Latest / Cultural Wars | America Out Loud News / Los Angelenos would rather be servants than masters

Transcript

Los Angelenos would rather be servants than masters · Cultural Wars | America Out Loud News

• 0:11
  Helping to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.
• 0:15
  This is the Constitution Study on the America Out Loud Network with your host, Paul Engel.
• 0:31
  No matter how often I say it, people don't seem to get the point.
• 0:36
  We are not government servants.
• 0:39
  Those in government are public servants.
• 0:42
  At least that's the way it's supposed to be.
• 0:45
  Hello there, everyday Americans, Paul Engel here with the Constitution Study, where we read and study the Constitution, teach the rising generation be free.
• 0:52
  So glad you could join me today.
• 0:54
  You know, it's this fundamental idea that everybody that gets a government paycheck is a servant to the people.
• 1:02
  They are a public servants.
• 1:04
  They are there to serve us.
• 1:06
  We are not there to serve them.
• 1:08
  They are there to serve us.
• 1:11
  It is the fundamental understanding.
• 1:13
  We come from the Declaration of Independence that all men are created equal.
• 1:19
  That governments are created to secure our rights, not to rule over us.
• 1:24
  And in so many ways, we've been taught, we've we've lost the plot.
• 1:28
  And I have a theory behind this.
• 1:29
  And I'll tell you the theory before we get started.
• 1:32
  Um we decided that 90% of our children at the age of five, we hand over to a government school system, expecting the government to teach the children to be free.
• 1:46
  In other words, we expect the government to teach the children that the government is there to serve the children.
• 1:54
  But does that make sense?
• 1:56
  Government isn't teaching our children to serve, they're teaching the children to serve government.
• 2:01
  Sit down, shut up, do what you're told.
• 2:04
  You challenge the government establishment, you're going to get punished.
• 2:06
  This is kind of a foundational uh teaching that I don't think we recognize.
• 2:13
  And it shows up this idea of well, government's in charge, and and you know, you have to do what the government says, shows up in so much of our understanding.
• 2:22
  Even going back to you know how often I see uh Christians, you know, they'll quote uh Paul, they'll quote the book of Romans, uh, chapter 13, which says, let every soul be subject to the governing authorities.
• 2:34
  Well, we have to be subject to government because, well, Paul said so, kind of ignoring the fact that in this nation, the government isn't the governing authority, that we the people collectively are sovereign, that we create governments to serve us, and this um this lack of understanding, again, it gets replicated along with the several others.
• 2:55
  There are other uh um uh things where we get we run into these types of problems.
• 3:01
  And again, I see it in so many places.
• 3:03
  I I'm reminded of my my mother-in-law, you know, my mother-in-law, my mother-in-law and father, they grew up in an age when doctors were kings.
• 3:12
  I mean, you did what the doctor said.
• 3:13
  You never questioned a doctor.
• 3:15
  And now we're in a days where you say, well, maybe that's kind of a dangerous thing to do.
• 3:21
  Uh, for example, according to uh some CDC research, um, the they this, of course, made news, right?
• 3:30
  That vaccine uh uh uh coverage by the age of two has declined for the vaccines that the CDC says they recommend.
• 3:41
  So the CDC researchers compared the percentage of children vaccinated with the entire recommended chat sequence uh across uh was it 2021 and 2020 or first or 2019 to 2020, and then 2021 to 2022.
• 3:56
  And what they found is the second group, the 2021-2022, um, their vaccine coverage had declined.
• 4:04
  Now, why is this?
• 4:07
  You see, uh, again, when I was a child, I got vaccinated, right?
• 4:11
  Because it wasn't a question.
• 4:12
  The CDC recommended it.
• 4:14
  Actually, I believe it was necessary for me to go to public school.
• 4:17
  That's a whole nother question.
• 4:18
  But it's interesting.
• 4:19
  Why would it have declined from 1920 to 2122?
• 4:25
  Well, what happened around that 2122 time frame that would have made people more vaccine hesitant?
• 4:33
  That's right, the COVID vaccine came out.
• 4:36
  And the COVID vaccine was actually, I don't remember when they did it, but it was actually recommended for children as long as six months.
• 4:43
  And people kept claiming this has not been safety tested properly.
• 4:46
  There's not been proper research.
• 4:48
  We don't know the long-term effects.
• 4:50
  There hasn't been time for us to study the medium to long-term effects.
• 4:54
  We barely know the short-term effects, and there's a problem.
• 4:57
  And then we what has started happening?
• 4:58
  We started seeing myocarditis.
• 5:00
  We started seeing young people simply dropping dead.
• 5:03
  We start seeing elite athletes either you know having serious problems, and we started saying, Wait, whoa, time.
• 5:10
  Maybe there's a problem here.
• 5:12
  And what's interesting is there's a group called the Informed Consent Action Network.
• 5:16
  They've been questioning the safety of uh vaccines.
• 5:19
  And again, they're not anti-vaxxers from what I've seen and what I've read.
• 5:24
  They want informed consent.
• 5:26
  They want the people to know here are the safety trials that were going through, here are the results, so that people could make the decision, not government, people.
• 5:36
  So now the C says, well, we're children not getting vaccinated.
• 5:39
  Well, again, another interesting thing.
• 5:42
  There was an uh apparently unpublished study, and uh sounds like it was done for um political reasons, not scientific reasons that question the overall safety of vaccines.
• 5:54
  Do children who are vaccinated have better health outcomes than children who are not vaccinated.
• 5:59
  And of course, there's a movie you can go and watch it, but it all comes in this question of wait a second, is the government supposed to be telling us how to live our lives?
• 6:06
  Well, these are just recommendations, Paul, but except they're not because there are plenty of um uh of institutions that say, no, no, no, you get this vaccine schedule.
• 6:18
  As I said, when I was in school, uh, didn't ask my mom and dad, but I'm pretty sure I got vaccinated in part because well, if I was going to go to public school, I had to be vaccinated.
• 6:29
  So these quote-unquote recommendations, not really recommendations, these are government actors telling you how to live your life.
• 6:36
  Now, personally, I say if vaccines were half as good as people say they are, shouldn't we be clamoring to get them?
• 6:44
  And if we really believe they work, well, then people who got vaccinated would be protected.
• 6:49
  Why are they worried about people who did not get vaccinated?
• 6:52
  If they're correct and the vaccines save them, then okay, people will suffer the consequence, and that may be sad, and that may be uh uh a concern to several to many people, but it's a consequence of a decision made by parents.
• 7:08
  And don't we have a right to decide our own futures?
• 7:11
  Well, not according to several organizations.
• 7:13
  For example, the uh um American uh uh was it American Pediatric Association, I think it is.
• 7:19
  They sued the CDC because they moved several of their vaccines from recommended to discuss with uh uh discuss with the your doctor.
• 7:30
  So they have multiple lists, right?
• 7:32
  These are the ones we recommend.
• 7:33
  These are the ones, yeah.
• 7:35
  Okay, talk to your doctor about it.
• 7:37
  And the American association, AMA and the APA, I think it's the APA sued, the CDC.
• 7:45
  What do you mean they have to talk to their doctor?
• 7:47
  No, no, no, you have to recommend it.
• 7:48
  How dare you?
• 7:50
  You know, it's it's actually criminal.
• 7:52
  It's actually wrong for you to let the parents make the decision with the doctors, and they're not alone.
• 8:00
  So there's legislation being introduced into the New York legislature that says we don't care what the CDC says, we are going to mandate that children get these vaccines, even at the federal author, the the so-called experts in the federal government say, well, you don't need to have uh uh, you know, uh uh you don't need you don't need to have these shots.
• 8:21
  Now, state representative Amy Paulin, uh, who's promoted this, uh, she unveiled the bill.
• 8:27
  Um, they want to require children to be vaccinated for polio measles and hepatitis B.
• 8:33
  Now, wait a second, polio.
• 8:35
  Um, the only polio is not around poly, there are still a handful of polio cases.
• 8:43
  And from my understanding, each one of those cases did not come from a wild uh polio virus, it came from the vaccine.
• 8:51
  Measles, I remember when they used to be measles, parties used to, you know, if a kid got measles, all the kids, the neighboring parent moms would send the kids over for a party so they'd get the measles while they're young, and it's it's it's not nearly as deadly as when they're an adult.
• 9:07
  But I'm trying to figure out why a six-month-old baby needs a vaccine against a sexually transmitted disease, hepatitis B.
• 9:16
  It's blood and sexually transmitted.
• 9:18
  If you're six months old, you either got it from your mom or you don't have it.
• 9:23
  So why do you need to inject this into your body to because you remember, remember how vaccines work?
• 9:29
  Uh yes, they you know, they always talk about they introduce a little bit of the of the you know, disabled virus or dead virus or whatever, uh, or attenuated virus.
• 9:37
  What they don't tell you is they also include what's called an adjuvant.
• 9:41
  What is an adjuvant?
• 9:42
  It is a chemical or a product designed to light up your immune system so that it sees the the attenuated virus and creates antibodies.
• 9:54
  But what happens when you start not just ramping up your immune system, but doing it over and over and over.
• 10:00
  Over again in just a couple years of your life.
• 10:04
  So apparently the state of New York, which doesn't surprise me a bit, this is the empire after all.
• 10:08
  Says parents don't have a choice.
• 10:11
  We don't think they're smart enough.
• 10:12
  You have to get this.
• 10:13
  These are, even when they make no medical sense, you have to get these because we said so.
• 10:20
  And people are just lining up to get stuff shot in their kids' arms without ever wondering.
• 10:24
  Wait a second.
• 10:25
  Has is the state of New York following due process?
• 10:28
  Due process, Paul.
• 10:30
  What are you talking about?
• 10:31
  Well, are they protecting the rights of the individual?
• 10:34
  No.
• 10:36
  Well, that means that that this law would violate the 14th Amendment because you're depriving people of their liberty without due process of law.
• 10:43
  We're not taught that in school.
• 10:45
  You're not taught that government can't simply decide to do something to you.
• 10:49
  They have to follow a process that protects your rights.
• 10:53
  And we under why people simply follow along without even thinking about it.
• 10:58
  And here's another one, another medical one while we're at it.
• 11:01
  Dr.
• 11:02
  Oz, right, the head of the centers of Medicaid and Medicare Services.
• 11:05
  Uh, he recently uh um in an interview on NBC News said that um the enrollment in Obamacare may be too high.
• 11:16
  Uh he said the fact that there are 23 million that we have 23 million makes me think we have too many participants in the ACA.
• 11:24
  It's too high of a number.
• 11:27
  And according to a statement from the CMS back in 2025, there are four to five million people who were improperly enrolled in the tax subsidized affordable care act coverage uh in 2024.
• 11:42
  That's like 20 billion dollars for people that are improperly enrolled.
• 11:45
  And I said some were by fraud, some were a simple mistake, but there's too many people.
• 11:50
  But what does this come from?
• 11:52
  This comes from the Affordable Care Act, which is the the height of hubris to say the government knows best how you should take care of your medical coverage, what insurance you need, how you should get it.
• 12:05
  We know best, so we're going to tell you how to do this.
• 12:10
  This it it it's an incredible amount of uh credible amount of hubris, a credible legislation to simply say you will punish you, we will find you, we will tax you for not purchasing a product because we think you need it.
• 12:25
  It went so far as when it went to the Supreme Court.
• 12:29
  Chief Justice Roberts not only wrote the opinion of the court supporting the ACA, he wrote a dissent to the opinion, the very same opinion.
• 12:39
  Guess what?
• 12:40
  I I don't I don't need the ACA.
• 12:42
  I take care of my own health care.
• 12:43
  I take care of that for my family.
• 12:46
  I do.
• 12:47
  Why?
• 12:47
  Because that's my responsibility.
• 12:49
  Because I am not a servant of government.
• 12:51
  Government is a servant of me.
• 12:54
  They don't go around saying, Paul, would you get me this?
• 12:58
  Paul, we want you to sign up for this.
• 13:00
  No, that's not the way it works.
• 13:02
  I turn around and say, uh, hey, government, um, take care of the roads.
• 13:06
  Why don't you pay the roads?
• 13:08
  Hey, hey, veteran, why don't you worry about your your deficit and the was it now, 78,000 per uh American that we owe in the fit?
• 13:17
  It's like 38 trillion dollars.
• 13:19
  How about you deal with that and leave me alone?
• 13:24
  See, that's the difference between a government servant and a public servant.
• 13:29
  See, if I'm a government servant, I have to do what government says.
• 13:33
  If government's a public servant, then they have to do what we say.
• 13:37
  And we said in the Constitution, here are your limited and enumerated powers.
• 13:41
  If you they, if it isn't on this list, it doesn't belong to the United States.
• 13:46
  You can't exercise it.
• 13:48
  You can't do it.
• 13:49
  And our states are supposed to be standing up saying, uh, no, federal government, we didn't, we didn't say you could do that.
• 13:55
  You can't do that.
• 13:56
  And uh sue us all you want.
• 13:58
  The answer is still no.
• 14:00
  Because the Supreme Court's not the Supreme Law of the Land.
• 14:03
  The Constitution is.
• 14:06
  I want you to think about that.
• 14:08
  Because we we uh the our our national anthem, right?
• 14:12
  The Star Spangled Banner.
• 14:13
  The last line asks, oh, say does that star spangled banner yet wave, or the land of the free and the home of the brave.
• 14:22
  Well, if we are government servants, if our job is to serve the government, this is not the land of the free.
• 14:29
  It's the land of the slave, the serf, the subject.
• 14:33
  If we're gonna be the land of the free, we have to be those the home of those brave enough to look government actors in the eye and say, No.
• 14:41
  No, no, I refuse.
• 14:42
  You're not allowed to do this.
• 14:44
  The Constitution says no.
• 14:45
  I refuse to comply, I confuse, I refuse to cooperate.
• 14:48
  I refuse to sit down and do what I'm told when what you're telling me to do is illegal.
• 14:54
  It is not a lawful order.
• 14:56
  You're not allowed to do that.
• 14:58
  We need to push back.
• 14:59
  We need to stand, and even if the courts say we're wrong, we need to stand up anyway.
• 15:03
  Because remember, we created the courts.
• 15:06
  The preamble to the constitution says, we the people do ordain and establish this constitution for the United States of America.
• 15:13
  We, through our states, created the Constitution, which created the federal government, including the federal courts.
• 15:20
  And uh, yeah, we created you, not the other way around.
• 15:23
  You're there to serve us, not the other way around.
• 15:27
  Now, look, sometimes the government actors they get real peeved when you do that.
• 15:31
  But that's when you have to be brave enough to stand up and say, I don't care if it pisses you off or not.
• 15:35
  You're here to serve me.
• 15:37
  You're the public servant.
• 15:39
  I'm not here to serve you.
• 15:41
  You are not my master.
• 15:42
  I am not your slave.
• 15:45
  You are here to serve me, and you're only your only authority over me is if I violate the actual law, not the stuff that that cities, states, and the federal government make up in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land.
• 15:59
  But you see, that takes guts.
• 16:02
  It also takes a fair amount of education, and I'm going to talk more about that later, but right now I have to take a break.
• 16:10
  Uh, you know, we talk about feeding the mind, making sure you're you've got the information you need to live a free life.
• 16:16
  What about your body?
• 16:18
  Some studies show that as much as 85% of the nutrients our body used to get from our food, we don't get from our food anymore.
• 16:26
  Think about that.
• 16:26
  80 as much as 85%.
• 16:30
  That's a lot.
• 16:32
  And of course, I know a lot of people, they take a lot of supplements.
• 16:35
  They take a lot of pills.
• 16:36
  Sometimes they go on these these odd, weird diets.
• 16:39
  See them all the time.
• 16:40
  What if there was a better way?
• 16:43
  What if you could get those 85% of the nutrients back into your diet by simply drinking a juice?
• 16:51
  What juice?
• 16:53
  Green 85.
• 16:55
  It's a juice powder you mix with with water first thing in the morning, and it gives your body the nutrients it needs.
• 17:01
  So you can get plenty of energy and get good night's sleep and build muscle and strengthen your immune system.
• 17:09
  Find out more by going to AmericaOutloud.shop and click on the green 85 panel.
• 17:14
  Then do your research, see what's included, uh, look at the testimonials, look at the expectations, and then give it a try.
• 17:20
  I did.
• 17:22
  And uh when you do, use the code out loud at checkout, you'll get 20% off of your order.
• 17:27
  So again, if you want your body to have the fuel that it needs, without strange diets or taking a fistful of pills, I suggest you try to treat green 85 by going to AmericaOutloud.shop, click on the green 85 panel, do your research, right?
• 17:41
  We want to be informed consumers.
• 17:43
  But when you're ready to give it a try, don't forget to use the code out loud at checkout, and they'll get 20% off of your order.
• 17:50
  Give your body the nutrients it needs and save a few dollars while you're at it by using green 85, and don't forget the code out loud at checkout to get 20% off of your order.
• 18:10
  Let's get real.
• 18:11
  Let's get loud on America Out Loud Talk News.
• 18:14
  Yes, this is Dr.
• 18:15
  Peter McCullough, and I'm personally inviting you to join me in Nashville on July 2nd, 3rd, and 4th for a historic experience in 2026.
• 18:24
  America Out Loud News 250-10, Nashville.
• 18:28
  Along with Clear and the Wellness Company, we're celebrating two big milestones: 250 years of America and 10 years of America Outloud News.
• 18:37
  I'm calling all patriots to this historic weekend with inspiring entertainment, incredible fireworks, and nationally recognized speakers who proudly stand for freedom.
• 18:46
  I would love to see you there because your presence matters and you are family.
• 18:51
  Now's the time to get together and we can exchange ideas, answer your questions, and enjoy fellowship.
• 18:58
  Join us and register now at AmericaOutloud.news forward slash Nashville.
• 19:03
  That's AmericaOutlaw.news forward slash Nashville.
• 19:07
  We'll see you there.
• 19:09
  Successful weight loss is about changing the gut brain relationship with food.
• 19:14
  I'm Dr.
• 19:14
  Kelly Victory with the wellness company.
• 19:16
  If you don't like needles, you'll love oral dissolving terzepitide RX.
• 19:21
  Works by targeting the GLP1 and GIP receptors that influence appetite and metabolism.
• 19:27
  And unlike injections, these are fast absorbing sublingual tablets placed under the tongue, paired with an energy boost of B6 and B12.
• 19:36
  Visit TWC.health slash outloud and use code out loud for an exclusive discount.
• 19:42
  In just two minutes per day, you can reclaim your health and cut your grocery bill in half with one simple convenient product.
• 19:49
  Our doctor formulated Green 85 juice formula's powerful dose of ultra-concentrated essential nutrients stops hunger in its tracks and supplies your cells with what's missing.
• 20:00
  In the grocery store food.
• 20:01
  Go to Chemicalfree Body.com forward slash out loud today, get nature's super multivitamin Green 85, empower your immune system, cut down on your grocery bill, and save 20% on your first order.
• 20:20
  Welcome back, every day, American jury.
• 20:22
  Join the Constitution study today.
• 20:24
  I'm talking of you, we're not government servants.
• 20:28
  The government is public servants.
• 20:30
  And one of the things that I think is important to recognize is I do not serve a party.
• 20:39
  I don't uh we don't we don't do that.
• 20:41
  So when I find that they're a group of Democrats that are doing something I believe is constitutional, I support it.
• 20:50
  See, uh a group of Democrats have filed a lawsuit against Donald Trump's executive order that um basically violates all sorts of things about the Constitution.
• 21:02
  He wants to create a basic a federal voter registration by gathering all the registration of all the the vote the state uh voter registration, and uh then tell the the wholesale service that they were to prohibit them from sending absentee ballots if they're not on the list.
• 21:18
  Well, voter registration is not a federal power.
• 21:21
  There's nothing in the constitution that delegates this to the federal government.
• 21:24
  In fact, the federal government has no need to know state uh uh registration phrasing.
• 21:29
  In fact, the DOJ has been suing there's something like 27 states, I think now they asked for voter registration details, and the state said no, and now the DOJ is suing.
• 21:40
  And again, I've told them the DOJs are wrong.
• 21:42
  Voter registration is not a power delegated to the federal government, it's none of their business.
• 21:47
  I understand there's cheating and mail and ballot.
• 21:50
  That doesn't make it the federal government's need to fix it.
• 21:55
  Now, somebody out there may be saying, but Paul, you know, this is this is going to impact elections for House and Senate.
• 22:00
  Yes.
• 22:02
  Congress has the authority to set by law, the time, place, and manner of elections for U.S.
• 22:09
  House and Senate, not the president.
• 22:13
  Congress has that power.
• 22:15
  This executive order is unconstitutional, it's illegal, it's null, it's void.
• 22:20
  And the fact that the people that are suing to find to have a court decide this, just the fact that they're Democrats doesn't mean I'm going to oppose them.
• 22:29
  I think they're doing the right thing.
• 22:31
  Are they doing it for the right reason?
• 22:33
  I don't know.
• 22:33
  I'm not in someone's heart.
• 22:34
  I don't know what they're thinking.
• 22:35
  I don't know the reasoning behind this.
• 22:37
  I simply know that the executive order is a blatant violation of the constitution.
• 22:41
  I mean, it's not even close.
• 22:43
  It's not even sort of kinda, right?
• 22:45
  Remember the tariffs where he said there was a law that allowed it that didn't actually allow it.
• 22:50
  That was closer than this.
• 22:53
  How are the courts going to decide?
• 22:55
  I have no idea.
• 22:56
  I've yet, you know, I let's face it.
• 22:58
  The federal courts, they don't understand the constitution better than most Americans.
• 23:04
  Why?
• 23:04
  They didn't study it in law school.
• 23:07
  I have asked lawyers for years, probably close to a decade now.
• 23:10
  When you went to law school, did you study the actual language of the constitution or constitutional law?
• 23:15
  I've had one man tell me in all that time that in law school they he studied the law, the language of the constitution.
• 23:22
  And I'm not sure how old he was, and I'm not sure maybe he just had a good professor.
• 23:26
  I don't know.
• 23:28
  But I know that based on the evidence, look at how many times I cover uh a court case, especially the Supreme Court case, where the court simply just can't comprehend the basic language of the Constitution.
• 23:39
  It's most fundamental basic language, they can't comprehend it.
• 23:43
  So I'm not waiting for the the courts to say whether it is.
• 23:47
  I'm telling you, this is an illegal order.
• 23:49
  It is illegal, and actually, anyone who tries to enforce this executive order is probably committing a federal crime.
• 23:58
  A crime?
• 24:00
  Yes.
• 24:01
  Because remember, 18 USC section 242.
• 24:04
  If under color of law you are deprived of a right protected by the constitutional laws of the United States, that is a federal crime, punishable by a year, uh a fine and up to a year in jail.
• 24:15
  Well, since you tell the states how you want them to handle voter registration, when the government federal government comes in and exercises the power not delegated to them, they're depriving you of your right to control your own government.
• 24:25
  In this case, the government of the state, they're depriving you of your right to to control the government of the United States.
• 24:33
  That means they're technically committing a crime.
• 24:36
  By the way, it's the same thing with the say with half of the Save Act.
• 24:39
  The half that says, listen, for House and Senate for what they call federal elections, you need to provide a voter ID.
• 24:47
  That's I guess that's part of the manner of elections.
• 24:50
  That's at least constitutional.
• 24:51
  It's being done by Congress.
• 24:53
  And it's about the other half of the Save Act that about registration having to be a U.S.
• 24:58
  citizen to register, that's unconstitutional because voter registration is not a power delegate to the United States.
• 25:03
  But so many of us have become servants of government simply because a government actor says so.
• 25:08
  We think we have to snap to attention and do exactly what they say.
• 25:12
  That's not true.
• 25:13
  That's the act of a government servant.
• 25:16
  That's not the act of a uh of a citizen of a free country, of a person at liberty.
• 25:23
  Here's another example.
• 25:25
  So uh did you hear you know, Trump's talking about building a new ballroom.
• 25:28
  Yeah, you know, he wants to um expand the White House and add a he says we don't have a grand ballroom for having events.
• 25:35
  So um uh he's moving forward.
• 25:40
  But uh there was a district judge that says, no, you can't do that.
• 25:44
  Uh Judge Richard Leon.
• 25:46
  I'm creating a new uh a new truism.
• 25:48
  You've heard the line that says, you know, a good prosecutor can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich.
• 25:53
  That's I'm pretty sure you can find a district judge that'll that will uh decide anything if it opposes Donald Trump.
• 26:00
  That seems to be the way the way things are going.
• 26:02
  Now, his his here's the interesting.
• 26:05
  Not only does his order violate the constitution, but it violates Supreme Court precedent.
• 26:12
  Let me explain.
• 26:13
  So the judicial power granted to the United States is to decide um cases and controversies, right?
• 26:21
  That's the the legal definition of the judicial power.
• 26:25
  It's to decide the cases and controversies.
• 26:29
  You read the uh Federalist 78 by Alexander Hamilton, and you realize the courts have neither force nor will only judgment.
• 26:35
  So this this judge did not rule as a lot of people are he didn't rule, he offered opinion.
• 26:41
  Actually, he issued a believe an injunction.
• 26:43
  He issued a an order.
• 26:44
  There's just one problem.
• 26:46
  You go back to Supreme Court precedent, Marbury versus Madison.
• 26:50
  The court said that the a court cannot be given a power that would go beyond what's in Article 3 of the Constitution.
• 26:59
  Meaning the court cannot order the no federal court, they said no federal court can order the president to do anything.
• 27:09
  Remember, Marby versus Madison.
• 27:11
  They were Mr.
• 27:12
  Marbury asked the court to order the uh secretary of state, James Madison, to sign his um his commission for justice of the peace, one that had been uh appointed and approved by the Senate, but not signed.
• 27:27
  And the court said, you're right, he has every right to have this, but we can't order the executive branch to do anything.
• 27:34
  Something federal courts seem to have forgotten in their zeal for starry decisions, they came seem to ignore the parts that well don't help them do whatever it is they want.
• 27:47
  Now, this came to to um uh to light because of a recent story that the National Capital Planning Commission, this is the the group, the agency that deals with all construction on federal property in Washington, right?
• 28:01
  So they've got to they've they're the ones doing the planning.
• 28:04
  They're moving ahead with plans.
• 28:06
  Oh my god, you're moving ahead with plans.
• 28:08
  You had it, you had a ruling from a judge.
• 28:11
  No, they didn't rule.
• 28:12
  Well, you have a you have a court order.
• 28:14
  He has a court order that they can't construct.
• 28:17
  We're just planning.
• 28:20
  It's like, hey, we don't have to worry about that.
• 28:22
  We don't have to worry about that case.
• 28:24
  We don't have to worry about because we're planning, we're not building.
• 28:28
  And so the plan can go ahead until you know this gets kicked up to a court that has a brain in its head and says, No, um, you can't order him not to.
• 28:38
  What is the legal justification for him for the the president not expanding uh uh the white house?
• 28:45
  As long as he gets the funding properly, and remember, a lot of this is being privately funded, meaning it doesn't have to go through Congress.
• 28:53
  Uh, I'm not, I don't think it's all of that.
• 28:55
  I think most of it is being handled by private donations.
• 28:59
  So really, what's the big deal?
• 29:02
  Oh, I know.
• 29:03
  This is Trump that's doing it.
• 29:04
  And of course, like I said, you can always find a judge that'll oppose anything.
• 29:08
  If if Trump were to sign an executive order saying the sky is blue, there's probably some judge that would oppose that order and put a uh claim to put a TRO on it.
• 29:19
  Now, here's another one.
• 29:20
  And again, this just proves the out of control of the U.S.
• 29:23
  Department of Justice has filed a lawsuit against the Morris Township of New Jersey.
• 29:30
  Why?
• 29:31
  Well, because that township uh has issued a ban on um fossil fuel appliances in newly constructed buildings.
• 29:41
  Now, here's a couple things I want you to know on, right?
• 29:44
  First of all, what Morris Township is doing is unconstitutional.
• 29:48
  Why?
• 29:48
  Because they're they are depriving people of their liberty to build their buildings the way they want without due process of law.
• 29:55
  Morris Township has not gone through a process that's looking to protect the individual.
• 29:59
  They're looking
• 30:00
  To promote a political agenda about their hatred of fossil fuels.
• 30:04
  So, but that's true.
• 30:05
  But it's not the people of Morris Township that are suing, claiming that they're violating their rights.
• 30:11
  No, this is the Department of Justice has filed lawsuits.
• 30:14
  Why did they file lawsuit?
• 30:17
  Well, they they claim that it drives up energy costs for everyday American consumers.
• 30:23
  Okay, where's the harm to the United States?
• 30:26
  Not the people of the United States.
• 30:28
  Where's the harm to the actual United States of America?
• 30:30
  The federal government.
• 30:31
  Where?
• 30:31
  Where?
• 30:32
  Where?
• 30:32
  They have no standing.
• 30:35
  But of course, you're talking about a federal court.
• 30:38
  And our federal court system has been so corrupted by this, not just starry decisions, but their their politicization that sure you're going to find a federal judge that'll say, yep, you have standing because, well, you're you're just out there, you're trying to protect the little guy.
• 30:54
  The federal government has no standing because they're not harmed.
• 30:57
  How many legitimate lawsuits have I talked about where the plaintiff couldn't was told they could not exercise their right to seek redress of grievance because the court said, well, you don't actually have standing because you weren't actually harmed.
• 31:12
  Some state passes a law that would that violates the constitution.
• 31:15
  They're saying you actually have to violate the law, get arrested, then you can sue because you don't have standing until you actually have harm.
• 31:24
  Well, they do allow certain instances of potential harm, but that's not nearly robust enough.
• 31:30
  And now you have the federal government and the department of justice, which has no standing, suing.
• 31:38
  For what?
• 31:39
  What violation of the constitution are they claiming this?
• 31:41
  No, no, no.
• 31:42
  Uh you're going to drive up energy costs.
• 31:44
  That's not a that's not within the jurisdiction of federal law, of federal courts.
• 31:52
  Then economics is not a jurisdiction.
• 31:56
  It has to be a violation of the Constitution or federal law.
• 32:01
  What violation are you claiming?
• 32:03
  Well, according to the complaint, they say, well, the supremacy clause of the Constitution mandates that this constitution and the laws of the United States, uh, which shall be made in pursuance thereof shall be the supreme law of the land.
• 32:14
  Well, that's absolutely true.
• 32:16
  But what law has this has Morris Township violated that was made in pursuance of the Constitution.
• 32:26
  Well, they claim that Congress passed the EPCA to establish a comprehensive energy policy.
• 32:31
  Look in the Constitution.
• 32:33
  Establishing energy policy is not a power delegated to the United States.
• 32:39
  Therefore, to do so is a violation of the 10th Amendment.
• 32:42
  That law was not made pursuant to the Constitution.
• 32:45
  Therefore, you've got no supremacy clause argument here.
• 32:49
  Because even though they they even put the language in there, uh it shall be made in pursuance thereof.
• 32:56
  They ignore it almost like two lines later.
• 33:00
  But this is what happens is people just follow along because, well, government says so.
• 33:05
  No.
• 33:06
  I would love to say the Morris Township.
• 33:08
  You should look at the DOJ, thumb your nose at them saying this is not a supremacy clause because the law you're quoting wasn't made pursuant of the Constitution, even though you put that own language in your own complaint.
• 33:20
  I'd say to the people of Morris Township, why in heck aren't you suing your township?
• 33:26
  Why aren't you suing them for a violation of the 14th Amendment?
• 33:30
  An actual supremacy clause issue.
• 33:32
  Because the township is depriving you both of your liberty and control of your property without due process of law, without a process that is designed to protect the individual rights, not group rights, not public rights, the rights of the individual.
• 33:48
  That's what happens when you become a government servant rather than when you become a putt when you realize that government is there to serve you, not the other way around.
• 33:56
  You look at these things differently.
• 33:57
  And it's oh, it's very freeing.
• 34:00
  Pardon the term, it's very liberating to be able to look at government actor in the eye and go.
• 34:06
  You can't say that.
• 34:07
  Sure, I can.
• 34:08
  I have the liberty.
• 34:09
  You're you want to deprive me of my liberty without due process of law.
• 34:12
  That's not only a constitutional violation, that's a crime.
• 34:16
  Should I get a should I get the the DOJ to investigate you for criminal uh violation of our deprivation of rights under color of law?
• 34:25
  It's amazing what happens when you actually know the Constitution and understand it enough to use it in day-to-day life.
• 34:32
  That's what studying the Constitution means to me.
• 34:35
  It's reading it, being able to explain it in my own words, and then applying it to day-to-day life.
• 34:41
  And if you want the government to serve you rather than the other way around, you need to know the foundations under which you can legally do that.
• 34:50
  And that starts with the Constitution of the United States.
• 34:52
  And of course, you want to go on, look at the Constitution of your state as well.
• 34:57
  Now, listen, I have another break coming up before I go, though.
• 35:00
  You know, we're talking a lot about government and and you know, government acting as our masters rather than our servant.
• 35:06
  And there are a lot of groups that are trying to do the same thing.
• 35:10
  They're trying to uh promote policies that do that to take away your rights and make government our master.
• 35:17
  I don't do business with them anymore.
• 35:18
  If I find them, I stop doing business with them.
• 35:21
  I'm looking for entities that are willing to protect my rights and corporations that are willing to support them.
• 35:26
  One of them is Patriot Mobile.
• 35:27
  They're America's only Christian conservative wildest provider.
• 35:31
  Yes, they got great 4G and 5G coverage on all across the country.
• 35:35
  Yes, their customer supports 100% U.S.
• 35:37
  base.
• 35:37
  That's not why I joined them.
• 35:39
  I join them because they take a portion of every dollar to support organizations that are fighting for your rights.
• 35:47
  Organizations like First Liberty, Turning Point USA, Susan B.
• 35:50
  Anthony list, folds of honors, and yes, the Constitution study as well.
• 35:54
  So the time is now.
• 35:56
  Don't just vote in the ballot booth.
• 35:58
  Vote with your dollars, vote with your cell phone.
• 36:00
  Support like-minded organizations that are sharing our beliefs and our desire to protect our rights using your cell phone.
• 36:08
  Go to patriotmobile.com/slash constitution, find a plan that works for you.
• 36:12
  Don't forget to look for a discount.
• 36:14
  Everyone from veterans and first responders to families with multiple lines are eligible for discounts.
• 36:19
  And use the code constitution at checkout to get your new line activated absolutely free.
• 36:23
  Then every time you pay your cell phone bill, you're supporting these organizations that are helping to fight for your rights.
• 36:28
  So again, go to patriotmobile.com/slash constitution.
• 36:31
  Do it today.
• 36:32
  Find a plan and discount that works for you.
• 36:35
  Don't forget to use the code constitution at checkout to get your new line activated absolutely free.
• 36:40
  I also recommend you head over to AmericaOut Loud.news each and every day for the latest news and information.
• 36:47
  Why?
• 36:48
  Because corporate media is lying to you.
• 36:49
  Corporate media want you to believe that government is your master, not your servant.
• 36:54
  It's more important than ever that we do our part, that we go to the news that tells us the truth, that we trust and verify, and then share it.
• 37:02
  Share the stories, the articles, the podcasts, the videos, showing the friends, family, neighbors, community groups, wherever you can.
• 37:10
  It's the act of sharing this information of how we can live free that helps secure the blessings of liberty for all of us.
• 37:21
  You wouldn't go a day without brushing your teeth or washing your hands.
• 37:24
  What about washing your nose?
• 37:27
  I mean, your nose does filter the air you breathe, air loaded with bacteria, viruses, and irritants.
• 37:32
  Make nasal hygiene part of your routine with clear.
• 37:35
  No messy bottles to fill, no drowning sensation.
• 37:38
  Clear is a natural drug-free saline with the added benefit of xylitol, which blocks bacterial and viral adhesion.
• 37:45
  Available in stores and online at clear.com.
• 37:48
  That is XLEAR.com.
• 37:51
  Are you looking for a healthy snacks?
• 37:54
  But you've had enough of all the sweet sugary energy bars.
• 37:59
  Good news.
• 38:00
  There's new bars to try.
• 38:03
  That's savory crunchy and packed with goodness.
• 38:06
  Bear bars are based just on six simple natural ingredients, a certified organic veggie, nut and seed bar.
• 38:16
  That's low temp dried, never baked or fried.
• 38:19
  Bear bars are plant-based, gluten-free and loaded with nutrients and protein.
• 38:26
  Head over to Bearbar.com slash out loud and get the exclusive discount just for America out loud.
• 38:35
  Listeners.
• 38:36
  That's B E A R B A R dot com forward slash out loud.
• 38:43
  I'm Doug Evans, author of the sprout book.
• 38:46
  And I'm also a father with a three-year-old daughter.
• 38:49
  And that's why we grow sprouts.
• 38:52
  Did you know that you could take seeds, add water, and get fresh organic vegetables in three to five days without soil, sunshine, or fertilizer for under a dollar a serving?
• 39:05
  That's the miracle of sprouting.
• 39:07
  And I want to share that with you.
• 39:09
  Go to the spouting company.com slash out loud and use the code out loud for a special offer.
• 39:23
  Welcome back, everyday Americans.
• 39:24
  You've rejoined the Constitution study today.
• 39:27
  We're talking about government servants.
• 39:30
  Are we servants of the government or the government public servants?
• 39:33
  Are the government our master or our servant?
• 39:36
  And uh we've had a pretty good conversation so far today, at least I've taught some of those.
• 39:41
  I have a new example.
• 39:42
  So again, the previous administration decided, nah, we're not going to force that law stuff.
• 39:48
  Nah, we're not going to worry about that.
• 39:50
  Because, well, laws don't matter if they get in the way of your agenda.
• 39:54
  At least that was the impression they had.
• 39:57
  And they're not the first.
• 39:58
  I doubt they'll be the last.
• 40:00
  In fact, we've already seen this administration doing the same thing, just for different reasons.
• 40:06
  But the reason I bring this up is I saw this Pew research study.
• 40:10
  And it was take a guess.
• 40:13
  What percentage of newborns in the United States are born to non-citizens?
• 40:19
  This goes all the way back to the birthright citizenship question, which I've talked about yesterday today.
• 40:24
  Take a guess.
• 40:26
  Is it 5%?
• 40:29
  30%.
• 40:31
  According to Pugh, nearly 10% of every newborn in the United States is born to a mother who is not a citizen.
• 40:39
  Now, why is this important?
• 40:42
  Because again, the Supreme Court has ignored the Supreme Law of the Land and are following their own erroneous previous decisions.
• 40:51
  I'm sorry, 1898, United States versus Wang Kim Ark, where the court said, and I understand the 14th Amendment says, specifically says that all persons born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the United States and the state in which they reside.
• 41:08
  Meaning to be a natural-born citizen, you must not only be born in the United States, but you must be subject to its jurisdiction.
• 41:18
  Well, in the case of Juan Kim Ark, the Supreme Court said that Mr.
• 41:21
  Ark was the child of parents who were subjects of the emperor of China.
• 41:27
  But we still think he should be a citizen.
• 41:30
  So the Supreme Court violated their oath of office.
• 41:32
  They ignored the Supreme Law of the land, they made up this decision.
• 41:35
  And for 125 years, the courts have simply said, everyone has said, well, you know, if you're born here, you're a citizen.
• 41:45
  Even if you're not if you're not born subject to our jurisdiction, they violated the constitution.
• 41:51
  But here we have government actors who say, no, we want this life of birth tourism, this is this birthright citizenship.
• 41:59
  Now, listen, I would grant, if a person is born in the United States to a parent who is a citizen of the United States, yes, they are a citizen.
• 42:08
  If they are born to a permanent resident, you've got a good argument that they should be citizens as well.
• 42:15
  But if you're born to an elite, what if you're born to an illegal immigrant?
• 42:21
  According to Pew, about 9% of births were born to unauthorized or temporary legal immigrant mothers, meaning they were here illegally or they were only here temporarily.
• 42:33
  That means they're not subject to our jurisdiction.
• 42:37
  But you don't hear that.
• 42:38
  You hear everybody saying, well, the 14th Amendment established birthright decision, except it did not.
• 42:43
  The gentleman who added the language and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, specifically said that it would that this would not include aliens and foreigners.
• 42:55
  But you see, we follow government because we don't we think, well, if they said so, we have to follow them.
• 43:02
  No.
• 43:03
  The court has neither force nor will, merely judgment.
• 43:07
  In this case, frequently bad judgment.
• 43:10
  Now, why is this so important?
• 43:12
  Well, again, if 9% of U.S.
• 43:14
  births were people who are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, then those children are not legally citizens, even if the court says so.
• 43:25
  I don't care what the court, the court is not the Supreme Law of the Land, the Constitution is.
• 43:30
  Those citizens, by the way, would when they turn 18, have the right to vote, meaning they have a right to change to choose our representation, to have a say in and in our laws, even to uh maybe amend the Constitution of the United States, not directly, but through through their representation.
• 43:51
  But they're not citizens.
• 43:54
  And if we were actually, if we recognize that the government is our servant, not the other way around, I bet more people would have stood up and said, uh, yeah, no, you're wrong, and I can prove it in the land.
• 44:07
  It's not like it's hidden.
• 44:09
  But this is government saying, well, we're going to do what we want, and we just expect you to sit down, shut up, and do what you're told.
• 44:15
  No, no.
• 44:16
  We need to stand up and say, no, government, you're our servants, and you screwed up, and now it's time to fix it.
• 44:24
  And if the Supreme Court, even if the Supreme Court says, no, we're going to agree with our previous decision, birthright civic, simply say no.
• 44:31
  Everybody should be going to their state legislature, saying, no, we're ignore that because it violates the 14th Amendment.
• 44:38
  And the 14th Amendment supersedes anything the Supreme Court says.
• 44:42
  But Paul, the Supreme Court defines what the Constitution says.
• 44:45
  No, it does not.
• 44:46
  Look at the Constitution.
• 44:47
  Doesn't say that anywhere, that the court has the power to decide what is and isn't constitutional, that they are the final arbiters of constitutionality.
• 44:55
  But but but Paul, um, uh, well, who's supposed to?
• 44:58
  Well, let's see.
• 45:00
  The Constitution is a compact amongst the states.
• 45:03
  That means the states are their parties to the compact, they decide what the Constitution does and doesn't say.
• 45:10
  And if you ignore an illegal state uh judicial decision, well, you're not violating the law.
• 45:18
  They're the ones that violated the law.
• 45:20
  Oh, you mean the government can't tell?
• 45:22
  That's right.
• 45:23
  We tell the government what it can do, not the other way around.
• 45:27
  They make a decision.
• 45:28
  They don't make laws, they don't make rulings, they make decisions, and guess what?
• 45:34
  Frequently, those decisions are wrong.
• 45:39
  Like this one, uh a judge Allison Burroughs said that the Department of Homeland Security acted illegally when they told 900,000 immigrants that use the CBP 1 app that uh they were not here legally and they had to leave the United States.
• 45:56
  Of course, the judge apparently completely ignored that that CBP one app was itself illegal, that the the um the president didn't have the authority to change federal law about applying for asylum.
• 46:12
  Oops.
• 46:14
  Now, again, you know, they they used a C BP 1 app to set create an appointment.
• 46:17
  There's nothing illegal about that.
• 46:19
  Um the question really is did DHS at the time have the authority to grant parole and allow them to receive temporary work authorization.
• 46:30
  Did they do that process properly?
• 46:32
  I guess there's evidence, or at least some claiming there's evidence that they did not do that properly.
• 46:38
  But it's interesting that they use this app to gain entry to the country in hoping that they would receive a form of parole later.
• 46:47
  And uh again, just because the court said so, the court can't order the federal government to do it.
• 46:52
  Marbury versus Madison, all the way back to the early 1800s.
• 46:56
  Amazing what happens when you understand the Constitution and just a little bit of the law.
• 47:01
  You don't need to know as much as most people think, because most of the laws are based on on simple uh on some rulings that that are rulings, some decisions, some court decisions are often based on previous decisions, often completely devoid of law.
• 47:17
  And uh here's another, let me one more example before we call it a day uh about how uh, well, we there are many Americans that want to be government servants.
• 47:26
  They don't want, they don't want to be the government's master, they want the government to be master over them.
• 47:31
  And of course, you got to turn to look at all the blue states where the government simply orders people to do things and they just sit down, shut up, and do what they're told.
• 47:40
  Then you have New York City, which actually uh hired elected a socialist mayor.
• 47:46
  Now, I'm not talking somebody that has socialist leanings.
• 47:49
  I'm talking somebody that was an outright declared socialist, a member of the Democratic Socialist Party.
• 47:55
  So, yeah, they're a socialist.
• 47:57
  And we thought, well, that's just, you know, that that's an aberration.
• 48:00
  That's just that's just weird.
• 48:03
  But here we have the largest city in America, just elected a socialist mayor.
• 48:09
  The second largest city in America, Los Angeles has a socialist running in the mayoral race.
• 48:16
  And so that may be well, it may you may not find that surprising.
• 48:21
  What I found interesting is a poll conducted by uh loyal loyal loyal Marymount University between February and March of this year, which um uh just under 50%, 47.7% of voters wanted a socialist in charge.
• 48:41
  They wanted they they actually said almost half of Los Angelinos that answer this poll said uh we want a socialist.
• 48:48
  We don't want to be free.
• 48:50
  That's they didn't say it that way.
• 48:52
  They said they wanted a socialist, they wanted government to tell them how to live their lives.
• 48:56
  They don't want to be free.
• 48:58
  Why?
• 48:58
  I you know, guess what?
• 48:59
  Freedom is hard.
• 49:00
  You know, I kind of understand you have to make decisions, you have responsibilities, you have to do stuff.
• 49:07
  But if you believe government is your master, all you really have to do is sit down, shut up, and do what you're told.
• 49:12
  You don't have to think.
• 49:14
  Just sit back and let government think for you.
• 49:17
  And that's apparently what almost half of Los Angeles want.
• 49:20
  They don't want to be free.
• 49:23
  They want to be, they want to be ruled.
• 49:26
  Remember what Benjamin Franklin said?
• 49:28
  What kind of government did you give us, Mr.
• 49:29
  Franklin?
• 49:31
  A republic, if you can keep it.
• 49:35
  He also said that those who would give up uh uh essential liberties for a promise of temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
• 49:45
  That's exactly what New York City has decided.
• 49:48
  It's exactly what apparently almost half of Los Angelinos want.
• 49:53
  They don't want to be free, they don't want a republican form of government, they want to be ruled.
• 49:59
  They want
• 50:00
  To be subjects.
• 50:01
  They want to be served.
• 50:02
  They want to be slaves.
• 50:03
  They want someone else to decide for them.
• 50:06
  They don't want the responsibility of living free.
• 50:10
  And I'm really not that surprised.
• 50:13
  How do I know that?
• 50:14
  Well, what's the old saying?
• 50:16
  You're not tried by a jury of your peers.
• 50:19
  You're tried by a jury of 12 people who couldn't figure out how to get out of jury duty.
• 50:24
  We abandoned one of the most powerful and potent civic responsibilities a citizen has.
• 50:55
  A jury does.
• 50:56
  A jury, supposedly, of your peers.
• 50:59
  But they couldn't be bothered to actually do that.
• 51:04
  To actually go up and see if the government actually made their case or not.
• 51:09
  To hold the future of another human being in your hands is an awesome responsibility.
• 51:16
  But do you really want government making that decision rather than people?
• 51:20
  And if you won't do it for someone else, why should anyone else do it for you?
• 51:26
  I'm not terribly surprised.
• 51:29
  Because for decades, we have been less and less free because the people have been begging for it.
• 51:37
  Don't believe me?
• 51:38
  Remember the Affordable Care Act?
• 51:40
  I can't actually find the policy.
• 51:42
  I want government to tell to tell me what to get.
• 51:45
  People supported that.
• 51:47
  People supported government telling businesses what they have to pay you, how much vacation you get, what type of leave you get.
• 51:55
  You couldn't negotiate that self with your employee.
• 51:57
  No, no, we had to get government to do it because we couldn't be bothered to do it.
• 52:01
  We couldn't be bothered to live free.
• 52:04
  We needed government masters.
• 52:07
  New York and Los Angeles are just the latest example of our own pellmill run towards socialism, towards servitude, towards slavery.
• 52:21
  Because if government starts making decisions for you, guess what they're going to do?
• 52:24
  They're going to start making more and more decisions for you.
• 52:27
  Remember when they said you had to put on a mask or put a shot in your arm?
• 52:30
  They're going to make those decisions.
• 52:32
  You don't get to go to school unless you get the vaccines we tell you to.
• 52:37
  You can't go out and buy healthcare coverage that meets your needs.
• 52:41
  No, no, no.
• 52:41
  You have to get this coverage we want you to get, whether it makes sense or not.
• 52:46
  Tell me, I mean, I have my own individual health policy.
• 52:49
  Why do I have to cover abortions?
• 52:51
  It's physically impossible for me to need an abortion.
• 52:54
  Why do I have to pay for it?
• 52:55
  Because government says so.
• 52:57
  Because government thinks they're the rulers, and my job is to sit down, shut up, and do it as I'm told.
• 53:02
  I don't do that very well.
• 53:05
  Sadly, I think more of us need to learn not to do that very well.
• 53:10
  That we're more than willing to trade our rights and our liberties for a promise, no matter how fake of our own safety.
• 53:19
  Don't believe me?
• 53:20
  Look at TSA.
• 53:22
  We were attacked on 9-11.
• 53:23
  The government said, we'll protect you, we'll create this whole thing, and we'll pat you down, and we'll do the pornoscanners and all that to keep you safe.
• 53:31
  And every stress test they've had, the TSA has failed.
• 53:36
  They failed to identify firearms and explosives that went right through their checkpoints.
• 53:42
  She was a false promise of safety.
• 53:44
  And for that we gave up our rights against unreasonable searches and seizures.
• 53:49
  We just keep going along.
• 53:54
  I think we need the spirit of Nathan Hale.
• 53:57
  When he says, I regret, but uh I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country.
• 54:06
  I regret that I have but one life to give for my freedom and the freedom of my family.
• 54:14
  I think if we started thinking more along those lines, maybe we would once again return the government to the role of servant, not of master.
• 54:26
  Now, how do you do that?
• 54:27
  Well, there's a lot of books out there, a lot of things you can find.
• 54:31
  Personally, I recommend book, recommend my book, The Constitution Study, Returning the Constitution to We the People.
• 54:36
  Where do you think I got these ideas?
• 54:39
  By reading and studying the Constitution, and that's what I wrote the book for, to help you read and study the Constitution, individually and in small groups.
• 54:46
  Just go to Constitution Study.com/slash shop and well, look under books.
• 54:49
  You'll find that and all the other books I've written.
• 54:52
  They're there to help you read and study the constitution.
• 54:55
  I've got t-shirts to help express your ideas so that other people may look at you and may even ask, what do you mean by that t-shirt?
• 55:03
  I've got mugs so you can express your support.
• 55:07
  Heck, you just want to donate to the cause.
• 55:09
  Nobody here takes a salary.
• 55:10
  Everything here is volunteer.
• 55:11
  We pay for all of this.
• 55:14
  You want to help?
• 55:15
  Well, go to the donations.
• 55:16
  You can make a one-time or occurring donation.
• 55:18
  And all that money goes to keeping the constitution study up and running.
• 55:22
  Now, I'm going to keep doing it because I'm fighting for my daughter's freedom for her rights.
• 55:29
  Will you fight for your children's rights?
• 55:31
  Will you engage?
• 55:33
  Will you give your pledge your life, liberty and I'm sorry, your lives, fortunes, and sacred honor to the protection of our rights and the rights of our children?
• 55:42
  Will you join me here on the Constitution study every weekday, 4 p.m.
• 55:46
  Eastern time on America Out Loud Talk Radio, heard in the iHeart Radio Network to find out how we can help defend our rights and the rights of our children and our grandchildren.
• 55:56
  You can listen on our media player.
• 55:57
  We've got after Apple and Android and Alexa.
• 56:00
  And of course, you can listen via podcast.
• 56:02
  It takes a couple days for an episode to get to podcast, but you can listen in your favorite podcast app.
• 56:07
  Do me a favor though, subscribe to the show.
• 56:09
  Leave us a rating on Apple Podcasts.
• 56:11
  The algorithm will then show us to more people, which means more people get to learn how to live free.
• 56:17
  More people will learn how to live with government as your servant, not as your master.news.
• 56:28
  But please share those links.
• 56:30
  Share this program, share the work that we're doing, share the information that we're sharing.
• 56:35
  Because that, ladies and gentlemen, is how we share the blessings of liberty to everyone who calls this great nation home.