Latest / Daniel and Kelly’s Extraordinary Universe / What is a space-time interval?
Transcript
- 0:07Speaker 1: Special relativity brings space and time together and in the
- 0:12Speaker 1: darkness binds them into space time. That sounds pretty awesome,
- 0:17Speaker 1: and it was fun to say, like something that could
- 0:19Speaker 1: only happen in Mordoor or during the Big Bang. But
- 0:23Speaker 1: what does it actually mean? What is space time? How
- 0:27Speaker 1: do you measure distances in four dimensional space time? And
- 0:32Speaker 1: why would you? Physicists are always saying that space and
- 0:36Speaker 1: time are like two sides of the same coin making
- 0:39Speaker 1: more sense together. What are they talking about? In what
- 0:43Speaker 1: way do they make more sense together? Today We're gonna
- 0:46Speaker 1: blow up all of those analogies and give you a
- 0:48Speaker 1: real conceptual understanding of how relativity breaks space and twists time,
- 0:55Speaker 1: but then clicks them back together into a harmonious hole.
- 0:59Speaker 1: We'll talk about what that really means and the crucial
- 1:02Speaker 1: but rarely explain concept at the heart of it all
- 1:05Speaker 1: the space time interval. Welcome to Daniel and Kelly's spacey
- 1:11Speaker 1: timey Universe.
- 1:26Speaker 2: Hello.
- 1:26Speaker 3: I'm Kelly Wiener Smith. I study parasites and space, and
- 1:29Speaker 3: I have fun in all spaces and at all times. Hi.
- 1:39Speaker 1: I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist who likes to think
- 1:41Speaker 1: about aliens, and I was having fun this morning until
- 1:44Speaker 1: Kelly showed me the crusher.
- 1:46Speaker 3: Oh was it sure you were going to mention the
- 1:49Speaker 3: crusher on the show.
- 1:50Speaker 1: It's the only thing I can think about now, Thank
- 1:52Speaker 1: you very much. Kelly. Tell everybody what does the crusher crush.
- 1:59Speaker 3: The tube that goes to the testicle and connects it
- 2:02Speaker 3: to the rest of the body. I am looking into
- 2:04Speaker 3: methods for what we'll say, weathering are male goats, and
- 2:10Speaker 3: I'm trying to figure out what method I would feel
- 2:11Speaker 3: comfortable doing, or if I need to call the vets
- 2:14Speaker 3: and Wow, the crusher is a big piece of equipment
- 2:16Speaker 3: that once I have it in my hands, I am
- 2:18Speaker 3: not sure that I am up for actually using.
- 2:22Speaker 1: But you were up for brandishing it on our video
- 2:25Speaker 1: call this morning.
- 2:28Speaker 3: Everybody needs to stop it.
- 2:31Speaker 1: Away the crusher, all right, But today we are not
- 2:34Speaker 1: crushing goats or any of their bits. We are crushing
- 2:37Speaker 1: your confusion. We are explaining the way the universe works.
- 2:43Speaker 3: You always pull us back somehow, Okay, So today we're
- 2:47Speaker 3: talking about space time, yes, which got me thinking about
- 2:50Speaker 3: all of space and all of time. And so, Daniel,
- 2:53Speaker 3: if you could snap your fingers and for five minutes,
- 2:57Speaker 3: you would be in a protective bubble, and you could
- 2:59Speaker 3: go anywhere in space, but you couldn't change the time,
- 3:01Speaker 3: like you had to just pop up right there. Now,
- 3:05Speaker 3: what would you want to see?
- 3:07Speaker 1: Kelly? You need this episode because if you had heard
- 3:10Speaker 1: this episode already, you would know that that question is
- 3:12Speaker 1: incoherent because there is no universal now. That's right, right,
- 3:16Speaker 1: there's no sense of time across the whole universe where
- 3:19Speaker 1: you can say this now is the same as that now.
- 3:22Speaker 1: It's observer dependent. We're gonna talk about and.
- 3:25Speaker 3: You know what, I should have known that from our
- 3:26Speaker 3: What Is Time and What Is Space? Episode series? But okay,
- 3:31Speaker 3: so is there some way to constrain it so I
- 3:33Speaker 3: can say, like, you can't go back to the beginning
- 3:35Speaker 3: of the universe. I was trying to, like, why do.
- 3:37Speaker 1: You want to stop me from going back to the
- 3:38Speaker 1: beginning of the.
- 3:39Speaker 3: Universe, because that's what I thought you'd say.
- 3:41Speaker 1: You were totally right, that is what I was gonna.
- 3:42Speaker 3: Say, But you said that on the show before. So
- 3:46Speaker 3: trying to figure out what you think is the most
- 3:47Speaker 3: interesting thing happening now. And my guess is that you
- 3:50Speaker 3: were gonna say black holes.
- 3:52Speaker 1: I'm gonna go to the factory that makes the crusher
- 3:54Speaker 1: and I'm gonna burn it down. Okay, No, but if
- 3:59Speaker 1: I could go somewhere in the modern universe, then for
- 4:03Speaker 1: sure I would like to see not only what's inside
- 4:06Speaker 1: a black hole, but the immediate vicinity of a black
- 4:09Speaker 1: hole would be super fascinating to see frame dragging and
- 4:13Speaker 1: to see all that time dilation and all the extreme
- 4:16Speaker 1: events around a black hole. I think my second choice
- 4:20Speaker 1: would be the heart of a neutron star, because when
- 4:24Speaker 1: every other defense against gravity has already collapsed and matter
- 4:28Speaker 1: becomes insanely dense so the protons and electrons eat each
- 4:32Speaker 1: other and become neutrons, then you have this fascinating environment
- 4:36Speaker 1: where quantum mechanics and gravity are at about the same strength.
- 4:40Speaker 1: And we don't know what's going on at the heart
- 4:42Speaker 1: of neutron stars because we can't calculate that stuff because
- 4:44Speaker 1: we don't have a theory of quantum gravity. We'll never
- 4:47Speaker 1: go inside a black hole, so that's sort of just
- 4:49Speaker 1: like fun to say, but hopeless. But the inside of
- 4:52Speaker 1: a neutron star is out there and real and on
- 4:55Speaker 1: the outside of event horizon, so in principle we could
- 4:58Speaker 1: one day see it, and that be the key to
- 5:00Speaker 1: unlocking quantum gravity.
- 5:02Speaker 3: WHOA Okay, So, how could I have worded the question
- 5:05Speaker 3: to constrain your ability to see the Big Bang? What
- 5:09Speaker 3: would have been the right way to word that?
- 5:11Speaker 1: Of Daniel? What would you like to see in the
- 5:12Speaker 1: universe except for the Big Bang?
- 5:18Speaker 3: Well, wouldn't you have to go backwards in time to
- 5:20Speaker 3: see the Big Bang?
- 5:21Speaker 1: It depends a little bit of what you mean by sea.
- 5:23Speaker 1: I mean the information from the Big Bang is out
- 5:26Speaker 1: there in some respects. People often say seeing the CMB
- 5:30Speaker 1: is like seeing the Big Bang, though it actually comes
- 5:32Speaker 1: from three hundred and eighty thousand years later. There is
- 5:35Speaker 1: information from the Big Bang out there and gravitational waves,
- 5:38Speaker 1: and so like seeing it means detecting those and reconstructing
- 5:42Speaker 1: what happened. We can do that today without like being
- 5:45Speaker 1: there during the Big Bang. In that sense, everything you
- 5:48Speaker 1: see happened in the past already.
- 5:51Speaker 3: So but I feel like you understand that that's not
- 5:54Speaker 3: what I mean like that, like, like, yes, you can
- 5:58Speaker 3: see evidence from it, yes, but like I don't you know,
- 6:02Speaker 3: So if I go to a civil war site and
- 6:03Speaker 3: I find a like bullet case, that's like evidence that
- 6:07Speaker 3: it happened. Yeah, but it's not the same as being
- 6:10Speaker 3: there and watching both sides run across a field and
- 6:13Speaker 3: start fighting each other.
- 6:15Speaker 1: Right, No, but it's sort of like going really really
- 6:18Speaker 1: far away instantaneously and capturing the light that left that
- 6:21Speaker 1: Civil War battlefield contemporaneously and using it to watch in
- 6:26Speaker 1: real time the battle, which is something you could literally.
- 6:29Speaker 3: Do, right, All right, all right, all right, Well I'm
- 6:32Speaker 3: gonna have you be more careful next time I ask you
- 6:33Speaker 3: a question. But we've all learned something from Kelly's bad question,
- 6:38Speaker 3: which is why Kelly's here.
- 6:40Speaker 1: So, and these are really fun topics to think about
- 6:42Speaker 1: because our intuition is broken about how all of this
- 6:45Speaker 1: stuff works. We tend to think that time flows the
- 6:48Speaker 1: same way for everyone. We tend to think that distances
- 6:51Speaker 1: are real and they're universal. When it turns out the
- 6:55Speaker 1: universe operates in a way that's fundamentally in conflict with
- 6:58Speaker 1: our intuition but amazingly does make sense. So we have
- 7:03Speaker 1: this task ahead of us to incorporate this new intuition
- 7:07Speaker 1: about the universe into our minds. But often this means
- 7:10Speaker 1: just like, read a bunch of equations and use them
- 7:11Speaker 1: to predict what happens. But I think it's possible to
- 7:14Speaker 1: develop a new kind of intuition, a conceptual understanding for
- 7:18Speaker 1: how the universe really does work. And that's what we're
- 7:21Speaker 1: going to try to do today by introducing you to
- 7:23Speaker 1: one of the most important concepts in special relativity that
- 7:26Speaker 1: almost nobody talks about and that we've never covered on
- 7:29Speaker 1: this show.
- 7:29Speaker 3: What. Yes, Well, this is a very exciting day here
- 7:33Speaker 3: at dk EU, and let's see if our audience heard
- 7:38Speaker 3: about this thing that pretty much no one talks about.
- 7:40Speaker 3: And so we asked our audience, what is a space
- 7:44Speaker 3: time interval?
- 7:46Speaker 2: Well, I would expect that that would be the reduction
- 7:51Speaker 2: of Einstein's space time into a quantum type interval, but
- 7:57Speaker 2: I'm really not too sure. It's the between two objects
- 8:02Speaker 2: and space.
- 8:03Speaker 4: Maybe I don't know.
- 8:05Speaker 1: Could a space time interval be the point where one
- 8:09Speaker 1: max plank length ends and one begins.
- 8:13Speaker 5: I'm not sure a space time interval is the required
- 8:16Speaker 5: time frame between semi convincing scientific mumbo jumbo that you
- 8:21Speaker 5: hear on sci fi shows and movies. But seriously, maybe
- 8:25Speaker 5: it's some form of the smallest unit of space time
- 8:30Speaker 5: length and distance, kind of almost a singularity, but not quite.
- 8:35Speaker 4: I've never actually heard the term space time interval before,
- 8:38Speaker 4: but guessing from context, I would imagine a space time
- 8:42Speaker 4: interval is one like frame of the universe. So you know,
- 8:49Speaker 4: you move forward one unit of time and look at
- 8:53Speaker 4: the way everything else changed. That's one interval of space type.
- 8:56Speaker 3: All right, Daniel, I asked a question that belied my ignorance,
- 9:00Speaker 3: and so I'm not going to even attempt to say
- 9:03Speaker 3: if I think the audience was correct or not with
- 9:07Speaker 3: this question. How close were they?
- 9:09Speaker 1: Pretty much? Zero points all around? A few points for
- 9:13Speaker 1: people thinking this is a kind of distance, because that's
- 9:16Speaker 1: the closest. It has nothing to do with the plank
- 9:19Speaker 1: length or frames of the universe or minimum distances or
- 9:24Speaker 1: anything like that. It's really an analog to what we
- 9:27Speaker 1: think of as distance, but now in four dimensional space
- 9:31Speaker 1: time with an uncomfortable twist in it. That we're going
- 9:34Speaker 1: to get.
- 9:34Speaker 3: To good news everybody. We all need this episode. So
- 9:39Speaker 3: here we go, and we are going to start from
- 9:42Speaker 3: the beginning, because clearly Kelly needs to go back to
- 9:44Speaker 3: first principles. So what I want you to explain to me, Daniel?
- 9:48Speaker 3: So space time sounds like space and time and distance,
- 9:51Speaker 3: and there's like, so what is distance? Let's start there.
- 9:56Speaker 1: Yeah, let's build our intuition with stuff that makes sense
- 9:58Speaker 1: to us. And let's start easy. Let's start in one dimension, right.
- 10:02Speaker 1: So imagine, for example, you have a pencil and you
- 10:06Speaker 1: have a ruler, and you want to know how long
- 10:09Speaker 1: is my pencil? What do you do? Well, you put
- 10:11Speaker 1: it along the ruler. You're operating in one dimension, right,
- 10:14Speaker 1: So the pencil and the ruler are lined up, and
- 10:16Speaker 1: you say, well, the back of the pencil, you know,
- 10:19Speaker 1: is that two centimeters on the ruler, and the front
- 10:21Speaker 1: of the pencil is that eight centimeters on the ruler.
- 10:23Speaker 1: And then you subtract it's like eight minus two six
- 10:26Speaker 1: centimeters long.
- 10:27Speaker 3: I don't know why you wouldn't just put it at
- 10:28Speaker 3: the beginning of the ruler and then you don't have
- 10:30Speaker 3: to do any subtraction.
- 10:32Speaker 1: Exactly. You could put it at the beginning of the
- 10:33Speaker 1: ruler so that you get zero and six. But what
- 10:37Speaker 1: happens You get the same answer, right, if you put
- 10:39Speaker 1: the pencil at the beginning or if you slide it along,
- 10:41Speaker 1: It doesn't matter. The answer you get does not depend
- 10:44Speaker 1: on where on the ruler of your pencil is. Right,
- 10:47Speaker 1: It's invariant. Okay, that's cool. That all makes sense. It's
- 10:50Speaker 1: makes so much sense. It's kind of blindingly obvious, which
- 10:53Speaker 1: is where we want to begin, right with, like firmly
- 10:55Speaker 1: grounded in our intuition.
- 10:56Speaker 3: This is very comforting, unlike the crusher.
- 11:01Speaker 1: Okay, so why do you keep bringing that up? Kelly?
- 11:04Speaker 1: You just like I don't want to throw me off.
- 11:06Speaker 3: I wasn't going to mention it on this episode, but
- 11:09Speaker 3: you brought it up because you did the whole crushing
- 11:12Speaker 3: thing on the video before the episode, And now there's
- 11:14Speaker 3: nothing else in my mind.
- 11:15Speaker 1: I'm trying to get space time in my brain, but
- 11:18Speaker 1: that's all I can see you.
- 11:19Speaker 3: I'm so sorry. I'm sorry.
- 11:22Speaker 1: It's fine, all right. So now let's go to two dimensions.
- 11:26Speaker 1: How do things change? Well, imagine you have like a
- 11:28Speaker 1: piece of graph paper and the little squares on the
- 11:30Speaker 1: graph paper are one centimeter by one centimeter, and you
- 11:34Speaker 1: drop your pencil onto the graph paper and ask you
- 11:36Speaker 1: how long is your pencil? So how do you figure
- 11:39Speaker 1: out how far it is from one side of the
- 11:41Speaker 1: pencil to the other.
- 11:43Speaker 3: But the Agrean theorem.
- 11:45Speaker 1: Yes exactly, So you say, well, how many squares does
- 11:49Speaker 1: it cross in one direction and how many squares in
- 11:51Speaker 1: the other? Direction, and now you have a right triangle
- 11:54Speaker 1: where the pencil is the hyphpot news right, it's the
- 11:56Speaker 1: long part of the right triangle, and we can calculate
- 11:59Speaker 1: one side because it's just counting squares. We can calculate
- 12:02Speaker 1: the length may the other side just counting squares, and
- 12:05Speaker 1: then the diagonal, which is the length of the pencil.
- 12:07Speaker 1: That's the Pythagorean theorem. Right, So a squared plus b
- 12:10Speaker 1: squared equal c square. Boom, we have an answer. And
- 12:14Speaker 1: just like in the one dimensional case, it doesn't matter
- 12:17Speaker 1: where the pencil was on the graph paper. If you
- 12:20Speaker 1: dropped it in a different direction, you might have gotten
- 12:23Speaker 1: more squares on one side and few or on the other,
- 12:26Speaker 1: but the answer wouldn't change. Or even if by chance
- 12:29Speaker 1: you happen to drop the pencil so it liigned up
- 12:31Speaker 1: perfectly in one direction right like along the X axis
- 12:35Speaker 1: conceptually right, then it's basically back to the one dimensional
- 12:38Speaker 1: problem or the other axis. The point is in this picture,
- 12:43Speaker 1: distance is real. It's invariant. It does not depend on
- 12:47Speaker 1: where you drop the pencil, or like the size of
- 12:49Speaker 1: these squares, if you made them two centimeters or five centimeters,
- 12:52Speaker 1: or like a furlong or whatever. All those are just
- 12:55Speaker 1: arbitrary choices humans have imposed. The pencil distance is the real.
- 13:00Speaker 3: Thing, right, Yes, this is very comforting. Can we stay
- 13:04Speaker 3: here for the rest of the episode. No, let's push
- 13:07Speaker 3: our boundaries.
- 13:08Speaker 1: Let's keep going, all right, And so now it's easy
- 13:11Speaker 1: to imagine how we might extend this to three dimensions,
- 13:14Speaker 1: or really any number of dimensions. Like if you have
- 13:17Speaker 1: your pencil and it's not on the paper, but it's
- 13:20Speaker 1: like floating in space. We're on the space station now, right,
- 13:23Speaker 1: and the pencils floating in space, and you imagine like
- 13:26Speaker 1: not graph paper, but like laser lines through space, and
- 13:29Speaker 1: you want to measure how long is it from one
- 13:31Speaker 1: edge of my pencil to the other. Well, you play
- 13:33Speaker 1: the same game, but now you have three directions of
- 13:36Speaker 1: counting squares and you can still do the pythagoranth theorem.
- 13:39Speaker 1: It's just A squared plus B squared plus C squared
- 13:42Speaker 1: equals D squared. Right, it's the same game fundamentally that
- 13:45Speaker 1: the geometry has not changed because the nature of these
- 13:48Speaker 1: dimensions are all the same, And so we can just
- 13:50Speaker 1: keep doing this. And if you wanted to work in
- 13:53Speaker 1: eleven dimensional space or twenty six dimensional space, the concept
- 13:56Speaker 1: of distance wouldn't change mathematically or in intuitively, because the
- 14:01Speaker 1: distance is the real thing, right, Everything else is just bookkeeping.
- 14:05Speaker 3: Okay, So I'm trying to imagine a pencil floating in space,
- 14:09Speaker 3: and now a squared plus B squared plus b squared
- 14:12Speaker 3: equals the length of the pencil squared. Yeah, my gut
- 14:16Speaker 3: feels like the more dimensions you add, the bigger the
- 14:19Speaker 3: pencil's going to get because you've got all these extra
- 14:21Speaker 3: squared terms that are gonna keep getting added. But that's
- 14:25Speaker 3: not true because why.
- 14:28Speaker 1: Yeah, that's not true because the pencil is a certain length,
- 14:31Speaker 1: and if you add squares in one of the dimensions,
- 14:35Speaker 1: the other ones will shrink. Okay, Just like if the
- 14:37Speaker 1: pencil falls to the floor and it's now on a
- 14:39Speaker 1: two dimensional surface, you only have two contributions, or the
- 14:42Speaker 1: third one is just zero, right, and those are longer
- 14:46Speaker 1: than if it's floating up above the graph and it
- 14:49Speaker 1: gets a third dimension, the first two dimensions are going
- 14:51Speaker 1: to shrink a little bit. So they all act in
- 14:54Speaker 1: harmony to make sure the distance never changes. You like
- 14:57Speaker 1: flip a pencil from one astronaut to another se so
- 15:00Speaker 1: it's like rotating through space. You know, your intuition tells
- 15:03Speaker 1: you the length of the pencil is not changing. The
- 15:06Speaker 1: difference between its front and its back along some axis
- 15:10Speaker 1: might change, right, it might go up and down and
- 15:12Speaker 1: be negative or whatever, But the length of the pencil
- 15:14Speaker 1: doesn't change because all three dimensions are working in harmony
- 15:18Speaker 1: to contribute various pieces to the length, and it always
- 15:22Speaker 1: adds up to the same number. Because that's the physical thing.
- 15:25Speaker 1: Everything else is just bookkeeping. It wouldn't make sense if
- 15:28Speaker 1: the length of the pencil depended on like where the
- 15:31Speaker 1: graph paper was right, or which ruler you used. It's
- 15:34Speaker 1: a real thing in the universe.
- 15:36Speaker 3: All right. But I bet that if I were to say, Daniel,
- 15:40Speaker 3: you can travel a billion, a trillion, a quadrillion miles
- 15:44Speaker 3: away in any direction in space. What is it that
- 15:46Speaker 3: you want to see within that area? Everybody should know
- 15:50Speaker 3: what I'm talking about. Are you going to tell me
- 15:52Speaker 3: that something about that doesn't work? Like the pencil?
- 15:57Speaker 1: I see, you're asking me to be the physics sweat
- 15:59Speaker 1: blanket here.
- 16:00Speaker 3: I mean we have to take turns there, right.
- 16:04Speaker 1: Well, if you said I could go at quadrillion miles
- 16:08Speaker 1: with respect to Earth, then you've given me a frame
- 16:11Speaker 1: of reference. In which that is well defined. Okay, so yeah,
- 16:14Speaker 1: I could totally do that, all.
- 16:15Speaker 3: Right, that's what I should have asked anyway.
- 16:16Speaker 1: All right, moving on, and so we have three dimensions
- 16:20Speaker 1: of space. We're comfortable with the idea of distance in space. Cool,
- 16:24Speaker 1: let's put that aside for now and think about time.
- 16:27Speaker 1: Time is one dimensional, right, We don't have like two
- 16:31Speaker 1: clocks going on, we don't think, so it's actually a
- 16:33Speaker 1: super fun theory we can explore. And we did an
- 16:36Speaker 1: episode a couple of years ago about two dimensions of time.
- 16:39Speaker 1: But for now, let's just think about one dimension of time, right,
- 16:42Speaker 1: And so, for example, you can click your stop watch
- 16:45Speaker 1: when this episode starts and when the episode ends, and
- 16:47Speaker 1: you can ask how long is this episode of the
- 16:50Speaker 1: pod and you can look at the difference, and that's
- 16:52Speaker 1: the length, right, totally obvious, basic subtraction.
- 16:56Speaker 3: Perfect. Yes, for our poor audio guy, it probably feels
- 16:59Speaker 3: like an hour is infinite, but it is still just
- 17:02Speaker 3: an hour exactly.
- 17:03Speaker 1: And in the same way, it doesn't actually matter when
- 17:06Speaker 1: you hit the stopwatch to start, as long as you
- 17:09Speaker 1: noted when the episode started. If you'd accidentally hit your
- 17:11Speaker 1: stopwatch like an hour before, as long as you wrote down. Oh,
- 17:14Speaker 1: the episode started at one hour in you could still
- 17:17Speaker 1: measure the length of the episode by looking at the difference, right,
- 17:22Speaker 1: because when you started it is arbitrary. What you're interested
- 17:25Speaker 1: in is the physical thing, which is the difference between
- 17:28Speaker 1: the start and the end of the episode. So intervals
- 17:31Speaker 1: and time are also physical in that sense, right, They're real,
- 17:34Speaker 1: It's not just bookkeeping.
- 17:35Speaker 3: What does physical mean in this case? Like physical I
- 17:38Speaker 3: think of as something I can touch. Oh, I see,
- 17:41Speaker 3: you mean physics all.
- 17:44Speaker 1: I mean it's a part of the universe. It's not
- 17:46Speaker 1: part of our measurement system, and it's invariant in that way.
- 17:50Speaker 1: And here so far, all these definitions are in a
- 17:53Speaker 1: classical world, right before relativity. This is Newton's idea about
- 17:58Speaker 1: how time and distance were worked, Right, that anybody could
- 18:02Speaker 1: measure the difference between two things that happened in the
- 18:04Speaker 1: universe and the time difference or the space difference, and
- 18:08Speaker 1: they would always get the same answer. That's the way
- 18:10Speaker 1: Newton thoughts the universe worked, and that's the way I
- 18:12Speaker 1: operate and you operate. And this whole segment of the
- 18:15Speaker 1: pod has been like, let's confirm our intuition about how
- 18:18Speaker 1: distances work and that's all very comforting until we learn
- 18:22Speaker 1: that it's all wrong.
- 18:24Speaker 3: Oh no, you pulled the soft blanket of Newtonian physics off. Yeah,
- 18:29Speaker 3: and now it's cold and unwelcoming. Let's take a break
- 18:34Speaker 3: before we have to sit with our discomfort for too long.
- 18:37Speaker 3: And when we get back, we'll hear what Einstein had
- 18:39Speaker 3: to add. And we're back. We had a very comforting
- 19:02Speaker 3: discussion about distance and time where everything felt like it
- 19:05Speaker 3: made sense. And now we're at the point of the
- 19:07Speaker 3: episode where we are going to expand our brains and
- 19:10Speaker 3: learn something new. So all right, Daniel, make us uncomfortable,
- 19:13Speaker 3: all right, So not crusher level uncomfortable.
- 19:17Speaker 1: Well, in nineteen oh five, Einstein pulled out the metaphorical
- 19:20Speaker 1: crusher and he said to Newton, he said, you know,
- 19:23Speaker 1: put your theories in this, buddy, because here I come.
- 19:28Speaker 3: It took me a second. Sorry for the delay. I
- 19:31Speaker 3: was drinking water. It almost totally destroyed my computer.
- 19:34Speaker 1: All right, go on, and you know these intuitive notions
- 19:36Speaker 1: of how the universe works, they do work for us
- 19:39Speaker 1: at our basic level. But Einstein discovered that when speeds
- 19:43Speaker 1: get high relative speeds get high, then they don't work.
- 19:47Speaker 1: The universe is broken. It actually works in a fundamentally
- 19:50Speaker 1: different way. And it's important to understand where this comes from.
- 19:53Speaker 1: It all comes from the same source, which is the
- 19:56Speaker 1: fact that the speed of light is constant for all observed.
- 20:00Speaker 1: That is at the heart of everything. If you accept
- 20:04Speaker 1: that the speed of light is the same number no
- 20:06Speaker 1: matter who measures it, no matter how fast they are
- 20:09Speaker 1: moving with respect to like the flashlight that gave off
- 20:12Speaker 1: that beam, then you'll see that everything breaks. And we're
- 20:15Speaker 1: going to walk you through that and how it crushes
- 20:18Speaker 1: your intuition, all.
- 20:19Speaker 3: Right, crush away.
- 20:22Speaker 1: So imagine here's the setup. Kelly gives two flashlights to
- 20:25Speaker 1: her goats and puts those goats in a crate and
- 20:28Speaker 1: puts that crate on a self driving tractor to the
- 20:31Speaker 1: vet to you know, have their problems taken care of
- 20:34Speaker 1: with great anesthetic, of course, and very humanely good, all right.
- 20:39Speaker 1: And so they have two flashlights and one is pointed
- 20:42Speaker 1: towards the front of the crate and one is pointed
- 20:44Speaker 1: towards the back of the crate. Okay, and they turn
- 20:47Speaker 1: the flashlights on at the same moment, so they click
- 20:49Speaker 1: both buttons. And then we're interested in, like, well, how
- 20:53Speaker 1: long does it take for that beam of light to
- 20:55Speaker 1: hit the front of the crate versus the back of
- 20:57Speaker 1: the crate. So what would you say, Kelly ghost during
- 21:00Speaker 1: the center of the crate, they turn on both flashlights
- 21:02Speaker 1: at the same time. Do those beams reach the front
- 21:05Speaker 1: and the back of the crate at the same time? Yes?
- 21:07Speaker 1: Or no?
- 21:08Speaker 3: I feel like they should. But it's moving forward, right,
- 21:13Speaker 3: and so does that mess up the answer?
- 21:15Speaker 1: That's very good intuition. But we're asking right now from
- 21:17Speaker 1: the goat's point of view, right, So, yes, the goat
- 21:20Speaker 1: is in the crate, and it's on the back of
- 21:23Speaker 1: the self driving tractor and it's driving itself towards the vet.
- 21:26Speaker 1: But the goat doesn't know how fast the tractor is
- 21:29Speaker 1: moving relative to you. You're outside the tractor. It's inside
- 21:32Speaker 1: the crate, and the crate is not moving with respect
- 21:34Speaker 1: to the goat.
- 21:35Speaker 3: Okay, so it reaches the front and the back at
- 21:37Speaker 3: the same time.
- 21:38Speaker 1: Yes, you're exactly right. The goat says that the light
- 21:41Speaker 1: reaches the front and the back at the same time,
- 21:43Speaker 1: and that makes perfect sense because it's going at light
- 21:45Speaker 1: speed forward and light speed backwards, and it hits the
- 21:48Speaker 1: front and the back, which are the same distance. Away
- 21:50Speaker 1: in the same time. Distance is great, time's time, very simple, right,
- 21:54Speaker 1: nothing complicated, that's right, all right. But Kelly is also watching.
- 21:58Speaker 1: She sent the goats this self driving tractor, and she
- 22:01Speaker 1: doesn't want them to get hurt, except maybe get crushed
- 22:04Speaker 1: when they get there. But she's paying attention to what happened.
- 22:07Speaker 1: And for her, unlike the goats who see the walls
- 22:10Speaker 1: of the crate at rest, for Kelly, the crate is
- 22:13Speaker 1: moving forward, and she says, hold on a second. I
- 22:17Speaker 1: also see light traveling at the speed of light forwards
- 22:21Speaker 1: and at the speed of light backwards. But I see
- 22:23Speaker 1: the front of the crate is moving forward from the
- 22:25Speaker 1: point where the light was emanated, so it's moving away
- 22:29Speaker 1: from the source at the same time as the light
- 22:31Speaker 1: is chasing it, so it takes longer. And the back
- 22:34Speaker 1: of the crate you see, moving towards where the light
- 22:37Speaker 1: was emitted, so that distance is effectively shorter. And so
- 22:40Speaker 1: you say, no, no, no. The light hits the back
- 22:43Speaker 1: of the crate first and the front of the crate second.
- 22:46Speaker 3: And then I look at the goats and I say,
- 22:47Speaker 3: you guys are bad at this.
- 22:50Speaker 1: And meanwhile, Zach, who's in his ferrari is zipping by
- 22:53Speaker 1: it one hundred miles an hour to do who knows what.
- 22:55Speaker 1: And he says, I see the opposite right, because from
- 22:59Speaker 1: his point of view, the crate is going backwards, and
- 23:02Speaker 1: so he says, no, no, the back of the crate
- 23:04Speaker 1: is running away from the light and the front of
- 23:06Speaker 1: the crate is moving towards the light. So Zach sees
- 23:10Speaker 1: the front of the crate get hit before the back
- 23:12Speaker 1: of the crate.
- 23:13Speaker 3: Ever since that lucrative Dorito sponsorship, he's been able to
- 23:16Speaker 3: afford fast cars.
- 23:20Speaker 1: Exactly, And so even though he's got one hand in
- 23:23Speaker 1: the Dorito's bag and one hand on the wheel, he's
- 23:25Speaker 1: able to make these measurements. And so what's going on here?
- 23:29Speaker 1: The issue comes down to the fact that everybody, the goat, Zach,
- 23:32Speaker 1: and Kelly all see light moving at the same speed,
- 23:35Speaker 1: no matter what. If you replicated this experiment with sound
- 23:38Speaker 1: instead of with light, then everybody would agree on what happened.
- 23:43Speaker 1: Why is that because the speed of sound is not
- 23:45Speaker 1: the same for all observers, Like if the goats are bleeding,
- 23:49Speaker 1: if they're going back inside the crate, then they're going
- 23:53Speaker 1: to see their sound hit the front in the back
- 23:55Speaker 1: of the same time, Kelly, who sees the crate moving,
- 23:59Speaker 1: is going to see the sound going forward faster than
- 24:02Speaker 1: it's going backwards, because the sound is moving with the
- 24:05Speaker 1: same speed with respect to the air in the crate,
- 24:08Speaker 1: and so like, if Zack has a speed relative to
- 24:10Speaker 1: that air or Kelly has a speed relative to that air,
- 24:13Speaker 1: then they see the sound moving at different speeds. Right,
- 24:16Speaker 1: So the front and the back move at different speeds,
- 24:18Speaker 1: which accounts for everything and closes the loop. So, because
- 24:22Speaker 1: light moves at the same speed with respect to all observers,
- 24:25Speaker 1: everybody sees light moving forwards or backwards at the same speed,
- 24:29Speaker 1: even if they have velocity relative to the goats. Then
- 24:33Speaker 1: that's why people see things happen in different orders, right,
- 24:36Speaker 1: That's why they can't agree on whether the light hits
- 24:38Speaker 1: the front or the back of the crate at the
- 24:40Speaker 1: same time. So the takeaway here is the fact that
- 24:44Speaker 1: the speed of light is constant for everybody. Breaks this
- 24:47Speaker 1: notion of simultaneity that if two things happen at the
- 24:50Speaker 1: same time for Kelly, they also happen at the same
- 24:52Speaker 1: time for the goats, and they happen at the same
- 24:54Speaker 1: time for Zack or for anybody else. Paying attention. That's
- 24:57Speaker 1: no longer true because of this one crucial fact that
- 25:02Speaker 1: the speed of light is the same for all observers.
- 25:05Speaker 3: I don't like it, but I accept it. It's confusing,
- 25:09Speaker 3: it's not confusing. You explained it clearly. It remains sort
- 25:12Speaker 3: of counterintuitive. It is, but I followed that explanation. I'm
- 25:16Speaker 3: with you.
- 25:17Speaker 1: It is, and it's somehow reassuring if you know where
- 25:19Speaker 1: it comes from, like it comes from this speed of
- 25:22Speaker 1: light fact. It's not just some like arbitrary thing about
- 25:25Speaker 1: the universe. In fact, in order for the universe to
- 25:29Speaker 1: make sense, to accommodate this speed of light being universal,
- 25:33Speaker 1: time has to not be universal for everybody. It doesn't
- 25:35Speaker 1: make sense for time to be universal. And this is
- 25:39Speaker 1: why we have things like time dilation. Right when we
- 25:42Speaker 1: say moving clocks run slow, it's really another statement of
- 25:46Speaker 1: the same thing. If I see somebody in a spaceship
- 25:49Speaker 1: and they have a clock and they're moving at half
- 25:51Speaker 1: the speed of light relative to me, I will see
- 25:53Speaker 1: their clock ticking slowly, and they will see my clock
- 25:55Speaker 1: ticking slowly. And all of the surprising counterintuitive facts about
- 25:59Speaker 1: relativetivity come from this one fact that the speed of
- 26:03Speaker 1: light is constant for all observers, which means simultaneidi is
- 26:06Speaker 1: not universal, which means clocks run slow or fast depending
- 26:11Speaker 1: on your speed relative to them. And so what that
- 26:13Speaker 1: means is what we said earlier about how everybody will
- 26:16Speaker 1: agree about how long the podcast is. That is not true.
- 26:19Speaker 1: What the distance in time between two events is not universal.
- 26:24Speaker 1: And it's not just because somebody is listening to the
- 26:26Speaker 1: pod at one point five X or whatever, or at
- 26:29Speaker 1: half X because we talked too fast or whatever. It's
- 26:31Speaker 1: because for them, clocks run faster or slower depending on
- 26:35Speaker 1: their velocity relative to them.
- 26:37Speaker 3: Okay, so it can be nearly infinite for Matt when
- 26:40Speaker 3: he's editing our.
- 26:41Speaker 1: Episodes, depending on his velocity with respective of the equipment.
- 26:46Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly.
- 26:47Speaker 3: So we've gone over all of this in the past,
- 26:50Speaker 3: which i'm and i'm it is always useful to go
- 26:53Speaker 3: over this again, especially when your co host is as
- 26:56Speaker 3: smart as a rock. But when do we get to
- 26:59Speaker 3: how this right is different?
- 27:00Speaker 1: So remember at the end of last segment we were
- 27:02Speaker 1: saying distance in time and classical physics are physical, and
- 27:05Speaker 1: we're like, what does physical mean? And I'm saying it's
- 27:07Speaker 1: it's a part of the universe. It doesn't depend on
- 27:10Speaker 1: where your graph paper is or who's doing the measurement.
- 27:13Speaker 1: It's a real thing everybody should agree on. Now we're
- 27:16Speaker 1: saying that's not true. Right. Time is not universal, it's
- 27:19Speaker 1: not physical, it's observer dependent. It does depend on where
- 27:22Speaker 1: you put the graph paper. It does depend on how
- 27:24Speaker 1: fast the graph paper is going. So now we're sort
- 27:26Speaker 1: of unmoored. We're like, oh no, what's real out there
- 27:29Speaker 1: in the universe.
- 27:30Speaker 3: Daniel was gaslating this.
- 27:32Speaker 1: So what we're going to get to is that time
- 27:35Speaker 1: is broken and space is broken, but we can put
- 27:37Speaker 1: them back together. And there is a concept of distance
- 27:41Speaker 1: in space time which is called the space time interval,
- 27:44Speaker 1: which is physical, which is real, which everybody can agree about.
- 27:48Speaker 1: So don't worry. We're going to get there. Yes, we've
- 27:51Speaker 1: just broken time and we're going to use that to
- 27:53Speaker 1: break space and then we're going to put them back
- 27:55Speaker 1: together with super glue.
- 27:57Speaker 3: Awesome, All right, now let's talk about space then.
- 28:00Speaker 1: Yeah. So remember we were saying earlier, like the length
- 28:03Speaker 1: of the pencil, that's physical. It doesn't matter if it's rotating,
- 28:05Speaker 1: it doesn't matter if your graph is moving, it doesn't
- 28:07Speaker 1: matter what rule you use. It is a number and
- 28:10Speaker 1: everybody should agree on it.
- 28:11Speaker 2: Right.
- 28:12Speaker 1: Well, it turns out that's not true, and it's for
- 28:15Speaker 1: the same fundamental reason that the speed of light is universal,
- 28:18Speaker 1: which breaks time, which is then going to break distance.
- 28:21Speaker 1: Because think about how we measure distance. How do we
- 28:25Speaker 1: measure distance? Is you measure where the back end of
- 28:27Speaker 1: the pencil is, and you measure where the front end
- 28:29Speaker 1: of the pencil is, and then you subtract. Very basic, right,
- 28:32Speaker 1: How could that go wrong? How could that depend on
- 28:35Speaker 1: clocks in any way? Well, implicit in that definition is
- 28:39Speaker 1: I'm measuring the back and the front end of the
- 28:41Speaker 1: pencil at the same time. Because if the pencil is
- 28:44Speaker 1: moving and I measure the back end of the pencil
- 28:46Speaker 1: now in the front end of the pencil later, then
- 28:49Speaker 1: I'm going to get two numbers that are much further apart,
- 28:51Speaker 1: and the pencil is going to look too long, right,
- 28:53Speaker 1: And so I have to measure the front in the
- 28:55Speaker 1: back at the same time.
- 28:57Speaker 3: And you can't cheap by saying I'm in the track
- 29:00Speaker 3: the tractors moving forward. But I'm going to take a
- 29:02Speaker 3: picture of the pencil so that i can measure from
- 29:04Speaker 3: the front in the back at the same time. Now
- 29:06Speaker 3: you've got a different frame of reference because it's a picture,
- 29:09Speaker 3: and that's cheating, is that right?
- 29:10Speaker 1: Okay, yeah, great question. And I love the idea of
- 29:12Speaker 1: using a camera. The camera actually makes this more complicated
- 29:15Speaker 1: instead of simpler, because now you have the additional issue
- 29:19Speaker 1: of how long did it take the information to arrive
- 29:23Speaker 1: from the back or the front of the pencil to
- 29:26Speaker 1: the camera, And if your camera is not like centered
- 29:28Speaker 1: along the pencil, then you're going to get like out
- 29:30Speaker 1: of date information in one direction. And usually when we
- 29:33Speaker 1: talk about special relativity, we try to remove all of
- 29:35Speaker 1: those effects, the effect of light traveling from the event
- 29:39Speaker 1: to the observer, because that's a completely separate, different kind
- 29:43Speaker 1: of effect, and so all the things we're talking about
- 29:45Speaker 1: today assume that basically you have an infinite number of
- 29:49Speaker 1: observers at every location who can always measure things locally,
- 29:52Speaker 1: so there's no time delay due to the speed of light.
- 29:55Speaker 1: So the camera is really tempting, but it actually adds
- 29:58Speaker 1: a bunch of confusion, and we can dig into special relativity,
- 30:00Speaker 1: including those time delays, but it's sort of like a.
- 30:02Speaker 3: Different rabbit hole, all right, different episode.
- 30:04Speaker 1: So let's instead say Kelly has two goats, and she
- 30:08Speaker 1: can measure the front and back of the pencil with
- 30:10Speaker 1: her two goat assistants, and they record, you know where
- 30:14Speaker 1: on the ruler it was, and then she subtracts it
- 30:16Speaker 1: and she gets a number.
- 30:17Speaker 3: Right, thanks short Bread and Newman.
- 30:19Speaker 1: No, that's right. But Zack is watching from his ferrari
- 30:22Speaker 1: and he says, look, one goat was off. Your goats
- 30:25Speaker 1: didn't measure the front in the back of the same time.
- 30:28Speaker 1: Because remember Zach doesn't think two things happening at the
- 30:31Speaker 1: same time for Kelly are happening at the same time
- 30:33Speaker 1: for him.
- 30:34Speaker 3: Typical.
- 30:37Speaker 1: So see how the speed of light being constant breaks
- 30:40Speaker 1: the universality of simultaneti, which breaks the universality of distance. Right,
- 30:45Speaker 1: people disagree about when you measure the front and when
- 30:48Speaker 1: you measure the back, and that changes you measured distance
- 30:52Speaker 1: of these things. So you give just one more simple example.
- 30:55Speaker 1: Go back to the pencil. If you measured the back
- 30:58Speaker 1: of the pencil to be a two centimeter and the
- 31:00Speaker 1: front to be eight centimeters, so you said it was
- 31:02Speaker 1: six centimeters long eight minus two. But what if the
- 31:05Speaker 1: pencil was moving and you had measured the front before
- 31:09Speaker 1: you measured the back, not at the same time. Then
- 31:12Speaker 1: the reason the pencil is that eight centimeters when you
- 31:14Speaker 1: measured it is because it moved. So because different people
- 31:19Speaker 1: disagree about what at the same time means. Because speed
- 31:23Speaker 1: breaks simultaneity, then people disagree about when to measure the
- 31:28Speaker 1: front and the back, and so they disagree about length
- 31:31Speaker 1: because length depends on simultaneity. That's why breaking time also
- 31:37Speaker 1: breaks distance.
- 31:39Speaker 3: All right, So we can't depend on time, we can't
- 31:41Speaker 3: depend on distance.
- 31:43Speaker 1: Yeah, so all of these things are now broken. Right.
- 31:46Speaker 1: Einstein revealed that time is not universal, space is not universal.
- 31:50Speaker 1: So the comfortable footing we were on a few minutes
- 31:52Speaker 1: ago seems to have evaporated behind us, right, and so
- 31:56Speaker 1: who comes to the rescue but mass.
- 31:59Speaker 3: Price math proffs, all right, none of us come to
- 32:06Speaker 3: DKAU to be comfortable. We come here to be challenged.
- 32:09Speaker 3: So tell me what the math proff had to say.
- 32:12Speaker 1: So this is after Einstein had introduced special relativity, which
- 32:15Speaker 1: showed us that distance is not universal, that time is
- 32:18Speaker 1: not universal. Right, and so then Hermann Minkowski, who's famous
- 32:23Speaker 1: for introducing this concept of Minkowski space, and he was
- 32:26Speaker 1: a math professor. He actually taught Einstein and Einstein famously
- 32:30Speaker 1: skipped some of his lectures, and Minkowski thought Einstein was
- 32:33Speaker 1: a quote lazy dog. Anyway, So Minkowski gives this talk
- 32:40Speaker 1: a few years later, and he starts off with his
- 32:43Speaker 1: famous line saying, quote, henceforth, space by itself and time
- 32:48Speaker 1: by itself are doomed to fade away into mere shadows,
- 32:52Speaker 1: and only a kind of union of the two will
- 32:55Speaker 1: preserve an independent reality. So it's a famous line because
- 32:59Speaker 1: what he I'm saying is space is not real. Time
- 33:02Speaker 1: is not real by themselves. But you know what we
- 33:05Speaker 1: can do is we can link them together and build
- 33:08Speaker 1: something new which is physical, which is real, which we
- 33:12Speaker 1: can count on.
- 33:14Speaker 3: I think ninety nine percent of us can work without
- 33:17Speaker 3: space time. But I'm glad the physicists have space suns.
- 33:21Speaker 1: It's sort of like if you're studying elephants, you know,
- 33:24Speaker 1: and elephants are lined up, so you can either see
- 33:25Speaker 1: the head or the tail right, and you like measure
- 33:28Speaker 1: the number of heads, and you measure the number of
- 33:30Speaker 1: elephants tails, and you have no idea that heads and
- 33:32Speaker 1: tails are connected, and you're just like noting, Okay, today,
- 33:35Speaker 1: I see ninety heads and ten tails. You come back
- 33:37Speaker 1: tomorrow and you see sixty tails and forty heads, and
- 33:40Speaker 1: you're like, what is going on the number of elephant
- 33:42Speaker 1: heads is changing, the number of elephant tails is changing.
- 33:45Speaker 1: What is going on with these elephant heads and tails?
- 33:47Speaker 1: And then somebody comes along and tells you heads and tails,
- 33:51Speaker 1: neither of these are fundamental. They're at both parts of
- 33:53Speaker 1: the same thing. And what's really constant here is the
- 33:56Speaker 1: number of elephants, the sum of the heads and the tails.
- 33:59Speaker 1: At the elephant. They just turn around, and so you
- 34:01Speaker 1: can measure different numbers of heads or tails that you
- 34:04Speaker 1: can see, but that doesn't change the number of elephants.
- 34:08Speaker 1: That's what's physical, what's real, And that's what Minkowski did.
- 34:11Speaker 1: He said, let me bring space and time together. The
- 34:15Speaker 1: reason space looks broken and the reason time looks broken
- 34:18Speaker 1: is that you're just looking at one part of a
- 34:20Speaker 1: larger object that's rotating. So as you see space changing,
- 34:24Speaker 1: time is changing in a way that's compensating for space changing.
- 34:28Speaker 1: You're just not paying attention to it. It's sort of
- 34:30Speaker 1: like your question earlier about the pencil in three dimensional space, right,
- 34:34Speaker 1: You're like, if the pencil floats up from the graph
- 34:36Speaker 1: paper and now it has three dimensions instead of two.
- 34:39Speaker 1: How do I know that those two dimensions are compensating
- 34:42Speaker 1: correctly to make sure the distance is the same. A
- 34:46Speaker 1: two dimensional physicist who only could see like two of
- 34:49Speaker 1: those dimensions. As the pencil floats up, he would say, no,
- 34:51Speaker 1: the pencil is getting shorter. You'd be like, that's just
- 34:54Speaker 1: because you forgot to account for the third dimension. Right,
- 34:56Speaker 1: the pencil is the same length. That's what's happening here.
- 35:00Speaker 1: Spa may be getting weird and short, but time is
- 35:02Speaker 1: out there compensating for it. So if we put space
- 35:04Speaker 1: and time together in some way, then we can build
- 35:08Speaker 1: a new sense of distance, which really is universal, which
- 35:12Speaker 1: really is invariant, which really is physical.
- 35:15Speaker 3: Well, One, I love when you recontextualize my dumb questions
- 35:19Speaker 3: to make them seem insightful, much appreciated. And two, let's
- 35:23Speaker 3: take some time to think about space. And we're going
- 35:25Speaker 3: to take a break, and when we get back, Daniel
- 35:27Speaker 3: is going to really dig in to what a space
- 35:30Speaker 3: time interval is. All Right, we are having fun at
- 35:53Speaker 3: this space in this time, and Daniel is going to
- 35:56Speaker 3: help us understand the complicated concept that is space time interval.
- 36:00Speaker 3: So space and time makes sense for all of us again.
- 36:03Speaker 1: All right, so we are building space time. We have
- 36:06Speaker 1: three dimensions. We want to add time to it. Earlier
- 36:09Speaker 1: I said, it's no big deal to add more dimensions.
- 36:12Speaker 1: You can just add them to our Pythagorea and theorem. Right,
- 36:15Speaker 1: you have X squarre plus y squared. No problem, we
- 36:17Speaker 1: can add z squared. It's all cozy, it's all happy,
- 36:20Speaker 1: it's easy. So probably you're thinking, great, now we just
- 36:23Speaker 1: have to add time. We have X squared plus y
- 36:26Speaker 1: squared plus D squared plus t squared. Right, Yes, Minkowski says, no,
- 36:32Speaker 1: that's wrong. We do have to account for time, but
- 36:35Speaker 1: time enters with a negative. So the concept of a
- 36:39Speaker 1: space time interval is distance in space minus the distance
- 36:44Speaker 1: in time. It's x squared plus y squared plus z
- 36:47Speaker 1: squared minus t squared. What this weird negative sign? Yes, exactly,
- 36:53Speaker 1: all right, So.
- 36:53Speaker 3: I'm thinking about the lights in the box. I'm thinking
- 36:56Speaker 3: about my goats in the box. Do subtracting time depend
- 36:59Speaker 3: on like what distance you're moving in because, like I'm imagining,
- 37:04Speaker 3: you know, when we measured the pencil and the distance
- 37:06Speaker 3: was shorter because you had been moving in a certain direction.
- 37:09Speaker 3: Does that have anything to do with why time is
- 37:11Speaker 3: negative or is my intuition yet again totally off here.
- 37:16Speaker 1: Now your intuition is right on. It all comes from
- 37:19Speaker 1: the same origin of how space and time connect to
- 37:22Speaker 1: each other, which is fundamentally because of how the speed
- 37:26Speaker 1: of light is invariant for all observers. But there's a
- 37:30Speaker 1: little bit of a twist here. What we're building, this
- 37:32Speaker 1: space time interval is not exactly like a four dimensional
- 37:36Speaker 1: analog of distance, right, It's not like how far apart
- 37:40Speaker 1: these two points are. So let's make that explicitly. Say
- 37:43Speaker 1: what are we talking about here? What is it space
- 37:45Speaker 1: time interval? Imagine you have some event, So a goat
- 37:48Speaker 1: is born, that happens at a location and a time.
- 37:51Speaker 3: Yay, we all celebrate.
- 37:52Speaker 1: And you have another event, a goat is crushed. Right,
- 37:56Speaker 1: That happens at some location and at some time. Right,
- 38:00Speaker 1: And we can talk about the distance between those two events. Right,
- 38:03Speaker 1: Maybe the goat was born in Kelly's farm and the
- 38:05Speaker 1: goat was crushed at the vet. There's a certain distance there,
- 38:08Speaker 1: and we can talk about the time interval between those two. Right,
- 38:12Speaker 1: the goat was born and three weeks later it was
- 38:14Speaker 1: crushed or whatever. Now we can also talk about the
- 38:17Speaker 1: space time interval between those two events, those space time events,
- 38:21Speaker 1: and now four dimensional coordinates in space time, we can
- 38:24Speaker 1: talk about the space time interval, and that has the
- 38:28Speaker 1: distance component and the time component, but in a negative, right,
- 38:32Speaker 1: So the time adds in a negative. It's not just
- 38:34Speaker 1: like a straight up distance. And you might think, well,
- 38:37Speaker 1: why would you do that? Why would you add the negative?
- 38:40Speaker 1: That doesn't give me some concept of distance? Now, it's
- 38:43Speaker 1: like space and time playing off each other, right, Well,
- 38:46Speaker 1: the reason is that that's the physical thing. That's what
- 38:48Speaker 1: the universe wants. That's the thing that's invariant. If I
- 38:52Speaker 1: calculate the distance in space and I calculate the distance
- 38:55Speaker 1: in time, from my point of view, I'm going to
- 38:57Speaker 1: get a number for the interval. Does it, She's going
- 39:00Speaker 1: to get the same number. If Zach and his Ferrari
- 39:03Speaker 1: does it, he's going to get the same number. We're
- 39:05Speaker 1: all going to disagree on distances, we're all going to
- 39:08Speaker 1: disagree on times, but when we put them together into
- 39:10Speaker 1: the space time interval, we're all going to get the
- 39:12Speaker 1: same number. The same way that, like the pencil has
- 39:15Speaker 1: a length in space, it doesn't matter right who's measuring
- 39:19Speaker 1: it or how it's rotating or whatever. The space time
- 39:22Speaker 1: interval is the physical thing in space time. It's what
- 39:25Speaker 1: the universe respects. So us little humans we want senses
- 39:29Speaker 1: of distance, and we'd love to add time to space
- 39:32Speaker 1: with a positive number, so we have like a four
- 39:34Speaker 1: dimensional pythagorea in theorem. But no, the universe says this
- 39:38Speaker 1: is the thing that's important.
- 39:40Speaker 3: Is it reasonable to think about it as like distance
- 39:43Speaker 3: standardized by time or not quite? I feel like the
- 39:46Speaker 3: answer is not quite right.
- 39:48Speaker 1: So we've answered one question, which is like what is
- 39:50Speaker 1: the space time interval. It's this weird mathematical construction where
- 39:54Speaker 1: you have space and time playing against each other. And
- 39:56Speaker 1: we've said it's important because the universe respects it. Now
- 40:00Speaker 1: the question is like, well what is this thing? Right?
- 40:03Speaker 1: Like what do I do with this thing? How do
- 40:05Speaker 1: I think about it? So it's not a distance again
- 40:08Speaker 1: because time is playing in the interval. The way to
- 40:11Speaker 1: think about it is causal separation, right, because there are
- 40:15Speaker 1: three different kinds of space time intervals. You can have
- 40:19Speaker 1: a space time interval that's zero, which is what we
- 40:22Speaker 1: call light light, and that's when the space and the
- 40:24Speaker 1: time balance each other. So like the distance minus the
- 40:28Speaker 1: time because you have a positive and negative they can
- 40:30Speaker 1: be zero. Two events have a space time interval of
- 40:34Speaker 1: zero if light can leave one and arrive at the other.
- 40:37Speaker 1: So for example, Kelly turns on a flashlight and then
- 40:41Speaker 1: the flashlight arrives at the end of a barn. Those
- 40:44Speaker 1: two events have a zero spacetime interval because they're exactly
- 40:49Speaker 1: causally connected. Right the interval between them is exactly how
- 40:53Speaker 1: long it would take light to go from one to
- 40:55Speaker 1: the other. So events have zero space time intervals if
- 40:58Speaker 1: they are perfectly causally linked, just enough time and not
- 41:02Speaker 1: too much a message. Departing and arriving are two space
- 41:07Speaker 1: time events with zero space time interval. They have a
- 41:11Speaker 1: distance in space and a distance in time, but those
- 41:15Speaker 1: balance to give no interval. Events that have a zero
- 41:18Speaker 1: space time interval from you are events that you can
- 41:22Speaker 1: exactly reach with your beam of light. Close by things
- 41:26Speaker 1: in the near future have a zero space time interval.
- 41:28Speaker 1: Far away things in the far future. It's basically your
- 41:32Speaker 1: forward light cone. Okay, you can also have positive space
- 41:36Speaker 1: time intervals right So, for example, Andromeda right now is
- 41:41Speaker 1: too far away for us to affect it causally, Kelly
- 41:44Speaker 1: turns on her death ray from her farm. She cannot
- 41:47Speaker 1: zap in the aliens in Andromeda right now because the
- 41:50Speaker 1: death ray is still traveling there. So the distance between
- 41:53Speaker 1: Kelly's farm and Andromeda has a positive space time interval.
- 41:58Speaker 1: It's outside the realm of anything she can influence because
- 42:03Speaker 1: her death ray, which with the speed of light, can't
- 42:05Speaker 1: reach it until the future. Even moving at the speed
- 42:08Speaker 1: of light is not fast enough. It's just too far away.
- 42:11Speaker 3: But so when I'm standing in a barn, I turn
- 42:13Speaker 3: on my flashlight and the light hits the opposite wall.
- 42:17Speaker 3: That happens in the future too, but it's just a
- 42:19Speaker 3: shorter future.
- 42:20Speaker 1: It happens in the future. But you're right, it's a
- 42:21Speaker 1: shorter future. And so you can imagine. We talk sometimes
- 42:24Speaker 1: about a light cone. Right, think about the future that
- 42:26Speaker 1: you can influence. Okay, you can influence exactly where you
- 42:30Speaker 1: are right now, or you can influence things that are
- 42:34Speaker 1: one light second away in one light second, or things
- 42:37Speaker 1: that are one light year away in a year. Right,
- 42:41Speaker 1: that's your future light cone. That light cone has space
- 42:45Speaker 1: time interval of zero because the speed of light is
- 42:47Speaker 1: the same for all observers. Everybody agrees on what Kelly's
- 42:50Speaker 1: light cone is you turn on the flashlight and it
- 42:53Speaker 1: does hit the side of the barn, and that event
- 42:56Speaker 1: where the light reaches the other side of the barn
- 42:59Speaker 1: is on your future l like cone. It's in your
- 43:02Speaker 1: causal reach. It has zero space time interval, and an
- 43:07Speaker 1: event much further away at that same moment is outside
- 43:11Speaker 1: your light cone. You can't affect it. Light doesn't have
- 43:14Speaker 1: time to reach it. It has a positive space time interval,
- 43:18Speaker 1: and everyone agrees on that. Unlike distance and time, the
- 43:22Speaker 1: space time interval is the invariant thing. Can Kelly zapp
- 43:27Speaker 1: this alien and when is a number everybody agrees on,
- 43:30Speaker 1: no matter where they are in the universe or how
- 43:32Speaker 1: fast they're going. Everything outside that cone, Kelly cannot zap.
- 43:37Speaker 1: It's beyond her causal reach. Everything within that cone has
- 43:41Speaker 1: a negative space time interval. So that's what the space
- 43:45Speaker 1: time interval is about. It's about what can you influence
- 43:48Speaker 1: where is your causal reach. Space time intervals that are
- 43:51Speaker 1: negative are time like things you can reach. Space time
- 43:55Speaker 1: intervals that are zero are where light will reach, and
- 43:57Speaker 1: space time intervals that are positive are outside of your reak.
- 44:01Speaker 1: You cannot influence them because life cannot get from you
- 44:04Speaker 1: to them in time. So it's sort of like a
- 44:08Speaker 1: sense of distance, but it's more like a sense of
- 44:10Speaker 1: causal distance. It's like, is this something I can influence
- 44:14Speaker 1: in the future.
- 44:16Speaker 3: I think I'm still a little caught up on Like,
- 44:18Speaker 3: so if I turn on a laser, it's gonna get
- 44:21Speaker 3: to Andrameda eventually, Yes, And so why can't we just
- 44:25Speaker 3: wait more time?
- 44:26Speaker 1: You can wait more time, absolutely, but you have to
- 44:29Speaker 1: wait more time to get further. And so you can't
- 44:33Speaker 1: zap Andrameda now. You have to zap it in the future,
- 44:37Speaker 1: just like you can't zap the other side of your
- 44:39Speaker 1: barn now. You have to wait for life to get there.
- 44:42Speaker 1: So there's no limit on how far you can zap,
- 44:45Speaker 1: but there is a limit on how far you can
- 44:48Speaker 1: zap in a given time, in a second or in
- 44:50Speaker 1: ten seconds or whatever. If the universe wasn't expanding, then
- 44:54Speaker 1: the whole universe is eventually in your light cone, your
- 44:58Speaker 1: future light cone, right, is that anybody? It just takes
- 45:01Speaker 1: time for those death rays to get there. But everywhere
- 45:05Speaker 1: along the bleeding edge of your death rays has the
- 45:08Speaker 1: same space time interval. That's zero because the distance and
- 45:12Speaker 1: the time portions balance perfectly. Because we're outing up distance
- 45:16Speaker 1: and we're subtracting time, and the space time conversion we
- 45:19Speaker 1: used to subtract time is the speed of light that
- 45:21Speaker 1: enters into that equation. And so the space time interval
- 45:25Speaker 1: between two events basically tells you, kid, light have gotten
- 45:28Speaker 1: here between these two events or not. If it's zero,
- 45:31Speaker 1: then light has just enough time to get there. If
- 45:33Speaker 1: it's positive, then it's too far for light to get to.
- 45:36Speaker 1: You can't influence it. If it's negative, then light can
- 45:39Speaker 1: definitely influence it.
- 45:40Speaker 3: So is Andromeda moving away from me faster than my
- 45:44Speaker 3: laser is going.
- 45:45Speaker 1: And Drama is actually moving towards us right because of gravity,
- 45:49Speaker 1: So it's going to collide with us in a few years.
- 45:51Speaker 1: But that's sort of adding a few billion years. I
- 45:54Speaker 1: say a few years. We got time, don't worry about it.
- 45:58Speaker 1: And please don't build a laser in points at the aliens.
- 46:00Speaker 1: We hope the aliens are friendly. I'm just using that
- 46:02Speaker 1: as an example. Yeah, yeah, And this isn't about Andromeda moving.
- 46:06Speaker 1: It's not that it's escaping your laser. It's just that
- 46:09Speaker 1: it's too far away for you to hit it now
- 46:12Speaker 1: or in a year, your laser won't get there. For
- 46:15Speaker 1: millions of years, and so the events your laser can
- 46:19Speaker 1: visit are only in the future. Those are the ones
- 46:22Speaker 1: with space time interval zero.
- 46:24Speaker 3: Okay, So I get one space time value for shining
- 46:28Speaker 3: a laser at my barn and a different space time
- 46:32Speaker 3: interval value by shining a laser at Andromeda. And I'm
- 46:36Speaker 3: still not understanding why they have different signs. I can't
- 46:39Speaker 3: remember if one was zero one was probably I've lost track,
- 46:42Speaker 3: but like, why are those different?
- 46:44Speaker 1: Okay, Well, let's stick with your barn for now, and
- 46:46Speaker 1: then we'll get to Andromeda.
- 46:47Speaker 2: Okay.
- 46:48Speaker 1: So if you turn your flashlight on now and you
- 46:52Speaker 1: shine it at the other wall right, then you can
- 46:55Speaker 1: ask what is the space time interval between me turning
- 46:59Speaker 1: on my life and the other side of my barn
- 47:02Speaker 1: right now before the light has a chance to get there?
- 47:05Speaker 1: And that is a positive space time interval because the
- 47:08Speaker 1: light has not had a chance to get to the
- 47:09Speaker 1: other side of the barn. Right. But if you ask,
- 47:12Speaker 1: what is this space time interval between me turning on
- 47:14Speaker 1: my flashlight and the other side of my barn in
- 47:18Speaker 1: one millisecond right or wherever long it takes light to
- 47:21Speaker 1: get there, that has a zero space time interval. So
- 47:24Speaker 1: there's two different space time intervals there. There's the one
- 47:27Speaker 1: between your flashlight now and the other side of the
- 47:30Speaker 1: barn now, or between your flashlight now and the other
- 47:33Speaker 1: side of your barn when the light gets there in
- 47:35Speaker 1: the future. Okay, so one is zero because light has
- 47:39Speaker 1: had a chance to get there. But if you ask,
- 47:42Speaker 1: what is the space time interval between my flashlight and
- 47:45Speaker 1: the other side of the barn now before light has
- 47:47Speaker 1: had a chance to get there, that's a positive space
- 47:49Speaker 1: time interval. That's outside of your light cone. So the
- 47:52Speaker 1: same location can be inside or on or outside the
- 47:55Speaker 1: light cone, depending on the time, because the light cone
- 47:58Speaker 1: expands with Time's true for Andromeda, right if you fire
- 48:02Speaker 1: your deathray right now and ask is Andromeda within my
- 48:05Speaker 1: light cone, well it isn't right now, but in five
- 48:08Speaker 1: million years or whatever, it will be, So that has
- 48:11Speaker 1: a space time interval that's zero. But firing your deathray
- 48:15Speaker 1: right now and Andromeda right now, that has a positive
- 48:18Speaker 1: space time interval. So basically just tells you which parts
- 48:21Speaker 1: of the universe can use ZAM, which parts are accessible
- 48:24Speaker 1: to you because of this limited speed of light.
- 48:27Speaker 3: Got it.
- 48:28Speaker 1: So that's something interesting about the universe, right, Like we
- 48:32Speaker 1: should listen when the universe tells us, hey, this is
- 48:35Speaker 1: the physical thing, this is what's invariant, this is what's important.
- 48:38Speaker 1: Like when we notice that momentum is conserved, we say, okay,
- 48:41Speaker 1: that means something useful about the universe, and it does.
- 48:44Speaker 1: It tells us something fascinating about space. Check out our
- 48:47Speaker 1: episode about Noether's theorem to understand the connections between symmetries
- 48:51Speaker 1: and conservation laws. But this is a really good way
- 48:53Speaker 1: to get deep insights about the nature of the universe
- 48:56Speaker 1: is to say, what does the universe respect, what does
- 48:59Speaker 1: it conserve, what does it keep constant? In this case,
- 49:02Speaker 1: we're not talking about conservation, we're talking about invariance. What
- 49:05Speaker 1: does the universe say everybody has to agree on no
- 49:08Speaker 1: matter how fast your ferrari or your spaceship is, everybody's
- 49:12Speaker 1: going to agree on Kelly's light cone, can she reach
- 49:15Speaker 1: Andromeda worth her death ray? Not now, but yes, in
- 49:19Speaker 1: the future. That's something everybody agrees on, no matter how
- 49:22Speaker 1: fast they're going. And so that's interesting, that's fascinating, and
- 49:26Speaker 1: it's connected to the idea of distance, right. But it's
- 49:29Speaker 1: clear that like spatial distance itself is not something the
- 49:33Speaker 1: universe insists everybody agree on. It's all twisted and broken
- 49:38Speaker 1: by high speeds and relativity. So this is something the
- 49:42Speaker 1: universe respects, and that means that it's closer to the truth.
- 49:46Speaker 1: It's like at the heart of the universe. Fundamentally, it
- 49:49Speaker 1: tells us something about the geometry of the universe. Remember
- 49:53Speaker 1: when we were adding up the pieces of the Pythagorean
- 49:55Speaker 1: theorem for space, and as we add more dimensions, we
- 49:57Speaker 1: just add them the same way. Because all the dimensions
- 50:00Speaker 1: are the same x and y and z, it don't matter. Well,
- 50:03Speaker 1: time is a dimension and it's a part of space time,
- 50:07Speaker 1: which is four dimensional, but it's different. The geometry of
- 50:10Speaker 1: time and space are different with respect to each other.
- 50:14Speaker 1: That's what the universe is saying here.
- 50:16Speaker 3: Okay, so, as you said, this is like fundamental and important.
- 50:20Speaker 3: But when we get the explanation about how distance is
- 50:23Speaker 3: invariant and time is invariant, it's not usually followed by
- 50:27Speaker 3: this explanation for well, how do you make it all
- 50:30Speaker 3: variant or whatever? Why don't we usually get that other step?
- 50:34Speaker 3: Is it just because it's hard to explain or what
- 50:36Speaker 3: do you think?
- 50:37Speaker 1: Yeah, I think this concept of a space time interval
- 50:39Speaker 1: is a little bit abstract because there's no real intuitive
- 50:42Speaker 1: and analog for it, Like, what is this thing we're
- 50:44Speaker 1: talking about, Like, yes, the universe respects it, but it's
- 50:48Speaker 1: not something that lines up with our notions very nicely.
- 50:51Speaker 1: And so I think that's why it's not typically like
- 50:54Speaker 1: introduced in POPSI, whereas you know, like the universe respects
- 50:58Speaker 1: energy or doesn't respect energy or momentum. These are things
- 51:00Speaker 1: we can get a handle on, so it's easier to
- 51:03Speaker 1: talk about. But the space time interval really is foundational
- 51:07Speaker 1: to the whole concept of the geometry of the universe,
- 51:09Speaker 1: which is what relativity is all about. That's really what
- 51:12Speaker 1: Menkowski was saying to Einstein. Yeah, you broke space and
- 51:16Speaker 1: you broke time, but really you showed us that these
- 51:19Speaker 1: are two sides of a more complicated object. You don't
- 51:22Speaker 1: stick them together trivially. You stick them together backwards, and
- 51:26Speaker 1: the universe has this weird geometry and that's how it
- 51:29Speaker 1: organizes itself. That's the internal mechanism of the mathematics of
- 51:33Speaker 1: the universe. And this turned out to be really crucial
- 51:36Speaker 1: for Einstein's next step in general relativity, because in special relativity,
- 51:41Speaker 1: these interval formulas are pretty simple. You just take the
- 51:44Speaker 1: differences in each spatial dimension, you take the difference in
- 51:46Speaker 1: the time dimension, you add them up with a negative,
- 51:49Speaker 1: and you do the pythegonorary and theorem. You're good. In
- 51:52Speaker 1: general relativity, the locations don't add up all the same way.
- 51:55Speaker 1: Some locations add up more and some locations add up less.
- 51:58Speaker 1: That's what we mean by the metrical talk about sometimes
- 52:00Speaker 1: in general relativity, how is space curved in this location?
- 52:04Speaker 1: How much space time interval do you crew by passing
- 52:07Speaker 1: through this space versus passing through that space? And so
- 52:11Speaker 1: this concept of having a geometry to the universe and
- 52:13Speaker 1: then having that geometry be non trivial, that's how you
- 52:17Speaker 1: go from special relativity to general relativity. But you got
- 52:20Speaker 1: to get your brain like the geometry of the universe
- 52:23Speaker 1: first before you can even get to general relativity.
- 52:26Speaker 3: Well, this conversation didn't crush my spirits. It lifted them up.
- 52:30Speaker 3: And now I have I guess you can't really make
- 52:32Speaker 3: a positive space time because then that would be too
- 52:35Speaker 3: far to travel. And so I'm still going to be
- 52:38Speaker 3: thinking about this tonight. But I totally followed the explanation,
- 52:41Speaker 3: and that's awesome. I learned something new today.
- 52:44Speaker 1: And one more speed bump to avoid is you often
- 52:46Speaker 1: hear people saying that photons do not experience time. And
- 52:49Speaker 1: here what we're saying is light can go from A
- 52:52Speaker 1: to B with no space time interval. Right, it's lightlight,
- 52:57Speaker 1: it's a zero space time interval along the light. That's
- 53:01Speaker 1: not the same as saying photons do not experience time.
- 53:04Speaker 2: Right.
- 53:05Speaker 1: Saying photons have a zero space time interval is very
- 53:08Speaker 1: different from saying photons do not experience time. There's a
- 53:11Speaker 1: whole separate POPSI rabbit hole. But photons do take time
- 53:15Speaker 1: to move across the universe. They just don't take space time.
- 53:19Speaker 3: I'm realizing. I want to ask, if space time intervals
- 53:24Speaker 3: have units, does it make sense to think of it
- 53:26Speaker 3: as a measurement with a unit.
- 53:29Speaker 1: Yes, it does. In the units we use are distance
- 53:32Speaker 1: right like length like meters for example, and time enters
- 53:36Speaker 1: with a conversion factor, which is the speed of light.
- 53:39Speaker 1: So it's not really time, it's the speed of light.
- 53:41Speaker 1: Time's time ct which is why photons have a space
- 53:45Speaker 1: time interval of zero, because they move at the speed
- 53:48Speaker 1: of light, so that conversion factor ensures that the space
- 53:51Speaker 1: and the time parts balance perfectly. Way to go, mass
- 53:54Speaker 1: harmonious mathematics. Love it all right? Well, thank you everybody
- 53:59Speaker 1: for going on this journey through space and time and
- 54:02Speaker 1: through space time. Thank you Kelly for all the great
- 54:04Speaker 1: questions and for not using the crusher on today's episode.
- 54:08Speaker 3: Thank you Daniel for the great explanation. I will keep
- 54:10Speaker 3: the crusher at home with me.
- 54:13Speaker 1: You guys, hear the sound of that thing.
- 54:15Speaker 2: Oh my gosh, oh gosh.
- 54:18Speaker 1: All right, and that's me signing off with a shiver.
- 54:22Speaker 3: Yep, that's me signing off as well. I don't think
- 54:24Speaker 3: I'm gonna be able to use this thing on anything
- 54:26Speaker 3: actually living without Yeah, I'm not doing it. All right, everybody,
- 54:30Speaker 3: Until next time, have a good space and have a
- 54:33Speaker 3: good time.
- 54:41Speaker 1: Thanks everybody for listening. Please go and do us a
- 54:43Speaker 1: favor and rate the show on whatever podcast app you're using.
- 54:46Speaker 1: It really helps people find us.
- 54:48Speaker 3: Daniel and Kelly's Extraordinary Universe is edited by the amazing
- 54:52Speaker 3: Matt Kesselman.
- 54:53Speaker 1: He really is a wizard. You can also find us
- 54:57Speaker 1: online on Blue Sky, Instagram, and d and K Universe.
- 55:02Speaker 1: Come engage with us.
- 55:03Speaker 3: You can email us at questions at Danielankelly dot org.
- 55:07Speaker 3: We really do want to hear from you, and you.
- 55:09Speaker 1: Can find our website www dot danieland Kelly dot org,
- 55:13Speaker 1: where you'll also find an invitation to join our discord
- 55:16Speaker 1: where everybody comes and talks about the amazing universe.
- 55:20Speaker 3: And we also have the most amazing moderators. This is
- 55:24Speaker 3: an iHeart podcast. Thanks for joining us.