Latest / Reformed Thinking / The Destination of the True Gospel: An Exegetical, Historical, and Theological Defense of the North Galatian Theory

Transcript

The Destination of the True Gospel: An Exegetical, Historical, and Theological Defense of the North Galatian Theory · Reformed Thinking

• 0:00
  So imagine discovering that the most aggressive, fiery letter
• 0:06
  you ever wrote, a letter where you basically skipped all the
• 0:08
  polite pleasantries and went straight for the jugular, was
• 0:11
  actually historically misunderstood and misunderstood
• 0:14
  just because people thought it was delivered to the completely
• 0:16
  wrong address. Oh yeah, that changes the entire
• 0:19
  reading of the text. Right.
• 0:21
  For centuries, theologians have been reading the Apostle Paul's
• 0:24
  Magna Carta of Christian Liberty, which is the Epistle to
• 0:27
  the Galatians, and they've been picturing the wrong audience in
• 0:30
  their minds. So welcome to Reformed thinking.
• 0:33
  You are stepping into an intensive deep dive today, and
• 0:36
  we're doing an exhaustive investigation into the
• 0:38
  historical and theological landscape this incredible text.
• 0:42
  Yes, and specifically we are looking at a historical puzzle
• 0:45
  known as the North Galatian theory.
• 0:47
  Spot on for those of you listening, it is so vital to
• 0:50
  grasp what is at stake here. The Epistle to the Galatians
• 0:54
  stands as the great charter of our freedom in Christ.
• 0:57
  It is. It's nothing less than the Holy
• 1:00
  Spirit's thundering artillery against that relentless human
• 1:03
  inclination to add our own filthy rags of righteousness to
• 1:06
  the finished, perfect work of Jesus Christ.
• 1:09
  It really is. Whenever the human heart
• 1:11
  attempts to drag self merit into the equation of justification,
• 1:14
  well, Galatians fires a devastating volley against that
• 1:18
  pride. Absolutely.
• 1:19
  But before we can accurately apply this massive theological
• 1:22
  weight to our own lives, we have to identify the foolish
• 1:25
  Galatians Paul is actually addressing in his letter.
• 1:28
  The mission of our deep dive today is to assess a very
• 1:30
  specific historical question. Was Paul writing to ethnic Selts
• 1:33
  living in the rugged, remote northern Highlands of Asia
• 1:36
  Minor? Or, and this is the alternative,
• 1:39
  was he addressing A culturally diverse Roman province in the
• 1:42
  accessible South? And answering this alters our
• 1:45
  entire timeline of Paul's ministry.
• 1:47
  It radically sharpens our understanding of justification
• 1:50
  by faith alone. That historical question is
• 1:53
  entirely necessary because it frames how we read the text.
• 1:57
  You know, I completely agree. To glass the visceral urgency in
• 2:00
  Paul's writing, you first need to look at a map of 1st century
• 2:04
  Asia Minor and really understand the people inhabiting that land.
• 2:09
  So back in the 3rd century BCA massive migration of Celtic
• 2:13
  peoples moved into the Central Anatolian plateau.
• 2:16
  A massive migration, right? Yes, and these were the ethnic
• 2:19
  Galate. They established themselves in a
• 2:21
  region that came to bear their name, heavily concentrated
• 2:24
  around leading centers like Ansira, Pasinus and Tavium.
• 2:28
  They possessed a highly distinct cultural and ethnic identity,
• 2:31
  completely separate from the surrounding Mediterranean
• 2:34
  populations. This is what we call the ethnic
• 2:36
  North. OK.
• 2:37
  So that is the North, but then you look at the political South
• 2:40
  and the picture shifts entirely, right?
• 2:42
  Precisely in 25 BC, Augustus Caesar engaged in.
• 2:46
  I mean, if they say New York, do they mean the sprawling,
• 2:50
  diverse, densely populated metropolis of New York City?
• 2:54
  Or are they talking about the specific ragged, mountainous
• 2:58
  terrain of upstate New York, where the culture and the
• 3:00
  landscape are entirely different?
• 3:02
  Yeah, the contrast is massive, right?
• 3:05
  So if a letter is just addressed to New York, how did 1st century
• 3:08
  readers know which one Paul meant?
• 3:10
  Do they instinctively lean toward the ethnic identity or
• 3:14
  the political boundary? That analogy captures the
• 3:16
  tension perfectly. To solve this puzzle, we must
• 3:19
  evaluate Roman administrative habits, biblical chronology, and
• 3:23
  the highly specific terminology Luke uses in the book of Acts.
• 3:27
  Because of this dual meaning, scholars have been forced to
• 3:30
  make a significant interpretive decision.
• 3:32
  And that decision is what gave rise to the North Galatian
• 3:35
  theory, correct? Absolutely.
• 3:36
  This hypothesis posits that Paul wrote specifically to the ethnic
• 3:40
  northern Celtic communities. It takes the word Galatia in its
• 3:44
  older, more restricted, purely ethnic sense.
• 3:46
  So they're looking at the linguistic roots.
• 3:49
  Yes. Supporters of this view look at
• 3:51
  those linguistic groups and argue that the natural meaning
• 3:53
  of Galatia and Galatians points directly to that ethnic
• 3:57
  homeland. The argument assumes Paul is
• 3:59
  targeting a specific people group with shared cultural
• 4:02
  traits. He's not just addressing a
• 4:05
  random collection of residents who happen to live within a
• 4:07
  recently drawn Roman border. That makes a lot of sense when
• 4:10
  you think about how people identify themselves.
• 4:13
  It does. Furthermore, ancient historians
• 4:15
  widely noted that these ethnic galls possessed a mercurial,
• 4:19
  impulsive nature. They were known to be quick to
• 4:22
  adopt new ideas and just as quick to abandon them.
• 4:25
  OK. Here is where it gets really
• 4:26
  interesting, and I have to push back a little on treating this
• 4:29
  as just a dry geographical debate.
• 4:32
  That specific ethnic temperament, that mercurial,
• 4:36
  impulsive nature. It aligns perfectly with Paul's
• 4:39
  visceral urgency and the sharp, almost aggressive tone of his
• 4:43
  letter. It really does line up well.
• 4:45
  I mean, think about his opening. He does not offer his usual
• 4:48
  polite Thanksgiving. He jumps straight in and says, I
• 4:51
  am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him.
• 4:53
  Who called you in the grace of Christ?
• 4:55
  Which is such a jarring way to start an epistle.
• 4:58
  Totally jawing. Could Paul's intense frustration
• 5:01
  be specifically tied to the impulsive nature of these
• 5:04
  northern Celts if he knew their cultural tendency was to adopt A
• 5:08
  position and then rapidly abandoned it for the next
• 5:11
  persuasive voice? It makes complete sense that his
• 5:14
  tone is so fiery. It feels like he is addressing a
• 5:17
  specific ethnic flaw, not just a general theological error.
• 5:20
  That psychological alignment is a major pillar for those who
• 5:23
  hold the North Galatian theory. If Paul is indeed writing to the
• 5:27
  north, dealing with that specific impulsive Celtic
• 5:30
  mindset, it forces a massive shift in how we date his
• 5:33
  letters. It actually reconstructs his
• 5:35
  entire missionary timeline. A massive shift?
• 5:38
  How so? Well, to understand this
• 5:40
  chronological shift, we have to analyze the travel notices in
• 5:43
  the book of Acts. Specifically, we need to look at
• 5:46
  Acts 16.6 and Acts 18.23. OK, I have those in mind.
• 5:50
  In these passages, Luke describes Paul moving through
• 5:53
  what is translated as the Phrygian and Galatian region.
• 5:56
  We really have to look at the Greek syntax here.
• 5:58
  Getting into the original language, I love it.
• 5:59
  Luke utilizes the adjectival form Galactican, meaning
• 6:03
  Galatian, to modify the noun Chiran, meaning region.
• 6:06
  A single definite article governs both of these
• 6:09
  adjectives. So grammatically, what does that
• 6:10
  indicate? In Greek grammar, this syntactic
• 6:13
  structure suggests a specific geographical or ethnic region.
• 6:17
  This contrasts with the standard noun usage that would typically
• 6:20
  describe the whole Roman province.
• 6:22
  This highly precise authorial word choice suggests an ethnic
• 6:26
  northern destination. Oh, I see.
• 6:28
  And the timeline impact here is massive.
• 6:31
  If Paul evangelized this northern region during the tours
• 6:34
  mentioned in Acts 16 and 18, the North Galatian theory places the
• 6:38
  writing of the letter much later.
• 6:39
  It would be between AD 53 and 57.
• 6:42
  Wow. Yeah, he likely wrote it during
• 6:44
  his later mature ministry in Ephesus or Macedonia.
• 6:47
  Wait, if he is writing to the north, that absolutely detonates
• 6:50
  the timeline I was taught in Sunday school.
• 6:52
  Because if he went to the ethnic N, that puts this letter in the
• 6:55
  mid 50s, right? Yes, right in the middle of that
• 6:57
  decade. So what does this all mean for
• 6:59
  the rest of the New Testament timeline?
• 7:01
  If the letter is written in the mid 50s, that means it was
• 7:04
  written after the events of Acts 15.
• 7:06
  This brings us to a major piece of evidence for the North
• 7:08
  Galatian theory, the alignment of Galatians chapter 2 with the
• 7:11
  Jerusalem Council in Acts chapter 15.
• 7:14
  The parallels there are undeniable.
• 7:16
  They are heavy. Both events happen in Jerusalem.
• 7:19
  Both tackle the specific controversy of circumcision.
• 7:22
  Both involve the exact same central figures, Paul Barnabas,
• 7:26
  Peter James and John and the. Outcome is the same.
• 7:29
  Right. Most crucially, both accounts
• 7:32
  conclude with the absolute agreement that Gentile believers
• 7:35
  are completely free from the ceremonial law.
• 7:38
  If you place Galatians in the mid 50s.
• 7:41
  Paul is writing this letter after that definitive counsel
• 7:44
  took place. Synthesizing those details shows
• 7:46
  how this theory presents a cohesive, mature phase of Paul's
• 7:49
  ministry. By the mid 50's, the Judaizing
• 7:52
  conflict, you know, the heresy demanding that Gentiles adopt
• 7:55
  Jewish ceremonial laws for justification, had fully
• 7:58
  developed. It was a widespread crisis
• 8:00
  across the early church. It wasn't just a small isolated
• 8:03
  issue anymore. No, not at all.
• 8:05
  Paul is not dealing with a localized misunderstanding.
• 8:08
  He is combating a highly organized theological threat.
• 8:11
  The North Galatian theory provides A framework where Pauls
• 8:14
  theology of justification has been tested, refined in the
• 8:17
  fires of the Jerusalem Council, and is now being deployed with
• 8:20
  Apostolic authority. He is using it to protect these
• 8:23
  vulnerable, impulsive northern Celtic congregations.
• 8:26
  Well, that northern timeline sounds incredibly cohesive.
• 8:30
  It has a glaring blind spot, and that blind spot gave rise to the
• 8:34
  major competing view, which is the South Galatian theory.
• 8:37
  It is a very robust alternative. It is the strongest objection to
• 8:41
  the North. Galatian theory is the missing
• 8:43
  narrative in the book of Acts. Luke provides extensive,
• 8:47
  meticulous details about Paul planting churches in the
• 8:50
  southern cities, the city in Antioch, Iconium, Lystra and
• 8:53
  Derby. We get entire chapters dedicated
• 8:55
  to these Southern missions in Acts 13 and 14.
• 8:58
  You really do get a play by play.
• 8:59
  Yeah, but Acts never explicitly narrates a northern church
• 9:03
  planting mission. Luke offers only passing
• 9:06
  ambiguous travel summaries for the North.
• 9:08
  That is a sticking point for many scholars.
• 9:10
  Furthermore, the phrase you mentioned, the Phrygian and
• 9:13
  Galatian region, could simply refer to a Frigogaladic
• 9:17
  territory within the southern part of the Roman province.
• 9:20
  Plus, Paul frequently used broad Roman provincial names in his
• 9:24
  letters, like Macedonia, Asia, and Ikaya.
• 9:28
  Why would he suddenly switch to a strict ethnic designation
• 9:31
  here? That is a very fair question to
• 9:34
  raise. And there are internal clues in
• 9:36
  the letter itself. Paul mentions Barnabas multiple
• 9:39
  times in Galatians. Appealing to Barnabas carries
• 9:41
  significantly more weight if the readers actually knew him
• 9:44
  personally. Which the southern churches did.
• 9:47
  Right. The southern churches knew
• 9:48
  Barnabas intimately from the first missionary tour, but
• 9:51
  Barnabas was not with Paul during the later travels to the
• 9:54
  north. Those are substantial objections
• 9:55
  and they lead directly into the chronological problem regarding
• 9:58
  the Jerusalem Council. If Galatians was written in the
• 10:00
  mid 50s, meaning it was written after the Acts 15 Jerusalem
• 10:04
  Council, we face a baffling omission.
• 10:06
  A huge omission. The Jerusalem Council produced
• 10:09
  an official Apostolic decree. It was a formal document
• 10:12
  confirming that Gentiles did not need to be circumcised.
• 10:16
  Yet in the entire Epistle to the Galatians, Paul never once cites
• 10:20
  this official decree. Which is mind boggling.
• 10:23
  He argues from Scripture, he argues from his own Apostolic
• 10:26
  calling and from theological logic, but he completely ignores
• 10:30
  the formal ruling that directly addressed the specific problem
• 10:34
  he is fighting. I have to interject here because
• 10:36
  this is where the North Galatian timeline feels strained to me.
• 10:39
  If Paul had a literal signed Apostolic ruling from Jerusalem
• 10:43
  in his pocket that categorically proved his point against the
• 10:47
  Judaizers, why on earth would he keep it hidden while fighting
• 10:50
  this specific battle with the Galatians?
• 10:52
  It does seem counterintuitive. It defies logic.
• 10:54
  He is fighting for the survival of the gospel in these churches,
• 10:57
  yet he leaves his most potent administrative weapon in his
• 11:00
  theological briefcase. Does this massive omission make
• 11:04
  an earlier date, say 8047 to 49, before the council even
• 11:08
  happened, a much more probable? Many would argue yes.
• 11:10
  It just seems far more likely that he does not mention the
• 11:13
  decree, because the decree did not exist yet, that is.
• 11:16
  Precisely the argument of those who hold the South Galatian
• 11:19
  view, they argue the silence is deafening and points to an early
• 11:23
  date, making Galatians one of Paul's first letters.
• 11:26
  Which is fascinating to consider.
• 11:28
  But regardless of whether you land in the north or the South,
• 11:31
  whether Paul was writing to ethnic Selts or provincial Roman
• 11:34
  citizens, we must read the text through the lens of proper
• 11:37
  hermeneutics. We must ensure that our
• 11:40
  historical and geographical theories submit to the unified
• 11:43
  truth of Scripture. Amen to that.
• 11:45
  In Reformed theology, we hold tightly to the Westminster
• 11:48
  Confession of Faith, specifically chapter 1,
• 11:51
  paragraph 9, which establishes the analogy of faith.
• 11:55
  This principle dictates that the infallible rule of
• 11:58
  interpretation of Scripture is the Scripture itself.
• 12:01
  Letting scripture interpret scripture.
• 12:03
  Absolutely. When we debate the technical
• 12:06
  findings in Greek syntax, like the definite articles modifying
• 12:10
  Galatea Consuron, those grammatical details must
• 12:13
  harmonize with the broader unified message of the entire
• 12:17
  Bible. The dry dust of syntax is the
• 12:20
  gold dust of divine revelation. We study the grammar
• 12:23
  meticulously because it is the very vehicle God chose to
• 12:27
  communicate His will. If the map is this confusing,
• 12:30
  how can we be sure of the theology that is a crucial point
• 12:33
  for you Listening to this deep dive?
• 12:35
  We are not just mapping ancient trade routes, we are tracing the
• 12:38
  boundaries of divine revelation. Beautifully said.
• 12:41
  And to do that, we must understand the covenantal
• 12:43
  transition taking place in the 1st century.
• 12:46
  The Westminster Confession in Chapter 7 outlines the
• 12:49
  historical shift from the administration of the Old
• 12:51
  Covenant to the New Covenant in Christ.
• 12:53
  A monumental shift in redemptive history.
• 12:55
  For centuries, the Old Covenant was the operating system.
• 12:58
  Now Christ has updated the entire system to the New
• 13:01
  Covenant. The Galatians were basically
• 13:03
  caught in the crossfire of this massive software update.
• 13:06
  That is a helpful way to visualize it.
• 13:08
  The source text mentions a specific dispensational
• 13:10
  distinction that we must highlight.
• 13:12
  The Law functioned as a schoolmaster or a tutor
• 13:15
  specifically for the nation of Israel to prepare them for the
• 13:18
  Messiah. But the Church is the body of
• 13:21
  Christ. It is a distinct entity living
• 13:23
  under the reality of grace, completely separate from the
• 13:26
  national theocratic program of ancient Israel.
• 13:29
  Understanding that distinction is key to understanding the
• 13:32
  historical crisis of the Judaizers.
• 13:35
  These false brethren were infiltrating the churches and
• 13:38
  demanding that Gentile believers submit to Jewish customs,
• 13:42
  primarily circumcision. They were adding requirements.
• 13:45
  Yes, they were essentially demanding that Gentiles become
• 13:47
  Jews to become Christians. They failed to recognize that
• 13:50
  the Old Covenant administration had reached its planned
• 13:53
  obsolescence in the finished work of Christ.
• 13:56
  They were trying to drag the church backward into a defunct
• 13:59
  covenantal era. Moving in reverse instead of
• 14:01
  forward. Exactly right.
• 14:03
  Recognizing this prevents us from isolating the passage from
• 14:07
  its redemptive historical context.
• 14:09
  The apostle Paul is not just arguing about a minor ceremonial
• 14:12
  preference. He is fighting against an error
• 14:15
  that completely undermines the transition from the types and
• 14:18
  shadows of the Old Testament into the fulfilled reality of
• 14:21
  the New Testament. And that historical crisis of
• 14:24
  the Galatians exposes a universal human condition,
• 14:27
  leading us directly to the absolute necessity of Christ.
• 14:31
  Paul calls the teaching of the Judaizers another gospel, which
• 14:35
  is really no gospel at all. It is a lethal distortion.
• 14:38
  We have to define their error clearly.
• 14:40
  The Judaizers core error was a reliance on self merit and
• 14:44
  moralism. They taught that faith in Christ
• 14:46
  was good, but it was insufficient on his own.
• 14:49
  You need Christ plus your own adherence to the ceremonial law
• 14:51
  to be justified. Christ plus anything ruins
• 14:54
  everything. Yes, and while we do not have
• 14:56
  people demanding physical circumcision in our churches
• 14:59
  today, we have modern equivalents everywhere.
• 15:01
  Think about how synergistic errors operate.
• 15:04
  Arminianism suggests that God's grace requires the decisive
• 15:07
  cooperation of the human will to be effective.
• 15:09
  A. Very subtle form of human
• 15:11
  addition. Roman Catholicism officially
• 15:13
  teaches that justification is a process requiring faith plus the
• 15:17
  infusion of grace through the sacraments and human merit.
• 15:20
  Even in broad evangelicalism, the seeker sensitive movements,
• 15:24
  man centered pragmatism suggests that church growth relies on
• 15:27
  human marketing strategies rather than the pure preaching
• 15:30
  of the word. Relying on the flesh instead of
• 15:33
  the spirit. And the prosperity gospel is
• 15:35
  perhaps the most blatant modern Judaizing heresy.
• 15:39
  It teaches that faith is a tool to acquire earthly wealth,
• 15:42
  essentially turning God into a vending machine that responds to
• 15:45
  our positive confessions. All of these modern errors to
• 15:48
  the Galatian error share one deadly trait.
• 15:51
  They all suggest Christ's work is insufficient without human
• 15:54
  effort. That is why Paul uses the law in
• 15:56
  a very specific way in this epistle.
• 15:58
  In Reformed theology, we recognize the first use of the
• 16:01
  law. The law is not a ladder you
• 16:03
  climb to reach heaven. It is a hammer designed to crush
• 16:07
  human self-sufficiency and pride.
• 16:08
  It shatters our illusions of being good enough.
• 16:11
  It does. Paul wields the demands of God's
• 16:13
  perfect justice to shatter the delusion that anyone can earn
• 16:17
  their stand. Ending before a holy God.
• 16:19
  He uses the law to close off every possible escape route,
• 16:22
  leaving the Galatians and us with absolutely no refuge but
• 16:26
  the cross. And what a refuge it is.
• 16:28
  And at the cross we encounter Christ in his threefold office
• 16:32
  As our supreme Prophet. Christ corrects the fickle,
• 16:35
  wandering heart of the Galatians, exposing the lies of
• 16:38
  the Judaizers through His living Word.
• 16:40
  As our great High Priest, he offers the perfect once for all
• 16:44
  sacrifice. The only sacrifice that counts.
• 16:46
  Yes, we must distinguish here between His passive obedience,
• 16:49
  where He willingly suffered the penalty for our sins on the
• 16:52
  cross, and His active obedience, where He perfectly fulfilled
• 16:56
  every righteous demand of the law on our behalf.
• 16:58
  Both are required for our justification.
• 17:00
  And finally, as our King, He sovereignly liberates the
• 17:03
  conscience from the crushing yoke of legalism, ruling over
• 17:06
  His people with grace. That active and passive
• 17:09
  obedience of Christ is the bedrock of our standing.
• 17:13
  The Westminster Confession in Chapter 11 makes it undeniably
• 17:16
  clear that justification is an act of God's free grace.
• 17:20
  Our security does not rest on our ability to maintain our own
• 17:23
  standing. Thank the Lord for that.
• 17:25
  It rests entirely on the imputed righteousness of the Savior.
• 17:29
  Imputation means that Christ's perfect record is legally
• 17:32
  credited to our account, while our sin was credited to His.
• 17:36
  If you believe you have to maintain your justification by
• 17:38
  your own performance, you have swallowed the Galatian error.
• 17:42
  It is a heavy realization. But this does not leave us
• 17:44
  lawless. Once we are justified by faith
• 17:47
  alone, we enter to the third use of the law as described in
• 17:50
  Westminster Confession, chapter 19.
• 17:52
  The justified believer is called to a life of grateful obedience.
• 17:55
  Obedience flowing from grace. Yes, we obey the moral law not
• 18:00
  because we are driven by the terrifying fear of punishment,
• 18:03
  and certainly not because we are following some secular self help
• 18:05
  program. We obey because we are motivated
• 18:09
  by an intense, overflowing love for the God who has already
• 18:11
  secured our salvation. This brings our historical and
• 18:14
  theological investigation to its proper conclusion.
• 18:17
  It moves us from the proclaimed word to the visible word.
• 18:21
  The rejection of works righteousness that Paul defends
• 18:24
  so fiercely connects directly to how we administer and receive
• 18:28
  the Lord's Supper. A perfect connection to make.
• 18:30
  When we approach the table, we do not come as individuals who
• 18:33
  have earned a seat through a week of exceptional moral
• 18:36
  performance. We approach as desperate sinners
• 18:39
  clothed exclusively in the imputed righteousness of Christ.
• 18:43
  We come empty handed. We do.
• 18:45
  The elements of bread and wine visually and tangibly confirm
• 18:49
  the very gospel Paul preached to the Galatians.
• 18:52
  They testify that our nourishment, our life, and our
• 18:54
  standing depend entirely on the broken body and shed blood of
• 18:57
  another. Any human supplement to Christ's
• 19:00
  finished work is a soul destroying subtraction from
• 19:02
  God's glory. A soul destroying subtraction.
• 19:04
  Well said. The intense debate over the map,
• 19:07
  whether north or South, helps us comprehend the precise timing
• 19:11
  and the specific intensity of Paul's ministry.
• 19:14
  It illuminates the historical mechanics of how the gospel
• 19:16
  spread. But regardless of the geography,
• 19:19
  the core doctrine stands resolute.
• 19:22
  Salvation is of the Lord. We've covered Roman
• 19:25
  administrative borders, Greek syntactic structures, covenantal
• 19:29
  shifts, and the crushing weight of the law, but I want to leave
• 19:32
  you with a final thought to consider on your own as you step
• 19:35
  back into your daily life. It has been quite the discussion
• 19:38
  today. It really has.
• 19:40
  So if Paul's most fiery, urgent defense of grace was
• 19:43
  deliberately aimed at an ethnic group famous for their
• 19:46
  impulsive, mercurial temperament, a people who
• 19:48
  rapidly embrace the truth only to quickly trade it for a newer,
• 19:52
  more demanding system, how might our own fast-paced, emotionally
• 19:56
  driven modern culture make us uniquely vulnerable?
• 19:58
  That is a convicting question to ponder.
• 20:00
  Are we, in our era of constant notifications and fleeting
• 20:03
  trends, acting just like those ancient Celts?
• 20:06
  Ask yourself, how quickly are you tempted to abandon the
• 20:09
  Finnish restful work of Christ for the next trending gospel of
• 20:12
  self improvement?