Latest / U.S. Right to Know articles / Tracking the Trump administration’s favors to the pesticide industry
Transcript
- 0:03Tracking the Trump administration's favors to the pesticides industry. The
- 0:12pesticide industry has spent decades building a highly effective influence operation in
- 0:17Washington, DC, shaping how pesticide are regulated and how American agriculture operates.
- 0:23Its political influence did not begin with the Trump administration’s and has
- 0:27extended across both Republican and Democratic administration But over the past eighteen
- 0:34months, the Trump administration has delivered a string of victories to the
- 0:38pesticide industry that could reshape pesticide use and public health protections for
- 0:43years to come. This tracker documents the Trump administration's favors to the
- 0:48pesticide industry since January 2025. Personnel is policy. The
- 0:54Trump administration has filled Many key posts with pesticide industry allies. U.S.
- 1:00Right to Know identified 26 administration officials with ties to the pesticide
- 1:05industry's lobbying or legal network, including 11 political appointees at the U.S.
- 1:10Environmental Protection Agency, where former chemical industry lobbyists now occupy the four
- 1:16highest ranking positions oversee federal pesticide regulations More PFAS
- 1:22pesticide approvals. In July 2026, EPA approve three new pesticide active ingredients
- 1:28that many scientists classify as PFAS, bringing the total number of PFAS
- 1:33pesticides approved since November 2025 to five. PFAS, forever chemicals, are highly
- 1:38persistent and linked to serious health problems including cancer. Birth defects, hormone
- 1:43disruption, liver and thyroid disease. Many scientists and regulators classify PFAS
- 1:50as substances containing at least one fully fluorinated methyl or methylene carbon
- 1:54atom, but EPA uses a narrower definition adopted in 2023 that excludes
- 2:00compounds containing only one fluorinated carbon. Weakened Endangered Species Protections.
- 2:06In July 2026, The Trump administration completed changes to Endangered Species Act
- 2:12regulations, including rescinding the
- 2:15longstanding regulatory definition of harm that could make it easier for the
- 2:19EPA to approve pesticides with fewer safeguards for threatened and endangered species.
- 2:25Legal Triumph for Bayer. In June 2026, the Supreme Court sided with
- 2:31the Trump administration and Bayer in a seven-two decision likely to block
- 2:35thousands of state level lawsuits alleging that Bayer failed to warn consumers
- 2:39that Roundup causes cancer. The ruling gives greater legal weight to EPA's
- 2:44approval of pesticide labels, making it harder for injured people to argue
- 2:49under state law that a manufacturer should have provided stronger warnings than
- 2:53EPA required. For decades, state failure to warn claims served as an
- 2:58independent check on EPA pesticide approvals, allowing juries to hold manufacturers accountable
- 3:04even when EPA had approved a pesticide label. The Court ruling narrows
- 3:09the pathway through which injured Americans can sue corporations that cause harm.
- 3:15Reshaping chemical safety assessments via NAMS. In June 2026, the Trump administration
- 3:21announced it will expand the use of new approach methods. NAMS, such
- 3:25as AI-powered computer models and cell-based tests, to evaluate industrial chemicals. The
- 3:30Agency is also developing NAMS approaches for pesticides and endocrine disruptors. Many
- 3:36scientists support NAMS as a way to reduce animal testing and improve
- 3:40toxicity screening, but emphasize the new methods should complement, not replace well-established
- 3:46evidence from animal and human studies. Critics argue that EPA is moving
- 3:51ahead without sufficiently validated scientific standards for NAMS, raising concerns that pesticide
- 3:57and other chemical risks could be underestimated. Backtracked on atrazine protections.
- 4:03In may twenty twenty six, the US Fish and Wildlife Service concluded
- 4:07that atrazines is unlikely to jeopardize threatened or endangered species, reversing an
- 4:13earlier federal finding that atrazines is likely to harm more than one
- 4:16thousand protected species. The decision removed a regulatory obstacle for the widely
- 4:22used herbicide that is banned in the European Union and many other
- 4:26countries due to concerns about its impacts on
- 4:29human health and the environment. Boosted Bayer again at the Supreme Court.
- 4:35In March 2026, the Trump Justice Department submitted a second brief to
- 4:39the Supreme Court supporting Bayer's position in Monsanto v. Durnell, arguing that
- 4:44federal pesticide law preempts state failure to
- 4:47warn claims that would require warning labels not approved by EPA. The
- 4:52brief was signed by three top Justice Department officials who had previously
- 4:56worked for law firms representing Bayer. Withdrew from International Cancer Research Agency.
- 5:03In March 2026, the National Institutes of Health ended its collaboration with
- 5:08the International Agency for Research on Cancer, IARC, the World Health Organization's
- 5:13Cancer Research Agency. As a result, US government scientists can no longer
- 5:19participate in IARC's work, and the world's leading independent cancer research
- 5:24agency may lose funding and research capacity. IRC has long been a
- 5:29target of the pesticides industrial After IARC classified glyphosate as probably carcinogenic
- 5:35to humans in 2015, internal Monsanto documents revealed plans to orchestrate outrage
- 5:40against the agency and undermine its credibility. Glyphosate elevated as national security
- 5:46priority. In February 2026, President Trump signed an executive order declaring
- 5:52glyphosate-based herbicides an elemental phosphorus, a raw material used in glyphosate
- 5:59and military weaponry, critical to national defense and directing The federal government
- 6:04to prioritize their domestic production. Bayer is the sole US producer of
- 6:09both glyphosate and elemental phosphorus. Dakamba reapproved. In February 2026,
- 6:16EPA restored over the top use of Dakamba herbicides on Dakamba tolerant
- 6:20GMO soybean and cotton crops, after two federal courts vacated previous approvals.
- 6:25The decision revives profitable pesticide industry product lines, despite years of litigation
- 6:31over widespread crop damage caused by Dakamba drift. Internal Monsanto documents, disclosed
- 6:37in litigation, indicate company scientists anticipated drift related damage before the products
- 6:42reach the market. See our Decamba fact sheet and link to the
- 6:46Decamba Papers, key I documents and analysis of lawsuits involving Decamba. Relented
- 6:52on Paraquat. In January 2026, EPA announced it would freshly reassess Paraquat,
- 6:58describing the move as more ma progress. But the agency did not
- 7:02initiate a new review of Paraquat's links to Parkinson's disease or imposed
- 7:06restrictions on the herbicide. Instead, EPA continued a registration review already underway
- 7:12and requested additional data from manufacturers. Paraquat is banned for agricultural use
- 7:18in many countries due to health and environmental concerns. EPA maintains that
- 7:23existing evidence does not establish a definitive link between Paraquat and Parkinson's
- 7:28disease or cancer. Backed Bayer's bid to block state cancer lawsuits. One
- 7:33of the Trump administration's most powerful actions for the pesticide industry came
- 7:38in December 2025, when the Justice Department urged the Supreme Court to
- 7:42hear Monsanto v. Durnell, and argued that federal pesticide law preempts many
- 7:47state law failure to warn claims. The filing reversed the legal position
- 7:51taken by the Biden administration. Bayer's stock price jumped at the news.
- 7:57That same week, a toxicology journal retracted a highly influential glyphosate safety
- 8:03review, after concluding Monsanto employees had ghostwritten portions of the paper. Two
- 8:09other influential papers that helped shape the scientific and regulatory debate over
- 8:13glyphosate have since come under investigation for allegations of ghostwriting. Decimated
- 8:19EPA's research arm and gutted scientific capacity. In july twenty twenty five,
- 8:24the Trump administration began dismantling EPA's Office of Research and Development, the
- 8:30agency's principal scientific research arm. ORD provides much of the independent scientific
- 8:36analyses and technicise EPA relies on to evaluate whether pesticides and industrial
- 8:42chemicals may cause cancer, harm children's development, disrupt hormones, or threaten ecosystems.
- 8:49Current and former EPA scientists warned the changes will weaken the scientific
- 8:53foundation for chemical and pesticide regulations, making it harder for EPA to
- 8:58conduct rigorous, independent safety assessments and increasing industry influence over regulatory decisions.
- 9:06Eliminated pesticide use record keeping requirements. In June 2025, USDA rescinded
- 9:12regulations that had required farmers to keep basic records documenting when, where,
- 9:17and how they applied use pesticides, including products containing periquot, atrazine, decomba,
- 9:23chlorpyrifose, and other hazardous pesticides. The record keeping requirements, which helped
- 9:29regulators verify compliance with pesticide laws, investigate health and environmental issues, and
- 9:36document enforcement of public health laws, had been in place since the
- 9:401990s.