Latest / Uncensored Objection / [Audio Version] Harvard Sues Trump Admin After It Tries to Silence What POTUS Can’t Outsmart]

Transcript

[Audio Version] Harvard Sues Trump Admin After It Tries to Silence What POTUS Can’t Outsmart] · Uncensored Objection

• 0:07
  I'm Mitch Jackson,
• 0:08
  and this is the audio edition of Uncensored Objection.
• 0:13
  You'll find the full text of this issue,
• 0:15
  dated May 23,
• 0:17
  2025,
• 0:17
  at mitchthelawyer.substack.com.
• 0:24
  SPEAKER_00: Today's post is titled,
• 0:26
  Harvard Sues Trump Admin After It Tries to Silence What POTUS
• 0:32
  Can't Outsmart.
• 0:35
  SPEAKER_00: An unprecedented and alarming overreach.
• 0:39
  SPEAKER_00: Imagine waking up to find the U.S.
• 0:41
  government has effectively banned Harvard University from
• 0:45
  enrolling any international students.
• 0:48
  As a lawyer and as an American,
• 0:50
  I am deeply alarmed by this unprecedented move.
• 0:55
  The Trump administration has yanked Harvard's certification to
• 0:58
  host foreign
• 0:59
  SPEAKER_00: students,
• 1:00
  a draconian step that forces current international students to
• 1:04
  transfer out or face
• 1:07
  SPEAKER_00: losing their legal status.
• 1:09
  SPEAKER_00: In plain terms,
• 1:11
  Washington is telling thousands of bright young people you're
• 1:15
  no longer welcome at
• 1:16
  SPEAKER_00: one of America's top universities simply because of where you come from.
• 1:21
  SPEAKER_00: This heavy-handed action isn't just about Harvard or its students.
• 1:26
  It strikes at the core of academic freedom,
• 1:29
  the rule of law,
• 1:30
  and the values of an open society.
• 1:34
  SPEAKER_00: For all the reasons shared in this article,
• 1:37
  SPEAKER_00: Harvard filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration on Friday,
• 1:42
  SPEAKER_00: May 23rd,
• 1:43
  SPEAKER_00: 2025.
• 1:43
  SPEAKER_00: There's a link to the lawsuit in the written article on my substack.
• 1:48
  SPEAKER_00: The Trump administration's bogus claims.
• 1:52
  Why would a presidential administration target a private
• 1:56
  university in such an extreme way?
• 1:59
  The Trump administration claims it has good reasons citing
• 2:02
  everything from national
• 2:04
  SPEAKER_00: security to campus safety and even ideology.
• 2:08
  Homeland Security officials argue that Harvard's campus has
• 2:13
  become unsafe,
• 2:14
  saying the university allowed anti-American pro-terrorist
• 2:18
  protest that harassed
• 2:20
  SPEAKER_00: Jewish students.
• 2:22
  They point to recent tensions on campus over the
• 2:25
  Israeli-Palestine conflict,
• 2:27
  SPEAKER_00: accusing Harvard of tolerating anti-Semitism and violence.
• 2:32
  Administration spokespeople also insist that there are national
• 2:36
  security concerns,
• 2:37
  SPEAKER_00: even alleging that Harvard has ties to the Chinese Communist Party,
• 2:41
  including claims that it hosted members of a Chinese
• 2:44
  paramilitary group involved in
• 2:47
  SPEAKER_00: human rights abuses.
• 2:49
  SPEAKER_00: And on top of that,
• 2:50
  SPEAKER_00: federal officials blast Harvard's commitment to diversity,
• 2:55
  SPEAKER_00: equity,
• 2:56
  SPEAKER_00: and inclusion,
• 2:57
  SPEAKER_00: DEI,
• 2:59
  SPEAKER_00: suggesting that these programs are racist or otherwise problematic.
• 3:04
  SPEAKER_00: In short,
• 3:05
  SPEAKER_00: the government's argument is that Harvard has been misbehaving so badly,
• 3:09
  SPEAKER_00: coddling extremists and endangering students,
• 3:12
  that it's undermining American values and that the government's
• 3:16
  extraordinary
• 3:17
  SPEAKER_00: intervention is justified.
• 3:20
  SPEAKER_00: Now, on the surface, these claims sound dire.
• 3:23
  SPEAKER_00: No one wants campuses overrun by violence or hate.
• 3:27
  SPEAKER_00: No one wants foreign spies infiltrating our institutions.
• 3:30
  And of course,
• 3:32
  everyone should condemn genuine anti-Semitism or discrimination
• 3:37
  of any kind.
• 3:38
  SPEAKER_00: But do these accusations hold water?
• 3:41
  SPEAKER_00: And even if Harvard has problems,
• 3:43
  does that justify the federal government essentially
• 3:46
  blackmailing a private
• 3:47
  SPEAKER_00: university into ideological submission?
• 3:52
  SPEAKER_00: When we examine the facts,
• 3:53
  SPEAKER_00: it becomes clear that the administration's case is built on exaggeration,
• 3:57
  SPEAKER_00: misdirection,
• 3:58
  SPEAKER_00: and a dangerous disregard for the law.
• 4:02
  SPEAKER_00: International students are not the enemy.
• 4:07
  SPEAKER_00: Let's start with the national security and crime arguments.
• 4:10
  The administration would have us believe Harvard's
• 4:12
  international students as a
• 4:14
  SPEAKER_00: group are a menace,
• 4:16
  SPEAKER_00: potential spies,
• 4:18
  SPEAKER_00: criminals,
• 4:19
  SPEAKER_00: or agitators.
• 4:20
  SPEAKER_00: This is a classic fear-mongering tactic that doesn't square with reality.
• 4:25
  SPEAKER_00: Harvard has welcomed students from around the globe for centuries.
• 4:30
  SPEAKER_00: The vast majority of these students are young scholars, not criminals.
• 4:34
  SPEAKER_00: They've come to learn and to contribute.
• 4:36
  SPEAKER_00: If a few individuals break the law or threaten safety,
• 4:40
  SPEAKER_00: regardless of their nationality,
• 4:42
  SPEAKER_00: the solution is to hold those individuals accountable,
• 4:45
  SPEAKER_00: not to punish an entire category of people.
• 4:49
  We don't shut down an entire airport because one passenger is
• 4:53
  caught misbehaving.
• 4:55
  And we shouldn't shut down a university's foreign student
• 4:58
  program because of
• 5:00
  SPEAKER_00: isolated incidents or unproven suspicions.
• 5:04
  The claim that Harvard is somehow a hotbed of espionage or
• 5:08
  terrorist training is
• 5:09
  SPEAKER_00: especially outlandish.
• 5:11
  SPEAKER_00: And yes,
• 5:12
  SPEAKER_00: students from countries like China study at Harvard,
• 5:15
  SPEAKER_00: as they do at many other US universities.
• 5:19
  SPEAKER_00: and some might later work in their home governments.
• 5:22
  But Harvard is not secretly training foreign militaries or
• 5:25
  plotting against America.
• 5:27
  There's zero evidence that the institution itself is colluding
• 5:30
  with hostile powers.
• 5:33
  If anything,
• 5:33
  America's openness in education has been a strength,
• 5:38
  not a weakness.
• 5:39
  By educating the world's brightest,
• 5:41
  we built goodwill and influenced many future world leaders.
• 5:46
  SPEAKER_00: Branding every international student as a security threat is a cynical
• 5:51
  SPEAKER_00: generalization that flies in the face of decades of positive outcomes.
• 5:56
  It's scapegoating,
• 5:58
  plain and simple,
• 6:00
  and it's particularly galling coming from a U.S.
• 6:04
  SPEAKER_00: administration.
• 6:06
  Our country has long been proud of attracting talent from
• 6:09
  around the world.
• 6:10
  Turning that proud tradition into a paranoid witch hunt harms
• 6:14
  America's reputation
• 6:16
  SPEAKER_00: and future far more than a few exchange students ever could.
• 6:22
  SPEAKER_00: Anti-Semitism as a pretext, not a policy.
• 6:26
  Now let's talk about the anti-Semitism issue because it's
• 6:30
  important and emotionally charged.
• 6:33
  SPEAKER_00: In recent months,
• 6:34
  SPEAKER_00: like many campuses,
• 6:35
  Harvard saw heated protests and debates over the war between
• 6:40
  Israel and Hamas.
• 6:42
  Some student demonstrations and statements were indeed
• 6:45
  offensive to Jewish students and alumni.
• 6:48
  Anti-Semitism is a real problem in society that absolutely must
• 6:52
  be confronted.
• 6:54
  SPEAKER_00: On that, I think we can all agree.
• 6:56
  SPEAKER_00: But the Trump administration's response is completely wrong-headed.
• 7:00
  Instead of working to protect Jewish students through lawful
• 7:03
  means like enforcing
• 7:04
  SPEAKER_00: anti-discrimination laws or supporting campus dialogues,
• 7:08
  SPEAKER_00: they've chosen to wield a sledgehammer against Harvard as a whole.
• 7:14
  Revoking Harvard's ability to enroll international students
• 7:17
  does nothing direct to
• 7:19
  SPEAKER_00: compound anti-Semitism.
• 7:21
  It looks more like retaliation punishing the university's
• 7:25
  leadership for not
• 7:26
  SPEAKER_00: cracking down in any way Washington wanted.
• 7:30
  If certain student groups said or did hateful things,
• 7:34
  address those specifically.
• 7:36
  Don't throw thousands of unrelated students out of the country
• 7:41
  as collateral damage.
• 7:43
  SPEAKER_00: Ironically,
• 7:44
  by using Jewish students' safety as a rationale for this broad
• 7:49
  attack on Harvard,
• 7:51
  SPEAKER_00: the administration is politicizing the fight against anti-Semitism.
• 7:55
  They're leveraging a legitimate concern as a convenient pretext
• 7:59
  to justify an
• 8:01
  SPEAKER_00: illegitimate power grab.
• 8:03
  SPEAKER_00: That should anger all of us who truly care about combating hate.
• 8:08
  Such a heavy-handed move creates backlash and division rather
• 8:12
  than education and understanding.
• 8:15
  It's using Jewish students as pawns in a political game rather
• 8:19
  than actually
• 8:20
  SPEAKER_00: ensuring they feel safe and supported.
• 8:23
  SPEAKER_00: Harvard,
• 8:24
  SPEAKER_00: for its part,
• 8:25
  SPEAKER_00: was already taking steps to address anti-Semitism on campus,
• 8:29
  SPEAKER_00: commissioning studies,
• 8:31
  SPEAKER_00: engaging with student groups,
• 8:32
  SPEAKER_00: and yes,
• 8:33
  facing tough conversations about the line between free speech
• 8:37
  and hate speech.
• 8:39
  SPEAKER_00: These are not easy issues,
• 8:40
  SPEAKER_00: but they are best handled by educators and communities,
• 8:45
  SPEAKER_00: not federal agents cutting off visas.
• 8:48
  SPEAKER_00: By intervening in this extreme way,
• 8:50
  the government short-circuited the university's own processes
• 8:54
  and essentially said,
• 8:55
  SPEAKER_00: do it our way or we will destroy your community.
• 8:59
  SPEAKER_00: That's not how you solve prejudice or protect anyone.
• 9:02
  That's how you breed resentment and fear,
• 9:06
  targeting diversity and independence.
• 9:10
  SPEAKER_00: And what about the attack on diversity, equity, and inclusion programs?
• 9:15
  The Trump administration's ultimatum to Harvard included
• 9:18
  demands to eliminate DEI
• 9:20
  SPEAKER_00: initiatives,
• 9:21
  SPEAKER_00: claiming these programs are part of the problem.
• 9:24
  Harvard is known for being a liberal,
• 9:27
  global institution that doesn't toe any party line.
• 9:31
  Many Harvard students and faculty have been outspoken critics
• 9:34
  of President Trump's
• 9:35
  SPEAKER_00: policies over the years.
• 9:38
  The university's leadership did not rush to implement the
• 9:40
  edicts from Washington.
• 9:42
  SPEAKER_00: In fact,
• 9:43
  Harvard's president and governing board flatly refused demands
• 9:46
  to overhaul their
• 9:47
  SPEAKER_00: admissions and governance to fit the administration's dick case.
• 9:52
  SPEAKER_00: And that is their right.
• 9:54
  SPEAKER_00: Harvard is a private institution with its own charter and mission.
• 9:58
  It has constitutional rights to academic freedom and to decide
• 10:02
  its own values.
• 10:04
  SPEAKER_00: The federal government does not get to micromanage Harvard's curriculum,
• 10:09
  SPEAKER_00: hiring,
• 10:10
  SPEAKER_00: or which student clubs it recognizes.
• 10:13
  SPEAKER_00: By trying to do so,
• 10:15
  SPEAKER_00: by saying,
• 10:16
  eliminate programs we don't like or will wreck your funding and
• 10:20
  student body,
• 10:21
  the administration is breaching a fundamental American
• 10:24
  principle that private
• 10:26
  SPEAKER_00: institutions,
• 10:27
  SPEAKER_00: especially universities,
• 10:29
  SPEAKER_00: should be free from excessive government control,
• 10:32
  SPEAKER_00: particularly control driven by political ideology.
• 10:36
  SPEAKER_00: From a legal perspective, this raises serious red flags.
• 10:40
  SPEAKER_00: The First Amendment of the U.S.
• 10:41
  Constitution restricts the government from punishing private
• 10:45
  entities for speech or
• 10:47
  SPEAKER_00: forcing them to adopt certain views.
• 10:50
  SPEAKER_00: Yet here we are,
• 10:51
  and we have the government effectively punishing Harvard
• 10:54
  because it dislikes the
• 10:55
  viewpoints expressed on campus and the university's approach to
• 11:00
  diversity.
• 11:01
  SPEAKER_00: This is a blatant abuse of power.
• 11:03
  SPEAKER_00: It's the kind of thing that,
• 11:04
  SPEAKER_00: if allowed to stand,
• 11:06
  would mean no institution can ever feel safe disagreeing with
• 11:11
  those in power.
• 11:13
  Now this isn't the first time Trump's administration has tried
• 11:15
  to bulldoze Harvard
• 11:17
  SPEAKER_00: into submission.
• 11:18
  SPEAKER_00: Earlier in 2025,
• 11:20
  SPEAKER_00: the White House issued a direct threat,
• 11:22
  SPEAKER_00: comply with sweeping demands,
• 11:25
  SPEAKER_00: including dismantling DEI programs,
• 11:28
  SPEAKER_00: disbanding certain student organizations,
• 11:30
  SPEAKER_00: and handing over internal records,
• 11:33
  SPEAKER_00: or lose billions in federal support.
• 11:38
  SPEAKER_00: The threat was clear.
• 11:40
  SPEAKER_00: Fall in line or face financial destruction.
• 11:45
  SPEAKER_00: When Harvard refused to play along,
• 11:47
  SPEAKER_00: the administration made good on its threat,
• 11:49
  SPEAKER_00: freezing $2.3 billion in federal research funding and then revoking the
• 11:55
  SPEAKER_00: university's ability to enroll international students.
• 11:58
  SPEAKER_00: It was a political chokehold masquerading as policy.
• 12:03
  SPEAKER_00: Harvard, to his credit, didn't back down.
• 12:06
  SPEAKER_00: It didn't fold.
• 12:08
  SPEAKER_00: It sued.
• 12:09
  SPEAKER_00: And Harvard didn't just come to court empty-handed.
• 12:13
  SPEAKER_00: The university brought in legal firepower from both sides of the aisle,
• 12:17
  SPEAKER_00: led by William Burke,
• 12:19
  SPEAKER_00: a former White House lawyer for George W.
• 12:21
  SPEAKER_00: Bush,
• 12:22
  SPEAKER_00: and Robert Kerr,
• 12:24
  SPEAKER_00: a former U.S.
• 12:24
  SPEAKER_00: attorney and special counsel with deep prosecutorial experience.
• 12:30
  SPEAKER_00: These aren't just top-tier litigators.
• 12:33
  SPEAKER_00: They're attorneys who've gone toe-to-toe with Trump's warbit before.
• 12:38
  SPEAKER_00: In fact,
• 12:39
  Burke had just been advising the Trump Organization until the
• 12:43
  moment he took on
• 12:44
  SPEAKER_00: Harvard's case.
• 12:46
  Trump was so enraged by Burke's involvement that he publicly
• 12:50
  attacked him and the
• 12:51
  SPEAKER_00: Trump Organization cut ties.
• 12:54
  Now that tells you everything you need to know about how
• 12:56
  personal this fight has become.
• 12:58
  SPEAKER_00: Harvard didn't just refuse to ask how high when Trump said jump.
• 13:03
  SPEAKER_00: It called the bluff,
• 13:05
  SPEAKER_00: exposed the abuse of power,
• 13:07
  SPEAKER_00: and chose to defend the Constitution instead of cower to a bully.
• 13:13
  SPEAKER_00: A Political Power Play Masquerading as Policy
• 13:17
  SPEAKER_00: When you put all the pieces together,
• 13:19
  SPEAKER_00: it becomes clear that this isn't about safety or law at all.
• 13:23
  SPEAKER_00: It's about politics and control.
• 13:26
  The move to bar international students and the laundry list of
• 13:29
  demands foisted on
• 13:31
  SPEAKER_00: Harvard read like an authoritarian wish list.
• 13:35
  SPEAKER_00: The message from the Trump administration is loud and clear.
• 13:40
  SPEAKER_00: Fall in line with our ideology or we will make your life hell.
• 13:44
  This is a political attack aimed at forcing ideological
• 13:48
  compliance from an
• 13:49
  SPEAKER_00: independent private university.
• 13:51
  It's not a good faith policy decision made after careful study
• 13:55
  or genuine concern
• 13:56
  SPEAKER_00: for student welfare.
• 13:58
  SPEAKER_00: If it were,
• 13:58
  the administration would be working cooperatively with
• 14:01
  universities to address
• 14:02
  SPEAKER_00: problems,
• 14:03
  SPEAKER_00: not ambushing them with sudden edits and punitive orders.
• 14:08
  SPEAKER_00: Consider the timing and context.
• 14:11
  SPEAKER_00: This action doesn't happen in a vacuum.
• 14:14
  It follows months of public feuding with elite universities
• 14:17
  over campus protests
• 14:19
  SPEAKER_00: and woke policies.
• 14:21
  It also follows the administration's pattern of labeling any
• 14:25
  institution it doesn't
• 14:26
  SPEAKER_00: like as fundamentally un-American.
• 14:30
  SPEAKER_00: It's an open secret that certain officials,
• 14:32
  SPEAKER_00: and perhaps President Trump himself,
• 14:35
  see places like Harvard as hotbeds of opposition and places
• 14:39
  that need to be taught
• 14:40
  SPEAKER_00: a lesson.
• 14:41
  SPEAKER_00: By going after Harvard so aggressively,
• 14:43
  SPEAKER_00: the administration aims to chill dissent,
• 14:46
  SPEAKER_00: not just at Harvard,
• 14:47
  SPEAKER_00: but everywhere.
• 14:49
  SPEAKER_00: The intent is to send a national message.
• 14:51
  SPEAKER_00: No matter how prestigious or powerful you think you are,
• 14:55
  SPEAKER_00: you're not beyond the reach of our retribution.
• 14:57
  SPEAKER_00: It's hard to read this as anything but ideological retaliation.
• 15:03
  We've seen this kind of tactic in other countries where
• 15:05
  democracy is backsliding.
• 15:08
  SPEAKER_00: Authoritarian leaders often start by attacking universities and cultural
• 15:12
  SPEAKER_00: institutions because those are places where independent thought thrives.
• 15:17
  SPEAKER_00: They manufacture a pretext,
• 15:19
  SPEAKER_00: say national security or moral crisis,
• 15:23
  SPEAKER_00: and then swoop in to seize control or scare others into self-censorship.
• 15:29
  That's exactly what we're seeing here and is chilling to
• 15:31
  witness in the United States.
• 15:34
  SPEAKER_00: No matter what your personal politics are,
• 15:36
  we should all be able to recognize the difference between
• 15:38
  genuine governance and
• 15:39
  SPEAKER_00: using government power to bully opponents.
• 15:42
  SPEAKER_00: This is the latter and it's unacceptable.
• 15:47
  SPEAKER_00: A Broader Campaign Against Higher Education and Legal Voices
• 15:52
  SPEAKER_00: Harvard is not the only target.
• 15:54
  This action is part of a broader campaign of authoritarian
• 15:57
  overreach that should
• 15:59
  SPEAKER_00: have every American concerned.
• 16:01
  SPEAKER_00: In recent weeks,
• 16:02
  we've also seen the Trump administration strong arm other
• 16:05
  universities and even law
• 16:06
  SPEAKER_00: firms in similar ways.
• 16:09
  SPEAKER_00: Columbia University, for example, was faced with a stark ultimatum.
• 16:13
  SPEAKER_00: Implement a series of policy changes dictated by Washington,
• 16:17
  including placing an entire academic department under special
• 16:21
  oversight or lose
• 16:23
  SPEAKER_00: billions in federal funding.
• 16:25
  SPEAKER_00: Faced with the prospect of financial ruin,
• 16:28
  Columbia's leadership felt they had no choice but to submit to
• 16:32
  some of these
• 16:32
  SPEAKER_00: outrageous demands.
• 16:34
  SPEAKER_00: The result?
• 16:35
  A chilling precedent where the government dictates how a
• 16:38
  university teaches and who
• 16:40
  SPEAKER_00: it hires,
• 16:41
  SPEAKER_00: all under threat of punishment.
• 16:44
  SPEAKER_00: It's not only colleges.
• 16:46
  SPEAKER_00: Big law firms have also found themselves in the crosshairs.
• 16:49
  In a move that shocks the conscience of anyone who values the
• 16:52
  rule of law,
• 16:53
  Trump orders sanctions against certain major law firms that he
• 16:56
  deems politically
• 16:58
  SPEAKER_00: unfriendly.
• 16:59
  firms that have represented causes or clients contrary to the
• 17:02
  administration's
• 17:03
  views or that have a robust diversity hiring programs suddenly
• 17:08
  facing threats,
• 17:09
  SPEAKER_00: loss of government contracts,
• 17:11
  SPEAKER_00: intrusive investigations,
• 17:13
  SPEAKER_00: and even backlisting of their attorneys from federal work.
• 17:17
  SPEAKER_00: Under this pressure,
• 17:17
  some of the country's top firms quietly made deals with the
• 17:21
  administration,
• 17:22
  pledging to redirect their resources toward causes the White
• 17:26
  House favors and
• 17:27
  SPEAKER_00: scaling back initiatives,
• 17:29
  SPEAKER_00: like some diversity programs,
• 17:31
  SPEAKER_00: that drew officials' ire.
• 17:33
  SPEAKER_00: As a lawyer, I find this both infuriating and terrifying.
• 17:37
  SPEAKER_00: I think you should too.
• 17:38
  So much so that I was a signatory on two amicus briefs
• 17:41
  supporting firms fighting
• 17:43
  SPEAKER_00: against Trump's executive orders.
• 17:46
  Lawyers are supposed to be free to advocate for clients and
• 17:49
  principals without fear
• 17:50
  SPEAKER_00: of government retaliation.
• 17:52
  that independence of the legal profession is a pillar of our
• 17:55
  justice system.
• 17:57
  SPEAKER_00: But this administration is effectively saying,
• 17:59
  SPEAKER_00: represent views we like,
• 18:01
  SPEAKER_00: not ones we don't,
• 18:02
  SPEAKER_00: or we will punish you.
• 18:05
  SPEAKER_00: This is a direct assault on the rule of law,
• 18:08
  just as the actions against universities are an assault on
• 18:12
  academic freedom.
• 18:13
  SPEAKER_00: When you connect the dots, the pattern is unmistakable.
• 18:17
  SPEAKER_00: From campuses to courtrooms,
• 18:18
  the Trump administration is pressuring independent institutions
• 18:22
  to conform or be
• 18:24
  SPEAKER_00: crushed.
• 18:25
  SPEAKER_00: The tools vary,
• 18:26
  SPEAKER_00: cutting off visas here,
• 18:27
  SPEAKER_00: yanking funds there,
• 18:29
  SPEAKER_00: launching investigations,
• 18:31
  SPEAKER_00: issuing executive orders,
• 18:33
  SPEAKER_00: but the motive's the same.
• 18:35
  SPEAKER_00: consolidating power, and silencing opposition.
• 18:39
  This is not normal governance and it has no place in the United
• 18:42
  States of America.
• 18:45
  SPEAKER_00: If they can do this to Harvard, they can do it to you.
• 18:49
  Some readers might be thinking,
• 18:50
  well,
• 18:51
  Harvard is rich and elitist,
• 18:53
  so why should I even care?
• 18:56
  SPEAKER_00: Here's why.
• 18:57
  If the government can do this to Harvard,
• 19:00
  it can do it to absolutely anyone.
• 19:04
  SPEAKER_00: Harvard,
• 19:05
  SPEAKER_00: for all its ivory tower reputation,
• 19:07
  SPEAKER_00: is still a private organization operating under the rule of law.
• 19:11
  SPEAKER_00: Even if Harvard can be targeted and strong-armed in this way,
• 19:15
  what's to stop the government from coming after a public state
• 19:19
  college or local
• 19:20
  SPEAKER_00: business or a non-profit community group?
• 19:24
  The answer is nothing unless we draw a line and say that this
• 19:28
  is unacceptable.
• 19:30
  SPEAKER_00: Today, the pretext is anti-Semitism on campus and foreign student visas.
• 19:34
  SPEAKER_00: Tomorrow,
• 19:35
  it could be something else that becomes the excuse to intrude
• 19:38
  on your school or
• 19:39
  SPEAKER_00: your company.
• 19:40
  SPEAKER_00: Think about it.
• 19:41
  Could a future administration ban a particular community
• 19:44
  college from teaching
• 19:45
  certain subjects because it claims national security or some
• 19:49
  kind of moral panic?
• 19:52
  Could they pressure a corporation by revoking licenses or
• 19:55
  contracts because the CEO
• 19:57
  SPEAKER_00: supported the wrong candidate or the wrong social cause?
• 20:02
  SPEAKER_00: Once the door is open, it can swing both ways and hit anyone.
• 20:07
  It's not hard to imagine a scenario down the road where a
• 20:10
  liberal administration,
• 20:11
  SPEAKER_00: citing this precedent,
• 20:13
  SPEAKER_00: tries to punish a conservative institution in a similar manner.
• 20:17
  SPEAKER_00: The point is,
• 20:19
  SPEAKER_00: no matter your politics,
• 20:20
  you don't want the federal government turning into an
• 20:23
  ideological enforcer.
• 20:25
  That's a road that leads straight away from democracy and
• 20:28
  toward an authoritarian state.
• 20:32
  Everyday Americans might not feel an immediate impact from
• 20:35
  Harvard's foreign
• 20:36
  SPEAKER_00: students being sent away.
• 20:38
  SPEAKER_00: But we will feel the effects if this mentality spreads.
• 20:41
  We'll feel it in a country that is less free,
• 20:44
  less innovative,
• 20:46
  and more fearful.
• 20:47
  SPEAKER_00: Students will think twice about speaking their minds,
• 20:50
  SPEAKER_00: or they'll only say what those in power want to hear.
• 20:54
  Schools will hesitate to invite certain speakers or teach
• 20:57
  certain topics worried
• 20:59
  SPEAKER_00: about federal retaliation.
• 21:01
  Employers might shy away from fair hiring initiatives or pro
• 21:05
  bono work that could
• 21:07
  SPEAKER_00: put a target on their backs.
• 21:08
  SPEAKER_00: In other words,
• 21:09
  the chilling effect will touch the lives of regular people who
• 21:13
  just want to learn,
• 21:15
  SPEAKER_00: work,
• 21:15
  SPEAKER_00: and live without Big Brother looming over their shoulder.
• 21:20
  SPEAKER_00: Defending Democracy and Academic Freedom We are at a pivotal moment.
• 21:27
  This attempt to bar international students from Harvard might
• 21:31
  seem like a niche
• 21:32
  SPEAKER_00: issue affecting one campus,
• 21:34
  SPEAKER_00: but it's actually a bellwether for the health of our democracy.
• 21:38
  SPEAKER_00: If we allow this kind of overreach to go in challenge,
• 21:40
  SPEAKER_00: we normalize the idea that the government can bully any institution into
• 21:45
  SPEAKER_00: compliance.
• 21:47
  This is not the America our founders envisioned,
• 21:50
  nor is it a country most of us want to live in.
• 21:54
  As a lawyer,
• 21:54
  I have faith that our legal system can and will check some of
• 21:59
  these excesses.
• 22:00
  SPEAKER_00: Indeed,
• 22:01
  SPEAKER_00: Harvard has already gone to court to fight back,
• 22:04
  SPEAKER_00: and I'm confident the law is on its side.
• 22:07
  Courts have historically been protective of academic freedom
• 22:10
  and skeptical of
• 22:11
  SPEAKER_00: executive power grabs.
• 22:13
  SPEAKER_00: But court battles take time, and the outcome's not guaranteed.
• 22:16
  SPEAKER_00: What's needed right now is public outcry.
• 22:19
  We the people,
• 22:20
  we must make it crystal clear that we won't stand for this.
• 22:25
  SPEAKER_00: Alumni,
• 22:26
  SPEAKER_00: students,
• 22:27
  SPEAKER_00: faculty,
• 22:28
  SPEAKER_00: business leaders,
• 22:30
  SPEAKER_00: and everyday citizens alike should raise their voices.
• 22:34
  Speak up in defense of institutions' right to be free from
• 22:38
  political intimidation.
• 22:40
  Let your elected representatives know that this behavior by the
• 22:44
  executive branch is
• 22:45
  SPEAKER_00: beyond pale.
• 22:47
  SPEAKER_00: Support organizations that are challenging these actions legally.
• 22:52
  SPEAKER_00: Most importantly, stay informed and do not become numb to these tactics.
• 22:58
  Authoritarian shifts often happen gradually under the guise of
• 23:03
  protecting the
• 23:04
  SPEAKER_00: public from some alleged threat.
• 23:07
  SPEAKER_00: It's our job as citizens to see through that and demand accountability.
• 23:12
  SPEAKER_00: Today, it's international students at Harvard.
• 23:16
  SPEAKER_00: Tomorrow, it could be your own community's rights on the line.
• 23:20
  In the end,
• 23:21
  this is about more than Harvard,
• 23:23
  more than universities or law firms.
• 23:26
  SPEAKER_00: It's about what kind of country we want to be.
• 23:30
  SPEAKER_00: I believe in an America where universities can welcome bright minds from
• 23:34
  SPEAKER_00: everywhere,
• 23:35
  SPEAKER_00: where dissent and debate are not only tolerated but cherished,
• 23:40
  and where no leader can trample on freedom without pushback
• 23:44
  from the people.
• 23:47
  The attempt to bar Harvard from enrolling international
• 23:49
  students is a stark test of
• 23:52
  SPEAKER_00: those values.
• 23:54
  SPEAKER_00: We must rise to the occasion and push back for the sake of our students,
• 23:58
  SPEAKER_00: our democracy,
• 24:00
  SPEAKER_00: and our future.
• 24:03
  SPEAKER_00: Thanks for listening to this edition of Uncensored Objection.
• 24:07
  SPEAKER_00: If you want to support the work,
• 24:09
  SPEAKER_00: whether with a free or premium subscription,
• 24:12
  SPEAKER_00: or if you'd like the next issue delivered straight to your inbox,
• 24:15
  SPEAKER_00: whether it's audio or text,
• 24:17
  just head over to my Substack at mitchthelawyer.substack.com
• 24:22
  forward slash
• 24:23
  SPEAKER_00: subscribe.
• 24:24
  SPEAKER_00: You can also find the subscription link at the bottom of any post.
• 24:29
  SPEAKER_00: And if today's episode struck a chord,
• 24:31
  a quick rating or review on your podcast platform helps more
• 24:36
  than you know.