Latest / Honey Badger Radio / What's the deal, Joe? | HBR Talk 333

Transcript

What's the deal, Joe? | HBR Talk 333 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Well, hello, and welcome to HBr Talk three thirty three.
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: I may have screwed up the numbers again. I gotta look,
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: but I think that's right. Anyway, title is what's the
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: deal Joe? Because he's always saying, here's the deal, and
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: boy did he hand one out to his son. I'm
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: your host, Hannah Wallen here with the personification of perceptivity.
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: Mike Stevenson, Hello Joe.
• 0:26
  Speaker 2: Someone you know the Simpsons reference. Everyone knows every Simpson's
• 0:31
  Speaker 2: reference ever right now, Hello Joe.
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: And nonsense andilator Lauren Brooks. And tonight we are going, uh,
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: we are going really into the monk. It's gonna seem
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: like we're going into the weeds, but we're not. We'll
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: be talking about the Biden pardon for what it's worth,
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: and it looks like it's worth quite a bit. U
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: and quite a bit of what we'll be talking about
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: is related to something that we see a lot in
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: argument with feminists about men's issues. So there's a variety
• 1:04
  Speaker 1: of different fallacies that feminists employ in their arguments. One
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: of the most common we've talked about it is the
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: Mott Bailey fallacy, where they say something that sounds completely reasonable,
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: but they're only using it in defense of something that
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: is completely unreasonable. But in this case, the apex fallacy
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: is the treatment of the idea that there are men
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: in charge, or more men in charge than there are women,
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: as a piece of evidence that all men have privilege.
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: So because a man is president, a homeless guy has
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: it much much easier than say a woman who is
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: a single mom and is receiving assistance from the government
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: and extorting her baby daddy for child support and so on. Okay,
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: so I'm getting it. I'm really quiet, and Mike's really loud.
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: Let me see if I can fix uh that. There
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: we go, all right, hopefully I've like turned myself up
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: as high as I can possibly get this.
• 2:19
  Speaker 2: I will attempt to speak as softly and chocolity as possible.
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: Yes, there we go, but I.
• 2:26
  Speaker 2: Warn you, I'm quite drunk, so this may be a struggle.
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: I might have you turned up in discord too, and
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: it's not going to let me. Look. Oh, there we go.
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: So let's see what happens if I take that down
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: a notch. We'll see. But it's quite a it's quite
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: a challenging thing trying to deal with this in obs
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: and I still haven't found a workaround that I like that.
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: It seems like it's gonna work. So there you go. Anyway,
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: so back to the apex fallacy. You know, if a
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: man is the king, then paupers are more privileged than
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: in the middle class, if they're if they're male, in
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: the middle class is female. Right, And before anybody complains
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: that I'm comparing single moms to the middle class, there
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: are single moms who have who get more economic benefit,
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: as in the stuff that they have would cost more
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: if they bought it themselves. They get more economic benefit
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: from the government and from which which is really from you,
• 3:42
  Speaker 1: especially if you're a man, uh you know, because you're
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: paying the taxes that go into that and from their
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: baby daddies. Then I get from my full time job,
• 3:50
  Speaker 1: and I'm considered middle class.
• 3:52
  Speaker 2: So and you just have to notice that. You don't
• 3:57
  Speaker 2: hear a lot of leftists saying, look what Millennia Trump gets,
• 4:02
  Speaker 2: Look what Jill Biden gets. Look what the the top
• 4:05
  Speaker 2: end of of of the Hollywood ladies get.
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: No, not at all.
• 4:13
  Speaker 2: Look Look what Taylor Swift gets, Look what Beyonce gets.
• 4:16
  Speaker 2: Look whatever the biggest actresses these days. I don't even
• 4:19
  Speaker 2: know these things, even I but no one does that, No,
• 4:24
  Speaker 2: even even the the most uncharitable stereotype of an m
• 4:30
  Speaker 2: R a megtail. So when you're doing that sort of
• 4:34
  Speaker 2: ship and even they don't say, well, Scarlet Johansson exists,
• 4:40
  Speaker 2: and and and and therefore the plight of the of
• 4:44
  Speaker 2: the working class women doesn't want is you know, it's
• 4:47
  Speaker 2: this is very much only applied in this direction. And
• 4:52
  Speaker 2: it's and it's always women talking about how look there's
• 4:57
  Speaker 2: a man, a man with an an enormous amount of power,
• 5:01
  Speaker 2: and therefore women have no power. It's it's it encompasses
• 5:06
  Speaker 2: everything that feminism has ever meant and has ever meant
• 5:09
  Speaker 2: to men.
• 5:11
  Speaker 1: Yep. And it's bigger than people think about too, too,
• 5:15
  Speaker 1: because when we are talking about apex fallacy in regard
• 5:20
  Speaker 1: to well, you know, you say men are in power
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: because there is a man or there are more men
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: in government positions and there are women. You know, yeah,
• 5:32
  Speaker 1: maybe maybe there are Maybe more men are inclined to
• 5:36
  Speaker 1: take government responsibility, more men are inclined to take the
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: risks involved, and so and so on in the public
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: life because they they do get death threats. They have
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: had some pretty scary shit sent to them. There are
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: poisons that are out there that come in a form
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: of like a white powder that if it just touches
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: your skin, you're fucked, and those of There have been
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: times when people have sent envelopes that look like that's
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: what it contained, and there have been times when people
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: have sent envelopes that did contain that to public officials.
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: So like a terrifying prospect. Somebody can send you something
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: in the mail and you open it and you're poisoned
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: in an irreversible way, and you are going to die
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: in it. It's going to suck the whole time, not
• 6:27
  Speaker 1: just because you're dying, right, And so yeah, when it
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: comes to risk, men men are the ones that step up.
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: Usually women don't step up as frequently. They usually have
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: men to protect them, and so men do end up
• 6:41
  Speaker 1: at that apex. Sure, but that apex fallacy has another effect, right,
• 6:49
  Speaker 1: The men at the top that have all that power,
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: they don't care about the men at the bottom. Case
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: in point, the biggest attacks on due process during the
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: twentieth century, which are still continued into this century, which
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: are still affecting your due process rights if you live
• 7:11
  Speaker 1: in the United States, They are still impacting what will
• 7:15
  Speaker 1: happen if you are falsely accused of a violent crime.
• 7:19
  Speaker 1: They are still affecting what will happen if you are
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: in a custody battle and your baby mama or wife
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: decides to use false allegations as a weapon against you
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: in that custody battle. Those were written by Joe Biden,
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: mister Apex, right, those were Your life has been impacted
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: by mister Apex. But there is nothing you can do
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: to him for that. The most you can do is
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: vote him out of office. And he is still mister
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: Apex because he can still turn around and put his
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: own son after affecting your due process rights that way,
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: after pulling the rug out from under you, if you
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: ever get falsely accused, right, he can put his son
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: above the law. That's the Apex fallacy right there. In action.
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: It's not just that all men don't share the power.
• 8:24
  Speaker 1: It's that, just as feminists say about women, men are
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: not a monolith. Men are not united in a way
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: that causes them to never turn on each other and
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: do terrible things to each other and cause each other
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: pain and suffering, just like women are not a monolith
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: and feminists are not a monolith. Men are not a monolith.
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: And so the apex fallacy is demonstrated to be the
• 8:54
  Speaker 1: fallacy that it is just by the fact that a
• 8:59
  Speaker 1: man with the power of the president can get away
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: with spending over thirty years attacking your due process rights,
• 9:11
  Speaker 1: systematically institutionalizing his attacks on your due process rights, and
• 9:19
  Speaker 1: then put his son above the law because apex. So
• 9:28
  Speaker 1: before we get into all of that, let me get
• 9:32
  Speaker 1: the window up so you can see. We're going to
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: look at a few different things, including some statements on this,
• 9:44
  Speaker 1: or at least a statement on this. This is Jonathan Turley,
• 9:49
  Speaker 1: and let me see if I can fix the way
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: that it looks here, because it's not showing the top
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: of his comment like it was earlier. All I did
• 10:02
  Speaker 1: was make the window invisible while I was talking. For
• 10:06
  Speaker 1: Pete's sake, it shouldn't have moved. There we go. Now
• 10:10
  Speaker 1: you can see that it's Jonathan Turley, so he points
• 10:16
  Speaker 1: out with his pardon, Joe Biden shredded any residue of
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: veracity and credibility as president. For years, he was repeatedly
• 10:23
  Speaker 1: asked if he met any of his son's clients. He
• 10:27
  Speaker 1: lied and denied it. Let me open this further so
• 10:32
  Speaker 1: we can see the rest of it. But I don't
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: believe there's a lot more there. He was repeatedly asked
• 10:37
  Speaker 1: if he was aware of Hunter's foreign dealings. He repeatedly
• 10:40
  Speaker 1: lied and denied it. He was asked if he would
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: pardon his son. He repeatedly lied and denied it, notably
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: when he was running for reelection and denying that he
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: would pardon Hunter, few believed him. Some of us noted
• 10:58
  Speaker 1: that Hunter's bizarre legal strike he only made sense if
• 11:01
  Speaker 1: he was told that, in the worst case scenario, his
• 11:04
  Speaker 1: father would pardon him, so basically if he was promised
• 11:09
  Speaker 1: to pardon. But it does call into question now everything
• 11:15
  Speaker 1: that Biden said, which nobody I don't think anybody believed
• 11:18
  Speaker 1: him to begin with. You know that though oh yeah,
• 11:21
  Speaker 1: I didn't have anything to do with my son's dealings.
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: I don't think anybody believed that to begin with. Now
• 11:27
  Speaker 1: he has absolutely no excuse to even suggest that people
• 11:33
  Speaker 1: should believe that, and it opens him up to being
• 11:36
  Speaker 1: tried for it after the changeover.
• 11:41
  Speaker 3: Right, now, correct me if I'm wrong, But can't he
• 11:45
  Speaker 3: pardon himself?
• 11:46
  Speaker 1: He might be able to, but that then brings into
• 11:50
  Speaker 1: play the question of are his pardons valid? Yeah, the
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: fact that there was a one year spy and a
• 12:00
  Speaker 1: number of people who voted that was rather large and suspicious.
• 12:06
  Speaker 1: Like the Trump administration could investigate whether the Biden administration
• 12:10
  Speaker 1: was ever legitimate, and if they discover evidence that proves
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: that Biden should never have occupied the White House, what
• 12:19
  Speaker 1: happens to all of his pardons?
• 12:23
  Speaker 3: Well, I mean that that would be best case scenario, right,
• 12:26
  Speaker 3: but I think everybody who's on Trump's side is waiting
• 12:30
  Speaker 3: for them to Well maybe not everyone, right, because some
• 12:33
  Speaker 3: people just kind of got past it. They took it
• 12:36
  Speaker 3: on the chin and said, Okay, yeah, we lost, even
• 12:38
  Speaker 3: though we really didn't. Because the problem is is that
• 12:41
  Speaker 3: holding these people accountable is damn near him next to impossible.
• 12:45
  Speaker 3: I mean, if anybody could do what Trump could, But
• 12:49
  Speaker 3: how long is that going to take? You know what
• 12:51
  Speaker 3: I mean? And he's going to be out of office
• 12:52
  Speaker 3: in four years, is it really going to matter that
• 12:58
  Speaker 3: much unless less he pardoned, Like if he pardons Stauci.
• 13:03
  Speaker 1: Oh my god, yeah, that's gonna be really you know,
• 13:08
  Speaker 1: It's funny every every time something like this happens that
• 13:14
  Speaker 1: the question comes up, can the president pardon himself, and
• 13:17
  Speaker 1: that there are legal scholars on both sides of the
• 13:21
  Speaker 1: argument whether he can or not and whether he should
• 13:24
  Speaker 1: or not. And it would be a disaster for the
• 13:28
  Speaker 1: president to pardon himself. But the consensus that I've seen
• 13:33
  Speaker 1: before is technically he can, but but they would consider
• 13:40
  Speaker 1: it to be a disaster. It would be a very
• 13:43
  Speaker 1: bad idea for the country if he did. But things
• 13:48
  Speaker 1: being a bad idea for the country, right, No, he
• 13:55
  Speaker 1: doesn't seem to care about that at all. Absolutely not,
• 13:59
  Speaker 1: that's not And I don't know. He may pardon Fauci,
• 14:06
  Speaker 1: which you know, there isn't anything that the public can
• 14:10
  Speaker 1: do to stop him because he is the president. Yeah,
• 14:14
  Speaker 1: but you know, it may have repercussions on him later on.
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: And the other one is the question of a control
• 14:24
  Speaker 1: with the purposes asking will Biden declare martial law. Biden
• 14:27
  Speaker 1: isn't going to do that, not unless we get like
• 14:31
  Speaker 1: an alien invasion or some shit like that that.
• 14:33
  Speaker 2: Happens, a Russian invasion or something like that.
• 14:37
  Speaker 1: A space alien invasion was what I was thinking of,
• 14:40
  Speaker 1: not aliens from another country. But yeah, it could could
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: could be, uh, you know that, and they could wag
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: the dog. We don't have to have a real invasion,
• 14:51
  Speaker 1: because I sincerely doubt Russia has any interest in invading
• 14:55
  Speaker 1: the United States. You know, I like the the United
• 15:00
  Speaker 1: States would be more likely to annex Canada than Russia
• 15:04
  Speaker 1: would be to come all the way over here and
• 15:07
  Speaker 1: put this put their men in our country trying to fight.
• 15:12
  Speaker 2: This is where the very existence of NATO turns this
• 15:17
  Speaker 2: into a Plato playground for the devil to do with
• 15:21
  Speaker 2: what what he will do with which with and so on.
• 15:26
  Speaker 2: I mean, the whole this whole thing has been the
• 15:29
  Speaker 2: idea that you that Ukraine might become part of NATO,
• 15:33
  Speaker 2: and and and Russia has gone, please don't it's it's
• 15:42
  Speaker 2: it's it's as though I'm trying to imagine the most
• 15:47
  Speaker 2: Russian part of the US a Florida. It's just though,
• 15:52
  Speaker 2: it's just though Florida was suddenly taken over by a
• 15:57
  Speaker 2: Russian organization that can be compared with NATO, which I
• 16:04
  Speaker 2: believe is the North Atlantic Treaty organization. Imagine if some
• 16:13
  Speaker 2: kind of treaty had come right into what you considered
• 16:16
  Speaker 2: your country and then they go. It's I'm dancing around
• 16:24
  Speaker 2: this without trying not to sound like a Putin apologist
• 16:29
  Speaker 2: but that's basically what the deal is between Russia and Ukraine.
• 16:33
  Speaker 2: The Ukraine is trying to become part of NATO, and
• 16:37
  Speaker 2: Russia is trying to say, we don't like that, We
• 16:40
  Speaker 2: would at least like to annex whatever part of Ukraine
• 16:44
  Speaker 2: that we don't want to become part of NATO, thank
• 16:47
  Speaker 2: you very much, because NATO was always supposed to be.
• 16:51
  Speaker 2: This is how we try to keep Russia at bay,
• 16:57
  Speaker 2: much like Israel is how we try to keep them
• 17:00
  Speaker 2: at least at bay. That sort of thing. And it's
• 17:04
  Speaker 2: and now that I've dropped that bomb, I've lost the
• 17:09
  Speaker 2: thread of what I was going to say. I've already
• 17:12
  Speaker 2: said the worst thing I could have said.
• 17:15
  Speaker 1: I've said this before too, and like I've had people
• 17:18
  Speaker 1: mad at me for saying it. But Ukraine becoming a
• 17:23
  Speaker 1: NATO country with NATO bases, with an administration that was
• 17:30
  Speaker 1: installed by the United States, and with the United States
• 17:35
  Speaker 1: assisting that administration in armed enforcement of its own existence,
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: and it's it's coverage of the entire country, despite portions
• 17:49
  Speaker 1: of Ukraine having its population voluntarily asked to become part
• 17:57
  Speaker 1: of Russia to get away from that administration like that,
• 18:00
  Speaker 1: at that little complexity there is Russia's version of the
• 18:06
  Speaker 1: Cuban missile crisis in the United States. You know, my opinion,
• 18:13
  Speaker 1: that is Russia experiencing what the US experienced, you know,
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: when when they were worried about nukes being positioned in
• 18:27
  Speaker 1: Cuba by our enemies. Like, that's just as scary to
• 18:35
  Speaker 1: be in a nation where the right next door you
• 18:40
  Speaker 1: have this big base that has been put there by
• 18:45
  Speaker 1: an organization that has treated your nation as an illegitimate
• 18:49
  Speaker 1: nation forever for its entire existence, in fact, that it
• 18:55
  Speaker 1: was created for that purpose, right to combat your nation,
• 19:02
  Speaker 1: And that's terrifying.
• 19:05
  Speaker 3: Yeah, and you know that's it, But that's entirely why
• 19:07
  Speaker 3: this whole thing is even happening in the first place, right,
• 19:11
  Speaker 3: And so what they're saying now is, oh, well, if
• 19:13
  Speaker 3: Ukraine gives back this territory, then then they can become
• 19:18
  Speaker 3: a part of NATO. And it's like that doesn't achieve
• 19:20
  Speaker 3: any of these goals. It might get them to put
• 19:23
  Speaker 3: down their weapons for a little bit, but it's still
• 19:26
  Speaker 3: the same thing. It's still parking your ally in your backyard.
• 19:31
  Speaker 3: It's ridiculous, you know. And I'm I'm no Russia apologist either,
• 19:36
  Speaker 3: but I'm with Pullton on this one.
• 19:40
  Speaker 1: I think that they're not. It's not going to end
• 19:42
  Speaker 1: until Trump gets in there, because yeah, Biden's not a
• 19:47
  Speaker 1: deal maker, No he does. He just he can tell
• 19:50
  Speaker 1: you here's the deal as all day long. Right, here's
• 19:53
  Speaker 1: the deal. Here's the deal. Trump makes deals and people
• 19:59
  Speaker 1: agree to them. Yeah, he made deals with leaders of
• 20:04
  Speaker 1: nations that don't agree with each other ever.
• 20:09
  Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, it's it's brilliant, you know. And he he's
• 20:15
  Speaker 3: gonna sanction this shit out of a bunch of countries
• 20:19
  Speaker 3: when he does get into office, you know, as as
• 20:22
  Speaker 3: he should, you know. And you know, the Left is
• 20:26
  Speaker 3: just going to cry about it. They're going to cry
• 20:28
  Speaker 3: about every and anything that he does, because that's what
• 20:30
  Speaker 3: they do, their cry babies. They throw a temper tantrum
• 20:34
  Speaker 3: when they don't get their way, as narcissists do.
• 20:38
  Speaker 1: Yep.
• 20:40
  Speaker 3: But yeah, I'm I'm I'm fully behind Putent in this
• 20:48
  Speaker 3: situation right now.
• 20:49
  Speaker 1: Yeah, And my hope in this situation is once we
• 20:53
  Speaker 1: change which man is at the apex, and we will
• 20:57
  Speaker 1: go from a man who is willing to use young
• 21:03
  Speaker 1: men who don't want anything to do with this as
• 21:06
  Speaker 1: pawns at the cost of their own lives to a
• 21:10
  Speaker 1: man who is going to put a stop to that practice.
• 21:13
  Speaker 1: I'm hoping that Trump will prevent further military conflict and
• 21:19
  Speaker 1: create an agreement that will lead to everybody that's been
• 21:26
  Speaker 1: drafted into the Ukrainian military and the Russian military getting
• 21:30
  Speaker 1: to go home and start to heal, and hopefully will
• 21:37
  Speaker 1: preserve peace for the United States, because I don't want
• 21:42
  Speaker 1: to see our guys and it's not just because one
• 21:45
  Speaker 1: of them is my son, but I don't want to
• 21:46
  Speaker 1: see our guys getting drafted to go fight in a
• 21:50
  Speaker 1: war that doesn't need to be happening in the first place. Heck,
• 21:53
  Speaker 1: I don't even want to see our guys that are
• 21:55
  Speaker 1: already in the military being sent.
• 21:58
  Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, absolutely, you know, And what does that even
• 22:04
  Speaker 3: look like now? Because after COVID and the people, the
• 22:10
  Speaker 3: ones who didn't take the vaccine, you know, they're now
• 22:14
  Speaker 3: sat at home. Do you think those guys want to
• 22:17
  Speaker 3: then take up arms just because it's Trump. No. I
• 22:21
  Speaker 3: would think that they feel that they were wronged by
• 22:23
  Speaker 3: this government, which they absolutely were, so with everyone in
• 22:27
  Speaker 3: this country, everything across the globe. If they mandated that
• 22:32
  Speaker 3: fucking vaccine quote in quotation marks thank you, uh you
• 22:37
  Speaker 3: were done wrong by your government. And I would never
• 22:40
  Speaker 3: want to fight for a government. I don't. I don't
• 22:43
  Speaker 3: want to.
• 22:43
  Speaker 1: Fight for a government.
• 22:46
  Speaker 3: No, absolutely not, absolutely not. But what is our military
• 22:54
  Speaker 3: going to look like? I think they're just all going
• 22:56
  Speaker 3: to be older, a bunch of older guys, you know
• 22:59
  Speaker 3: what I mean. I don't see these young kids unless
• 23:03
  Speaker 3: they draft them. I don't see them willing to go
• 23:07
  Speaker 3: and fight for this.
• 23:09
  Speaker 1: But that's that's that's pretty much what the draft is for. Yeah,
• 23:17
  Speaker 1: it's the draft doesn't exist because we have to force
• 23:21
  Speaker 1: men to defend their country when their country is in trouble.
• 23:24
  Speaker 1: The draft exists because when there isn't a reason for
• 23:31
  Speaker 1: a war that is valid enough and uh serious enough
• 23:36
  Speaker 1: and life impacting enough to the people in our nation
• 23:41
  Speaker 1: that that the men of our nation feel compelled by
• 23:45
  Speaker 1: those reasons to step up, that that that they have
• 23:48
  Speaker 1: a stake in the game, right that the government needs
• 23:53
  Speaker 1: or wants at least the power to make them go anyway. Yeah, right,
• 23:58
  Speaker 1: And that's that's wrong. It shouldn't be that way. It
• 24:02
  Speaker 1: shouldn't happen and say it's one of the reasons one
• 24:07
  Speaker 1: of the reasons I don't entirely hate Richard Nixon. He
• 24:12
  Speaker 1: he was the one that that was gonna end the draft.
• 24:15
  Speaker 1: He wanted an all volunteer military. He did not remain
• 24:19
  Speaker 1: in office long enough to to enact that. Ford had
• 24:25
  Speaker 1: to do it, but it was his idea to h
• 24:31
  Speaker 1: to end the draft, and of course as soon as
• 24:33
  Speaker 1: Carter got in, he reinstated it. And before anybody makes
• 24:37
  Speaker 1: the statement, it's not a draft, it's not a draft.
• 24:41
  Speaker 1: You know, the draft is not active. The draft is
• 24:44
  Speaker 1: always active. The first stage of the draft is making
• 24:50
  Speaker 1: everybody sign up for well all the men because women
• 24:53
  Speaker 1: don't have to do it, right, but making all the
• 24:55
  Speaker 1: men sign up for selective service. Just like the first
• 24:58
  Speaker 1: step of going to the grocery store is making your
• 25:01
  Speaker 1: fucking shopping list. Yeah, the selective service registration is the
• 25:06
  Speaker 1: shopping list. The second stage is when they start picking
• 25:10
  Speaker 1: from that shopping list. Okay, these are the guys we're
• 25:12
  Speaker 1: gonna send. But we are always as long as selective
• 25:18
  Speaker 1: service is active, as long as men are required as
• 25:23
  Speaker 1: soon as they reach legal manhood to sign up for
• 25:29
  Speaker 1: selective service, we are always in the first stage of
• 25:33
  Speaker 1: the draft. And no one should ever think of it
• 25:35
  Speaker 1: any other way, because at any time the second stage
• 25:41
  Speaker 1: can be activated. There's not something that says, well, since
• 25:44
  Speaker 1: we haven't done this for forty years, we have to
• 25:47
  Speaker 1: go through a longer and more complicated process. No, anytime
• 25:52
  Speaker 1: that the conditions occur that lead to a draft, which
• 25:57
  Speaker 1: basically is the government gets us involved in a war
• 26:02
  Speaker 1: that not enough people are going to sign up on
• 26:04
  Speaker 1: their own to fight, then then they will draft. They
• 26:08
  Speaker 1: will draft from those who have signed up for selective service. Right,
• 26:13
  Speaker 1: And and it doesn't even matter if if you think
• 26:17
  Speaker 1: the penalties aren't that bad. Right, it's not your college education,
• 26:24
  Speaker 1: it's his. It's not your name that a felony is
• 26:29
  Speaker 1: attached to. It's his when he doesn't sign up for
• 26:31
  Speaker 1: selective service. It's not your benefits that are that are denied.
• 26:37
  Speaker 1: It's his. And it's not your risk that the government
• 26:41
  Speaker 1: will decide, just on a dime that because they want to,
• 26:46
  Speaker 1: you know, enact the second stage where they actually start
• 26:50
  Speaker 1: drafting people, they're going to enforce it. And since it
• 26:54
  Speaker 1: is a felony, they're going to jail you because you
• 26:56
  Speaker 1: didn't sign up. Right, it's it's his risk. You don't
• 27:00
  Speaker 1: need to decide whether it's it's an acceptable risk or not.
• 27:04
  Speaker 1: Because it's not your risk, it's his risk.
• 27:07
  Speaker 3: Right, right. And just remember what Kamala said. Thank god
• 27:11
  Speaker 3: she didn't get into office, but remember what she said
• 27:14
  Speaker 3: when she was prosecutor. With just the swipe of her pen,
• 27:17
  Speaker 3: she can change your life. And that's exactly Any president
• 27:22
  Speaker 3: has that ability when it comes to in regards to
• 27:25
  Speaker 3: the draft. You know, so I'm completely there with you,
• 27:29
  Speaker 3: like it's never just because you know, they want to
• 27:33
  Speaker 3: make you think that it's not on the table, but
• 27:36
  Speaker 3: it absolutely is, you know.
• 27:38
  Speaker 1: They yep, it's you know, it's this is one of
• 27:45
  Speaker 1: those things that you know, I think a lot of
• 27:48
  Speaker 1: women don't have the frame of reference to understand mm hmmm,
• 27:55
  Speaker 1: because they've never been in a position.
• 27:57
  Speaker 3: They've never had to sacrifice.
• 28:00
  Speaker 1: Well, and it's it's it's not even even women who
• 28:04
  Speaker 1: have maybe had to take a job they didn't want
• 28:08
  Speaker 1: because they had to fulfill the responsibility and obligation, or
• 28:11
  Speaker 1: they needed money and couldn't get help or whatever women have.
• 28:15
  Speaker 1: There's there are things that men have faced that are
• 28:19
  Speaker 1: related to the reasoning behind the obligation for the draft
• 28:24
  Speaker 1: that women just don't face unless you go to dangerous
• 28:29
  Speaker 1: places alone with your children. Yeah, right, that that being
• 28:34
  Speaker 1: the the the Daniel Penny factor. Right, you're in a
• 28:41
  Speaker 1: public place and there is a disturbed man, an abnormal
• 28:45
  Speaker 1: man there, and he's threatening people. And it doesn't matter
• 28:50
  Speaker 1: whether it's because he's malicious or because he's got an
• 28:54
  Speaker 1: illness that's gone untreated, whether it's because he's wilful or
• 28:58
  Speaker 1: it's because he's been nick by society. If he's a
• 29:02
  Speaker 1: danger to other people, you get treated like you have
• 29:06
  Speaker 1: an obligation to stop him. You have an obligation to
• 29:10
  Speaker 1: do so at his expense and potentially at your expense,
• 29:15
  Speaker 1: health wise and safety wise. And if you don't, you
• 29:19
  Speaker 1: get called a coward, and if you do, you get
• 29:23
  Speaker 1: called a criminal. Right, only guys are subjected to that.
• 29:29
  Speaker 1: Ladies are exempt. Women are exempt. Only if your children
• 29:35
  Speaker 1: are being threatened? Do you face that? And then a
• 29:40
  Speaker 1: woman whose children are being threatened has the excuse that
• 29:45
  Speaker 1: any reasonable person would do anything to protect their children. Right,
• 29:49
  Speaker 1: that's so, So it's still not quite the same, And
• 29:58
  Speaker 1: you know it's it's women have been caught, women have
• 30:01
  Speaker 1: been pampered, We've had we are so surrounded by safety
• 30:06
  Speaker 1: nets that we are the equivalent of you know, the
• 30:11
  Speaker 1: parody movie the Boy in the plastic bubble. What's a
• 30:15
  Speaker 1: bubble boy, not the boy on the plast because the
• 30:18
  Speaker 1: regular movie, the movie, the other movie was the boy
• 30:20
  Speaker 1: in the plastic bubble, Bubble boy. That's that's us. We
• 30:26
  Speaker 1: are so shielded that we don't even know what's not
• 30:29
  Speaker 1: hitting us. Men are so vulnerable they know everything that's
• 30:35
  Speaker 1: not hitting them, and most of the time when something's
• 30:38
  Speaker 1: not hitting them, it's because they have taken active measures
• 30:41
  Speaker 1: to make sure of that. So their frame of reference
• 30:45
  Speaker 1: for understanding selective service and understanding the draft is significantly
• 30:50
  Speaker 1: different then than our frame of reference. If there was
• 30:56
  Speaker 1: a system like that, that would cause all women up
• 31:01
  Speaker 1: and create vulnerability and risk and obligation. And it's not
• 31:08
  Speaker 1: just any obligation either. This is the other thing a
• 31:11
  Speaker 1: lot of women don't understand because a lot of women,
• 31:13
  Speaker 1: when they were growing up as little girls, they grew
• 31:16
  Speaker 1: up in a culture, or a local culture at least,
• 31:20
  Speaker 1: where little girls didn't tough out conflict with each other.
• 31:26
  Speaker 1: If you got into a fight with another little girl,
• 31:28
  Speaker 1: it was usually verbal, not physical, and maybe you know,
• 31:35
  Speaker 1: social manipulation with other little girls. Right, Most little girls
• 31:40
  Speaker 1: didn't get fish hooked in the mouth by another little
• 31:43
  Speaker 1: girl when they were eight years old, over a fago
• 31:46
  Speaker 1: bottle that somebody wanted to use to put water in
• 31:48
  Speaker 1: the sandbox at the park to make a little castle.
• 31:52
  Speaker 1: Like I did, you know, fish hooked in the mouth
• 31:57
  Speaker 1: with a hand that had been in that sandbox with
• 32:00
  Speaker 1: the local parents, also called the litter box because everybody's
• 32:03
  Speaker 1: cats used. I wasn't actually allowed to play in the sandbox,
• 32:09
  Speaker 1: so it wouldn't happened if I had listened to my mom.
• 32:12
  Speaker 1: But I mean, like that's I grew up in a
• 32:14
  Speaker 1: different situation. The only reason I can see this is
• 32:18
  Speaker 1: because I grew up in that different situation. Y'all. To understand,
• 32:21
  Speaker 1: my family lived in a part of a rough and
• 32:26
  Speaker 1: tumble town where our recreation included things like going to
• 32:32
  Speaker 1: the hobby store and getting one inch doal rods and
• 32:34
  Speaker 1: bringing them home and wrapping them up in towels and
• 32:38
  Speaker 1: beating the hell out of each other with them for fun.
• 32:41
  Speaker 1: We called it sword fighting. We were pretending they were swords,
• 32:45
  Speaker 1: but they were just they were just dowrods with towels
• 32:49
  Speaker 1: wrapped around them with macroma cord holding it on, and
• 32:53
  Speaker 1: you know, so they were a little bit kind of
• 32:56
  Speaker 1: sort of cushioned, like you could hit each other pretty
• 32:58
  Speaker 1: hard without leaving bruises. And in the in the fall,
• 33:01
  Speaker 1: when all the leaves came off the willow trees, we
• 33:04
  Speaker 1: used to take the long leaf branch that the little
• 33:09
  Speaker 1: leaves would grow on and whip the hell out of
• 33:12
  Speaker 1: each other with them. And you know, boxing in the backyard,
• 33:18
  Speaker 1: jumping around on the monkey bars like it was solid ground,
• 33:21
  Speaker 1: all that kind of risky fun. I don't know how
• 33:26
  Speaker 1: to explain it to other people why that's fun. But
• 33:29
  Speaker 1: you get to test yourself for how how tough you are.
• 33:34
  Speaker 1: Oh yeah, whiffleball bats troll with a purpose of nodes.
• 33:39
  Speaker 3: Yep.
• 33:40
  Speaker 1: We used to hit each other with it because if
• 33:43
  Speaker 1: you hit just right and hard enough on skin with
• 33:47
  Speaker 1: a whiffleball bat it because it's hollow, and because it's
• 33:51
  Speaker 1: so fat and everything it leaves this nice. It almost
• 33:55
  Speaker 1: looks like a hive. The welt is weird. It's it's
• 33:59
  Speaker 1: it's fat, and it's it just looks funny, so you
• 34:02
  Speaker 1: have to see it. But or getting getting like we
• 34:08
  Speaker 1: played dodgeball at the park. The other kids were made
• 34:12
  Speaker 1: to play dodgeball. In gym class. We played dodgeball at
• 34:16
  Speaker 1: the park. We played tackle football at the park. Uh
• 34:21
  Speaker 1: we well, we had we had one game where there
• 34:25
  Speaker 1: we had a they put in our park as a
• 34:28
  Speaker 1: play toy for us, drainage ditchliner that was about four
• 34:33
  Speaker 1: feet high and had a little ladder on the side
• 34:36
  Speaker 1: of it. And that thing was everything from a pirate
• 34:42
  Speaker 1: ship to a spaceship to the last iceberg on water World,
• 34:50
  Speaker 1: which before there was a movie about a water world
• 34:53
  Speaker 1: that we were all fighting over and pushed each other
• 34:56
  Speaker 1: off of. And and yeah no padding. Hell, half the
• 35:01
  Speaker 1: guys weren't even wearing I was always on the shirts team,
• 35:04
  Speaker 1: of course, but we did shoots and skins like I
• 35:08
  Speaker 1: being a girl, I was always on shirts.
• 35:11
  Speaker 3: That's King of the Hill, right that game you got
• 35:14
  Speaker 3: to fight to get to the top.
• 35:15
  Speaker 1: Oh yeah, yeah, King of the Hill. Then we had
• 35:19
  Speaker 1: a game. I don't know. YouTube might actually penalize us
• 35:25
  Speaker 1: for saying the name of the game, but it was smear.
• 35:30
  Speaker 1: The word that rhyme's was smear. That gets used as
• 35:34
  Speaker 1: a normal part of gender mafia language, but if anybody
• 35:40
  Speaker 1: else says it, it gets treated as a slur, especially
• 35:43
  Speaker 1: in the context of that game. The game was you
• 35:46
  Speaker 1: throw football up in the air, somebody catches it. That
• 35:48
  Speaker 1: person is basically it, but it's like reverse tag. Everybody
• 35:54
  Speaker 1: is trying to tackle that guy and he has to
• 35:55
  Speaker 1: get to the the end zone. So literally everybody's after you.
• 36:03
  Speaker 1: Massive water wars like super soakers, squirt guns, buckets, the holes.
• 36:09
  Speaker 1: Everything was fair game. It was knocked down, drag out right.
• 36:12
  Speaker 1: So the only reason I can see this stuff is
• 36:15
  Speaker 1: because I was that kid that might be in one
• 36:18
  Speaker 1: tree and jump to another tree just like the boys did.
• 36:23
  Speaker 1: And I, you know I was. I was that kid
• 36:26
  Speaker 1: that ended up at the bottom of a dog pile
• 36:28
  Speaker 1: if I didn't run fast enough with with my asthma
• 36:30
  Speaker 1: and everything, and you know, I was, so I understand
• 36:37
  Speaker 1: the fighting end of it. Two, there was a video
• 36:45
  Speaker 1: I made a few years ago about a fight I
• 36:49
  Speaker 1: got into when I was in elementary school with a
• 36:52
  Speaker 1: girl that was a couple of years older than me
• 36:53
  Speaker 1: that was not part of my neighborhood. It was stranger
• 36:55
  Speaker 1: to the neighborhood, and I heard her and I was
• 37:00
  Speaker 1: worried because I hurt her. I felt really bad too,
• 37:03
  Speaker 1: but I mean she was trying to hurt me. Everybody
• 37:06
  Speaker 1: tried to make me feel better about it. I just
• 37:09
  Speaker 1: happened to kick her in the wrong place, and I
• 37:13
  Speaker 1: knocked the wind out of her, and I thought I
• 37:17
  Speaker 1: broke her ribs and punctured her lungs and she was
• 37:19
  Speaker 1: going to suffocate to death, and I ran home to
• 37:21
  Speaker 1: get my mom to save her, and all kinds of stuff.
• 37:24
  Speaker 1: She thought she was in trouble, so when she got
• 37:26
  Speaker 1: her breath back, she ran away. But I mean all
• 37:31
  Speaker 1: my life, I've had this memory of how that felt,
• 37:36
  Speaker 1: and that was just I didn't hurt her as badly
• 37:39
  Speaker 1: as I thought I did, just thinking for five minutes
• 37:43
  Speaker 1: that I might have possibly killed somebody. It's the most horrific.
• 37:50
  Speaker 1: Nothing else I have ever felt bad about doing in
• 37:53
  Speaker 1: my life has felt as bad as I felt in
• 37:56
  Speaker 1: those moments moments, Right, So, if you get drafted, it's
• 38:03
  Speaker 1: not the same as volunteering for the military. There are
• 38:05
  Speaker 1: people who volunteer for the military. They make peace with
• 38:08
  Speaker 1: the fact that they may be required to kill somebody.
• 38:14
  Speaker 1: They may be in a situation where they have to
• 38:16
  Speaker 1: kill somebody it's trying to kill them. Their actions may
• 38:19
  Speaker 1: support other people's death. It's what they're in the military for, right.
• 38:24
  Speaker 1: But if you don't have that temperament where you can
• 38:28
  Speaker 1: make peace with that. It's just not part of your
• 38:31
  Speaker 1: personality to make peace with that. And you get drafted.
• 38:35
  Speaker 1: The government doesn't say do you consent to killing other
• 38:41
  Speaker 1: people for your government. They don't say that. They tell
• 38:44
  Speaker 1: you you're gonna do it whether you like it or not.
• 38:47
  Speaker 1: And if you don't agree, you're gonna get court martialed,
• 38:51
  Speaker 1: you're gonna get jailed. You could even be executed for
• 38:57
  Speaker 1: being a trader to the country if you if your
• 39:02
  Speaker 1: refusal is big enough. Now there are some exceptions, right,
• 39:07
  Speaker 1: you can be a conscientious objector, and you have to
• 39:11
  Speaker 1: prove that you have a very solid philosophy. It can't
• 39:17
  Speaker 1: just be that you feel you would be very upset
• 39:22
  Speaker 1: by having to engage in that kind of violence. It
• 39:24
  Speaker 1: has to It's a very limited, very serious thing to
• 39:29
  Speaker 1: become a conscientious objector, and it doesn't get you out
• 39:34
  Speaker 1: of service. It gets you out of fighting. So, for instance,
• 39:38
  Speaker 1: during the Vietnam War, when my parents were in college,
• 39:43
  Speaker 1: they went with their university did a lot of charity work,
• 39:49
  Speaker 1: and they went with a bunch of people to it's
• 39:53
  Speaker 1: no longer an operation, but Yipsil any mental facility, the
• 40:00
  Speaker 1: one that's famous because they put the two or three
• 40:05
  Speaker 1: guys that thought they were Jesus in the same room
• 40:08
  Speaker 1: together just to see how they would react to each other,
• 40:14
  Speaker 1: because if one of them is Jesus, the other one
• 40:16
  Speaker 1: can't also be Jesus. Right. But they went as volunteers,
• 40:24
  Speaker 1: but there are a bunch of people on the bus
• 40:26
  Speaker 1: with them that were going to do the same service
• 40:30
  Speaker 1: that they went there to do as a religious pilgrimage
• 40:35
  Speaker 1: kind of thing, missionary work. These other people were doing
• 40:39
  Speaker 1: it because the government made them do it, because they
• 40:42
  Speaker 1: were conscientious objectors, and like they come up with, you
• 40:47
  Speaker 1: get shit duty, it's just your your shit duty doesn't
• 40:52
  Speaker 1: involve pointing a gun at another person, pulling the trigger
• 40:54
  Speaker 1: and watching them die.
• 40:56
  Speaker 3: Yeah.
• 40:59
  Speaker 1: So this apex fallacy that we've seen playing, you know,
• 41:05
  Speaker 1: being proven by by the Biden administration, where Turley talks
• 41:11
  Speaker 1: about how how big a proof it is that everything
• 41:15
  Speaker 1: that Biden has said in his own defense in regard
• 41:19
  Speaker 1: to his son's case is a lie. I want to
• 41:21
  Speaker 1: point out first before we talk about any other aspect
• 41:25
  Speaker 1: of this, just you know, how much this proves that
• 41:33
  Speaker 1: apex fallacy is a fallacy that that you know, the
• 41:38
  Speaker 1: guy at the top has an entirely different experience than
• 41:42
  Speaker 1: the guy at the bottom. And it's not just a
• 41:46
  Speaker 1: different experience, it's a level of power over the guy
• 41:48
  Speaker 1: at the bottom that if you get an abusive guy
• 41:51
  Speaker 1: at the top, the guys at the bottom have no
• 41:54
  Speaker 1: nothing they can do about it, you know, until they
• 41:56
  Speaker 1: get to vote, and they if they're not all united
• 42:00
  Speaker 1: against him, if he's not so blatantly bad that they
• 42:04
  Speaker 1: that they're all united against him, Uh, he may remain
• 42:09
  Speaker 1: in power. And because women don't always understand the abuses
• 42:15
  Speaker 1: of the ruling class, the abuses of the elites against men,
• 42:20
  Speaker 1: they don't always care enough to consider the experiences of men.
• 42:26
  Speaker 1: Women may outvote men and keep an an oligarch in power,
• 42:32
  Speaker 1: or you know, a totalitarian in power, or a totalitarian
• 42:36
  Speaker 1: oligarch in power who abuses and uh exploits the common
• 42:44
  Speaker 1: man the way the Biden family has done. So beyond
• 42:51
  Speaker 1: what Turley had to say, Oh, learn, did you have something?
• 42:55
  Speaker 3: No, I'm just agreeing with you.
• 42:58
  Speaker 1: Beyond what what Turli is s. Let's take a look
• 43:00
  Speaker 1: at this party.
• 43:03
  Speaker 2: I also with you.
• 43:06
  Speaker 1: Thank you. So this is CBS News. We don't necessarily
• 43:14
  Speaker 1: trust CBS News, but I think this is pretty much
• 43:17
  Speaker 1: just a lot of it's just a word for word
• 43:19
  Speaker 1: publication of the statements made by the president and the
• 43:26
  Speaker 1: actual pardon itself. So those things we actually can at
• 43:31
  Speaker 1: least confirm. So let's scroll down here eliminate the video
• 43:37
  Speaker 1: because we're not here to watch the video. And this
• 43:41
  Speaker 1: is the part that really gets me because usually when
• 43:43
  Speaker 1: you have a presidential pardon, it's I don't know, Bob Smith. Like,
• 43:51
  Speaker 1: sorry to everybody out there named Bob Smith. Bob Smith
• 43:54
  Speaker 1: has been wrongly convicted of I don't know, uh, hogging,
• 44:01
  Speaker 1: hogging the pumpkin piot Thanksgiving. It's really serious crime, and
• 44:10
  Speaker 1: his punishment was disproportionate. You know, maybe maybe he didn't
• 44:15
  Speaker 1: actually hog the pie, or maybe there was another pie
• 44:18
  Speaker 1: or whatever, and they're going to give him the death
• 44:20
  Speaker 1: penalty for it. I'm gonna pardon him. He is. He's
• 44:24
  Speaker 1: no longer culpable for hogging the pumpkin pie at Thanksgiving, right,
• 44:30
  Speaker 1: And that's it, not everything he did at Thanksgiving or
• 44:35
  Speaker 1: everything he did this whole decade. President Biden on Sunday
• 44:41
  Speaker 1: issued a sweeping, full and unconditional pardon of his son Hunter,
• 44:47
  Speaker 1: who was convicted earlier this year of federal gun and
• 44:50
  Speaker 1: drug charges under laws, by the way, that his father wrote,
• 44:58
  Speaker 1: which have been used against men in this country for
• 45:03
  Speaker 1: thirty years. But that's that's supposedly beside the point, right,
• 45:11
  Speaker 1: and pleaded guilty to federal tax charges in California. The
• 45:15
  Speaker 1: pardon covers offenses that Hunter Biden has committed or may
• 45:20
  Speaker 1: have committed or taken part in during the period from
• 45:24
  Speaker 1: January one, twenty fourteen, through December one, twenty twenty four so.
• 45:33
  Speaker 3: In other words, right before he went to go work
• 45:35
  Speaker 3: for Charisma up until now.
• 45:37
  Speaker 2: Yeah, And this was laid in place before the witching
• 45:44
  Speaker 2: hour of December the first. Yeah, And many people were speculating,
• 45:49
  Speaker 2: like Hunter has a certain number of hours to do
• 45:52
  Speaker 2: literally whatever he wants, and you have and you have
• 45:58
  Speaker 2: to wonder what he would do. And I, like dear listener,
• 46:02
  Speaker 2: would do nothing, because we couldn't conceive of the idea
• 46:06
  Speaker 2: of murdering anyone on a moral level, even if we
• 46:13
  Speaker 2: could get away with it. We couldn't just simply murder
• 46:16
  Speaker 2: someone just for the sake of we can get away
• 46:20
  Speaker 2: with it. But you and I are not like Hunter Biden.
• 46:24
  Speaker 2: Hunter Biden is a man who has evidently been above
• 46:29
  Speaker 2: the law for the last ten years, and when he
• 46:32
  Speaker 2: was given this federal permission to break literally any international
• 46:38
  Speaker 2: law anywhere ever. I like, I would love to be
• 46:45
  Speaker 2: a fly on the wall in Hunter Biden's bedroom that night,
• 46:51
  Speaker 2: as he asked himself, I can literally get away with anything.
• 46:55
  Speaker 2: What am I going to do? But in the end,
• 46:57
  Speaker 2: he probably just smoked some crack and fuck the hooker
• 46:59
  Speaker 2: and went to sleep.
• 47:00
  Speaker 1: Because unless his father, Yeah, like, why why else would
• 47:06
  Speaker 1: he pick that specific date? Well, I'm going to have
• 47:10
  Speaker 1: you do x Y z illegally like maybe disposed of
• 47:14
  Speaker 1: evidence that could be used against the Biden family in
• 47:18
  Speaker 1: a criminal case or something like that. You know, he
• 47:23
  Speaker 1: couldn't be prosecuted for it because he's pardoned, And that's
• 47:27
  Speaker 1: that's the situation. So we're we're gonna look at the
• 47:30
  Speaker 1: actual pardon. It's not even limited to offenses charge you're prosecuted,
• 47:37
  Speaker 1: so it's anything like anything he might have stuff that
• 47:42
  Speaker 1: if we don't even know about it yet and it
• 47:44
  Speaker 1: comes out later, well sorry, can't. I can't do anything
• 47:50
  Speaker 1: about it now because he's And if.
• 47:52
  Speaker 2: Hunter didn't commit a crime, then Joe didn't commit a
• 47:55
  Speaker 2: crime either.
• 47:57
  Speaker 1: Well that's I think. I think that's what Biden's thinking.
• 48:02
  Speaker 1: But it's not how it it's not how it works
• 48:04
  Speaker 1: in the real world. It's going to be interesting. So
• 48:07
  Speaker 1: the pardon says, be it known that this day, I,
• 48:11
  Speaker 1: Joseph R. Biden, Junior President of the United States, pursued
• 48:14
  Speaker 1: to my powers under Article two, Section two, Clause one
• 48:17
  Speaker 1: of the Constitution, have granted unto Robert Hunter Biden, a
• 48:22
  Speaker 1: full and unconditional pardon for those offenses against the United
• 48:28
  Speaker 1: States which he has committed, or may have committed, or
• 48:30
  Speaker 1: taken part in during the period from January one, twenty
• 48:34
  Speaker 1: fourteen through December one, twenty twenty four including but not
• 48:38
  Speaker 1: limited to, all offenses charged or prosecuted. And then he
• 48:42
  Speaker 1: gets real specific about those and in those have resulted
• 48:46
  Speaker 1: in convictions. And then it says in testimony, whereof I
• 48:53
  Speaker 1: have here unto signed my name and caused a pardon
• 48:57
  Speaker 1: to be recorded with the Department of Justice. So the
• 49:01
  Speaker 1: one thing that he wasn't able to do with this
• 49:05
  Speaker 1: pardon was prevent the state from jailing Hunter if he
• 49:14
  Speaker 1: refuses to answer a subpoena later on to be compelled
• 49:20
  Speaker 1: to testify against his father in any kind of criminal hearing,
• 49:25
  Speaker 1: and if the testimony happens to be about something that
• 49:30
  Speaker 1: happened during that ten year period. What this does is
• 49:35
  Speaker 1: since Hunter's actions during the period, he could confess to
• 49:40
  Speaker 1: mass murder. He could he could confess to going into
• 49:45
  Speaker 1: a building full of people and being an active shooter
• 49:48
  Speaker 1: and taking out half of them, and he wouldn't go
• 49:52
  Speaker 1: to jail for it, like talking about Midnight in the
• 49:55
  Speaker 1: Garden of Good and Evil, Good Greece.
• 49:58
  Speaker 3: Right, this can't.
• 50:00
  Speaker 1: Because of that, because he cannot incriminate himself. He cannot
• 50:05
  Speaker 1: take the fifth on anything that happened during that time.
• 50:11
  Speaker 3: Go on, Laura, this cannot be the reason or the
• 50:16
  Speaker 3: intention behind a presidential pardon, like when what just to
• 50:25
  Speaker 3: get out of jail free card for anyone you want,
• 50:29
  Speaker 3: you know, and listen, I'm sorry, I'm still pissed that
• 50:32
  Speaker 3: we couldn't get Julian Assange pardon. Yeah, Okay, it's so far, yes,
• 50:41
  Speaker 3: so far, we got one more shot.
• 50:43
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 50:44
  Speaker 1: Well, and it's it's possible that, you know, we don't
• 50:48
  Speaker 1: know who's going to be president after Trump, so it's
• 50:51
  Speaker 1: possible that the mood of the country could be such
• 50:53
  Speaker 1: that we would get more and more libertarian, maybe closer
• 50:58
  Speaker 1: to end cap and we might get somebody who will
• 51:01
  Speaker 1: pardon Julian Assange because he did nothing wrong. I know
• 51:07
  Speaker 1: there's a few people that are like, we went overboard
• 51:09
  Speaker 1: on his criticism of the military. No, he didn't go
• 51:11
  Speaker 1: far enough. And it's in my opinion, there's quite a
• 51:17
  Speaker 1: bit of information that has come out in the last
• 51:23
  Speaker 1: well during during the lifetime of most gen xers that
• 51:26
  Speaker 1: is so condemning of the way the federal government, particularly
• 51:31
  Speaker 1: the federal bureaucracy runs the military and uses the soldiers
• 51:35
  Speaker 1: that I absolutely when it comes to that apex fallacy,
• 51:42
  Speaker 1: I absolutely consider the draft to be human trafficking.
• 51:49
  Speaker 2: Why hasn't Elon Musk been subjected to the same law
• 51:53
  Speaker 2: fair as Julian Assange.
• 51:57
  Speaker 1: I think it's probably partly because he has more resources.
• 52:02
  Speaker 3: M H.
• 52:03
  Speaker 2: It's it's because Juve and the Songe discovered the nature
• 52:10
  Speaker 2: of the matrix before Elon Musk did. The only reason
• 52:15
  Speaker 2: that the legacy media loves Jeff Bezos and his takeover
• 52:20
  Speaker 2: of the Washington Post was it. And yet they turn
• 52:24
  Speaker 2: around and go, we can't possibly stand for Elon musks
• 52:27
  Speaker 2: takeover of the of the Twitter network. It's because of
• 52:35
  Speaker 2: the direction in which all of this narrative is being
• 52:40
  Speaker 2: pushed and it's going to go the same for all
• 52:43
  Speaker 2: of the other things in the near future that we've
• 52:46
  Speaker 2: been talking about. And I've had a big old rant
• 52:51
  Speaker 2: to say about that singularity of conversation point that we
• 52:59
  Speaker 2: were but I forgot what it was. So it doesn't matter.
• 53:02
  Speaker 2: Someone take over. I'm drunk.
• 53:06
  Speaker 3: I mean, these left cards have been crying about leaving
• 53:11
  Speaker 3: Twitter before Elon ever got there, right, and that they
• 53:15
  Speaker 3: haven't left. There's still that Well I think now some
• 53:19
  Speaker 3: of them are go, but you know, they still check in,
• 53:22
  Speaker 3: they still look, they still read it because there's not
• 53:25
  Speaker 3: enough interaction. When you take a fraction of the people
• 53:30
  Speaker 3: or the users on x slash Twitter and shuffle them
• 53:34
  Speaker 3: over to another place, well, it's it's an echo chamber.
• 53:37
  Speaker 3: They're just talking amongst themselves, you know what I mean.
• 53:40
  Speaker 3: It's kind of like why parlor didn't really work and
• 53:45
  Speaker 3: true social didn't really work. Nobody wants to sit around
• 53:49
  Speaker 3: and talk to people who are saying the exact same
• 53:51
  Speaker 3: thing because at some point you all know the arguments,
• 53:55
  Speaker 3: you all know what everyone's going to say. You need
• 53:58
  Speaker 3: a little something different to spice it up up, right,
• 54:01
  Speaker 3: These people are eternally online.
• 54:04
  Speaker 1: Yeah, you know, well, and they want specifically they want drama. Yeah,
• 54:10
  Speaker 1: they don't want to hash ideas and may the best
• 54:13
  Speaker 1: idea when they just want drama.
• 54:15
  Speaker 3: Yeah, they want drama. And they want to dictate to
• 54:19
  Speaker 3: everyone else what they should and shouldn't do, how they
• 54:22
  Speaker 3: should and shouldn't feel, what they can and can't say.
• 54:25
  Speaker 1: Yeah, or they're outrage porn. Yeah, you know. Outrage porn
• 54:33
  Speaker 1: is a different ballgame from looking at major issues and
• 54:40
  Speaker 1: things that are being done by the government, things that
• 54:43
  Speaker 1: are happening in the news, and saying, this is what
• 54:45
  Speaker 1: needs to change, and here's who is proposing the best ideas,
• 54:50
  Speaker 1: and we're going to support this guy because we think
• 54:52
  Speaker 1: that the policy changes he is promising might actually fix
• 54:58
  Speaker 1: the problem that this is exposing. You know, like that's
• 55:01
  Speaker 1: that's the arena of ideas and it should be a
• 55:07
  Speaker 1: mosh pit, maybe a combination mosh pit and gladiator ring, right,
• 55:16
  Speaker 1: just a crossover. But outrage porn is just when you
• 55:21
  Speaker 1: find some individual anecdotal example of something objectionable, and every
• 55:31
  Speaker 1: single time something similar to that comes up, you have
• 55:35
  Speaker 1: to freak out about each individual one, Each individual one
• 55:39
  Speaker 1: deserves your full attention. Each individual one must be discussed
• 55:44
  Speaker 1: at length, even though the discussion is going to lead
• 55:47
  Speaker 1: to absolutely nothing. And it's it's fair to compile outrage
• 55:56
  Speaker 1: porn and make note of the fact, gosh, this very
• 56:00
  Speaker 1: frequently and maybe try to use it to change the
• 56:04
  Speaker 1: position of the Overton window. But that's not what snowflakes
• 56:08
  Speaker 1: on the left do. It's not what you know snowflakes
• 56:12
  Speaker 1: on the right do either. Like the there's you have
• 56:15
  Speaker 1: activists that are trying to get people to understand what
• 56:18
  Speaker 1: the problems are and what policy changes or eliminations need
• 56:22
  Speaker 1: to happen to fix it. But you also have people
• 56:26
  Speaker 1: that just want to stir shit, and you know, just
• 56:30
  Speaker 1: want to initiate cancelation mobs, and and that's it, that's
• 56:36
  Speaker 1: all they want. So somebody gets yelled at and and
• 56:41
  Speaker 1: somebody gets maybe fired from their job or debanked or
• 56:45
  Speaker 1: or other consequences like that because they said the wrong
• 56:48
  Speaker 1: set of words, or even the wrong one word. I
• 56:54
  Speaker 1: got I got limited on on X last night for
• 57:00
  Speaker 1: explaining not for using the word faggot as a slur,
• 57:05
  Speaker 1: but for explaining that it is not always used as
• 57:09
  Speaker 1: a reference to homosexuality, that it has other uses and
• 57:14
  Speaker 1: that if you look at the old school, knockdown, drag
• 57:17
  Speaker 1: out Internet, like the heyday of four Chan, the days
• 57:21
  Speaker 1: when you know, there was no such thing as a blog.
• 57:24
  Speaker 1: The days went like back to you know, use net days,
• 57:30
  Speaker 1: even the AOL chat rooms that were so insulated in
• 57:34
  Speaker 1: everything because you only use them if you were sort
• 57:38
  Speaker 1: of stuck in the little circle of Aol and didn't leave.
• 57:44
  Speaker 1: There was none of this oh, you can't say that word.
• 57:48
  Speaker 1: It's those are nasty words, those are hurdy words. We're
• 57:51
  Speaker 1: going to kick you out. It was everybody was. It
• 57:55
  Speaker 1: was like the way the cunt gets used in Australia.
• 57:59
  Speaker 1: You know, you faggots get over here, and it means everybody.
• 58:04
  Speaker 1: And it's really sad and pathetic that we've gotten to
• 58:07
  Speaker 1: the point where we're empowering language to be hurdy words
• 58:14
  Speaker 1: again that we had disempowered by pretty much applying it
• 58:20
  Speaker 1: to everything and making it meaningless. Why would you do that?
• 58:24
  Speaker 1: You give mean people weapons that they don't deserve and
• 58:28
  Speaker 1: they don't have a write to, and you don't have
• 58:32
  Speaker 1: to allow them to be weapons in other people's hands.
• 58:37
  Speaker 1: But somebody got very but hurt that I corrected the
• 58:43
  Speaker 1: hysteria that was being engaged in. And it wasn't even
• 58:48
  Speaker 1: one of the people I was explaining it to. It
• 58:51
  Speaker 1: was somebody else watching the conversation. And I actually think
• 58:56
  Speaker 1: it was a news outlet, a news outlet that we
• 58:58
  Speaker 1: were criticizing for some behaviors that were really shitty. So, yeah,
• 59:06
  Speaker 1: it's it's it's quite interesting that we're sort of returning
• 59:12
  Speaker 1: to that snowflakering and it makes it very difficult for
• 59:16
  Speaker 1: conversations to happen, and that outrage porn tendency to ignore
• 59:23
  Speaker 1: persuading people to change their minds about the gap between
• 59:29
  Speaker 1: the way things are and the way they should be,
• 59:32
  Speaker 1: and abanding abandoning that in favor of getting upset and
• 59:36
  Speaker 1: getting other people upset and stopping at we're upset that
• 59:42
  Speaker 1: that that's really starting to bother me. This is like this,
• 59:47
  Speaker 1: a lot of people stopped at it's so unfair that
• 59:50
  Speaker 1: Hunter Biden got got pardoned, which we can acknowledge that, yes,
• 59:56
  Speaker 1: it is, it is unfair, but that's not the biggest
• 59:58
  Speaker 1: problem with it. That opens a door. That unfairness opens
• 1:00:04
  Speaker 1: a door to examine several things that are much more
• 1:00:10
  Speaker 1: important than whether or not it's fair, one of which
• 1:00:13
  Speaker 1: is like, yeah, well even that, like, yes, I will
• 1:00:19
  Speaker 1: be livid if Anthony Fauci get gets pardoned. But it's
• 1:00:23
  Speaker 1: not the unfairness of it that is the problem, right,
• 1:00:30
  Speaker 1: It's the fact that an apex person, a person in
• 1:00:36
  Speaker 1: the elite, can commit horrible crimes with the full knowledge
• 1:00:42
  Speaker 1: that he doesn't have to worry about accountability because he
• 1:00:45
  Speaker 1: is in a set of elites that are in power
• 1:00:51
  Speaker 1: that can protect him from being held accountable for his
• 1:00:55
  Speaker 1: actions in the future when they are about to leave power.
• 1:00:59
  Speaker 1: That is a major issue. If you don't have accountability
• 1:01:04
  Speaker 1: in government, you don't have anything even remotely resembling a democracy.
• 1:01:13
  Speaker 1: It's totalitarian if your government officials can engage in profoundly,
• 1:01:22
  Speaker 1: deadly evil violations of human rights that cause damage across
• 1:01:30
  Speaker 1: the entire population, that damage the economy, that damage the
• 1:01:36
  Speaker 1: development of an entire generation of children. Because Jen Alpha
• 1:01:42
  Speaker 1: is going to suffer from from the things that happened
• 1:01:45
  Speaker 1: to them during the COVID crisis as a result of policy,
• 1:01:50
  Speaker 1: direct result of policy that Fauci put into action by
• 1:01:55
  Speaker 1: advising Biden what to do, right, and he can. If
• 1:01:59
  Speaker 1: he can get away with that, that means another person
• 1:02:02
  Speaker 1: can do it, and another and another yeah, right, that
• 1:02:07
  Speaker 1: you can take the hits over and over again from
• 1:02:11
  Speaker 1: government officials not caring about the effect of their policy
• 1:02:16
  Speaker 1: on you. And to me, that is probably one of
• 1:02:21
  Speaker 1: the best and cap arguments I could make as long
• 1:02:26
  Speaker 1: as the government is able to exempt itself and it's
• 1:02:29
  Speaker 1: it's denzens, it's participants, whatever, from accountability for things that
• 1:02:36
  Speaker 1: impact broad swatches of the population, to impact the economy,
• 1:02:42
  Speaker 1: that change how the future is going to go. It's
• 1:02:49
  Speaker 1: probably the most dangerous thing in existence. It's more dangerous
• 1:02:53
  Speaker 1: to have government than it is to have nuclear bombs
• 1:02:56
  Speaker 1: out there in a government free world.
• 1:03:02
  Speaker 2: And yeah, I've I've found myself at this crossroads of
• 1:03:07
  Speaker 2: of how authoritarians should we be and how libertarians should
• 1:03:11
  Speaker 2: we be when it comes to the average person, when
• 1:03:13
  Speaker 2: it comes to the likes of of Anthony Fauci. And
• 1:03:19
  Speaker 2: I'm thinking, Okay, what what's the worst that could happen
• 1:03:24
  Speaker 2: if we enact the most authoritarian measures on Anthony Fauci?
• 1:03:30
  Speaker 2: Will will not only arrest him, will will incarcerate him,
• 1:03:38
  Speaker 2: and we might even torture I mean.
• 1:03:43
  Speaker 1: I would.
• 1:03:44
  Speaker 2: It's not Lauren just yelled I would from the other room,
• 1:03:49
  Speaker 2: And yes I would, because I mean we've been enacting
• 1:03:53
  Speaker 2: torture for the last few decades, largely for the sake
• 1:03:59
  Speaker 2: of war, and that's you know, that's certainly a controversial
• 1:04:06
  Speaker 2: way to approach things. A lot of us would like
• 1:04:09
  Speaker 2: to say, we probably shouldn't torture peach people. I mean,
• 1:04:13
  Speaker 2: unless we're in a situation where we can get some
• 1:04:17
  Speaker 2: extremely important information, and I would I would quite like
• 1:04:28
  Speaker 2: to get Anthony Faucci into a position where we can
• 1:04:32
  Speaker 2: get some important information from him. It's this is what
• 1:04:40
  Speaker 2: I'm talking about about, this line between authoritarian and libertarianism.
• 1:04:44
  Speaker 2: I I like to think I lean against whatever force
• 1:04:52
  Speaker 2: might involve torturing people for information. But I think we've
• 1:04:57
  Speaker 2: reached the point where we found the last generation of
• 1:05:03
  Speaker 2: evil bastards that we can legitimately and laudaly justify using
• 1:05:12
  Speaker 2: torture against.
• 1:05:16
  Speaker 4: Because because I don't know, I don't know how it's
• 1:05:20
  Speaker 4: even theoretically possible to have a government appointed evil bastards
• 1:05:28
  Speaker 4: any more evil than Anthony Fauci.
• 1:05:33
  Speaker 2: And Yeah, there's all sorts of things swelling around in
• 1:05:40
  Speaker 2: my head that I want to say right now, but
• 1:05:43
  Speaker 2: I can't say any of them because I'm pretty sure
• 1:05:45
  Speaker 2: it would get this channel deleted if I said any
• 1:05:48
  Speaker 2: of those things. So, yeah, you know.
• 1:05:53
  Speaker 3: And you might get a talking to from TSA.
• 1:05:56
  Speaker 2: Again, there was thirty minutes in my head of rant
• 1:06:01
  Speaker 2: just now, but I'm just gonna have to leave it there.
• 1:06:04
  Speaker 2: But I think I've said my thing. Probably, I think
• 1:06:08
  Speaker 2: I've tickled your senses for dear listeners as to what
• 1:06:12
  Speaker 2: you want to say, you.
• 1:06:14
  Speaker 1: Know, probably probably Mike cannot get away was comparing uh,
• 1:06:20
  Speaker 1: doctor doctor Anthony Fauci to Joseph Mingle, for instance, But
• 1:06:28
  Speaker 1: I can he certainly experimented on more people than the Mingle.
• 1:06:37
  Speaker 1: He kind of experimented on the entire world. There were
• 1:06:40
  Speaker 1: a lot of places where policy that he influenced made
• 1:06:48
  Speaker 1: vaccines whose creation he influenced and was invested in mandatory.
• 1:06:57
  Speaker 1: And I agree that they're not real vaccines like that.
• 1:07:03
  Speaker 1: That's something that there were. There were other things. Uh,
• 1:07:07
  Speaker 1: then there's a lot of information that has come out
• 1:07:10
  Speaker 1: about those drugs.
• 1:07:14
  Speaker 3: I mean, for Christ's sake, India, India needed Fauci from
• 1:07:20
  Speaker 3: their entire country. And these are the same people who
• 1:07:24
  Speaker 3: ship in the street.
• 1:07:26
  Speaker 1: Okay, the better the rest of us, you know, really
• 1:07:31
  Speaker 1: ought to be rejecting. The man.
• 1:07:35
  Speaker 2: Is a wanted man in Japan, and they are the
• 1:07:38
  Speaker 2: opposite of people who ship in the street. Yes, you
• 1:07:41
  Speaker 2: have to in a robot in Japan, but.
• 1:07:45
  Speaker 1: But they are very polite. And for them to get
• 1:07:48
  Speaker 1: that irate about one guy, uh, that's that says something too,
• 1:07:52
  Speaker 1: especially like I would never set foot there if I
• 1:07:57
  Speaker 1: was him. Just there's there's a very stark division between
• 1:08:03
  Speaker 1: two segments of the Japanese population. And so there's there's
• 1:08:07
  Speaker 1: the ones that you meet if you're your average tourist,
• 1:08:11
  Speaker 1: and then there's the ones that you meet if you're
• 1:08:13
  Speaker 1: a dumb ass. And I wouldn't want to meet the ones, say,
• 1:08:17
  Speaker 1: in thinking Fauci is most likely to meet if he
• 1:08:20
  Speaker 1: goes there, we'll just we'll just put it that way.
• 1:08:23
  Speaker 1: Uh you know, it's like I suppose it's that way
• 1:08:26
  Speaker 1: in every country that's known for being maybe a little
• 1:08:32
  Speaker 1: more socially enlightened. But uh, yeah, I I definitely would
• 1:08:40
  Speaker 1: not want the experience he would have if he shows
• 1:08:43
  Speaker 1: up there. They are mad, they are really mad, and
• 1:08:47
  Speaker 1: they have every right to meet, and.
• 1:08:50
  Speaker 3: For some reason, the rest of the world is just
• 1:08:53
  Speaker 3: not paying attention or not talking about it.
• 1:08:55
  Speaker 1: Yeah, you know, I mean a witch country, some of them,
• 1:08:59
  Speaker 1: can't you know, right, right?
• 1:09:02
  Speaker 3: But I mean we here where we have access to
• 1:09:06
  Speaker 3: this information and we have the ability to speak about it.
• 1:09:10
  Speaker 3: Why is not Why aren't there more people saying this
• 1:09:13
  Speaker 3: and pointing it out, you know, vehemently. It's it's it's
• 1:09:20
  Speaker 3: just beyond me. And I think I think the problem
• 1:09:22
  Speaker 3: is is that the news cycle runs so fast, right,
• 1:09:26
  Speaker 3: Like people are done talking about COVID because well we're
• 1:09:31
  Speaker 3: past it now, and well Trump's in office, yay, you know,
• 1:09:34
  Speaker 3: we have something excited to be about to be excited about.
• 1:09:38
  Speaker 1: You know, actually we're not. We are not professions.
• 1:09:43
  Speaker 2: How South Korea is facing all these problems that have
• 1:09:49
  Speaker 2: obviously been caused by feminism, like people, sorry, South Korea
• 1:09:56
  Speaker 2: has been taken over by insight now is being taken
• 1:09:59
  Speaker 2: over by people who are stick to their back teeth
• 1:10:03
  Speaker 2: of all the feminism. And that's what's and and this
• 1:10:07
  Speaker 2: reflects what's been going on in the West, and this
• 1:10:15
  Speaker 2: results in different apocalyptic probabilities in different areas of the world.
• 1:10:24
  Speaker 2: And what's happening in the West is happening in the
• 1:10:27
  Speaker 2: East in an in in the same way, but in
• 1:10:31
  Speaker 2: a in a in a slightly different uh, trajectory. I
• 1:10:40
  Speaker 2: think his word and and uh, the fobby movement they
• 1:10:48
  Speaker 2: say originated in South Korea, m all, but it was
• 1:10:57
  Speaker 2: it was always an adaptation of what was already going
• 1:11:04
  Speaker 2: on in Europe, the same as in Japan. Grass eaters
• 1:11:08
  Speaker 2: came before Magtow, but there was already a precursor to
• 1:11:14
  Speaker 2: Magtow that took place before grass eaters.
• 1:11:19
  Speaker 1: There always has been, There have always been clearback during
• 1:11:25
  Speaker 1: like medieval days, there have always been men who figured
• 1:11:29
  Speaker 1: out that guynes centrism created a huge social scam around
• 1:11:36
  Speaker 1: male female relationships and they wanted no part of it.
• 1:11:41
  Speaker 1: That's been that's been a thing for as long as
• 1:11:44
  Speaker 1: I'm pretty sure it's been a thing for as long
• 1:11:46
  Speaker 1: as marriage has been an institution rather than a sort
• 1:11:53
  Speaker 1: of a default status that existed because humans pair bond
• 1:12:00
  Speaker 1: for life normally. But yeah, in any case with regard
• 1:12:10
  Speaker 1: to Fauci, and he hasn't done it yet, I wouldn't
• 1:12:13
  Speaker 1: be surprised if he does. If he does, it just
• 1:12:17
  Speaker 1: reinforces everything we've said here, and Biden's excuses are pathetic,
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 1: like truly truly pathetic. I want to remind you that
• 1:12:26
  Speaker 1: there have been numerous cases across the country during the
• 1:12:30
  Speaker 1: last thirty years, where men have been convicted of owning
• 1:12:36
  Speaker 1: guns after being busted for smoking a joint or you know,
• 1:12:44
  Speaker 1: having one hit of a drug or you know, having
• 1:12:50
  Speaker 1: a couple of pills, anything that they have been They
• 1:12:55
  Speaker 1: don't even have to have the gun with him. We
• 1:12:56
  Speaker 1: talked about one on Tuesday that he was suspected of
• 1:13:04
  Speaker 1: a crime he didn't commit. So the cops arrested him
• 1:13:08
  Speaker 1: and questioned him. They found a joint on him, and
• 1:13:13
  Speaker 1: they convicted him for owning a gun that he hadn't
• 1:13:19
  Speaker 1: brought with him. It was at home in another state.
• 1:13:26
  Speaker 1: So the gun not only wasn't used in a crime crime,
• 1:13:28
  Speaker 1: by the way, was not a crime. The suspected crime
• 1:13:35
  Speaker 1: was murder. A woman had actually killed herself with her
• 1:13:39
  Speaker 1: own gun, later to be proved because it's you know,
• 1:13:44
  Speaker 1: it was able to they were able to match the
• 1:13:46
  Speaker 1: bullets to that gun. Uh. But this guy, this guy
• 1:13:51
  Speaker 1: still ended up with a conviction because he had a
• 1:13:55
  Speaker 1: joint and he was a gun owner. He had a
• 1:14:00
  Speaker 1: joint in Florida and he had a gun in I
• 1:14:03
  Speaker 1: think it was Georgia. Just completely ridiculous. There are tons
• 1:14:10
  Speaker 1: of cases like that where you know, somebody. Somebody gets
• 1:14:17
  Speaker 1: busted because they got high ones, or they get busted
• 1:14:22
  Speaker 1: because they're in a car where drugs are found and
• 1:14:26
  Speaker 1: maybe they're they're riding with somebody that had drugs, uh,
• 1:14:30
  Speaker 1: you know, or that they get busted because they were
• 1:14:34
  Speaker 1: trying to buy drugs and uh and and they have
• 1:14:39
  Speaker 1: a gun somewhere else or you know, uh there they've
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 1: got a gun in their car, or they legally own
• 1:14:46
  Speaker 1: a gun, and they hadn't committed a gun a drug
• 1:14:49
  Speaker 1: crime when they purchased the gun. The actual crime that
• 1:14:54
  Speaker 1: Hunter Biden committed was lying about his drug use on
• 1:14:59
  Speaker 1: a form when he applied for gun ownership, and so
• 1:15:04
  Speaker 1: he willfully broke the law. It wasn't a law that
• 1:15:11
  Speaker 1: and there have been people that have been gun owners,
• 1:15:14
  Speaker 1: that were gun owners before that law was passed that
• 1:15:18
  Speaker 1: were busted for violating it because they didn't change their
• 1:15:23
  Speaker 1: lifestyle after the law was passed. Right, But Biden's statement is,
• 1:15:33
  Speaker 1: let's see, I'm gonna sneak past the beginning because it
• 1:15:36
  Speaker 1: doesn't matter. He claims he kept his word, which is bullshit.
• 1:15:41
  Speaker 1: So he claims to have watched his son being selectively
• 1:15:44
  Speaker 1: and unfairly prosecuted, Right, which we know is not true
• 1:15:48
  Speaker 1: because this is pretty typical use of that law. He says,
• 1:15:53
  Speaker 1: without active aggravating factors like use in a crime, multiple
• 1:15:59
  Speaker 1: perch or buying a weapon as a straw purchaser, people
• 1:16:03
  Speaker 1: are almost never brought to trial on felony charges solely
• 1:16:06
  Speaker 1: for how they filled out a gun for him. And like,
• 1:16:13
  Speaker 1: I I don't believe that the almost never bit you know,
• 1:16:20
  Speaker 1: that's bullshit. And the way he right states that, it's
• 1:16:25
  Speaker 1: it's like, you know, he he gave the wrong hair
• 1:16:28
  Speaker 1: color or something. It's, yeah, he literally concealed a crime
• 1:16:34
  Speaker 1: that he was committing by buying the gun in the
• 1:16:37
  Speaker 1: first place when he lied about his drug use, because
• 1:16:41
  Speaker 1: if he had admitted to his drug use, he the
• 1:16:43
  Speaker 1: reason he lied about it is because if he admitted it,
• 1:16:47
  Speaker 1: he knew the gun seller wouldn't legally be allowed to
• 1:16:51
  Speaker 1: sell him the gun.
• 1:16:53
  Speaker 3: M h.
• 1:16:53
  Speaker 1: It's just like if you.
• 1:16:56
  Speaker 3: Loopholes.
• 1:16:57
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, well you know, if you wanted one today,
• 1:17:03
  Speaker 1: he could just get a three D printer. But uh,
• 1:17:07
  Speaker 1: that's going to change a lot of things because it's
• 1:17:09
  Speaker 1: it's gonna be like, it's a lot harder to It's
• 1:17:12
  Speaker 1: not that they can't do it, but it's a lot
• 1:17:14
  Speaker 1: harder to prevent people from three D printing their own
• 1:17:18
  Speaker 1: guns and using them. It's it's they're calling them ghost
• 1:17:23
  Speaker 1: guns for a reason. And you know, I was I
• 1:17:27
  Speaker 1: was actually talking to a friend of mine who is
• 1:17:31
  Speaker 1: he used to be a guard in a juvenile detention
• 1:17:35
  Speaker 1: facility and now he is a He wanted to actually
• 1:17:39
  Speaker 1: be able to do something for the juveniles instead of
• 1:17:43
  Speaker 1: just managing them, and so now he is a probation
• 1:17:47
  Speaker 1: officer for juvenile offenders who are trying to actually improve
• 1:17:52
  Speaker 1: their situation.
• 1:17:53
  Speaker 3: I actually have a friend who just started a new
• 1:17:56
  Speaker 3: job doing that very same thing. And I can't imagine
• 1:18:00
  Speaker 3: just the amount of troubled kids that you come across.
• 1:18:03
  Speaker 1: And today, you know, what you're rescuing kids from, Like
• 1:18:09
  Speaker 1: what you were rescuing kids from in the eighties and
• 1:18:11
  Speaker 1: the nineties that were in that situation, you know, was
• 1:18:15
  Speaker 1: was life circumstances that may have stunted their development a
• 1:18:22
  Speaker 1: little bit. But what you're rescuing them from today when
• 1:18:27
  Speaker 1: you're when you're trying to help them through the pathway
• 1:18:30
  Speaker 1: of reform after they've done something that's landed them in juvi,
• 1:18:34
  Speaker 1: Like you're rescuing some of those kids from bizarre life circumstances,
• 1:18:40
  Speaker 1: from from circumstances that don't just stunt your development, but
• 1:18:44
  Speaker 1: warp it and send it down a trajectory that is
• 1:18:47
  Speaker 1: incredibly wrong. And the worst part is, you know, he's
• 1:18:50
  Speaker 1: also dealing with the fact that a rather large percentage
• 1:18:54
  Speaker 1: of boys that come out of JUVI and go into probation.
• 1:18:59
  Speaker 1: They're they're not just coming from single mother homes where they,
• 1:19:03
  Speaker 1: you know, grew up without learning the ropes of becoming
• 1:19:08
  Speaker 1: an adult and all that. They're not just coming out
• 1:19:11
  Speaker 1: of gang neighborhoods where they learned that you have to
• 1:19:14
  Speaker 1: use violence one way or another because if you don't,
• 1:19:16
  Speaker 1: you're going to find it used against you. You know,
• 1:19:19
  Speaker 1: they're not They're not just facing those kinds of problems.
• 1:19:22
  Speaker 1: They're they've been molested by the female staff at the
• 1:19:28
  Speaker 1: juvenile detention facility. And so he's he's not just dealing
• 1:19:33
  Speaker 1: you know, he's dealing with kids who have had trauma
• 1:19:40
  Speaker 1: that is mind altering to a degree that it increases
• 1:19:44
  Speaker 1: their recidivism, It warps their ability to have normal relationships
• 1:19:51
  Speaker 1: with other people. It damages them in ways that aren't
• 1:19:56
  Speaker 1: fully understood. It creates, it causes them to anywhere from
• 1:20:01
  Speaker 1: you know, twice as likely to forty four times as
• 1:20:05
  Speaker 1: likely to engage in subs substance abuse can make them
• 1:20:08
  Speaker 1: up to fourteen times more likely to commit suicide. And
• 1:20:13
  Speaker 1: in that environment, he's also got tech savvy kids who
• 1:20:17
  Speaker 1: know how to use three D printers and have some
• 1:20:20
  Speaker 1: have access to them. And and like we were talking about,
• 1:20:26
  Speaker 1: like ghost guns are gonna change the game entirely for
• 1:20:29
  Speaker 1: law enforcement because they can't they're not illegal, and even
• 1:20:34
  Speaker 1: if they were illegal, they there's not a way that
• 1:20:39
  Speaker 1: they can fully stop people from creating them. So the
• 1:20:47
  Speaker 1: thing that is the least available in today's family and
• 1:20:52
  Speaker 1: social environment that Art Force just mentioned, male role models.
• 1:21:00
  Speaker 1: That's going to be the most important thing going forward,
• 1:21:04
  Speaker 1: because you if you can't, if there's no way to
• 1:21:08
  Speaker 1: cut off totally cut off the supply of something like that,
• 1:21:15
  Speaker 1: then the only other pathway that you have is to
• 1:21:22
  Speaker 1: reform the way that children are raised so that they
• 1:21:27
  Speaker 1: will not misuse those things because they're gonna have them
• 1:21:32
  Speaker 1: as they get older. Right, So, and instead of trying
• 1:21:39
  Speaker 1: to micromanage the people, they should support the people's best
• 1:21:45
  Speaker 1: pathway to child earing and human development. But in any case, yeah,
• 1:21:53
  Speaker 1: all of that said, what Biden was saying here was
• 1:21:59
  Speaker 1: a bald faced line. It's you know, it's it's not
• 1:22:05
  Speaker 1: clear that Hunter was treated differently. He was treated exactly
• 1:22:07
  Speaker 1: like everybody else. And that's why Barden Biden pardoned him.
• 1:22:15
  Speaker 1: So when he says, no reasonable person who looks at
• 1:22:20
  Speaker 1: the facts of Hunter's cases can reach any other conclusion
• 1:22:22
  Speaker 1: than Hunter was singled out only because he is my son,
• 1:22:27
  Speaker 1: that's bullshit, bitch. He was not singled out only because
• 1:22:34
  Speaker 1: he was Biden's son. He was pardoned only because he
• 1:22:36
  Speaker 1: was at the Apex exactly exactly.
• 1:22:42
  Speaker 3: There's no other excuse for it. There's no other reason,
• 1:22:45
  Speaker 3: there's no other explanation.
• 1:22:49
  Speaker 1: No, no, here's when I'm expecting to hear some outrage here,
• 1:22:54
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna skip to the last paragraph. For my entire career,
• 1:22:59
  Speaker 1: I have followed a simple principle, just tell the American
• 1:23:03
  Speaker 1: people the truth.
• 1:23:09
  Speaker 3: Oh, is that what he's been doing for the past
• 1:23:12
  Speaker 3: How many years has he been in government? His whole life?
• 1:23:16
  Speaker 1: He has never to my knowledge, he has never held
• 1:23:19
  Speaker 1: a job that wasn't as a public official. Mm hmm,
• 1:23:28
  Speaker 1: Like he started out as a prosecutor. I don't know
• 1:23:33
  Speaker 1: if he did anything in law before being a prosecutor.
• 1:23:37
  Speaker 1: He maybe worked for a firm or something, but obviously
• 1:23:41
  Speaker 1: not very long because he was pretty young when he
• 1:23:42
  Speaker 1: got into politics. Yeah, right, and and and that's just
• 1:23:49
  Speaker 1: insane for him to say that, just tell the American
• 1:23:51
  Speaker 1: people the truth. My god, man, he's obviously got Alzheimer's
• 1:24:00
  Speaker 1: If he thinks people aren't going to remember all of
• 1:24:04
  Speaker 1: the lies that he has told, well.
• 1:24:07
  Speaker 3: See, but that's the thing. That's the thing. The people
• 1:24:11
  Speaker 3: who support him do not care about the truth. They
• 1:24:15
  Speaker 3: will look the truth smack dab in the face and say, oh, yeah,
• 1:24:18
  Speaker 3: but anyway, Orange man is bad.
• 1:24:20
  Speaker 1: And yeah, it's because they don't believe in the truths.
• 1:24:27
  Speaker 1: Anybody that uses the words my truth, and when they
• 1:24:31
  Speaker 1: are talking about truth as if they're talking about truth
• 1:24:36
  Speaker 1: as something that yours can be different from theirs. Anybody
• 1:24:40
  Speaker 1: that says that they're bullshitting you right, Like it's if
• 1:24:46
  Speaker 1: I describe the way gravity works accurately in the environment
• 1:24:54
  Speaker 1: in which we are currently, I say, yep, we are
• 1:24:57
  Speaker 1: on Earth, and on Earth gravity works this way, and
• 1:25:00
  Speaker 1: here's where the variations are in. You know, if you're
• 1:25:03
  Speaker 1: in this particular type of topography, if you're this far
• 1:25:07
  Speaker 1: above sea level versus that far above sea level, you know,
• 1:25:10
  Speaker 1: and how little those variations are and so on. But
• 1:25:15
  Speaker 1: you know, with my specificity and everything, this is what
• 1:25:18
  Speaker 1: it is. This is how we experience gravity right here,
• 1:25:22
  Speaker 1: right That is not my truth. That is the truth.
• 1:25:28
  Speaker 1: It is fact, and it is truth. And if somebody
• 1:25:34
  Speaker 1: wants to argue that it's not truth because gravity is
• 1:25:38
  Speaker 1: different on the moon, well bullshit. We're not talking about
• 1:25:40
  Speaker 1: the moon. We're talking about Earth. You know, we're talking
• 1:25:44
  Speaker 1: about men, darling. But honestly, when I hear the phrase
• 1:25:54
  Speaker 1: my truth, it puts me into a mentality of automatically
• 1:26:02
  Speaker 1: not believing whatever follows it. So I hate when people
• 1:26:07
  Speaker 1: adopt the phrase when they they're saying I'm gonna tell
• 1:26:10
  Speaker 1: the things I know, the things I've seen and I'm
• 1:26:12
  Speaker 1: gonna witness and they say my truth. No, just say
• 1:26:15
  Speaker 1: the truth. But when somebody like Joe Biden perverts the
• 1:26:19
  Speaker 1: phrase tell the truth, when him's saying, here, I'm telling
• 1:26:26
  Speaker 1: the truth is a lie, it's just offensive because of that, Yeah,
• 1:26:31
  Speaker 1: because you don't know what he doesn't know what truth is. No,
• 1:26:37
  Speaker 1: he thinks if he says something that makes it true.
• 1:26:40
  Speaker 3: Mm hm he's spitting in your faces. He's spitting in
• 1:26:44
  Speaker 3: all of our faces. That's all it is, you know, And.
• 1:26:48
  Speaker 1: He can because he's at the apex.
• 1:26:52
  Speaker 3: Yeah, what the hell is anybody gonna do?
• 1:26:55
  Speaker 1: You know at this point, so and and and it's
• 1:27:00
  Speaker 1: if if you do it, or I do it, If
• 1:27:03
  Speaker 1: the man down the street from me does it, he
• 1:27:06
  Speaker 1: gets no benefit, and he might get smacked down for
• 1:27:09
  Speaker 1: it by you know, whatever authority he's dealing with. It's time.
• 1:27:15
  Speaker 1: But Joe Biden can do it when he is a
• 1:27:18
  Speaker 1: lame duck, outgoing president who just pardoned his own son
• 1:27:22
  Speaker 1: for a crime that he caused hundreds of other people
• 1:27:28
  Speaker 1: to be jailed for during his career in politics. You know,
• 1:27:36
  Speaker 1: it's it's it's bullshit, and it is an an immense,
• 1:27:41
  Speaker 1: immense abuse of your tolerance, and that tolerance is kind
• 1:27:47
  Speaker 1: of forced. We can't like we can. We could turn
• 1:27:50
  Speaker 1: around and say we don't believe him, we can vote
• 1:27:53
  Speaker 1: him out of office, but we can't do anything about this.
• 1:27:58
  Speaker 1: This He's going to do this, and he's gonna lie
• 1:28:00
  Speaker 1: about it, and he's gonna expect to be believed and
• 1:28:04
  Speaker 1: he's gonna be satisfied basically that you know, he has.
• 1:28:11
  Speaker 1: He has fooled everybody.
• 1:28:13
  Speaker 3: Mm hmm.
• 1:28:15
  Speaker 1: That pisses me off. So, but that's not why we're
• 1:28:19
  Speaker 1: discussing this, right, So we got through that. We're going
• 1:28:22
  Speaker 1: to look at Trump sites Hunter Biden pardon in motion
• 1:28:27
  Speaker 1: to dismiss New York criminal case. And that's the thing.
• 1:28:32
  Speaker 1: If if, if my son does something he shouldn't do,
• 1:28:39
  Speaker 1: and the I have a way of keeping him from
• 1:28:42
  Speaker 1: being held accountable for it, the impact on that is
• 1:28:46
  Speaker 1: not nearly as much. Right, people who hate Trump, He's
• 1:28:52
  Speaker 1: using the Hunter Biden pardon as a possible means of
• 1:28:57
  Speaker 1: getting a case you were hoping would take him down dismissed.
• 1:29:03
  Speaker 1: That should bother you, those of us who don't hate him,
• 1:29:07
  Speaker 1: those of us who support him. You know, it still
• 1:29:11
  Speaker 1: creates a bad taste for me. Not because I think
• 1:29:16
  Speaker 1: that the case is legitimate, but how else is that
• 1:29:19
  Speaker 1: going to be used? You know, if if Hunter Biden's
• 1:29:25
  Speaker 1: pardon results in the dismissal of this case. So I'm
• 1:29:30
  Speaker 1: gonna take a look here at this article with you guys.
• 1:29:35
  Speaker 1: Donald Trump's lawyers appointed to an unlikely person in demanding
• 1:29:38
  Speaker 1: a judge dismissed the president elects new York criminal case
• 1:29:42
  Speaker 1: Hunter Biden. Trump's attorneys said in a court filing made
• 1:29:46
  Speaker 1: public Tuesday that President Joe Biden's controversial pardon of his
• 1:29:49
  Speaker 1: son echoed Trump's complaints about the prosecution yesterday, and in
• 1:29:55
  Speaker 1: issuing a ten year pardon to Hunter Biden that covers
• 1:29:58
  Speaker 1: any and all crimes, whether charged or uncharged, President Biden
• 1:30:02
  Speaker 1: asserted that his son was selectively and unfairly prosecuted and
• 1:30:06
  Speaker 1: treated differently, they wrote, claiming before claiming Trump was treated similarly.
• 1:30:12
  Speaker 1: In the filing, which was submitted Monday night, they formally
• 1:30:16
  Speaker 1: demanded a New York judge throw out a president criminal
• 1:30:19
  Speaker 1: case or the president criminal case, and nullify a unanimous
• 1:30:24
  Speaker 1: jury's conclusion that Trump committed dozens of felonies. Their argument
• 1:30:30
  Speaker 1: struck at the quality of the case against Trump, but
• 1:30:33
  Speaker 1: centers largely on a wholly unique argument in the history
• 1:30:37
  Speaker 1: of America's legal system. Trump's lawyers set his conviction in
• 1:30:41
  Speaker 1: state court should not stand because he was elected president
• 1:30:44
  Speaker 1: after his conviction. Prosecutors from Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg
• 1:30:49
  Speaker 1: have vowed to oppose the dismissal motion and have given
• 1:30:53
  Speaker 1: a one week deadline to file their response. They have
• 1:30:57
  Speaker 1: been given a one week deadline suit. The case amid
• 1:31:01
  Speaker 1: a torrent of public threats of retribution by Trump's allies
• 1:31:05
  Speaker 1: and anonymous threats of violence by his supporters. So remember
• 1:31:08
  Speaker 1: it's the CBS News, so this is therebias is anti Trump.
• 1:31:13
  Speaker 1: So they're gonna call accountability threats threats of retribution. Right,
• 1:31:21
  Speaker 1: if you break the law in the course of this,
• 1:31:23
  Speaker 1: we're going to apply the law to you. Is a
• 1:31:27
  Speaker 1: threat of retribution when it's made against somebody doing something
• 1:31:33
  Speaker 1: unnecessarily bad to somebody that they hate, Right. So my
• 1:31:40
  Speaker 1: big thing with this is if this is how Trump
• 1:31:48
  Speaker 1: gets this stuff overturned instead of proving that the case
• 1:31:54
  Speaker 1: was bad and he was innocent, it sets a precedent
• 1:31:59
  Speaker 1: that a person at the apex, a person who is
• 1:32:02
  Speaker 1: in office, can manipulate the system just by saying, well,
• 1:32:07
  Speaker 1: you're targeting me because I'm in office. This was a
• 1:32:09
  Speaker 1: political prosecution and get it dismissed that way, And I personally,
• 1:32:15
  Speaker 1: my preference would be to see it happen the other
• 1:32:18
  Speaker 1: way around, where it is proved in court that the
• 1:32:23
  Speaker 1: case was never valid, and that proof is used to
• 1:32:28
  Speaker 1: bolster and support the point that, hey, this prosecution was
• 1:32:36
  Speaker 1: targeted because you know, I was the political opposition like
• 1:32:43
  Speaker 1: it's being done passackwards and it's probably got a chance
• 1:32:50
  Speaker 1: of working, because if it didn't have any chance at
• 1:32:54
  Speaker 1: all of working, these attorneys wouldn't be doing it. The
• 1:33:01
  Speaker 1: other thing is, I'm not sure the story is accurate
• 1:33:11
  Speaker 1: talking about the convictions. But in any case, are you
• 1:33:16
  Speaker 1: sharing your screen? Yes? I was? Did it? Stop? I
• 1:33:21
  Speaker 1: can did damn it?
• 1:33:22
  Speaker 4: All?
• 1:33:22
  Speaker 1: Right, Well, I'll bring it back up. Come on, Okay,
• 1:33:28
  Speaker 1: there it is. I think that's the right page. Let
• 1:33:32
  Speaker 1: me go back. It comes up really tiny. Yeah, that's
• 1:33:37
  Speaker 1: the right thing. Okay, So I'm looking at something that
• 1:33:40
  Speaker 1: is the size of a thirty five millimeter negative on
• 1:33:44
  Speaker 1: my screen when I want to to see if I've
• 1:33:48
  Speaker 1: got the right screen. And there's other things it, you know,
• 1:33:51
  Speaker 1: like my obs and some other things that are up
• 1:33:54
  Speaker 1: our discord, But that's the correct one. So yeah, if
• 1:34:00
  Speaker 1: you look at this, it's it's created an argument that's
• 1:34:05
  Speaker 1: being used in court right now that could in the
• 1:34:11
  Speaker 1: future be used by corrupt politicians as a get out
• 1:34:16
  Speaker 1: of accountability free card if it works. And even though
• 1:34:23
  Speaker 1: it isn't actually being used to cover up corruption this time,
• 1:34:29
  Speaker 1: in my opinion, it doesn't matter. What matters is what
• 1:34:35
  Speaker 1: what's it going to make possible in the future. Now,
• 1:34:40
  Speaker 1: there's always the argument that if this is the most
• 1:34:43
  Speaker 1: likely thing to work, it's better to protect the presidency.
• 1:34:50
  Speaker 1: But if you're going to do that, then Hall, you
• 1:34:52
  Speaker 1: might as well just acquit anybody that's getting that gets elected. So, yeah,
• 1:35:01
  Speaker 1: I don't know. This bothers me immensely, and I don't
• 1:35:04
  Speaker 1: I'm not. It's not something where I'm like, Oh, I'm
• 1:35:07
  Speaker 1: angry at Trump for doing this. I'm angry that it
• 1:35:09
  Speaker 1: became a possibility. I haven't gotten to the point of
• 1:35:12
  Speaker 1: being angry at Trump for doing it yet. We'll see
• 1:35:14
  Speaker 1: how it plays out. Maybe there's something he knows that
• 1:35:18
  Speaker 1: I don't. But I have the potential to become angry
• 1:35:23
  Speaker 1: at Trump for doing this instead of going there out
• 1:35:26
  Speaker 1: of contesting all of the flaws in the case and
• 1:35:32
  Speaker 1: taking it beyond the level where it is currently in
• 1:35:35
  Speaker 1: order to get it get it overturned for more legitimate reasons.
• 1:35:48
  Speaker 1: There we go keep getting hidden behind discord here. So
• 1:35:54
  Speaker 1: this is more about the postponement of sentencing after Trump
• 1:36:00
  Speaker 1: won presidency won the presidency on November five, as attorneys
• 1:36:03
  Speaker 1: quickly indicated they'd make Monday's request and Trump's filing his
• 1:36:07
  Speaker 1: attorneys referred to his election victory is overwhelming. Bragg's office
• 1:36:11
  Speaker 1: has floated postponing sentencing and other proceedings until after Trump's
• 1:36:15
  Speaker 1: term in office, which ends in twenty twenty nine. Consideration
• 1:36:19
  Speaker 1: must be given to various non dismissal options that may
• 1:36:22
  Speaker 1: address any concerns raised by the presidency or the penancy
• 1:36:27
  Speaker 1: of a post trial criminal proceeding during the presidency, such
• 1:36:31
  Speaker 1: as deferral of all remaining criminal proceedings until after the
• 1:36:34
  Speaker 1: end of the defendant's upcoming presidential term. They wrote in
• 1:36:38
  Speaker 1: a November nineteen letter to Merchant. So it's all unprecedented
• 1:36:44
  Speaker 1: and all that. They can complain about that all they like,
• 1:36:49
  Speaker 1: But I think what's really going on here is Bragg's
• 1:36:56
  Speaker 1: office is trying to find a way to avoid have
• 1:37:00
  Speaker 1: being their case any further analyzed by any higher level judges.
• 1:37:06
  Speaker 1: And uh, you know, Trump wants to be free of
• 1:37:10
  Speaker 1: it because he wants to focus on more important things,
• 1:37:15
  Speaker 1: and unfortunately Biden just gave him a shortcut that is
• 1:37:23
  Speaker 1: all too tempting and in my opinion, potentially damaging. It's
• 1:37:31
  Speaker 1: like mother's little Helper. Yeah, it works great a couple
• 1:37:39
  Speaker 1: the first couple of times you use it, and then
• 1:37:41
  Speaker 1: all of a sudden it's addicted and you're abusing. It's
• 1:37:45
  Speaker 1: not a good thing. So from there we go to India.
• 1:37:55
  Speaker 1: India actually explained the under Biden story pretty succinctly, and
• 1:37:59
  Speaker 1: we probably need to look at it a little bit,
• 1:38:02
  Speaker 1: just because not everybody is up to speed on everything
• 1:38:09
  Speaker 1: that's happened here. So from laptop to pardon, the Hunter
• 1:38:14
  Speaker 1: Biden story explained a lot of times. This kind of
• 1:38:20
  Speaker 1: information on something that happened or is happening in the
• 1:38:23
  Speaker 1: United States, you got to get it from an external
• 1:38:26
  Speaker 1: source because our news media they're not being honest about it.
• 1:38:31
  Speaker 1: So we'll give it a bit of a rundown here.
• 1:38:33
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna maybe have to widen this. I don't know how. Nope,
• 1:38:39
  Speaker 1: it's still gonna be like right up against the edge. Sorry, guys,
• 1:38:42
  Speaker 1: I don't know if it's cut off on it is
• 1:38:44
  Speaker 1: a little bit. That's really annoying. I wish that wouldn't happen,
• 1:38:50
  Speaker 1: but oh well. The Hunter Biden story has been a
• 1:38:53
  Speaker 1: roller coaster of allegations, revelations, political controversies, culminating in an unprecedented,
• 1:39:00
  Speaker 1: precedented presidential pardon. What began as a dismissed fake laptop
• 1:39:10
  Speaker 1: conspiracy in the heat of the twenty twenty election has
• 1:39:14
  Speaker 1: evolved into a significant chapter in American political history. This
• 1:39:18
  Speaker 1: narrative weaves together allegations of influence, pedaling, media suppression, legal battles,
• 1:39:22
  Speaker 1: and family loyalty, ending with President Joe Biden's December first,
• 1:39:26
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty four decision to issue a full and unconditional
• 1:39:31
  Speaker 1: pardon to his son Hunter Biden. Here's the full story,
• 1:39:35
  Speaker 1: from its contentious origins to its dramatic conclusion. So the
• 1:39:40
  Speaker 1: first bit goes over. Just weeks before the twenty twenty election,
• 1:39:48
  Speaker 1: the New York Post published an explosive story claiming that
• 1:39:51
  Speaker 1: a laptop allegedly belonging to Hunter Biden had been abandoned
• 1:39:55
  Speaker 1: at a Delaware repair shop. The laptop purportedly contained emails, documents,
• 1:40:00
  Speaker 1: and personal materials suggesting Hunter had engaged in questionable business
• 1:40:04
  Speaker 1: dealings abroad, including with Ukrainian and Chinese entities. One email,
• 1:40:14
  Speaker 1: in particular, referenced a proposed equity split in a deal
• 1:40:18
  Speaker 1: with Chinese company mentioning ten held by h for the
• 1:40:22
  Speaker 1: Big Guy. Critics speculated that the big guy was Joe Biden,
• 1:40:25
  Speaker 1: then the Democratic presidential nominee. These allegations of true implied
• 1:40:31
  Speaker 1: potential conflicts of interest and influence peddling involving the Biden family.
• 1:40:37
  Speaker 1: The dismissal of the story is fake. And this was
• 1:40:40
  Speaker 1: kind of fun because it didn't take very long for
• 1:40:44
  Speaker 1: it to get debunked. At the time, the Biden campaign
• 1:40:48
  Speaker 1: and allied Democrats vehemently deny the laptop's authenticity, labeling it
• 1:40:52
  Speaker 1: a Russian disinformation campaign. So, just for purpose, is of
• 1:41:00
  Speaker 1: the men's rights movement understanding. You look at the American
• 1:41:06
  Speaker 1: Democrat Party, and this is especially for MRAs outside of
• 1:41:11
  Speaker 1: the United States because you're getting a different narrative a
• 1:41:14
  Speaker 1: lot of times than everybody else in the United States.
• 1:41:19
  Speaker 1: But anytime you hear American news labeled a Russian disinformation campaign,
• 1:41:29
  Speaker 1: that is Democrat code for thing that we don't want
• 1:41:32
  Speaker 1: people talking about. It has absolutely nothing to do with Russia.
• 1:41:36
  Speaker 1: It's not disinformation. It is something that goes against whatever
• 1:41:40
  Speaker 1: narrative the Democrat Party has that they want to maintain,
• 1:41:44
  Speaker 1: or creates conflict over some policy or procedure that the
• 1:41:50
  Speaker 1: Democrat Party politicians are engaged in, and so rather than
• 1:41:55
  Speaker 1: confronting things on their merits with their interests on their marriage,
• 1:42:00
  Speaker 1: it's they cry Russian disinformation. It is essentially democrat politics
• 1:42:07
  Speaker 1: equivalent of feminist crying misogyny every time you say something
• 1:42:12
  Speaker 1: they don't like. So let's see it goes through the
• 1:42:21
  Speaker 1: fifth There were fifty one former intelligence officials, so people
• 1:42:25
  Speaker 1: who had retired, people who had quit, people who had
• 1:42:28
  Speaker 1: been fired for whatever reason, like anybody could be in
• 1:42:32
  Speaker 1: that list, who wrote that this story had all the
• 1:42:37
  Speaker 1: classic earmarks of a Russian information operation. And we're talking
• 1:42:43
  Speaker 1: when they say intelligence officials, American spies, CIA agents, FBI agents,
• 1:42:53
  Speaker 1: said government bureaucrats basically said, don't believe that It'sussian disinformation.
• 1:43:03
  Speaker 1: Don't believe the white curtain being drawn aside and exposing
• 1:43:10
  Speaker 1: the little guy behind the curtain. Believe the establishment that
• 1:43:15
  Speaker 1: we're part of. It's all fake news. On during an
• 1:43:22
  Speaker 1: October twenty twenty debate, by himself referred to the laptop
• 1:43:25
  Speaker 1: allegations as part of a Russian plan, asserting there are
• 1:43:29
  Speaker 1: fifty former national intelligence folks who said that what he's
• 1:43:33
  Speaker 1: accusing me of is a Russian plan. Then social media
• 1:43:40
  Speaker 1: platforms like Twitter and Facebook, took extraordinary measures to limit
• 1:43:44
  Speaker 1: the story's reach. They hid it, they banned people were
• 1:43:47
  Speaker 1: posting it. That Twitter suspended the New York Post account.
• 1:43:53
  Speaker 1: They're the ones that broke the story.
• 1:43:55
  Speaker 3: Oh yeah, that's right. And then they held strong. They date, Yeah,
• 1:44:00
  Speaker 3: they wouldn't take down the tweet. I don't. I don't
• 1:44:04
  Speaker 3: know if that sense has changed, because I'm sure they're back.
• 1:44:07
  Speaker 3: But yeah, I definitely vividly remember that.
• 1:44:12
  Speaker 1: I thought they said it was really violating their hacked
• 1:44:16
  Speaker 1: materials policies, even though there was no hacking taking place.
• 1:44:20
  Speaker 3: Yeah, exactly exactly. And now I don't, I don't. I
• 1:44:25
  Speaker 3: don't remember where I heard it, but I distinctly remember
• 1:44:30
  Speaker 3: people talking about there being more than one laptop.
• 1:44:35
  Speaker 1: Yeah, so yeah, there were all kinds of narratives bandied about, well,
• 1:44:39
  Speaker 1: that's not the real laptop. He has the real laptop.
• 1:44:42
  Speaker 1: That's a fat laptop. There were a bunch of things.
• 1:44:45
  Speaker 1: I remember that too, right, So then next thing that
• 1:44:50
  Speaker 1: happens boom after after the election, which people did speculate
• 1:44:56
  Speaker 1: that it was influenced by the claim that the laptop
• 1:45:02
  Speaker 1: was Russian disinformation. There were people that voted on the
• 1:45:05
  Speaker 1: idea that the Trump campaign tried a supposed second time
• 1:45:11
  Speaker 1: to use Russian disinformation to manipulate an election. Even though
• 1:45:16
  Speaker 1: there was no first time and it was proved that
• 1:45:20
  Speaker 1: there was no first time, the news media still runs
• 1:45:25
  Speaker 1: with that narrative, and they just added this to it.
• 1:45:27
  Speaker 1: Right So, after the election, investigations by independent outlets, including
• 1:45:32
  Speaker 1: the New York Times and the Washington Post, who wanted
• 1:45:37
  Speaker 1: very badly to debunk the laptop as being a real thing,
• 1:45:43
  Speaker 1: proved that it was confirmed the authenticity of key materials
• 1:45:48
  Speaker 1: from laptop. Critics of the initial suppression argued that these
• 1:45:52
  Speaker 1: revelations validated earlier concerns and exposed systemic bias and how
• 1:45:57
  Speaker 1: the media handled politically sensitive stories. So everybody that voted
• 1:46:03
  Speaker 1: for Joe Biden during the twenty twenty election because they
• 1:46:07
  Speaker 1: thought that the Trump campaign tried to use Russian disinformation
• 1:46:12
  Speaker 1: to steal the election, because that is what the Biden
• 1:46:15
  Speaker 1: administration told them, basically got lied to. What is this, Oh,
• 1:46:22
  Speaker 1: thank you spywere I really don't want to do that
• 1:46:24
  Speaker 1: right now. Going back to India, spyware is mad because
• 1:46:32
  Speaker 1: I haven't updated anti and not spyware, but super Andy.
• 1:46:35
  Speaker 1: Spyware is mad because I haven't updated in like two weeks,
• 1:46:40
  Speaker 1: and I usually do it much more frequently than that.
• 1:46:45
  Speaker 1: So there you go. Then I haven't shut off the
• 1:46:49
  Speaker 1: thing where it suggests that I should update and then
• 1:46:51
  Speaker 1: opens a tab. So fun anyway, So here here we are.
• 1:46:58
  Speaker 1: It comes out, Hey, hey, this was real. They lied,
• 1:47:02
  Speaker 1: it wasn't Russian disinformation. Oh, by the way, check this
• 1:47:06
  Speaker 1: rug out. We're gonna sweep it all under there. Nobody apologized.
• 1:47:11
  Speaker 1: Nobody came out and said, oh gosh, those all of
• 1:47:14
  Speaker 1: those uh, all of those officials that stated that it
• 1:47:23
  Speaker 1: was it was Russian disinformation were wrong or did they lie?
• 1:47:29
  Speaker 1: Nobody came out and did that, except a few people
• 1:47:31
  Speaker 1: asking questions in the alternative media, not the establishment media,
• 1:47:37
  Speaker 1: except I guess Tucker Carlson did bring it up. He
• 1:47:40
  Speaker 1: brought up you know, who are these guys that made
• 1:47:43
  Speaker 1: this claim that just came out of the woodwork to
• 1:47:46
  Speaker 1: make this claim in order to manipulate the election? Are
• 1:47:51
  Speaker 1: they really former intelligence officials? Or are they still on
• 1:47:57
  Speaker 1: the payroll? Is their cover feigned retirement, feigned firing, feigned
• 1:48:08
  Speaker 1: job changes? Right? Nobody else really said anything about it.
• 1:48:16
  Speaker 1: Nobody in the mainstream media anyway, Only Tucker Carslon I
• 1:48:20
  Speaker 1: really didn't see anybody else discussing that. Let's see, And
• 1:48:28
  Speaker 1: of course Glenn Greenwald pointed out that social media moguls,
• 1:48:33
  Speaker 1: everybody tried to suppress the story, tech sectors so on.
• 1:48:39
  Speaker 1: It wasn't just censorship, it was narrative control, and it
• 1:48:42
  Speaker 1: was there was a whole machine. Literally every institution, every
• 1:48:50
  Speaker 1: major institution in the United States, conspired to hide the
• 1:48:56
  Speaker 1: truth from you during the twenty twenty election. That that
• 1:49:05
  Speaker 1: was scary to find out. Right. Then we have the
• 1:49:09
  Speaker 1: legal charges, the legal troubles. So the laptop had an actual,
• 1:49:18
  Speaker 1: I don't know what to call it, a mob, a
• 1:49:21
  Speaker 1: population like it had a bushel of things that he
• 1:49:27
  Speaker 1: could have been charged with. He was charged with tax
• 1:49:30
  Speaker 1: violations and gun charges. There were so many things on
• 1:49:34
  Speaker 1: there that he could have been charged over.
• 1:49:39
  Speaker 3: Yeah, like he got he got the easiest yeah, bro
• 1:49:46
  Speaker 3: that anybody could have given. Oh my god, it's just
• 1:49:50
  Speaker 3: and I mean, but I guess, you know, to prove
• 1:49:53
  Speaker 3: other things, there would have to be more of an investigation,
• 1:49:57
  Speaker 3: and I just yeah, they just don't seem too gung
• 1:50:02
  Speaker 3: ho and trying to actually do anything about it.
• 1:50:04
  Speaker 1: But well, the difficult thing is the people who have
• 1:50:10
  Speaker 1: seen what's on that laptop that are talking about what's
• 1:50:12
  Speaker 1: on that laptop are all like anybody who is anti
• 1:50:19
  Speaker 1: Trump will dismiss their witness testimony as pro Trump and
• 1:50:26
  Speaker 1: therefore not believable. Right. But the fact is that it's
• 1:50:35
  Speaker 1: been pretty consistent that people have who have seen it
• 1:50:39
  Speaker 1: have indicated that there were there was evidence of crimes
• 1:50:46
  Speaker 1: against children on that laptop. So being just charged for
• 1:50:52
  Speaker 1: a tax violation and unrelated yeah, so, you know, in
• 1:51:03
  Speaker 1: order to avoid a long drawn out trial, he initially
• 1:51:06
  Speaker 1: reached a plea deal with the prosecutors. The judge felt
• 1:51:12
  Speaker 1: that the plea deal was overly lenient. Quite likely the
• 1:51:17
  Speaker 1: prosecutors were pressured into that by the Biden administration because,
• 1:51:22
  Speaker 1: i mean, one of the scandals during that came out
• 1:51:26
  Speaker 1: during the election was the Barisma scandal in Ukraine, where
• 1:51:34
  Speaker 1: Biden was employed by a company that was under investigation
• 1:51:40
  Speaker 1: for some sort of fraud or other corruption. The investigation
• 1:51:46
  Speaker 1: included investigating Hunter Biden's actual work in that company, and
• 1:51:54
  Speaker 1: Joe Biden leveraged public aid to Ukraine during the Obama
• 1:52:01
  Speaker 1: administration when he was vice president to get that prosecutor
• 1:52:06
  Speaker 1: thrown out of office to stop the investigation. Of his son.
• 1:52:13
  Speaker 1: So yeah, I wonder how the prosecutors here in the
• 1:52:17
  Speaker 1: United States were inspired to give him such a great
• 1:52:20
  Speaker 1: deal that the judge was like, uh uh, you're being
• 1:52:23
  Speaker 1: too lenient. I wonder how that happened.
• 1:52:31
  Speaker 3: I want to know, But it's just going to point
• 1:52:35
  Speaker 3: the finger at more people that I'm going to be
• 1:52:37
  Speaker 3: pissed off with and want to yeat from the society.
• 1:52:42
  Speaker 1: So yeah, ooh, I mean you think about that. Let's
• 1:52:48
  Speaker 1: compare this to a case that was like one of
• 1:52:51
  Speaker 1: the first major cases I became aware of that, you know,
• 1:52:55
  Speaker 1: like I knew cases locally that were people that I
• 1:52:59
  Speaker 1: knew that had been hit with false allegations and were
• 1:53:04
  Speaker 1: pressured by the system. I had a friend. I had
• 1:53:06
  Speaker 1: one friend that was convicted when the Violence Against Women
• 1:53:10
  Speaker 1: Act was new because a woman saying that she was
• 1:53:16
  Speaker 1: afraid of a man was enough to cause him to
• 1:53:20
  Speaker 1: be guilty of domestic violence. And then, you know, I
• 1:53:24
  Speaker 1: had another friend who was convicted because no matter what
• 1:53:30
  Speaker 1: a woman is trying to do to a man violently,
• 1:53:34
  Speaker 1: he's supposed to still be gentle with her. So he
• 1:53:38
  Speaker 1: fought too hard when he defended himself against her second
• 1:53:43
  Speaker 1: attempt at stabbing him in the throat with a sharp object,
• 1:53:48
  Speaker 1: and therefore the judge found him guilty of assaulting her.
• 1:53:53
  Speaker 1: So I saw cases like that, right, But Brian Banks,
• 1:53:57
  Speaker 1: that one really pissed me off, because here was a
• 1:54:00
  Speaker 1: young man who was an athlete, who was on a
• 1:54:04
  Speaker 1: trajectory that could have placed him he like this, This
• 1:54:08
  Speaker 1: kid could have been a rich guy by today because
• 1:54:12
  Speaker 1: of his sports career.
• 1:54:15
  Speaker 3: Had everything going for him, everything, and some lying bitch
• 1:54:22
  Speaker 3: comes in and ruins it all.
• 1:54:24
  Speaker 1: Right, And and the thing that that nailed him wasn't
• 1:54:29
  Speaker 1: evidence or even bias in the jury or the judge.
• 1:54:36
  Speaker 1: The prosecutor got him alone without his mom, and if
• 1:54:42
  Speaker 1: I understand right, without his lawyer, and browbeat him into
• 1:54:47
  Speaker 1: signing a plea deal out of fear of a longer
• 1:54:53
  Speaker 1: sentence if he fought the case. And in reality that
• 1:54:56
  Speaker 1: fear is valid because if a man is offered a
• 1:55:01
  Speaker 1: plea deal in a case like that and he doesn't
• 1:55:03
  Speaker 1: take it, and he fights the case and then he's
• 1:55:04
  Speaker 1: found guilty, he does get a harsher sentence. So like judges,
• 1:55:13
  Speaker 1: judges do have that bias. If you exercise your right
• 1:55:16
  Speaker 1: to defend yourself against a charge, you get punished with
• 1:55:24
  Speaker 1: something closer to the maximum sentence for what you were
• 1:55:28
  Speaker 1: charged with. And that happened to young men all over
• 1:55:32
  Speaker 1: the United States, right, this one just happened to be innocent.
• 1:55:37
  Speaker 1: Brian Banks didn't do anything to that girl, and she
• 1:55:41
  Speaker 1: admitted it later on camera, and that was his saving grace.
• 1:55:46
  Speaker 1: But it was too late. It was he'd been in
• 1:55:49
  Speaker 1: for five years and his chance was gone.
• 1:55:56
  Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean, you can't get those five years of
• 1:55:58
  Speaker 3: your life back, you know. And and was there any
• 1:56:05
  Speaker 3: kind of restitution for him on his side?
• 1:56:10
  Speaker 1: But there's there's never enough. There's never enough. I've watched,
• 1:56:15
  Speaker 1: like the Innocence Project has had a lot of men
• 1:56:18
  Speaker 1: that they have gotten out of out of imprisonment and
• 1:56:26
  Speaker 1: other punishments because of false allegations. You know that they've
• 1:56:31
  Speaker 1: either pled guilty to or been found guilty of wrongfully
• 1:56:35
  Speaker 1: on false evidence or other things. And you know, there
• 1:56:40
  Speaker 1: the awards that they get from the States very dramatically,
• 1:56:44
  Speaker 1: but there's not enough money in the universe to pay
• 1:56:49
  Speaker 1: for stealing five years of somebody's life, and sometimes it's
• 1:56:53
  Speaker 1: thirty eight years. There was a guy, there's a guy
• 1:56:57
  Speaker 1: on their website whose story is on their website who
• 1:57:00
  Speaker 1: was wrongly imprisoned for thirty eight years. Thirty years is
• 1:57:04
  Speaker 1: a full career in a job, and he was in
• 1:57:07
  Speaker 1: prison for longer than you would you would be at
• 1:57:11
  Speaker 1: your job, if you had a full career at your job,
• 1:57:13
  Speaker 1: from hiring to retirement. Right. They took his whole life.
• 1:57:19
  Speaker 1: They took his whole adult life.
• 1:57:22
  Speaker 3: Yeah, that's that's just unacceptable. It doesn't even begin to
• 1:57:29
  Speaker 3: And you know, Brian Banks, like I was gonna say,
• 1:57:32
  Speaker 3: before you even brought this man up, I was gonna say,
• 1:57:35
  Speaker 3: how they didn't just take the five years. They took
• 1:57:38
  Speaker 3: his career, right, they took his whole life, effectively, the
• 1:57:44
  Speaker 3: rest of his life. You know, he's going to have
• 1:57:46
  Speaker 3: to pick up the pieces, and it's going to take
• 1:57:49
  Speaker 3: an employer that has, you know, any kind of wits
• 1:57:53
  Speaker 3: about them, any kind of wherewithal to care enough to
• 1:57:59
  Speaker 3: look into the situation, because it's not something that you
• 1:58:03
  Speaker 3: just hide right on a job in job application. Right.
• 1:58:08
  Speaker 1: Well, he famous for it, so it helps him that
• 1:58:11
  Speaker 1: he's famous for being innocent, and I think he's a motive,
• 1:58:14
  Speaker 1: motivational speaker now. But the thing is, this happens to
• 1:58:19
  Speaker 1: a lot of men where in the nineties there was
• 1:58:23
  Speaker 1: an issue of men being convicted of sex crimes because
• 1:58:28
  Speaker 1: an expert identified their hair as being the same as
• 1:58:34
  Speaker 1: hair that was found on the victim, and about twenty
• 1:58:38
  Speaker 1: five percent of cases that were later reevaluated using DNA
• 1:58:44
  Speaker 1: testing found that no, actually that was not their hair.
• 1:58:51
  Speaker 1: One in four turned out to be at least a
• 1:58:54
  Speaker 1: wrong identification. Even if it wasn't, the crime didn't happen,
• 1:59:01
  Speaker 1: the allegation against the convicted was false. That man didn't
• 1:59:07
  Speaker 1: commit the crime, so, from his experience, is still a
• 1:59:12
  Speaker 1: false allegation, right, right, And a lot of these men
• 1:59:18
  Speaker 1: get confronted with stuff like that, well, we have your
• 1:59:21
  Speaker 1: hair on the victim, and it's like, how could you
• 1:59:24
  Speaker 1: possibly Well, the expert says, it's your hair. You can't
• 1:59:27
  Speaker 1: contest that, right, There's nothing you can say to prove
• 1:59:30
  Speaker 1: that wrong. So they get pressured into these plea deals.
• 1:59:35
  Speaker 1: All right, I'll agree to plead guilty to this crime
• 1:59:38
  Speaker 1: if you don't give me the maximum sentence. But they
• 1:59:41
  Speaker 1: still lose their whole lives.
• 1:59:45
  Speaker 3: I mean, you can walk past a person in a
• 1:59:48
  Speaker 3: grocery store and leave your hair on them, Like that's
• 1:59:52
  Speaker 3: how easy it is, you know what I mean? If
• 1:59:55
  Speaker 3: you just simply touch someone, you can leave skin.
• 2:00:00
  Speaker 1: You could, you know, take the hair of four or
• 2:00:04
  Speaker 1: five different people from my family and put them all
• 2:00:07
  Speaker 1: in the same area, like a single strand in the
• 2:00:10
  Speaker 1: same area, and one of the hair identification experts from
• 2:00:15
  Speaker 1: the nineties would think they were all from the same person.
• 2:00:18
  Speaker 1: M M. And without DNA testing, you wouldn't realize, oh,
• 2:00:22
  Speaker 1: these people might all be related, but they're not the
• 2:00:24
  Speaker 1: same person. And there are people that I know that
• 2:00:28
  Speaker 1: I'm friends with that could put their hair right next
• 2:00:33
  Speaker 1: to my hair and the hair expert, the identification expert,
• 2:00:39
  Speaker 1: would think it was from the same person. And we
• 2:00:41
  Speaker 1: are not biologically related at all. In fact, we don't
• 2:00:45
  Speaker 1: even have the same national backgrounds.
• 2:00:52
  Speaker 3: So you know, I mean, the scary thing for me
• 2:00:56
  Speaker 3: is when you think about like in the past, I mean,
• 2:01:00
  Speaker 3: I guess it's not so scary anymore because we do
• 2:01:02
  Speaker 3: have DNA evidence. But before we had DNA evidence, hair
• 2:01:07
  Speaker 3: follicles were like that was their big thing. Yeah, you
• 2:01:12
  Speaker 3: know what I.
• 2:01:12
  Speaker 1: Mean, they're smoking gun. It's your hair. It looks exactly
• 2:01:15
  Speaker 1: like your hair, so it must be your hair. It
• 2:01:18
  Speaker 1: turns out that actually a lot of people's hair looks
• 2:01:21
  Speaker 1: alike yeah.
• 2:01:23
  Speaker 3: You.
• 2:01:24
  Speaker 1: Much more alike than people would think. And then the
• 2:01:27
  Speaker 1: other thing is you could take hair from different spots
• 2:01:31
  Speaker 1: on my head and put them side by side, little
• 2:01:35
  Speaker 1: strands of hair for and think they were all from
• 2:01:37
  Speaker 1: different people. In fact, some of them you could assume
• 2:01:44
  Speaker 1: were from people of a different racial background than you
• 2:01:47
  Speaker 1: would call me if you looked at me. Yeah, and
• 2:01:54
  Speaker 1: I have like, I don't have to dye my hair
• 2:01:57
  Speaker 1: to have quote unquote unknownatural hair colors. I have some
• 2:02:02
  Speaker 1: brown hair, I have some black hair, I have some
• 2:02:05
  Speaker 1: red hair. I have some blonde hair, very few, but
• 2:02:09
  Speaker 1: they're in there. I've found him before, and I have some.
• 2:02:12
  Speaker 1: I have a lot of silver hair now too, So
• 2:02:14
  Speaker 1: I'm rich and silver on my head, all out on
• 2:02:18
  Speaker 1: my head. But yeah, I you could. You could try
• 2:02:24
  Speaker 1: to identify me by my hair and fail miserably. Right,
• 2:02:30
  Speaker 1: So so there you go. But these guys, because they
• 2:02:33
  Speaker 1: are commoners, they're not at the apex. They're not the
• 2:02:36
  Speaker 1: men whose father has the power of the state to
• 2:02:40
  Speaker 1: use against a prosecutor, to strong arm him into being
• 2:02:45
  Speaker 1: supposedly fair or favoring you know, his son. They get
• 2:02:54
  Speaker 1: strong armed, they get run over, they get their due
• 2:02:58
  Speaker 1: process rights, violated. They get them violated so badly that
• 2:03:05
  Speaker 1: there's organizations out there dedicated solely to the practice of
• 2:03:12
  Speaker 1: helping people who have been wrongly convicted get their sentences
• 2:03:17
  Speaker 1: overturned based on solid evidence that they shouldn't have been
• 2:03:22
  Speaker 1: convicted in the first place, because the way that they
• 2:03:30
  Speaker 1: were convicted was based on bad science. And they don't
• 2:03:35
  Speaker 1: have a dad who can pardon them. They don't have
• 2:03:39
  Speaker 1: a dad who can withhold federal aid to a foreign
• 2:03:44
  Speaker 1: country to get a prosecutor dismissed, so they won't be investigated. Right,
• 2:03:48
  Speaker 1: they don't even have a dad who can go in
• 2:03:50
  Speaker 1: and say we're gonna we're gonna sue you if you
• 2:03:56
  Speaker 1: discriminate against my son.
• 2:04:00
  Speaker 3: Lucky if they have any dad.
• 2:04:01
  Speaker 1: Right, there's a lot of them, right that have no dad.
• 2:04:04
  Speaker 1: There's a lot of them that their dad couldn't file
• 2:04:08
  Speaker 1: a lawsuit because he's broke, he doesn't have any money.
• 2:04:14
  Speaker 1: And then there's a lot of them that because their
• 2:04:17
  Speaker 1: dad's a commoner, even if he did file a lawsuit,
• 2:04:20
  Speaker 1: the state would just run him over to mm hm
• 2:04:25
  Speaker 1: apex fallacy Biden being able to do this, and we're
• 2:04:28
  Speaker 1: gonna hear it from feminists, Well, look, Hunter Biden committed
• 2:04:31
  Speaker 1: all these crimes and his father just pardoned him. Patriarchy,
• 2:04:36
  Speaker 1: you benefit from it? Oh yeah, how how did Brian
• 2:04:41
  Speaker 1: Banks benefit from Joe Biden being able to pardon his son?
• 2:04:56
  Speaker 1: Then it gets on it and explains to pardon. So
• 2:04:58
  Speaker 1: we already know that part. Right, So next week when
• 2:05:06
  Speaker 1: we come back, we're going to get into this article.
• 2:05:09
  Speaker 1: This is uh Sky News in Australia. It's it's interesting.
• 2:05:16
  Speaker 1: There seems to be some good and some bad that
• 2:05:18
  Speaker 1: comes out of there. But this this article, it is
• 2:05:26
  Speaker 1: interesting just in where it leads. So we'll we'll read
• 2:05:31
  Speaker 1: through a little bit of this article on the laptop
• 2:05:35
  Speaker 1: from Hell and the corruption story that it exposes. And
• 2:05:41
  Speaker 1: why why might you know, if all Hunter Biden ever
• 2:05:45
  Speaker 1: did wrong was have a gun while he was an
• 2:05:49
  Speaker 1: addict and not pay taxes and then have to pay
• 2:05:53
  Speaker 1: them back later. If that's all he ever did wrong,
• 2:05:55
  Speaker 1: why did he need a ten year pardon? Why did
• 2:05:58
  Speaker 1: it have to be a blanket harden for things that
• 2:06:01
  Speaker 1: he may have done during that time? All right, this
• 2:06:06
  Speaker 1: is going to answer some of those questions. We start
• 2:06:08
  Speaker 1: with this and it will take us. Oh, come on,
• 2:06:14
  Speaker 1: open sesame to this report This report is the Marco
• 2:06:18
  Speaker 1: Polo Report on what was found on the Hunter Biden laptop.
• 2:06:26
  Speaker 1: And as you can see here on the table of contents,
• 2:06:29
  Speaker 1: we have business related crimes, sex related crimes, drug related crimes, influence, pedaling,
• 2:06:40
  Speaker 1: legal accountability, and then conclusion in notes. So there's quite
• 2:06:44
  Speaker 1: a bit there to look at. So now you know
• 2:06:47
  Speaker 1: where we're going next week, next year, going to Parisma.
• 2:06:54
  Speaker 1: And I'm laughing, but it's it's not happy laughter. I'm
• 2:06:57
  Speaker 1: really pissed about this because and I knew was gonna
• 2:07:00
  Speaker 1: happen to like when people people were like, well Biden said,
• 2:07:03
  Speaker 1: he's not gonna part pardon his son. Yeah, you knew
• 2:07:09
  Speaker 1: he was a snake when you picked him up, right right.
• 2:07:12
  Speaker 1: I knew this was when it happened. Yeah, So you
• 2:07:17
  Speaker 1: know it's ready for this.
• 2:07:21
  Speaker 3: You know, it feels like, at least for me personally,
• 2:07:27
  Speaker 3: I'm just in a period where I the only way
• 2:07:31
  Speaker 3: that my brain knows how to handle this, the garbage,
• 2:07:37
  Speaker 3: the just the influx of bullshit is to make the
• 2:07:42
  Speaker 3: darkest jokes about it, right and try to laugh because
• 2:07:49
  Speaker 3: anything else just doesn't compute, you know what I mean, Like.
• 2:07:53
  Speaker 1: That's a that's a part of trauma recovery.
• 2:07:56
  Speaker 3: Yeah. Yeah, And that's that's where I I just I
• 2:08:02
  Speaker 3: have to make jokes about this crap because it's too
• 2:08:06
  Speaker 3: bleak to look right in the face and deal with,
• 2:08:09
  Speaker 3: you know. And for me, the problem is is that
• 2:08:14
  Speaker 3: I'm very doubtful that anything is gonna happen. You know.
• 2:08:18
  Speaker 3: I'm so glad that Trump has been re elected for
• 2:08:21
  Speaker 3: the third time, and I would really love to see
• 2:08:26
  Speaker 3: something be done. Yeah, but I just am I'm out
• 2:08:31
  Speaker 3: of hope. I'm out of hope.
• 2:08:33
  Speaker 1: Yeah. And I you know, if Joe Biden's pardon for
• 2:08:39
  Speaker 1: his son stands, which it probably will, I'm not gonna
• 2:08:44
  Speaker 1: be That's not gonna be my concern. I'm not gonna
• 2:08:48
  Speaker 1: It's not that I'm not gonna be upset about it,
• 2:08:50
  Speaker 1: but I'm not gonna be focused on that. What I
• 2:08:52
  Speaker 1: want to see is the current administration or the administration
• 2:08:58
  Speaker 1: that follows up from the current administration, depending on how
• 2:09:03
  Speaker 1: long it takes to get this achieved, make changes to
• 2:09:06
  Speaker 1: the pardon power of the president that would act as
• 2:09:12
  Speaker 1: checks and balances to this type of corruption. Because this
• 2:09:17
  Speaker 1: is a situation and we're going to see this in
• 2:09:19
  Speaker 1: the next episode. When we talk next week about more
• 2:09:22
  Speaker 1: of this where a corrupt politician with a life long
• 2:09:30
  Speaker 1: habit of exploiting his office to lean on members of
• 2:09:37
  Speaker 1: the public for essentially mafia insurance type payments, and that
• 2:09:45
  Speaker 1: includes oligarchs and other countries when he got into national politics.
• 2:09:49
  Speaker 1: So we don't know how long how many people he
• 2:09:53
  Speaker 1: did that too when he was a small time politician,
• 2:09:55
  Speaker 1: but we know who he did it too when he
• 2:09:56
  Speaker 1: was a big time politician. And you don't get there
• 2:09:59
  Speaker 1: without having a life habit of that right has used
• 2:10:03
  Speaker 1: the presidential pardon powers to try to cover his tracks
• 2:10:09
  Speaker 1: and prevent himself from being held accountable for his corruption.
• 2:10:15
  Speaker 1: There has to be some checks and balances on that
• 2:10:19
  Speaker 1: power that prevents that. Even if he can pardon anyone
• 2:10:25
  Speaker 1: he wants to anywhere he wants to in the country,
• 2:10:28
  Speaker 1: there has to be some degree of accountability or some
• 2:10:32
  Speaker 1: limitation that does not allow the president of the United
• 2:10:37
  Speaker 1: States to use his pardon powers to cover his tracks
• 2:10:43
  Speaker 1: for crimes that he has potentially committed, like if he's
• 2:10:48
  Speaker 1: accused of or suspected of. That's that's it's just insane
• 2:10:57
  Speaker 1: that it can happen. Yea. You know, the Left would
• 2:11:00
  Speaker 1: never tolerate that if Donald Trump could do it, and
• 2:11:05
  Speaker 1: they found that Donald Trump was going to do it right,
• 2:11:07
  Speaker 1: even if he pardoned people in his administration or when
• 2:11:10
  Speaker 1: he pardoned people in his administration, they got mad. If
• 2:11:14
  Speaker 1: he pardoned his if he had a deal going like
• 2:11:18
  Speaker 1: Joe Biden and Hunter Biden had with Ukraine, and his
• 2:11:23
  Speaker 1: son did for him what Hunter Biden did for Joe Biden,
• 2:11:31
  Speaker 1: and he pardoned his son as a means of protecting himself,
• 2:11:37
  Speaker 1: there would be outcry all over the world about it. Yeah,
• 2:11:43
  Speaker 1: heads would roll.
• 2:11:45
  Speaker 3: It would be heads on spikes, you know what I mean.
• 2:11:48
  Speaker 1: Being marched down the street, you know, like a macab
• 2:11:54
  Speaker 1: audience watching.
• 2:11:56
  Speaker 3: You, you know, yeah, And you know they keep saying
• 2:12:01
  Speaker 3: that old Trump's sons are just it's the same situation
• 2:12:05
  Speaker 3: for Trump. Well, what has any of his children done
• 2:12:10
  Speaker 3: that rises to the level of anything, anything that Hunter
• 2:12:14
  Speaker 3: Biden has been proven to have done?
• 2:12:18
  Speaker 1: Yeah, receipts please, yeah, be nice.
• 2:12:22
  Speaker 3: Yeah no, but it's it's just it's Trump, So everyone
• 2:12:25
  Speaker 3: around him must automatically be guilty of something. Doesn't matter what.
• 2:12:31
  Speaker 3: Just slap a fucking charge on him and and you know, ah,
• 2:12:35
  Speaker 3: oh guilty.
• 2:12:38
  Speaker 1: And I mean, like if this if the the parties
• 2:12:41
  Speaker 1: were reversed, Well, if the parties were reversed while Trump
• 2:12:45
  Speaker 1: is in office, if a not just a Republican president,
• 2:12:48
  Speaker 1: but specifically Trump, If if this was Trump instead of Biden,
• 2:12:54
  Speaker 1: and the Trump family instead of the Biden family, there
• 2:12:58
  Speaker 1: might even be military action to deal with the situation.
• 2:13:02
  Speaker 1: Oh yeah, all right, And I'm not saying that that's
• 2:13:05
  Speaker 1: what should happen in this case. It's simply how different
• 2:13:08
  Speaker 1: things would be, because you know, it's a difference between
• 2:13:12
  Speaker 1: anti existing establishment political establishment, because Trump's not political establishment,
• 2:13:18
  Speaker 1: he's business establishment. Very different although they use each other,
• 2:13:24
  Speaker 1: but he may not have had the same benefit. But
• 2:13:29
  Speaker 1: if if that were the case, it's what would happen.
• 2:13:35
  Speaker 1: So next week we'll start with Laptop from Hell and
• 2:13:39
  Speaker 1: then move on to the report. And this report is
• 2:13:44
  Speaker 1: not short, okay, it's it's got like six hundred some pages.
• 2:13:49
  Speaker 1: We aren't going to read all six hundred pages, but
• 2:13:52
  Speaker 1: we will go through some highlights and take a look
• 2:13:55
  Speaker 1: at things. And the main thing, the first, the thing
• 2:13:57
  Speaker 1: I'm primarily interested in with regard to business related crimes
• 2:14:01
  Speaker 1: is Ukraine. I also have an upcoming discussion planned that,
• 2:14:09
  Speaker 1: in my opinion, is related to this where in the
• 2:14:16
  Speaker 1: upcoming discussion. Our upcoming discussion, we are going to look
• 2:14:20
  Speaker 1: at the history of America's interference in Iranian politics, beginning
• 2:14:30
  Speaker 1: with World War One, I think is what I found.
• 2:14:37
  Speaker 1: But we're going to have some specific focus on the
• 2:14:44
  Speaker 1: coup that the United States staged in Iran in nineteen
• 2:14:50
  Speaker 1: fifty three, because a lot of what's happening today in
• 2:14:54
  Speaker 1: the Middle East that the United States is involved in
• 2:14:59
  Speaker 1: is directly traceable back to that. And it was the
• 2:15:04
  Speaker 1: same like our government installed the Zelenski administration. Our government
• 2:15:14
  Speaker 1: engaged in a coup to do that and then genocided
• 2:15:21
  Speaker 1: the Russian nationals who objected to it. Like it just
• 2:15:30
  Speaker 1: because I learned about the genocide part this year. It's
• 2:15:33
  Speaker 1: hard for me to even talk about this. This is
• 2:15:35
  Speaker 1: so repulsive. I can't even begin to There's a lot
• 2:15:43
  Speaker 1: of stuff that we were never taught about in school.
• 2:15:46
  Speaker 1: And as I'm going back and looking at US military
• 2:15:50
  Speaker 1: actions in other countries where we were trying to promote democracy,
• 2:15:55
  Speaker 1: this isn't the first time. This is just routine for
• 2:16:00
  Speaker 1: for the administration, or not the administration, but the establishment,
• 2:16:06
  Speaker 1: and it has been for longer than I've been alive. Yeah,
• 2:16:10
  Speaker 1: so to understand it that we're going to look at
• 2:16:16
  Speaker 1: that history and and it's it's partly because this is
• 2:16:23
  Speaker 1: the story of men's exploitation by the establishment of the
• 2:16:30
  Speaker 1: United States as cannon fodder and pawns in war and
• 2:16:37
  Speaker 1: contract killers. This is all the exploitation, manipulation, corruption and
• 2:16:46
  Speaker 1: discarding of men, and if we don't pay attention to it,
• 2:16:52
  Speaker 1: it'll never stop. So so we're going to look into it.
• 2:16:57
  Speaker 1: We're gonna dig some nasty ass dirt up and look
• 2:17:01
  Speaker 1: at it and get it people recognizing it and understanding
• 2:17:05
  Speaker 1: it and pissed off about it, talking about it and
• 2:17:09
  Speaker 1: demanding change.
• 2:17:11
  Speaker 2: Cool.
• 2:17:13
  Speaker 1: So if anything happens to me in the meantime, just
• 2:17:18
  Speaker 1: so you all know, I'm not suicidal. I haven't been
• 2:17:23
  Speaker 1: suicidal for thirty years. So I love you guys. And
• 2:17:29
  Speaker 1: with that now you know what's coming. We will see
• 2:17:35
  Speaker 1: you next Thursday. Thanks to everybody for listening this. I
• 2:17:37
  Speaker 1: know this stuff stry, but it's very important. Thanks to
• 2:17:40
  Speaker 1: my two co hosts for going through this with me.
• 2:17:43
  Speaker 1: Thanks to everybody works in the background and make HBr
• 2:17:45
  Speaker 1: talk happen. Good Night all