Latest / Salem Podcast Network / LARRY with Larry O'Connor - Obama Investigated Ilhan Omar?! New York Times Drops BOMBSHELL Revelation!

Transcript

LARRY with Larry O'Connor - Obama Investigated Ilhan Omar?! New York Times Drops BOMBSHELL Revelation! · Salem Podcast Network

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: You know that Ilhan Omar is in deep, deep trouble
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: with this criminal investigation. You know that because you've been
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: right here for a long time hearing us detail exactly
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: what's involved in the raid on her home and even
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: all of the questions that we've had about Ilhan Omar,
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: even leading up to that raid a couple of weeks ago.
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: But you know that because you watch this show. The
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: readers of The New York Times, right up until this morning,
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: they knew nothing about it. Now they do. New York
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: Times today, headline Ilhan Omar investigation involves new scrutiny of
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: long disputed marriage. I love it when they admit to
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: their readers that they have ignored a story. And that
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: their readers, if they just relied on the New York
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: Times for all the news that's fit to print, that
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: they'd be clueless about this story that we've been talking
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: about for, what, years? New scrutiny. New scrutiny? No, it's
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: the same scrutiny, guys. Bill Malusion points out the Obama
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: administration investigated Representative Ilhan Omar. Yeah, let me just pause
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: here for a second because I like to correct the record.
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: We had told you, based on all of the information
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: and facts that we knew at our disposal, that it
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: was the Biden administration that had begun the investigation into
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: Ilhan Omar and a lot of questions and discrepancies about
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: her finance, about her immigration status, about the marriage, all
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: this stuff. And we regret the error. We were wrong.
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: And we'd like to correct the record as soon as possible.
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: It was not the Biden administration. Now, the Ilhan Omar
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: people and the Rashida Tlaib people and the Democrats, they'll
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: tell you that this is all about Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump.
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: And we've responded and say, no, actually, Biden started this.
• 1:44
  Speaker 1: And we were wrong. It was Obama. It was the
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: Obama administration that first started scrutinizing all of this information. OK,
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: we regret the error. The Obama administration investigated Ilhan Omar
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: in 2016 and found, quote, some evidence that Ms. Omar
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: had entered into a sham marriage with a man suspected
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: of being her brother, unquote. But the case and potential
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: felony charges stalled because of a five year statute of limitations. Oh, gosh, guys,
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: there's a statute of limitations. Sorry. It's almost like ignoring
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: a crime. and not pursuing the evidence that would lead
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: to an indictment or an arrest or a conviction, just
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: ignoring it is almost a way for you to sort of,
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: you know, have it both ways. Oh yeah, we looked
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: into that and gee, we'd love to pursue it, but
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: statute of limitations. Now hold that thought for a second,
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: by the way, even fusion can, Ken Delaney and one
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: of the, in my opinion, one of the most duplicitous
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: and maybe even corrupt journalists in Washington, D.C. Of course,
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: he's at MS now. Even he posted this New York
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: Times article on his social media, quoting, federal agents in
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: Minnesota found evidence suggesting that Mr. Elmey and Ms. Omar
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: were siblings, meaning Representative Omar married her brother, according to
• 3:15
  Speaker 1: the six former and current officials familiar with the case.
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: Six sources on this. But because prosecutors didn't pursue the matter,
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: The agents had limited investigative tools, the official said. Why
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: didn't they pursue the matter? Oh, well, that's a mystery,
• 3:30
  Speaker 1: isn't it? By the way, understand the other shoe that's
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: about to drop in this story based on the New
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: York Times reporting here. It's right there before your very eyes.
• 3:42
  Speaker 1: Do you see it? Evidence suggesting that Mr. Elmi and Ms.
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: Omar were siblings. Well, wait a second. If they were siblings...
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: why don't they have the same last name? Oh, they
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: do have the same last name. And that means the
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: continued use of a fake and fraudulent name in official
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: federal documents, including immigration and passport forms, that would be
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: continued fraud and continued crimes that go well beyond the
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: statute of limitations. And if she continued to perpetuate this fraud,
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: in any kind of official filings or documents or forms, well,
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: that just starts the clock ticking again on that statute
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: of limitations. It's almost like if you've got prosecutors and
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: investigators who are really intent on finding the bad guys
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: and prosecuting crimes, no matter the political affiliation, you'll be
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: able to get your guy or gal. So thanks, Fusion Ken.
• 4:42
  Speaker 1: Thanks for pointing that out. Let's get to the New
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: York Times article. We subscribe so you don't have to.
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: The federal investigation of Representative Ilhan Omar is focused in
• 4:50
  Speaker 1: part on whether she entered into a sham marriage in
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: 2009 to help a man suspected of being her brother
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: obtain a green card, according to current and former officials
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: familiar with the matter. That's a crime. The FBI and
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: Department of Homeland Security investigated the marriage in summer 2016
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: during the Obama administration and found some evidence that it
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: was fraudulent, current and former officials said, in speculation that Ms.
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: Omar committed marriage fraud with her brother, has shadowed the
• 5:15
  Speaker 1: Minnesota Democrat's political career for more than a decade. And
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: President Trump repeated the accusation last week. She has long
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: called it a right wing conspiracy theory. And that's why
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: we at The New York Times haven't pursued it. Oh,
• 5:27
  Speaker 1: I'm sorry. They didn't write that. They were just thinking it.
• 5:32
  Speaker 2: Sorry.
• 5:32
  Speaker 1: What they said was federal officials debunked during her first
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: race for elected office in twenty sixteen. But that case stalled,
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: chiefly because prosecutors concluded the potential crime of felony fell
• 5:43
  Speaker 1: outside of five-year statute of limitations, according to the current
• 5:45
  Speaker 1: and former officials, most of whose law enforcement careers span
• 5:48
  Speaker 1: several presidential administrations. Murmurs that Ms. Omar married a brother
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: first surfaced publicly in 2016 when she was on the
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: brink of making history as the first Somali-American elected to
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: a state legislature. A first-time candidate, she had just defeated
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: a 44-year incumbent to the primary Democratic primary to represent
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: a Minneapolis district when Somali community message boards and conservative
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: outlets claimed that she had once married a sibling. It's
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: called Powerline Blog. It's one of the OG blogs from
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: the earliest days of the blogosphere. His name is Scott Johnson.
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: He's a stud. Say his name. I hate them. The
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: New York Times. It would have been fine if they
• 6:33
  Speaker 1: had just said Powerline Blog. and citizen journalist Scott Johnson,
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: but they can't bring themselves to do it. They're so
• 6:41
  Speaker 1: freaking elitist and old school that they just have conservative outlets.
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: Powerline blog. They're brilliant. Scott's a mensch. The Medicare annual
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: enrollment period is here. Most Medicare plans change every year
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: and many go away entirely. Now you have from October
• 7:01
  Speaker 1: 15th till December 7th, to get on the right 2027
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: Medicare plan for you. And this means for your parents
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: as well, guys. Now, even if you're happy with your
• 7:11
  Speaker 1: current plan, it's critical to review 2027 options. Every year,
• 7:15
  Speaker 1: millions of people end up stuck on the wrong plan
• 7:18
  Speaker 1: for their needs, which means they're overpaying for care or worse,
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: they're not able to get the care they need. So
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: this is why I recommend you call my trusted Medicare partner, Chapter.
• 7:29
  Speaker 1: They're the only advisor that looks at every plan nationwide
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: to make sure you have the best plan for your
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: specific situation. Their support is free, and they can review
• 7:38
  Speaker 1: your options in under 20 minutes. If you're on the
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: right plan for your needs, they're going to tell you.
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: And if you're not, they'll help you switch. By doing this,
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: they've saved an average of $ 1, 100 a year on health
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: care costs. Call Chapter today to get this out of
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: the way quickly and enjoy peace of mind. You can
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: reach them at 580- 308-0975. That's 580-308-0975 for chapter. Federal
• 8:02
  Speaker 1: agents in Minnesota opened investigation. According to several people familiar
• 8:06
  Speaker 1: with the matter, they found evidence suggesting that Mr. Elmy
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: and Ms. Omar were siblings, according to the six former
• 8:12
  Speaker 1: and current officials familiar with the case. But because prosecutors
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: did not pursue the matter, the agents had limited investigative tools.
• 8:18
  Speaker 1: The officials said, why did the prosecutors pursue the matter? Again,
• 8:22
  Speaker 1: it's a mystery. Mr. Elmey had obtained a provisional two-year
• 8:25
  Speaker 1: green card based on the marriage, two former officials said.
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: But when he sought to make that status permanent, immigration
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: officials requested additional evidence about the validity of the marriage.
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: Instead of responding, Mr. Elmey left the United States and
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: abandoned his green card petition. The officials said, boy, that
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: would be suspicious behavior, wouldn't it? Hey, I want to
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: make my status permanent here. I want to be a citizen.
• 8:52
  Speaker 3: Oh, really?
• 8:53
  Speaker 1: Okay, great. Can you give us more evidence about this
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: marriage of yours? Were you married a U.S. citizen? We
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: would love to have more information. Oh, never mind. I'm
• 9:00
  Speaker 1: out of here. And so then, of course, investigators just
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: dropped the matter. But shouldn't you then investigate the person
• 9:08
  Speaker 1: that he was married to? That would be Ohan Omar.
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: That would be Ohan Omar. So it was the Obama
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: administration that began this investigation in 2016, and they had
• 9:20
  Speaker 1: evidence to suggest that. that this was sham marriage, and
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: this is before Ilhan Omar ran for Congress. I hope
• 9:26
  Speaker 1: you caught that in the story. She defeated in the
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: Democrat primary a 40-plus-year Democrat incumbent in the state legislature.
• 9:36
  Speaker 1: Sound familiar? This is how these radicals gained power. It's
• 9:40
  Speaker 1: how AOC gained power. It's how a bunch of these
• 9:44
  Speaker 1: DSA candidates who are now coming to Congress this November
• 9:48
  Speaker 1: because they're running in deep blue districts came to power.
• 9:51
  Speaker 1: It's how Ilhan Omar came to power. They run to
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: the radical left of an incumbent Democrat and they eat
• 9:59
  Speaker 1: the party out from the inside. This is the pattern
• 10:02
  Speaker 1: of behavior. And Obama was just fine with it. In fact,
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: if you remember right last week when the investigation was
• 10:11
  Speaker 1: announced into Ilhan Omar, Barack Obama did something very, very rare.
• 10:17
  Speaker 1: He put out a very lengthy written statement condemning the
• 10:21
  Speaker 1: investigation into Ilhan Omar. It's a basic principle of American
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: democracy that the government isn't selectively target individuals simply because
• 10:29
  Speaker 1: of their political beliefs or what they say. I'm sorry,
• 10:32
  Speaker 1: that's Barack Obama telling me this? Barack Obama? Yeah, we
• 10:35
  Speaker 1: already investigated this statement and blew it apart the other day.
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: But now we bring it to your attention again because
• 10:42
  Speaker 1: knowing that it was his administration that actually pursued this
• 10:46
  Speaker 1: investigation in the first place, and then suddenly they just, oh,
• 10:49
  Speaker 1: nothing to see here, forget it. Go everybody look the
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: other way, statute of limitations, no evidence, stop pursuing it.
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: It makes you wonder again why Obama decided to extend
• 10:57
  Speaker 1: himself on this issue in particular and put out this
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: long diatribe about Ilhan Omar and about how she should
• 11:05
  Speaker 1: not be investigated. Maybe, just maybe, he was aware of
• 11:08
  Speaker 1: that investigation. Maybe, you think? Interesting, very interesting. It also
• 11:15
  Speaker 1: reminds us of this glorious moment during her one interview
• 11:18
  Speaker 1: that she's granted to a very friendly Chris Hayes at
• 11:21
  Speaker 1: MS Now, and even here she stumbled. Who was this
• 11:25
  Speaker 1: man that was your husband? When did they start saying
• 11:27
  Speaker 1: that he was your brother?
• 11:28
  Speaker 2: Why? I started with the Somali blog that I don't
• 11:35
  Speaker 2: know if it still exists, but somebody put in there that,
• 11:38
  Speaker 2: you know, that he had to have been my brother
• 11:40
  Speaker 2: or something to that effect. And right-wing conspiracy theorists in
• 11:47
  Speaker 2: Minneapolis got a hold of it, and they just kind
• 11:49
  Speaker 2: of went and, like, found random people who were like,
• 11:52
  Speaker 2: she introduced us. You know, she introduced him to us
• 11:56
  Speaker 2: and said he was her brother, which is.
• 12:00
  Speaker 1: You know, insane.
• 12:01
  Speaker 2: I mean, I don't I don't know those people that
• 12:03
  Speaker 2: they talk about.
• 12:05
  Speaker 1: He was not you were not related to him at all.
• 12:07
  Speaker 2: Not that there's not like.
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: There's a weird kernel of truth that through some game.
• 12:11
  Speaker 2: Not to my knowledge.
• 12:13
  Speaker 1: That's great. Not to my knowledge. Well, I live in infamy. Hey,
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: quick follow up. You said it was a Somali blog
• 12:19
  Speaker 1: and right wing outlets and all that stuff. But isn't
• 12:22
  Speaker 1: it true that federal investigators under the Obama administration pursued this, too?
• 12:26
  Speaker 1: I mean, how do you explain that? Can you hear me? Hello?
• 12:33
  Speaker 1: Can you? Is she not? I don't think she heard that.
• 12:36
  Speaker 1: She looked good, though. She made sure she got the
• 12:38
  Speaker 1: makeup going. Remember the day before we saw her in
• 12:40
  Speaker 1: the car and she had puffy eyes like she had
• 12:42
  Speaker 1: been crying and all that stuff. But she made sure
• 12:44
  Speaker 1: she looked good for the interview. And she looked great
• 12:47
  Speaker 1: as she was going to the mall yesterday. Wait, is
• 12:49
  Speaker 1: that really her? Hold on. Blow that up. Is that
• 12:52
  Speaker 1: really her? Are we sure this is her? She looks different. Well,
• 12:55
  Speaker 1: apparently somebody at Fox News Digital said, and captured a
• 12:58
  Speaker 1: woman who is purportedly Ilhan Omar. She decided to have
• 13:02
  Speaker 1: an outing. She went to the Mall of America. Sorry, what?
• 13:07
  Speaker 1: I'm sorry. It's the Mall of Somalia in America. Wait,
• 13:11
  Speaker 1: is that just the Mall of America and now we
• 13:12
  Speaker 1: call it the Mall of Somalia just because, you know?
• 13:15
  Speaker 1: Or is there actually a Mall of Somalia that competes
• 13:17
  Speaker 1: with the Mall of America? Well, wherever it is, she
• 13:19
  Speaker 1: was at the food court. can i just tell you
• 13:36
  Speaker 1: that she posed for pictures it's the carmel mall of
• 13:40
  Speaker 1: somalia in suburban minneapolis because of course you wouldn't go
• 13:43
  Speaker 1: to the mall of america can i just tell you
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: my favorite part look at the security look at the
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: cop watching her he's like he's not watching because he's
• 13:52
  Speaker 1: protecting her he's like she looks shady I'm going to
• 13:55
  Speaker 1: keep my eye on her. Something's going on there. So
• 14:01
  Speaker 1: she did this public appearance and she met people and
• 14:03
  Speaker 1: they wanted to take pictures with her. And look at
• 14:05
  Speaker 1: the Somali flag right next to the Palestinian flag. That's terrific.
• 14:09
  Speaker 1: Two fake countries. Good for her. She's looking good, isn't she?
• 14:14
  Speaker 1: Sure she is. That's Minnesota for you. I mean, you
• 14:19
  Speaker 1: think about Minnesota and all you can think about now are,
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: you know, fake flags of fake countries, including their brand
• 14:24
  Speaker 1: new fake state flag. And you think about fraud. You
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: think about fraud at every level. And we've got a
• 14:32
  Speaker 1: new wrinkle because apparently Minnesota is also involved in. Oh,
• 14:38
  Speaker 1: excuse me. Sorry, I'm jumping ahead of myself because there's
• 14:41
  Speaker 1: so much fraud to talk about today. There's one more
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: wrinkle in this investigation now, and it seems to be
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: a smoke screen put up by supporters of Ilhan Omar
• 14:51
  Speaker 1: and opponents to truth, justice and the American way. They
• 14:55
  Speaker 1: are now pounding the table and screaming because they don't
• 14:57
  Speaker 1: have any evidence on their side. And they hate the
• 15:00
  Speaker 1: fact that The New York Times has to concede that
• 15:02
  Speaker 1: the investigation started with Barack Obama. So they're trying to
• 15:05
  Speaker 1: distract from all of that. And the distraction is this.
• 15:08
  Speaker 1: They want to know. What the federal investigators said to
• 15:12
  Speaker 1: a judge to obtain a search warrant. They want details
• 15:17
  Speaker 1: on the search warrant. Now, it's very unorthodox for investigators
• 15:21
  Speaker 1: to unseal a search warrant for various reasons. But Democrats
• 15:26
  Speaker 1: are pounding the table and screaming for it. Here's how
• 15:28
  Speaker 1: Fox reported.
• 15:29
  Speaker 3: To deny requests for the warrant's release, Jeanine Pirro saying
• 15:32
  Speaker 3: it would jeopardize the investigation into Ilhan Omar's investigation immigration probe.
• 15:39
  Speaker 1: She used a fake name to be sworn in.
• 15:41
  Speaker 2: I assume she will immediately resign from Congress.
• 15:46
  Speaker 3: Trump's call for Omar's resignation prompting an email solicitation stating, quote,
• 15:52
  Speaker 3: Ilhan's not going anywhere, but it's cute that Trump thinks
• 15:55
  Speaker 3: he can call on her to resign. This comes as
• 15:58
  Speaker 3: the congresswoman raised $ 847, 000 the day of the raid and
• 16:00
  Speaker 3: $ 665, 000 the day after the raid. And while 40 Democrats
• 16:01
  Speaker 3: declined to back Omar, nearly 200 Dems signed a letter
• 16:03
  Speaker 3: to the DOJ and DHS saying this, quote, We write
• 16:16
  Speaker 3: to express our unequivocal opposition to your raid of Congresswoman
• 16:20
  Speaker 3: Ilhan Omar's home. We are profoundly alarmed by your weaponization
• 16:24
  Speaker 3: of federal law enforcement against her and demand you refrain
• 16:27
  Speaker 3: from taking any further actions that could affect the outcome
• 16:30
  Speaker 3: of any upcoming election.
• 16:32
  Speaker 1: Hold on a second. Well, what's the part of the
• 16:33
  Speaker 1: letter where all of those members of Congress who signed
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: that letter said, we know Ilhan Omar, we work with
• 16:38
  Speaker 1: Ilhan Omar. She is a woman of the highest character
• 16:41
  Speaker 1: and integrity, and she would never do this. We are
• 16:44
  Speaker 1: confident that she is not guilty of any of these fake,
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: bogus crimes that you're investigating. Where's that part of the letter?
• 16:50
  Speaker 1: Do we have that part of the letter? Did they
• 16:51
  Speaker 1: put that in the letter? They did not put that
• 16:53
  Speaker 1: in the letter. They're screaming about procedure. It's all about procedure.
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: You can't investigate her right now. You can't investigate her
• 17:04
  Speaker 1: if it's going to affect the election. You can't investigate
• 17:09
  Speaker 1: her unless you release the contents of the search warrant.
• 17:12
  Speaker 2: What?
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: Why is that a thing all of a sudden?
• 17:15
  Speaker 3: Omar is seeking reelection in Minnesota's 5th Congressional District in
• 17:19
  Speaker 3: one week as she denies the allegations that she and
• 17:21
  Speaker 3: her family committed immigration fraud. But if the investigation shows otherwise, guys,
• 17:25
  Speaker 3: the congresswoman could face both criminal charges and denaturalization. Meantime,
• 17:30
  Speaker 3: the fight over whether to unseal the records is being
• 17:33
  Speaker 3: overseen by District Judge James Bosberg.
• 17:35
  Speaker 1: Wait, what? Oh, great. So remember, they got D.C. judges
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: to sign off on the warrants to search her home.
• 17:46
  Speaker 1: And we recognized at the time that that's an extraordinary
• 17:49
  Speaker 1: thing because they're all Democrats. They know the political implications.
• 17:53
  Speaker 1: So the evidence in that warrant must have been overwhelming
• 17:56
  Speaker 1: for even a D.C. judge at this moment against a
• 17:59
  Speaker 1: Democrat and Ilhan Omar, of all people, to say, oh, yeah,
• 18:02
  Speaker 1: you definitely you get your warrant here. Search away. Right.
• 18:06
  Speaker 1: And so now. The argument is we want to see
• 18:10
  Speaker 1: what's in that warrant. We want you to see it,
• 18:12
  Speaker 1: knowing that as Judge Jeanine Pirro just said, you know,
• 18:15
  Speaker 1: we can't do that. That would compromise the investigation. It
• 18:18
  Speaker 1: would actually give a roadmap to the defendant about what
• 18:22
  Speaker 1: we're pursuing. It would allow the defendant or excuse me,
• 18:25
  Speaker 1: not the defendant, the the person of interest in our
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: investigation to. to actually have an understanding of the evidence
• 18:33
  Speaker 1: that we already have and all of those things. And
• 18:35
  Speaker 1: they're not entitled to see all of that as we
• 18:36
  Speaker 1: continue together. It would allow them to destroy evidence. Theoretically,
• 18:39
  Speaker 1: there are a lot of reasons why the contents of
• 18:42
  Speaker 1: a search warrant at this point of an investigation is
• 18:45
  Speaker 1: not released. Democrats know that. And so they're throwing up
• 18:48
  Speaker 1: a smoke screen and they're trying to create this. Oh,
• 18:51
  Speaker 1: they're hiding something. They're hiding something. Where's the transparency here?
• 18:56
  Speaker 1: And they know better. So what did they do, knowing
• 18:58
  Speaker 1: that there were a couple of judges in D.C. who
• 19:00
  Speaker 1: have already signed off on this? So it's got to
• 19:02
  Speaker 1: be bad. Well, they got Judge Boasberg, Boasberg, Boasberg, this guy.
• 19:07
  Speaker 1: Who's Judge Boasberg?
• 19:09
  Speaker 3: Oh.
• 19:10
  Speaker 1: The same federal judge Trump called a radical left lunatic
• 19:13
  Speaker 1: after he blocked Venezuelan deportation fights. That's right. He's the
• 19:17
  Speaker 1: guy who tried to have planes turn around in midair
• 19:20
  Speaker 1: as they were taking gang members illegally in the country
• 19:23
  Speaker 1: from Venezuela. He tried to override the the president's authority
• 19:27
  Speaker 1: as commander in chief and as the chief executive of
• 19:30
  Speaker 1: the executive branch where he can oversee immigration policy. He
• 19:34
  Speaker 1: was wrong. He was smacked down. Supreme Court spanked him.
• 19:38
  Speaker 1: Doesn't matter. He's now been assigned to be the judge
• 19:42
  Speaker 1: to oversee the fight to unseal the FBI search warrant
• 19:45
  Speaker 1: used in the raid on Representative Ilhan Omar's home. Wow.
• 19:50
  Speaker 1: How did that happen? It's amazing how the wheels of
• 19:54
  Speaker 1: justice turn in the District of Columbia, run entirely by Democrats. Well,
• 20:01
  Speaker 1: that's the latest. We've got more and we'll continue to
• 20:05
  Speaker 1: give you more. That's the latest out of this New
• 20:07
  Speaker 1: York Times article. And I'm just happy to tell you
• 20:10
  Speaker 1: that the New York Times has now put their blessing
• 20:12
  Speaker 1: on a story that we've been talking about for quite
• 20:14
  Speaker 1: some time over here. You know, up until now, this
• 20:17
  Speaker 1: was just right-wing fever swamp, maggot conservative spirit crap that
• 20:22
  Speaker 1: was all fake news and never real. But now, guys,
• 20:27
  Speaker 1: the New York Times noticed us. The New York Times,
• 20:31
  Speaker 1: they've decided that it's news that's fit to print. Back
• 20:40
  Speaker 1: in time.