Latest / David Icke / Do We Want An Insane World To Judge Our Own Sanity?

Transcript

Do We Want An Insane World To Judge Our Own Sanity? · David Icke

• 0:00
  100 years ago, Nikola Tesla discovered a healing technology that threatened the entire pharmaceutical
• 0:06
  industry. The day he died, the government seized everything. For 100 years, this technology was
• 0:14
  hidden. Until now, Plasma is back. Tesla Club, TZLA.Club.
• 0:24
  Hello. Welcome to The Dot Connector. A little bit different this week.
• 0:28
  I'm going to focus on two programs that have gone out, been broadcast in the last few days,
• 0:38
  called 70 Up. And it's a fascinating look at human life and how it plays out. Because what they did
• 0:52
  was, in 1964, they got together children from many and various backgrounds who were seven years old.
• 1:06
  And I think it was meant to just be a one-off. But what they've done since is every seven years,
• 1:15
  they have done another documentary to see how those children are progressing through life. And
• 1:23
  they reached the point in the last few days where they broadcast what they say will be the last
• 1:30
  in the series with the participants 70 years of age, hence 70 Up. And on so many levels,
• 1:45
  just watching this finale has been such a statement about human life as it plays out.
• 2:03
  And it's something I'm going to kind of dot connect and play with this week. It's got a lot of
• 2:12
  publicity. There's been a lot of media about it. But I'm going to take a different angle to the one
• 2:20
  that or the ones that you've seen in the media. And so before we start, here's a little bit of
• 2:30
  background and some idea of the people involved. In 1964, Grenada Television made a program about
• 2:41
  14 seven-year-old children. They came from very different backgrounds. Some were from wealthy
• 2:46
  families. Some were from working-class homes. Some were being educated privately. Others
• 2:52
  were already being prepared for working lives. The program wanted to ask how much of a person's
• 2:59
  future was determined by the circumstances they were born into. It was called Seven Up.
• 3:05
  And it was supposed to be a one-off. Nobody involved could have known that the cameras
• 3:10
  would still be following these children more than 60 years later. Nobody could have known
• 3:15
  that the children would become pensioners or that two of them would die before the story was
• 3:20
  finished or that the man who became synonymous with the series would himself die before it ended.
• 3:26
  And nobody could have known. In 2026, television would finally ask them the question for the last
• 3:33
  time. This is the story of Up. So that's the basis of the series. And you've got these
• 3:46
  vibrant seven-year-olds in 1964 looking forward to their lives. And even then, when you
• 3:55
  watch the shows right back to the start, you see the people's background influencing where they
• 4:06
  think they're going to go. And of course, I'm very much interested in this sequence because
• 4:15
  I was born in 1952, which was a little bit just a few years earlier than these people in the
• 4:22
  programs. But pretty much the same period. I'm 74 now. And programs. Yeah, television programs.
• 4:36
  Well, actually, that's so appropriate because life, if you just follow the norms,
• 4:47
  is pretty much a program. You have stories that you follow. I mean, you've got a working class
• 4:57
  story. You've got an upper class story. You've got a religious story, whichever one that you
• 5:03
  follow. You've got a career story. And all these stories relate to one overall program
• 5:14
  where you're born. You then go through a period called childhood where massive amounts of programming
• 5:23
  happen, programming of perception, programming of stories, life stories. You go into adulthood.
• 5:33
  And then not everybody, but most people get married and they have children.
• 5:40
  And then they grow older and older and older. And then they plop you in a box at the end.
• 5:50
  And over and over through what we call history, ancient and modern,
• 5:57
  you've seen the same sequence playing out. But why? Why is there a norm,
• 6:12
  the whole foundation of which has continued through all cultures and backgrounds and periods?
• 6:26
  Why? What is it all about? Well,
• 6:34
  program, I guess, is the common theme of what I'm saying because it's my contention,
• 6:44
  and has been for a long time, that we are following a program,
• 6:49
  that we live in a simulated fake reality. And we are attached to that fake reality via
• 7:00
  what I call the biological computer, the body brain. And the body brain is a software program.
• 7:13
  It's a software program in the sense that it's doing things unconsciously all the time,
• 7:20
  like responding to different temperatures, responding to different situations,
• 7:26
  fight or flight, which is a body response to danger. And so, as I say many times,
• 7:39
  when's the last time you remember breathing? Well, the last time you remember breathing is when you
• 7:47
  were out of breath. Because when you were out of breath, it became conscious. Otherwise, you just
• 7:54
  breathe. You don't say, I'm breathing now. You just breathe. And that is the body program playing
• 8:03
  out in all its facets and forms. But this is the key. What I'm also saying is that the body carries
• 8:12
  psychological programs. I mean, fight or flight is a classic example of what I'm talking about.
• 8:20
  But there are many other psychological programs that are playing out that we put together
• 8:29
  under the title normal. It's what people normally do. It's how they normally react.
• 8:41
  But if you break out of that program into the greater self consciousness beyond the
• 8:52
  body-mind program, suddenly you start to see life very differently. And you start to question the
• 9:02
  norms. And you don't follow the sequence in the same way. You question it. You say, why
• 9:11
  do we do it like this? Why is life so much the same, no matter what culture or religious
• 9:21
  domination of a society that you experience? And the foundation of it is the body-mind program,
• 9:35
  which is there to dictate your perception and therefore dictate your behavior
• 9:43
  and hold you in these norms. Now, these norms take the form of stories.
• 9:52
  You know, the stories will appear to be different, which gives you the illusion of diversity.
• 10:01
  But actually, the stories are so similar in so many ways. Take religious stories.
• 10:08
  You can have a religious story that calls itself Christianity. You can have a religious story that
• 10:17
  calls itself Islam or Judaism or Hinduism. But basically, the story is the same.
• 10:25
  There's a God in Hinduism's terms, gods, that you must keep on board to prevent you going to hell
• 10:40
  or whatever when you eventually leave the body. And in so many of these religions,
• 10:46
  we are judged, apparently, by this God on one life on earth. And as this series 70 Up looked at,
• 11:01
  they were children back in 1964 that came from very different backgrounds. Some were upper
• 11:11
  class, some were working class. And yet, the stories of the challenges of life are
• 11:26
  incredibly similar. And one of the foundations of the stories is you mustn't deviate from them.
• 11:38
  So you have a religious story that says, this is what you must believe. And if you deviate from it,
• 11:45
  you're a blasphemer or you're not one of us anymore. You are dabbling in the paranormal or
• 11:54
  the occult or whatever. And you leave the fold. You can't deviate from your story. And you had
• 12:06
  children from upper class backgrounds in this series who were saying as seven-year-olds where
• 12:15
  they were going to go to school and what they were going to do and how their life was going to
• 12:21
  play out. Not because they were making free choices about that, but their parents had given them a
• 12:29
  story that they had followed and their children have to follow it as well. It's all crazy. And this
• 12:39
  is the foundation in this image. And that is whatever your story turns out to be, whatever is
• 12:51
  implanted in your perception of who you are, you mustn't deviate from it. You absolutely
• 12:59
  mustn't start exploring beyond the bounds of the story, what we call normal. Because if you do,
• 13:11
  people jump on you and they call you mad or bad or dangerous because you've deviated from the
• 13:19
  story. And if you look at religion and orthodox science, they seem to be at odds with each other
• 13:30
  because they're different stories, right? Well, only in detail because if you deviate from the
• 13:41
  religious stories, whichever religion you follow, then you are called a blasphemer or, you know,
• 13:50
  dabbling in the occult, a word that just means hidden. In other words, when you start exploring
• 13:56
  what we don't know, they're hidden, you're dabbling in the occult.
• 14:02
  But in the same way, if you look at mainstream science, it's also a religion.
• 14:09
  Its story may be different, but it's the same sequence. You have a belief in orthodox science.
• 14:21
  You have the holy books, which are the holy books of orthodox science. And if you deviate from the
• 14:30
  story of orthodox science, then you are a pseudo scientist or you're going into the paranormal,
• 14:43
  not credible. And there's a common theme between the two, religion and science.
• 14:51
  Don't explore beyond the norm. Don't do it. And the norms I've called over the years,
• 15:06
  the postage stamp consensus, that's a tiny perception of possibility
• 15:17
  which you mustn't deviate from the postage stamp consensus. This is the postage stamp that is taught
• 15:27
  in the schools, that's communicated by the mainstream media, that's taught in the universities,
• 15:37
  the postage stamp. And there's a German philosopher, Arthur Schopenhauer,
• 15:43
  who captures this situation in this quote, every man takes the limits of his own field of vision
• 15:53
  for the limits of the world. And that takes us into another area, which is he who programs
• 16:07
  the field of vision dictates the perceived limits of the world. And that is how the few
• 16:27
  have always controlled the many by controlling perception, which then controls behavior. And if
• 16:37
  you can squeeze the sense of the possible, then when someone like me or others come along and say,
• 16:46
  actually, this is what's happening out here, that sense of the possible says, that's not possible,
• 16:56
  you're mad, this is crazy, that can't be happening. And what I didn't see, except maybe in one case,
• 17:10
  what I didn't see in these documentaries in the last few days, 70 up, were the following questions.
• 17:23
  What's it all about? What is reality? Who am I? What is this I?
• 17:35
  What is this place? It's like you go through life so mesmerized and so confined by the norms
• 17:49
  and fear going beyond them, you're dangerous, you're mad, that you don't ask the big
• 18:01
  questions. Now, some may have done, I'm only going on what I saw in these
• 18:08
  these two programs that completed the series. And one person definitely found religion at one point,
• 18:17
  but then again, religion is just another story, which you must not deviate from.
• 18:30
  Another norm. Now, one man, Peter from Liverpool in the series, who seemed a very intelligent guy,
• 18:44
  he did say, hallelujah, that he quite often asked, why am I here?
• 18:54
  What am I doing? Where am I going? His conclusions from that didn't become clear in the series,
• 19:05
  but at least he was asking those questions. And if we don't ask them, if we don't pursue them,
• 19:19
  then what are we? We're just a software program playing out where people believe they are doing
• 19:32
  the thinking, they are doing the deciding, they are adhering to the limits or perceived limits
• 19:44
  that are imposed upon them. But actually, the program, the software program running through the
• 19:55
  body mind is doing the thinking and doing the deciding absent, opening your mind to consciousness
• 20:06
  beyond it, at which point, whoa, you start to see the world in a completely different way. And
• 20:17
  we have this part of this program. We have this idea that certain people
• 20:29
  know more than we do. Now, that can be the case if you've studied different things to a
• 20:36
  further degree, then you will know some things more than other people. But just because
• 20:45
  you are called an expert, just because you're called a scientist or a doctor or an academic
• 20:56
  does not mean you know your ass from your elbow. It doesn't go along the line that
• 21:08
  they are an academic, they're a scientist, they're a religious leader even.
• 21:17
  So they know what they're talking about. And yet,
• 21:21
  the people we hold up there as the experts, the people who tell us what to think,
• 21:31
  what are they? Are they smart people? Are they super clever? Are they more intelligent than the
• 21:47
  more programmed than the rest of us? Because what do you do? You progress to be a scientist,
• 21:56
  to be a doctor, to be a lawyer, whatever, by passing exams in your formative years.
• 22:06
  And what are exams? They say, this is what we're telling you to think, this is what
• 22:15
  we're telling you to believe across the great spectrum of subjects. And if you tell us in your
• 22:25
  exam paper, what we've told you to believe, you'll pass and progress within our system. So
• 22:39
  what we call experts are largely repeaters. They're just repeating the program they've been told to
• 22:53
  believe in and repeat, because if they don't repeat it, then they're out the door in terms of
• 23:03
  the system and its institutions. Do you remember, I've said this many times,
• 23:13
  if you're looking at a television doctor, right, they wheel them out,
• 23:21
  he's a doctor, you must believe what the doctor says, he's a doctor. Oh, really? What was that
• 23:28
  about the COVID-19 vaccine again, safe and effective, they told us? How do you know that?
• 23:36
  What a system told us, so I just told you what a system told me, exactly. Repeaters.
• 23:45
  That's what so many, quote, experts are. And I've met people around the world
• 23:54
  who didn't do grade at school, who didn't progress in the system, but with their open mind, they are
• 24:05
  some of the best researchers in the world, because they have an open mind and are not
• 24:14
  confined to repeating the norms. So if you're a television doctor, you're a television doctor for
• 24:24
  one reason, you're repeating the system's version of health, otherwise you wouldn't be a television
• 24:32
  doctor. There's a couple of blokes in Britain called Amir Khan, doctor, and Hilary Jones,
• 24:42
  doctor, who told us all that the COVID-19 vaccine was safe and effective.
• 24:53
  And it's killed and maimed enormous numbers of people.
• 24:59
  Consequences.
• 25:04
  Still television doctors.
• 25:08
  And so many things that we think are facts, or how things are, are just assumptions,
• 25:20
  assumptions that become perceived facts merely by repetition of the assumption.
• 25:33
  And what is science? What is mainstream science, if you look at its history?
• 25:40
  It is assumptions repeated into the perception of facts that are later shown to be fallacy
• 25:55
  and fakery and a load of old nonsense.
• 26:02
  But the hierarchy of society that these 70-up programs,
• 26:16
  7-up, 70-up different periods of these people's lives, what they set out to do was look at
• 26:28
  the upper class children and the middle, I guess, working class children,
• 26:39
  just figments of society's imagination, upper class, middle class, working class.
• 26:47
  And they wanted to see if the background dictated their life. Well, to a very large extent,
• 26:57
  of course, it did. But the hierarchy that perceived I'm down here, they're up there,
• 27:06
  is merely created to create control so that the vast majority of children, and then as they become
• 27:21
  adults, know their place. Know your place in society.
• 27:32
  Well, I started out as a different kid for the first few years.
• 27:37
  You know, I was frightened of my own shadow, basically. And then I had a, I guess,
• 27:46
  you could call it the first awakening.
• 27:51
  And it was a massive awakening because I wasn't having it anymore.
• 27:55
  I wasn't going to fit the mold. I wasn't going to follow the norms
• 28:05
  that I was told to follow. I wasn't going to think the way I was told to think.
• 28:15
  And I remember when I was at school, I was thinking, what am I going to do?
• 28:22
  Because I can't go into this world that all my mates were going to go into.
• 28:29
  Now, I'm not knocking that because those jobs need doing. It's just that I weren't going to go there.
• 28:39
  And football, basically, was my way out of the norms. And I went on to be a journalist, a television
• 28:51
  presenter, and then a crazy person, a crazy person. What does that mean in a society based on norms?
• 29:11
  It means that you are exploring the hidden that the norms don't want you to do.
• 29:28
  A crazy person. Let's look at a definition of that.
• 29:33
  We live in a world in which crazy is the norm.
• 29:45
  We have wars and conflicts and hunger. We have unfairness, injustice as a matter of course.
• 30:01
  A world in which through the systems of communication, people are programmed with a perception that suits the system.
• 30:17
  The world is bloody mad. So,
• 30:29
  do you want, do we want, a world that is insane to see us as sane?
• 30:45
  Do we want a world of madness to be the arbiter of our own sanity?
• 30:57
  Or do we want a world of madness to tell us we are mad as confirmation of our sanity?
• 31:10
  When a world that's insane tells you you're sane, it's time to just have a rain check.
• 31:19
  When it tells you you're mad, yes, thank you very much, very kind of you.
• 31:31
  So, we live in a world that's an inversion. All the things we would like it to be are inverted.
• 31:51
  So, we have hunger in a world of plenty. We have wars and conflicts
• 32:01
  when people don't really want wars and conflicts among the general population, but we have them anyway
• 32:08
  because it suits the system to impose them and divide us and rule us.
• 32:21
  So, what happens when you ask those big questions? Who am I? Where am I?
• 32:36
  What is this reality?
• 32:42
  When you ask those questions, the answers do come, but you have to ask them first and you have to pursue
• 32:55
  the answers and then they come. But while we are stuck in myopia, the myopia of normal,
• 33:08
  those questions don't get answered and don't get pursued, but what happens when we do that?
• 33:18
  You realize that the world we take so seriously that we think is so real
• 33:33
  is just an illusion, just like a dream, an induced dream that we think is real and therefore treat it
• 33:54
  as such. You realize that we are caught in a perceptual trap designed specifically
• 34:12
  to separate us, to disconnect us from the true eye, the infinite eye, which is consciousness,
• 34:27
  no form ultimately, just a state of being aware.
• 34:37
  And you realize this whole fake reality, which I explain in detail in the books,
• 34:47
  has been set up and created to make us forget our true self and live a life.
• 35:02
  As I saw in this finale to the series, to live as a phantom self, a mask that we think is real.
• 35:20
  And how appropriate that the word person comes from persona,
• 35:28
  a word meaning actor's mask. And the guy from Liverpool, Peter, who I mentioned earlier,
• 35:48
  who does seem to have thought about a lot more than most. He sang a song in one of the programs,
• 36:01
  which was so
• 36:08
  appropriate to what I'm saying, really. It went like this.
• 36:13
  The ghost of a cowboy looked up to the stars, said they'll all be here when you're gone.
• 36:23
  You just keep chasing, no matter how far, something that was there, all alone.
• 36:40
  And that's what we're doing.
• 36:44
  That's what the norms and structures are designed to make us do.
• 36:54
  To forget the true I and yet then pursue
• 37:05
  the induced ambitions of the phantom I.
• 37:13
  And to pursue something that was there all along.
• 37:23
  The consciousness that we are beyond the program.
• 37:32
  We're living in a perceptual trap, a frequency trap.
• 37:40
  And we go through childhood and education and death, still in the illusion
• 37:49
  that feeds the beast and keeps us enslaved. It doesn't matter what level of the hierarchy
• 37:59
  you're talking about, whether you're upper class or middle class or working class,
• 38:06
  only a tiny few and those who pursue the hidden
• 38:13
  get to understand the true nature of the human reality,
• 38:27
  those and the inner circle of what I call the global cult that's behind world events.
• 38:37
  And you only discover the real story of the human plight and why
• 38:53
  the norms have always prevailed through the generations as the norms have changed,
• 39:01
  but their impact has been the same.
• 39:04
  When you ask the big questions, who am I? Where am I? What is this reality? What is this I?
• 39:33
  Get tickets for public events and how you can subscribe to a fantastic video channel called
• 39:41
  Iconic.com. So I was playing with a dog on the grass and there were these big holes in the ground
• 39:54
  and I fell right into a hole and rolled my ankle and I have torn ligaments in my wrist
• 40:00
  from about three and a half years ago. I shattered my wrist and if I try to move my
• 40:04
  wrist back or spread my hand open, I'm about a six or seven in the back of my hand pain.
• 40:09
  And I went up to the Tesla room and thankfully there was a little break in between sessions.
• 40:14
  I've been super excited to try the Tesla machine for quite a year now.
• 40:18
  And Gabriel put the Tesla on my ankle. And as soon as the machine turned on,
• 40:23
  I immediately felt this actually kind of hurt in the back of my wrist.
• 40:27
  Within a couple hours it felt completely normal again. I was totally back to walking normally,
• 40:33
  no limping, there's no swelling. And after one session that particular pain went down to zero.
• 40:40
  Pain that I have that was kind of nagging is gone. It's pretty amazing. And within a couple hours
• 40:48
  it felt completely normal again. Zero. Tingling at first hurt at first and then
• 40:52
  it dissipated and then went away. And I think holding the bulbs for like 20 minutes really
• 40:57
  helped my wrist to lock. And I was totally back to walking normally, no limping, there's no swelling.