Latest / iwon™ podcast with Michael J Thomas / AI + What Every Founder Needs to Know Now | iwon podcast | Episode 13
Transcript
- 0:00If you're a founder and you're trying to build something amazing, whatever you're doing, odds are you don't have a lot of time to keep up with everything that's going on.
- 0:08My name is Michael and I'm here to help you get up to date with absolutely everything.
- 0:13After all, there's a ridiculous amount going on in tech at the moment, and some of it sounds absolutely insane.
- 0:18As you will also know, many AI companies are raising huge amounts of money.
- 0:23And believe it or not, they're actually starting to generate some very real money.
- 0:27Two at the same time, the European Central bank is asking the big question on everyone's minds.
- 0:33What we're all wondering Is this going to work exactly as it is, or are we heading towards another dot com style bubble?
- 0:40Even though the UK has left the eu, it can still affect any company.
- 0:46If a European customer buys your software, your product might also be built around one of the best AI models in the world.
- 0:55But what happens to your company if that provider changes, the price changes, the rules are suddenly whatever reason, you cannot use it.
- 1:03And somehow three founders in the mid-20s looked at Nvidia and thought, yeah, so what does that actually mean for you?
- 1:13That's the thing I care about.
- 1:14Because whether you're a founder or CEO in the us, the uk, Europe, or you're listening in Asia or somewhere else entirely, your customers are global, your technology is global, your competitors are global.
- 1:26So something that happens in Brussels, Washington, London or Silicon Valley can suddenly affect your product, your customers, or the way you make money.
- 1:35You probably haven't got three hours every single morning to work out what is going on, what matters and what's just Norse.
- 1:43So think of this as you and I having a coffee, going through a reliable services, no bs.
- 1:48I'll give you my take and why I think it matters to use upon versus the CEO.
- 1:52I digest the news, go back to the original sources and try to answer one simple question for you.
- 1:58So what does this actually tell us about building and growing your company?
- 2:03I'll do the digging, you make the decisions.
- 2:06I speak to founders constantly through Ione and I've also spent the last 15 years helping tech companies and software companies grow through my consulting.
- 2:17So these aren't theoretical questions to me.
- 2:20They're the kinds of things that founders and CEOs ask me all the time privately.
- 2:26And that's where I started Ione in the first place.
- 2:28Because I know that most business podcasts give you just a published ending.
- 2:35They're a bit bs.
- 2:36The funding, the great the exit and the success story.
- 2:39I want to share everything that happened in between.
- 2:43Iowan stands for it was never an eye.
- 2:46The more founders I speak to, the more questions they ask me.
- 2:49What's happening with AI?
- 2:51Should I be worried?
- 2:52Should I raise?
- 2:54Should I hire?
- 2:56I have to keep up with this stuff anyway, so I thought, why not do some of the work for you and share it?
- 3:02I'm not pretending I've got every answer.
- 3:04I definitely haven't.
- 3:06But what I can do is go back to the sources I trust and actually show you, work out what they're saying and give you mindset or limits.
- 3:15If you want to read the original sources or watch any of the videos, I'll link them all the way.
- 3:21Don't take my word for it.
- 3:23Come read it.
- 3:24All right, let's get you up to speed.
- 3:26So I'm going to start with something I like to call the grips, the bad and the bloody complicated.
- 3:31First up, AI Drew or Bubble.
- 3:34Here's the question.
- 3:36Can AI be completely transformational and still be massively overvalued?
- 3:43The European Central bank published something with the title and on Doom, Rifle, enthusiasm or the very next.com bundle.
- 3:53Let's try.
- 3:54That's an interesting question because it isn't like someone like shouting, the AI bubble is about to burst.
- 4:03We're talking about the European Central bank.
- 4:05And the interesting thing is they're not actually saying AI is nonsense.
- 4:09In fact, quite the opposite.
- 4:10They're basically saying AI could genuinely change fundamentally huge parts of the economy, increase productivity, create enormous value, and yet we could also still be paying far too much for some of those companies today.
- 4:26Both things can be true.
- 4:27And I think that's the bit founders need to understand.
- 4:31We have a tendency to talk in absolutes or about bubbles, as if the underlying technology must therefore have been nonsense.
- 4:39But if you go back to the original.com period when I had hair, was the Internet nonsense?
- 4:44Obviously not.
- 4:45The Internet changed practically everything we do.
- 4:49That didn't mean every single Internet company deserved the valuation that their investors gave it.
- 4:54Maybe that's a more interesting question with aerial.
- 4:58I think that debate is becoming increasingly pointless and it's certainly changing things for better and worse.
- 5:04The better question is how much future success have we priced into all of this?
- 5:11Because at almost exactly the same time, Reuters have been looking at interoper and what could eventually become an absolutely enormous ipo.
- 5:23According to reporting in the source pack that I read, Anthropic's annual revenue run rate had reportedly $65 billion by the end of July.
- 5:33That was apparently up from 47 billion in May and roughly just 9 in months ago.
- 5:41So just stop and think about that.
- 5:43Rate of growth and Royal separately reported forecast being considered of leaving out roughly 190 to $200 billion in annual revenue by 2018.
- 5:54So when people are thinking about what anthropic could ultimately be worth as a tool and as a company, we've got two stories happening at exactly the same time.
- 6:05The ECB effectively saying be careful.
- 6:09Valuations are becoming very stretched when you think about on the stock market and on the other hand, this extraordinary revenue growth.
- 6:20I just talked about saying, yeah, look how much money could be created here for these companies.
- 6:26So which side is right?
- 6:28I'm going to have to say potentially both.
- 6:31First, AI companies are getting a lot of investment and they're starting to generate some very real money from it.
- 6:37This isn't just type anymore.
- 6:38Real companies are spending serious amounts of money on AI.
- 6:42That doesn't automatically mean every AI company is worth whatever enormous value gets attached to.
- 6:50If you're a founder, don't ask how do I make it sound like we're at the forefront of it all?
- 6:55Before you do anything, ask where does AI genuinely make my product better?
- 7:01Does it save my customers time?
- 7:03Does it make them more money?
- 7:04Reduce their cost?
- 7:05Remove a painful bit of work?
- 7:07Does it help them do something?
- 7:09Maybe they couldn't be there before because eventually people will start to realize that there is a lot of hype up or 2 solving genuine problems.
- 7:19That's the bit that people will pay for.
- 7:21AI can be revolutionary and it festers instead of your timely carried web.
- 7:26Both can be true.
- 7:27We've seen it before.
- 7:28And this actually reminds me of something from the episode with Sachin Goya where when he was on the podcast, he's somebody who's built a mysteriously high growth environment, Spanduel multiverse and now Clarity with one of his warnings was
- 7:45about raising far too early, because raising money can feel like the goal, the validation.
- 7:51But his point was rising too early can actually hurt you.
- 7:54Also because you might be putting fuel into something before you've actually established that you have a real business that is worth growing.
- 8:03And I think that's incredibly relevant to what's happening around AI.
- 8:07Raising money is not the same thing as proving you've got a market and a value.
- 8:12A good valuation is also not the same thing as a valuable business.
- 8:18And hype definitely isn't the same thing as a proper business model.
- 8:23If you want to do that full conversational session, I'll link that episode in the show.
- 8:27Notes and stretching below.
- 8:29Next, I want to dive into more about the EU and AI.
- 8:34So here are the guidelines.
- 8:37If you're a UK founder, you might hear EU AI act and think, by the way, I'm not in the EU anymore.
- 8:44The UK has its own approach regulating AI.
- 8:48Sort of.
- 8:49They definitely got a ministry before every UK founder rolls their eyes and banks.
- 8:54Lovely.
- 8:55This doesn't apply to new work here in the us.
- 8:57Not true.
- 8:58Because if you're building something for customers who could buy from the European Union, you may still fall into parts of the EU rules.
- 9:08And this is exactly why I'm including stories like this, because they get overlooked.
- 9:12Some of you are in Britain, some of you might be in the eu, so you're more aware.
- 9:16Some of you might be in America.
- 9:19Nobody ever stops a company to say, I hope no one outside my country ever buys this.
- 9:23You want to grow and grow, but particularly if you're trying to build an enterprise customer base.
- 9:29Those customers could be from anywhere.
- 9:31So something happening in Brussels, London or Silicon Valley could eventually become a real problem.
- 9:38It could end up in your product roadmap, your sales process, or anywhere else.
- 9:44That is why I think you should know more about Article 50 of the EU air.
- 9:49Just be aware, because it started applying to companies on 2 August 2026 and the European Commission has published detailed guidance around its transparency requirements.
- 10:02I'll share those links in the description.
- 10:04But among other things, there are situations where people need to know they're interacting directly with an AI system rather than human.
- 10:11There are also requirements about identifying certain AI generated or manipulated content, including areas like defects.
- 10:20Now, I'm not a lawyer and I don't pretend to be, so please don't watch this, men.
- 10:24Tell your legal team, Mike says this.
- 10:28Don't do that.
- 10:29If you think this might affect your product, speak to somebody who properly understands the legislation.
- 10:38But there are two things here that I find really interesting as a founder.
- 10:42Number one, AI legislation starting to roll out.
- 10:46Number two, if you sell software to larger organizations, you're going to get asked questions.
- 10:54New ones, such as what AI are you using?
- 10:56What happens to your.
- 10:59Where is the process?
- 11:00Can we audit exactly what's happening?
- 11:03What does the end user need to know?
- 11:06And can generated material be identified?
- 11:09What are the controls?
- 11:11You see, those aren't just legal questions.
- 11:13They will become sales questions.
- 11:15They're procuring questions, they're product questions.
- 11:18And what that means is that if you want to land a bigger customer, you need to know these things.
- 11:24And then there's the second part, compliance actually become a competitive advantage.
- 11:29Because if you're Microsoft, you're Google.
- 11:32Odds are you have enormous teams of lawyers, security people, policy people, compliance people, whatever it is you need at that level.
- 11:40But if you're six people sitting in an office somewhere trying to build something, another layer of regulation doesn't feel quite so trivial to you as a founder.
- 11:51So there is a genuine tension there for me.
- 11:54On one hand, regulation can protect customers.
- 11:57It can also create trust.
- 11:59It can force companies to behave better.
- 12:02But every additional barrier also increases the cost of entry.
- 12:07And when you increase the cost of entry, you potentially strengthen the businesses that are already inside it.
- 12:13So I'm much less interested in is the EU AI act good or bad?
- 12:19That's far too simplistic a view.
- 12:22The more useful, harder question is, can you turn compliance into something customers actually choose you because of?
- 12:30Can you say, no problem?
- 12:33Here's exactly what our AI does.
- 12:35Here's where your information goes.
- 12:37Here's what happens if something goes wrong.
- 12:39All of that stuff can become part of your site, so why should you care?
- 12:44Because if you want bigger customers, they're going to ask questions about that.
- 12:51They'll want to know, where does our data go?
- 12:55Who can see it?
- 12:56Can it be trusted?
- 12:58What happens if something goes wrong?
- 13:00You see, this isn't just a legal issue.
- 13:02It can affect whether somebody buys for you.
- 13:04And if you handle it better than any of your competitors, might even help you win.
- 13:09On the podcast, Beth Dodson talked about this very thing.
- 13:13Beth has spent years dealing with huge organizations.
- 13:19She's currently the co founder of Hanzone, and before that she sold and exited a company that delivered software used around enormous projects, including NFL stadium bills.
- 13:30For those of you who aren't familiar with the NFL, it's those big hundreds.
- 13:34100 seat, 100,000 seat saves.
- 13:38One of the things I really liked in that conversation was her attitude towards all of the details.
- 13:43You got to adopt the I's and cross the t's and protect your business.
- 13:46That's going to become even more important as AI gets baked more into your software.
- 13:52I'll link that episode down below as well, in case you want to have a look.
- 13:57She shares so many useful tips for founders, so watch it.
- 14:02Answering another question, what if your AI disappears?
- 14:05Smart.
- 14:06Well, what happens if the company behind your entire AI party of your product relies on the one you rely on?
- 14:14Changes the rules, changes the price, changes the products?
- 14:18Or what if you suddenly can't use it all?
- 14:21The FC reported on this very thing.
- 14:25The UK government has been urgently looking at what might happen if British companies and consumers are whilst access to the newest frontier models from American companies.
- 14:34Whatever you think of the government level policies bring that right down to you.
- 14:38At startup, imagine your entire product depends on one AI company.
- 14:44Your workflows depend on it, your customers depend on it.
- 14:46You spent months optimizing everything around it.
- 14:50Your team has integrated its API everywhere, the output's fantastic, everything is lovely.
- 14:57Then the price changes, the model, the terms, the access, maybe even regulation or any extreme situation.
- 15:09Now you can't use it anymore.
- 15:11What would happen to your company?
- 15:12And that's the VIDAC era because founders have quite reasonably said should we build our own model to protect or use the companies building them 247 most startups you probably shouldn't.
- 15:26It can be very expensive.
- 15:29Just use the best tools available and think about it.
- 15:32You should think about how you could switch provider.
- 15:35How difficult would it be?
- 15:37Which pieces of your product genuinely require one specific model?
- 15:42And of course what happens if the provider depreciates the version that you built everything on?
- 15:48How long would a migration or a fix take?
- 15:52This came up in a really interesting way when I spoke to Hapsish Dakar from Pedagog.
- 15:57He's not only built a large language model, he's also Pedagog is focused on educating people for the future.
- 16:04The AI future.
- 16:05We talked about the difference between Vibe coding and much more structured agentic engineering.
- 16:12One principle he was very strong on was model agnosticism.
- 16:17In simple English, don't build yourself into a corner where the entire system assumes one model will always be the answer.
- 16:26Build systems that can work across things like ChatGPT, Gemini and whatever comes next.
- 16:32That doesn't mean randomly swapping models every Wednesday.
- 16:36It means thinking structurally about that dependency.
- 16:39I know it doesn't sound sexy, but I think it has become a much bigger strategic issue than it would have been even six months ago.
- 16:50There's a huge difference between saying we use anthropic and if anthropic disappears tomorrow, our company stops functioning.
- 16:59If I were investing in you, and I speak to a lot of VCs too, they wouldn't want to know exactly that if they were acquiring your company.
- 17:10And I think increasingly enterprise customers will want to know that too.
- 17:14So this FT story that I just shared and I will link to isn't really just about British AI policy, it's about properly planning your company.
- 17:22In the AI era, single points of failure could feel completely harmless like that right up until the moment something went.
- 17:33The second one is really simple.
- 17:35Don't build a company that only works because of one other company.
- 17:39You don't necessarily need to build your own AI either, but you do need to know what your backup plan is.
- 17:46I'll put a link to Ax Issue's episode below as well, because if you're building with AI, that conversation is definitely worth listening to.
- 17:56He's a really smart guy when it comes to AI.
- 17:59He makes it all really simple and clear.
- 18:02Now to another AI story you should consider.
- 18:08AI could make your product better, but it could also make it worse.
- 18:14That's the slightly uncomfortable SaaS story here.
- 18:19API isn't just changing what software can do, it could change what customers pay for and what costs you to serve them.
- 18:29The lovely thing about traditional SaaS in the old days was you build the software, someone logs in and someone else logs in some more people up.
- 18:37You don't necessarily incur massive additional cost every single time someone signs on.
- 18:45More seats equal more recurring revenue.
- 18:47Happy days.
- 18:48And yeah, it slightly complicates that.
- 18:51And this article I'm just sharing McKinsey looked at how software pricing could change as AI starts performing more and more of the work itself.
- 19:02The basic argument makes sense.
- 19:04If software stops merely helping a person do a job and instead starts actually doing a larger and larger part of that job, why would the customer necessarily keep paying the same number of human seats?
- 19:17Imagine like software sold into a finance department.
- 19:22Say there's 100 people in that department.
- 19:23Big finance department you charge per seat.
- 19:27Suddenly with AI it means your department can perform the same amount of work in one seat that Thor would have required in the past.
- 19:36Yes, that's an amazing productivity win for the customer.
- 19:39But your revenue generating and addressable seat count just fell by 75%.
- 19:46And that doesn't necessarily mean you're in trouble.
- 19:49You might actually be creating much more value.
- 19:51And more value equals better retention.
- 19:54But perhaps the thing customers buy changes.
- 19:58Maybe they hyper usage activity outputs completed work, revenue generated, money saved, risk removed.
- 20:06Something a little bit closer to the outcome they're looking for.
- 20:10There's another side to that though.
- 20:12Your costs will change too, because AI isn't free.
- 20:16Every time new customer's agent analyzes something, generates something, searches something, processes something thing or runs a workflow, somebody pays for it.
- 20:26And that somebody probably is you.
- 20:29So imagine a Customer pays you 100amonth per se and it costs you 25 lovely recurring revenue and great margins.
- 20:39Except now with AI the usage is costing you 85.
- 20:45You now are only making 15 and step 75, which means founders need to understand the usage career user Economics much more carefully who's profitable, which workflows are expensive, do you include usage, do you cap it, do you charge
- 21:04extra?
- 21:04Or do you build complicated tiers?
- 21:07No, because ultimately there's the awkward bit.
- 21:12You want to stop yourself from overspending, but your customer also wants a predictable price.
- 21:16Both are completely reasonable points to come from.
- 21:19So how do you build a pricing model in the AI era that is a win win for you?
- 21:26I think we're going to see loads of experimentation here in the market.
- 21:30So what should you do with that?
- 21:32Work out what your customer is really paying you for.
- 21:35Maybe a piece of work that's getting done, time saved, money made, that's where the value is.
- 21:40And at the same time know what it actually costs you every time the AI does that piece of amazing work.
- 21:46Because a product can be brilliant for the customer and still if you don't do it right, be a terrible business for you.
- 21:53The numbers don't work.
- 21:55Now if you're thinking about that before, your margins force easier.
- 21:59Now I'd like to take you to a true underdog story.
- 22:02An ambitious startup is taking on Nvidia head to head.
- 22:07324 year olds and a bunch of others looked at one of the most powerful companies in the AI era and basically thought, yeah, well the Garrett absolutely love this story.
- 22:19The company is called Etched.
- 22:21The Wall Street Journal recorded that the AI chip startup is now valued at over $21 billion.
- 22:27It has reportedly booked more than $1 billion from our and a lead investor in a new $700 million round of funding.
- 22:36And about 15% of Edge, roughly 400 employees, came from Nvidia.
- 22:42Now, I'm not going to pretend to be a semiconductor expert because I'm definitely not and I'm not qualified to tell you whether their architecture ultimately be Nvidia.
- 22:50That's not actually the interesting part for me.
- 22:53The interesting part for me is these are founders who looked at a market practically everyone else would describe as impossible and identified something changing underneath.
- 23:03They're focusing heavily on something called inference.
- 23:08In simple terms, it's not necessarily the gigantic job of training the model originally, but running the whole thing more efficiently once it exists.
- 23:18So if the job changes, the hardware changes, and when the basis of competition changes, incumbents can become very vulnerable.
- 23:27It's not because Nvidia are not an important company in the AI era.
- 23:31Totally not.
- 23:33As products develop, expectations change, value changes.
- 23:37The same goes for chips.
- 23:40Data centers want better and lower cost solutions.
- 23:44And as we know with chips, Nvidia can't seem to come up with the demand either.
- 23:50So why should you care?
- 23:51The lesson isn't go and take on Nvidia.
- 23:53The lesson is that big companies can look unbeatable until something shifts and the market changes.
- 24:00That's when there's an opening for you.
- 24:02So ask yourself some different questions.
- 24:04Ask what is changing Reactor?
- 24:08Is it the technology?
- 24:10Customer behavior?
- 24:10Pricing regulation?
- 24:12The way the work gets done?
- 24:14Don't try to become a slightly worse version of the biggest player in the market.
- 24:17Look for what is changing.
- 24:20Sachin and I talked about startups like this on the podcast.
- 24:24We both thought of it like speed boats compared with oil tankers.
- 24:28The big company has scale, resources, process, brand, existing customers, all of that.
- 24:34But the small company can shift quickly, listen better, adapt more quickly, build better relationships with customers, and respond much more quickly if the market itself is changing.
- 24:45Speed is everything.
- 24:48Now let's test some of the strong advice that gets repeated over and over as if it's gospel, not what somebody said on LinkedIn.
- 24:57What does the evidence actually say?
- 24:59First factor fiction.
- 25:01An MVP isn't enough to raise money anymore.
- 25:03An MVP?
- 25:05You probably know this.
- 25:07The VCs don't tell that you've built an MVP.
- 25:10You need clear ICPs.
- 25:12You need exciting and realistic revenue projections.
- 25:15You need retention to be bet.
- 25:19Nobody funds ideas.
- 25:21But it's certainly very rare anymore.
- 25:24So the fact that fiction isn't MVP isn't enough.
- 25:28I'm going to go with it depends because Stage matters enormous Cardi's latest precedent investment data says US startups on Friday raised $3.9 billion across more than 11,500 BC investments in Q2 of this year.
- 25:47So clearly people are still investing early precede investments are still out there, but the market is changing.
- 25:55If you move towards Series A or beyond, the evidence changes.
- 25:59Investors start looking at things like how quickly ARR or annual recurring revenue is growing, how much money is left after you deliver the product, how profitable is it and how much does it cost to acquire a customer and
- 26:13do this thing.
- 26:14Also your burn rate is very important comparatively correct whether the whole thing is becoming more efficient or less.
- 26:23Not just look everybody it works.
- 26:26But look.
- 26:26Customers buy it, they stay, some of them buy more from us and the economics make complete sense.
- 26:33Non VP can help answer can we build this or envision this?
- 26:36Series A requires and beyond to start answering some gas.
- 26:41Can this become a seriously profitable business that can adapt when and if needed?
- 26:46That's a very different question.
- 26:47And this is where Christian's comments about funding early matters.
- 26:51Again, money can allow you to scale, but if you haven't established what you're good at, money can also run out much faster than you think.
- 26:59So my verdict is, you cannot raise without MVP as fiction.
- 27:03Because in MVP alone, Chris, you're more ready, but also know where you're really at and what it is you're promising.
- 27:12Factor fiction number two.
- 27:14Solve your own problem is really bad startup advice.
- 27:18Here many versions of this classic thing.
- 27:22One side says, scratch your own itch, build something you desperately want to exist.
- 27:27The other says, no advice your sample size of 1.
- 27:32So which one's right?
- 27:33I'd say solving your own problem is absolutely not a bad place to start.
- 27:37You'll know the problem well, assuming, of course, that the problem represents a much bigger market than just you.
- 27:43And that's the dangerous bit.
- 27:44Product board is a great example of that.
- 27:47His founder had lived the problem as a product leader.
- 27:50He'd experienced teams losing focus, struggling to arrive.
- 27:54Customers really wanted that frustration gave him the idea of a product board.
- 28:00Your frustration alone, as I said, doesn't validate the market.
- 28:03Other people do.
- 28:04Will strangers talk to you about the problem in your industry?
- 28:08Will they use a similar solution that they hate?
- 28:11Will they actually change their behavior?
- 28:14Are they enthusiastic about a solution?
- 28:17So enthusiastic that will science something okay.
- 28:21And will they stay around?
- 28:23I think the sentence I'd remember is, your own problem can be a great starting point, but it cannot validate a whole market answer.
- 28:30I think we massively underestimate the difference between these two statements.
- 28:35Yeah, that's quite annoying.
- 28:36And where do I sign them?
- 28:38Pay?
- 28:39They're not.
- 28:39Same thing.
- 28:41And I share this because I don't want you to listen to this and either build a product or new feature before you really know for sure people will value.
- 28:49Ah, the next factor.
- 28:50Fiction.
- 28:51Founder, audiences.
- 28:53Everything drives sales.
- 28:54Building a bigger audience will drive sales.
- 28:56I do that all the time.
- 28:59This is a particularly dangerous one to talk about because I'm literally sitting here making content.
- 29:05My audience is growing.
- 29:07I host a podcast, I post on LinkedIn.
- 29:10I now also create YouTube videos.
- 29:12I obviously would like some of that to have commercial value at some point.
- 29:17But does having a gigantic audience automatically create revenue?
- 29:22Well, this is mostly fiction, because the more niche the audience in the beginning, the better in many ways.
- 29:29Truthfully, a low percentage of your followers will become your paying customers.
- 29:33So if you go wide, it's quite hard to be specific.
- 29:37For them, audience size, that was almost meaningless, especially the way algorithms are structured.
- 29:42Now, if the audience has no relationship with what you actually sell, it doesn't matter how big they are good.
- 29:49Thought leadership can absolutely influence and help with buying decisions and LinkedIn Adam did some research that I'll share down below.
- 29:58They found that buyers often consume content in more places as a part of evaluating vendors than they did before.
- 30:05And those buyers coming across you, however, they do really do matter and they may never comment or interact with you.
- 30:13So whether your audience is in finance, procurement, operations, legal, C suite people, often key stakeholders, never touch the software, but they can still be part of the deal.
- 30:27So content can matter enormously.
- 30:29The important question isn't how many followers have I got, it's am I building trust with the people who matter?
- 30:36And where is your life?
- 30:38100,000 followers consisting of the wrong audience.
- 30:42People who may just enjoy your jokes.
- 30:45They could theoretically produce zero pipeline for you, but you also never know who is paying attention.
- 30:522000 followers with 300 of them being potential buyers, partners or even investors could be a fantastic audience for your startup.
- 30:59So I wouldn't optimize to go viral unless your product has a huge tenant, heavily addressable market.
- 31:08Instead, optimize it for the right people.
- 31:11Make useful things for people whose opinion matters to your business.
- 31:15And actually that's probably what I'm trying to do with ion.
- 31:20I'm not particularly interested in making content that goes viral, I just want it to be helpful.
- 31:25I want you to finish an episode having learned something or thought about something new.
- 31:30And when somebody gives you that much of their time, that means the world to me.
- 31:34That's massive because it means the conversations are actually worth listening to for that.
- 31:39And that was the goal from day one.
- 31:42Useful conversations, real founders, the stuff that happened between the beginning and the success story.
- 31:48And interestingly, that experience has also led us into helping other founders start conversations and podcasts that are on.
- 31:58Because then properly podcast isn't just content, it can help build relationships, build trust.
- 32:05But all of it only works if the thing is genuinely worth somebody's time.
- 32:12Usefulness first.
- 32:13Everything else comes afterwards.
- 32:16Next factor Friction.
- 32:17Always go niche with your tech business or SaaS.
- 32:22People often say smaller niche software companies are always that are business or put another way because every company needs to be gigantic all in one platform.
- 32:33Can you solve one horrible problem for one very specific customer and build something fantastic?
- 32:40I know there simply isn't evidence that every single niche SaaS business will automatically win, meaning they get better retention or becomes a much better company.
- 32:51That's too generic when it comes to advice for founders, but there are some fantastic vertical examples like Mango Events which I will share with you.
- 33:01It focuses specifically on stones and spas.
- 33:04And it is reportedly reached around 110% net revenue retention, while growing towards roughly $20 million in AR.
- 33:16One success story doesn't create a universal rule, but the strategic logic is interesting.
- 33:23A horizontal product says we can up any business.
- 33:27Really good vertical product says we understand exactly how your weird wonderful world works.
- 33:35That means the terminology, the workflows, the reputation, the scheduling, the payments, reporting, integrations, whatever the stuff outside the industry that large companies won't even consider, but everyone inside it knows it's an absolute pain.
- 33:52And once your software becomes deeply embedded, switching gets more difficult because you're great at solving an astonishingly awful problem.
- 34:02But you still need enough market, even if it's just 47 possible customers.
- 34:08Clearly you haven't become the next salesforce, but you might have created a moat and a globally specialist software company in the age of ar.
- 34:16And there's absolutely nothing wrong with that.
- 34:18I think venture pro culture has occasionally distorted this.
- 34:23Not every great company needs to become a $10 billion platform.
- 34:28There are plenty of founders who can create extraordinary wealth, freedom and impact by being incredibly valuable to a relatively narrow market.
- 34:37Smaller isn't automatically better.
- 34:40Bigger isn't automatically better either.
- 34:43But clearer is always a winner.
- 34:47So whatever clearer is to you, hope that answers next question.
- 34:52Should you pre sell without writing a single line of code?
- 34:57You should.
- 34:58Okay, this gets treated like scripture.
- 35:01I hear this all the time.
- 35:02Don't build anything.
- 35:03Create a landing page, pre sell it, get money, then write code.
- 35:08But is that the safest way to validate a startup?
- 35:11I think it's mostly fiction.
- 35:12Pre sounding can be a brilliant way to see if you're on the right track.
- 35:17But it's one of many validation methods and material security is a great example.
- 35:23The founders at least the possible third of ideas ability to sell products that didn't yet exist.
- 35:30The commercial response helps them filter things down and really decide what to build.
- 35:36And that's powerful because money is an incredibly strong signal.
- 35:40Because people say yes to free things all the time, commitment changes the conversation.
- 35:45There are loads of other legitimate validation methods you can consider.
- 35:49You might interview partners, customers, prototypes, communities, and obviously free some.
- 35:56So the rule is never write a single line of code until somebody pays.
- 36:01My version would be don't invest too much before you have collected meaningful evidence that the primary matters and your chances of success are higher.
- 36:12And the closer that evidence gets to genuine behavior, the stronger it becomes.
- 36:17I love the idea.
- 36:19It's fine.
- 36:20I joined the waitlist.
- 36:22Okay, I'll tell what it seemed that we want to build it with you.
- 36:27Right?
- 36:28Here's a chunk of money, very bloody useful information.
- 36:32So pre selling is a fantastic tool, but it's not the only way.
- 36:36Okay, so here's founder question number one.
- 36:40When should I actually hire a sales leader?
- 36:45This one comes up very often.
- 36:46A founder gets some traction, investors start saying we need scale.
- 36:50Now we're driving the go to market strategy and revenue.
- 36:54The founder's knackered, burnt up.
- 36:58I'm spending too many plates already.
- 36:59So the solution might seem an obvious one Higher VP of Sales Problem solved.
- 37:03Right?
- 37:04Except what exactly are they supposed to scare?
- 37:09This is one that I've come across many times and actually was was the reason behind one of my podcast conversations that genuinely changed the way I think about it too.
- 37:19So Alexa would be has spent years helping GTM team scare and on the podcast we talked about what I think is one of the biggest hiring mistakes.
- 37:31Sorry to make the assumption that the impressive VP from the massive company is automatically the right person to scale your early stage company doesn't necessarily make sense because imagine what that person had around them before recognized by the
- 37:48marketing team.
- 37:49Budget data, sales enablement, maybe a really large customer base in terms of proof.
- 37:58Then you bring them into your startup and you say brilliant, here's your laptop.
- 38:04But if you're much earlier on in your company, odds are you don't really know how to build that sort of operation or who the best ICP is.
- 38:16Maybe you haven't quite nailed the marketing or the first 2000 customers.
- 38:212000 is just a number and that's a completely different job.
- 38:25He needs to be a different type of person to do it.
- 38:27Alex's argument was to think more carefully about aptitude, attitude and resilience and the ability to build from the ground up.
- 38:35He even talked about potentially hiring a much more junior generalist GTN associate and keeping them very close to user founder while you figure out everything together.
- 38:46I think that's fantastic advice because before somebody scales sales, you need to understand what it is they're scaling, who buys, not who might buy.
- 38:55You'll need to work out much more than who you need to understand.
- 39:01Why did they act?
- 39:03What's the most painful trigger?
- 39:07Where do your best customers and opportunities come from?
- 39:10Referral, outbound, inbound partnerships, and what objections appear constantly.
- 39:16Is it security?
- 39:16Is it pricing?
- 39:17Is it implementation?
- 39:19Do they feel like it's not the most important thing?
- 39:23Or it could be any incumbent supplier has tied them in, they won't let them leave for everything.
- 39:29You need to consider what does a successful sales journey actually look like how long, how many conversations?
- 39:36Who needs to be involved?
- 39:38What evidence moves them forward?
- 39:41You can't answer any of that.
- 39:42You might not be hiring somebody to scale your sales.
- 39:46You might be hiring someone to discover your business for you.
- 39:48And that's a very expensive investment in time and money that I don't want you to mess up.
- 39:55If this is something you're dealing with, go and watch my full conversation with Alex.
- 39:58It's totally free.
- 39:59I'll link it below.
- 40:02Next founder question how do I stand up in a crowded market?
- 40:07I'll try and answer it as specifically I can without knowing much about your business.
- 40:13So for me, it's about research.
- 40:15Because founders should make research a continuous thing.
- 40:19Competitors, all the usual stuff.
- 40:23And sometimes founders find a really strong one in their industry and it might make them think, oh no, somebody's already done it.
- 40:33Okay, that's not necessarily the worst news.
- 40:36Competition proves people are willing to spend their money to solve a problem.
- 40:41No, competition might also mean that you find an enormous, untouched market.
- 40:46Or it could be that the problem isn't the one they're willing to pay you for.
- 40:51The more useful question about standing out is why should somebody choose you?
- 40:57And please come start by making a 47 row feature, spreadsheet or table.
- 41:04Customers don't respond to that stuff.
- 41:06Nobody says, I really need to see 999 features today.
- 41:11They think I've got a problem.
- 41:13This takes us six hours.
- 41:14My team hates doing that.
- 41:16We keep losing money.
- 41:18They don't know what's happening.
- 41:20This all feels risky and I need to fix this.
- 41:24Those are just examples.
- 41:25So why does the right customer for you genuinely prefer you?
- 41:31Is it better service?
- 41:33Better user experience, Better pricing?
- 41:37The trust they built with you?
- 41:40Perhaps it's because you have a much stronger understanding of their specific industry.
- 41:44And Beth Dawson talked about this really nicely in the podcast.
- 41:48When it works with insurance companies and mortgage partners, for example, which they do do, they must turn up showing they extend them.
- 41:57That means thinking about what does the insurance company care about?
- 41:59Risk, retention, et cetera.
- 42:02And remember, you're not marketing yourself.
- 42:06I know that you think it's great, but I do see this mistake.
- 42:09Often companies obsess about how to sound different before working, why the customer cares, and the language they use to express that.
- 42:17If a customer sees a meaningful difference, eventually price becomes the only thing that they say they care about because it's all they can compare.
- 42:27And personally, that's not a situation I want a founder like you to find themselves in.
- 42:32Okay, next question.
- 42:34The product works, but I have absolutely no idea how to sell it.
- 42:39Founders do ask me versions of this question all the time, and I have enormous sympathy for them because building and selling are two very different skill sets.
- 42:48Software is completely logical.
- 42:50You write something, you test it, it works or it doesn't.
- 42:53People, much less predictable people, don't always tell you why they're saying no to you.
- 42:59Sometimes they don't know, sometimes they say, I'll think about it.
- 43:02What that may actually mean is, I just want this meeting to end.
- 43:08So for me, the first mindset shift I make is this.
- 43:12Customers deny the effort they buy, what changes for them.
- 43:17You might have developed the most beautiful AI orchestration layer anybody has ever seen, or whatever technical jargon you might use.
- 43:27Fantastic.
- 43:29But as the customer, so what?
- 43:31What gets cheaper?
- 43:32How does it make my life better?
- 43:34Or perhaps what can my team do tomorrow that they couldn't do to them and why should I do anything about that now?
- 43:42That's what they care about.
- 43:43So as a technical founder, I think instead of saying, we built the best AI powered orchestration architecture by.
- 43:50Your finance team spends 8 hours doing this every Friday.
- 43:54We can get that down to 20 minutes.
- 43:56That sounds sexy.
- 43:58Now they're listening.
- 43:59And again, speak their language, not yours.
- 44:01Your technical skills are valuable, but the customer doesn't need to understand all the engineering in order to understand the value to them.
- 44:09So if you're a technical founder who says, I hate marketing, forget marketing for a moment.
- 44:15Just talk to 10 customers.
- 44:18What is their life like?
- 44:19What problems are they facing?
- 44:21Why is it annoying?
- 44:23What are they doing currently to fix it?
- 44:25What does it cost?
- 44:27What have they already tried?
- 44:28And why did it work?
- 44:30Of course, what would need to happen for them to actually make a change?
- 44:35You'll learn so much more useful marketing from those conversations than copying somebody's viral LinkedIn framework that you had to kind of the word guide for.
- 44:48So the final founder question today is a marketing sales one, apparently.
- 44:53Okay, so finder question.
- 44:55Marketing says the leads are good.
- 44:58Sales says they're rubbish.
- 45:00Okay, he's right.
- 45:02Possibly both or long or neither.
- 45:06Without knowing more about your business, this is one of the arguments that's been happening since, I guess, electricity was invented.
- 45:14Marketing says, hey, we generated 400 leads.
- 45:17Sales says, yeah, they're rich.
- 45:18Marketing says, we did it.
- 45:22And then sales says, bond is somebody who actually wants the buys.
- 45:26Meanwhile, as the founder, you're looking at the forecast, wondering, why the numbers?
- 45:30Dennis, I hear this all the time, so I'll share it with you.
- 45:36Start by defining a good opportunity.
- 45:39Get your marketing and sales teams together.
- 45:41Odds are you'll get so much from it about the customer, the problems they face, how much they care about.
- 45:48So I'll be getting crucially the questions that help you understand who will actually buy and who wants what has to be true before sales actually has to invest time, then work backlisting that.
- 46:02Because if marketing is rewarded for just generating more, guess what?
- 46:05Marketing will produce more volume.
- 46:08Equally, if sales says the only acceptable lead is somebody who's already chosen the product, gotten approval, has the budget, and is standing in front of you waiting a purchase order, that's not a realistic thing either.
- 46:22That's with Mark B one of who's on the podcast.
- 46:29He said this brilliantly.
- 46:30So Mark is a chief finance analysis.
- 46:32Very little patience for the imaginary numbers in this world.
- 46:35He talked about the difference between a nice chat and an actual sales qualified opportunity.
- 46:40That's why I think founders need to hear this.
- 46:43A 60 minute conversation isn't necessarily lead.
- 46:46Some people just love talking on the phone, so it isn't necessarily intent.
- 46:51Someone liking you isn't the same as somebody being very divided from you with a bug view a buying process.
- 46:57No reason to do it now.
- 47:00Mark urged founders to cut out the waste from their pipelines.
- 47:03And that's a brilliant way to describe it.
- 47:05Be as objective as you possibly can.
- 47:08Think about things like is that really an opportunity or are you just seeing what you want to see?
- 47:15I know you're probably optimistic as a founder, we all have to be.
- 47:19Nobody starts a company thinking this probably won't work, but I'll give it a go anyway.
- 47:25Optimism and determination against everything keeps, well, gets the company going.
- 47:30But the optimism can be a dangerous thing too.
- 47:33So you get marketing and sales together.
- 47:34Ask the stupidly simple question, who are we trying to help and why should they choose us?
- 47:41And take one if 5, 10, 15 people around the table, how many there are, give you 5, 10, 15 different answers, that's probably where I'd start.
- 47:52Before the CRM, before attribution, before lead sourcing or scoring or buying another bit of sophisticated software.
- 48:00Get aligned with the customer and the problem, the value and what good looks like for both parties.
- 48:07Because pipeline isn't a marketing or sales number, it's the key to your growth.
- 48:12I'm looking forward and I hope you found this very useful.
- 48:15Please do like comment and subscribe.
- 48:17I'm trying to grow this channel very quickly to bring on many more guests after the summer break, which this is.
- 48:25If you have any questions, comment below.
- 48:26And if you'd like to be a guest.
- 48:28Scan that QR code on screen up there.
- 48:31Have a wonderful day.
- 48:32Thank you for listening.