Latest / Sabiduría Oculta Podcast / Guerras del Agua

Transcript

Guerras del Agua · Sabiduría Oculta Podcast

0:00
Just to create a solar panel. The composition is eighty- five percent aluminum
0:04
and thus eleven percent copper, in addition to other minerals, a wind turbine.
0:11
We need aluminum and steel and that although the aim is to create something
0:15
that takes advantage of renewable energies, we resort to mining and exploitation of the
0:22
subsoil and we do not go so far or brotherly. What it takes to
0:24
create a cell phone, no, because it' s too much. They
0:27
are mainly lithium for batteries, cobalt and all kinds of heavy metals that,
0:32
to begin with, waste a lot of water in seconds use a lot of
0:37
chemicals to drill stones and all that damages what is the earth' s surface
0:42
and ecosystem. Evidently clear hello. How can I welcome you to one more
1:17
episode of wisdom hidden your source of mystical knowledge, it is hotter and spiritual.
1:23
My name is Moses Guzman, if this is your first time on this
1:26
channel. Here we are engaged in seeking our own truth and this expansion of
1:33
consciousness, and today is an episode, a little different, a special episode.
1:40
I have here with me my dear brother, Nicolás Silva. How are
1:44
you, my brother? Nice to meet you, brother, actually. I
1:47
' m very grateful that you invited me to your table. I have seen
1:51
some videos and find them extremely interesting and I hope to be able to contribute
1:56
something to the people who listen to you. No thanks to you, my
1:59
brother, for accepting the invitation. As I had said in a previous episode,
2:04
some somewhat political issues that we are going to discuss today. But I
2:07
have always said that knowledge is power. So I think knowing what' s
2:15
going on and the things that come to affect us, directly or indirectly,
2:19
is good. Totally in agreement and especially when we talk about political power,
2:24
regardless of whether or not we like to participate actively in public affairs, public
2:30
affairs impact our lives. So, as you well mentioned, it is necessary
2:37
to be informed, at least to know what is happening on stage in our
2:40
country. Yes, there aren' t many things going under the water,
2:46
so to speak notarly, and speaking of water, we' re going to
2:53
deal with those issues of water, water wars, climate changes, energy sovereignty
2:59
and, a little bit there of drug trafficking. In the end, in
3:08
addition to Mexico' s foreign debt, which was almost fifteen billion pesos,
3:12
there is also a water debt of a water treaty that was signed out there
3:17
of one thousand nine hundred forty- four. What can you tell me about
3:23
this, my brother yes, this indeed, there is also a historical debt,
3:29
we could say to the United States around water. This takes place in
3:34
one thousand and forty- four in the Water Treaty signed by both governments,
3:38
in which Mexico is committed to giving thirty percent of the water flowing from our
3:44
main rivers to the Rio Bravo to the United States. Now why is this
3:52
done good, mainly because water is a very important issue for the agricultural sector,
3:58
which must be remembered that the United States is the number one food power.
4:03
So he' s not gonna put this thing aside. And the problem
4:11
has mainly been that Mexico has experienced a series of droughts that have prevented it
4:15
from being able to pay those concessions that were agreed in the nine hundred and
4:20
forty- four U S Water Treaty, and the U S Government has therefore
4:26
been pressing our country to comply with the agreements of that Treaty. So that
4:30
' s why we can see situations like the two thousand twenty- one,
4:34
where the Chihuahua peasants besieged the dam at the mouthpiece and closed the floodgates because
4:42
the Mexican government is giving water from our own dams to the United States to
4:46
settle that historic debt. And basically there was no water for the peasants,
4:50
for agriculture or ships. That' s precisely why they blocked the gate.
4:56
And what was the government' s response, because walking the National Guard to
5:00
reprint the people, of course, sadly, as you say, my brother,
5:06
sadly the people paying for government mistakes. And on this issue of water
5:12
wars there have been several more precedents in different countries. What do you think
5:17
there are so many. Actually, the issue of water is something that has
5:20
been a territorial dispute since historical times. But in order to get into the
5:26
present, we can go to the dispute on the Nile River between Ethiopia,
5:30
South Sudan, North Egypt, Central Asia, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan,
5:33
and Southeast Asia, between China, Nepal, Thailand and Vietnam. The problem
5:43
of water arises mainly because the countries that are upriver are those that have the
5:46
full control of because the draining of water and the countries that are in downstream
5:51
or where the rivers flow because they are affected mainly because the countries build dams
5:59
And this makes that, because all the water that is stored decreases the amount
6:03
of water that reaches all other countries will cover everything basically yes, and that
6:08
is part of the problem also that there is between Mexico and the United States.
6:14
Well, and this problem between the United States and Mexico, as a
6:16
result of the signing of this Treaty, my brothers, arises from the fact
6:23
that Mexico wanted to be granted water from the Colorado River, because we have
6:28
a small score, a small basin that flows into the Sea of Cortes.
6:31
Then the peasants wanted that water and the U S government did what it did,
6:35
because it was saying we' re going to let you use water from
6:40
your own rivers, but in return, you' re going to have to
6:43
give us the water that runs along the Bravo River too for Texas farmers to
6:46
use. And the problem arises that, as we know, the northeastern part
6:49
of the country is an area that has experienced many droughts. Yes, and
6:55
there' s no way that water can be replenished. Well, and seeing
6:59
how it is, I think water management here in Mexico, specifically hasn'
7:01
t been optimal. Well, the issue of water management in Mexico has been
7:06
a very neglected issue by the government. I would venture to say that before
7:12
the neoliberal period, which is known as this, the government did not invest
7:16
enough in infrastructure. But the neoliberal governments not only stopped investing, but they
7:21
stopped maintaining that existing infrastructure and began granting public water services. Water is a
7:30
democratic good, a right is not even a human right, it is a
7:34
right of survival. And what these politicians do is sell, is privatize,
7:41
and the concept that these water privatizations bring is that citizens are the main cause
7:46
of water waste. So what you want to do, you want to regulate
7:53
that so that you stop wasting water through costs. And this means without n
7:58
signifi s s s s ns. More water with sums or the more water
8:01
you waste because more you will pay on your water receipt. So this seems
8:05
logical. No, but the point is that it is not taken into account
8:09
that companies have a lot of money to pay and sometimes carry out processes that
8:16
are, therefore, like breweries not that waste a lot of water. Like
8:20
the coke cola coolers, thirty- five liters of water to make half a
8:24
liter of coc ok. So those who can pay can waste a lot of
8:30
water and those who don' t have money don' t have access to
8:31
it. If in the end, who is affected, because it is the
8:35
people, it is not the people who have no water, as in this
8:39
case the peasants you spoke of. But here too, not in a new
8:43
lion, the drought that has taken place. If water cuts have always been
8:46
a problem, also not, and suddenly I hear that there is in Juarez,
8:50
for example, Santa Catarina months without water. If not, and if
8:58
those same people did not, after so many months without water, decided to
9:01
go to strike there to the Paseo Santa Lucía and there you saw people bathing
9:05
in the green water, not endangering with so many chemicals, because in fact
9:09
I do not know if you remember that precisely there was a religious group that
9:13
went to pray to the river Santa Catarina and found the virgin there. I
9:18
remember they pulled it out and they were drinking that water I had. I
9:22
don' t know any more stuck months and that because it was holy water,
9:28
they said what that virgin did to her. I think she got up
9:30
there on the hill. No, I don' t. I think the
9:31
government put it back, but they didn' t put it there anymore,
9:37
or I don' t know. I suddenly see there he took up some
9:39
kind of virgin, but I don' t know if it' s the
9:43
same one or it' s a replica or what it was. No.
9:46
I think it should be the same as a symbol of why to remember or
9:50
not the problem of water and a little hope that it will change well.
9:56
Something else you want to add about what g water soil is and what treatises
10:00
there are. I think that makes everything very clear about the problem that Mexico
10:05
has with the United States and, above all, about the poor management of
10:09
water. The last thing they would add is that water is a very important
10:15
issue, as we mentioned, for agriculture and if we do not have a
10:20
constant source of water to produce our own food, we are leaving a very
10:26
important flank neglected to depend on the food sold to you by other countries.
10:31
It' s a big mistake. There' s no other way around here,
10:35
I mean, just cut off your water for a day or two and
10:39
it' s a problem for the bathroom for you to bathe in, for
10:43
your toilet to wash. Yeah, so yeah, I think so. We
10:46
should create a little awareness of that, because I feel that it can lead
10:52
to a civil war basically that there is no water, not that the crazy
10:56
people kay go and those who do have water, like the beer brewers,
11:01
because they take them away by force. I don' t feel like it
11:05
can go that far, because I think that we here in Monterrey were very
11:07
calm about the water issue. Let' s see how they get in Mexico
11:11
City. Now I don' t know if you heard that they' re
11:15
one hundred and thirty days away, if I don' t remember day zero,
11:20
or being like us in water their national problem. Moving on to another
11:24
issue that is also related to climate change. There is no water and besides,
11:30
because it also does not rain definitively, and well this climate change.
11:37
We have been told a lot that it is man' s fault, that
11:41
it is anthropogenic changes, but there is also another theory that is handled there
11:46
I am more convinced of that, that are geological changes of the earth produced
11:50
by the flares of the sun, those explosions that affect the electromagnetic field and
11:56
that sadly make the droughts more severe and that the times of price pitations are
12:01
more exacerbated. As Hurricane Otis now in Acapulco was a category two and within
12:07
an hour it became a category five. Yes, no one saw it coming
12:11
and it destroyed everything here, not every warrior. So speaking of climate change,
12:15
they also place a great deal of blame on what the Green Agenda is.
12:20
I don' t know, it' s kind of a costume because
12:24
you say. Yes, I want renewable resources, not to use renewable resources
12:28
for my energy. But really what is behind building all these things from solar
12:33
panels and air turbines, because it carries a lot of mining as well.
12:41
Yes, it is not a subject that they want to sell us as a
12:46
solution and that if we want to refute it, we simply have to look
12:50
at the example of Germany. Today, Germany decided to shut down its nuclear
12:54
reactors. If I remember correctly, they were eight and decided to close them
12:58
to transition to green energy and also to Russian gas. So, now,
13:03
with this war there in Europe, Russia closes the gas pipelines. The renewable
13:09
energies sadly are intermittent energies, that is, we are at the expense of
13:15
blowing the air to make the mills work, to have sun and so on.
13:20
Then they' re not reliable sources. And all this energy that is
13:24
being lost, both renewable energy and gas. Germany is supplanting him, burning
13:28
coal. In other words, they are countries that are promoting the Green Agenda
13:31
and that, in order to solve their problems, are polluting more than all
13:37
underdeveloped countries. And, as you well mentioned, the issue of mines is
13:39
something that is not mentioned. Around there, only to create a solar panel,
13:46
the composition is eighty- five percent aluminum and thus eleven percent copper,
13:50
in addition to other minerals, a wind turbine, is needed aluminum and steel
13:56
and that, although the aim is to create something that approves made renewable energies,
14:00
since the mining and exploitation of the subsoil is resorted to. And we
14:05
' re not going that far, brother. What it takes to create a
14:09
cell phone, no, because it' s too much. They are mainly
14:11
lithium for batteries, cobalt and all kinds of heavy metals that, to begin
14:16
with, waste a lot of water in seconds are used a lot of chemicals
14:22
to drill the stones and all that damages what is the earth' s surface
14:26
and ecosystem. Obviously, and this brings us to the subject of fracking.
14:31
This brings us a little bit to the issue of fracking, which is related
14:35
to hypocrisy, which is handled by the United States and all these pseudo-
14:41
environmental countries that, in their political faces, are handling a discourse, but
14:46
on their corporate side, they continue to carry out the same polluting practices.
14:48
What is fracking. Well, fracking is the pumping of the subsoil to extract
14:54
all kinds of hydrocarbons. Oil can be extracted, gas can be extracted,
14:58
oils can be extracted, etcetera. This is done with a tube that pierces
15:01
the ground and that tube releases water under pressure along with chemicals. So that
15:07
causes gas and oil to shoot up, and the problem with it is that
15:13
it pollutes the water that is in the subsoil. These chemicals can cause cancer
15:18
and can also cause earthquakes in their removal. Yes, well, for all
15:24
the fractures he makes inside the mantle. No yes, that' s right,
15:30
I mean besides affecting as you mention, because we are also seeing that
15:35
they do it where there is fauna, for example, and those animals,
15:39
because that water is the one they are taking and you end up destroying fauna
15:45
and flora also from where they are doing this kind of fracking practice, besides
15:50
the risks of explosions, because if you' re taking gas and pressure,
15:56
there' s really not much control and there' s this risk now all
16:04
that, also that they take the waste where they throw it. No,
16:06
the waste stays there on earth. That' s why there' s a
16:11
lot of mention that leaves infertile land behind the use of fracking, and that
16:17
' s why companies in the United States use it too much. But don
16:18
' t think it' s so easy to frack in America. It can
16:23
take from a year to two to be granted a fracking well because of the
16:27
regulatory laws they have, because they already care for their ecosystem. Evidently,
16:30
if you take care of your people. And even when these concessioned wells exploit
16:34
it, there are environmentalist groups of citizens who demand or point out all the
16:41
bad practices of these companies and put millions of demands on them. So fracking
16:45
is not as profitable to do in the United States, unless there are high
16:49
oil and gas prices as we have today. And that is why today they
16:55
are turning to see the basin of villages here in Mexico, which are located
16:59
in the north east still do not exploit it. Why, then, the
17:03
northeastern part of the country we have just spoken that we have a water drought
17:06
and it takes care of water and they want to give water for the tail
17:11
occupy water for fracking and that' s where the Monterrey Six project arises.
17:14
It' s an issue that supposedly comes to solve the drought here in Monterrey,
17:18
but its main agenda is to use that water for fracking, that is,
17:22
take it there, take it to the basin. Yes, let'
17:26
s see and it' s a subject that here and I ask you what
17:30
you prefer economics or humanism. I think that' s the dichotomy we'
17:34
re running here, jobs against human and environmental care. If it is a
17:41
difficult decision, because both have their positive side, but, like everything else,
17:45
they also have that negative side. Bringing more Monterrey economy to the country
17:51
gives employees more opportunities for a better quality of life. And I say better
17:56
quality of life in quotation marks, because more companies mean more pollution. Note
18:03
that there is a list of the twenty cities with the lowest air quality in
18:07
Mexico and of those twenty six cities are in Nuevo León. We have Escobedo,
18:14
third, Guadalupe with rooms, Santa Catarina in fifth, San Pedro in
18:18
tenth, San Nicolás in XIII and Monterrey has the number fourteen. The only
18:27
city near the urban area of Nuevo León that is not in that top twenty
18:30
is Apodaca and the more companies open here the more people from other states arrive
18:37
in search of opportunities and because that also translates to the continued construction of houses
18:42
for this high demand for housing, destroy the few green areas that remain,
18:48
and that is also less water for those who already live here. So I
18:53
think that in a certain way we should find that balance as having and maintaining
19:00
more green areas within the city and basically taking care of what we have left
19:06
already to close this issue of climate change and the inefficiency of the Green Agenda.
19:11
One more thing I like is to add no. I think we'
19:14
ve already made a little bit clear about all this false speech that exists.
19:19
So, in your opinion, here, the ideal would still be to use
19:27
resources like oil, like coal and nuclear energy. Yes, that' s
19:33
precisely what I wanted to comment on. I believe that hydrocarbons and the geopolitical
19:37
model can continue to be used. We can say that we see today,
19:45
it tells us that oil, coal and gas will continue to be used,
19:48
especially because of high demand and population growth. In other words, there is
19:55
no reliable and safe alternative to replace hydrocarbons that can be to meet the energy
20:00
demand, for example, of a country as growing demographically as Mexico, as
20:07
China and other emerging countries like Brazil. Then we have to see. I
20:11
believe that on the subject of Mexico, to look after the interests of energy
20:15
sovereignty, to see it as a matter of national security, because it is
20:19
also here that I do not know if you remember that in two thousand twenty
20:23
- one, when there was a great frost throughout the continent, American.
20:26
We ran out of light in two states of the country, yes for about
20:30
three or four days, of course some trees were taken out there that I
20:33
had planted. As if we don' t remember well, that was mainly
20:41
because the gas pipelines, we bought the gas from the United States, from
20:45
Texas, they froze and stopped selling us. And we, because we are
20:48
in this fallacy of transitioning renewable energies, did not have the way to solve
20:55
that existing demand And in the end, because the citizens ended up paying.
21:00
That problem is to be thought of because we depend a lot on the United
21:07
States, not for everything, for water, for gas, for many things,
21:11
and Mexico, being a country that is rich in all these things.
21:15
I do not understand why governments have not invested in infrastructure for us to be
21:18
able to generate our own energies. Or it' s too expensive. Yes,
21:22
yes, it' s very expensive. But I believe that, above
21:25
all, there is no political will. The politicians here have done business on
21:30
the subject of hydrocarbons. They are doing it or they have already done it
21:33
with the water issue, because during the Peña Nieto period it was when it
21:37
was most granted. And now that we have lithium, we' re going
21:42
to see how they handle it, we' re going to see what the
21:45
policy is, because it' s going to be the same, they'
21:48
re going to sell it to talk in probably so that we can exploit it,
21:56
because nothing isn' t like, we' re still a third world
22:00
country when we have all the potential to really make a Japan, a Germany.
22:02
In that I fully agree. We have one to see how it is
22:06
possible that a country that has three hundred years of history is subjugating a country
22:11
that has civilizations of more than three thousand five hundred years. Yes, that
22:15
we have inheritance not only from indigenous civilizations, but also from one of the
22:21
greatest empires in history, as was the Spanish Empire, the empire where the
22:25
sun never hid, that is, it is not possible that we are following
22:30
this path. Mexico has to wake up and I think the best way to
22:34
do this is to raise awareness of these issues. Of course I say,
22:41
and that' s also why I invited you to this podcast and again,
22:45
thank you for accepting the invitation, because I still feel the same way.
22:47
Knowledge is power and if you are not aware that all this is happening,
22:52
you are no longer a sheep. I feel and good and we move on
23:00
to this last point that I have here on the agenda is about drug trafficking.
23:04
Also Mexico, children, I think it is one of the countries with
23:10
the most drug trafficking problem. We could say that drug trafficking is America'
23:15
s perfect enemy. To a certain extent, it' s completely been the
23:21
business you' ve maintained. I would venture to say that the economy of
23:23
both countries in that regard has been laundered too much money through drug trafficking.
23:30
And when statistics or data from our country' s main sources of income are
23:36
shown, it is never mentioned in the main one that is the sale of
23:40
drugs, the sale of drugs, the sale of arms. Not also do
23:47
drug trafficking occupy all these weapons that the army suddenly doesn' t have and
23:52
they already have them and are using them too, obviously, they arrive in
23:56
illegal quotation marks in Mexico from the United States. I don' t know
24:00
if it' s totally illegal. It is against the pure and hard side
24:03
that I think everyone knows about the operation quickly and furiously and for those who
24:07
do not know, because checking it was a huge arms smuggling where even the
24:11
United States Government denied that they had carried out that act, even though we
24:17
had here. I think that the bloodiest decade and the whole history of Mexico,
24:22
the fight against nacota, that started out as a calderon. That was
24:29
with Calderón. Well, the issue is beginning to grow with Vicente Fox,
24:34
who begins to sell the squares to a cartel that emerges as a cell,
24:40
we could say from the Gulf Cartel, which were the cetes, they began
24:45
to sell the squares to this group, but they, because they were military,
24:49
almost mercenaries, were not drug traffickers, but they were and came to
24:55
change the whole work scheme that was already seen here in Mexico, but that
25:00
had not culminated in such a high level of violence. The problem with all
25:06
these weapons illegally entering Mexico is that in the end they end up in the
25:10
wrong hands and, as you say, all this violence. And because the
25:17
bloody decade of Mexico and it is still seen and it is very easy to
25:22
acquire this type of weapons because, because they sell them to you as if
25:26
they were gums in a store. Yeah, you don' t need permits
25:30
anymore, or anything. And as one is registered. The narco also tries
25:33
to erase the numbers of how we can seriously say them. If serial numbers,
25:37
precisely but still, those souls can be traced. So why do we
25:44
say that the United States is good for all this good stuff, because mainly
25:48
because if you want to have control of a potential rival like Mexico, because
25:53
to see they have sold us the idea that the bilateral relationship of Mexico and
25:56
the United States is of support and cooperation, but it is not always subjugation
26:03
in Mexico, exactly then, if you want to have control, you have
26:07
to divide and the best way to divide a country is to generate internal conflicts.
26:11
Today, if I remember correctly, it was like forty- two cartels
26:15
in Mexico. Obviously, the main ones, because they are the ones we
26:19
all know about Sinaloa, the CJNG, Gulf, etcetera. But more and
26:25
more criminal groups are born in this country and they are not only dependent on
26:29
the sale of drugs, but also, for example, a short time ago
26:33
we were talking about the Burgos basin, the Zetas, the Gulf basins.
26:38
All these criminal groups not only depend on the sale of narcotics, but also
26:42
steal through the huachicoleo, gasoline and all kinds of hydrocarbons to sell them.
26:49
Then it is a subject that not only affects health, but is also hitting
26:55
us strongly in the pocket, because they are very, very interested topics before
27:00
and very heavy in a certain way, because, because, in the end,
27:03
as you say that suffering is the people, it is the Mexican that
27:10
does not know. And because nothing else ends up being the result of the
27:14
causes, not so to speak, the conflict of the government' s agendas
27:21
that because they say they are fighting drug trafficking, but because I feel just
27:25
like it' s a smokescreen, nothing more for people to believe that something
27:30
is being done about it. And in the end, because they themselves give
27:33
the permits, they let them do things that crime always goes unpunished. In
27:38
the end, and because all this migration, also that there were Haitians,
27:45
if not all Nicaraguans, there is not all the human business that is being
27:52
taken there, because to get to the United States you have to have permission
27:56
from the criminal groups to control the border and I don' t know what
28:00
you think of. For example, Trump has wanted to label the cartels as
28:03
terrorists. In Mexico we see them as armed civilians. Trump wants to qualify
28:07
them as terrorism. How so, children, I do not agree with anything
28:14
that the narco and these armed groups do, because it happens to affect civilians,
28:18
people who have nothing to do with these issues of domains, of territories,
28:21
but classify them as terrorists I do not think is the best option.
28:29
I feel that gives the United States the lead to come and give us a
28:32
little freedom. It' s very dense of that and also the weird thing
28:37
is that Mexico is pointed out too much on the subject of posters, but
28:41
there is never talk about who are the recipients of the drug, and who
28:44
are the ones who move it, because we cross it. Cary demands,
28:48
obviously, if there was no lawsuit, then, but who distributes it all
28:52
to, who takes it to the confines of super remote cities like New York
28:56
or so has to have their criminal groups, but they are not caring for
29:02
their internal problems, they are blaming us. Yeah, well, it'
29:04
s easier to always point fingers out. It' s not Mexico' s
29:10
problem, and you see how they are. We' re not taking a
29:11
little bit of freedom to the Middle East. They won' t want to
29:15
try here to give us a little freedom. Not with drug trafficking, because
29:21
it' s always been like that. I mean, I think that America
29:22
' s currency, or rather I know that America' s currency is entrenched
29:26
in what is oil. It has always been so and many of the wars
29:32
that have taken place, as it really is a smokescreen, like the attacks
29:37
of September 11. It is easier to sell to the people that we are
29:41
going to go to war because they attacked us, than before, the Presidents
29:45
even said no, our goal is oil, but then they began to change
29:49
that, because this talk they had, that message they gave to the people.
29:55
And now it' s easier that we' re going to war because
29:59
they attacked us, and p o r sr being there you grab the oil
30:02
and the resources all you gave him to the point? I think it'
30:06
s far enough from the point? And I don' t like it if
30:08
you want to label drug traffickers as terrorists, not because they don' t
30:15
hurt, but because of the issue you' re talking about. Since it
30:17
was classified as terrorism in the Middle East, they went to plunder all the
30:22
resources and, for example, these cartels that I mention usually settle in areas
30:26
where there are resources not only to plant or traffic drugs, but also to
30:33
exploit hydrocarbons. There are cartels in Michoacán that control the avocado trade, that
30:38
is, there are many other factors that, if you even control agriculture,
30:44
they already control. Yes, that' s why there are the self-
30:48
defenses in Michoacán because of the fact that they want to take away their fields.
30:52
They' re getting them out now, and since there' s no
30:56
government, it' s the same people who have to defend themselves who raise
30:59
arms. Yeah, then, yeah. I believe that America' s goal
31:03
of classifying these criminal groups as terrorists is not exactly to fight them, because
31:08
if they wanted to fight them, they would do so from money. Its
31:11
banks are the ones that wash money away from large amounts of drug trafficking and
31:15
make it clean, but rather have a hidden agenda in trying to do the
31:21
same as the Middle East, to fight these criminal groups and leave soldiers or
31:26
bases in the strategic areas of our country' s resources. Yeah, well,
31:32
that' s where I' m saying, apart from the old shoplifter,
31:34
so go on now. Yes in a total way, it' s
31:38
easier for them. Mexico is a country very rich in everything in everything,
31:42
in water, in minerals, you have the jungles down there, in Yucatán,
31:48
in the south and then up here or what is the economy of big
31:53
companies all the North. But yes, I think America' s agenda is
31:59
this relationship that you say we' ve been wanted to paint that mutual support,
32:01
because it really hasn' t existed. It' s always been to
32:07
see how to screw Mexico. We' re not like some kind of geopolitical
32:13
prison with the United States. My brother, some other point you want to
32:17
deal with. No, because I think that enough has already been said about
32:21
a number of alarming issues here. The point is not to convey fear to
32:25
people, but rather to make people aware of all the mistakes that are being
32:30
made and that Mexico has the potential to succeed. Despite all these muddy things,
32:37
as you mention it, we are very rich in all aspects, from
32:39
culture to resources. So, nothing. I believe there is hope and we
32:45
must believe in a change but above all, we must be part of it.
32:49
I' ve always said so too that the world changes with your example,
32:52
not your opinion. No, and many people, then, can say
32:54
and say and this and the other. But if you don' t start
32:58
with yourself, something as simple as it is good, you don' t
33:01
have the trash on the floor, I mean, find a boat or keep
33:05
it until you get home and throw it away. But I think it'
33:07
s also very cultural people' s way of thinking. I' ve seen
33:13
it for example, because here in Mexico they don' t care, they
33:15
throw garbage and everything, and I don' t know what happens that nothing
33:20
else crosses the border and they already live there and it' s very clean
33:23
people who transform exactly and I don' t know why. I mean,
33:24
why can' t there be that culture here all the flooding there is,
33:29
because, because the ay drainage system we have, it' s not very
33:32
efficient, let' s say, but a lot of garbage. That is,
33:36
when the Santa Catarina River is filled, Pasas, since all the water
33:39
was taken from the river, you see the trees full of garbage, bags,
33:44
things that you say, because it is so polluted to the city.
33:47
And that' s why everything is flooded here. You' ve never turned
33:52
around the river, because I wanted no good. There, apart from throwing
33:54
away garbage jets, appliances, appliances, refrigerators stoves to be found, but
34:02
they have also found bodies in bags in this country. Actually, as you
34:08
rightly say, we must begin an individual transformation in order to be able to
34:22
transform collectively, for so must be my brother Nicholas, so thank you very
34:25
much for having accepted the invitation to this podcast. If we deal with an
34:30
issue, a little bit political. But I hope you liked it the same
34:35
way, because if you want topics of this kind here and there, you
34:39
can write me there on social networks, suggest us topics and we will gladly
34:44
treat you. Thank you, my brother. Nice to meet you, brother,
34:47
and then again, I greet you all. I hope you have been
34:52
interested in the subject and continue to support Moses’ work. Thank you,
34:57
my brother and you who listened to us today or today, because thank you
35:00
for your time, for having been here for a few minutes of your day.
35:04
I want to wish you that this week everything flows and you come closer
35:08
to meeting your goals and goals, so be a hug until the next