Latest / SpeakSmart English / Mastering English Idioms Through Interactive Conversation Practice

Transcript

Mastering English Idioms Through Interactive Conversation Practice · SpeakSmart English

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Pictures standing on a crowded sidewalk in a totally unfamiliar city.
• 0:03
  Speaker 2: Okay, I'm with you, and.
• 0:05
  Speaker 1: Two people just a few feet away from you suddenly
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: erupt into this incredibly heated argument.
• 0:11
  Speaker 2: Oh wow.
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: Yeah, the volume is loud, the hand gestures are sharp,
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: and the tone is just incredibly tense.
• 0:18
  Speaker 2: Right, a really uncomfortable situation to be near.
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: Exactly. But here is the catch. You do not speak
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: a single word of the language they are using.
• 0:27
  Speaker 2: Not one, nothing at all.
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: Nothing. You can't identify the verbs, you don't recognize the nouns,
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: and you have absolutely no grasp of the grammar.
• 0:35
  Speaker 2: But you still know exactly what is happening.
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: Yes, Internally, your physiology is undergoing this massive shift. Your
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: heart rate elevates slightly, your pupils dilate to take in
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: more visual information.
• 0:47
  Speaker 2: You are entering a mild fight or flight state.
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: Right, and your brain is instantly calculating the social stakes
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: of the interaction. You're mapping the power dynamic between these
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: two strangers.
• 0:58
  Speaker 2: Which is incredible when you think about it.
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: It really is. You know who is acting defensively, you
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: know who is pressing an advantage, right, and you know
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: the exact emotional tenor of the dispute, all without understanding
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: a single syllable of the actual vocabulary.
• 1:13
  Speaker 2: Well, that is because the human brain is an unparalleled
• 1:16
  Speaker 2: pattern recognition machine, right, especially when it comes to social tension.
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: We are just wired for it.
• 1:22
  Speaker 2: We really are. Before we are linguists, we are survivalists.
• 1:25
  Speaker 2: We evolve to read the friction in a room long
• 1:27
  Speaker 2: before we evolve to parse, you know, the conditional.
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: Perfect tense that makes total sense.
• 1:32
  Speaker 2: The scenario you just described highlights a really fundamental truth
• 1:36
  Speaker 2: about human cognition, which is that meaning precedes mechanics.
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: Meaning precedes mechanics. I like that.
• 1:42
  Speaker 2: Yeah. We process the emotional and social reality of a
• 1:46
  Speaker 2: situation using a completely different set of neurological tools than
• 1:49
  Speaker 2: we use to decode literal vocabulary.
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: Like tone of voice and things like that.
• 1:53
  Speaker 2: Exactly, we rely on prosody, which is the musicality and
• 1:57
  Speaker 2: rhythm of speech. We rely on body language, microexpressions, context,
• 2:02
  Speaker 2: All of that comes first, and.
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: That biological reality brings us to our mission for you.
• 2:06
  Speaker 2: Today, Yes it does.
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: We are exploring this fascinating methodology designed to train your
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: brain for fluency, and.
• 2:13
  Speaker 2: It is built entirely around those raw mechanics of how
• 2:17
  Speaker 2: humans actually acquire information.
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: Right, So, our source material today is a detailed transcript
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: from an educational language curriculum.
• 2:25
  Speaker 2: But we should clarify this is not a traditional textbook approach.
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: Oh not at all. There are no alphabet recitations here,
• 2:31
  Speaker 1: there are no isolated.
• 2:32
  Speaker 2: Flash cards, thank goodness for that.
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: Seriously. Instead, this curriculum argues that the feeling of social tension,
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: that exact feeling of being dropped into an unfiltered conversation,
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: is the ultimate biological key to unlocking fluency, which.
• 2:47
  Speaker 2: Is a bold claim, but the methodology backs it up.
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: It does. We are going to unpack a four part
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: system that forces a learner to move from passive, confused
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: listening into active comprehension.
• 2:58
  Speaker 2: And ultimately into confident risms exactly.
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: Now, while the architects of this specific curriculum designed it
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: for individuals learning English, the psychological framework they're utilizing is universal.
• 3:09
  Speaker 2: It really applies to any language because by studying how
• 3:13
  Speaker 2: they instruct a learner to map a new language, we
• 3:15
  Speaker 2: are actually getting a masterclass in the psychology of human
• 3:19
  Speaker 2: communication itself.
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: It goes so far beyond just learning new words.
• 3:22
  Speaker 2: Oh, absolutely, the source material forces us to look at
• 3:26
  Speaker 2: how we absorb conflicting information, how we negotiate social risk
• 3:32
  Speaker 2: with our peers, which is huge yeah, And perhaps most interestingly,
• 3:36
  Speaker 2: how we alter our own inherent prejudices when we are
• 3:39
  Speaker 2: confronted with new evidence. The curriculum doesn't just teach words,
• 3:42
  Speaker 2: it actually models psychological adaptability.
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: So rather than giving you a dry overview of the syllabus,
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: we are going to follow the exact chronological journey this
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: curriculum demands of the learner.
• 3:54
  Speaker 2: I think that is the best way to do it.
• 3:55
  Speaker 2: Follow the step.
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: The very first step requires the learner to completely abandon
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: their design.
• 4:00
  Speaker 2: For translation, which is so hard to do.
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: It is you have to step directly into the friction
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: of a real world scenario. The instruction is incredibly strict.
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: Here it says to focus solely on the meaning of
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: the conversation between native speakers.
• 4:13
  Speaker 2: So no dictionaries allowed none.
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: The learner is told to ignore the individual words and
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: simply try to understand the real life dynamic playing out.
• 4:22
  Speaker 2: And I have to say this is a radical departure
• 4:25
  Speaker 2: from traditional education models. How so well, Normally schools prioritize
• 4:31
  Speaker 2: creating a safe, sterile environment. A traditional curriculum wants to
• 4:36
  Speaker 2: reduce cognitive load. They want to give you the training wheels.
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: Right, they break it down into tiny safe pieces.
• 4:42
  Speaker 2: Exactly, But here they are deliberately inducing cognitive dissonance. They
• 4:46
  Speaker 2: actually want the learner to feel that slight spike and
• 4:49
  Speaker 2: heart rate you mentioned earlier.
• 4:50
  Speaker 1: To induce that dissonance. The curriculum introduces a story about
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: two people. We will call them Ben and Lisa.
• 4:55
  Speaker 2: Okay, Ben and Lisa.
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: They are standing on a street looking at an old
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: cafe and out of the gate. Lisa exhibits this visceral
• 5:03
  Speaker 1: immediate visual.
• 5:04
  Speaker 2: Prejudice, visual prejudice. What does she see?
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: She looks at the building and immediately points out that
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: this sign is broken. She notes that the windows look dirty.
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: Ah okay, And based entirely on this visual data, she
• 5:15
  Speaker 1: concludes bluntly that the cafe quote doesn't look very nice.
• 5:19
  Speaker 2: Which is so interesting because Lisa is demonstrating a highly efficient,
• 5:23
  Speaker 2: evolutionarily protective heuristic.
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: There, a protective heuristic like a mental shortcut.
• 5:28
  Speaker 2: Yes, from a biological standpoint, her reaction makes perfect sense.
• 5:33
  Speaker 2: Throughout human history, visual decay, like dirt, broken structures, or rot,
• 5:37
  Speaker 2: has been a reliable indicator of pathogens or physical danger.
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: So her brain is trying to keep her safe.
• 5:43
  Speaker 2: Exactly her amigdala is processing the visual input of dirty
• 5:47
  Speaker 2: windows and signaling caution. She's not analyzing the menu at
• 5:51
  Speaker 2: this point. She's assessing biological risk.
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: Wow. But then Ben counters this biological risk assessment with
• 5:58
  Speaker 1: a totally different kind of evidence. He uses tribal authority.
• 6:01
  Speaker 2: Tribal authority right, word of mouth.
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: Yeah, he acknowledges her visual evidence. He sees the dirty windows,
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: but he tells her that his friend claims this specific
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: cafe makes the best sandwiches in town.
• 6:11
  Speaker 2: So he is asking Lisa to override her own immediate
• 6:14
  Speaker 2: visual survival instincts purely.
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: Based on hearsay from a member of his social circle.
• 6:19
  Speaker 2: He is leveraging social trust against physical evidence. This is
• 6:22
  Speaker 2: actually a highly complex cognitive negotiation.
• 6:25
  Speaker 1: It really is.
• 6:26
  Speaker 2: Ben is essentially saying, I know your eyes are telling
• 6:29
  Speaker 2: you this environment is unsafe, but the social data I
• 6:32
  Speaker 2: have gathered from a trusted source supersedes your visual data.
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: Okay, but I have to stop you there and just
• 6:39
  Speaker 1: challenge the curriculums designed for the second Sir, go ahead,
• 6:42
  Speaker 1: Why throw a learner into this specific nuanced disagreement before
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: teaching them a single vocabulary word.
• 6:49
  Speaker 2: Wow.
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: I mean, if the learner doesn't know the word for
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: sign or window or sandwich, they cannot possibly understand the
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: nuance of visual prejudice versus tribal authority.
• 7:00
  Speaker 2: It seems counterintuitive.
• 7:01
  Speaker 1: I know, it feels like throwing a heavy transmission into
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: a car while it is rolling down the highway. The
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: learner just doesn't have the machinery to process the conflict.
• 7:10
  Speaker 2: But the lack of machinery is the entire point.
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: Really, Yes.
• 7:14
  Speaker 2: By depriving the learner of explicit translation, the curriculum is
• 7:18
  Speaker 2: forcing the brain to activate what cognitive scientists call top
• 7:21
  Speaker 2: down processing.
• 7:22
  Speaker 1: Hop down processing. Okay, unpack that for me.
• 7:25
  Speaker 2: So when you learn language via flash cards, you were
• 7:28
  Speaker 2: using bottom up processing. You take a small piece a letter,
• 7:32
  Speaker 2: a sound word, and you slowly build it up into
• 7:35
  Speaker 2: a concept.
• 7:36
  Speaker 1: Right, building blocks.
• 7:37
  Speaker 2: But human beings are notoriously bad at retaining isolated data
• 7:41
  Speaker 2: points without context.
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: Oh absolutely, I forget flash cards instantly.
• 7:45
  Speaker 2: Right, So top down processing works in reverse. You give
• 7:48
  Speaker 2: the brain the massive, confusing, overarching context first, the conflict
• 7:54
  Speaker 2: between two people outside of building the argument, yes, the argument,
• 7:57
  Speaker 2: and you force the brain to desperately search for the
• 8:00
  Speaker 2: missing pieces to resolve the confusion.
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: So the confusion is a deliberate feature. It is not
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: a bug exactly.
• 8:07
  Speaker 2: The confusion creates a psychological hunger. When the brain senses
• 8:10
  Speaker 2: a pattern, in this case, an argument, but it lacks
• 8:13
  Speaker 2: the data to complete it, it opens up a cognitive loop.
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: Ah.
• 8:16
  Speaker 2: I see the learner hears the tension in Lisa's voice,
• 8:19
  Speaker 2: they hear the reassurance in Den's voice. They understand that
• 8:23
  Speaker 2: a negotiation is happening regarding this building, even without the
• 8:26
  Speaker 2: words exactly, And because they understand the why of the situation,
• 8:30
  Speaker 2: their brain is incredibly primed to absorb the what later on.
• 8:34
  Speaker 2: They are actively hunting for the meaning of the words
• 8:37
  Speaker 2: because they need to resolve the tension of the.
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: Scene that is fascinating. So the scene escalates from a
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: simple disagreement into a formal social.
• 8:47
  Speaker 2: Wager, a wager okay yeah.
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: Ben pushes to go inside. Lisa yields, but she establishes
• 8:53
  Speaker 1: a very clear boundary. She says, if it's bad, you
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: owe me a coffee.
• 8:56
  Speaker 2: Ah I love that, and.
• 8:58
  Speaker 1: Ben accepts immediately with deal, let's go inside.
• 9:01
  Speaker 2: The stakes are set.
• 9:02
  Speaker 1: The curriculum quickly provides a resolution to this too. They
• 9:05
  Speaker 1: eat and Lisa announces, Wow, the food is amazing. You're right,
• 9:08
  Speaker 1: so the.
• 9:09
  Speaker 2: Tribal authority won out over the visual prejudice.
• 9:11
  Speaker 1: It did, and then she offers this moral summary of
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: her own behavior, stating, see, that's why we shouldn't judge
• 9:17
  Speaker 1: too quickly. Next time, I'll be more open minded.
• 9:19
  Speaker 2: The curriculum completes a perfect narrative arc. There we have
• 9:23
  Speaker 2: an inciting incident, rising action through negotiation, a climax of discovery,
• 9:28
  Speaker 2: and a resolution that results in a changed worldview.
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: But I want to look closely at that phrase. If
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: it's bad, you owe me a coffee.
• 9:35
  Speaker 2: Okay, let's look at it.
• 9:36
  Speaker 1: This strikes me as a really fascinating use of language
• 9:40
  Speaker 1: as a protective barrier. Lisa isn't just ordering a meal here,
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: she is establishing a social insurance policy.
• 9:46
  Speaker 2: A social insurance policy. That is a great way to
• 9:49
  Speaker 2: put it right.
• 9:49
  Speaker 1: She looks at the dirty windows, calculates the risk of
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: a terrible experience, and immediately demands a guarantee of compensation.
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: It is a micro contract, it is.
• 9:59
  Speaker 2: It is an excellent example of reciprocal altruism playing out
• 10:03
  Speaker 2: through language.
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: Reciprocal altruism.
• 10:05
  Speaker 2: Yeah, and evolutionary biology, reciprocal altruism is a behavior where
• 10:08
  Speaker 2: an organism acts in a manner that temporarily reduces its
• 10:11
  Speaker 2: own fitness while increasing another organism's fitness. Okay, but they
• 10:16
  Speaker 2: do it with the expectation that the other organism will
• 10:18
  Speaker 2: act in a similar manner at a later time.
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: So it was a trade exactly.
• 10:22
  Speaker 2: Lisa is risking her time and her digestion to appease
• 10:25
  Speaker 2: Ben's desire. To balance the scales of this social exchange,
• 10:29
  Speaker 2: Ben must assume a debt. Yes, language allows humans to
• 10:34
  Speaker 2: track these complex social debts without having to physically exchange
• 10:38
  Speaker 2: goods in the moment. We just log it in our
• 10:40
  Speaker 2: social ledger.
• 10:41
  Speaker 1: But hold on, let me push back on how profound
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: we are making this scene for a second. Fair enough,
• 10:46
  Speaker 1: are we really equating a coffee bit over a sandwich
• 10:50
  Speaker 1: with some massive leap in psychological adaptability?
• 10:54
  Speaker 2: I think we are.
• 10:55
  Speaker 1: I mean, look at her conclusion. Next time, I'll be
• 10:57
  Speaker 1: more open minded. Yeah, isn't she just a hungry person
• 10:59
  Speaker 1: who ate a good sandwich? Attributing profound moral growth to
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: a quick lunch feels like we are over analyzing a
• 11:06
  Speaker 1: very basic biological satisfaction.
• 11:08
  Speaker 2: I see your point. The stakes of the specific scenario
• 11:11
  Speaker 2: a sandwich, are very low, right, but the cognitive mechanism
• 11:15
  Speaker 2: being modeled is incredibly high level. Think about the psychological
• 11:19
  Speaker 2: friction involved in admitting you're wrong.
• 11:21
  Speaker 1: Oh, people hate admitting they were wrong.
• 11:23
  Speaker 2: Exactly. The human ego works tirelessly to confirm its own biases.
• 11:28
  Speaker 2: When Lisa says the cafe is dirty, her brain actually
• 11:31
  Speaker 2: wants the sandwich to be bad so she can validate
• 11:34
  Speaker 2: her initial assessment.
• 11:35
  Speaker 1: That makes sense, she wants to be right.
• 11:37
  Speaker 2: The fact that she can consume new data, the taste
• 11:39
  Speaker 2: of the food and openly state you are right, I
• 11:42
  Speaker 2: will change my future behavior is the very definition of
• 11:46
  Speaker 2: cognitive flexibility. Okay, I see the curriculum intentionally chooses a
• 11:50
  Speaker 2: low stake scenario like a cafe to model a very
• 11:54
  Speaker 2: high stake psychological.
• 11:55
  Speaker 1: Tool, and by wrapping that psychological tool inside a story,
• 11:59
  Speaker 1: they sure the learner actually remembers it. Precisely, because if
• 12:02
  Speaker 1: the curriculum just handed you a piece of paper that
• 12:04
  Speaker 1: said admit when you are wrong, you would forget.
• 12:07
  Speaker 2: It in five minutes, completely forget it.
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: But because it is tied to the dirty windows, the
• 12:11
  Speaker 1: coffee wager and the surprise of the amazing sandwich It sticks.
• 12:16
  Speaker 2: You are touching on the difference between semantic memory and
• 12:19
  Speaker 2: episodic memory.
• 12:20
  Speaker 1: Here, semantic versus episodic. Yeah.
• 12:22
  Speaker 2: Semantic memory is the recall of general facts like the
• 12:27
  Speaker 2: capital of France or the definition of a vocabulary.
• 12:30
  Speaker 1: Word okay, facts and figures right.
• 12:32
  Speaker 2: Episodic memory, on the other hand, is the recall of
• 12:34
  Speaker 2: personal experiences and specific events situated in a time and place,
• 12:39
  Speaker 2: like a story exactly. And the human brain is exponentially
• 12:43
  Speaker 2: better at storing and retrieving episodic memories.
• 12:46
  Speaker 1: So by making it a story, they are hacking the brain.
• 12:49
  Speaker 2: Yes. By framing the language lesson as an episode, a
• 12:53
  Speaker 2: story with characters, a setting, and a conflict, the curriculum
• 12:57
  Speaker 2: hacks the learner's episodic memory. It actually gives the vocabulary
• 13:01
  Speaker 2: a geographical location in the.
• 13:02
  Speaker 1: Mind, a geographical location in the mind. That is a
• 13:06
  Speaker 1: brilliant way to conceptualize it.
• 13:08
  Speaker 2: It makes the language sticky, it.
• 13:09
  Speaker 1: Does, and once the story is anchored, the curriculum makes
• 13:13
  Speaker 1: a major shift. The source dictates that the learner must
• 13:16
  Speaker 1: now isolate specific elements from the narrative.
• 13:18
  Speaker 2: Ah Okay, Moving into phase two.
• 13:20
  Speaker 1: Yes, a phase focused entirely on vocabulary. But again the
• 13:23
  Speaker 1: curriculum avoids the obvious. It does not teach the words
• 13:26
  Speaker 1: for window, door, or food.
• 13:28
  Speaker 2: It skips the nouns.
• 13:29
  Speaker 1: It skips them completely. Instead, it pulls three highly abstract
• 13:33
  Speaker 1: conceptual phrases out of the dialogue, defines them, and then
• 13:36
  Speaker 1: forces the learner to apply them to entirely different scenarios.
• 13:39
  Speaker 2: And that transition right there, from the concrete narrative to
• 13:43
  Speaker 2: abstract application is arguably the most difficult hurdle in language acquisition.
• 13:48
  Speaker 2: Why is that because it is one thing to mimic
• 13:52
  Speaker 2: a phrase you heard in a specific situation, but it
• 13:55
  Speaker 2: is another thing entirely to understand its underlying conceptual architect
• 14:00
  Speaker 2: sure well enough to use it in a totally novel.
• 14:03
  Speaker 1: Situation, right to actually own the phrase exactly well. The
• 14:05
  Speaker 1: first phrase the curriculum isolates is you can't judge a.
• 14:08
  Speaker 2: Book by its cover, classic idiom.
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: The provided definition is you shouldn't decide if something is
• 14:14
  Speaker 1: good or bad just by how it looks.
• 14:16
  Speaker 2: Okay, straightforward enough.
• 14:17
  Speaker 1: But to lock this in, the source text provides a
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: secondary example that is completely divorced from the cafe. It
• 14:24
  Speaker 1: asks the learner to consider an old car that looks
• 14:27
  Speaker 1: terrible on the outside but runs perfectly.
• 14:29
  Speaker 2: Which is just a masterclass in cognitive bridging.
• 14:32
  Speaker 1: It has to be, because idioms are quite frankly literal nonsense.
• 14:36
  Speaker 2: They really are when you think about them.
• 14:37
  Speaker 1: If you are a learner trying to decode English and
• 14:41
  Speaker 1: someone uses the phrase judge a book by its cover
• 14:45
  Speaker 1: while you are both staring at a crumbling brick building,
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: your brain has to work incredibly.
• 14:51
  Speaker 2: Hard because there are no books around, There.
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: Are no books present, there is no cover, there's no
• 14:56
  Speaker 1: printing press. Why do human beings use a metaphor about
• 14:59
  Speaker 1: a bound manuscript to describe a building?
• 15:02
  Speaker 2: It is absurd.
• 15:03
  Speaker 1: If you take the language literally, it is utterly useless.
• 15:06
  Speaker 2: Idioms feel like structural nonsense until you realize that human
• 15:09
  Speaker 2: communication is fundamentally metaphorical.
• 15:11
  Speaker 1: Fundamentally metaphorical.
• 15:12
  Speaker 2: Yes, our brains struggle to process raw abstract concepts like
• 15:16
  Speaker 2: deceptive appearances. It's just too vague. So to handle the extraction,
• 15:21
  Speaker 2: the brain anchors it to a physical object. The phrase
• 15:24
  Speaker 2: judge a book by its cover relies on the shared
• 15:26
  Speaker 2: cultural understanding of a book as an object that contains
• 15:29
  Speaker 2: hidden value inside a protective exterior.
• 15:32
  Speaker 1: So the book is just a vessel for the concept exactly.
• 15:35
  Speaker 2: And the curriculum bridges the gap by proving the phrase
• 15:38
  Speaker 2: is modular. By moving from the cafe to the rusty car.
• 15:42
  Speaker 2: The curriculum demonstrates that the phrase is not a description
• 15:45
  Speaker 2: of an object at all. It is a description of
• 15:47
  Speaker 2: a principle.
• 15:48
  Speaker 1: It teaches the learner to see the underlying code rather
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: than the surface interface.
• 15:52
  Speaker 2: That is a great analogy.
• 15:54
  Speaker 1: A rusty car with a great engine and a dirty
• 15:57
  Speaker 1: cafe with great food. They share the exact send source code.
• 16:00
  Speaker 2: Yes they do, okay.
• 16:02
  Speaker 1: The second phrase isolated is you owe me. The curriculum
• 16:06
  Speaker 1: defines this as a situation where someone must give you
• 16:09
  Speaker 1: something due to a promise or favor.
• 16:11
  Speaker 2: The social ledger again.
• 16:13
  Speaker 1: Right, And the secondary example provided is someone helping a
• 16:16
  Speaker 1: friend with their homework, resulting in the friend owing them
• 16:19
  Speaker 1: a coffee. Ah.
• 16:20
  Speaker 2: So the isolation of you owe me shifts the focus
• 16:23
  Speaker 2: from perception to social economy. Yes, we touched on this
• 16:26
  Speaker 2: with the concept of reciprocal altruism earlier. Language really is
• 16:30
  Speaker 2: the ledger we use to keep track of our social accounts.
• 16:33
  Speaker 1: The ledger of social accounts. I just find it so
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: fascinating that the curriculum uses the exact same currency, a
• 16:39
  Speaker 1: cup of coffee, to define the debt in both the
• 16:42
  Speaker 1: cafe story and the homework example.
• 16:44
  Speaker 2: It creates consistency.
• 16:45
  Speaker 1: It reinforces that the coffee isn't really a beverage in
• 16:48
  Speaker 1: this context.
• 16:49
  Speaker 2: No, it is a unit of social exchange exactly.
• 16:51
  Speaker 1: It is the agreed upon token of gratitude. Now, the
• 16:54
  Speaker 1: third phrase the text isolates is open minded. Okay, The
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: definition given is being ready to try new things or
• 17:02
  Speaker 1: listen to new ideas, with the example being someone willing
• 17:05
  Speaker 1: to try a new kind of food.
• 17:06
  Speaker 2: You know, open minded is essentially a spatial metaphor applied
• 17:10
  Speaker 2: to human consciousness.
• 17:11
  Speaker 1: A spatial metaphor.
• 17:12
  Speaker 2: How so, we are conceptualizing the mind as a physical container,
• 17:16
  Speaker 2: one that can either be sealed shut or opened up
• 17:19
  Speaker 2: to allow new material to enter.
• 17:21
  Speaker 1: Wow, I never thought of it that way.
• 17:23
  Speaker 2: By teaching these three specific phrases, an idiom about perception,
• 17:27
  Speaker 2: a phrase about social debt, and a spatial metaphor for
• 17:30
  Speaker 2: psychological flexibility, the curriculum actually equips the learner with tools
• 17:35
  Speaker 2: for high level abstract thought.
• 17:37
  Speaker 1: But the curriculum does not allow the learner to merely
• 17:40
  Speaker 1: sit back and reflect on these philosophical concepts, of course
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: not No. After absorbing the story and analyzing the abstractions,
• 17:47
  Speaker 1: the methodology pivots into what I can only describe as
• 17:50
  Speaker 1: a cognitive pressure.
• 17:51
  Speaker 2: Test, the interactive phase.
• 17:53
  Speaker 1: Yes. The source text mandates that the learner engage in
• 17:57
  Speaker 1: an interactive listen and answer practice. The recording asks specific
• 18:01
  Speaker 1: questions about the story, and the learner is explicitly instructed
• 18:05
  Speaker 1: to speak the answer out loud before the recording provides
• 18:08
  Speaker 1: the correct response ah.
• 18:10
  Speaker 2: And this represents the shift from recognition memory to active recall.
• 18:15
  Speaker 1: The text gives clear examples of the prompts. The voice
• 18:18
  Speaker 1: asks did Lisa think the cafe look nice? The learner
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: must wait in the silence and actually say out loud no,
• 18:23
  Speaker 1: she didn't, before the recording confirms it right. The voice
• 18:26
  Speaker 1: asks what was broken at the cafe? The learner has
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: to produce the word sign out of thin air. The
• 18:32
  Speaker 1: voice asks who is right about the cafe, and the
• 18:35
  Speaker 1: learner must answer.
• 18:36
  Speaker 2: Ben forcing them to generate the answer yes.
• 18:38
  Speaker 1: But I have a significant issue with the physical mechanics
• 18:41
  Speaker 1: of this requirement.
• 18:42
  Speaker 2: Ooh, what is your objection to the physical mechanic?
• 18:46
  Speaker 1: Well, speaking out loud to an empty room or to
• 18:50
  Speaker 1: a pre recorded audio file feels inherently ridiculous.
• 18:53
  Speaker 2: It does feel a bit silly.
• 18:54
  Speaker 1: It breaks the social contract of communication, which usually requires
• 18:58
  Speaker 1: a listener. I mean, if I'm sitting in my kitchen
• 19:00
  Speaker 1: and the recording asks what was broken at the cafe,
• 19:04
  Speaker 1: and I instantly picture the broken sign in my head,
• 19:08
  Speaker 1: I know the answer.
• 19:09
  Speaker 2: You have the information.
• 19:10
  Speaker 1: I possess the information. Why is the physical act of
• 19:13
  Speaker 1: vibrating my vocal cords to push air out of my
• 19:15
  Speaker 1: mouth so strictly mandated by the methodology? Is my brain
• 19:20
  Speaker 1: somehow unaware that it knows the answer until my mouth
• 19:23
  Speaker 1: says it.
• 19:23
  Speaker 2: Well, your brain is aware, but it is relying on
• 19:25
  Speaker 2: a very weak neurological pathway in that moment. Weak How
• 19:29
  Speaker 2: when you just picture the sign in your head, you
• 19:31
  Speaker 2: are using recognition memory. You are essentially opening a mental
• 19:34
  Speaker 2: filing cabinet, looking at the file labeled cafe and confirming
• 19:37
  Speaker 2: that the word sign is in there. You close the
• 19:40
  Speaker 2: cabinet and you feel satisfied. The problem is, language is
• 19:42
  Speaker 2: not an archiving system. It is a rapid deployment system AH.
• 19:47
  Speaker 1: Meaning that simply knowing the word is useless if it
• 19:50
  Speaker 1: takes you ten seconds to find the file during a
• 19:52
  Speaker 1: live conversation.
• 19:53
  Speaker 2: Exactly in the late nineteenth century, a psychologist named Hermann
• 19:57
  Speaker 2: Ebbinghouse conducted this groundbreaking recas search on memory okay, and
• 20:01
  Speaker 2: it resulted in the concept of the forgetting curve. He
• 20:04
  Speaker 2: demonstrated that humans rapidly lose memory of learned information unless
• 20:09
  Speaker 2: that information is actively retrieved and repeatedly reviewed.
• 20:12
  Speaker 1: The forgetting curve right.
• 20:14
  Speaker 2: And more importantly, cognitive science has shown that the effort
• 20:17
  Speaker 2: required to retrieve a memory actually strengthens the neural pathway
• 20:21
  Speaker 2: to that memory.
• 20:22
  Speaker 1: So the harder you work to remember it, the stronger
• 20:24
  Speaker 1: the connection gets.
• 20:25
  Speaker 2: Yes, when the curriculum asks the question and leaves a
• 20:28
  Speaker 2: gap of silence, it creates a micro stressor you only have, say,
• 20:33
  Speaker 2: three seconds.
• 20:33
  Speaker 1: To find the file, so the timelinit forces the brain
• 20:36
  Speaker 1: to panic slightly.
• 20:37
  Speaker 2: Yes, the time limit is crucial. But your question was
• 20:40
  Speaker 2: about the physical act of speaking. Why must you vibrate
• 20:43
  Speaker 2: your vocal cords?
• 20:44
  Speaker 1: Right? Why talk to an empty room?
• 20:46
  Speaker 2: Because producing speech is a staggeringly complex motor function. When
• 20:51
  Speaker 2: you decide to say the word sign. The concept originates
• 20:55
  Speaker 2: in the cerebral cortex there's in the cortex, then the
• 20:58
  Speaker 2: signal must travel to Broca's area, which organizes the grammatical structure.
• 21:02
  Speaker 2: Then the signal is sent to your motor cortex.
• 21:05
  Speaker 1: Wow, it really travels around.
• 21:06
  Speaker 2: And the motor cortex coordinates the exact movements of your
• 21:09
  Speaker 2: diaphragm to push the air, your larynx to create the vibration,
• 21:13
  Speaker 2: and your tongue licks and hard palette to shape the sound.
• 21:17
  Speaker 1: That is a lot of moving parts.
• 21:18
  Speaker 2: And all of this happens in milliseconds.
• 21:21
  Speaker 1: So by forcing the learner to speak to an empty room,
• 21:25
  Speaker 1: the curriculum is not testing their intelligence. It is demanding
• 21:29
  Speaker 1: physical conditioning.
• 21:30
  Speaker 2: Physical conditioning is the perfect term for it.
• 21:32
  Speaker 1: It is like a pianist practicing scales. The pianists can
• 21:36
  Speaker 1: read the sheet music perfectly in their mind. They know
• 21:39
  Speaker 1: what the notes sound like, but if they have not
• 21:41
  Speaker 1: physically pressed the keys thousands of times to build the
• 21:43
  Speaker 1: motor pathways, their fingers will just fail. When it is
• 21:46
  Speaker 1: time to perform, the conscious analytical part of the brain
• 21:50
  Speaker 1: is too slow to control the physical body. During a
• 21:53
  Speaker 1: rapid performance.
• 21:54
  Speaker 2: You are building muscle memory for your articulatory system by
• 21:58
  Speaker 2: forcing the air out of your lung and shaping the
• 22:00
  Speaker 2: word sign in the physical world. You are bridging the
• 22:04
  Speaker 2: gap between passive semantic knowledge and active physical deployment.
• 22:09
  Speaker 1: You're proving the system works.
• 22:11
  Speaker 2: You are proving that the entire system, from the cognitive
• 22:14
  Speaker 2: recall to the motor cortex execution is fully functional under
• 22:18
  Speaker 2: a time constraint, and.
• 22:19
  Speaker 1: That physical execution transitions seamlessly into the final and frankly,
• 22:24
  Speaker 1: the most bizarre instruction in the entire methodology.
• 22:27
  Speaker 2: Oh, the shadowing.
• 22:28
  Speaker 1: Yes. Yeah. Up until now we have dealt with context, vocabulary,
• 22:31
  Speaker 1: and memory retrieval. Now the curriculum introduces a phase called
• 22:35
  Speaker 1: shadowing practice, and it demands a completely different skill set
• 22:39
  Speaker 1: from the learner.
• 22:40
  Speaker 2: Shadowing practice requires the learner to listen to the original
• 22:43
  Speaker 2: dialogue and repeat the lines out loud, but with a
• 22:45
  Speaker 2: highly specific focus.
• 22:47
  Speaker 1: The instructions tell the learner to ignore the definitions and the.
• 22:49
  Speaker 2: Grammar, completely ignore them, and.
• 22:51
  Speaker 1: Instead concentrate entirely on the rhythm and intonation of the
• 22:55
  Speaker 1: English expressions. This feels like shifting from a linguistics class
• 22:59
  Speaker 1: into an acting workshop.
• 23:01
  Speaker 2: It really does.
• 23:02
  Speaker 1: The curriculum is essentially saying you understand the plot, you
• 23:06
  Speaker 1: know the words, your memory works. Now we need you
• 23:09
  Speaker 1: to focus on the music of the scene. We are
• 23:12
  Speaker 1: no longer dealing with lyrics. We are dealing with melody.
• 23:15
  Speaker 2: Melody.
• 23:15
  Speaker 1: Yes. When Lisa says ah no, the text requires the
• 23:19
  Speaker 1: learner to mimic the specific emotional hesitation. When Ben counters
• 23:23
  Speaker 1: with deal, let's go inside, the learner must adopt his quick,
• 23:27
  Speaker 1: decisive cadence.
• 23:29
  Speaker 2: You are identifying the concept of procity here.
• 23:32
  Speaker 1: Prosody again. Yes.
• 23:33
  Speaker 2: Prosody encompasses the pitch, loudness, tempo, and rhythm of speech,
• 23:37
  Speaker 2: and in human communication, prosody often carries more critical information
• 23:41
  Speaker 2: than the literal vocabulary.
• 23:43
  Speaker 1: Oh for sure. If I say the words that's a
• 23:45
  Speaker 1: great idea, but I drag out the vowels and drop
• 23:47
  Speaker 1: my pitch like that's a great eddie, my pro city
• 23:50
  Speaker 1: completely reverses the literal meaning of the words. Exactly, I
• 23:53
  Speaker 1: am communicating sarcasm, even though the vocabulary communicates approval.
• 23:57
  Speaker 2: And Neurologically, this is where the this becomes deeply fascinating.
• 24:02
  Speaker 2: We mentioned Broca's area earlier, which sits in the left
• 24:05
  Speaker 2: hemisphere of the brain for most people and handles speech production.
• 24:09
  Speaker 1: And grammar right the left hemisphere.
• 24:11
  Speaker 2: But the interpretation and production of emotional prosody. The music
• 24:15
  Speaker 2: of the speech is heavily reliant on the right hemisphere
• 24:18
  Speaker 2: of the brain.
• 24:19
  Speaker 1: Oh wow.
• 24:20
  Speaker 2: When the curriculum demands that the learner focus on rhythm
• 24:23
  Speaker 2: and intonation, it is actually forcing the integration of both hemispheres.
• 24:27
  Speaker 1: It is demanding a full brain performance.
• 24:29
  Speaker 2: It is because if you execute the vocabulary perfectly with
• 24:34
  Speaker 2: flawless grammar, but your prosody is flat and robotic, a
• 24:38
  Speaker 2: native speaker will experience an immediate sense of unease.
• 24:42
  Speaker 1: The uncanny valley of spech.
• 24:43
  Speaker 2: Yes, they might not be able to articulate why, but
• 24:46
  Speaker 2: they will intuitively feel that the social contract is broken.
• 24:50
  Speaker 2: Shadowing forces the learner to bypass their analytical filters and
• 24:54
  Speaker 2: engage in pure auditory mimicry.
• 24:56
  Speaker 1: You have to embody the emotional state of the speaker.
• 24:59
  Speaker 2: You must physically feel leases skepticism.
• 25:01
  Speaker 1: In your own throat, and stepping into her shoes vocally
• 25:06
  Speaker 1: builds empathy. It requires the learner to stop analyzing the
• 25:10
  Speaker 1: language as a puzzle to be solved and start treating
• 25:14
  Speaker 1: it as a physical behavior to be inhabited.
• 25:16
  Speaker 2: It really places the final code of polish on the
• 25:19
  Speaker 2: cognitive structure we have been building.
• 25:21
  Speaker 1: It does. But the curriculum does not end with a
• 25:23
  Speaker 1: single successful performance.
• 25:25
  Speaker 2: No, it has one more rule.
• 25:27
  Speaker 1: The source material outlines one final overarching mandate that governs
• 25:31
  Speaker 1: the entire methodology. It provides a strict directive regarding.
• 25:35
  Speaker 2: Repetition, the daily practice.
• 25:37
  Speaker 1: Yes, the source explicitly states that repetition is crucial to
• 25:41
  Speaker 1: become fluent. The instruction is to watch the interaction many times,
• 25:45
  Speaker 1: to answer the prompts out loud repeatedly. And it gives
• 25:47
  Speaker 1: a very specific timeline, which is keep watching this sequence
• 25:50
  Speaker 1: every day for seven consecutive days and repeat the exercises
• 25:54
  Speaker 1: to see significant improvements.
• 25:55
  Speaker 2: Daily repetition for an entire week.
• 25:57
  Speaker 1: I am going to aggressively question the utility of this mandate,
• 26:00
  Speaker 1: go for it. To a rational person, repeating the exact
• 26:03
  Speaker 1: same story about Ben, Lisa and the dirty cafe every
• 26:06
  Speaker 1: single day sounds agonizingly tedious.
• 26:09
  Speaker 2: It does sound boring.
• 26:10
  Speaker 1: By day three. I know the cafe is a broken sign,
• 26:12
  Speaker 1: I know Ben's friend recommended it. I know Lisa loves
• 26:15
  Speaker 1: the sandwich. There's zero narrative surprise left. I have solved
• 26:20
  Speaker 1: the puzzle.
• 26:20
  Speaker 2: You know the plot.
• 26:22
  Speaker 1: What possible cognitive benefit is there to staring at a
• 26:25
  Speaker 1: solve puzzle on day five, day six, and day seven.
• 26:29
  Speaker 1: Does sheer repetition of known facts actually manufacture fluency or
• 26:34
  Speaker 1: does it just manufacture boredom?
• 26:36
  Speaker 2: Well, if human memory operated like a computer hard drive,
• 26:39
  Speaker 2: your objection would be entirely correct. Howso, once a file
• 26:43
  Speaker 2: is saved on a hard drive, clicking save six more
• 26:46
  Speaker 2: times does not make the file any more permanent. It
• 26:48
  Speaker 2: is completely redundant.
• 26:49
  Speaker 1: Exactly my point.
• 26:50
  Speaker 2: But the human brain is a biological organism, and it
• 26:53
  Speaker 2: relies on structural changes to retain capability. The goal of
• 26:57
  Speaker 2: repeating the cafe scenario is not to memorize the acts
• 27:00
  Speaker 2: of the story. The curriculum does not care if you
• 27:02
  Speaker 2: remember Ben's name.
• 27:03
  Speaker 1: Then what is a story for?
• 27:05
  Speaker 2: The story is a trojan horse?
• 27:07
  Speaker 1: A trojan horse for what?
• 27:08
  Speaker 2: For automating linguistic.
• 27:10
  Speaker 1: Architect automating architecture, Yes, we need.
• 27:13
  Speaker 2: To look at the physical structure of your neurons. When
• 27:16
  Speaker 2: you learn a new grammatical structure like the conditional promise,
• 27:19
  Speaker 2: if it's bad, you owe me, a neural pathway fires
• 27:22
  Speaker 2: in your brain. The first time it fires, the signal
• 27:25
  Speaker 2: is relatively weak and slow. It requires a lot of
• 27:28
  Speaker 2: conscious effort to assemble the parts. But every time you
• 27:30
  Speaker 2: force that specific pathway to fire again, a type of
• 27:34
  Speaker 2: glial cell in your brain called an oligodendrocyte wraps a
• 27:38
  Speaker 2: fatty substance around the axon of the.
• 27:40
  Speaker 1: Neuron oligodendrosay, wow, And what is the fatty substance?
• 27:44
  Speaker 2: This substance is called myelin myolin Okay.
• 27:47
  Speaker 1: Myelin acts like the rubber insulation around a copper electrical wire.
• 27:51
  Speaker 2: That is a perfect analogy. The myelin sheath prevents the
• 27:54
  Speaker 2: electrical signal from leaking out, which drastically increases the speed
• 27:58
  Speaker 2: and efficiency of the neural transmission.
• 28:00
  Speaker 1: So makes the signal faster.
• 28:01
  Speaker 2: Yes. The more you repeat the exact same shadowing exercise,
• 28:04
  Speaker 2: the thicker the miline sheath becomes along that specific grammatical pathway.
• 28:09
  Speaker 2: You are physically insulating the circuitry of the language. Oh.
• 28:12
  Speaker 1: I see. So by day seven, the pathway for if
• 28:15
  Speaker 1: it's bad, you owe me is so heavily insulated that
• 28:18
  Speaker 1: the signal travels instantaneously exactly, I do not have to
• 28:21
  Speaker 1: think about the word if, or the prone un i
• 28:24
  Speaker 1: or the verb O. The entire clause fires as a single,
• 28:28
  Speaker 1: unified block of data, and.
• 28:29
  Speaker 2: That leads to the ultimate goal of the curriculum, which
• 28:32
  Speaker 2: is reducing cognitive load.
• 28:34
  Speaker 1: Reducing cognitive load.
• 28:35
  Speaker 2: Yes, working memory, the part of your brain that holds
• 28:38
  Speaker 2: and manipulates information in real time, has a very limited capacity.
• 28:42
  Speaker 1: We can only hold so much at once.
• 28:43
  Speaker 2: Right. If you have to use your working memory to
• 28:45
  Speaker 2: construct basic sentences, you have no processing power left to
• 28:49
  Speaker 2: actually listen to the person you were talking to, or
• 28:51
  Speaker 2: to read the room, or to formulate a complex argument.
• 28:54
  Speaker 1: You are too busy building the car to actually drive it.
• 28:57
  Speaker 2: Yes, By using repetition to force the basic structures into
• 29:01
  Speaker 2: automatic subconscious processing, you free up your working memory.
• 29:05
  Speaker 1: So you can focus on the situation.
• 29:07
  Speaker 2: When you are in a completely novel, high stakes scenario
• 29:10
  Speaker 2: down the road. Perhaps you are negotiating a salary contract,
• 29:14
  Speaker 2: not buying a sandwich. The underlying grammatical tools of condition
• 29:19
  Speaker 2: and consequence emerge.
• 29:20
  Speaker 1: Automatically because they're fully insulated.
• 29:22
  Speaker 2: Exactly your brain reaches for the pre built, fully insulated tool.
• 29:27
  Speaker 2: That is what true fluency is. Fluency is not the
• 29:29
  Speaker 2: possession of a massive vocabulary. Fluency is the absence of
• 29:33
  Speaker 2: conscious thought during execution.
• 29:35
  Speaker 1: Fluency is the accents of conscious thought during execution. That
• 29:39
  Speaker 1: is a powerful definition.
• 29:41
  Speaker 2: It changes how you view learning it really does.
• 29:44
  Speaker 1: To reach that state, the learner must endure the initial
• 29:46
  Speaker 1: dissonance of the argument they most analyze. The social wagers
• 29:50
  Speaker 1: decode the bizarre abstractions of idioms.
• 29:52
  Speaker 2: Practice retrieving the data under the stress of a ticking.
• 29:55
  Speaker 1: Clock, embody the musicality of the emotion, and then repeatedly
• 29:59
  Speaker 1: physically alter the insulation of their own neural pathways until
• 30:03
  Speaker 1: the effort disappears. It is a grueling, magnificent biological process.
• 30:08
  Speaker 2: And it forces us to confront a profound philosophical question
• 30:11
  Speaker 2: about the nature of communication itself. Question is that, well,
• 30:14
  Speaker 2: when a learner masters a phrase like open minded and
• 30:17
  Speaker 2: practices the rhythm and intonation until it fires automatically, we
• 30:21
  Speaker 2: have to ask, what is truly happening?
• 30:23
  Speaker 1: Okay?
• 30:23
  Speaker 2: Are they merely learning a new sequence of acoustic vibrations
• 30:27
  Speaker 2: to get what they want in a foreign city, or
• 30:29
  Speaker 2: by internalizing the spatial metaphor of an open mind, are
• 30:33
  Speaker 2: they actively rewiring their cognitive framework to view the world differently?
• 30:37
  Speaker 1: Ah The sepir war hypothesis or linguistic relativity exact the
• 30:42
  Speaker 1: idea that the structure of a language influences its speaker's worldview.
• 30:46
  Speaker 1: Or cognition. Right.
• 30:47
  Speaker 2: When Lisa stepped through the doors of a visually decaying
• 30:50
  Speaker 2: cafe and discovered an amazing experience, she had to formulate
• 30:53
  Speaker 2: language to explain her shift and perspective.
• 30:56
  Speaker 1: She had to articulate the change.
• 30:57
  Speaker 2: By forcing a learner to inhabit her realization, to practice
• 31:00
  Speaker 2: her exact vocal cadence of admitted wrongness. The curriculum is
• 31:04
  Speaker 2: doing more than teaching English. It is actually providing the
• 31:07
  Speaker 2: learner with the cognitive software required to overcome prejudice.
• 31:11
  Speaker 1: That is profound.
• 31:12
  Speaker 2: Language does not simply describe the reality we inhabit. It
• 31:16
  Speaker 2: actively shapes the boundaries of what we are capable of perceiving.
• 31:20
  Speaker 1: Our words are the lens through which we process the
• 31:23
  Speaker 1: chaos of the world. By refining the vocabulary, automating the grammar,
• 31:28
  Speaker 1: and perfecting the melody, we are polishing the.
• 31:30
  Speaker 2: Lens beautifully said.
• 31:32
  Speaker 1: Thank you all so much for staying with us until
• 31:35
  Speaker 1: the end of this exploration. We appreciate the time you
• 31:37
  Speaker 1: spend with us unraveling these complex mechanics. If you found
• 31:41
  Speaker 1: this discussion valuable, please hit that subscribe button to ensure
• 31:44
  Speaker 1: you catch our future conversations. We have many more fascinating
• 31:48
  Speaker 1: systems to analyze together until next time, take care, keep learning,
• 31:52
  Speaker 1: and farewell.