Latest / Dr Justin Coulson's Happy Families / #995 Why Ratings Matter With Liz Handsley

Transcript

#995 Why Ratings Matter With Liz Handsley · Dr Justin Coulson's Happy Families

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: It's the Happy Families Podcast. It's the podcast for the
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: time poor parent who just wants answers. Now, do you
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: ever wonder why some movies have a G rating, some
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: have a PG rating, others have an M or an MAA.
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: What do the ratings mean? Why do they always change?
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: Why do they not seem very consistent? What is the
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: deal with ratings? And how can we use them to
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: guide the decisions that we're making for our children effectively
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: and in healthy ways. Today I'm joined by a Professor
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: Elizabeth Hansley on the Happy Families Podcast. Professor Hansley is
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: an adjunct professor in the School of Law at Western
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: Sydney University. Elizabeth is the President of Children and Media Australia,
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: it's national NGO providing information and advocacy on children's needs
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: and rights as media users. Liz has been on podcasts
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: and TV shows and in conferences talking about screens in
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: the lives of children and families. And I'm really excited
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: for this conversation today. It's one of those things that
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: really really bothers me, Liz, the way that ratings are
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: so inconsistent, they don't seem to be applied even though
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: we have them, and in some ways it's kind of like, well,
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: what's the point of ratings, because with podcasts and with streaming,
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: does any of this even matter anymore? The reason we're
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: talking is there's an inquiry into Australia's national classification scheme
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: being run by the Australian federal government and that's what
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: I want to talk to you about today, Liz, thank
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: you for being with me. What's the deal with ratings?
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: Do they still matter?
• 1:32
  Speaker 2: Well, it's a delight to be here, justin I'm really
• 1:35
  Speaker 2: happy to talk to you and I hope that what
• 1:37
  Speaker 2: we say will be of use to your listeners. Is
• 1:40
  Speaker 2: there any point to classifications? Well, look, we think there
• 1:43
  Speaker 2: is a huge point to them, which is to provide
• 1:45
  Speaker 2: information to parents and others who make decisions on behalf
• 1:49
  Speaker 2: of children as to what children should be seeing and
• 1:52
  Speaker 2: not seeing. And there is great potential for classifications to
• 1:57
  Speaker 2: be useful in that regard. The problem is that the
• 1:59
  Speaker 2: system that we have at the moment really doesn't provide
• 2:02
  Speaker 2: the kind of information that we need. It doesn't provide
• 2:05
  Speaker 2: age based information, and it doesn't provide research based information.
• 2:09
  Speaker 2: So there's a lot of stuff in there that there's
• 2:11
  Speaker 2: really no research to support and where there is research
• 2:14
  Speaker 2: to support it, they tend to go off in the
• 2:16
  Speaker 2: opposite direction or a different direction from where the research
• 2:19
  Speaker 2: would lead. And that's what's great about these proposals that
• 2:21
  Speaker 2: the government's looking at now because they really open up
• 2:24
  Speaker 2: the possibility of having a greater impact from research evidence.
• 2:28
  Speaker 2: And also hopefully we really we've got our fingers cross
• 2:31
  Speaker 2: age based classifications, which we know that would be really
• 2:34
  Speaker 2: really helpful to parents.
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: I want to come back to both the age based
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: and the research based classification elements shortly, but just a
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: quick anecdote. Recently, I sat down with a couple of
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: my kids to watch a movie that was classified as
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: PG and I had to turn it off. I mean,
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: it was explicit, it had content in there that was
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: so coarse and degrading, and I just sat there and thought,
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: what is going on here? I know that there's some
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: research around this idea of ratings creep. That is, what
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: was once rated as let's say, an R rated movie
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: has now moved back to being an M or an
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: MA Many M and maas have been shifted back to
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: being pgs. Now, can you describe a bit about what
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: ratings creep really is, and the extent to which it's
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: a problem.
• 3:13
  Speaker 2: The problem here is that the criteria that we have
• 3:17
  Speaker 2: are so subjective that the conclusions that people reach when
• 3:23
  Speaker 2: they apply those criteria will change over time because people's
• 3:27
  Speaker 2: values and standards change over time, and their experience might,
• 3:32
  Speaker 2: to use your word, course in them to certain elements
• 3:35
  Speaker 2: that they might see. I've also heard quite a few
• 3:38
  Speaker 2: people saying that what's suitable for a child or a
• 3:43
  Speaker 2: group of children will depend on what that child or
• 3:46
  Speaker 2: children have already seen. So it's like, oh, if they
• 3:49
  Speaker 2: say in this movie, then they'll be okay with that movie.
• 3:51
  Speaker 2: And again that implies that what we're interested in here
• 3:54
  Speaker 2: is coursening, that if someone's been coarsened to something, then
• 3:58
  Speaker 2: they'll be okay going forward, and that's not what the
• 4:00
  Speaker 2: research says at all. Rather, it says there's more of
• 4:04
  Speaker 2: a dose response relationship. And particularly if you think about
• 4:06
  Speaker 2: something like violence, the more violent content a child is
• 4:10
  Speaker 2: exposed to, the more likely that child is too become
• 4:14
  Speaker 2: desensitized to violence, to developed attitudes that aren't as sort
• 4:18
  Speaker 2: of concerned with violence as we would like children to be,
• 4:22
  Speaker 2: and so on. So there's a lot of difficulties with
• 4:25
  Speaker 2: just the general beliefs and practices out there in the community,
• 4:29
  Speaker 2: which again aren't based on research, and that's why we
• 4:32
  Speaker 2: would really like to bring it back to the research.
• 4:34
  Speaker 1: Well, it's one of the things that my kids are
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: constantly hearing me say is just because your friends are
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: allowed to watch it, doesn't mean that you're allowed to
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: watch it. Every family has different standards. This inquiry that
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: the government's having and the submission that Children in Meater
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: Australia have made, can you talk a bit about this
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: age based criteria that you're describing, and then we'll talk
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: about the research base as well.
• 4:54
  Speaker 2: Yeah, we'd be delighted to see age based classifications. At
• 4:58
  Speaker 2: the moment, people are probably familiar with the idea of
• 5:01
  Speaker 2: M A fifteen plus.
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: That's the only one we've got that, yes, of course.
• 5:04
  Speaker 2: Yeah, well we have eighteen, we have fifteen, but anybody
• 5:07
  Speaker 2: under fifteen. We're just reliant on these very very vague
• 5:11
  Speaker 2: and broad and amorphous ideas of GPG and M and
• 5:16
  Speaker 2: listeners might not be aware, but M is different from
• 5:18
  Speaker 2: M A fifteen plus and it's not legally restricted, so
• 5:21
  Speaker 2: anybody can legally watch M rated content and that includes
• 5:25
  Speaker 2: some quite violent superhero content. For example. And it also
• 5:29
  Speaker 2: might include some rom coms that might have some sexual
• 5:32
  Speaker 2: content that some people might feel uncomfortable with, but other's
• 5:35
  Speaker 2: not so much. And so that's why we really need
• 5:37
  Speaker 2: to know more about the actual content of the of
• 5:42
  Speaker 2: the films and so on that are out there. And
• 5:44
  Speaker 2: remember we're talking about games as well, and apps and
• 5:48
  Speaker 2: other sorts of content a subject to this classification.
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: You've just raised something for me as well. I mean,
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: the games will come back to But why don't we
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: have ratings on books? I'm always astounded that there are
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: no raps on books. Even the theater, if you're going
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: to go and see a play, no ratings. What's the
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: deal with this? I just don't quite get how these
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: things have slipped through the cracks.
• 6:09
  Speaker 2: Well, yeah, it's just that different legal schemes grow up
• 6:12
  Speaker 2: in different places for different purposes, and they don't end
• 6:15
  Speaker 2: up being comprehensive. But we do actually have classifications for
• 6:20
  Speaker 2: written publications. It's just they don't try to be as
• 6:23
  Speaker 2: comprehensive as for films. And there are some things that
• 6:27
  Speaker 2: are submittable for classification which would basically be pornomax just
• 6:33
  Speaker 2: to put two fine A points on it. So if
• 6:36
  Speaker 2: things have fairly strong sexual content, then they would be submittable,
• 6:40
  Speaker 2: and there's a couple of different levels of classification depending
• 6:45
  Speaker 2: just how much detail they show.
• 6:49
  Speaker 1: Let's talk about how this would work though. I mean,
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: if you're going to have an age based classification scheme,
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: how do you determine from a developmental perspective whether it's
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: old can or cannot watch that superhero movie? I mean,
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: I know plenty of people who are really fine with
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: their five and six year olds watching them, and in
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: our home, our kids don't tend to watch them until
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: they're in their adolescent use. It's a big.
• 7:12
  Speaker 2: Discrepancy, yeah, exactly. Superhero movies are an interesting example because
• 7:17
  Speaker 2: they're often heavily promoted to very young children well before the.
• 7:22
  Speaker 1: Classification is known, not just the movie, but the merch, right,
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: I mean, the kids get all the merch before the
• 7:26
  Speaker 1: movie comes out.
• 7:27
  Speaker 2: That's what I mean. I mean the merch. Merch comes
• 7:30
  Speaker 2: out long before, and it's clearly merch that is aimed
• 7:34
  Speaker 2: at young children as size for pajamas, little backpacks, little
• 7:39
  Speaker 2: pencil cases, all that sort of stuff. We've all seen it,
• 7:43
  Speaker 2: and that really undermines the classification message when it comes
• 7:46
  Speaker 2: out so by the time you find out that it's
• 7:49
  Speaker 2: emerated and therefore not recommended for anybody under fifteen, it's
• 7:53
  Speaker 2: too late and the die is cast. Every four year
• 7:55
  Speaker 2: old's going to see it because that expectation has been raised,
• 7:58
  Speaker 2: and it's just too much to ask if parents that
• 8:00
  Speaker 2: they resist that, and there's no legal compulsion on them
• 8:03
  Speaker 2: to do so. But to come back to your original question,
• 8:07
  Speaker 2: the government is proposing to put in place a panel
• 8:11
  Speaker 2: which has people on it who have research in different
• 8:14
  Speaker 2: disciplines bit psychology, education, pediatrics. We'd hope there'd be some
• 8:19
  Speaker 2: pediatric nurses on there because they know real lot about
• 8:22
  Speaker 2: child development, and then they would look at all of
• 8:25
  Speaker 2: the research and try to get some sort of sense
• 8:28
  Speaker 2: of what's suitable for a five year old, a nine
• 8:31
  Speaker 2: year old, thirteen year old and so on, and have
• 8:34
  Speaker 2: the classifications accordingly. Most of these classifications, we would hope
• 8:39
  Speaker 2: would still be advisory. So if you've got a particularly
• 8:42
  Speaker 2: mature five year old, then maybe they could see something
• 8:45
  Speaker 2: a bit higher. That's up to you, but you've got
• 8:47
  Speaker 2: all the information to make that decision. And also if
• 8:50
  Speaker 2: a child's especially sensitive, then you might not show them
• 8:53
  Speaker 2: something that would otherwise be okay for their age group.
• 8:56
  Speaker 2: But we do think that there are some things, just
• 8:59
  Speaker 2: as with the kind of content where we have the
• 9:01
  Speaker 2: cutoff of eighteen and fifteen, we think it would be
• 9:05
  Speaker 2: justifiable to have a cutoff of twelve for some content
• 9:07
  Speaker 2: where we're parents just told very strongly your child should
• 9:11
  Speaker 2: not be seeing this and use the legal system to
• 9:14
  Speaker 2: do so.
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: Yeah, so that's the age based and I guess the
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: research would inform that age based system classification system that
• 9:21
  Speaker 1: you're discussing, Liz. Something that's been on my mind a
• 9:25
  Speaker 1: lot lately with the introduction of Kyle Sandlans and Jackie
• 9:28
  Speaker 1: O into Melbourne Radio, the growth in the listenership that
• 9:34
  Speaker 1: they have. I'm astonished at the content that is being
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: played at six o'clock, seven o'clock, eight o'clock, nine o'clock
• 9:41
  Speaker 1: in the morning, when parents are doing school runs with
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: their kids. I know that there's codes of practice around this,
• 9:46
  Speaker 1: but it seems like to some degree much of the
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: world has just stopped caring about explicit content, content that
• 9:54
  Speaker 1: is genuinely not for kids. I mean, I might even
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: argue that it's not really for some adults as well,
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: But regardless of that, my question isn't so much about
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: Kyle and Jackie out as much as I think that
• 10:05
  Speaker 1: the degrading way that they present is definitely affecting our
• 10:09
  Speaker 1: kids in unhelpful ways. Rather, the question is what do
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: you think typical mums and dads are focused on now
• 10:17
  Speaker 1: when it comes to their children's exposure to various forms
• 10:21
  Speaker 1: of content. Is it the same today in twenty twenty
• 10:24
  Speaker 1: four as it was back in the nineteen eighties when
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: I was a kid growing up, and mom and dad
• 10:28
  Speaker 1: would say absolutely, no, you're not watching that emirated movie
• 10:30
  Speaker 1: because you're a kid, you're ten years old. What are
• 10:33
  Speaker 1: you seeing in children in media Australia in terms of
• 10:36
  Speaker 1: responses from parents on topics like this.
• 10:39
  Speaker 2: Well, the kinds of parents who get in touch with
• 10:41
  Speaker 2: us are the parents who care a real lot. They're
• 10:44
  Speaker 2: very concerned about what their children are seeing and hearing
• 10:48
  Speaker 2: and playing, and they really seek out our help in
• 10:53
  Speaker 2: not just giving them advice as to what they should
• 10:56
  Speaker 2: be doing in their own home, but in supporting the
• 10:58
  Speaker 2: broader reforms that we advocate for. But I don't know
• 11:04
  Speaker 2: if there is such a thing as a typical parent really,
• 11:06
  Speaker 2: because you know that's that group of parents. But then
• 11:09
  Speaker 2: there are other parents who want their children to have
• 11:12
  Speaker 2: as broader an experience as possible, and as I was
• 11:15
  Speaker 2: saying before, parents who think, oh, they've already seen this,
• 11:18
  Speaker 2: so that should that means they should be okay to
• 11:20
  Speaker 2: see that they have that sort of logic to what
• 11:21
  Speaker 2: they do. Parents do all different sorts of things, but
• 11:24
  Speaker 2: I think ultimately all parents, with maybe a very few,
• 11:28
  Speaker 2: very minor exceptions, want their children to grow up healthy
• 11:31
  Speaker 2: and happy.
• 11:32
  Speaker 1: Yeah, and I'm convinced that having a healthy classification system
• 11:36
  Speaker 1: is going to be part of that, so that we
• 11:37
  Speaker 1: can make sure that our kids aren't seeing content that's
• 11:40
  Speaker 1: not developmentally appropriate, that exposed them the things they're not
• 11:42
  Speaker 1: ready for.
• 11:43
  Speaker 2: That's right, and we want to make it usable for parents,
• 11:46
  Speaker 2: and I think that's part of the problem at the moment.
• 11:47
  Speaker 2: A lot of parents have sort of checked out of
• 11:49
  Speaker 2: the system because it's not usable, because it doesn't provide
• 11:52
  Speaker 2: the kind of information that they want. We would like
• 11:54
  Speaker 2: to see a lot and we would expect to see
• 11:56
  Speaker 2: a lot more parents relying on a very well design
• 12:00
  Speaker 2: system that provides the information they need.
• 12:02
  Speaker 1: Okay, Liz, the classification inquiry is ongoing into this scheme
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: that currently exists and how it can be improved. But
• 12:11
  Speaker 1: if I'm a parent today who wants help, I mean personally,
• 12:15
  Speaker 1: as you know, I've been a long time following supporter
• 12:18
  Speaker 1: of what you do at Children Media Australia. But if
• 12:20
  Speaker 1: I'm just hearing this conversation for the first time, where
• 12:23
  Speaker 1: do I go? What do I do to help my
• 12:25
  Speaker 1: children to minimize the risk that they're going to be
• 12:28
  Speaker 1: exposed to content that's not for them in movies and
• 12:31
  Speaker 1: games and other media.
• 12:33
  Speaker 2: Well, justin thank you very much for the opportunity to
• 12:36
  Speaker 2: plug Children and Media Australians know before you go movie
• 12:39
  Speaker 2: review service. If parents what that kind of information, all
• 12:43
  Speaker 2: they have to do is go to Children Andmedia dot
• 12:45
  Speaker 2: org dot au and click on the movie reviews tab
• 12:48
  Speaker 2: and there you'll find reviews of every movie or release
• 12:52
  Speaker 2: in Australian cinemas since two thousand and two that was
• 12:58
  Speaker 2: rated G ORPG and of emirated ones that were promoted
• 13:01
  Speaker 2: to children, and a selection of other movies that might
• 13:06
  Speaker 2: be older but are available on streaming services. And we
• 13:09
  Speaker 2: also review apps, so you can go there and get
• 13:12
  Speaker 2: information that is from a child development perspective. It's written
• 13:17
  Speaker 2: by somebody with child development expertise, and that is age based,
• 13:20
  Speaker 2: and it gives recommendations for different age groups of children.
• 13:24
  Speaker 2: Now you don't have to do or not do or
• 13:26
  Speaker 2: to follow the recommendations, but there's lots of information there.
• 13:30
  Speaker 2: One thing that I did with my own daughter when
• 13:32
  Speaker 2: she was younger was she wanted to see a particular
• 13:34
  Speaker 2: movie and I wasn't sure if it was going to
• 13:36
  Speaker 2: be right for her, and we sat down and read
• 13:39
  Speaker 2: the review together, and based on what was in the review,
• 13:42
  Speaker 2: I think she was probably about eleven or twelve at
• 13:44
  Speaker 2: the time, and that's often a tricky age when kids
• 13:47
  Speaker 2: really want to watch quite adult stuff and you're really
• 13:49
  Speaker 2: a bit nervous about what's going to do. Anyway, we
• 13:52
  Speaker 2: read the review together and she thought, based on it, no,
• 13:55
  Speaker 2: I still want to see it, and so I went
• 13:56
  Speaker 2: along with her, and we talked about it afterwards, and
• 13:59
  Speaker 2: she said, well, I'm really glad I read the review
• 14:01
  Speaker 2: before because it would have been really, really scary if
• 14:04
  Speaker 2: I hadn't known how the movie works out. And so
• 14:07
  Speaker 2: she enjoyed the movie and she got a lot out
• 14:09
  Speaker 2: of it, but she wasn't scared out of her wits
• 14:12
  Speaker 2: as she might have been if she hadn't read the reviews,
• 14:14
  Speaker 2: so that's one thing you can do with the reviews,
• 14:16
  Speaker 2: or just read it yourself and make up in your
• 14:18
  Speaker 2: own mind. It's entirely up.
• 14:20
  Speaker 1: To you now. Like that, Forewarned is forearmed, No before
• 14:22
  Speaker 1: you go. Children and Media Australia. Professor Elizabeth Hansley is
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: the President of Children and Media Australia and it's been
• 14:31
  Speaker 1: so great to talk to you about the challenges with ratings.
• 14:34
  Speaker 1: I hope that the submission is well received and we
• 14:36
  Speaker 1: see some changes to the national classification scheme. My goodness,
• 14:40
  Speaker 1: we need it. Thank you so much, Liz for.
• 14:41
  Speaker 2: Your time, My pleasure to be with you. Justin.
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: The Happy Family's podcast is produced by Justin Rulant from
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: Bridge Media. Craig Bruce is our executive producer. And for
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: more information about making your family happy, we'd love for
• 14:52
  Speaker 1: you to visit Happy families dot com dot We'll put
• 14:54
  Speaker 1: some notes about Children MEA Australia in the show notes
• 14:57
  Speaker 1: so that you can check out all the resources there
• 14:58
  Speaker 1: as well.
• 15:01
  Speaker 2: Let