Latest / The Chuck ToddCast / Interview Only w/ David S. Brown - What Teddy Roosevelt Can Teach Us About Trump’s America

Transcript

Interview Only w/ David S. Brown - What Teddy Roosevelt Can Teach Us About Trump’s America · The Chuck ToddCast

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: This episode of the Chuck Todcast is brought to you
• 0:02
  Speaker 1: by Wild Grain. Wild Grain is the first bake from
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: frozen subscription box for sour dough breads, artisonal pastries, and
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: fresh pastas, plus all the items conveniently baked in twenty
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: five minutes or less. Unlike many store brought options, Wild
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: Grain uses some simple ingredients you can pronounce and a
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: slow fermentation process that can be a lot easier on
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: your belly, little gut health there right, and richer in
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: nutrients antioxidants. There's also no preservatives and no shortcuts. The
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: Wild Grain boxes are fully customizable. In addition to their
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: variety box, they have a gluten free box, a vegan box,
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: and a new protein box. I will tell you I
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: have done the gluten free box. I have done it
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: a second time. I have also used the code the
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: todcast code. You use the promo code toodcast at checkout
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: you get thirty dollars off. I've already used it as
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: a gift to somebody else who loves this bread. It
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: is hard to find good gluten free bread. It is fantastic.
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: They give you step by step instructions.
• 1:04
  Speaker 2: I really dig this.
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: There is nothing like having an artesion bakery in your
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: freezer to chase away the winter chill. Now is the
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: best time to stay in and enjoy some comforting homemade
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: meals with Wildgrain. I obviously highly recommend it. It is
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: worth giving Wildgrain to try. Right now, Wildgrain is offering
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: my listeners thirty dollars off your first box plus free
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: croissants for life. Come on when you go to wildgrain
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: dot com slash podcast to start your subscription today. That's
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: thirty dollars off your first box and free croissants for
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: life when you visit wildgrain dot com slash podcast, or
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: simply use the promo code podcast at checkout. This is
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: a sponsor I absolutely embrace, so use that code.
• 1:51
  Speaker 3: Well.
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: You have heard me talk to via that history is rhyming,
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: that there's a familiarity in our recent history, early twentieth
• 1:59
  Speaker 1: century with what the current situation is.
• 2:02
  Speaker 2: We're in a we're in a we've got.
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: These big tech titans, we had the big robber barons.
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: And you've probably heard myself another say that, you know, boy,
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: the country really needs a Teddy Roosevelt. And what's fascinating
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: about Teddy Roosevelt is is that he's a Rorschach test.
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: If you're a liberal, you love certain parts of him.
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: If you're a conservative, you love other parts of him.
• 2:23
  Speaker 2: He is somebody.
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: He is like Lincoln in Washington and maybe to a
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: lesser extent, Eisenhower, where it's the rare biography you can write,
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: where there are interested people on the left and the right,
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: and there are people that are devoted to say, no,
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: he's really a progressive. No, he's really a conservative. He's
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: a disruptor, he's this, and Teddy is definitely one of those.
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: And let's just say I devour every Teddy Roosevelt book.
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: I think I've only read more Lincoln books than Teddy
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: Roosevelt books. He is clearly one of the most fascinating
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: Americans we've ever had. My guest today is David Brown.
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: He's got one of the more recent additions in the
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: Teddy Roosevelt Library, if you will, This is called in
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: the Arena, which of course is a homage to his
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: a Man in the Arena speech back in the day.
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: And this is a it is It is not just
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: the Teddy of the Roosevelt presidency or the Roosevelt this
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: it really is as much an attempt to capture the
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: zeitgeist and the culture that was Teddy, that inspired Teddy,
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: and the culture that he helped try to create and build.
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: So that's my intro, David hod I do my selling.
• 3:36
  Speaker 2: Your book pretty well?
• 3:38
  Speaker 3: Wonderful.
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: Yes, he's a magnet for historians like yourself, right, like
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: Teddy is, just there's in the only challenge I imagine
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: you had was writing something unique that others hadn't attempted.
• 3:55
  Speaker 3: You know, you're right, here's a magnet, not because not
• 3:59
  Speaker 3: just because it's an incredible life, really an incredible life,
• 4:04
  Speaker 3: but that life that tells us so much about America,
• 4:08
  Speaker 3: and I think what an a storying can bring to it.
• 4:11
  Speaker 3: You know, five years from out twenty five years amount
• 4:15
  Speaker 3: is the perspective of the culture. And so as you note,
• 4:18
  Speaker 3: you know there's something of the times in this book.
• 4:20
  Speaker 3: You know, it's a life, but it's also at times,
• 4:23
  Speaker 3: and historians also bring, you know, additional perspective. They've seen
• 4:28
  Speaker 3: additional presidents, they've seen people use and the views rosual reputation.
• 4:33
  Speaker 3: We might read Roosevelt's actions differently in say nineteen fifty
• 4:36
  Speaker 3: or twenty twenty five than we would have in nineteen ten.
• 4:41
  Speaker 2: In the moment.
• 4:42
  Speaker 3: So in that sense, I think that there's almost always something,
• 4:46
  Speaker 3: something fresh, something interesting perspective that a storying can bring
• 4:51
  Speaker 3: to a topic.
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: How did you tackle this? I mean, there's, like I said,
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: there is so much incredible scholarship on Teddy. You know,
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: did you go how much core sort of you know,
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: back to letters and all of that sort of the
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: ground zero type research.
• 5:12
  Speaker 2: How much did you.
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: Either devour or avoid other takes on him?
• 5:18
  Speaker 2: What was your balance? Yeah?
• 5:19
  Speaker 3: I read the major biographies, but made notes selectively because
• 5:25
  Speaker 3: I didn't want too much of the perspective to sink in,
• 5:28
  Speaker 3: And I focused most of my research on Roosevelt's writings, letters,
• 5:37
  Speaker 3: journals at the journal Pritt when he was younger, and
• 5:41
  Speaker 3: as many many books. He was a voluminous writer he wrote.
• 5:44
  Speaker 3: He wrote many books, and also the private papers, some
• 5:50
  Speaker 3: of the newspapers, the culturea miliar the people who knew him,
• 5:53
  Speaker 3: the people who loved him, the people who didn't love him,
• 5:56
  Speaker 3: because I wanted to get a broad sense. But the
• 5:59
  Speaker 3: man and the times, because I think that the two
• 6:02
  Speaker 3: go hand in hand.
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: I'm always curious of why an author chooses their subjects,
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: and more importantly, when they choose their subjects. Is there
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: something that was happening in the moment that made you
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: turn there and you realize I want to unpack this,
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: tell me walk me through. You've done a few other books,
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: and so what drew you to Roosevelt? And when did
• 6:29
  Speaker 1: you decide you wanted to tackle Teddy?
• 6:31
  Speaker 3: So about twenty or thirteen years ago I started an
• 6:35
  Speaker 3: a biography of Henry Adams and Henry Adams from the
• 6:38
  Speaker 3: Great Adams family. It was a neighbor of Roosevelt's in Washington.
• 6:43
  Speaker 3: Roosevelt was, of course living in the White House then
• 6:46
  Speaker 3: Henry Adams was living well what is now the Hay
• 6:50
  Speaker 3: Adams Hotel.
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: Right across the street, although I think it's technically the
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: building was across the street from the across the right. Anyway,
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: there's some yeah, there's some origin story of the hotel itself,
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: but yes, basically right there was those listed.
• 7:01
  Speaker 3: So they knew each other. And Henry Adams was generation older,
• 7:07
  Speaker 3: old money, like tr dry Wit, somewhat acerbic, and he
• 7:12
  Speaker 3: saw not unlike Mark Twain, he saw Roosevelt as something
• 7:17
  Speaker 3: of a big boy. Mark Twain said through to someone
• 7:20
  Speaker 3: said basically this is this is this is Tom Sawyer.
• 7:24
  Speaker 3: We have Tom Swear in the White House, and I
• 7:27
  Speaker 3: just found Roosevelts excuse me, Adams's take on Roosevelt so interesting,
• 7:32
  Speaker 3: so pungent, so provocative, and it kind of drew me in.
• 7:35
  Speaker 3: And also I think writing that biography of Henry Adams,
• 7:38
  Speaker 3: it drew me to the late nineteenth century. So I
• 7:41
  Speaker 3: was on my graduate work. I tend to focus on
• 7:44
  Speaker 3: America in the early Republic seventeen nineties, eighteen twenty, eighteen thirties,
• 7:49
  Speaker 3: and there was a lot there in the late nineteenth century.
• 7:52
  Speaker 3: Early wasn't aware of cultural history, intellectual history, so I
• 7:56
  Speaker 3: do Henry Adams. I'm thinking there's a lot there about
• 8:00
  Speaker 3: intellectual life at that time. Now I'm interested in the politics,
• 8:03
  Speaker 3: so I'd obviously read something. You know, some things about
• 8:06
  Speaker 3: Roosevelt before, but never systematic, never in depth, and so
• 8:11
  Speaker 3: I started to read just for my own curiosity. And
• 8:14
  Speaker 3: the deeper I got into it, the more I said
• 8:16
  Speaker 3: to myself, you know, I really want to write on
• 8:18
  Speaker 3: this guy. I want to write a biography. So it
• 8:20
  Speaker 3: was deep in COVID back in twenty twenty, and that's
• 8:24
  Speaker 3: when I started the project.
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: What makes Roosevelt so intriguing to me is like Lincoln
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: and Washington. He's a president. Like I said to a
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: lesser excent Eisenhower that anybody running for president, far left
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: or far right, moderate, centrist, you name it, would love
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: to be compared favorably to said president.
• 8:46
  Speaker 2: Right. And I have I've been having.
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: An uncomfortable intellectual exercise which that i've i'm and I'm
• 8:59
  Speaker 1: going to I'm this is with trepidation that I that
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: I tiptoe on this, which is Donald Trump and Teddy Roosevelt,
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: and the shocking amount of similarities that there are. There
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: are some important differences. And if you're a fan of
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: Teddy and not a fan of Trump, you probably recoil
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: at this. But you know, there's there's there is something
• 9:25
  Speaker 1: about Teddy in the time that he served of narcissism, right,
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: I mean the original great quote the bride at every
• 9:34
  Speaker 1: wedding and the and the corpse at every funeral was
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: about him, right, you know it was it was said
• 9:40
  Speaker 1: of him his daughter.
• 9:43
  Speaker 2: Right. What do you make of it?
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: And how much? How much do you see of it?
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: And how did you avoid it? How did you write
• 9:54
  Speaker 1: about it? You know, how did it? How did it
• 9:56
  Speaker 1: influence you?
• 9:57
  Speaker 3: Sure? I make some notes of this late in the book,
• 10:01
  Speaker 3: last pages. The narcissism was there. The question is how
• 10:07
  Speaker 3: do you deal with the narcissism and Roosevelt's it was
• 10:14
  Speaker 3: all about Roosevelt, but there was a sort of generosity
• 10:17
  Speaker 3: underlying Roosevelt, and that generosity I think really drew people
• 10:22
  Speaker 3: to him. Of course, Trump has a wide appeal as well.
• 10:27
  Speaker 3: Some of the similarities are a tremendous charisma on the
• 10:30
  Speaker 3: part of both men. The loyalists, they've really been loyalists
• 10:36
  Speaker 3: for both men. Roosevelt had a broader reach. Roosevelt got
• 10:39
  Speaker 3: I think like fifty six percent of the popular vote
• 10:42
  Speaker 3: in two thousand. Excuse me, the nineteen oh four acts.
• 10:45
  Speaker 1: An important point you made that I didn't fully appreciate
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: that it was. It was actually the most dominant vote
• 10:50
  Speaker 1: total we'd had really in the.
• 10:53
  Speaker 2: With the country that big at the time.
• 10:55
  Speaker 3: That's right, that's right. So he was really popular. He
• 10:58
  Speaker 3: could really cross over. Trump doesn't have the crossover appeal,
• 11:02
  Speaker 3: but to their loyalists, they could do no wrong. Roosevelts
• 11:08
  Speaker 3: was seen by party regulars in the GOP as being
• 11:13
  Speaker 3: a threat. You know, he was never supposed to be presidents.
• 11:17
  Speaker 3: He was a war hero, and they made him a veep,
• 11:20
  Speaker 3: and of course McKinley wasn't supposed to get shot and killed.
• 11:23
  Speaker 3: But then Rooseveald becomes presidents and he's so popular that
• 11:27
  Speaker 3: they can't do anything with him until Roosevelt decides that
• 11:30
  Speaker 3: he's going to leave after a couple of terms and
• 11:33
  Speaker 3: then once the crown back. And at that time, for
• 11:37
  Speaker 3: GP regulars, this sort of gave currency to their concerns
• 11:42
  Speaker 3: for the last few years that Roosevelt was a maverick,
• 11:44
  Speaker 3: he was a loose cannon, He could not be trusted
• 11:47
  Speaker 3: for party regularity, and they opposed him, and they were
• 11:52
  Speaker 3: able to essentially keep them from getting the nomination in
• 11:56
  Speaker 3: nineteen twelve, and in Roosevelt said that that this was stolen,
• 12:02
  Speaker 3: that the people wanted him, and of course he then
• 12:05
  Speaker 3: broke away from the party, which is said that Trump
• 12:08
  Speaker 3: had talked about doing in twenty sixty. If the GOP
• 12:12
  Speaker 3: at that time had kept the nomination from him.
• 12:15
  Speaker 2: Don't we credit Teddy with primaries?
• 12:17
  Speaker 1: Essentially that that that that that sort of it was
• 12:20
  Speaker 1: right after that that we I think Oregon had the
• 12:23
  Speaker 1: first presidential primary.
• 12:25
  Speaker 3: There were there were there were there were a few,
• 12:26
  Speaker 3: and they're about thirteen but in Reison actually got more
• 12:34
  Speaker 3: votes and delegates in these thirteen primaries, right the sitting
• 12:39
  Speaker 3: president did. And there's a number of reasons why these
• 12:43
  Speaker 3: these these these primaries would expand, but one was that
• 12:48
  Speaker 3: it was seen that that perhaps that people need to
• 12:51
  Speaker 3: have more say and we would look back to, for example,
• 12:54
  Speaker 3: nineteen twelve and say so, clearly the party wanted Taft
• 12:59
  Speaker 3: to get the nomination, but clearly most garden variety Republican
• 13:04
  Speaker 3: voters wanted Roosevelt.
• 13:07
  Speaker 1: It's obviously the era that I think makes this an
• 13:09
  Speaker 1: extra magnet for me right now. And there's always been
• 13:12
  Speaker 1: something about Teddy, did it take a rich guy to
• 13:15
  Speaker 1: go after rich guys?
• 13:17
  Speaker 2: Did it?
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: Meaning? You know that the progressive populist politics of that
• 13:25
  Speaker 1: era only gets traction when a rich guy turned on
• 13:28
  Speaker 1: rich guys.
• 13:29
  Speaker 2: That's too simplistic.
• 13:31
  Speaker 3: Not necessarily, he was a different kind of rich guy,
• 13:35
  Speaker 3: like Henry Adams.
• 13:36
  Speaker 1: Here was old money and inherited, inherited well, which is
• 13:40
  Speaker 1: always important. I always find it fascinating. I track I
• 13:44
  Speaker 1: love to see right now where billionaires go right, New
• 13:48
  Speaker 1: billionaires support Trump, Inherited billionaires support the.
• 13:52
  Speaker 2: Left right now. It's just an interesting era that we're
• 13:56
  Speaker 2: in yeah it is.
• 13:57
  Speaker 3: Yeah. So Roosevelt did not like new money. Roosevelt thought
• 14:03
  Speaker 3: that that that new money was essentially, you know, building
• 14:07
  Speaker 3: factories and whatnot, which he recognized the country needed if
• 14:10
  Speaker 3: it was going to be strong. But in his notion
• 14:13
  Speaker 3: of the string of his life, sitting in an office
• 14:16
  Speaker 3: all day just making money, there was nothing romantic, There
• 14:19
  Speaker 3: was nothing important about that. It's going to lead to
• 14:23
  Speaker 3: the country becoming soft and not sharp any longer. So
• 14:30
  Speaker 3: he did feel I think when he called, for example,
• 14:33
  Speaker 3: JP Morgan into the White House, that there was a
• 14:37
  Speaker 3: sense of superiority on his side in reading, in culture
• 14:43
  Speaker 3: and background. And if Morgan had a bit more money,
• 14:46
  Speaker 3: which of course he did, that was okay because because
• 14:49
  Speaker 3: Roosevelt had had some money too. But more important, I think,
• 14:53
  Speaker 3: I think Roosevelt thought that he Roosevelt understood how money
• 14:58
  Speaker 3: should be used, and people like this new rich they
• 15:01
  Speaker 3: liked imagination. They didn't know what was best for the country.
• 15:04
  Speaker 3: They only understood what was best for themselves.
• 15:08
  Speaker 1: Why do you think he had this this sense, because
• 15:14
  Speaker 1: I mean, is it because he went on his travels
• 15:18
  Speaker 1: or you know, he did seem to at least understand.
• 15:23
  Speaker 1: You couldn't concentrate this much power in the in in
• 15:28
  Speaker 1: with these the titans of that era. But was his
• 15:33
  Speaker 1: motivation because he didn't want them stronger than the government,
• 15:36
  Speaker 1: or was his motivation because the little guy was getting hurt?
• 15:40
  Speaker 3: I use all those things.
• 15:43
  Speaker 2: You know.
• 15:43
  Speaker 3: He never called himself a populous and there was a
• 15:46
  Speaker 3: populist party at that time is it Gradon farmers, And
• 15:50
  Speaker 3: he thought that they were just radical and vaguely ridiculous,
• 15:53
  Speaker 3: But there was a populistic bone in Roosevelt. He wrote
• 15:57
  Speaker 3: to John Hey, the Secretary of State, after he Roosevelt
• 16:01
  Speaker 3: had toured the country, and he said, you know, seeing
• 16:04
  Speaker 3: these these common people out there who were standing in
• 16:08
  Speaker 3: you know, by a train stession for two hours in
• 16:10
  Speaker 3: the wintertime, you know, waiting to Henry talk. Uh, they're
• 16:14
  Speaker 3: so sincere, there's so there's such hard workers. You know,
• 16:17
  Speaker 3: we we we need to we need to do right
• 16:18
  Speaker 3: by these people. He did believe that, he did believe
• 16:21
  Speaker 3: that he that the presidency, that the government had a
• 16:24
  Speaker 3: responsibility the people. So there was something also, I think
• 16:28
  Speaker 3: a little bit of old money about that, the sense
• 16:30
  Speaker 3: of paternalism where they're they're social work, economic betters so called,
• 16:36
  Speaker 3: and we need to take care of them. That's our obligation.
• 16:41
  Speaker 3: Also though when when he's thinking about obtaining the trust.
• 16:45
  Speaker 3: But I think I think there's something about Roosevelt that
• 16:48
  Speaker 3: is vaguely consulted, that that these that these titans, that
• 16:53
  Speaker 3: they should have so much just because they invented something
• 16:57
  Speaker 3: or they have a factory, And why should they have
• 17:01
  Speaker 3: so much say in our politics? Why should why should
• 17:05
  Speaker 3: they be able to put politicians in their pockets through
• 17:08
  Speaker 3: through through lobby. So I think he sincerely saw them
• 17:12
  Speaker 3: as something of a potential thread through public in a
• 17:15
  Speaker 3: different way, but not unlike say Jefferson with the First
• 17:19
  Speaker 3: National Bank and UNC Jackson with the Second National Bank,
• 17:23
  Speaker 3: looking at money congealing together and saying, if this continues,
• 17:28
  Speaker 3: this could be a real problem for the Republic moving forward.
• 17:32
  Speaker 1: So let's let's let's do this intellectual exercise. What would
• 17:38
  Speaker 1: Teddy be doing right now with the aim, with the
• 17:44
  Speaker 1: with the with with the AI technology that we're trying
• 17:47
  Speaker 1: to build, the infrastructure and the concentration of wealth that
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: we're experiencing at the moment.
• 17:53
  Speaker 3: I think if it was President's with AI, he would
• 17:57
  Speaker 3: want to harness AI. He would he would want to
• 18:00
  Speaker 3: use it to make you know, as as America as
• 18:03
  Speaker 3: powerful as possible. That would also tie him with the
• 18:07
  Speaker 3: second part of your question, because so these people who
• 18:10
  Speaker 3: have this this this uh, this resource, some of the billionaires,
• 18:16
  Speaker 3: I suspect that he would look upon them not unlike
• 18:19
  Speaker 3: he looked upon the the rich class of his own day,
• 18:23
  Speaker 3: which is they have a purpose. The purpose is to
• 18:26
  Speaker 3: continue to be patriotic and contribute to the growing wealth
• 18:31
  Speaker 3: of America. And they could have their nice houses and
• 18:33
  Speaker 3: and and and and and and whatnot. But but he
• 18:37
  Speaker 3: I think he would draw a real line uh at
• 18:40
  Speaker 3: the kind of influence that these people would have. So
• 18:44
  Speaker 3: I wouldn't see him inviting billionaires to be in his
• 18:49
  Speaker 3: official cabinet family.
• 18:51
  Speaker 1: And yet he's super transactional, particularly in foreign affairs.
• 18:54
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 18:56
  Speaker 3: Yes, he's he's he's savvy. Uh. He looks to get
• 19:01
  Speaker 3: things done. He wants to build a canal. Not not
• 19:08
  Speaker 3: in Panama because there's no country in Panama, but there's
• 19:10
  Speaker 3: a province in Colombia. And when the Columbian Senate sort
• 19:16
  Speaker 3: of bulks a little bit on what was supposed to
• 19:18
  Speaker 3: be a done deal, then he will essentially, you know,
• 19:23
  Speaker 3: support a independence movement, which which would not have succeeded
• 19:28
  Speaker 3: with just.
• 19:29
  Speaker 1: Let's just be let you're being a little gentle here.
• 19:32
  Speaker 1: He manufactures this movement in this separatist region called Panama
• 19:36
  Speaker 1: a little bit. There were certainly some independence people that
• 19:39
  Speaker 1: were but it you know, it's it was a pretext, right.
• 19:44
  Speaker 3: He sends ships and he sends men, and they will
• 19:48
  Speaker 3: support and in a sense, it's it's what John F.
• 19:52
  Speaker 3: Kennedy tried and failed to.
• 19:55
  Speaker 2: Do with.
• 19:57
  Speaker 3: Uh, you know, the the Cubans the quote unquote lead it,
• 20:02
  Speaker 3: but there was American support, but there wasn't enough American support.
• 20:05
  Speaker 3: Rose Alt, I'm sure that there was more than enough
• 20:07
  Speaker 3: American support. So you're right, this is transactional here. He's
• 20:13
  Speaker 3: very happy to play both with Columbia. When Columbia wouldn't
• 20:16
  Speaker 3: play ball with him any longer, he gave Pen the ball.
• 20:23
  Speaker 1: Do you hate hangovers? We'll say goodbye to hangovers. Out
• 20:25
  Speaker 1: of Office gives you the social buzz without the next
• 20:28
  Speaker 1: day regret.
• 20:28
  Speaker 2: They're best selling.
• 20:29
  Speaker 1: Out of Office gummies were designed to provide a mild,
• 20:31
  Speaker 1: relaxing buzz, boost your mood, and enhance creativity and relaxation.
• 20:35
  Speaker 1: With five different strengths, you can tailor the dose to
• 20:38
  Speaker 1: fit your vibe from a gentle one point five milligram
• 20:41
  Speaker 1: micro dose to their newest fifteen milligram gummy for a
• 20:45
  Speaker 1: more elevated experience. Their THHC beverages and gummies are a modern,
• 20:49
  Speaker 1: mindful alternative to a glass of wine or a cocktail.
• 20:52
  Speaker 1: And I'll tell you this, I've given up booze. I
• 20:55
  Speaker 1: don't like the hangovers. I prefer the gummy experience. Soul
• 20:59
  Speaker 1: is a oneless brand that believes feeling good should be
• 21:02
  Speaker 1: fun and easy. Soul specializes in delicious hemp derived THHC
• 21:05
  Speaker 1: and CBD products, all designed to boost your mood and
• 21:09
  Speaker 1: simply help you unwind. So if you struggle to switch
• 21:11
  Speaker 1: off at night, Sol also has a variety of products
• 21:14
  Speaker 1: specifically designed to just simply help you get a better
• 21:17
  Speaker 1: night's sleep, including their top selling Sleepy gummies. It's a
• 21:20
  Speaker 1: fan favorite for deep, restorative sleep. So bring on the
• 21:23
  Speaker 1: good vibes and treat yourself to Soul today. Right now,
• 21:26
  Speaker 1: Soul is offering my audience thirty percent off your entire order,
• 21:31
  Speaker 1: So go to get sold dot Com use the promo
• 21:33
  Speaker 1: code toodcast. Don't forget that code that's getsold dot Com
• 21:37
  Speaker 1: promo code toodcast for thirty percent off. This is where,
• 22:01
  Speaker 1: you know, when you look deeper at Roosevelt's sort of
• 22:08
  Speaker 1: point of view and actions in the Western hemisphere actually
• 22:13
  Speaker 1: pale in comparisons to Trump's beltic.
• 22:17
  Speaker 2: You know it.
• 22:17
  Speaker 3: It was a different time, and so it's a period
• 22:21
  Speaker 3: when that type of American imperialism, the so called Banana
• 22:27
  Speaker 3: Republic era, is just beginning to take off. We had
• 22:30
  Speaker 3: this early phase of American form policy. You know, except
• 22:35
  Speaker 3: American Revolution, we're very Atlantic facing. And then you know,
• 22:39
  Speaker 3: by the time you get to the eighteen twenties, thirties
• 22:41
  Speaker 3: and forties and you're talking about bringing Florida and Texas
• 22:46
  Speaker 3: into the Union, then we become a golf golf of Mexico,
• 22:52
  Speaker 3: golf of America depends on who you talk to these days.
• 22:55
  Speaker 3: That becomes the focus of our foreign policy, and then
• 22:59
  Speaker 3: American it becomes this beginning of a global power in
• 23:03
  Speaker 3: the late nineteenth century with with with the acquisition Philippines
• 23:08
  Speaker 3: and whatnot. So the central in South America had always
• 23:15
  Speaker 3: been sort of an abstraction. There was the Monroe Doctrine,
• 23:20
  Speaker 3: but America didn't really have much power to police that.
• 23:23
  Speaker 3: There were there were there were various individual filibuster attempts
• 23:26
  Speaker 3: by American citizens with armies and whatnot private, although some
• 23:31
  Speaker 3: were sort of okay by congressman senators to cut out
• 23:36
  Speaker 3: parts of Central and South America. It's really not until
• 23:42
  Speaker 3: about nineteen hundred.
• 23:43
  Speaker 2: It's all through the nineteenth century.
• 23:45
  Speaker 1: I mean, look, there's a whole part in the Grand
• 23:48
  Speaker 1: Presidency where there's where a bunch of Republicans want Canada
• 23:53
  Speaker 1: as reparations for the UK's for Britain's role in the.
• 23:58
  Speaker 2: In the Civil War.
• 23:59
  Speaker 3: Sure too.
• 24:00
  Speaker 1: I mean like it seems like we had all sorts
• 24:02
  Speaker 1: of ambitions to grab parts of the Western hemisphere in
• 24:05
  Speaker 1: the nineteenth century, right.
• 24:06
  Speaker 3: Yeah, and I got about one third of Mexico, so
• 24:12
  Speaker 3: with with Roosevelt, and I'd also extend this, you know,
• 24:14
  Speaker 3: to look at Woodrow Wilson. There then is is I
• 24:19
  Speaker 3: think I think more over not simply using filibusters or threads,
• 24:24
  Speaker 3: but actually you know, going into countries and and and
• 24:28
  Speaker 3: putting putting some teeth into the Monroe doctrine.
• 24:33
  Speaker 1: Well, and that was the thing I mean he almost
• 24:35
  Speaker 1: wanted to. I mean it was interesting you used a phrase.
• 24:38
  Speaker 1: I think he viewed it as a police you know,
• 24:40
  Speaker 1: he wanted to police the governments in the Western hemisphere,
• 24:44
  Speaker 1: you know, know what was going on, right, And it
• 24:48
  Speaker 1: was almost the first use of the idea that we're
• 24:50
  Speaker 1: going to be the global police force.
• 24:52
  Speaker 3: Yeah, you know, so I think that there Bracklin Roosevelts
• 24:57
  Speaker 3: related distantly, sort of get the credit for the American
• 25:01
  Speaker 3: century and for this notion of when the Second World
• 25:04
  Speaker 3: War's over, regard to the four policemen, you know, sort
• 25:08
  Speaker 3: of take care of the world. And I think a
• 25:11
  Speaker 3: lot of these ideas, including the social welfare state with
• 25:15
  Speaker 3: the progressive here under results. I think actually the antecedents
• 25:18
  Speaker 3: are there around nineteen five, nineteen ten. It's a result,
• 25:22
  Speaker 3: but it's with the different Roosevelt. And so certainly, you know,
• 25:26
  Speaker 3: Roosevelt have been the top cop in New York when
• 25:31
  Speaker 3: he was a commissioner, and he took policing very seriously.
• 25:35
  Speaker 3: He applies the concept not just to you know, a
• 25:40
  Speaker 3: city or a state, but to an entire country. The
• 25:42
  Speaker 3: countries will not live up to the obligations, he said,
• 25:45
  Speaker 3: the name must be, they must be policed. Of course,
• 25:50
  Speaker 3: what we know is happening here also is that there's
• 25:53
  Speaker 3: a game that's being played by European countries as well,
• 25:56
  Speaker 3: which is to get some of these but in American
• 26:00
  Speaker 3: countries into debts and then it would be made to
• 26:04
  Speaker 3: pay by for example, leasing a ports, we're opening up markets,
• 26:09
  Speaker 3: and Roosevelt was very very quick to ensure that, for
• 26:13
  Speaker 3: example Great Britain and in Germany, we're not going to
• 26:17
  Speaker 3: be effective of doing that, violating the minor doctrine. But
• 26:20
  Speaker 3: it was also tactic, as you suggested, that he from
• 26:24
  Speaker 3: time to time employed as well.
• 26:28
  Speaker 1: I want to go back to his days in New
• 26:30
  Speaker 1: York politics, because that was a very machine heavy wing
• 26:35
  Speaker 1: of the Republican Party in the eighteen eighties in the
• 26:39
  Speaker 1: eighteen nineties. Was he seen as a good party man
• 26:47
  Speaker 1: in the eighteen eighties and nineties because he was connected
• 26:52
  Speaker 1: to wealthy patrons of Manhattan, or was he already being
• 26:57
  Speaker 1: identified as a bit of a disruptor inside the party.
• 27:00
  Speaker 3: He was always a bit of a disruptor. He was
• 27:03
  Speaker 3: connected to wealthy people in New York. But many of
• 27:05
  Speaker 3: these wealthy people, including must of the people in his
• 27:08
  Speaker 3: Graderroting class at Harvard, thought he was nuts for getting
• 27:11
  Speaker 3: involved in politics, at least politics at the local level.
• 27:17
  Speaker 3: If somebody wants to bring you into their cabinet and
• 27:21
  Speaker 3: make you Secretary of States. Well, then what kind of
• 27:23
  Speaker 3: a service. But Rosewock came in at the low end,
• 27:27
  Speaker 3: and he was questioned about this some of his friends,
• 27:31
  Speaker 3: and he said, you know, either I'm going to be
• 27:34
  Speaker 3: part of the willing class or I'm not, and I
• 27:37
  Speaker 3: aim to be part of the ruling class. In other words,
• 27:40
  Speaker 3: the ruling class had been losing its share ever since
• 27:44
  Speaker 3: whenever under eighteen twenty eighteen thirty to Patricius right, And
• 27:48
  Speaker 3: so Roosevelt is going to in effect try to reassert
• 27:54
  Speaker 3: that no bless oblige do so in democratic age, Well,
• 27:59
  Speaker 3: you've got to you got to get involved. He gets involved,
• 28:03
  Speaker 3: but he was not. He was not a great party man.
• 28:08
  Speaker 3: There's a maverick. There was a lot of talk in
• 28:12
  Speaker 3: eighteen eighty four about the Republican Party's presidential candidate, James G. Blaine,
• 28:18
  Speaker 3: as someone had the continental liar from the state of Maine,
• 28:21
  Speaker 3: very controversial, reputed to be the dirty politician, had taken bribes,
• 28:28
  Speaker 3: and so Roosevelt fought very hard as a young man
• 28:31
  Speaker 3: to try to stop that nomination, and of course he
• 28:34
  Speaker 3: couldn't at that time, but there was real question would
• 28:38
  Speaker 3: you stay with the party or would you bolt And
• 28:41
  Speaker 3: Roosel understood that if you bolt it, if he was
• 28:44
  Speaker 3: not regular, then he would have really no chance. There
• 28:49
  Speaker 3: was no way he was going to become a Democrat.
• 28:50
  Speaker 3: At that time. The Democrat Party in the North was
• 28:53
  Speaker 3: associated with with with the immigrants, with Irish. The South
• 28:56
  Speaker 3: was associated with with with secession. And so he swallowed
• 29:00
  Speaker 3: real hard and he became a regular politician in eighteen
• 29:05
  Speaker 3: eighty four, and he gave campaign speeches on behalf of Blaine.
• 29:12
  Speaker 3: But that was of the moment that was opportunistic, and
• 29:16
  Speaker 3: he was always free. He thought to go his own way,
• 29:20
  Speaker 3: and sometimes he did.
• 29:23
  Speaker 1: Maybe this is the fault of some of the educators
• 29:25
  Speaker 1: I have, but I've always tied William Jennings Bryan and
• 29:28
  Speaker 1: Roosevelt oddly more together than separate. And yet they were
• 29:31
  Speaker 1: on opposing tickets. Right, What did you think of William
• 29:35
  Speaker 1: Jennings Bryan.
• 29:36
  Speaker 3: So he was not a big Brian fan, probably for
• 29:40
  Speaker 3: a few reasons, some would be political. He just didn't
• 29:44
  Speaker 3: like Brian's politics. Brian was a populist. He was also
• 29:49
  Speaker 3: a Democrat. Brian was concerned with, for example, enlarging the
• 29:55
  Speaker 3: country's money supply with free silver. Roosevelt's on the East coast,
• 29:59
  Speaker 3: it's the gold Stan and all the way. And so
• 30:01
  Speaker 3: O'Brien represents two conservatives. And we were talking earlier about
• 30:06
  Speaker 3: you know, sometimes Rooselt's progressive and sometimes he's a conservative.
• 30:09
  Speaker 3: He was bearing a conservative on Brian, who he thought
• 30:14
  Speaker 3: was just you know, this kind of you know, was
• 30:16
  Speaker 3: going to make the French Revolution happen in America, was
• 30:19
  Speaker 3: going to attack the money supply, and and representing a group,
• 30:24
  Speaker 3: you know, American farmers who Roosevelt respected but did not
• 30:29
  Speaker 3: really take seriously as as being a part of part
• 30:33
  Speaker 3: of the ruling class. They had their place, they should vote,
• 30:37
  Speaker 3: and they should love like like Roosevelt. I wonder if
• 30:41
  Speaker 3: Roosevelt also, you know, we think of Roosevelt being so young,
• 30:44
  Speaker 3: the youngest American president, Brian was actually just a little
• 30:48
  Speaker 3: bit younger. He was the boy orator. I always wondering
• 30:51
  Speaker 3: if there was a part of Roosevelt. It was vaguely
• 30:54
  Speaker 3: jealous that Roosevelt didn't have a great speaking voice, could
• 30:58
  Speaker 3: get a good speech, great speaking voice, and here's Brian
• 31:02
  Speaker 3: just wonderful. He would have been on radio at a
• 31:04
  Speaker 3: different time or television and really give a speech, if
• 31:08
  Speaker 3: you know Brian's because this cross of gold speech you gave,
• 31:11
  Speaker 3: there was at a little bit of jealousy that here was
• 31:14
  Speaker 3: this younger man who had these qualities that he aspired
• 31:17
  Speaker 3: to have himself.
• 31:18
  Speaker 1: You know, by the way, I'm really taken with the
• 31:21
  Speaker 1: cover of your book because of the it feels like
• 31:25
  Speaker 1: an authentic photo.
• 31:26
  Speaker 2: I'm assuming it's not in that it's colorized. It is colorist, right,
• 31:31
  Speaker 2: but it has this just wonderful right.
• 31:35
  Speaker 1: And you just brought up something that I think is
• 31:38
  Speaker 1: you know, one of the things I like to say is,
• 31:40
  Speaker 1: you know about certain people that run for president in
• 31:42
  Speaker 1: the modern era, boy, they'd have made a great nineteenth
• 31:44
  Speaker 1: century president, meaning when you didn't need this sort of
• 31:47
  Speaker 1: public oratory or the public charisma. And here's Teddy Roosevelt
• 31:53
  Speaker 1: thought of it as this incredibly charismatic president, larger than
• 31:57
  Speaker 1: life figure. Would he have been an nobody in the
• 32:00
  Speaker 1: TV the TV era?
• 32:03
  Speaker 3: Oh, you know, it's hard to answer because I'm not
• 32:08
  Speaker 3: sure how the charisma translates. RW again, didn't have a
• 32:14
  Speaker 3: great projecting voice, the ponds neck glasses, I'm not sure
• 32:20
  Speaker 3: about that. Wasn't a particularly tall man. And sometimes you
• 32:27
  Speaker 3: you kind of look back at those photographs and you
• 32:29
  Speaker 3: see him as a forty year old officer in the
• 32:33
  Speaker 3: Spanish American War, and he just doesn't maybe maybe look like,
• 32:38
  Speaker 3: I don't know, Douglas MacArthur, you know, with.
• 32:41
  Speaker 2: No, he doesn't that right, Yeah, the square jo.
• 32:44
  Speaker 3: So so it is it is a real question. Uh,
• 32:47
  Speaker 3: And I guess to answer your question, I don't know
• 32:50
  Speaker 3: if that, if all that would have translated particularly well.
• 32:53
  Speaker 3: He was very well read, He was a thoughtful man.
• 32:55
  Speaker 3: He was an intellectual one. Is America ever been in
• 32:58
  Speaker 3: love with people who have demonstrated intellectual qualities? Uh, that's
• 33:02
  Speaker 3: pretty tough to come up with. It's possible, though, that
• 33:07
  Speaker 3: his argumentative skills and debates would have caught people's eye.
• 33:12
  Speaker 3: It's also possible that because people who went to see
• 33:15
  Speaker 3: him live they said, wow, you know, there's.
• 33:18
  Speaker 2: Good always really good reactions, right, Yeah.
• 33:21
  Speaker 3: There were there were good reactions there.
• 33:22
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 33:22
  Speaker 3: So I wouldn't I wouldn't count him out.
• 33:26
  Speaker 1: One of the other points you make that I thought,
• 33:30
  Speaker 1: frankly it was one of those I'm my boy, there's
• 33:32
  Speaker 1: a whole book in here was the how Roosevelt's presidency
• 33:37
  Speaker 1: was sort of the first one you know, Lincoln challenged
• 33:40
  Speaker 1: the supremacy of Congress for obvious reasons during the Civil War.
• 33:45
  Speaker 1: But the but the sort of the strong presidency versus
• 33:49
  Speaker 1: the strong legislative branch. You know, the last time there
• 33:52
  Speaker 1: was big fights like that was you had to go
• 33:54
  Speaker 1: back to Andrew Jackson, and you were sort of painting
• 33:57
  Speaker 1: a picture that Roosevelt in many ways was, you know,
• 34:00
  Speaker 1: sort of certainly in the twentieth century, and now in hindsight,
• 34:04
  Speaker 1: looks like he laid the groundwork for a strong the
• 34:07
  Speaker 1: strong executive that we're now used to today. And in
• 34:10
  Speaker 1: many ways he epitomized this.
• 34:12
  Speaker 2: Yeah, go ahead, Yeah, it.
• 34:14
  Speaker 3: Was semichael an imperial presidency, and it.
• 34:18
  Speaker 1: Was the big the what realistically really kind of in
• 34:22
  Speaker 1: hindsight now the first of its kind, right.
• 34:26
  Speaker 3: And I think I think what makes it unique is
• 34:30
  Speaker 3: that you mentioned you mentioned Andrew Jackson back in the day,
• 34:34
  Speaker 3: and even Lincoln a little bit later, nobody really had
• 34:37
  Speaker 3: the kind of force and power that Roosevelt had. The
• 34:43
  Speaker 3: country had obviously grown great development, including industrial development, and
• 34:49
  Speaker 3: so Jackson and Lincoln were primarily presidents of groaring republics,
• 34:57
  Speaker 3: and Roosevelt was a president of a country tree that
• 35:00
  Speaker 3: was industrializing, and that was urbanizing. We just become an
• 35:05
  Speaker 3: overseas imperial power. And that means that how the presidency
• 35:12
  Speaker 3: is also going to increase. There's more resources, there's a
• 35:16
  Speaker 3: bigger military, there's more money available. And this can give
• 35:21
  Speaker 3: someone who's interested and not necessarily expand the part of
• 35:26
  Speaker 3: the presidency just to do it, or to challenge the constitution,
• 35:29
  Speaker 3: but to project, say his vision about what America should
• 35:33
  Speaker 3: look like, or the fruition of America. If you don't
• 35:36
  Speaker 3: have a real strong congress or court system, then with
• 35:39
  Speaker 3: those advantages, that president can really push things. And it
• 35:46
  Speaker 3: doesn't come just with the times. The individual is also important,
• 35:50
  Speaker 3: because we don't talk about McKinley that way. We don't
• 35:52
  Speaker 3: talk about William Howard Taff that way, and if we
• 35:55
  Speaker 3: talk about Wilson that way, Wilson came from a southern state,
• 35:58
  Speaker 3: troits tradition would allow Wilson to and some wadys expand
• 36:02
  Speaker 3: the power of the presidency. Not unlike Lincoln. He was
• 36:05
  Speaker 3: involved in a great war.
• 36:06
  Speaker 1: Right, you point out something, and I remember this being
• 36:11
  Speaker 1: I remember reading something about Bill Clinton feeling this way
• 36:14
  Speaker 1: after nine to eleven, that he lamented that his presidency
• 36:18
  Speaker 1: was too peaceful and too prosperous, right, Like he didn't
• 36:21
  Speaker 1: he didn't have a moment where he could have made history, right.
• 36:25
  Speaker 1: You know, there's always the debate, right, do the men
• 36:28
  Speaker 1: make the history or just the history make the men
• 36:30
  Speaker 1: right type of thing. And you write something similar about
• 36:34
  Speaker 1: Woodrow Wilson and Teddy Roosevelt that there was a jealousy
• 36:38
  Speaker 1: of sorts that Wilson, you know that he didn't get
• 36:43
  Speaker 1: a chance to lead. But here's the thing, Like he
• 36:46
  Speaker 1: ran for president in nineteen twelve. You know he could
• 36:48
  Speaker 1: get elected in nineteen twelve and in theory have been
• 36:51
  Speaker 1: president during World War One. Give you know, I'm a
• 36:54
  Speaker 1: big fan of alternative histories. That's a that's a sliding door,
• 36:57
  Speaker 1: that's not unrealistic. Teddy Roosevelt as president at the start
• 37:03
  Speaker 1: of the Great War, does America get in sooner or later?
• 37:06
  Speaker 1: Or is it just different rhetoric but same same basic result.
• 37:12
  Speaker 3: I think that he begins to arm the country in
• 37:18
  Speaker 3: a percadials campaign. I would guess pretty much right away,
• 37:22
  Speaker 3: like in late nineteen fourteen, whereas the Wilson administration waited
• 37:26
  Speaker 3: until he's say hunting right, And I think unless the
• 37:33
  Speaker 3: Germans had sort of pulled back on unrestricted summon warfare.
• 37:38
  Speaker 3: I mean they did, but then by nineteen seventeen they
• 37:42
  Speaker 3: they put it back in play. I think Roosevelt I
• 37:47
  Speaker 3: could see Roosevelt administration going to war in nineteen fifteen
• 37:52
  Speaker 3: unless the German government recognized this guy's real serious, this
• 37:55
  Speaker 3: guy will do it, and then completely, you know, leaving
• 38:00
  Speaker 3: Americans alone. And then I wonder in that context if
• 38:05
  Speaker 3: Roosevelt would have found ways too, for example, aid the Allies,
• 38:09
  Speaker 3: even with the United States wasn't part of the Allied cause,
• 38:12
  Speaker 3: of course you could do so saying we're neutral country
• 38:14
  Speaker 3: and we can trade with who we want to. In
• 38:17
  Speaker 3: that sense, it would not have been much different than
• 38:20
  Speaker 3: occurred under Wilson's presidency, which is that billions went to
• 38:24
  Speaker 3: the Allies and millions went to the Germans. But I
• 38:29
  Speaker 3: think we would have been in the war earlier.
• 38:32
  Speaker 1: That's my initial instinct when even asking you the question,
• 38:36
  Speaker 1: was I assume he gets us in earlier.
• 38:40
  Speaker 2: Is it you know?
• 38:43
  Speaker 1: Do you know does the groundwork for the United Nations
• 38:46
  Speaker 1: get laid if there's a Roosevelt presidency in the teens
• 38:49
  Speaker 1: rather than a Wilson presidency.
• 38:50
  Speaker 3: You know, it's possible because Roosevelt really came to loathe Wilson,
• 38:56
  Speaker 3: and so anything that Wilson proposed, Roosevelt was going to
• 39:00
  Speaker 3: are you againsting He.
• 39:01
  Speaker 1: Wasn't alone among conservatives both of that era and of
• 39:04
  Speaker 1: today when it comes to Wilson.
• 39:06
  Speaker 2: I guess.
• 39:08
  Speaker 3: And so when when Wilson proposes the League of Nations,
• 39:13
  Speaker 3: tr really attacks.
• 39:14
  Speaker 2: It, of course, right, But one can.
• 39:17
  Speaker 3: Imagine that that Roosevelt would have loved to have had
• 39:21
  Speaker 3: the world stage, and if he had been in power,
• 39:25
  Speaker 3: one could easily imagine that he would have made some
• 39:28
  Speaker 3: proposal for this great, huge crusade which is world peace. Well, actually,
• 39:35
  Speaker 3: you know, that's sort of what Wilson was asking for
• 39:37
  Speaker 3: the war to end all wars. One can imagine Roosevelt's
• 39:40
  Speaker 3: sort of adopting like rhetorick and the like mission. I
• 39:46
  Speaker 3: can't remember who it was, but the research one of
• 39:49
  Speaker 3: contemporaries said the other thing that really bothered Roosevelt was
• 39:54
  Speaker 3: that Wilson was doing things that that Rooselt would have
• 39:58
  Speaker 3: loved to have done, including including go to Congress and
• 40:03
  Speaker 3: give the Stay of the Union address, which which was
• 40:06
  Speaker 3: just like habitually just sort of like delivered this this
• 40:08
  Speaker 3: big long paper and now here's Wilson going to Congress
• 40:13
  Speaker 3: and delivering it. And of course you know, now once
• 40:16
  Speaker 3: a year that's what we do. We sit around our
• 40:18
  Speaker 3: TVs and whatnot, and we've watched rallies depending upon office,
• 40:23
  Speaker 3: and I think not unlike Roosevelt's relationship to Brian, there
• 40:30
  Speaker 3: was a little bit of jealousy in Roosevelt's reaction and
• 40:33
  Speaker 3: some criticism to Wilson.
• 40:39
  Speaker 1: Having good life insurance is incredibly important. I know from
• 40:42
  Speaker 1: personal experience. I was sixteen when my father passed away.
• 40:45
  Speaker 1: We didn't have any money. He didn't leave us in
• 40:48
  Speaker 1: the best shape. My mother, single mother, now widow, myself
• 40:52
  Speaker 1: sixteen trying to figure out how am I going to
• 40:54
  Speaker 1: pay for college and lo and behold, my dad had
• 40:57
  Speaker 1: one life.
• 40:58
  Speaker 2: Insurance policy that we found.
• 41:00
  Speaker 1: It wasn't a lot, but it was important at the time,
• 41:03
  Speaker 1: and it's why I was able to go to college.
• 41:06
  Speaker 1: Little did he know how important that would be in
• 41:09
  Speaker 1: that moment.
• 41:10
  Speaker 2: Well, guess what.
• 41:11
  Speaker 1: That's why I am here to tell you about Etho's life.
• 41:14
  Speaker 1: They can provide you with peace of mind knowing your
• 41:17
  Speaker 1: family is protected even if the worst comes to pass.
• 41:20
  Speaker 1: Ethos is an online platform that makes getting life insurance
• 41:24
  Speaker 1: fast and easy, all designed to protect your family's future
• 41:27
  Speaker 1: in minutes, not months. There's no complicated process, and it's
• 41:31
  Speaker 1: one hundred percent online. There's no medical exam require you
• 41:35
  Speaker 1: just answer a few health questions online. You can get
• 41:37
  Speaker 1: a quote in as little as ten minutes, and you
• 41:39
  Speaker 1: can get same day coverage without ever leaving your home.
• 41:43
  Speaker 1: You can get up to three million dollars in coverage,
• 41:45
  Speaker 1: and some policies start as low as two dollars a
• 41:48
  Speaker 1: day that would be billed monthly. As of March twenty
• 41:51
  Speaker 1: twenty five, Business Insider named Ethos the number one no
• 41:54
  Speaker 1: medical exam instant life insurance provider. So protect your family
• 41:59
  Speaker 1: with life and insure sure it's from Ethos. Get your
• 42:01
  Speaker 1: free quoted ethos dot com slash chuck. So again, that's
• 42:05
  Speaker 1: Ethos dot com slash chuck. Application times may vary and
• 42:10
  Speaker 1: the rates themselves may vary as well, but trust me,
• 42:13
  Speaker 1: life insurance is something you should really think about, especially
• 42:17
  Speaker 1: if you've got a growing family. Part of the reason
• 42:22
  Speaker 1: I think the presidency had a chance to sort of
• 42:25
  Speaker 1: dominate Congress's Congress was pretty evenly divided. That was another
• 42:28
  Speaker 1: mark of similarity between the era we live in now
• 42:32
  Speaker 1: in the air then, is that we were in the
• 42:34
  Speaker 1: middle of a political realignment. Back then, we just didn't
• 42:36
  Speaker 1: fully realize that. You know, that's the beauty of historians
• 42:40
  Speaker 1: like yourself, Right, you can oh, well, that was the
• 42:42
  Speaker 1: middle of a political realignment. Well at the moment, people
• 42:45
  Speaker 1: didn't realize it. Right, I always say that about the
• 42:47
  Speaker 1: moment we're living in. I'm like, you know, we think
• 42:49
  Speaker 1: every election is this permanent you know picture of a coalition.
• 42:54
  Speaker 1: I mean I watched these people going the Trump coalition.
• 42:57
  Speaker 1: It's like, Okay, on one day, Trump had these voters
• 42:59
  Speaker 1: and there's a whole bunch of.
• 43:00
  Speaker 2: People that literally the next day might not have voted
• 43:02
  Speaker 2: that way.
• 43:03
  Speaker 1: Like, this is a more fluid situation than we give
• 43:06
  Speaker 1: it credit for. But as you went through in writing
• 43:11
  Speaker 1: this book, you know, how much did it echo with
• 43:14
  Speaker 1: the current era? In your mind as you were writing.
• 43:19
  Speaker 3: You know, I think back to nineteen hundred and nineteen five,
• 43:23
  Speaker 3: anxiety about where the country's moving, anxiety about forign policy.
• 43:30
  Speaker 3: We were just entering a phase where we were going
• 43:34
  Speaker 3: to become an imperial power, which seemed to contradict our history, right,
• 43:39
  Speaker 3: I mean, the United States was born in a great
• 43:41
  Speaker 3: anti colonial rebellion. We identified ourselves as the world's leader
• 43:45
  Speaker 3: against colonization. And now with the war against Spain, you know,
• 43:49
  Speaker 3: there's Hawaii, there's the Philippines.
• 43:51
  Speaker 1: There's suddenly acquiring territory. And this was quite a This
• 43:55
  Speaker 1: was a something we hadn't really done since Mexico, I
• 43:58
  Speaker 1: guess exactly.
• 44:00
  Speaker 3: And then you know, I'm thinking, you know, we're industrializing,
• 44:03
  Speaker 3: there's monopolies, there's a need for reform. This would become
• 44:07
  Speaker 3: the progressive era. There's the populist Party. These farmers in
• 44:11
  Speaker 3: the frontier, hitherto the bone and sinew, the backbone of
• 44:15
  Speaker 3: the country. The here's the textbooks, the agrarians. If you
• 44:19
  Speaker 3: were a president back in their own republic and you
• 44:21
  Speaker 3: were listing what you did for a living, you would
• 44:23
  Speaker 3: check I was a farmer. Of course, farmers are are
• 44:25
  Speaker 3: the best people. So the American identity is undergoing a
• 44:30
  Speaker 3: great change. Some people would argue of last twenty five
• 44:33
  Speaker 3: years or so from policy AI dot com billionaires, the
• 44:38
  Speaker 3: American identity is undergoing a great change, and so in
• 44:43
  Speaker 3: times of uncertainty, one might rebel against the existing structure.
• 44:49
  Speaker 3: In nineteen you know, term the century, it wasn't that
• 44:52
  Speaker 3: that people dumped the Republican Party, but in a sense
• 44:56
  Speaker 3: and latched on under Roosevelt. They latched onto a maverick
• 45:01
  Speaker 3: within the party who was never within the good graces
• 45:04
  Speaker 3: of the party's old guard. One could say that Trump
• 45:08
  Speaker 3: is a transactional Republican and was quite willing to go
• 45:13
  Speaker 3: his own way. So he said maybe in twenty sixteen
• 45:16
  Speaker 3: and run a third party candidcy, which is what Rooseveldt did,
• 45:19
  Speaker 3: And so the party sort of, you know, went with
• 45:23
  Speaker 3: him whenever he was in power. And when Roosevelt was
• 45:27
  Speaker 3: in power, the old guard went with him too. But
• 45:30
  Speaker 3: when Roosevelt left, they quickly moved on to Taft.
• 45:34
  Speaker 1: So what's the lesson there, because that's fascinating to me too,
• 45:37
  Speaker 1: And I feel like the McKinley wing of the party
• 45:39
  Speaker 1: took back control of the party by nineteen twenty right,
• 45:43
  Speaker 1: and Harding and Coolidge were really more Republicans in the
• 45:47
  Speaker 1: style of your McKinley's or your Tafts less So a
• 45:53
  Speaker 1: Roosevelt is that is that foreshadowing what we should expect
• 45:59
  Speaker 1: inside this Publican party as they move forward post Rum.
• 46:02
  Speaker 3: It's hard to say, because on one hand, there's just there's
• 46:05
  Speaker 3: just politics, right, sure, and so and so even even
• 46:08
  Speaker 3: if I'm the old guard, you know, and we look
• 46:10
  Speaker 3: like we've got control this year, there's there's there's elections coming,
• 46:15
  Speaker 3: and if you want to stand power, you have to
• 46:17
  Speaker 3: win elections. And so, on one hand, it would be
• 46:20
  Speaker 3: easy to say, yeah, I can imagine that. Uh you know,
• 46:24
  Speaker 3: when when when Thrumbs gone the cult to Christma, that's
• 46:27
  Speaker 3: there that that the Republican Party is going to look
• 46:31
  Speaker 3: quite a bit different. Maybe so perhaps, But on another hand,
• 46:36
  Speaker 3: you have to win elections, and so what are the
• 46:38
  Speaker 3: voters pushing for? What are the voters demanding? And in
• 46:43
  Speaker 3: nineteen twenties, you know, even though farmers had are difficult,
• 46:48
  Speaker 3: there was a booming stock market. The standard living kept increasing,
• 46:51
  Speaker 3: and so there were Republicans who who might you know,
• 46:54
  Speaker 3: in their library have a couple of books by rosewant
• 46:56
  Speaker 3: say Roosevelt. It's great, Roosevelt's my hero, and I I'm
• 47:00
  Speaker 3: supporting the results because I'm voting for Republicans. But really
• 47:03
  Speaker 3: they might be supporting a Republican party that was antithetical
• 47:06
  Speaker 3: to Roosevelt. They can't necessarily see the difference because it's
• 47:10
  Speaker 3: party labels. They're voting the pocketbook. They feel good.
• 47:12
  Speaker 2: About this.
• 47:14
  Speaker 3: With us, It's not exactly clear where some of these
• 47:18
  Speaker 3: Republican voters might go after Trump, and that depends upon
• 47:23
  Speaker 3: all kinds of things, the future of the economy, the
• 47:27
  Speaker 3: future of how the things that been happening the last year.
• 47:30
  Speaker 3: So i'll jart in playouts. This year we have elections,
• 47:34
  Speaker 3: and in three years and moving forward. So wow, it's
• 47:39
  Speaker 3: a steal. It's a hard question to answer.
• 47:43
  Speaker 1: Well, I'd like to actually spend the next five or
• 47:45
  Speaker 1: so minutes here as we wrap up, talking about another
• 47:47
  Speaker 1: book you wrote, which has to do with moderates. It's
• 47:53
  Speaker 1: called The Vital Center of American Politics from the Founding
• 47:56
  Speaker 1: to Today. And I look at these two books, right
• 48:00
  Speaker 1: wrote about Teddy and he wrote that book, and it
• 48:01
  Speaker 1: tells me you sort of which is why, frankly, I
• 48:05
  Speaker 1: was why I wanted you on, because I sort of
• 48:08
  Speaker 1: I always say I'm not a liberal or conservative. I'm
• 48:10
  Speaker 1: an incrementalist, and that I'm a believer that ultimately, like
• 48:15
  Speaker 1: you know, we have you know, whenever we incrementally move,
• 48:20
  Speaker 1: it's on solid footing. It takes you know, and it's incremental. Right,
• 48:24
  Speaker 1: So security is the best example of incrementalism that over
• 48:28
  Speaker 1: time takes root and then it becomes something something more
• 48:32
  Speaker 1: permanent to many people.
• 48:37
  Speaker 2: When you view the.
• 48:38
  Speaker 1: Center of American politics, do you view it in terms
• 48:41
  Speaker 1: of the middle ground between left and right or do
• 48:44
  Speaker 1: you view it more in terms of how I describe,
• 48:46
  Speaker 1: which is it's not whether I have some views I'm
• 48:50
  Speaker 1: very progressive, some views I'm very conservative, but ultimately I
• 48:53
  Speaker 1: come down as an incrementalist. Some might call that a pragmatist.
• 48:57
  Speaker 1: However you want to view it. What do you view
• 49:00
  Speaker 1: as the center of American politics? Is it ideological or
• 49:04
  Speaker 1: is it really more about how you practice politics?
• 49:08
  Speaker 3: Let me tell you practice politics. You could be you know,
• 49:13
  Speaker 3: I mean, you know, to be a Democrat in nineteen
• 49:16
  Speaker 3: thirty five, it's much different than to be a Democrat
• 49:20
  Speaker 3: in twenty twenty five. And the party's origins are actually
• 49:26
  Speaker 3: I think the protection the institution slavery are these forms
• 49:29
  Speaker 3: in the seventeen nineties, principally by the efforts of Jefferson
• 49:32
  Speaker 3: and Madison. For parties to be successful, they have to
• 49:36
  Speaker 3: attract coalitions and people, and so that's where I think
• 49:41
  Speaker 3: of moderation, That's where I think of connecting with voters
• 49:46
  Speaker 3: and if you're too far on the right. I think,
• 49:48
  Speaker 3: if you're too far on the left, you're not gonna
• 49:50
  Speaker 3: be able to do that effectively. You'll have your hardcore,
• 49:53
  Speaker 3: you know, enough to lose elections respectively. But that's not
• 49:56
  Speaker 3: the name of the game. And so you know, when i'
• 50:00
  Speaker 3: I think of the two major parties and I look
• 50:02
  Speaker 3: at some of the rhetoric, I can usually find some
• 50:09
  Speaker 3: appeal at a center, and sometimes it's a big appeal,
• 50:15
  Speaker 3: and sometimes maybe now, for example, it's not such a
• 50:18
  Speaker 3: big appeal. And when I don't see the appeal to
• 50:22
  Speaker 3: the center, that gives them suggestion that that party may
• 50:26
  Speaker 3: not be very successful.
• 50:28
  Speaker 1: And the next select you know, I answer this question
• 50:31
  Speaker 1: people are I had a student in a class I
• 50:35
  Speaker 1: teach currently was asking me why the Democrats come across
• 50:38
  Speaker 1: as mushier than the Republicans, And to me, it's a
• 50:42
  Speaker 1: matt I always say, well, there's your answer is a
• 50:45
  Speaker 1: mathic problem, meaning there are more base Republicans and based Democrats,
• 50:50
  Speaker 1: and so the path to fifty percent plus one for
• 50:54
  Speaker 1: a Republican allows them to be more conservative than the
• 50:57
  Speaker 1: path to fifty percent plus one. And this is generic.
• 51:00
  Speaker 1: You know, in certain places it's blue and you can.
• 51:02
  Speaker 1: You can do this, but the Democrats need more of
• 51:05
  Speaker 1: these moderates to get to fifty percent plus one. By
• 51:08
  Speaker 1: the way, this was reversed right when you and I
• 51:10
  Speaker 1: were growing up in the sixty seventies and eighties.
• 51:13
  Speaker 2: You could argue it the other way.
• 51:14
  Speaker 1: The Republicans right where they considered more of the centrist party,
• 51:18
  Speaker 1: well they didn't. They had a smaller base. The Democrats
• 51:21
  Speaker 1: at the larger base, so the Democrats didn't have to
• 51:24
  Speaker 1: you know it always I always was trying to tell
• 51:26
  Speaker 1: the student, Look, it's just a numbers game.
• 51:28
  Speaker 2: You know.
• 51:28
  Speaker 1: Parties aren't centrists because they want to be Parties reach
• 51:31
  Speaker 1: out to the center out of necessity, right, not out
• 51:35
  Speaker 1: of so in looking at that, there's clearly a vacuum, right,
• 51:44
  Speaker 1: there's a We always say there's this vast middle of
• 51:46
  Speaker 1: America in some of us want to believe it's between
• 51:49
  Speaker 1: the thirty yard lines.
• 51:52
  Speaker 2: Is it is that correct?
• 51:54
  Speaker 1: Or how should we describe the vast moderate center of
• 51:58
  Speaker 1: the American electorate?
• 51:59
  Speaker 3: You know, I think that's one of the great narratives
• 52:02
  Speaker 3: that's been out there for at least the last half century.
• 52:05
  Speaker 3: I think back, for example, to Richard Nixon, the forgotten American.
• 52:10
  Speaker 3: So yeah, it's it's it's about recognizing you can't reach
• 52:16
  Speaker 3: these people unless you recognize that they're there, that that
• 52:20
  Speaker 3: they're not going to automatically vote for you, automatically not
• 52:24
  Speaker 3: vote for you. And so I I, you know, I
• 52:26
  Speaker 3: look at the hardcore voters on both sides and what
• 52:30
  Speaker 3: always interests me though, is that who's available, who is
• 52:34
  Speaker 3: in play, And it seems to me that that's that's
• 52:37
  Speaker 3: who you need to go after. That that, to me,
• 52:41
  Speaker 3: that's that's the art of politics, which is which is
• 52:44
  Speaker 3: building coalitions, big tents. And you obviously have to do
• 52:48
  Speaker 3: this because if you if you're in a country our
• 52:50
  Speaker 3: size and you only have two major parties, well.
• 52:53
  Speaker 1: I think that's the flawed our system right there, is
• 52:55
  Speaker 1: that we're trying. Can you imagine going to a clothing
• 52:59
  Speaker 1: store and they're only being small and extra large, And
• 53:04
  Speaker 1: that's what we've done to you know. And you know,
• 53:08
  Speaker 1: I think people sit there and say, yeah, I'm registered
• 53:11
  Speaker 1: as a Republican, but the Republicans don't represent everything I believe,
• 53:14
  Speaker 1: Or I'm registered as a Democrat, but the Democrats don't
• 53:16
  Speaker 1: represent everything I believe. That if we had, you know,
• 53:20
  Speaker 1: if we had more parties and no majority, and no
• 53:24
  Speaker 1: party had to get a majority to get power, but
• 53:25
  Speaker 1: you had to form a coalition. I mean, in some ways,
• 53:28
  Speaker 1: I always say, both parties are coalitions. Are not parties,
• 53:31
  Speaker 1: They're coalitions of multiple sub parties. Right, there's a there's
• 53:35
  Speaker 1: a Christian Conservative party, there's a business party. Right all
• 53:38
  Speaker 1: on the right, there's a progressive you know, you could
• 53:40
  Speaker 1: put together your different pieces of each you know, basically
• 53:45
  Speaker 1: multiple political parties within this umbrella group called.
• 53:48
  Speaker 2: The left and the right.
• 53:51
  Speaker 1: You know, look, I will I will admit, well, I
• 53:53
  Speaker 1: don't want us to be a parliamentary system. I do
• 53:56
  Speaker 1: wish we had a system that allowed for parties to
• 54:01
  Speaker 1: be more representative of where people wanted to be. But
• 54:03
  Speaker 1: you but you had sort of top four, right, we
• 54:06
  Speaker 1: had four major We're really I think we're really four
• 54:08
  Speaker 1: major political parties stuffed into two.
• 54:11
  Speaker 3: Interesting. Yeah, well it's it's obviously it's a very diverse country.
• 54:16
  Speaker 3: And I think some of the difficulty in going after
• 54:20
  Speaker 3: the center is you don't want to alienate certain coalitions within.
• 54:27
  Speaker 2: Your coaches.
• 54:29
  Speaker 3: And and uh, obviously if you do that, there's there's
• 54:34
  Speaker 3: there's the fear of alienation. But you know, there's also
• 54:38
  Speaker 3: the question of do you want to government from fear?
• 54:41
  Speaker 3: Do you want to do you want to try to
• 54:43
  Speaker 3: gain things all the time. So if I could do
• 54:45
  Speaker 3: in one more result reference and this guy really was
• 54:47
  Speaker 3: a romantic and he wasn't thinking about, you know, sort
• 54:50
  Speaker 3: of electoral votes, and he wasn't counting. He was really
• 54:54
  Speaker 3: leading from his heart. And maybe this is romantic than
• 54:57
  Speaker 3: to say, but I think if we had more of that,
• 55:00
  Speaker 3: I think voters would really resonate to someone who they
• 55:03
  Speaker 3: thought was speaking directly to them, was mostly sincere and
• 55:09
  Speaker 3: believed that we all had something in stake together. It
• 55:14
  Speaker 3: wasn't Jovis reading spreadsheets.
• 55:18
  Speaker 1: As a historian who's a president, we don't have enough
• 55:22
  Speaker 1: scholarship on that. You wish people would spend more time
• 55:25
  Speaker 1: getting to know deserves the better biography treatment. You know,
• 55:29
  Speaker 1: I used to say I felt like Eisenhower was under scholarship,
• 55:32
  Speaker 1: and that's changed. I'd argain in the last twenty years
• 55:34
  Speaker 1: we've gotten the proper what I think is a proper
• 55:37
  Speaker 1: amount of historians tackling him in different ways, which feel
• 55:44
  Speaker 1: there's some people that are overwritten about, like Kennedy, And I.
• 55:46
  Speaker 2: Say this with no disrespect.
• 55:48
  Speaker 1: They just you know, I get why, what does it
• 55:51
  Speaker 1: because of the circumstances of his death. But I'm curious
• 55:55
  Speaker 1: because I still actually think there are more things to
• 55:57
  Speaker 1: learn about Teddy. So I'm not saying this to say, hey,
• 55:59
  Speaker 1: we've you know, we've had too much on Teddy. Don't agree.
• 56:03
  Speaker 1: I think not enough sometimes still there. But who's somebody
• 56:07
  Speaker 1: that he thinks a bit under represented in your ranks
• 56:09
  Speaker 1: of the historians? Now you like to see tackled.
• 56:13
  Speaker 3: Yeah, I net sure to see some aspects of James
• 56:18
  Speaker 3: Munroe's presidency looked at more carefully. So this is kind
• 56:22
  Speaker 3: of going way back. But you know, he was the
• 56:25
  Speaker 3: last president to here knee breeches, and so we're really
• 56:28
  Speaker 3: moving from.
• 56:28
  Speaker 1: You use that phrase, and can I make a confession.
• 56:31
  Speaker 1: When you use the phrase the first time, I'm like,
• 56:33
  Speaker 1: what the hell are knee bridges? So I literally the
• 56:36
  Speaker 1: old I hadn't done this in a while where I
• 56:37
  Speaker 1: did the old? Okay, I gotta I gotta go look
• 56:39
  Speaker 1: up what that is. You know, you know when as
• 56:41
  Speaker 1: a kid, you know you're reading books that are a
• 56:43
  Speaker 1: little ahead of your time, you're constantly doing that.
• 56:45
  Speaker 3: I had done that.
• 56:45
  Speaker 2: I was like Neighbridge. Oh knee britches, got it? Okay?
• 56:49
  Speaker 3: Sorry, so very eighteenth century.
• 56:52
  Speaker 2: Yes, it is.
• 56:53
  Speaker 3: Simun wrote as this transitional figure, right, I mean he
• 56:57
  Speaker 3: was a founder, he was it was neighbors.
• 57:00
  Speaker 1: He was the last founder president, right, I would say so, yeah.
• 57:05
  Speaker 3: John Quincy Adams follows him. But John Quincy Adams was
• 57:07
  Speaker 3: a bored in the revolution, right, And we're moving into
• 57:11
  Speaker 3: what would be called machine politics, and Monroe sort of
• 57:15
  Speaker 3: resisted that. Monroe wanted to push what he once called
• 57:19
  Speaker 3: amalgamation politics, which is we need to go back to
• 57:22
  Speaker 3: where there are no parties. There's just essentially, you know,
• 57:26
  Speaker 3: Americans in governments and we're not federalists and we're not
• 57:29
  Speaker 3: we're not republicans. We're just all in this together, which
• 57:32
  Speaker 3: which looks so antiquated by that time, it's just blown
• 57:36
  Speaker 3: out the waters in eighteen twenties. But I'm interested in
• 57:39
  Speaker 3: the intellectual history that's there, his readings of you know,
• 57:43
  Speaker 3: a Thinian democracy in the Roman Republic, and you know,
• 57:47
  Speaker 3: he was the last chief executive to essentially run you know,
• 57:51
  Speaker 3: all by himself. There was there was no one opposed
• 57:53
  Speaker 3: to him. So there really was that moment of what
• 57:56
  Speaker 3: do you call it moderation or the center or consensus
• 58:00
  Speaker 3: that we could we could we could as a country
• 58:01
  Speaker 3: say yeah, you know, we're essentially behind this person. It
• 58:05
  Speaker 3: doesn't last.
• 58:07
  Speaker 1: It's interesting, you know Lincoln has that now, but he
• 58:09
  Speaker 1: never had it in practice. Right, what's that meaning that
• 58:13
  Speaker 1: what you just described that Monroe had this sort of Hey,
• 58:16
  Speaker 1: he's representative of all of us.
• 58:17
  Speaker 2: Well, that's right.
• 58:18
  Speaker 1: In hindsight, we've decided Lincoln is is an avatar for
• 58:22
  Speaker 1: the for who we want America to have been in
• 58:25
  Speaker 1: the nineteenth century, and it wasn't what America was, but
• 58:27
  Speaker 1: he's the avatar of what we could be.
• 58:28
  Speaker 2: Right, he's America.
• 58:30
  Speaker 1: I think FDR is pretty close to achieving that status. Eisenhower,
• 58:34
  Speaker 1: I think has that status. But there's not many presidents
• 58:37
  Speaker 1: that have that status.
• 58:39
  Speaker 3: No, there isn't. Oftentimes it's it's chief executives who are
• 58:43
  Speaker 3: associated in some way, shape or form with wars. With sure,
• 58:48
  Speaker 3: with America's more popular wars, more necessary wars, and so
• 58:54
  Speaker 3: that loves off.
• 58:55
  Speaker 1: You made a great case for James Monroe America at
• 58:58
  Speaker 1: two fifty. How should the average citizens celebrate.
• 59:05
  Speaker 3: Part of their country cognizance of are our successes cognizance
• 59:14
  Speaker 3: of our failures, and to love and respect our country
• 59:18
  Speaker 3: enough to to look at it wholly and clearly as
• 59:22
  Speaker 3: as best we can, and to to do what we
• 59:25
  Speaker 3: can to be good, productive, honest, deliberate, considerate citizens.
• 59:35
  Speaker 1: Well, David, I enjoyed it. Uh, you know, look, I'm
• 59:38
  Speaker 1: an easy mark. I enjoyed Teddy Roosevelt books.
• 59:41
  Speaker 2: But look, you.
• 59:45
  Speaker 1: The best history books to read are the ones that
• 59:48
  Speaker 1: make you feel like they echo in the moment we're
• 59:50
  Speaker 1: currently living in. And I would say that you've you've
• 59:53
  Speaker 1: You've done a good job of trying to capture you know,
• 59:55
  Speaker 1: I think that's a plus side of a history book,
• 59:58
  Speaker 1: right is when it can also it's writing about the past,
• 1:00:01
  Speaker 1: but it's writing about the present.
• 1:00:02
  Speaker 3: Well, thanks, You know, the historian is objective as objective
• 1:00:06
  Speaker 3: can be. Use this.
• 1:00:08
  Speaker 1: You're you're gonna get You're going to get influenced by
• 1:00:10
  Speaker 1: the times you're living in.
• 1:00:11
  Speaker 2: It's just inevitable, right exactly.
• 1:00:14
  Speaker 3: The history is living is living through the times.
• 1:00:18
  Speaker 1: Well, we need a lot more historians as journalists these days.
• 1:00:21
  Speaker 1: I feel like context and nuances falls off too much.
• 1:00:26
  Speaker 1: So I'm glad to surface this, and.
• 1:00:32
  Speaker 2: Well done. It's great to get to know you Dad.
• 1:00:34
  Speaker 3: Thanks, check,