Latest / Turley Talks / Ep. 3972 It's ACTUALLY Happening — And It's BIGGER Than Anyone Thought!!!

Transcript

Ep. 3972 It's ACTUALLY Happening — And It's BIGGER Than Anyone Thought!!! · Turley Talks

• 0:00
  [UNKNOWN]: The liberal globalist order is on its brink and awakening a new conservative age.
• 0:06
  [UNKNOWN]: Dr. Steve Turley, join me every day as we discover answers to today's toughest challenges and explore the re-bondalization of conservative civilization.
• 0:18
  [UNKNOWN]: This is Turley Talks.
• 0:21
  [UNKNOWN]: We got to get rid of this loser.
• 0:23
  [UNKNOWN]: This guy is bad.
• 0:24
  [UNKNOWN]: He's disroiled to the Republican Party.
• 0:28
  [UNKNOWN]: He's disloyaled to the people of Kentucky, and most importantly, he is disloyaled to the United States of America.
• 0:36
  [UNKNOWN]: And he's got to be voted out of office as soon as possible.
• 0:40
  [UNKNOWN]: You write you raise a good question about the people who voted for Trump as a voter in this district.
• 0:43
  [UNKNOWN]: Let me stand up for my people.
• 0:45
  [UNKNOWN]: These people voted for Donald Trump.
• 0:47
  [UNKNOWN]: They also voted for Massey on the expectation that he would help Donald Trump and act as agenda.
• 0:53
  [UNKNOWN]: He stopped doing that.
• 0:54
  [UNKNOWN]: And it's pretty simple.
• 0:55
  [UNKNOWN]: They decided to get a congressman who will help him enact that agenda.
• 0:59
  [UNKNOWN]: It's easy to overanalyze this.
• 1:00
  [UNKNOWN]: The bottom line is they love Trump.
• 1:03
  [UNKNOWN]: They love his agenda.
• 1:04
  [UNKNOWN]: tax cuts, border security, you name it.
• 1:07
  [UNKNOWN]: Massey got off that team and they wanted to put someone on the team who would help the president.
• 1:11
  [UNKNOWN]: It's pretty simple.
• 1:12
  [UNKNOWN]: What's the old song?
• 1:13
  [UNKNOWN]: You don't tug on Superman's cape, you don't spit into the wind, you don't pull the mask off the old loan ranger and you don't mess around with Trump in a Republican primary.
• 1:21
  [UNKNOWN]: And that's what Thomas Massey has done by becoming his chief antagonist in the U.S. House.
• 1:27
  [UNKNOWN]: And this became really a referendum on his Thomas Massey on the team or not.
• 1:35
  [UNKNOWN]: There has simply never been a political force like him.
• 1:39
  [UNKNOWN]: And as he redefines the GOP, President Donald J. Trump is even more actively redefining the midterms.
• 1:47
  [UNKNOWN]: You are watching the single most consequential political remapping of a major American political party in modern history, play out in real time.
• 1:57
  [UNKNOWN]: Trump is not just the leader of the Republican Party.
• 2:03
  [UNKNOWN]: the Republican party.
• 2:04
  [UNKNOWN]: What he pulled off this week, this singular extraordinary jaw dropping week should be the front page of every newspaper in America.
• 2:14
  [UNKNOWN]: Make sure to stick me the very end of this video because I'm going to show you exactly how Trump is building the most structurally dominant midterm map.
• 2:25
  [UNKNOWN]: the GOP has seen in a generation and there is absolutely nothing.
• 2:31
  [UNKNOWN]: Nothing, nothing, the fledgling Democrats could do to stop and greetings everyone.
• 2:38
  [UNKNOWN]: It is I, Dr. Steve, and it is live stream Friday.
• 2:41
  [UNKNOWN]: I love seeing you guys on our live stream Friday.
• 2:44
  [UNKNOWN]: Look at all the comments.
• 2:45
  [UNKNOWN]: Wonderful.
• 2:46
  [UNKNOWN]: It is I, your Patriot Professor celebrating yet another absolutely glorious day in the
• 2:51
  [UNKNOWN]: that you all, my heroes made possible back in November of 2024.
• 2:57
  [UNKNOWN]: So if you want a front row seat on how you continue to change the nation and the entire world in ways you never even imagine.
• 3:07
  [UNKNOWN]: make sure to smack that bell and subscribe button as always we got a jam pack show for you today our super chats are up so feel free to send in your comments your questions it'll be my privilege my honor to read them and answer them during our line stream also before we dive in here you've got to go right now to totally training dot com,
• 3:32
  [UNKNOWN]: We're living through it time when a lot of people are beginning to realize something important.
• 3:37
  [UNKNOWN]: The old economic system, the one that told you to work harder, grind longer, and depend on institutions that frankly don't care about you.
• 3:45
  [UNKNOWN]: They don't got your best interest in mine.
• 3:48
  [UNKNOWN]: That system is starting to break down, and you see it everywhere.
• 3:50
  [UNKNOWN]: Inflation, instability, and just a growing sense that the system is increasingly designed for the benefit of a very small group at the top.
• 3:59
  [UNKNOWN]: And whenever we see moments like this historically, something interesting happens, ordinary people begin looking for ways to create independence from the system rather than depend on it.
• 4:11
  [UNKNOWN]: And that's why I want to invite you to a free training with someone I know personally good friend of mine named Ryan who's been quietly building.
• 4:20
  [UNKNOWN]: What he calls, I kid you not, the perfect lifestyle business that takes advantage of the new hidden economy and what's fascinating about it's probably not what you think when you hear about something like an online business.
• 4:35
  [UNKNOWN]: For example, in fact, when he explained it to me, I'll be honest.
• 4:39
  [UNKNOWN]: I was it was a little dubious sounded a little weird, but then he showed me the results and I immediately got so excited because it's working so well right now in 2026 and the part that really caught my attention is that it takes them get this less than 30 minutes a day to actually run an operate.
• 5:02
  [UNKNOWN]: No advertising, no social media marketing to worry about, no employees to hire, no inventory to buy, no websites to build, and you don't need any technical background to get started.
• 5:14
  [UNKNOWN]: It's unbelievable.
• 5:15
  [UNKNOWN]: So I asked him to break this down for you, step by step, and so he agreed we're hosting a free private training where you can see exactly how this works because this is about creating real independence in a time when more and more people are starting to question the system altogether.
• 5:31
  [UNKNOWN]: So if you want to see how this hidden economy works,
• 5:34
  [UNKNOWN]: And to sign that this is right strategy for you, go to curly training dot com and reserve your spot right now because you already know the world is changing more people are stepping outside the system not by chance, but by choice and this is one of those opportunities to do exactly that learn more at curly training dot com all right, let's dive right in here gang.
• 5:55
  [UNKNOWN]: So let's start.
• 5:57
  [UNKNOWN]: with, it's got to be the single most important political statistic of the week.
• 6:06
  [UNKNOWN]: And I want to let this, you've just got to let this number sink in because the legacy media is absolutely desperately trying to stop you from seeing this.
• 6:19
  [UNKNOWN]: 37 and oh, you can be sure the legacy media is dwindling audience does not know this step.
• 6:26
  [UNKNOWN]: 37 and O.
• 6:30
  [UNKNOWN]: That is Donald Trump's endorsement record from Tuesdays, May 19th, primaries alone.
• 6:37
  [UNKNOWN]: 37 candidates endorsed by Trump running in states like Pennsylvania, George Alabama, Kentucky, Idaho, Oregon, every single one of them, 100% one.
• 6:52
  [UNKNOWN]: Pennsylvania 10 wins, zero losses, Georgia 9 wins, zero losses.
• 6:57
  [UNKNOWN]: Alabama, Kentucky, Idaho, Oregon, perfect sweet.
• 7:03
  [UNKNOWN]: Gang, that's not just a good night, right?
• 7:06
  [UNKNOWN]: That's a great, no, it's not even a great night.
• 7:09
  [UNKNOWN]: That's a political force in nature that we simply have never seen before.
• 7:14
  [UNKNOWN]: Obama couldn't count those numbers.
• 7:16
  [UNKNOWN]: Not even close, we're about to see how we just got humiliated again.
• 7:21
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, this is unbelievable for all the naysayers who claim that Trump was losing the Republican base for all the doomers that said that the maga movement was fracturing that the voters were leaving this numbers and absolute got this numbers of five finger death punch.
• 7:39
  [UNKNOWN]: It's a good metal band.
• 7:41
  [UNKNOWN]: 37 wins, zero losses, a 97% win streak overall in Trump's total endorsements.
• 7:52
  [UNKNOWN]: That's not a movement in retreat.
• 7:55
  [UNKNOWN]: That is a movement at the absolute apex of its power.
• 8:00
  [UNKNOWN]: And what Trump is proven is that it really doesn't matter who you are.
• 8:05
  [UNKNOWN]: Doesn't matter how long you've been in Congress, doesn't matter how popular you may be on the talk shows or on podcasts to stand.
• 8:14
  [UNKNOWN]: It doesn't matter if you're perceived as an obstacle to the full and total unleashing of mega power your gone.
• 8:27
  [UNKNOWN]: You will be politically steamrolled
• 8:36
  [UNKNOWN]: Now, of course, the real sort of weight of this moment started with the Indiana GOP.
• 8:45
  [UNKNOWN]: Remember all those Indiana State senators some weeks back, who decided that they would side with the Mike Pence wing of the party, the loser wing of the party and vote against redistricting to give the GOP two new seats in Congress from Indiana.
• 9:01
  [UNKNOWN]: And let that hit you.
• 9:03
  [UNKNOWN]: Indiana Republicans.
• 9:06
  [UNKNOWN]: voted with every single state Democrat to keep two Democrats' seats.
• 9:16
  [UNKNOWN]: Who the hell needs Democrats when you have Republicans like that?
• 9:21
  [UNKNOWN]: Well, it just so happens that eight of those Republican state senators in Indiana were a free election a couple of weeks ago.
• 9:28
  [UNKNOWN]: And when Trump unleashed Indiana voters on them,
• 9:33
  [UNKNOWN]: It was an absolute bloodbath.
• 9:37
  [UNKNOWN]: When Indiana primary voters showed up to the polls, they delivered what one commentator called a flat out wipeout.
• 9:46
  [UNKNOWN]: Travis Holdman, one of the most vile of these anti-trust anti-Trump rhinos from District 19, gone.
• 9:54
  [UNKNOWN]: Jim Buck, District 21, gone.
• 9:57
  [UNKNOWN]: Greg Walker, District 41, gone.
• 10:01
  [UNKNOWN]: Linda Rogers, District 11, gone.
• 10:05
  [UNKNOWN]: Dan Dernolk, District 1, gone.
• 10:07
  [UNKNOWN]: And many of them were defeated by massive, I should say, District 11 there.
• 10:12
  [UNKNOWN]: Many were defeated by massive marches.
• 10:14
  [UNKNOWN]: In fact, in that District 11 race, the Trump endorsed Challenger beat him with 73% of the vote.
• 10:22
  [UNKNOWN]: He literally got Liz Cheneyd.
• 10:25
  [UNKNOWN]: As the smoke cleared six of the eight turn coat Republican centers keep in mind Trump only actively endorsed five six of the eight turn coat Republican senators were defeated it was an absolutely astonishing display of political power that has reverberations to go way beyond Indiana here again is CNN Scott Jennings who had a rather ominous indeed prophetic warning for what was to come.
• 10:54
  [UNKNOWN]: The boss of the party, I think, Alyssa stated it very well.
• 10:58
  [UNKNOWN]: He calls his shots in the Republican party.
• 11:00
  [UNKNOWN]: And if you go against that, he will pour his wrath out upon you and it doesn't typically turn out well.
• 11:06
  [UNKNOWN]: Is Harriet and his said before, go against Trump in a primary and you wind up in the grinder.
• 11:11
  [UNKNOWN]: And that's what happened in Indiana.
• 11:12
  [UNKNOWN]: To me, what I was looking for tonight was the forward-looking lessons here.
• 11:17
  [UNKNOWN]: For instance, what's going to happen in Kentucky in a couple of weeks in that fourth congressional district where Thomas Massey is the one congressional Republican who has been the biggest thorn in Donald Trump's side.
• 11:27
  [UNKNOWN]: They have poured millions into that race and a lot of people are wondering, could he withstand a challenge from a Trump backed challenger there?
• 11:35
  [UNKNOWN]: If you look at what happened in Indiana tonight in your Thomas Massey tonight or your anybody else in a primary right now, where Trump's on the other side of you.
• 11:42
  [UNKNOWN]: You got to be thinking, this is a bad night for me, but bottom line is there's always plenty of money in politics and it's always a president's priorities and prerogatives that call the shots in his or her political party and here we are.
• 11:54
  [UNKNOWN]: And indeed, Scott, as usual, was spot on just this past Saturday.
• 11:59
  [UNKNOWN]: The ultra repulsive Louisiana Center, Bill Cassidy, who voted to convict Donald Trump in that shaman impeachment trial back in January of 2021, he got his butt handed to him.
• 12:14
  [UNKNOWN]: He was decimated in his primary.
• 12:16
  [UNKNOWN]: He was, he made history as the first incumbent center to come in third.
• 12:21
  [UNKNOWN]: in his primary in over 60 years.
• 12:25
  [UNKNOWN]: And then of course, the big one, the showdown which Scott Jennings was just a looting to there between Trump and his ultra-nemesis Tom Massey in Kentucky's fourth district.
• 12:38
  [UNKNOWN]: And, again, it wasn't even close.
• 12:41
  [UNKNOWN]: It was one of those like, you know, Mike Tyson, Michael Spinks fights, you know, was there just huge lead up the two big heavy weights and it was over 91 seconds.
• 12:52
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, Massey was pummeled by Trump endorsed Ed Gallerine.
• 12:57
  [UNKNOWN]: He lost by double digits.
• 12:59
  [UNKNOWN]: The race was called within an hour of polls closing.
• 13:02
  [UNKNOWN]: He lost by 10 points.
• 13:04
  [UNKNOWN]: It wasn't
• 13:05
  [UNKNOWN]: unmistakable message that Trump has total iron control over the GOP, whether they like it or not.
• 13:15
  [UNKNOWN]: Whether they like it, the Republican Party is being remade in Trump's image.
• 13:21
  [UNKNOWN]: The Republican Party is now officially the Maga Party, just ask Dan Crenshaw.
• 13:27
  [UNKNOWN]: Or better, even if it just asks Texas Senator John Corneon.
• 13:31
  [UNKNOWN]: mile mile was that a bombshell.
• 13:34
  [UNKNOWN]: In many respects, the most seismic event this week did not happen in Kentucky.
• 13:41
  [UNKNOWN]: It happened in its backdrop because he endorsed Ken Paxton that Tuesday morning at the Kentucky primary.
• 13:49
  [UNKNOWN]: So it was a bit overshadowed, but it really actually happened in Texas.
• 13:53
  [UNKNOWN]: Donald Trump looked, I want you to get this.
• 13:56
  [UNKNOWN]: He looked at a 24 year Senate veteran.
• 14:00
  [UNKNOWN]: John Coranett, the senior United States Center from Texas, the former Senate Majority Whip, one of the most entrenched figures in the entire Washington establishment.
• 14:10
  [UNKNOWN]: He was a future Senate Majority Leader and Trump endorsed his opponent.
• 14:17
  [UNKNOWN]: Texas's Attorney General Ken Paxton for the Senate seat.
• 14:20
  [UNKNOWN]: Trump turned his back on Coranett and in doing so, he demonstrated his total and complete
• 14:29
  [UNKNOWN]: to stain for the whole of the Rhino Republican Senate establishment who literally do nothing of value when it comes to advancing the maga agenda in the Senate.
• 14:41
  [UNKNOWN]: They did the BBB and that's it.
• 14:45
  [UNKNOWN]: And that's key.
• 14:45
  [UNKNOWN]: Remember, Paxton offered to drop out of the Senate primary of Corn and agreed to finally
• 14:56
  [UNKNOWN]: Corrent Corrent had no political choice in order for his own survival.
• 15:01
  [UNKNOWN]: He agreed.
• 15:01
  [UNKNOWN]: He's always been in the establishment hack.
• 15:04
  [UNKNOWN]: He's always defended the filibuster.
• 15:06
  [UNKNOWN]: They need to turn around, wrote and up.
• 15:07
  [UNKNOWN]: And so all right, that's it.
• 15:08
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm turning my back on the filibuster.
• 15:10
  [UNKNOWN]: We have to pay a pass to save back.
• 15:14
  [UNKNOWN]: I think he was kind of lackluster milk toast with that.
• 15:18
  [UNKNOWN]: But he did flip.
• 15:19
  [UNKNOWN]: He got on board of getting rid of the filibuster past the save act, but his fellow rhino establishment Republicans didn't move an inch on it.
• 15:30
  [UNKNOWN]: And so when he turned around, looking for their help, he was like, yo, guys, guys,
• 15:38
  [UNKNOWN]: And in failing to pass either of those legislative priorities, Trump just absolutely I was going to do a chop, but I think it's better gut punch the establishment and endorse the incumbent senators primary challenge knocking out a 24 year Senate veteran and the betting markets.
• 15:58
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean.
• 15:59
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, I'm not kidding.
• 16:00
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, obviously, Corne in his gone, he's lost.
• 16:02
  [UNKNOWN]: Everyone's like, well, he may look, no, he's lost.
• 16:04
  [UNKNOWN]: The betting markets recognized it instantly before the endorsement.
• 16:08
  [UNKNOWN]: Ken Paxon was sitting at roughly, he was in a lead, but roughly it about 48 percent odds in the prediction markets.
• 16:14
  [UNKNOWN]: Within hours at Trump's true social post endorsing Paxon, Paxon shot up nearly to 100 percent to get the nomination.
• 16:21
  [UNKNOWN]: And Corne and Collapse to single digits.
• 16:23
  [UNKNOWN]: That's not a campaign shift, that's a total annihilation, as a result of one endorsement, one post done.
• 16:35
  [UNKNOWN]: Now, why does this matter so much beyond just Texas?
• 16:41
  [UNKNOWN]: think about what that endorsement signals to every single Republican senator and congressman across the country who's been playing both sides.
• 16:50
  [UNKNOWN]: Every rhino in the Senate who's been quietly working to block Trump's agenda while publicly pretending to support it.
• 16:59
  [UNKNOWN]: every establishment Republican who's been counting on their and combsy advantage and their DC donor network to carry them through another cycle.
• 17:09
  [UNKNOWN]: John Cornean had all of it, the money, the establishment backing, decades of name recognition, the Fox News seal of approval, and it was all for no, it all came crashing down with one single social media post.
• 17:29
  [UNKNOWN]: That's the power that this Trumpian presidency has over the Republican party.
• 17:36
  [UNKNOWN]: And here's the deeper strategic genius of what Trump just did here.
• 17:42
  [UNKNOWN]: John Corne is not just any rhino.
• 17:45
  [UNKNOWN]: John Cornean is actually the closest Senate ally to none other than majority leader John Thun.
• 17:51
  [UNKNOWN]: The man who's been the single greatest obstacle to the Save America Act, the man who refuses to nuke the filibuster, the man who's entire political strategy is to keep Trump's agenda permanently bottled up in procedural amber.
• 18:06
  [UNKNOWN]: By targeting Cornean, Trump is sending an unmistakable message to Thun.
• 18:15
  [UNKNOWN]: The presidential endorsement is no longer a formality.
• 18:19
  [UNKNOWN]: It's no longer a courtesy.
• 18:21
  [UNKNOWN]: It's no longer a political fee.
• 18:23
  [UNKNOWN]: It is now a weapon.
• 18:26
  [UNKNOWN]: And Trump just showed the entire Republican Party exactly how that weapon works.
• 18:33
  [UNKNOWN]: Now, while all of this is happening, many of you may have missed the political earthquake that happened in the state of Georgia this week.
• 18:43
  [UNKNOWN]: There were two Georgia Supreme Court seats on the ballot Tuesday night, the same night, that Massey went down.
• 18:50
  [UNKNOWN]: You had the Republican Charlie Bethel versus the ultra-woke Democrat Miracle Rankin in One Race, and then you had the presiding justice, the Republican Sarah Warren versus former Democrat
• 19:03
  [UNKNOWN]: in the other race.
• 19:04
  [UNKNOWN]: Now, technically, technically, these are officially non-partisan races, but, yeah, let's be clear, everyone knows who's side everybody's on.
• 19:14
  [UNKNOWN]: And guess who the Democrats rolled out to get the voters out?
• 19:18
  [UNKNOWN]: Yep, Barack Hussein Obama.
• 19:22
  [UNKNOWN]: Well, you skipped one, guys.
• 19:25
  [UNKNOWN]: You should have one there.
• 19:26
  [UNKNOWN]: Where's brought no.
• 19:27
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, you missed it.
• 19:29
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh my, I love my producers.
• 19:31
  [UNKNOWN]: I love them.
• 19:31
  [UNKNOWN]: But sometimes I just can't, did I miss it there?
• 19:34
  [UNKNOWN]: Maybe I forgot to put it in my notes there.
• 19:36
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, Barack Hussein Obama, Obama himself came off the sidelines to personally endorse Rankin and Jordan for the Georgia Supreme Court.
• 19:45
  [UNKNOWN]: He posted a statement calling these races critical to voting rights and basic freedoms blah, blah, blah, blah.
• 19:50
  [UNKNOWN]: He uses full more on political capital to try to drag the Democrat candidates over the finish line in a state that Democrats have been desperately trying to lock down as their midterm centerpiece, Georgia.
• 20:03
  [UNKNOWN]: The results, now you can show it, it was a GOP blowout, an absolute blowout, Charlie Bathowon, Sarah Warren, Sarah Warren, one of them, 60% of the vote, Trump's endorsed picks, when 100% in every race Tuesday, Obama's endorsements went zero for two.
• 20:33
  [UNKNOWN]: voters in what may be the most pivotal swing state in the 2026 midterm map chose Republicans over Democrats and statewide races while Democratic energy was supposedly at its highest they were the most enthusiastic they were the most jazz they couldn't wait to get out and vote remember the Wisconsin Supreme Court state Supreme Court vote they killed us they clocked us the same thing was supposed to happen here and it didn't.
• 21:00
  [UNKNOWN]: Both, not one, two Republicans, one, handle it.
• 21:05
  [UNKNOWN]: And here's the civilizational bottom line about what this means.
• 21:10
  [UNKNOWN]: Republican-based voters are awake in a way they simply have not been in an off-year election and modern memory.
• 21:19
  [UNKNOWN]: These are the kind of state Supreme Court races that Republicans have routinely lost for years, I.E.
• 21:25
  [UNKNOWN]: Wisconsin, because low-prepensity Macaboters simply don't show up for low-profile races, but that simply didn't happen here.
• 21:35
  [UNKNOWN]: Those low propensity voters showed up on Tuesday.
• 21:38
  [UNKNOWN]: They showed up in Georgia.
• 21:39
  [UNKNOWN]: They showed up in Kentucky.
• 21:41
  [UNKNOWN]: They showed up in elections all across the country.
• 21:44
  [UNKNOWN]: And they sent one unmistakable message.
• 21:48
  [UNKNOWN]: We want MAGA.
• 21:50
  [UNKNOWN]: We voted for Trump, and we want Trump's America first agenda as he defines it as heat of not some faction, not some splinter or marginal group, not such some interest group.
• 22:04
  [UNKNOWN]: It's Trump's agenda that we voted for and Trump's alone.
• 22:09
  [UNKNOWN]: Again, this is nothing.
• 22:14
  [UNKNOWN]: This is actually just the tip of the iceberg.
• 22:17
  [UNKNOWN]: because Trump is changing politics and far more profound and fundamental ways and simply his endorsements.
• 22:24
  [UNKNOWN]: He is overseeing the literal remapping of the nation's congressional districts and more and more pundits are now shocked to discover that involves nothing less.
• 22:37
  [UNKNOWN]: than a permanent Republican congressional majority for the next generation.
• 22:44
  [UNKNOWN]: It's really happening and it's bigger than anyone, could have ever imagined.
• 22:49
  [UNKNOWN]: But first gang, if you are just joining us, our super chats are up to feel free to send in your comments and questions.
• 22:55
  [UNKNOWN]: I'll be happy to answer them on our livestream here.
• 22:58
  [UNKNOWN]: Also, yeah, let's face it.
• 22:59
  [UNKNOWN]: You had a number in your head, right?
• 23:02
  [UNKNOWN]: The number you thought would be enough to retire.
• 23:07
  [UNKNOWN]: And up, and now the question isn't whether you saved, it's whether what you saved could still buy the retirement, you plan for, I mean, think about what's happening right now, we got war, we got oil spiking and then everything gets higher gas, groceries and insurance bills.
• 23:22
  [UNKNOWN]: We've seen this before, we're watching a structural shift in the global economy where inflation isn't temporary, it's embedded, and historically when that happens, purchasing power doesn't recover, it erodes.
• 23:35
  [UNKNOWN]: So your dollar buys less, your savings carry less, and people who are counting down the retirement start wondering if they have to push it back, all because the cost of living move the finish line.
• 23:47
  [UNKNOWN]: That was my wake up call, and I knew there had to be something else I could do to protect what I built.
• 23:52
  [UNKNOWN]: So I research and that's when I found Augusta precious metals.
• 23:56
  [UNKNOWN]: And gang, they taught me things I didn't even know were possible.
• 24:00
  [UNKNOWN]: I had no idea you could move your IRA or 401k into physical gold, tax free, and penalty free.
• 24:08
  [UNKNOWN]: A real asset that's held its value through war, oil spikes, and market chaos.
• 24:13
  [UNKNOWN]: And that changed everything for me.
• 24:16
  [UNKNOWN]: I spoken with Augusta's education team and these guys, I'm telling you, they know there's stuff.
• 24:21
  [UNKNOWN]: And they explain it so clearly.
• 24:22
  [UNKNOWN]: So here's what I recommend you do right now.
• 24:25
  [UNKNOWN]: Go to turlybyesgold.com, which I do.
• 24:29
  [UNKNOWN]: I love gold, turlybyesgold.com or text, turly, to 35052 to get Augusta's free gold IRA guide.
• 24:38
  [UNKNOWN]: That's turly.
• 24:39
  [UNKNOWN]: early buysgold.com or text early to 35052 because the retirement you dreamed of is still possible, but only if you protected.
• 24:51
  [UNKNOWN]: Give them a call or text right now.
• 24:53
  [UNKNOWN]: All right.
• 24:55
  [UNKNOWN]: Feast your eyes on this glorious piece of artwork.
• 25:00
  [UNKNOWN]: This wonderful map.
• 25:02
  [UNKNOWN]: This deep, deep, deep red map.
• 25:05
  [UNKNOWN]: This is the latest midterms forecast map from inside elections.
• 25:10
  [UNKNOWN]: They have the GOP now at a solid 215 seats going into the midterms.
• 25:17
  [UNKNOWN]: Nearly 10 more.
• 25:19
  [UNKNOWN]: than the Democrats, the Republicans need only three more seats to keep the majority, that's at according to inside elections.
• 25:29
  [UNKNOWN]: Now again, this is astonishing here.
• 25:32
  [UNKNOWN]: We have not seen this before.
• 25:34
  [UNKNOWN]: We've not seen the GOP in a midterm election when they're the party in power going into a midterms ahead.
• 25:44
  [UNKNOWN]: It's almost always inevitably, the Denver, of course.
• 25:47
  [UNKNOWN]: It's always the Democrat, the key is, remember, mid-term elections for the party in power sucks.
• 25:56
  [UNKNOWN]: Midterm elections for the party in power sucks.
• 25:59
  [UNKNOWN]: Our good friend Seth Cashley, election analyst likes to say that.
• 26:02
  [UNKNOWN]: There's just no way around it.
• 26:04
  [UNKNOWN]: There's only been three times in the last century where the party in power has not lost seats in the midterms.
• 26:10
  [UNKNOWN]: Three.
• 26:13
  [UNKNOWN]: But if ever there were a fourth, I think we're staring at it.
• 26:17
  [UNKNOWN]: Now, the key here, what's very important is that this isn't about polling.
• 26:24
  [UNKNOWN]: It's not about the generic ballot of who you're going to vote for in the lives.
• 26:28
  [UNKNOWN]: This is about the structural architecture of permanent victory.
• 26:34
  [UNKNOWN]: Now, the foundation for this architecture is, of course, the Supreme Court's April 29th ruling in Louisiana versus Kale, a six to three decision authored by Justice Alito, the fundamentally transformed the redistricting landscape.
• 26:50
  [UNKNOWN]: The court ruled that Louisiana's majority black district was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander and in doing so, significantly raised the evidentiary burden for racial discrimination claims under section two of the voting rights act.
• 27:08
  [UNKNOWN]: So up until that point, just I've many of you know this, but up to this point,
• 27:13
  [UNKNOWN]: The Democrats invented this concept of vote dilution where if you kid you not, if you have too many whites in a district, then black voters are disenfranchised because they'll never get the politician they want elected.
• 27:33
  [UNKNOWN]: And they did the same thing with Latina, or any non-white group, that's why they started creating what are called majority minority,
• 27:40
  [UNKNOWN]: districts they actually use this notion of white vote dilution under section to voting rights act.
• 27:48
  [UNKNOWN]: To more or less redraw the the congressional district maps across the country guaranteeing Democrat seats.
• 27:59
  [UNKNOWN]: Those days are over.
• 28:02
  [UNKNOWN]: The Supreme Court came in and said, um,
• 28:10
  [UNKNOWN]: you're not getting rid of discrimination aren't you just projecting and aren't you just relocating it now to whites aren't you telling whites that they can't vote in a certain district because of the color of their skin.
• 28:23
  [UNKNOWN]: So the collitis decision is just it literally changes everything.
• 28:28
  [UNKNOWN]: It overturned the Democrats' entire structural strategy for congressional majorities.
• 28:37
  [UNKNOWN]: And the ruling got immediately almost immediately effectuated as it were.
• 28:43
  [UNKNOWN]: It was in just five.
• 28:44
  [UNKNOWN]: Normally there was a 32-day standard window before you start enforcing.
• 28:51
  [UNKNOWN]: a Supreme Court decision, they started enforcing it within five days, and that enabled states to immediately begin redrawing maps.
• 29:01
  [UNKNOWN]: What the six conservative justice is said is unmistakable.
• 29:08
  [UNKNOWN]: You cannot use race.
• 29:11
  [UNKNOWN]: I can't even believe I have to say this.
• 29:13
  [UNKNOWN]: You cannot use race as the dominant factor in drawing congressional districts.
• 29:19
  [UNKNOWN]: Even if you call it, I don't care if you call it a remedy.
• 29:22
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't care if you call it justice.
• 29:23
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't care what you call it equity.
• 29:26
  [UNKNOWN]: Call it Stephen, call it whatever you want.
• 29:28
  [UNKNOWN]: It's still wrong.
• 29:30
  [UNKNOWN]: It's still reverse racism.
• 29:32
  [UNKNOWN]: And the ripple effects are going to be felt
• 29:36
  [UNKNOWN]: by this from Florida and Mississippi to Virginia to every single state where Democrats have been weaponizing race to guarantee literally hundreds of congressional seats and I'm not being hyperbolic.
• 29:50
  [UNKNOWN]: This isn't a matter of a couple of dozen here or there like political originally projected.
• 29:57
  [UNKNOWN]: We're talking 100, the American spectator just published a very interesting piece.
• 30:03
  [UNKNOWN]: Seriously asking the question is to whether the Democrat party could even survive the collay decision given it's so much of their power has been accumulated over the last four decades based more in geography than issues.
• 30:19
  [UNKNOWN]: The spectator noted that the Democrats are poised to lose not just seats,
• 30:24
  [UNKNOWN]: They are on the cusp instead of structural institutional and perhaps permanent collapse as a viable national party.
• 30:34
  [UNKNOWN]: And here's why that conclusion is not as hyperbolic as it might sound.
• 30:39
  [UNKNOWN]: Ballet Pedia.
• 30:41
  [UNKNOWN]: use data straight from the U.S. Census Bureau's 2024 American Community Survey.
• 30:45
  [UNKNOWN]: And they identified 148 house districts that were drawn with race as the predominant factor under the old section to standard, under the vote dilution standard.
• 31:07
  [UNKNOWN]: That's a full one-third of the entire House of Representatives.
• 31:10
  [UNKNOWN]: And of those 148 districts, 128, 128, 128 are currently held by Democrats.
• 31:19
  [UNKNOWN]: 122, gang, that's more than half of the Democrats entire 112 seat house caucus sitting on maps that collage us declared legally suspect.
• 31:31
  [UNKNOWN]: more than half their entire caucus built on the foundation of race-based cartography that the Supreme Court has now condemned.
• 31:42
  [UNKNOWN]: And if you could believe it, it actually gets worse.
• 31:46
  [UNKNOWN]: The Democrat Stacey Abrams, right?
• 31:48
  [UNKNOWN]: The two-time loser for Georgia's governor.
• 31:51
  [UNKNOWN]: to her credit, she's openly panicking about the scope of the problem for Democrats.
• 31:58
  [UNKNOWN]: Because she's arguing to scope goes way beyond congressional redistricting.
• 32:03
  [UNKNOWN]: That's what so many people don't get.
• 32:04
  [UNKNOWN]: Colladen just addressed the drawing of federal congressional lines.
• 32:09
  [UNKNOWN]: It lay down a constitutional principle that race cannot be the predominant factor in drawing any electoral district.
• 32:18
  [UNKNOWN]: That means state legislative districts.
• 32:21
  [UNKNOWN]: That means county commission districts.
• 32:23
  [UNKNOWN]: That means school board districts.
• 32:26
  [UNKNOWN]: That means city council district maps.
• 32:29
  [UNKNOWN]: In short, hundreds upon hundreds of districts deliberately drawn at the local and state level under the old section to standard are now legally and constitutionally vulnerable.
• 32:42
  [UNKNOWN]: Even the ACLU is acknowledging this.
• 32:45
  [UNKNOWN]: Warning that the ruling affects not only congressional redistricting, but challenges to state legislative and local election systems across the country.
• 32:54
  [UNKNOWN]: Agram's outfit, her non-profit fair fight, I think it's going through a little investigation.
• 33:00
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't, I shouldn't say that, out loud, but they put out a report projecting that Republicans could pick up as many as 30 congressional seats alone in 2026 and 2028.
• 33:10
  [UNKNOWN]: But again, it's not just Congress, the downstream effect on state legislatures and local government across the country could be even more profound.
• 33:25
  [UNKNOWN]: literally hundreds of local seats because of the required redistricting post-colae.
• 33:33
  [UNKNOWN]: The Democrats built their entire political infrastructure, their bench, their pipeline, their community organizing works on a foundation of race, engineered, local representation, and collage, just crack that foundation from top to bottom.
• 33:52
  [UNKNOWN]: closing the loop here on the midterms, Democrats are now in a position where they would need to flip seats that Republicans have now gerrymandered into fortress territory in states like Florida, Texas, Ohio, Tennessee, Missouri, North Carolina, and beyond.
• 34:12
  [UNKNOWN]: Keep in mind,
• 34:13
  [UNKNOWN]: This insides elections map.
• 34:15
  [UNKNOWN]: Let's put that up again because I just, I think it's so beautiful.
• 34:18
  [UNKNOWN]: It's like a work of art.
• 34:19
  [UNKNOWN]: It doesn't yet include there it is.
• 34:21
  [UNKNOWN]: Beautiful.
• 34:21
  [UNKNOWN]: It doesn't yet include the new seats we're seeing coming from states like South Carolina or the new seat from Mississippi or the new seats as many as four coming from Georgia at least by 2028.
• 34:34
  [UNKNOWN]: And we can keep going on and on and on.
• 34:36
  [UNKNOWN]: The redistricting
• 34:43
  [UNKNOWN]: nothing, and it's none other than panicked Democrats openly, admitting it.
• 34:54
  [UNKNOWN]: The structural map has shifted underneath their feet, and most of the legacy media hasn't even begun to explain to their dwindling audiences how seismic the shift actually is.
• 35:06
  [UNKNOWN]: But if you can believe it, it gets even better.
• 35:09
  [UNKNOWN]: because the structural advantages are not just on the map, they're in the money, the two 10 to go together, and the money tends to follow the maps.
• 35:19
  [UNKNOWN]: And so that we're not just talking voter roles here.
• 35:23
  [UNKNOWN]: Let's start with the money here, because these numbers are absolutely breathtaking.
• 35:30
  [UNKNOWN]: The lifeblood of politics, gang, money, cash, when it comes to cash on hand,
• 35:36
  [UNKNOWN]: The Republican National Community R&C is absolutely blowing the Democrats out the water.
• 35:44
  [UNKNOWN]: Look at these numbers.
• 35:45
  [UNKNOWN]: The R&C now has nearly $124 million cash on hand, and by the way, they're debt free.
• 35:55
  [UNKNOWN]: The Democrats are stuck at just over 14 mil.
• 35:59
  [UNKNOWN]: It's absolutely insane.
• 36:01
  [UNKNOWN]: Do you see what happens when you get rid of USAID?
• 36:04
  [UNKNOWN]: Isn't it wonderful?
• 36:06
  [UNKNOWN]: 124 mil, the barely 14 mil.
• 36:08
  [UNKNOWN]: Republicans are literally out fundraising the Democrats nine to one.
• 36:12
  [UNKNOWN]: And to make it even worse, I mentioned that the RNC is debt free.
• 36:19
  [UNKNOWN]: Ain't that way for the Democrats, they reportedly 17 mil in debt.
• 36:25
  [UNKNOWN]: That means the DNC started 2026 broke, negative, net worth.
• 36:31
  [UNKNOWN]: And they've all the money they waste in Virginia.
• 36:33
  [UNKNOWN]: The whole cherry-mandering referendum, Hindenburg, that went down in flames.
• 36:39
  [UNKNOWN]: They port tens of millions of dollars only to see the whole thing go up and smoke.
• 36:45
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh, and by the way, that 124 million, it's nothing.
• 36:49
  [UNKNOWN]: For the RNC, that's just the front door to the mansion here.
• 36:55
  [UNKNOWN]: It's a trickle in the ocean.
• 36:57
  [UNKNOWN]: Pick your metaphor, take a look at this.
• 37:00
  [UNKNOWN]: Again, if you wanna see how dominant Trump is in this political realignment, Trump has a mast, a near one billion dollars that's billion with a B,
• 37:14
  [UNKNOWN]: war chest for the midterms.
• 37:16
  [UNKNOWN]: That's three X.
• 37:18
  [UNKNOWN]: What the entire Democrat party has been able to put together.
• 37:22
  [UNKNOWN]: One billion.
• 37:24
  [UNKNOWN]: Democrats are not just being out redistricted.
• 37:27
  [UNKNOWN]: They're being out spent.
• 37:29
  [UNKNOWN]: It's not just the map that's against them.
• 37:32
  [UNKNOWN]: It's the money.
• 37:33
  [UNKNOWN]: And again, they don't have a figure like Trump that can raise that kind of cash that has that kind of political power,
• 37:43
  [UNKNOWN]: This is not a marginal fundraising edge.
• 37:45
  [UNKNOWN]: This is total financial dominance.
• 37:49
  [UNKNOWN]: But we're not through.
• 37:51
  [UNKNOWN]: It gets even better because now there's the voter registration numbers, which are the most accurate predictive indicators for how an election turns out again.
• 38:01
  [UNKNOWN]: Notice that I'm not appealing to polls here.
• 38:04
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm appealing to structural realignments.
• 38:07
  [UNKNOWN]: The results are baked into the structures.
• 38:11
  [UNKNOWN]: Our good friend election analysis, I mentioned Seth Cashell.
• 38:14
  [UNKNOWN]: He is confirmed that the Republican voter registration advantage is continuing as we speak.
• 38:21
  [UNKNOWN]: There's now a near six year voter realignment, a six year voter registration advantage that is completely reshaping the electoral map across all 30 states that track party affiliation.
• 38:36
  [UNKNOWN]: Democrats have lost a net of over five million voters to Republicans since 2020.
• 38:42
  [UNKNOWN]: Can you imagine how many they've lost since the mass deportations or since the mass voter role purchase that's had been happening over the last.
• 38:51
  [UNKNOWN]: 16 months or so.
• 38:52
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, it's absolutely astonishing, even in Pennsylvania, my backyard here, where things are low, where they were looking a little iffy there for the last couple of months with some big games by Democrats, even there, the Republicans have regained the lead in voter registration.
• 39:07
  [UNKNOWN]: And the key here is that voter registration is not just at snapshot today's political preferences.
• 39:13
  [UNKNOWN]: It's a geological record of
• 39:19
  [UNKNOWN]: When a voter changes their registration from Democrat to Republican, they're not just casting a vote, they're making an identity declaration.
• 39:29
  [UNKNOWN]: Rarely does a voter deliberately identifies a registered vote and then turn around and vote for the other identity.
• 39:36
  [UNKNOWN]: And we're watching that declaration happen on a mass scale and battleground states and swing counties and local communities that are working together with the new map and the mass of money that's giving the GOP a very real structural advantage going into these midterms.
• 39:56
  [UNKNOWN]: So, in some, what is all of this ultimately mean?
• 40:02
  [UNKNOWN]: The 37 and 0 endorsement sweep.
• 40:05
  [UNKNOWN]: the Massey and Corn and earthquakes, the Georgia Bell Weather Result, the redistricting revolution, the billion dollar financial fortress, the voter registration title wave.
• 40:18
  [UNKNOWN]: What are we actually watching here?
• 40:21
  [UNKNOWN]: I would argue that we're watching the full expression of what I've been calling a civilizational realignment happening at every level of the American political system simultaneously, down ballot, up ballot on the map in the money, in the voter rolls, in the courtrooms.
• 40:42
  [UNKNOWN]: Donald Trump is not just the most dominant figure in American electoral politics.
• 40:49
  [UNKNOWN]: He is systematically rebuilding the Republican Party from the precinct level to the Senate cloakroom.
• 40:57
  [UNKNOWN]: He is retiring the establishment candidates who blocked his agenda.
• 41:02
  [UNKNOWN]: He's installing Magaloyalus who will fight.
• 41:06
  [UNKNOWN]: He's reshaping the Congressional map with a redistricting revolution that Democrats have no legal tools left to stop, like I said, they're helpless.
• 41:18
  [UNKNOWN]: When a party is 215 safe seats and only needs three more to keep the majority.
• 41:26
  [UNKNOWN]: When it has eight times, it's opponents cash reserves.
• 41:30
  [UNKNOWN]: When it's voter registration is surging in states like Nevada, North Carolina, and Florida, when it's base voters are showing up for state supreme court races in Georgia, levels not seen in a generation, that's not a party stumbling towards defeat.
• 41:45
  [UNKNOWN]: That's a party that's been strategically repositioned,
• 41:52
  [UNKNOWN]: MATLINE by MATLINE endorsement by endorsement for exactly this moment.
• 42:01
  [UNKNOWN]: The Democrats' dumpster fire is burning.
• 42:07
  [UNKNOWN]: They're in total disarray, maybe we could talk about their autopsy report.
• 42:11
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't know if you saw that, but they can't even, they can't even openly say why they lost in that landslide election back in 2024.
• 42:20
  [UNKNOWN]: They can't openly say it.
• 42:22
  [UNKNOWN]: They can't even agree where the dumpster is.
• 42:26
  [UNKNOWN]: The Republicans by contrast, they're building a cathedral.
• 42:35
  [UNKNOWN]: It is making America great again in ways we never, even imagined.
• 42:45
  [UNKNOWN]: Over to you guys.
• 42:46
  [UNKNOWN]: Over to you.
• 42:46
  [UNKNOWN]: I want to hear what you have to say.
• 42:48
  [UNKNOWN]: Remember our super chats are live, so our moderator Josh is putting together your questions.
• 42:53
  [UNKNOWN]: If you have any questions, go ahead and shoot them over to us.
• 42:57
  [UNKNOWN]: It'll be my honor, my privilege to answer them during this livestream.
• 43:00
  [UNKNOWN]: Also, did you know that US life expectancy actually peaked at 78 years back in 2014?
• 43:07
  [UNKNOWN]: and global life expectancy is declining for the like the first time in 30 years because people are aging faster than ever before.
• 43:14
  [UNKNOWN]: And this is largely due to more toxins in the air and chemicals in our soil and our food and other external factors that are new to us.
• 43:22
  [UNKNOWN]: Now what most people don't know is that we can actually fight aging on a cellular level.
• 43:28
  [UNKNOWN]: Scientists have discovered that kimchi actually slows the aging process of human cells, helping to protect them and delay aging.
• 43:37
  [UNKNOWN]: The power of nature can outweigh the power of pharmaceuticals without the nasty side effects.
• 43:43
  [UNKNOWN]: And now you get all the benefits of kimchi,
• 43:45
  [UNKNOWN]: This simple capsule with kimchi one, I take kimchi one every single day, I absolutely love it.
• 43:51
  [UNKNOWN]: Each capsule delivers over 900 probiotic strains plus antioxidants and enzymes that support your digestion, your metabolism, your skin health from the inside out.
• 44:03
  [UNKNOWN]: You know, as we age, we do become more susceptible to like microbial threats and harmful viruses bacteria.
• 44:11
  [UNKNOWN]: But the beauty is that kimchi one is a natural anti-microbial.
• 44:15
  [UNKNOWN]: helping your body fight off harmful bacteria, viruses, and even toxins while boosting immunity and energy.
• 44:21
  [UNKNOWN]: Investible, kimchi 1 to 100% made in America, it's all natural, non-GMO.
• 44:27
  [UNKNOWN]: So do what I do.
• 44:28
  [UNKNOWN]: Support your gut, protect yourselves, and feel younger every day with kimchi 1 from Brightcore.
• 44:32
  [UNKNOWN]: Today you can get an exclusive offer by clicking the link below, just use Code Turley.
• 44:37
  [UNKNOWN]: for 25% off your entire order.
• 44:39
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh, you know, if we need even better deal, call my friends at Brightcore.
• 44:44
  [UNKNOWN]: You're gonna get 50% off your order, plus free shipping.
• 44:47
  [UNKNOWN]: Give them a call right now.
• 44:48
  [UNKNOWN]: Triple 8, 597, 0233, that's 888597, 0223.
• 44:53
  [UNKNOWN]: All right, Josh, what do we got?
• 44:58
  [UNKNOWN]: What do we got?
• 45:02
  [UNKNOWN]: Ehh, Fusian.
• 45:03
  [UNKNOWN]: Carol, thank you so much.
• 45:04
  [UNKNOWN]: I think it's a fun shine for Fusian.
• 45:10
  [UNKNOWN]: You know, all of the ancient New Testament scripts and ancient Greek scripts were all written in capitals and without any breaks.
• 45:19
  [UNKNOWN]: So the original manuscripts of the earliest manuscripts of the New Testament are all uncles and no breaks.
• 45:25
  [UNKNOWN]: So when I was studying that, I had to learn how to read without little dashes and breaks and so forth.
• 45:32
  [UNKNOWN]: They're called uncles.
• 45:33
  [UNKNOWN]: And unfortunately, as you can see, fun, shine, Kelly.
• 45:36
  [UNKNOWN]: I have lost that ability.
• 45:37
  [UNKNOWN]: Thank you so much for the super stick.
• 45:39
  [UNKNOWN]: A very nice, very kind of it.
• 45:42
  [UNKNOWN]: Avoid spikes super stick.
• 45:43
  [UNKNOWN]: Thank you, sir.
• 45:44
  [UNKNOWN]: Very kind.
• 45:47
  [UNKNOWN]: Maximum.
• 45:48
  [UNKNOWN]: What is thinking and how is it done?
• 45:50
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh my heavens.
• 45:51
  [UNKNOWN]: Very good question, Max.
• 45:54
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah.
• 45:55
  [UNKNOWN]: What is thinking?
• 45:56
  [UNKNOWN]: Um, what's so, uh, just from from the vet.
• 46:00
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, I'm going to take a swing at this here.
• 46:06
  [UNKNOWN]: what I remember of forging this.
• 46:11
  [UNKNOWN]: So we tend, as modernists, we tend to think of thinking as an action, as a practice, and it is, it is an action, it is a practice, but the ancients tend to think of thinking,
• 46:31
  [UNKNOWN]: as in many respects a revelation of eternity, a revelation of infinity, a revelation of a metaphysical world that extends beyond the physical.
• 46:50
  [UNKNOWN]: And the basic gist of this is, and this is what separates it from a lot of modern,
• 46:59
  [UNKNOWN]: views that are by the way going I mean modern day consciousness studies are actually going back more towards the ancient view that consciousness precedes creation that that the mind precedes matter, but they basically saw.
• 47:17
  [UNKNOWN]: the human mind as an indicator of a reality that cannot be reduced to the physical.
• 47:25
  [UNKNOWN]: So if I were to open up your brain, Max Miller, I'll never find your thoughts.
• 47:30
  [UNKNOWN]: I'll never find your personality.
• 47:33
  [UNKNOWN]: I'll never find your hopes, your dreams, your visions, and so forth.
• 47:37
  [UNKNOWN]: It's not part of your brain.
• 47:39
  [UNKNOWN]: it exists in the brain, and the state of the brain can impair, and, in fact, how
• 47:48
  [UNKNOWN]: I think with this image or this indicator of eternity, just like if I were in a hospital room without windows, I'm not the hospital room, I'm very distinct from it, but I'm still limited at what I can see.
• 48:09
  [UNKNOWN]: So the brain can, in fact, no question, and does, in fact,
• 48:14
  [UNKNOWN]: how and what we see.
• 48:15
  [UNKNOWN]: Never the less the fact of, and notice even just the way I'm using that term, the very, I'm using the metaphor of seeing, the act of thinking was interpreted in the ancient world as a form of seeing.
• 48:35
  [UNKNOWN]: They use the term theory for it.
• 48:37
  [UNKNOWN]: So literally means to gaze.
• 48:41
  [UNKNOWN]: I see the world as a met as a form of a metaphysical reality that is not of this world.
• 48:49
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh, a reality that exists, but it is not a biology chemistry in physics.
• 48:56
  [UNKNOWN]: and it's not time space and manner.
• 48:58
  [UNKNOWN]: It goes, so that's what we mean by spiritualhood.
• 49:01
  [UNKNOWN]: It's a, I don't like the word because it has, you know, that has kind of guru like connotations in our modern world today, but all it means is it's not dependent on physical, tangible biological chemical processes as it were.
• 49:21
  [UNKNOWN]: biological, chemical, physical processes are ultimately dependent on it, mind-preseeds matter.
• 49:27
  [UNKNOWN]: So our thinking is the action we're engaged in that reveals that right ordering of reality, that our personalities,
• 49:40
  [UNKNOWN]: our thoughts, our goals, our aspirations are all reflections of a reality that exists outside the physical world, that is the basis for the physical world, and then, and then, that
• 49:59
  [UNKNOWN]: that trans-physical world has invaded its come into this body.
• 50:06
  [UNKNOWN]: We've got fused in this body and there's different conceptions of insolment in relation to the body.
• 50:13
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm generally agnostic with that, but, and so, and so, when I'm doing right now, is I am in a very real way,
• 50:27
  [UNKNOWN]: with a non-physical reality.
• 50:30
  [UNKNOWN]: by virtue of the fact of my thinking and my consciousness and my speaking and the like.
• 50:35
  [UNKNOWN]: Hence why the ultimate thinking for the ancient world was called contemplation, which meant to think thoughts in accordance with the temple.
• 50:44
  [UNKNOWN]: The Latin is con-templari, con-is-with-templari temple.
• 50:49
  [UNKNOWN]: To think thoughts in accordance with the gods, quite literally.
• 50:53
  [UNKNOWN]: So that's thinking, thinking is it's the,
• 51:00
  [UNKNOWN]: within us, and it is the Christian tradition, it is one of the key elements of being an image of God, receiving the communicable attributes of God that makes humanity distinct in the world as God's, literally God's representative in the world as being sons of God, as well as mediators, because we've got minds that are more akin to heaven, but we've got bodies
• 51:29
  [UNKNOWN]: heaven and earth together.
• 51:30
  [UNKNOWN]: Of course, our sin destroyed.
• 51:32
  [UNKNOWN]: That's so there need to be a new mediator.
• 51:34
  [UNKNOWN]: And hence there's Christ and Christ is the one who restores that Adamic mediation of bringing heaven and earth together in his divinity and his humanity.
• 51:43
  [UNKNOWN]: So there you go.
• 51:46
  [UNKNOWN]: rebel squirrel.
• 51:47
  [UNKNOWN]: I think President Trump is the monopolitical reincarnation of
• 51:55
  [UNKNOWN]: That's Victor Davis Hanson said that over and over and over again, the historian, that the more and more he studies the Trump, the more and more he studies history, then that's he is convinced he is basically a modern version.
• 52:10
  [UNKNOWN]: of jacks and both political outsiders became leaders of anti-establishment populist movements that fundamentally transform American politics and government had plenty of enemies too, we might add lots of lots of obstacles in their way in the process so absolutely rebel, I think you're you're absolutely right.
• 52:30
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, I'd love to riff off that a bit more.
• 52:34
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, we're definitely, see, this is why I don't buy the notion that I know some big, like macyites are wetting the bed over neocons taking over the maga movement.
• 52:48
  [UNKNOWN]: And I just think, you know, again, I just look at what Trump just did to corner for up in the States.
• 52:54
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, it's just so patently absurd.
• 52:57
  [UNKNOWN]: It's like, look at what he did to Cassidy.
• 53:01
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, look at what he did to Dan Crenshaw.
• 53:03
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, it's just, he doesn't, would a lot of people don't get with Trump.
• 53:08
  [UNKNOWN]: And maybe there's a rebel score check if there's a, because I don't know, I don't have the historical acumen for this.
• 53:16
  [UNKNOWN]: I wonder if there is a parallel to the way Jackson function, because Trump doesn't care what you profess to be.
• 53:25
  [UNKNOWN]: He doesn't care your ideology.
• 53:27
  [UNKNOWN]: He doesn't care if you're Neocon.
• 53:29
  [UNKNOWN]: He doesn't care if you're establishment.
• 53:31
  [UNKNOWN]: He doesn't care if you're a, if you claim to be Maga Faithful, the torch bearer for Maga, I.E.M.T.J.
• 53:39
  [UNKNOWN]: He doesn't care if you're a libertarian populist.
• 53:41
  [UNKNOWN]: He doesn't care who, he doesn't care if you're Christian,
• 53:48
  [UNKNOWN]: Are you on board?
• 53:50
  [UNKNOWN]: Are you ready for war?
• 53:52
  [UNKNOWN]: We're going in.
• 53:53
  [UNKNOWN]: We're taking over.
• 53:55
  [UNKNOWN]: We are literally taking over Washington, DC, architecturally as well as politically.
• 54:04
  [UNKNOWN]: We're taking it all over.
• 54:07
  [UNKNOWN]: The arc of liberty, by the way, just got approved.
• 54:09
  [UNKNOWN]: Yes.
• 54:10
  [UNKNOWN]: I love classical architecture.
• 54:12
  [UNKNOWN]: We're
• 54:14
  [UNKNOWN]: And then we're taking, and the process we're taking over the entire nation, we're going to create a Republican supermajority for the foreseeable future.
• 54:23
  [UNKNOWN]: Are you in?
• 54:25
  [UNKNOWN]: Are you in?
• 54:26
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh, and at the same time, we're going to create a networked multiplicity of American brokered alliances.
• 54:37
  [UNKNOWN]: stretching all the way from the Western Hemisphere through Greenland, through Europe, but primarily at this point, it looks like more central Europe and Eastern Europe.
• 54:47
  [UNKNOWN]: Through the Mediterranean, through Israel, through the Abrahamic Accords Realign Middle East, through the I2 U2 into India, into the Indo-Pacific with India, Australia and Japan, and by the way, in the process, we're going to
• 55:07
  [UNKNOWN]: We are going to literally control the four most important energy choke points on the planet, including the, uh, the, uh, the strain of Malaca after, uh, with this kind of quad.
• 55:26
  [UNKNOWN]: Iran, Australia, Japan, structure.
• 55:30
  [UNKNOWN]: We've just brought in Indonesia and Malaysia, Singapore has always been with us.
• 55:35
  [UNKNOWN]: So now we have basic control over Malaka through which trying to get 80% of its imports.
• 55:43
  [UNKNOWN]: We're going to do that just so we are going to, we are going to create a permanent MAGA majority in this country.
• 55:50
  [UNKNOWN]: And then we are going to create a permanent MAGA centered, networked, multi-polarity throughout the world, literally from North America all the way to Japan.
• 56:06
  [UNKNOWN]: Are you in?
• 56:08
  [UNKNOWN]: Are you in and what we're finding is there's a lot of people know I don't want to do it for all of their own reasons it doesn't matter Some are principle can say it doesn't matter some are true mag doesn't matter Some are well, you know, we in the established it doesn't matter are you in are you ready to play ball that's what we're here to do we're here to win when win fight fight fight and if you're not on the team
• 56:35
  [UNKNOWN]: Forget my French, only your fuck off.
• 56:39
  [UNKNOWN]: You're done.
• 56:39
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't care who you are.
• 56:41
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't care.
• 56:42
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't care if you're Marjorie Taylor Green.
• 56:45
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't care if you're Massey.
• 56:46
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't care if you're Coranan.
• 56:49
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't care if you're Thune.
• 56:50
  [UNKNOWN]: That was the message I think Coranan said to them.
• 56:52
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't care who you are.
• 56:54
  [UNKNOWN]: You're going, I don't care if you're Pence.
• 56:56
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't care if you're my vice president.
• 56:58
  [UNKNOWN]: You're gone.
• 56:59
  [UNKNOWN]: You're all aware winners, you're a loser.
• 57:02
  [UNKNOWN]: Go, go join your losers.
• 57:05
  [UNKNOWN]: So you've got, I'm really curious to what extent that's I'm going off in this whole tangent here.
• 57:11
  [UNKNOWN]: But I'm really curious to what extent Andrew Jackson reflected those very values as well.
• 57:16
  [UNKNOWN]: Perhaps in our next lives, from your predominant level scroll, I'll do a little dabbling myself as well.
• 57:21
  [UNKNOWN]: Very cool.
• 57:24
  [UNKNOWN]: uh... don't that don't join her uh... what can Donald Trump do since rhino john thun is not going to work for the american people can the senate hold a majority vote yeah yeah now they can and this is this is the ultimate frustration that trump has with thun thun is a whiner thun is whining that he doesn't have the votes
• 57:49
  [UNKNOWN]: Now, say what you want about Mike Johnson, Mike Johnson does not wine.
• 57:54
  [UNKNOWN]: And I'm very impressed with it.
• 57:56
  [UNKNOWN]: It took him a while to get his mojo and get kind of his balance.
• 58:01
  [UNKNOWN]: He found it.
• 58:03
  [UNKNOWN]: no one could have steered the the the Republican thin majority that we have in Congress like Mike Johnson he's done an excellent job kudos to him is he you know is he mag all that no again Trump don't care Trump's maga we don't need anybody else to be magas Trump's maga are you going to play or you're going to play ball right are you going to fight so the problem with
• 58:28
  [UNKNOWN]: The problem is, through and so like, well, I can't find the votes and Trump's like, well, find other votes.
• 58:34
  [UNKNOWN]: Do what you're going to, well, but then we got the fill about what then get rid of the fill of us.
• 58:38
  [UNKNOWN]: But I'll have the votes to get rid of the fill of us well, then put it as a reconciliation bill.
• 58:44
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, but then the parliamentarian won't pass it with and get rid of the parliamentarian.
• 58:48
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh, but I can't do that.
• 58:50
  [UNKNOWN]: That'll look too partisan.
• 58:51
  [UNKNOWN]: So he's he is not fighting.
• 58:53
  [UNKNOWN]: He's not a fighter.
• 58:55
  [UNKNOWN]: So here's I'm still holding out to this, but we've got two things.
• 59:03
  [UNKNOWN]: We've got Trump is going to get his save act, okay?
• 59:08
  [UNKNOWN]: No way around it.
• 59:09
  [UNKNOWN]: If he has first, if he has to sign his own executive order, he'll do it, okay?
• 59:16
  [UNKNOWN]: And then let it get beaten up in the courts or whatever, but at the very least we can begin the process of establishing,
• 59:26
  [UNKNOWN]: vote right T in elections that 90% of the population wants to see and then proof of citizenship in the like.
• 59:32
  [UNKNOWN]: So at the very least, apparently he does have a lot of evidence of how 2020 was rigged that he's going to bring forward.
• 59:41
  [UNKNOWN]: It doesn't have to convince the legacy media.
• 59:44
  [UNKNOWN]: Obviously, you can because they were part of the rigging.
• 59:47
  [UNKNOWN]: It doesn't, you don't have to convince the you just have to convince enough Republicans to start flipping out on the Republican representatives
• 59:56
  [UNKNOWN]: And then, um, so that's the first thing is he can he can sign some kind of EO, put it into action that way, you know, it's limited because he'll get held up in the courts, but so would legislation getting passed into law.
• 1:00:12
  [UNKNOWN]: But regardless, he could do that.
• 1:00:16
  [UNKNOWN]: And then I think as we get closer to the convention that he has for the midterms scheduled, I think it's an August, then I think that's when you're going to start seeing, leading up to that, you're going to see the Senate doing things because they have to.
• 1:00:34
  [UNKNOWN]: Um, we'll see what Tela sends up doing.
• 1:00:36
  [UNKNOWN]: He's been, he's been that, you know, instruction since he's leaving.
• 1:00:40
  [UNKNOWN]: He's just a just a bitter old hag.
• 1:00:43
  [UNKNOWN]: We'll see what Cassidy ends up doing.
• 1:00:44
  [UNKNOWN]: We'll see what Corne and ends up doing.
• 1:00:46
  [UNKNOWN]: Again, you can, you can give these guys a, uh, carrots.
• 1:00:51
  [UNKNOWN]: You know, this is one of the reasons why you always endorse the incumbent.
• 1:00:55
  [UNKNOWN]: congressmaner center because if you don't they won't vote for your legislation you know it's it's this is politics it's all about power it's all about leverage so i think he'll end up
• 1:01:07
  [UNKNOWN]: getting it, one way or the other.
• 1:01:10
  [UNKNOWN]: I think all of Washington was put on notice this week.
• 1:01:14
  [UNKNOWN]: This was Trump's biggest political week in many respects.
• 1:01:17
  [UNKNOWN]: And I think, you know, again, they keep they keep digging in their heels.
• 1:01:22
  [UNKNOWN]: Okay.
• 1:01:22
  [UNKNOWN]: Well, we're just not going to work.
• 1:01:25
  [UNKNOWN]: Well, first of all, then he then he signs in a yell and they'll sign another yell and they'll sign another yell, no problem.
• 1:01:32
  [UNKNOWN]: How long do you want to play this game?
• 1:01:35
  [UNKNOWN]: And then he'll, you know, and then the push back when it comes to, when it comes to reelection, those who are still in positions of power want to be reelected, they're going to have to politically perform in some way.
• 1:01:49
  [UNKNOWN]: And yeah, I got to say, I mean, with whom putting the Senate on vacation right now, I mean, they are, they're worse than worthless at this point.
• 1:01:57
  [UNKNOWN]: But that's the Senate.
• 1:01:58
  [UNKNOWN]: There's almost, you know, I almost almost want to sign with Democrats, like, just get rid
• 1:02:04
  [UNKNOWN]: ridiculous.
• 1:02:04
  [UNKNOWN]: We got the votes in the house.
• 1:02:05
  [UNKNOWN]: Let's just go with it.
• 1:02:06
  [UNKNOWN]: We got the White House.
• 1:02:08
  [UNKNOWN]: Let's just go with it.
• 1:02:08
  [UNKNOWN]: I know.
• 1:02:09
  [UNKNOWN]: It'll bite you in the end, but nevertheless, yeah.
• 1:02:13
  [UNKNOWN]: So I think Trump can do a lot to politically pressure and and sign EOs.
• 1:02:20
  [UNKNOWN]: There's a lot he can do and just soon is just a definite definite disappointment.
• 1:02:26
  [UNKNOWN]: He was not the man for the hour for sure.
• 1:02:31
  [UNKNOWN]: Brian, my good friend, I keep seeing these poll results saying that the president of the water on both the war and the economy.
• 1:02:37
  [UNKNOWN]: By senses that they're the end product to digestion, as if it were otherwise, we would see a different result in the primaries.
• 1:02:46
  [UNKNOWN]: As if it was seen, my senses that they were the end product of digestion, as if it were otherwise, we would see a different result, yes, yes, in the primaries.
• 1:02:57
  [UNKNOWN]: What is your take?
• 1:02:58
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, yeah, yeah, that's.
• 1:03:00
  [UNKNOWN]: That's my only problem with a lot of these polls.
• 1:03:05
  [UNKNOWN]: So, you know, one of the things we've learned, right?
• 1:03:08
  [UNKNOWN]: And we all love polls, we all do our polling.
• 1:03:11
  [UNKNOWN]: It's just a quick snapshot and gives you a sense of where things are.
• 1:03:15
  [UNKNOWN]: Here are there, or at least it's supposed to, but we've all learned, especially after Anne Seltzer's Kamala plus three Iowa poll, we've all learned polls are weapons, polls have been politicized, polls have been politicized, and they serve more propaganda ends than, you know, information ends, which is sad, you know, you would want, you would hope that, for example,
• 1:03:42
  [UNKNOWN]: The polling outlets that I found actually very good ironically are in Europe.
• 1:03:47
  [UNKNOWN]: European polling is very accurate.
• 1:03:49
  [UNKNOWN]: If you have a poll, usually they don't allow for polling the week leading up to the election.
• 1:03:54
  [UNKNOWN]: But if you have a poll, a week out from the election like in a French election or a Spain election or even Hungary's elections is so forth, you know,
• 1:04:10
  [UNKNOWN]: had one or two polls that looked pretty good for them, but the vast majority of the polls, all the polls showed Peter Mayart, running away with it for good reason because of at least for good reason politically speaking, given the corruption charges.
• 1:04:29
  [UNKNOWN]: So yeah, our polling is just, it's just because, so there's very few, it's become propaganda, it's very few polling outlets that I trust.
• 1:04:38
  [UNKNOWN]: But I think what you just did is I think it's very academic.
• 1:04:43
  [UNKNOWN]: I think you corroborated.
• 1:04:46
  [UNKNOWN]: You sought to corroborate the polling.
• 1:04:48
  [UNKNOWN]: And that's the key for me.
• 1:04:50
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm looking for alignment.
• 1:04:53
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm looking at the polling and I'm looking at the voter registration and I'm looking at where the money is and I'm looking at the alignment, the redistricting and I'm looking at the endorsement percentage rates and on and on and on and what and so what I'm seeing is I'm seeing all of what I like to call the structural indicators.
• 1:05:21
  [UNKNOWN]: Right.
• 1:05:21
  [UNKNOWN]: So the money, the redistricting, the voting registrations, those are really solid.
• 1:05:30
  [UNKNOWN]: Those are rock.
• 1:05:31
  [UNKNOWN]: Those don't change.
• 1:05:32
  [UNKNOWN]: You got a billion or you don't.
• 1:05:34
  [UNKNOWN]: Right.
• 1:05:35
  [UNKNOWN]: You have 15 or 16 read new seats or you don't.
• 1:05:43
  [UNKNOWN]: You've got.
• 1:05:47
  [UNKNOWN]: 1.5 million more voter registrations or you don't.
• 1:05:50
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, those are really fixed.
• 1:05:53
  [UNKNOWN]: Those are structural.
• 1:05:54
  [UNKNOWN]: I like to see.
• 1:05:55
  [UNKNOWN]: I like to balance out the polling with the structure.
• 1:06:00
  [UNKNOWN]: And one of the reason why I don't buy a lot of the pro-democrat polling is because structurally they're a mess.
• 1:06:06
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, literally everywhere, they're a mess with redistricting.
• 1:06:10
  [UNKNOWN]: They're a mess with their voter registration.
• 1:06:13
  [UNKNOWN]: They're a mess with their finances.
• 1:06:15
  [UNKNOWN]: They're a mess.
• 1:06:16
  [UNKNOWN]: And they couldn't even pass a stupid...
• 1:06:18
  [UNKNOWN]: You know, redistricting map and Virginia after their Democrat candidate, one by 15 points, they couldn't even do that.
• 1:06:27
  [UNKNOWN]: So something tells me that those polls are our suspect.
• 1:06:33
  [UNKNOWN]: So again, pulling, pulling, I'm more and more relying on the structural indicators that seem to be a lot more solid than far less manipulated than pulling.
• 1:06:58
  [UNKNOWN]: Lee Roy, is there anything the Constitution that would allow removal John Tho not to my knowledge?
• 1:07:03
  [UNKNOWN]: There isn't.
• 1:07:04
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, you mean as a senator, no, not to my knowledge, as a majority leader, yes.
• 1:07:13
  [UNKNOWN]: I thought it was the same as a speaker, they could, they can McCarthy him.
• 1:07:17
  [UNKNOWN]: they can do that.
• 1:07:17
  [UNKNOWN]: But again, well, that it turned out to be a good thing.
• 1:07:22
  [UNKNOWN]: But for a while, it was a Matt Gaetz kind of rebellion in Matt Gaetz, and I'm having his own issues.
• 1:07:29
  [UNKNOWN]: So it couldn't end up bringing more catastrophe than anything.
• 1:07:34
  [UNKNOWN]: I know Rick Scott would be wonderful.
• 1:07:36
  [UNKNOWN]: But again,
• 1:07:45
  [UNKNOWN]: Again, you just have to deal with a very dysfunctional Senate right now.
• 1:07:49
  [UNKNOWN]: There's just no way around it.
• 1:07:50
  [UNKNOWN]: And no matter how you rearrange the furniture, you're still in a lunatic asylum.
• 1:07:57
  [UNKNOWN]: It's a very dysfunctional place.
• 1:07:59
  [UNKNOWN]: It's going to take a long time.
• 1:08:00
  [UNKNOWN]: The Senate will be the last place to be fixed, I think.
• 1:08:03
  [UNKNOWN]: We've already done a really good job at the House.
• 1:08:05
  [UNKNOWN]: We've got the Supreme Court.
• 1:08:07
  [UNKNOWN]: We've got, and we obviously have the presidency.
• 1:08:09
  [UNKNOWN]: Senate is just, it's going to take us.
• 1:08:11
  [UNKNOWN]: It's our House of Lords.
• 1:08:13
  [UNKNOWN]: And it's just where politics goes to get paralyzed basically.
• 1:08:22
  [UNKNOWN]: Joan, I can't help but notice that conservative commentators born since the Iranian Revolution in 1979, tend to be dismissive of Iran as the threat to World Peace.
• 1:08:32
  [UNKNOWN]: I can recall Girl Scout event for international students held during the Revolution.
• 1:08:37
  [UNKNOWN]: I offered sympathy to some from Iran saying it was glad they were here where it was safe.
• 1:08:41
  [UNKNOWN]: Their response was shocking.
• 1:08:42
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh no, I would love to be there.
• 1:08:44
  [UNKNOWN]: There's so much love.
• 1:08:45
  [UNKNOWN]: I started a crazy person and they still have crazies.
• 1:08:48
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, I know.
• 1:08:50
  [UNKNOWN]: I know.
• 1:08:51
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, you know, again, sure.
• 1:08:54
  [UNKNOWN]: No question about it.
• 1:08:55
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, don't get me wrong.
• 1:08:56
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, you know, we're living in an age.
• 1:09:00
  [UNKNOWN]: We have to understand.
• 1:09:01
  [UNKNOWN]: We are living in an age where constitutional theocracies are becoming the dominant form of government in the world.
• 1:09:08
  [UNKNOWN]: Constitutional theocracies make up about 40% of the world's national governments.
• 1:09:15
  [UNKNOWN]: And the constitutions of theocracy is where a traditional world religion forms overtly the basis for their constitutional law.
• 1:09:28
  [UNKNOWN]: And then normally they'll have ironically a kind of secular court or in the case of Iran, they'll have a council of millas of theologians to interpret the extent to which
• 1:09:43
  [UNKNOWN]: the civil laws, both are faithful to the theological tradition, but also honor sort of the civil rights of the individual.
• 1:09:55
  [UNKNOWN]: Very similar, like what we see with Israel, though technically, Israel doesn't have a constitution as I understand it, but nevertheless,
• 1:10:06
  [UNKNOWN]: And so it's about 40% of the world's nations, which makes up their population, makes up about 55% of the world's population.
• 1:10:16
  [UNKNOWN]: So, constitutional theocracies, and some have even called the United States a soft,
• 1:10:22
  [UNKNOWN]: theocracy, just because we are so religiously minded, just even from the shining city on a hill, a scripture that mythos, that sustains our identity, it comes straight from the words of Christ.
• 1:10:38
  [UNKNOWN]: So, regardless, just a lot of people are comfortable with what they have in a place like Iran.
• 1:10:45
  [UNKNOWN]: I know for liberty-minded people that's almost crazy and insane, but you have to understand we're in a civilizationalist period where we're moving away from the idea that there's a one-size-fits-all political and economic system for all people for all times.
• 1:11:01
  [UNKNOWN]: We're moving away from that and
• 1:11:07
  [UNKNOWN]: as the basis for political identity.
• 1:11:11
  [UNKNOWN]: And for many Persians, you know, the Iranian regime, they
• 1:11:16
  [UNKNOWN]: they appreciate it.
• 1:11:18
  [UNKNOWN]: Now, I don't think they're the majority.
• 1:11:20
  [UNKNOWN]: As a matter of fact, we do have, and you're talking about people who were born after the revolution.
• 1:11:26
  [UNKNOWN]: People inside, some of to my knowledge, some of the more accurate studies show 8 upwards of 80 to 90 percent want the regime gone.
• 1:11:33
  [UNKNOWN]: It's that, it's that unpopular.
• 1:11:35
  [UNKNOWN]: Masks have closed at a rate of about 75 percent.
• 1:11:39
  [UNKNOWN]: People are voting with their feet.
• 1:11:41
  [UNKNOWN]: They don't want to be lectured to by Amala.
• 1:11:43
  [UNKNOWN]: It's going to
• 1:11:44
  [UNKNOWN]: give them their kind of weird sort of Shiite messianic theology.
• 1:11:48
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm just giving you the sense of where they're coming from.
• 1:11:51
  [UNKNOWN]: So, and remember, it's not Shiite per se because the Azarees and Azerbaijan, they're Shiite, but yet they get along very well with Israel and very well with Suni's particularly Turkey, because they're fellow Turks.
• 1:12:02
  [UNKNOWN]: So,
• 1:12:04
  [UNKNOWN]: So anyway, you just have to understand, when I hear people talk that way, I just see civilizationless mindset, that's all I'm seeing.
• 1:12:13
  [UNKNOWN]: It's irrelevant to the geopolitical structure that's emerging.
• 1:12:19
  [UNKNOWN]: Where Trump said, I can, in one fell swoop, get rid of the the biggest impediment to an Abraham
• 1:12:32
  [UNKNOWN]: and permanently box out China from having control over the straight-to-form moves via their proxy Iran.
• 1:12:37
  [UNKNOWN]: If I take out Iran, those two good things happen.
• 1:12:42
  [UNKNOWN]: America's stronger the world is stronger, and the free world is stronger, and that's why he's doing it.
• 1:12:48
  [UNKNOWN]: So yeah, that's what I would say.
• 1:12:50
  [UNKNOWN]: It kind of has little to do whether they're authoritarian or not.
• 1:12:55
  [UNKNOWN]: Richard, Dr. Steve, quite a while back.
• 1:12:56
  [UNKNOWN]: I saw a video of you playing classical guitar and a recital like something made me smile.
• 1:13:01
  [UNKNOWN]: I would like to be playing again.
• 1:13:03
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh, Richard, so would I, my, my old, my tired hand.
• 1:13:07
  [UNKNOWN]: So would I, bro, I've grown out the nails a little bit.
• 1:13:10
  [UNKNOWN]: I just, honestly, what happens is I, um,
• 1:13:14
  [UNKNOWN]: So if you don't know, I was a professional class of the guitars for the first years of my adult life.
• 1:13:22
  [UNKNOWN]: I went to music, conservatory, peabondic conservatory.
• 1:13:25
  [UNKNOWN]: As a matter of fact, somebody was pointing out to me that when you punch my name in, to Google, a lot of times, it'll say like American classical guitars.
• 1:13:32
  [UNKNOWN]: So I think it's very interesting to me.
• 1:13:34
  [UNKNOWN]: I really kind of...
• 1:13:37
  [UNKNOWN]: I bowed out of the pro scene, oh gosh, early as 2002, 2005, maybe 2006 was my last concert, something like that.
• 1:13:48
  [UNKNOWN]: And anyway, since then, I just don't practice that much.
• 1:13:53
  [UNKNOWN]: And just because my time is consumed with other things, and when I played, I hate to say it, but I played professionally.
• 1:14:02
  [UNKNOWN]: I played to make a living.
• 1:14:05
  [UNKNOWN]: It wasn't quite out of love per se.
• 1:14:07
  [UNKNOWN]: I loved it, but it was part and parcel of a musician's life.
• 1:14:12
  [UNKNOWN]: and I just don't have that life anymore.
• 1:14:15
  [UNKNOWN]: So I don't know how to fit it in.
• 1:14:17
  [UNKNOWN]: So pray for me and maybe I could try to figure it out because every time I do life comes in and it gets interrupted and I don't touch it for months.
• 1:14:31
  [UNKNOWN]: So.
• 1:14:32
  [UNKNOWN]: So hopefully we'll see.
• 1:14:33
  [UNKNOWN]: Thrawn with what happened on Tuesday night across the country with all these fake Trump approvals.
• 1:14:38
  [UNKNOWN]: What do you think is the true approval of trial?
• 1:14:42
  [UNKNOWN]: I'd say high 40s probably mid 40s high 40s.
• 1:14:47
  [UNKNOWN]: It's so you have the full magma movement.
• 1:14:49
  [UNKNOWN]: You have the GOP behind them and you have right leaning independence behind them.
• 1:14:54
  [UNKNOWN]: They're fully behind them.
• 1:14:55
  [UNKNOWN]: So I'd say 45.
• 1:14:58
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, it could be low fifties, but yeah, I just, again,
• 1:15:05
  [UNKNOWN]: If he had, they're trying to claim, and again, he doesn't, you notice he doesn't pay any attention to it.
• 1:15:11
  [UNKNOWN]: It's so funny.
• 1:15:12
  [UNKNOWN]: But they're trying to claim he's been busched that he has George W. Bush's like low 30s approval ratings.
• 1:15:20
  [UNKNOWN]: How politically successful was George W. Bush in his second term when he had low 30s polling.
• 1:15:28
  [UNKNOWN]: He collapsed.
• 1:15:29
  [UNKNOWN]: He couldn't get anything done.
• 1:15:31
  [UNKNOWN]: He absolutely collapsed.
• 1:15:33
  [UNKNOWN]: He wanted to reform social security.
• 1:15:36
  [UNKNOWN]: He wanted to reform all of us.
• 1:15:38
  [UNKNOWN]: He couldn't get anything passed.
• 1:15:40
  [UNKNOWN]: And then 2026, and they were malt.
• 1:15:45
  [UNKNOWN]: The Nancy, or 2026, about 2006, the Nancy Pelosi revolution.
• 1:15:51
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, he was Trump is stronger now than ever demonstrably so.
• 1:16:01
  [UNKNOWN]: you know, you know, to hell with the polls.
• 1:16:05
  [UNKNOWN]: He's stronger now than he's ever been.
• 1:16:08
  [UNKNOWN]: He's had polling that's been at 60%.
• 1:16:10
  [UNKNOWN]: Guess what?
• 1:16:11
  [UNKNOWN]: He's stronger now than he was back then.
• 1:16:13
  [UNKNOWN]: So I think the polls are in the 50s and the reason why Democrats flip out when every says, yeah, maybe I'll run for for a fourth term as it were in 2021.
• 1:16:27
  [UNKNOWN]: The reason why they flip out of that is because they know
• 1:16:33
  [UNKNOWN]: Kevin will auto pen judges be removed will fraudulently elected politicians be removed when Mrs. Omar be deported.
• 1:16:39
  [UNKNOWN]: I love.
• 1:16:40
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh, I love it.
• 1:16:41
  [UNKNOWN]: I love Arizona Georgia senators and governors.
• 1:16:44
  [UNKNOWN]: Probably not, you know, to be honest with you, probably not.
• 1:16:48
  [UNKNOWN]: But you know, what or let me do let me put it to this way or or what do you mean by removed, right?
• 1:16:56
  [UNKNOWN]: I think we it's very interesting.
• 1:16:57
  [UNKNOWN]: It's a it's
• 1:17:01
  [UNKNOWN]: In this new politics, we're going to have to reconfigure how we think about things.
• 1:17:09
  [UNKNOWN]: So like a new red wave would be 222 seats.
• 1:17:12
  [UNKNOWN]: That's a red wave.
• 1:17:13
  [UNKNOWN]: Now back in 2006, that wouldn't have been a red wave.
• 1:17:18
  [UNKNOWN]: That would have been a very, very close election.
• 1:17:20
  [UNKNOWN]: But we're now living at a time where seats have been so jerry-mandered.
• 1:17:25
  [UNKNOWN]: So, so partizantly redrawn and redistricted.
• 1:17:29
  [UNKNOWN]: that there's really only about four, five percent contested toss-up seats.
• 1:17:37
  [UNKNOWN]: So the ceiling is always going to be very low.
• 1:17:40
  [UNKNOWN]: The question is making sure we push that ceiling as high as we can, but getting about 230 is going to be the absolute limit at this point until all the redistricting and realignment kicks in.
• 1:17:54
  [UNKNOWN]: It's the same thing like with removing these judges.
• 1:17:56
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, we can remove them.
• 1:17:59
  [UNKNOWN]: But it's more structurally removing them.
• 1:18:01
  [UNKNOWN]: It's more cleaning out
• 1:18:04
  [UNKNOWN]: the corrupt system that put him in power in the first place so that while they may continue to be in positions of power, the structure that put him in has been eliminated and therefore it's just a matter of time before they removed i.e.
• 1:18:20
  [UNKNOWN]: replaced.
• 1:18:21
  [UNKNOWN]: So I just think you have to
• 1:18:35
  [UNKNOWN]: Because you have the administration openly saying this is JD openly saying that we they have all the evidence they need that she committed immigration fraud and that's it doesn't matter who you are you're gone.
• 1:18:49
  [UNKNOWN]: Um, if you committed immigration fraud doesn't matter who you are, you could be a CEO of a company you're gone.
• 1:18:56
  [UNKNOWN]: And, um, and then he said, now it's a question strategy how we can roll it out.
• 1:19:02
  [UNKNOWN]: So I'm keeping my eye on Omar.
• 1:19:04
  [UNKNOWN]: You don't have someone as very rhetorical and careful as J.D.
• 1:19:10
  [UNKNOWN]: is say something like that without him, you know, anticipating something big is going to happen.
• 1:19:15
  [UNKNOWN]: So we'll keep an eye on Omar for sure.
• 1:19:20
  [UNKNOWN]: Milo, any evidence Hermit will really go into every blue state for a DOJ challenge to racially jerry-mandered districts, housing.
• 1:19:28
  [UNKNOWN]: I have not caught up on that, but I just, from what I've seen thus far, Hermit is awesome.
• 1:19:33
  [UNKNOWN]: She's doing great stuff, and again, I think this is part of Trump's redistricting strategy.
• 1:19:42
  [UNKNOWN]: Keep in mind, Trump is looking at
• 1:19:46
  [UNKNOWN]: the overall map with a 2028 focus ultimately.
• 1:19:52
  [UNKNOWN]: So of course, he's got 2026, front and center now.
• 1:19:57
  [UNKNOWN]: But this is more of a two and a half year project as opposed to a seven-month project form.
• 1:20:03
  [UNKNOWN]: We'll get as much as we can in those seven months.
• 1:20:06
  [UNKNOWN]: But over the course of two and a half years, I think you can bet, harmeet will be in every blue state and overturning the racially journey-mandered districts at the federal level, state level, and local level.
• 1:20:19
  [UNKNOWN]: Or men are goes all the way, we're talking every kind of district imaginable.
• 1:20:27
  [UNKNOWN]: Politically incorrect forever, Dr. Steve, the Democrats and rhinos, are going to need bigger pathology departments,
• 1:20:35
  [UNKNOWN]: More corridors and more autopsies, yes, they are, they are.
• 1:20:42
  [UNKNOWN]: They're in trouble, obviously.
• 1:20:43
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, if you saw, if you looked at me, obviously, I didn't read through the whole thing, but the Democrat autopsy, that's been out apparently for it was authored for over a year, written by one person, apparently, and even the head of the DNC's Chairman's distancing himself from it.
• 1:21:01
  [UNKNOWN]: But it basically, it's written by a bunch of woke people, don't know what a woman is.
• 1:21:06
  [UNKNOWN]: So how can they know what's behind a catastrophe like this?
• 1:21:12
  [UNKNOWN]: So it's probably the single most ridiculous autopsy or self supposed self reflection imaginable.
• 1:21:24
  [UNKNOWN]: It's really an attempt to just say when all said and done, we were right, you voters were just too stupid to realize it.
• 1:21:32
  [UNKNOWN]: Center for Earth at this rate, the DNC is looking in becoming a regional party at the coast.
• 1:21:37
  [UNKNOWN]: The alternative is tacking the center left and winning the blue dogs back.
• 1:21:42
  [UNKNOWN]: Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.
• 1:21:51
  [UNKNOWN]: So the Democrats right now, it seems to me when you look at the redistricting,
• 1:21:59
  [UNKNOWN]: The Democrats are in real trouble, because when they, when they redistrict, when they jerry-mandered, it has to, all the districts have to go through urban centers.
• 1:22:13
  [UNKNOWN]: And particularly, as you're talking about, in the coastal municipalities.
• 1:22:21
  [UNKNOWN]: Whereas when the GOP redistricts, you'll see they're actually just almost like, you know, rectangular blocks, like continuously connected like a puzzle all throughout their state.
• 1:22:36
  [UNKNOWN]: And then every one of those blocks in a state like Louisiana could be a plus 30 Trump district.
• 1:22:45
  [UNKNOWN]: So in other words, the, this is why the Democrats absolutely hate and despise the electoral map.
• 1:22:55
  [UNKNOWN]: The electoral map radically favors the Republicans because the map is there a precise
• 1:23:05
  [UNKNOWN]: elections, regions have to have to say as well.
• 1:23:09
  [UNKNOWN]: And so, regionally, the GOP is beyond dominant.
• 1:23:15
  [UNKNOWN]: I forgot, we had to staddle that.
• 1:23:20
  [UNKNOWN]: but it's been a while, but I think it's even gotten bigger.
• 1:23:23
  [UNKNOWN]: But I think the GOP owns like 85, 85% of the geographical map of the United States, 80 to 85% of the geographical map.
• 1:23:41
  [UNKNOWN]: If you were to look at it through the lens of a electoral map would be red.
• 1:23:48
  [UNKNOWN]: So there's no question the Democrats are becoming increasingly, and again, regionally, 10, 15% of the country, which if it translated, perfectly, would be a perfect example of an 80, 20, 80, 20 political discrepancy, right?
• 1:24:09
  [UNKNOWN]: They're always on the 20 side of a political issue.
• 1:24:11
  [UNKNOWN]: No voter ID, no proof of citizenship, things like that.
• 1:24:17
  [UNKNOWN]: But of course, it doesn't because they do have, it doesn't translate directly because they do have enormous population.
• 1:24:25
  [UNKNOWN]: The population is going to help you.
• 1:24:26
  [UNKNOWN]: They'll help you with the popular vote, but it's not going to help you with the the electoral college hence why they despise it so much.
• 1:24:35
  [UNKNOWN]: And then they do have, they do have some success with it.
• 1:24:39
  [UNKNOWN]: So like in Oregon,
• 1:24:47
  [UNKNOWN]: I think they're like 36 counties in Oregon.
• 1:24:51
  [UNKNOWN]: Some of you guys would know, put it in the chat.
• 1:24:53
  [UNKNOWN]: Like there's 36 counties in Oregon.
• 1:24:56
  [UNKNOWN]: Democrats only win about three, but yet they win.
• 1:25:01
  [UNKNOWN]: If they got rid, they win the popular vote on the state level.
• 1:25:05
  [UNKNOWN]: If they got rid of Multimaccounty that has Portland in it, the Republican would win every election by 10%.
• 1:25:13
  [UNKNOWN]: So they concentrated all of these numbers into a very limited regional era area.
• 1:25:22
  [UNKNOWN]: This is again why you have to watch out for polling.
• 1:25:25
  [UNKNOWN]: when we look at national polls for Trump, right?
• 1:25:28
  [UNKNOWN]: That's including LA.
• 1:25:30
  [UNKNOWN]: That's including Portland.
• 1:25:32
  [UNKNOWN]: That's including New York.
• 1:25:34
  [UNKNOWN]: It's including Chicago.
• 1:25:36
  [UNKNOWN]: It's including Baltimore.
• 1:25:38
  [UNKNOWN]: It's including places where 99% of the population might hate them, right?
• 1:25:43
  [UNKNOWN]: Or just at least the one to answer the phone or answer the poll.
• 1:25:47
  [UNKNOWN]: So, but when it comes to districts,
• 1:25:52
  [UNKNOWN]: when it comes to the Electoral College, when it comes to congressional power, it's a losing issue.
• 1:26:01
  [UNKNOWN]: And the only way they were able to keep it prior to that was through this bizarre vote dilution interpretation of Section 2 of the VRA.
• 1:26:12
  [UNKNOWN]: Those days are over.
• 1:26:13
  [UNKNOWN]: And so, yeah, you're right.
• 1:26:15
  [UNKNOWN]: I think they are now dwindling into a very regionally specific party.
• 1:26:23
  [UNKNOWN]: Mark, I hope that Trump comes to Maine to endorse anyone running against Graham Platner the way America is going.
• 1:26:30
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm afraid that he'll be elected not really a fan of Collins, but if he's elected, I'm moving.
• 1:26:35
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh, I hear you know, he's he's horrible.
• 1:26:37
  [UNKNOWN]: He's pathetic.
• 1:26:38
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh, don't can't I don't count Susan Collins out.
• 1:26:41
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, she'll she'll probably pull that off.
• 1:26:45
  [UNKNOWN]: The polling and Maine is really hard apparently very hard.
• 1:26:49
  [UNKNOWN]: So in 2020,
• 1:26:52
  [UNKNOWN]: Susan Collins one main and she she I think the polls on average rough by like six or seven.
• 1:27:02
  [UNKNOWN]: If you look at the real clear politics polling and the aggregated polling, they all had her challenge or winning easily, easily, uh, some by seven eight nine points, so, um, but she always pulls it off.
• 1:27:17
  [UNKNOWN]: She is, uh, so there's just something about main politics that really likes Susan Collins, not necessarily the people who answer polls.
• 1:27:26
  [UNKNOWN]: But the votes that matter, and so she should pull it off.
• 1:27:30
  [UNKNOWN]: If he does win, it'll be a loss for the GOP that I'd be too bad, because we're also looking at a possible loss in North Carolina.
• 1:27:39
  [UNKNOWN]: But we may be seeing some pickups as well in George and Michigan would be very interesting to say.
• 1:27:44
  [UNKNOWN]: We'll still be in the lead.
• 1:27:46
  [UNKNOWN]: We'll be at 51 instead of 53.
• 1:27:48
  [UNKNOWN]: But still, I think she's
• 1:27:51
  [UNKNOWN]: If she were to lose, that would be a sign that the Democrat party has gone radical, and the Democrat voter has gone radical.
• 1:28:00
  [UNKNOWN]: They want their own fighters too, except their fighters like Trump, except their fighters are incredibly destructive.
• 1:28:07
  [UNKNOWN]: Their fighters aren't building anything.
• 1:28:08
  [UNKNOWN]: Their fighters are all about burning things down.
• 1:28:14
  [UNKNOWN]: Well, yeah, I'm Dr. Turley.
• 1:28:15
  [UNKNOWN]: Good.
• 1:28:15
  [UNKNOWN]: A.M. Trump is appearing with Congressman Lawler in New York.
• 1:28:18
  [UNKNOWN]: It was wondering why he's stumping with a congressman who's giving illegal citizenship with the Florida Congresswoman, uh, your thought, and because he's not, probably not, I don't even know where you're going with that.
• 1:28:33
  [UNKNOWN]: Well, I, I, I, I'm not, yeah, I don't even know.
• 1:28:36
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't know, um, I don't know what, I, you got, huh, how do I say this?
• 1:28:41
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, you just, can you just trust the guy you voted for?
• 1:28:47
  [UNKNOWN]: Can, is that really hard?
• 1:28:50
  [UNKNOWN]: Can you do that?
• 1:28:52
  [UNKNOWN]: Just trust the guy you voted for.
• 1:28:54
  [UNKNOWN]: Don't trust the podcast, a catastam, how would I go?
• 1:28:57
  [UNKNOWN]: Podcastastam, crowd, don't trust the doomers online.
• 1:29:01
  [UNKNOWN]: Don't trust them.
• 1:29:02
  [UNKNOWN]: They're just chatty, women in this sewing circle.
• 1:29:05
  [UNKNOWN]: They just don't listen to them.
• 1:29:08
  [UNKNOWN]: Just trust the man you voted for.
• 1:29:11
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm pleading you because I don't know anything about that.
• 1:29:13
  [UNKNOWN]: Just what I would do is they just trust him.
• 1:29:17
  [UNKNOWN]: He's gotten you this far.
• 1:29:23
  [UNKNOWN]: Black Wolf, Inc, as we approach the midterms, I noticing another trend occurring.
• 1:29:28
  [UNKNOWN]: 2018 the Democrats were Teflon Steele was a strong adversary.
• 1:29:32
  [UNKNOWN]: Now it's like Trump is completely spading little to them and the rhinos.
• 1:29:36
  [UNKNOWN]: It's very good point, you know, it's very good point.
• 1:29:39
  [UNKNOWN]: And keep in mind, even in 2018,
• 1:29:42
  [UNKNOWN]: It was a puric victory for the Democrats because Trump still picked up two seats and a GOP picked up two seats in the Senate, and that was the year that Florida officially turned red.
• 1:29:54
  [UNKNOWN]: That was the year, that was the year of the Santa's, and that was the year that was the beginning of Florida's Republican dominance.
• 1:30:03
  [UNKNOWN]: It was always a purple state.
• 1:30:04
  [UNKNOWN]: It was voted for Obama twice.
• 1:30:07
  [UNKNOWN]: Okay, can't say that about Texas.
• 1:30:10
  [UNKNOWN]: sort of voted for Obama twice, and you know, so it was a puric victory.
• 1:30:15
  [UNKNOWN]: But again, like you said, yes, they were strong.
• 1:30:17
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, you had the Russian collusion investigation, you had the entire Republican party against Trump back in the day.
• 1:30:24
  [UNKNOWN]: You know, Trump's first term was really like his second term.
• 1:30:29
  [UNKNOWN]: He was lame duck.
• 1:30:30
  [UNKNOWN]: They had every intention of getting rid of him in 2020, Republicans included.
• 1:30:37
  [UNKNOWN]: It's a new party.
• 1:30:38
  [UNKNOWN]: It's a new, it's a new Trump.
• 1:30:41
  [UNKNOWN]: And something happened, honestly, I mean, he had some really good momentum, but something happened in Butler in July when he was almost killed in Butler 2024.
• 1:30:51
  [UNKNOWN]: When he stood up and fist pumped fight, that was in many ways that was the rebirth of the nation.
• 1:31:00
  [UNKNOWN]: And I think very much so.
• 1:31:02
  [UNKNOWN]: And it's gonna be very hard to take
• 1:31:06
  [UNKNOWN]: the Republicans down when they are so structurally strong when they have a strong leader who's going to take them into the midterms with a really awesome midterms convention, who's so strong with the voter registration, who's so strong with money, who's so strong with redistricting.
• 1:31:26
  [UNKNOWN]: So the map, the money,
• 1:31:29
  [UNKNOWN]: the registration advantages, it's, it's structurally he's, they're in very, very good shape.
• 1:31:40
  [UNKNOWN]: Milo, since the US State Postal Service is a final pathway for male ballads, does the Trump EO prohibit blanket ballot, male delivery, and will it be enforced?
• 1:31:50
  [UNKNOWN]: That's a good question.
• 1:31:51
  [UNKNOWN]: Well, obviously, Trump is no fan of male and ballots, being the victim of the 3 AM truck loads.
• 1:31:59
  [UNKNOWN]: But I don't know the answer to that question.
• 1:32:00
  [UNKNOWN]: It's a very good question.
• 1:32:01
  [UNKNOWN]: We'd have to check that out.
• 1:32:03
  [UNKNOWN]: Prohibiting blanket ballot,
• 1:32:05
  [UNKNOWN]: male delivery, and we'll be in four.
• 1:32:07
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, so I've talked with Cliff Maloney, who's on the front lines of a ballot harvesting and so forth.
• 1:32:13
  [UNKNOWN]: And he did say that the, again, in blue states, I get you.
• 1:32:19
  [UNKNOWN]: All right, in the handful of blue states, they're a mess, they're Somalia, right?
• 1:32:23
  [UNKNOWN]: But in most states, they have clamped down since 2020 and have made male and ballot,
• 1:32:36
  [UNKNOWN]: they put a what's the term I'm looking for.
• 1:32:40
  [UNKNOWN]: They put a a very clear stamp of process throughout there's a term for it and I can't I can't remember it right now.
• 1:32:52
  [UNKNOWN]: Whatever Trump is going to do to make sure that this election is secure, I think you can be assured he's going to do it.
• 1:33:01
  [UNKNOWN]: He wants only the most secure election out there because he knows what happens when it's not.
• 1:33:08
  [UNKNOWN]: But that's my best take at the answer.
• 1:33:15
  [UNKNOWN]: Uh, you, night to include unit, uh, unit to glue, uh, for a states like Washington can rule residents, book a hotel room in Seattle, have their mail and ballot delivered to the hotel address and have their vote counted as being from Seattle.
• 1:33:33
  [UNKNOWN]: Good question.
• 1:33:33
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't know.
• 1:33:34
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't know the, uh, I don't know the rules, uh, in Washington can rule residents,
• 1:33:43
  [UNKNOWN]: I doubt it, if I recall Washington don't they do all their voting by mail, something stupid, you know.
• 1:33:55
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, there's just something in the air with that rainy, rainy place, but I don't know the answer to that.
• 1:34:02
  [UNKNOWN]: I would assume not.
• 1:34:03
  [UNKNOWN]: I would assume you can only request a ballot from proof of residence.
• 1:34:08
  [UNKNOWN]: You'd have to turn that hotel room into proof of residence.
• 1:34:11
  [UNKNOWN]: But if it's that lacks, then no wonder why the Democrats have been there forever.
• 1:34:18
  [UNKNOWN]: Brenda, never miss your podcast.
• 1:34:20
  [UNKNOWN]: You are finnie and speak, I think you mean funny.
• 1:34:24
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm finnie and I speak, King, oh, you're funny and speaking truth.
• 1:34:29
  [UNKNOWN]: Thanks for all you do.
• 1:34:30
  [UNKNOWN]: Thank you, Brenda.
• 1:34:30
  [UNKNOWN]: That's very kind of you.
• 1:34:32
  [UNKNOWN]: Very, very appreciative.
• 1:34:34
  [UNKNOWN]: Thank you.
• 1:34:36
  [UNKNOWN]: Ms. Crudell, maga forever.
• 1:34:37
  [UNKNOWN]: Amen, Ms. Crudell.
• 1:34:39
  [UNKNOWN]: Amen.
• 1:34:41
  [UNKNOWN]: Politically and correct forever, Dr. Steve didn't act blue, begin dismantling, being dismantled, contribute a dwindling of Democrat funds, given that act blue was laundering money of billionaires and foreign money in the smaller Democrat donor accounts.
• 1:34:57
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, so as I understand, act blue has not been fully dismantled.
• 1:35:02
  [UNKNOWN]: It's still there, but it does not have access to your and my money anymore and you're exactly right, they were laundering money as I understand it from USAID through all of these shell.
• 1:35:18
  [UNKNOWN]: you know, 401c3s and 401c4s and all these center for democracy nonsense or you know, helping the third world places that ended up just enriching Democrats.
• 1:35:32
  [UNKNOWN]: Remember, remember the chairman of the Kennedy Center, where they have classical music concerts, the chairman of the Kennedy Center, was making over a million dollars a year.
• 1:35:46
  [UNKNOWN]: Let that each, and oh, and the Kenny Center, Kenny Center was in debt every single year.
• 1:35:54
  [UNKNOWN]: They were in the red, and yet he was getting a million dollars here.
• 1:35:58
  [UNKNOWN]: And as I recall, all the, for the top four CEOs and the, their executive board, we're making high six figure incomes from your tax dollars.
• 1:36:11
  [UNKNOWN]: Now, where do you think they were donating all that money?
• 1:36:14
  [UNKNOWN]: What do you think they were writing big, big, big checks for?
• 1:36:18
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't have the proof, but I bet we can all gas, right?
• 1:36:21
  [UNKNOWN]: So it's, yeah, it's, yeah, that,
• 1:36:27
  [UNKNOWN]: I think we're going to look back at what Elon and Big Balls and Doge did in those first several months of Trump's presidency as really one of the most formative moments of the new nation, the new American magnation that's that's rising because what we did is we cut off the gravy train.
• 1:36:52
  [UNKNOWN]: that Democrats had depended on.
• 1:36:54
  [UNKNOWN]: Remember, Washington was theirs.
• 1:36:56
  [UNKNOWN]: They owned Washington, right?
• 1:36:58
  [UNKNOWN]: I say this all the time, Democrats own Washington Republicans merely ran, at least that was the calculus.
• 1:37:05
  [UNKNOWN]: That was the equation for decades after World War II.
• 1:37:08
  [UNKNOWN]: So after four stints in office with FDR, two stints, Truman, 40 years of uninterrupted,
• 1:37:20
  [UNKNOWN]: Democrat congressional rule.
• 1:37:22
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, they they re-aligned the rules around themselves.
• 1:37:26
  [UNKNOWN]: So whether they were in power out of power, they're the money went through them.
• 1:37:31
  [UNKNOWN]: And and Elon cut that off.
• 1:37:36
  [UNKNOWN]: and now they're suffering, they're suffering big time.
• 1:37:38
  [UNKNOWN]: Again, that's the other thing of Trump is collapsing and the polls, why is there such a huge money discrepancy?
• 1:37:45
  [UNKNOWN]: And some will say, well, the money doesn't go through the DNC.
• 1:37:47
  [UNKNOWN]: It goes through, it goes to individual candidates or goes through these other organs.
• 1:37:51
  [UNKNOWN]: Granted, but do those other organizations can they match the one billion treasure trove that Trump has?
• 1:38:00
  [UNKNOWN]: amounted.
• 1:38:00
  [UNKNOWN]: I haven't seen any numbers for that.
• 1:38:02
  [UNKNOWN]: Again, by their own reporting and then legacy media, that's a three X advantage that the Republicans have over the Democrats.
• 1:38:11
  [UNKNOWN]: So it was huge, gigantic.
• 1:38:16
  [UNKNOWN]: Uh, Kiko, uh, where do I need to go to register to help Cuba community and I'm planning to stay there.
• 1:38:22
  [UNKNOWN]: I got family there.
• 1:38:23
  [UNKNOWN]: Just want to build the community and make it better.
• 1:38:25
  [UNKNOWN]: That's a great question, Kiko.
• 1:38:26
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't know the answer to that.
• 1:38:29
  [UNKNOWN]: Um, you know, you may want to reach out to the State Department, US State Department, Marco Rubius.
• 1:38:35
  [UNKNOWN]: office and see what they, what they recommend.
• 1:38:39
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm curious to see two if there's some churches connected with that perhaps some Catholic churches since Cuba's predominantly Catholic, but there may be some evangelical churches as well.
• 1:38:53
  [UNKNOWN]: That would be involved in something like that.
• 1:38:55
  [UNKNOWN]: Great question with God bless you.
• 1:38:57
  [UNKNOWN]: If anyone knows, put it in the chat,
• 1:39:02
  [UNKNOWN]: Zuki's, what do you think will happen if the blue states don't comply with the DOJ to turn over their voting world?
• 1:39:09
  [UNKNOWN]: Well, as I understand it, then they get defunded.
• 1:39:12
  [UNKNOWN]: They get defunded and then they have to pay for the voting themselves.
• 1:39:18
  [UNKNOWN]: Remember, they don't get to just print money.
• 1:39:20
  [UNKNOWN]: They have to account for every penny, and they're already in most of them are already in the red.
• 1:39:26
  [UNKNOWN]: And so that would be a real blow to them for sure.
• 1:39:29
  [UNKNOWN]: They may just not even have the money to do it.
• 1:39:32
  [UNKNOWN]: Um, but she'll caught all she make has made it clear.
• 1:39:35
  [UNKNOWN]: They'll cut off the money.
• 1:39:39
  [UNKNOWN]: In addition to all the headwinds you mentioned, the all tops who's making them focus inward and destroying them.
• 1:39:44
  [UNKNOWN]: So yeah, that's right.
• 1:39:46
  [UNKNOWN]: That's a good point.
• 1:39:48
  [UNKNOWN]: That's a good point, Zirki's.
• 1:39:49
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah.
• 1:39:49
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, it is.
• 1:39:50
  [UNKNOWN]: It's basically just one big cop.
• 1:39:53
  [UNKNOWN]: It seems to be again, it seems to be just like one big cop document.
• 1:39:58
  [UNKNOWN]: one big cope assessment and it's just yeah, it's just it's typical Democrat, you know, the worst part I think about being a Democrat today and as being part of the woke aligned Democrat is the way it shrinks the frames by which you're allowed to think.
• 1:40:17
  [UNKNOWN]: You're not allowed to think, say what you want about Trump and MAGA and whatever, you know, there is an incredibly open way of thinking.
• 1:40:26
  [UNKNOWN]: Well, what can we do?
• 1:40:28
  [UNKNOWN]: Well, let's go to the moon.
• 1:40:29
  [UNKNOWN]: You know, hey, let's remake world order.
• 1:40:32
  [UNKNOWN]: So it's to permanently box out China and actually make it forget Gaza as the Riviera of the Middle East.
• 1:40:38
  [UNKNOWN]: Let's make the whole Middle East one huge Riviera.
• 1:40:41
  [UNKNOWN]: Let's do it.
• 1:40:42
  [UNKNOWN]: Let's do it.
• 1:40:43
  [UNKNOWN]: It's just, it's got this, yeah, well, let's take it.
• 1:40:46
  [UNKNOWN]: Let's take Ben as well.
• 1:40:48
  [UNKNOWN]: And we don't need a war.
• 1:40:50
  [UNKNOWN]: Let's just take out that one idiot who stands in our way.
• 1:40:53
  [UNKNOWN]: Okay, great.
• 1:40:53
  [UNKNOWN]: We'll have this amazing, you know, special forces arrest, put him in prison for the rest of his life, and then we'll basically either directly or indirectly run their oil.
• 1:41:05
  [UNKNOWN]: Largest oil reserves in the world.
• 1:41:07
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, he just, you know, I'll even cube us next.
• 1:41:10
  [UNKNOWN]: You know, it's just, he thinks outside of the box whereas when you're so woke,
• 1:41:15
  [UNKNOWN]: You're so radically myopic in the way you can think, and you get offended all the time.
• 1:41:21
  [UNKNOWN]: And there are just ways of thinking that's not even allowed.
• 1:41:25
  [UNKNOWN]: It ends up, I like you say, you end up destroying yourself.
• 1:41:28
  [UNKNOWN]: So known as bio-leninism, when the only way to advance
• 1:41:36
  [UNKNOWN]: to be promoted in an organization is not because of your competence, but because of the identity markers that you tick off.
• 1:41:45
  [UNKNOWN]: And when that's the case like Kamala, it would be a perfect example of that.
• 1:41:49
  [UNKNOWN]: They're standard bear when that's the case when you're promoted based solely on your identity and your ideological fidelity, not your competence, then competency becomes the first casualty and the whole thing eventually implodes.
• 1:42:07
  [UNKNOWN]: R-O-T-O-Grayton, Lair Ed, Patriot Professor, have heard about the movement of Republicans of traveling to LA from all over the country, just to vote for Spencer Pratt, because LA doesn't have voter ID.
• 1:42:18
  [UNKNOWN]: I love it.
• 1:42:19
  [UNKNOWN]: I love it.
• 1:42:19
  [UNKNOWN]: By the way, I love it.
• 1:42:20
  [UNKNOWN]: That being said, what are you doing on June 2nd, in and off?
• 1:42:27
  [UNKNOWN]: Do you know about my Brazil trip?
• 1:42:28
  [UNKNOWN]: I am off to Brazil.
• 1:42:30
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm going to be at a classical.
• 1:42:32
  [UNKNOWN]: So one of the, one of the, so let me, I'll go backwards because I love this question that you, or the observation region, but if you don't know we are, we have.
• 1:42:46
  [UNKNOWN]: Turley talks is working with an international classical school organization that my business partner has started to basically spread classical Christian education all over the world so as to awaken Christian civilization.
• 1:43:05
  [UNKNOWN]: and a new era of civilization.
• 1:43:07
  [UNKNOWN]: We don't just talk about this stuff, man.
• 1:43:09
  [UNKNOWN]: We do it, all right?
• 1:43:10
  [UNKNOWN]: So that's where I was in Hungary and the next big, I mean, we're talking huge conference over 1,000 people is in Brazil.
• 1:43:18
  [UNKNOWN]: So I'll be in Brazil in June doing a bunch of talks out there as well.
• 1:43:24
  [UNKNOWN]: And then after that, a couple weeks later, I'll be in Atlanta.
• 1:43:28
  [UNKNOWN]: for the association of class of Christian schools repairing the ruins conference as well.
• 1:43:32
  [UNKNOWN]: I think that would be it for all the classical stuff that I've got to plan.
• 1:43:37
  [UNKNOWN]: Now, I love what you say or saying there.
• 1:43:41
  [UNKNOWN]: And this is where I wish Republicans would just start really learning to fight.
• 1:43:49
  [UNKNOWN]: Why aren't we voting early in our own?
• 1:43:53
  [UNKNOWN]: elections right perfectly legally and so forth.
• 1:43:58
  [UNKNOWN]: And then yeah, like you said, just in mass by the hundreds of thousands over well in California.
• 1:44:06
  [UNKNOWN]: LA and vote illegally for the Republican.
• 1:44:10
  [UNKNOWN]: Why not, right?
• 1:44:12
  [UNKNOWN]: Now again, I maybe I should say since I'm on the airways here, not that I'm advocating that, but it's that kind of thinking that I think a Democrat for the Republicans were doing this.
• 1:44:24
  [UNKNOWN]: This is exactly what a Democrat would do.
• 1:44:26
  [UNKNOWN]: Republicans have to get with the game.
• 1:44:29
  [UNKNOWN]: How are you going to use their own rules against them?
• 1:44:34
  [UNKNOWN]: how are you going to use their own rules or lack their of against them?
• 1:44:39
  [UNKNOWN]: That's the way we need to be thinking.
• 1:44:42
  [UNKNOWN]: And maybe since they don't require voter ID, maybe that's what we need to do.
• 1:44:46
  [UNKNOWN]: Overwhelm blue states with red voters from all over the country.
• 1:44:53
  [UNKNOWN]: Again, they may have no other choice than but to enact voter ID.
• 1:45:01
  [UNKNOWN]: James were a public should go ahead and get rid of the filibuster and pack the Supreme Court like the Democrats want.
• 1:45:07
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, but I agree.
• 1:45:08
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, again, I think you just have to fight fire with fire.
• 1:45:11
  [UNKNOWN]: No question about it.
• 1:45:15
  [UNKNOWN]: WS now, uh, what, why is our Western border solid blue?
• 1:45:20
  [UNKNOWN]: Is that a national security issue?
• 1:45:21
  [UNKNOWN]: Makes me very nervous.
• 1:45:23
  [UNKNOWN]: Well, what's he?
• 1:45:23
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh, yeah.
• 1:45:24
  [UNKNOWN]: No, Trump has talked a little bit about that.
• 1:45:27
  [UNKNOWN]: He's talked a
• 1:45:29
  [UNKNOWN]: that, you know, that, you know, and that's one of the reasons why we're going in to blue states to enforce border security deportations is because it's a natural security issue.
• 1:45:43
  [UNKNOWN]: He hasn't gone there yet.
• 1:45:44
  [UNKNOWN]: I'd love to see him do it.
• 1:45:45
  [UNKNOWN]: I think, again, I think he needs play hardball and I'd love to see him go in to West Coast countries kind of crack down on them.
• 1:45:54
  [UNKNOWN]: that said they're not in charge of border security.
• 1:45:59
  [UNKNOWN]: Thank God federal government is and the Supreme Court has been very consistent with that.
• 1:46:05
  [UNKNOWN]: So yeah, they're blue, but we control their borders when all of a sudden done.
• 1:46:09
  [UNKNOWN]: They can't.
• 1:46:10
  [UNKNOWN]: We've had zero illegal border entries.
• 1:46:16
  [UNKNOWN]: since Trump has taken office, or at least since within the first few months, once it was finally fully secured.
• 1:46:23
  [UNKNOWN]: Apparently the argument that they're saying is that for border patrol agents, they're number one thing they wrestle with today's boredom.
• 1:46:34
  [UNKNOWN]: boredom.
• 1:46:36
  [UNKNOWN]: That's what a lot.
• 1:46:37
  [UNKNOWN]: That's the golden age.
• 1:46:40
  [UNKNOWN]: Elaine, make T.C.
• 1:46:42
  [UNKNOWN]: Square again, before midterm, make Virginia.
• 1:46:45
  [UNKNOWN]: Rad, yes, yes, there's been talk about that again.
• 1:46:49
  [UNKNOWN]: I haven't seen a follow-up on that.
• 1:46:52
  [UNKNOWN]: But Elaine's talking about bringing, you know, districts like Arlington and others, sort of, right, there's a couple of others in back into DC, constitutionally as I understand that they're supposed to be a permanent part of DC and not part of the state.
• 1:47:13
  [UNKNOWN]: And somewhere, I think it was in the 1800s.
• 1:47:15
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh, yeah, it was one of the key.
• 1:47:18
  [UNKNOWN]: slavery alive in Arlington that it was turned over to Virginia by Democrats if I recall.
• 1:47:28
  [UNKNOWN]: So yes, so that we could say this is this is a what how did the Democrats like to say you know this is a relic of the Jim Crow era because this is a relic of the Confederacy and it needs to be brought back in alignment with DC.
• 1:47:41
  [UNKNOWN]: I would love to see that.
• 1:47:42
  [UNKNOWN]: I'd love to
• 1:47:46
  [UNKNOWN]: And that would have the effect of completely boxing out much of Nova, Northern Virginia, and hopefully return Virginia to its solid conservative politics that is so representative of two-thirds of the country.
• 1:48:10
  [UNKNOWN]: Two-thirds of the status, say.
• 1:48:13
  [UNKNOWN]: Uh, Joker Kai, uh, can you explain a census and what effect the banking executive order on a legal immigrants will do to the outcome?
• 1:48:25
  [UNKNOWN]: Well, the census is just a, it's a, fundamentally, it's a survey to determine population and all kinds of demographic data for, which is very important for public use, for private use and the likes.
• 1:48:44
  [UNKNOWN]: You just, you basically want to know who and how many are in your country.
• 1:48:53
  [UNKNOWN]: Banking executive order is there to basically force the illegals to self-deport, that's that would be, it doesn't have a direct relationship to a census, but it is before the net and they're decade, they're every decade.
• 1:49:11
  [UNKNOWN]: So we don't see one until another one until 2030.
• 1:49:14
  [UNKNOWN]: And Trump is actively, what they found is actually for every,
• 1:49:21
  [UNKNOWN]: person forcibly removed and deported to self-deported.
• 1:49:26
  [UNKNOWN]: So if they can, if they can sweeten the deal or sharpen, or make, you know, heavier the stick to get you to leave, they're going to do it.
• 1:49:38
  [UNKNOWN]: They're going to do it.
• 1:49:39
  [UNKNOWN]: They sweeten the deal by paying for your ticket to leave.
• 1:49:42
  [UNKNOWN]: And then they, uh, that's the carrot.
• 1:49:45
  [UNKNOWN]: But then the, the stick is, yeah, well, we're going to, we're going to debank you.
• 1:49:49
  [UNKNOWN]: We're going to cut you off from everything.
• 1:49:50
  [UNKNOWN]: And I, you know, I, I, all like it's, I remember being in a bank.
• 1:49:55
  [UNKNOWN]: I won't say when we're or anything like that.
• 1:49:57
  [UNKNOWN]: My wife could tell you the same thing.
• 1:49:59
  [UNKNOWN]: We're both in the bank.
• 1:50:00
  [UNKNOWN]: And I stood a long, long, long line.
• 1:50:03
  [UNKNOWN]: So only a few years ago.
• 1:50:05
  [UNKNOWN]: Not even two years ago.
• 1:50:07
  [UNKNOWN]: Long, long, long, long.
• 1:50:09
  [UNKNOWN]: Every, it was on a Friday afternoon, every single person in that line was Hispanic speaking Spanish and look like they just came from, you know, some kind of, you know, landscaping job or whatever.
• 1:50:26
  [UNKNOWN]: They just had to clothing the jeans.
• 1:50:29
  [UNKNOWN]: Very hard working.
• 1:50:30
  [UNKNOWN]: No question.
• 1:50:31
  [UNKNOWN]: Love you.
• 1:50:31
  [UNKNOWN]: God bless you.
• 1:50:33
  [UNKNOWN]: How many were illegal?
• 1:50:34
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't know, but there's so many in that area that we were that all the tellers, not all the tellers.
• 1:50:41
  [UNKNOWN]: I remember one teller said, I'm sorry.
• 1:50:43
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't speak Spanish.
• 1:50:43
  [UNKNOWN]: You're going to have to wait for this teller.
• 1:50:45
  [UNKNOWN]: But most of the tellers spoke Spanish.
• 1:50:48
  [UNKNOWN]: You know, Trump is trying to get rid of that, but I, you know, if I can make the assumption that at least a significant portion were early some were illegal, they're they're trying to get rid of that you can't you can't cash your checking anymore.
• 1:51:02
  [UNKNOWN]: Again, I guess you can find somebody else to cash your check for you, but it just makes life a lot more difficult to live in.
• 1:51:12
  [UNKNOWN]: It's called what is it life, it's a limiting life choices.
• 1:51:16
  [UNKNOWN]: WS now, I duck.
• 1:51:18
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm so just bursting proud to be an American last year, so shame, angry and scared.
• 1:51:22
  [UNKNOWN]: Thank God for President Trump, manga, musk, and streamers like you.
• 1:51:26
  [UNKNOWN]: Thank you and God bless, dude.
• 1:51:28
  [UNKNOWN]: Right back at your man, love you.
• 1:51:30
  [UNKNOWN]: Thank you, God bless, that's so awesome.
• 1:51:32
  [UNKNOWN]: It is.
• 1:51:33
  [UNKNOWN]: It is an incredibly exciting time to be alive.
• 1:51:36
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm not a big fan.
• 1:51:38
  [UNKNOWN]: of so much as you guys know, I don't like the, uh, hit in esoteric, nostic.
• 1:51:44
  [UNKNOWN]: Here's what's really going on conspiracy stuff.
• 1:51:47
  [UNKNOWN]: Never liked it.
• 1:51:48
  [UNKNOWN]: It was never attracted to it.
• 1:51:50
  [UNKNOWN]: I find reality to be so fascinating.
• 1:51:53
  [UNKNOWN]: I find what's happening right now to be so incredibly exciting.
• 1:51:57
  [UNKNOWN]: None of that stuff even remotely interests me.
• 1:52:00
  [UNKNOWN]: So I'm right with the WS now.
• 1:52:03
  [UNKNOWN]: Thank you for that.
• 1:52:05
  [UNKNOWN]: Katherine, I recently concluded President Trump eventually endorses candidates.
• 1:52:09
  [UNKNOWN]: I supported through research before he announced the support for it seems to me Trump is supporting the people's base show signs of supporting.
• 1:52:17
  [UNKNOWN]: Example can packs in Texas.
• 1:52:19
  [UNKNOWN]: So he seems to choose candidates that guarantee his ability to prove his ability to make a break a politician rather than him responding to the wants of conservative supporters.
• 1:52:30
  [UNKNOWN]: Hope this makes sense what you say, which came first.
• 1:52:32
  [UNKNOWN]: It's checking right, yeah, no, that's a great.
• 1:52:35
  [UNKNOWN]: That's a great question.
• 1:52:37
  [UNKNOWN]: I'd have to look at some stats on that, but like I said, in the livestream, he's an equal opportunity, crusher, and endorser.
• 1:52:55
  [UNKNOWN]: He doesn't really care where you come from.
• 1:53:00
  [UNKNOWN]: He's about converting you to the team.
• 1:53:05
  [UNKNOWN]: And we're here to win, win, win, win.
• 1:53:07
  [UNKNOWN]: We're here to realign politics for a permanent Republican majority for the foreseeable future, are you in?
• 1:53:15
  [UNKNOWN]: And if you're not, get out.
• 1:53:16
  [UNKNOWN]: Or if you're in, but get out.
• 1:53:19
  [UNKNOWN]: There's no, there's no buts, get out.
• 1:53:22
  [UNKNOWN]: So I mean, when he took down Massey, everyone was like, oh, that's the Neocons, the Neocons win.
• 1:53:30
  [UNKNOWN]: And they're saying that the very morning, Trump endorsed Paxton over corn and neocon par excellence.
• 1:53:40
  [UNKNOWN]: They're saying that within the shadow of Bill Cassidy going down in flames, neocon par excellence.
• 1:53:47
  [UNKNOWN]: They're saying that in the shadow of, of now, Liz, Cheney got turned into a verb.
• 1:53:54
  [UNKNOWN]: She got cheneyed.
• 1:53:57
  [UNKNOWN]: You know, he doesn't care where you fall on your own little messaging map.
• 1:54:04
  [UNKNOWN]: What he cares about is are you on the team?
• 1:54:06
  [UNKNOWN]: He cares about loyalty and loyalty only.
• 1:54:09
  [UNKNOWN]: Marco was on the other side of it once in 2016.
• 1:54:12
  [UNKNOWN]: Marco got beat up pretty bad by Trump.
• 1:54:16
  [UNKNOWN]: And then, and then throughout his tenure, Marko is a little bit on the sidelines here or there.
• 1:54:21
  [UNKNOWN]: It's kind of Trump neutral.
• 1:54:23
  [UNKNOWN]: But as of 2024, Marko was all in 100% same with JFK, same with Tulsi.
• 1:54:31
  [UNKNOWN]: Same with JD, same with Dr. Ross.
• 1:54:35
  [UNKNOWN]: And we could just go down the list.
• 1:54:36
  [UNKNOWN]: What makes these guys,
• 1:54:40
  [UNKNOWN]: MAGA is they are team players with Trump as the coach.
• 1:54:45
  [UNKNOWN]: Trump is the general and they're they're they're Trump is the commander right there they're the whatever the the the lower generals are and they're given they're given out orders and when the general speaks we we do it we don't mess around because we're fighting a war here this isn't just some team sport this is war
• 1:55:06
  [UNKNOWN]: political war, ballots or bullets is what it's often said.
• 1:55:11
  [UNKNOWN]: So I don't have to look at it, but I think he's very in tune with what his base wants.
• 1:55:18
  [UNKNOWN]: And he's going to give them what he wants.
• 1:55:20
  [UNKNOWN]: But I think he's also, he goes his way.
• 1:55:24
  [UNKNOWN]: He goes the way he thinks we need to go.
• 1:55:27
  [UNKNOWN]: I think in Iran, we were a little bit like, whoa, what are you doing here?
• 1:55:30
  [UNKNOWN]: But then it started to make sense and what low and behold, his base says, we're with the man.
• 1:55:36
  [UNKNOWN]: We're with you.
• 1:55:37
  [UNKNOWN]: We're with you all the way through this.
• 1:55:40
  [UNKNOWN]: Massey didn't say that, Cornendon didn't say that, Cassidy didn't say that, you know, it was a, I patch McCain didn't say that, um, P. Favata, I never know how to say your name is it, Favata or P. Favata, forgive you, you post a lot here, so I want to say it right, Doc, you so smart, I love you so much to learn that lyrics, thank you, thank you, P. Favata,
• 1:56:06
  [UNKNOWN]: I hope you're there, play it very much, you're very sweet, thank you man, no, that's cool, very cool, very good, I like that.
• 1:56:14
  [UNKNOWN]: Benton Curry, Dr. C. Do you remember the time when the Democrats and their lap dog at mainstream media claim when Obama won the president of the United States and legislating majority, they boast of the left.
• 1:56:25
  [UNKNOWN]: What had a generation of majority in the good sort of movement was dead.
• 1:56:28
  [UNKNOWN]: Then the Tea Party and Magogenesis came for what do you thought?
• 1:56:31
  [UNKNOWN]: Absolutely.
• 1:56:32
  [UNKNOWN]: Again, they were more projecting.
• 1:56:34
  [UNKNOWN]: It was more prescriptive rather than descriptive.
• 1:56:36
  [UNKNOWN]: That's what they wanted.
• 1:56:38
  [UNKNOWN]: Not necessarily what was happening.
• 1:56:39
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah.
• 1:56:40
  [UNKNOWN]: The Republican Party fell apart in 2008.
• 1:56:43
  [UNKNOWN]: That's the dirty little secret.
• 1:56:49
  [UNKNOWN]: Carl Rove, well, I'll bring him up.
• 1:56:54
  [UNKNOWN]: He came in in 2012, but the Romney Rove,
• 1:56:58
  [UNKNOWN]: Ryan wing of the party destroyed it, it absolutely destroyed the party and it was it was a rock when all said and done it was a rock and it was just a it was a It was an elitist Republican party that just had lost touch with the working class voter and then they thought the solution to that, you know, they had their own autopsy
• 1:57:28
  [UNKNOWN]: uh... after the twenty twelve disaster they thought the solution to that was uh... this after the wrongy disaster was to become more like the democrats then become more like obama and start supporting amnesty opening up the borders
• 1:57:44
  [UNKNOWN]: being more, you know, diverse, and all that.
• 1:57:47
  [UNKNOWN]: That's why Marco Rubio at the time was really more or less the coronated candidate for 2016 that Trump crushed.
• 1:57:56
  [UNKNOWN]: They never, the establishment never quite forgave him for.
• 1:57:59
  [UNKNOWN]: But the establishment destroyed the party.
• 1:58:01
  [UNKNOWN]: They destroyed it.
• 1:58:02
  [UNKNOWN]: And so the people had to rebuild it.
• 1:58:05
  [UNKNOWN]: And so the party got destroyed in 2008.
• 1:58:08
  [UNKNOWN]: McCain was a perfect candidate for that destruction.
• 1:58:11
  [UNKNOWN]: And then within two years the people rose up and we had the Tea Party movement and it was a giant made 1994 look like a trickle it was a huge huge wave election again we won't see anything like that anymore just so you know with all the redistricting we won't see big massive wave elections like that a doubt at least and then.
• 1:58:35
  [UNKNOWN]: And then, of course, Obama won because the establishment came back and says, okay, that's fine for Congress, but we take a we take over the speaker i e-bainer, you know, we take over the house majority leader i Mitch McConnell, and then we take over who gets to be the presidential nominee i romney and again, a fellow part and yeah, they thought they would have to go.
• 1:58:58
  [UNKNOWN]: the way of the woke left in some way shape or form, 2014 happened, it was more just, it showed that the people really had no interest in going the way of Obama.
• 1:59:10
  [UNKNOWN]: And then Trump came in and then we finally found it.
• 1:59:13
  [UNKNOWN]: We finally found the secret sauce of what,
• 1:59:19
  [UNKNOWN]: really what the Christian coalition, what the Reagan coalition, what the Gingert Revolution and the Tea Party movement were longing for.
• 1:59:30
  [UNKNOWN]: What were they looked?
• 1:59:30
  [UNKNOWN]: They were looking for a leader who would come in and unwaveringly fight to establish
• 1:59:41
  [UNKNOWN]: a permanent Republican order in our nation.
• 1:59:46
  [UNKNOWN]: That's what they were looking for.
• 1:59:47
  [UNKNOWN]: They weren't looking for somebody being Mr. Gentile and working across the aisle, or what is that 180 at South Carolina State Center say.
• 1:59:58
  [UNKNOWN]: Our country's stronger with the Democrat and nope, you're gone.
• 2:00:01
  [UNKNOWN]: You don't know what time it is, but you're part of the oldest establishment go F off.
• 2:00:05
  [UNKNOWN]: So that's what they were looking for.
• 2:00:08
  [UNKNOWN]: So no, I think you're absolutely right, Benton.
• 2:00:13
  [UNKNOWN]: the land only I think one day they will be able to isolate the part of the brain where memories are stored and read them your electrical impulses after all yeah maybe but they're not only you can't be a materialist reductionless because then what you're giving me there are just that's just digital pixels that's all it is right now there's a mind behind that
• 2:00:35
  [UNKNOWN]: that mine can't be reduced to digital pixels or electoral impulses, but like you said, there is electoral impulses involved so to what extent can we be able to collect those memories.
• 2:00:48
  [UNKNOWN]: It would be very interesting.
• 2:00:49
  [UNKNOWN]: Harry Potter figured it out.
• 2:00:52
  [UNKNOWN]: Steffy Correction, it's draws in not
• 2:01:06
  [UNKNOWN]: Okay, all right.
• 2:01:10
  [UNKNOWN]: Now how about, so that's yours.
• 2:01:13
  [UNKNOWN]: Mine will be, how about now you see no constant in a politics in orthodoxy.
• 2:01:20
  [UNKNOWN]: Work on that one.
• 2:01:24
  [UNKNOWN]: Necrophilia James O'Keefe exposed a black rock head hunter two years ago talked about being able to buy senators.
• 2:01:31
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh yeah, yeah, yeah.
• 2:01:32
  [UNKNOWN]: I remember that.
• 2:01:33
  [UNKNOWN]: Who do you think fought John through?
• 2:01:35
  [UNKNOWN]: There you go.
• 2:01:36
  [UNKNOWN]: There you go.
• 2:01:36
  [UNKNOWN]: Good crowd.
• 2:01:37
  [UNKNOWN]: Well, again, it is that's the establishment.
• 2:01:40
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't know if it's one person.
• 2:01:42
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't know if it's a good question, like he's, oh yeah, we can buy a center, but it's more the state, it's, it's, we buy them through this gravy train that comes in and you do, I mean, I remember this was back in 2011, I had lunch with a donor and he was telling me that they had already decided on Romney.
• 2:02:11
  [UNKNOWN]: There's before even the primaries.
• 2:02:13
  [UNKNOWN]: They had already signed on Romney and the one thing they're all trying to figure out is how to keep Trump out of it.
• 2:02:18
  [UNKNOWN]: We're hearing Trump might want to cause trouble.
• 2:02:23
  [UNKNOWN]: But they'd already decided it was gonna be, it was gonna be Romney.
• 2:02:28
  [UNKNOWN]: All the money decided it was gonna be, they picked him, we didn't, they did.
• 2:02:32
  [UNKNOWN]: Right?
• 2:02:35
  [UNKNOWN]: Look, you're never going to be able to get money out of politics, even if you were to consolidate it all through the government, right?
• 2:02:41
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, if you were to make it all public like in Venezuela, the way they used to it.
• 2:02:46
  [UNKNOWN]: Cuba, you're still somebody's going to have control that money and that person's going to control.
• 2:02:52
  [UNKNOWN]: who's going to do this.
• 2:02:54
  [UNKNOWN]: You've got to have what's called an aristopopolis system.
• 2:02:58
  [UNKNOWN]: And this is something that political philosopher Patrick Deneen talks about.
• 2:03:02
  [UNKNOWN]: aristopopials and bottom line.
• 2:03:05
  [UNKNOWN]: The aristocracy that's in place, you're always going to have your elites, your wealthiness.
• 2:03:09
  [UNKNOWN]: So they have to have, they have to see as their greatest good acting in alignment with the values interest and concerns of the people.
• 2:03:20
  [UNKNOWN]: They can't treat the people as, you know, let a meat cake.
• 2:03:25
  [UNKNOWN]: You can't treat them as poppers like they don't matter, ha ha, who cares what they have to say.
• 2:03:31
  [UNKNOWN]: You have to see that only that the only vision for truly flourishing society is when those who have the means
• 2:03:42
  [UNKNOWN]: and act by those means the very values interesting concerns of the people who depend on those who have means to see those values interesting concerns represented.
• 2:03:55
  [UNKNOWN]: So that's where we're still waiting for in the Senate.
• 2:03:59
  [UNKNOWN]: We're still waiting to see that Aristopopulist
• 2:04:07
  [UNKNOWN]: realignment.
• 2:04:07
  [UNKNOWN]: There's still way too much oligarchical nonsense in the in the in the Senate.
• 2:04:16
  [UNKNOWN]: And again, you see it with someone like Graham Platter where he goes says, I know the enemy, the enemies, you all are garky, you know, I mean he's.
• 2:04:23
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, he's so full of it, but never the last, he knows it or the populist sense is there's a growing alienation between the people and the permanent political class.
• 2:04:33
  [UNKNOWN]: And the more Thun presents himself as literally a caricature of an aloof political class that governs for their own benefit, not for the benefit of the people, the more he is alienating himself from the very voters that he's supposed to represent.
• 2:04:54
  [UNKNOWN]: There's a whole consortium of cash providers that keep that system alive.
• 2:05:06
  [UNKNOWN]: Is rich Miami Cuzz?
• 2:05:09
  [UNKNOWN]: Is rich bears finally coming around to the increased possibility of the Republicans holding on to the house?
• 2:05:17
  [UNKNOWN]: Not to my knowledge, my amicas, not to know, I mean, he's a big, massive fan, and I think he, he was, he was not, certainly not happy with, with the, with the, with the massive loss, not happy with Trump, but what Trump is doing with the massive loss.
• 2:05:37
  [UNKNOWN]: No, that's.
• 2:05:38
  [UNKNOWN]: As I understand it, maybe he has since that was on Tuesday, but when I I availed myself a bit of what, of what he was arguing, he thinks Massie, the loss of Massie's the destruction of the Republican Party, at least him or Robert Barnes was saying that.
• 2:06:06
  [UNKNOWN]: And it's all based on Paul primarily not all I should but it's primarily based on polling and it's primarily based as I understand on his polling
• 2:06:16
  [UNKNOWN]: So, you know, I mean, for me, it's not the strongest argument, but the argument is the only way the Republicans win is if the Trump coalition translates into a GOP coalition.
• 2:06:31
  [UNKNOWN]: Right, so Trump does not, I'm sorry, the Republicans do not have a coalition, Trump has the coalition.
• 2:06:37
  [UNKNOWN]: And the only way the Republicans can win is to somehow that Trumpian coalition
• 2:06:45
  [UNKNOWN]: translates over into a Republican coalition, okay?
• 2:06:50
  [UNKNOWN]: So that's the first point of the argument.
• 2:06:53
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't know if that's necessarily true anymore, by the way, right?
• 2:06:57
  [UNKNOWN]: With, see that, so let me divide it out.
• 2:07:00
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't think that's necessarily true.
• 2:07:02
  [UNKNOWN]: Not with redistricting, not with the voter registration advantage, not with the money advantage.
• 2:07:07
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't think that's true.
• 2:07:08
  [UNKNOWN]: Now, the money can necessarily buy things, but the first thing people said,
• 2:07:12
  [UNKNOWN]: Trump knocked out Tom Massey.
• 2:07:14
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, well, they had to spend 35 million to do it.
• 2:07:16
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh, which is it?
• 2:07:17
  [UNKNOWN]: You know, John Cornton spent a hundred million to save the seat, didn't work.
• 2:07:20
  [UNKNOWN]: So, but money does help.
• 2:07:23
  [UNKNOWN]: Money does help.
• 2:07:23
  [UNKNOWN]: You definitely, if you don't have money, you're in trouble, right?
• 2:07:26
  [UNKNOWN]: So, I don't think in today's politics and the way it's getting restructured that the coalition is as important, per se.
• 2:07:35
  [UNKNOWN]: But I may be wrong, but that's the first premise.
• 2:07:38
  [UNKNOWN]: Second premise, as I understand it, is that Trump has destroyed his coalition.
• 2:07:43
  [UNKNOWN]: By bombing Iran and then by doing this whole originally back in June of 2025 and then the whole war that's been going on since February 28th, that's it, that's shattered the coalition.
• 2:07:59
  [UNKNOWN]: And so
• 2:08:02
  [UNKNOWN]: And what he's talking about is he's talking more about these peripheral voters, libertarians, non-white working class, low to no prop voters that to collectively made up the couple of
• 2:08:23
  [UNKNOWN]: popular vote victory, they're gone, and they're not going to show up for the midterms now.
• 2:08:28
  [UNKNOWN]: And so the Republicans are cooked.
• 2:08:32
  [UNKNOWN]: That's basically the argument, as I understand it, and not only do I find problematic the first premise, the Republicans have won without a Trump coalition.
• 2:08:47
  [UNKNOWN]: It's called 2022.
• 2:08:49
  [UNKNOWN]: They barely won, but they still won.
• 2:08:51
  [UNKNOWN]: So they don't need the Trump coalition to win.
• 2:08:54
  [UNKNOWN]: We don't even know if the Trump coalition can translate.
• 2:08:59
  [UNKNOWN]: as a congressional coalition.
• 2:09:01
  [UNKNOWN]: We've not seen it yet.
• 2:09:02
  [UNKNOWN]: So we don't even know that's possible.
• 2:09:07
  [UNKNOWN]: And then all this well, they've lost.
• 2:09:10
  [UNKNOWN]: They, the Trump coalition's been shattered.
• 2:09:12
  [UNKNOWN]: That's based on polling, primarily.
• 2:09:15
  [UNKNOWN]: Whereas like we've seen in a lot of these, like we saw in Georgia or publicans are coming out pretty strong right now.
• 2:09:23
  [UNKNOWN]: And they're defending their turf.
• 2:09:28
  [UNKNOWN]: the special elections have been a mixed match.
• 2:09:33
  [UNKNOWN]: There's been a lot that Republicans have lost, but there's been a lot that they've won, and they've even flipped a few seeds.
• 2:09:39
  [UNKNOWN]: And again, this is an off-year election when they're in power.
• 2:09:41
  [UNKNOWN]: Generally, it tends to swing the other way.
• 2:09:45
  [UNKNOWN]: So, I think my big problem with this when all said and done is it seems to be primarily based on polling, and very particular polling.
• 2:09:54
  [UNKNOWN]: Rich is on polling.
• 2:09:56
  [UNKNOWN]: I may be wrong.
• 2:09:57
  [UNKNOWN]: I know problem, but if it is, I think then there's a little bit of a circular argument going on.
• 2:10:02
  [UNKNOWN]: I think the polling is raising the alarm, the conclusions of the coalition.
• 2:10:12
  [UNKNOWN]: And then those conclusions are being used to interpret the polling.
• 2:10:17
  [UNKNOWN]: So I think there's a little bit of a.
• 2:10:19
  [UNKNOWN]: circular argument going on there.
• 2:10:22
  [UNKNOWN]: But more than that, you know, the polling, I just don't see polling, as you guys all know, I think there's a very healthy skepticism when it comes to polling.
• 2:10:34
  [UNKNOWN]: And his polling seems to be way out there on the extreme side of things.
• 2:10:39
  [UNKNOWN]: Whereas there's plenty of other polling that shows that Republicans and Democrats are pretty much, you know, Republicans were then just a few points in the generic ballot and even that doesn't matter because the generic ballot the way the districts are all spread out and different generic ballot doesn't matter that much.
• 2:10:58
  [UNKNOWN]: So I go with the structural indicators so I go with the voting registration trends.
• 2:11:07
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm going with the redistricting maps and I'm going with the money and all that right now it's all going to the to the Republican.
• 2:11:13
  [UNKNOWN]: So anyway so that's the argument we'll see but I don't I just don't see it.
• 2:11:18
  [UNKNOWN]: I think it's a I think it's a very sophisticated argument but I think it kind of breaks
• 2:11:29
  [UNKNOWN]: uh... paracteria's uh... if republicans lose any seats in the senate skittabee established neocons lose their seats plus we're getting big upgrades in the house and the senate already brand in her era and packed in push forward a man i love the way you're thinking and i think you're absolutely right um... that really things really got consolidated uh... in twenty twenty four so
• 2:11:54
  [UNKNOWN]: You know, for the last 20 years or so, there's been to my knowledge, maybe one if any state.
• 2:12:05
  [UNKNOWN]: That voted double digits for the Republican candidate like Texas voting for Trump by 14, for example, that voted double digits for a for a presidential candidate, but then, but then defected and voted for the other parties Senate candidate two years later, every single state that voted for Trump.
• 2:12:29
  [UNKNOWN]: by double digits has two solid red Republican senators.
• 2:12:34
  [UNKNOWN]: And that's what he's doing with Texas.
• 2:12:37
  [UNKNOWN]: He looked at Texas and said there is no way Texas is going, no, no, no, no.
• 2:12:43
  [UNKNOWN]: Not with God as binary boy, that's for sure.
• 2:12:47
  [UNKNOWN]: That's not happening.
• 2:12:48
  [UNKNOWN]: Texas isn't going blue.
• 2:12:50
  [UNKNOWN]: It hasn't gone blue, statewide since 1994.
• 2:12:53
  [UNKNOWN]: It's not going blue.
• 2:12:55
  [UNKNOWN]: So he's very smartly taking the deepest red states and saying, all right, I'm putting solid maga guys in there and we're getting, we're getting rid of the rhino trash.
• 2:13:06
  [UNKNOWN]: And that's exactly the neocontrash.
• 2:13:08
  [UNKNOWN]: And that's exactly what happened to John Coran.
• 2:13:10
  [UNKNOWN]: It's exactly what happened to Bill Cassidy.
• 2:13:14
  [UNKNOWN]: And it's exactly what's going to happen, by the way, to Lisa Murkowski.
• 2:13:18
  [UNKNOWN]: You just have to get rid of that stupid rank choice voting.
• 2:13:22
  [UNKNOWN]: But other than that, you got it, if anyone, if anyone loses, it's going to be more in purple states or around the margins and who are really, really neocon or or someone like someone like Susan Collins.
• 2:13:40
  [UNKNOWN]: I would also like to add get out and vote.
• 2:13:42
  [UNKNOWN]: We need to get Tom Tiffany and other members of the Republican ticket over the finish line in Wisconsin.
• 2:13:47
  [UNKNOWN]: We must defeat Francesca Hong and Mandela Barnes, both RDSA, got it, man, everybody.
• 2:13:55
  [UNKNOWN]: everybody get out there and vote in Wisconsin.
• 2:13:58
  [UNKNOWN]: Absolutely.
• 2:13:59
  [UNKNOWN]: Wisconsin's so much for the taking Wisconsin.
• 2:14:02
  [UNKNOWN]: The Republican party really has to get its act out together out there.
• 2:14:05
  [UNKNOWN]: That's to become a lot more populous that's really key to Wisconsin.
• 2:14:10
  [UNKNOWN]: But the key, Wisconsin doesn't track voter registration by party.
• 2:14:16
  [UNKNOWN]: So the key indicator for Wisconsin is Iowa.
• 2:14:19
  [UNKNOWN]: where Iowa votes was constant votes about nine points to the left of Iowa.
• 2:14:27
  [UNKNOWN]: So one of the things that Seth Cashell was able to predict was if Trump won Iowa by like 11, that meant he was going to win Wisconsin by two.
• 2:14:38
  [UNKNOWN]: So that's kind of the fun games you get to play with voter registration, it comes out almost exact.
• 2:14:44
  [UNKNOWN]: And by the way, it's exactly what happened more or less.
• 2:14:48
  [UNKNOWN]: Whereas if Trump was up by seven in Iowa, actually, that'd be bad news.
• 2:14:53
  [UNKNOWN]: Because that means he's probably down by a couple in Wisconsin.
• 2:14:58
  [UNKNOWN]: So I was been going right.
• 2:15:00
  [UNKNOWN]: It's been trending red, deeper and deeper and deeper all these months.
• 2:15:06
  [UNKNOWN]: And so we just got to get, we got to get things much more structured there.
• 2:15:10
  [UNKNOWN]: So we don't have those, you know, Supreme Court fiascas that we've been seeing.
• 2:15:17
  [UNKNOWN]: Kevin, should President Trump promise retiring and primary right of senators and ambassador ship.
• 2:15:23
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, they vote for the same America accent and abroad.
• 2:15:25
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, that's it.
• 2:15:27
  [UNKNOWN]: So right now, Cassidy, Cornan, tell us I think it's too pissed.
• 2:15:34
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't think you were going to get anything to tell us.
• 2:15:35
  [UNKNOWN]: But,
• 2:15:36
  [UNKNOWN]: Cassidy and corn and are waiting for their compensation package.
• 2:15:40
  [UNKNOWN]: Yep.
• 2:15:40
  [UNKNOWN]: They're waiting for the retirement package.
• 2:15:43
  [UNKNOWN]: That's how politics works.
• 2:15:45
  [UNKNOWN]: They've got a vote.
• 2:15:45
  [UNKNOWN]: You need it.
• 2:15:46
  [UNKNOWN]: What do you get to give me?
• 2:15:47
  [UNKNOWN]: So, absolutely.
• 2:15:49
  [UNKNOWN]: Of course, they can Trump could give him whatever they want.
• 2:15:52
  [UNKNOWN]: And he has no problem doing it.
• 2:15:53
  [UNKNOWN]: He knows how to play the game.
• 2:15:57
  [UNKNOWN]: Texas and Lashak, if we get a deal on Iran, how it not just be kicking the can down the road.
• 2:16:03
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't think anyone trusts them to abide by it.
• 2:16:05
  [UNKNOWN]: Even when we take their uranium, they'll probably try to get more and start again.
• 2:16:09
  [UNKNOWN]: Great, no, it's a very, very good question, it's excellent.
• 2:16:13
  [UNKNOWN]: There is a difference.
• 2:16:14
  [UNKNOWN]: This is what I'm writing a book on this on what I call the SIV calls them civilization calls democracy.
• 2:16:20
  [UNKNOWN]: There is a difference.
• 2:16:21
  [UNKNOWN]: It's called the Abraham Accords.
• 2:16:22
  [UNKNOWN]: The Abraham Accords are now the new peace and prosperity, regional architecture for the Middle East.
• 2:16:31
  [UNKNOWN]: So it involves Israeli mite with Arab muscle, and they're coming together and coming together brilliantly throughout this process.
• 2:16:39
  [UNKNOWN]: Mohammed bin Salman is not technically a member of it.
• 2:16:43
  [UNKNOWN]: He tries to be a bit independent, but he's fully on board.
• 2:16:47
  [UNKNOWN]: One of the arguments was one of the reasons for October 7th was Iran's real concern.
• 2:16:54
  [UNKNOWN]: That Saudi Arabia was going to be locking arms with Tel Aviv, and they did not want that.
• 2:16:59
  [UNKNOWN]: And so they had to make the Palestinian issue once again an issue for Saudi Arabia being sort of at least the regional center of Islam with with Mecca and Medina.
• 2:17:10
  [UNKNOWN]: So so with that architecture in place.
• 2:17:17
  [UNKNOWN]: What had to, what we had to get rid of was Iran's ability to project power, because the one interruption of that architecture was their ability to project power both in terms of their own weaponry and then in terms of their proxy networks that they frankly paid off and supplied with weaponry in the forms of Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis that's all been shattered.
• 2:17:46
  [UNKNOWN]: And so now the negotiations are in place to try to find how we're going to contain Iran in this new Abraham Accord to era.
• 2:18:00
  [UNKNOWN]: So this is new.
• 2:18:01
  [UNKNOWN]: This is not kicking down, kicking the can down the road like we've been seeing for the last 47 years.
• 2:18:06
  [UNKNOWN]: This is something fundamentally new here.
• 2:18:09
  [UNKNOWN]: Trump knows it and that's what he's going for.
• 2:18:12
  [UNKNOWN]: So it's going to be hard.
• 2:18:13
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, there's a lot of pieces to to to sift through and position, but in the end, Trump is medically.
• 2:18:23
  [UNKNOWN]: They will not be allowed to have and rich uranium.
• 2:18:25
  [UNKNOWN]: And the enriched uranium has to be taken out of their hands and fully accounted for.
• 2:18:31
  [UNKNOWN]: And he's made it clear that that will happen that that's his unconditional surrender when all said and done and it looks like you know keep in mind to there's plenty of people in the Iranian regime that are more part of the the popularly elected parliament side of things like possession the president.
• 2:18:51
  [UNKNOWN]: They want him to start, I guarantee they want the U.S. forces and Israeli force to start bombing again because they want him to take out some of the IRGC, some more of the IRGC, the guys that are getting in their way.
• 2:19:04
  [UNKNOWN]: Remember, this is not one government, this is several governments, these are several factions and they're plenty in the Iranian parliamentary wing that would love to make a deal with the United States and start a new chapter in the Iranian Republic.
• 2:19:20
  [UNKNOWN]: but they got the IRGC hardliners threatening them that they do that, then they're treasonous, they're traders, and they'll be hanged, right?
• 2:19:29
  [UNKNOWN]: So, you know, they wouldn't mind a couple of more sorties of bombing, so we'll have to see what happens, but it won't be the same.
• 2:19:38
  [UNKNOWN]: Jim, Massey and A-Pak controls our Congress.
• 2:19:41
  [UNKNOWN]: Each Congress person has their A-Pak handler on speed dial and check with them before important votes.
• 2:19:48
  [UNKNOWN]: Massey said A-Pak controls our Congress, each Congress person has their A-Pak handler on speed dial and check with them before important votes.
• 2:19:58
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, I mean, is that, I mean, are you making a call?
• 2:20:07
  [UNKNOWN]: This is, this is what I mean when I say that I think Tucker and Massey and canna so and they're all part of an old world.
• 2:20:19
  [UNKNOWN]: They're all part of a world that actually doesn't even really exist anymore.
• 2:20:25
  [UNKNOWN]: The old days of the Jewish lobby, and they were very real, and they were very powerful.
• 2:20:33
  [UNKNOWN]: So John Mirchheimer's written about it.
• 2:20:35
  [UNKNOWN]: It was a big critic of it.
• 2:20:38
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't know if I go all the way with it.
• 2:20:40
  [UNKNOWN]: I mean, there are some counter arguments, certainly to what he said.
• 2:20:43
  [UNKNOWN]: But there was, but there's no question that APAC was probably the most powerful lobby in Congress.
• 2:20:54
  [UNKNOWN]: For decades, siding with APAC meant siding against the Arab Gulf countries.
• 2:21:03
  [UNKNOWN]: And that was the tension in Middle Eastern geopolitics.
• 2:21:09
  [UNKNOWN]: If you side it on the side of Israel, you were siding against the Sunni Arab countries, who certainly siding against the Iranian regime post-79 and you were siding against the vast majority of the United Nations.
• 2:21:25
  [UNKNOWN]: Welcome to the era of the Abraham Accords.
• 2:21:29
  [UNKNOWN]: The Abraham Accords have completely upended that world.
• 2:21:34
  [UNKNOWN]: The most of us just look, we look at news that we think is important and then we care about and it's within our own sphere.
• 2:21:41
  [UNKNOWN]: And we anything else we just pretend doesn't exist.
• 2:21:44
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm not saying that's what you're doing, Jim.
• 2:21:46
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm just saying in general, that's we all have that habit.
• 2:21:50
  [UNKNOWN]: So one of the things I have to watch out for as being a commentator is how much am I doing that, how much am I overlooking and dismissing all of these different factors that may be happening and I don't even know that.
• 2:22:02
  [UNKNOWN]: So that's why I have a pretty high power AI scanning the globe headlines and everything reporting each day.
• 2:22:10
  [UNKNOWN]: on what's going on in the world and I look at the civilizational structures and so for a lot of people ignored the significance of the Abraham Accords and the Abraham Accords by the way, have only grown.
• 2:22:23
  [UNKNOWN]: They've only gotten bigger since 2020 when they were signed and broken by President Trump.
• 2:22:29
  [UNKNOWN]: the Abraham Accords have removed the whole issue of the Palestinians from the equation by bringing all countries together Israel and the Sunni Arab countries to rebuild Gaza into the Riviera of the Middle East.
• 2:22:45
  [UNKNOWN]: That was Trump's vision of
• 2:22:47
  [UNKNOWN]: going forward with the Abraham Accords.
• 2:22:50
  [UNKNOWN]: But then they went farther and recognized that this is an opportunity to realign the entire region in such a way that disrupts and interrupts Iran's attempt to control the regional architecture through their proxies.
• 2:23:09
  [UNKNOWN]: But the only way Iran could do that is that their finance because they're so heavily sanctioned and who's the chief finance
• 2:23:17
  [UNKNOWN]: So part of the new multi-polar brick-soriented world of which Iran just joined was to have China end up becoming the financier of Iran and therefore have de facto control over the straight-of-port moves, a single most important energy choke point.
• 2:23:38
  [UNKNOWN]: On the planet, all the while they were providing the money,
• 2:23:41
  [UNKNOWN]: for Iran to control the security and monetary architecture of the region through their proxies, not the Abraham Accords.
• 2:23:52
  [UNKNOWN]: So the Abraham Accords were really, they were going up against Iran and China.
• 2:24:03
  [UNKNOWN]: So what does Israel have to do with that?
• 2:24:08
  [UNKNOWN]: What is Israel alone have to do with it?
• 2:24:11
  [UNKNOWN]: What is A-pack have to do with that?
• 2:24:16
  [UNKNOWN]: Nothing more or less than what Saudi Arabia has to do with that.
• 2:24:22
  [UNKNOWN]: And what Bahrain has to do with that.
• 2:24:24
  [UNKNOWN]: And the UAE has to do with that.
• 2:24:27
  [UNKNOWN]: And Kuwait has to do with that.
• 2:24:29
  [UNKNOWN]: And Egypt has to do with that.
• 2:24:31
  [UNKNOWN]: And even by implication, Turkey has to do with that.
• 2:24:34
  [UNKNOWN]: Suddenly now they're all in the same team.
• 2:24:38
  [UNKNOWN]: So this whole nonsense.
• 2:24:44
  [UNKNOWN]: that Trump is fighting BB Netanyahu's wars is a trope from an era that doesn't exist anymore.
• 2:24:54
  [UNKNOWN]: If it was siding with Israel so that we team up against the Gulf, the Suni Gulf Arab states.
• 2:25:02
  [UNKNOWN]: Sure, I get it.
• 2:25:04
  [UNKNOWN]: Yes, and then we'd have to rethink what the hell's going on.
• 2:25:07
  [UNKNOWN]: Why is he doing this?
• 2:25:08
  [UNKNOWN]: What possible advantages this for the United States and so forth?
• 2:25:14
  [UNKNOWN]: But when you recognize that we're dealing now with networked polarity, we're an age of networked multi-polarity and we're a Abrahamic Accordic Accorded an Abrahamic Accord's Alliance has provided a vision for architecture, a peace and prosperity in the region that is in direct
• 2:25:41
  [UNKNOWN]: that's clashing directly with Iran and its Hezbollah, Hamas, and Hutti Proxies and China's financiering of Iran suddenly then you realize, okay, we've got a civilizational clash here that goes way freaking beyond a path.
• 2:26:03
  [UNKNOWN]: So that's, you know, I do, I try to use this channel as opportunities to help you understand some of the geopolitical dynamics that are going in the world.
• 2:26:13
  [UNKNOWN]: They don't make it in the podcasts, I get it, or they just, or they're just brushed off.
• 2:26:17
  [UNKNOWN]: It's, oh, that's just more Jewish propaganda, whatever, right?
• 2:26:21
  [UNKNOWN]: I'm just telling you the way the world is as I see it, and APAC's got very little do do with it.
• 2:26:32
  [UNKNOWN]: Tomassey Laws, because he tried to take out the big dog.
• 2:26:38
  [UNKNOWN]: He tried to stand up to the big dog and the big dog crushed him.
• 2:26:42
  [UNKNOWN]: That's why he lost.
• 2:26:43
  [UNKNOWN]: He tried to be a gad fly with Epstein and with Israel and turns out Kentucky Ford and Gibble with, about either one of them, they wanted the Magga agenda supported.
• 2:26:55
  [UNKNOWN]: And if you're not going to support it, you're out.
• 2:26:58
  [UNKNOWN]: And again, it doesn't matter if you're a libertarian
• 2:27:02
  [UNKNOWN]: or if you're, or if you're a neocon rhino like John Cornean, they both got taken out in the same freaking day.
• 2:27:12
  [UNKNOWN]: Stop telling me this is new comes, taking over the Republican poor, taking over Magga.
• 2:27:17
  [UNKNOWN]: Tell that to John Corne and tell that to Bill Cassidy.
• 2:27:20
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh, well, they're the exception there.
• 2:27:22
  [UNKNOWN]: Ah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
• 2:27:24
  [UNKNOWN]: Death by a thousand exceptions.
• 2:27:26
  [UNKNOWN]: No, bottom line, bottom line, Massey was more about message than governing.
• 2:27:32
  [UNKNOWN]: He didn't go.
• 2:27:33
  [UNKNOWN]: How many, how many bills of his to respond to that became law over his 12 years?
• 2:27:38
  [UNKNOWN]: Crickets.
• 2:27:44
  [UNKNOWN]: At some point, could someone report on the back in Ohio, please?
• 2:27:47
  [UNKNOWN]: Mama, mama bear Christine.
• 2:27:49
  [UNKNOWN]: He'll win, uh, handily.
• 2:27:52
  [UNKNOWN]: There's just too many Republicans in Ohio.
• 2:27:54
  [UNKNOWN]: He'll win handily.
• 2:27:55
  [UNKNOWN]: He'll be fine.
• 2:27:55
  [UNKNOWN]: Don't worry.
• 2:27:56
  [UNKNOWN]: Ohio is very hard to pull, uh, but in the end, it always goes red.
• 2:28:01
  [UNKNOWN]: You have to worry about anything.
• 2:28:04
  [UNKNOWN]: BB, thanks for keeping me sane and hope.
• 2:28:06
  [UNKNOWN]: Thanks, BB, both of us, right?
• 2:28:08
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah.
• 2:28:10
  [UNKNOWN]: We keep each other sane and hopeful.
• 2:28:12
  [UNKNOWN]: Absolutely.
• 2:28:14
  [UNKNOWN]: Love you too much.
• 2:28:16
  [UNKNOWN]: You can even vote more than once in person since they don't ask for IDs and blue states.
• 2:28:22
  [UNKNOWN]: Just go to different, different polling places.
• 2:28:24
  [UNKNOWN]: You don't even have to write, you show up with makeup or costumes or, no more, I haven't been here yet today.
• 2:28:34
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, that'll be so funny.
• 2:28:35
  [UNKNOWN]: So it's so ridiculous, it's, you have to meme it.
• 2:28:39
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, you have to play off the insanity of it.
• 2:28:44
  [UNKNOWN]: BB Denns also are seeking collapse and they're seeing a collapse in their coalition.
• 2:28:48
  [UNKNOWN]: They are well, it was the Obama coalition and the Obama coalition became the Trump coalition.
• 2:28:54
  [UNKNOWN]: So they lost their coalition.
• 2:28:55
  [UNKNOWN]: They don't have one.
• 2:28:57
  [UNKNOWN]: The I think Biden was the first presidential candidate to win without without any discernible coalition.
• 2:29:07
  [UNKNOWN]: And it crushed them in 2022 and 2024.
• 2:29:12
  [UNKNOWN]: try magic how about making the senate decided by the states again versus popular yeah but it's not gonna happen now you're not getting a good luck on that
• 2:29:22
  [UNKNOWN]: Peritorious breaking news, the N.I.
• 2:29:24
  [UNKNOWN]: director tells you it has resigned.
• 2:29:26
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh my gosh, her last day would be June 30th.
• 2:29:29
  [UNKNOWN]: She's resigned to support her husband and is fight with a rate bound rate bond cancer.
• 2:29:34
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh my gosh.
• 2:29:35
  [UNKNOWN]: Oh wow.
• 2:29:36
  [UNKNOWN]: Okay.
• 2:29:37
  [UNKNOWN]: I did hear some rumors that she might get replaced.
• 2:29:40
  [UNKNOWN]: I think they were very upset with her and and her what's his name Matt.
• 2:29:47
  [UNKNOWN]: Why am I forgetting?
• 2:29:48
  [UNKNOWN]: A Jill Walsh, not Matt Walsh.
• 2:29:50
  [UNKNOWN]: Joe Walsh, who is under her leadership.
• 2:29:54
  [UNKNOWN]: I don't know, I don't know anything about it, but I did hear rumors, but if there was somebody that was next to go would be Tulsi, I understand.
• 2:30:03
  [UNKNOWN]: Stephanie, the Oregon election and a massive issue huge amount of mail and ballots didn't have selection for the public candidates even with that, DRAZON 1 by 30,000.
• 2:30:13
  [UNKNOWN]: Yeah, let me get hold on.
• 2:30:16
  [UNKNOWN]: Let me get this or DRAZON, DRAZON, and how are you?
• 2:30:19
  [UNKNOWN]: Let me make sure I get my.
• 2:30:26
  [UNKNOWN]: Okay, well, yeah, so I was going to my my I got a great computer here, but it goes to sleep.
• 2:30:31
  [UNKNOWN]: I know I when I'm some battery and I know I have to just readjust it, but it literally goes to sleep.
• 2:30:37
  [UNKNOWN]: I have to wake this thing up and ask to reboot and so forth Oregon's a mess because it's a blue state and it's going to take a long time for Oregon to get to get back into the swing of things, but like you said, it is trending red.
• 2:30:52
  [UNKNOWN]: And that's a good thing and just keep it up, you know, you've got your greater Idaho movement going all with the 13 counties saying we we don't want to be a part of this anymore again, it's just momentum is getting people engaged and active and then let me get your Christine draws and right or yeah, right, she's the Republican.
• 2:31:18
  [UNKNOWN]: And then you said she won by 30,000.
• 2:31:23
  [UNKNOWN]: In that I don't know what you're like if you're talking about 22 right I thought she she came within losing or she came within winning by 30,000, but maybe you're saying there's some there's some shenanigans going on there.
• 2:31:35
  [UNKNOWN]: So anyway.
• 2:31:38
  [UNKNOWN]: And there you go.
• 2:31:38
  [UNKNOWN]: All right guys have a wonderful weekend.
• 2:31:40
  [UNKNOWN]: I will be your back porch professor of any events come up.
• 2:31:44
  [UNKNOWN]: I will do my best to give breaking news and analysis.
• 2:31:46
  [UNKNOWN]: You're not going to get anywhere else.
• 2:31:48
  [UNKNOWN]: Love you guys stay safe.
• 2:31:49
  [UNKNOWN]: God bless.
• 2:31:51
  [UNKNOWN]: Thanks so much for listening to this episode of The Turley Talks Podcast.
• 2:31:55
  [UNKNOWN]: Don't forget to subscribe, leave us a five-star review, and share this episode with your friends.
• 2:32:00
  [UNKNOWN]: Help us defeat the fake news media and rank us the number one news and commentary podcast all over the world.
• 2:32:08
  [UNKNOWN]: Come back again tomorrow for another episode celebrating the rise of a new conservative age.