Latest / Brian Thomas / Judge Napolitano
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: And Rye Bolt. Coming up next, a very happy guest
- 0:04Speaker 1: this morning. I'm having trouble figuring out why. Let's see. Well,
- 0:08Speaker 1: the price of Halloween candy is way too high. His
- 0:11Speaker 1: costume's done. Oh, there it is. His New York Giants
- 0:15Speaker 1: are in first place. The judge is next. Chuck Ingram
- 0:19Speaker 1: on 55KRC, the talk station.
- 0:23Speaker 2: See, I get the benefit of seeing Judge Napolitano's reaction
- 0:25Speaker 2: to Chuck Ingram's comments. He's looking down. He's shaking his
- 0:30Speaker 2: head back and forth like, what in God's name is
- 0:32Speaker 2: this guy talking about? Welcome back, Judge Ananapolitano. It's that
- 0:34Speaker 2: time of week. We get the benefit of your insight,
- 0:37Speaker 2: constitutionally grounded wisdom. It's good to always have you on
- 0:41Speaker 2: the program at this time. Judge, welcome back.
- 0:43Speaker 3: Thank you, Brian. It's always a pleasure. And I love Ingram,
- 0:46Speaker 3: no matter what he says. And the Giants are in
- 0:48Speaker 3: first place. Surprise, surprise.
- 0:50Speaker 2: They are indeed. Is that your team?
- 0:53Speaker 3: Yes. How's Joe Burrow? Is he injured yet?
- 0:57Speaker 2: No, don't say things like that. Now it's going to happen.
- 1:01Speaker 2: Thank you very much.
- 1:02Speaker 3: Listen, I wish him well. I'm an admirer of his
- 1:06Speaker 3: athleticism and I want my friends in Cincinnati to be
- 1:09Speaker 3: happy unless they play the Giants.
- 1:11Speaker 2: Well, OK, we'll take that caveat. And I agree with you.
- 1:14Speaker 2: And he is one hell of an athlete. There's no
- 1:16Speaker 2: doubt about it. Guy can throw a pass, man. Anyway,
- 1:19Speaker 2: I loved your column. I refer to it as brilliant.
- 1:21Speaker 2: America's deadly addiction to war. And it was sort of
- 1:24Speaker 2: an objective oversight of the realities since 1950 that presidents
- 1:28Speaker 2: have sort of just unilaterally waged war without sort of
- 1:31Speaker 2: a defined objective. And the predicate for the various military
- 1:35Speaker 2: conflicts we've been in is an agenda populace that's worried
- 1:38Speaker 2: about some existential threat to our existence, only to find
- 1:42Speaker 2: out when the bombs drop that we don't ultimately get
- 1:44Speaker 2: the outcome we've hoped for. And that's when mission creep
- 1:46Speaker 2: and changes come. And we find ourselves in a place
- 1:49Speaker 2: like Afghanistan for 20 years, Only to pull the plug
- 1:52Speaker 2: with terrible result. I know I'm just boiling down your
- 1:54Speaker 2: brilliant column very quickly, but I don't know how anybody
- 1:58Speaker 2: can disagree with you about the realities of what you write,
- 2:00Speaker 2: Judge Napolitano. We do have a Constitution.
- 2:03Speaker 3: You're nice to say that. We do have a Constitution
- 2:06Speaker 3: totally obliterated, utterly ignored by a feckless Congress that would
- 2:14Speaker 3: rather criticize from the sidelines than prevent these things from happening.
- 2:19Speaker 3: We'll see what the Congress does if it's controlled by
- 2:23Speaker 3: or dominated by the Democrats. I'm not looking for better
- 2:29Speaker 3: things from the Democrats than the Republicans, but we'll see
- 2:31Speaker 3: if they can put a brake on Trump's wars. So
- 2:36Speaker 3: many people feel betrayed by a president who promised an
- 2:40Speaker 3: end to endless wars, and here we are again. We're
- 2:43Speaker 3: in the middle of two of them.
- 2:45Speaker 2: The CIA is.
- 2:48Speaker 3: finding targets in Russia for Ukraine to hit. We are
- 2:54Speaker 3: funding the Israelis in Gaza. And of course, we're in
- 2:59Speaker 3: a bit of a pause now, but every other day
- 3:01Speaker 3: seems to be threatening to resume attacks on Iran so that, quote,
- 3:06Speaker 3: it can't take out Los Angeles, an absurd, absurd threat
- 3:11Speaker 3: that no serious military analyst believes is even possible, much
- 3:17Speaker 3: less feasible.
- 3:18Speaker 2: Well, do you actually expect the Democrats to do anything
- 3:20Speaker 2: about this? Because I'm looking at your list, and I
- 3:22Speaker 2: don't think it's a comprehensive one. Korea, Vietnam, Kosovo, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Ukraine, Iran, and, well, others.
- 3:29Speaker 2: I don't recall any political party being the major challenger
- 3:32Speaker 2: to those actions or stepping up and endeavoring to stop them.
- 3:36Speaker 3: The only thing they'll do is, because they detest him personally,
- 3:41Speaker 3: is try to make Trump's life miserable for him.
- 3:45Speaker 2: Oh, yeah.
- 3:46Speaker 3: But many of the Democrats... probably secretly, I'm not a shrink,
- 3:53Speaker 3: I can't tell you what, compare what they say publicly
- 3:55Speaker 3: to what they think inwardly, support all this military activity
- 4:01Speaker 3: for the reasons articulated in the piece. It gives them
- 4:06Speaker 3: a feeling of power. It enriches the military-industrial complex. The
- 4:10Speaker 3: military-industrial complex is all over the United States. in many, many,
- 4:16Speaker 3: many congressional districts. They don't want those people to lose
- 4:19Speaker 3: their jobs, even if their jobs are based on borrowed
- 4:24Speaker 3: dollars going to the Pentagon.
- 4:27Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm glad you said this. The next place I
- 4:29Speaker 2: was going to go, you read my mind. You mentioned funding. Okay,
- 4:34Speaker 2: people are all pissed off. We fund Israel. Fine, you're
- 4:36Speaker 2: either against it or you're for it. But our money,
- 4:38Speaker 2: taxpayer borrowed dollars, goes to Israel for the purpose of what?
- 4:42Speaker 2: Acquiring arms, which money goes back to the U.S. manufacturers
- 4:45Speaker 2: of arms benefiting the military-industrial complex. But that's the way
- 4:49Speaker 2: it is in any country that we give money to
- 4:52Speaker 2: for the purpose of acquisition of arms. It's buying from
- 4:55Speaker 2: our U.S. companies and building up and keeping their profitability. Correct.
- 4:59Speaker 3: In the case of Israel, much of the money goes
- 5:01Speaker 3: directly to the arms manufacturers so that Israel doesn't have
- 5:06Speaker 3: to wait. So those huge military planes that carry cargo,
- 5:13Speaker 3: I forget what they're called, they land two or three
- 5:15Speaker 3: times a day in Israel with the gear right there.
- 5:20Speaker 3: In the case of Ukraine, it's an actual cash transfer.
- 5:25Speaker 3: The Europeans are paying American manufacturers who are then shipping
- 5:31Speaker 3: supplies either directly to Ukraine or to the Pentagon to
- 5:34Speaker 3: replace the what the Pentagon is shipping to Ukraine, if
- 5:38Speaker 3: all of this makes sense to you. In both cases,
- 5:42Speaker 3: it is the federal government borrowing money, paying for wars
- 5:48Speaker 3: that have nothing to do with American national security, but
- 5:52Speaker 3: your children and your grandchildren and your great-grandchildren, as yet unborn,
- 5:57Speaker 3: will be paying higher taxes to pay back the debt
- 6:00Speaker 3: that was created by this borrowing.
- 6:03Speaker 2: And the corollary being they will also be living in
- 6:05Speaker 2: a less free society because Lord knows if we are
- 6:08Speaker 2: under any form of threat, existential, created or otherwise, if
- 6:12Speaker 2: you gin up enough concern over it, then that's when
- 6:14Speaker 2: your civil liberties are eradicated and you find out the
- 6:18Speaker 2: NSA is literally listening to every phone call you've ever made.
- 6:21Speaker 3: Well, the NSA is listening to every phone call you
- 6:23Speaker 3: and I have made since 2001 because of 9-11. even though,
- 6:29Speaker 3: according to the federal government, everybody that caused 9-11 is
- 6:32Speaker 3: either dead or incarcerated in Cuba. But the feds took
- 6:36Speaker 3: the power that the Congress gave them in October of
- 6:43Speaker 3: 2001 and retained it. And that power expires every five years,
- 6:48Speaker 3: and every five years, there's this narrow, narrow, narrow vote
- 6:51Speaker 3: in the House of Representatives, and it passes by one
- 6:54Speaker 3: or two votes.
- 6:56Speaker 2: You don't think that's planned?
- 6:58Speaker 3: Of course it's planned. Congressman Johnson, Mike Johnson, who's the
- 7:04Speaker 3: Speaker of the House, was a fierce opponent of the
- 7:07Speaker 3: NSA when he was a just congressman. Now that he's
- 7:11Speaker 3: Speaker of the House and receives periodic private visits from
- 7:15Speaker 3: the intelligence community, gee, I wonder what they're showing him.
- 7:19Speaker 3: He comes out in favor of all the spying. I mean,
- 7:23Speaker 3: this happened literally last time. when he left the Speaker's
- 7:27Speaker 3: chair to go on the floor and cast a vote.
- 7:31Speaker 3: And the reauthorization of the spying authorities passed the House
- 7:37Speaker 3: by one vote.
- 7:40Speaker 2: Again, you don't think that was.
- 7:41Speaker 3: Hey, what is our friend Thomas Massey going to be
- 7:44Speaker 3: doing in January? Do we know?
- 7:47Speaker 2: I do not know. He's probably going to go back
- 7:49Speaker 2: to enjoying the benefits of his multiple patents and the
- 7:53Speaker 2: income he generates off of that, enjoy life on his
- 7:56Speaker 2: successful off-the-grid farm where he is raising his own beef
- 8:01Speaker 2: and having it slaughtered locally for local consumption. And of course,
- 8:05Speaker 2: he's continuing to ask the question, why can't local farmers
- 8:08Speaker 2: butcher their own beef? He's got a new bill out
- 8:11Speaker 2: that hoping to advance that common sense reality. Why can't
- 8:15Speaker 2: we Why do we have to go to some major
- 8:19Speaker 2: corporate-owned slaughterhouse to have beef processed at a significant increase
- 8:23Speaker 2: in cost to you and I?
- 8:25Speaker 3: Because Congress can regulate interstate commerce, and therefore it can
- 8:28Speaker 3: regulate anything that affects interstate commerce. And therefore, according to
- 8:32Speaker 3: Justice Clarence Thomas, it could regulate a Tupperware party if
- 8:36Speaker 3: it wanted to. This is absurd. Congressman Massey is 100% correct.
- 8:42Speaker 3: The government should have nothing to do with this.
- 8:45Speaker 2: Agreed. Well, that's why he introduced the Red Meat Inspection
- 8:48Speaker 2: Exemption Act. So what bell is rung can be unrung
- 8:52Speaker 2: in the name of freedom and liberty and common sense,
- 8:54Speaker 2: for that matter. Let's free it up. And I think
- 8:56Speaker 2: he'll still be hard at work and maybe not, of course,
- 8:59Speaker 2: in a representative capacity. But because he has experience, knowledge,
- 9:02Speaker 2: and he's been such a profound advocate for these free market,
- 9:06Speaker 2: freedom-loving principles, he'll continue to work towards those efforts. I'm
- 9:10Speaker 2: just confident he will. He can't give up. He's a
- 9:12Speaker 2: man of principle, Judge Napolitano.
- 9:13Speaker 3: Correct. Correct. Absolutely. I'd love to see him as the
- 9:17Speaker 3: governor of Kentucky or as the junior senator from Kentucky.
- 9:23Speaker 3: Imagine Rand Paul and Thomas Massey as your senators.
- 9:27Speaker 1: Wow.
- 9:28Speaker 2: I'd write a check in support of that campaign. I
- 9:31Speaker 2: write very few checks in support of campaigns. Judge Ed Napolitano,
- 9:34Speaker 2: Judging Freedom is the podcast. You can find it wherever
- 9:36Speaker 2: you find your podcasts, including iHeartMedia. Judge Napolitano, standard cast
- 9:40Speaker 2: of characters on a Wednesday, or you got someone different today?
- 9:42Speaker 3: I do have Jeff Sachs, Professor Sachs, to analyze what
- 9:47Speaker 3: we hope is a result in the Israeli elections. Otherwise,
- 9:51Speaker 3: Pepe Escobar from Thailand and Phil Giraldi.
- 9:56Speaker 2: Yeah, we're still waiting on that outcome. It looks like
- 9:59Speaker 2: it was... basically tied.
- 10:01Speaker 3: Yes, it does look like a tie. And whoever is
- 10:06Speaker 3: going to form a new government is going to have
- 10:08Speaker 3: to deal with the Arab parties who have a huge number.
- 10:14Speaker 3: They have three times the numbers in the new Knesset
- 10:17Speaker 3: than they do in the present one. This is going
- 10:20Speaker 3: to cause a lot of head scratching.
- 10:22Speaker 2: It is. And they're both sides are a little bit
- 10:24Speaker 2: worried about forming a coalition with those Arab factors. But
- 10:26Speaker 2: isn't it remarkably interesting for those who think that only
- 10:29Speaker 2: Jewish people and Jews are capable of getting elected to
- 10:31Speaker 2: higher office in Israel? There you go. They have Arab
- 10:34Speaker 2: coalition and they have Arabs in positions of power in Israel.
- 10:39Speaker 3: One of the members of the Arab coalition is a
- 10:43Speaker 3: Jewish Israeli. Go figure.
- 10:45Speaker 2: Yeah.
- 10:48Speaker 3: As Yogi Berra would say, only in America.
- 10:50Speaker 2: Is that cognitive dissonance or a Stockholm syndrome kind of thing?
- 10:55Speaker 2: I guess we'll have to worry about and wonder about
- 10:57Speaker 2: that psychological diagnosis. DSM-5, probably. Judge Ed Napolitano will do
- 11:01Speaker 2: this again next Wednesday on the 55 KRC Morning Show.
- 11:03Speaker 2: I always appreciate your columns. Get a copy of it
- 11:06Speaker 2: after midnight tonight, America's Deadly Addiction to War. God bless you, sir.
- 11:11Speaker 2: Have a great week.
- 11:11Speaker 3: Thank you, Brian.
- 11:12Speaker 1: All the best.
- 11:13Speaker 2: It's 841.