Latest / Politix / Who Wants To Beat The Billionaires?
Transcript
- 0:00SPEAKER_01: Hey,
- 0:00SPEAKER_01: one thing we realized when we finished recording this conversation is that none of
- 0:05SPEAKER_01: the conversation was good and we don't have anything to use as a cold open.
- 0:08SPEAKER_00: It was good.
- 0:09SPEAKER_00: I thought we had a very substantive conversation.
- 0:11SPEAKER_00: We just, we didn't say anything witty or at all funny.
- 0:15SPEAKER_00: Enjoy.
- 0:22SPEAKER_01: Hey everyone, you're listening to a free preview of the Politics Podcast.
- 0:26SPEAKER_01: In this episode, we'll discuss Donald Trump's consolidation of the billionaire vote.
- 0:31SPEAKER_01: Why do the owners and executives of multinational corporations feel insulated from
- 0:36SPEAKER_01: consequences for supporting a convicted white-collar felon who tried to overthrow
- 0:41SPEAKER_01: the government?
- 0:42SPEAKER_01: Which of them is truly red-pilled and which of them are trying to conceal their
- 0:47SPEAKER_01: greedier motive of tax cuts behind a kind of pseudo-populism?
- 0:52SPEAKER_01: Do they actually stand to gain anything from a corrupt inflationary Trump presidency?
- 0:58SPEAKER_01: And can Biden welcome their hatred the way FDR did in a climate where Democrats are
- 1:03SPEAKER_01: also a bit cozy with affluent donors and reluctant to impose consequences on them?
- 1:09SPEAKER_01: I hope you enjoy the conversation.
- 1:10SPEAKER_01: And if you want to hear the whole thing, you can upgrade your subscription to paid at politics.fm.
- 1:21SPEAKER_01: Hey, everyone.
- 1:22SPEAKER_01: Welcome to the Politics Podcast.
- 1:23SPEAKER_01: I'm Brian Boitler.
- 1:24SPEAKER_01: And I'm Matthew Iglesias.
- 1:25SPEAKER_01: So we're about two weeks out from Donald Trump's beautiful transformation into a felon.
- 1:31SPEAKER_01: And I think it's safe to say a couple things about the initial impact of the verdict.
- 1:36SPEAKER_01: First, it might have moved polls just a little bit in Joe Biden's favor.
- 1:41SPEAKER_01: But it did not render Trump toxic in the way he was and probably should have stayed after January 6th.
- 1:48SPEAKER_01: And like to the contrary,
- 1:49SPEAKER_01: I think if anything,
- 1:50SPEAKER_01: we've seen tech and financial elites respond by by almost like riding to Trump's
- 1:56SPEAKER_01: rescue as if they're worried the convictions would send his campaign into a
- 2:00SPEAKER_01: nosedive and they wanted to help him weather the turbulence.
- 2:04SPEAKER_01: Politico had a piece about this and we'll link to it in the show notes.
- 2:07SPEAKER_01: But Matt,
- 2:08SPEAKER_01: I think what I want your take on is like what's going on behind the scenes in
- 2:13SPEAKER_01: billionaire world?
- 2:14SPEAKER_01: And just like as a matter of basic brand protection,
- 2:19SPEAKER_01: why do people associated with these valuable entities not fear also associating
- 2:24SPEAKER_01: with Donald Trump?
- 2:25SPEAKER_00: Well,
- 2:25SPEAKER_00: so,
- 2:25SPEAKER_00: I mean,
- 2:25SPEAKER_00: I think it's important to sort of explain what's going on because you described
- 2:29SPEAKER_00: this as sort of like billionaires riding to Trump's rescue.
- 2:33SPEAKER_00: In part, I think that this has been a deliberate Trump messaging strategy, right?
- 2:39SPEAKER_00: So there were sort of like two big pillars to this.
- 2:41SPEAKER_00: One was that Trump did a very high dollar fundraising event
- 2:46SPEAKER_00: in San Francisco at David Sachs' house.
- 2:49SPEAKER_00: And the other is that a bunch of sort of New York-based Wall Street titans voiced
- 2:55SPEAKER_00: their support for Trump and committed money to him.
- 2:58SPEAKER_00: Although I don't think there was like an in-person event in the same way.
- 3:03SPEAKER_00: So now if you look down at to like
- 3:06SPEAKER_00: who is in these stories.
- 3:08SPEAKER_00: The Politico story is mostly about Wall Street guys.
- 3:11SPEAKER_00: And they're talking about John Katsimidis, who's a New York real estate guy.
- 3:17SPEAKER_00: They're talking about Stephen Schwartzman from Blackstone.
- 3:21SPEAKER_00: They're talking about this guy, Hal Lambert, who's a more obscure kind of hedge fund guy.
- 3:27SPEAKER_00: They're talking about Ken Griffin.
- 3:29SPEAKER_00: These are all guys who've been Republicans forever.
- 3:33SPEAKER_00: You know, like they are Mitt Romney donors, they're George Bush donors, they're NRSC donors.
- 3:40SPEAKER_00: The story is that these are people who had backed like Ron DeSantis or somebody else, right?
- 3:46SPEAKER_00: They kind of condemned Trump after January 6th.
- 3:49SPEAKER_00: They tried to steer the Republican Party to a different candidate.
- 3:54SPEAKER_00: And then like once Trump, I think the right way to understand it is that like a lot of people,
- 4:00SPEAKER_00: They believed Trump was not the best possible nominee for the Republican Party, but they're Republicans.
- 4:07SPEAKER_00: So once Trump became the nominee, they were supporting Trump.
- 4:11SPEAKER_00: But the rollout of their support was orchestrated to come after the conviction, right?
- 4:18SPEAKER_00: Because there's a risk that the conviction reinforces that sort of like January 6th untouchability.
- 4:27SPEAKER_00: And so I mean,
- 4:28SPEAKER_00: I don't have like secret info on this,
- 4:31SPEAKER_00: but at least from what I understand from the Silicon Valley side of this,
- 4:34SPEAKER_00: where again,
- 4:35SPEAKER_00: like Marc Andreessen and David Sachs are not
- 4:38SPEAKER_00: newly red-pilled figures.
- 4:40SPEAKER_00: Those guys have been Republicans as long as they've been active in politics, going back multiple cycles.
- 4:46SPEAKER_00: Andreessen was a big Romney fundraiser.
- 4:48SPEAKER_00: They held back their vocal support for Trump until after the conviction.
- 4:56SPEAKER_00: In order to make the case,
- 4:59SPEAKER_00: to use the conviction as a permission structure for arguing that,
- 5:04SPEAKER_00: in fact,
- 5:05SPEAKER_00: Joe Biden is a threat to democracy,
- 5:09SPEAKER_00: You know what I mean?
- 5:10SPEAKER_00: To not just say I will overlook the misconduct that was at the root of this felony conviction,
- 5:16SPEAKER_00: but to say that in my mind,
- 5:18SPEAKER_00: this felony conviction ought to counterbalance other Trump crimes and malfeasance.
- 5:26SPEAKER_00: Because it's not that Trump has gained new support from right-wing billionaires
- 5:31SPEAKER_00: that he didn't previously have,
- 5:33SPEAKER_00: so much as these billionaires are trying and I think succeeding to
- 5:37SPEAKER_00: in creating social permission for other rich people to do what rich people have
- 5:43SPEAKER_00: traditionally done,
- 5:44SPEAKER_00: like in pre-Trump election cycles,
- 5:47SPEAKER_00: which is like mostly vote Republican and donate to Republicans.
- 5:51SPEAKER_00: Trump got freakishly little business support for a Republican Party nominee in 2016 and 2020.
- 5:58SPEAKER_00: And what he's achieving in 2024 is coming...
- 6:03SPEAKER_00: closer.
- 6:04SPEAKER_00: He's approaching,
- 6:05SPEAKER_00: we don't know if he'll match traditional Republican levels of support,
- 6:09SPEAKER_00: but what we have right now is like very right-wing billionaires are trying to sort
- 6:15SPEAKER_00: of like bring the CEO class back to Trump,
- 6:19SPEAKER_00: right?
- 6:20SPEAKER_00: To say, look, if you're mad at Lena Kahn or what's his name at the SEC?
- 6:27SPEAKER_00: Gary Gensler.
- 6:28SPEAKER_00: Gary Gensler at the SEC,
- 6:30SPEAKER_00: or some shit the EPA did,
- 6:32SPEAKER_00: or you don't like Biden's calls for tax increases,
- 6:34SPEAKER_00: or this greedflation rhetoric bothers you.
- 6:37SPEAKER_00: It's okay.
- 6:38SPEAKER_00: The water's warm here.
- 6:39SPEAKER_00: Join the grand old party.
- 6:41SPEAKER_00: And if your wife tells you, didn't he try to overthrow the government?
- 6:48SPEAKER_00: You could be like, no, Joe Biden is the real threat to democracy.
- 6:51SPEAKER_01: I think that there's been a bit of code switching in that like in the forums where
- 6:54SPEAKER_01: they're talking to a bunch of red pilled freaks,
- 6:57SPEAKER_01: they will talk about how
- 6:59SPEAKER_01: the felony,
- 7:00SPEAKER_01: the hush money trial is like the summa of deep state attacks on Donald Trump and
- 7:08SPEAKER_01: thus the liberals are the real threat to democracy.
- 7:10SPEAKER_01: In their big public,
- 7:12SPEAKER_01: like I have decided to endorse Donald Trump or I will raise money for him or whatever.
- 7:17SPEAKER_01: They're just not talking about January 6th at all.
- 7:19SPEAKER_01: They're not talking about the convictions at all.
- 7:21SPEAKER_01: They are
- 7:23SPEAKER_00: I read this sort of latest- Sacks' thing is a very message discipline.
- 7:30SPEAKER_00: According to David Sacks,
- 7:31SPEAKER_00: David Sacks has none of the kinds of concerns that you would expect a wealthy
- 7:36SPEAKER_00: venture capitalist to have.
- 7:38SPEAKER_00: He is purely motivated by worry about the price of groceries and border security.
- 7:45SPEAKER_00: Yes.
- 7:45SPEAKER_00: Right.
- 7:46SPEAKER_00: Like Trump, like a Trump pitch to swing voters.
- 7:50SPEAKER_01: Prior to the convictions, you saw Jamie Dimon of J.P.
- 7:54SPEAKER_01: Morgan do this at Davos where
- 7:57SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 7:57SPEAKER_01: he didn't come out and say,
- 7:58SPEAKER_01: I will be supporting Donald Trump,
- 8:00SPEAKER_01: but he did sort of present this revisionist history of the Trump presidency where
- 8:06SPEAKER_01: Donald Trump was right about so many things,
- 8:07SPEAKER_01: including immigration,
- 8:09SPEAKER_01: which is like,
- 8:11SPEAKER_01: I don't have the research in front of me,
- 8:13SPEAKER_01: but I would wager that it's never been Jamie Dimon's or JP Morgan's position that
- 8:20SPEAKER_01: highly restrictionist immigration policy is awesome.
- 8:24SPEAKER_01: And so they – I interpreted it,
- 8:27SPEAKER_01: therefore,
- 8:28SPEAKER_01: as them wanting to help him crowd out the convictions with some good news about
- 8:37SPEAKER_01: these respectable people who nevertheless saw fit to endorse him and raise money
- 8:43SPEAKER_01: for him so that –
- 8:45SPEAKER_01: people would essentially forget that this had happened.
- 8:49SPEAKER_01: And like, as a strategy, I think it's sharp.
- 8:54SPEAKER_01: I mean,
- 8:55SPEAKER_01: they really have managed to draw a lot of attention to the fact that Trump has
- 9:01SPEAKER_01: these affluent supporters without the affluent supporters facing a lot of questions
- 9:08SPEAKER_01: about the wisdom of what they're doing.
- 9:11SPEAKER_01: And I find that part of it a little bit weird.
- 9:14SPEAKER_01: And like,
- 9:16SPEAKER_01: like thinking through how to explain why it's weird as we were prepping this.
- 9:20SPEAKER_01: Like I come back to what's happening in journalism right now.
- 9:25SPEAKER_01: Like we're living through this disastrous era for the journalism industry.
- 9:30SPEAKER_01: And there's obviously like a ton of reasons why journalism is in such bad shape.
- 9:35SPEAKER_01: But the one that doesn't get enough attention in my mind is that Donald Trump made
- 9:40SPEAKER_01: politics toxic to advertisers,
- 9:42SPEAKER_01: right?
- 9:42SPEAKER_01: Like before Trump,
- 9:44SPEAKER_01: Republicans would shit talk mainstream media all the time,
- 9:49SPEAKER_01: but politics kind of turned on normalish stuff.
- 9:52SPEAKER_01: And you could still put an ad for JP Morgan, for instance, next to some content about politics.
- 10:00SPEAKER_01: And people thought that that was a good swap.
- 10:03SPEAKER_01: They don't want to do that anymore.
- 10:04SPEAKER_01: And fine, right?
- 10:06SPEAKER_01: They have their interests to protect, and they're not obligated to prop up my industry.
- 10:12SPEAKER_01: But if politics is toxic,
- 10:13SPEAKER_01: and we all know why,
- 10:15SPEAKER_01: why do they not interpret being openly supportive of the insurrectionist felon
- 10:20SPEAKER_01: Donald Trump as a big risk for whatever their companies happen to be?
- 10:25SPEAKER_01: JP Morgan, Tesla, whatever else.
- 10:28SPEAKER_01: They seem to have decided that this comes with no...
- 10:34SPEAKER_01: Meanwhile, like putting an ad next to news about politics is an intolerable risk for them.
- 10:40SPEAKER_00: Well,
- 10:40SPEAKER_00: and,
- 10:40SPEAKER_00: you know,
- 10:41SPEAKER_00: I so I do think that like one thing that,
- 10:44SPEAKER_00: you know,
- 10:44SPEAKER_00: something that's interesting because I talked to somebody,
- 10:47SPEAKER_00: a couple of people who've been involved in sort of trying to do this.
- 10:53SPEAKER_00: political outreach to the business community for Biden.
- 10:57SPEAKER_00: And one point that the people who do that work made to me is that even if you look
- 11:04SPEAKER_00: at the people who are vocally pro-Trump,
- 11:06SPEAKER_00: none of them,
- 11:07SPEAKER_00: with the exception of Musk,
- 11:08SPEAKER_00: who is important enough that we need to talk about him separately,
- 11:13SPEAKER_00: it's usually not executives of consumer-facing brands.
- 11:18SPEAKER_01: Yes.
- 11:18SPEAKER_01: I mean, David Sachs is like a good example of this.
- 11:20SPEAKER_01: Nobody would have any reason to care who he is except – And again,
- 11:25SPEAKER_00: Ken Griffin,
- 11:25SPEAKER_00: Bill Ackman,
- 11:26SPEAKER_00: these are all – they're investors.
- 11:29SPEAKER_00: And so it's like even though – like if you ever talk to an executive at like a fast
- 11:35SPEAKER_00: food company,
- 11:36SPEAKER_00: those guys are super right wing because like they hate labor unions and various
- 11:41SPEAKER_00: other things.
- 11:42SPEAKER_00: But like you will never – not this cycle, not any cycle ever –
- 11:46SPEAKER_00: hear like an executive from Wendy's offering an opinion about partisan politics.
- 11:52SPEAKER_00: Cause that's just like,
- 11:53SPEAKER_00: you know,
- 11:53SPEAKER_00: when,
- 11:54SPEAKER_00: when liberals tried to get Michael Jordan to come out against like racist Republicans,
- 12:01SPEAKER_00: he said like Republicans buy sneakers too.
- 12:04SPEAKER_00: And so you get the same thing with these kinds of consumer brands, right?
- 12:06SPEAKER_00: So like the heavy politicization tends to be concentrated in these like companies
- 12:12SPEAKER_00: that like normal people don't know what they are.
- 12:14SPEAKER_00: person square capital, anything like that.
- 12:19SPEAKER_00: But they do have employees.
- 12:23SPEAKER_00: And there has been a shift here.
- 12:26SPEAKER_00: I think the perception in 2016, in 2020, was that the workforce in Silicon Valley was very liberal.
- 12:37SPEAKER_00: And that you were at real risk of pissing off engineers,
- 12:43SPEAKER_00: the people who were working at not just Apple and Google,
- 12:48SPEAKER_00: but all kinds of startups.
- 12:50SPEAKER_00: The whole ecosystem was very, very left wing.
- 12:53SPEAKER_00: And that's what drove a lot of the content moderation policies that Republicans didn't like.
- 13:00SPEAKER_00: But this is what the people working at Meta and Twitter and working in that ecosystem wanted to do.
- 13:08SPEAKER_00: And something has changed there.
- 13:11SPEAKER_00: You know what I mean?
- 13:11SPEAKER_00: Not that it's over.
- 13:14SPEAKER_00: Obviously, San Francisco and Santa Clara County continue to be very liberal places.
- 13:21SPEAKER_00: But there is more and more comfort with being openly right-wing.
- 13:26SPEAKER_00: in those kind of universes, right?
- 13:27SPEAKER_00: Like less of a sense that you will face some terrifying, problematic staff revolt.
- 13:35SPEAKER_00: And some of that is that the labor market for software people has gotten much weaker.
- 13:40SPEAKER_00: There isn't the same kind of desperate battle to compete.
- 13:45SPEAKER_00: And some of it is that the Biden administration has governed in a very kind of like
- 13:52SPEAKER_00: bold, progressive manner on economic issues, which has some upsides and has some downsides.
- 14:00SPEAKER_00: But they have definitely,
- 14:01SPEAKER_00: on the helping Republicans get votes side of it,
- 14:08SPEAKER_00: sort of brought back a more traditional class politics.
- 14:13SPEAKER_00: And
- 14:15SPEAKER_00: You know,
- 14:16SPEAKER_00: if that had generated for Biden like Obama levels of working class support,
- 14:22SPEAKER_00: I think everybody would be saying like it's a great trade.
- 14:24SPEAKER_00: You know, like some tweets from some venture capitalists are not necessarily worth that much.
- 14:32SPEAKER_00: But,
- 14:33SPEAKER_00: you know,
- 14:33SPEAKER_00: it's a perilous position for Biden to be in,
- 14:37SPEAKER_00: you know,
- 14:38SPEAKER_00: that like he has alienated some people and it's not obvious to me.
- 14:44SPEAKER_00: I mean,
- 14:45SPEAKER_00: people who are worth alienating,
- 14:46SPEAKER_00: like I don't think courting the votes of people who are just desperate for low
- 14:51SPEAKER_00: taxes would be a good path forward for Democrats.
- 14:55SPEAKER_00: But what you want to do is like win back the votes of Democrats.
- 15:01SPEAKER_00: working class people who need health insurance.
- 15:04SPEAKER_00: Because like, that's the flip side of this, right?
- 15:06SPEAKER_00: Like the thing that's the other,
- 15:08SPEAKER_00: one thing that's not in David Sachs' long form tweets is like,
- 15:12SPEAKER_00: I personally lust for TCJA extension.
- 15:15SPEAKER_00: Yes.
- 15:16SPEAKER_00: But then the other thing that's not in it is like,
- 15:18SPEAKER_00: Matt Iglesias will tell you that Trump's tax policies are going to blow out
- 15:22SPEAKER_00: inflation interest rates.
- 15:24SPEAKER_00: But don't worry,
- 15:25SPEAKER_00: Trump has assured me that he's going to take care of the deficit with savage cuts
- 15:30SPEAKER_00: to poor people's healthcare and nutrition assistance.
- 15:33SPEAKER_00: Right?
- 15:34SPEAKER_00: Because that's how you would make the numbers add up.
- 15:38SPEAKER_00: How you do the tax cuts Trump is promising without cutting Social Security or Medicare...
- 15:44SPEAKER_00: without creating a huge fiscal crisis is you go to town on Medicaid.
- 15:51SPEAKER_01: I mean, I think that the implications of what you're saying
- 15:56SPEAKER_01: is that ideally the response from Democrats and Biden to this realignment of
- 16:02SPEAKER_01: billionaires behind the extremely wealthy Republican nominee would be to run
- 16:08SPEAKER_01: something like the 2012 campaign against Donald Trump.
- 16:11SPEAKER_01: And I was thinking about the 2012 campaign as you were running through all that.
- 16:17SPEAKER_01: And I just struck by the fact that Mitt Romney,
- 16:20SPEAKER_01: almost like David Sachs,
- 16:21SPEAKER_01: was not famous for being the CEO of
- 16:25SPEAKER_01: some beloved brand, right?
- 16:26SPEAKER_01: He was not the CEO of Nike.
- 16:28SPEAKER_01: He was Bain Capital guy, right?
- 16:30SPEAKER_01: Yep.
- 16:31SPEAKER_01: And in a weird way, the narrative tension in that campaign was,
- 16:37SPEAKER_01: between the Obama campaign trying to define him as this Bain capital corporate
- 16:44SPEAKER_01: raider type and him trying to emphasize his,
- 16:47SPEAKER_01: I've saved the Olympics.
- 16:49SPEAKER_01: He was trying to make what he did seem like what the corporate leaders people respect do.
- 16:57SPEAKER_01: And I don't think that for a number of reasons, I don't think that
- 17:02SPEAKER_01: Biden can do that to Trump so easily because the Trump brand is much more like,
- 17:06SPEAKER_01: even though it shouldn't be,
- 17:08SPEAKER_01: is much more like a respected consumer brand than like random consulting company
- 17:14SPEAKER_01: that no one's ever heard of and it sounds vaguely nefarious.
- 17:18SPEAKER_01: And then separately,
- 17:19SPEAKER_01: just that like the trends that have made working class people swing right are more
- 17:24SPEAKER_01: entrenched than they were in 2012.
- 17:27SPEAKER_01: And so like the nightmare scenario is that Trump consolidates
- 17:32SPEAKER_01: the corporate elite without losing much support from workers.
- 17:38SPEAKER_01: And then Biden, I think, is just completely fucked.
- 17:40SPEAKER_00: Well, the other thing about 2012, right?
- 17:43SPEAKER_00: I mean,
- 17:43SPEAKER_00: everybody remembers the sort of like Bain attacks on Romney,
- 17:48SPEAKER_00: but that was a two,
- 17:50SPEAKER_00: that was like a plane with two wings,
- 17:52SPEAKER_00: right?
- 17:53SPEAKER_00: And like one of it- Good for a plane to have two wings.
- 17:55SPEAKER_00: Yeah, yeah, no, but I mean, there was the kind of like,
- 17:59SPEAKER_00: personal digs at Romney as this out-of-touch rich guy.
- 18:02SPEAKER_00: And then there was Paul Ryan pushing grandma off the cliff, right?
- 18:07SPEAKER_00: And the thing that happened after 2012 is that Republican Party elites didn't want
- 18:16SPEAKER_00: to compromise on entitlement programs.
- 18:20SPEAKER_00: So they wrote this autopsy report that was like, we need to move to the center on immigration.
- 18:24SPEAKER_00: And then Trump did what rank and file Republican voters wanted.
- 18:28SPEAKER_00: which was drop the Paul Ryan Medicare stuff and stay right-wing on immigration.
- 18:36SPEAKER_00: And if you had just asked the Obama campaign in the heat of 2012,
- 18:45SPEAKER_00: what if Mitt Romney had spent this whole campaign vowing not to cut Medicare?
- 18:50SPEAKER_00: like Romney would have been in way better shape.
- 18:53SPEAKER_00: You know what I mean?
- 18:54SPEAKER_00: And it's like, it's made it tough.
- 18:56SPEAKER_00: I was talking about Medicaid, right?
- 19:00SPEAKER_00: I was talking about SNAP.
- 19:01SPEAKER_00: I mean, those are popular programs.
- 19:03SPEAKER_00: If Trump becomes president and tries to cut them, he will, I think, pay a steep political price for it.
- 19:09SPEAKER_00: But as you like to point out, it's always harder
- 19:13SPEAKER_00: to make people fear something hypothetical.
- 19:14SPEAKER_00: That's something that's on the table.
- 19:17SPEAKER_00: And Medicare is like five times hotter than Medicaid.
- 19:22SPEAKER_00: So like mobilizing people against hypothetical Medicare cuts is,
- 19:28SPEAKER_00: gets you somewhere.
- 19:29SPEAKER_00: We're mobilizing people.
- 19:31SPEAKER_00: I will tell you,
- 19:32SPEAKER_00: I hope that people who have parents who are in long-term care understand that even
- 19:40SPEAKER_00: if you're middle class,
- 19:41SPEAKER_00: you think this is a program for the poor.
- 19:43SPEAKER_00: It's like, no, your parents' long-term care is being subsidized by the federal Medicaid program.
- 19:50SPEAKER_00: If Donald Trump becomes president,
- 19:52SPEAKER_00: Either he is going to enact swinging cuts in that program or the deficit is going to explode.
- 20:00SPEAKER_00: I can't tell you which of those it will be because conservative media doesn't do
- 20:06SPEAKER_00: reporting on intra-Republican dialogue about public policy.
- 20:11SPEAKER_00: But this is a big stakes in the election.
- 20:15SPEAKER_00: There is a much larger disagreement between Biden and Trump about Medicaid policy
- 20:20SPEAKER_00: than there is about immigration.
- 20:22SPEAKER_00: But, like, that's not what's out there in the discourse.
- 20:27SPEAKER_00: And,
- 20:27SPEAKER_00: like,
- 20:27SPEAKER_00: I unfortunately cannot,
- 20:28SPEAKER_00: like,
- 20:29SPEAKER_00: mind control everybody covering the campaign and,
- 20:32SPEAKER_00: like,
- 20:32SPEAKER_00: get them to write it that way.
- 20:34SPEAKER_00: Yeah.
- 20:35SPEAKER_00: And it makes it tough because rich people...
- 20:39SPEAKER_00: I don't want to say that,
- 20:41SPEAKER_00: like...
- 20:41SPEAKER_00: Rich people are more informed about politics than working class people.
- 20:47SPEAKER_00: You know, like, if you are a billionaire...
- 20:49SPEAKER_00: You can just hire somebody to do bespoke research for you to understand what your
- 20:56SPEAKER_00: personal stakes in this election campaign are.
- 20:58SPEAKER_00: You can get Donald Trump on the telephone.
- 21:02SPEAKER_00: And ask him your questions and get commitments out of him.
- 21:07SPEAKER_00: And so it's tough.
- 21:10SPEAKER_00: It is much easier for Trump to court a small number of very rich people with
- 21:17SPEAKER_00: right-wing class politics than it is for Biden to pitch left-wing class politics to
- 21:23SPEAKER_00: an electorate that is not being fed that in the media.
- 21:26SPEAKER_01: So there's like two distinct challenges here if you're looking at the dilemma from Biden's perspective.
- 21:33SPEAKER_01: One is getting the tens of millions of working class people who will be on Medicare
- 21:38SPEAKER_01: someday and who have an interest that they might not recognize in keeping Medicaid
- 21:46SPEAKER_01: like –
- 21:47SPEAKER_01: protecting it from huge cuts, right?
- 21:49SPEAKER_01: People like that,
- 21:50SPEAKER_01: getting them to realize that Donald Trump is not a good choice for working or
- 21:55SPEAKER_01: middle-class people,
- 21:56SPEAKER_01: right?
- 21:57SPEAKER_01: The second is,
- 21:59SPEAKER_01: and I mean,
- 22:00SPEAKER_01: it's delicate for a number of reasons,
- 22:02SPEAKER_01: but it would also be helpful for Biden,
- 22:06SPEAKER_01: I think,
- 22:06SPEAKER_01: if the people who are endorsing Trump,
- 22:11SPEAKER_01: these Republican financial and tech elites who are endorsing and raising money for Trump,
- 22:17SPEAKER_01: were a little bit more nuanced in their thinking about what the implications of a
- 22:23SPEAKER_01: second Trump presidency would be versus a Biden presidency.
- 22:27SPEAKER_01: In 2012,
- 22:29SPEAKER_01: the value proposition on the table for these guys between Obama and Romney was
- 22:34SPEAKER_01: pretty clear to me.
- 22:35SPEAKER_01: I understood why the rich guys were gravitating towards Romney.
- 22:42SPEAKER_01: I don't totally understand what it is that makes
- 22:48SPEAKER_01: someone like Steven Schwartzman,
- 22:49SPEAKER_01: who's like,
- 22:50SPEAKER_01: who's like net worth went up under Trump,
- 22:52SPEAKER_01: but really exploded under Biden.
- 22:54SPEAKER_01: Why he thinks Trump is his, like is a safer bet than Biden.
- 23:00SPEAKER_01: And it's not just like backward looking in that sense.
- 23:04SPEAKER_01: I'm,
- 23:04SPEAKER_01: I'm,
- 23:05SPEAKER_01: we talk about this on this show all the time is like the,
- 23:09SPEAKER_01: the Biden promise is essentially like more of the same,
- 23:11SPEAKER_01: like,
- 23:12SPEAKER_01: like we've got a good economy and,
- 23:15SPEAKER_01: We're just going to carry that forward and make adjustments as needed.
- 23:18SPEAKER_01: The Trump promise is like huge cuts to the like the blue collar workforce because
- 23:28SPEAKER_01: he's going to kick out all the immigrants and inflationary tax cuts and price
- 23:37SPEAKER_01: increasing tariffs.
- 23:38SPEAKER_00: So I mean, so there's one thing that's going on that I think is a little tough.
- 23:45SPEAKER_00: is like when I have talked to... I saw an interesting thing, actually.
- 23:50SPEAKER_00: So like Mark Cuban is a... Who's like the one, he's like the exception.
- 23:55SPEAKER_00: He's like the one who seems to see it clearly, yeah.
- 23:57SPEAKER_00: He's a vocal Biden supporter.
- 23:58SPEAKER_00: But I saw him getting pushback on social media from some of his rich guy peers.
- 24:04SPEAKER_00: And not the like...
- 24:06SPEAKER_00: Most vocally red pilled ones, some like slightly random, you know, sort of like tech and finance people.
- 24:13SPEAKER_00: And they were really fired up about this like Treasury Department white paper about
- 24:19SPEAKER_00: Biden's plans to tax unrealized capital gains.
- 24:23SPEAKER_00: So this is different from like Biden would partially.
- 24:27SPEAKER_00: Partially extend the Trump tax cuts, whereas Trump would fully extend them.
- 24:32SPEAKER_00: But over and above that,
- 24:34SPEAKER_00: Biden has this stated budget proposal,
- 24:39SPEAKER_00: which calls for...
- 24:41SPEAKER_00: It does call for trillions of dollars in tax increases over and above TCJA repeal.
- 24:49SPEAKER_00: And Cuban was saying what I think is true, which is that this is not...
- 24:54SPEAKER_00: It's an idea.
- 24:55SPEAKER_00: It's not.
- 24:56SPEAKER_00: This is not happening.
- 24:57SPEAKER_00: You know what I mean?
- 24:58SPEAKER_00: This is like saying that like, you know, this is not how politics works.
- 25:03SPEAKER_00: It's not how the system works, etc.
- 25:04SPEAKER_00: I don't think this is an area where like Trump's brand as like a liar.
- 25:10SPEAKER_00: Yeah.
- 25:11SPEAKER_00: Kind of serves him well.
- 25:12SPEAKER_00: Like if Trump says something that's like politically implausible,
- 25:16SPEAKER_00: like I'm going to deport all 11 million undocumented people.
- 25:20SPEAKER_00: aliens, people who think that's a good idea are like, great.
- 25:25SPEAKER_00: But people who think it's a bad idea,
- 25:27SPEAKER_00: precisely because they think it's a bad idea,
- 25:30SPEAKER_00: they sort of reason,
- 25:31SPEAKER_00: look,
- 25:32SPEAKER_00: if he actually did that,
- 25:34SPEAKER_00: it would be a huge disaster.
- 25:36SPEAKER_00: So he's not going to do that.
- 25:39SPEAKER_00: He'll probably step up enforcement a little bit.
- 25:41SPEAKER_00: But I remember when he was president, nothing like that happened, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
- 25:46SPEAKER_00: But Biden,
- 25:48SPEAKER_00: because Democrats are seen as a more serious party,
- 25:52SPEAKER_00: and because Biden is seen as a more serious person,
- 25:55SPEAKER_00: if Biden says,
- 25:57SPEAKER_00: when we get a majority,
- 25:59SPEAKER_00: we are going to create
- 26:01SPEAKER_00: A multi-trillion dollar expansion of the welfare state financed through attacks on
- 26:06SPEAKER_00: the unrealized capital gains of a handful of wealthy investors.
- 26:12SPEAKER_00: People...
- 26:14SPEAKER_00: like people believe that, you know what I mean?
- 26:16SPEAKER_00: Like they don't go for like, Oh, that's just like Biden blustering.
- 26:20SPEAKER_01: Okay.
- 26:20SPEAKER_01: But I have,
- 26:21SPEAKER_01: but I want to press this point because I,
- 26:23SPEAKER_01: I do not believe that if Biden and like,
- 26:26SPEAKER_01: I might encourage him to try just as an experiment,
- 26:29SPEAKER_01: but like,
- 26:30SPEAKER_01: because I,
- 26:30SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 26:31SPEAKER_01: I don't particularly have strong feelings about Biden,
- 26:34SPEAKER_01: Where the revenue comes from in some sense, as long as it's like mostly progressive, right?
- 26:40SPEAKER_01: But if you were to say enough with the Trump bullshit,
- 26:43SPEAKER_01: if all it will take for you guys to realize I'm the better choice for not just like
- 26:49SPEAKER_01: for the country,
- 26:49SPEAKER_01: but for your specific interest,
- 26:50SPEAKER_01: I will withdraw that policy.
- 26:53SPEAKER_01: I don't think a single one of them would be like,
- 26:54SPEAKER_01: okay,
- 26:55SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 26:55SPEAKER_01: in that case,
- 26:56SPEAKER_01: I rescind my endorsement of Trump.
- 26:59SPEAKER_00: I mean,
- 26:59SPEAKER_00: you know,
- 27:00SPEAKER_00: I just look,
- 27:00SPEAKER_00: I mean,
- 27:01SPEAKER_00: again,
- 27:01SPEAKER_00: you got to talk about different populations of people like the longtime Republicans
- 27:06SPEAKER_00: of the investment community.
- 27:08SPEAKER_00: Like, of course not.
- 27:09SPEAKER_00: But like, it's just true.
- 27:11SPEAKER_00: Like,
- 27:11SPEAKER_00: if you ask any like any of the Democratic lobbyists for these companies,
- 27:17SPEAKER_00: like people were freaked out.
- 27:20SPEAKER_00: By that.
- 27:22SPEAKER_00: When it came out,
- 27:23SPEAKER_00: because,
- 27:24SPEAKER_00: you know,
- 27:26SPEAKER_00: and they're talking down like I think most of the people who were freaked out by
- 27:29SPEAKER_00: that white paper at the end of the day are going to vote for Biden.
- 27:33SPEAKER_00: Because like precisely as you say, like it's it's hard to move people's opinions with this kind of thing.
- 27:39SPEAKER_00: But I think it's a troubling, to me, asymmetry.
- 27:46SPEAKER_00: Sartre,
- 27:46SPEAKER_00: I think,
- 27:47SPEAKER_00: has this thing about how anti-Semites benefit from the perception that they're just
- 27:53SPEAKER_00: trolling and joking.
- 27:55SPEAKER_00: And this kind of, like, wink-wink thing.
- 27:57SPEAKER_01: And Hannah Arendt... And a semi-Jew.
- 27:59SPEAKER_00: Yeah,
- 27:59SPEAKER_00: and Hannah Arendt talks about this in fascism,
- 28:02SPEAKER_00: that,
- 28:02SPEAKER_00: like,
- 28:02SPEAKER_00: it's not that...
- 28:04SPEAKER_00: It's not that the fascist convinces his supporters that he's honest.
- 28:07SPEAKER_00: It's that he convinces his supporters that lying constantly is good.
- 28:11SPEAKER_01: Mm-hmm.
- 28:12SPEAKER_00: Right?
- 28:12SPEAKER_00: And,
- 28:12SPEAKER_00: like,
- 28:12SPEAKER_00: that's just,
- 28:13SPEAKER_00: like,
- 28:13SPEAKER_00: part of the Trump dynamic,
- 28:15SPEAKER_00: where it's,
- 28:16SPEAKER_00: like,
- 28:16SPEAKER_00: Biden is very tied down by this kind of,
- 28:19SPEAKER_00: like,
- 28:19SPEAKER_00: literalism.
- 28:20SPEAKER_00: You know, where, like...
- 28:22SPEAKER_00: And Biden went to a fundraiser, or I think it was a virtual fundraiser because it was 2020.
- 28:27SPEAKER_00: And he told a bunch of rich people what I think is a totally reasonable Biden
- 28:32SPEAKER_00: message to rich people,
- 28:33SPEAKER_00: which is like,
- 28:34SPEAKER_00: look,
- 28:35SPEAKER_00: if I'm president of the United States,
- 28:37SPEAKER_00: your taxes are going to go up somewhat as part of my commitment to social
- 28:42SPEAKER_00: solidarity and equality.
- 28:43SPEAKER_00: But nothing is going to fundamentally change about...
- 28:48SPEAKER_01: You'll still be rich.
- 28:49SPEAKER_00: Well, and crucially, you'll still be executives of your company.
- 28:54SPEAKER_00: If you think about what is the social standing and esteem of a CEO or a leading venture,
- 29:00SPEAKER_00: it's like you're a captain of industry.
- 29:03SPEAKER_00: You not only have a larger house than the people who work for you, but those people work for you.
- 29:09SPEAKER_00: And Biden is trying to reassure them.
- 29:12SPEAKER_00: He's not a communist.
- 29:17SPEAKER_00: It's just still going to be a capitalist economy with a hierarchy,
- 29:20SPEAKER_00: but more of the revenue is going to come from wealthy people.
- 29:24SPEAKER_00: He got...
- 29:25SPEAKER_00: slammed by the left for this.
- 29:28SPEAKER_00: And I still see posters from the leftist poster and crew in my neighborhood who's like,
- 29:35SPEAKER_00: they want to ban oil.
- 29:37SPEAKER_00: They hate Israel.
- 29:39SPEAKER_00: They have these Biden, nothing will fundamentally change kind of stickers out there.
- 29:45SPEAKER_00: And when he promises big sweeping change, moderates get pissed off.
- 29:52SPEAKER_00: When he reassures people about the modesty of his agenda, leftists get pissed off.
- 29:57SPEAKER_00: Whereas Trump just says stuff.
- 30:00SPEAKER_00: And I don't want to say it's like nothing Trump has ever said has alienated anyone,
- 30:04SPEAKER_00: but he holds together,
- 30:06SPEAKER_00: if not a big tent,
- 30:07SPEAKER_00: at least a medium-sized tent of
- 30:10SPEAKER_00: of different kinds of people of right-wing dispositions without them all
- 30:14SPEAKER_00: complaining all the time because people are afraid of him.
- 30:18SPEAKER_01: But Matt,
- 30:19SPEAKER_01: as you say,
- 30:20SPEAKER_01: these people,
- 30:22SPEAKER_01: whether they have a long history of being Republicans,
- 30:26SPEAKER_01: whether they feel an affinity to Republicans or not,
- 30:29SPEAKER_01: they have money to hire people to tell them,
- 30:33SPEAKER_01: who would be better for my bottom line as president, Joe Biden or Donald Trump?
- 30:38SPEAKER_01: And like, I think the answer is Joe Biden, but I think it's at the very least a close call.
- 30:46SPEAKER_01: And Joe Biden is presumably better for whatever brand interest these people have
- 30:51SPEAKER_01: than Donald Trump,
- 30:52SPEAKER_01: who,
- 30:52SPEAKER_01: whatever you think about his policy,
- 30:54SPEAKER_01: his view about democracy versus fascism,
- 30:57SPEAKER_01: he's like,
- 30:59SPEAKER_01: he's like a kind of brutish figure that is not good for advertisers, right?
- 31:05SPEAKER_01: Like people just don't like, right.
- 31:07SPEAKER_01: Okay.
- 31:08SPEAKER_01: So why, where are the people, are they paying people to offer them this advice?
- 31:13SPEAKER_01: What advice is being given?
- 31:15SPEAKER_01: And like,
- 31:15SPEAKER_01: I feel like the,
- 31:16SPEAKER_01: the blindness to the likelihood that Trump would be worse for them as president to
- 31:22SPEAKER_01: say nothing of like the tail risk of another COVID like catastrophe is,
- 31:26SPEAKER_01: kind of like calls into question the presumption,
- 31:30SPEAKER_01: which I feel like you tend to share,
- 31:33SPEAKER_01: that these people are like,
- 31:39SPEAKER_01: bright.
- 31:40SPEAKER_00: Well, I mean, it's interesting, you know, I mean, because I sometimes think about this.
- 31:45SPEAKER_00: It's like, it's like a pretty bad call.
- 31:49SPEAKER_00: You know,
- 31:49SPEAKER_00: I mean,
- 31:49SPEAKER_00: I think that if you try to do the sort of like cost benefit,
- 31:53SPEAKER_00: even from like a kind of business rich guy standpoint,
- 31:57SPEAKER_00: that it's like,
- 31:58SPEAKER_00: you know,
- 31:58SPEAKER_00: Trump has policies that will help rich people as individuals.
- 32:02SPEAKER_00: He also has policies that will be bad for the overall economy.
- 32:06SPEAKER_00: And he also has like
- 32:08SPEAKER_00: I think reasonable people can disagree as to like, is it Trump will establish a fascist dictatorship?
- 32:16SPEAKER_00: Or is it like there's a 5% chance that Trump will establish a fascist dictatorship?
- 32:21SPEAKER_00: But for a whole bunch of reasons,
- 32:22SPEAKER_00: like Trump's personality versus Biden's,
- 32:25SPEAKER_00: but also like the skew of the Supreme Court.
- 32:28SPEAKER_00: And the tilt of the Senate map,
- 32:30SPEAKER_00: it's just so much more likely that a second Trump administration will go off the
- 32:35SPEAKER_00: rails than that a second Biden administration will go off the rails.
- 32:40SPEAKER_00: It's like- That's important political intelligence.
- 32:43SPEAKER_00: And they don't seem to have it.
- 32:45SPEAKER_00: And I think that like-
- 32:49SPEAKER_00: I think that there has been really effective relational organizing by hardcore
- 32:54SPEAKER_00: right-wingers in the finance community of some of their peers,
- 32:59SPEAKER_00: and that there has not been the same kind of pushback.
- 33:03SPEAKER_00: One thing that Democrats did during the four years of Trump,
- 33:07SPEAKER_00: that progressives did,
- 33:08SPEAKER_00: rather,
- 33:09SPEAKER_00: is they really raised the bar in terms of revolving door type stuff.
- 33:16SPEAKER_00: They successfully got Joe Biden to appoint dramatically fewer people with business
- 33:22SPEAKER_00: backgrounds into his administration.
- 33:24SPEAKER_00: There's way fewer Wall Street guys who worked for Biden,
- 33:28SPEAKER_00: way fewer tech guys,
- 33:30SPEAKER_00: lots of people who worked for Obama and then did lobbying or something for Google
- 33:35SPEAKER_00: and Apple and thought they might be invited to come back,
- 33:38SPEAKER_00: who instead told thanks but no thanks.
- 33:42SPEAKER_00: Some good reasons for that.
- 33:44SPEAKER_00: Some less good reasons.
- 33:45SPEAKER_00: It's a complicated topic.
- 33:47SPEAKER_00: But one cost of it has been a decline of a pro-Biden whisper network in those places,
- 33:55SPEAKER_00: where people can tell you guys,
- 33:56SPEAKER_00: you know what?
- 33:58SPEAKER_00: Sherrod Brown is toast.
- 34:00SPEAKER_00: There's no way we're going to have a Senate majority who's going to be able to do any of this stuff.
- 34:04SPEAKER_00: Because obviously, Joe Biden's public posture has to be that Sherrod Brown is not toast.
- 34:09SPEAKER_00: You know what I mean?
- 34:09SPEAKER_00: And that he's going to carry forth a bold progressive agenda in his second term.
- 34:14SPEAKER_00: But he's definitely not.
- 34:16SPEAKER_00: I mean,
- 34:18SPEAKER_00: I don't know exactly what will happen in the down-ballot elections,
- 34:21SPEAKER_00: but it would be so crazy to have a strong progressive legislative majority
- 34:28SPEAKER_00: And anything Biden does by executive order is being like hyper checked by the judiciary.
- 34:33SPEAKER_00: It's just like, it doesn't make any sense rationally to worry about this.
- 34:37SPEAKER_00: That being said,
- 34:38SPEAKER_00: we're talking about,
- 34:39SPEAKER_00: you know,
- 34:40SPEAKER_00: people live in San Francisco,
- 34:41SPEAKER_00: people live in New York city,
- 34:42SPEAKER_00: people who are in fact exposed to,
- 34:45SPEAKER_00: uh,
- 34:46SPEAKER_00: more aggressive left-wing governance.
- 34:49SPEAKER_00: And, you know, they don't like it.
- 34:50SPEAKER_00: And I think only recently has the White House started actually trying to address
- 34:57SPEAKER_00: this because their fundraising was so strong.
- 35:01SPEAKER_00: You know,
- 35:02SPEAKER_00: like this whole concern that like Trump is suddenly raising lots of money from rich people,
- 35:07SPEAKER_00: although it sounds so banal,
- 35:08SPEAKER_00: like of course Republicans are raising money from rich people.
- 35:11SPEAKER_00: It's like only actually popped up very recently until this June.
- 35:15SPEAKER_00: Biden was just like crushing Trump in fundraising.
- 35:18SPEAKER_00: So there was a lot of complacency about this side of the politics.
- 35:22SPEAKER_01: Okay,
- 35:23SPEAKER_01: let's put a paywall here and we can talk on the other side of it about to what
- 35:27SPEAKER_01: extent the anti-Biden whisper network that these people inhabit is rooted in real
- 35:33SPEAKER_01: material interests versus like grievance politics or whatever.
- 35:38SPEAKER_01: And then also like if what Biden can do
- 35:41SPEAKER_01: carrot and stick wise to sort of reset things in a better way.
- 35:46SPEAKER_01: If you want to hear that piece of the conversation, go to politics.fm and upgrade your subscription.