Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Brother can you spare a fortune? | HBR Talk 357

Transcript

Brother can you spare a fortune? | HBR Talk 357 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to HBr Talk three fifty seven. Brother,
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: can you spare a fortune? I'm your host, Hannah Wallen
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: here with nonsense annihilator Lauren Brooks in the personification of perceptivity,
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: Mike Stevenson with the doge in charge in the background
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: helping us make the magic. And tonight we are to our.
• 0:23
  Speaker 2: Stool, Tony yoursel.
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: This is this is a group effort. I honestly what
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: we're doing tonight. I could not do this without Brian
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: because I have not advanced my learning on the streaming
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: capabilities that we're using and just having had time. So
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: just just for the record, though, about a third of
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: my income from my job last year, according to my
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: husband who our taxes, a little more than the third
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: actually was was accounted for by overtime, so that tells
• 1:08
  Speaker 1: you where all my time went. We had a crisis
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: and a half last year. So I have learned nothing
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: about this stuff in the last year.
• 1:20
  Speaker 3: It's not that Annah was able to do this to
• 1:23
  Speaker 3: her own devices for the last god knows how many years,
• 1:27
  Speaker 3: and that there is that, and I thank Brian for
• 1:30
  Speaker 3: everything he does well as well, because I tried doing
• 1:34
  Speaker 3: what these guys do for a brief period in twenty seventeen,
• 1:39
  Speaker 3: and good god, it was awful actually being in charge
• 1:43
  Speaker 3: of the live stream. It's horribly stressful, and to be.
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: I needed Brian's help getting that set up too.
• 1:53
  Speaker 2: But I don't even I can't even do any of
• 1:55
  Speaker 2: that because I don't work off of a laptop. I
• 1:58
  Speaker 2: work off of my mobile. So you know, I'm just
• 2:02
  Speaker 2: here lending my voice in my pity conversation to to
• 2:09
  Speaker 2: to you know what this is that we do here,
• 2:12
  Speaker 2: and you know, thank you all for being here with us.
• 2:17
  Speaker 4: We appreciate you.
• 2:18
  Speaker 3: Alley, please do donate to Honey Badge Radio in a
• 2:24
  Speaker 3: way that goes towards Hannah and Brian. I don't know
• 2:26
  Speaker 3: how you do that, but if you find a way
• 2:28
  Speaker 3: to do.
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: That and do that because I can't, I can tell
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: you and I will do that. Since we are at
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: we got to do what we got to do. But
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: credit where credit is due. This is a lot of
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: a lot of work that gets done in the background,
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: mostly by men, and especially in this case by Brian.
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: So as always, Honey Badger Radio dishes out as mortgage
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: board of thought, provoking discussions and as experiences both recent
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: and long past have demonstrated the provoked thoughts are fighting back.
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: They made it clear that for people like us, relying
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: on third party payment platforms like Patreon to fund our
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: work is treading on thin ice or building our house
• 3:15
  Speaker 1: in the path of a rapidly growing wildfire. And I
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: will be honest. I got rid of my Patreon account,
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: my personal Patreon account, when I got rid of my
• 3:22
  Speaker 1: YouTube channel. Did both at about the same time when
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: Patreon started canceling people for political opinions and keeping their money.
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: So I don't know if that has ever been fully
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: resolved or not, but I didn't wait around to find
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: out they didn't. If that that was the way they
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: were going to do business, I wasn't gonna do business
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: with them, So there you go. But in light of that,
• 3:50
  Speaker 1: we strongly encourage our supporters to switch at least their
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: support for us. To feed the Badger dot Com the
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: most stable way to help us out, And if you
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: want to tip us directly instead of lying on any
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: social media platforms, tip jar. The link for that is
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: feed the Badger dot com slash just the tip, And
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: as always, the same risk applies to our social media platforms.
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: I'm probably gonna get suspended for something today, which is oh,
• 4:15
  Speaker 1: I guess I'll explain in a minute. But you should
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: further provoke the thought police by tracking our thought provoking
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: discussions on Honeybadger Brigade dot com, where you can find
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: your way to all of our content, as well as
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: a link to feed the Badger dot com in the
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: drop down menu at the top of the page. So
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: this is actually kind of relevant, you know, now that
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: I think about it. Before I get into the exploitation
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: of our military for gibbs, for funding gibs and training
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: gibs and all that kind of stuff, I will point
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: out this. I just had a conversation on Twitter and
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: just just today yesterday and today really that I commented
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: on a tweet that was in response to a tweet
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: that Alison had had responded to, which basically, these women
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: are are just condemning men for being men. Right, They
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: hate they hate men. They don't want to acknowledge that
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: anything that men do can be good, that men can
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: be good, and.
• 5:32
  Speaker 4: So have they ever stopped doing that?
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: No, they've never stopped doing that. Right. So, Alison had
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: a few conversations where you could see feminists just condemning
• 5:43
  Speaker 1: men and they're using the phrase patriot or the term patriarchy,
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: or you know, the phrase patriarchal domination and shit like that,
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: over over. So she made an op tweet, Bear with me,
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: what if the effects of patriarchy are just the effects
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: of biology, And what if feminists are really trying to
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: get men to apologize for their very existence? What if
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: what feminists are trying really trying to get men to
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: apologize for is their very existence. Was a great tweet
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: because what feminists are complaining about in terms of patriarchy
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: is largely the history of men taking responsibility for everything dangerous, difficult, dirty, ugly. Uh,
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: you know, anything that that doesn't involve being safe at
• 6:33
  Speaker 1: home and being sheltered while while you enjoy your relationships
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: with your family. You know, anything that involves creating the
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: ability to do that so that women and children are
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: kept safe and men's progeny is kept safe, and that
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: men have a safe haven to go home to. Anything
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: that's involved in that men have taken responsibility for. They
• 7:01
  Speaker 1: didn't ask women to protect them. They didn't ask women
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: to fight in wars. They didn't ask women to build
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: structures create all of the amenities that we have today.
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: They didn't ask women to do the manual labor and
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: the risks involved in optimizing civilization. Men did that. So
• 7:22
  Speaker 1: my response, well, this woman responded, I choose to believe
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: that men are not biologically domineering assholes, which means that
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: she's really saying that men are domineering assholes, but she
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: chooses to believe it's not biological. So my response, of
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: course was men in brackets spend generations laboring and suffering
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: to build, generate or build civilizations to facilitate the fulfillment
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: of people's physiological and safety needs, the base of the
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: base of Maslow's hierarchy of needs. Uh, so they can
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: focus on the social esteem and self actualization aspect, which
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: are the higher levels of Maslow's hierarchy. And then feminists
• 8:12
  Speaker 1: in quotes few domineering assholes women first, the butt hurt
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: that stemmed from this, the women who got mad, Oh
• 8:22
  Speaker 1: and one simp. I have a simp. Actually the simp
• 8:25
  Speaker 1: is the most rabid, and he went full pee wee
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: herman on me and actually started using I know you are,
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: but what am I in his responses like a two
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: year old.
• 8:37
  Speaker 4: Those are the best.
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: But they're mad at seeing it. Acknowledged that it's men
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: that built civilization. The SIMP tried to change it to
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: humans and tried to ignore the fact that it was
• 8:54
  Speaker 1: in response to a woman demonizing men, because.
• 9:00
  Speaker 2: Men aren't humans, you know, So it can't be even
• 9:04
  Speaker 2: if it even if there's some small part of his
• 9:07
  Speaker 2: brain that would acknowledge that it is men that created society,
• 9:12
  Speaker 2: he has to reduce it down to well, but there
• 9:16
  Speaker 2: might be some women too, so we have to just
• 9:20
  Speaker 2: think humans.
• 9:22
  Speaker 1: Oh yeah, and I like I pointed out, you know,
• 9:25
  Speaker 1: if if women, all women everywhere and all of civilization
• 9:32
  Speaker 1: went on strike right now, the electricity would still flow, right,
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: We still have water, sewer, trash, natural gas, transportation wouldn't
• 9:46
  Speaker 1: break down. We wouldn't lose our supply chain, you know,
• 9:51
  Speaker 1: all of the things that we rely on for survival
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: and comfort. All of the optimization of civilization would still occur.
• 10:00
  Speaker 3: What would but the hr departments would be tragically unable
• 10:04
  Speaker 3: to operate.
• 10:06
  Speaker 2: Well, well, we're starting to see what's happening when you
• 10:09
  Speaker 2: kick these women out of their unearned uh places in
• 10:16
  Speaker 2: their respective you know, uh jobs. And that's that's because
• 10:25
  Speaker 2: the governmental departments are being defunded and these people are
• 10:29
  Speaker 2: being picked out, and and oh what's that nothing is changed,
• 10:34
  Speaker 2: and our our coffers are being built with, you know,
• 10:39
  Speaker 2: just being refilled with all of this money, even though
• 10:43
  Speaker 2: you know it's obviously it's going to take a while
• 10:46
  Speaker 2: to see the actual benefits of this, because you know,
• 10:50
  Speaker 2: things get held up and in stupid courts under stupid
• 10:55
  Speaker 2: judges who believe that our president doesn't have the actual
• 11:00
  Speaker 2: presidential right to do the things that he's doing right now.
• 11:07
  Speaker 2: But yeah, no, no, no, no, no, these these people
• 11:10
  Speaker 2: are losing their jobs and nothing of value as being lost.
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, in fact, and this.
• 11:19
  Speaker 3: By the way, this, by the way, is why I'm
• 11:22
  Speaker 3: so disinterested and fatigued by this argument between the left
• 11:27
  Speaker 3: and the right that's going on these days, particularly between
• 11:31
  Speaker 3: the left of the right calling the right of the
• 11:34
  Speaker 3: right work right, and it just digging into this minute, Sha,
• 11:41
  Speaker 3: because you don't have to ask yourself, what if the
• 11:43
  Speaker 3: left stopped stopped existing tomorrow, what if the right stopped
• 11:47
  Speaker 3: existing tomorrow, Yeah they would have there would be different
• 11:51
  Speaker 3: things going on. But here's us, having been here for
• 11:54
  Speaker 3: the last twelve years, sort of going on about the
• 12:00
  Speaker 3: real problem. Like left and right is a symbolic dichotomy, folks,
• 12:07
  Speaker 3: and it's nothing but a false dichotomy. Well, all these
• 12:12
  Speaker 3: Johnny cum Lately's are arguing about the left and the
• 12:16
  Speaker 3: right and to what degree we should purify the left
• 12:19
  Speaker 3: and the right. We're here going. You know, this entire
• 12:23
  Speaker 3: discussion was set into motion by frankly feminists, and it's
• 12:31
  Speaker 3: it's been pushed back against by the likes of us.
• 12:34
  Speaker 3: And I don't even know what. I don't even know
• 12:36
  Speaker 3: what to call us anti feminists or men's rights advocates
• 12:40
  Speaker 3: or whatever.
• 12:41
  Speaker 1: I'm just saying, you got to remember our name from feminists.
• 12:45
  Speaker 1: They were mad that we were talking about discriminatory law
• 12:51
  Speaker 1: that impacts men, and so they called us men's rights activists.
• 12:55
  Speaker 3: Yeah, and I'm like, none, none of these labels that
• 12:58
  Speaker 3: you throw on people mad, Never mind the second or
• 13:01
  Speaker 3: third degree labels that now everyone's arguing about. All these
• 13:05
  Speaker 3: fucking online intellectuals arguing about about whether liberalism is the
• 13:10
  Speaker 3: right way to go, or we should go back to liberalism,
• 13:13
  Speaker 3: or we should accelerate beyond liberalism. Like these words don't matter.
• 13:19
  Speaker 3: You can't define what liberalism means, but you know what
• 13:23
  Speaker 3: you can define men and women, And fucking we've had
• 13:28
  Speaker 3: these political dynasties of misinformation, and yes, I'm gonna call
• 13:37
  Speaker 3: its well lies dynasties of lies that have been going
• 13:41
  Speaker 3: on for at least a century, going on, two centuries
• 13:46
  Speaker 3: in which in which men's destinies have been dare I say,
• 13:53
  Speaker 3: marginalized by these imagined destinies of women, And like, you're
• 14:01
  Speaker 3: all just sword fighting fats until you can actually get
• 14:06
  Speaker 3: to grips with where all this happened. I know, y'all
• 14:10
  Speaker 3: think it happened with communism, with this class war between
• 14:15
  Speaker 3: the left, between the rich and the poor. But that
• 14:19
  Speaker 3: was defeated when Communism was defeated, when the original communism,
• 14:24
  Speaker 3: Communism was defeated at the fall of the Soviet Union.
• 14:29
  Speaker 3: It the war we're fighting is the war not between
• 14:36
  Speaker 3: men and women, but the war against men by women,
• 14:42
  Speaker 3: and not just by women, but by simple men, by
• 14:46
  Speaker 3: romantic chival ric men and romantic cheval ric women. That's
• 14:52
  Speaker 3: that's Those are the seeds by which everything by which
• 14:56
  Speaker 3: everything else is is the creeping ivy growing from it.
• 15:02
  Speaker 3: And I just I don't know how I accentuate that
• 15:07
  Speaker 3: enough that the ship everyone else is talking about is secondary,
• 15:12
  Speaker 3: or indeed tertiary to the ship we've been trying to
• 15:15
  Speaker 3: talk about for twelve years. And I know I would
• 15:17
  Speaker 3: say that, but that's because we're right, Yore, sorry, well,
• 15:23
  Speaker 3: and I mean I.
• 15:25
  Speaker 2: While I would like to agree with you, I would
• 15:29
  Speaker 2: also like to expound upon that because I believe that
• 15:33
  Speaker 2: it is the people who are higher up on that
• 15:36
  Speaker 2: hierarchy who want to control all.
• 15:40
  Speaker 1: Of us.
• 15:42
  Speaker 2: And want to they care about what everybody thinks, feminists
• 15:47
  Speaker 2: and men's rights activists alike. They are here to make
• 15:53
  Speaker 2: sure that we are in a never ending fucking cycle
• 15:58
  Speaker 2: of arguing against the each other so that they can
• 16:02
  Speaker 2: distract us from what it is that they're.
• 16:05
  Speaker 3: Actually trying to do.
• 16:08
  Speaker 2: And you know it doesn't. While while I definitely I
• 16:16
  Speaker 2: am absolutely I will stand here ten toes down and
• 16:20
  Speaker 2: agree that there is a war being waged against men
• 16:24
  Speaker 2: because that is how they wage their war. The men
• 16:29
  Speaker 2: are the tools in which they use to fight this
• 16:34
  Speaker 2: fucking war that they want to expound upon us, and
• 16:41
  Speaker 2: they are they are quite successful.
• 16:47
  Speaker 4: But you know, it's it's.
• 16:52
  Speaker 2: It's not just the men against women thing, right, It's
• 16:57
  Speaker 2: not just that it's just like the fucking NFL and
• 17:03
  Speaker 2: the NBA and any other fucking major sports team that
• 17:06
  Speaker 2: you can think of, because most of the owners are
• 17:10
  Speaker 2: have have financial stakes in both sides of the game, right,
• 17:16
  Speaker 2: All they want, all they want is asses and ceas.
• 17:19
  Speaker 2: They just want you to buy a ticket to the game.
• 17:22
  Speaker 2: They just want you to buy their fucking merchandise. They
• 17:26
  Speaker 2: don't care what side of the game you're on, right,
• 17:32
  Speaker 2: They just want you there. They just want you, uh,
• 17:37
  Speaker 2: they just want you invested in in the fight.
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: Yep, in particularly, Yeah, go ahead, go ahead.
• 17:46
  Speaker 5: No, I'm just gonna say.
• 17:47
  Speaker 2: And I think that's where we all find ourselves invested
• 17:51
  Speaker 2: in this fight. And you know, I mean some of
• 17:55
  Speaker 2: us for the right reasons, some of us for the
• 17:57
  Speaker 2: wrong reasons. But at any point, we are all being
• 18:03
  Speaker 2: used as pawns, you know, And I just choose to
• 18:08
  Speaker 2: fight on the side that says that. You know, Hey, listen,
• 18:13
  Speaker 2: men are just as equal players in this game as
• 18:17
  Speaker 2: women are, and maybe we should stop trying to use women.
• 18:21
  Speaker 3: To you know.
• 18:27
  Speaker 1: Two.
• 18:28
  Speaker 2: I don't even know how I want to say what
• 18:29
  Speaker 2: I want to say, but yeah, I'm just gonna end it.
• 18:37
  Speaker 3: There, bums on seats, Starling. As I've always said, it's
• 18:44
  Speaker 3: just about bums on seats, and it should never have
• 18:46
  Speaker 3: been about identity politics. To get bums on seats, it's
• 18:50
  Speaker 3: what do you like in life? What do you enjoy
• 18:53
  Speaker 3: in life that should get your your your bum on
• 18:57
  Speaker 3: the seats, male, female, black, whatever. But we happen to
• 19:01
  Speaker 3: live in an age where that's not good enough, Like
• 19:05
  Speaker 3: your bum has to be male or female or black
• 19:08
  Speaker 3: or white, and it's usually female and.
• 19:11
  Speaker 1: Usually and your hair has to be blue. When it
• 19:14
  Speaker 1: comes down to it, the analogy of the the the
• 19:19
  Speaker 1: owners in the NFL is a really good one because
• 19:22
  Speaker 1: we are what we're dealing with. People think that the
• 19:27
  Speaker 1: anti male feminist movement is a grassroots movement among women
• 19:34
  Speaker 1: two to take back some of their own after men
• 19:39
  Speaker 1: spent generations domineering them and dominating them and and uh
• 19:45
  Speaker 1: keeping them from achieving you know, their their full potential
• 19:49
  Speaker 1: and and blah blah blah, when in reality, uh, none
• 19:53
  Speaker 1: of that is true. Like it's it's literally not a
• 19:57
  Speaker 1: men versus women thing, it's a commoners versus elite thing.
• 20:03
  Speaker 1: The elite invented cultural guynes centrism during the thirteenth century.
• 20:12
  Speaker 1: The twelfth or thirteenth century elite actually French courtisans invented
• 20:19
  Speaker 1: it and the goal of cultural guynescentrism, which is different
• 20:24
  Speaker 1: from like family values and having a division of labor
• 20:30
  Speaker 1: and having, you know, a recognition that there are things
• 20:35
  Speaker 1: men are more suited to do in general, and there
• 20:38
  Speaker 1: are things that women are more suited to do in general,
• 20:41
  Speaker 1: and that that division of labor is going to kind
• 20:44
  Speaker 1: of naturally fall in two different directions because of that.
• 20:49
  Speaker 1: But the idea of a valuing of women not because
• 20:57
  Speaker 1: of what women do in the world or who women
• 21:00
  Speaker 1: are in the world, but just because there are women
• 21:02
  Speaker 1: over and above everyone else to the degree that our
• 21:06
  Speaker 1: society favors women in law and policy in ways that
• 21:09
  Speaker 1: are to the detriment of not just men but also
• 21:13
  Speaker 1: women's children. Like that was created by the elite to
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: be men and women against each other for the purpose
• 21:21
  Speaker 1: of crippling men's ability to resist enslavement right, and it
• 21:27
  Speaker 1: has worked. It has worked for centuries and men in check.
• 21:34
  Speaker 3: It has.
• 21:36
  Speaker 1: Made men compliant with things like conscription, with forced parenthood,
• 21:44
  Speaker 1: being forced to parent other men's children without knowing, being
• 21:49
  Speaker 1: forced to take responsibility for the women around them when
• 21:52
  Speaker 1: the women around them do things that are inadvisable uh
• 21:56
  Speaker 1: and and during the Coviture era, it it put men.
• 22:04
  Speaker 1: It forced men to be the shield between the family
• 22:06
  Speaker 1: and the state. And the thing that women rebelled against
• 22:12
  Speaker 1: was when you're under a shield, that shield also restricts
• 22:16
  Speaker 1: you in some ways. Right, just like when you put
• 22:21
  Speaker 1: up an umbrella to keep yourself dry, you can't then
• 22:27
  Speaker 1: feel the rain on your face.
• 22:30
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: That's that's pretty pretty solid two. Uh, to understand that, Yes, Brian,
• 22:39
  Speaker 1: I will read the super chowd shortly here that we had.
• 22:41
  Speaker 1: We had a superchow last week that came in after
• 22:44
  Speaker 1: the bell and we didn't get to read it. But
• 22:47
  Speaker 1: what I wanted to point out is what as we're
• 22:49
  Speaker 1: discussing this, I want people to keep that in mind
• 22:52
  Speaker 1: that this idea of pitting men and women against each.
• 22:55
  Speaker 2: Other, as.
• 22:58
  Speaker 1: You know, uh, this this group of domineering assholes that
• 23:02
  Speaker 1: kept women down throughout centuries, that women had to rebel against,
• 23:05
  Speaker 1: and women are now getting their own back. None of
• 23:08
  Speaker 1: that is grassroots. The women that are latching onto it,
• 23:13
  Speaker 1: they're not latching onto it because it's a grassroots idea
• 23:18
  Speaker 1: that resonates with them. They're latching onto it because they've
• 23:21
  Speaker 1: been inundated, bombarded with it throughout their entire lives. In
• 23:25
  Speaker 1: the public education system and the establishment media, the entertainment media,
• 23:31
  Speaker 1: from the people around them, and if they've taken any
• 23:35
  Speaker 1: kind of therapy or any kind of medical, psychological treatment whatsoever,
• 23:40
  Speaker 1: it's been inserted into that they're getting it in their workplace, training.
• 23:44
  Speaker 1: It's everywhere.
• 23:46
  Speaker 2: It's everywhere, It's everywhere, and I would even say that
• 23:50
  Speaker 2: you know it kind of it has an almost even
• 23:56
  Speaker 2: more deleterious effect on the black community because we were
• 24:03
  Speaker 2: already in a place listen, after Jim Crow happened.
• 24:07
  Speaker 1: We were good.
• 24:09
  Speaker 6: Until a point until.
• 24:13
  Speaker 2: Uh, the Welfare Act became into place, and it just
• 24:17
  Speaker 2: completely demolished the family structure, right.
• 24:21
  Speaker 4: But that was.
• 24:25
  Speaker 2: Another thing that just completely i mean just came in
• 24:33
  Speaker 2: and destroyed the minds of black women because it is oh, well,
• 24:38
  Speaker 2: men are yes, no, men are they are? They are
• 24:41
  Speaker 2: the ones who are are you know, they're the who
• 24:48
  Speaker 2: are holding us back. Meanwhile, it's Big Daddy government who
• 24:52
  Speaker 2: has told you to kick your the fathers of your
• 24:56
  Speaker 2: children out of the house.
• 24:58
  Speaker 5: And but we'll pay you for that, you know what
• 25:00
  Speaker 5: I mean.
• 25:01
  Speaker 2: So it was just completely detrimental and I think that
• 25:10
  Speaker 2: that has such a major, major, uh impact.
• 25:17
  Speaker 1: On Tommy Sotomayor who said, uh, black men were the
• 25:24
  Speaker 1: canaries and nicoal mine for men.
• 25:26
  Speaker 6: Yes, yes, absolutely were.
• 25:31
  Speaker 3: People like to talk about the genetic difference between these races.
• 25:36
  Speaker 3: But what I want to see is an experiment along
• 25:41
  Speaker 3: the lines of not telling black people that they are
• 25:48
  Speaker 3: eternal victims of life, because we really haven't seen that
• 25:52
  Speaker 3: that kind of control experiment, especially especially not in America.
• 25:57
  Speaker 1: Yeah, we did carry very short time like that. There
• 26:01
  Speaker 1: was a brief cross really fast.
• 26:05
  Speaker 3: Yeah, it went from Jim Crow to black people are
• 26:10
  Speaker 3: better than white people. It went it went from white
• 26:11
  Speaker 3: people are better than black people to black people are
• 26:13
  Speaker 3: better than white people, like over night. I don't know
• 26:16
  Speaker 3: what night it was, but that was that, and and
• 26:19
  Speaker 3: and for half a century since then, like, uh, the
• 26:23
  Speaker 3: American government and indeed every vassal state of the American
• 26:27
  Speaker 3: government has been telling has been telling black people that
• 26:31
  Speaker 3: they're victims of life, and that they need to think
• 26:34
  Speaker 3: of themselves as victims of life and they need to
• 26:37
  Speaker 3: fight the police and steal from the white man and
• 26:40
  Speaker 3: all that, and like and yeah, I know it looks
• 26:42
  Speaker 3: like like black people are stealing from white people all
• 26:45
  Speaker 3: the time, but that you know what I want to
• 26:48
  Speaker 3: see is an experiment in a country that doesn't teach people,
• 26:53
  Speaker 3: that doesn't teach black people people to be victims, to
• 26:56
  Speaker 3: be victims. And that's I don't know if that's ever
• 26:59
  Speaker 3: happened in any country everywhere.
• 27:01
  Speaker 1: There was a short time in the US between black
• 27:05
  Speaker 1: suffrage and uh before the before the Civil Rights movement,
• 27:11
  Speaker 1: where in especially in the North, the black family began
• 27:16
  Speaker 1: to grow and thrive and you started seeing uh more
• 27:21
  Speaker 1: and more just integration within society. Now in the South
• 27:26
  Speaker 1: that that wasn't the same because there they were still
• 27:29
  Speaker 1: resisting the idea of just a normal, integrated society. Democrats
• 27:36
  Speaker 1: really were the driving force behind the butt hurt there.
• 27:43
  Speaker 1: But you know, there were there were black men with
• 27:48
  Speaker 1: families who became doctors, lawyers, uh CEOs of companies. There
• 27:55
  Speaker 1: were black women that that worked and became in fact,
• 27:59
  Speaker 1: one of the earliest female millionaires. Gosh, I can't think
• 28:05
  Speaker 1: of her name. She she started an industry and in
• 28:11
  Speaker 1: black beauty products.
• 28:14
  Speaker 2: Yeah, and she wasn't even the first she stole. She
• 28:18
  Speaker 2: stole it from someone else and I can't think of
• 28:22
  Speaker 2: her name either, But that just goes to show you
• 28:26
  Speaker 2: how little we really understand about even our own American
• 28:32
  Speaker 2: and ancestry. And I'm not going to call it African
• 28:37
  Speaker 2: American ancestry because these people yes, And and so I'm
• 28:46
  Speaker 2: gonna go from here. And and you know, again, like
• 28:55
  Speaker 2: I have said before, African people have had their their
• 29:00
  Speaker 2: own historical legacy that has been just erased from our memories. Right,
• 29:10
  Speaker 2: we're not taught about it.
• 29:12
  Speaker 6: They exist in books that are not you know, we're.
• 29:16
  Speaker 2: Not taught through this public education system that we have,
• 29:23
  Speaker 2: right because it would just be you know, just a
• 29:28
  Speaker 2: little bit distant, disadvantageous. But we have a legacy, right
• 29:36
  Speaker 2: And and.
• 29:38
  Speaker 1: Just I mean just being able to acknowledge that progress
• 29:45
  Speaker 1: was being made after after I'm not poling effects of
• 29:51
  Speaker 1: slavery and the crow, just being able to acknowledge that
• 29:55
  Speaker 1: progress was being made until the victim narratives got ramped up.
• 30:00
  Speaker 1: That that alone should tell you, Like it's it's definitely
• 30:04
  Speaker 1: the victim narratives that are that are the problem. It
• 30:08
  Speaker 1: is the the the demographic versus demographic, when in fact,
• 30:15
  Speaker 1: the reality is it's the elite that have pushed all
• 30:19
  Speaker 1: of this. It is the people in government, the people
• 30:23
  Speaker 1: in media, people in entertainment media, people in education system,
• 30:28
  Speaker 1: every time you turn around, you're you're looking at something
• 30:33
  Speaker 1: that you think is just grassroots, and in reality it's not.
• 30:42
  Speaker 4: It's you know, it really isn't.
• 30:46
  Speaker 2: And and the further I dig into my cometic studies,
• 30:51
  Speaker 2: the more I understand how you know, this goes deeper
• 30:55
  Speaker 2: than anyone really wants to acknowledge. Right and again, like
• 31:01
  Speaker 2: I will say it again, because people treat it as
• 31:05
  Speaker 2: if it's a joke. It turns into the we was
• 31:08
  Speaker 2: kings thing, right, But no, actually, go and study like
• 31:16
  Speaker 2: the Ebers papers right there, there are texts there, There
• 31:21
  Speaker 2: are there are things beyond what what what we are
• 31:28
  Speaker 2: willing to accept as knowledge because it has been so
• 31:31
  Speaker 2: ingrained into us that this is just the way of life, right,
• 31:36
  Speaker 2: and that the Greeks just discover this this knowledge right
• 31:42
  Speaker 2: only where the discovered is a very different word from invented, right, so,
• 31:51
  Speaker 2: you know, and whatever.
• 31:57
  Speaker 1: But to get it back to, you know, the the
• 32:00
  Speaker 1: thing that makes what we just discussed and what I
• 32:04
  Speaker 1: talked about with regard to the Twitter thing relevant to
• 32:09
  Speaker 1: what we're about to talk about with regard to the
• 32:11
  Speaker 1: military actually goes back to a comment somebody posted on
• 32:15
  Speaker 1: last week's show that alerted me to a name I
• 32:21
  Speaker 1: didn't know there was a name for this phenomenon called
• 32:26
  Speaker 1: cargo cult mentality. Cargo cult mentality is the phenomenon where
• 32:32
  Speaker 1: individuals or groups blindly imitate rituals or practices without understanding
• 32:37
  Speaker 1: their underlying principles or purpose, hoping to achieve a desired outcome,
• 32:42
  Speaker 1: like the arrival of material goods or prosperity. So that
• 32:47
  Speaker 1: how that translates into the pitning of women against men,
• 32:52
  Speaker 1: the pinning of blacks against whites, the pitting of religious
• 32:56
  Speaker 1: against non religious, and so on. Is have this history,
• 33:01
  Speaker 1: this human history of women supporting men, women being the
• 33:09
  Speaker 1: hub of the household and the family, and men optimizing
• 33:16
  Speaker 1: civilization as they went, as they figured out new ways
• 33:20
  Speaker 1: to keep their community safe, keep their communities secure, keep
• 33:25
  Speaker 1: their communities clean, keep their communities sanitary, get you know,
• 33:31
  Speaker 1: to banish things that caused illness, like shit in the streets,
• 33:38
  Speaker 1: you know, and things like that. Women have now gotten
• 33:43
  Speaker 1: to the point where they want to take over. They're
• 33:47
  Speaker 1: engaging in that cargo cult mentality. They want to take
• 33:50
  Speaker 1: over the things that men have always done. But they
• 33:54
  Speaker 1: don't necessarily have the same level of accountability. They don't
• 33:59
  Speaker 1: understand necessarily the entire purpose of it. Men are inspired
• 34:04
  Speaker 1: to do these things because not only did they want
• 34:07
  Speaker 1: comfort for themselves, but they wanted to ensure the best
• 34:11
  Speaker 1: possible chances of their family's survival and their children's survival.
• 34:18
  Speaker 1: Whereas when you hear women talk about wanting to see
• 34:22
  Speaker 1: more female CEOs, see more women in this industry or
• 34:25
  Speaker 1: that industry, it's about the prestige and the pay, not
• 34:30
  Speaker 1: about the industry's work. And so the comment was actually
• 34:37
  Speaker 1: a response to the discussion about what's going on in
• 34:40
  Speaker 1: South Africa right now, but it really heavily applies to feminism,
• 34:46
  Speaker 1: and it really heavily applies to the feminist takeover the military.
• 34:50
  Speaker 1: Before we get into that, I'm going to read two
• 34:52
  Speaker 1: Superchows by Meredith G. Last week, Meredith G gave us
• 34:56
  Speaker 1: a super chow that didn't come until after the bell
• 34:59
  Speaker 1: and it needs to be And this is sort of
• 35:04
  Speaker 1: segues into that she gave us five dollars and said,
• 35:08
  Speaker 1: HBr News five oh four, which actually I think we're
• 35:12
  Speaker 1: we just had the wrong number up. Trump's meeting with
• 35:15
  Speaker 1: the South African president has JD. Vans written all over it.
• 35:18
  Speaker 1: As Hannah pointed out, we've seen this policy before. We
• 35:21
  Speaker 1: saw it in Zimbabwe. It's communism using grievance drifting to
• 35:26
  Speaker 1: size power. We also saw it in Jamaica in the
• 35:30
  Speaker 1: nineteen seventies. How did that work out? What about in
• 35:33
  Speaker 1: the Soviet Union in the earlier twentieth century and the
• 35:36
  Speaker 1: starvation that rolled through Eastern Europe as the farms became
• 35:39
  Speaker 1: the primary target of attack. And this is pretty much
• 35:44
  Speaker 1: my point. When you decide, gosh, these people have built
• 35:50
  Speaker 1: something good, but they left us out of it. We
• 35:52
  Speaker 1: want it and we're going to take it from them.
• 35:55
  Speaker 1: And then you do, and you don't know how they
• 35:58
  Speaker 1: built it, why they built it, why is actually as
• 36:01
  Speaker 1: important as how to and and how they run it.
• 36:05
  Speaker 1: You end up creating a mess. The cargo cult mentality
• 36:09
  Speaker 1: came from apparently people in Hawaii trying to imitate imitate
• 36:17
  Speaker 1: the military bringing in goods by building runways and things,
• 36:25
  Speaker 1: even though there was no system to land anything on
• 36:27
  Speaker 1: them and deliver the goods. And I believe it was Hawaii,
• 36:32
  Speaker 1: but it may have been elsewhere after World War Two,
• 36:37
  Speaker 1: So it's kind of a it's not an old term,
• 36:43
  Speaker 1: but it's an interesting term that that idea of imitating, right,
• 36:50
  Speaker 1: the the element the elements of a system of achievement,
• 36:56
  Speaker 1: but not the ones that actually create achievement, and then
• 37:01
  Speaker 1: not understanding why the imitation fails. And in terms of
• 37:08
  Speaker 1: what we're discussing with regard to the military, the relevance
• 37:12
  Speaker 1: of that is women trying to control the military. Military discipline,
• 37:22
  Speaker 1: military service, military action. Those things have all existed long
• 37:30
  Speaker 1: before this country existed, and they've always been reliant upon
• 37:38
  Speaker 1: male labor, male risk, male ingenuity, male willingness. And of
• 37:47
  Speaker 1: course it's been male dominated because it's been men that
• 37:49
  Speaker 1: have been used as soldiers throughout modern history. And as
• 37:58
  Speaker 1: a result, everything about the military, the way that's it's built,
• 38:03
  Speaker 1: the way that it runs, the way that it's designed right,
• 38:08
  Speaker 1: the way that it interacts within itself, the way that
• 38:13
  Speaker 1: it interacts with the outside, everything about it is masculine, right,
• 38:18
  Speaker 1: Everything about it is essentially made to work with men.
• 38:25
  Speaker 1: And in the middle of the twentieth century it sort
• 38:31
  Speaker 1: of became more common and I mean this sort of
• 38:34
  Speaker 1: started with our Civil War, but it really didn't hit
• 38:38
  Speaker 1: commonality until about the middle of the twentieth century. The
• 38:41
  Speaker 1: early part of the twentieth century, really the first, First
• 38:45
  Speaker 1: and Second World War that women started getting involved in
• 38:51
  Speaker 1: capacities like being nurses and nursing assistants, and being in
• 38:56
  Speaker 1: the medical part of the military, and being in the
• 39:00
  Speaker 1: administrative not administrative like boss administrative, but data entry, you know,
• 39:09
  Speaker 1: doing the paperwork end of the military. Like women started
• 39:15
  Speaker 1: to get more involved. And women have never been a
• 39:17
  Speaker 1: big part of the military, and they've really never been
• 39:20
  Speaker 1: a big part of the fighting force in the United States,
• 39:23
  Speaker 1: and in fact, for a long time there weren't even
• 39:27
  Speaker 1: any positions for women in the military. So this is
• 39:32
  Speaker 1: this is definitely an area where this was built by men.
• 39:38
  Speaker 1: It is maintained by men. It has always been optimized
• 39:42
  Speaker 1: by men.
• 39:44
  Speaker 4: It has been.
• 39:46
  Speaker 1: Optimized through masculine means and masculine understanding of optimization, and
• 39:55
  Speaker 1: women getting involved isn't necessarily in and of itself detrimental
• 40:00
  Speaker 1: to that, as long as women understand that this is
• 40:05
  Speaker 1: a masculine environment and it's not women's place to come
• 40:09
  Speaker 1: in and change it. Right, But in the nineteen nineties,
• 40:15
  Speaker 1: a little bit during the nineteen eighties, but more during
• 40:18
  Speaker 1: the nineteen nineties, women began pushing hard to change it.
• 40:25
  Speaker 1: In that push, oh, go ahead, there is.
• 40:32
  Speaker 3: I have a long rent on my mind. But I
• 40:33
  Speaker 3: don't know if I'm gonna get through it. It's you
• 40:35
  Speaker 3: can get through to normies when it comes to communism
• 40:40
  Speaker 3: by sort of posing to them the idea that what
• 40:44
  Speaker 3: if everyone in school was just given an A What
• 40:50
  Speaker 3: if it didn't matter how well they did on their tests?
• 40:52
  Speaker 3: What if everyone was just given an A plus and
• 40:57
  Speaker 3: everyone was it was just advanced in the same way.
• 41:01
  Speaker 3: They would sort of go, well, no, that doesn't make
• 41:03
  Speaker 3: sense because because then you'd be putting people who are
• 41:09
  Speaker 3: qualified into jobs into which they should be qualified. And
• 41:15
  Speaker 3: you know, it makes perfect sense to any given person,
• 41:19
  Speaker 3: even midwd, even an absolute fuck wit. They can they
• 41:25
  Speaker 3: can sort of understand, no, you don't just give an
• 41:27
  Speaker 3: A plus to everyone, because because society would break down.
• 41:32
  Speaker 3: But then once once they're introduced to the UH, to
• 41:42
  Speaker 3: the idea that women and men don't get the same
• 41:45
  Speaker 3: grades in all the same subjects, and the different races
• 41:49
  Speaker 3: of people don't get the same marks and all the
• 41:53
  Speaker 3: same subjects, and they go, well, well, that's different. They
• 41:58
  Speaker 3: if that's not happening, it can't possibly be for genetic reasons.
• 42:04
  Speaker 3: When it's it's not that those people need to be adjusted,
• 42:08
  Speaker 3: is that society needs to be adjusted in the effect
• 42:11
  Speaker 3: or it's not that it's not even that they don't
• 42:19
  Speaker 3: it's not even that they don't need to be adjusted,
• 42:21
  Speaker 3: is that they can't be adjusted because people are just different.
• 42:27
  Speaker 3: I know we're all held then on this equality thing,
• 42:29
  Speaker 3: but you know, really people really are different, and that
• 42:36
  Speaker 3: in the same way that if some people get fifty
• 42:42
  Speaker 3: on their tests and some people get on their test,
• 42:46
  Speaker 3: it's it's because different people have different abilities. And if
• 42:55
  Speaker 3: women get lower on certain tests and men get lower
• 42:59
  Speaker 3: on certain tests, it's not because women and men are
• 43:02
  Speaker 3: being held back in those ways. It's because people are
• 43:06
  Speaker 3: different and the same. And the same goes for racial things. Again,
• 43:10
  Speaker 3: I refer back to my earlier notion that it's difficult
• 43:16
  Speaker 3: to actually assess how different races are differently proficient at
• 43:21
  Speaker 3: these tests until you stop teaching certain races to be
• 43:27
  Speaker 3: victims or teaching certain sexes to be to be victims.
• 43:34
  Speaker 3: And yeah, to get that through to normies is particularly
• 43:40
  Speaker 3: difficult because they've had their heads fucking brainwashed by the
• 43:44
  Speaker 3: mass media. Like they can understand that stupid people and
• 43:49
  Speaker 3: smart people are different, they can't quite understand what it
• 43:53
  Speaker 3: is that makes people stupid or smart in different directions.
• 43:59
  Speaker 3: It's especially when it comes to sexes and races that
• 44:05
  Speaker 3: at that point they go, oh, well, no, they you know,
• 44:09
  Speaker 3: in that case, everyone is equal and you can't possibly
• 44:14
  Speaker 3: say that they're not, or else you're a sexist and
• 44:17
  Speaker 3: a racist. And and that's why it's been so easy
• 44:24
  Speaker 3: for for communism to bury itself in in the general
• 44:29
  Speaker 3: mindset of the West. The class divide didn't quite work
• 44:36
  Speaker 3: out except in Soviet Russia and China, but it was
• 44:43
  Speaker 3: absolutely able to bury itself in the in the West
• 44:46
  Speaker 3: in general along the lines of race and sex, because
• 44:51
  Speaker 3: even the average normy can't quite they can't quite get
• 44:55
  Speaker 3: their heads around the way men and women are different
• 45:01
  Speaker 3: and races are different in the same way the rich
• 45:06
  Speaker 3: and the poor are different, but on on sort of
• 45:09
  Speaker 3: different levels. And it is very much on different levels
• 45:12
  Speaker 3: because the rich got that way because their ancestors were competent,
• 45:17
  Speaker 3: and the poor got that way because their ancestors were
• 45:20
  Speaker 3: not competent in the in the same way. Well, it's
• 45:24
  Speaker 3: not even in the same way. Women aren't that way
• 45:28
  Speaker 3: and men aren't that way because of genetic determination, and
• 45:35
  Speaker 3: different races aren't that way because of genetic determination. And
• 45:39
  Speaker 3: I'm going to start talking, because I think I might
• 45:41
  Speaker 3: have got us in trouble by even suggesting any of
• 45:45
  Speaker 3: you know what I mean.
• 45:47
  Speaker 1: It's very possible, but I mean we're already demonetized. So
• 45:50
  Speaker 1: there you go. But the upshot is you cannot you
• 45:56
  Speaker 1: cannot take people who do not understand system and just
• 46:01
  Speaker 1: plug them in because democrat demographic equality blah blah blah
• 46:07
  Speaker 1: and have it work the same as it did with
• 46:12
  Speaker 1: the people who know what they're doing in that system.
• 46:16
  Speaker 1: So to add to that, now we have Meredith G's
• 46:21
  Speaker 1: second super chow, which is she gave us another five
• 46:25
  Speaker 1: dollars and said, HBr talk three fifty seven. When men
• 46:28
  Speaker 1: go on strike, society loses its basic needs and comforts.
• 46:31
  Speaker 1: When women go on strike, you know, your children become
• 46:35
  Speaker 1: messed up, and all moral foundation flies out the window
• 46:38
  Speaker 1: as traditional morality is replaced by a victim narrative. Welcome
• 46:42
  Speaker 1: to decades of women on strike. And that's that's the
• 46:46
  Speaker 1: very salient point, because we have had decades of women
• 46:49
  Speaker 1: insisting that they'd rather fill men's roles than women's and
• 46:56
  Speaker 1: they're not happier, but they think they're supposed to be,
• 47:02
  Speaker 1: and so their complaints are all it's men's fault that
• 47:05
  Speaker 1: we're not satisfied with this. It's men's fault that we're
• 47:09
  Speaker 1: spinning our wheels and not progressing. It's men's fault that
• 47:12
  Speaker 1: we're not also achieving women's roles, achieving our best potential
• 47:23
  Speaker 1: in women's roles while we are trying to fill men's roles,
• 47:27
  Speaker 1: when in reality, the truth says you can't do it all.
• 47:32
  Speaker 1: You know, you have to pick a path and take
• 47:34
  Speaker 1: that path. And the idea that you can take all
• 47:38
  Speaker 1: the paths and do everything just as well as the
• 47:44
  Speaker 1: person that focuses on just one path is a myth
• 47:48
  Speaker 1: promoted by the elite to pit women against men, to
• 47:53
  Speaker 1: keep men stressed enough that they will not fight back
• 47:56
  Speaker 1: against that enslavement. But in any case, yeah, oh gosh,
• 48:08
  Speaker 1: we have an idiot in our in our vertical chat.
• 48:15
  Speaker 1: Take out the maga trash. I'll tell you what you
• 48:17
  Speaker 1: can go to doctor a doctor that flunked out of
• 48:21
  Speaker 1: high school and and was given access to university because equality.
• 48:27
  Speaker 1: And I'll stick with uh, my doctor that actually got
• 48:31
  Speaker 1: straight a's in school and and did the homework and
• 48:34
  Speaker 1: studied properly nose anatomy and physiology, has studied various aspects
• 48:40
  Speaker 1: of human health and and will do what needs to
• 48:45
  Speaker 1: be done in order to maintain mine because I don't
• 48:49
  Speaker 1: want to die in my in my fifties. So there
• 48:53
  Speaker 1: you go. In any case, so we are at the
• 48:59
  Speaker 1: actual this is what we're looking at. And now last
• 49:02
  Speaker 1: week we started on this page as well. I want
• 49:06
  Speaker 1: to just remind people what we're looking at here. This
• 49:10
  Speaker 1: is USA spending dot gov. This is spending on on
• 49:18
  Speaker 1: studying sexual assault prevention in the military and sexual harassment
• 49:25
  Speaker 1: prevention in the military. And these are things that like
• 49:29
  Speaker 1: in the nineteenth century, nobody ever heard of this idea
• 49:33
  Speaker 1: of dealing with sexual assault in a military. If you
• 49:37
  Speaker 1: brought up sexual assault in the military, the men would
• 49:40
  Speaker 1: all look at you like, what the fuck are you
• 49:41
  Speaker 1: talking about? Right, in the first half of the twentieth century,
• 49:46
  Speaker 1: this was unheard of. This was not something that anybody
• 49:50
  Speaker 1: had anything to say about that in the military, within
• 49:55
  Speaker 1: the military, that this would be a problem.
• 49:58
  Speaker 4: Right.
• 49:58
  Speaker 1: The only in the second half of the two twentieth
• 50:00
  Speaker 1: century that anything was brought up about this, and it
• 50:03
  Speaker 1: really kind of crystallized in the public eye, at least
• 50:08
  Speaker 1: with the tailhook scandal, where there was a lot of
• 50:14
  Speaker 1: rowdy behavior, drunken behavior at a party. That really isn't
• 50:18
  Speaker 1: something that you would have seen happening in a military
• 50:24
  Speaker 1: environment before there were women. Like men might have gotten
• 50:30
  Speaker 1: drunk together, but there would not have been colleagues there
• 50:35
  Speaker 1: that were the opposite sex. So just bear in mind
• 50:44
  Speaker 1: with that cargo cult mentality. Women entering into the military
• 50:50
  Speaker 1: are entering into an environment that was built, maintained, and
• 50:56
  Speaker 1: optimized by men for centuries without women's involvement, right, very
• 51:02
  Speaker 1: little involvement. All their involvement was outside involvement, not as
• 51:07
  Speaker 1: part of the military. Like women might follow the military
• 51:10
  Speaker 1: and do cooking and things like that provide assistance if
• 51:14
  Speaker 1: their husbands were in the military during the Revolutionary War,
• 51:19
  Speaker 1: but you know, it wasn't something where women were soldiers
• 51:27
  Speaker 1: in large numbers. There were a few women that stepped
• 51:30
  Speaker 1: up when men got injured, or there was a woman
• 51:32
  Speaker 1: here and there that did something like spying, but the
• 51:37
  Speaker 1: overwhelming majority, like ninety nine point nine percent repeating, all male.
• 51:43
  Speaker 1: And when women did step into this, they stepped into
• 51:46
  Speaker 1: that all male, masculine environment and demanded change. The demand
• 51:54
  Speaker 1: for change didn't come immediately, but when it did come,
• 51:57
  Speaker 1: it came with a price tag. So one of these
• 52:00
  Speaker 1: that I will look at. We looked at training that
• 52:05
  Speaker 1: soldiers are subjected to last week and the week before.
• 52:08
  Speaker 1: Now we're going to look at something else. This is
• 52:10
  Speaker 1: research that is funded by the Department of Defense. So
• 52:15
  Speaker 1: this ASM research company, this one initiative is two point
• 52:22
  Speaker 1: nine million dollars. They got paid two point nine million
• 52:26
  Speaker 1: dollars to research what operations maintenance for the Defense Sexual
• 52:39
  Speaker 1: Assault Incident database. There's so much of a problem between
• 52:47
  Speaker 1: men and women in the military that they need to
• 52:50
  Speaker 1: spend two point nine million dollars figuring out how to
• 52:54
  Speaker 1: maintain a database of incident reports. I want to get
• 53:03
  Speaker 1: people to understand, like if you're just a layman and
• 53:05
  Speaker 1: you don't databases are often just lists of numbers or
• 53:13
  Speaker 1: lists of incidents that are stored in something like a spreadsheet, right,
• 53:22
  Speaker 1: not not anything complicated, but for this or they may
• 53:27
  Speaker 1: be stored in a in a server or even just
• 53:34
  Speaker 1: a single storage unit of paperwork or of like digital paperwork,
• 53:45
  Speaker 1: where you have a filing system that's been created, not
• 53:50
  Speaker 1: unlike the library's Dewey decimal system, except that it's it's
• 53:54
  Speaker 1: more in terms of year, what year, who was reported
• 53:59
  Speaker 1: to and things like that, and they needed almost three million.
• 54:06
  Speaker 1: Nearly three million. Women are so perpendicular to how the
• 54:18
  Speaker 1: military works that it costs almost three million dollars just
• 54:24
  Speaker 1: to build a database of one type of conflict between
• 54:29
  Speaker 1: men and women in the military. And this research organization.
• 54:40
  Speaker 1: The total amount that they've received via twenty eight different
• 54:44
  Speaker 1: transactions for different things that they've provided different research, different
• 54:51
  Speaker 1: like creating databases and training and so on, twenty point
• 54:56
  Speaker 1: three million. And their goal here what the thing that
• 55:05
  Speaker 1: we're looking at that was almost three million, is described
• 55:09
  Speaker 1: on this page. ASM Research LLC. Well, this is who
• 55:14
  Speaker 1: they are is a solutions integrator specializing in information technology
• 55:20
  Speaker 1: services for federal government organizations, with a particular focus on
• 55:24
  Speaker 1: the Department of Defense and its components we look at.
• 55:30
  Speaker 1: They hold a significant and definite delivery contract with the
• 55:35
  Speaker 1: Defense Human Resources Activity valued at eighteen point one million,
• 55:40
  Speaker 1: primarily focused on supporting sexual assault Prevention response offices, Defense
• 55:45
  Speaker 1: Sexual Assault Incident Database. So they're what a indefinite delivery
• 55:52
  Speaker 1: contract is is that they they own, their contract doesn't end.
• 55:58
  Speaker 1: They are just consumer distantly employed hired used by the
• 56:05
  Speaker 1: military to create and maintain and optimize this database for
• 56:14
  Speaker 1: tracking you know this, this particular type of conflict between
• 56:19
  Speaker 1: men and women in the military that did not have
• 56:25
  Speaker 1: any kind of authoritative response or documented existence when it
• 56:34
  Speaker 1: was all just men. As a conflict between men and
• 56:37
  Speaker 1: other men.
• 56:40
  Speaker 3: Maybe we need two different military divisions females. Was that
• 56:44
  Speaker 3: ever a thing. I feel like that might have been
• 56:46
  Speaker 3: the thing once upon a time.
• 56:50
  Speaker 1: None in the United States, we never really like we
• 56:52
  Speaker 1: didn't have a separate female military. But I think the
• 56:57
  Speaker 1: only way to have women in the military maybe to
• 57:00
  Speaker 1: have a separate female military. But then the question becomes
• 57:03
  Speaker 1: is it worth the money. Indeed, maybe if we're going
• 57:09
  Speaker 1: to have women have obligations that are related to national defense,
• 57:18
  Speaker 1: maybe we should start looking somewhere other than the jobs
• 57:24
  Speaker 1: men do and stop interfering with the jobs men do.
• 57:28
  Speaker 1: And I hate to say this because I don't like
• 57:31
  Speaker 1: that the draft is gendered. I think that it should
• 57:34
  Speaker 1: not be gendered. I don't think it should exist, and
• 57:39
  Speaker 1: I think that it is an act of discrimination against
• 57:42
  Speaker 1: men that it is gendered. But the solution does not
• 57:46
  Speaker 1: seem to be forcing men in the military to accommodate
• 57:54
  Speaker 1: basically an uncontacted tribe that has no clue what they're
• 58:03
  Speaker 1: getting into when they get in and and it doesn't
• 58:07
  Speaker 1: understand the reality of how that system works, why that
• 58:11
  Speaker 1: system works, and what it's really for. There's a very
• 58:17
  Speaker 1: small percentage maybe of women that understand. But women have
• 58:25
  Speaker 1: as a as a demographic, women have acted like a
• 58:33
  Speaker 1: tribe that's been left behind in terms of of understanding
• 58:40
  Speaker 1: the way civilization works for centuries because we never had to.
• 58:48
  Speaker 1: We always have been able to rely on men to
• 58:50
  Speaker 1: drive everything forward. We've always had been able to rely
• 58:54
  Speaker 1: on men to to maintain our safety, our security, our sustenance. Right,
• 59:05
  Speaker 1: even if well women do the cooking, Even if women
• 59:08
  Speaker 1: did the cooking right, which isn't necessarily always true, it's
• 59:14
  Speaker 1: men for centuries who brought home the bacon. In fact,
• 59:21
  Speaker 1: when the bacon had to be hunted down and killed,
• 59:24
  Speaker 1: it was exclusively men. So yeah, we really are as
• 59:32
  Speaker 1: a gender the equivalent of when it comes to what
• 59:39
  Speaker 1: men have built in both the the the aspects of
• 59:47
  Speaker 1: civilization that keep us applied and protected and comfortable, and
• 59:54
  Speaker 1: the aspects of the military that keep the country safe
• 59:58
  Speaker 1: and supplied, protected comfortable, women have. Women are almost like
• 1:00:04
  Speaker 1: a tribe that has never been civilized.
• 1:00:09
  Speaker 3: As I understand it, when when men. When anyone passes
• 1:00:13
  Speaker 3: basic military training, they get assigned to a particular job
• 1:00:20
  Speaker 3: within the military. It could be infantry, it could be artillery,
• 1:00:24
  Speaker 3: it could be intelligence, it could be medical units, m
• 1:00:31
  Speaker 3: And you could do exactly the same thing with female applicants,
• 1:00:38
  Speaker 3: and it would make sense to give them the same standards.
• 1:00:42
  Speaker 3: And if you give them the same standards, you'll find
• 1:00:45
  Speaker 3: none of them qualify for the infantry, and none of
• 1:00:50
  Speaker 3: them qualify for the artillery, but some may qualify for
• 1:00:55
  Speaker 3: the medical units, and some might even qualify for the
• 1:01:00
  Speaker 3: intelligence department. We can cross those bridges when they come
• 1:01:07
  Speaker 3: to them, and that should be the case, and I
• 1:01:09
  Speaker 3: think in a lot of countries it is the case,
• 1:01:12
  Speaker 3: and it has always been the case. And you can
• 1:01:17
  Speaker 3: do that quite easily without without throwing unqualified women into
• 1:01:24
  Speaker 3: the infantry. Yeah, in a situation where it might sort
• 1:01:29
  Speaker 3: of bugger up the dynamics of an otherwise all male division, because,
• 1:01:38
  Speaker 3: as has been understood for literally thousands of years, one
• 1:01:43
  Speaker 3: woman in a division of one hundred men will completely
• 1:01:49
  Speaker 3: fuck up the provisions of those hundred men because they
• 1:01:53
  Speaker 3: will want to defend that woman rather than defend each other.
• 1:01:58
  Speaker 3: Because and I need to step over some uh, some
• 1:02:04
  Speaker 3: rakes right now in terms of how men really do
• 1:02:11
  Speaker 3: want to protect women naturally. That's not to say that
• 1:02:16
  Speaker 3: kind of centrism is natural or that any of this
• 1:02:20
  Speaker 3: romantic chivalry is natural, but yeah, one hundred men can
• 1:02:28
  Speaker 3: work as a very well oiled unit. At the moment
• 1:02:31
  Speaker 3: you throw a single woman into that unit of one
• 1:02:34
  Speaker 3: hundred men, you fuck up the system.
• 1:02:37
  Speaker 1: It's like throwing a rock into the gears.
• 1:02:40
  Speaker 3: Yes, and that's because and that's because men like to
• 1:02:44
  Speaker 3: protect women. And yes, you might say that's because of
• 1:02:48
  Speaker 3: some kind of natural kind of centrism. Maybe it is,
• 1:02:51
  Speaker 3: or maybe we can call that something else, or maybe
• 1:02:55
  Speaker 3: we don't need to fuck around with words or what
• 1:02:57
  Speaker 3: they mean. But it's sort of obvious even without words
• 1:03:03
  Speaker 3: if you throw a woman when if you throw a
• 1:03:06
  Speaker 3: woman in with one hundred men like that, that that
• 1:03:09
  Speaker 3: unit of one hundred men is not quite so efficiently
• 1:03:11
  Speaker 3: as it did before. It's kind of obvious. And it's
• 1:03:19
  Speaker 3: the armed forces have always worked as not not just
• 1:03:28
  Speaker 3: principally male, but entirely male. And you can try and
• 1:03:35
  Speaker 3: fuck that up if you like, But as long as
• 1:03:39
  Speaker 3: military units need to exist, it seems they do need
• 1:03:43
  Speaker 3: to exist, as yes, one male, because men are stronger
• 1:03:51
  Speaker 3: and stronger and faster than women. And I realize there
• 1:03:58
  Speaker 3: are a great many people who will find that statement controversial,
• 1:04:02
  Speaker 3: but that's because we found ourselves surrounded by feminist, fucking
• 1:04:07
  Speaker 3: demagogues who can't quite get on board with the notion
• 1:04:11
  Speaker 3: that men are stronger and faster than women. But they are.
• 1:04:15
  Speaker 3: It's the same reason that that that men. We found
• 1:04:22
  Speaker 3: this situation where men can participate in women's sports because
• 1:04:28
  Speaker 3: we're not allowed to say that men are faster and
• 1:04:31
  Speaker 3: stronger than women. How dare you say men are stronger
• 1:04:35
  Speaker 3: than and faster than women. They're not men. They call
• 1:04:40
  Speaker 3: themselves women, they're men. And this is this is the
• 1:04:45
  Speaker 3: star burst of completely incorrect conclusions that have that has
• 1:04:54
  Speaker 3: found its way burning through our civilization. The idea that
• 1:05:01
  Speaker 3: men are stronger and faster than women. You can't say that.
• 1:05:06
  Speaker 3: You just can't say that it is true, but you
• 1:05:09
  Speaker 3: can't say that, and we will tear up every part
• 1:05:15
  Speaker 3: of our civilization in pursuit of denying that men are
• 1:05:21
  Speaker 3: stronger and faster than women.
• 1:05:24
  Speaker 1: There's another aspect as well, and I know I'm going
• 1:05:30
  Speaker 1: to get pushed back for this, but when it comes
• 1:05:33
  Speaker 1: to things like creating a system of defense or creating
• 1:05:42
  Speaker 1: a system for the distribution of something like electricity or
• 1:05:47
  Speaker 1: groceries or medical care, anything like that. Men are more
• 1:05:53
  Speaker 1: capable than women in that area, and men are more
• 1:05:56
  Speaker 1: focused than women on the job at hand, and even
• 1:06:03
  Speaker 1: in downtimes when they goof off, you know, they they
• 1:06:08
  Speaker 1: recognize the difference between goofing off and being aggressive, and
• 1:06:16
  Speaker 1: they recognize the difference between work and goofing off, and
• 1:06:20
  Speaker 1: women blur the lines on both sides of goofing off,
• 1:06:24
  Speaker 1: between goofing off and work, and between goofing off and aggression.
• 1:06:29
  Speaker 1: You have to to catch boys during their teenage years
• 1:06:35
  Speaker 1: or young men during their just because you know, still
• 1:06:38
  Speaker 1: wet behind the ears adulthood years, out of environments where
• 1:06:43
  Speaker 1: maybe they didn't get the full benefit of their their
• 1:06:48
  Speaker 1: upbringing by by a dad. Before you run into guys
• 1:06:52
  Speaker 1: who don't understand fully the difference between work and play
• 1:06:57
  Speaker 1: and don't fully understand the difference between play and aggression.
• 1:07:02
  Speaker 1: And usually in a system where it's all men the system,
• 1:07:09
  Speaker 1: the men of the system will handle that situation where
• 1:07:14
  Speaker 1: the one individual young man or almost but not quite
• 1:07:20
  Speaker 1: yet a man, doesn't understand those differences and they'll they'll
• 1:07:25
  Speaker 1: handle it, sometimes pretty roughly, but they will handle it,
• 1:07:30
  Speaker 1: and that individual becomes a better individual, better part of
• 1:07:36
  Speaker 1: the community, more prepared to enjoy his own success in life,
• 1:07:42
  Speaker 1: and so on. And that's that's sort of what the
• 1:07:45
  Speaker 1: military used to do four men in return for their service,
• 1:07:51
  Speaker 1: was that it honed their skill at doing their work
• 1:07:56
  Speaker 1: and at engaging with each other, and at taking responsibility
• 1:08:04
  Speaker 1: for themselves and their families. And so when they would
• 1:08:07
  Speaker 1: come out of the military, if they chose to not
• 1:08:10
  Speaker 1: make the military their career, wherever they took those skills,
• 1:08:14
  Speaker 1: those would contribute to their performance in their job, their profession,
• 1:08:19
  Speaker 1: their family life, everything, to the degree that they would
• 1:08:23
  Speaker 1: be more successful in what they did than they would
• 1:08:26
  Speaker 1: have been if they had not had that military service.
• 1:08:30
  Speaker 1: But when you throw women in there unable to differentiate
• 1:08:36
  Speaker 1: between work and play or play and aggression, and you
• 1:08:41
  Speaker 1: can't be as rough with women in training them on
• 1:08:46
  Speaker 1: the difference, and you can't keep them from finding and
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 1: interacting with the guys that haven't understood that difference yet
• 1:08:55
  Speaker 1: and then getting wounded emotionally by the situation and making complaints.
• 1:09:01
  Speaker 1: Then you end up with the system that we're looking
• 1:09:04
  Speaker 1: at Ultimately, since two thousand and two, the dollars obligated
• 1:09:11
  Speaker 1: to spend on this one contract have amounted to two
• 1:09:15
  Speaker 1: point one billion. We have had to spend two point
• 1:09:19
  Speaker 1: one billion over the last couple decades just documenting this problem. Right,
• 1:09:30
  Speaker 1: And we go to the next one that I wanted
• 1:09:32
  Speaker 1: to look at, the University of Texas Health Science Center
• 1:09:35
  Speaker 1: at Houston. This one again Department of Defense three million
• 1:09:41
  Speaker 1: dollars to study. And this was a cluster randomized controlled
• 1:09:48
  Speaker 1: trial of x Corps, a multi level sexual assault prevention
• 1:09:52
  Speaker 1: intervention for active duty airman. So this is about not
• 1:09:59
  Speaker 1: st say the prevalence or problems caused by sexual misconduct
• 1:10:05
  Speaker 1: in the military, but a training system for preventing sexual
• 1:10:11
  Speaker 1: misconduct in the military. This university, and there have been
• 1:10:18
  Speaker 1: several universities, this university has had eight hundred and ninety
• 1:10:23
  Speaker 1: four transactions and received one hundred and ninety two point
• 1:10:26
  Speaker 1: three million dollars. So again, brother, can you spare a
• 1:10:32
  Speaker 1: small fortune that's actually a big fortune, Like I could
• 1:10:35
  Speaker 1: probably have my whole uh immediate family set for life
• 1:10:40
  Speaker 1: with that much money and still find places where I
• 1:10:44
  Speaker 1: could donate money and not go broke.
• 1:10:46
  Speaker 3: But in terms of how much the US government is wasting.
• 1:10:49
  Speaker 3: This is a pittance, but I know.
• 1:10:51
  Speaker 1: It's a drop in the bucket. But in fact, just
• 1:10:56
  Speaker 1: on this subject, this is a drop in the bucket.
• 1:10:59
  Speaker 1: We go back to that, uh, the page where we started, right,
• 1:11:03
  Speaker 1: we're looking at you know, millions and millions just on contracts,
• 1:11:09
  Speaker 1: individual contracts, not idvs, just just in in a search
• 1:11:18
  Speaker 1: using the keywords sexual assault, and that doesn't include there's
• 1:11:25
  Speaker 1: thirteen grants here, see if this will show them, and
• 1:11:28
  Speaker 1: that's just recent more recent grants in the University of
• 1:11:32
  Speaker 1: Texas Health Science Center at Houston's at the top, but
• 1:11:36
  Speaker 1: there's Aristona, Arizona State University, New York University, University of Florida,
• 1:11:41
  Speaker 1: Rhode Island Hospital h So you know, there's there's there's
• 1:11:46
  Speaker 1: different entities that are getting this money. Uh. And you
• 1:11:52
  Speaker 1: know you see the idvs, there's several different We looked
• 1:11:56
  Speaker 1: at Catharsis Productions previously. This is looking at what they
• 1:12:02
  Speaker 1: got paid this year. But yeah, they haven't outlaid it yet.
• 1:12:09
  Speaker 1: But these are contracts that are ongoing, so it doesn't
• 1:12:14
  Speaker 1: show the amount there. But on just individual contracts, current
• 1:12:21
  Speaker 1: contracts and so on. Seven hundred and what is that
• 1:12:26
  Speaker 1: seven and twenty five, with the top one being twenty
• 1:12:30
  Speaker 1: nine million, and then there's just multiple little ones that
• 1:12:36
  Speaker 1: are over a million, and it goes down by the page. Basically,
• 1:12:42
  Speaker 1: I've got one hundred to a page, and you eventually
• 1:12:45
  Speaker 1: get down to where there are a few thousand here,
• 1:12:47
  Speaker 1: a few thousand there, and it'll be for individual things
• 1:12:51
  Speaker 1: like the videos we watched a couple of weeks ago,
• 1:12:54
  Speaker 1: where they've paid you know, like professional quality cost for
• 1:13:04
  Speaker 1: amateur college student presentation to the classroom quality videos. Not
• 1:13:10
  Speaker 1: even that really, because I have a feeling that if
• 1:13:12
  Speaker 1: you had a student that was getting graded on this,
• 1:13:15
  Speaker 1: they would make a better fitt he ho. So what
• 1:13:21
  Speaker 1: is this UT Health thing? We have an article? See
• 1:13:28
  Speaker 1: if I can get this to not jump up so
• 1:13:30
  Speaker 1: far there we go. Three million dollar grant awarded to
• 1:13:34
  Speaker 1: UT Health Houston School of Public Health or Sexual Assault
• 1:13:37
  Speaker 1: and Harassment Prevention Intervention in the Air Force, and it's
• 1:13:42
  Speaker 1: actually for studying it. A four year, three million dollar
• 1:13:46
  Speaker 1: grant to implement and evaluate a multi level sexual assault
• 1:13:49
  Speaker 1: and sexual harassment prevention study for active duty Airmen has
• 1:13:53
  Speaker 1: been awarded to the researchers at UT Health Houston by
• 1:13:57
  Speaker 1: US Department of Defense, and we have this professor.
• 1:14:03
  Speaker 2: That is.
• 1:14:05
  Speaker 1: The principal investigator in the study. According to the Department
• 1:14:11
  Speaker 1: of Defense, sexual assault sexual harassment within the military have
• 1:14:14
  Speaker 1: continued to increase over the past three years, creating significant
• 1:14:18
  Speaker 1: public health problems. It's very very big deal for the
• 1:14:23
  Speaker 1: military that this is this is occurring like this. This
• 1:14:26
  Speaker 1: is actually incredibly disruptive to the work of the military
• 1:14:33
  Speaker 1: and it actually creates problems out in the rest of
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 1: the public. Sexual assault can have serious consequences for the
• 1:14:42
  Speaker 1: survivors and negatively affect productivity, mission readiness, and overall service
• 1:14:49
  Speaker 1: members well being and mission readiness is a big point, right.
• 1:14:56
  Speaker 1: So if you have that one hundred men and one
• 1:14:59
  Speaker 1: win or ninety nine men and one woman, and that
• 1:15:05
  Speaker 1: one woman has accused one of the guys of sexual
• 1:15:10
  Speaker 1: assault before you even know whether the guy did it
• 1:15:14
  Speaker 1: or not, the divisiveness of that situation affects their ability
• 1:15:19
  Speaker 1: to work together as a unit. So if they have
• 1:15:23
  Speaker 1: to go overseas into another country and uh position themselves
• 1:15:30
  Speaker 1: be be stationed on a base in this foreign country,
• 1:15:34
  Speaker 1: and they have a job to do while they're there,
• 1:15:37
  Speaker 1: the focus on that job is reduced by the amount
• 1:15:41
  Speaker 1: of conflict that is created by that situation, and that
• 1:15:47
  Speaker 1: is if the military doesn't remove both the perpetrator or
• 1:15:51
  Speaker 1: or accuser, you know, like accuser and alleged perpetrator, Like
• 1:15:59
  Speaker 1: we're not necessary one hundred percent whether there's a victim
• 1:16:03
  Speaker 1: every time there's an accusation. Outside of the military, there
• 1:16:08
  Speaker 1: is some evidence that rape allegations in the United States
• 1:16:12
  Speaker 1: have a false rate of over forty percent, So it's
• 1:16:20
  Speaker 1: it's hard to tell how much of what is accused
• 1:16:23
  Speaker 1: in the military is actually true either, and that's maybe
• 1:16:28
  Speaker 1: their investigative process is a little easier because it's a
• 1:16:31
  Speaker 1: closed environment. But aside from that, because we have this predisposition,
• 1:16:40
  Speaker 1: this feminist trained predisposition to just believe accusers when they're women,
• 1:16:45
  Speaker 1: we can't necessarily assume that the military doesn't have the
• 1:16:49
  Speaker 1: same problem as the public. Let's see, assault and sexual
• 1:17:00
  Speaker 1: harassment can be prevented by implementing interventions that promote healthy
• 1:17:04
  Speaker 1: relationship skills. However, there's no current intervention for active duty
• 1:17:08
  Speaker 1: service members. So they get this during training, like they
• 1:17:11
  Speaker 1: go to boot camp and they get their regular training
• 1:17:14
  Speaker 1: for military service, and then in addition to everything else
• 1:17:18
  Speaker 1: they get, they've got to go through the training that
• 1:17:19
  Speaker 1: we looked at that that teaches them how to use
• 1:17:24
  Speaker 1: pronouns correctly. According to social justice Warriors, well.
• 1:17:28
  Speaker 3: You could just segregate the I mean, I mean, segregation
• 1:17:32
  Speaker 3: is not always a good idea, but sometimes it is,
• 1:17:36
  Speaker 3: such as in the military, so as to prevent sh
• 1:17:39
  Speaker 3: like this from happening. I mean, why the men and
• 1:17:42
  Speaker 3: women need to be trained together militarily speaking.
• 1:17:47
  Speaker 1: It really doesn't need to be. There's not a purpose
• 1:17:53
  Speaker 1: for putting them together. Actually that you can.
• 1:17:59
  Speaker 3: Make the same case for schools. Yeah, for the longest
• 1:18:02
  Speaker 3: time that there were there were there were boys schools
• 1:18:06
  Speaker 3: and girls schools, and that did seem to work kind
• 1:18:10
  Speaker 3: of all right for a while before the so called
• 1:18:14
  Speaker 3: progressives put an end to it in terms of civilian education.
• 1:18:21
  Speaker 3: But this, this is civilian training we're talking about. It's
• 1:18:25
  Speaker 3: in the interests of.
• 1:18:30
  Speaker 1: National defense.
• 1:18:31
  Speaker 3: National defense.
• 1:18:35
  Speaker 1: Yeah, the only problem is women have sued to end
• 1:18:41
  Speaker 1: that practice. So anytime we try to do something functional
• 1:18:47
  Speaker 1: like that as a anywhere in the United States, whether
• 1:18:53
  Speaker 1: it's in our military, in our schools, in any other profession,
• 1:18:57
  Speaker 1: in any type of you know, treatment, or any type
• 1:19:02
  Speaker 1: of well, any service, any anything, when we segregate. Women
• 1:19:10
  Speaker 1: sue for two reasons, to get into men's side of
• 1:19:15
  Speaker 1: it and to keep men out of women's side of it.
• 1:19:19
  Speaker 1: So they want women to have their own sex segregated
• 1:19:24
  Speaker 1: spaces and services and jobs, environments of all kinds, right,
• 1:19:33
  Speaker 1: but they don't want men to have any of the
• 1:19:36
  Speaker 1: same things. They don't want men to have anything be
• 1:19:40
  Speaker 1: sex segregated, anything, be male only. Anything be specifically for men,
• 1:19:47
  Speaker 1: dedicated only to men, provided for men and not for women,
• 1:19:53
  Speaker 1: or done by men, and not buy women, even if
• 1:19:58
  Speaker 1: women aren't good at it, even if women do don't
• 1:20:00
  Speaker 1: need it, even if women don't want it. Feminists will
• 1:20:05
  Speaker 1: sue to force segregation or to force the end of segregation,
• 1:20:10
  Speaker 1: even when it's not artificial, when it just naturally happens.
• 1:20:13
  Speaker 1: Men form their own groups of clubs and recreational activities
• 1:20:19
  Speaker 1: that they just want to hang out with the guys
• 1:20:21
  Speaker 1: and there's not some government agency or some authority keeping
• 1:20:25
  Speaker 1: women out. Women will sue for inclusion. So you know
• 1:20:33
  Speaker 1: it is if if the military were to go back
• 1:20:38
  Speaker 1: to a segregated system, you would still have the battle
• 1:20:43
  Speaker 1: of having to fight off feminist insistence that that's somehow bad.
• 1:20:49
  Speaker 1: And we have to stop it, and you know, and
• 1:20:53
  Speaker 1: you wouldn't. Still, you still wouldn't even get an opportunity
• 1:20:56
  Speaker 1: to focus on you know, like I said, where there
• 1:20:59
  Speaker 1: are instances where they're young men that don't have failed
• 1:21:03
  Speaker 1: to differentiate between work and play, and fail to differentiate
• 1:21:06
  Speaker 1: between play and aggression, and then the guidance of other
• 1:21:11
  Speaker 1: men straightens them out. You still have to create some
• 1:21:16
  Speaker 1: sort of official system to deal with when women fail
• 1:21:20
  Speaker 1: to differentiate or when women fail to avoid contact with
• 1:21:25
  Speaker 1: immature men and boys, because they would still those are
• 1:21:32
  Speaker 1: the guys they're going to hang out with. And then
• 1:21:35
  Speaker 1: the next thing you have is there's an incident that
• 1:21:38
  Speaker 1: has to be documented and recorded and investigated and adjudicated,
• 1:21:45
  Speaker 1: and then the investigation has to be recorded and documented,
• 1:21:48
  Speaker 1: and the adjudication has to be recorded and documented, and
• 1:21:51
  Speaker 1: then there has to be a penalty applied and so on.
• 1:21:55
  Speaker 1: And it's not just a training issue anymore. The same
• 1:21:59
  Speaker 1: with the you know, any other aspect of It's the
• 1:22:04
  Speaker 1: same reason why human resources have been imposed on everything
• 1:22:09
  Speaker 1: in the business world, because as soon as you mix
• 1:22:12
  Speaker 1: the sexes, you have to have a whole system to
• 1:22:15
  Speaker 1: deal with it, instead of just having mentorship as a
• 1:22:19
  Speaker 1: means of dealing with it. But women do not understand
• 1:22:24
  Speaker 1: that where they do not care, and they sue to
• 1:22:28
  Speaker 1: impose that situation anyway. So this study, four year cluster
• 1:22:36
  Speaker 1: randomized controlled trial. They're going they've got a base where
• 1:22:40
  Speaker 1: they're doing this experiment on our soldiers.
• 1:22:44
  Speaker 2: It is this.
• 1:22:47
  Speaker 1: This training called Code of Respect, and let's make sure
• 1:22:51
  Speaker 1: this is Yeah, this started in twenty twenty three, so
• 1:22:55
  Speaker 1: there's something that's already going on. They're already doing this.
• 1:23:00
  Speaker 1: They'll recruit a thousand junior enlisted airmen between eighteen to
• 1:23:04
  Speaker 1: twenty four years old, and they'll run them through this training.
• 1:23:10
  Speaker 1: The grant shows that sexual assault and sexual harassment prevention
• 1:23:13
  Speaker 1: is a priority to the Department of Defense. Like when
• 1:23:18
  Speaker 1: you think of what's the department called, it is not
• 1:23:21
  Speaker 1: called the Department of Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault Prevention,
• 1:23:28
  Speaker 1: called a Department of Defense, and it is about being
• 1:23:32
  Speaker 1: prepared to go to war, being prepared to deal somewhat
• 1:23:37
  Speaker 1: with natural disasters, being prepared to have war come to
• 1:23:41
  Speaker 1: the United States. So all of this is an unnecessary distraction,
• 1:23:51
  Speaker 1: and all of this expense is an unnecessary expense that
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 1: is only in place to support our ability to have
• 1:24:02
  Speaker 1: a military that is like less than seventeen percent women.
• 1:24:15
  Speaker 3: We might be fucked, ladies and gentlemen, we might be fucked.
• 1:24:19
  Speaker 3: This might be the result of us being yea of
• 1:24:24
  Speaker 3: warfare being waged against us by people who understand that
• 1:24:29
  Speaker 3: war can be waged against us without a shot ever
• 1:24:32
  Speaker 3: being fired. We should look into the world for certain
• 1:24:39
  Speaker 3: countries and certain cultures who have learned over millennia that
• 1:24:45
  Speaker 3: war can be waged without ever firing a single shots. Yeah,
• 1:24:50
  Speaker 3: think any.
• 1:24:52
  Speaker 4: It's almost as if that was the plan.
• 1:24:55
  Speaker 3: Maybe his name is Sun Sou, Ladies and gentlemen. He
• 1:25:01
  Speaker 3: laid this out for a large country of people about
• 1:25:05
  Speaker 3: how war is not about fighting, but about deceiving our
• 1:25:08
  Speaker 3: enemies so that you don't even need to fight them.
• 1:25:12
  Speaker 3: You can you can sigh up them into diminishing their
• 1:25:19
  Speaker 3: own army. Mm hmmm, hey mm hmm.
• 1:25:25
  Speaker 2: Army, the army, the society, or they're killing our are
• 1:25:35
  Speaker 2: you know, biological productivity? We're we're not having.
• 1:25:38
  Speaker 1: Kids and what we do educating them?
• 1:25:44
  Speaker 4: Yeah, exactly, And I'm going it's not.
• 1:25:48
  Speaker 3: It's communism.
• 1:25:50
  Speaker 2: And on top of the fact that we're not educating them,
• 1:25:54
  Speaker 2: the people who are, the people around us are telling
• 1:26:00
  Speaker 2: us that we're wrong for not wanting to not educate
• 1:26:04
  Speaker 2: them under.
• 1:26:07
  Speaker 4: This state. Yeah, this is just so stupid, so stupid.
• 1:26:18
  Speaker 1: He served in the military for twelve years from nineteen
• 1:26:21
  Speaker 1: ninety nine to twenty eleven, and it seemed like the
• 1:26:25
  Speaker 1: entire time he was in they were demoralizing them in.
• 1:26:31
  Speaker 5: And that's that's that's kind of where I think that
• 1:26:36
  Speaker 5: they are going with that whole thing.
• 1:26:38
  Speaker 4: Were talking about.
• 1:26:39
  Speaker 2: I think it was last week or the week, well,
• 1:26:41
  Speaker 2: definitely not last week, as I was. I was, no,
• 1:26:46
  Speaker 2: I've been going back to the gym, so you know,
• 1:26:49
  Speaker 2: I'm sorry.
• 1:26:50
  Speaker 1: I just yeah, that's a good thing. Everybody should be
• 1:26:53
  Speaker 1: doing that, everybody.
• 1:26:54
  Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, so you know, I was absent that week.
• 1:26:59
  Speaker 2: But anyway, the week before that, we were talking about how,
• 1:27:04
  Speaker 2: you know, they they are just kind of trying to
• 1:27:09
  Speaker 2: erase men from the military and and using sorry, god
• 1:27:18
  Speaker 2: damn it, I forgot.
• 1:27:24
  Speaker 1: The sexual assault prevention training.
• 1:27:26
  Speaker 2: Yes, yes, exactly, thank you, thank you, and you're welcome,
• 1:27:36
  Speaker 2: you know. And that's what it all seems to be.
• 1:27:38
  Speaker 4: Is is just this one big sigh oup to.
• 1:27:42
  Speaker 2: Prevent men from even wanting to join, not only the
• 1:27:46
  Speaker 2: ones that are in there, right like just oh, you
• 1:27:51
  Speaker 2: better not touch the women's and who would.
• 1:27:55
  Speaker 4: Want to anyway, But I mean, yeah, it's just it's
• 1:28:00
  Speaker 4: it's it's all one big.
• 1:28:07
  Speaker 2: It's all one big operation to uh, you know, reduce
• 1:28:13
  Speaker 2: the powers that we actually that we have in the military.
• 1:28:18
  Speaker 1: Yeah, weakened them.
• 1:28:19
  Speaker 4: Yeah.
• 1:28:20
  Speaker 3: Imagine if your country had been coerced into doing what
• 1:28:24
  Speaker 3: it's doing by a cabal of its enemies. I forget
• 1:28:28
  Speaker 3: that it was who outlined that's provision in the first place,
• 1:28:36
  Speaker 3: but just it's a it's an interesting thought experiment. What
• 1:28:41
  Speaker 3: if what if the powers that be in charge of
• 1:28:44
  Speaker 3: your country had been coerced into doing what they're doing
• 1:28:48
  Speaker 3: by a cabal of their enemies. It looks exactly like
• 1:28:53
  Speaker 3: what's happening right now.
• 1:28:54
  Speaker 4: And yeah, exactly what's happening right now.
• 1:28:59
  Speaker 1: You know, our man says, the whole time he was
• 1:29:02
  Speaker 1: in the military, they they were telling the men they
• 1:29:07
  Speaker 1: could be replaced.
• 1:29:08
  Speaker 4: You're right, Jesus.
• 1:29:12
  Speaker 1: Yeah. And so what we're looking at here, like this
• 1:29:15
  Speaker 1: paperwork here basically is a report on the start of
• 1:29:22
  Speaker 1: this this training, and it has this statement the abstract.
• 1:29:29
  Speaker 1: Sexual assault within the military is a major public health problem,
• 1:29:32
  Speaker 1: impacting over twenty five thousand service members essay can have
• 1:29:37
  Speaker 1: serious consequences, like twenty five thousand service members. Let's how
• 1:29:44
  Speaker 1: many total, and so how many total service members are
• 1:29:57
  Speaker 1: there in the US military Two point eighty seve million,
• 1:30:03
  Speaker 1: and that includes the National Garden and reserves. So where
• 1:30:10
  Speaker 1: was it twenty five thousand out of oops, that's we
• 1:30:17
  Speaker 1: looked at that already out of there. It is two
• 1:30:24
  Speaker 1: point eighty six million. So it's not really more prevalent.
• 1:30:32
  Speaker 1: In fact, it's less prevalent than what feminists say takes
• 1:30:35
  Speaker 1: place in the public. But of course, yeah, and then
• 1:30:45
  Speaker 1: it goes on to say the number one factor that
• 1:30:49
  Speaker 1: increases the service member's risk for essays having experienced sexual harassment.
• 1:30:55
  Speaker 1: So this, I like, this indicates a failure to report,
• 1:31:00
  Speaker 1: you know, or a failure of handling if they report.
• 1:31:04
  Speaker 1: And this is in twenty twenty three, right when this
• 1:31:08
  Speaker 1: was proposed or when this started. They have had sexual
• 1:31:14
  Speaker 1: assault prevention training and response in place in the military
• 1:31:22
  Speaker 1: since the nineteen nineties, so we are thirty years in,
• 1:31:31
  Speaker 1: you know, basically over thirty years in, and whatever they
• 1:31:35
  Speaker 1: were doing all this time that was guided by feminists
• 1:31:40
  Speaker 1: has been totally ineffective.
• 1:31:44
  Speaker 2: I'm sorry, and I'm gonna go above and beyond that.
• 1:31:49
  Speaker 2: But you know, if you can't withstand a little inappropriate
• 1:32:00
  Speaker 2: conversation or provocation, what fucking business do you have being
• 1:32:06
  Speaker 2: on the front lines and trying to protect this country against.
• 1:32:12
  Speaker 6: Gunfire and ammunition.
• 1:32:15
  Speaker 1: Like, I'm all for training the soldiers to exhibit exemplar characters, right,
• 1:32:20
  Speaker 1: which that's why, absolutely, absolutely, I understand your point about toughness,
• 1:32:26
  Speaker 1: but I'm all for training them to exhibit exemplary behavior.
• 1:32:29
  Speaker 1: What I'm saying is we have had a system in place.
• 1:32:34
  Speaker 1: Our military has been paying for these types of trainings,
• 1:32:40
  Speaker 1: these types of prevention systems, tracing back to the nineteen nineties,
• 1:32:49
  Speaker 1: so for over thirty years the military has had systems
• 1:32:53
  Speaker 1: in place. Probably longer than that, but for over thirty years,
• 1:32:57
  Speaker 1: the military has had definitely has led systems in place
• 1:33:02
  Speaker 1: to prevent soldiers from having no recourse when they are
• 1:33:10
  Speaker 1: sexually harassed and to prevent sexual assault. And twenty five
• 1:33:17
  Speaker 1: thousand service members are still affected. And the number one
• 1:33:26
  Speaker 1: factor that increases a service member's risk for being sexually
• 1:33:30
  Speaker 1: assaulted is that they've been sexually harassed. So they've been
• 1:33:35
  Speaker 1: sexually harassed, and then it has the opportunity to escalate.
• 1:33:40
  Speaker 1: Despite all of this stuff that we've been learning that
• 1:33:44
  Speaker 1: they've paid billions of dollars for, despite all of that,
• 1:33:52
  Speaker 1: the problem has not even been solved. Like what the
• 1:33:57
  Speaker 1: fuck are they doing? Oh yeah, that's right, they're teaching
• 1:34:00
  Speaker 1: people to use the correct pronouns.
• 1:34:01
  Speaker 2: I forgot, Yeah, because that totally fixes, you know, the
• 1:34:09
  Speaker 2: problems that they're facing.
• 1:34:13
  Speaker 4: It's just.
• 1:34:15
  Speaker 6: It's ridiculous, you know what I mean.
• 1:34:19
  Speaker 2: And I'm not saying that the soldiers out there aren't
• 1:34:23
  Speaker 2: facing you know, some kind of but doesn't that just.
• 1:34:29
  Speaker 4: Doesn't it just go to.
• 1:34:33
  Speaker 2: Explain why maybe these I'll say it, these women maybe
• 1:34:40
  Speaker 2: shouldn't be on the fucking front lines. Maybe they shouldn't
• 1:34:44
  Speaker 2: be there, and you know, because again it's not and
• 1:34:49
  Speaker 2: who are these women who are making these complaints? Are
• 1:34:53
  Speaker 2: they people pushing the paper or are these women on
• 1:34:58
  Speaker 2: the front lines who are facing some kind of uh,
• 1:35:02
  Speaker 2: you know, you know, sexual assault from their counterparts, you know,
• 1:35:08
  Speaker 2: which I could understand, right, like, it shouldn't be happening.
• 1:35:14
  Speaker 6: It shouldn't be happening, Okay.
• 1:35:17
  Speaker 1: Got you.
• 1:35:19
  Speaker 2: But this is just why And I'm sorry, I would
• 1:35:29
  Speaker 2: I'm standing behind this. I think this is why they
• 1:35:32
  Speaker 2: shouldn't be there in the fucking first place.
• 1:35:36
  Speaker 1: Yeah, this is this is me changing my mind in
• 1:35:39
  Speaker 1: real time as we go through this, and I've read
• 1:35:42
  Speaker 1: more and more about this, Like I was always really
• 1:35:44
  Speaker 1: adamant about just degendering the draft, and I have been that,
• 1:35:49
  Speaker 1: Like that's been my position since day one. Is an
• 1:35:53
  Speaker 1: MRA the draft shouldn't be gendered, or it shouldn't exist, right,
• 1:35:58
  Speaker 1: and I'm about to end the It shouldn't be gendered.
• 1:36:01
  Speaker 1: It just shouldn't exist. It should not be no selective service,
• 1:36:05
  Speaker 1: there should be no conscription and all volunteer, all male
• 1:36:11
  Speaker 1: military is the way to go. And if women want
• 1:36:15
  Speaker 1: to form some sort of militias that are that can
• 1:36:21
  Speaker 1: cooperate with the military from the outside, women can do that.
• 1:36:25
  Speaker 1: Nothing is stopping them. We have a second Amendment, And
• 1:36:29
  Speaker 1: I like, if I wanted to today, I could go
• 1:36:32
  Speaker 1: out and start the process to get a firearm and
• 1:36:37
  Speaker 1: I could have one before you know, two weeks this
• 1:36:41
  Speaker 1: past and you know, form a group of women that
• 1:36:45
  Speaker 1: are prepared to defend my neighborhood in the Dayton metro
• 1:36:50
  Speaker 1: area and all that we could do that nobody's stopping us.
• 1:36:54
  Speaker 1: We don't actually have to be in the military to
• 1:36:58
  Speaker 1: do that, right, and so you know, and if the
• 1:37:04
  Speaker 1: government wanted to have an all female I don't know,
• 1:37:09
  Speaker 1: supplement to the military that didn't have any involvement with
• 1:37:14
  Speaker 1: the all mailmen military, that would not be difficult to do.
• 1:37:19
  Speaker 1: They can create a department or an agency for anything,
• 1:37:22
  Speaker 1: So something like that could be created if it was
• 1:37:24
  Speaker 1: worth doing. But this idea of integration within the military,
• 1:37:31
  Speaker 1: I think just the fact that after thirty years of
• 1:37:39
  Speaker 1: feminist led efforts to deal with sexual misconduct in the military,
• 1:37:44
  Speaker 1: we are being told by the head of this research
• 1:37:48
  Speaker 1: the no prevention program that utilizes behavior change theories or
• 1:37:52
  Speaker 1: other proven strategies have been developed for the military, and
• 1:37:58
  Speaker 1: that despite all of these so called advancements, twenty five
• 1:38:02
  Speaker 1: thousand service members are impacted and the number one factor
• 1:38:06
  Speaker 1: that increases the service member's risk for essay is having
• 1:38:10
  Speaker 1: experienced sexual harassment. That is a description of thirty years
• 1:38:18
  Speaker 1: of failure, right, right, and but and and but.
• 1:38:25
  Speaker 5: They do this all the while saying.
• 1:38:28
  Speaker 2: That, well, women are just as good to be able
• 1:38:31
  Speaker 2: to serve all the front us, and you know, we
• 1:38:34
  Speaker 2: should have women. What is this is not equality?
• 1:38:40
  Speaker 4: We should have women on the fucking front and ham
• 1:38:44
  Speaker 4: on home on.
• 1:38:46
  Speaker 6: You cannot have it both ways.
• 1:38:49
  Speaker 2: You want to have women doing all of these being
• 1:38:54
  Speaker 2: in all of these positions of power, right that you
• 1:38:57
  Speaker 2: feel like, right.
• 1:39:00
  Speaker 4: What is the front line? The foot line is not power.
• 1:39:03
  Speaker 4: The front line is where you go to die.
• 1:39:07
  Speaker 3: If if if the government said here's a gun, go
• 1:39:11
  Speaker 3: and fight in Taiwan for Taiwanese self determination, I'll be like, no,
• 1:39:18
  Speaker 3: go fuck yourself. But if the government said to me,
• 1:39:22
  Speaker 3: here's a gun, defend your own property from China, I'll
• 1:39:26
  Speaker 3: be like, give me that gun. Yeah, give my woman
• 1:39:31
  Speaker 3: that gun. That gun, we will stand side by side
• 1:39:36
  Speaker 3: and shoot a thousand fucking Chinamen. Sorry, that's that's gonna
• 1:39:41
  Speaker 3: get taken out of context. Probably if we're defending our
• 1:39:45
  Speaker 3: own fucking countries, then by all means, I will fucking
• 1:39:51
  Speaker 3: kill a million people to defend to defend our own properties.
• 1:39:55
  Speaker 3: But I will not go to fucking Taiwan or Israel,
• 1:40:00
  Speaker 3: Ukraine to defend some other niggas property. You Sorry, I
• 1:40:05
  Speaker 3: keep dropping the you know what that was? That was appropriate,
• 1:40:10
  Speaker 3: That was an appropriate use of it.
• 1:40:11
  Speaker 1: Fuck you there you go. But but here's here's the thing.
• 1:40:15
  Speaker 1: You if if it's worth doing men will step up
• 1:40:19
  Speaker 1: to do it, mm hmm if they. If our country
• 1:40:23
  Speaker 1: were to actually be invaded, men would step up to
• 1:40:26
  Speaker 1: defend it, and women would too. Yeah. And and when
• 1:40:31
  Speaker 1: it comes to enlistment in the military, it is almost exclusively,
• 1:40:36
  Speaker 1: you know, male when it comes to men who go
• 1:40:40
  Speaker 1: in expecting to be in combat, any kind of combat. Rule.
• 1:40:47
  Speaker 1: A few women have sued for that, but most women
• 1:40:50
  Speaker 1: they don't.
• 1:40:51
  Speaker 2: They don't want that, but right, and they and they shouldn't,
• 1:40:54
  Speaker 2: and they wouldn't unless it becomes such a dire situation
• 1:41:00
  Speaker 2: where oh my god, all of our men are are dying,
• 1:41:04
  Speaker 2: and I need to take up arms to defend this country, right,
• 1:41:09
  Speaker 2: and you know, thankfully we have enough competent males, right,
• 1:41:16
  Speaker 2: or or just male bodies, because that's really all that
• 1:41:20
  Speaker 2: it takes, right for someone to pick up a gun
• 1:41:25
  Speaker 2: and shoot it at an enemy and fire a bullet
• 1:41:29
  Speaker 2: into their fucking.
• 1:41:33
  Speaker 1: I don't to buy the sales pitch that you're gonna
• 1:41:35
  Speaker 1: learn all kinds of skills and get all kinds of
• 1:41:37
  Speaker 1: prestige and be more employable, get your college paid for
• 1:41:42
  Speaker 1: so that you can get yanked out of all of
• 1:41:44
  Speaker 1: that and sent over to desert storm or Desert Shield
• 1:41:47
  Speaker 1: or Somalia or you know, any number of the places
• 1:41:51
  Speaker 1: that Gen xers were sent to, and and so on
• 1:41:53
  Speaker 1: and and whatever conflicts zoomers and millennials are being sent
• 1:41:59
  Speaker 1: to now without fulfilling any of the promises that the
• 1:42:04
  Speaker 1: military made.
• 1:42:06
  Speaker 2: Well, yeah, I mean, and that's that's what that's what
• 1:42:10
  Speaker 2: it has turned into. But I'm saying, in a situation
• 1:42:15
  Speaker 2: of actual warfare, do you know what I mean? Like,
• 1:42:20
  Speaker 2: the women, the women who would actually stand up and
• 1:42:25
  Speaker 2: take arms and go into battle are few and far between,
• 1:42:30
  Speaker 2: you know, and and fully.
• 1:42:32
  Speaker 1: Capable of preparing themselves without joining the military exactly.
• 1:42:37
  Speaker 4: So you know, we're talking, we're we're talking.
• 1:42:42
  Speaker 2: In different like, we're speaking in different tongues almost right
• 1:42:47
  Speaker 2: because we're we're thinking about the situations that have happened before.
• 1:42:54
  Speaker 4: Us, and we're talking about what we're.
• 1:42:58
  Speaker 2: What we're actually fake sing right now, and it's just
• 1:43:02
  Speaker 2: a completely different situation, right Like we are we are
• 1:43:10
  Speaker 2: theoretically thinking about what a war could look like, and we're.
• 1:43:21
  Speaker 6: These people who are.
• 1:43:26
  Speaker 2: These people, these women who want to be a part
• 1:43:29
  Speaker 2: of this army now have absolutely no idea of what
• 1:43:36
  Speaker 2: it actually means to be in war.
• 1:43:40
  Speaker 4: Yeah, and defend a country, and well.
• 1:43:44
  Speaker 1: They certainly don't have much understanding of the history of it.
• 1:43:48
  Speaker 2: No, no, And you know, I mean, they're either going
• 1:43:54
  Speaker 2: to learn the hard way or we're going to actually
• 1:43:58
  Speaker 2: correct the sitution situation. And it just sounds so fucking
• 1:44:06
  Speaker 2: bad because correcting correcting the situation means means.
• 1:44:19
  Speaker 1: It means, it means kind of a reset, doesn't it. Yeah, yeah, yeah,
• 1:44:26
  Speaker 1: the great reset that the elites are talking about. Though. No,
• 1:44:30
  Speaker 1: the societill collapse unfortunately, and that's where we're headed.
• 1:44:34
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 1:44:35
  Speaker 1: The last thing that I'll bring up. This is from
• 1:44:38
  Speaker 1: their statement of Let's see if I can find the
• 1:44:41
  Speaker 1: first page of it here. So the title is building
• 1:44:44
  Speaker 1: a Better Workplace a sexual Harassment assault Prevention Program for
• 1:44:47
  Speaker 1: active duty members. This is their description of what the
• 1:44:52
  Speaker 1: grant is paying for, basically a report on that. So
• 1:44:57
  Speaker 1: it tells the contracting organization the principal investigator.
• 1:45:01
  Speaker 2: Uh.
• 1:45:01
  Speaker 1: And it's been prepared for the US Army Medical Research
• 1:45:05
  Speaker 1: and Development Command, which interestingly buys a lot of monkeys.
• 1:45:12
  Speaker 1: That's another thing that I discovered. The military has spent
• 1:45:15
  Speaker 1: quite a bit of money buying research monkeys. I wonder
• 1:45:19
  Speaker 1: what those are for. MM hmmm, we probably shouldn't they
• 1:45:24
  Speaker 1: get to that too far? But yeah, So what is
• 1:45:30
  Speaker 1: accomplished under these the goals? Their goals being let's see
• 1:45:38
  Speaker 1: design documents and obtain UH sign offs. Developed theoretically and
• 1:45:48
  Speaker 1: empirically based program. The program has been developed, UH, and
• 1:45:55
  Speaker 1: it's starting to be implemented. Usability tests completed, Reports and
• 1:46:01
  Speaker 1: manuscripts have been written. The staff is now implementing the program.
• 1:46:06
  Speaker 1: And here is what it's. What's accomplished under these goals
• 1:46:10
  Speaker 1: identify attitudes and beliefs towards sexual harassment and sexual assault. Wait,
• 1:46:15
  Speaker 1: mentioned among junior enlisted service members?
• 1:46:18
  Speaker 2: Wait?
• 1:46:20
  Speaker 1: Yeah, dogs? What what do these people think of sexual
• 1:46:27
  Speaker 1: harassment and sexual assault?
• 1:46:28
  Speaker 4: That's it.
• 1:46:30
  Speaker 1: It's basically the same kind of survey that feminists have
• 1:46:33
  Speaker 1: done in university settings, in high school settings and social
• 1:46:39
  Speaker 1: settings and so on.
• 1:46:43
  Speaker 4: Did you say dogs? Did you not say dogs?
• 1:46:45
  Speaker 1: Am?
• 1:46:46
  Speaker 4: I am? I?
• 1:46:48
  Speaker 2: What?
• 1:46:49
  Speaker 1: No? I didn't say dogs?
• 1:46:51
  Speaker 5: What did you say?
• 1:46:53
  Speaker 1: I don't know what I said? That sounded like dogs,
• 1:46:55
  Speaker 1: but probably it came out sounded my.
• 1:47:01
  Speaker 4: Speak.
• 1:47:01
  Speaker 6: They recruited, they've recruited.
• 1:47:08
  Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, all right, so it says this year we
• 1:47:14
  Speaker 1: completed the analysis of data.
• 1:47:15
  Speaker 3: The record I would even give my dog a gun.
• 1:47:18
  Speaker 1: Yeah, there you go. The analysis of data from in
• 1:47:22
  Speaker 1: depth interviews. So it's all survey interviews, all right, conducted
• 1:47:28
  Speaker 1: with airmen twenty twenty eight. Twenty eight airmen number equals
• 1:47:34
  Speaker 1: twenty eight in April twenty twenty one to July twenty
• 1:47:41
  Speaker 1: twenty one. All right, I want to go back to
• 1:47:44
  Speaker 1: a previous page here. Alright, I want you to remember
• 1:47:47
  Speaker 1: what I just said. They interviewed twenty one airmen. Let's see,
• 1:47:53
  Speaker 1: this is the University of Health. The cost of this
• 1:47:58
  Speaker 1: particular three point zero million dollars. We found that airman
• 1:48:09
  Speaker 1: had mixed beliefs as to win. An incident is considered
• 1:48:13
  Speaker 1: sexual harassment and sexual assault, Oh my god, which is
• 1:48:17
  Speaker 1: pretty much normal. Like people have different opinions regarding levels
• 1:48:25
  Speaker 1: of intoxication that cause a sex act to become non consensual?
• 1:48:32
  Speaker 1: Who is the perpetrator in such an incident? For instance,
• 1:48:38
  Speaker 1: when I was at university, I had a classmate used
• 1:48:42
  Speaker 1: to go to parties when she was in high school.
• 1:48:43
  Speaker 1: She talked about this when we were at university together.
• 1:48:46
  Speaker 1: But she used to go to parties when she was
• 1:48:48
  Speaker 1: in high school and she would get drunk and then
• 1:48:50
  Speaker 1: she would just grab some guy by the shirt, drag
• 1:48:52
  Speaker 1: him off into another room and go fuck him. And
• 1:48:55
  Speaker 1: then she took women's studies and she found out scare
• 1:49:00
  Speaker 1: Crows quotes that she had been raped like forty sometimes
• 1:49:05
  Speaker 1: because dragged off to another room and fucked while she
• 1:49:10
  Speaker 1: was drunk. We're perpetrators, even though she initiated the situation
• 1:49:17
  Speaker 1: and they were also drunk because they were men.
• 1:49:21
  Speaker 4: So glad I never went to college.
• 1:49:25
  Speaker 1: Yeah, we had a really heated argument about that. Whose
• 1:49:33
  Speaker 1: idea was it, who grabbed who, who initiated things? Did
• 1:49:38
  Speaker 1: any of them ever drag their heels? You know, maybe
• 1:49:42
  Speaker 1: you're the rapist? She got really mad when I said
• 1:49:44
  Speaker 1: that part. How drunk were they? Did they just have
• 1:49:52
  Speaker 1: a beer and you had six? Or did they have
• 1:49:55
  Speaker 1: just as much as you did and were barely stumbling
• 1:49:57
  Speaker 1: when you dragged them off at you know, like, you know,
• 1:50:01
  Speaker 1: did any of them ever feel bad about it? Later on?
• 1:50:04
  Speaker 1: You know, like we was pretty knocked down, drag out
• 1:50:07
  Speaker 1: because she was ready to hit me by the time
• 1:50:09
  Speaker 1: we were done with that conversation.
• 1:50:10
  Speaker 3: You're not even allowed to ask those questions in the UK, It's.
• 1:50:16
  Speaker 1: Yeah, because you can't imagine, You can't imagine that the
• 1:50:21
  Speaker 1: woman might be the aggressor. Right, So the two of
• 1:50:23
  Speaker 1: us had very different attitudes about whether what happened in
• 1:50:28
  Speaker 1: those instances constituted his sex crime and also who was
• 1:50:35
  Speaker 1: the bad guy if it did, right? So of course,
• 1:50:41
  Speaker 1: I mean, it wouldn't be surprising. This is not new information.
• 1:50:45
  Speaker 1: Airman had mixed beliefs as to when an incident is
• 1:50:47
  Speaker 1: considered sexual harassment sexual assault. Okay, they spent three million
• 1:50:52
  Speaker 1: dollars to ask twenty one or twenty eight airman questions
• 1:50:56
  Speaker 1: about it and learn something that we already knew about people.
• 1:51:02
  Speaker 4: Great, wait, how much money?
• 1:51:05
  Speaker 1: Three million.
• 1:51:07
  Speaker 6: For twenty eight twenty eight?
• 1:51:12
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm like, I hope they did something besides ask
• 1:51:15
  Speaker 1: those twenty eight people, because like that's three million.
• 1:51:20
  Speaker 2: How, oh my god, where where is this when we
• 1:51:25
  Speaker 2: were breaking down the whole fucking oh my god, twenty
• 1:51:33
  Speaker 2: eight people had to be asked and it took any
• 1:51:40
  Speaker 2: kind of million dollars to figure this the fuck out?
• 1:51:46
  Speaker 4: Jesus Jesus.
• 1:51:48
  Speaker 1: Yeah, then we have this one. Okay. Airmen who know
• 1:51:52
  Speaker 1: the offender or perceive an incident as having low severity
• 1:51:57
  Speaker 1: are less likely to consider an incident axtual harassment or
• 1:52:00
  Speaker 1: sexual assault and are less likely to report it, so
• 1:52:05
  Speaker 1: the the perceive an incident as having low severity, meaning
• 1:52:10
  Speaker 1: they don't perceive an incident as having done great harm,
• 1:52:16
  Speaker 1: right like I had. I had a coworker flirt with
• 1:52:21
  Speaker 1: me when I worked at the gas station. I have
• 1:52:22
  Speaker 1: no idea why, right, but because I I was already
• 1:52:27
  Speaker 1: a mom at that point, I already had three kids, Like,
• 1:52:31
  Speaker 1: what the heck are you flirting with me for.
• 1:52:33
  Speaker 4: Mills?
• 1:52:35
  Speaker 1: He was a mill?
• 1:52:36
  Speaker 4: Hello?
• 1:52:38
  Speaker 1: But that was somebody else's wife. That that really kind
• 1:52:41
  Speaker 1: of that always doesn't populated some people.
• 1:52:44
  Speaker 4: Okay, no, you're you're right.
• 1:52:46
  Speaker 1: It didn't stop some people, right, But it wasn't upsetting, right,
• 1:52:51
  Speaker 1: and it it never was an incident where like when
• 1:52:54
  Speaker 1: I said, you know, I'm not not doing this, I'm not.
• 1:52:56
  Speaker 1: This is a bad idea. You know, what the hell
• 1:52:58
  Speaker 1: are you doing trying to get get DIBs on sloppy
• 1:53:01
  Speaker 1: seconds from somebody else's marriage when you can be dating
• 1:53:04
  Speaker 1: somebody who's single and uh, you know, brreon to go.
• 1:53:09
  Speaker 1: And that was the end of it. And I didn't
• 1:53:11
  Speaker 1: feel harassed by that. There wasn't a pattern of behavior.
• 1:53:14
  Speaker 1: There was a five minute conversation and then, and I
• 1:53:17
  Speaker 1: never had a problem again, So why would I report
• 1:53:22
  Speaker 1: that to somebody? What's the point just getting somebody in
• 1:53:27
  Speaker 1: trouble because the problem was solved. Yeah, it's done, like you.
• 1:53:37
  Speaker 1: So I wonder how many times in this twenty eight
• 1:53:40
  Speaker 1: airman interview there were incidents where something happened that could
• 1:53:47
  Speaker 1: be considered sexual misconduct and the perpetrator was known to
• 1:53:53
  Speaker 1: the victim, and the victim went, you know that that
• 1:53:56
  Speaker 1: was pretty shitty. I would rather not do that again,
• 1:53:59
  Speaker 1: or hey, you know you can get trouble for doing that.
• 1:54:01
  Speaker 1: Don't do that again. It doesn't bother me, but it
• 1:54:04
  Speaker 1: might bother somebody else if you do it to them. Uh.
• 1:54:07
  Speaker 1: And and then they recalled that incident during the prevention
• 1:54:15
  Speaker 1: training survey and and this was the result. Oh, they
• 1:54:19
  Speaker 1: didn't think they didn't take it seriously, Like, well, there's
• 1:54:23
  Speaker 1: sometimes it's serious and sometimes it's not.
• 1:54:26
  Speaker 3: M h.
• 1:54:28
  Speaker 1: And if you've experienced serious you pretty well learn to
• 1:54:31
  Speaker 1: differentiate between when it's serious and when it's not, because
• 1:54:33
  Speaker 1: you don't want to be on edge all the time. So,
• 1:54:39
  Speaker 1: just for the record, none of my kids are named Stacy.
• 1:54:41
  Speaker 6: It's heard, uh, but yeah, Stacy's mom, she's got it
• 1:54:50
  Speaker 6: going on.
• 1:54:50
  Speaker 4: I get I'm not even reading the chat, but I get.
• 1:54:53
  Speaker 1: It because you were Stacy's Uh, that's crazy. It was
• 1:55:02
  Speaker 1: in a uniform that looked like a freaking bowling shirt. Like,
• 1:55:07
  Speaker 1: what the hell is that E've been doing?
• 1:55:10
  Speaker 4: Doesn't matter, you still gotta going on, Hannah.
• 1:55:13
  Speaker 1: But I made the cookies. That's the thing. When you
• 1:55:18
  Speaker 1: make the cookies, you're the hot mom. But yeah, airman
• 1:55:23
  Speaker 1: who knew the offender might have might have worked things
• 1:55:27
  Speaker 1: out with the offender, right, Airman who perceived an incident
• 1:55:30
  Speaker 1: is having low severity, while maybe maybe to them the
• 1:55:35
  Speaker 1: incident wasn't a big deal, and maybe again because of that,
• 1:55:39
  Speaker 1: they worked it out with the offender, right, So then
• 1:55:44
  Speaker 1: why would they go report it to somebody if the
• 1:55:46
  Speaker 1: problem is solved. Other factors that influenced Airman's intention to
• 1:55:49
  Speaker 1: report include fear of hurting the offender's career, perception that
• 1:55:53
  Speaker 1: there will be no consequences for the offender. So there's
• 1:55:57
  Speaker 1: the first thing, right, So again I have to bring
• 1:56:02
  Speaker 1: up thirty years, thirty years of us as civilians hearing
• 1:56:08
  Speaker 1: about this problem existing in the military, right, and the
• 1:56:12
  Speaker 1: military having to take measures and continuing to take measures
• 1:56:17
  Speaker 1: for the last thirty years to address this problem, and
• 1:56:21
  Speaker 1: all these feminists led initiatives and all these organizations that
• 1:56:26
  Speaker 1: have been paid individually millions collectively billions of dollars to
• 1:56:31
  Speaker 1: address this issue. And one of the factors that keeps
• 1:56:35
  Speaker 1: airmen from reporting is the perception that there will be
• 1:56:37
  Speaker 1: no consequence for the offender. How did they not address
• 1:56:41
  Speaker 1: that sooner?
• 1:56:47
  Speaker 4: Like?
• 1:56:47
  Speaker 1: How with feminists leading the way, feminists determining what they
• 1:56:52
  Speaker 1: were going to do in the military in response to
• 1:56:55
  Speaker 1: this type of that they never came up with a
• 1:56:58
  Speaker 1: system that could reassure airmen or uh marines or army
• 1:57:08
  Speaker 1: soldiers right, Navy soldiers, sailors that when they report to
• 1:57:16
  Speaker 1: one of their superior officers that that this has happened
• 1:57:19
  Speaker 1: to them, that something would be done about it and
• 1:57:24
  Speaker 1: the individual would have face consequences and at least retraining
• 1:57:29
  Speaker 1: of some sort fear of repercussions if they report the incident,
• 1:57:34
  Speaker 1: particularly if the offender is higher ranking. So I work
• 1:57:39
  Speaker 1: in in in a job that is low paying, not
• 1:57:45
  Speaker 1: commonly done by people you know in the US. It's
• 1:57:49
  Speaker 1: in a health it's in the healthcare field, but it's
• 1:57:51
  Speaker 1: for a nonprofit organization. It is the kind of work
• 1:57:57
  Speaker 1: that like, we do have a chain of command and
• 1:58:00
  Speaker 1: in my workplace, and in fact, human resources and the
• 1:58:07
  Speaker 1: chain of command in my workplace is the same ladder. Okay,
• 1:58:13
  Speaker 1: but if something like that happen to me, I would
• 1:58:16
  Speaker 1: I have a workaround. I have another direction. I can
• 1:58:20
  Speaker 1: go for reporting that bypasses that whole chain of command.
• 1:58:24
  Speaker 1: If that, if it was on that chain of command,
• 1:58:27
  Speaker 1: I can go over the head of the person who
• 1:58:32
  Speaker 1: is responsible, or I can go around that chain. And
• 1:58:38
  Speaker 1: that's been that way in the civilian world forever for
• 1:58:42
  Speaker 1: as long as there's been this type of dealing with
• 1:58:48
  Speaker 1: sexual harassment and sexual misconduct and any other kind of
• 1:58:51
  Speaker 1: conflict between men and women in the workplace or women
• 1:58:56
  Speaker 1: and women in the workplace, because that actually happens quite
• 1:58:58
  Speaker 1: a bit too. But apparently thirty years of feminist interference
• 1:59:05
  Speaker 1: with the military has not led to a similar system.
• 1:59:09
  Speaker 1: Billions of dollars of feminist influence in the military has
• 1:59:12
  Speaker 1: not led to a similar system. And then also they're
• 1:59:18
  Speaker 1: afraid of being blamed, which again, how did feminists not
• 1:59:23
  Speaker 1: change that? Like, feminists are useless. You had thirty years
• 1:59:31
  Speaker 1: of access here, they had billions of dollars and they get.
• 1:59:35
  Speaker 1: These are the attitudes they were complaining about in the
• 1:59:39
  Speaker 1: nineteen seventies, like feminists are useless. Yeah, they are.
• 1:59:56
  Speaker 4: I think.
• 1:59:58
  Speaker 2: It's only because of their academic stronghold that they still
• 2:00:04
  Speaker 2: have any type of relevance. I mean, and not even that,
• 2:00:09
  Speaker 2: because they they absolutely do have relevance within within our society,
• 2:00:16
  Speaker 2: because they have been for so long such a major
• 2:00:22
  Speaker 2: part in in the.
• 2:00:27
  Speaker 4: Oh God, in in.
• 2:00:32
  Speaker 1: Everything and everything. It's in the in the medical field,
• 2:00:39
  Speaker 1: it's in the education fields, administration, every.
• 2:00:44
  Speaker 5: In everywhere, and and so they know that, you know,
• 2:00:48
  Speaker 5: there's they have the stronghold.
• 2:00:51
  Speaker 2: So how in the world is anyone any any men's
• 2:00:56
  Speaker 2: rights advocate, How how are we going to you know,
• 2:01:00
  Speaker 2: try to hold you know, do anything against them. But
• 2:01:07
  Speaker 2: you know, it's just gonna be so blaringly obvious to
• 2:01:13
  Speaker 2: anyone when it comes down to, you know, a fight
• 2:01:20
  Speaker 2: of disproportion.
• 2:01:23
  Speaker 4: Right, So.
• 2:01:29
  Speaker 5: Then it's it's just gonna be interesting to see.
• 2:01:33
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, when we look at this and we
• 2:01:36
  Speaker 1: see this, this, this paragraph is pretty much an admission
• 2:01:42
  Speaker 1: of failure. Yeah, of the system that feminists imposed on
• 2:01:46
  Speaker 1: the military m h between the nineteen nineties and today.
• 2:01:53
  Speaker 4: Mm hmm.
• 2:01:54
  Speaker 1: That's that's all that is. All that is is a
• 2:01:57
  Speaker 1: paragraph of we we we knew nothing, we got nothing done.
• 2:02:02
  Speaker 1: We sat on our thumbs. We had no effect, no
• 2:02:06
  Speaker 1: impact on the experience of the soldiers, and we no
• 2:02:11
  Speaker 1: impact on the knowledge and understanding of the soldiers. Ye like,
• 2:02:15
  Speaker 1: that's what they're saying right there. And so they have
• 2:02:18
  Speaker 1: to do this whole new training creation, and then they
• 2:02:24
  Speaker 1: had to study to see whether that training works.
• 2:02:30
  Speaker 2: Like that.
• 2:02:30
  Speaker 1: That's literally what they've admitted here. And I want to
• 2:02:36
  Speaker 1: remind you, all right, just just going back here, this
• 2:02:40
  Speaker 1: individual study three million dollars, University of Texas Health Science
• 2:02:45
  Speaker 1: Center at Houston one one hundred ninety two point three million, right,
• 2:02:55
  Speaker 1: and ASM Research two point one billion, just since two
• 2:03:03
  Speaker 1: thousand and two, and they have achieved nothing zero. You fail, it's.
• 2:03:17
  Speaker 3: Less than zero. I mean, don't give them too much credit.
• 2:03:20
  Speaker 3: It's considerably less than zero.
• 2:03:23
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Actually in the negative, things are apparently worse because
• 2:03:28
  Speaker 1: they've spent tons of money and they've confused people about gender,
• 2:03:33
  Speaker 1: but they haven't solved the problem of sexual harassment sexual
• 2:03:37
  Speaker 1: assault the military, which is such.
• 2:03:41
  Speaker 6: A major problem.
• 2:03:43
  Speaker 5: Oh my god, we gotta stop.
• 2:03:46
  Speaker 1: Well, if we took women out of the military, most
• 2:03:48
  Speaker 1: of it would be solved. Yes, yep, that's right there.
• 2:03:54
  Speaker 1: But yeah, that's you can't say that, right, you can't.
• 2:03:58
  Speaker 1: You can't suggest that me be integration general integration in
• 2:04:02
  Speaker 1: the military. It's a bad idea.
• 2:04:05
  Speaker 4: Yeah, oh my god.
• 2:04:07
  Speaker 1: So that's where we are, that's where we've been. Can
• 2:04:10
  Speaker 1: you can you spare a fortune? Brother? Can you spare
• 2:04:14
  Speaker 1: a fortune for those poor helpless women that can't find
• 2:04:19
  Speaker 1: anything else to do with their lives? But fuck up
• 2:04:22
  Speaker 1: the military And with that, I think we have killed
• 2:04:28
  Speaker 1: the subject. I think we pretty much. There really isn't
• 2:04:33
  Speaker 1: anything else to say about this, honestly, no, I mean,
• 2:04:40
  Speaker 1: it's not clost effective to have a military that that
• 2:04:45
  Speaker 1: integrates men and women together in uh military service.
• 2:04:57
  Speaker 2: No, nothing at all, you know, And you know what
• 2:05:03
  Speaker 2: you're going to be left with is a bunch of
• 2:05:06
  Speaker 2: fucking angry I'm sorry to say it, but dice who
• 2:05:13
  Speaker 2: are mad because they have lost something.
• 2:05:17
  Speaker 4: That they felt that they have a place in being.
• 2:05:22
  Speaker 2: You know, and listen, there is going there is such
• 2:05:32
  Speaker 2: a rearrangement of employment that's happening right now, right now
• 2:05:42
  Speaker 2: and probably for the next four years because of the
• 2:05:45
  Speaker 2: way that our society is being restructured, and it's mostly
• 2:05:52
  Speaker 2: important due to.
• 2:05:56
  Speaker 4: You know the fact that Trump is here and he is.
• 2:06:03
  Speaker 2: You know, emphasizing the different areas in which we need
• 2:06:09
  Speaker 2: to be focused on.
• 2:06:10
  Speaker 5: But you know, I mean there is a job like
• 2:06:17
  Speaker 5: jobs like mine are going to be gone.
• 2:06:21
  Speaker 2: You know, there's a lot of jobs that are going
• 2:06:25
  Speaker 2: to not be existent unless you know how to adapt.
• 2:06:31
  Speaker 4: And you know, so these it feels like just like.
• 2:06:43
  Speaker 1: Just like the.
• 2:06:47
  Speaker 2: The postal service, right, because that's really is a job.
• 2:06:52
  Speaker 2: It's really is something that people go to just to
• 2:06:56
  Speaker 2: have a job. Those jobs are going to be gone,
• 2:07:01
  Speaker 2: right who's getting physical mail?
• 2:07:08
  Speaker 1: Amazon is going to drone delivery exactly right in them?
• 2:07:12
  Speaker 2: Like these these services are being incorporated into one another, yeah,
• 2:07:20
  Speaker 2: by these bigger and bigger companies. So you know a
• 2:07:26
  Speaker 2: lot of these jobs people are going to have to
• 2:07:29
  Speaker 2: find a place to go, a place to be.
• 2:07:32
  Speaker 4: You know, they're being pushed.
• 2:07:34
  Speaker 2: Out and maybe for rightful reason, but you know you're
• 2:07:39
  Speaker 2: gonna have to find some actual skills.
• 2:07:43
  Speaker 1: Yeah, you know, there's there's some jobs that will be
• 2:07:48
  Speaker 1: around for longer. It's going to take a much more
• 2:07:50
  Speaker 1: complex system to replace caregivers and nurses than it will
• 2:07:55
  Speaker 1: to replace data entry specialists and people who well, for instance,
• 2:08:03
  Speaker 1: with mail, a significant amount of what used to be
• 2:08:07
  Speaker 1: sent on paper to people's homes is now being sent electronically,
• 2:08:12
  Speaker 1: and a lot of communication that used to take place
• 2:08:15
  Speaker 1: through the post office is now taking place through that
• 2:08:18
  Speaker 1: little pocket computer that everybody keeps calling a phone and
• 2:08:23
  Speaker 1: your mobile device does so much other stuff.
• 2:08:26
  Speaker 4: Yeah, and.
• 2:08:29
  Speaker 1: We used to call mobile devices that did about ten
• 2:08:33
  Speaker 1: percent of what the mobile devices we call phones today
• 2:08:37
  Speaker 1: can do. Personal assistance electronic personal assistance and personal assistant
• 2:08:44
  Speaker 1: used to be a widespread job. There are still people
• 2:08:47
  Speaker 1: that use personal assistance that are like human as you know,
• 2:08:52
  Speaker 1: like they'll hire personal assistance. But everyone has an electronic
• 2:08:59
  Speaker 1: person assistant now in their pocket, and as a result,
• 2:09:02
  Speaker 1: there's a significant amount of what used to be done
• 2:09:05
  Speaker 1: on paper that is just not anymore. My old profession,
• 2:09:10
  Speaker 1: I had a twenty five year career as a professional
• 2:09:14
  Speaker 1: wedding photographer. That is a dying industry. If you don't
• 2:09:19
  Speaker 1: have a gimmick. It's like the the the song from
• 2:09:27
  Speaker 1: that movie about Gypsy rose Lee. You gotta have a
• 2:09:31
  Speaker 1: gimmick if you want to win it. But they you
• 2:09:35
  Speaker 1: have to be doing something unique or different. At least
• 2:09:40
  Speaker 1: it doesn't have to be something nobody else is doing,
• 2:09:42
  Speaker 1: but it has to be something that's maybe unusual. Before
• 2:09:47
  Speaker 1: people will spend a few thousand dollars getting a wedding
• 2:09:52
  Speaker 1: album created by you, and it used to be pretty common.
• 2:09:57
  Speaker 1: Of course, it wasn't a few thousand dollars. I think
• 2:09:58
  Speaker 1: we shelled out. We had people shelling out between five
• 2:10:03
  Speaker 1: hundred and one thousand, depending on how many services, Like
• 2:10:07
  Speaker 1: if we made a video and everything, then it was
• 2:10:09
  Speaker 1: more because there's a lot of work that goes into that, right.
• 2:10:14
  Speaker 1: But people are having, you know, their their aunt or
• 2:10:18
  Speaker 1: their their uncle or their cousin do a lot of photography.
• 2:10:22
  Speaker 1: People are buying disposable cameras and then uploading the pictures
• 2:10:26
  Speaker 1: to a DVD and sending them out to family members.
• 2:10:31
  Speaker 1: People are just gathering the pictures from their family members'
• 2:10:34
  Speaker 1: phones right setting up their phones to record, and and
• 2:10:39
  Speaker 1: so on and and so you see a lot more
• 2:10:42
  Speaker 1: weddings that aren't getting covered anymore.
• 2:10:46
  Speaker 3: I used to have to deliver letters for a living
• 2:10:51
  Speaker 3: and small packages. I would leave it up to the
• 2:10:53
  Speaker 3: drivers to deliver the loads packages. I assume in the
• 2:10:57
  Speaker 3: future it's going to be drunk delivering the large packages,
• 2:11:03
  Speaker 3: or at least the medium sized packages. But it's going
• 2:11:06
  Speaker 3: to be left up to the humans to deliver the letters,
• 2:11:11
  Speaker 3: because you can't give such an unimportant job to robots.
• 2:11:17
  Speaker 3: If ever, I do need to return to His Majesty's
• 2:11:21
  Speaker 3: pleasure delivering letters, it's nice to know I'll be able
• 2:11:25
  Speaker 3: to unless unless any of that is side swiped by
• 2:11:31
  Speaker 3: anyone who gets in touch with the Royal Male and says,
• 2:11:35
  Speaker 3: don't give this guy a job, he's a fascist. Luckily
• 2:11:40
  Speaker 3: I won't have to return to that job. As long
• 2:11:43
  Speaker 3: as you'll keep me above board.
• 2:11:48
  Speaker 2: You'll be delivering your large packages over here, thank you, hopefully.
• 2:11:55
  Speaker 3: Yeah, maybe maybe of FedEx.
• 2:12:00
  Speaker 1: Yeah, there are tons of delivery services over here. Drone
• 2:12:05
  Speaker 1: delivery is basically used just in the circumstances where the
• 2:12:10
  Speaker 1: package is just getting dropped off and nobody has to
• 2:12:13
  Speaker 1: sign for it or anything like that. I don't think
• 2:12:15
  Speaker 1: that drones are sophisticated enough yet to get signatures, but
• 2:12:20
  Speaker 1: they have a camera on them so they can prove
• 2:12:23
  Speaker 1: they delivered the package. But uh, but there are still
• 2:12:30
  Speaker 1: human delivery for if it if it requires a signature,
• 2:12:35
  Speaker 1: and uh, and then there's a whole section of deliveries
• 2:12:40
  Speaker 1: that require signatures that after you've signed for it, you
• 2:12:43
  Speaker 1: find out you got to go to court and stuff
• 2:12:44
  Speaker 1: like that. Those are usually delivered by cops though, But
• 2:12:48
  Speaker 1: in any case, Yeah, it's it's gonna be a brave
• 2:12:53
  Speaker 1: new world with regard to employment options. And I understand
• 2:12:57
  Speaker 1: why women are wanting more and more access to men's
• 2:13:01
  Speaker 1: employment options. But the reality is, if this is the
• 2:13:07
  Speaker 1: result for the employer, it's not cost effective to hire women.
• 2:13:15
  Speaker 1: If feminists can't straighten their shit out and either solve
• 2:13:21
  Speaker 1: the problems that they claim to exist to address or
• 2:13:25
  Speaker 1: like get off the pot shit or get off the
• 2:13:27
  Speaker 1: pot feminists, then all they are doing is making it
• 2:13:32
  Speaker 1: less cost effective to hire women. So I don't think
• 2:13:38
  Speaker 1: we have any more super chats. I don't think we
• 2:13:40
  Speaker 1: have any more rumbel rants do we have. I don't
• 2:13:42
  Speaker 1: think we have any more We do have a super chat.
• 2:13:48
  Speaker 1: So I don't know if I read this one or not.
• 2:13:50
  Speaker 1: Meredith g was five dollars and said when men go
• 2:13:53
  Speaker 1: on strike, society loses its basic needs and comforts. When
• 2:13:57
  Speaker 1: women go on strike, Yeah, I read this. Your children
• 2:14:00
  Speaker 1: become messed up in all moral foundations fly out the
• 2:14:02
  Speaker 1: window as traditional morality is placed, replaced by a victim narrative.
• 2:14:06
  Speaker 1: Welcome to decades of women on strike, and I think
• 2:14:09
  Speaker 1: it's salient as a as a point to end with, because.
• 2:14:13
  Speaker 3: There's no such thing as men going on strike. If
• 2:14:16
  Speaker 3: there was, humanity would have it dissolved.
• 2:14:22
  Speaker 1: There's workers in certain industries going on strike, right, But
• 2:14:27
  Speaker 1: when I was in high school, I took calculus from
• 2:14:29
  Speaker 1: a teacher who was a teacher because it was illegal
• 2:14:35
  Speaker 1: for him to go on strike during the nineteen eighties
• 2:14:40
  Speaker 1: when his industry went on strike. He was an air
• 2:14:43
  Speaker 1: traffic controller. We just talked about that not too long ago.
• 2:14:47
  Speaker 3: Too.
• 2:14:47
  Speaker 1: We don't we don't do right by air traffic controllers,
• 2:14:50
  Speaker 1: I will say that. And you know they they they
• 2:14:56
  Speaker 1: need the proper tools to do their job if you
• 2:15:00
  Speaker 1: don't want people to die in the hundreds and thousands,
• 2:15:04
  Speaker 1: and they also need the proper environment to do their job.
• 2:15:10
  Speaker 1: It's a very stressful job and it's made a lot
• 2:15:14
  Speaker 1: worse by lack of proper equipment and poor hours and
• 2:15:20
  Speaker 1: so on. So in the eighties that that sort of
• 2:15:24
  Speaker 1: hit a peak. This is a big problem situation, and
• 2:15:29
  Speaker 1: the government wasn't listening to them, and they went on
• 2:15:31
  Speaker 1: strike and they all got fired by Ronald Reagan. And
• 2:15:36
  Speaker 1: I lucked out personally by getting to have this man
• 2:15:39
  Speaker 1: as a teacher, but I think that the system did
• 2:15:47
  Speaker 1: not luck out by losing him as an air traffic controller.
• 2:15:51
  Speaker 1: And so yeah, men on men. When men participate in strikes,
• 2:15:58
  Speaker 1: regardless of what industry there in, it results in such
• 2:16:03
  Speaker 1: a disaster that there are industries that are primarily made
• 2:16:08
  Speaker 1: up of men that the law says you can't strike right,
• 2:16:15
  Speaker 1: whereas it's a very rare thing for there to be
• 2:16:18
  Speaker 1: an industry. I think the education industry, maybe they're not
• 2:16:21
  Speaker 1: allowed to strike, but not very many industries are banned
• 2:16:25
  Speaker 1: from going on strike that are primarily made up of women.
• 2:16:30
  Speaker 1: And there's a reason for that. So thanks everybody for
• 2:16:34
  Speaker 1: going through this. I know the information we look at
• 2:16:37
  Speaker 1: that very dry, but I think the conversation was very productive.
• 2:16:41
  Speaker 1: So thanks everybody for going through that information with me.
• 2:16:45
  Speaker 1: Thanks to my two co hosts, especially for staring at
• 2:16:49
  Speaker 1: this on their screen, and you know, thanks to Brian
• 2:16:54
  Speaker 1: for helping me out to make sure this can happen,
• 2:16:57
  Speaker 1: and everybody who works in the background and make HBr
• 2:16:59
  Speaker 1: talk happen, and good night, all the girl. We will
• 2:17:04
  Speaker 1: see you next Thursday.