Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Gen Z women hate men, men to blame

Transcript

Gen Z women hate men, men to blame · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Good morning, good afternoon, good evening, wherever you may be,
• 0:02
  Speaker 1: and welcome to Honey Badger Radio. My name is Brian.
• 0:05
  Speaker 1: I'm here with Alison and this is maintaining frame gen
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: z Women hate men, Men to blame. Where we'll be
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: looking at video that's been making the rounds on other
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: parts of the YouTuber sphere. I guess I know. V
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: Monroe responded to it, and Sargon responded to it, and
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: now it's our turn. So the New State Well, I'll
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: let so we're gonna be looking at this because the
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: New Statesman, this like three woman panel has discovered or
• 0:38
  Speaker 1: is discovering in real time, that it turns out that
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: miss injury is actually a lot more common than misogyny.
• 0:46
  Speaker 2: So but before we saw, now what just now they're discovering, Yes,
• 0:53
  Speaker 2: now they're discovering this something has been painfully obvious is
• 1:00
  Speaker 2: for at least as long as I've been on the internet,
• 1:03
  Speaker 2: which is what I don't know, fIF fifty thirty years now,
• 1:08
  Speaker 2: So that's uh, but they're just discovering it.
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: So that's well, you know, that's what matters, is that.
• 1:14
  Speaker 2: Better labor never better late than never.
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: Eh, yeah, exactly. So before we get into that we
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: gotta do what we gotta do, so I will give
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: the Florida Allison.
• 1:25
  Speaker 2: All right, So if you want to send us a
• 1:27
  Speaker 2: message at any point throughout the show, and it's very
• 1:29
  Speaker 2: appreciated if you do. You can send a tip, any
• 1:33
  Speaker 2: message to feed the Badger dot com slash just the tip.
• 1:36
  Speaker 2: Let's feed the Badger dot com slash just the tip.
• 1:38
  Speaker 2: Got those messages in and yes, what uh Deky Dietro,
• 1:46
  Speaker 2: Niki Dietro? What for leaky Dietro? What the guy you know?
• 1:52
  Speaker 2: The guy?
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: Uh say.
• 1:55
  Speaker 2: Dark Kiki Mora. Yes, we will respond to your super
• 2:02
  Speaker 2: chat the next time we talk about Byrony, which would
• 2:05
  Speaker 2: be too, which will be soon. We have if you
• 2:09
  Speaker 2: if you look at your super chat in the discord,
• 2:12
  Speaker 2: you will see a recycle arrow on it. That means
• 2:14
  Speaker 2: that we are going to be responding to it. Okay,
• 2:18
  Speaker 2: so don't don't keep asking. Yeah, it's a reminder exactly.
• 2:23
  Speaker 2: So if you send your super chows to feed the
• 2:26
  Speaker 2: Badger dot just the tip dot just the tip dot
• 2:30
  Speaker 2: com slash, just the tip, we it will pop up
• 2:35
  Speaker 2: in our discord, which you can access at Badger nation
• 2:37
  Speaker 2: dot online, and it stays there and we can comment
• 2:43
  Speaker 2: on it on any show. Really, we'll try to comment
• 2:46
  Speaker 2: on the show that you send it to, but if
• 2:48
  Speaker 2: we get it after the show is over, we can't
• 2:50
  Speaker 2: do that. But then we'll comment on a show with
• 2:53
  Speaker 2: a similar topic. See how that works, all right, So
• 2:55
  Speaker 2: Feedbadger dot com slash just the tip and you avoid
• 3:00
  Speaker 2: YouTube's comment enhancement system that is censorship another euphemism for censorship,
• 3:06
  Speaker 2: and we get the full benefit of whatever funds you sent.
• 3:09
  Speaker 2: And if you want to support the show, that's feed
• 3:11
  Speaker 2: Thebadgery dot com slash support. Once again, that's feed the
• 3:15
  Speaker 2: Badger dot com slash support. Please help us out because
• 3:17
  Speaker 2: we continue to be able to talk about these topics
• 3:20
  Speaker 2: at the depth that they actually require, and I think
• 3:26
  Speaker 2: that's going to be really critical when people want to
• 3:29
  Speaker 2: start repairing the damage that's been created by the particular
• 3:34
  Speaker 2: ideological belief system that we have pursued too well with
• 3:40
  Speaker 2: what's starting to look like the death of our civilization.
• 3:43
  Speaker 2: So anyway, if you want to support us, Feedbadgery dot
• 3:45
  Speaker 2: com slash support. Anyway, I hand it back to you, Brian.
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: Okay, so before we get into this, let's look at
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: a super child that we got just before the show started,
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: so I'm assuming it's for us. So I hate the
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: Anti Cris gives us five dollars and says, the Antichrist
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: begins to consolidate its power. Mankind of weights a revolution.
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: The seed of Eden has begun to rot. You do
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: not have much time, son of Man. Thank you to
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: I hate the Antichrist for the five I'm gonna assume
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: that this is related to this stream because of the timing.
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: So all right, So with that out of the way,
• 4:23
  Speaker 1: what's let's get into the video. So this is from
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: the New Statesman, and the New Statesman is a progressive outlet,
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: let's say, pretty far left run. It's very feminist and
• 4:36
  Speaker 1: woke and all that, but it also presents itself as
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: sort of like highly academic. Can you hear me? Yeah,
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: I can hear you.
• 4:44
  Speaker 2: Oh okay? Then oh sit, wait what.
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: Wait? What?
• 4:50
  Speaker 2: What? Okay?
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: All right?
• 4:55
  Speaker 2: Good, good good, Sorry, I was my I was testing
• 4:58
  Speaker 2: my microphone. Apologies, guys, a little bit weird.
• 5:01
  Speaker 1: Oh I think there might be like an insane amount of.
• 5:03
  Speaker 2: Lag, Are you really?
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: Oh goodness, no, it's not now, it's just a it
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: took you a long time to react to what I said.
• 5:12
  Speaker 2: Oh okay, all right, Well, I think I think we
• 5:15
  Speaker 2: got it sorted now, so okay, let's do it all right.
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: So anyway, so yeah, so the New Statesman is kind
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: of a really progressive outlet. They also present themselves as
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: sort of like, you know, sort of like hard intellectual content.
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: So you'll note that from the tone of this talk,
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: it's very like NPR is what I think of. And
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: you have three women on the panel. There is the
• 5:45
  Speaker 1: host of the show, who is going to show up
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: in a second. I'm sorry, I don't have their names, handy,
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: I don't think they're that important. There is the woman
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: presenting the results of a study they're going to be discussing.
• 5:58
  Speaker 1: And then there's going to be a young gen Z
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: woman who's going to give her anecdotal experience in this.
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: And well, let's just get into it. I got the
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: time codes here, so let's go ahead and start.
• 6:10
  Speaker 3: Scarlett, you conducted the exclusive polling for this piece, and
• 6:15
  Speaker 3: there are some really fascinating results. One of the starkest
• 6:18
  Speaker 3: findings was how negatively young women feel towards men compared
• 6:21
  Speaker 3: with the other way around. Can you unpack some of
• 6:23
  Speaker 3: the stats for.
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: Us fascinating It appears that young women really hate young
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: men a lot more than young men hate young women.
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: We have the genders divided, but the numbers are fascinating.
• 6:39
  Speaker 1: So this is the host of the show.
• 6:40
  Speaker 4: Okay, yeah, I think out of everything we found, this
• 6:44
  Speaker 4: is what jumped out the most to me. I think
• 6:47
  Speaker 4: we're very used to hearing about young men's negative views
• 6:49
  Speaker 4: of young women's and sort of you know, misogyny amongst
• 6:53
  Speaker 4: young men. But this really struck me because we found that,
• 6:56
  Speaker 4: you know, seventy two percent of young men have a
• 6:59
  Speaker 4: favorable view of your women, and not very many really
• 7:03
  Speaker 4: have an unfavorable view of young women when coming.
• 7:06
  Speaker 1: I'm sorry, let me put my headphones on, but for
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: some reason, my michaelphone's picking up the audio from this.
• 7:11
  Speaker 1: So you want to say anything about that so far?
• 7:17
  Speaker 2: Yeah, well, but we intended to create an unfavorable view.
• 7:25
  Speaker 2: I mean. The thing is, the problem is with everybody
• 7:27
  Speaker 2: who's talking about this is you can really divide them
• 7:30
  Speaker 2: into two categories. People who recognize that if you tell
• 7:35
  Speaker 2: young women that heterosexuality is the source of female oppression
• 7:39
  Speaker 2: and their relationships with young men are essentially going to
• 7:44
  Speaker 2: be extractive, exploitative, and abusive on the part of young men.
• 7:49
  Speaker 2: That might create anger and resentment and hatred towards young
• 7:54
  Speaker 2: men on the part of young women. But the problem
• 7:57
  Speaker 2: is that the one side of the argument refuses to
• 8:00
  Speaker 2: recognize that saying that men oppress women is false. Okay,
• 8:07
  Speaker 2: like it's wrong. And until you recognize that that's wrong,
• 8:10
  Speaker 2: that is a wrong framing. And I don't mean just
• 8:14
  Speaker 2: morally wrong. I mean it's literally factually wrong on every
• 8:20
  Speaker 2: conceivable level. It is a complete and utter lie about
• 8:25
  Speaker 2: human nature. Men do not oppress women. They do not
• 8:29
  Speaker 2: do do not with green eggs, they do not with
• 8:32
  Speaker 2: ham you know, they just do not oppress women, full
• 8:37
  Speaker 2: stop and never have. And until you get through, you
• 8:44
  Speaker 2: cross the rubicon and you get to the other side,
• 8:48
  Speaker 2: and you stand with us on the other side of
• 8:50
  Speaker 2: the chasm, with the other people who have understood this
• 8:54
  Speaker 2: on a fundamental level and don't make it part of
• 8:57
  Speaker 2: their worldview. You're not going to get anywhere with women's
• 9:00
  Speaker 2: hatred of men, because it's logical, it's rational in a
• 9:06
  Speaker 2: world if we accept that men oppress women, that men
• 9:11
  Speaker 2: use rape and domestic violence to uphold patriarchy, which is
• 9:16
  Speaker 2: a system of men extracting from women, then women's you know,
• 9:21
  Speaker 2: antipathy towards men makes perfect sense, right, Just you can't
• 9:26
  Speaker 2: expect them not to feel that. So if you want
• 9:30
  Speaker 2: to believe that men oppress women, fine, I mean I
• 9:36
  Speaker 2: have lots of issues with that. But for the sake
• 9:39
  Speaker 2: of argument, if that's what you want to believe, and
• 9:42
  Speaker 2: that's what you want to teach young women, then what
• 9:44
  Speaker 2: you will end up with is hatred towards young men. Now,
• 9:49
  Speaker 2: you can actually look at the science, the nonscience, the
• 9:54
  Speaker 2: nonsense around this whole thing, and come to the logical
• 9:58
  Speaker 2: and correct collusion conclusion that men do not oppress women
• 10:03
  Speaker 2: and never have, and then we can move forward from there.
• 10:08
  Speaker 2: Or you can continue to operate in the ideologically comfortable,
• 10:13
  Speaker 2: institutionally approved framework and continue to reap the benefits of
• 10:19
  Speaker 2: destroying the relationship between men and women. And by benefits,
• 10:22
  Speaker 2: I mean not benefits, non benefits, the opposite of benefits.
• 10:32
  Speaker 2: You will continue penalties, Yes, the penalties, the social and
• 10:36
  Speaker 2: civilizational penalties on continuing to assert something fundamentally false about
• 10:41
  Speaker 2: the relationship between men and women. Yeah, okay, but again
• 10:46
  Speaker 2: there's just there is the chasm, right right, There is
• 10:52
  Speaker 2: the belief that men oppress women. There is the recognition
• 10:56
  Speaker 2: that that is false, right, that that is actually something
• 11:01
  Speaker 2: that makes absolutely no sense. And then there's a chasm
• 11:05
  Speaker 2: between those two viewpoints. And as long as you're on
• 11:10
  Speaker 2: the other side of the chasm, I don't know, Well
• 11:14
  Speaker 2: what you do, You're just gonna destroy everything. You're gonna
• 11:18
  Speaker 2: destroy your civilization, and there's nothing that you can do
• 11:21
  Speaker 2: to stop it. There's no way to not have civilization destruction.
• 11:28
  Speaker 2: And the beliefs that men oppress women, you can't have those.
• 11:31
  Speaker 2: You cannot have a civilization that lasts, and that belief
• 11:35
  Speaker 2: you must make your choice God, yep.
• 11:39
  Speaker 1: And so despite all of that, despite all of the
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: antipathy and the insults and the fear mongering and all
• 11:49
  Speaker 1: of this other stuff surrounding men, they still favor women.
• 11:55
  Speaker 1: Seventy percent of men still favor women or like view
• 11:58
  Speaker 1: women FAVORABI doesn't if they somehow manage to not let
• 12:02
  Speaker 1: that get to them for the most part. Yeah, So
• 12:07
  Speaker 1: let's hear the other side.
• 12:08
  Speaker 2: Well, I know, I know, Okay, I won't tell you why.
• 12:11
  Speaker 2: Then let's leave here, all right.
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: Let's get let's get into the other side of this.
• 12:15
  Speaker 4: Women under thirty fifty percent have a favorable view the
• 12:18
  Speaker 4: unfavorable view of men goes up to twenty one percent,
• 12:21
  Speaker 4: and then under twenty five women is just thirty five
• 12:25
  Speaker 4: percent of young women.
• 12:26
  Speaker 1: So we're looking at like something like a fifth of
• 12:30
  Speaker 1: women view men unfavorably, a fifth of them, and that's
• 12:37
  Speaker 1: like you know, in the broad and then like when
• 12:40
  Speaker 1: you like focus down to like the under twenty five women,
• 12:43
  Speaker 1: it's even higher. It's thirty five percent. Thirty five percent
• 12:47
  Speaker 1: of women under twenty five have an unfavorable view of men,
• 12:53
  Speaker 1: and it is likely something completely not rational that they've
• 12:56
  Speaker 1: just been like it's instilled in them or something. But
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: that's how high that's that's a crazy number, just saying wait, wait, are.
• 13:05
  Speaker 2: You sure, because that's the exact inverse because if about
• 13:09
  Speaker 2: twenty seventy.
• 13:10
  Speaker 1: Two she's saying, I think that because there's also like
• 13:14
  Speaker 1: neutral and then they're so it's not just favorable or unfavorable.
• 13:20
  Speaker 1: There's also like neutral ground as well, so men are
• 13:24
  Speaker 1: generally neutral to favorable. I think when it comes to
• 13:27
  Speaker 1: unfavorable men, I think it was like she said, it
• 13:29
  Speaker 1: was seven percent of men view women unfavorably, which is
• 13:32
  Speaker 1: really still really high, but it's not nearly it's not
• 13:36
  Speaker 1: twenty percent. It's not thirty five percent, it's seven percent.
• 13:41
  Speaker 1: So do you see what I'm saying?
• 13:45
  Speaker 2: Yes, I got ya, I got ya, okay, And I'm
• 13:48
  Speaker 2: sure that unfavorably means probably extremely anti Yeah, like really unfavorable.
• 13:56
  Speaker 1: That's what I'm saying. Like, it's not it's not indifference.
• 13:59
  Speaker 1: It's not even like I think that, because again i'd
• 14:02
  Speaker 1: have to look at I don't have it in front
• 14:04
  Speaker 1: of me. But yeah, she said earlier that seventy percent
• 14:08
  Speaker 1: of men view women favorably, seven percent view them unfavorably.
• 14:13
  Speaker 1: So that means that there's a chunk in the middle
• 14:16
  Speaker 1: that's you know, maybe ah indifferent. I don't know if
• 14:20
  Speaker 1: it's like three different positions or if there's more. And
• 14:23
  Speaker 1: she's sort of like throwing who knows, right, But anyway,
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: let's keep going.
• 14:30
  Speaker 4: You have a favorable view of men, and if you
• 14:32
  Speaker 4: go into very favorable, we actually is positive rather than favorable.
• 14:34
  Speaker 4: But if you say very positive, it's just eleven percent
• 14:37
  Speaker 4: of under twenty five women. So we are looking at
• 14:39
  Speaker 4: an environment where young women feel a lot more negatively
• 14:43
  Speaker 4: towards young men than the other way around.
• 14:45
  Speaker 3: It's really interesting because I think if you sort of
• 14:48
  Speaker 3: as a casual observer of some of the discourse about
• 14:50
  Speaker 3: sort of gender politics and particularly the manosphere, you'd assume
• 14:54
  Speaker 3: that this sort of rift between young women and young
• 14:57
  Speaker 3: men was driven by young men's opinions and behavior towards women.
• 15:01
  Speaker 3: Perhaps it is. We'll get more into the reasons behind
• 15:03
  Speaker 3: some of these these these figures.
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: But okay, so she's trying to steer the conversation, right.
• 15:11
  Speaker 1: You see that the woman is saying, it looks like
• 15:14
  Speaker 1: women really don't like men, and this woman's like, well,
• 15:17
  Speaker 1: that's weird because if you look at the discourse, it
• 15:21
  Speaker 1: looks like the opposite, you know, with the manisphere and
• 15:24
  Speaker 1: all of that. Alison, are you not saying anything?
• 15:30
  Speaker 2: Or yes, I I was fighting with my mute button.
• 15:37
  Speaker 2: I apologize. Oh wait, I'm still fighting with my mute button.
• 15:41
  Speaker 2: Oh really you heard me?
• 15:42
  Speaker 1: Even no, I hear you now?
• 15:45
  Speaker 2: Okay, all right, okay, So what I was going to
• 15:49
  Speaker 2: say is that she to be charitable, she might just
• 15:53
  Speaker 2: be saying from the common position. So from what you hear, well,
• 15:57
  Speaker 2: of course, from what you generally hear, you're they only
• 16:01
  Speaker 2: focus on what presenting men as disliking women because that's
• 16:08
  Speaker 2: what they care to focus on that's consistent with their
• 16:12
  Speaker 2: narrative around patriarchy, backlash, entitlement and everything else, which itself
• 16:21
  Speaker 2: will promoting that kind of narrative with no constraint on
• 16:25
  Speaker 2: whether or not it's accurate, will itself cause young women
• 16:29
  Speaker 2: to hate young men. That's but I mean, if we're
• 16:34
  Speaker 2: gonna be charitable, maybe she's just saying, well, commonly, maybe maybe.
• 16:39
  Speaker 1: Maybe all right, as you going, wait, let me look
• 16:43
  Speaker 1: at the time, codes me sure, I'm I'm done with
• 16:45
  Speaker 1: that part.
• 16:48
  Speaker 3: Really, I mean, it's much more stark on the side
• 16:50
  Speaker 3: of women's.
• 16:50
  Speaker 4: Attitudes exactly, and it's not even reciprocated, you know, on
• 16:53
  Speaker 4: the young men's side. It really is unbalanced, with young
• 16:56
  Speaker 4: women feeling much more negatively than young men.
• 16:59
  Speaker 3: And Emily, you spent a lot of time with this
• 17:01
  Speaker 3: demographic of young women for your feature. How was this
• 17:05
  Speaker 3: negativity towards men shaping their lives? How did it come
• 17:08
  Speaker 3: out when you were speaking to them?
• 17:10
  Speaker 5: I was really really surprised by how negatively they spoke
• 17:13
  Speaker 5: about men. And I mean some of them still had
• 17:16
  Speaker 5: boyfriends and still were dating, although some of them were
• 17:18
  Speaker 5: even quite negative about the men they were dating. One
• 17:22
  Speaker 5: girl I spoke to was like, I can't imagine my
• 17:24
  Speaker 5: boyfriend at the pub with his friends talking about political issues,
• 17:28
  Speaker 5: whereas that's basically all me and my friends talk about. So,
• 17:32
  Speaker 5: you know, she felt quite scathing towards even though she
• 17:34
  Speaker 5: loved him, She felt quite scathing towards him, and some
• 17:37
  Speaker 5: someone then.
• 17:38
  Speaker 1: She doesn't love him. Oh wow, ah yeah, yeah.
• 17:46
  Speaker 2: That's a that's a that's a real red flag right there.
• 17:50
  Speaker 2: Huh yeah, okay.
• 17:53
  Speaker 1: It's wild. Okay, so well, let's let's just keep going.
• 17:58
  Speaker 5: And I spoke to had basically sworn off men completely
• 18:01
  Speaker 5: and said they were uninterested in them, didn't have male friends.
• 18:04
  Speaker 5: They all said they would not date a man who
• 18:06
  Speaker 5: didn't share their basic views, and given women and men
• 18:09
  Speaker 5: don't have exactly the same politics, and you know, that's
• 18:12
  Speaker 5: going to become more tricky if women are just totally
• 18:15
  Speaker 5: not up for dating a man who disagrees with them
• 18:17
  Speaker 5: on core issues. They viewed that as an absolutely uncompromising
• 18:20
  Speaker 5: moral standpoint.
• 18:21
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I thought that was really okay, all right, So.
• 18:26
  Speaker 1: This is.
• 18:28
  Speaker 2: I guess we are surprised now that, after three generations
• 18:32
  Speaker 2: of promoting the notion that men are defined by oppressing women,
• 18:36
  Speaker 2: that young women now hate men and don't want to
• 18:39
  Speaker 2: date them, and don't tolerate any kind of political viewpoint
• 18:43
  Speaker 2: outside of whatever they've decided is correct, which incidentally is
• 18:49
  Speaker 2: entirely based on the modality that they think in and
• 18:53
  Speaker 2: find most comfortable. So it completely denies the possibility that
• 19:00
  Speaker 2: men understand the world and any way that's kind of
• 19:03
  Speaker 2: unique to them. In fact, I believe that they would
• 19:05
  Speaker 2: consider what I'm saying to be complete sexism, right, So yeah,
• 19:09
  Speaker 2: I get well, there here we are, and this is
• 19:13
  Speaker 2: like I'm why would anybody be surprised as something that
• 19:15
  Speaker 2: I've been predicting overtly, like on this channel and before
• 19:20
  Speaker 2: on my own channel for like what is it fifteen
• 19:24
  Speaker 2: years now, Like I've said this repeatedly. You're going to
• 19:29
  Speaker 2: promote this and then the outcome is going to be
• 19:32
  Speaker 2: the destruction of the relationship between the sexes. And unfortunately,
• 19:37
  Speaker 2: we sort of need that as a society. We sort
• 19:40
  Speaker 2: of need that to work, you know, to have our
• 19:42
  Speaker 2: civilization function. That's a that's something that's load bearing. But okay,
• 19:48
  Speaker 2: we're gonna We're gonna do that. We're going to promote
• 19:51
  Speaker 2: a belief about men that's inherently dehumanizing and also wrong
• 19:56
  Speaker 2: and demonizing and also wrong, and it's going to women's
• 20:00
  Speaker 2: attitudes towards men, and now their attitudes towards men are destroyed.
• 20:06
  Speaker 2: Go us, yay, we got our wind condition. Okay, let's
• 20:11
  Speaker 2: let's uh, yeah, we got it. We did it. Hell,
• 20:13
  Speaker 2: let's give us give us all a hand in the west. Yay,
• 20:17
  Speaker 2: we've done it. That's uh? Is it satisfying? Is it
• 20:21
  Speaker 2: what every what everybody hoped it would be? Is? Is this? Is? This?
• 20:25
  Speaker 1: Is this? Like?
• 20:25
  Speaker 2: Are we all going to have like a little celebration
• 20:27
  Speaker 2: now we've done it? Guys? We all did it. We finished,
• 20:31
  Speaker 2: we did we got our wind condition. We got to
• 20:34
  Speaker 2: the goal, like, it's where we're here. I guess the uh,
• 20:41
  Speaker 2: the treasure was the miss injury we made all along
• 20:43
  Speaker 2: the way or some ship.
• 20:46
  Speaker 1: What is it that maybe the true missionry was the
• 20:50
  Speaker 1: friends we made along the way or something or something
• 20:54
  Speaker 1: like that. The real patriarchy was the friends we made
• 20:57
  Speaker 1: along the way.
• 20:58
  Speaker 2: I mean, isn't everybody like our Well we did it, guys,
• 21:01
  Speaker 2: this is what our society set out to do and
• 21:03
  Speaker 2: we've done it.
• 21:04
  Speaker 5: Yay?
• 21:05
  Speaker 2: Go us doesn't feel very satisfying, But.
• 21:12
  Speaker 1: Well, I think this is a case of I think
• 21:15
  Speaker 1: these people are realizing, No, they're not realizing what I'm
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: about to say, but they are brushing up against it.
• 21:22
  Speaker 1: They're brushing up against the idea. I think that they
• 21:25
  Speaker 1: have radicalized women against men, and they've done it by
• 21:32
  Speaker 1: essentially making politics, specifically their version of politics, their lens
• 21:39
  Speaker 1: of seeing the world through the political whatever. They've made
• 21:44
  Speaker 1: that everything young women are like. They've basically made that
• 21:48
  Speaker 1: everything young women have to care about, and every single
• 21:51
  Speaker 1: one of these political issues that they are bringing forward
• 21:55
  Speaker 1: are existential threats to women's existence. And that's why you're
• 22:00
  Speaker 1: getting young women who are so afraid and so negative
• 22:05
  Speaker 1: about the future which they're going to get into because
• 22:08
  Speaker 1: of all of the stuff that these people have told
• 22:11
  Speaker 1: them about reality, I mean, including and especially men in
• 22:16
  Speaker 1: their lives and how bad everything is, which is why
• 22:20
  Speaker 1: she this so like, I'm the right you have like
• 22:22
  Speaker 1: the young I think she's a college student or something,
• 22:26
  Speaker 1: and she does studies on her college campus, and she
• 22:29
  Speaker 1: was saying that these women I know are so negative
• 22:34
  Speaker 1: about men, that some of them are even negative. They
• 22:37
  Speaker 1: say bad things, they bad mouth their boyfriends, and they'll
• 22:41
  Speaker 1: say things like, well, these are the issues that I
• 22:43
  Speaker 1: care about and we talk about politics all the time whatever,
• 22:47
  Speaker 1: and it's always, you know, it's always a leftist like
• 22:49
  Speaker 1: purse puppy politics. And if like a man, you know,
• 22:54
  Speaker 1: I don't believe that men are going to care about
• 22:56
  Speaker 1: these things as much as I do. So I'm gonna
• 22:58
  Speaker 1: have to exclude them from my life if they don't
• 23:01
  Speaker 1: line up with me, because if any of these issues
• 23:04
  Speaker 1: are not resolved, even if they're like happening half a
• 23:07
  Speaker 1: world away, which is some of these things that these
• 23:09
  Speaker 1: women are really caught up in that somehow it's a
• 23:12
  Speaker 1: it's a threat, it's an existential threat to my existence.
• 23:16
  Speaker 1: So it's like these women are captured, they're held prisoner
• 23:21
  Speaker 1: by these sort of like ideas that are if you
• 23:25
  Speaker 1: understand that the world is the world and that there
• 23:28
  Speaker 1: are things that will always be out of your control,
• 23:30
  Speaker 1: then you know you won't be bothered by this. So
• 23:33
  Speaker 1: you just be like, Okay, well, you know, I'll do
• 23:36
  Speaker 1: what I can in my small way. But these women
• 23:38
  Speaker 1: are consumed with this stuff, and it probably because it's
• 23:43
  Speaker 1: bombarding them at school, it's in their friend groups, it's
• 23:46
  Speaker 1: on the internet, it's constant, and I think that they're
• 23:49
  Speaker 1: I think that it's made them crazy. I think that's
• 23:52
  Speaker 1: what's happened to most young women is that they are
• 23:56
  Speaker 1: basically operating in arenas they probably were not supposed to
• 23:59
  Speaker 1: and it's making thee Yeah, I can tell you.
• 24:04
  Speaker 2: I can give you the interpretation based on the modalities analysis.
• 24:09
  Speaker 2: This is a they're operating in a social modality. So
• 24:12
  Speaker 2: it is an existential crisis because if they don't correctly
• 24:16
  Speaker 2: signal their virtue, they could be removed from the social web,
• 24:22
  Speaker 2: and for women, that means death because that means they
• 24:25
  Speaker 2: can't get the resources they need from their communal group
• 24:28
  Speaker 2: to survive. So that's what they're looking at. That's the
• 24:32
  Speaker 2: way that they're looking at everything is and they need
• 24:35
  Speaker 2: to have a boyfriend who is compatible with the social
• 24:39
  Speaker 2: webs virtue signaling or they risk being excised from the
• 24:44
  Speaker 2: social web. That's what's happening. That's where they're coming from.
• 24:49
  Speaker 2: That is the ex extential horror that they're experiencing. And
• 24:53
  Speaker 2: to really understand this and why this is creating such
• 24:57
  Speaker 2: a friction, the relational web, when it has these kind
• 25:03
  Speaker 2: of virtue signaling things that it engages in, has absolutely
• 25:09
  Speaker 2: no interest in doing anything to change the problems it's identified.
• 25:17
  Speaker 2: So these women can virtue signal over all of these
• 25:21
  Speaker 2: problems while doing absolutely nothing to make them better. And
• 25:26
  Speaker 2: any man who enters that kind of a lansing and
• 25:29
  Speaker 2: they don't understand this, they don't understand this because they
• 25:31
  Speaker 2: do not understand like these women. And this is another
• 25:35
  Speaker 2: thing I want to point out. Not these women on
• 25:37
  Speaker 2: the panel, although I think that they're a little bit
• 25:40
  Speaker 2: they haven't noticed this by now. They're not paying attention,
• 25:44
  Speaker 2: so they're probably relational web thinkers too. But most women
• 25:49
  Speaker 2: in our society are completely artificial, like it's the way
• 25:54
  Speaker 2: that they approach the world is an artificial construct, and
• 25:58
  Speaker 2: it's a construct of come and ease and technological progress
• 26:03
  Speaker 2: to the point where women don't have to engage with
• 26:06
  Speaker 2: actual questions of survival at any point throughout their life.
• 26:10
  Speaker 2: That means that their endocrine architecture is actually childlike relative
• 26:17
  Speaker 2: to what it would have been with women in the
• 26:20
  Speaker 2: past who had to engage with issues of survival either
• 26:24
  Speaker 2: like directly because there could be famine, there could be war,
• 26:27
  Speaker 2: there could be environmental devastation which couldn't be absorbed by
• 26:32
  Speaker 2: a federal government. It was something that was immediate and
• 26:36
  Speaker 2: could destroy your village and there's also like issues of
• 26:40
  Speaker 2: survival because of the winter. You know, there's a constant stressor's,
• 26:43
  Speaker 2: constant expectation of work, constant existential threats, physical threats.
• 26:49
  Speaker 1: You know.
• 26:49
  Speaker 2: So women in the past had a different endocrine architecture
• 26:53
  Speaker 2: than women who live essentially in a walled garden. They
• 26:58
  Speaker 2: can maintain we were talking about the infra pink. They
• 27:02
  Speaker 2: can maintain an infra pink mentality in a way that
• 27:05
  Speaker 2: has never been seen before in the human race. We
• 27:09
  Speaker 2: are in levels of pink never before thought possible. Okay,
• 27:15
  Speaker 2: so they are so relational reading modality, and this is like,
• 27:19
  Speaker 2: this is not like, this can't happen. You know, it
• 27:22
  Speaker 2: doesn't happen with a I don't know, a peasant in
• 27:24
  Speaker 2: the Himalayas. It doesn't happen with a peasant woman, you know,
• 27:30
  Speaker 2: three hundred years ago, right, it probably didn't happen with
• 27:33
  Speaker 2: women who doubt who lived with it through the Great
• 27:35
  Speaker 2: Depression or World War one and two. Right, But now
• 27:40
  Speaker 2: we have this, We have women who are not really
• 27:44
  Speaker 2: women their children in a way that we've never seen before.
• 27:50
  Speaker 2: And they do not understand how men think at all,
• 27:53
  Speaker 2: because men do engage with existential threats they do engage
• 27:58
  Speaker 2: with hard work, and one of them is that for
• 28:01
  Speaker 2: a lot of men, if they don't work, they starve
• 28:04
  Speaker 2: because nobody's going to pick them out of the gutter
• 28:07
  Speaker 2: and say here, you can sleep on my couch. Right,
• 28:11
  Speaker 2: they have to They have to maintain certain standards in
• 28:15
  Speaker 2: order to survive, which means that men in our society
• 28:19
  Speaker 2: still deal with existential threats to their survival. They also
• 28:23
  Speaker 2: deal with the fact that they're signed up for selective service.
• 28:26
  Speaker 2: And even if you're a part of a generation that
• 28:29
  Speaker 2: never goes, that always is a possibility, right that you
• 28:34
  Speaker 2: might end up being thrown into a war because of
• 28:38
  Speaker 2: political expedience. So there's another pressure that men so. And
• 28:42
  Speaker 2: then also men have naturally an endocrine architecture that's more
• 28:49
  Speaker 2: responsive and more capable of comprehending threat. So when the
• 28:56
  Speaker 2: reading modality that like the social web, presents all of
• 29:00
  Speaker 2: these very very important virtue and men look at that
• 29:06
  Speaker 2: and they say, but what do we do, Like, if
• 29:07
  Speaker 2: this is important, we need to do something, And then
• 29:10
  Speaker 2: they'll analyze it in terms of systems and say, well,
• 29:12
  Speaker 2: I don't think we can do anything about this, right this,
• 29:16
  Speaker 2: Maybe this is not something that we need to consider
• 29:18
  Speaker 2: as vitally important because it's not something that we can
• 29:22
  Speaker 2: do anything about or should do anything about, because it
• 29:24
  Speaker 2: might create more problems or maybe you know, more problems
• 29:29
  Speaker 2: along the line, because I'm thinking, you know, in terms
• 29:31
  Speaker 2: of the system, like, for example, immigration, these women probably
• 29:35
  Speaker 2: think that immigration is really really critical. And anybody who
• 29:38
  Speaker 2: doesn't think that the entire population of the world shouldn't
• 29:43
  Speaker 2: be allowed to enter the United States this moment is
• 29:49
  Speaker 2: a fascist not see toxically masculine trumper. You know, you
• 29:55
  Speaker 2: get what I'm saying. And if a guy is like, wait, okay,
• 29:58
  Speaker 2: I'm okay even with refugees coming in or people in need,
• 30:03
  Speaker 2: but the entire population won't we have like logistical problems,
• 30:07
  Speaker 2: She's gonna be like, I can't, you can't be my boyfriend.
• 30:11
  Speaker 2: And it's just because that's the way his mind works,
• 30:15
  Speaker 2: that's the way men's minds work. You identify a problem
• 30:18
  Speaker 2: and they're gonna be like, okay, can we fix that?
• 30:20
  Speaker 2: And the women are gonna be like, no, no, what
• 30:23
  Speaker 2: are you talking about. You're questioning the virtue. You're questioning
• 30:28
  Speaker 2: the virtue of the problem. It's about sitting with the
• 30:31
  Speaker 2: it's about signaling your concern over the problem. The men
• 30:34
  Speaker 2: are like, well, but this problem is unfixable. It's either
• 30:36
  Speaker 2: fixable or unfixable. And if it's unfixable, it's problem. And
• 30:39
  Speaker 2: she's like, I can't be your you evil misogynist. Is
• 30:44
  Speaker 2: this crazy conflict? You see what I'm saying? And has
• 30:48
  Speaker 2: absolutely nothing to do really with morality. It has to
• 30:50
  Speaker 2: do with how men and women process the world. And
• 30:56
  Speaker 2: and it's a disaster because feminists of essentially labeled the
• 31:00
  Speaker 2: way men process the world as morally illegitimate, which is
• 31:06
  Speaker 2: very convenient to the people who don't want to have
• 31:09
  Speaker 2: to deal with the way men process the world, because
• 31:12
  Speaker 2: the way men process the world creates things like free
• 31:14
  Speaker 2: markets and police and audits.
• 31:19
  Speaker 1: Okay, mm hm, no, it's okay, it's just no, no,
• 31:26
  Speaker 1: it's fine. It's a lot, but it's all right, all right,
• 31:29
  Speaker 1: I got any super chats to read out and then
• 31:32
  Speaker 1: we'll keep going. Albatross four nine two zero gives us
• 31:37
  Speaker 1: five dollars and says this video is beyond useless. They
• 31:41
  Speaker 1: didn't solve anything and still pin all this propaganda as
• 31:43
  Speaker 1: somehow men's doing. Did you watch it? I'm just curious.
• 31:48
  Speaker 1: Senior Stix gives us two dollars, and says Western women
• 31:51
  Speaker 1: not all become the story villain. All right, Yes, it
• 31:58
  Speaker 1: is going to we are going to feel it, but
• 32:02
  Speaker 1: I guess at least they're talking around it at this point. Well,
• 32:07
  Speaker 1: I don't want to distract, but I will say that
• 32:08
  Speaker 1: I have seen more and more people talking about the
• 32:11
  Speaker 1: woman question, so that that's it's it's hard. Only one
• 32:15
  Speaker 1: question is the only question.
• 32:18
  Speaker 2: Yes, do you blame women? And if you can blame women,
• 32:24
  Speaker 2: you are part of the solution. If you cannot blame women,
• 32:28
  Speaker 2: you continue to be part of the problem.
• 32:30
  Speaker 1: That's all right. Uh wit Avern slots two eight four
• 32:37
  Speaker 1: six give gives us ten dollars, Thank you, witt and says,
• 32:42
  Speaker 1: what's your guys thought on Andrew and Rachel Wilson. For me,
• 32:45
  Speaker 1: they're the first to go mainstream. I used to follow
• 32:48
  Speaker 1: Alison and Hannah on X until I got Shadow Band,
• 32:51
  Speaker 1: probably the anti abortion I mean, I like them, I've
• 32:56
  Speaker 1: I've you know, Andrew has complemented us a couple of times,
• 33:01
  Speaker 1: which is cool. I haven't been able to get them
• 33:03
  Speaker 1: on the show or Rachel. I've been trying to get
• 33:06
  Speaker 1: Rachel on ever since I learned what a book it
• 33:09
  Speaker 1: was at least a year ago. And but you know,
• 33:12
  Speaker 1: I think that they've kind of gotten probably too big
• 33:15
  Speaker 1: to come on a show. But like, I don't have
• 33:18
  Speaker 1: a problem with it as far as I'm concerned, the
• 33:20
  Speaker 1: more people involved in the conversation the better.
• 33:23
  Speaker 2: So yep, I think I think it. I think it's good.
• 33:30
  Speaker 2: I think that, and I don't. I don't want to
• 33:32
  Speaker 2: speak for them, but in terms of I would say
• 33:36
  Speaker 2: more of a conservative approach, My my concern would be
• 33:41
  Speaker 2: that it the idea is that a particular like I
• 33:46
  Speaker 2: don't being conservative or being Christian no offense is the
• 33:50
  Speaker 2: solution When I think the solution is to start listening
• 33:54
  Speaker 2: to men and caring about their issues. I don't. I
• 33:57
  Speaker 2: don't think like that is literally what we need to do.
• 33:59
  Speaker 2: Now We're at the point where this is what we
• 34:02
  Speaker 2: need to do, and saying that anything else is going
• 34:05
  Speaker 2: to help is not going to help. And I'm fine
• 34:11
  Speaker 2: with like conservative voices saying that, like actually saying that,
• 34:17
  Speaker 2: but I have a concern that it becomes like, oh,
• 34:20
  Speaker 2: this political position is going to solve the issue. Nope,
• 34:24
  Speaker 2: I'm going to say this, No political position is going
• 34:27
  Speaker 2: to solve this issue. The only thing that's going to
• 34:30
  Speaker 2: solve this issue is to start addressing men's issues full stop.
• 34:36
  Speaker 2: But that's my position. Other people might have a different one,
• 34:39
  Speaker 2: So let's continue.
• 34:42
  Speaker 3: All right, Let's keep going interesting because it becomes really
• 34:48
  Speaker 3: pronounced when it gets down to particular political and social issues.
• 34:51
  Speaker 3: So six in ten, so they would find it difficult
• 34:54
  Speaker 3: to date someone who disagreed with them on the Palestine
• 34:57
  Speaker 3: Israel conflict or who didn't share their views Donald Trump.
• 35:01
  Speaker 1: So six out of ten women. And I mean, like,
• 35:05
  Speaker 1: I think these are really weird questions, but it doesn't
• 35:08
  Speaker 1: surprise me if they're coming out of this this new Statesman,
• 35:11
  Speaker 1: because this is the stuff they care about. Six out
• 35:15
  Speaker 1: of ten women would find it difficult to date a
• 35:18
  Speaker 1: guy if he doesn't have the right opinions on the
• 35:21
  Speaker 1: Israel Palestine conflict or Donald Trump. This is what I
• 35:26
  Speaker 1: mean when I say these women are absolutely radicalized and captured.
• 35:30
  Speaker 1: Like and it's not just like having the correct opinion,
• 35:33
  Speaker 1: but also not being neutral. Like if you're if you're
• 35:36
  Speaker 1: a guy and you're on a date with a girl
• 35:37
  Speaker 1: and she's like so like you know, just you sit
• 35:40
  Speaker 1: down and you're like at the cheesecake factory and you think, wow,
• 35:43
  Speaker 1: that's a green flag because she didn't just walk out
• 35:46
  Speaker 1: on the cheesecake factory and you're you're about to get
• 35:48
  Speaker 1: your chicken wings and you sit down, you're waiting for
• 35:51
  Speaker 1: your chicken wings to come, and she says, puts her
• 35:54
  Speaker 1: purse down, turns to you and goes, so, what do
• 35:57
  Speaker 1: you think about the straight up hormuz like and if
• 36:03
  Speaker 1: he goes, I don't know. I haven't been following it
• 36:05
  Speaker 1: very closely. She's like gonna walk away, like, no, we're
• 36:09
  Speaker 1: not doing this like you you So it's not enough
• 36:11
  Speaker 1: that you're indifferent. Yeah, it's not enough to be indifferent.
• 36:14
  Speaker 1: It's not enough to be uninformed. It's you have to
• 36:18
  Speaker 1: hold a very specific perspective. It has to be the
• 36:21
  Speaker 1: one that she was told to hold, because a lot
• 36:23
  Speaker 1: of the time these people don't know why they believe
• 36:25
  Speaker 1: what they believe. They just know they're supposed to believe
• 36:28
  Speaker 1: it because they're trying to figure out what is the consensus. Yeah,
• 36:33
  Speaker 1: where the exactly where the relational web is. They can
• 36:35
  Speaker 1: like essentially place their opinion in the position that's gonna
• 36:41
  Speaker 1: make them the most safe from like social ostracization or
• 36:45
  Speaker 1: whatever the social consequences for not doing that are so.
• 36:50
  Speaker 2: But the neutral opinion penalizes an operative mindset. And what
• 36:55
  Speaker 2: I mean by that is like if a man is like, well,
• 36:58
  Speaker 2: I don't know what he is saying, is okay, my dear,
• 37:02
  Speaker 2: I have to do like an in depth analysis, operative
• 37:05
  Speaker 2: analysis of the situation to determine the relative strategic importance
• 37:11
  Speaker 2: of the U and and also how the Iran has
• 37:15
  Speaker 2: has developed its strategic position, what we can do in
• 37:21
  Speaker 2: the strait, what we are, what we should do. And
• 37:25
  Speaker 2: it's like it's an analysis, an extended analysis that he'd
• 37:29
  Speaker 2: have to go through to then come to an opinion,
• 37:32
  Speaker 2: which she doesn't have to do. She just asked. She
• 37:35
  Speaker 2: just looks at a relational web and it delivers the
• 37:37
  Speaker 2: opinion to her. But you see how now she's expecting
• 37:40
  Speaker 2: him to abide by the way that she sees the
• 37:44
  Speaker 2: world as opposed to understanding that this is a deeper
• 37:48
  Speaker 2: question for him than it is for her. Like for her,
• 37:51
  Speaker 2: it's just well, what does the relational web tell me
• 37:53
  Speaker 2: that I should think? For him, it's like, okay, well,
• 37:56
  Speaker 2: I got to do an analysis the systems involved in
• 37:59
  Speaker 2: this situation to land on what I think is feasible.
• 38:06
  Speaker 2: So she this entire thing is constructing a situation where
• 38:14
  Speaker 2: the woman is basically saying, okay, well he has to
• 38:17
  Speaker 2: have my political beliefs. Well, men don't process your political
• 38:21
  Speaker 2: beliefs the way you do as women. They process them differently.
• 38:27
  Speaker 2: So even when they say, well, I'm neutral, and of
• 38:29
  Speaker 2: course that's not going to be acceptable, what they're saying
• 38:32
  Speaker 2: is I haven't done the work to have a position.
• 38:35
  Speaker 2: So they're demanding that men not be men in order
• 38:38
  Speaker 2: to be datable. You see what I'm saying, Brian, Like,
• 38:42
  Speaker 2: they can't be men. It's like that. That's basically what
• 38:45
  Speaker 2: they're saying here. It's like these women have decided that
• 38:49
  Speaker 2: they do not want to date men. Okay, well that
• 38:52
  Speaker 2: that's uh, then what do you do with that? And
• 38:56
  Speaker 2: again perfectly understandable output of deciding to inform women that
• 39:02
  Speaker 2: men oppress women like that eventually women will be so
• 39:08
  Speaker 2: intolerant of the very like the things that men do
• 39:12
  Speaker 2: that they can't date them at all. And they do
• 39:14
  Speaker 2: it with complete self righteousness. They're basically saying, my political
• 39:18
  Speaker 2: position is the correct one, and their political position is
• 39:23
  Speaker 2: derived from a completely different cognitive process than men's political
• 39:28
  Speaker 2: positions generally are derived from. So the only way that
• 39:33
  Speaker 2: men could have the correct political positions because this is
• 39:37
  Speaker 2: going to change, right, I mean, even if they understand
• 39:39
  Speaker 2: the correct political positions of the relational web on Tuesday,
• 39:42
  Speaker 2: that might have changed by Thursday. So men have to
• 39:45
  Speaker 2: operate in the same way that women do politically, you
• 39:51
  Speaker 2: see what I'm getting at. In order to keep track
• 39:54
  Speaker 2: of all this, they literally have to be women. So
• 39:56
  Speaker 2: these women are basically saying, no, I just want to
• 39:59
  Speaker 2: I don't want to date men. Okay, well, okay, date
• 40:03
  Speaker 2: other women. Here's your punch card to the women's shelter. Well,
• 40:09
  Speaker 2: they don't really accept lesbians. Your punch card to the
• 40:13
  Speaker 2: er for you know, four broken arms and you get
• 40:18
  Speaker 2: a free nose reconstruction. There you go. Yeah, go enjoy
• 40:24
  Speaker 2: your lesbian relationship. Okay, all right?
• 40:31
  Speaker 3: And and Emily, did you get did you get a
• 40:35
  Speaker 3: sense of why? I mean, you spoke to some influence
• 40:37
  Speaker 3: influencers actually, and we often talk about these influences in
• 40:40
  Speaker 3: the manosphere who are leading boys astray, But in a
• 40:43
  Speaker 3: way there's something sort of reflecting what's going on on
• 40:46
  Speaker 3: the male side of things going on for women.
• 40:48
  Speaker 1: Have they been sort of like that throwaway, you know,
• 40:50
  Speaker 1: leading boys astray, astray from what like this fucking femtopia
• 40:55
  Speaker 1: you guys are trying to create that literally excludes them. Like,
• 40:58
  Speaker 1: why don't you ask yourself why men are seeking the
• 41:02
  Speaker 1: manisphere instead of saying, well, these manuspeer guys are just
• 41:05
  Speaker 1: like an obstacle. We need to do something about them.
• 41:08
  Speaker 1: Oh wow, look at how much women hate men right now,
• 41:11
  Speaker 1: that's weird. Anyway, let's get back to this manisphere thing
• 41:14
  Speaker 1: that we have to stop.
• 41:18
  Speaker 3: Okay, anyway, influenced by things that they were seeing online, Yes,
• 41:21
  Speaker 3: I mean I think men and women are looking at
• 41:23
  Speaker 3: very very different Internet now.
• 41:25
  Speaker 5: Young men and young women, like the women I spoke
• 41:29
  Speaker 5: to said they were worried about what the men were
• 41:30
  Speaker 5: looking at online. They're worried about you know, Andrew Taits
• 41:33
  Speaker 5: and people like that. Whereas I spoke to an influencer
• 41:36
  Speaker 5: who would post very very left wing content, very sort
• 41:40
  Speaker 5: of anti imperialists, very pro Palestine, very anti the government,
• 41:44
  Speaker 5: anti Starmer, anti Trump. But also there is mixed in
• 41:48
  Speaker 5: content about and with her and people like her, about
• 41:51
  Speaker 5: toxic masculinity, about manufacturing male victimhood, things like that. It
• 41:56
  Speaker 5: all kind of blurs into a larger online space.
• 41:59
  Speaker 1: Where manufactured male victim hood? What's I don't want to know?
• 42:10
  Speaker 2: All right?
• 42:10
  Speaker 1: Should I jump ahead to the next time?
• 42:12
  Speaker 2: I want to say manufactured male victim Oh? Good lord?
• 42:16
  Speaker 2: What are these like? These these women are going to
• 42:18
  Speaker 2: be having this conversation as the world burns down around them.
• 42:23
  Speaker 2: Oh oh, what's that flickering? The lights are going out? Well,
• 42:26
  Speaker 2: how did that happen? Why can't we get fresh water anymore?
• 42:32
  Speaker 2: Why does it cost a million million pounds to get
• 42:35
  Speaker 2: a roll? Well? What what is? Well, let's get back
• 42:39
  Speaker 2: to the discussion Jesus, Like it's it's I don't I
• 42:45
  Speaker 2: think we're I think we're past the event horizon on
• 42:48
  Speaker 2: this issue. And what it is now is we got
• 42:52
  Speaker 2: to just record the problems and hope that we can
• 42:56
  Speaker 2: build something from what happened. We're like, we're at sort
• 43:03
  Speaker 2: of the Red Sea situation at this point. But this
• 43:07
  Speaker 2: doesn't this doesn't help, Like this this kind of complete
• 43:13
  Speaker 2: lack of and yeah, they get a lot more attention,
• 43:16
  Speaker 2: but they aren't even positioned to really understand what's going
• 43:21
  Speaker 2: on or connect it to anything. But yeah, you're right, Brian,
• 43:26
  Speaker 2: they are noticing. I guess I guess that's good. They're
• 43:30
  Speaker 2: starting to notice more and more. But they've been noticing
• 43:32
  Speaker 2: more and more for decades now. But anyway, let's keep.
• 43:38
  Speaker 1: Going, all right, Well, yeah, I'll do a little.
• 43:40
  Speaker 5: Bit more of this that has a significant antipathy towards
• 43:44
  Speaker 5: men alongside progressive politics.
• 43:46
  Speaker 3: Yeah, I found it interesting. Actually, that's something that I've
• 43:48
  Speaker 3: come across on my own feed.
• 43:50
  Speaker 1: You know.
• 43:50
  Speaker 2: Oh, for the love of God, the progressive politics. Oh,
• 43:56
  Speaker 2: it's so fascinating, so intriguing, that progressive policy.
• 44:00
  Speaker 1: I know, they're stroking like wow, fascinating come from the.
• 44:06
  Speaker 2: Vulcan politics have have the strain of myssonry. That how peculiar. Meanwhile,
• 44:18
  Speaker 2: for the last how many decades have they been really
• 44:20
  Speaker 2: explicit that the problem is men? Why you're telling me
• 44:24
  Speaker 2: that the group of people that have identified the problem
• 44:28
  Speaker 2: in the in the the location of men, the existence
• 44:34
  Speaker 2: of men, are are you know? They are anti male?
• 44:39
  Speaker 2: What a shock like this is? Are these women who
• 44:46
  Speaker 2: are just woken up from like were they like some
• 44:48
  Speaker 2: Futurama time capsule in the last forty years of an
• 44:54
  Speaker 2: entire movement situating the problem with everything in the world
• 44:57
  Speaker 2: and men. Of course, they try to fake gleef by saying, oh,
• 45:01
  Speaker 2: it's patriarchy but somehow patriarchy. The patriarchy fairy visits every
• 45:07
  Speaker 2: little baby boy the instant he's born and blesses him
• 45:10
  Speaker 2: with the evil of toxic masculinity somehow, which can only
• 45:15
  Speaker 2: be purged by a feminist exorcism. Right, but but but
• 45:21
  Speaker 2: but they're not blaming all men. It just happens to
• 45:24
  Speaker 2: be all it's always men. Anyway.
• 45:28
  Speaker 1: I think it's funny it is you they just saying
• 45:32
  Speaker 1: I think this is Yeah, that's why I said. It's
• 45:34
  Speaker 1: like NPR coded. It's like they're they don't They just
• 45:38
  Speaker 1: keep saying this is really interesting, and it doesn't go anywhere.
• 45:43
  Speaker 1: It seems they're just like, wow, wow, that's ira interesting.
• 45:47
  Speaker 1: Well this one in another direction than I expected this,
• 45:50
  Speaker 1: And like, again, what why were you expecting men to
• 45:54
  Speaker 1: hate women to begin with? Don't you think that that
• 45:56
  Speaker 1: actually demonstrates the thing that you're shocked by? But anyway,
• 46:00
  Speaker 1: Nova Fan twenty one gives us a dollar and says,
• 46:03
  Speaker 1: women make tons of man bashing videos online. Men try
• 46:07
  Speaker 1: to shame the man bashing videos feminists. I guess men
• 46:10
  Speaker 1: and women experience the internet differently. Yeah, exactly, Yeah, I
• 46:15
  Speaker 1: like that she does that thing where they blame that
• 46:18
  Speaker 1: abstract external thing. Yeah, it's like they're living in two
• 46:20
  Speaker 1: different internets. No, maybe it's like you're teaching women to
• 46:24
  Speaker 1: fear and hate men and everything around them, and you're
• 46:28
  Speaker 1: constantly putting them in a state of existential dread that
• 46:32
  Speaker 1: everything that they are and will ever be is going
• 46:36
  Speaker 1: to be destroyed by men, and they're believing you, whereas
• 46:41
  Speaker 1: men are like, you know what, I think that's bullshit,
• 46:45
  Speaker 1: and they're doing something else. They're not as because in general,
• 46:49
  Speaker 1: men are not as neurotic about any of the things
• 46:54
  Speaker 1: happening in the world, despite all of the real problems,
• 46:56
  Speaker 1: Like they're aware, you know, men are aware of the
• 46:59
  Speaker 1: problems the economy and the problems with the job market
• 47:03
  Speaker 1: and the problems with affordability. But most of them are like, well,
• 47:07
  Speaker 1: I guess I'm just gonna have the grind harder. I
• 47:09
  Speaker 1: guess I'm just gonna have to, you know, figure out
• 47:11
  Speaker 1: some other That's why they're going to people who are
• 47:13
  Speaker 1: helping them with investing and stuff like that, or they
• 47:16
  Speaker 1: starting their own businesses. They're basically trying to adapt to
• 47:19
  Speaker 1: the situation, and women, because all they can do is
• 47:23
  Speaker 1: appeal to men, are just losing their minds. They're just
• 47:27
  Speaker 1: becoming insane, like more insane than normal, which is a lot.
• 47:33
  Speaker 1: And I think that's that that's not two different internets,
• 47:36
  Speaker 1: that's two different ways of processing information that is becoming
• 47:41
  Speaker 1: manifest differently.
• 47:43
  Speaker 2: So yeah, all right, all.
• 47:46
  Speaker 1: Right, anyway, let's keep going a little bit more of
• 47:48
  Speaker 1: this bit.
• 47:49
  Speaker 3: You know, as a mom of a first child, like
• 47:51
  Speaker 3: she's a toddler, I've got a lot of parenting content
• 47:53
  Speaker 3: coming through on on Instagram reels in particular, and it's
• 47:57
  Speaker 3: a lot of women basically being so horrible about their
• 48:00
  Speaker 3: husbands and the fathers of their children, you know, weaponized
• 48:03
  Speaker 3: incompetents and all of these kind of buzz phrases. And
• 48:06
  Speaker 3: I come off it and I don't recognize that in
• 48:09
  Speaker 3: my own partner or many people that I know, but
• 48:11
  Speaker 3: I do get a sense that there is a lot
• 48:13
  Speaker 3: of there's a lot of frustration in hatred for the
• 48:16
  Speaker 3: opposite sex out there.
• 48:17
  Speaker 1: She didn't she had a problem saying hate. Did you
• 48:20
  Speaker 1: catch that? Yes, she wanted to say it, and then
• 48:23
  Speaker 1: she was like, well, maybe that's not what it is. Well,
• 48:28
  Speaker 1: then she did eventually get back to it and say it. Yeah.
• 48:31
  Speaker 2: Yeah, she wanted to soften it with frustration. No, it's hatred.
• 48:36
  Speaker 2: And honestly, these women, these Instagram mommies, don't deserve their partners.
• 48:42
  Speaker 2: Like at the point if you are going on Instagram
• 48:45
  Speaker 2: to complain about emotional labor or learn learn, Yeah right,
• 48:54
  Speaker 2: you don't like Basically, what you've said is your social
• 48:57
  Speaker 2: web signaling is more important than your relationship with your husband.
• 49:01
  Speaker 2: That speaks to a deficit in your ability to bond.
• 49:07
  Speaker 2: I'm gonna be I'm just gonna be like completely, I'm
• 49:09
  Speaker 2: gonna lay it right out. It speaks to a deficit
• 49:12
  Speaker 2: in these women that they're putting social web signaling ahead
• 49:17
  Speaker 2: of their relationship. They're putting getting social points in their
• 49:23
  Speaker 2: web ahead of their relationship. That is a deficit in
• 49:27
  Speaker 2: their bonding. And it's too bad that men don't actually
• 49:31
  Speaker 2: come together and complain right and actually identify this stuff.
• 49:36
  Speaker 2: And if they found it on their wives computer, just
• 49:38
  Speaker 2: be like, you know, you are a problem, you have
• 49:41
  Speaker 2: a problem. You are a problem. You have a problem.
• 49:48
  Speaker 2: And men can't do that, they have no basis to
• 49:51
  Speaker 2: do that, and yet they should be able to because
• 49:55
  Speaker 2: what their women have done is betray them in a
• 49:57
  Speaker 2: public way and it's to disgusting.
• 50:03
  Speaker 3: Yeah, and it.
• 50:05
  Speaker 2: Is beyond hatred. I like I look at I look
• 50:09
  Speaker 2: at women today and they don't deserve men. Like many
• 50:13
  Speaker 2: of them. Their behavior is appalling that you may have
• 50:17
  Speaker 2: a problem with your husband, right, First of all, I'll
• 50:22
  Speaker 2: be honest, these these women, their problems are bullshit almost entirely.
• 50:29
  Speaker 2: You may have a problem, but you don't throw it
• 50:32
  Speaker 2: into the public as as fodder for your relational web.
• 50:37
  Speaker 2: That's disgusting behavior, that's betrayal behavior. And I know exactly
• 50:45
  Speaker 2: where it's coming from. It's coming from the fact that again,
• 50:49
  Speaker 2: women's are indocrine architecture, so they're they're hormonal profiles in
• 50:54
  Speaker 2: our society are way too coddled. They don't have the
• 51:00
  Speaker 2: experiences of threat, deprivation, hard work that would have matured
• 51:08
  Speaker 2: them in the past. And like they say, oh, strong
• 51:14
  Speaker 2: men create strong times, strong times create weak men. No,
• 51:17
  Speaker 2: what happens is strong men create strong good times. Good
• 51:22
  Speaker 2: times create infra pink, and infra pink destroys everything, and
• 51:30
  Speaker 2: we are living in a time of infrapink. Women are
• 51:34
  Speaker 2: again I'm gonna say this, it's gonna sound really weird.
• 51:36
  Speaker 2: Women are way too feminine. Feminism is femininity taken to
• 51:44
  Speaker 2: an extreme, to an extreme where it can't even recognize
• 51:46
  Speaker 2: its own actions or its own thoughts as its own responsibility.
• 51:52
  Speaker 2: And then women themselves are so oxytocin dominant that they
• 51:57
  Speaker 2: are incapable of pair bonds. Like pair bonds require specificity,
• 52:03
  Speaker 2: they require certain amount of activated vasapressin, or at least
• 52:06
  Speaker 2: oxytocin that's acting like vasapressant, which itself requires a environment
• 52:13
  Speaker 2: of threat, which doesn't exist for women. They're too coddled,
• 52:17
  Speaker 2: so they're not even capable of proper pair bonding. So
• 52:21
  Speaker 2: they live in these vapid oxytocin webs where everything is
• 52:28
  Speaker 2: about the relationship. And I figured out what being seen is.
• 52:33
  Speaker 2: I have a theory now on what the relational modality's
• 52:37
  Speaker 2: obsession with being seen is about, and it doesn't bode
• 52:41
  Speaker 2: well for their eventual happiness. In order to be seen,
• 52:48
  Speaker 2: you actually need a man, because only a man can
• 52:52
  Speaker 2: provide it. Other women are not going to provide that
• 52:55
  Speaker 2: for you, ladies. So you can spend all the time
• 52:58
  Speaker 2: you want in your relation webs trying to extract being
• 53:02
  Speaker 2: seen from other women who are trying to extract being
• 53:06
  Speaker 2: seen from you. But you're not going to get anywhere.
• 53:09
  Speaker 2: You're just going to increase your misery. And incidentally, you
• 53:13
  Speaker 2: know all of that stuff about men being lonely and
• 53:17
  Speaker 2: men being having a crisis. You know that when you
• 53:22
  Speaker 2: drill down into the statistics around happiness, women are worse
• 53:27
  Speaker 2: than men off the men. Did you know that? No,
• 53:34
  Speaker 2: Like they're substanti And I don't mean that as in, oh,
• 53:37
  Speaker 2: let's let's feel bad for the poor women. They've done
• 53:39
  Speaker 2: this to themselves. They've done this to themselves when you
• 53:45
  Speaker 2: actually look at like if you if you ask women
• 53:47
  Speaker 2: generic questions like are you fulfilled? Are you happy? They'll
• 53:52
  Speaker 2: say yes. When you ask them behaviorally specific questions like
• 53:57
  Speaker 2: are you having depressive episodes? Do you do X, Y
• 54:01
  Speaker 2: and Z behavior associated with negative mental health outcomes, they
• 54:07
  Speaker 2: are saying yes significantly more than men. There were if
• 54:12
  Speaker 2: you just look at the behavioral like if you if
• 54:15
  Speaker 2: you ask behavioral level, which is about as like, about
• 54:20
  Speaker 2: as objective as you can get on these surveys, women
• 54:23
  Speaker 2: are absolutely miserable and men are doing significantly better. Did
• 54:27
  Speaker 2: you like? This is if you drill down on it,
• 54:30
  Speaker 2: that's what you see. Sure, And the I think one
• 54:35
  Speaker 2: of the reasons why is men know what's wrong, right,
• 54:39
  Speaker 2: You know, the pair bonding is crude. The men on
• 54:43
  Speaker 2: that panel looked at the women. This the the dating panel.
• 54:47
  Speaker 2: You've got four men who are ready, you know, they're
• 54:51
  Speaker 2: in their pair bonding era, and you've got four women
• 54:55
  Speaker 2: who are in there atavistic like regressing to baboon era.
• 55:04
  Speaker 2: I guess they're baboon era. Men know they can see
• 55:09
  Speaker 2: shit well, odds are not good, and they know what's missing.
• 55:14
  Speaker 2: Women don't. They're just sitting in their relational lagoon, in
• 55:19
  Speaker 2: each other's shit and piss and being like, what I
• 55:24
  Speaker 2: want you to see me? And then the other woman's
• 55:27
  Speaker 2: like I want you to see me. Why can't you
• 55:29
  Speaker 2: see me? It's like, well, because none of you are
• 55:32
  Speaker 2: going to give each other what you want. And the
• 55:34
  Speaker 2: reason why you're trying to get it from women is
• 55:36
  Speaker 2: because you're afraid of men, because you believe in a
• 55:40
  Speaker 2: stupid statement, a stupid ideology that's convinced you that men
• 55:45
  Speaker 2: oppress women. So you're sitting there trying to get from
• 55:48
  Speaker 2: women something you can only get from men, and it's
• 55:50
  Speaker 2: making you more and more and more miserable. And on
• 55:53
  Speaker 2: top of that, you can't even identify why men are there.
• 55:59
  Speaker 2: They're like, yeah, know why women are unbondable. Now I
• 56:02
  Speaker 2: can't have a partner. That's that's a certain amount of misery.
• 56:05
  Speaker 2: But at least you know and you can start to
• 56:08
  Speaker 2: compensate for it. Women don't even know that, they're not
• 56:12
  Speaker 2: even at the point of knowing what's wrong. All they
• 56:17
  Speaker 2: know is that they can't get their girlfriends to see them,
• 56:23
  Speaker 2: and they're really miserable. Continue to fuck with yourselves, ladies, Okay.
• 56:34
  Speaker 1: All right, let me see here. Yeah, this is the
• 56:38
  Speaker 1: next time code.
• 56:39
  Speaker 5: Just as you see these skits drive to enrage men,
• 56:42
  Speaker 5: there is the same version for women as well.
• 56:44
  Speaker 3: Yeah, And what is it making women feel so disaffected? Scarlet?
• 56:48
  Speaker 3: Who you've studied in this polling, I mean, you find
• 56:51
  Speaker 3: that they're very, very pessimistic about their own economic outlook.
• 56:54
  Speaker 4: Yeah, they're hugely pessimistic about their own economic outlook. They
• 56:57
  Speaker 4: don't think the economy is working for them, which I
• 57:00
  Speaker 4: think is partly then why they have a more favorable
• 57:03
  Speaker 4: view of communism than capitalism, while they think the economy
• 57:06
  Speaker 4: is stacked against them in a way that the young
• 57:08
  Speaker 4: men feel less strongly. And what I find about that is,
• 57:11
  Speaker 4: I think it's really interesting because I think it's very
• 57:12
  Speaker 4: clear to me that the economy.
• 57:14
  Speaker 3: Is not working for young people generally.
• 57:15
  Speaker 4: You know, if you look at the youth on employment rate,
• 57:18
  Speaker 4: if you look at student loans, it's very hard to
• 57:21
  Speaker 4: make your way as a young person, I think, at
• 57:23
  Speaker 4: the moment in this country. But I think what's interesting
• 57:26
  Speaker 4: is that young women feel so much more pessimistically about
• 57:29
  Speaker 4: it than the young men, even though actually they're all
• 57:33
  Speaker 4: in a bad situation. But women are in a better
• 57:35
  Speaker 4: position than men overall. So you know, female youth, youth employees.
• 57:39
  Speaker 1: So I'm just pausing there for the banana, just in case.
• 57:42
  Speaker 1: So women are more pessimistic about economic you know, the
• 57:47
  Speaker 1: estate of the economy. They're voting for socialists, they're voting
• 57:51
  Speaker 1: far left because they think that's going to take care
• 57:53
  Speaker 1: of them. Men, despite the fact that they also are
• 57:57
  Speaker 1: dealing with these issues, are more are not as pessimistic
• 58:00
  Speaker 1: like I've seen before. And on top of that, she
• 58:04
  Speaker 1: says that women are in a better position than men are,
• 58:06
  Speaker 1: which is true, like you know, they're getting a better
• 58:09
  Speaker 1: education nonetheless and all that. But also, and I don't
• 58:13
  Speaker 1: think she's gonna say this, she might say it, I
• 58:15
  Speaker 1: want to like check and see. Also, ultimately, men are
• 58:19
  Speaker 1: going into the economy under the assumption that they're going
• 58:24
  Speaker 1: to have to use their resources to invest in a
• 58:29
  Speaker 1: wife and family, whereas women are just having the resources
• 58:33
  Speaker 1: for themselves. I'm not saying that's the way it should be,
• 58:36
  Speaker 1: that's the way it is. That's the way that women
• 58:40
  Speaker 1: see it. So when they say I'm not making any money,
• 58:43
  Speaker 1: it's not I am not making money so that I
• 58:45
  Speaker 1: can start a family with a man. It's I'm not
• 58:48
  Speaker 1: making money for myself. But men are thinking, I need
• 58:51
  Speaker 1: to make money so that I can start a family
• 58:54
  Speaker 1: and like buy a house and take care of my kids.
• 58:57
  Speaker 1: So it's like a not even the same mindset, which
• 59:00
  Speaker 1: means men are under more pressure to get more, but
• 59:04
  Speaker 1: they're less pessimistic than women. Okay, so you.
• 59:11
  Speaker 2: Want to know why, because women, well, perst of all architecture,
• 59:17
  Speaker 2: but also women are taught help learned helplessness, right, And
• 59:24
  Speaker 2: of course women don't really want it. I think in
• 59:27
  Speaker 2: a lot of cases, they don't want to take care
• 59:29
  Speaker 2: of themselves the rest of their lives. That's not something
• 59:33
  Speaker 2: they particularly want, and yet that is the world that
• 59:36
  Speaker 2: they've now inherited because that's what we decided to do.
• 59:41
  Speaker 2: We decided to discriminate against men in the job market
• 59:45
  Speaker 2: and in education, and we did, and now men are
• 59:48
  Speaker 2: discriminated against and they aren't doing as well as women.
• 59:52
  Speaker 2: That actually doesn't mean that women are doing better objectively,
• 59:56
  Speaker 2: as in doing a better job, which I don't think
• 59:59
  Speaker 2: they are. I know, we want We watched a video
• 1:00:02
  Speaker 2: while back where women were oh yeah, it was Pearl
• 1:00:05
  Speaker 2: versus Anakisparian. An Anisparian was like, well, women, they've taken
• 1:00:10
  Speaker 2: over and it's fine, and I'm like, no, it's not fine.
• 1:00:15
  Speaker 1: No.
• 1:00:17
  Speaker 2: The first of all, women have not taken over the
• 1:00:19
  Speaker 2: jobs that matter. Like if you if you actually looked
• 1:00:24
  Speaker 2: at our society and said, okay, what does society bare
• 1:00:27
  Speaker 2: bones need to perpetuate itself. It is ninety nine percent male.
• 1:00:32
  Speaker 2: I'm gonna be I'm just gonna I'm flat out. And
• 1:00:34
  Speaker 2: nurses probably could be taken over by men too, I'll
• 1:00:39
  Speaker 2: be honest, right, And a lot of nursing could probably
• 1:00:42
  Speaker 2: take home be at home too. So for the most part,
• 1:00:47
  Speaker 2: our society, well not for the overwhelming part, the people
• 1:00:51
  Speaker 2: who are keeping us alive and keeping our society running
• 1:00:56
  Speaker 2: are men ninety nine percent of them. And like not
• 1:01:01
  Speaker 2: u indre events, but the way that I look at
• 1:01:04
  Speaker 2: that statistic is you just look at workplace deaths in
• 1:01:07
  Speaker 2: this in the workplaces that matter, okay, well, energy, infrastructure, industry,
• 1:01:18
  Speaker 2: mining resources, all of those industries, the workplace deaths in
• 1:01:23
  Speaker 2: those industries are over like ninety eight percent male. So
• 1:01:29
  Speaker 2: those industries need men, they do not need women. And
• 1:01:34
  Speaker 2: that also includes all of the emergency industries as well.
• 1:01:37
  Speaker 2: Right except for maybe EMT okay, m h, we need men.
• 1:01:46
  Speaker 2: Women have not taken over those jobs. So when I
• 1:01:50
  Speaker 2: say that men women are doing better, I don't mean
• 1:01:52
  Speaker 2: that they're doing better job because they're not. They're doing
• 1:01:57
  Speaker 2: better in the system in which the narrative becomes something
• 1:02:02
  Speaker 2: that earns money. So we decided to do this, and
• 1:02:08
  Speaker 2: now it's done. Okay, all right, let's keep it.
• 1:02:13
  Speaker 3: All right, that's much better than male ones.
• 1:02:17
  Speaker 4: Again, female earnings now for those younger generations, have surpassed
• 1:02:20
  Speaker 4: male earnings. So actually, yes, I think it's sort of
• 1:02:23
  Speaker 4: absolutely right that they're feeling frustrated. But I still can't
• 1:02:28
  Speaker 4: quite explain how much more pessimistically they feel. And that
• 1:02:32
  Speaker 4: is even more pronounced actually amongst that it's a bit
• 1:02:35
  Speaker 4: of an awful poster term. But you know about ABC
• 1:02:38
  Speaker 4: one women rather than C twode so sort of middle class,
• 1:02:42
  Speaker 4: more affluent young women in this country are the ones
• 1:02:45
  Speaker 4: that feel those negative feelings towards the economy, towards So
• 1:02:49
  Speaker 4: I don't.
• 1:02:50
  Speaker 1: I'm not from England. So if you guys know what
• 1:02:53
  Speaker 1: she means by those, I don't know. I think they're
• 1:02:55
  Speaker 1: like stations or something. They're like different audiences. Not not
• 1:03:00
  Speaker 1: at all surprising, but again, you know, I think that
• 1:03:04
  Speaker 1: women just feel more negative feelings, like more from prominently,
• 1:03:08
  Speaker 1: I'm guessing than men. Men are like, Okay, well, this
• 1:03:11
  Speaker 1: is the situation we're in. How do we you know,
• 1:03:14
  Speaker 1: how do we get out of it? And that's what
• 1:03:15
  Speaker 1: they're doing. So all right, I'm gonna move on to
• 1:03:19
  Speaker 1: the next time code unless there's something else. And let
• 1:03:22
  Speaker 1: me just check. No super chats or superchows yet and
• 1:03:25
  Speaker 1: we got some early on but not since.
• 1:03:27
  Speaker 2: Get those superchows in. Guys, feed the Badger dot com
• 1:03:30
  Speaker 2: slash just the tip send them in. Tell me what
• 1:03:33
  Speaker 2: you think. Do you guys understand what I'm talking about.
• 1:03:37
  Speaker 2: Some're sending a superchow and say that, yes, Alison, you
• 1:03:40
  Speaker 2: haven't squirreled into a place where nobody can follow all right,
• 1:03:45
  Speaker 2: the Badger dot com slash just tip all.
• 1:03:47
  Speaker 1: Right, we're gonna get eleven minutes in and uh look
• 1:03:51
  Speaker 1: at Yeah, the more pessimism from women, I say eleven minutes.
• 1:03:57
  Speaker 5: So I go like right here with the young men
• 1:03:59
  Speaker 5: in that personal lives, they feel like they will make
• 1:04:02
  Speaker 5: racist jokes and sexist jokes, and they won't. They'll laugh
• 1:04:04
  Speaker 5: at them. They won't. They won't stand up unless as
• 1:04:06
  Speaker 5: a very specific sexual goal.
• 1:04:09
  Speaker 3: Well, Scotlett and you talked about the sort of contrast
• 1:04:14
  Speaker 3: in terms of class. But actually that's quite interesting.
• 1:04:17
  Speaker 2: We address the fact that that beginning of the time code,
• 1:04:21
  Speaker 2: because I'm sure there's a lot to it. Do women
• 1:04:23
  Speaker 2: stand up when other women engage in miss injury? Probably
• 1:04:29
  Speaker 2: not sexual assault on them?
• 1:04:32
  Speaker 1: Go back and play a lot.
• 1:04:33
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm curious what that was about.
• 1:04:37
  Speaker 1: Yeah, sure, let me find it here. Stay of the
• 1:04:44
  Speaker 1: Country eleven fourteen. Why am I not seeing any of
• 1:04:49
  Speaker 1: this text? Well whatever, I'll just go back a little bit.
• 1:04:52
  Speaker 5: Social justice issues that don't involve self promotion. That's their feeling.
• 1:04:55
  Speaker 3: And they felt that that extended into their personal relationships
• 1:04:58
  Speaker 3: as well, didn't They They felt that a man would
• 1:05:00
  Speaker 3: call out misogyny if they fancy they were defending, but
• 1:05:04
  Speaker 3: if not, they weren't really saying things to their friends
• 1:05:07
  Speaker 3: that you know, you shouldn't say that. Yeah, oh yeah.
• 1:05:09
  Speaker 5: There's very very frustrated with the young men in their
• 1:05:12
  Speaker 5: personal lives. They feel like they will make racist jokes
• 1:05:14
  Speaker 5: and sexist jokes, and they won't. They'll laugh at them.
• 1:05:17
  Speaker 5: They won't. They won't stand up unless as a very
• 1:05:19
  Speaker 5: specific sexual goal.
• 1:05:22
  Speaker 2: Well okay, yeah, so all right, that's what they do.
• 1:05:26
  Speaker 2: The young women stand up for them like there's no reciprocation.
• 1:05:34
  Speaker 2: This is ridiculous. Yeah, I wish that people would recognize
• 1:05:39
  Speaker 2: that men were the ones who did most of the
• 1:05:43
  Speaker 2: work to end like institutional sexism and racism in so
• 1:05:48
  Speaker 2: far as they existed and did most of the sacrificing
• 1:05:51
  Speaker 2: for that. Let them have their stupid let them have
• 1:05:55
  Speaker 2: their crass jokes about the things that they actually fight against.
• 1:05:59
  Speaker 2: That's the irony reading modality. Sorry, relational modality thinkers will
• 1:06:06
  Speaker 2: sit around talking about how sexist and racist jokes are
• 1:06:11
  Speaker 2: bad while doing absolutely nothing to change real problems in
• 1:06:17
  Speaker 2: the world. They'll sit and signal. Meanwhile, operational readers or men, sir,
• 1:06:24
  Speaker 2: I'll just use men will actually fix things. If they're
• 1:06:27
  Speaker 2: a serious problem, and it makes sense in the context
• 1:06:30
  Speaker 2: of their ethics, and men tend to be merit based,
• 1:06:33
  Speaker 2: So systems that judge people based on how they're born.
• 1:06:38
  Speaker 2: That's interesting how in the past there were systems that
• 1:06:41
  Speaker 2: judge people based on how they're born. I wonder who
• 1:06:44
  Speaker 2: was the ones who are the ones supporting those kinds
• 1:06:47
  Speaker 2: of systems. Maybe the ones who are currently supporting systems
• 1:06:50
  Speaker 2: based on judging people on how on what position they
• 1:06:53
  Speaker 2: were born, as you know, maybe that's those are the
• 1:06:56
  Speaker 2: people who are polding that the relational modality things, who
• 1:07:01
  Speaker 2: think of everything in terms of a social web and
• 1:07:03
  Speaker 2: signaling and your relationship to who you were your ancestors were.
• 1:07:09
  Speaker 2: Maybe they're responsible for those things in the past. And
• 1:07:12
  Speaker 2: it was the group of people who are more merit
• 1:07:15
  Speaker 2: based who said, hey, people shouldn't be judged by who
• 1:07:18
  Speaker 2: their ancestors are, the color of their ancestors, and then said,
• 1:07:21
  Speaker 2: we gotta we gotta make sure that doesn't happen. Because
• 1:07:25
  Speaker 2: that's what really burns me is that the people who
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 2: probably supported the relational modality people thinkers who were probably
• 1:07:36
  Speaker 2: the ones who established all the racism in the past,
• 1:07:41
  Speaker 2: who said that people should be judged by how they
• 1:07:44
  Speaker 2: were born who they were born too, because that's a
• 1:07:48
  Speaker 2: relational modality system of hierarchy, and still do that today.
• 1:07:54
  Speaker 2: Are the ones who are tisking about the operational modality
• 1:08:00
  Speaker 2: thinkers who are the ones who probably did what they
• 1:08:03
  Speaker 2: could to end it and replace it with a meritocracy.
• 1:08:08
  Speaker 2: Does anybody understand what I'm saying. I'm saying women are
• 1:08:11
  Speaker 2: racists on a fundamental level. They support racist institutions, which
• 1:08:17
  Speaker 2: is what intersectionality is. They're also sexists on a fundamental level,
• 1:08:22
  Speaker 2: and they support sexism, which is what feminism is. And
• 1:08:26
  Speaker 2: they continue to do these things and they did them
• 1:08:29
  Speaker 2: in the past, and it was men who challenged them men,
• 1:08:35
  Speaker 2: and these men are probably making these jokes because they're
• 1:08:40
  Speaker 2: they find it crass and funny, the whole concept of it,
• 1:08:48
  Speaker 2: because it's not meritocracy, which is what they respect. Okay,
• 1:08:57
  Speaker 2: And I just I want to say that I don't
• 1:09:00
  Speaker 2: even think these girls have the right to have an
• 1:09:02
  Speaker 2: opinion on these issues because when two hundred years ago,
• 1:09:08
  Speaker 2: they would be the ones supporting the racist institutions that
• 1:09:12
  Speaker 2: judge people based on how they're born, just like right
• 1:09:15
  Speaker 2: now they're supporting the racist institutions that judge people how
• 1:09:20
  Speaker 2: they're born, and they're supporting the sexist institutions who create
• 1:09:25
  Speaker 2: a hierarchy of morality with men on the bottom. I'm
• 1:09:31
  Speaker 2: so fucking tired of this. Yeah, okay, And I wanted
• 1:09:37
  Speaker 2: to actually say what I was trying to get at
• 1:09:39
  Speaker 2: previously was these women are like, they seem somewhat surprised
• 1:09:44
  Speaker 2: that the outcomes that institutions that come in billion dollar
• 1:09:49
  Speaker 2: budgets said where their desired outcomes have come to pass.
• 1:09:54
  Speaker 2: You know, like we said, Okay, the future is female.
• 1:09:57
  Speaker 2: We're going to prioritize girls in school and treat boys
• 1:10:01
  Speaker 2: like defective girls. Oh wow, And then these women are like, wow,
• 1:10:06
  Speaker 2: boys boys are failing in schools. Where did that come from? How?
• 1:10:12
  Speaker 2: It's almost like it was just I don't know, maybe
• 1:10:16
  Speaker 2: uranus gave off a magnetic pulse and it just somehow
• 1:10:20
  Speaker 2: caused that to happen. Where could they have come from?
• 1:10:26
  Speaker 1: Okay, all right, I got a super chat from witha
• 1:10:32
  Speaker 1: vern slots to eighty four six, who gives us five
• 1:10:36
  Speaker 1: dollars thank you and says, I work in distribution and
• 1:10:38
  Speaker 1: people don't realize how much our daily life still rely
• 1:10:41
  Speaker 1: on actual physical strength pisses me off every day. My
• 1:10:44
  Speaker 1: back hurts. Yeah. No, did they take it for granted? Yeah, yeah,
• 1:10:49
  Speaker 1: we talk about it on here all the time, like
• 1:10:52
  Speaker 1: they're like all the stuff that we enjoy, we like
• 1:10:56
  Speaker 1: you you cannot, let's say, completely, you can't separate yourself
• 1:11:00
  Speaker 1: from the raw materials that make it possible. And a
• 1:11:03
  Speaker 1: lot of that is still men's labor. Like it's it's
• 1:11:06
  Speaker 1: mostly men's labor.
• 1:11:07
  Speaker 2: It's not just distribution. It relies on men. Every place
• 1:11:10
  Speaker 2: that relies on men's strength is a place that is
• 1:11:15
  Speaker 2: indispensable to the continuation of society. So men are absolutely indispensable,
• 1:11:23
  Speaker 2: and you can see that in the workplace death statistics
• 1:11:26
  Speaker 2: because they try to they try to pretend like, oh,
• 1:11:29
  Speaker 2: mining its twenty percent women. It's not. What the way
• 1:11:33
  Speaker 2: that they do that is. First of all, the mining
• 1:11:37
  Speaker 2: quote unquote company will outsource all of its operation to contractors.
• 1:11:43
  Speaker 2: So the actual executives of the quote unquote mining company
• 1:11:50
  Speaker 2: have never even seen the inside of a mine, they
• 1:11:54
  Speaker 2: haven't even seen mining equipment. They have no clue about
• 1:11:58
  Speaker 2: any aspect of the process of mining. What they do
• 1:12:02
  Speaker 2: is they extract financially from the contractor contractors that they
• 1:12:09
  Speaker 2: no longer consider part of their business. They're basically turned
• 1:12:12
  Speaker 2: the mining operation into financial extraction on mining contractors basically,
• 1:12:20
  Speaker 2: so they contract out the actual operative parts of their
• 1:12:24
  Speaker 2: business and what remains is HRPR the c suite, all
• 1:12:30
  Speaker 2: of the people engage in the financial derivatives on mining
• 1:12:33
  Speaker 2: and everything else. Okay. And then they say, as a
• 1:12:37
  Speaker 2: result of that, as a result of putting all of
• 1:12:40
  Speaker 2: their male workforce into contractor positions, oh, we changed everything
• 1:12:45
  Speaker 2: to be now we have thirty percent deployed women in
• 1:12:48
  Speaker 2: our mining as bullshit. They're not miners anymore. They're a
• 1:12:55
  Speaker 2: freaking like a bureaucratic extraction node that's rents seeking on
• 1:13:00
  Speaker 2: mining operations. Yeah, and and they'll say, oh, the mining
• 1:13:06
  Speaker 2: industry is twenty percent. It's not. It isn't. It's still
• 1:13:12
  Speaker 2: effectively ninety nine percent. Mail. They've just played games with
• 1:13:17
  Speaker 2: who's on the payroll in order to get their EESG
• 1:13:21
  Speaker 2: number and their kickbacks uh, and their investments and to
• 1:13:30
  Speaker 2: increase their stock portfolio and to cover their ass in
• 1:13:33
  Speaker 2: terms of all of their their corporate good citizenship stars
• 1:13:41
  Speaker 2: that they get. Yeah, it's actually really sickening, but yeah,
• 1:13:46
  Speaker 2: there is an operative layer. Actually, you know what it
• 1:13:49
  Speaker 2: might be good that it's completely divorced from this financial
• 1:13:53
  Speaker 2: this bloated fatburg of fetti eunuchs, because they when this
• 1:14:02
  Speaker 2: all burns to the ground, we might still have an
• 1:14:05
  Speaker 2: operative layer that's functioning. So who knows. Maybe it's a
• 1:14:08
  Speaker 2: good thing that we've separated the two.
• 1:14:11
  Speaker 1: Okayh Winnavern Slots gives us another super chat. Thank you
• 1:14:17
  Speaker 1: for twenty dollars. Really appreciate it. Good news everyone, and
• 1:14:22
  Speaker 1: says it's not even just the workplace deaths. Look at
• 1:14:25
  Speaker 1: any man in his fifties or sixties, disabled or dead. Yeah, yeah,
• 1:14:30
  Speaker 1: we talk about all that stuff all the time. There's
• 1:14:33
  Speaker 1: definitely a bigger picture to take into consideration. Appreciate the message.
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 1: Thank you so much. All right, let's let's get to
• 1:14:39
  Speaker 1: this timecode. Uh this is yeah, let's let's let's get
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 1: it to it.
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 3: And you talked about the sort of contrast in terms
• 1:14:47
  Speaker 3: of class. But actually that's quite interesting stuff coming out
• 1:14:50
  Speaker 3: of your research about the differences in outlook between white
• 1:14:53
  Speaker 3: women and those from an ethnic minority background. So you
• 1:14:56
  Speaker 3: might expect women of color to be more likely to
• 1:15:00
  Speaker 3: to say that they feel the country is racist, for example,
• 1:15:02
  Speaker 3: because they're more likely to be on the receiving end
• 1:15:04
  Speaker 3: of racism, but it's actually the opposite.
• 1:15:06
  Speaker 4: It is the opposite way around. So, yeah, white women
• 1:15:08
  Speaker 4: in this country, young white women, sorry I should specify,
• 1:15:11
  Speaker 4: think that the country is racist. Ethnic minority women do
• 1:15:15
  Speaker 4: not overall think it as racist. They're actually tied on
• 1:15:17
  Speaker 4: the question, but they are They're significantly less likely to
• 1:15:20
  Speaker 4: say that it's racist than they're white peers. And I
• 1:15:23
  Speaker 4: think that's interesting. That's interesting in and of itself, but
• 1:15:26
  Speaker 4: then it extends into other issues as well. So actually,
• 1:15:29
  Speaker 4: I'm young. Ethnic minority women are much more likely to
• 1:15:31
  Speaker 4: say they feel valued by the country. They're much more
• 1:15:33
  Speaker 4: likely to say they feel positive about improving positively about
• 1:15:36
  Speaker 4: improving their life chances, you know, about things like being
• 1:15:39
  Speaker 4: the better position than their parents, about earning a decent amount,
• 1:15:42
  Speaker 4: getting a house one day, all of these issues. They
• 1:15:44
  Speaker 4: feel like they're much more positive and have more of
• 1:15:47
  Speaker 4: a steak. Potentially society will feel that they do than
• 1:15:50
  Speaker 4: they're white peers.
• 1:15:51
  Speaker 1: Yeah, we weig Net's on suicide Watch. Like I said
• 1:15:56
  Speaker 1: on X, you know your white women are your largest obstacle,
• 1:16:00
  Speaker 1: wig Nance. I'm sorry, but if you don't do something
• 1:16:03
  Speaker 1: about that, you're not fixing anything. And it's interesting because
• 1:16:07
  Speaker 1: I mean, if it's true, then that makes perfect sense.
• 1:16:10
  Speaker 1: It's like wop. White women are like their own worst
• 1:16:14
  Speaker 1: enemy and they think that everything is so much worse.
• 1:16:17
  Speaker 1: I guess they're more neurotic than minority women. I guess
• 1:16:20
  Speaker 1: like there must be like some other things at play.
• 1:16:23
  Speaker 1: I think that overall women are more on that side
• 1:16:26
  Speaker 1: of things, like at the contrast or the difference is
• 1:16:30
  Speaker 1: probably a lot greater between men and women than it
• 1:16:33
  Speaker 1: is between white women and women of other races. But
• 1:16:37
  Speaker 1: go ahead, yeah, tell.
• 1:16:38
  Speaker 2: Us, Yeah, Well, minority women are more likely to have
• 1:16:43
  Speaker 2: dealt with the pressures of poverty. They're more likely to
• 1:16:46
  Speaker 2: have dealt with actual war and famine and disease burdens
• 1:16:52
  Speaker 2: that can overwhelm like their health systems. They're more likely
• 1:16:56
  Speaker 2: to have dealt with existential threats and physical threats, which
• 1:17:01
  Speaker 2: is going to have had an effect on their understanding
• 1:17:06
  Speaker 2: of chardship. So it's gonna it's gonna make it more
• 1:17:12
  Speaker 2: less salient. Let's say, the hardship that would devastate our princess,
• 1:17:18
  Speaker 2: our white princess, is not going to devastate them. But
• 1:17:21
  Speaker 2: then the other thing is that they may not be
• 1:17:23
  Speaker 2: as embedded in these relational webs So like these when
• 1:17:30
  Speaker 2: I say that the women apparently it's white women, white
• 1:17:33
  Speaker 2: woke women who are doing this signaling, don't actually they're
• 1:17:39
  Speaker 2: not going to do anything about the things they're signaling about.
• 1:17:44
  Speaker 2: This is like and the fact that they are completely
• 1:17:47
  Speaker 2: divorced from the from what the experience of the people
• 1:17:51
  Speaker 2: that they're actually signaling about, right, doesn't make any like
• 1:17:54
  Speaker 2: it does. It makes perfect sense because it's not about
• 1:17:58
  Speaker 2: minority women. It's not about the name, you know, it's
• 1:18:01
  Speaker 2: about the signal. They couldn't give a crap. I mean,
• 1:18:05
  Speaker 2: they could promote a policy that you know, recognizes the
• 1:18:09
  Speaker 2: plight of minority women, but somehow, through some operational quirk
• 1:18:14
  Speaker 2: that they don't care about, actually kills every minority woman ever,
• 1:18:18
  Speaker 2: and they would be just fine with that because they
• 1:18:21
  Speaker 2: have signaled how much they care. It doesn't matter that
• 1:18:25
  Speaker 2: they actually are dying. They've signaled that's what matters. And
• 1:18:30
  Speaker 2: this is why men, you know, they walk into this
• 1:18:33
  Speaker 2: and they're probably like a lot of these guys are
• 1:18:35
  Speaker 2: probably horrified by it because they know these women have
• 1:18:38
  Speaker 2: absolutely no concern about the people that they're signaling concern
• 1:18:43
  Speaker 2: about it's just about the signaling, and it never gets
• 1:18:48
  Speaker 2: to the point of actually doing anything to benefit anybody
• 1:18:51
  Speaker 2: but themselves through signaling. I mean, and that's sort of
• 1:18:56
  Speaker 2: like when we actually comprehend that that that whole skit.
• 1:19:01
  Speaker 2: It's not about the nail, it's not about the minorities,
• 1:19:05
  Speaker 2: it's not really about the cause, it's not really about
• 1:19:07
  Speaker 2: helping anybody. It's just about signaling to my relational web
• 1:19:11
  Speaker 2: that I care. In fact, if all of these people
• 1:19:15
  Speaker 2: die as a result of me signaling doesn't matter. The
• 1:19:18
  Speaker 2: fact is I signaled, That's what matters. And it's so sylopsistic,
• 1:19:24
  Speaker 2: so self involved that I think that men who are
• 1:19:30
  Speaker 2: able to really comprehend this probably are disgusted by it
• 1:19:35
  Speaker 2: mm hm, because it's extractive, like these these white woke
• 1:19:40
  Speaker 2: women are extracting social benefit and social resources and for them,
• 1:19:47
  Speaker 2: embedded in their networks, this can be quite significant because
• 1:19:49
  Speaker 2: many of them are extremely wealthy and they if they
• 1:19:53
  Speaker 2: if they signal correctly, they can be installed in in
• 1:19:56
  Speaker 2: NGO positions that will give them million dollars. So you know,
• 1:20:02
  Speaker 2: it's very extractive and it has absolutely nothing to do
• 1:20:06
  Speaker 2: with helping anybody but themselves. And this is The problem
• 1:20:14
  Speaker 2: is that we have this view of women's hormone, the oxytocin,
• 1:20:19
  Speaker 2: which is which is framed as women's hormone, as being
• 1:20:22
  Speaker 2: this beautiful thing that creates love, and it doesn't. It
• 1:20:27
  Speaker 2: creates affiliated behavior, sure, you know, and then specifically the
• 1:20:31
  Speaker 2: mother infant diad, it creates a desire to take care
• 1:20:35
  Speaker 2: of something that's completely helpless. But in general it's also
• 1:20:40
  Speaker 2: very extractive, and it's very aggressive towards out groups, you know,
• 1:20:47
  Speaker 2: and it's vas oppressing like the male bonding hormone that
• 1:20:50
  Speaker 2: creates the specificity That means, hey, maybe we should care
• 1:20:54
  Speaker 2: about the people are actually hurting, not just signaling to
• 1:20:57
  Speaker 2: our relational web and presenting ourselves as somebody worthy of resources.
• 1:21:03
  Speaker 2: Of being in an extraction position, you know, getting that
• 1:21:07
  Speaker 2: NGO job where you get a million dollar salary because
• 1:21:10
  Speaker 2: you signaled so perfectly, maybe we should actually care about
• 1:21:13
  Speaker 2: the people on the ground who are hurting. That is
• 1:21:16
  Speaker 2: a male position, because it's a position that isn't about
• 1:21:22
  Speaker 2: extracting resources from a web. It's a position about solving
• 1:21:25
  Speaker 2: a problem. Like I think men really need to realize
• 1:21:30
  Speaker 2: how moral they are and that women aren't necessarily these
• 1:21:35
  Speaker 2: fricking angels, and that they don't actually deserve respect as
• 1:21:42
  Speaker 2: being more moral than men because they're friendlier and they're
• 1:21:46
  Speaker 2: more warm and affiliative, because that can disguise a lot
• 1:21:51
  Speaker 2: of extractive and vicious behavior, and also an inability need
• 1:22:00
  Speaker 2: to recognize that maybe you shouldn't virtue signal something that
• 1:22:06
  Speaker 2: you aren't putting your skin into, that you aren't actually trying.
• 1:22:11
  Speaker 2: You shouldn't virtue signal at about a problem that you
• 1:22:13
  Speaker 2: aren't doing anything operational on the ground to solve, because
• 1:22:19
  Speaker 2: that's a male thing. That's a male way of thinking.
• 1:22:22
  Speaker 2: To have disgust towards people who do that. Okay, let's continue,
• 1:22:30
  Speaker 2: all right.
• 1:22:32
  Speaker 1: Yeah, Like basically the what I was going to add
• 1:22:34
  Speaker 1: to that is minority women have had or basically any
• 1:22:40
  Speaker 1: woman that's had contact with the perimeter, that has experienced
• 1:22:44
  Speaker 1: the perimeter, the place that have like basically gotten to
• 1:22:49
  Speaker 1: a place that men experience all the time are more
• 1:22:53
  Speaker 1: resilient to that that existing because they've been they've experienced it.
• 1:22:59
  Speaker 1: White women are more or at least the white women
• 1:23:01
  Speaker 1: she's talking about, the progressive urbanite white woman is more
• 1:23:06
  Speaker 1: sheltered from that. So you know, like the existential thread
• 1:23:11
  Speaker 1: is of her own imagining, basically, and it's made a
• 1:23:13
  Speaker 1: lot worse and that's why they think everything sucks. Okay,
• 1:23:18
  Speaker 1: So that was that, and then I got one more
• 1:23:22
  Speaker 1: I think we just double check it here. Yeah, so
• 1:23:26
  Speaker 1: I got one more time code twenty one twenty six
• 1:23:32
  Speaker 1: right about here.
• 1:23:35
  Speaker 5: You know that they feel like their government doesn't get
• 1:23:37
  Speaker 5: them and it doesn't care about the things they care about,
• 1:23:40
  Speaker 5: and young men don't care about the things they care about.
• 1:23:42
  Speaker 5: You feel very sympathetic towards them because they're identifying real
• 1:23:45
  Speaker 5: issues and if they want to opt out, why not.
• 1:23:48
  Speaker 5: But obviously it has very bad ramifications for British society
• 1:23:53
  Speaker 5: of one group so alienated.
• 1:23:55
  Speaker 3: Yes, yeah, exactly. And it's interesting because I think you
• 1:23:57
  Speaker 3: mentioned it Scarlett, but.
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 1: Wait, she just made women Victor. Let me go back
• 1:24:00
  Speaker 1: a little bit so you guys can get a little
• 1:24:02
  Speaker 1: bit more context.
• 1:24:03
  Speaker 5: Just like Britain. It's a problem for them. I mean, yeah,
• 1:24:09
  Speaker 5: I mean they can't. You know, I don't necessarily blame
• 1:24:12
  Speaker 5: them for it because when you speak.
• 1:24:14
  Speaker 1: Wait, okay, yeah, it's this woman's question.
• 1:24:18
  Speaker 3: I think you know we're talking about online.
• 1:24:20
  Speaker 4: A lot of that is framed in terms of American
• 1:24:23
  Speaker 4: politics and their political discussions.
• 1:24:25
  Speaker 3: Yeah, it's so interesting because I think, particularly on the
• 1:24:28
  Speaker 3: right of politics, there's this there's this image of sort
• 1:24:31
  Speaker 3: of over educated young women who come out of university
• 1:24:35
  Speaker 3: with these kind of radical political opinions and they're the
• 1:24:38
  Speaker 3: reason why we're not getting enough babies born and that
• 1:24:40
  Speaker 3: kind of thing. I mean, is there is there any
• 1:24:42
  Speaker 3: sort of grain of truth in that?
• 1:24:44
  Speaker 1: Frankly yes, but but of course they're going to present
• 1:24:49
  Speaker 1: it as ridiculous. It's a silly, silly thing. Okay, let's
• 1:24:54
  Speaker 1: let's keep going. I mean, I do.
• 1:24:57
  Speaker 5: Think they probably are maybe perhaps they are spending more
• 1:25:00
  Speaker 5: time online and that's why that's part and you know,
• 1:25:04
  Speaker 5: that message is being reinforced. Universities are left wing. That
• 1:25:08
  Speaker 5: with the good people who feel the same, it becomes
• 1:25:10
  Speaker 5: a bubble where they think that.
• 1:25:11
  Speaker 3: I mean, you do have those differences of opinion.
• 1:25:13
  Speaker 5: Between the degrees, and that they're in a bubble where
• 1:25:18
  Speaker 5: people think like that. I mean, you know, it's natural
• 1:25:20
  Speaker 5: to look at America and be scared of it. I
• 1:25:23
  Speaker 5: think America came up a lot with everyone. They were
• 1:25:25
  Speaker 5: all worried about Trump. They take cares almost as much
• 1:25:29
  Speaker 5: as like Britain. It's a problem for them I mean, yeah.
• 1:25:35
  Speaker 1: I mean, I'm just positive there for the for the banana.
• 1:25:41
  Speaker 2: Okay, I'm so freaking that conversation.
• 1:25:45
  Speaker 1: Look, this is the this is what women are thinking
• 1:25:49
  Speaker 1: about right now.
• 1:25:50
  Speaker 2: So I am obviously not a woman. Wow.
• 1:25:56
  Speaker 1: Well look, I think it's, like I said, the whole thing.
• 1:26:00
  Speaker 1: At this point, what women are experiencing is just the
• 1:26:04
  Speaker 1: next crisis. So in twenty twenty eight, when Trump is gone,
• 1:26:09
  Speaker 1: whoever the next one is, depending on where that goes,
• 1:26:12
  Speaker 1: it will be the next crisis. Until then, there'll be
• 1:26:15
  Speaker 1: other crises. It's just a constant cycle of crisis after crisis,
• 1:26:21
  Speaker 1: and women are going to be at the forefront of
• 1:26:23
  Speaker 1: feeling all of that unless they basically get it together
• 1:26:26
  Speaker 1: and say, oh, you know what, this is all designed
• 1:26:29
  Speaker 1: to drive me crazy and I'm not going to do that.
• 1:26:32
  Speaker 5: But okay, I don't necessarily blame them for it, because
• 1:26:35
  Speaker 5: when you speak to them, you just feel there's quite
• 1:26:37
  Speaker 5: compelling about all these issues they describe, you know, graduating
• 1:26:40
  Speaker 5: into a world where they're watching war on the internet.
• 1:26:43
  Speaker 5: You know that they feel like their government doesn't get
• 1:26:46
  Speaker 5: them and it doesn't care about the things they care about,
• 1:26:49
  Speaker 5: and young men don't care about the things they care about.
• 1:26:51
  Speaker 5: You feel very sympathetic towards them because they're identifying real
• 1:26:54
  Speaker 5: issues and if they want to opt out, why not.
• 1:26:57
  Speaker 5: But obviously it has very badifications for British society of
• 1:27:02
  Speaker 5: one group so alienated.
• 1:27:04
  Speaker 1: Yes, so women are being alienated because they don't feel
• 1:27:09
  Speaker 1: like the government or men are listening to them. That's
• 1:27:16
  Speaker 1: where they've on this. Yes, you see that. And they're
• 1:27:22
  Speaker 1: not having children, you know. It's the thing that this
• 1:27:25
  Speaker 1: is where they are landing this plane, which started off
• 1:27:29
  Speaker 1: with them saying it looks like women are have a
• 1:27:32
  Speaker 1: lot more antipathy or even hatred towards men than men
• 1:27:36
  Speaker 1: do towards women. It looks like women men still view
• 1:27:39
  Speaker 1: women quite favorably, and then they made it towards the
• 1:27:42
  Speaker 1: end they're like, women are alienated and that's why they're
• 1:27:45
  Speaker 1: so upset. It's men. Men are not giving them enough attention.
• 1:27:49
  Speaker 1: The government's not doing everything they ask, They're not just
• 1:27:53
  Speaker 1: granting wishes like some kind of genie. They're you know,
• 1:27:56
  Speaker 1: they're not doing these things. And so I'm sympathetic to
• 1:27:59
  Speaker 1: women who aren't getting their wishes granted. I mean, that's
• 1:28:02
  Speaker 1: where that's what it's landing on. So you see that.
• 1:28:06
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, unless they're trying to be fair in
• 1:28:08
  Speaker 2: both sides.
• 1:28:09
  Speaker 1: Oh no, I don't think they are. This is like
• 1:28:12
  Speaker 1: nearly the end of the video. I think this is
• 1:28:15
  Speaker 1: the pivot. I mean, it's a very progressive outlet and
• 1:28:19
  Speaker 1: there and look, I think the women who have brought
• 1:28:21
  Speaker 1: the study of the Blonde, she's probably the least, let's say,
• 1:28:29
  Speaker 1: the least cringe on the panel, Like she's obviously been
• 1:28:32
  Speaker 1: invited on the panel, so she must have some overlap
• 1:28:35
  Speaker 1: beliefs wise, But she's also the most objective. She's like, well,
• 1:28:39
  Speaker 1: this is what the data shows, and it's it's surprising,
• 1:28:42
  Speaker 1: but you know, and she even like sort of I
• 1:28:45
  Speaker 1: wouldn't say, defends men, but she sort of says it's
• 1:28:48
  Speaker 1: interesting that men are not as upset as women are,
• 1:28:52
  Speaker 1: even though men I think should have more cause to be,
• 1:28:56
  Speaker 1: you know, and and they're not, which is probably good
• 1:28:59
  Speaker 1: for society. But you know, she doesn't acknowledge that, I guess.
• 1:29:04
  Speaker 1: But the other women are just trying to be like, well,
• 1:29:07
  Speaker 1: it's something men have done, something like men must have
• 1:29:11
  Speaker 1: done something to make this happen. But anyway, let's see
• 1:29:16
  Speaker 1: twenty yeah, a little bit. This is the last time,
• 1:29:20
  Speaker 1: cod We're just going to get through this.
• 1:29:21
  Speaker 3: Yeah, exactly. And it's interesting because I think you mentioned
• 1:29:24
  Speaker 3: it Scarlett. But the way that they feel more positively
• 1:29:28
  Speaker 3: about communism and socialism than they do about capitalism, is
• 1:29:31
  Speaker 3: that right? Yeah, they too shift, isn't it?
• 1:29:33
  Speaker 2: That is?
• 1:29:34
  Speaker 1: Yeah?
• 1:29:34
  Speaker 4: I mean I was quite so. Overall women have a
• 1:29:36
  Speaker 4: sort of say plus two view of capitalism, so just
• 1:29:39
  Speaker 4: about in that positive right, but they have a much
• 1:29:42
  Speaker 4: more favorable view of communism on's on plus eleven. So
• 1:29:44
  Speaker 4: you know, they do feel much more favorably inclined towards communism.
• 1:29:48
  Speaker 4: One of the interesting divides I found because I do think,
• 1:29:50
  Speaker 4: you know what, you just.
• 1:29:51
  Speaker 1: Because they think that men are going to basically do
• 1:29:53
  Speaker 1: all the labor and take care of them if they
• 1:29:55
  Speaker 1: do that. So they basically just like the government saying
• 1:29:59
  Speaker 1: it depends what. That's why they're not pessimistic about a
• 1:30:02
  Speaker 1: large government.
• 1:30:03
  Speaker 2: They're communism communism over capitalism. Communism is the redistributive model.
• 1:30:10
  Speaker 2: Resources distributed broadly, everyone receives, nobody earns differentially. That's the
• 1:30:16
  Speaker 2: oxytocin generalist social model applied to economics. Of course, they're
• 1:30:22
  Speaker 2: going to be more communists. They're women mm hmm. Yeah.
• 1:30:26
  Speaker 2: And they're not just any women. They're women who have
• 1:30:29
  Speaker 2: lived in a situation where they don't have to fight
• 1:30:35
  Speaker 2: for anything. Yep, that's that's a You put women in
• 1:30:39
  Speaker 2: a situation where they have to fight the environment, they
• 1:30:42
  Speaker 2: have to fight poverty, they have to fight war, they
• 1:30:44
  Speaker 2: have to fight a freaking plague, they have to fight
• 1:30:47
  Speaker 2: any kind of threat. They don't like communism. Remember that, uh,
• 1:30:51
  Speaker 2: that older Chinese woman who went into the uh that
• 1:30:57
  Speaker 2: uh that hearing about gun control and she said, uh,
• 1:31:02
  Speaker 2: can you promise me the government isn't going to become
• 1:31:05
  Speaker 2: tyrannical And then they were like whah blah blah blah,
• 1:31:08
  Speaker 2: and she said, well, you can't promise me you're not
• 1:31:10
  Speaker 2: getting my guns. Yeah. That's a woman who went through something,
• 1:31:14
  Speaker 2: who had to fight for something, you know, And that's
• 1:31:18
  Speaker 2: not these women. These women have never had to fight
• 1:31:23
  Speaker 2: for anything in their life. That's why they're communists. Yeah,
• 1:31:29
  Speaker 2: all right, all right, you go on put on it.
• 1:31:32
  Speaker 4: But the data does bear out that, you know, especially
• 1:31:36
  Speaker 4: white but you know, middle class educated women do feel
• 1:31:38
  Speaker 4: these things more strongly than the rest of that that
• 1:31:41
  Speaker 4: cohort women who don't have to fight.
• 1:31:44
  Speaker 1: Yeah, like literally middle class women, affluent women.
• 1:31:48
  Speaker 2: Yeah, that is the group of women who don't have
• 1:31:50
  Speaker 2: to fight, and they are not elite enough that they
• 1:31:55
  Speaker 2: understand what's going on. Right, because the women on top,
• 1:31:58
  Speaker 2: they have kids, they have linear, they make sure that
• 1:32:01
  Speaker 2: their children aren't taught trans stuff in school because they
• 1:32:06
  Speaker 2: want to stay on top. They're actually fighting for something.
• 1:32:09
  Speaker 2: The elite women are fighting for something. White, middle class,
• 1:32:14
  Speaker 2: moderately wealthy women, they have nothing to fight for and
• 1:32:17
  Speaker 2: they've never fought for anything in their life, so they
• 1:32:19
  Speaker 2: act like this, Yeah, well, get well.
• 1:32:25
  Speaker 4: I think is that there's a huge difference between what
• 1:32:27
  Speaker 4: I call it the COVID or many people called COVID generation, right,
• 1:32:30
  Speaker 4: and they're slightly old, appears, So if we break out
• 1:32:32
  Speaker 4: the sort of eighteen to twenty five year olds versus
• 1:32:34
  Speaker 4: the twenty five to thirty year olds, the eighteen to
• 1:32:37
  Speaker 4: twenty five year olds feel these things much more extremely
• 1:32:41
  Speaker 4: and with the eighteen to twenty five year olds, so
• 1:32:44
  Speaker 4: poor is their view of CATALYSM that they actually have
• 1:32:48
  Speaker 4: as favorable view of fascism. Now, I'm not suggesting that
• 1:32:51
  Speaker 4: all these under twenty fives of fascists. They are very
• 1:32:53
  Speaker 4: clearly not they're very very.
• 1:32:54
  Speaker 1: Part from that, But there really isn't that much of
• 1:32:57
  Speaker 1: a difference. So it makes sense fascism and communism are
• 1:33:01
  Speaker 1: not that different. I'm sorry, they're not opposites stoppretading, they are,
• 1:33:05
  Speaker 1: They're very similar.
• 1:33:07
  Speaker 3: I thought that was a bit that really made my
• 1:33:08
  Speaker 3: jaw job. Yeah, that's amazing, and I suppose Coke, we
• 1:33:12
  Speaker 3: haven't talked about COVID, but that is I mean, that's
• 1:33:15
  Speaker 3: such a big percentage of some of these women's lives.
• 1:33:17
  Speaker 3: They're so young, you know, and it was their formative
• 1:33:19
  Speaker 3: years that were impacted by this, whether they were at
• 1:33:21
  Speaker 3: university or whether they're at school.
• 1:33:23
  Speaker 1: You would also argue that they're like fucking kids and
• 1:33:26
  Speaker 1: they don't actually understand what it is they're advocating for
• 1:33:29
  Speaker 1: because they're eighteen. But uh, okay, let me see if
• 1:33:34
  Speaker 1: there's like anything else to this thing. I think we
• 1:33:36
  Speaker 1: might be about done here. But like, women have become
• 1:33:39
  Speaker 1: very radical politically. There's like thirty seconds.
• 1:33:43
  Speaker 3: How far did you find that being something that they
• 1:33:45
  Speaker 3: would sort of refer back to as the thing that
• 1:33:48
  Speaker 3: kind of radicalized them. Sounds pejorative, but you know, sort
• 1:33:51
  Speaker 3: of led them to where they are now.
• 1:33:52
  Speaker 5: I really think that is a massive factor in it.
• 1:33:55
  Speaker 5: I mean, they didn't cite it so much, but you
• 1:33:57
  Speaker 5: have to think, well, because I'm twenty eight, so I'm
• 1:33:59
  Speaker 5: just sort of older, just a bit older than these people,
• 1:34:02
  Speaker 5: and I'm at school, I was part of these feminist
• 1:34:05
  Speaker 5: society and at university these kind of protests. I was
• 1:34:08
  Speaker 5: so in that kind of world. But I was trying
• 1:34:11
  Speaker 5: to think, what's the difference between my experience of it
• 1:34:13
  Speaker 5: where everyone was talking about progressive things and Fourth Way feminism,
• 1:34:17
  Speaker 5: feminism and all that stuff. What's the difference between that
• 1:34:21
  Speaker 5: and these people now? And it is just this overwhelming
• 1:34:25
  Speaker 5: bleakness that I just I don't recognize that at all
• 1:34:28
  Speaker 5: from when I was at school and when I was
• 1:34:29
  Speaker 5: at university.
• 1:34:31
  Speaker 1: Okay, so she's saying that when she was in school,
• 1:34:38
  Speaker 1: and she's not old. She's the youngest one on the panels,
• 1:34:40
  Speaker 1: so she's probably like in her twenties, so this is,
• 1:34:42
  Speaker 1: you know, like she's maybe in her late twenties. She
• 1:34:46
  Speaker 1: said that she was into the feminist thing, and it's
• 1:34:48
  Speaker 1: funny the way that she talks about it. It sounds
• 1:34:51
  Speaker 1: like it was just something fashionable, not like serious, but like,
• 1:34:55
  Speaker 1: oh I did this because I made friends doing this,
• 1:34:59
  Speaker 1: you know, it was almost like a fashionable thing, like
• 1:35:03
  Speaker 1: all the all the all the cool kids are feminists now.
• 1:35:06
  Speaker 1: And then she's like, well that was in my in
• 1:35:09
  Speaker 1: those days, I did that, and now I don't do that.
• 1:35:12
  Speaker 1: But I noticed there's a lot of bleakness amongst the women.
• 1:35:15
  Speaker 1: It's almost like I didn't warn them that this was
• 1:35:18
  Speaker 1: going to be a nihilistic ideology, because it is. And
• 1:35:24
  Speaker 1: now they're I don't know, she doesn't she doesn't relate,
• 1:35:28
  Speaker 1: and they're going to try and blame it on COVID.
• 1:35:29
  Speaker 1: But I'm that's basically the last one.
• 1:35:31
  Speaker 2: But you can actually blame it on right, Okay. Her
• 1:35:34
  Speaker 2: generation still had men willing to engage, all right, So
• 1:35:40
  Speaker 2: they could be bleak or they could have they could
• 1:35:43
  Speaker 2: have these nihilistic belief systems, but they still had men
• 1:35:45
  Speaker 2: to drag them out of it. I don't think these
• 1:35:48
  Speaker 2: women do anymore, right, That's that. I think that's the difference.
• 1:35:53
  Speaker 2: Men make everything better. Put that on a mug, all right,
• 1:35:57
  Speaker 2: let's go.
• 1:35:58
  Speaker 1: That's it.
• 1:36:01
  Speaker 2: Oh, that's it.
• 1:36:02
  Speaker 1: Okay, Yeah, that's what I've been. That's what I said.
• 1:36:04
  Speaker 1: That was like the last time code, I mean, like
• 1:36:07
  Speaker 1: the general summary of it all is. I mean, the
• 1:36:13
  Speaker 1: general summaries is essentially they're finding that gen Z women
• 1:36:19
  Speaker 1: are more man haiti than gen Z men, and they
• 1:36:24
  Speaker 1: use that as a launch. She says, she's twenty eight. Okay,
• 1:36:28
  Speaker 1: So that's why I thought. Late twenties, they found polling
• 1:36:32
  Speaker 1: that reveals a significant asymmetry in how young women and
• 1:36:35
  Speaker 1: men view each other. Seventy two percent of young men
• 1:36:38
  Speaker 1: hold a favorable view of young women, with well only
• 1:36:41
  Speaker 1: fifty percent of women feel similarly about men. Among women
• 1:36:46
  Speaker 1: under twenty five, this view drops even more to thirty
• 1:36:49
  Speaker 1: five percent, with only eleven percent describing the view as
• 1:36:53
  Speaker 1: very positive. This negativity among young women manifest strongly in
• 1:36:58
  Speaker 1: their personal lives, with women expressing skepticism or criticism even
• 1:37:03
  Speaker 1: towards their boyfriends. Others have completely sworn off men or
• 1:37:07
  Speaker 1: refused to date men who disagree with them on core
• 1:37:10
  Speaker 1: political or social issues. The divide is not reciprocated. Young
• 1:37:15
  Speaker 1: men generally maintain more positive views towards women, making the
• 1:37:18
  Speaker 1: negativity from women more pronounced and unbalanced. So that's kind
• 1:37:22
  Speaker 1: of like the basics of it. And then they go
• 1:37:24
  Speaker 1: into like, basically, because the New Statesman is a very
• 1:37:28
  Speaker 1: progressive outlet, The last thing they want to do is
• 1:37:31
  Speaker 1: be like, this must be feminisms doing so that's why
• 1:37:33
  Speaker 1: they're saying, Oh, it's the economy. Oh it's women are
• 1:37:36
  Speaker 1: being neglected. Oh it's Andrew Tate sort of, you know.
• 1:37:42
  Speaker 1: And that's why they don't land on it. And they
• 1:37:44
  Speaker 1: spend most of the talk trying to figure out what
• 1:37:46
  Speaker 1: to blame other than feminism or women's own behavior and anything.
• 1:37:51
  Speaker 1: But that basically so what.
• 1:37:53
  Speaker 2: And what like Like I said, that's going to get
• 1:37:56
  Speaker 2: them nowhere? Yes? Ya literally literally, there's a there, some
• 1:38:00
  Speaker 2: billion dollar industry telling women, young women and girls to
• 1:38:04
  Speaker 2: hate men and older women, every woman, right, And that's feminism,
• 1:38:11
  Speaker 2: And if you include all of feminism's various enterprises, it's
• 1:38:18
  Speaker 2: probably a trillion dollar industry, right. And it gets it
• 1:38:24
  Speaker 2: money from disrupting and destroying the relationship between the sexes
• 1:38:28
  Speaker 2: and advocating for the spinsters who result, and that they
• 1:38:32
  Speaker 2: create the sum the sense that they advocate for a
• 1:38:35
  Speaker 2: large body of women, which gives them a lot of
• 1:38:38
  Speaker 2: their political plower and their political clout, and they need
• 1:38:41
  Speaker 2: women to buy into it. And so they've constructed this
• 1:38:44
  Speaker 2: narrative that men oppression heterosexuality is the site of oppression.
• 1:38:50
  Speaker 2: They need the Party of single Ladies in order to
• 1:38:52
  Speaker 2: have their political clout, otherwise it doesn't work, all right,
• 1:38:57
  Speaker 2: So they promote these narratives which are horrendous and wrong
• 1:39:03
  Speaker 2: and are specifically designed to tear men and women apart.
• 1:39:06
  Speaker 2: And then these women are like, oh, well, where did
• 1:39:08
  Speaker 2: this hatred of men come from? Hmm, I wonder And
• 1:39:11
  Speaker 2: if they can't identify the source of it, how are
• 1:39:15
  Speaker 2: they ever going to do anything to change it? And
• 1:39:18
  Speaker 2: the answer is they aren't. They're just going to keep
• 1:39:20
  Speaker 2: identifying it, you know, and saying, oh, that's strange, where
• 1:39:24
  Speaker 2: did that come from? Oh? Well, I guess no, Ah,
• 1:39:28
  Speaker 2: bet are better put some more money into feminism because
• 1:39:31
  Speaker 2: if these girls, in fact, we probably have just heard
• 1:39:34
  Speaker 2: what their solution would be. These girls aren't feeling heard,
• 1:39:38
  Speaker 2: they're feeling isolated. They should be less isolated. We should
• 1:39:42
  Speaker 2: have a government program. Heuck, well, we should probably have
• 1:39:46
  Speaker 2: a feminist initiative.
• 1:39:50
  Speaker 1: Yeah, we should open up a new ministry, a ministry
• 1:39:54
  Speaker 1: for women feeling isolated.
• 1:39:57
  Speaker 2: Women feeling isolated politically. I that's gonna be their solution.
• 1:40:04
  Speaker 2: And you know what, the actual you know, I'm gonna
• 1:40:06
  Speaker 2: I'm gonna give you another interpretation what the actual problem is,
• 1:40:09
  Speaker 2: and I'm gonna do it based on endocrinology. I'm sure
• 1:40:13
  Speaker 2: you guys are fascinated. This is my new autistic statistic obsession.
• 1:40:17
  Speaker 2: So I'm gonna take you through it, all right. So
• 1:40:20
  Speaker 2: what the data actually shows, and this is through the
• 1:40:23
  Speaker 2: endocrinology Arctic architecture framework, and I have found what little
• 1:40:29
  Speaker 2: information exists about human endocrinology and how it creates the relate,
• 1:40:34
  Speaker 2: how it creates the behavior between the sexes. Is that
• 1:40:38
  Speaker 2: when women are subjected and I've been talking about this
• 1:40:41
  Speaker 2: a little bit, but I'll lay it out cleanly here
• 1:40:43
  Speaker 2: before I begin. When women are subjected to threats, stressors,
• 1:40:49
  Speaker 2: basically anything where women have to fight for something, what
• 1:40:53
  Speaker 2: happens is their oxytocin is recruited into a vas oppressing
• 1:40:58
  Speaker 2: more like vas oppress and behavior. So the behavior starts
• 1:41:01
  Speaker 2: to become more male coded. They start to have specificity.
• 1:41:06
  Speaker 2: So I'm going to fight for this man and these
• 1:41:09
  Speaker 2: children they are mine. I'm going to fight for this community.
• 1:41:13
  Speaker 2: This is the community which has my future in it,
• 1:41:17
  Speaker 2: the future for my children in it. Right, So they
• 1:41:20
  Speaker 2: start to develop more of that, and that's a very
• 1:41:23
  Speaker 2: male behavior. Men tend to have specificity. They want to
• 1:41:28
  Speaker 2: get this done. They want to benefit this person. They
• 1:41:31
  Speaker 2: want to protect these kids because they're their kids. They
• 1:41:34
  Speaker 2: want to work for this family because it's theirs right.
• 1:41:38
  Speaker 2: They want to fight for this army because this is
• 1:41:40
  Speaker 2: their nation. That kind of thing that is a male thing.
• 1:41:44
  Speaker 2: It's mediated by vasippressant. So women under threat start to
• 1:41:49
  Speaker 2: operate more in that mode. Okay, And our problem really
• 1:41:54
  Speaker 2: and where the radicalization of women is really coming from,
• 1:41:58
  Speaker 2: is they are artificially allowed to saturate themselves with oxytop
• 1:42:03
  Speaker 2: like pure oxytocin, pure feminine oxytocin expression in a way
• 1:42:07
  Speaker 2: that has never existed before in human history. They are
• 1:42:11
  Speaker 2: too feminine. That is literally the problem with our society.
• 1:42:16
  Speaker 2: It is on an endocrine label. It is too feminine,
• 1:42:21
  Speaker 2: way too feminine. We have achieved levels of infra pink
• 1:42:25
  Speaker 2: that should not be possible, should be inconceivable. So anyway,
• 1:42:30
  Speaker 2: these young women have a favorable view of communism because
• 1:42:33
  Speaker 2: of course communism is in for pink thinking over capitalism.
• 1:42:38
  Speaker 2: The under twenty five cohort has a favorable view of fascism.
• 1:42:43
  Speaker 2: They loathe I'm not gonna go through the Trump stuff.
• 1:42:46
  Speaker 2: The speakers treat all of this as political opinion. Through
• 1:42:50
  Speaker 2: what I just detailed about the architecture, the endocrine architecture,
• 1:42:53
  Speaker 2: it's actually something different. It's the behavioral output of women
• 1:42:57
  Speaker 2: whose bonding architecture has never been activated. So they've never
• 1:43:00
  Speaker 2: gone through anything, they've had to fight for, any kind
• 1:43:03
  Speaker 2: of kind of tribulation or problem that has actually activated
• 1:43:08
  Speaker 2: their ability to understand things in terms of a future,
• 1:43:13
  Speaker 2: in terms of specific goals, in terms of I want
• 1:43:17
  Speaker 2: this my family to have a future in this community.
• 1:43:21
  Speaker 2: That's what I'm going to fight for. They've never had
• 1:43:23
  Speaker 2: that experience. They've never been activated in this way. They
• 1:43:27
  Speaker 2: remain in a very childlike state of oxytocin. I mean,
• 1:43:32
  Speaker 2: this isn't this isn't womanhood, This is girlhood, right, so
• 1:43:37
  Speaker 2: there's still girls. This is the problem. We're running on
• 1:43:42
  Speaker 2: pure oxytocin generalists. That's girl mode with no activation, right,
• 1:43:47
  Speaker 2: no adult activation of specificity. So they have no bonded targets.
• 1:43:53
  Speaker 2: So they have no men, no reproductive drive. That's the
• 1:43:56
  Speaker 2: other thing. Women saturated in girl the them Wait, I
• 1:43:59
  Speaker 2: shouldn't even call them women. Girls saturating and girldom don't
• 1:44:03
  Speaker 2: have any reproductive drive, right, They don't have a man
• 1:44:08
  Speaker 2: to have a reproductive drive with. Because they don't have specificity,
• 1:44:12
  Speaker 2: they can't fall in love. That these girls that they
• 1:44:16
  Speaker 2: were talking about, with their extreme political position, they have
• 1:44:18
  Speaker 2: self selected out themselves out of the ability to fall
• 1:44:22
  Speaker 2: in love. We are now constructing women who cannot love
• 1:44:27
  Speaker 2: because they cannot develop the specificity of this person, this man,
• 1:44:32
  Speaker 2: this is mine, and they no felt connect Why if
• 1:44:37
  Speaker 2: they don't have a family and they don't have a man,
• 1:44:40
  Speaker 2: why would they have a connection to the future of
• 1:44:42
  Speaker 2: their communities? All right? The fascism finding it the undertwam,
• 1:44:48
  Speaker 2: keep going, I still have more, Yeah, I got you
• 1:44:52
  Speaker 2: for another fourteen minutes.
• 1:44:53
  Speaker 1: The fascism finding I have a couple of super childs too,
• 1:44:57
  Speaker 1: So just keep.
• 1:44:57
  Speaker 2: That is probably did okay, It's probably not ideological fascism.
• 1:45:03
  Speaker 2: It's the word strong attached to state. And these women
• 1:45:05
  Speaker 2: are seeking a powerful protective structure because they have no
• 1:45:09
  Speaker 2: personal protective structure, no bonded partner, husband, no family unit,
• 1:45:14
  Speaker 2: no coalitional embedding. So they don't have a clan, they
• 1:45:18
  Speaker 2: don't have a family, they don't have a community that
• 1:45:21
  Speaker 2: they recognize. Like that's the other thing their community is
• 1:45:25
  Speaker 2: of race is a source of racism and sexism and patriarchy.
• 1:45:28
  Speaker 2: So it's a danger, but somehow the state is fine.
• 1:45:31
  Speaker 2: I don't know how that works. The state becomes the
• 1:45:34
  Speaker 2: substitute for a custodial architecture they don't have. They want
• 1:45:37
  Speaker 2: a strong state the way a woman with like an
• 1:45:42
  Speaker 2: adult hormonal profile who has gone through this priming wants
• 1:45:46
  Speaker 2: a strong man as a source of protection and order.
• 1:45:50
  Speaker 2: But because the bonding architecture hasn't activated, the desire for
• 1:45:53
  Speaker 2: protection attaches to the only entity available, which is the collective,
• 1:45:58
  Speaker 2: which is the social web. Okay, so these women are
• 1:46:02
  Speaker 2: totally done with men. The interviewer, who was feminist eight
• 1:46:09
  Speaker 2: in his twenty eight was part of the same ideological ecosystem.
• 1:46:14
  Speaker 2: She doesn't recognize the nihilism. Her generation was angry but
• 1:46:18
  Speaker 2: energized books to read new concepts excitement. This current generation
• 1:46:23
  Speaker 2: is bleak. The difference maps to the cross activation timeline.
• 1:46:28
  Speaker 2: So what I'm talking about cross activation is again women
• 1:46:32
  Speaker 2: activated to have the kind of specificity you associate with men.
• 1:46:37
  Speaker 2: So they go from being a girl to being a woman.
• 1:46:40
  Speaker 2: All right, new ideas, new language, the sense of collective project.
• 1:46:45
  Speaker 2: The younger cohort inherited the framework. The feminist framework is
• 1:46:48
  Speaker 2: settled orthodoxy, no novelty, no discovery, just the output separation
• 1:46:53
  Speaker 2: from men, adversarial orientation, suppressed bonding without the excitement of
• 1:46:59
  Speaker 2: the ideological project that generated it, the consequences without the thrill.
• 1:47:04
  Speaker 2: So the analysis is this woman got feminism when I
• 1:47:08
  Speaker 2: guess it was still felt new. Now they just have
• 1:47:11
  Speaker 2: the downstream nihilistic consequences of it. Done with men in
• 1:47:17
  Speaker 2: a twenty one year old woman isn't a considered evaluation
• 1:47:21
  Speaker 2: based on experience. So these women don't have experience with men,
• 1:47:25
  Speaker 2: So why are they done with them? It's a woman
• 1:47:27
  Speaker 2: or it's a girl who has never experienced that kind
• 1:47:31
  Speaker 2: of priming, so she has she has to fight for
• 1:47:34
  Speaker 2: anything because her environment never produced the cross activation conditions
• 1:47:39
  Speaker 2: describing the absence of something she doesn't know she's missing.
• 1:47:43
  Speaker 2: So these women don't even know what they're missing. Like
• 1:47:45
  Speaker 2: the previous generation, like my generation, her generations twenty eight
• 1:47:49
  Speaker 2: year old might have had actual experience with men, right
• 1:47:55
  Speaker 2: something something a little bit and before that, you know,
• 1:47:59
  Speaker 2: generation and I don't know what. I guess our generation,
• 1:48:02
  Speaker 2: Brian was like the last time there was any kind
• 1:48:04
  Speaker 2: of warmth between men and women. But anyway, she hasn't
• 1:48:08
  Speaker 2: done with men. She never started. So these young women,
• 1:48:11
  Speaker 2: they aren't they how could they be done with men?
• 1:48:14
  Speaker 2: They don't even they have never encountered one. The bonding
• 1:48:17
  Speaker 2: architecture that would produce specific desire for a specific man
• 1:48:20
  Speaker 2: has never been activated. They never had to fight for
• 1:48:22
  Speaker 2: anything done with men, is what the absence of that
• 1:48:25
  Speaker 2: activation feels like from the inside, when the only framework
• 1:48:29
  Speaker 2: available to explain it is political. They don't have They've
• 1:48:34
  Speaker 2: never been activated to want a man because they've never
• 1:48:38
  Speaker 2: had to fight for it. So you see what I'm saying.
• 1:48:40
  Speaker 2: Oxytocin doesn't generate a desire for a specific person. It
• 1:48:44
  Speaker 2: just generates a desire for the social web. You need
• 1:48:48
  Speaker 2: to be activated as a woman. You need to become
• 1:48:50
  Speaker 2: a woman to have a desire for a man. This
• 1:48:52
  Speaker 2: is why hunter gatherer tribes. You know, people don't realize this.
• 1:48:57
  Speaker 2: Hunter gatherer tribes had initiations girls like when they achieved
• 1:49:02
  Speaker 2: men arc they would go through trials. They weren't necessarily
• 1:49:06
  Speaker 2: as physically extreme as the male trials, but they usually
• 1:49:10
  Speaker 2: involved a combination of being removed from the social web,
• 1:49:16
  Speaker 2: so they were isolated. They were put in the hut,
• 1:49:18
  Speaker 2: and they had to meditate for months alone. Right, that's
• 1:49:23
  Speaker 2: actually a very very strenuous thing to do. They had endurance.
• 1:49:29
  Speaker 2: In some tribes, they would have to run like they
• 1:49:33
  Speaker 2: would take their girl and they would make her run
• 1:49:35
  Speaker 2: until she fell down from exhaustion, and then they would
• 1:49:38
  Speaker 2: make her do it again for days, or they'd make
• 1:49:43
  Speaker 2: her dance for days. So these were physically arduous situations
• 1:49:48
  Speaker 2: that took some form of grit to get through. So
• 1:49:51
  Speaker 2: they would force these girls to endure depredation, exhaustion, isolation,
• 1:49:58
  Speaker 2: and then when they were done priming the girls into womanhood,
• 1:50:03
  Speaker 2: they would present suitors like the eligible bachelors of the tribe,
• 1:50:07
  Speaker 2: and she'd make a selection or they court or whatever.
• 1:50:10
  Speaker 2: But that's how the the cultures that are closest to
• 1:50:14
  Speaker 2: the edge of survival dealt with it. Because they couldn't.
• 1:50:18
  Speaker 2: Hunter gatherers would not be able to survive with the
• 1:50:22
  Speaker 2: women that we can we can enable in our societies
• 1:50:25
  Speaker 2: with the infrapink. They wouldn't. They would have all died.
• 1:50:29
  Speaker 2: With the women that we see today, these women would
• 1:50:33
  Speaker 2: have caused so much problems that they couldn't They could
• 1:50:36
  Speaker 2: not allow a woman a girl. They couldn't allow a
• 1:50:41
  Speaker 2: girl to end up like one of these individuals, these
• 1:50:45
  Speaker 2: non activated women, so to speak, the bleakness is architectural,
• 1:50:52
  Speaker 2: not political. Gaza, Trump, climate change, the cost of living.
• 1:50:57
  Speaker 2: These are the content. This is the these are the
• 1:50:59
  Speaker 2: content that bleakness attaches to. They're not the source. A
• 1:51:04
  Speaker 2: woman bonded to a specific man, pregnant or raising children,
• 1:51:08
  Speaker 2: invested in a concrete future, processes Gaza as a distant horror.
• 1:51:13
  Speaker 2: A woman with no bond, no investment, no specific future,
• 1:51:16
  Speaker 2: processes Gaza as evidence the world is ending. But she'll
• 1:51:19
  Speaker 2: also not do anything about She's just signaling to her
• 1:51:22
  Speaker 2: relational web. The difference is an empathy. It's whether you
• 1:51:26
  Speaker 2: have something local and concrete that anchors your emotional processing,
• 1:51:30
  Speaker 2: or whether your oxytocin generalist system is distributing its concern
• 1:51:34
  Speaker 2: across every global tragedy simultaneously with no local bond to
• 1:51:38
  Speaker 2: regulate the input. And also, you're not doing anything about
• 1:51:41
  Speaker 2: any of this. You're just feeling a lot of things
• 1:51:43
  Speaker 2: and signaling a lot of things. The unbonded woman is
• 1:51:47
  Speaker 2: neurochemically unregulated. She has no bond partner whose presence suppresses
• 1:51:51
  Speaker 2: or codosol. She has no specific investment that prioritizes her
• 1:51:54
  Speaker 2: emotional attention. Every input from the global information system hits
• 1:51:58
  Speaker 2: her unfiltered because it has no filter. The filter is
• 1:52:02
  Speaker 2: the bond. The bond doesn't exist. So she absorbs Gaza, Trump,
• 1:52:06
  Speaker 2: climate chant collapse, housing costs, and the war on women simultaneously,
• 1:52:10
  Speaker 2: and the cumulative weight produces the bleakness the interviewer can't
• 1:52:13
  Speaker 2: recognize from five years earlier, when she was capable of
• 1:52:17
  Speaker 2: actually bonding with men, like I'm pretty sure that she
• 1:52:20
  Speaker 2: has a husband or something. Well, there you go, lady.
• 1:52:23
  Speaker 2: That's why that's why you are functional, because men make
• 1:52:27
  Speaker 2: everything better. Put it on a mug. No one's been
• 1:52:32
  Speaker 2: trying to speak with them, the speaker says, this is
• 1:52:34
  Speaker 2: a political observation. Labor hasn't reached out to these women,
• 1:52:37
  Speaker 2: these girls through the framework. Nobody can speak to them
• 1:52:41
  Speaker 2: because nobody has the vocabulary for what's actually wrong. Their
• 1:52:45
  Speaker 2: problem isn't political representation. The problem is that the bonding
• 1:52:49
  Speaker 2: architecture that would give them a concrete stake in the
• 1:52:51
  Speaker 2: future has never been activated, and every institution in their
• 1:52:55
  Speaker 2: environment is designed to prevent that activation. We are coddling
• 1:53:01
  Speaker 2: these girls, and they are never achieving any form of adulthood.
• 1:53:05
  Speaker 2: No political party can offer them what they actually need,
• 1:53:09
  Speaker 2: the conditions under which that specificity, that adult hardware would
• 1:53:15
  Speaker 2: come online and convert their diffuse, generalist bleakness into a specific,
• 1:53:20
  Speaker 2: directed investment in a bond, a partner, a family, a
• 1:53:24
  Speaker 2: future that belongs to them rather than to everyone abstractly
• 1:53:28
  Speaker 2: and everyone extractly, so nobody in actuality. All right, I
• 1:53:34
  Speaker 2: can stop there if you would like, If you like,
• 1:53:35
  Speaker 2: I have more on what the speakers are doing in
• 1:53:38
  Speaker 2: the modality that they're speaking in, but it's getting maybe
• 1:53:43
  Speaker 2: a bit. At least we could do the Superchows.
• 1:53:46
  Speaker 1: I'll read the Superchows. Richard Bierre gives us five dollars
• 1:53:51
  Speaker 1: and says, as to what Alison said about having to
• 1:53:53
  Speaker 1: fight for survival, look at the island where the women
• 1:53:57
  Speaker 1: were on that survival island and were doing everything except
• 1:53:59
  Speaker 1: for what was necessary for survival. I wonder if that
• 1:54:02
  Speaker 1: panel was sponsored by the Lilly of the Valley.
• 1:54:05
  Speaker 2: Maybe yes, I'm not explaining it anymore. We're doing everything
• 1:54:13
  Speaker 2: except for what was necessary for survival. Well, because they
• 1:54:16
  Speaker 2: were being enabled. Let's face it, the crew wasn't going
• 1:54:20
  Speaker 2: to let them die. I'm talking about situations in which
• 1:54:24
  Speaker 2: women are facing death if they don't actually function, and
• 1:54:31
  Speaker 2: that doesn't exist in our world, and that means that
• 1:54:38
  Speaker 2: what we're dealing with is a bunch of girls. We're
• 1:54:42
  Speaker 2: dealing with girl culture. We're dealing with infrapink culture that
• 1:54:45
  Speaker 2: never has to actually develop any kind of adult architecture.
• 1:54:51
  Speaker 2: And because they never have to actually develop adult architecture,
• 1:54:55
  Speaker 2: they don't know what men are for. Right, Because they're
• 1:54:58
  Speaker 2: fripped and girls their children. They have no ability to
• 1:55:03
  Speaker 2: bond like adults. They have no ability to actually look
• 1:55:07
  Speaker 2: at the world like adults. Everything is their relational web.
• 1:55:11
  Speaker 2: There's no specificity. Okay, let's go to the next one. Right.
• 1:55:16
  Speaker 1: The next superchat is from dark Kikimora, who gives us
• 1:55:19
  Speaker 1: five dollars and says, does this understanding that structures that
• 1:55:25
  Speaker 1: run on oxytocin reward loyalty and structures that run on
• 1:55:29
  Speaker 1: vasapress and reward merit back up my pet idea that
• 1:55:33
  Speaker 1: government and business are the traditional male power structures and
• 1:55:36
  Speaker 1: education and religion are the traditional female power structures, based
• 1:55:41
  Speaker 1: on the fact that the first two tend to diverge
• 1:55:43
  Speaker 1: into individualism and the latter two tend to converge into collectivism,
• 1:55:48
  Speaker 1: because that would mean that communism is an attempt to
• 1:55:51
  Speaker 1: turn a male power structure into a female one by
• 1:55:54
  Speaker 1: doing something other than making it female controlled, just like
• 1:55:57
  Speaker 1: religion is a female power structure that is a male
• 1:56:00
  Speaker 1: controlled To tie it all together to something that was
• 1:56:03
  Speaker 1: relevant when I started typing.
• 1:56:05
  Speaker 2: This, possibly would do you want to say anything to that, Brian?
• 1:56:11
  Speaker 1: I don't think religion is female dominated, and I don't
• 1:56:16
  Speaker 1: think it's supposed to be. That's the only thing I'll
• 1:56:17
  Speaker 1: say about that. I think that putting women in positions
• 1:56:20
  Speaker 1: of power religion is how we get woke churches like
• 1:56:23
  Speaker 1: we have now, because they end up losing their identity.
• 1:56:27
  Speaker 1: So what you need? I think men give something when
• 1:56:30
  Speaker 1: they're in leadership positions in something. They give it an identity,
• 1:56:34
  Speaker 1: and that means exclusion. It means that there's a hierarchy
• 1:56:38
  Speaker 1: in it and it excludes things. But yeah, it's specific
• 1:56:42
  Speaker 1: and it's exclusionary by its nature. So the problem with
• 1:56:47
  Speaker 1: women is they want everyone to feel included. You know, yes, men,
• 1:56:53
  Speaker 1: when when men have a ball, they want to see
• 1:56:58
  Speaker 1: which one can get it in the who when women
• 1:57:00
  Speaker 1: have the ball, they want to give everyone a chance
• 1:57:02
  Speaker 1: to shoot.
• 1:57:04
  Speaker 2: So yeah, And strangely enough, women want everyone included except
• 1:57:11
  Speaker 2: men for some reason.
• 1:57:14
  Speaker 1: Yeah. When they say included, they basically mean children and
• 1:57:18
  Speaker 1: other women.
• 1:57:19
  Speaker 2: Yeah, but not children after a certain age like maybe three, okay,
• 1:57:24
  Speaker 2: not male children. Okay. So the entire conversation is conducted
• 1:57:31
  Speaker 2: within the reading modality. What do these women are the
• 1:57:35
  Speaker 2: relational modality, that's the modality that's deeply concerned about the
• 1:57:38
  Speaker 2: relational web. What do these women think? How do they
• 1:57:42
  Speaker 2: feel about issues? What messaging would reach them, what political
• 1:57:46
  Speaker 2: coalition would include them? Nobody asks the operative question, what
• 1:57:50
  Speaker 2: is physically, biologically, neurochemically happening to these women that produces
• 1:57:55
  Speaker 2: this output? And that's what I want to nail down. Guys.
• 1:58:00
  Speaker 2: Women are radicalized because they aren't spanked enough. What was
• 1:58:07
  Speaker 2: that that quiet woman? No, the one where oh I.
• 1:58:12
  Speaker 1: Don't know if I have that one handy it's.
• 1:58:15
  Speaker 2: Uh where she's he talks about slapping women like, yes,
• 1:58:20
  Speaker 2: they aren't slapped enough. Nobody asks, and in minecraft, okay,
• 1:58:23
  Speaker 2: I'm not advocating domestic violence. Nobody asks the operative question.
• 1:58:28
  Speaker 2: What is the physically bible? Kid? Nobody asks because the
• 1:58:32
  Speaker 2: frameworks available to the speakers political science, pulling media analysis
• 1:58:36
  Speaker 2: don't contain biological categories, and they don't contain operative categories,
• 1:58:40
  Speaker 2: because you could also say what happens when you apply
• 1:58:45
  Speaker 2: feminist hatred to women and girls. Feminist hatred creates women
• 1:58:51
  Speaker 2: and girls who hate men. That's that's just like, okay,
• 1:58:54
  Speaker 2: here's the input, here's the machine, here's the output. That
• 1:58:58
  Speaker 2: that is also an operative observation that is inaccessible to
• 1:59:01
  Speaker 2: these women. Apparently the answer that these speakers can't reach.
• 1:59:05
  Speaker 2: These women are experiencing the felt output of unbonded, unactivated,
• 1:59:10
  Speaker 2: unregulated oxytocin generalist architecture processing, an unfiltered global information system
• 1:59:17
  Speaker 2: with no local bond to anchor their emotional processing, no
• 1:59:22
  Speaker 2: specific investment to prioritize their intention, and no reproductive drive
• 1:59:26
  Speaker 2: to connect them to the future. The bleakness is what
• 1:59:29
  Speaker 2: it feels like to be a mammal whose bonding architecture
• 1:59:32
  Speaker 2: was never given the inputs it requires to produce the
• 1:59:35
  Speaker 2: outputs the organism needs to experience life is meaningful. They
• 1:59:40
  Speaker 2: don't experience life is meaningful because they don't have a man,
• 1:59:43
  Speaker 2: and they don't have children, or at least a man
• 1:59:48
  Speaker 2: like The political analysis will never find this because it's
• 1:59:53
  Speaker 2: beneath the floor of political analysis. Get this, guys, The
• 1:59:57
  Speaker 2: solution to women's political bullshit. It is a man who
• 2:00:02
  Speaker 2: knew And the problem is that we undersell men as partners.
• 2:00:07
  Speaker 2: So these women think they're gaining something by excluding men,
• 2:00:10
  Speaker 2: when all they're gaining is their own misery. On the
• 2:00:15
  Speaker 2: solutions of political analysis produces better messaging. Coalitional building, rent
• 2:00:20
  Speaker 2: controls are the moral levers that connect to nothing operative.
• 2:00:25
  Speaker 2: So no changes, These women will do nothing. This discussion,
• 2:00:28
  Speaker 2: this panel discussion. The most useful part of this panel
• 2:00:31
  Speaker 2: discussion was me and Brian talking about it. That's it,
• 2:00:38
  Speaker 2: so right here, the most useful part of this. Now,
• 2:00:41
  Speaker 2: I don't know what Sargon and whoever the other individual
• 2:00:45
  Speaker 2: that you said would respond it to this.
• 2:00:47
  Speaker 1: Who is it Brian uh vmon Roe. I mean, there's
• 2:00:50
  Speaker 1: probably a lot of other people too, but it was Yeah,
• 2:00:53
  Speaker 1: I saw that. I didn't watch Sargon's video. I just
• 2:00:55
  Speaker 1: know that he made one about it.
• 2:00:57
  Speaker 2: I'm sure that they probably said something useful, right, But
• 2:01:02
  Speaker 2: I think I think my analysis and Brian's explaining my
• 2:01:07
  Speaker 2: squirrel tracks and also bringing his own analysis, this is
• 2:01:12
  Speaker 2: the most useful thing that happened from the existence of
• 2:01:15
  Speaker 2: this podcast, right, So I hope that was enlightening. Like,
• 2:01:20
  Speaker 2: we're not going to solve this problem. Women are gonna
• 2:01:23
  Speaker 2: be rat Sorry, girls are going to be radicalized by
• 2:01:27
  Speaker 2: infrapink society culture for as long as they don't get
• 2:01:34
  Speaker 2: the necessary inputs for them to grow the fuck up.
• 2:01:39
  Speaker 2: And we're all going to have to live with this
• 2:01:41
  Speaker 2: bullshit and get this. Hunter gatherers would not have let
• 2:01:45
  Speaker 2: this happen. They would not have allowed these girls not
• 2:01:50
  Speaker 2: to grow into women. They would have applied the necessary
• 2:01:56
  Speaker 2: pressure to make these women, these girls grow the fuck up.
• 2:02:01
  Speaker 2: And that's the problem with our society. We have a
• 2:02:03
  Speaker 2: whole bunch of a whole bunch of quote unquote women
• 2:02:06
  Speaker 2: who are actually girls, who are actually children with boobs
• 2:02:14
  Speaker 2: and uh but not adult brains. All right, that's that's
• 2:02:18
  Speaker 2: my conclusion. Thank you all for coming to my ted talk.
• 2:02:22
  Speaker 1: Okay, all right, well I don't have any more super
• 2:02:27
  Speaker 1: chats or anything, so.
• 2:02:29
  Speaker 2: All right, so I'll do the things. If you would
• 2:02:31
  Speaker 2: like to send us a message anytime the show is over,
• 2:02:34
  Speaker 2: we will respond to it. We will respond to Dyke Kayama,
• 2:02:38
  Speaker 2: right dark Kiki Mora, we will when we talk about
• 2:02:43
  Speaker 2: Byron Byronny again, but if you want, you can go
• 2:02:46
  Speaker 2: to that show and make sure we respond to it.
• 2:02:50
  Speaker 2: But we will respond to if you send a message
• 2:02:52
  Speaker 2: feedbadger dot com slash just a tip and anytime the
• 2:02:55
  Speaker 2: show is over. After the show's over, we will respond
• 2:02:58
  Speaker 2: to it in the next show that's relatively similar topic.
• 2:03:04
  Speaker 2: And if you want to support the show, feedbadger dot
• 2:03:06
  Speaker 2: com slash support. And if you want to join us
• 2:03:09
  Speaker 2: in our community and read more of my thoughts on
• 2:03:13
  Speaker 2: architecture like indocrine architecture and what's really going on, you
• 2:03:17
  Speaker 2: can do so at badgernation dot online. And I shall
• 2:03:21
  Speaker 2: now hand it to Brian because it is the time.
• 2:03:24
  Speaker 1: All right. Then, if you guys like this video, please
• 2:03:27
  Speaker 1: hit like, subscribe. If you're not already subscribed, hit the
• 2:03:29
  Speaker 1: bell for notification, leave us a comment, let us know
• 2:03:32
  Speaker 1: what you guys think about what we talked about on
• 2:03:33
  Speaker 1: the show today, and share this video because sharing is caring.
• 2:03:37
  Speaker 1: Thank you guys so much for coming on this episode
• 2:03:39
  Speaker 1: of Maintaining Frame and we will talk to you guys
• 2:03:41
  Speaker 1: in the next one. Men's rite activists are machines, Dude,