may be also illegal because I can't download it.
24:50
Speaker 1: There has a defense system named great Wall. Wish you
24:54
Speaker 1: can see it and read it in your program. But
24:56
Speaker 1: don't mock me. It's what he says, and I think
25:00
Speaker 1: he means there is I'm you know, apologies for the
25:03
Speaker 1: broken English or emen don't market one of those. So
25:07
Speaker 1: that is from Yao Jian and we appreciate you all listening.
25:10
Speaker 1: And yes, yeah, and thank you for the information. Because
25:12
Speaker 1: I actually did blog about Tianamen Square the anniversary the
25:17
Speaker 1: twenties anniversaries happened. I couldn't remember which listener told us
25:21
Speaker 1: that we were banned there, but yeah, I gotta tell
25:23
Speaker 1: you that's the point of pride for maybe. Yeah, that's awesome,
25:25
Speaker 1: and we love folks writing in and given their best
25:27
Speaker 1: attempt at speaking are weird language. Yeah, Chica, thanks to
25:34
Speaker 1: all of you. And I just think it's cool that
25:36
Speaker 1: there's people on the other side of the world that
25:38
Speaker 1: think we're interesting. Yeah, weird. Yeah, Well, if you want
25:42
Speaker 1: to tell us that we're interesting, or correct us about
25:44
Speaker 1: where some guy was born or whatever for Marcus, sure,
25:48
Speaker 1: you can send an email to stuff podcast how stuff
25:52
Speaker 1: works dot com. For more on this and thousands of
25:59
Speaker 1: other topics at how stuff works dot com. Want more
26:02
Speaker 1: house stuff works, check out our blogs on the house
26:05
Speaker 1: stuff works dot com home page. Brought to you by
26:10
Speaker 1: the reinvented two thousand twelve camera. It's ready, are you