Latest / Kendall County News - Shaw Local / Developers agree to re-phase Project Cardinal data center in Yorkville in settlement with resident
Transcript
- 0:05Speaker 1: Developers agree to RePhase Project Cardinal Data Center in Yorkville
- 0:09Speaker 1: in settlement with resident. Written by Joey Weslow, This article
- 0:15Speaker 1: is being read by an automated voice brought to you
- 0:17Speaker 1: by Everlett. Matt McCarron and Pioneer Development LLC previously said
- 0:23Speaker 1: there was no way they could reorder the construction phasing
- 0:26Speaker 1: of the one thousand and thirty seven acre Project Cardinal
- 0:29Speaker 1: Data Center in Yorkville away from the more residential areas.
- 0:34Speaker 1: A residence lawsuit has changed all that. A settlement has
- 0:38Speaker 1: been reached with resident John Bryan, who sued the City
- 0:41Speaker 1: of Yorkville and the developers in an attempt to halt
- 0:44Speaker 1: construction of the project. Bryan argued the construction of the
- 0:48Speaker 1: fourteen two story warehouses over ten twenty years will negatively
- 0:52Speaker 1: impact his property values and quality of life. After months
- 0:56Speaker 1: of extended negotiations, the developers agreed to re order the
- 1:00Speaker 1: phases of construction to a northeast southeast west order. The
- 1:04Speaker 1: city previously approved a planned unit development agreement back in
- 1:08Speaker 1: November twenty twenty five, dictating a phasing plan with construction
- 1:12Speaker 1: beginning in the northeast of the site working to the
- 1:15Speaker 1: west before finishing in the southeast of the site. Brian
- 1:19Speaker 1: lives west of the project's site. According to the settlement,
- 1:23Speaker 1: each construction phase must be substantially complete before workers can
- 1:27Speaker 1: begin construction on the next phase. City Council approved on
- 1:31Speaker 1: June twenty third an ordinance regarding the settlement agreement. The
- 1:36Speaker 1: settlement contains no financial payment from the city to Brian. However,
- 1:40Speaker 1: Brian and the project developers may still separately negotiate the
- 1:44Speaker 1: terms of a side agreement. No financial data of any
- 1:48Speaker 1: possible settlement between them has been made public. City Administrator
- 1:52Speaker 1: bart Olsen said any change to the phasing plan requires
- 1:55Speaker 1: a major PEWD amendment to the project. According to the City,
- 1:59Speaker 1: the d developers have already applied for a major pued
- 2:02Speaker 1: amendment to update the phasing plan. The plans are expected
- 2:07Speaker 1: to be discussed during the July meetings of the Economic
- 2:10Speaker 1: Development Committee and Planning and Zoning Committee before a vote
- 2:14Speaker 1: can take place during the July fourteenth City Council meeting.
- 2:18Speaker 1: The re ordering of the phases of construction for the
- 2:21Speaker 1: project is not the only snag the developers have recently hit.
- 2:25Speaker 1: City Council also passed on June twenty third an amendment
- 2:29Speaker 1: to the developer's annexation agreement to allow an eighteen month
- 2:33Speaker 1: extension for the developers to acquire all the titles for
- 2:36Speaker 1: the subject property. The city did not say why the
- 2:40Speaker 1: developer is struggling closing on all the properties, only citing
- 2:44Speaker 1: unforeseen circumstances. The original deadline for the developer to acquire
- 2:49Speaker 1: all the parcels for the project to keep all the
- 2:51Speaker 1: city's agreements was July first. It has now been extended
- 2:55Speaker 1: to December thirty first, twenty twenty seven. If the developers
- 3:00Speaker 1: cannot close by that date, the annexation agreement green lighting
- 3:03Speaker 1: the whole project would become null and void. According to
- 3:07Speaker 1: city documents, This would put the entire project at risk
- 3:11Speaker 1: of ever being built because it would also void the PAD,
- 3:15Speaker 1: the Utility and Infrastructure Agreement, and the fifty one million
- 3:19Speaker 1: dollars upfront payment development Agreement. Shaw Local News has reached
- 3:23Speaker 1: out to McCarran for comment via email on June eighth,
- 3:26Speaker 1: but has not received a response. While the one thousand,
- 3:30Speaker 1: thirty four acre site consists of several properties, the annexation
- 3:33Speaker 1: agreement specifically pertained to seven individual farmland parcels stretched across
- 3:39Speaker 1: a total of three hundred five acres. The city and
- 3:43Speaker 1: the developers for Project Cardinal are also facing another lawsuit
- 3:47Speaker 1: by residents forming a community based organization, Preserve Our Yorkville
- 3:51Speaker 1: Community LLC, who argue the city failed to properly notify
- 3:55Speaker 1: area residents before approving the project. The lawsuits also are
- 4:00Speaker 1: argue the sound, traffic, environmental and property value studies were
- 4:04Speaker 1: not comprehensive in taking into account the lengthy period of
- 4:07Speaker 1: construction and the close proximity of the other data center
- 4:11Speaker 1: projects approved by the city. During an April City Council meeting,
- 4:15Speaker 1: Mayor John Purcell said there's no more appetite from the
- 4:18Speaker 1: City Council for data center proposals outside of what's already
- 4:22Speaker 1: been approved. The city was at one point entertaining about
- 4:26Speaker 1: a dozen different data center proposals stretched out across more
- 4:29Speaker 1: than three thousand acres of the el Domain corridor for
- 4:33Speaker 1: Yorkville's own data center alley. The city already has approved
- 4:37Speaker 1: the two hundred and twenty eight acre cyrus Ie Data Center,
- 4:40Speaker 1: the Project Cardinal Data Center, and the five hundred forty
- 4:44Speaker 1: acre Project Steel Data Center.