Latest / Luke's English Podcast / How did the diversity of life come about
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: Well, Simon, this is exciting. We've got a new sponsor.
- 0:02Speaker 2: Yeah, absolutely.
- 0:03Speaker 3: So we're being sponsored by Pingooey Bags International, who are
- 0:08Speaker 3: based in Oxford's world famous covered market.
- 0:10Speaker 1: They also have a website, don't they, where you can
- 0:12Speaker 1: buy things. But you've got one of their products in
- 0:14Speaker 1: front of you. What's that?
- 0:15Speaker 4: I do.
- 0:15Speaker 3: It's absolutely beautiful, actually. It's a smaller bag. It's called
- 0:19Speaker 3: La Petite Creperie Mini Grace. And it's from their latest,
- 0:22Speaker 3: their spring summer range. And it's a vegan leather limited
- 0:26Speaker 3: edition clutch bag.
- 0:27Speaker 2: And I have to say, it's Beautiful.
- 0:29Speaker 3: So it actually literally looks like a little shop front
- 0:32Speaker 3: and it's beautifully made.
- 0:33Speaker 2: So you have one too, Tim?
- 0:35Speaker 1: I do. So this is called the London 234 Crossbody
- 0:40Speaker 1: Go Anywhere Bag. It's made from canvas by Troop London,
- 0:44Speaker 1: a British company. It's made from eco-friendly materials and it's
- 0:49Speaker 1: beautifully handcrafted. It's got lots of pockets and it really
- 0:53Speaker 1: is fantastic. So I'm certainly going to be using this today.
- 0:58Speaker 1: Come down to the podcast with all my bits and
- 0:59Speaker 1: bobs in it.
- 1:00Speaker 2: It does suit you, actually.
- 1:02Speaker 1: No, it does.
- 1:02Speaker 4: It's great.
- 1:03Speaker 3: And so Pinguy refreshed their range twice yearly. So if
- 1:06Speaker 3: you want to know more, it's really best to head
- 1:08Speaker 3: over to their website to have a look. And we'll
- 1:11Speaker 3: provide a link at the bottom of this video.
- 1:14Speaker 1: And thank you very much, Pinguy, for sponsoring us. I
- 1:17Speaker 1: hope we sold some bags for you.
- 1:18Speaker 3: And while you're there taking a look at their website,
- 1:21Speaker 3: please also hit like and subscribe to Science of the Times.
- 1:37Speaker 2: Hi everyone, I'm Simon Callett.
- 1:40Speaker 1: And I'm Tim Colson, and welcome to another episode of
- 1:42Speaker 1: Science of the Times.
- 1:44Speaker 2: So, Tim, what have you been up to this week?
- 1:47Speaker 1: It's kind of been a fairly typical week. Yeah, I
- 1:54Speaker 1: don't really know, to be honest. I did some gardening
- 1:56Speaker 1: at the weekend. Oh, I was on, maybe that was
- 2:00Speaker 1: two weeks ago, I was on The Life Scientific. I
- 2:03Speaker 1: don't know if we talked about that, maybe not. Anyway,
- 2:05Speaker 1: if we didn't, another plug.
- 2:08Speaker 3: Well, I listened to it and it was fantastic.
- 2:11Speaker 2: Really, really cool. So well worth a listen, folks.
- 2:13Speaker 3: Listen to Jim Al-Khalili questioning Tim on Life Scientific.
- 2:18Speaker 1: Very fantastic. And actually, you have been up in Bradford.
- 2:20Speaker 1: You were doing a really big talk, weren't you, to
- 2:24Speaker 1: the British?
- 2:27Speaker 3: It was a Muslim institute inviting me to give the
- 2:30Speaker 3: second Ibn-i-Sinna lecture. And it was, yeah, it was really nice.
- 2:34Speaker 3: It was in the City Hall in Bradford. hosted by
- 2:37Speaker 3: the Lord Mayor. So it took my parents over and
- 2:40Speaker 3: they had a great time.
- 2:41Speaker 2: So it was fun.
- 2:42Speaker 1: And it went well, I assume.
- 2:44Speaker 2: I think so. Yeah, lots of questions.
- 2:46Speaker 3: Lots of interesting questions about not just science and medicine,
- 2:51Speaker 3: but AI actually. Sort of, you know, these topics that
- 2:54Speaker 3: we've covered in the podcast and come up again and again.
- 2:58Speaker 3: People sort of concerned, I think, about what the future
- 3:03Speaker 3: has in store.
- 3:03Speaker 2: When it comes to AI.
- 3:05Speaker 1: No, well, congratulations on being asked to do that. That's
- 3:07Speaker 1: a real honour. And I bet you were a bit nervous.
- 3:10Speaker 1: I would have been.
- 3:11Speaker 3: I was very nervous, especially when the mayor walked in in.
- 3:13Speaker 2: All his gold.
- 3:15Speaker 1: Oh, wow.
- 3:15Speaker 2: You know, sat there thinking, oh, better do a good
- 3:18Speaker 2: job here.
- 3:19Speaker 1: He was all blinged up, was he?
- 3:20Speaker 2: That's right.
- 3:23Speaker 4: Cool.
- 3:24Speaker 1: Well, today we've got a chap called Max Telford on.
- 3:30Speaker 1: And so he's... He's a bit like me. He's a zoologist,
- 3:34Speaker 1: but he's actually interested in the tree of life.
- 3:38Speaker 4: Cool.
- 3:38Speaker 3: And he's just written a book sort of going through
- 3:41Speaker 3: the journey and trying to solve the big question. So
- 3:44Speaker 3: where do we all come from and how are we
- 3:46Speaker 3: all related?
- 3:47Speaker 1: No, that's right. And he really focuses in particular on
- 3:49Speaker 1: the animal tree of life. But he does go right
- 3:52Speaker 1: the way back to life's beginning. So it's a good read. Well,
- 3:56Speaker 1: should we get him on?
- 3:57Speaker 2: Yeah, let's go for it.
- 3:58Speaker 1: Fantastic. So Max has now joined us on the line. Max,
- 4:03Speaker 1: would you like to introduce yourself and say a little
- 4:05Speaker 1: bit about who you are and where you are?
- 4:07Speaker 4: So I'm Max Telford. I'm a zoologist at University College London.
- 4:12Speaker 4: I've been interested for 35 years, perhaps a little bit more,
- 4:16Speaker 4: in the animal tree of life. So I'm a zoologist
- 4:19Speaker 4: rather than just a general biologist. And I've been working
- 4:23Speaker 4: on some of the thornier problems of how big animal
- 4:27Speaker 4: groups fit together and how they're related to each other.
- 4:30Speaker 1: And all the best people are zoologists. So congratulations on your, um,
- 4:38Speaker 1: new book that just came out last month. I really
- 4:40Speaker 1: enjoyed reading it. Um, it's called, um, the tree of
- 4:44Speaker 1: life solving sciences, greatest puzzle. Uh, and that's, um, that's
- 4:49Speaker 1: published by John Murray. So, um, we'll put a link
- 4:53Speaker 1: below for our, our readers, our listeners, so they can, um,
- 4:58Speaker 1: they can go and read it. And I thoroughly recommend
- 5:00Speaker 1: it's worth reading. I know you've had a look at
- 5:02Speaker 1: it as well, haven't you?
- 5:04Speaker 2: Yeah, absolutely. It was absolutely fascinating.
- 5:06Speaker 3: And I think for me, not only did I find
- 5:10Speaker 3: the book fascinating, but I was also found it fascinating,
- 5:13Speaker 3: your fascination, you know, with the tree of life and
- 5:18Speaker 3: trying to sort of get to the bottom of this, you.
- 5:22Speaker 2: Know, billion year, you know, journey really.
- 5:24Speaker 3: And sort of, I'm interested in what sort of, Before
- 5:28Speaker 3: we get into the book and what it's about, what
- 5:30Speaker 3: that motivation is and where it comes from.
- 5:32Speaker 4: Yeah, it's funny. I've been thinking about this. I became
- 5:37Speaker 4: a zoologist because I loved animals and I was interested
- 5:39Speaker 4: in natural history as a teenager. I think the two
- 5:44Speaker 4: big influences that got me going were, first, Jacques Cousteau.
- 5:49Speaker 4: I really wanted to be a marine biologist. And aged 18,
- 5:53Speaker 4: I went and trained to become a scuba diver and
- 5:55Speaker 4: then realized I got incredibly seasick. So that was kind
- 6:00Speaker 4: of ruled that one out. And the other big influence
- 6:02Speaker 4: was David Attenborough's Life on Earth series, which both the series,
- 6:06Speaker 4: which is obviously beautiful, beautifully made, you know, incredible natural
- 6:11Speaker 4: history videos, but also the book, which I, you know,
- 6:14Speaker 4: I read multiple times as a teenager. So I absolutely
- 6:17Speaker 4: loved it. zoology. But I think the other thing about
- 6:20Speaker 4: Life on Earth is that it's, in a sense, it's
- 6:23Speaker 4: a phylogenetic book. It takes a trip up the tree
- 6:28Speaker 4: of life, starting at the origin of life, four billion
- 6:31Speaker 4: years ago, and moving up sort of gradually heading towards humans.
- 6:36Speaker 4: And I sort of take, you know, rather cheekily, or
- 6:38Speaker 4: perhaps obviously, take a similar path towards the end of
- 6:41Speaker 4: my book, when I try and take a sort of
- 6:44Speaker 4: broader view of what the tree of life actually looks like,
- 6:46Speaker 4: but with a focus on ending up at humans.
- 6:49Speaker 1: And so have you always enjoyed classifying things? Because as
- 6:52Speaker 1: you talk about in the book, you know, there are
- 6:55Speaker 1: various branches to the tree of life. So I imagine
- 6:58Speaker 1: you as a kid, for example, with all of your
- 7:00Speaker 1: books in like perfect alphabetical order or pots of fossils
- 7:05Speaker 1: or something.
- 7:06Speaker 4: I'm not like that. I wasn't like that as a teenager, actually.
- 7:09Speaker 4: I was sort of more going and digging out things
- 7:11Speaker 4: out of cattle troughs and raising up mosquito larvae and
- 7:15Speaker 4: stick insects and things. So I wasn't one of these
- 7:17Speaker 4: undergraduates who already knew, you know, every species of butterfly
- 7:23Speaker 4: and et cetera. I remember there was one guy... when
- 7:26Speaker 4: I was an undergraduate who discovered a new species of
- 7:29Speaker 4: woodlouse in the college garden where his university college. I
- 7:33Speaker 4: wasn't like that. But I guess I'm more interested in
- 7:37Speaker 4: the big picture. I'm classifying. I've done some classifying. I've
- 7:41Speaker 4: named a couple of branches of the tree of life.
- 7:44Speaker 4: I guess my interest, I mean, I do have a
- 7:46Speaker 4: slightly geeky interest in more knowing the shape of it
- 7:52Speaker 4: and what that all means sort of gets tacked on later.
- 7:56Speaker 4: So I think that's a slightly geeky bit to me,
- 7:59Speaker 4: that I'm very interested in the mechanics of how we
- 8:02Speaker 4: discover the truth, what the shape of the tree of
- 8:05Speaker 4: life is. But really the point of the tree of
- 8:07Speaker 4: life is not just to classify, it's to travel back
- 8:11Speaker 4: in time and to know what happened in evolution.
- 8:14Speaker 3: So, Max, if we just take a step back for
- 8:16Speaker 3: those of our listeners who perhaps are a little bit
- 8:19Speaker 3: unfamiliar with what the Tree of Life actually means, can
- 8:21Speaker 3: you just explain what you mean when you say the
- 8:23Speaker 3: Tree of Life and what it's trying, you know, what
- 8:25Speaker 3: it does?
- 8:26Speaker 4: Well, you could sort of think of it from the
- 8:29Speaker 4: top down or from the bottom up. And from the
- 8:31Speaker 4: top down, it's like looking at everything around us today.
- 8:34Speaker 4: You can see the trees in my garden. It's London,
- 8:38Speaker 4: so there's loads of wildlife. There's foxes, there's parakeets. So
- 8:42Speaker 4: how all of those many different species of life, from
- 8:46Speaker 4: humans to plants to bacteria to fungi, how they're all related.
- 8:50Speaker 4: What's the family tree that unites all of those? Going
- 8:53Speaker 4: back in time, where did they meet in the past?
- 8:57Speaker 4: When did they have a common ancestor? But it might
- 8:59Speaker 4: be easier to think of it from the bottom up.
- 9:01Speaker 4: Think of the very first species of life on Earth.
- 9:04Speaker 4: It's a species that certainly existed. We call it Luca,
- 9:07Speaker 4: the last universal common ancestor. And you can think of
- 9:10Speaker 4: that sprouting up like a tree. And at some point,
- 9:13Speaker 4: that single species dividing into two, and that's going to
- 9:16Speaker 4: form eventually two huge branches that still survive today. And
- 9:21Speaker 4: those branches will go on to split and to split
- 9:23Speaker 4: and to split to make more and more species. And
- 9:26Speaker 4: as those species go up, they evolve, they change, they
- 9:29Speaker 4: evolve new characters, they become plants or mammals or animals, mammals, whatever.
- 9:37Speaker 4: And that is... It is that tree-like process of branching
- 9:42Speaker 4: and moving through time and evolving and becoming different that
- 9:47Speaker 4: has produced what we can see outside my window here,
- 9:50Speaker 4: which is the huge diversity of life.
- 9:52Speaker 1: That branching started a long time ago, right? Life is old.
- 9:56Speaker 1: It's been around for a while.
- 9:58Speaker 4: Life is, as far as we can tell, about 4
- 10:01Speaker 4: billion years old. We've got fossils from about 3.5 billion
- 10:05Speaker 4: years old. But rocks, 4 billion-year-old rocks are... very very
- 10:09Speaker 4: rare if not you know non-existent so there are well
- 10:12Speaker 4: sorry they are they do exist but they don't have
- 10:14Speaker 4: fossils in them but there are signatures of life so
- 10:17Speaker 4: molecules that is produced by life and not by geological
- 10:21Speaker 4: processes that we can discover in rocks that are four
- 10:24Speaker 4: billion years old which is basically as old as as
- 10:26Speaker 4: old as we're able to discover on on the planet.
- 10:30Speaker 1: And the last universal common ancestor was a bit later
- 10:33Speaker 1: than that is that right so life existed before Luca,
- 10:37Speaker 1: but we don't know what that life looked like.
- 10:39Speaker 4: So I think probably Luca existed about 4 billion years ago,
- 10:43Speaker 4: but there was a period before Luca, which is effectively...
- 10:46Speaker 4: So we can reconstruct what Luca looked like by following
- 10:50Speaker 4: the tree down to that very, very earliest branching point.
- 10:54Speaker 4: And if we look at those two branches coming out
- 10:56Speaker 4: of Luca, there are the branch which is the bacteria,
- 11:00Speaker 4: and there's another branch which is bacteria-like things called archaea,
- 11:04Speaker 4: If we compare what their descendants, the things that are
- 11:08Speaker 4: alive today, have in common, by logic, those things in
- 11:13Speaker 4: common in those very ancient branches must have come from
- 11:16Speaker 4: their common ancestor, which we can extrapolate back to. Essentially,
- 11:20Speaker 4: we can go right back in time to Luca because
- 11:23Speaker 4: we can extrapolate back from their modern descendants. But before Luca,
- 11:27Speaker 4: there's no other branches coming off it. There were other branches.
- 11:30Speaker 4: There were presumably several species, many species, around at the
- 11:35Speaker 4: same time as Luca, but they've all gone extinct and
- 11:37Speaker 4: Luca is the only one that's actually given rise to
- 11:39Speaker 4: anything that's still alive today.
- 11:43Speaker 3: So when you mean they've gone extinct, we mean that
- 11:46Speaker 3: nothing came forth from them afterwards, right? It was like
- 11:49Speaker 3: the end of the line, is that right?
- 11:51Speaker 4: Well, they might as well have gone on, you know,
- 11:53Speaker 4: after the existence of Luca, but at some point they
- 11:56Speaker 4: went extinct. So we've got no trace of them today
- 11:59Speaker 4: and no way of tracing back down their branch today.
- 12:02Speaker 4: to get to a place on the tree that is lower,
- 12:04Speaker 4: is further back in time than Luca.
- 12:07Speaker 1: But your real interest is in animals, isn't it? And then,
- 12:12Speaker 1: so the first animals... Genetics tells us, what, about 800
- 12:17Speaker 1: million years ago, the first fossils.
- 12:19Speaker 4: There's a big argument about this.
- 12:23Speaker 1: I know. So.
- 12:27Speaker 4: Essentially, we can't find the first animal fossils. We're very
- 12:32Speaker 4: unlikely to find the very first one of a branch.
- 12:35Speaker 4: We'll find them eventually. Fossils are quite rare, especially nearly
- 12:40Speaker 4: a billion years old. But we can sort of estimate
- 12:43Speaker 4: when they're likely to have existed by comparing how different
- 12:48Speaker 4: things are today and knowing how quickly differences build up
- 12:54Speaker 4: in our genes. So if two things are 10% different
- 12:58Speaker 4: and you know 1% things become different at 1% per
- 13:01Speaker 4: million years then 10% different means they're 10 million years separated.
- 13:05Speaker 4: So we can sort of estimate when the first animals
- 13:08Speaker 4: existed And this is where it gets tricky. And I'm
- 13:11Speaker 4: not a great expert on this. I'm basically a sceptic
- 13:14Speaker 4: about molecular clocks. OK.
- 13:17Speaker 1: So the molecular clock is that 10% thing you were
- 13:19Speaker 1: just talking about?
- 13:20Speaker 4: Exactly. So the molecular clock lets us use the difference,
- 13:24Speaker 4: especially in the genes, between two existing creatures, two species,
- 13:28Speaker 4: and to use that difference to estimate how distantly related
- 13:33Speaker 4: they are, effectively. And using the molecular clock, people come
- 13:37Speaker 4: up with estimates of the animals probably about 600 million
- 13:39Speaker 4: years old. So that's for the bilaterians, actually. So that's
- 13:45Speaker 4: a major group of animals. But the first fossils are 100,
- 13:49Speaker 4: 120 million years younger than that. So there's this huge
- 13:53Speaker 4: gap in the fossil record between where the molecular clocks
- 13:57Speaker 4: tell us that the animals first appeared and when we
- 14:00Speaker 4: actually first see the first one.
- 14:01Speaker 1: It's a big....
- 14:03Speaker 4: Source of argument. There was a meeting in Canada last
- 14:06Speaker 4: week where everyone thought about it.
- 14:10Speaker 2: And what makes you such a skeptic? Just because there
- 14:13Speaker 2: are no fossils?
- 14:16Speaker 4: Because I have watched the gap between the molecular clock
- 14:24Speaker 4: estimates of when animals first appeared and the fossil estimates,
- 14:28Speaker 4: which haven't changed, get smaller and smaller and smaller and
- 14:32Speaker 4: smaller over the last 20 years. So the first molecular
- 14:36Speaker 4: clock estimates for the first appearance of animals was 1.2
- 14:40Speaker 4: billion years ago. And now it's about 600 million years. Essentially,
- 14:45Speaker 4: the clocks, as they get better, are converging on what
- 14:50Speaker 4: we can see in the fossil record, essentially.
- 14:52Speaker 1: But we also don't know what those first animals would
- 14:54Speaker 1: have looked like, do we? I mean, they're presumably very,
- 14:57Speaker 1: not much more than a sort of a mouth and
- 14:59Speaker 1: a gut, you know, surrounded by cells, presumably. But we
- 15:03Speaker 1: don't really know what they would have looked like. So
- 15:05Speaker 1: that must make, they're probably small. So that's going to
- 15:07Speaker 1: make it hard to find as well.
- 15:09Speaker 4: Well, we've got, so what I guess what, so just
- 15:12Speaker 4: like Luca, so there will be animals before the first
- 15:16Speaker 4: of the animals that gave rise to all the animals
- 15:19Speaker 4: alive today. So they were animal-like things and at some
- 15:22Speaker 4: point we've got what we call the crown group of
- 15:25Speaker 4: animals and so that is the last common ancestor of
- 15:29Speaker 4: all the most recent common ancestor of all the animals
- 15:33Speaker 4: that are alive today. So that's the ancestor of humans
- 15:36Speaker 4: and jellyfish and sponges. So a sponge is a very
- 15:40Speaker 4: very simple animal and so we can We can certainly
- 15:43Speaker 4: look at all the descendants of that very first animal.
- 15:47Speaker 4: We call it the ur-metazoan, the ur-animal. And we look
- 15:51Speaker 4: at the descendants and we can see what's in common
- 15:53Speaker 4: between them. And most obviously, they're all large. They've got
- 15:57Speaker 4: lots and lots of cells. And there are other large things.
- 16:01Speaker 4: Plants are large and fungi are large. But this is
- 16:04Speaker 4: something that lived in the bottom of the sea. If
- 16:07Speaker 4: we find something at 1,000 metres depth, it wasn't a
- 16:10Speaker 4: plant because there's no light there. So we do find
- 16:13Speaker 4: fossils about 570, 600 million years ago that are large,
- 16:20Speaker 4: obviously have lots of cells. And we know from the paleontology,
- 16:25Speaker 4: I'm not a paleontologist, so I'm guessing a little bit
- 16:29Speaker 4: or I'm exaggerating my knowledge a little bit. But we
- 16:32Speaker 4: know that they weren't plants because they were living in
- 16:35Speaker 4: deep water, etc., So we've got some things that clearly
- 16:39Speaker 4: were animals because of where they lived and how big
- 16:42Speaker 4: they are. And it's trying to fit those in with
- 16:47Speaker 4: the animals we know today and trying to see whether
- 16:49Speaker 4: they're similar or whether they're a unique group that's sort
- 16:52Speaker 4: of gone extinct and left nothing alive today.
- 16:57Speaker 3: And so when those fossils are analysed, is that a
- 17:02Speaker 3: genetic analysis.
- 17:03Speaker 2: Of the fossils?
- 17:05Speaker 4: No, there's no DNA. The oldest DNA is a couple
- 17:09Speaker 4: of million years old. And we're talking 600 million years old.
- 17:13Speaker 4: So there's no DNA at all. All you've got is
- 17:17Speaker 4: the impression of the animal's body or the species' body
- 17:23Speaker 4: left in the rock. So it's the shape. And sometimes
- 17:26Speaker 4: you can... I really shouldn't go too deeply into this.
- 17:28Speaker 4: I'm not a paleontologist. But sometimes... different structures, like your
- 17:34Speaker 4: nerve cord, or our nerve cord, a vertebrate's nerve cord,
- 17:39Speaker 4: a jellyfish doesn't have a nerve cord, but if you've
- 17:41Speaker 4: got a nerve cord, there's a lot of phosphorus in that,
- 17:45Speaker 4: for whatever reason, and that fossilises differently. So sometimes you
- 17:49Speaker 4: can see that this structure, this long, thin structure, was
- 17:54Speaker 4: probably a nerve cord rather than any other bit of
- 17:57Speaker 4: the body. I'm definitely, definitely straying off my expertise here.
- 18:03Speaker 4: Probably saying the wrong elements, et cetera, et cetera, but
- 18:05Speaker 4: the point is made.
- 18:07Speaker 1: Let's bring it back to something that you have spent
- 18:11Speaker 1: a lot of time studying. Bilaterians, it's a word you
- 18:16Speaker 1: met before, and it basically means that anything that's like
- 18:19Speaker 1: a tube-like animal with a mouth and a... Well, actually,
- 18:23Speaker 1: I think there's some bilaterians that only have one.
- 18:27Speaker 1: Entrance, but I tend to think of bilaterians as worm-like animals.
- 18:31Speaker 1: And I think worms are one of your, you know,
- 18:33Speaker 1: you write a lot about worms and bilaterians, but tell
- 18:36Speaker 1: us about when the bilaterians arose and what they are
- 18:38Speaker 1: and how we kind of, how they've become so incredibly common.
- 18:43Speaker 4: Yeah, so bilaterians, we can see that the bilaterian body
- 18:48Speaker 4: plan was very successful because nearly all animals are bilaterian.
- 18:52Speaker 4: So a bilaterian is simply something like me that's got
- 18:56Speaker 4: a A head at one end and a tail at
- 18:58Speaker 4: the other. A dorsal, like your back, which is different
- 19:03Speaker 4: from your belly.
- 19:03Speaker 1: I haven't got a tail.
- 19:06Speaker 4: You have. A front end and a back end. A
- 19:11Speaker 4: head end and a not head end. A back and
- 19:14Speaker 4: a belly, which are different from each other.
- 19:17Speaker 1: They're not symmetrical.
- 19:19Speaker 4: And that leaves you with the left and right, which
- 19:20Speaker 4: are mirror images of each other. So that's where the
- 19:22Speaker 4: name comes from. They're bilaterally symmetrical. They've essentially got a
- 19:25Speaker 4: left side which is a mirror image of their right side.
- 19:29Speaker 4: And this body planning is probably nothing to do with
- 19:31Speaker 4: the symmetry. It's probably to do with having a head
- 19:33Speaker 4: at one end, a gut with a mouth at one
- 19:36Speaker 4: end and an anus at the other, food going through
- 19:40Speaker 4: and various elaborations of that body, which is sort of
- 19:44Speaker 4: kind of more purposeful than a jellyfish. It's got a
- 19:47Speaker 4: direction of travel, which is forward and you end up
- 19:51Speaker 4: with a brain at one end and various sensory organs
- 19:56Speaker 4: at one end, your eyes and, you know, taste, etc.
- 20:01Speaker 4: And they're much more, you know, they've become very successful.
- 20:04Speaker 4: It was obviously a very good idea, a very good,
- 20:07Speaker 4: very successful body plan. So almost all animals are, almost
- 20:10Speaker 4: all major kinds of animals are bilaterians. And indeed, almost
- 20:14Speaker 4: all animals are bilaterians because most animals are insects.
- 20:18Speaker 1: And when did they arise, the bilaterians? They're, I think,
- 20:23Speaker 1: late Ediacaran, early Cambrian. But they were popular. They were
- 20:27Speaker 1: doing well by the early Cambrian, weren't they?
- 20:29Speaker 4: Well, so the Cambrianist, you know, the change between the
- 20:33Speaker 4: Ediacaran and the Cambrian... is defined by the first appearance
- 20:38Speaker 4: of bilaterian fossils. And actually, these fossils are not fossils
- 20:42Speaker 4: of bodies, but they're trace fossils, something called treptichnus. So
- 20:47Speaker 4: these are essentially a bilaterian animal scrabbling around on the bottom,
- 20:51Speaker 4: leaving a mark in the sediment. And that mark, essentially
- 20:55Speaker 4: that trackway, becoming fossilised.
- 20:57Speaker 1: And it looked like a worm, did it?
- 21:01Speaker 4: That... that looked like probably something like a priapolid or
- 21:05Speaker 4: a penis worm, which is something alive today. And so
- 21:08Speaker 4: essentially what it is is you've got this worm-like thing
- 21:11Speaker 4: and you can see from the marks that it's made
- 21:13Speaker 4: that it sort of had a head end that was
- 21:15Speaker 4: searching around looking for food. And that's kind of telling
- 21:18Speaker 4: us it's probably a little cleverer than a jellyfish, which
- 21:22Speaker 4: is sort of, you know, rather aimless, wandering around the sea,
- 21:26Speaker 4: you know, pulsing its umbrella. So this is something crawling
- 21:30Speaker 4: around looking for food. with a front end and a
- 21:32Speaker 4: back end, which are different from each other.
- 21:34Speaker 1: And if our listeners very carefully type penis worm into Google,
- 21:39Speaker 1: they will understand why it's been named along those lines.
- 21:43Speaker 4: Well, the scientific name is Priapulus, which was given to
- 21:47Speaker 4: it by Linnaeus. And yes, it has the same meaning.
- 21:52Speaker 1: It's appropriate. We should probably think about having a quick
- 21:57Speaker 1: break and going to our sponsors. So we'll be back
- 22:01Speaker 1: in a couple of minutes when we will continue and
- 22:05Speaker 1: we'll sort of move up towards the modern day, I suspect.
- 22:09Speaker 4: Hi, Tim.
- 22:10Speaker 3: You're looking particularly snazzy today.
- 22:12Speaker 2: What are you wearing?
- 22:13Speaker 1: I'm wearing a piece from a company called Grace and Garbo.
- 22:17Speaker 1: And actually, you know a little bit more about them
- 22:19Speaker 1: than I do, to be honest.
- 22:20Speaker 2: Yeah, you're right, I do.
- 22:21Speaker 1: You're the fashion queen.
- 22:24Speaker 2: I'm also wearing a piece from Grayson Garbo.
- 22:26Speaker 3: So this is a delightful knitwear outfit set.
- 22:30Speaker 2: Up in Birmingham.
- 22:31Speaker 3: What they do is they source knitwear, quality knitwear from
- 22:35Speaker 3: all around the world. It's vintage, one-off pieces, many of
- 22:39Speaker 3: which they then hand embellish, like the one you're wearing
- 22:42Speaker 3: today with its beautiful purple flowers. And so they're big
- 22:45Speaker 3: on sustainability and You know, nothing goes to waste. Everything
- 22:49Speaker 3: is sort of recycled and reused. And if you want
- 22:52Speaker 3: to know more about them, then have a look at
- 22:54Speaker 3: the link beneath this episode.
- 22:57Speaker 1: And thank you very much to them for supporting our podcast.
- 23:00Speaker 1: I hope their sales soar.
- 23:03Speaker 3: Thanks a lot, Grace and Garvo.
- 23:05Speaker 1: Well, welcome back and welcome again to our guest, Max Telford,
- 23:11Speaker 1: who's recently published The Tree of Life, Solving Science's Greatest Puzzle,
- 23:15Speaker 1: published by John Murray. And we're sort of we're in
- 23:18Speaker 1: the Cambrian and the Cambrian explosion is something that had
- 23:23Speaker 1: even been discovered when I was at school. But it
- 23:26Speaker 1: was an important time for animals, wasn't it, Max?
- 23:29Speaker 4: I think even Darwin knew about it. Darwin thought of
- 23:32Speaker 4: this as one of his abominable mysteries. He was a
- 23:34Speaker 4: few years ahead of me. So why this sudden appearance of...
- 23:42Speaker 4: So the conundrum is that out of nowhere, you don't
- 23:46Speaker 4: get just a bilaterian, an animal with a left and
- 23:50Speaker 4: a right. You get all sorts of different ones. So
- 23:52Speaker 4: you get arthropods and penis worms and primitive fish-like things
- 23:58Speaker 4: and primitive mollusk-like things. And I could probably go on
- 24:01Speaker 4: a few more. So these appear as if from nowhere,
- 24:05Speaker 4: but we know they're all related and we know that they...
- 24:09Speaker 4: must have had some time to become different from each other.
- 24:13Speaker 4: You can't become as different as an arthropod is from
- 24:17Speaker 4: an earthworm instantaneously. So some time must have passed before
- 24:24Speaker 4: their common ancestor existed, between the point at which their
- 24:29Speaker 4: common ancestor existed and at which they appear in the
- 24:33Speaker 4: fossil record. So I sort of hinted at this before,
- 24:37Speaker 4: that this.
- 24:39Speaker 4: Estimate of when they first appeared is older than their
- 24:42Speaker 4: first actual appearance in the fossil record. And so there's
- 24:45Speaker 4: this conundrum that people are still arguing about.
- 24:50Speaker 3: So Max, geographically, these appearances, are they all over the
- 24:54Speaker 3: world when they start appearing or are they sort of
- 24:57Speaker 3: discrete localisations?
- 24:58Speaker 4: They're all over the world, but I think that the thing,
- 25:02Speaker 4: and they're sort of spread out in time. So the
- 25:03Speaker 4: Cambrian lasts for tens of millions of years. And the
- 25:09Speaker 4: most famous ones actually are Middle Cambrian. So these are
- 25:12Speaker 4: the famous Burgess Shale fossils. So this isn't the first appearance.
- 25:16Speaker 4: But yeah, they're found all over the world. Well, not everywhere,
- 25:20Speaker 4: because rocks that old are rare. But where we find
- 25:24Speaker 4: rocks that old, we're finding evidence of bilaterian animals.
- 25:30Speaker 1: And that was back in the time of just all
- 25:32Speaker 1: the land. There was nothing living on the land.
- 25:35Speaker 4: Obviously, plants hadn't.
- 25:37Speaker 1: And was it just one big continent?
- 25:40Speaker 4: Yes, you've got me there, Tim. Don't worry. Certainly the
- 25:44Speaker 4: continents were moving around, and I think you're right that
- 25:47Speaker 4: Pangaea was around at the time of the Cambrian explosion.
- 25:50Speaker 1: So I think.
- 25:51Speaker 3: It's important for our listeners just to get an idea
- 25:54Speaker 3: of the scope of what we're talking about here, right?
- 25:56Speaker 3: So the time span is millions of years. The geography
- 26:00Speaker 3: is all over the world, which the Earth doesn't look
- 26:03Speaker 3: like it looks like now. And so to try and
- 26:06Speaker 3: put that into a sort of... not put it into
- 26:10Speaker 3: a modern context, but in the world we are in now,
- 26:12Speaker 3: and there's, I guess, a level of imagination also that
- 26:15Speaker 3: has to come into it when you're trying to piece
- 26:17Speaker 3: these things together and imagine the world. You don't have
- 26:20Speaker 3: photographs or anything like that of what it looked like then.
- 26:23Speaker 3: So there's, I guess, the layers of complexity.
- 26:26Speaker 2: Are enormous, right?
- 26:27Speaker 4: Yeah, and it's these millions and billions. It's hard to
- 26:33Speaker 4: picture these. And so I use, in the book, I
- 26:35Speaker 4: use this sort of... human timescale to try and get
- 26:40Speaker 4: some idea of how much time is passing. And what's extraordinary,
- 26:45Speaker 4: so my human timescale is the soles of its feet
- 26:49Speaker 4: are the beginning of the formation of the Earth, which
- 26:52Speaker 4: is about 4.5 billion years ago. And the very top
- 26:55Speaker 4: of the head is today. And so as we move
- 26:58Speaker 4: up that body, we can see things happening and sort
- 27:02Speaker 4: of get some grasp of when it happened in the
- 27:06Speaker 4: history of the Earth. And what's extraordinary is that on
- 27:09Speaker 4: that time scale, the animals appear at the bottom of
- 27:12Speaker 4: the chit. So really, really recent thing. And humans, you know,
- 27:17Speaker 4: it's the last cell on the top of your head.
- 27:20Speaker 4: So it's incredibly recent in the geological time scale.
- 27:26Speaker 1: So let's kind of think a little bit about the
- 27:29Speaker 1: process of how evolution works and how new characteristics are made.
- 27:36Speaker 1: You have a chapter on the insect wing, for example,
- 27:39Speaker 1: and where insect wings came from that I thought was
- 27:42Speaker 1: really fascinating. So perhaps explain, you know, where we think
- 27:47Speaker 1: insect wings come from and why we think that's the case,
- 27:51Speaker 1: because it really is, it goes all the way back
- 27:53Speaker 1: to one of the animals that was swimming around in
- 27:55Speaker 1: the Cambrian, one of the.
- 27:56Speaker 4: Predators, no less. Yeah, so there's been actually rumbling on
- 28:01Speaker 4: for probably 100 years about is an argument about how
- 28:06Speaker 4: insect wings first evolved. And there were really two ideas.
- 28:10Speaker 4: The first is that essentially we had a wingless insect
- 28:15Speaker 4: with a carapace, so the exoskeleton, the body effectively, which
- 28:21Speaker 4: had a slight flaring sticking out. And these flared bits
- 28:26Speaker 4: gave it some minor ability to glide. And this was
- 28:29Speaker 4: something that could be picked up on by evolution and exaggerated.
- 28:33Speaker 4: and the gliding would get better and better and better.
- 28:35Speaker 4: So theory number one, the wings are part of the dorsal,
- 28:42Speaker 4: the exoskeleton, the skeleton on the back of the animal.
- 28:45Speaker 4: And then the second idea is that we know that
- 28:49Speaker 4: insects are relatively closely related to crustaceans, and crustaceans at
- 28:53Speaker 4: the bottom of their legs have a sort of flappy
- 28:55Speaker 4: bit sticking out, which is a gill, because crustaceans live
- 28:59Speaker 4: in the water. And they have these feathery things sticking
- 29:02Speaker 4: out which absorb oxygen from the water and do various
- 29:06Speaker 4: other things. And so the other idea is that when insects,
- 29:10Speaker 4: which came from the crustaceans, when they emerged from the water,
- 29:14Speaker 4: they still had these gills and they essentially used that
- 29:18Speaker 4: flappy thing and used it in some way to help
- 29:23Speaker 4: them glide and then flap and then have powered flight,
- 29:26Speaker 4: et cetera, et cetera. And the way we've tried to
- 29:30Speaker 4: differentiate between these is by looking at gene expression. And
- 29:33Speaker 4: what we've actually found, what's been found recently, is that
- 29:36Speaker 4: if you look at the genes that are switched on
- 29:38Speaker 4: in the cells of a crust gill we find the
- 29:42Speaker 4: same genes switched on in the cells of an insect
- 29:45Speaker 4: wing so suggesting that that they're essentially the same structure
- 29:49Speaker 4: because they share these two structures which share a lot
- 29:52Speaker 4: in common they're special genes involved in building an insect
- 29:57Speaker 4: skill are the same genes that are involved in, sorry,
- 30:01Speaker 4: a crustacean's gill are the same genes involved in building
- 30:04Speaker 4: an insect's wing.
- 30:05Speaker 1: But it took a long time, right?
- 30:08Speaker 4: It would have been very slow and, you know, quite
- 30:12Speaker 4: possibly the gills, you know, many of the most primitive
- 30:15Speaker 4: insects still have spent a lot of their life in water,
- 30:19Speaker 4: things like mayflies and dragonflies, etc. And they have gills.
- 30:25Speaker 4: And the gills, they're at the end of the body
- 30:27Speaker 4: in mayflies and dragonflies, but they have those same genes
- 30:32Speaker 4: that are switched on in other crustacean gills and other
- 30:34Speaker 4: bits of the body and in insect wings.
- 30:37Speaker 1: So it's a bit of a story of evolution really
- 30:40Speaker 1: finding a way to co-opt genes that did one thing.
- 30:44Speaker 1: Evolution rarely sort of comes up with a whole new
- 30:47Speaker 1: characteristic like wings or like a large neocortex from scratch.
- 30:54Speaker 1: It often... it often kind of uses genes, it repurposes
- 30:58Speaker 1: genes for new purposes. That happens again and again, and
- 31:02Speaker 1: something that you kind of cover in the book a
- 31:03Speaker 1: little bit.
- 31:04Speaker 4: Yeah, absolutely. And I guess in this context, you'd think
- 31:08Speaker 4: of it on a slightly larger scale. You'd think of
- 31:10Speaker 4: it as repurposing a gill. And the gill is obviously
- 31:13Speaker 4: built by genes. But sometimes we think of genes being
- 31:16Speaker 4: repurposed because an enzyme that does one thing then gets
- 31:19Speaker 4: repurposed and does something similar but different. But in this case,
- 31:23Speaker 4: it's a whole structure being repurposed in very much the
- 31:27Speaker 4: same way that the front legs of a dinosaur have
- 31:31Speaker 4: become repurposed to become the wings of a bird. So
- 31:34Speaker 4: it's the same structure with the same bones built by
- 31:36Speaker 4: the same genes, but it's been changed gradually over time
- 31:41Speaker 4: in the same mysterious process. Something developed, a flying dinosaur
- 31:48Speaker 4: is fairly extraordinary.
- 31:50Speaker 1: And it's great that dinosaurs are still around in the
- 31:52Speaker 1: form of dinosaurs.
- 31:53Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, yeah.
- 31:55Speaker 2: Men and dinosaurs, right?
- 31:56Speaker 3: It's a strange thing. Men are always fascinated by dinosaurs.
- 32:00Speaker 1: We had a pet emu a few years ago when
- 32:04Speaker 1: my father-in-law's farm, he rescued it, and that emu made
- 32:09Speaker 1: me realise that, yes, dinosaurs would have, A, been terrifying,
- 32:13Speaker 1: and this was like a dinosaur. It was an awful animal.
- 32:16Speaker 4: Yeah.
- 32:16Speaker 1: Yeah.
- 32:17Speaker 3: I think my favourite, obviously, you probably know what I'm
- 32:20Speaker 3: going to say, Tim, being essentially a bacteriologist, I think
- 32:24Speaker 3: my favourite really is the mitochondrion, right? Just that, you know,
- 32:30Speaker 3: essentially it was probably a bacterium.
- 32:33Speaker 4: Well, yeah, you're absolutely right. So I talked about, a
- 32:38Speaker 4: while ago, I talked about these two branches coming out
- 32:41Speaker 4: of leuka, one being the bacteria... The eubacterium, the proper bacteria,
- 32:46Speaker 4: and the other being the archaea, which used to be
- 32:48Speaker 4: called the archaebacteria. So these are very, very simple creatures, tiny,
- 32:53Speaker 4: tiny single-celled creatures. But at some point, one species of
- 32:58Speaker 4: eubacterium and one species of archaean have come together to
- 33:03Speaker 4: form a completely new cell, which is a much more
- 33:06Speaker 4: complex cell. And so the archaebacterium has... essentially turned into
- 33:12Speaker 4: the mitochondria in all eukaryotic cells. So our cells are,
- 33:17Speaker 4: all of our cells and all eukaryotic cells, so all
- 33:20Speaker 4: large-ish cells, complex cells, have this structure called a mitochondrion,
- 33:26Speaker 4: which is literally another creature living inside our cells. And
- 33:30Speaker 4: it's been there for billions of years, a couple of
- 33:32Speaker 4: billion years.
- 33:33Speaker 1: And the animals couldn't have happened unless... eukaryote cells evolved, right?
- 33:38Speaker 1: And that, you know, we are eukaryotes as are plants
- 33:41Speaker 1: and fungi and what have you.
- 33:43Speaker 4: Correct. But people always talk about the inevitability of things.
- 33:49Speaker 4: I think it wasn't very inevitable to get animals. It
- 33:51Speaker 4: took two billion years before anyone had the idea of
- 33:54Speaker 4: making an animal. So it wasn't an obvious thing to do.
- 33:59Speaker 1: No, that's fair enough. So how complete... is the animal
- 34:02Speaker 1: tree of life then? I mean, you know, is your
- 34:05Speaker 1: job done? You've written this book. Can I finally retire
- 34:11Speaker 1: as a zoologist?
- 34:12Speaker 4: I think, well, there's various ways in which it's not complete,
- 34:16Speaker 4: thank goodness, and my career continues. First of all, there's
- 34:20Speaker 4: bits we argue about. So some of it's easy. It's
- 34:23Speaker 4: very obvious that mammals all belong together and that birds
- 34:27Speaker 4: belong somewhere else. So there's big bits of the tree
- 34:30Speaker 4: which we can So, very confidently, we've solved this bit.
- 34:35Speaker 4: But the bits I work on are the tricky bits
- 34:38Speaker 4: where we've got weird organisms which have thrown away half
- 34:42Speaker 4: their genes or become very simple in other ways. There's
- 34:47Speaker 4: occasions on the tree where lots of species appeared all
- 34:50Speaker 4: at once. And so untangling their exact relationships is very,
- 34:54Speaker 4: very difficult. So these things called adaptive radiations, a good
- 34:58Speaker 4: example being the Darwin's finches or the fishes in the
- 35:03Speaker 4: African Great Lakes. So there's lots of bits of the
- 35:06Speaker 4: tree which I think are very important and need sorting
- 35:10Speaker 4: out and I argue with people over and have been
- 35:13Speaker 4: doing for the last 30 years. So there's plenty still
- 35:17Speaker 4: to solve and there's mistakes we've been made that need correcting, etc.
- 35:21Speaker 4: And the other way in which it's incomplete is all
- 35:24Speaker 4: the species, all the extinct ones that we're never going
- 35:28Speaker 4: to know because they haven't left fossils yet. Almost no
- 35:32Speaker 4: bacteria have left. There's probably literally trillions of bacterial species
- 35:37Speaker 4: that have gone extinct and we'll never know about. There's
- 35:40Speaker 4: lots of things alive today that we don't know yet.
- 35:46Speaker 4: There was a paper a couple of weeks ago where
- 35:49Speaker 4: somebody took one teaspoon of soil, sequenced it using the
- 35:53Speaker 4: very latest sequencing technology, and found a genome, so DNA,
- 36:00Speaker 4: from about 800 species of mostly bacteria, almost none of
- 36:05Speaker 4: which were known to science before. So that's one teaspoon
- 36:08Speaker 4: of soil from one place in the world. So there's millions,
- 36:12Speaker 4: and according to some people, a trillion species alive today
- 36:16Speaker 4: that we have no idea about yet. And then, of course,
- 36:20Speaker 4: there's the future, which we don't know what's going to happen.
- 36:22Speaker 4: And I'm not going to worry too much about that.
- 36:25Speaker 4: Not a lot I can do about that.
- 36:27Speaker 3: Well, what's the thing that I guess sort of what's
- 36:30Speaker 3: your next big thing, Max? What's the thing that you
- 36:32Speaker 3: feel most excited about now sort of moving on with
- 36:35Speaker 3: your work?
- 36:36Speaker 4: Well, a slightly quixotic quest, I suppose, which we went
- 36:43Speaker 4: a couple of years ago to Argentina in search of
- 36:46Speaker 4: a worm, which would be very interesting if it exists.
- 36:50Speaker 4: So this is a worm called Salinella. And it was
- 36:53Speaker 4: described in the late 19th century by a German called
- 36:58Speaker 4: Johannes Frenzel. And he was in Argentina. So he wrote
- 37:05Speaker 4: various papers about it. He described it as the simplest
- 37:08Speaker 4: animal that exists at all alive today. It's basically a tube.
- 37:14Speaker 1: He hasn't met my dog, Woofler. He's not a simple animal. Anyway,
- 37:19Speaker 1: I'm joking. He's obviously quite complex.
- 37:21Speaker 4: Even simpler than Woofler. Salinella, if Frenzel is to be believed,
- 37:28Speaker 4: is simply a tube of cells. So it's a gut
- 37:31Speaker 4: and nothing else. So a mouth at one end, anus
- 37:33Speaker 4: at the other, and nothing else to it at all.
- 37:35Speaker 4: And so it would be very exciting to go and
- 37:38Speaker 4: discover this, to study this simplest of all animals, if
- 37:43Speaker 4: it really is that simple. But nobody's seen it since
- 37:47Speaker 4: Frenzel described it in the late 19th century.
- 37:51Speaker 1: And is that because the habitat it lived in is gone,
- 37:55Speaker 1: do you think? I mean, you mention in the book
- 37:57Speaker 1: that it's probably, you know, the salt marshes, I think
- 38:01Speaker 1: it was, where he said he'd found it, don't really
- 38:03Speaker 1: exist there anymore.
- 38:04Speaker 4: Yes, so we went there and it's the Argentinian Pampas,
- 38:09Speaker 4: which is just a huge flat area to the east
- 38:13Speaker 4: of the Andes. And presumably, I don't know, I wasn't
- 38:17Speaker 4: there in the 19th century, but it was covered with
- 38:19Speaker 4: pampas grass and little else. And today, we went there
- 38:23Speaker 4: a couple of years ago, it's completely and utterly covered
- 38:26Speaker 4: with farms. So as you drive along, there's nothing there.
- 38:30Speaker 4: but soya and alfalfa and whatever else. And they're all
- 38:34Speaker 4: fenced off, so it's very difficult to go and look
- 38:38Speaker 4: for potential sources of this creature. But slightly worse than
- 38:44Speaker 4: that is the ambiguous papers that Frenzel wrote. So they
- 38:47Speaker 4: were sort of written quite professionally and published in good journals,
- 38:53Speaker 4: but the methods section leaves a lot to be desired,
- 38:57Speaker 4: shall we say. He describes how he got a soil sample,
- 39:03Speaker 4: salt and mud in it, from a friend of his,
- 39:07Speaker 4: from the region of Rio Cuarto, which is where we went,
- 39:10Speaker 4: but doesn't say where. So we don't even know if
- 39:14Speaker 4: the region of Rio Cuarto means within a mile of
- 39:16Speaker 4: the town or within 50 miles of the town. So,
- 39:20Speaker 4: you know, it's not easy to start with. And then
- 39:23Speaker 4: he puts this sample in some water and then he
- 39:27Speaker 4: leaves this on a windowsill for about three months and
- 39:31Speaker 4: he tops it up with tap water from time to
- 39:34Speaker 4: time and he puts in some pond weed. And at
- 39:38Speaker 4: one point he says he drops a bit of iodine in,
- 39:40Speaker 4: but it sounds like it was a mistake or an
- 39:42Speaker 4: accident and he doesn't tell us how much. And then
- 39:45Speaker 4: after three months he discovers in the bottom of this,
- 39:48Speaker 4: you know, this jar on his windowsill this magical and
- 39:53Speaker 4: potentially very, very exciting worm, our most distant animal relative,
- 39:58Speaker 4: if Frenzel is to be believed.
- 39:59Speaker 1: Still alive?
- 40:00Speaker 4: Still alive, yeah.
- 40:02Speaker 1: Sounds a bit dodgy, doesn't it, really?
- 40:05Speaker 4: Yes, I forgot to mention, at one point he says,
- 40:08Speaker 4: quite a lot of sand and flies blew into the
- 40:11Speaker 4: water through the window. So, honestly, we don't know where
- 40:15Speaker 4: the soil sample came from, we don't know where the
- 40:18Speaker 4: worms came from, and the whole thing is very mysterious
- 40:22Speaker 4: but anyway we got there having studied Google Maps and
- 40:27Speaker 4: looked for possible sources of salty sandy soil so we're
- 40:32Speaker 4: looking for bare patches with a white crust you can
- 40:35Speaker 4: zoom in on Google and a tiny number of them
- 40:39Speaker 4: were within sort of reach of a track or a
- 40:42Speaker 4: road we couldn't actually get to them because it was
- 40:44Speaker 4: all fenced off but my colleague Philip who I was
- 40:47Speaker 4: with had a a drone. So we went zooming in, looking,
- 40:52Speaker 4: looking down and then, you know, inevitably there was it
- 40:55Speaker 4: was just a muddy pool or something. So we, what
- 40:58Speaker 4: we've really discovered is how difficult it is going to
- 41:01Speaker 4: be to rediscover this work.
- 41:03Speaker 1: If it actually did exist.
- 41:05Speaker 4: If it, if it isn't a figment of Frenzel's imagination.
- 41:08Speaker 3: I think the reviewers of that paper need to have
- 41:10Speaker 3: a word of themselves.
- 41:13Speaker 1: No, I think that's right. Well, I mean, I think
- 41:16Speaker 1: we're kind of running out of time, so we better
- 41:18Speaker 1: draw this to a close. But I mean, good luck
- 41:21Speaker 1: with your continued research and finding that worm. And I mean,
- 41:26Speaker 1: we could talk and talk and talk, but your book
- 41:29Speaker 1: published by John Murray, The Tree of Life, Solving Science's
- 41:32Speaker 1: Greatest Puzzle, is well worth a read. And thank you
- 41:34Speaker 1: very much, Max, for coming on our podcast. And I
- 41:37Speaker 1: think we've both really enjoyed talking to you.
- 41:38Speaker 2: If you find the worm, please come back.
- 41:41Speaker 4: I will do, without a doubt.
- 41:43Speaker 1: Fantastic. Thank you. Well, I thought that was really interesting, Saima.
- 41:47Speaker 1: I mean, you know, I thought I did some slightly
- 41:50Speaker 1: kind of bonkers field work. But imagine going off to
- 41:53Speaker 1: Argentina to dig around for a worm that someone from
- 41:56Speaker 1: a couple of hundred years ago or, you know, 150
- 41:59Speaker 1: years ago claimed to have found.
- 42:03Speaker 3: Yes, it's quite funny. I was wondering, you know, the
- 42:06Speaker 3: person who wrote the paper, you know, was he totally sober?
- 42:09Speaker 2: Had he smoked something? Can we test that? But I mean, remarkable.
- 42:13Speaker 3: Commitment to, you know, to his field to go out
- 42:17Speaker 3: there and look for that.
- 42:18Speaker 2: And I sincerely hope he finds it.
- 42:20Speaker 1: I tell you one thing I really loved, you know,
- 42:23Speaker 1: trying to understand the how quite how long life has
- 42:26Speaker 1: been around. I hadn't heard his analogy until I read
- 42:30Speaker 1: his book about going up the height of the human
- 42:32Speaker 1: body and sort of how at what point different, you know,
- 42:37Speaker 1: different different animals and different life forms arose. Really fascinating.
- 42:42Speaker 2: We're here, right? Animals are at the chin level, is
- 42:45Speaker 2: that right?
- 42:46Speaker 1: That's right. And then humans are just like the very
- 42:49Speaker 1: top layer of skin. So we think we're so important,
- 42:53Speaker 1: we've been around for ages, but actually we're just less
- 42:57Speaker 1: than a blink of an eye of geological time. Absolutely.
- 43:00Speaker 3: I think at school I really struggled with the spatial
- 43:03Speaker 3: scales of biology, which of course you don't have in
- 43:06Speaker 3: the same way in chemistry. And then now, on top
- 43:09Speaker 3: of that, when you consider the temporal scales as well,
- 43:13Speaker 3: it becomes quite mind-boggling, I think.
- 43:15Speaker 1: No, it does. But I thought he did a great job.
- 43:17Speaker 1: And I have to say, I enjoyed talking to him,
- 43:18Speaker 1: but I did enjoy his book. So I'd encourage our
- 43:21Speaker 1: listeners to go and have a read.
- 43:23Speaker 2: Oh, sure. Absolutely.
- 43:25Speaker 1: Okay. What are we doing next week?
- 43:29Speaker 3: Next week?
- 43:30Speaker 2: Who do we... Ah, we have Ian next week, right?
- 43:32Speaker 1: Ian Golden. I think that's right. I think we're going
- 43:34Speaker 1: to be talking about migration and how important it's been
- 43:37Speaker 1: over human history.
- 43:38Speaker 3: That's right so it's specifically human migration um over again
- 43:43Speaker 3: a long long time span i actually heard ian give
- 43:46Speaker 3: a talk um at the woodstock book festival a science
- 43:49Speaker 3: festival a few weeks back and he did a great
- 43:52Speaker 3: job and uh yeah i was thrilled when he was
- 43:54Speaker 3: agreed to come on the podcast.
- 43:55Speaker 1: No no it's great it's fantastic well i look forward
- 43:58Speaker 1: to that but otherwise have.
- 43:59Speaker 2: A good week yep i'll see you around tim
- 44:01Speaker 1: Okay thanks a lot bye everyone