Latest / THINK BEFORE YOU SLEEP / Anita Sarkeesian Bites the Dust

Transcript

Anita Sarkeesian Bites the Dust · THINK BEFORE YOU SLEEP

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: One of the big arguments of the left is that
• 0:02
  Speaker 1: the evil capitalists who make commercials on TV have brainwashed
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: society into certain cultural norms. So if you're going to
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: be a boy, well, then you have to play with
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: trucks and action figures. And if you're going to be
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: a girl, you have to play with dolls. And it's
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: all part of this whole big brainwashing technique that they
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: use to sell and make money and do things that
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: are evil in general. Not to mention that those companies
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: who are evil also employ a lot of you, and
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: you wouldn't have jobs if they didn't sell toys. Now,
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: unless you sit there and brainwash the person over and
• 0:38
  Speaker 1: over and over again for years and years, it is
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: not very likely that you can brainwash them into liking
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: something they don't actually value. So maybe if you had
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: an entire school system that people were at for 12 years,
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: if not more, where you just... throw an idea down
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: their throat over and over and over again. Maybe you
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: can brainwash and change some of their actual desires. But
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: for the most part, if your company is selling something
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: and you only have a 10 to 30 second commercial
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: on TV, you're not going to have time to brainwash
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: your customer into buying your product. And this is why
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: these companies have focus groups and they do lots of testing.
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: When they do those things, they're trying to determine what
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: the audience already values and what they already like. And
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: it's the goal of the company to provide that thing
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: to the audience. This is something that Tom Lankes would
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: say all the time. He's like, I'm not sitting here
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: telling you what to believe. I'm telling you what you
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: already believe and I'm articulating it better than you can
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: articulate it. And that's how you find value in philosophical conversation.
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: That's all I do in this channel is I find
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: out what the people believe. I find out how that
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: lines up with my beliefs and I just sit there
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: and articulate it better. That way you have that information
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: more readily usable. So if you believe a certain thing
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: about truth and I kind of am in line with that,
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: I might do a better job at articulating your version
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: of how you believe your truth than you can, which
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: is why you would listen to a channel like this.
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: And so all I'm doing is just repeating things you
• 1:59
  Speaker 1: already believe, and that's what every good speaker does, is
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: they repeat things you already believe. So here's how this
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: relates to Anita Sarkeesian, because Anita, like many other feminists,
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: believe that they can change the opinions in the minds
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: of their audience rather than doing what good speakers do,
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: is just reflect the opinions and minds of their audience.
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: And it clearly is not working because she is basically bankrupt,
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: or at least her company, Feminist Frequency, is bankrupt. And
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: I'm not going to go over the finance of that
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: too much. I'll just put a video in the description
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: of a guy who did a much better job than
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: I would do at discussing her finances. But basically, she's
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: spending way more money than she's bringing in, and her
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: company has basically gone broke. I think the only reason
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: her company did survive was outside of that first Kickstarter campaign,
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: which people... If you don't know, if you don't remember
• 2:45
  Speaker 1: this from a couple years ago, she raised something like $ 160, 000
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: to make six videos on YouTube about how games are sexist. Now,
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: based on the quality of these videos that she produced,
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: they cost nowhere near the $ 160, 000 that she made on
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: her Kickstarter campaign. And by the way, she promised to
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: deliver them, and I think she didn't deliver those six
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: videos for like well over a year or two before
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: she finished the whole project. Not to mention that I
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: have some other information. I don't know if this is
• 3:15
  Speaker 1: posted publicly yet or if people know about this, but
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: all of the expensive camera equipment that she used, she
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: didn't have to pay for that stuff. That was actually
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: donated to her. She borrowed it from some of her
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: male friends, probably some of her male feminist friends. And
• 3:30
  Speaker 1: so that's already a huge amount of the cost taken down.
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: I mean, a good, decent camera cost at least $ 1, 000
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: at that point, if not more than that. Plus, you
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: have to get lighting equipment. You have to get audio equipment.
• 3:42
  Speaker 1: And there's all this type of stuff that you need
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: to record a decent video and make yourself look good.
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: All that was just donated to her. She didn't even
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: have to use her Kickstarter money. So basically she, she
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: kind of stole this $ 160, 000 and didn't really deliver on,
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: on what her promise was, or at least didn't deliver
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: on it for a very, very long time. Like these
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: videos could have been made in a couple of weeks
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: and she took like a couple of years to do it,
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: or she took at least a year. I forget the timeline,
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: but it was a, well over what it would have
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: taken to make six videos on how games are sexist.
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: And the content of her videos were completely devoid of
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: any sort of truth. Like, any sort of basic gamer
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: who's been playing video games for a couple years could
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: have poked holes all through what she was saying. I
• 4:23
  Speaker 1: think it was so easy to knock her down because
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: she wasn't actually a video game player. Like, people have
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: been asking, well, if you're a real game player and
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: you have this big Steam profile, why don't you make
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: your Steam profile public so we can see how much
• 4:34
  Speaker 1: games you play? And I think her answer was no
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: on that because the answer is she doesn't play video games.
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: And even when they've got this video of her in college,
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: and if I can find this, I'll put this in
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: the description, of her saying that, well, she doesn't play
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: video games. She had to do a lot of video
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: game research to write this particular essay, and she was
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: in her 20s. So she has not been someone who's
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: been playing games her entire life, and it's very easy
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: to tell because her main argument of these videos was
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: that there's not enough female roles in video games And
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: that is a complete lie. I think women are often
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: overrepresented in video games based on how many women play
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: video games, which is not very many. I mean, here's
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: some big ones that people would know. Laura Croft from
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: Tomb Raider. Joanna Dark from Perfect Dark. Fantastic game, by
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: the way. I just beat that game again about six
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: months ago. Samus from Metroid. Terra or Tina from Final
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: Fantasy VI. Actually, most if not all the Final Fantasy
• 5:30
  Speaker 1: games have a pretty strong female cast. I think the
• 5:32
  Speaker 1: only one that doesn't is like 15 or something like that.
• 5:36
  Speaker 1: a lot of female characters and a lot of female
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: leads in RPGs. So complete lie, and people who are
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: the male audience can see right through that, so the
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: message doesn't hit. And so because the message doesn't hit
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: with the broader audience, her and actually Zoe Quinn as well,
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: I believe Zoe Quinn was the star of GamerGate, Zoe
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: Quinn who slept her way all the way up to
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: the UN and made this game called Depression Quest, which
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: is a very, very awful game. I actually played it.
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: It was not even a game. It was like a website.
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: It was like a questionnaire. If you have this, here's
• 6:10
  Speaker 1: what you can do. If you have that, that's what
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: you can do. It sounds boring because it is boring.
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: It was a terrible game. The only reason anybody knows
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: anything about it was because she slept with some people
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: at Kotaku, or at least a person at Kotaku, to
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: get that person to write a good review about her game,
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: despite the fact that it sucks. I believe there was
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: one more A girl who made, it's like Brianna or
• 6:32
  Speaker 1: something like that, or Brittany, who made another game that
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: was just god-awful, and she got all over the news
• 6:36
  Speaker 1: saying that people didn't like her game because there's sex.
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: It's like, we don't like your game because it sucks.
• 6:41
  Speaker 1: And so if that's the case, you can't bully people
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: into liking your stuff. I mean, they tried to do
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: this with Ghostbusters, and nobody watched Ghostbusters. They tried to
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: do this with Star Wars, and look what happened. They
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: lost money, and nobody wanted to watch it. So no
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: amount of feminism is going to make people want to
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: buy your product. and no amount of feminism is going
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: to make people naturally attracted to a certain thing. In fact,
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: on that note, I've actually met Anita Sarkeesian, by the way.
• 7:06
  Speaker 1: I met her back in 2016. I remember saying a
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: couple words to her, but I can't remember what those
• 7:11
  Speaker 1: words were. But that wasn't the point in this particular event,
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: because the point was to go see her live and
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: see how she presents to an actual audience. And it
• 7:20
  Speaker 1: turns out her and the people on her panel were
• 7:23
  Speaker 1: not very interesting. That panel was an hour, and unfortunately,
• 7:26
  Speaker 1: I sat in the very front row, so I couldn't
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: just leave politely. I was so bored the entire time
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: that I can't believe these people can attract any sort
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: of audience. Most of the time when you see Anita Sarkeesian,
• 7:37
  Speaker 1: you're seeing small little clips or you're seeing a cut-up video,
• 7:40
  Speaker 1: but when she has to hold and her friends have
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: to hold an hour of conversation, oh my God, I
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: had a lot of trouble paying attention. All they really
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: did for that whole hour was just talk about how
• 7:50
  Speaker 1: they were oppressed in a very, very boring way. I
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: honestly can't really remember like one strong point they made
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: because I don't think they really made any strong points.
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: She was pretty, pretty boring. And that's not the only
• 8:02
  Speaker 1: thing that's gone on VidCon with her because I think
• 8:04
  Speaker 1: she's been at quite a few VidCons. At least she
• 8:06
  Speaker 1: was at one one or two years ago where Boogie2988,
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: a big YouTuber, was talking. Her and him were on
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: a panel that talked about bullying. Someone who, Boogie298, someone
• 8:18
  Speaker 1: who's been very, very bullied for being overweight and bullied
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: by his mother his entire life and then now bullied
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: by his audience where he's had people send him boxes
• 8:25
  Speaker 1: of shit to his front door and had actual threats,
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: whereas Anita Sarkeesian maybe has threats. I'm a little skeptical
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: of that. And here's another video reference I'll give you.
• 8:35
  Speaker 1: I'll give you a reference of Boogie talking about his
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: event with Anita Sarkeesian and basically how horribly he was
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: treated by her. This person who is supposed to be
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: out for the victim. Women are the victims. Women are
• 8:47
  Speaker 1: the oppressed class. I'm here on behalf of women speaking
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: for them because they're too afraid to speak because I'm
• 8:53
  Speaker 1: here to help the victims. And as someone who's promoted
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: the message of being the protector of victims, she was
• 8:58
  Speaker 1: a complete tyrant to an actual victim. In fact, Boogie
• 9:00
  Speaker 1: recounts that he was afraid of going on this panel
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: with her because he was afraid of things that he
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: had heard about her. He was afraid of her attacking him,
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: which he did. And they had to have a conversation
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: for like an hour after the event where Boogie she
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: had to explain to Boogie how terrible of a person
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: he was and how wrong it was to say that
• 9:21
  Speaker 1: men are victims too. But that telling of the story
• 9:24
  Speaker 1: will be in the description below. Just another example of
• 9:26
  Speaker 1: how really not great of a person Ines Sarkeesian is.
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: Not only is she not a great speaker, not only
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: is she actually attacking the people who she proclaims to defend,
• 9:36
  Speaker 1: but even her own staff, people reported on her own
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: staff that she didn't pay them. They were often working
• 9:42
  Speaker 1: for free or they were owed money and they weren't paid.
• 9:45
  Speaker 1: So that's another great way to lose your support is
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: not only to have a message that nobody cares about,
• 9:49
  Speaker 1: but to not actually help the people who are helping you.
• 9:51
  Speaker 1: And one thing I remember from reading that book Rich
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: Dad Poor Dad about 10 years ago is that Robert
• 9:56
  Speaker 1: Kiyosaki says that you should pay your staff well. If
• 9:59
  Speaker 1: you want to get a lot of money back from
• 10:01
  Speaker 1: your taxes that you had to pay, pay a good accountant.
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: Don't pay a shitty accountant. If you want to make
• 10:05
  Speaker 1: sure that you don't get in trouble with the law,
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: get a really good lawyer. The people who are out
• 10:09
  Speaker 1: here that help you, make sure they are well paid
• 10:11
  Speaker 1: so they actually like working for you so they actually
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: defend you when things go wrong. And as soon as
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: things started going wrong for Anita, they just kind of left.
• 10:18
  Speaker 1: They said, well, she's kind of a bitch. So I'm
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: not going to help her at all. She didn't help
• 10:22
  Speaker 1: me when I needed help. So why should I help her?
• 10:24
  Speaker 1: And maybe I get a sixth sense of pleasure out
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: of this more so than others, because I've heard all
• 10:28
  Speaker 1: my life that people don't prefer the truth. People prefer
• 10:31
  Speaker 1: comfortable lives over things that are difficult to handle. And
• 10:35
  Speaker 1: as far as we've seen with the internet, that is
• 10:37
  Speaker 1: not the case. Because what's happened as the truth has
• 10:40
  Speaker 1: been unveiled a lot more, people have started going more
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: towards the truth. It's like, here's what it's like. You
• 10:46
  Speaker 1: have a car. And you've got a really, really good
• 10:49
  Speaker 1: car that gets good mileage. It goes really fast. It
• 10:52
  Speaker 1: looks really nice. And it's been well tested. It's very,
• 10:55
  Speaker 1: very safe. And then you've got a piece of shit car. Now,
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: before the internet and before we had free speech or
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: real free speech or competitive speech with the media, all
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: the media would show you was that shit car. And
• 11:11
  Speaker 1: they would make it look like the best car on
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: the planet. But as soon as the internet comes out,
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: you now see both cars and you can see and
• 11:18
  Speaker 1: test and feel that other car for yourself. You can say, hey,
• 11:21
  Speaker 1: this car over here, the good car, is way better
• 11:24
  Speaker 1: than that piece of crap over here. And that's kind
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: of what they've done with the truth. They showed you
• 11:28
  Speaker 1: a very, very small picture of what's actually true or
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: some things that are true, but most of it lies.
• 11:33
  Speaker 1: And then when the internet comes around and they say, well, hey, here's,
• 11:37
  Speaker 1: you know, that thing that you guys said about that
• 11:38
  Speaker 1: guy wearing that MAGA hat with the Indian, that was
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: completely not true. In fact, if you look at the
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: entire event, there were these black racists shouting a ton
• 11:47
  Speaker 1: of racial slurs at other black people and a ton
• 11:48
  Speaker 1: of racial slurs at the white kids who were children.
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: And look how terrible you guys were for basically assaulting
• 11:54
  Speaker 1: these kids and getting them to have their schools shut down.
• 11:58
  Speaker 1: They got death threats because the media lied about what
• 12:01
  Speaker 1: was going on there. And so because of the internet,
• 12:04
  Speaker 1: we can kind of zoom out a little bit. And
• 12:05
  Speaker 1: it seems to be the case, and let's hope this
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: continues to be the case, that when the truth is offered,
• 12:10
  Speaker 1: people tend to prefer it. In fact, here's another example
• 12:14
  Speaker 1: of this, because I was told that this is actually
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: not true, because I read the Bible a couple years ago,
• 12:18
  Speaker 1: and I read it from cover to cover, is that
• 12:20
  Speaker 1: people would say, because I didn't know any better, I'd
• 12:22
  Speaker 1: never read the Bible before, is that the king has
• 12:25
  Speaker 1: a choice to pardon either Jesus, who he admits has
• 12:28
  Speaker 1: done nothing wrong, or Barabbas, who is a criminal. And
• 12:32
  Speaker 1: when he gets feedback from the audience, the audience says
• 12:34
  Speaker 1: that they should pardon Barabbas and not Jesus. Now, when
• 12:37
  Speaker 1: I was told this story, I was told this as
• 12:40
  Speaker 1: the people said, said that they would rather have the
• 12:42
  Speaker 1: criminal than the person who's being honest. But that is
• 12:45
  Speaker 1: not the case. When you read the actual Bible, and
• 12:47
  Speaker 1: I read the King James Version, the actual Bible says
• 12:51
  Speaker 1: the clergy, or the people who are the rulers, people
• 12:54
  Speaker 1: who are the powers that be, they chose the criminal.
• 12:57
  Speaker 1: They chose Barabbas over Jesus. If you would ask the people,
• 13:01
  Speaker 1: they probably would have chosen Jesus. And this is what
• 13:03
  Speaker 1: it's like. The media sits here and chooses the lies
• 13:06
  Speaker 1: over the truth, and then they translate to us that
• 13:09
  Speaker 1: we would choose the lies too because we're watching it. Well,
• 13:12
  Speaker 1: you guys were the only things that were available. In
• 13:14
  Speaker 1: that case in the Bible, the clergy was the only
• 13:16
  Speaker 1: thing that's available. But when everybody's available, when you have
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: a chance for everybody to compete with you guys, people
• 13:21
  Speaker 1: tend to choose the truth. And you can see how
• 13:23
  Speaker 1: they're responding to this loss because they're going absolutely batshit insane,
• 13:26
  Speaker 1: and we probably haven't seen the end of this. I mean,
• 13:28
  Speaker 1: they're going absolutely nuts. Look what they've done in the
• 13:30
  Speaker 1: past couple weeks. They've tried to take all the people
• 13:33
  Speaker 1: who are disproving them and ruin their source of income,
• 13:35
  Speaker 1: like through Patreon or through their ad revenue. They've tried
• 13:37
  Speaker 1: to ban these people. They've tried to do all these
• 13:40
  Speaker 1: kinds of things because their arguments don't work. And when
• 13:43
  Speaker 1: they stand up to criticism, they're losing. That's kind of
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: the key factor here, which is why they tend to
• 13:48
  Speaker 1: not want us to go towards science. Because science is
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: basically our fundamental mechanism for finding truth. And the way
• 13:55
  Speaker 1: you find truth in science is criticism. There is no
• 13:59
  Speaker 1: idea in science that cannot be criticized, and there are
• 14:01
  Speaker 1: a lot of ideas that were well-established that were criticized
• 14:05
  Speaker 1: years later and found out to be wrong. One of
• 14:08
  Speaker 1: those ideas is the law of conservation of mass. Before,
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: we said that matter can't be created or destroyed. And
• 14:14
  Speaker 1: then Einstein came along and was like, well, let me
• 14:18
  Speaker 1: say this. Yes, it can. You can break atoms apart,
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: and we call that nuclear physics. And so he came
• 14:24
  Speaker 1: along and took this well-established principle and broke it. Even
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: things like gravity, which is another well-established principle. There was
• 14:31
  Speaker 1: a guy who did a banned TED Talk, and if
• 14:32
  Speaker 1: I can find that, I will put that in the description.
• 14:35
  Speaker 1: But he was basically criticizing science and saying, hey, this
• 14:38
  Speaker 1: thing that you call gravity is not as consistent as
• 14:40
  Speaker 1: you'd like to believe it is. It actually changes. It
• 14:42
  Speaker 1: depends on where the Earth is around the sun. It
• 14:45
  Speaker 1: depends on where you are on the Earth. But this
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: constant that you call gravity, which I think is what,
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: things fall at 9.2 meters per second, it depends on
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: where you are in the world. And if you're trying
• 14:55
  Speaker 1: to do calculations on 9.2 meters per second, and you're
• 14:58
  Speaker 1: at some different part of the world where it's 9.1006
• 15:03
  Speaker 1: instead of 9.2, your calculations are going to be off.
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: So this is a pretty big deal, especially if you're
• 15:08
  Speaker 1: going to spend tons of money on spacecrafts and stuff
• 15:11
  Speaker 1: like that to calculate for gravity, and those calculations happen
• 15:15
  Speaker 1: to be off. There's a very famous example where this
• 15:17
  Speaker 1: guy sends a probe to Mars, and it crashed because
• 15:22
  Speaker 1: they didn't convert their units from miles to kilometers. And
• 15:28
  Speaker 1: I think that lost like $ 25 million or something like that.
• 15:31
  Speaker 1: So criticism is a very, very key part. Nothing is
• 15:34
  Speaker 1: ever perfectly true. Things are just more true. Like that
• 15:37
  Speaker 1: car example, the way you get a better car is
• 15:40
  Speaker 1: you make your initial car and it drives, it works,
• 15:43
  Speaker 1: but then it hits a bump on the road and
• 15:45
  Speaker 1: it breaks. And so you say, okay, we can't just
• 15:47
  Speaker 1: make wheels like this anymore. We have to put shocks.
• 15:50
  Speaker 1: So that way when we hit rocks, the car bounces
• 15:52
  Speaker 1: back naturally or bounces back a lot easier and doesn't
• 15:55
  Speaker 1: break the entire suspension. And then, okay, now we've got
• 15:58
  Speaker 1: good suspensions. Now we've got good shocks. And then it rains.
• 16:01
  Speaker 1: And when it rains, you get water all inside the car.
• 16:04
  Speaker 1: So now we have to make some weather stripping. And then, okay,
• 16:07
  Speaker 1: now our engine doesn't last more than 10,000 miles. So
• 16:11
  Speaker 1: let's make it so it lasts longer. And so all
• 16:13
  Speaker 1: these critiques from actual nature are what makes the car better.
• 16:17
  Speaker 1: And so if you have an idea that is immune
• 16:19
  Speaker 1: to criticism, or if you have these certain principles that
• 16:21
  Speaker 1: are immune to criticism, they're always going to be very
• 16:23
  Speaker 1: weak because criticism and And problems are how we make
• 16:27
  Speaker 1: things stronger. So the media is finding this out, or
• 16:29
  Speaker 1: they realized it a long time ago, that their ideas
• 16:32
  Speaker 1: are not as strong as the newer ideas. When they
• 16:34
  Speaker 1: have competition, they get beaten down every single time. And
• 16:38
  Speaker 1: so because their ideas will never win yet, they have
• 16:40
  Speaker 1: to push them for some reason. Maybe they're trying to
• 16:42
  Speaker 1: get some type of complete government control, which hopefully won't happen.
• 16:46
  Speaker 1: Because they're trying to get that, they basically have to
• 16:49
  Speaker 1: flip the table. They have to say, well, your ideas
• 16:51
  Speaker 1: are so bad. are so much more powerful than ours
• 16:54
  Speaker 1: that the only way we can defeat them is by
• 16:56
  Speaker 1: basically destroying you. By destroying your income by doing things
• 16:59
  Speaker 1: like getting rid of your YouTube ad revenue or destroying
• 17:01
  Speaker 1: your donation services through whether it's Patreon or whether it's
• 17:03
  Speaker 1: PayPal not giving services or credit card companies not giving
• 17:06
  Speaker 1: services to Subscribestar. By destroying your reputation, by destroying your
• 17:11
  Speaker 1: ability to get a job if YouTube doesn't work out.
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: This is the only recourse they have. And fortunately what
• 17:16
  Speaker 1: happens is because there's so much truth around this because
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: most people don't believe these things. every time they do
• 17:21
  Speaker 1: a major move like this, they might get away with
• 17:23
  Speaker 1: some of it, but there's this huge backlash. And so
• 17:26
  Speaker 1: as long as YouTube is the power that is for
• 17:31
  Speaker 1: right now, they might get away with some of this.
• 17:33
  Speaker 1: But as soon as Jordan Peterson's video website comes up
• 17:37
  Speaker 1: or his social media website comes up or whatever his
• 17:39
  Speaker 1: team is calling it, or as soon as BitChute gets
• 17:41
  Speaker 1: more popular and they have a competitor, people are just,
• 17:44
  Speaker 1: anytime things like this happen, people are just going to
• 17:46
  Speaker 1: jump to the next competitive platform. The only reason people
• 17:48
  Speaker 1: have not done that in large ways, like, have not
• 17:52
  Speaker 1: made these other sources their primary sources, it's because they're
• 17:54
  Speaker 1: not as big as YouTube yet. But when that happens,
• 17:57
  Speaker 1: none of this shit will be gotten away with. So anyway,
• 18:00
  Speaker 1: I thought I'd just make this video to give you
• 18:01
  Speaker 1: guys some good news. I don't think Anita Sarkeesian is
• 18:03
  Speaker 1: going to be around very much longer. And if you
• 18:06
  Speaker 1: look at her channel, Feminist Frequency, it basically gets no views.
• 18:08
  Speaker 1: It gets like two... I mean, my channel almost gets
• 18:11
  Speaker 1: as many views as Feminist Frequency does, which is pretty
• 18:13
  Speaker 1: embarrassing considering how much money they got. And I think
• 18:16
  Speaker 1: the only reason she survived up to this point was
• 18:18
  Speaker 1: because her company was getting donations from either her fake
• 18:22
  Speaker 1: Kickstarter campaign, which was just basically a scam, and then
• 18:25
  Speaker 1: from big corporations that give donations. And kind of how
• 18:28
  Speaker 1: the way that places like Vox survive despite the fact
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: that Vox gets a lot of views on YouTube, but
• 18:32
  Speaker 1: they don't get enough to actually fund their project. So
• 18:35
  Speaker 1: they have to get the funding somewhere else. And that's
• 18:37
  Speaker 1: kind of the same case with Anita Sarkeesian, but they're
• 18:39
  Speaker 1: going to find out and say, hey, we're giving you
• 18:40
  Speaker 1: all this money. And we're either not getting the political
• 18:43
  Speaker 1: power that we wanted because if we're going to give
• 18:45
  Speaker 1: you a million dollars to not make us money, what
• 18:47
  Speaker 1: we're going to get is you're going to give people ideas.
• 18:50
  Speaker 1: So we want you to promote this certain idea. That's
• 18:53
  Speaker 1: why we're going to give you a million dollars or
• 18:54
  Speaker 1: $ 10 million or $ 200 million because we want people to
• 18:57
  Speaker 1: believe this. That way we can, I don't know, get
• 18:59
  Speaker 1: more government power. And that government power is going to
• 19:02
  Speaker 1: lead to our company being more successful because we'll make
• 19:04
  Speaker 1: favorable laws for ourselves. That's basically why some of these
• 19:07
  Speaker 1: companies want government power. is because they get to spend $ 100, 000
• 19:11
  Speaker 1: buying this politician off, and they get to make $ 10
• 19:13
  Speaker 1: million off of the new legislation. And so if they're
• 19:17
  Speaker 1: not even doing that for them, I don't think these
• 19:18
  Speaker 1: companies are going to be paying them any money anymore.
• 19:21
  Speaker 1: So I think these people are pretty much dead. And
• 19:23
  Speaker 1: seeing how recent events have been going, I don't think
• 19:26
  Speaker 1: this is going to be the last time the left loses,
• 19:27
  Speaker 1: and I think they're going to lose a lot more
• 19:29
  Speaker 1: in the future. But that'll be for me to cover
• 19:31
  Speaker 1: some other time. And so that's it for this video.
• 19:34
  Speaker 1: If you liked it, please hit the like button. Subscribe
• 19:36
  Speaker 1: if you're new. Comment and share. My bits you link
• 19:38
  Speaker 1: will be in the description if you want to sign
• 19:40
  Speaker 1: up for my backup channel. Otherwise, I will see you
• 19:43
  Speaker 1: in the next video.