Latest / True Nightmare Stories / The Night Two Women Died: Jack the Ripper's Unsolved Shadow

Transcript

The Night Two Women Died: Jack the Ripper's Unsolved Shadow · True Nightmare Stories

0:03
Speaker 1: The horse stopped. Not slowed. Not hesitated. Stopped completely. In
0:09
Speaker 1: the middle of Dutfield's yard, at one o'clock in the
0:11
Speaker 1: morning on the 30th of September, 1888, Louis Deenschutz, a
0:16
Speaker 1: street vendor heading home after a long day, flicked his
0:20
Speaker 1: whip toward the shadows along the yard doors. The animal
0:23
Speaker 1: wouldn't move. He reached the whip further, into the dark
0:27
Speaker 1: pooled against the wall. He touched something. It didn't move
0:30
Speaker 1: the way a sack moves. It didn't have the weight
0:33
Speaker 1: of abandoned rubbish. Lewis climbed down from his cart, struck
0:37
Speaker 1: a match, and held the small flame over the ground.
0:40
Speaker 1: Then he ran. Five women would die in the east
0:43
Speaker 1: end of London between August and November of 1888. Their
0:47
Speaker 1: bodies would be found in yards, on cobblestones, in a
0:51
Speaker 1: rented room behind a broken window, and the man who
0:54
Speaker 1: killed them would walk away from every single one. No arrest,
0:57
Speaker 1: no trial. No name confirmed in any court, any record,
1:01
Speaker 1: any conviction that has survived to this day. There is
1:04
Speaker 1: no version of this story where everything makes sense. What
1:07
Speaker 1: we call him now, the name printed on every book,
1:10
Speaker 1: whispered in every documentary, stamped across a century, and a
1:14
Speaker 1: half of fascination, was invented by a journalist, not confessed
1:18
Speaker 1: by a killer, not identified by police. A name created
1:22
Speaker 1: to sell newspapers in a city already terrified, already hungry
1:26
Speaker 1: for a monster it could point to. The monster obliged,
1:29
Speaker 1: and then he disappeared. This case stayed with me in
1:32
Speaker 1: a way I didn't expect. Not because of the violence,
1:36
Speaker 1: but because of how completely the story erased the women
1:39
Speaker 1: at the center of it and replaced them with a
1:41
Speaker 1: name that may never have been real. There is something
1:44
Speaker 1: about this story that still doesn't sit right, and I
1:47
Speaker 1: think by the end you'll understand why. Autumn of 1880
1:52
Speaker 1: arrived in Whitechapel the way it always did, with fog
1:55
Speaker 1: that sat low on the cobblestones. with the smell of tanneries,
1:59
Speaker 1: and slaughterhouses bleeding into the river air, with the sound
2:02
Speaker 1: of boots on wet stone at hours when most of
2:04
Speaker 1: the city was asleep. This was not a neighborhood the
2:07
Speaker 1: rest of London thought much about, except to fear it.
2:10
Speaker 1: The East End was overcrowded, underfunded, and largely ignored by
2:14
Speaker 1: the institutions that were supposed to govern it. People lived
2:17
Speaker 1: pressed together in lodging houses where a bed cost four
2:20
Speaker 1: pennies a night. Women walked the streets at hours that
2:22
Speaker 1: made them easy targets. Not because they were careless, but
2:26
Speaker 1: because the streets were where their lives happened. Polly Nichols
2:28
Speaker 1: was 43 years old. She had five children. On the
2:33
Speaker 1: 31st of August, 1888, her body was found on the street, mutilated,
2:37
Speaker 1: before the city had finished its night. She was the first.
2:41
Speaker 1: But she was not the beginning of anything. She was
2:44
Speaker 1: a mother. A woman with a history that the newspapers
2:47
Speaker 1: reduced to a single word. Victim. Eight days later, Annie
2:51
Speaker 1: Chapman was found. She had been married to a coachman.
2:55
Speaker 1: She had wanted something better for her daughters, a step
2:58
Speaker 1: toward the middle class, a life that looked different from
3:01
Speaker 1: the one Whitechapel offered. The alcohol had already taken most
3:05
Speaker 1: of that. Her body, like Polly's, had been mutilated in
3:08
Speaker 1: a way that suggested not rage, but something more deliberate,
3:11
Speaker 1: more practiced. The city began to understand that this was
3:14
Speaker 1: not a single incident. Then came the 30th of September.
3:18
Speaker 1: Two women, two locations, one night, 90 minutes apart. Elizabeth
3:22
Speaker 1: Stride had been born Elizabeth Gustav's daughter in 1843, near Gothenburg,
3:28
Speaker 1: in Sweden. She arrived in London in 1866, married a
3:32
Speaker 1: carpenter named John Stride, and built a life in the
3:35
Speaker 1: East End. John died in 1884. Her partner after that,
3:40
Speaker 1: a man named Michael Kidney, was described by those who
3:43
Speaker 1: knew them as violent. On the night of the 30th,
3:45
Speaker 1: someone pinned a red rose to her chest. She carried
3:49
Speaker 1: sweets to freshen her breath. where she went between dusk
3:52
Speaker 1: and one in the morning remains, to this day completely unknown.
3:55
Speaker 1: Louis Diemschutz found her in Dutfield's yard at one o'clock.
3:59
Speaker 1: Her throat had been cut. The knife, according to the examination,
4:03
Speaker 1: was described as very blunt. There were no extensive mutilations,
4:07
Speaker 1: a detail that would later divide investigators on whether she
4:10
Speaker 1: truly belonged to this sequence of killings at all. 45
4:14
Speaker 1: minutes later and less than a mile away, in Mitre Square,
4:17
Speaker 1: Police Constable Edward Watkins made his 15th patrol sweep of
4:21
Speaker 1: the night. The gas lamp in the square had failed.
4:24
Speaker 1: He used his lantern. At 1.45 in the morning, the
4:28
Speaker 1: beam caught Catherine Eddowes on the ground. Catherine had been
4:31
Speaker 1: born in Wolverhampton. She had arrived in Whitechapel just two
4:35
Speaker 1: days earlier. On the 28th of September, returning from a
4:38
Speaker 1: failed hop harvest in Kent with her partner, John Kelly,
4:42
Speaker 1: the night before her death, she had been arrested drunk
4:45
Speaker 1: in Bishopsgate at 8.30 in the evening. The desk sergeant
4:48
Speaker 1: released her at 12.30 in the morning. She walked out
4:51
Speaker 1: of the station with 75 minutes left to live. What
4:54
Speaker 1: was done to her in Mitre Square was extensive. Her nose,
4:58
Speaker 1: her abdomen, her kidney removed and taken. She was not
5:02
Speaker 1: identified for five days. There was no evidence she was
5:05
Speaker 1: a prostitute. The newspapers called her one anyway. Here is
5:09
Speaker 1: what the two murders that night revealed about the investigation.
5:12
Speaker 1: They happened in different jurisdictions. Dutfield's yard fell under the
5:16
Speaker 1: Metropolitan Police. Mitre Square fell under the City of London Police,
5:21
Speaker 1: a completely separate force, with separate command, separate records, and
5:26
Speaker 1: no obligation to coordinate. The killer had crossed a boundary line,
5:30
Speaker 1: the detectives had not, and that detail changes everything about
5:33
Speaker 1: what came next. The night of September 29th moved fast,
5:37
Speaker 1: too fast for any one force to follow. At one
5:40
Speaker 1: o'clock in the morning, Louis Diemschutz guided his cart through
5:43
Speaker 1: the narrow entrance of Dutfield's yard on Burner Street. His
5:46
Speaker 1: pony stopped. It would not move. He reached out with
5:50
Speaker 1: his whip into the darkness beside the doors and felt
5:53
Speaker 1: something give, not wood, not stone. Elizabeth's stride was already there.
5:59
Speaker 1: Her throat had been cut. The knife, investigators later noted,
6:03
Speaker 1: was described as remarkably blunt. There were no other wounds,
6:07
Speaker 1: no mutilations, just a cut and a stillness and a dark,
6:11
Speaker 1: That detail troubled the detectives assigned to the case. Every
6:14
Speaker 1: prior body had shown more. The same controlled violence, then
6:18
Speaker 1: something further. Something that took time. Here, nothing. As if
6:22
Speaker 1: whoever held that blunt knife had been disturbed before finishing,
6:26
Speaker 1: or as if it was never the same hand at all.
6:28
Speaker 1: Forty-five minutes later and less than a mile east, P.C.
6:32
Speaker 1: Edward Watkins swept his lantern through Mitre Square on his
6:35
Speaker 1: fifteenth patrol of the night. The gas lamp there had failed.
6:39
Speaker 1: He was working in darkness. Catherine Eddowes had not been
6:42
Speaker 1: there on his previous pass. Now she was. Her nose
6:45
Speaker 1: had been severed. She had been opened from the lower
6:48
Speaker 1: body to the sternum. Her intestines were pulled free and
6:51
Speaker 1: draped over one shoulder. Her left kidney was gone entirely.
6:55
Speaker 1: Two murders, 45 minutes apart. One mile of night between them.
7:00
Speaker 1: But here was the problem no one could solve cleanly.
7:03
Speaker 1: Dutfield's yard fell under the Metropolitan Police. Mitre Square fell
7:07
Speaker 1: under the City of London police. These were separate forces
7:11
Speaker 1: with separate chains of command, separate officers, and no real-time coordination.
7:16
Speaker 1: The killer had simply crossed a jurisdictional line that investigators
7:20
Speaker 1: could not cross with equal speed. While one force processed stride,
7:24
Speaker 1: the other was still unaware that a second body existed.
7:28
Speaker 1: That gap, administrative, bureaucratic, almost mundane, may have been the
7:32
Speaker 1: space inside which the killer vanished. an officer discovered a
7:36
Speaker 1: fragment of Catherine Eddowes' apron on the ground near a doorway,
7:40
Speaker 1: cut clean, still wet with blood. Above it, written in
7:43
Speaker 1: chalk on the brick doorframe, were words. Two versions of
7:47
Speaker 1: the message were recorded by different officers, and they do
7:50
Speaker 1: not precisely match. One read, The Jews are not the
7:54
Speaker 1: men that shall be blamed for nothing. The other, The
7:57
Speaker 1: Jews are the men that will not be blamed for nothing.
8:00
Speaker 1: Either way, a message, left by someone who wanted it found.
8:03
Speaker 1: Sir Charles Warren, The commissioner of Metropolitan Police arrived before dawn.
8:08
Speaker 1: He gave the order to erase it. His stated reason
8:11
Speaker 1: was to prevent anti-Semitic violence in the neighborhood. The message
8:15
Speaker 1: was in a Jewish district. Tensions were high. He chose
8:18
Speaker 1: public order over evidence. The message was wiped from the
8:21
Speaker 1: wall before any photographer arrived. No one has ever read
8:25
Speaker 1: that message the way it was written. No one ever will.
8:28
Speaker 1: What it meant, whether it was a taunt or misdirection,
8:31
Speaker 1: A genuine clue or something scrawled by someone else entirely
8:35
Speaker 1: is permanently unknowable. The commissioner of police personally destroyed the
8:39
Speaker 1: only piece of communication the killer may have left, and
8:42
Speaker 1: he did it before sunrise, in the dark, before most
8:46
Speaker 1: of the city knew another woman was dead. Rational explanation
8:49
Speaker 1: fails here, not because the supernatural intervenes, but because the
8:54
Speaker 1: system that was supposed to catch a killer instead erased
8:56
Speaker 1: its own evidence by official order. Three weeks passed without
9:00
Speaker 1: another body, Then, on October 16th, George Lusk received a
9:04
Speaker 1: small cardboard box. Lusk was the chairman of a local
9:08
Speaker 1: vigilance committee, a group of East End citizens who had
9:11
Speaker 1: organized patrols after the police proved insufficient. The box measured
9:14
Speaker 1: approximately three inches square. Inside it was half of a
9:18
Speaker 1: preserved human kidney. Alongside it, a letter. The letter was
9:22
Speaker 1: headed from hell. It described the writer having fried and
9:26
Speaker 1: eaten Eden the other half. It ended with a challenge
9:29
Speaker 1: to catch him if they could. It was not signed
9:31
Speaker 1: as Jack the Ripper, not once. Medical examiners of the
9:35
Speaker 1: era could not definitively determine whether the kidney was human
9:38
Speaker 1: or animal. The tests to distinguish human blood from animal
9:42
Speaker 1: blood did not exist in any reliable form in 1888.
9:46
Speaker 1: What some physicians noted was that the organ appeared to
9:49
Speaker 1: belong to a woman around 45 years of age, possibly
9:52
Speaker 1: with early kidney disease, possibly with early kidney disease. Catherine
9:56
Speaker 1: Ettawas was 46. Her left kidney was the one removed
10:00
Speaker 1: from her body in Mitre Square. That correspondence, the age, estimate,
10:05
Speaker 1: the organ type, the removal from the specific victim, has
10:08
Speaker 1: never been fully explained away. But here is the thing
10:11
Speaker 1: that changes everything about the Ripper mythology. The letter from
10:15
Speaker 1: Hell was not signed by the man the newspapers had named.
10:18
Speaker 1: The journalist's creation, the initials, the theatrical persona, the taunting letters,
10:23
Speaker 1: full of rhyme, most investigators now believe that correspondence was
10:27
Speaker 1: largely fabricated by reporters hungry for circulation. One journalist in particular,
10:32
Speaker 1: working for the Central News Agency, is considered the likely
10:36
Speaker 1: author of the famous letters that built the legend. The
10:38
Speaker 1: kidney letter was different. It came without theater. It came
10:42
Speaker 1: without a name. If it was genuine, the person who
10:45
Speaker 1: sent it did not want to be Jack the Ripper.
10:48
Speaker 1: That name was not his. It was theirs. The presses.
10:52
Speaker 1: The cities. A costume stitched together from panic and newspaper ink.
10:57
Speaker 1: Something settled in that detail, and something else cracked open.
11:01
Speaker 1: Three weeks of silence ended on November 9th. The patrols continued.
11:05
Speaker 1: The fear continued. The city waited. Tommy Boyer, an assistant
11:09
Speaker 1: to the landlord of Miller's Court in Dorset Street, came
11:12
Speaker 1: to collect overdue rent from room number 13. He knocked.
11:17
Speaker 1: No answer. He tried the door. It was locked. He
11:20
Speaker 1: walked to the window at the side of the room.
11:22
Speaker 1: The glass was broken. It had been broken for some time,
11:26
Speaker 1: repaired with nothing more than a rag stuffed into the frame.
11:29
Speaker 1: Boyer removed the rag and looked through the broken pane.
11:32
Speaker 1: The room was small. One bed. Early morning light. He ran.
11:37
Speaker 1: Mary Jane Kelly was approximately 25 years old. She had
11:41
Speaker 1: arrived in London around 1883. Her name may not have
11:45
Speaker 1: been her real name. No verified record of her origin exists.
11:48
Speaker 1: No confirmed family. No traceable history before the city. Her partner,
11:53
Speaker 1: a Billingsgate market porter named Joseph Barnett, had left the
11:56
Speaker 1: room they shared in Miller's Court just ten days earlier.
11:59
Speaker 1: The circumstances were ordinary. An argument about money? About other women?
12:05
Speaker 1: She had allowed to sleep in their room when they
12:07
Speaker 1: had nowhere else to go. He left on October 30th.
12:11
Speaker 1: She was dead by the morning of November 9th. The
12:13
Speaker 1: level of violence in that room went beyond anything in
12:16
Speaker 1: the prior four cases. The reports from the attending physician
12:19
Speaker 1: described what the light revealed through that window as the
12:22
Speaker 1: worst he had encountered in his career. That phrasing was his.
12:26
Speaker 1: Those are his words. Nobody heard the door. Nobody heard
12:30
Speaker 1: a struggle. What one neighbor reported hearing around 4 o'clock
12:34
Speaker 1: in the morning was a faint cry. A single word. Murder.
12:38
Speaker 1: weak enough that she thought nothing of it. In Dorset
12:40
Speaker 1: Street in 1880-80, a cry of murder in the night
12:44
Speaker 1: was not unusual enough to move anyone from their bed.
12:47
Speaker 1: The killer was in that room, doing what he did,
12:49
Speaker 1: while the street outside continued its ordinary darkness. The rational
12:53
Speaker 1: framework collapsed at several distinct points, and the sequence matters. First,
12:58
Speaker 1: the jurisdiction problem was not incompetence in the usual sense.
13:02
Speaker 1: Both police forces were operating as designed. The Metropolitan Police
13:06
Speaker 1: and the City of London Police were legally separate entities.
13:09
Speaker 1: Their failure to communicate was structural, not individual. No single
13:14
Speaker 1: detective could have fixed it by working harder. The system
13:17
Speaker 1: itself created the gap, and something moved through that gap
13:20
Speaker 1: with apparent knowledge of where the lines fell. Second, the
13:24
Speaker 1: erasure of the Goldstone Street message removed the only potential
13:27
Speaker 1: direct communication from the killer. Not through neglect, not through accident.
13:32
Speaker 1: but through a deliberate administrative decision made at the highest
13:35
Speaker 1: level of the Metropolitan Police. The evidence was not lost.
13:39
Speaker 1: It was deleted. Whatever intelligence or psychological insight that message
13:43
Speaker 1: might have offered is gone by design. Third, the six-week
13:47
Speaker 1: silence between the double event of September 30th and the
13:51
Speaker 1: death of Mary Jane Kelly on November 9th suggests either
13:55
Speaker 1: a killer who stopped when pressure increased or one who
13:58
Speaker 1: was watching, waiting. and chose the most enclosed, most private
14:02
Speaker 1: location of all five crimes to do the most extreme thing.
14:05
Speaker 1: Four women died in open streets and yards. One died
14:08
Speaker 1: behind a locked door in a room too small for
14:11
Speaker 1: anything to escape without being heard. The locked room problem
14:15
Speaker 1: has no clean answer. The door was locked from inside.
14:19
Speaker 1: Barnett had a key. Kelly may have had a key.
14:22
Speaker 1: Boyer could not enter through the door, and yet something
14:25
Speaker 1: got in and got out, and left the room the
14:27
Speaker 1: way it was found. Several generations of investigators have proposed suspects.
14:32
Speaker 1: An English solicitor with connections to Whitechapel. A Polish-Jewish immigrant
14:36
Speaker 1: known to local police. A minor Russian criminal with a
14:39
Speaker 1: history of violence. None of them come with sufficient evidence.
14:43
Speaker 1: Scotland Yard's own files, whatever they contained, were discarded in
14:48
Speaker 1: routine administrative clearances and then finished off by German bombs
14:51
Speaker 1: in the Second World War. The National Archives at Kew
14:54
Speaker 1: hold what survived. Researchers describe it as a remarkably small collection.
14:59
Speaker 1: There is no version of this story where all the
15:01
Speaker 1: evidence exists, and the answer is simply waiting. The evidence
15:05
Speaker 1: is gone. Some of it was thrown away. Some was
15:08
Speaker 1: erased at dawn. Some burned. What that leaves is not
15:12
Speaker 1: a mystery waiting to be solved. It leaves something closer
15:15
Speaker 1: to a permanent absence, a shape in the historical record
15:18
Speaker 1: where an answer should be, but has been removed by time,
15:21
Speaker 1: by fire, by a commissioner with a piece of chalk,
15:24
Speaker 1: and an early morning decision, and by the particular way
15:27
Speaker 1: institutions protect themselves when they fail. The name Jack the
15:30
Speaker 1: Ripper never came from the killer. The letters that made
15:33
Speaker 1: him famous were almost certainly written by journalists. The mythology,
15:38
Speaker 1: the top hat, the surgical precision, the idea of a
15:41
Speaker 1: gentleman killer hiding in plain sight, none of it has
15:44
Speaker 1: verified evidence behind it. What it has is over 130
15:48
Speaker 1: years of people projecting onto a blank space the particular
15:52
Speaker 1: monster they needed, a foreign threat. A class enemy. A madman.
15:57
Speaker 1: A genius. A ghost, he is. And has always been.
16:01
Speaker 1: The shape that fear takes when a society needs something
16:04
Speaker 1: to point at. No arrest ever came. No trial. No verdict.
16:08
Speaker 1: No name spoken in a courtroom. The three men's Scotland
16:12
Speaker 1: Yard eventually circled. An English barrister. A Polish-Jewish immigrant. A
16:17
Speaker 1: minor Russian criminal. Shared one thing. Investigators could not build
16:22
Speaker 1: a convincing case against any of them. The evidence that
16:25
Speaker 1: might have changed that was gone. Scotland Yard's files were
16:28
Speaker 1: discarded in routine administrative clearances long before anyone understood what
16:32
Speaker 1: was being thrown away. What the clearances missed, the bombs
16:35
Speaker 1: of the Second World War finished. The National Archives at
16:39
Speaker 1: Kew holds what survived, and investigators who have examined it
16:43
Speaker 1: describe the collection as remarkably small. What remained was the press.
16:47
Speaker 1: Newspapers that had invented a name, inflated a mythology, and
16:51
Speaker 1: sold more copies than they ever had before. The famous
16:54
Speaker 1: letters signed Jack the Ripper, the ones that gave the
16:57
Speaker 1: killer his brand, are now believed by most researchers to
17:00
Speaker 1: have been written by a journalist at the Central News Agency,
17:03
Speaker 1: not by the man who held the knife. The one
17:06
Speaker 1: letter that may have been authentic was addressed to George
17:08
Speaker 1: Lusk and signed something else entirely. The killer, if he
17:12
Speaker 1: wrote it at all, did not call himself what the
17:14
Speaker 1: papers called him. That detail matters more than it first seems.
17:18
Speaker 1: The entire architecture of the Ripper myth, the top hat,
17:21
Speaker 1: the medical bag, the aristocratic shadow... was built on a
17:25
Speaker 1: name no one can verify the killer ever used. Every
17:28
Speaker 1: suspect theory that followed was shaped by that invented identity.
17:32
Speaker 1: Investigators were not hunting a man, they were hunting the
17:35
Speaker 1: character the press had drawn. There is something specific about
17:38
Speaker 1: what happened to these five women in the decades that
17:40
Speaker 1: followed their deaths. Polly Nichols, who had five children. Annie Chapman,
17:45
Speaker 1: who wanted something better for her daughters. Catherine Eddowes, who
17:48
Speaker 1: had walked back from a failed harvest in Kent with
17:51
Speaker 1: almost nothing. and was dead within 36 hours of arriving
17:55
Speaker 1: in the city. Elizabeth Stride, who had crossed from Sweden
17:58
Speaker 1: to London more than 20 years before, and survived a
18:01
Speaker 1: violent partner named Michael Kidney. Mary Jane Kelly, whose real
18:05
Speaker 1: name may not have been Mary Jane Kelly, who was
18:07
Speaker 1: 25 years old, and whose origins no record has ever verified.
18:12
Speaker 1: These women were turned into clues. Their lives became puzzle
18:15
Speaker 1: pieces in a parlor game that grew into an industry. Ripperology,
18:19
Speaker 1: the word itself, became an academic adjacent hobby. complete with
18:23
Speaker 1: conferences and competing suspect lists. The game required the victims
18:27
Speaker 1: to stay abstract. The moment they became specific people, the
18:31
Speaker 1: game became harder to play. There is no version of
18:34
Speaker 1: this story where everything resolves cleanly. The killer was never caught,
18:38
Speaker 1: never named, never tried. The message on the doorframe in
18:41
Speaker 1: Gulston Street, the only thing he may have left in
18:44
Speaker 1: writing that night, was scrubbed off a wall by official
18:47
Speaker 1: order before a single photograph could be taken. The half-kidney
18:51
Speaker 1: in a cardboard box arrived with a letter from hell
18:54
Speaker 1: and proved nothing because 1888 medicine could not tell human
18:58
Speaker 1: tissue from animal. The woman locked inside room 13 of
19:01
Speaker 1: Miller's Court was found only when a landlord's assistant pulled
19:04
Speaker 1: a rag from a broken window pane and looked through
19:07
Speaker 1: the glass. When I first spent time with this case,
19:10
Speaker 1: what stayed with me was not the murders themselves. It
19:13
Speaker 1: was how completely the story had swallowed the people at
19:15
Speaker 1: its center. A monster had to be invented, and the
19:18
Speaker 1: invention worked so well that it became more real than
19:21
Speaker 1: the man who used a knife in the dark. Jack
19:24
Speaker 1: the Ripper never existed. A name was needed, and so
19:27
Speaker 1: a name was made. The man who killed in Whitechapel
19:30
Speaker 1: in the autumn of 1888 has no face, no identity,
19:35
Speaker 1: and no verified voice. What he left behind was five
19:39
Speaker 1: women who deserve to be remembered as something other than
19:42
Speaker 1: his victims and a myth so durable that 136 years later,
19:46
Speaker 1: his invented name is still the one that everyone knows.
19:50
Speaker 1: The rose on Elizabeth Stride's coat, the cry of murder
19:54
Speaker 1: too faint for anyone to answer, the rag stuffed in
19:57
Speaker 1: a broken window that no one had repaired. He is
19:59
Speaker 1: what the story required him to be, the foreigner to despise,
20:03
Speaker 1: the wealthy man to resent, the poor man to fear,
20:07
Speaker 1: a monster assembled from whatever each era needed to believe,
20:10
Speaker 1: and the women remain just past the edge of the frame,
20:13
Speaker 1: waiting for someone to look at them instead. This show
20:16
Speaker 1: is made by Oba Media.