Latest / Murder Files Unsealed / Leonard Lake Case - Why Killers Write Manifestos

Transcript

Leonard Lake Case - Why Killers Write Manifestos · Murder Files Unsealed

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: All right, so you guys requested it a deep dive
• 0:03
  into the minds of killers, specifically those who leave behind
• 0:07
  those bone chilling manifestos. Yeah, and honestly, I got to say,
• 0:13
  it's a topic that both fascinates me and kind of
• 0:15
  terrifies me at the same time.
• 0:16
  Speaker 2: Well, you're not alone. I mean, it's a question that's puzzled.
• 0:19
  You know, criminologists and forensic psychologists. Those are the folks
• 0:23
  who study the minds of criminals for decades. What drives
• 0:27
  someone to not only commit these horrific acts but then
• 0:30
  to feel the need to meticulously document their rationale? Like,
• 0:34
  what's the point they're trying to make?
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: Yeah, it's like they're looking for an audience, even if
• 0:37
  it's from you know, beyond the grave exactly. And it
• 0:40
  makes me think of cases like Leonard Lake back in
• 0:42
  the eighties, his cabin in California. Yeah, totally infamous.
• 0:46
  Speaker 2: Oh yeah, infamous is putting it lightly. Lake, along with
• 0:49
  his accomplice Charles Aang, they turned that cabin into a
• 0:53
  living nightmare. They documented their crimes, and investigators uncovered Lakes,
• 0:57
  you know, chillingly detailed written records basically laying out his
• 1:01
  twisted justification for the enslavement and murder of possibly as
• 1:05
  many as twenty five people.
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: God, it's the kind of stuff that gives you nightmares. Yeah,
• 1:08
  and Lake's not alone in this, you know, morbid need
• 1:12
  to explain himself. You've got Ted Kasinski, the unobomber, mailing
• 1:16
  his rambling manifesto to newspapers trying to justify his deadly
• 1:20
  bombing spree. And then there's Christopher Dorner, the ex cop
• 1:24
  who use Facebook as his platform to air his grievances
• 1:27
  before going on that rampage.
• 1:29
  Speaker 2: It's crazy, right, and the variety across these cases is
• 1:31
  really strike him. You have different backgrounds, different motives, yet
• 1:34
  you see this shared compulsion to explain, to justify. It
• 1:38
  really makes you wonder what is going on in their minds.
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: Let's unpack that. Let's start with a motive that honestly
• 1:44
  probably resonates with most people on some level at least
• 1:47
  a little bit.
• 1:47
  Speaker 2: Okay, narcissism, sure, but we're not just talking about someone
• 1:50
  who's a bit full of themselves here, right. This is
• 1:53
  about an utterly warped sense of self importance so extreme
• 1:57
  that these individuals convince themselves that they're acts are not
• 2:00
  only justified, but they're necessary.
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: So they've basically become the heroes in their own like
• 2:06
  twisted narratives exactly.
• 2:08
  Speaker 2: Doctor Joni Johnstair, a forensic psychologist who has spent years
• 2:12
  studying serial killers, calls this the UH injustice collector phenomenon.
• 2:18
  Think about a time you felt slighted or wronged.
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: We've all been there, absolutely, that feeling of hey, that's
• 2:24
  not fair. Ye, pretty universal.
• 2:26
  Speaker 2: Now, for most of us, that feeling it fades, we
• 2:29
  move on, But for these individuals it festers. It turns
• 2:32
  into this toxic cocktail of resentment and rage. They become
• 2:35
  consumed by these perceived injustices, utterly convinced that the world
• 2:39
  is against them, and that's where the narcissism explodes. They
• 2:42
  see themselves as uniquely victimized. They're suffering so profound, so singular,
• 2:47
  that it somehow justifies extreme action.
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: So it's not just about ego then, it's about feeling
• 2:52
  justified in seeking retribution for these wrongs, even if they're
• 2:57
  completely imagined.
• 2:58
  Speaker 2: Exactly, because they've cast themselves as the victims in their
• 3:02
  own minds, they feel entitled to retaliate, and their manifestos
• 3:06
  become their platform to air their grievances to set the
• 3:09
  record straight as they see it, even if that version
• 3:12
  of reality is completely warped.
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: And that brings to mind what doctor N. G. Beryl,
• 3:17
  a forensic psychologist in New York said about these manifestos.
• 3:21
  He called them self congratulatory, almost as if they're proud
• 3:24
  of these horrific acts.
• 3:25
  Speaker 2: Oh. Absolutely, there's an undeniable performative element to it. They're
• 3:29
  making a grand statement, ensuring the world remembers they're brilliance,
• 3:33
  or at least they're perceived brilliance, even if it's a
• 3:35
  brilliance rooted in darkness and violence.
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: Okay, now that since chills down my spine. So we've
• 3:40
  got this potent mix of narcissism and a need to
• 3:44
  justify their actions fueling these manifestos. But what about the
• 3:48
  need for power and control? Is that also connected to
• 3:51
  this narcissism?
• 3:52
  Speaker 2: Oh? Absolutely, I mean that need for power and control,
• 3:55
  it's often like deeply intertwined with this narcissism we've been
• 3:58
  talking about.
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: Okay, I see that.
• 3:59
  Speaker 2: Because for many of these individuals, you know, that need
• 4:02
  to seize control to make themselves heard, it often stems
• 4:05
  from this deeply rooted feeling of powerlessness, like a belief
• 4:10
  that they're genius. They're suffering, it's been ignored by the world.
• 4:15
  Speaker 1: So the manifesto becomes their way to finally kind of
• 4:19
  like grab the microphone, Yes, demand the attention they feel
• 4:22
  they've been denied.
• 4:23
  Speaker 2: Exactly. It's about controlling the narrative, even if you know
• 4:26
  it's a narrative built on violence and terror. Doctor Johnston
• 4:30
  she described this really well when she said, these individuals
• 4:33
  they feel like, I've been silent for so long and ignored.
• 4:36
  I've been invisible, I've been mistreated. So the manifesto becomes
• 4:39
  their way of kind of shouting their truth, however twisted
• 4:42
  and horrifying it may be, you know, from the rooftop.
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: And ensuring that their version of the story, their justification,
• 4:49
  is the one that gets left behind, the one that
• 4:51
  echoes in the aftermath.
• 4:53
  Speaker 2: Yes, exactly, because I mean, think about it, these documents
• 4:57
  don't just disappear. They're poured over, analy debated, and they
• 5:01
  ultimately become part of the killer's legacy, right right, And
• 5:04
  that kind of takes us to another key motivation we
• 5:07
  see with these manifestos, the desire to make a mark.
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: So it's not just about no variety then, is it. Yeah,
• 5:12
  it's got to be something bigger. They want something more lasting.
• 5:15
  They crave like a place in history, even if it's
• 5:19
  in the Hall of infamy, you got it.
• 5:21
  Speaker 2: They don't just want to be remembered, They want to
• 5:23
  be seen as like agents of change, even if that
• 5:26
  change is rooted in terror and destruction. And for some
• 5:31
  there's this delusional belief that their ideas, as outlined in
• 5:34
  their manifestos, will be seen as profound, maybe even visionary,
• 5:37
  by future generation.
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: That's where that chilling quote comes in, right, but one
• 5:41
  about these killers believing, yeah, that their manifestos will be
• 5:45
  considered compelling, that people will actually be drawn to their ideas.
• 5:49
  Speaker 2: Exactly. It's a level of disconnect from reality that's difficult
• 5:53
  to grasp, This belief that their actions, no matter how
• 5:56
  to prave, no matter how horrific, will be understood even validated,
• 6:01
  if people would just take the time to like truly
• 6:03
  understand their quote unquote brilliance.
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: Which is I mean terrifying. It really speaks to how
• 6:09
  warps they're thinking has become. So we've got this like
• 6:12
  toxic brew of narcissism, this need for control, and this
• 6:16
  intense desire for a legacy. It's all feeding into this
• 6:19
  urge to create a manifesto. But here's something I wasn't
• 6:22
  really expecting, the whole idea of copycatting.
• 6:25
  Speaker 2: Yeah, and it's a chilling reminder, you know, of the
• 6:27
  power these documents can hold, this dark influence that they
• 6:30
  can exert, because in some cases, manifestos aren't just the
• 6:33
  product of a single disturbed mind. They can actually inspire
• 6:38
  other disturbed minds to act.
• 6:39
  Speaker 1: Well, hold on, you're saying people actually get influence to
• 6:42
  write manifestos, that these documents can almost become like blueprints
• 6:45
  for violence.
• 6:46
  Speaker 2: Sadly, yes, And to kind of illustrate this, let's circle
• 6:49
  back to Leonard Lake, the man we discussed earlier. He's
• 6:53
  a prime example of how a manifesto can plant those
• 6:56
  seeds of violence in another mind.
• 6:57
  Speaker 1: You mean because he didn't act alone, that his accomplice,
• 7:01
  Charles Ng, was also influenced by his twisted worldview exactly.
• 7:06
  Speaker 2: Remember, Ang wasn't just along for the ride, he was
• 7:09
  heavily influenced by Lake's whole ideology, those survivalist beliefs that
• 7:13
  completely warped sense of reality.
• 7:15
  Speaker 1: And we're talking some seriously disturbing brutal crimes here. I
• 7:20
  mean they recorded themselves torturing and murdering their victims, and
• 7:24
  not just men and women, infants too.
• 7:27
  Speaker 2: It's a horrifying case, and it's made all the more
• 7:29
  disturbing by the fact that Ang is actually still alive today,
• 7:31
  He's sitting on death row.
• 7:33
  Speaker 1: God, that sends chills down my spine knowing he's still
• 7:36
  out there, forever shaped by Lake's toxic influence. It makes
• 7:40
  you wonder if there's specific elements of Lake's manifesto that
• 7:43
  particularly resonated with n that might have pushed him over
• 7:46
  the edge.
• 7:46
  Speaker 2: It's a question criminologists have really grappled with, especially considering
• 7:50
  that Lake's writings were just I mean rife with misogyny,
• 7:54
  a deep distrust of authority, and this warped belief in
• 7:58
  a coming apocalyptic clap So it's not a stretch to
• 8:02
  imagine these themes resonating with someone you know already teetering
• 8:05
  on the brink, someone.
• 8:06
  Speaker 1: Like nem So in a way, lakes manifesto acted as
• 8:10
  like a blueprint, a roadmap for Ang's descent into darkness.
• 8:14
  Speaker 2: That's a chilling but accurate way to put it, and
• 8:17
  it really underscores a deeply unsettling aspect of these manifestos,
• 8:21
  their ability to take on a life of their own,
• 8:23
  to potentially influence and incite violence even after the author
• 8:27
  is gone. And this is especially true now in the
• 8:29
  age of the Internet, where these documents can be disseminated
• 8:31
  with a click, reaching a potentially vast audience.
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: It's a terrifying thought that the manifestos can become like
• 8:37
  breeding grounds for further violence. So it's like these manifestos
• 8:41
  are almost contagious. They can spread their toxicity to vulnerable minds.
• 8:45
  We've covered a lot of ground narcissism, of thirst for control,
• 8:48
  this burning desire to leave a mark, and this chilling
• 8:51
  ribble effect of copycatting. But I don't know. I'm kind
• 8:54
  of left grappling with this unsettling thought. If manifestos are
• 8:58
  partly about control, about shit the narrative even in death,
• 9:01
  is it even more terrifying when a killer doesn't leave
• 9:04
  one behind, Like, is the silence even more chilling? Even
• 9:06
  more I don't know, indicative of a mind we just
• 9:09
  can't comprehend.
• 9:10
  Speaker 2: That's a question that I think haunts anyone who dares to,
• 9:13
  you know, really delve into the darkest recesses of the
• 9:16
  human psyche. Because silence, in these cases it can be deafening.
• 9:22
  It leaves us adrift, desperately seeking answers and a sea of,
• 9:26
  you know, unanswered questions. We're left to grapple with the
• 9:29
  unthinkable without even the bleakest roadmap. We're completely blind to
• 9:32
  the motivations of the person who committed these horrific acts.
• 9:35
  Speaker 1: So we end not with answers, but with even more questions,
• 9:40
  more I don't know, unsettling possibilities.
• 9:43
  Speaker 2: Perhaps, But you know, I truly believe that even in
• 9:46
  the face of such darkness, even when we're confronted with
• 9:49
  the truly unfathomable, the act of seeking answers, of trying
• 9:53
  to understand those motivations behind these acts, it's essential. It
• 9:58
  might be unsettling, even deeply uncomfortable, but it's often the
• 10:01
  first step towards prevention. It's about, you know, shedding light, however,
• 10:06
  faint into those dark corners of the human experience.
• 10:09
  Speaker 1: Well said, It's definitely a sobering thought to end on
• 10:12
  a reminder that sometimes the most disturbing mysteries are the
• 10:15
  ones we may never fully solve. Thanks for Thanks for
• 10:19
  taking us on this deep dive. Yeah, of course, and
• 10:21
  to our listeners, keep those requests coming, but maybe, you know,
• 10:23
  maybe next time, let's explore something a little lighter. Agreed.
• 10:26
  Until then, take care,