Latest / Daniel and Kelly’s Extraordinary Universe / What is the real charge of the electron?
Transcript
- 0:08Speaker 1: Hey, Orry, remember a few weeks ago when we criticized
- 0:11Speaker 1: Albert Einstein. I remember you criticize Einstein. Well, you know
- 0:16Speaker 1: he added a big fudge factor to his theory just
- 0:18Speaker 1: to make it work. Yeah, it was a pretty big
- 0:20Speaker 1: fudge factor. I guess it was a little bit embarrassing
- 0:23Speaker 1: for the old genius. It was sort of a universe
- 0:25Speaker 1: size fudge factor. Well, you know, it turns out maybe
- 0:28Speaker 1: I shouldn't have been so critical because particle physics has
- 0:31Speaker 1: some fudge factors of its own. Particle physicist shouldn't be
- 0:34Speaker 1: throwing stones at glass theories. That's right, we got some
- 0:39Speaker 1: whoppers of fudge factors. Are they Einstein size? Are they
- 0:42Speaker 1: really big? Well? Does an infinity count is really big?
- 0:47Speaker 1: Does nothing count as really small? I think so. I
- 1:06Speaker 1: am more handy cartoonists and the creator of PhD comics. Hi,
- 1:09Speaker 1: I'm Daniel. I'm a particle of physicist, and I'd just
- 1:13Speaker 1: like to point out that Jorge is not just a cartoonist.
- 1:15Speaker 1: He also has a PhD from a famous university. Thank you.
- 1:19Speaker 1: I'm glad you think it's a famous university, you being
- 1:22Speaker 1: on the other side of the Bay Area. It's famously
- 1:24Speaker 1: the second best university in the Bay Area, even enough
- 1:28Speaker 1: to Santa Clara University. I think that's probably true. But
- 1:32Speaker 1: welcome anyway to our podcast Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe,
- 1:35Speaker 1: a production of I Heart Media in which we take
- 1:38Speaker 1: you on a tour of all the incredible, amazing bunker
- 1:41Speaker 1: stuff in the universe, from tiny little particles that don't
- 1:44Speaker 1: really spin too enormous galaxies that spin mysteriously. Yeah. We
- 1:49Speaker 1: go from the crazy maybe ideas that physicists have about
- 1:53Speaker 1: the universe to the actual nitty gritty theories that they have.
- 1:56Speaker 1: Because everybody is curious about our universe. How does it work?
- 1:59Speaker 1: What's really happened? The search for truth and understanding is
- 2:02Speaker 1: as old as human consciousness. And here we take you
- 2:05Speaker 1: on some of the last steps and we try to
- 2:07Speaker 1: bring you up to speed to what scientists are thinking
- 2:10Speaker 1: right now. What model is in the head of particle
- 2:13Speaker 1: physicists when they think about a particle. How does a
- 2:16Speaker 1: cosmologists think about the whole universe? Yeah? And are they
- 2:20Speaker 1: right or are they just making it up as they
- 2:22Speaker 1: go along? And doesn't make any sense? And what does
- 2:26Speaker 1: it mean if the universe doesn't actually make sense? Oh? Boy,
- 2:30Speaker 1: now you got me worried. Well, after today's episode, you'll
- 2:33Speaker 1: discover that it's all sort of well. These days, the
- 2:36Speaker 1: universe doesn't seem to make a lot of sense. But
- 2:38Speaker 1: fortunately that's what we're here for, and that's what physicists
- 2:41Speaker 1: are here for, to try to put some order into
- 2:43Speaker 1: the universe. And so today on the program, we'll be
- 2:45Speaker 1: talking about a particular I don't know what do you
- 2:50Speaker 1: what would you call it a whole in your theory
- 2:52Speaker 1: of the universe or a hole in your theory of matter.
- 2:54Speaker 1: It's sort of like a shift in your perspective. We're
- 2:57Speaker 1: used to thinking about particles in one certain way. What
- 3:00Speaker 1: is their spin, where is their mass, what is their charge?
- 3:03Speaker 1: But we discover that didn't really make a lot of sense,
- 3:05Speaker 1: and what we had to do was think about particles
- 3:07Speaker 1: in a totally different way. I see. So when something's
- 3:10Speaker 1: wrong or there's a big hole in it, you just
- 3:13Speaker 1: you just call it need to shift our perspective. That's right,
- 3:16Speaker 1: let's just sweep all that under the rug and then
- 3:19Speaker 1: called the rug our new idea. That's essentially what's happening here.
- 3:23Speaker 1: But that's you know, that's an important part of physics
- 3:25Speaker 1: when you have a model and you push on it
- 3:27Speaker 1: and push on it, you discover it doesn't actually quiet work,
- 3:30Speaker 1: and then you have to accept something counterintuitive, something new,
- 3:33Speaker 1: a new perspective on the universe, but one that actually
- 3:36Speaker 1: does work mathematically. That's right, and so to be on
- 3:38Speaker 1: the program, we'll be tackling the question what is renormalization.
- 3:47Speaker 1: Is it just a fancy physics word for making stuff
- 3:50Speaker 1: up and pushing all the infinities under the carpet, or
- 3:54Speaker 1: are we going to talk about when things will go
- 3:55Speaker 1: back to normal in this crazy world we live in
- 3:57Speaker 1: right now? That's what I was hoping for, or when
- 4:00Speaker 1: I saw the title, Daniel, I would not rely on
- 4:02Speaker 1: particle physics to make things normal. It reveals the bonkersness
- 4:06Speaker 1: of the universe. It reveals how the universe is so
- 4:09Speaker 1: hard to grasp, and we're in this constant journey of
- 4:12Speaker 1: trying to map our understanding of the universe onto the
- 4:15Speaker 1: microscopic to think about these little objects electrons and photons
- 4:20Speaker 1: in terms of quantities that we find familiar, you know,
- 4:22Speaker 1: mass or charge or spin. But it's a struggle, I see.
- 4:26Speaker 1: You have to sort of assume the opposite when a
- 4:28Speaker 1: particle physics is walks in you're like, let's throw normal
- 4:31Speaker 1: out the door. It's buckle up and get ready for
- 4:34Speaker 1: a journey to the weird, because that's where we all live.
- 4:38Speaker 1: All right. Well, this is a pretty interesting idea, and
- 4:41Speaker 1: it has to do with your theories about particles and
- 4:44Speaker 1: matter and that they sort of don't always work or
- 4:48Speaker 1: there's holes about them. Yeah, it's sort of akin to
- 4:51Speaker 1: how if you try to describe particles in terms of
- 4:54Speaker 1: particles like tiny little dots of stuff, that doesn't always work. Right.
- 4:58Speaker 1: We see particles sometimes having produce like waves, right, they interfere,
- 5:02Speaker 1: and so we have a broader sense of these things.
- 5:05Speaker 1: They're not just little dots of stuff. They're these weird
- 5:07Speaker 1: quantum mechanical objects. It can be like waves and like particles.
- 5:11Speaker 1: So that's an example of how you might have to
- 5:13Speaker 1: broaden your concept of a particle. And today we're gonna
- 5:15Speaker 1: have to broaden it again, sort of in a different direction,
- 5:19Speaker 1: because the idea we had about particles carrying these little
- 5:22Speaker 1: numbers with them doesn't actually quite work when you sit
- 5:24Speaker 1: down to do the man. I was just wrapping my
- 5:27Speaker 1: head around that idea. Daniel, you're saying it doesn't apply
- 5:30Speaker 1: or doesn't quite tell me, what's happening in the universe? Yeah,
- 5:33Speaker 1: And you know what we do is we have this idea.
- 5:36Speaker 1: We say, let's give these little dots in space, these labels,
- 5:39Speaker 1: these numbers will say charge mine is one mass of whatever,
- 5:43Speaker 1: spin of a half, and then let's see if it works.
- 5:46Speaker 1: And when you run the numbers and try to compare
- 5:48Speaker 1: it to what we see in experiments, it doesn't actually work.
- 5:51Speaker 1: And it tells us something sort of deep and weird
- 5:54Speaker 1: about what the particles are and what they aren't. Sounds
- 5:57Speaker 1: interesting and I want to know more. But at first,
- 6:00Speaker 1: as usual, Daniel went out there into the wilds of
- 6:03Speaker 1: the internet to ask people if they knew what renormalization was.
- 6:08Speaker 1: That's right, So thank you to everybody who volunteered to
- 6:11Speaker 1: answer a random person on the internet questions. Before you
- 6:14Speaker 1: listen to these answers, think about it. Have you heard
- 6:16Speaker 1: of the term renormalization or would you even know or
- 6:21Speaker 1: guess what it could mean. Here's what people had to say. Um,
- 6:24Speaker 1: maybe something happened to you and you are becoming normal again.
- 6:31Speaker 1: I do not know, no clue. I my guests would
- 6:39Speaker 1: be to bring something back to normal after a change.
- 6:44Speaker 1: I'm not sure when something goes normal again. What happens
- 6:50Speaker 1: if you don't know what any of the words. I
- 6:52Speaker 1: really don't know. It's not a term I've heard before.
- 6:56Speaker 1: My guess is it has something to do with phenomen
- 7:00Speaker 1: of maintaining order in the universe. We've learned something new
- 7:04Speaker 1: about space or um, so, whether that's on a cosmic
- 7:10Speaker 1: scale or a particle scale, and we need to change
- 7:15Speaker 1: our assumptions that go into our equations based on the
- 7:20Speaker 1: nearing side. Well, it seems like some people have the
- 7:23Speaker 1: same idea you did, are going to go back. I
- 7:26Speaker 1: think getting back to normal is probably high on people's
- 7:29Speaker 1: mind right now. But I like, yes or there where
- 7:31Speaker 1: the person just said doesn't mean becoming normal. Well, I've
- 7:33Speaker 1: never been normal, so I can't really speak to them.
- 7:37Speaker 1: All right, Well, this sounds like a normal word, renormalization,
- 7:41Speaker 1: but I'm guessing it has some pretty deep mathematical consequences here.
- 7:46Speaker 1: For particle physics, it comes from the word normalization, and
- 7:49Speaker 1: normalization is just to make something normal. But in mathematics,
- 7:53Speaker 1: when we say making something normal, we don't mean make
- 7:56Speaker 1: it usual or typical, or you know, like when you
- 7:59Speaker 1: were a kid it. What we mean is that we
- 8:01Speaker 1: make it all add up to one or fix it
- 8:03Speaker 1: to some specific number, right to sort of calibrate it
- 8:06Speaker 1: almost in a way. Yes, calibration exactly. And so renormalization
- 8:10Speaker 1: is like, oops, something went wrong and now we need
- 8:13Speaker 1: to do it again. It's like, you know, you thought
- 8:16Speaker 1: you had your spendometer working correctly on your ferrari, and
- 8:19Speaker 1: then it turns out you were going one sixty when
- 8:21Speaker 1: you thought you were only going eighty. So you gotta
- 8:23Speaker 1: recounty account. You gotta renormal make it normal again, make
- 8:28Speaker 1: it normal again, make it the old familiar ferrari or
- 8:31Speaker 1: electric charge that you knew when you were a kid. Okay,
- 8:34Speaker 1: And that's exactly the issue here is that we ran
- 8:36Speaker 1: into a problem when we were trying to calculate the
- 8:38Speaker 1: electric charge of the electron. It sounds pretty basic, isn't
- 8:43Speaker 1: the electron something we've known for a long time and
- 8:46Speaker 1: know what the charges? You think? So, right, it's sort
- 8:48Speaker 1: of like how we defined electric charge. It's like, you know,
- 8:51Speaker 1: Ben Franklin or whoever you know first identified this as
- 8:55Speaker 1: moving charges. Define charges to be plus and minus, and
- 8:59Speaker 1: that's where the electron charts comes from, right. It's the
- 9:01Speaker 1: carrier of the minus one charge, is like the definition
- 9:04Speaker 1: of what the charge is, right right? Oh, I see,
- 9:08Speaker 1: So an electron has a negative charge one, it's sort
- 9:10Speaker 1: of the definition of charge. What are the units electronus? Well,
- 9:15Speaker 1: you know, it's defined in terms of cool ombs, but
- 9:17Speaker 1: it's a crazy number in terms of cool ombs, and
- 9:19Speaker 1: so we just in particle physics, we'd like to drop
- 9:21Speaker 1: all the units and redefined everything, and so we just
- 9:24Speaker 1: call it one e like one electron charge. That's the
- 9:27Speaker 1: unit alright, So it's kind of like the standard. It's
- 9:31Speaker 1: kind of like the standard. But the problem is if
- 9:34Speaker 1: you say, okay, I have a little particle and I'm
- 9:36Speaker 1: gonna put a minus one charge on it, and then
- 9:39Speaker 1: you put that into an experiment and try to measure
- 9:41Speaker 1: the charge of it, you would actually measure zero. Like
- 9:45Speaker 1: you shot other electrons at it, you would measure almost
- 9:48Speaker 1: zero charge. It sounds like a big area here. You're
- 9:52Speaker 1: expecting minus one and you got zero. Yeah. So the
- 9:56Speaker 1: electron can't have charge minus one because if it did,
- 9:59Speaker 1: we would measure zero. And the reason is that the
- 10:01Speaker 1: electron is never just by itself, right, It's not like
- 10:05Speaker 1: a whole universe populated by just an electron. Instead, the
- 10:08Speaker 1: electron is surrounded by space and space is never empty.
- 10:13Speaker 1: We've talked to this podcast a lot of times how
- 10:15Speaker 1: space is not just the backdrop of the universe. It's
- 10:18Speaker 1: this crossing quantum mechanical weirdness that can do stuff we
- 10:22Speaker 1: don't understand, like expand and wiggle and stretch, and their
- 10:26Speaker 1: deep theories about space that people are working on. We
- 10:28Speaker 1: talked about Steve Wolfram's idea about space and quantum foam
- 10:32Speaker 1: space and like it's a huge question marks empty space
- 10:35Speaker 1: is not empty. Empty space is not empty space. Sometimes
- 10:40Speaker 1: that space out when I think about it, but there's
- 10:43Speaker 1: a lot of it. That's the one thing that's still true.
- 10:46Speaker 1: There's something to it, and somehow that's affecting what we
- 10:48Speaker 1: measure about the electron. Yeah, because space is filled with energy,
- 10:52Speaker 1: and energy can turn into virtual particles, particles that pop
- 10:56Speaker 1: in and out of existence really briefly. And when that happens,
- 10:59Speaker 1: usually you get a pair of the particles like a
- 11:01Speaker 1: plus one and a minus one that pop out together
- 11:04Speaker 1: because it has to balance out, like you can't just
- 11:07Speaker 1: introduce more negative charge into the universe. You kind of
- 11:09Speaker 1: have to balance it out. That's right, There still follows
- 11:11Speaker 1: some rules, right, Virtual particles are not a total free
- 11:14Speaker 1: for all. They still have to observe the rules of
- 11:16Speaker 1: the universe, and one of those is that the pluses
- 11:18Speaker 1: in the minuses have to balance out. And so essentially
- 11:22Speaker 1: any electron is surrounded by a bunch of positive negative
- 11:26Speaker 1: charged particles. So then the electrons field, the electric field
- 11:30Speaker 1: that it creates, it pulls on the positive part of
- 11:33Speaker 1: those virtual particles, and it pushes on the negative part
- 11:37Speaker 1: of those virtual particles. But they don't exist. They do exist, though,
- 11:41Speaker 1: they do exist briefly, right and constantly. It is a
- 11:43Speaker 1: frowthing swarm of these particles. And so what it does
- 11:47Speaker 1: is it like polarizes the vacuum. It pulls the positive
- 11:51Speaker 1: part of these virtual particles closer, and it pushes the
- 11:54Speaker 1: negative ones away, and it has the effect of essentially
- 11:57Speaker 1: shielding the charge of the electron. Oh, I see, But
- 12:01Speaker 1: they don't exist, though, do they They actually pop into existence?
- 12:04Speaker 1: They do exist, They actually do pop into existence. Yeah,
- 12:07Speaker 1: And you know, this is the kind of effect that's
- 12:09Speaker 1: very familiar. Like the reason you can't use your cell
- 12:12Speaker 1: phone inside an elevator is that electromagnetic field can't penetrate
- 12:17Speaker 1: very well through metals because metals are filled with little
- 12:20Speaker 1: charge carriers electrons, and when electric field passes through metal,
- 12:24Speaker 1: the electrons will like rearrange themselves to cancel out any field.
- 12:28Speaker 1: It's called a Faraday cage. Okay, So then if you
- 12:30Speaker 1: have an electron, it's gonna pull these virtual plus particles
- 12:35Speaker 1: to it, which then cancel it it out. Is that?
- 12:37Speaker 1: What is that kind of what you're saying? Yeah, but
- 12:39Speaker 1: these per virtual particles are also like possetrons or are
- 12:43Speaker 1: they you know, imaginary? Are they actual like you know,
- 12:47Speaker 1: ions or muans or what are they? They're actually all
- 12:50Speaker 1: kinds because you can have any kind of virtual particle.
- 12:53Speaker 1: You can have virtual particles that are pairs of electrons
- 12:55Speaker 1: and positrons, like you said, you could also create muons
- 12:59Speaker 1: and anti muon. You can create quarks and antiquarks. You
- 13:03Speaker 1: can create anything you like out of the vacuum as
- 13:05Speaker 1: long as you observe the conservation laws, and then most
- 13:08Speaker 1: likely you're going to create the lowest mass particles. So
- 13:11Speaker 1: usually you're going to get things like electrons and positrons. Okay,
- 13:15Speaker 1: but they're sort of virtual because they're popping into existence
- 13:18Speaker 1: and popping out of existence. But there's enough of them,
- 13:21Speaker 1: and there's a constant popping in and out of existence.
- 13:23Speaker 1: That effectively they are real. They count as if they
- 13:26Speaker 1: were there. And so what happens is that you you
- 13:29Speaker 1: shield the true charge of the electronic it reduces it.
- 13:32Speaker 1: It like screens the charge sort of like if you
- 13:35Speaker 1: want to know how cold it is in your freezer,
- 13:37Speaker 1: but all you can do is measure on the outside. Well,
- 13:40Speaker 1: you're not really measuring the true temperature inside your freezer, right,
- 13:43Speaker 1: You're shielded by all the insulation, and so that's essentially
- 13:46Speaker 1: what's happening here. So then if all electrons then are shielded,
- 13:51Speaker 1: how do they even work? Yeah, Like if I have
- 13:54Speaker 1: two electrons in space and they're shielded, then they wouldn't
- 13:58Speaker 1: repel each other. That's true if electrons charge is actually
- 14:01Speaker 1: minus one, But it's not. That's the kicker, that's the renormalization.
- 14:06Speaker 1: The charge we measure is minus one. Right, electrons do
- 14:10Speaker 1: repel each other. You're right, electricity is real. Right, we're
- 14:13Speaker 1: not repealing electricity today in the podcast, which is canceled
- 14:16Speaker 1: the electricity exactly. But what we've discovered is what we've
- 14:20Speaker 1: been measuring for more than a hundred years is not
- 14:23Speaker 1: the true charge of the electron. It's this shielded charge.
- 14:27Speaker 1: We're measuring the electron on the outside of the freezer.
- 14:30Speaker 1: That charge is minus one. What is the electrons true
- 14:34Speaker 1: charge behind all that shielding? That was the new question. Oh,
- 14:38Speaker 1: I see it's in the freezer, and we didn't really
- 14:41Speaker 1: know how cold it is or how electrically charge it is. Yeah,
- 14:44Speaker 1: and we sat down to do these calculations. We realized, wait,
- 14:46Speaker 1: isn't there a big effect from this freezer, from this shielding,
- 14:49Speaker 1: from the screening, from all these virtual particles. And people
- 14:52Speaker 1: started calculating. The realized, yeah, there is. So if electrons
- 14:56Speaker 1: had charge actually minus one, we should be measuring zero
- 14:59Speaker 1: charge experiments, but obviously we're not. So they went back
- 15:02Speaker 1: and they said, how much do we have to dial
- 15:05Speaker 1: up the charge of the electron before we get a
- 15:08Speaker 1: measure charge of minus one to extrapolate through this cloud
- 15:14Speaker 1: of particles and say, what's really going on in there?
- 15:17Speaker 1: So what we see of the electron when we measure
- 15:19Speaker 1: as its charge is what we measure through the installation,
- 15:22Speaker 1: this virtual installation that that you're talking about. That's right,
- 15:25Speaker 1: and so the question is what's its true value inside?
- 15:28Speaker 1: That's right. Let's pull back a layer of reality and
- 15:30Speaker 1: say what is really happening. Okay, it's not just minus too.
- 15:33Speaker 1: I'm gonna guess you know it's gonna be totally unsatisfying
- 15:36Speaker 1: and frustrating, like usual with particle physics. Great, well, I'm
- 15:41Speaker 1: looking forward to Daniel. So let's get into it, and
- 15:45Speaker 1: what does a real charge means of the for the
- 15:48Speaker 1: electron and for mass and for the entire universe. But
- 15:51Speaker 1: first let's take a quick break. Al Right, So an
- 16:06Speaker 1: electron doesn't have the charge of an electron apparently depends
- 16:10Speaker 1: what you mean by an electron. Up is not up,
- 16:12Speaker 1: and the electron doesn't have electron on an electron. No,
- 16:15Speaker 1: it's really it's about definitions, and that's where we're gonna
- 16:18Speaker 1: end up today, is talking about like what it means
- 16:20Speaker 1: to be an electron. Because the thing we measure you
- 16:23Speaker 1: call that an electron. You know, some weird quantum dot
- 16:26Speaker 1: with all of its shielding and fuzziness and virtual particles
- 16:29Speaker 1: all around it. That thing has charged minus one. But
- 16:33Speaker 1: if you try to penetrate that cloud and say this
- 16:36Speaker 1: bit at the core, the true electron, the fundamental electron.
- 16:40Speaker 1: Because we're interested in understanding the deep nature of the universe,
- 16:44Speaker 1: not like the effective, messy, sloppy things we can actually measure.
- 16:48Speaker 1: We want to, you know, penetrate all the way in
- 16:50Speaker 1: and see what's really happens to see it's not I
- 16:52Speaker 1: guess celebrity. You know, they're surrounded by all this hype
- 16:55Speaker 1: and people and you never know really who they are
- 16:58Speaker 1: on the inside. And so that what we're doing today,
- 17:00Speaker 1: we're peeling back the layers of stuff to get a
- 17:03Speaker 1: real sneak pick at the electron inside. That's right, So
- 17:06Speaker 1: what what is the real charge in of the elector
- 17:08Speaker 1: when you get through the electrons entourage? What you discoverage
- 17:12Speaker 1: is to make the measure charge minus one, you have
- 17:15Speaker 1: to set the true charge. And particle physics we call
- 17:18Speaker 1: this the bare charge, like an electrono by itself to
- 17:21Speaker 1: minus infinity, like what the bare minimum? You know, just
- 17:30Speaker 1: a small thing like minus infinity. I know. I remember
- 17:35Speaker 1: learning about this and thinking, oh, renormalization. Okay, so you
- 17:38Speaker 1: gotta adjust the charge of it's going to go down
- 17:41Speaker 1: to one and a half or two or whatever, and
- 17:44Speaker 1: then discovering you gotta minus infinity. What that doesn't even
- 17:48Speaker 1: make any sense? That's great. You can't call that renormalization.
- 17:52Speaker 1: How can how can you say that an electron has
- 17:55Speaker 1: a negative charge of negative infinity. What does that even mean?
- 17:57Speaker 1: It's hard to understand, and you know mathematically what happening
- 18:00Speaker 1: is that the more the electron is charged, the more
- 18:03Speaker 1: it gets shielded. Like, the more powerful its charges, the
- 18:06Speaker 1: more it polarizes the vacuum around it. If you crank
- 18:09Speaker 1: it up to minus two, you don't get much measured charge.
- 18:12Speaker 1: You've got to really crank it up incredibly just to
- 18:15Speaker 1: get any measured charge because it works against you. There's
- 18:17Speaker 1: no limit to these virtual particles. I mean space is
- 18:21Speaker 1: full of them. And then what does it mean, like
- 18:25Speaker 1: whenever you discover an infinity and particle physics, space is
- 18:28Speaker 1: full up to infinity, Like space has an infinite number
- 18:31Speaker 1: of virtual particles all the time everywhere. Yeah, an infinite
- 18:34Speaker 1: number of virtual particles. That is true, it's not an
- 18:36Speaker 1: infinite amount of energy. So there's an infinite number virtual particles.
- 18:40Speaker 1: The number of them increases as their energy decreases. So
- 18:44Speaker 1: it's rare to get a high energy virtual particle or
- 18:46Speaker 1: a high mass virtual particle. It's totally common to get
- 18:50Speaker 1: an almost zero energy particle. That the smaller the energy,
- 18:55Speaker 1: the higher the probability and so as that goes to zero,
- 18:57Speaker 1: you literally get infinite numbers of particles. But anytime you
- 19:00Speaker 1: get infinity in a particle physics, like you say, okay,
- 19:03Speaker 1: this particle has minus infinity charge, that tells you you're
- 19:06Speaker 1: doing something wrong, not just this particle. Imagine it then
- 19:10Speaker 1: applies to all particles. Yep, this does actually apply to
- 19:13Speaker 1: every single charge particle in the universe. That's right. So
- 19:18Speaker 1: that's a pretty big problem. And you know, we should
- 19:20Speaker 1: not be throwing stones at Einstein when it comes to like,
- 19:22Speaker 1: you know, by making big corrections to basic facts about
- 19:26Speaker 1: particles in the universe. So so my intuition tells me
- 19:30Speaker 1: that it's it seems implausible, if not impossible, for every
- 19:33Speaker 1: particle in the universe who have a infinite charge. So
- 19:38Speaker 1: I guess, step me through what's going on, Like, where
- 19:41Speaker 1: does our model of the universe break that we have
- 19:43Speaker 1: to do this fudge? If it is a fudge, No,
- 19:45Speaker 1: it's it's sort of a fudge. But what you have
- 19:48Speaker 1: to do is renormalize your theory of a particle, your
- 19:51Speaker 1: idea of what a particle is. Like we've been thinking
- 19:54Speaker 1: about electron as a tiny individual dot, like a basic constituent.
- 19:58Speaker 1: You know many lego brick out of which stuff in
- 20:01Speaker 1: the universe is made out of, right, But instead that
- 20:04Speaker 1: doesn't physically make sense. It has to have negative infinity charge. Instead.
- 20:08Speaker 1: You need to think about the electron, not by itself.
- 20:11Speaker 1: The whole concept of an electron only makes sense together
- 20:15Speaker 1: with this virtual swarm of particles. So that's not separate
- 20:18Speaker 1: from the electron. It's not just an electron in the freezer.
- 20:21Speaker 1: The freezer is part of the electron. Oh I see.
- 20:25Speaker 1: Just gonna pull back your definition and ignore what's inside
- 20:28Speaker 1: of the freezer is kind of what you're saying. That's right.
- 20:31Speaker 1: It's like you say, hey, I'm not going to clean
- 20:33Speaker 1: up my living room. Messiness is my new living room,
- 20:36Speaker 1: and that's just you know, this is how I live now.
- 20:38Speaker 1: This is the new clean. Right, that's a renormalization. Oh
- 20:42Speaker 1: I see, okay, God, messiness is a new clean, Infinite
- 20:47Speaker 1: particles is a new emptiness, and negative charge isn't a
- 20:51Speaker 1: new minus one? Right, and space is the new not nothingness.
- 20:56Speaker 1: Trust me, this all makes sense. Okay, got it? Got it?
- 20:59Speaker 1: So I think that's kind of what you're saying is
- 21:01Speaker 1: just ignore what's inside of the freezer and just don't
- 21:04Speaker 1: open the freezer. Don't even think about what could be
- 21:07Speaker 1: in there, growing you know, who knows what. Just lock
- 21:10Speaker 1: the freezer, throw away the key, and just deal with
- 21:13Speaker 1: the freezer. Yeah, And the thing to remember is that
- 21:15Speaker 1: when you get an infinity to the answer to a
- 21:17Speaker 1: physics question, it tells you that you're asking a question
- 21:19Speaker 1: that doesn't really make sense or that isn't really logical.
- 21:23Speaker 1: Here is another simple example. Say you wanted to know
- 21:26Speaker 1: what's the force on my head from all the stuff
- 21:29Speaker 1: in the universe that's on my left. Well, the universe
- 21:33Speaker 1: is infinite, then there's literally an infinite force of gravity
- 21:37Speaker 1: and electromagnetism and all that stuff on your head from
- 21:40Speaker 1: that side of the universe. Now there's a whole other
- 21:43Speaker 1: side of the universe that also has an infinite force
- 21:46Speaker 1: from the right side of the universe, right, and and
- 21:49Speaker 1: they cancel each other out to get basically zero force.
- 21:52Speaker 1: So asking that kind of question just means there's an
- 21:55Speaker 1: artificial distinction that you've introduced. The infinity comes only because
- 21:59Speaker 1: the question you're asking doesn't really make sense, like what
- 22:02Speaker 1: is the left side of the universe or the right
- 22:04Speaker 1: side of the universe. In the same way, trying to
- 22:06Speaker 1: separate the electron from the rest of the universe and
- 22:09Speaker 1: asking what is its charged all by itself, that doesn't
- 22:13Speaker 1: really make sense. You have to think about the electron
- 22:15Speaker 1: as part of an interaction. I mean, the electron has interactions.
- 22:18Speaker 1: It It sends off photons constantly. It's not doesn't really
- 22:21Speaker 1: make sense to sort of draw a dotted line just
- 22:24Speaker 1: around it and say, only think about this bit. I
- 22:27Speaker 1: think I understood that a negative infinity amount. I feel
- 22:33Speaker 1: like what I feel like you're saying, that's just ignore
- 22:35Speaker 1: this little weird fact and just not think about it
- 22:38Speaker 1: and just go with the flip. No, don't ignore it,
- 22:41Speaker 1: but just redefine the question you're asking. It's just like
- 22:44Speaker 1: in Douglas Adams. You know, if you ask a question
- 22:46Speaker 1: and get a nonsense answer, you have to go back
- 22:48Speaker 1: and think about maybe I should ask a better question.
- 22:50Speaker 1: In this context, asking what is the charge of the
- 22:53Speaker 1: bare electron doesn't really make sense because that's not a
- 22:56Speaker 1: physical thing. You will never have a bare electron. There
- 22:59Speaker 1: will never be an ale tron without its entourage. That's right,
- 23:02Speaker 1: only in a universe in which there is only electrons
- 23:05Speaker 1: and there are no interactions at all, which can't exist.
- 23:09Speaker 1: So I guess you're saying that what's inside the freezer
- 23:12Speaker 1: doesn't matter because we'll never open the freezer, or they'll
- 23:15Speaker 1: never be something without a freezer, that's right, And we
- 23:17Speaker 1: can't open the freezer. So even though you would predict
- 23:21Speaker 1: that there's negative infinity charge inside of the freezer, that's
- 23:24Speaker 1: probably not what's going on because we don't really know
- 23:28Speaker 1: when we never will open that freezer. Yes, except we
- 23:32Speaker 1: have ways to partially crack open the freezer. Yeah, all right,
- 23:36Speaker 1: because this is a virtual cloud of particles, right, and
- 23:40Speaker 1: we can penetrate it. Like if you shoot an electron
- 23:42Speaker 1: at another electron really hard, it will get through more
- 23:46Speaker 1: of that virtual cloud. Then if you shoot an electron
- 23:49Speaker 1: at it really gently. And so it turns out that
- 23:53Speaker 1: the harder you shoot one electron at another, the stronger
- 23:56Speaker 1: the charge you measure. So the charge of the actron
- 24:00Speaker 1: depends on the energy of the particle you're using to
- 24:04Speaker 1: measure it. So the electron doesn't just have a charge
- 24:10Speaker 1: of minus one that you measure or minus infinity inside
- 24:13Speaker 1: the freezer. The answer depends on how much you've cracked
- 24:17Speaker 1: open the freezer, how much the entourage gets out of
- 24:20Speaker 1: the way, or something. Yes, so you can get through
- 24:22Speaker 1: this virtual cloud of particles partially. You can never get
- 24:25Speaker 1: all the way, but the more you probe in there,
- 24:28Speaker 1: the stronger the charge of electron that you measure. So
- 24:31Speaker 1: it's sort of is like a real physical thing. You
- 24:34Speaker 1: can poke at the freezer and kind of take a
- 24:36Speaker 1: peek inside, and it does look like it's almost negative affinity.
- 24:39Speaker 1: Is that kind of what you're saying. Yeah, you can
- 24:40Speaker 1: never get to negative infinity, but the higher energy you
- 24:43Speaker 1: probe with, the stronger the charge you measure. And so
- 24:46Speaker 1: that's also sort of like, you know, a bit of
- 24:48Speaker 1: a brain scramble. You're used to thinking of the charge
- 24:51Speaker 1: of the electron as a basic fundamental constant, right, Well,
- 24:55Speaker 1: it turns out it's not constant. It depends on the
- 24:58Speaker 1: energy at which you're probing the electron. So the charge
- 25:02Speaker 1: of an electron is not then one of the fundamental constants. No,
- 25:06Speaker 1: it's not, or basic constants not. And we talked about
- 25:09Speaker 1: this on a podcast recently, how there's a different constant.
- 25:12Speaker 1: It's called the fine structure constant that includes the charge
- 25:16Speaker 1: of the electron and the speed of light and planks
- 25:19Speaker 1: constant because those things themselves are not actually fundamental constants.
- 25:23Speaker 1: Only in combination the ratio especial ratio of those things
- 25:27Speaker 1: are fundamental constants. I see. So I guess what you're
- 25:30Speaker 1: saying is that if I shoot an electron with a
- 25:32Speaker 1: fast enough electron, I would maybe measure it's charged to
- 25:36Speaker 1: be negative infinity. Yeah, it had to be infinitely fast
- 25:39Speaker 1: electron that you're shooting. The faster the electron that you're
- 25:42Speaker 1: using in your gun, the stronger the charge you measure
- 25:46Speaker 1: on the electron. Well, I feel like we're throwing infinities
- 25:48Speaker 1: all around, So why not let's just throwing infinite a
- 25:51Speaker 1: number of infinitely fast electrons. Now there's just no rules, right,
- 25:57Speaker 1: It's like whatever anything can happen doesn't even matter. All right. Well,
- 26:00Speaker 1: that that's pretty wild to know that the electron has
- 26:03Speaker 1: this kind of hidden and maybe infinite charge. And so
- 26:07Speaker 1: I guess the question is, how does that affect what
- 26:10Speaker 1: we thought about the universe or how we look at
- 26:12Speaker 1: things like mass or you know, effic goes to me
- 26:15Speaker 1: and all that stuff. So let's get into it, But
- 26:17Speaker 1: first let's take a quick break. Al Right, So apparently
- 26:34Speaker 1: the electron has possibly a negative infinity charge if you
- 26:39Speaker 1: can get to it, if you can get past a
- 26:41Speaker 1: cloud of virtual particles that surrounded and protected and kind
- 26:44Speaker 1: of shielded from the rest of the universe. And so
- 26:47Speaker 1: that's a wild concept, Daniel. Now, what doesn't mean about
- 26:51Speaker 1: what we know about the electron? Well, it's not just
- 26:53Speaker 1: the electron. Remember, all charged particles have the same property
- 26:57Speaker 1: that they shield themselves. And what we're measuring is really
- 27:01Speaker 1: the variable strength of the electromagnetic interaction. And the higher
- 27:05Speaker 1: the energy you have, the stronger this interaction is. And
- 27:09Speaker 1: so what it tells us is that the particles by
- 27:11Speaker 1: themselves is unique. This bare particle, the stripped of all interactions,
- 27:16Speaker 1: is not a physical thing that we should be thinking about.
- 27:18Speaker 1: And we need to renormalize our idea and think about
- 27:21Speaker 1: the particle together with its entourage. That really defines who
- 27:24Speaker 1: it is. Because you know, if you met a celebrity
- 27:26Speaker 1: without their entourage, they probably wouldn't seem that famous either,
- 27:29Speaker 1: would they. It seemed normal and down to earth. I
- 27:33Speaker 1: don't know, you tell me you've met me in person, Daniel,
- 27:35Speaker 1: what is that? I had to fight my way through
- 27:39Speaker 1: your entourage? Um? All right, So so that's kind of
- 27:43Speaker 1: what this renormalization means. It's like kind of like getting
- 27:46Speaker 1: used to the entourage of particles, and it doesn't just
- 27:48Speaker 1: apply to the charge. It turns out that most of
- 27:52Speaker 1: the fundamental characteristics of the particles have this same property,
- 27:56Speaker 1: that they have a measured value and then a weird
- 28:00Speaker 1: it's sometimes non physical sort of bear true value. I mean,
- 28:03Speaker 1: like some of the other quantum charges like color and
- 28:07Speaker 1: spin and things like that. Just like that. Yeah, the
- 28:10Speaker 1: strong nuclear force also has its strength vary with the
- 28:14Speaker 1: energy of the particles that are shooting at it. But
- 28:17Speaker 1: I think one of the weirdest things is the particle mass.
- 28:20Speaker 1: Like we think about mass and sort of like a
- 28:22Speaker 1: defining characteristic of a particle, like what's the difference between
- 28:26Speaker 1: an electron and muant while a muan is heavier, right,
- 28:29Speaker 1: And we identify particles by their mass, But it turns
- 28:32Speaker 1: out that what we measure, and we measure the mass
- 28:35Speaker 1: of the particle is not actually like the true fundamental
- 28:38Speaker 1: mass of the particles, not the mass the particle would
- 28:41Speaker 1: have if it was all by itself in the universe
- 28:43Speaker 1: with no interactions, right, because instead of virtual particles that
- 28:46Speaker 1: it interacts with, it interacts with something else, the Higgs field. Right,
- 28:50Speaker 1: that's right, all particles moving through the universe are interacting
- 28:53Speaker 1: with all the quantum fields that are around them, and
- 28:56Speaker 1: what happens when they interact is that you know, those
- 28:58Speaker 1: fields amid little particle for them to interact with. And
- 29:01Speaker 1: so you can imagine like an electron flying through the
- 29:04Speaker 1: universe and it can emit the Higgs boson and then
- 29:08Speaker 1: it can reabsorb that Higgs boson. That's effectively what's happening
- 29:11Speaker 1: when it's interacting with the Higgs field. It emits a
- 29:14Speaker 1: virtual Higgs boson and then re absorbs it. And it
- 29:17Speaker 1: can do that, or it can do admit to Higgs bosons,
- 29:20Speaker 1: or that Higgs boson can split into other particles and
- 29:23Speaker 1: then come back together. There's millions of different possible things
- 29:26Speaker 1: that could happen as an electron is moving from A
- 29:29Speaker 1: to B. And so we've talked before on the podcast
- 29:32Speaker 1: about how the Higgs boson gives particles mass, and we
- 29:36Speaker 1: say this this field that fills the universe, and interacting
- 29:40Speaker 1: with that field gives those particles masses. But we sort
- 29:43Speaker 1: of dot dot dotted over that critical bit, like how
- 29:46Speaker 1: does interacting with a quantum field give a particle mass?
- 29:50Speaker 1: What does that mean? Right? Well, there's the analogy of
- 29:53Speaker 1: like moving through a crowded party or something, right, Like
- 29:56Speaker 1: you're trying to move, but the field is throwing particles
- 29:58Speaker 1: at you, and you're throwing particles at and that's kind
- 30:00Speaker 1: of what inertia sort of is. That's exactly right. And
- 30:04Speaker 1: if you want to go from A to B and
- 30:05Speaker 1: you talk about a particle having mass, then it takes
- 30:08Speaker 1: energy to speed it up as it's going from A
- 30:10Speaker 1: to B, or it takes energy to slow it down,
- 30:13Speaker 1: and it turns out that's inertia, right, And that can
- 30:16Speaker 1: be exactly modeled as a particle interacting with the field
- 30:20Speaker 1: because as it goes along, you can admit a particle,
- 30:22Speaker 1: you can absorb a particle. There's all these complicated interactions
- 30:25Speaker 1: that can happen, and those interactions have exactly the same
- 30:29Speaker 1: effect as if you just gave a particle inertia sort
- 30:32Speaker 1: of by hand. Those interactions all add up to create
- 30:35Speaker 1: this effect that we describe as mass. Like it again,
- 30:40Speaker 1: this is a separation between like our macroscopic observations of
- 30:44Speaker 1: stuff and the microscopic explanation for what's really happening, and
- 30:49Speaker 1: the macroscopic thing were familiar with is like, hey, stuff
- 30:52Speaker 1: seems to have inertia. You know, you push on a
- 30:54Speaker 1: heavy rocket, takes a while to get it going. You're
- 30:56Speaker 1: downhill from a heavy rock, you better move out of
- 30:58Speaker 1: the way because it's hard to slow down, right, And
- 31:01Speaker 1: that macroscopic property turns out to be explained by all
- 31:05Speaker 1: the little particles inside it interacting with the Higgs field,
- 31:08Speaker 1: with virtual particles, with virtual particles exactly, that's the key,
- 31:12Speaker 1: are you saying, sort of like all particles, and it's
- 31:15Speaker 1: not just their electrical charge, You're saying their mass. It's
- 31:18Speaker 1: also kind of insulated by these virtual Higgs boson clouds.
- 31:22Speaker 1: I'm saying that what we call an electron that has
- 31:25Speaker 1: mass is actually an electron with a swarm of Higgs
- 31:29Speaker 1: bosons around it. That's what it means for an electron
- 31:32Speaker 1: to have mass, is that it's sort of clouded by
- 31:34Speaker 1: the Higgs field. And so an electron moving through universe
- 31:38Speaker 1: with no Higgs field would have no mass. Right, So
- 31:41Speaker 1: what we call the electron is not really just the electron.
- 31:44Speaker 1: Is the electron surrounded by this swarm of virtual particles
- 31:47Speaker 1: it's constantly interacting with. So in the same way we
- 31:51Speaker 1: renormalized our concept of the electron as the electron surrounded
- 31:55Speaker 1: by its virtual screen of particles shielding its charge, we
- 31:59Speaker 1: all also have to include for the electron when we
- 32:01Speaker 1: think about its mass, we have to think about this
- 32:04Speaker 1: virtual cloud of particles it's interacting with, because that's where
- 32:07Speaker 1: it gets. It's like, it's like kind of like what
- 32:10Speaker 1: you're saying is that all of these quantum fields and
- 32:13Speaker 1: the universe are all sort of connected to each other,
- 32:15Speaker 1: and so you can't really talk about one thing because
- 32:19Speaker 1: it's it's all connected everything. Nothing can exist on its own.
- 32:23Speaker 1: That's right. We've got pretty spiritual pretty quick there. Man.
- 32:26Speaker 1: Maybe we're connect Man, it all is just a renormaliz
- 32:34Speaker 1: past that do be over here, man, I want to
- 32:35Speaker 1: be normalize. Yeah, exactly. Got to smoke your banan appeals.
- 32:39Speaker 1: And you've got to understand that these particles, they're not
- 32:42Speaker 1: on their own. They're just fluctuations of quantum fields, and
- 32:45Speaker 1: these fields are all interacting with each other, and so
- 32:48Speaker 1: it doesn't really make physical sense to say, what is
- 32:50Speaker 1: the mass of this one little particle, what is the
- 32:53Speaker 1: charge of this one little particle. You've got to think
- 32:55Speaker 1: about it together. But you're sort of saying that particles
- 32:57Speaker 1: don't have mass without the Higgs field, right, that's exactly right.
- 33:01Speaker 1: If there was no Higgs field, these particles would all
- 33:03Speaker 1: have zero masses. And so the bare mass of these
- 33:06Speaker 1: particles in the limit where you think about the non
- 33:08Speaker 1: interacting is zero. All the particles in the Standard model
- 33:11Speaker 1: except for the Higgs boson, have bare mass of zero,
- 33:15Speaker 1: and they all get their masses through this virtual swarm
- 33:18Speaker 1: of craziness. And it's not just actually through interacting with
- 33:22Speaker 1: the Higgs. Like the electron also gets more mass because
- 33:24Speaker 1: it emits photons. I know, that's especially weird because photons
- 33:28Speaker 1: have no mass. Right, in addition to interacting with the Higgs,
- 33:31Speaker 1: they get mass from photons. That's right, they get mass
- 33:34Speaker 1: from photons. And now, if there wasn't the Higgs, the
- 33:36Speaker 1: electrons would have no mass. But because they're the Higgs,
- 33:39Speaker 1: photons can add mass to the electron. It's like multiplicative,
- 33:43Speaker 1: like they make it have, you know, they multiply its
- 33:45Speaker 1: mass by a certain factor. If it was zero would
- 33:47Speaker 1: stave zero. But since the electron gets some mass from
- 33:50Speaker 1: the Higgs, the photons boosted. Remember mass is also related
- 33:54Speaker 1: to energy, and in a sense, what we're talking about
- 33:56Speaker 1: is how the electron has a lot of self energy.
- 33:59Speaker 1: It's constantly emitting and absorbing a swarm of photons, and
- 34:03Speaker 1: those contribute to its effective mass, which is what in
- 34:05Speaker 1: the end we measure. We only measure, you know, physical things.
- 34:08Speaker 1: We can't actually measure true things about the electron. If
- 34:11Speaker 1: it was all its only in the universe. I feel
- 34:13Speaker 1: like you guys wanted to call it naked charge, but
- 34:16Speaker 1: you were, but you still have backed down. You're like
- 34:18Speaker 1: to naked charge, but we can't. It's called naked charge.
- 34:21Speaker 1: It's called bear charge, and thus confusing everyone because they're
- 34:24Speaker 1: like bears. What do you mean, like like a bear? Exactly,
- 34:28Speaker 1: it's one of the bare necessities, you know, exactly, all right,
- 34:32Speaker 1: But then does the electron then have a constant mass
- 34:36Speaker 1: or does it also vary like it's charge, It also varies. Yeah,
- 34:39Speaker 1: all these quantities actually vary with the energy you're using
- 34:43Speaker 1: to probe it. But last time we talked, that's in
- 34:46Speaker 1: the mass of the particles were constant in the universe. No,
- 34:49Speaker 1: you're totally right, And what we actually mean when we
- 34:51Speaker 1: say those constants is we mean the strength of the
- 34:54Speaker 1: interaction with those particles and the Higgs field. That's what
- 34:57Speaker 1: controls the mass but the mass of you measure and
- 35:00Speaker 1: individual experiment does depend on the actual energy of that experiment. Wow,
- 35:07Speaker 1: so now we also have to redefine mass mass um
- 35:11Speaker 1: doesn't exist. It seems it's inside the freezer. Yeah, everything's
- 35:15Speaker 1: inside the freezer. This is something that helps you also
- 35:17Speaker 1: understand how the universe could have been very different in
- 35:21Speaker 1: its early years, because in the very early moments of
- 35:23Speaker 1: the universe, Remember, things were hot and dense and nasty,
- 35:26Speaker 1: and all the particles had a lot of energy, and
- 35:29Speaker 1: all these forces charge, and the strong nuclear force and
- 35:32Speaker 1: the weak nuclear force, all of them depend on the energy.
- 35:36Speaker 1: And so back in the early days of the universe
- 35:38Speaker 1: we think that maybe all the forces had the same strength,
- 35:42Speaker 1: and that what's happened since then as things cool down
- 35:45Speaker 1: and things got slower and calmer, is that these things
- 35:48Speaker 1: have different like variations with energy. You know, one of
- 35:51Speaker 1: them drops really quickly as things go to low energy,
- 35:54Speaker 1: another one drops really slowly. But back in the early days,
- 35:57Speaker 1: things were glorious and unifisity. Back then, thanks are normal
- 36:00Speaker 1: Then we denormalize kind and now we've got a renormalize.
- 36:04Speaker 1: You got a normalize. And but I have to say,
- 36:07Speaker 1: none of this makes me feel normal at all, Daniel,
- 36:11Speaker 1: you just told me that the electron doesn't have a
- 36:14Speaker 1: charge and it doesn't have mass, so it's not easy
- 36:16Speaker 1: also for particle physics to accept this. There are a
- 36:19Speaker 1: lot of years when after people made this discovery that
- 36:22Speaker 1: you have these weird infinities in the theory, that they thought, well,
- 36:24Speaker 1: the theory must just be wrong, right, there must be
- 36:27Speaker 1: a problem with the theory. And then people realized, oh, well,
- 36:30Speaker 1: you know, you just redefine what you mean by an
- 36:32Speaker 1: electron and then you don't have to worry about those infinities.
- 36:35Speaker 1: And a lot of people objected. They were like, you
- 36:37Speaker 1: can't just do that. You can't just define your living
- 36:40Speaker 1: room to be clean now, but if you don't have
- 36:42Speaker 1: any better ideas that you can. But but but it
- 36:46Speaker 1: turns out you can. If yours is the only house
- 36:50Speaker 1: in the universe and you're the only one person living there,
- 36:53Speaker 1: you didn't define it however you want. But then there
- 36:55Speaker 1: was a guy Ken Wilson, who is sort of an
- 36:56Speaker 1: underappreciated genius, who sort of made a deeper point about
- 37:00Speaker 1: the whole nature of the universe, and he said, you know,
- 37:02Speaker 1: nothing is really constant. Everything depends on energy the physics
- 37:06Speaker 1: you measure depends on the energy you're using to measure it,
- 37:09Speaker 1: so it's totally natural for things to vary. In fact,
- 37:12Speaker 1: the mistake was to expect anything to be constant. So
- 37:16Speaker 1: he said that the grandest renormalization of them all. I see. Wow,
- 37:20Speaker 1: he like dropped the mic. He's like, bam, I just
- 37:24Speaker 1: redefined normal exactly. He redefined what success was. All right, Well,
- 37:31Speaker 1: I think it's pretty interesting and mind blowing to like
- 37:35Speaker 1: think about what happens when you actually get down to
- 37:38Speaker 1: that level. You know, when you try to get down
- 37:40Speaker 1: to the zero size of the electron, what happens and
- 37:44Speaker 1: how things kind of blow up mathematically. Yeah, and we'll
- 37:47Speaker 1: always struggle to explain the microscopic in terms of ideas
- 37:50Speaker 1: we invented as macroscopic meanings, and there's no guarantee that
- 37:54Speaker 1: we're going to succeed. But when those ideas break down
- 37:57Speaker 1: is when I think we get the greatest insights into
- 38:00Speaker 1: what's really happening down there. We know that there's not
- 38:03Speaker 1: really particles, they're not really ways, they're weird quantum fluctuations
- 38:07Speaker 1: and fields, and they're not just isolated little dots. And
- 38:10Speaker 1: so that's I think when physics has to confront our priors.
- 38:13Speaker 1: Are assumptions, are basic instincts, and discovery that they're wrong
- 38:16Speaker 1: are when we can make a big step forward in
- 38:18Speaker 1: our sort of intuitive understanding. Well, thank you, Daniel. I
- 38:22Speaker 1: feel like that for the rest of to day, I'm
- 38:23Speaker 1: going to be thinking about naked electrons, naked higsons. This
- 38:29Speaker 1: is all cleared by the Emotion Picture Association of America.
- 38:32Speaker 1: That's right to this rated P for physics, some naked
- 38:37Speaker 1: particles may appear. All right. Well, we hope you enjoyed
- 38:42Speaker 1: that discussion and learn a little bit more about what's
- 38:46Speaker 1: really the charge of the electrons and what's really the
- 38:48Speaker 1: massive things and what happens when you get down to
- 38:53Speaker 1: where things are not normal. That's right, and I hope
- 38:55Speaker 1: that this podcast on renormalization has renormalized everybody else out
- 38:59Speaker 1: there to be an at home particle physicist. Thanks for
- 39:02Speaker 1: joining us, See you next time. Thanks for listening, and
- 39:13Speaker 1: remember that Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe is a
- 39:16Speaker 1: production of I Heart Radio. For more podcast from my
- 39:19Speaker 1: Heart Radio, visit the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,
- 39:23Speaker 1: or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.