Latest / Turley Talks / Ep. 3676 Dems in FREEFALL as Supreme Court CRUSHES Their Midterm Dreams!!!
Transcript
- 0:00[SPEAKER_00]: The liberal globalist order is on its brink and awakening a new conservative age.
- 0:06[SPEAKER_00]: Dr. Steve Turley joined me every day as we discover answers to today's toughest challenges and explore the re-bondalization of conservative civilization.
- 0:18[SPEAKER_00]: This is Turley Talks.
- 0:20[SPEAKER_00]: Did the Democrats just lose the midterms?
- 0:24[SPEAKER_00]: That's what a lot of commentators are saying this after yet another massive win at the Supreme Court for the Trump administration.
- 0:32[SPEAKER_00]: And of course this huge win comes on the heels of the big win in Tennessee where the radical Democrat got crushed by nearly 10 points.
- 0:40[SPEAKER_00]: We're going to look at the political earthquake.
- 0:42[SPEAKER_00]: happening in the redistricting wars.
- 0:44[SPEAKER_00]: We're going to see how it's all a sign of an even more tectonic political shift happening deep below the surface and what the latest special election in Tennessee tells us about 2026 and beyond.
- 0:56[SPEAKER_00]: You're not going to want to miss this.
- 0:58[SPEAKER_00]: Greetings everyone, it is a live stream for today.
- 1:01[SPEAKER_00]: I am your host, Dr. Steve, near a Patriot professor, celebrating what you made possible back on November the 5th.
- 1:08[SPEAKER_00]: So if you want to front row seat on how you continue to change the world in ways you never even imagine, make sure to smack that bell.
- 1:15[SPEAKER_00]: Where is it smack, err, it is smack that?
- 1:17[SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, smack that bell and subscribe button was always we got a jam pack show for you today our super chats are up feel free to send in your comments your questions And be my privilege to read them and answer them during this line stream also I do want to give a quick shout out
- 1:34[SPEAKER_00]: to the sponsor of this video.
- 1:36[SPEAKER_00]: And that's our amazing friends over at Augusta Gold.
- 1:40[SPEAKER_00]: Gang, have you seen the price of Gold lately?
- 1:43[SPEAKER_00]: And silver, they're absolutely skyrocketing.
- 1:46[SPEAKER_00]: Gold, in particular, is up 50% year to date.
- 1:49[SPEAKER_00]: And silver's up a hundred percent.
- 1:52[SPEAKER_00]: And it's no coincidence.
- 1:54[SPEAKER_00]: It's the direct result of President Trump's golden age.
- 1:57[SPEAKER_00]: pro-growth agenda that you made possible back on November the 5th.
- 2:02[SPEAKER_00]: Goldman Sachs, they actually just raised their 2026 gold outlook to $4,900 per ounce.
- 2:11[SPEAKER_00]: And many analysts think they're being too conservative.
- 2:14[SPEAKER_00]: And to make it even better, we got over three more glorious years of these America first policies ahead of us.
- 2:21[SPEAKER_00]: This is exactly why smart Americans are taking control of
- 2:26[SPEAKER_00]: with physical gold and silver.
- 2:28[SPEAKER_00]: My friends over at Augusta Precious Metals are so excited to help you be a part of this new gold rush.
- 2:34[SPEAKER_00]: Augusta works with Americans who've got over 50 grand in their IRAs or 401k's rather retirement accounts to make the smart move in the smart money.
- 2:43[SPEAKER_00]: Their Patriots just like you and me and they would love to chat with you.
- 2:47[SPEAKER_00]: Give them a call at
- 2:51[SPEAKER_00]: to 3, 5, 0, 5, 2, that's 3, 5, 0, 5, 2, series against central banks.
- 2:59[SPEAKER_00]: They are loading up.
- 3:01[SPEAKER_00]: They are stocking up on the gold and silver as we speak.
- 3:05[SPEAKER_00]: Let the Patriots over to gastroprecious metals.
- 3:07[SPEAKER_00]: Make sure you don't miss out.
- 3:09[SPEAKER_00]: Texturly, to 3, 5, 0, 5, 2 or click on the link below and go to Turley Gold,
- 3:14[SPEAKER_00]: dot com and you'll get instant access to a free two-minute report that reveals the greatest stretch your retirement today.
- 3:21[SPEAKER_00]: And that's turligol.com or text, turlig, to three, five, zero, five, two, and talk with our good friends, the Patriots over at Augusta Gold.
- 3:32[SPEAKER_00]: Today, I like that.
- 3:33[SPEAKER_00]: That's right.
- 3:34[SPEAKER_00]: Click those mugs.
- 3:35[SPEAKER_00]: It's a glorious morning in the Golden Age.
- 3:38[SPEAKER_00]: President Trump and the Republicans have won yet another massive victory in the Supreme Court, which is another way of saying, I think I like saying this just as much.
- 3:49[SPEAKER_00]: It is yet another loss for the Democrats, the Democrats are in the midst of a historic
- 3:56[SPEAKER_00]: catastrophic legal losing streak at the level of the Supreme Court, the likes of which we have never seen.
- 4:03[SPEAKER_00]: Remember, the key to understanding what's happening here and all of these legal dramas and all of these activist courts trying to stop the Trump train.
- 4:11[SPEAKER_00]: The key in all of this is that every Democrat so-called win only ends up a colossal loss at the Supreme Court, which is
- 4:24[SPEAKER_00]: But Supreme Court is actively and consistently crushing every single ruling from these rogue left wing activists judges all across the country.
- 4:33[SPEAKER_00]: So while Democrats win 60% of their, that's the documented percentage.
- 4:39[SPEAKER_00]: They win 60% of their cases against Trump in the lower courts, precisely precisely because they court shop.
- 4:48[SPEAKER_00]: Right, the outcome is baked into the cake.
- 4:52[SPEAKER_00]: They deliberately find courts that are sympathetic to their politics.
- 4:56[SPEAKER_00]: So of course Democrats are going to win 60% of the time in the lower courts.
- 5:00[SPEAKER_00]: But the case is immediately go to the Supreme Court on appeal.
- 5:03[SPEAKER_00]: And then what happens?
- 5:05[SPEAKER_00]: What happens?
- 5:06[SPEAKER_00]: Literally every single time the Supreme Court crushes the Democrat lower courts.
- 5:12[SPEAKER_00]: That is not an exaggeration, the Trump administration has won 23 of the last 24 Supreme Court cases.
- 5:21[SPEAKER_00]: That's a 96% win rate, which again is another way of saying that Democrats lose 96% of the time.
- 5:29[SPEAKER_00]: Justice Cavanle, for example.
- 5:31[SPEAKER_00]: has voted in favor of the Trump administration 90% of the time, while, by contrast, he voted in favor of the Biden administration only about 40% of the time.
- 5:43[SPEAKER_00]: That's a 50 point swing in Trump's favor.
- 5:47[SPEAKER_00]: So when I saw the Supreme Court as delivered yet another win for Trump and the Republicans, I just want you, you know, you got to a, I should say, when I say that the Supreme Court as delivered yet another win for Trump and the Republicans, you really have to appreciate just how dominant that winning has been.
- 6:08[SPEAKER_00]: The Supreme Court has now officially,
- 6:10[SPEAKER_00]: Made a ruling that fundamentally changes the math for 2026 and there's absolutely nothing the Democrats can do about it
- 6:18[SPEAKER_00]: they've been shut down hard.
- 6:19[SPEAKER_00]: Yes, the Supreme Court issued an emergency stay that reinstated Texas brand new congressional map.
- 6:26[SPEAKER_00]: And this wasn't just any map.
- 6:27[SPEAKER_00]: This was President Trump's map.
- 6:29[SPEAKER_00]: This was the map specifically designed to flip five Democrat health seats in a Republican stronghold just in time for the midterms.
- 6:38[SPEAKER_00]: And old man Al Green and the borderline and literate Jasmine Crocket have both officially lost their seats.
- 6:48[SPEAKER_00]: Just, what a glorious, more.
- 6:50[SPEAKER_00]: Pour yourself a cup of coffee.
- 6:52[SPEAKER_00]: Come on over.
- 6:53[SPEAKER_00]: I mean, this is fun.
- 6:54[SPEAKER_00]: Now, as many of you know.
- 6:57[SPEAKER_00]: leading up to this a lower court, and I say that somewhat choking on my words here, it's not a lower court, it's a kangaroo court, okay?
- 7:07[SPEAKER_00]: These lower courts have turned it a little more than a hippie gather, hippie activists disguises jurors playing hacky sack in the back, but they tried to block the redistricting map at the last minute, Texas's redistricting map.
- 7:20[SPEAKER_00]: claiming that it was, of course, of course, what's always their excuse?
- 7:25[SPEAKER_00]: Why would they block the redistricting map?
- 7:27[SPEAKER_00]: What's their excuse?
- 7:29[SPEAKER_00]: Because it's racist!
- 7:33[SPEAKER_00]: The old Democrat playbook, the old stale dusty playbook from the 1960s, designed to give them a permanent majority in perpetuity
- 7:46[SPEAKER_00]: name and blame everything on racism and they can bully their way to permanent political power.
- 7:52[SPEAKER_00]: That's the old playbook.
- 7:54[SPEAKER_00]: So the Democrats and the lower court claim that the Republicans in Texas were engaging in racist redistricting the very party.
- 8:04[SPEAKER_00]: That is itself addicted to racially jerrymandering districts to deliberately exclude white voters.
- 8:14[SPEAKER_00]: runs around accusing others of racial redistricting.
- 8:18[SPEAKER_00]: Rules for the not for me make no mistake.
- 8:21[SPEAKER_00]: The jig in that old playbook is up.
- 8:25[SPEAKER_00]: Everyone now knows.
- 8:27[SPEAKER_00]: Everyone that accusations of racism today simply mean the Democrats aren't getting enough seats.
- 8:34[SPEAKER_00]: They're not getting enough safe seats.
- 8:37[SPEAKER_00]: That's what racial jerrymandering or the accusations of it is code for.
- 8:41[SPEAKER_00]: You're not guaranteeing enough Democrat election win outcomes.
- 8:46[SPEAKER_00]: That's all it means.
- 8:48[SPEAKER_00]: And the Supreme Court's on to it, and they're not having any of it, most especially Clarence Thomas.
- 8:53[SPEAKER_00]: He ain't having none of that.
- 8:55[SPEAKER_00]: Now originally just to Sam Alito some days back we reported on this said no to this rogue lower court he granted the emergency stay.
- 9:06[SPEAKER_00]: But now yesterday literally hours ago the supreme court as a whole followed six to three decision the court found no evidence whatsoever obviously that race was defining criteria.
- 9:19[SPEAKER_00]: for or I should say criteria for the redistricting.
- 9:23[SPEAKER_00]: They said the only thing we could see is partisan considerations.
- 9:27[SPEAKER_00]: In other words, state legislator and the Supreme Court is ruled on this before.
- 9:31[SPEAKER_00]: There's ample precedent for this.
- 9:33[SPEAKER_00]: This is state legislator's.
- 9:35[SPEAKER_00]: are perfectly free to draw district maps around party leanings and identification.
- 9:41[SPEAKER_00]: Republicans want to hang out with Republicans Democrats who are slowly getting made extinct in these red states, but Democrats want to hang out with Democrats.
- 9:51[SPEAKER_00]: So it's perfectly viable, perfectly constitutional.
- 9:55[SPEAKER_00]: to redraw districts around party leanings and identification, which is exactly what the Texas legislature did after, of course, President Trump pressured them to do so.
- 10:08[SPEAKER_00]: You remember originally, Texas Republicans were not
- 10:13[SPEAKER_00]: doing anything like this, that's because Texas unfortunately still has way too many bush height rhino republicans who refuse to fight politically out flanked the Democrats, but President Trump personally pushed Texas to redraw these maps over the summer.
- 10:29[SPEAKER_00]: He understood something that Democrats didn't.
- 10:32[SPEAKER_00]: He understood that this decade in this cycle,
- 10:36[SPEAKER_00]: this was the moment to go on the offense and I'm going to show you exactly why in a moment I'm going to show you the tectonic shift that's happening underneath this extraordinary sort of political earthquake in the redistricting.
- 10:48[SPEAKER_00]: So I'm going to show you exactly what President Trump is seeing he believes gives us the green light to go full animal in these redistricting efforts.
- 10:56[SPEAKER_00]: So the old rules route the window, the days of playing defense and drawing fair maps
- 11:02[SPEAKER_00]: While the other side of course weaponizes the Justice Department, those days are officially over and we have President Trump and you to thank for it because you made this a reality under them of the fact.
- 11:12[SPEAKER_00]: So the new Texas map that was just confirmed by the Supreme Court converts five currently Democrat-held seats into solid Republican territory, five seats, and as it turns out, Texas is just the beginning.
- 11:26[SPEAKER_00]: Take a look at this.
- 11:27[SPEAKER_00]: This is also your little love this.
- 11:29[SPEAKER_00]: The Florida House just launched an official committee to redraw their congressional map for 2026.
- 11:35[SPEAKER_00]: We told you it was coming.
- 11:37[SPEAKER_00]: Florida Republicans already control 20 of the state's 28 seats, but they aren't sitting on a lead.
- 11:43[SPEAKER_00]: They are looking to lock that down big time.
- 11:46[SPEAKER_00]: Florida is so deep red.
- 11:48[SPEAKER_00]: Eight Democrats seats out of 28.
- 11:52[SPEAKER_00]: So forget it.
- 11:52[SPEAKER_00]: No, the latest proposals are redrawing at least three more seats for the GOP at most five, at least three at most five.
- 12:04[SPEAKER_00]: So we're probably seeing something
- 12:06[SPEAKER_00]: right, they're going to split it in the middle.
- 12:08[SPEAKER_00]: And what's so cool here is that coveted of descent.
- 12:11[SPEAKER_00]: This really appears to be playing for D chess here.
- 12:13[SPEAKER_00]: He's signaling that a special session in the spring could use upcoming Supreme Court rulings on the voting rights act to force redraw that favors conservative conservatives even more.
- 12:25[SPEAKER_00]: Remember,
- 12:26[SPEAKER_00]: Politico is projecting a pickup of 19 GOP seats at the Supreme Court strikes down Article 2 of the VRA, the voting rights act that has been blatantly exploited by Democrats to redraw congressional districts.
- 12:42[SPEAKER_00]: Well, what do you know, along explicitly racial lines?
- 12:45[SPEAKER_00]: Again, this is actually baked into the cake of the VRA.
- 12:49[SPEAKER_00]: They call it vote dilution, right?
- 12:52[SPEAKER_00]: We've talked
- 12:56[SPEAKER_00]: is a left wing legal concept that Democrat activists came up with in the particularly was in the 80s where they convinced the courts that the Democratic participation of a minority group.
- 13:11[SPEAKER_00]: is weakened or rendered ineffective.
- 13:15[SPEAKER_00]: That is diluted through the way electoral districts are drawn.
- 13:19[SPEAKER_00]: So bottom line proponents of vote dilution or proponents of instituting a vote dilution as the excuse for redrawing districts.
- 13:31[SPEAKER_00]: argue that unless districts were drawn around majority minority population regions, that's the key, majority minority population regions, like what we're seeing in Minneapolis with Ilhan Omar's district, for example.
- 13:46[SPEAKER_00]: Unless they are given the right to do that, then minorities can never elect the candidates or they can never elect Ilhan Omar.
- 13:54[SPEAKER_00]: And the reason for that is because there's too many
- 14:00[SPEAKER_00]: I kid you not, this for the last four decades, the courts have actually bought into that.
- 14:07[SPEAKER_00]: And they've made it easier for Democrat activists to draw up these race-based congressional districts that deliberately exclude white voters.
- 14:16[SPEAKER_00]: I can't make this stuff up all under the guise of voting rights act.
- 14:22[SPEAKER_00]: The very act that was supposed to prevent voter discrimination in the basis of race and ethnicity that was authoring and signed in the law in the 1960s has since been exploited by the very party that initiated the act and to begin with to stop discrimination.
- 14:35[SPEAKER_00]: I mean, it's just, I mean, it's just, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I
- 14:42[SPEAKER_00]: You can't make this stuff up.
- 14:43[SPEAKER_00]: Truth is stranger than fiction.
- 14:45[SPEAKER_00]: And so the concern majority on the Supreme Court has signaled that they are about to shoot down that provision they are about to overturn section to the VRA and as a result of that single decision the soups would render.
- 14:58[SPEAKER_00]: literally dozens of congressional districts unconstitutional overnight.
- 15:03[SPEAKER_00]: So Florida is using the specter of that decision as an excuse to redraw their districts mid-decade.
- 15:10[SPEAKER_00]: They don't have to wait for the decision.
- 15:12[SPEAKER_00]: They can just use it as an excuse.
- 15:14[SPEAKER_00]: And again, they're not alone.
- 15:15[SPEAKER_00]: A house committee in the state of Indiana has just passed a new nine to zero Republican redistricting map for the 2026 congressional midterms eliminating the final two Democrats seats and giving the GOP another pick up of a comparable two and we could keep and by the way keep pressure on their Senate their state Senate there's one center in particular just a total
- 15:43[SPEAKER_00]: who's saying he's promising he's going to try to sink that.
- 15:46[SPEAKER_00]: Make sure you put your breath.
- 15:48[SPEAKER_00]: Those of you in Indiana put pressure on that guy.
- 15:50[SPEAKER_00]: Well, I guess, and my, I allowed to, I don't know if I'm allowed to that.
- 15:53[SPEAKER_00]: But anyway, keep him, just keep a very close line what he's doing there.
- 15:57[SPEAKER_00]: And we keep going and going.
- 15:59[SPEAKER_00]: We're looking at,
- 16:00[SPEAKER_00]: seven to nine states right now, seven to nine states that are redrawing their districts, California Democrats tried a counter punch with the referendum, uh, the Prop 50 to rig their own maps.
- 16:14[SPEAKER_00]: And by the way, uh, literally disenfranchised Latino voters who've been going right, but turning way to the right over the last decade in California now they're trying to deliberately
- 16:27[SPEAKER_00]: But, you know, ironically, that's heading straight for a court challenge, and California might lose, especially given that it's in their state constitution that maps are drawn, not by the California legislature, but by a nonpartisan redistricting committee, that is in their constitution and they're bypassing that.
- 16:48[SPEAKER_00]: When all said and done, let's say it does pass, let's say Virginia, they've been threatening to redistrict as well.
- 16:56[SPEAKER_00]: Let's say a few of these blue states actually end up doing it.
- 17:00[SPEAKER_00]: When all is said and done, when the dust clears from all these redistricting efforts, not including the Supreme Court's pending decision on the VRA,
- 17:08[SPEAKER_00]: We're looking at a net advantage for the Republicans of at least three to five seats solely from these new maps.
- 17:15[SPEAKER_00]: Again, this is assuming that Virginia redistricts in favor of Democrat pickups, but the California Prop 50 stays all that sort of stuff.
- 17:23[SPEAKER_00]: So just being conservative, we're looking at a net pickup of three to five seats.
- 17:28[SPEAKER_00]: And in a house that's this tight, that's 2020 to 2012, that's the entire ballgame.
- 17:34[SPEAKER_00]: Now, to remember Democrats are having to fend about 70% of what's left to swing seats, purple seats that could go either way.
- 17:43[SPEAKER_00]: All the while red states are basically wiping out what remain of their blue seats.
- 17:48[SPEAKER_00]: And the Cook political report has a Republican safely right now at 213 seats.
- 17:54[SPEAKER_00]: And so in that five would mean two 18 and perpetual control of the house without having to flip a single contested seat.
- 18:03[SPEAKER_00]: Now, that said, remember, remember, remember, did I mention, remember, we are swimming against the stream here.
- 18:12[SPEAKER_00]: We are swimming upstream, I guess.
- 18:14[SPEAKER_00]: There's to say, the party is in power.
- 18:17[SPEAKER_00]: The party has the White House.
- 18:19[SPEAKER_00]: Has increased their numbers in Congress during midterm elections only three times in our nation's history.
- 18:33[SPEAKER_00]: only three times.
- 18:34[SPEAKER_00]: Every other election goes the way of the party that's out of power.
- 18:39[SPEAKER_00]: So, you know, I just want, I want us to be pumped.
- 18:42[SPEAKER_00]: I want us rocking.
- 18:44[SPEAKER_00]: I want us, I want us a fervent, but I want us realistic as well, right?
- 18:49[SPEAKER_00]: This is a stockdale principle.
- 18:50[SPEAKER_00]: You have to have a very sober assessment of the two.
- 18:55[SPEAKER_00]: dire situation you're in while at the same time never losing hope that you're going to prevail.
- 18:59[SPEAKER_00]: You've got to have those two motivating facts.
- 19:02[SPEAKER_00]: That's how those are, that's what makes, that's Trump in a nutshell, that's what makes great entrepreneurs like Elon Musk, you're constantly facing adversity, you're constantly facing tall orders as it were, but you never lose hope that you're going to prevail.
- 19:19[SPEAKER_00]: That said, the hope isn't these middecade redistrictings all across the nation because they may indeed be the game changer in all this.
- 19:27[SPEAKER_00]: This is something new that we have not seen middecade redistricting.
- 19:32[SPEAKER_00]: We did not see in previous midterms.
- 19:36[SPEAKER_00]: And there's something else.
- 19:39[SPEAKER_00]: There's something I mentioned Trump is looking at something that tells him this is it.
- 19:43[SPEAKER_00]: This is the year that we finally enshrine our power permanently in Congress.
- 19:50[SPEAKER_00]: There's something else that's happening that we haven't seen before.
- 19:54[SPEAKER_00]: And this may indeed seal the Democrats' fate for good.
- 19:59[SPEAKER_00]: wait until you see this.
- 20:02[SPEAKER_00]: But first gang, if you are just joining us, our super chats are up.
- 20:05[SPEAKER_00]: So feel free to send in your comments, your questions.
- 20:08[SPEAKER_00]: I'll be happy to answer them on our line stream here.
- 20:10[SPEAKER_00]: Also, this is a good time to remember, you know, that every one of us has to make sure that we take steps to protect ourselves and a loved ones online.
- 20:19[SPEAKER_00]: And that actually begins with your home title.
- 20:21[SPEAKER_00]: Now, if you're a home tone or, but do what?
- 20:25[SPEAKER_00]: If you're a home owner
- 20:28[SPEAKER_00]: When's the last time you check your title?
- 20:31[SPEAKER_00]: It's the legal proof you own your house and it's online exposed.
- 20:36[SPEAKER_00]: Well, if you're like me, I've never checked it.
- 20:38[SPEAKER_00]: And the problems today's AI and cyber world scammers are stealing your home titles and your equity is the target.
- 20:45[SPEAKER_00]: It works.
- 20:45[SPEAKER_00]: I mean, it's so insanely easy.
- 20:47[SPEAKER_00]: It's nuts.
- 20:48[SPEAKER_00]: Criminals forge your signature on a single document.
- 20:51[SPEAKER_00]: They use a fake notary stamp.
- 20:53[SPEAKER_00]: They pay a small fee with your county.
- 20:57[SPEAKER_00]: Your home titles have been transferred out of your name and then what do they do?
- 21:01[SPEAKER_00]: They take out all these loans using your house's equity, some even sell your property, and you won't know what happened until months later when you start getting a collection notice or foreclosure notice.
- 21:13[SPEAKER_00]: That's why you need to stop what you're doing right now today and see if you've already been
- 21:22[SPEAKER_00]: at hometownelock.com to make sure your title is still in your name.
- 21:26[SPEAKER_00]: You'll get a free title history port and you're going to get free 14 day trial of their million dollar triple lock protections 24 seven monitoring of your title, urgent alerts, Danny changes and if Rod should occur, they'll spend up to $1 million to fix it.
- 21:44[SPEAKER_00]: So go to hometownelock.com.
- 21:46[SPEAKER_00]: Right now, use promo code, Charlie talks it's hometownelock.com,
- 21:52[SPEAKER_00]: early talks.
- 21:53[SPEAKER_00]: All right, gang, the voter registration bloodbath continues unabated for the Democrats.
- 22:01[SPEAKER_00]: Now, if you want to understand the real structural advantage that the Republicans are building, this exactly what Trump is seeing here with his own eyes.
- 22:12[SPEAKER_00]: You understand the real, I mean, we're talking at the, the tectonic level, structural advantage, the Republicans are building.
- 22:19[SPEAKER_00]: You have to look at something the legacy media completely ignores, and that's voter registration terms, voter registration trends, while Democrats are obsessing over polling and focus groups in Virginia, New Jersey,
- 22:34[SPEAKER_00]: The ground game is shifting beneath their feet all across the country and ways that are almost irreversible.
- 22:41[SPEAKER_00]: So look at what's happening, for example, in Arizona.
- 22:45[SPEAKER_00]: Both parties are purging in active voters and their roles.
- 22:49[SPEAKER_00]: But Democrats are losing dramatically more.
- 22:54[SPEAKER_00]: We're talking, they are hemorrhaging voters in these voter world purges.
- 22:58[SPEAKER_00]: They're losing ground in with 108,000 fewer registered voters than in 2020.
- 23:04[SPEAKER_00]: They are behind where they were when they were when they last quote one, Arizona.
- 23:13[SPEAKER_00]: over 100,000 votes behind in North Carolina.
- 23:16[SPEAKER_00]: It's the same story.
- 23:18[SPEAKER_00]: Both sides dropped, right?
- 23:20[SPEAKER_00]: This is the beauty of it.
- 23:22[SPEAKER_00]: The federal government's making them purge all their voter rules.
- 23:25[SPEAKER_00]: Our else they're not going to get any federal funds.
- 23:28[SPEAKER_00]: So they have to purge all their voter rules.
- 23:29[SPEAKER_00]: Everyone even California and look what's happening.
- 23:32[SPEAKER_00]: Democrats fell by 10,000 more than Republicans.
- 23:37[SPEAKER_00]: Republicans fell by 6,000.
- 23:39[SPEAKER_00]: Democrats fell by 16,000.
- 23:42[SPEAKER_00]: Oregon saw both parties lose voters.
- 23:44[SPEAKER_00]: But again, Democrats lost 4,000 more.
- 23:47[SPEAKER_00]: That's the pattern.
- 23:48[SPEAKER_00]: It's not a coincidence.
- 23:50[SPEAKER_00]: It's not a one off.
- 23:51[SPEAKER_00]: It's the pat colorado colorado.
- 23:53[SPEAKER_00]: It's the best to be a blue state, right?
- 23:55[SPEAKER_00]: Good old pot smoking color Republicans lost 30,000 voters in their latest voter roll purge Democrats lost 36,000 a net Republican gain of 6,000 in a state that should be safely Democrat Rhode Island followed the same trajectory Republicans lost 630, but Democrats lost nearly 4,000.
- 24:18[SPEAKER_00]: New Mexico.
- 24:19[SPEAKER_00]: Now they've been shifting Republican for months.
- 24:23[SPEAKER_00]: And the latest data shows both parties gaining, but Republicans have net gain about 400 more.
- 24:30[SPEAKER_00]: And we could go on and on.
- 24:31[SPEAKER_00]: Louisiana is flipping right across the board, Democrats losing Republicans gaining about a net.
- 24:36[SPEAKER_00]: 4,000 Florida, of course, right on schedule, added another 10,000 net Republicans to their roles.
- 24:45[SPEAKER_00]: Oklahoma continues its deep redning with Republicans netting another 1600 more voters in Democrats.
- 24:52[SPEAKER_00]: Even my state of Delaware, sleepy Joe Delaware showed a net Republican game of a
- 25:06[SPEAKER_00]: This is not random.
- 25:08[SPEAKER_00]: This is not statistical noise.
- 25:12[SPEAKER_00]: This is a complete restructuring of the electorate at the grassroots level.
- 25:21[SPEAKER_00]: So while Democrats are spending millions of ads and talking points and talking about war crimes, Republicans are quietly winning the battle for voter registration.
- 25:34[SPEAKER_00]: And the key here is that all of this redistricting that we're seeing is actually a surface level phenomenon.
- 25:43[SPEAKER_00]: It's indicative of a deeper voter registration trend that is absolutely devastating for the Democrats.
- 25:53[SPEAKER_00]: The bottom line, the electorate in 2026 will not look like the electorate of 2024.
- 25:59[SPEAKER_00]: It will be more red.
- 26:02[SPEAKER_00]: It will not look like the electorate of 2022.
- 26:04[SPEAKER_00]: It will be more red.
- 26:06[SPEAKER_00]: It will certainly not look like the electorate of 2018.
- 26:09[SPEAKER_00]: It will be more red, it will be more rule, and it will be deeper in Republican territory.
- 26:16[SPEAKER_00]: And, tad insult to injury, if you're a Democrat, voter registration is the single most predictive metric we have for election outcomes.
- 26:31[SPEAKER_00]: That tells Seth Cashore, good friend, the election analyst gets like 99.9% of all of his election predictions, right?
- 26:39[SPEAKER_00]: That's where you've got to make sure to smack that Bell and subscribe button and hang out with us on this channel because we're going to give you only the best when it comes to predictive election outcomes, right?
- 26:49[SPEAKER_00]: There you go, yeah, smack that Bell and subscribe button, but Seth, what Seth does, Seth doesn't even look at the polls, Seth looks at voter registration patterns throughout
- 26:58[SPEAKER_00]: The, the, pretty much modern political history, certainly in the last seven, 70, 80 years and what he is found is he is identified how.
- 27:08[SPEAKER_00]: districts, counties, states, vote in relation to these voter registration patterns.
- 27:16[SPEAKER_00]: So for example, Pennsylvania, my backyard, Pennsylvania, always votes two to three points to the right of its voter registration, always votes two to three points.
- 27:29[SPEAKER_00]: two to three points to the right of their voter registration, Wisconsin always votes what is it now?
- 27:38[SPEAKER_00]: I think seven points to the left of Iowa and Iowa's voter registration.
- 27:43[SPEAKER_00]: So if I was like plus 11,
- 27:47[SPEAKER_00]: voter Republican voter registration, if I was plus 11, then Wisconsin, you can pretty much on a dime predict that Wisconsin is going to vote around what, four, five, six percent Republican.
- 28:04[SPEAKER_00]: So that and that's how we was able to call both Pennsylvania and Wisconsin as well as Michigan.
- 28:11[SPEAKER_00]: uh... he's even has a pattern of Michigan always in relation to voter righteousness that's how he was able to call them and or predict them for twenty twenty four bottom line you can't win an election with voters you don't have register if your voters don't exist you can't win
- 28:32[SPEAKER_00]: Democrats are hemorrhaging registrations in swing states while Republicans are gaining ground literally everywhere.
- 28:39[SPEAKER_00]: And when you combine this with the redistricting maps, we just talked about the structural advantage becomes almost mathematically insurmountable.
- 28:48[SPEAKER_00]: And so that brings us full circle to what we all just saw this week in Tennessee seven, that's special election.
- 28:55[SPEAKER_00]: Now, leading up to that election,
- 28:59[SPEAKER_00]: We had a lot of the, you know, the panicins is they're cold out there, uh, legitimately, you know, concerned in the fallout from November and the blowout elections we suffered in Virginia New Jersey.
- 29:12[SPEAKER_00]: and what made them so concerned.
- 29:16[SPEAKER_00]: And again, rightly so, I don't, I don't disparage anyone for being concerned.
- 29:21[SPEAKER_00]: I disparage people for being doomers.
- 29:23[SPEAKER_00]: I despise you guys, no, I despise dooming because I think it falls on one side.
- 29:29[SPEAKER_00]: It collapses on one side of the stockdale principle.
- 29:32[SPEAKER_00]: Stockdale principle is you have to take very sober assessment of the dire situation
- 29:40[SPEAKER_00]: That you're going to prevail.
- 29:42[SPEAKER_00]: So we don't want to be Pollyanna often.
- 29:44[SPEAKER_00]: Oh, well, when we're going to prevail no matter what.
- 29:47[SPEAKER_00]: No, some of us won't.
- 29:49[SPEAKER_00]: No, this is a dire situation.
- 29:51[SPEAKER_00]: We're going to lose some here.
- 29:53[SPEAKER_00]: Okay.
- 29:54[SPEAKER_00]: Yes, we're going to win in the end, but at a cost.
- 29:58[SPEAKER_00]: But you don't go the other way.
- 29:59[SPEAKER_00]: Go all as lost.
- 30:01[SPEAKER_00]: All as lost.
- 30:02[SPEAKER_00]: We're done.
- 30:03[SPEAKER_00]: We're it's over.
- 30:10[SPEAKER_00]: OK, you got to keep this balance.
- 30:13[SPEAKER_00]: And frankly, I think we saw that balance on display in Tennessee seven.
- 30:18[SPEAKER_00]: And now again, we weren't enough pill battle.
- 30:23[SPEAKER_00]: This was an off-year special election.
- 30:29[SPEAKER_00]: It wasn't just an off-year election.
- 30:31[SPEAKER_00]: It was an off-year.
- 30:33[SPEAKER_00]: It was literally days after Thanksgiving.
- 30:36[SPEAKER_00]: And it was a special election.
- 30:37[SPEAKER_00]: There was no income in on the ticket.
- 30:40[SPEAKER_00]: And it's in a heavily rural district surrounding Nashville, Franklin, Brentwood, Noel, where turnout is typically a bismal, especially for off-off-year elections, because people don't care.
- 30:53[SPEAKER_00]: They don't give a rip.
- 30:56[SPEAKER_00]: and democrats understood that uh... democrats understand uh... you know this is they understand the the whole calculus of turnout better than anyone's why they're trying to import voters uh... from uh... from south of the border and from mail and ballots and all that so in a special action with no trump on the ballot no high profile race driving people to the polls uh... the republican was was relatively unknown
- 31:24[SPEAKER_00]: turn out was going to be suppressed.
- 31:29[SPEAKER_00]: So this is why Democrats thought they had a real chance here, because their base is frothing at the bit to get out vote, vote out Hitler, right?
- 31:38[SPEAKER_00]: And this is why number of Republican commentators were so worried, given that their base appeared to be rather demoralized from the bitter losses in Jersey and Virginia.
- 31:50[SPEAKER_00]: And what happened on Tuesday?
- 31:52[SPEAKER_00]: What happened?
- 31:55[SPEAKER_00]: The Republican Vannaps didn't just win.
- 32:00[SPEAKER_00]: He destroyed the Democrat, despite being, by the way, massively outspent.
- 32:04[SPEAKER_00]: Democrats went all in on this race.
- 32:06[SPEAKER_00]: The House majority packed dumped a million dollars.
- 32:10[SPEAKER_00]: The DCCC through another million at it, outside packs poured in millions more.
- 32:17[SPEAKER_00]: The Democrat candidate burned through 1.2 million dollars of her own money.
- 32:23[SPEAKER_00]: And this is after she went on record things.
- 32:25[SPEAKER_00]: She hated Nashville.
- 32:27[SPEAKER_00]: She hated Nashville, she hated country music, she didn't like Tennessee.
- 32:32[SPEAKER_00]: Then, I've spent just around a million dollars and he crushed her by nine points.
- 32:40[SPEAKER_00]: He was outspent three to one and he won decisively.
- 32:47[SPEAKER_00]: And it gets worse for them too, because we've been very concerned about the whole notion of messaging,
- 32:57[SPEAKER_00]: affordability.
- 32:59[SPEAKER_00]: And the Democrats decided to double down on that.
- 33:01[SPEAKER_00]: They focused group.
- 33:02[SPEAKER_00]: They're messaging and they found that affordability was their best closing message, given how it worked for a Mamedani in New York City.
- 33:10[SPEAKER_00]: So it was supposed to be a slam dunk for them.
- 33:13[SPEAKER_00]: This was a off-off-year special election with a Republican that wasn't well-known in a district that has, it's very rural, so it doesn't have very, you know, low-propped, no-propped,
- 33:25[SPEAKER_00]: voters very low turnout.
- 33:27[SPEAKER_00]: They're going to hit Republicans on economic anxiety on housing costs on inflation and alike.
- 33:34[SPEAKER_00]: And it didn't just flop, it totally flopped.
- 33:39[SPEAKER_00]: And they even brought out Kamala Harris.
- 33:41[SPEAKER_00]: She showed up, you know, big named Democrats blew into Tennessee between Thanksgiving and Christmas specifically to get out the vote.
- 33:51[SPEAKER_00]: And it was, it was a disaster.
- 33:53[SPEAKER_00]: The Democrat law, she lost by nearly 10 points in an off-off year special election.
- 34:01[SPEAKER_00]: They got demolished by a Republican who spent half as much in a district they thought Democrats thought they can flip.
- 34:09[SPEAKER_00]: And so what does all of that mean?
- 34:13[SPEAKER_00]: It means that despite the uphill battle that we do face for the midterms, the fundamentals for the GOP remain very, very strong.
- 34:23[SPEAKER_00]: They continue to dominate voter registration trends across all 30 states that register voters by party.
- 34:30[SPEAKER_00]: They're winning the redistricting wars.
- 34:32[SPEAKER_00]: They're cleaning and purging voter roles in every single state.
- 34:37[SPEAKER_00]: They're deporting a mass number of illegals and blue states and the Supreme Court is poised to overturn the VRA, which would unleash another near two dozen safer publicancies.
- 34:52[SPEAKER_00]: When some of those fundamentals come together in Tennessee, we win, we always win in the end.
- 35:01[SPEAKER_00]: Now again, this is hardly any time for complacency.
- 35:06[SPEAKER_00]: I continue to stress.
- 35:08[SPEAKER_00]: The 2026 is going to be an huge uphill bow.
- 35:14[SPEAKER_00]: Again, it would only be the fourth time if we were to pull this off, that would only be the fourth time.
- 35:20[SPEAKER_00]: in our nation's history where the party and power actually gain seats in the midterm.
- 35:25[SPEAKER_00]: It's a very formidable task.
- 35:27[SPEAKER_00]: I'm talking in the house, Trump pulled it off by the way in 2018 in the Senate.
- 35:31[SPEAKER_00]: We gained two seats in the Senate.
- 35:34[SPEAKER_00]: And so there can't be a, there can't be an ounce of complacency here.
- 35:40[SPEAKER_00]: But that said, the stars do appear to be aligning for a major and possibly permanent political realignment.
- 35:49[SPEAKER_00]: that may indeed be the final nail in the Democrats' coffin for the foreseeable future.
- 35:58[SPEAKER_00]: Over to you, over to you, as Josh, our moderator, assembles your questions.
- 36:02[SPEAKER_00]: If you've been wanting to get into crypto, just scape, you know, the fledgling Wall Street globalist game, this gang is your best opportunity to do that.
- 36:13[SPEAKER_00]: You know, I'm a huge, huge fan.
- 36:15[SPEAKER_00]: of crypto.
- 36:16[SPEAKER_00]: And if you don't know the crypto revolution that's happening right now, it represents the single largest wealth transfer in human history.
- 36:26[SPEAKER_00]: Here's a nice stop for you.
- 36:27[SPEAKER_00]: Over 80,000 new millionaires were created last year alone just because of crypto.
- 36:36[SPEAKER_00]: Why not you next?
- 36:37[SPEAKER_00]: But I know why.
- 36:39[SPEAKER_00]: It's the volatility, isn't it?
- 36:40[SPEAKER_00]: It's the extreme eyes are gray, you know, 30, 40, 50%.
- 36:44[SPEAKER_00]: It's them lows, those roller coaster drops that tend to be a turnoff, right?
- 36:51[SPEAKER_00]: Well, guess what?
- 36:52[SPEAKER_00]: Your experience of that volatility is now officially a thing in the past.
- 36:57[SPEAKER_00]: Meet block trust IRA.
- 37:00[SPEAKER_00]: They have a super AI system that Bitcoin magazine has named the number one.
- 37:06[SPEAKER_00]: That's right, numero uno.
- 37:09[SPEAKER_00]: Crypto technology platform in the world.
- 37:11[SPEAKER_00]: That's someone 1500 global competitors.
- 37:14[SPEAKER_00]: And what that's super AI does is it works 24-7 to analyze global market data and it predicts with uncanny accuracy.
- 37:23[SPEAKER_00]: The highs and the lows of crypto volatility.
- 37:26[SPEAKER_00]: And so what then happens is that block trust IRA sells at the highs and then what do they do?
- 37:31[SPEAKER_00]: They buy again at the lows with all those bargains and that mitigates the volatility, all the while you stand to make incredible gains.
- 37:40[SPEAKER_00]: So that's why I'm a proud client of Block Trust IRA.
- 37:42[SPEAKER_00]: I got my own account with them and I absolutely love them and I know you will too.
- 37:46[SPEAKER_00]: So if you've never gotten into crypto game yet, let Block Trust IRA ease you in.
- 37:52[SPEAKER_00]: click on that link below or visit TurleyTalksCrypto.com and find out how they can help you join the Trump Financial Revolution's finally giving forgotten Americans access to the greatest crypto wealth opportunity in history.
- 38:07[SPEAKER_00]: Oh, another thing.
- 38:08[SPEAKER_00]: This is awesome.
- 38:09[SPEAKER_00]: They're offering my viewers up to $2,500 in bonus crypto when you open up an account with absolutely amazing.
- 38:17[SPEAKER_00]: So don't
- 38:20[SPEAKER_00]: That's Charlie Talks.
- 38:21[SPEAKER_00]: Great though, in that the gamma.
- 38:25[SPEAKER_00]: Alright, why start suddenly starts at sound like Vlad the impeller.
- 38:27[SPEAKER_00]: I don't want to go on it.
- 38:28[SPEAKER_00]: What do we got, Josh?
- 38:29[SPEAKER_00]: Where do we got?
- 38:30[SPEAKER_00]: Let's hear some of your questions.
- 38:31[SPEAKER_00]: Uh, oh, get 10th.
- 38:33[SPEAKER_00]: No, question.
- 38:34[SPEAKER_00]: Just wanted to say thank you for the work you do to keep us informed.
- 38:37[SPEAKER_00]: You're my daily go to a took your advice having a relationship with families more important than being right.
- 38:43[SPEAKER_00]: Well, thank you.
- 38:44[SPEAKER_00]: Thank you.
- 38:45[SPEAKER_00]: August 10th.
- 38:46[SPEAKER_00]: Well, first of all, thank you for the super chats.
- 38:48[SPEAKER_00]: Thank you for the expression of gratitude itself.
- 38:52[SPEAKER_00]: My gratitude to you.
- 38:54[SPEAKER_00]: And yes, yes, that's it.
- 38:56[SPEAKER_00]: What August 10th is saying there's is something we all have to
- 39:00[SPEAKER_00]: keep in mind, especially during the holidays and during Christmas is when you're with family and they go, you know, they have a little bit to drink.
- 39:11[SPEAKER_00]: I'm sorry, I'm just thinking, I saw a tweet, you know, you remember Trump's speech from during the the cabinet meeting when he just went off.
- 39:23[SPEAKER_00]: on everyone in all the Somali population, Minneapolis, their garbage, and a lot of our garbage, and the little plug at the top,
- 39:36[SPEAKER_00]: Oh, comment said, this is me after having committed not to pledge not to talk politics at the Thanksgiving dinner table.
- 39:47[SPEAKER_00]: This is be after one beer and then you just got Trump just going off on a lot of odds of or look you're going to you're going to come across a lot of challenges with family and and love ones in general.
- 40:02[SPEAKER_00]: And one of the key pieces of advice I get, I preach it to myself first.
- 40:07[SPEAKER_00]: I don't, I sometimes screw up, I'll admit it.
- 40:11[SPEAKER_00]: But the biggest piece of advice I once got that I've used that I've seen the fruit of is value your relationships more than value being right.
- 40:22[SPEAKER_00]: Being right,
- 40:23[SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, right in both ways right, but being right is what we're all about here.
- 40:29[SPEAKER_00]: This is that that's the fellowship we offer here on this channel and many other channels as well.
- 40:35[SPEAKER_00]: Enjoy that fellowship.
- 40:37[SPEAKER_00]: So it's it's literally like, you know, it's kind of a Lord of the Rings sort of thing.
- 40:41[SPEAKER_00]: We all come together.
- 40:43[SPEAKER_00]: We all encourage one another get out there fight the good fight where to put our resources.
- 40:48[SPEAKER_00]: How to interpret the events and so forth.
- 40:50[SPEAKER_00]: And then when you go home and when you're with family and loved ones for the holidays, when you're surrounded by the people who will surround you on your deathbed, don't talk politics, don't get in the book.
- 41:03[SPEAKER_00]: And if they do, if they bring it up, listen to them.
- 41:07[SPEAKER_00]: Try to get a sense of where they're coming from.
- 41:10[SPEAKER_00]: If they're really just tearing into Trump, you have to understand that's fear.
- 41:16[SPEAKER_00]: That's fear.
- 41:17[SPEAKER_00]: They're sensing their entire world getting destroyed right in front of their very eye.
- 41:24[SPEAKER_00]: They're seeing their whole politics burning down.
- 41:27[SPEAKER_00]: Have some empathy.
- 41:29[SPEAKER_00]: You're winning.
- 41:30[SPEAKER_00]: We're winning.
- 41:31[SPEAKER_00]: Don't worry.
- 41:32[SPEAKER_00]: Even if they win the midterms.
- 41:34[SPEAKER_00]: So what?
- 41:35[SPEAKER_00]: They've inherited a dysfunctional Congress.
- 41:37[SPEAKER_00]: They're not going to do anything.
- 41:39[SPEAKER_00]: We still got the White House for the
- 41:43[SPEAKER_00]: There's nothing they can do, and shady is clearly a position to crush this with the electoral math, is clearly in the position as an Ohio boy to take Pennsylvania Wisconsin, Michigan easily.
- 41:57[SPEAKER_00]: So just take that confidence, go into any situation, and if you have people who are flipping out that you love, who are flipping out,
- 42:06[SPEAKER_00]: value the relationship more than value being right value the relationship more than value being right that that's going to pay off in spades where so thank you augtence i appreciate that max a million what effects of the discoveries of new epistemologies had on societies yeah easy question surely more haha you're so evil i'll give you i'll give you one
- 42:36[SPEAKER_00]: In the Soviet Union, their epistemology was what we call dialectical materialism, right?
- 42:42[SPEAKER_00]: So that was their Hegelian Marxist synthesis.
- 42:47[SPEAKER_00]: That basically argued, I run, but then you've talked about this, maximally, that human history operates by thesis and tithesis than synthesis.
- 42:57[SPEAKER_00]: So there's a thesis, there's a dominant
- 43:02[SPEAKER_00]: uh, hegemonic view in society inevitably an antithesis to that hegemonic view arises.
- 43:09[SPEAKER_00]: They start to clash and eventually get a synthesis that draws together the common ground of both in that forms of new thesis and you get a new antithesis and the light.
- 43:20[SPEAKER_00]: But the key there, the key there is that the world is constantly, the key there is that the
- 43:29[SPEAKER_00]: And progress by definition means leaving the old Thesis behind and constantly moving.
- 43:38[SPEAKER_00]: to, you know, to new frontiers, bold new worlds, brave new worlds, and so on.
- 43:45[SPEAKER_00]: So you're always leaving the past behind.
- 43:48[SPEAKER_00]: Soviet Union Fels falls 1991.
- 43:51[SPEAKER_00]: The surveys back then found that only 30% of the population consider themselves orthodox Christian.
- 44:00[SPEAKER_00]: the yelps and years intervene and then the Putin years and the rise of a new orthodox civilizationalist epistemology that sees truth as fundamentally eternal and that tradition
- 44:20[SPEAKER_00]: is the means that holds and that communicates that truth in temporal ways, but it's not simply passed.
- 44:33[SPEAKER_00]: This is very important.
- 44:34[SPEAKER_00]: This is the traditional school.
- 44:35[SPEAKER_00]: It's not simply passed.
- 44:36[SPEAKER_00]: Tradition states that there are
- 44:40[SPEAKER_00]: that there are rules, understandings, goals, beliefs, institutions that are absolutely indispensable in the present for our future human flourishing.
- 44:54[SPEAKER_00]: So tradition binds together past, present, and future which means that the more we progress, the more we are also retrospective.
- 45:06[SPEAKER_00]: The more we advance, the more we're also returning because the past is every bit as relevant for the future as it is for the present and so that's where you get our key of futurism.
- 45:23[SPEAKER_00]: So archaeofuturism basically says that the more we progress, ironically, the more we're returning back to where we came from.
- 45:32[SPEAKER_00]: That's the alpha-nomega concept.
- 45:34[SPEAKER_00]: If we came from eternity,
- 45:37[SPEAKER_00]: we are going it back into eternity.
- 45:41[SPEAKER_00]: So the more we progress the more we were returning alpha and omega today with that new epistemology that more archaea future epistemology.
- 45:52[SPEAKER_00]: Today, the latest study show that 90% of Russians consider themselves Russian Orthodox friends.
- 45:59[SPEAKER_00]: 30 percent and that's a 60 point swing.
- 46:02[SPEAKER_00]: So that's a way in which new epistemologies can radically reshape societies.
- 46:08[SPEAKER_00]: But it'll be very interesting to see like a more economic level, but that plays out in everything because economics is really the queen of the social sciences.
- 46:19[SPEAKER_00]: But it'll be interesting to see what happens with Havir Malay right now.
- 46:22[SPEAKER_00]: I mean,
- 46:23[SPEAKER_00]: Argentines bought in the socialism the last four to six decades, and it's been an absolute disaster.
- 46:29[SPEAKER_00]: Now you've got literally like this anarcho-capitalist who is spouting, you know, Murray Rothbard, and Hayek, and, you know, Freeman, and all that sort of stuff.
- 46:44[SPEAKER_00]: And so now we're getting a new
- 46:53[SPEAKER_00]: blew it out the water.
- 46:54[SPEAKER_00]: There's the number one party.
- 46:56[SPEAKER_00]: And that again, that rarely happens with the party that's in power that has the presidency.
- 47:02[SPEAKER_00]: So now we might see a whole different, a whole different economy arise out of this new, more libertarian epistemology.
- 47:11[SPEAKER_00]: So facet, very good, I love your questions, maximum.
- 47:14[SPEAKER_00]: We have to have like a max a million award or something for, and then give it to people
- 47:22[SPEAKER_00]: And I get 24 of it, Dr. Steve with one month shy, the first year of Trump administration.
- 47:27[SPEAKER_00]: How much have they done to dismantle the administrative state and deep state if they are different?
- 47:32[SPEAKER_00]: Uh, would you see 25% of the job is done more or less?
- 47:35[SPEAKER_00]: Yeah.
- 47:35[SPEAKER_00]: So I did a video on that yesterday.
- 47:37[SPEAKER_00]: I don't know if you could put a percentage on it, it's, um, I mean, you can like with employees.
- 47:44[SPEAKER_00]: So they, they've now.
- 47:45[SPEAKER_00]: The new numbers are, it looks like 320,000 federal employees and federal positions are gone.
- 47:51[SPEAKER_00]: And I forget what that percentage was.
- 47:55[SPEAKER_00]: Was that something like 15, 20% of the workforce?
- 48:01[SPEAKER_00]: The Army Dillins,
- 48:04[SPEAKER_00]: Civil Rights Division of the DOJ has gotten rid of 70% of their lawyers I did a video on that the other day so you could do sort of percentages with the actual you know human resource side of things so we're we're getting there so you go gave me 25%
- 48:26[SPEAKER_00]: Maybe, maybe, maybe like 17, 20% I'd have to look at the total number of employees.
- 48:34[SPEAKER_00]: Of course, you know, we want things like the military to be growing in a Enlistment, growing in a healthy and flourishing way, just for a sense of, you know, civic nationalism and so on.
- 48:45[SPEAKER_00]: But we definitely want administrative state.
- 48:48[SPEAKER_00]: I see administrative state and deep state different.
- 48:51[SPEAKER_00]: So administrative state is the bureaucracies, they're all the commission, like the federal trade commissions, and so forth.
- 48:58[SPEAKER_00]: That basically, you know, are OSHA, the Occupational Safety and Housing Association.
- 49:04[SPEAKER_00]: They are these agencies of permanent, unelected bureaucrats that basically run the country.
- 49:12[SPEAKER_00]: We know all that I'm done.
- 49:13[SPEAKER_00]: Then the deep state is the same thing that was supposed to be running our international policies in terms of intelligence.
- 49:22[SPEAKER_00]: So all the three letter agencies, the FBI, the CIA.
- 49:26[SPEAKER_00]: I know FBI's national, but
- 49:29[SPEAKER_00]: homeland security and of course now they're using the same dictatorial tactics as they've used primarily in Europe and the Middle East to thwart democratic expressions and so forth, particularly populist sentiments, they're using them now here we saw that with the Twitter files that literally they were doing everything they can to initiate color revolutions and thwart our elections here in the United States.
- 49:54[SPEAKER_00]: So I see
- 49:58[SPEAKER_00]: John Solomon of
- 50:01[SPEAKER_00]: just the news, excellent investigative reporter.
- 50:05[SPEAKER_00]: He thinks that cash and Dan have done an exceptional job at the FBI, the rather panicked report that came out, the 114-page report that said that both cash and Dan were clowns and that they were failures.
- 50:20[SPEAKER_00]: Does look like it was a desperate attempt by establishment holdouts to get rid of them.
- 50:31[SPEAKER_00]: It looks like Pamboni's done the exact same thing in the DOJ.
- 50:36[SPEAKER_00]: There's, again, remember, there's been mass firings in both FBI and DOJ of all these, these partisan hacks disguised as law enforcement.
- 50:49[SPEAKER_00]: So, and Joe, it still is there.
- 50:52[SPEAKER_00]: Still behind the scenes, though, I would like to see it more prominent.
- 50:56[SPEAKER_00]: in the headlines, like it was originally.
- 50:58[SPEAKER_00]: But again, it had its problem.
- 51:00[SPEAKER_00]: I mean, we loved it, but it had its prominence because of Elon Musk and Elon Musk was the, what's the pinata, basically the punching boy for the Democrats back then in Elizabeth Warren and hyperventilating about billionaires, you know, and all that.
- 51:16[SPEAKER_00]: As her net worth goes up 30% every year.
- 51:19[SPEAKER_00]: So I think it's been very good.
- 51:21[SPEAKER_00]: I think it's been very good.
- 51:22[SPEAKER_00]: It is good.
- 51:23[SPEAKER_00]: I think we went into this knowing it's going to be incredibly hard bringing down both deep state and administrative state.
- 51:30[SPEAKER_00]: It was going to be there.
- 51:31[SPEAKER_00]: That's the swamp and then not shell.
- 51:33[SPEAKER_00]: It was going to be very, very hard.
- 51:35[SPEAKER_00]: But Trump, I think, is doing it tremendously based on the numbers that are gone and based on reports that we're getting from very trusted sources that they are, that they are being very successful in cleaning house and the administrative state and the deep state are nowhere near the power they were this time last year.
- 52:05[SPEAKER_00]: WSNow, I hate doc.
- 52:08[SPEAKER_00]: Did you look up the Constitution Article 4 section for guarantee of Republican former government?
- 52:13[SPEAKER_00]: I got that by asking grok is a state or city run by socialist constitution.
- 52:20[SPEAKER_00]: I'm sorry.
- 52:20[SPEAKER_00]: I did not WSNow.
- 52:22[SPEAKER_00]: I'm sorry.
- 52:23[SPEAKER_00]: Article 4 section for from my head.
- 52:27[SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, I would have to I'd have to look it up to give you a credible answer.
- 52:31[SPEAKER_00]: I just couldn't give to one
- 52:37[SPEAKER_00]: USA, it's great that we're getting victories at Supreme Court.
- 52:40[SPEAKER_00]: What does the Trump administration doing to get younger, mega judges at all levels of judicial system?
- 52:46[SPEAKER_00]: Thank you for all you do.
- 52:47[SPEAKER_00]: Love your business.
- 52:47[SPEAKER_00]: Thank you, USA.
- 52:49[SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, I'll have to catch up on that.
- 52:51[SPEAKER_00]: We just had a whole slew like 90 plus judges affirm federal judges affirm the other day.
- 52:59[SPEAKER_00]: I think it was actually just yesterday, two days ago, through the Senate.
- 53:05[SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, I mean, they've been working very closely with the federal society, federalists society, but again, federal society judges have been a bit disappointing here or there.
- 53:15[SPEAKER_00]: Generally speaking though, he seems to be continuing the record he had of his first administration, which was record setting judicial appointees, very conservative, holding up the law,
- 53:30[SPEAKER_00]: And that's why again, that's why the Democrats are having to jurisdiction shop.
- 53:35[SPEAKER_00]: They are looking specifically, not just for an initial court, an initial judge that will be on their side, but through the appellate process as well and particularly there again, all these challenges coming.
- 53:50[SPEAKER_00]: to the Trump administration are coming out from California, or Massachusetts, or New York, you know, very, very deep, deep blue states.
- 53:58[SPEAKER_00]: So anyway, Trump is basically forced them to force them into a position where their court shopping is more or less been reduced to a little little less than a dozen.
- 54:14[SPEAKER_00]: So it's good, it's good stuff.
- 54:16[SPEAKER_00]: But I don't have exact numbers for you
- 54:19[SPEAKER_00]: Confirm, don't you say?
- 54:22[SPEAKER_00]: Miss, just spot first time catching a live doctor.
- 54:24[SPEAKER_00]: Steve, thanks for all your videos.
- 54:26[SPEAKER_00]: Thank you.
- 54:26[SPEAKER_00]: Mr. Spock, very appreciate.
- 54:28[SPEAKER_00]: Glad to have you on with the family.
- 54:29[SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, we do live streams every Friday.
- 54:33[SPEAKER_00]: And then we also do for our Insiders Club, a courageous Patriots Club.
- 54:37[SPEAKER_00]: We do a special private Q&A live Q&A on Monday nights as well.
- 54:42[SPEAKER_00]: So a lot of people are asking questions to there from our courageous Patriots Club.
- 54:46[SPEAKER_00]: So join.
- 54:47[SPEAKER_00]: We'd love to have you.
- 54:51[SPEAKER_00]: Anthony McNabb, do you see ice actually getting the illegal immigrant crisis solve?
- 54:57[SPEAKER_00]: I'm hopefully well.
- 54:58[SPEAKER_00]: I hope Washington will turn red soon.
- 55:01[SPEAKER_00]: Oh, that'd be interesting.
- 55:02[SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, Washington is a tough state.
- 55:04[SPEAKER_00]: Washington and Oregon are both tough just with the not so much, obviously not with the rule populations, but just with the coastal elite
- 55:21[SPEAKER_00]: Um, your border Idaho, so I don't think it happened, right?
- 55:26[SPEAKER_00]: Um, the chimney of it, a very thin part of Idaho.
- 55:30[SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, I think I was just doing phenomenal job.
- 55:32[SPEAKER_00]: I think they're doing an amazing job.
- 55:34[SPEAKER_00]: The, the hype of ventilating hysteria surrounding ice is the counter part to how effective and powerful they've been.
- 55:45[SPEAKER_00]: So the latest count we have now,
- 55:48[SPEAKER_00]: is that we're looking at about 2.5 possibly 3 million deportations this year, both voluntary and involuntary.
- 56:01[SPEAKER_00]: So the involuntary is up around 6,700,000.
- 56:04[SPEAKER_00]: And then the rest are like dude, if I ever, if I have any, they're the smart ones.
- 56:09[SPEAKER_00]: If I have any hope of ever getting back in this country, I've been relieved now because if I get arrested, I get caught.
- 56:16[SPEAKER_00]: Um, we're shot.
- 56:17[SPEAKER_00]: So, you know, I'll never, we'll never be able to come back in the country again.
- 56:21[SPEAKER_00]: The key with ice raids is they're not just designed to get rid of the, uh, illegals they catch.
- 56:30[SPEAKER_00]: They're designed to send fear, which they are you.
- 56:33[SPEAKER_00]: Here, the Democrats send fear all throughout the illegal migrant community.
- 56:38[SPEAKER_00]: to encourage them to leave voluntarily.
- 56:41[SPEAKER_00]: So it's supposed to have a two-fold effect there.
- 56:43[SPEAKER_00]: And they're doing it.
- 56:44[SPEAKER_00]: I mean, just the numbers don't lie.
- 56:46[SPEAKER_00]: And the Democrats are flipping out because they're watching their future, well, man, I would even say to a certain extent current voter constituency expelled from the country.
- 56:56[SPEAKER_00]: And without illegals, they've got nothing.
- 56:59[SPEAKER_00]: Because they're, you know, demographically liberals have stopped having kids.
- 57:03[SPEAKER_00]: Well, conservators having more kids than ever.
- 57:05[SPEAKER_00]: The quote was a back in 2004.
- 57:09[SPEAKER_00]: The states that Bush won had a 12% fertility advantage over the states that John Kerry won.
- 57:19[SPEAKER_00]: And since then, in the last 20 years, in some parts of those red states, it's more than doubled.
- 57:26[SPEAKER_00]: the birth discrepancy, the fertility discrepancy.
- 57:29[SPEAKER_00]: So it's real.
- 57:31[SPEAKER_00]: The liberal left is literally disappearing off the planet.
- 57:35[SPEAKER_00]: So the only possibility they had.
- 57:38[SPEAKER_00]: of maintaining power was importing new voters, you know, creating them from scratch as it were.
- 57:47[SPEAKER_00]: And well, I guess the creating from scratch would be more the mail-in ballots.
- 57:53[SPEAKER_00]: We certainly like, well, those four, five million voters that mysteriously disappeared from 2020 in 2024 interestingly enough.
- 58:01[SPEAKER_00]: Yes, they've been doing a phenomenal job.
- 58:03[SPEAKER_00]: I I despot I hate the way the left wing lunatics get in their way and mock them and spit on them But they are rocking.
- 58:10[SPEAKER_00]: They are rolling.
- 58:11[SPEAKER_00]: They are doing it and yeah, with all the bluster and privato from all of these left wing city mayors what are they doing?
- 58:21[SPEAKER_00]: They can't do a damn thing and they know it.
- 58:23[SPEAKER_00]: They can't do a damn thing
- 58:29[SPEAKER_00]: uh... broning man is the congressional g op waking up and putting pedal the metal and writing the ship i hope so it it will
- 58:39[SPEAKER_00]: You know, it's really interesting, you say that because in the end, maga is not a congressional movement, right?
- 58:45[SPEAKER_00]: I think that's what we have to, we have to understand.
- 58:48[SPEAKER_00]: Maga is an executive movement.
- 58:50[SPEAKER_00]: It is not a congressional movement.
- 58:52[SPEAKER_00]: Maga is the Trump coalition.
- 58:55[SPEAKER_00]: It is not the Republican coalition, right?
- 58:58[SPEAKER_00]: And a number of pollsters, you mark Mitchell, rich bearerist, they say this adenosium to their credit.
- 59:08[SPEAKER_00]: The Republicans do not have a coalition, Trump has the coalition.
- 59:13[SPEAKER_00]: And therefore, MAGA is not a congressional movement.
- 59:18[SPEAKER_00]: It is not a congressional coalition.
- 59:20[SPEAKER_00]: It is an executive coalition.
- 59:22[SPEAKER_00]: It rallies around executive power, exercise in the hands of one man that every the only man on the planet.
- 59:30[SPEAKER_00]: every single person in the country votes either four or against, right?
- 59:36[SPEAKER_00]: So that's the uniqueness of the president, the presidency or the presidential contest is it's the only one the executive contest is the only one where every single voter in the entire nation,
- 59:50[SPEAKER_00]: votes for.
- 59:52[SPEAKER_00]: All right.
- 59:52[SPEAKER_00]: So I don't vote for your senator.
- 59:54[SPEAKER_00]: You don't vote for mine.
- 59:56[SPEAKER_00]: I don't vote for my neighboring districts representative.
- 59:59[SPEAKER_00]: They don't vote for mine.
- 1:00:01[SPEAKER_00]: That's sort of such.
- 1:00:01[SPEAKER_00]: So it's harder to write the ship of a congressional cohort.
- 1:00:12[SPEAKER_00]: that occupies such a different cultural space from the MAGA coalition.
- 1:00:21[SPEAKER_00]: That said, politics is all about survival.
- 1:00:24[SPEAKER_00]: Politicians are nothing if they don't get reelected.
- 1:00:28[SPEAKER_00]: And so it is obvious, Tennessee 7 proved it.
- 1:00:34[SPEAKER_00]: It is obvious that if you go paddle to the metal, Trump, Trumpian, MAGA, border security, economic security, cultural security, you're gonna win.
- 1:00:46[SPEAKER_00]: You're gonna galvanize.
- 1:00:47[SPEAKER_00]: the vote.
- 1:00:48[SPEAKER_00]: You're going to, you're going to bring out the low-prop to no-prop voter.
- 1:00:53[SPEAKER_00]: And so, but what stands in the way of that is the congressional Republican establishment.
- 1:01:02[SPEAKER_00]: made up of strategists and the donor class, their advisor class, who are all make no mistake, they are all Romney, Ryan, Roe, Republicans, all of them, literally all of them, and they despise
- 1:01:28[SPEAKER_00]: uh... on the uh... on the uh... on the republican ticket for congress and for senate and they do everything they can to keep maga out now they failed with jd they felt failed with marino and you know what and uh... and ohio they fed they fail here or there but but by a large i mean someone like a Ted Cruz is about as maga as you can get
- 1:01:51[SPEAKER_00]: with the current Republican apparatus in place of strategists, advisors, donors who are all Romney, Ryan, row for Republicans.
- 1:02:01[SPEAKER_00]: So, now they're good to die off.
- 1:02:03[SPEAKER_00]: You just don't want to have happened to them what we've seen happen to the Tories in the UK.
- 1:02:08[SPEAKER_00]: They're basically going the way the Dodoberg.
- 1:02:10[SPEAKER_00]: They're getting replaced by a whole new party right now.
- 1:02:13[SPEAKER_00]: of reform party, Nigel Farroch.
- 1:02:16[SPEAKER_00]: So in one sense, yes, they are writing the ship because they can't survive without it.
- 1:02:22[SPEAKER_00]: On the other hand, it's just hard because they just occupy such a different, cultural space in the rest of Maga.
- 1:02:31[SPEAKER_00]: Sean, hey, Dr. Steve, what is your analysis of Marjorie Taylor Green situation?
- 1:02:35[SPEAKER_00]: Why have we not had a video?
- 1:02:37[SPEAKER_00]: Oh, okay, why have you not, oh, why haven't I had a video on?
- 1:02:40[SPEAKER_00]: That's a good question.
- 1:02:41[SPEAKER_00]: Why haven't I done a video on Marjorie?
- 1:02:45[SPEAKER_00]: I don't I don't know the answer to that.
- 1:02:48[SPEAKER_00]: I guess just so many things come out or so many things are in front of me.
- 1:02:52[SPEAKER_00]: You know what to be honest with you, though, Sean, I don't have I haven't done the video on it probably in the end.
- 1:03:00[SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, I'm giving you it's funny.
- 1:03:03[SPEAKER_00]: I'm going to confess my sentiments when I've considered doing the video.
- 1:03:11[SPEAKER_00]: I don't think I have anything to add to it, honestly.
- 1:03:16[SPEAKER_00]: So I usually do a video that I feel like I can give you something, right?
- 1:03:20[SPEAKER_00]: Analysis, you're not going to hear anywhere else, right?
- 1:03:22[SPEAKER_00]: That's often how I breaking news and analysis.
- 1:03:24[SPEAKER_00]: You're not going to hear anywhere else.
- 1:03:25[SPEAKER_00]: Make sure to smack that Bell and subscribe button for analysis here.
- 1:03:28[SPEAKER_00]: So that's what I try to do for you guys.
- 1:03:30[SPEAKER_00]: I try to be unique, not unique for unique sake, but unique in terms of trying to get deeper into what's happening here.
- 1:03:39[SPEAKER_00]: that define the political realignment that's happening.
- 1:03:44[SPEAKER_00]: And I guess with Marjorie, I just, I didn't, I don't think I, well here, I'll tell you my assessment, and then you tell me if it would have been a good video or not.
- 1:03:58[SPEAKER_00]: So based on everything I'm gathering,
- 1:04:04[SPEAKER_00]: the bottom line seems to be and this is coming straight from Trump as well.
- 1:04:09[SPEAKER_00]: So Scott Jennings said this.
- 1:04:10[SPEAKER_00]: He had a meeting with Trump.
- 1:04:12[SPEAKER_00]: He gave our meeting where he gave him a copy of his book and Trump signed it on.
- 1:04:16[SPEAKER_00]: He signed it for trying all the sort of stuff from great meeting.
- 1:04:19[SPEAKER_00]: But he said, you know, he was right after the whole Marjorie Taylor green announcement of her leaving Congress.
- 1:04:25[SPEAKER_00]: and leaving early retiring.
- 1:04:28[SPEAKER_00]: And Trump bottom line said she just changed after he showed her her polling numbers in Georgia.
- 1:04:37[SPEAKER_00]: For, I think was it governor, I thought it was governor, or sat could have been Senate, I can't remember.
- 1:04:42[SPEAKER_00]: It was a statewide office.
- 1:04:44[SPEAKER_00]: And you, you know, according to Trump, she was going to get, she was going to get crushed.
- 1:04:49[SPEAKER_00]: And so he told her, don't run.
- 1:04:50[SPEAKER_00]: He basically sat can't endorse you, don't run.
- 1:04:53[SPEAKER_00]: And he said, just ever since then, she just turned on it.
- 1:04:58[SPEAKER_00]: And without real, really any explanation.
- 1:05:02[SPEAKER_00]: So that Trump's assessment of what happens
- 1:05:07[SPEAKER_00]: And then, and then, of course, he turned on her when he saw that she was sour, he saw her sour grapes and she was going to try to throw it as a gender.
- 1:05:17[SPEAKER_00]: And, but at the same time, there's another view that says, in effect, that she felt that Trump was abandoning.
- 1:05:30[SPEAKER_00]: the maga agenda, the politics of the disaffected independent populace, who tend to be very attracted to Margie Taylor Greene.
- 1:05:41[SPEAKER_00]: They like her very much.
- 1:05:43[SPEAKER_00]: And so she was calling him out on it.
- 1:05:45[SPEAKER_00]: Now, how she does that by going on the view, I'm not quite sure.
- 1:05:50[SPEAKER_00]: But everyone
- 1:05:56[SPEAKER_00]: but or maybe an audition for being one of the ladies on the view.
- 1:06:00[SPEAKER_00]: But which would be interesting, I'd be very interested.
- 1:06:05[SPEAKER_00]: And so to add to give her the benefit of the doubt, I think that's
- 1:06:12[SPEAKER_00]: that is a legit criticism.
- 1:06:14[SPEAKER_00]: I'd both can be true, you know, she could be really upset at Trump and found that he's been for her to interest in the Middle East and not enough in middle America to interest in foreign policy, not enough in food prices.
- 1:06:29[SPEAKER_00]: And then when he turned around and said, and I'm not gonna endorse you for statewide office because you're poll-suck.
- 1:06:34[SPEAKER_00]: Maybe that was it.
- 1:06:35[SPEAKER_00]: That was just the last straw for her.
- 1:06:36[SPEAKER_00]: And so you know what, you know, I just, you and I are just on different sides right now, more or less.
- 1:06:41[SPEAKER_00]: And I think her sighting with the Epstein, with Tom Massey and the whole Epstein thing, and doing rallies with Democrats while they were holding signs saying, you know, Trump is a pedophile and all that sort of stuff, whatever they were saying.
- 1:06:58[SPEAKER_00]: I think Trump just, for him, that was the last straw.
- 1:07:02[SPEAKER_00]: So, so they broke ranks, and I think she felt, well,
- 1:07:11[SPEAKER_00]: I don't think she would have lost her district, but I think this was her way of telling Trump's career.
- 1:07:16[SPEAKER_00]: Yeah.
- 1:07:17[SPEAKER_00]: I'm going to leave you with one last seat and have fun with that.
- 1:07:22[SPEAKER_00]: And so she left, but after, I think she's leaving after what January 5th or whatever once she gets her, her, her, her, her, her pension, right?
- 1:07:31[SPEAKER_00]: So, um,
- 1:07:36[SPEAKER_00]: Look, in the end, I like Marjorie, but she never created in Congress.
- 1:07:42[SPEAKER_00]: You have to create in any legislative body, parliament, Congress Senate.
- 1:07:48[SPEAKER_00]: You have to be a coalition builder.
- 1:07:50[SPEAKER_00]: You can't just be a bomb thrower.
- 1:07:52[SPEAKER_00]: You can't just run around making great speeches like Ron Paul did, he is an entire career.
- 1:08:00[SPEAKER_00]: And he made a lot of money because he got a lot of very
- 1:08:05[SPEAKER_00]: followers, rightly so.
- 1:08:07[SPEAKER_00]: I like I like a lot of what Ron Paul said, and we got a lot of devoted followers who who who supported him financially all across the country.
- 1:08:17[SPEAKER_00]: So he went he was he was
- 1:08:25[SPEAKER_00]: In terms of his career, I mean, his career was really, and then he was able to go and start his own channel, it's Liberty Channel, Ron Paul Channel.
- 1:08:35[SPEAKER_00]: You know, he, he, his impact on,
- 1:08:40[SPEAKER_00]: audiences, as much larger than his impact on his district per se, and much larger than his impact in Congress.
- 1:08:48[SPEAKER_00]: And Trump right now, Trump wants a Congress that institutes MAGA.
- 1:08:59[SPEAKER_00]: Marjorie's assertion that Trump is not MAGA, or is betrayed MAGA, she could say that.
- 1:09:07[SPEAKER_00]: And she may represent a number of disinfectant depenipocos who believe that, but in the end, Trump is MAGA.
- 1:09:14[SPEAKER_00]: MAGA is not when Marjorie says it is.
- 1:09:17[SPEAKER_00]: MAGA is not what Tom Massey says it is.
- 1:09:19[SPEAKER_00]: MAGA is what Trump says it is.
- 1:09:20[SPEAKER_00]: Sorry, that's just the way it is.
- 1:09:22[SPEAKER_00]: So again, maggot is nothing without the power source that it institutes it into law.
- 1:09:30[SPEAKER_00]: And that's Trump right now, via the power of the executive branch.
- 1:09:33[SPEAKER_00]: So Marjorie just never did anything to
- 1:09:37[SPEAKER_00]: create coalitions that could further maga.
- 1:09:43[SPEAKER_00]: That's the big criticism, same with Tom Massey.
- 1:09:47[SPEAKER_00]: They just kind of grandstand.
- 1:09:48[SPEAKER_00]: This is the criticism I'm not saying is right a wrong per se, but that's the perception so far.
- 1:09:53[SPEAKER_00]: They just generally grandstand it.
- 1:09:56[SPEAKER_00]: for their donors, that were trans district, they were all out, a lot of it was from their own district, but a lot of it was from outside, just support us from all over the country, just like kind of their Ron Paul like, Gadfly messaging.
- 1:10:12[SPEAKER_00]: So there you go, that was it, I just, I didn't think I really had anything
- 1:10:15[SPEAKER_00]: more to add to it, and but I think I think I find it just unfortunate, but it's part it's just part of politics politics a lot of ego and they clash and that's just so I'm just I'm really glad to see thus far Trump's cabinet has been rock solid all the people the executive branch has been rock solid and he wants to see a comparable rock
- 1:10:45[SPEAKER_00]: and Marjorie wasn't doing it.
- 1:10:46[SPEAKER_00]: So I think she's stuck Trump with one last seat 2019 when she's gone.
- 1:10:53[SPEAKER_00]: I think her district's relatively safe, but you know, it just makes things harder and I just I think in the end she was very ineffective congresswoman.
- 1:11:06[SPEAKER_00]: Deonra, DJT is playing a win for a whole generation.
- 1:11:10[SPEAKER_00]: You're absolutely right for next 20 years.
- 1:11:11[SPEAKER_00]: No, I think you're absolutely right, Deonra.
- 1:11:14[SPEAKER_00]: He is playing chess and that's exactly what we're really looking at a congressional map that you just knock it out swing seats anymore.
- 1:11:23[SPEAKER_00]: And because just there were more red states than blue states in the end, we're just going to come out on top, both in the Senate and the House.
- 1:11:37[SPEAKER_00]: Johnny the Whiz!
- 1:11:39[SPEAKER_00]: What can you tell us about what's gotten into Canada's Owens ever since Charlie's End?
- 1:11:43[SPEAKER_00]: She's changing to something unrecognizable to so many.
- 1:11:47[SPEAKER_00]: She's claiming TPUSA is responsible for Charlie's death.
- 1:11:50[SPEAKER_00]: Tim Pull is calling her out and it's worried TPUSA won't survive without Charlie and that because they were a help in winning elections and we might lose the midterms.
- 1:12:00[SPEAKER_00]: Should we be worried?
- 1:12:01[SPEAKER_00]: If you think you can make a video on giving your two cents on Candace, is she calling a callsring harm?
- 1:12:09[SPEAKER_00]: Ah, good question, boy.
- 1:12:12[SPEAKER_00]: I wish, again, it's kind of like the margin request.
- 1:12:15[SPEAKER_00]: I wish I had something to contribute here, but I really don't, I don't know Candace, I've never met her, I've been on Tim Show, but Tim was sick when I was on there.
- 1:12:32[SPEAKER_00]: Um, I thought I saw a little something on Tim yet on, I did on X Tim calling Candice out saying, look, you know, you're going to, you know, you're, you're weakening probably the strongest organization that we have for voter turnout, particularly in Arizona.
- 1:12:51[SPEAKER_00]: and they helped in Pennsylvania as well, because the Pennsylvania Chase is associated however loosely with TPUSA, now Cliff Maloney, you guys know I'm well, you helped him out amazingly to win Pennsylvania.
- 1:13:06[SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, if you if you if you
- 1:13:09[SPEAKER_00]: If you dissolve that organization, we're shot for the midterms.
- 1:13:12[SPEAKER_00]: I mean, I get the argument.
- 1:13:14[SPEAKER_00]: I think it's a little premature, maybe.
- 1:13:16[SPEAKER_00]: I don't know.
- 1:13:16[SPEAKER_00]: I mean, we're only 10 months away in the end, 11 months away.
- 1:13:20[SPEAKER_00]: Not me early voting starts in just a few months, right?
- 1:13:23[SPEAKER_00]: So, um,
- 1:13:28[SPEAKER_00]: No, no, in the end, I don't think Candice, I don't see any indicator.
- 1:13:33[SPEAKER_00]: I will let you know if I see one.
- 1:13:35[SPEAKER_00]: But I don't see any indicator that Candice Owens is going to destroy TPUSA and is going to affect the midterms.
- 1:13:43[SPEAKER_00]: I don't see that.
- 1:13:44[SPEAKER_00]: I don't see her reaching that big.
- 1:13:46[SPEAKER_00]: It may be.
- 1:13:47[SPEAKER_00]: I just haven't seen the indicator for that.
- 1:13:51[SPEAKER_00]: as to what happened to her, I, you know, I just have to be a thousand percent honest with you.
- 1:13:57[SPEAKER_00]: I don't follow her.
- 1:13:58[SPEAKER_00]: I just don't.
- 1:13:58[SPEAKER_00]: I don't, I don't, I'm not a, yeah, she just gives, she gives a perspective that I just don't find, I mean, I shouldn't even say this because again, I don't really have
- 1:14:19[SPEAKER_00]: I don't have a first person contact, not sitting and watching or videos.
- 1:14:24[SPEAKER_00]: And there's nothing that I'm seeing in terms of the promos or in terms of the critiques that makes me want to sit and watch them.
- 1:14:34[SPEAKER_00]: I just, you know, to me it's just, it's so, I'm a big, I'm a, I'm a, I'm a, I'm a, I'm a,
- 1:14:43[SPEAKER_00]: I'm a trans guy.
- 1:14:45[SPEAKER_00]: I like trajectory.
- 1:14:47[SPEAKER_00]: I like dynamics.
- 1:14:48[SPEAKER_00]: I like where we were, where we are, where we going.
- 1:14:53[SPEAKER_00]: For me, that kind of analysis is so like in the moment.
- 1:14:58[SPEAKER_00]: And it's so tabloidy and, yeah, I just don't have any interest in it and all, because in the end, it just doesn't matter.
- 1:15:10[SPEAKER_00]: I, you know, just, there's just no topic there that seems in any way shape or form to have any long term.
- 1:15:20[SPEAKER_00]: Significance.
- 1:15:21[SPEAKER_00]: Now, I think that's in fairness was Tim is trying to say it does it can affect the midterms, but I just don't see any indicator for that, but they're maybe they're maybe it's just I, so I, I wouldn't know, I don't know what's going on just from what again third person.
- 1:15:39[SPEAKER_00]: Uh, by way, the great bond literally like what you just said from what I'm hearing it just it seems like It seems like, um, the things she's saying are really over the top, but it seems to be working.
- 1:15:52[SPEAKER_00]: I mean, she's she get she has a really large right.
- 1:15:56[SPEAKER_00]: She like the number one podcast was the number one podcast.
- 1:15:59[SPEAKER_00]: I don't get how long can she and it just seems.
- 1:16:03[SPEAKER_00]: I can't, I don't know.
- 1:16:04[SPEAKER_00]: I'm talking, talking at him, you know what?
- 1:16:08[SPEAKER_00]: I don't know, but it just seems like the, I'm seeing a kind of doom loop where where the accusations could just get more and more and more extreme and absurd.
- 1:16:23[SPEAKER_00]: And they just, yeah, they just seem to be playing them.
- 1:16:26[SPEAKER_00]: And she seems to be the only person on the planet that sees the world the way she does and yet
- 1:16:33[SPEAKER_00]: convince of it.
- 1:16:35[SPEAKER_00]: You know, I'm, again, I'm a data guy and I'm an evidence guy.
- 1:16:39[SPEAKER_00]: And if you're, if you're rhetoric gets ahead of your evidence, I'm just not interested.
- 1:16:46[SPEAKER_00]: I'm not, I don't care if you're on the right left.
- 1:16:48[SPEAKER_00]: I don't care.
- 1:16:49[SPEAKER_00]: And she just, yeah, she, I think she's, I don't, I really don't, so there you go.
- 1:16:55[SPEAKER_00]: There, there's enough of my muddering on that.
- 1:16:58[SPEAKER_00]: I don't know.
- 1:17:01[SPEAKER_00]: Franz Ball is Scotus rules of the administration and a Humphrey's executor.
- 1:17:06[SPEAKER_00]: How does that impact a post-security America in general and specifically with an institution like the Federal Reserve?
- 1:17:15[SPEAKER_00]: Good question.
- 1:17:17[SPEAKER_00]: Humphrey's executive, well, I mean, just bottom line, Humphrey's executive supposedly put limits on the chief executive in terms of who he can fire, higher and higher, well, primarily fire in these commissions.
- 1:17:31[SPEAKER_00]: And so if I remember, Humphrey's executive was a federal trade commission issue.
- 1:17:38[SPEAKER_00]: So, well, I think its strengthens our security, our nationals in that it, you no longer have a globalist unelected bureaucracy running domestic or national or international policies.
- 1:17:59[SPEAKER_00]: So I think that's wonderful.
- 1:18:03[SPEAKER_00]: For federal reserve, I think it's right now it's different because the president does not have direct control over the federal reserve.
- 1:18:13[SPEAKER_00]: Federal reserve is supposed to be independent.
- 1:18:15[SPEAKER_00]: And it's because federal reserve works with banks.
- 1:18:19[SPEAKER_00]: So it's, it's technically in the banking industry.
- 1:18:21[SPEAKER_00]: It's not, it's not doesn't come under any particular branch of government as I understand it.
- 1:18:26[SPEAKER_00]: Though it intersects with it, the president can appoint the chairman, but I don't, it's a very good question.
- 1:18:35[SPEAKER_00]: I'd have to look into how, how humphries would, would relate to the fed.
- 1:18:45[SPEAKER_00]: I'm not sure on that.
- 1:18:46[SPEAKER_00]: I don't have to look at that.
- 1:18:50[SPEAKER_00]: The mad hater, do you think it's possible, Trump will run SVP in 2021?
- 1:18:54[SPEAKER_00]: Is that what he's teasing when he post Trump 2020?
- 1:18:57[SPEAKER_00]: Great question.
- 1:18:58[SPEAKER_00]: No, I don't think so.
- 1:18:59[SPEAKER_00]: I don't think so.
- 1:19:00[SPEAKER_00]: He's, he teases it, I think, to troll Democrats.
- 1:19:04[SPEAKER_00]: Bannon is convinced he'll run again.
- 1:19:06[SPEAKER_00]: Well, he's convinced to find a way for him to constitutionally run again.
- 1:19:13[SPEAKER_00]: Again, because the,
- 1:19:20[SPEAKER_00]: the way they're trying to skirt it is I believe the wording is that the president cannot serve more than two consecutive terms, right?
- 1:19:31[SPEAKER_00]: So that's the way they're trying to skirt it because he hasn't served to consecutive terms.
- 1:19:38[SPEAKER_00]: We had an autopant in between.
- 1:19:40[SPEAKER_00]: But no, I don't think so.
- 1:19:42[SPEAKER_00]: I don't think JD is, I think we're ready for a JD.
- 1:19:45[SPEAKER_00]: I think JD would actually, ironically, be even more maga than Trump because Trump is a transition, yeah, a transitionary president.
- 1:19:55[SPEAKER_00]: He's a catalyst event.
- 1:19:59[SPEAKER_00]: He's taking us from one period to the next period.
- 1:20:02[SPEAKER_00]: So that's why we talk about, we haven't talked about in a while because we're in the golden age now, but during the binding years, we call that post-normal period.
- 1:20:10[SPEAKER_00]: That was a period of time in between a no longer but a not yet and we're clearly seeing the not yet and the reestablishment of constitutional presidential executive authority where he can actually really do things and change the country and and extraordinary directions.
- 1:20:26[SPEAKER_00]: So I think he's the catalyst for this, and then JD will be the one to really solidify maga for the foreseeable future.
- 1:20:34[SPEAKER_00]: But no, I don't see him as VP.
- 1:20:39[SPEAKER_00]: What's the sudden change from the DC?
- 1:20:41[SPEAKER_00]: I'm sorry, Dave.
- 1:20:42[SPEAKER_00]: What's the sudden change from the DC female cop bomber to the male?
- 1:20:47[SPEAKER_00]: Well, the female cockbommer was from an investigative reporting from the blaze, if I recall, where they used gate technology, analyzing your walk, your gate.
- 1:21:03[SPEAKER_00]: and found like a 99.9% match with this one female capital police officer that then all mysteriously start working for this CIA.
- 1:21:17[SPEAKER_00]: We'll have to see the evidence that cash and
- 1:21:28[SPEAKER_00]: that all the other evidence, not simply gate, well, because you'd have to see to what extent is gate evidence, determinative?
- 1:21:40[SPEAKER_00]: You know, if you're looking at your, your priority of the, what, what, your prioritization of evidence, you'd have to take a look at where gate analysis comes in.
- 1:21:53[SPEAKER_00]: And I doubt it's that high.
- 1:21:56[SPEAKER_00]: Uh, if they could ping his cell phone in both locations at the exact time, you know, if they've got, uh, other, uh, they've got receipts from, um, the materials that were purchased to make the bombs, uh, in his name, this sort of stuff.
- 1:22:17[SPEAKER_00]: That's going to take tremendous precedent over, uh, over gate analysis.
- 1:22:31[SPEAKER_00]: Terry, what can Trump do to expedite the admission to the Union of Alberta and Saskatchewan, both of which have taken steps to break away from Canada and the addition of which would also add four senators possibly to Trump's column.
- 1:22:44[SPEAKER_00]: Wouldn't that be awesome?
- 1:22:45[SPEAKER_00]: Yeah.
- 1:22:46[SPEAKER_00]: So two states with both Alberta and Saskatchewan.
- 1:22:49[SPEAKER_00]: I don't know.
- 1:22:49[SPEAKER_00]: I mean, you would have to have the independence vote first.
- 1:22:52[SPEAKER_00]: You'd have to have that.
- 1:22:54[SPEAKER_00]: And then if Albert leaves, I think Sask would leave, they would follow.
- 1:22:58[SPEAKER_00]: I don't know if they'd have it on the same day.
- 1:23:01[SPEAKER_00]: But I don't think there's anything he can do to expedite it other than to really encourage him to get, get going with it.
- 1:23:10[SPEAKER_00]: You need an independence.
- 1:23:11[SPEAKER_00]: referendum, and the independence referendum are the biggest voter turnout elections on the map.
- 1:23:22[SPEAKER_00]: So we see that historically.
- 1:23:23[SPEAKER_00]: There are last voter independence referendum was, if I recall, it was Quebec back in the 90s.
- 1:23:30[SPEAKER_00]: And that had what 90 percent, 90 plus percent voter turnout.
- 1:23:36[SPEAKER_00]: And almost, they almost, they almost succeeded.
- 1:23:41[SPEAKER_00]: Rock or oh great and learn it, Bait your professor.
- 1:23:45[SPEAKER_00]: Got a coworker, Alexa, listen to you too.
- 1:23:48[SPEAKER_00]: Getting promoted today, all right, all right, great.
- 1:23:51[SPEAKER_00]: Well, all the best of you guys, whoever you are, our ROT Corps co-worker, love you, man.
- 1:23:57[SPEAKER_00]: God bless you, bro.
- 1:24:00[SPEAKER_00]: Kevin, good morning, Dr. Charlie, and all your wonderful members of the team question.
- 1:24:04[SPEAKER_00]: Just a couple of weeks ago, we were being told that we knew who the pipe bomber was and that she is now working for the CIA.
- 1:24:11[SPEAKER_00]: Now they're telling us he has been arrested.
- 1:24:12[SPEAKER_00]: Now there's CIA, we'll have to see what the evidence is.
- 1:24:15[SPEAKER_00]: That's what I mentioned that on the video, yes, I did on you know.
- 1:24:19[SPEAKER_00]: There are still some unanswered questions here.
- 1:24:22[SPEAKER_00]: We're gonna have to see how those questions get answered.
- 1:24:24[SPEAKER_00]: those anomalies get answered in relation to this new paradigm.
- 1:24:28[SPEAKER_00]: But we'll see again keep in mind that that capital hill cop that woman was identified by gate analysis and and by an independent
- 1:24:40[SPEAKER_00]: investigation from the blaze.
- 1:24:43[SPEAKER_00]: So we have to just be a little bit careful there, because we, first of all, was an independent analysis, they didn't have all the evidence that the FBI has.
- 1:24:51[SPEAKER_00]: And secondly, we don't know where gate analysis comes in the prioritization of evidence.
- 1:24:56[SPEAKER_00]: So that's all.
- 1:24:57[SPEAKER_00]: You just have to keep that all in mind, let it play itself out.
- 1:25:00[SPEAKER_00]: That's all.
- 1:25:05[SPEAKER_00]: Richard, let's see, my reference speaker Johnson seems to be half mega half right now, you thought, yeah, yeah, you pretty much summarized the whole of, you pretty much summarized the whole of Congress, right, look, I mean, in the end, I mean, even Marjorie Taylor Green wasn't fully mega, right, I mean, even she was, she was vying from the,
- 1:25:28[SPEAKER_00]: from the farms or no, look, again, maga is not a congressional, it's not a congressional coalition.
- 1:25:36[SPEAKER_00]: Congress occupies very different cultural space than maga.
- 1:25:41[SPEAKER_00]: Congress is made up.
- 1:25:43[SPEAKER_00]: The whole culture of Congress is made up of strategists, advisor class, donor class,
- 1:25:55[SPEAKER_00]: Romney, Ryan, Rove, Republicanism, and so they just, they just live at breathe and have they're being in a very, very different cultural space.
- 1:26:07[SPEAKER_00]: Maga is all about populism, civ populism, technopopulism, the technotrata alliance.
- 1:26:14[SPEAKER_00]: It's all about low-prop voters, no-prop voters, disaffecting dependent populists.
- 1:26:19[SPEAKER_00]: Christian conservatives, libertarians, Latinos, jenzy men, it's a black man, it's it's it's it's a hodgepodge that all come together around this notion that we are going to crush.
- 1:26:39[SPEAKER_00]: the establishment, the political class that are ruling for their own benefit at the expense of our own values interest and concerns.
- 1:26:48[SPEAKER_00]: And you know what, most of the Republicans are joining in on that political class as well.
- 1:26:54[SPEAKER_00]: So they, they
- 1:26:56[SPEAKER_00]: And the MAGA coalition despises Republicans almost as much as they despise Democrats.
- 1:27:03[SPEAKER_00]: And so this is what we were concerned about after Virginia New Jersey.
- 1:27:07[SPEAKER_00]: If it looks as if congressional Republicans are failing in the populist promises it were, then they'll just go on over to populist Democrats like Mam Donnie in New York.
- 1:27:20[SPEAKER_00]: There's a Mam Donnie Trump voter about 10% of Mam Donnie's vote voted for Trump.
- 1:27:25[SPEAKER_00]: So, because, again, remember, populism flips the horizontal divide, left versus right to a vertical divide.
- 1:27:31[SPEAKER_00]: People versus political class.
- 1:27:34[SPEAKER_00]: So, the left and right now are actually on the same side that that vertical divide.
- 1:27:38[SPEAKER_00]: So, they can, they can, they can, affect very easily.
- 1:27:41[SPEAKER_00]: So that's the risk that Republicans are taking the more they ignore MAGA concerns.
- 1:27:48[SPEAKER_00]: So there you go.
- 1:27:49[SPEAKER_00]: That just bottom line in the end, MAGA is not yet.
- 1:27:53[SPEAKER_00]: It is not translated into a congressional movement.
- 1:27:56[SPEAKER_00]: And that's what Trump has to do.
- 1:27:58[SPEAKER_00]: He has to translate it into a full Republican party movement.
- 1:28:04[SPEAKER_00]: Manga 24 ever what can be done to stop the Democrats from court shopping and the activists judges who consistently make unlawful rulings, they're always overturned the Supreme Court's going to have to find those judges in contempt of court, they're going to have to find those lawyers in contempt of court because they've ruled repeatedly you're not supposed to be doing that and they've shot they've every attempt again it's only.
- 1:28:27[SPEAKER_00]: In the end, they only end up stepping on their own rakes.
- 1:28:33[SPEAKER_00]: It only just ends up blowing it in their face.
- 1:28:35[SPEAKER_00]: I know you're upset as I am that it does delay, but it delays the inevitable.
- 1:28:41[SPEAKER_00]: And to me, just because I'm more of a trajectory guy, trends guy, I just let the inevitable play out.
- 1:28:47[SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, I just don't pay any attention to them.
- 1:28:52[SPEAKER_00]: Kevin, a question, a comment about the only time the Rhino's apparently can produce evidence that they may have co-honest is when they are obstructing President Trump or plausible deniability stabbing maggot in the back.
- 1:29:05[SPEAKER_00]: What are your ideas directly cut off their horn and balls at the same time?
- 1:29:10[SPEAKER_00]: It's hard, Kevin.
- 1:29:11[SPEAKER_00]: It's hard.
- 1:29:12[SPEAKER_00]: I mean, bottom line, I share your frustrations.
- 1:29:14[SPEAKER_00]: It's hard.
- 1:29:14[SPEAKER_00]: They, again,
- 1:29:16[SPEAKER_00]: Congressional Republicans occupy their and as do as do a gubernatorial Republicans as do Indiana repost Senate Republicans and we've seen state Senate Republicans.
- 1:29:28[SPEAKER_00]: They occupy just a very different space.
- 1:29:30[SPEAKER_00]: They have different, they have different advisors.
- 1:29:34[SPEAKER_00]: They have different strategists.
- 1:29:36[SPEAKER_00]: They have different donors and they just tend to be more comfortable with the old bush.
- 1:29:41[SPEAKER_00]: I rhino Republicanism.
- 1:29:43[SPEAKER_00]: They liked McCain, they liked Romney, they liked Paul Ryan.
- 1:29:49[SPEAKER_00]: They like Carl Robe.
- 1:29:51[SPEAKER_00]: They thought those days were great.
- 1:29:53[SPEAKER_00]: So it's rough, it's hard.
- 1:29:56[SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, because we are the future.
- 1:29:58[SPEAKER_00]: That's the past, that world is dead.
- 1:30:00[SPEAKER_00]: That world just simply doesn't exist anymore.
- 1:30:04[SPEAKER_00]: That coalition doesn't exist anymore.
- 1:30:06[SPEAKER_00]: The coalition's that gave Bush back to back victories in 2000, 2004, barely, by the way, barely.
- 1:30:18[SPEAKER_00]: electoral college.
- 1:30:19[SPEAKER_00]: Those coalitions do not exist anymore.
- 1:30:22[SPEAKER_00]: I forget somebody gave a stat like half of them are dead, you know, half of the people voted for particularly Bush senior who voted for toll, whatever, you know voted for Bush.
- 1:30:33[SPEAKER_00]: Junior in 2000, I have a more dead.
- 1:30:36[SPEAKER_00]: It's a coalition that just doesn't exist anymore.
- 1:30:38[SPEAKER_00]: The new coalition is populism, populism is the way of the future.
- 1:30:42[SPEAKER_00]: It's not just here.
- 1:30:42[SPEAKER_00]: It's everywhere.
- 1:30:44[SPEAKER_00]: Even the CCP considers the public, they will say the true voice of the Chinese people.
- 1:30:51[SPEAKER_00]: Nobody can find political legitimacy apart from appealing to populism.
- 1:30:58[SPEAKER_00]: Republicans just have to get on board with it.
- 1:31:00[SPEAKER_00]: They will for for political survival or they'll be a third party to replace them like what we're seeing in the UK now I agree third parties are generally doomed from the start bond if the Republicans are really that bad
- 1:31:13[SPEAKER_00]: There could be the impetus, the momentum for like an America party to rise, especially with Elon's backing, that just fundamentally crushes them and then replaces them.
- 1:31:26[SPEAKER_00]: So they have only their own political lives to expand to the extent that they ignore Maga.
- 1:31:36[SPEAKER_00]: William O'Toole Lembarni was reported past then reported as alive and well Lembarni was reported past then reported as alive and well.
- 1:31:47[SPEAKER_00]: First, typical of mainstream media at number two in 2013, he has stated that he doesn't think the NFL will be rounded in 20 years.
- 1:31:56[SPEAKER_00]: Your thoughts on the future of the NFL?
- 1:31:58[SPEAKER_00]: Oh, good question.
- 1:31:59[SPEAKER_00]: Oh, I...
- 1:32:01[SPEAKER_00]: I don't know, you know, I don't, I've studied sports and nationalism, that's kind of the extent to which I think I can speak with some learnedness on the NFL, the national football league or major league.
- 1:32:17[SPEAKER_00]: I mean, these, these were founded as symbols of nationalism and national unity.
- 1:32:21[SPEAKER_00]: They're messing it up with things like the Black National Anthem, they are actually contradicting the whole point of their formation, which was to bring America together, not to highlight one group over and against another group and then suddenly tribalize the nation.
- 1:32:43[SPEAKER_00]: No, I don't see, I mean, there was a time NFL during particularly the Woke era in 2018, 2019, 2020.
- 1:32:52[SPEAKER_00]: They were losing a lot of audience.
- 1:32:54[SPEAKER_00]: I had, I had boycott of them.
- 1:32:58[SPEAKER_00]: I was gonna, as, as they, when they doubled down on wokeness, I said, see, I'm Bud Light New.
- 1:33:06[SPEAKER_00]: And, but they've,
- 1:33:09[SPEAKER_00]: it's much lighter today.
- 1:33:11[SPEAKER_00]: They're not really pushing it anymore.
- 1:33:14[SPEAKER_00]: If there is a let every voice saying or whatever the so-called black national anthem is, if they have it, they tend to put it off to the side, they don't televise it, have the audience booze anyway,
- 1:33:34[SPEAKER_00]: I just think, I think the NFL and Roger Gdell, I think they've navigated their disastrous experiment with wokeness.
- 1:33:47[SPEAKER_00]: They've navigated out of it.
- 1:33:50[SPEAKER_00]: As long as they stay clear of wokeness, they should be okay.
- 1:33:55[SPEAKER_00]: It'll remain the number one income producing sporting event in the country.
- 1:34:04[SPEAKER_00]: because of all their freaking commercials, right?
- 1:34:09[SPEAKER_00]: Oh, thank you, Zenderman, 11, thank you for the super sticker.
- 1:34:15[SPEAKER_00]: Oh, Brian, my brother from another mother, just turned in any chance.
- 1:34:20[SPEAKER_00]: Latisha James gets tried after grandeur refuses to indict.
- 1:34:24[SPEAKER_00]: Can she be charged elsewhere?
- 1:34:26[SPEAKER_00]: Oh, I did not see that is is that breaking news that she just did a grand jury.
- 1:34:30[SPEAKER_00]: Just refused to end daughter.
- 1:34:31[SPEAKER_00]: If that's breaking from one, if that's breaking news, I don't know.
- 1:34:35[SPEAKER_00]: I don't know the answer to that.
- 1:34:36[SPEAKER_00]: If it's from it's from the the judge tossing her case.
- 1:34:40[SPEAKER_00]: And, um,
- 1:34:42[SPEAKER_00]: What's the, what's the other swamp rats case, comies case, apparently they're going to be able to charge or charge both of them relatively easily.
- 1:34:52[SPEAKER_00]: So I don't know if, if it's, if this is a new development, since I started the live stream, then I'd have to take a look at it, Brian.
- 1:34:59[SPEAKER_00]: I don't know.
- 1:35:02[SPEAKER_00]: And Tyler is there a way to stop the Islamification of our country, a way to reclassify Islam for religion to not a religion.
- 1:35:09[SPEAKER_00]: They're invaders that do not assimilate, and the religion does not respect laws.
- 1:35:20[SPEAKER_00]: Good question.
- 1:35:21[SPEAKER_00]: Probably not.
- 1:35:23[SPEAKER_00]: I don't know that have to be, I mean, you could
- 1:35:27[SPEAKER_00]: You know, you do have a significant number of Islamic groups designated as legitimate terrorist groups, so you could push it from that vantage point.
- 1:35:37[SPEAKER_00]: So I guess that would that would fit with your question because that would be there no longer religious group there now terrorist group.
- 1:35:47[SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, I mean, you could do it that way.
- 1:35:50[SPEAKER_00]: Look, bottom line is they're filling in the gap.
- 1:35:54[SPEAKER_00]: that that Republicans left during the great white flight from the cities as it's called in 60s 70s.
- 1:36:03[SPEAKER_00]: So urban centers used to have periodically Republican governors.
- 1:36:09[SPEAKER_00]: I mean, we saw that
- 1:36:11[SPEAKER_00]: I'm sorry, mayors, but with the increasing elections going Democrat and with the city council's going fully Democrat, you know, there was just any conservative presence there just laughed went in the suburbs and now there are 100% Democrat virtually every city if there's a Republican it's completely negligible.
- 1:36:36[SPEAKER_00]: Or you have the enclaves like Staten Island and in the five boroughs of New York, it's thoroughly Republican.
- 1:36:43[SPEAKER_00]: But on that, they're all Democrat and they are basically dying.
- 1:36:50[SPEAKER_00]: They're decaying socially and they are they are tribalizing.
- 1:36:57[SPEAKER_00]: And the group that appears to be emerging in ornamentally,
- 1:37:03[SPEAKER_00]: in Democrat politics, particularly their urban politics are islamists are Muslims.
- 1:37:10[SPEAKER_00]: And you know, hamtramic in Michigan is an old Muslim city council, Dearborn is predominantly Muslim city council.
- 1:37:21[SPEAKER_00]: And ironically, they're passing very conservative laws, very anti-LGBT laws, ironically.
- 1:37:29[SPEAKER_00]: So the left loses anyway, but like you're seeing with Europe and so on, they're certainly not going to be conservative if they
- 1:37:38[SPEAKER_00]: If they become the norm, they're not going to be conservative in a constitutional or, you know, faith-family freedom sort of ways we would know it.
- 1:37:46[SPEAKER_00]: It would be much more in Islamic conservatism.
- 1:37:49[SPEAKER_00]: So, I think bottom line, the deportations are putting a huge dent in the whole of my migrant populations.
- 1:38:03[SPEAKER_00]: And I think awareness,
- 1:38:06[SPEAKER_00]: And a bit of a clash of civilizations push back among American patriots is going to go a long way to thwarting any possibility of really a large scale Islamification of our country and closing the borders as well.
- 1:38:26[SPEAKER_00]: And with that, I believe that was our final question.
- 1:38:29[SPEAKER_00]: Great gang, keep an eye out for your back porch professor over the week.
- 1:38:35[SPEAKER_00]: And I'll be doing some few videos on the latest on any breaking news and news and analysis you're not going to hear anywhere else.
- 1:38:42[SPEAKER_00]: Love you guys, have a wonderful weekend.
- 1:38:45[SPEAKER_00]: So beautiful time of the year, get ready for a wonderful Christmas.
- 1:38:48[SPEAKER_00]: Love you all, God bless.
- 1:38:51[SPEAKER_00]: Thanks so much for listening to this episode of The Turley Talks Podcast.
- 1:38:55[SPEAKER_00]: Don't forget to subscribe, leave us a five star review, and share this episode with your friends.
- 1:39:00[SPEAKER_00]: Help us defeat the fake news media and rank us the number one news and commentary podcast all over the world.
- 1:39:07[SPEAKER_00]: Come back again tomorrow for another episode celebrating the rise of a new conservative age.