Latest / Honey Badger Radio / The WNBA is BTFO'd | HBR News 564

Transcript

The WNBA is BTFO'd | HBR News 564 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:02
  Speaker 1: This is HBr News number five sixty four. The w
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: n B A is bt f O where we discussed
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: the news of the week and give it the Badger treatment. Hello, everybody,
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: welcome to Honey Badger Radio. I hope you guys are
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: doing well this week and that you're laughing at all
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: of the absurdities so that you're not consumed by it.
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: I'm your host, Brian. I'm joined by, as always, my
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: lovely co host Hannah Wallen and doctor Randmerckham. Okay, so
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: this is amazing for me.
• 0:32
  Speaker 2: Uh, they'll comment it's funny bout radio.
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: Was I going too fast?
• 0:37
  Speaker 3: I didn't do nothing.
• 0:40
  Speaker 2: I couldn't think of anything to say, and I was
• 0:42
  Speaker 2: hoping I would would.
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: Just okay, I thought you would just say hello.
• 0:46
  Speaker 3: I think a hello will do I I invented this
• 0:50
  Speaker 3: accountability gain.
• 0:52
  Speaker 2: Yeah a couple of years ago. Every you just you
• 0:55
  Speaker 2: just introduced everyone and we just didn't say anything. But yeah,
• 0:59
  Speaker 2: because I'm such a narcissist, I'll be like, yeah, I
• 1:03
  Speaker 2: am here. I'm going to insert my voice into this gap.
• 1:06
  Speaker 2: But it does work, as thank you. It also tests
• 1:14
  Speaker 2: if the audience can hear.
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: Us it is it's a bad idea if.
• 1:18
  Speaker 2: You could be social and technical at the same time.
• 1:22
  Speaker 2: I think that's that's surely a win win anyway, Sorry,
• 1:26
  Speaker 2: yeah Jack the show.
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: No, No, you're good. Well, I mean, I will simply
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: I will simply expect people to do that when I
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: do my intro. I'm just I'm just trying to prevent
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: dead air. So go on, all right, we have a
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: great show liner for you guys today, so please be
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: sure to continue the conversations both in the chat as
• 1:47
  Speaker 1: well as a comment section. This week's HBr News show.
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: We're gonna be talking about the the latest trolling that's
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: been going on with the w n B A which
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: I'm totally here for. Ireland is going to protect the
• 1:59
  Speaker 1: women's by going after Native irishmen, and I am vindicated
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: and more so, stick around. It's gonna be a good time.
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: You're gonna like the vindication story because I know I'm
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: excited about it, and be sure to join us afterwards
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: for the patron only show. So it appears that despite
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: the fact that aoc was, that is, Alexandria Ocasio Cortez
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: had been telling us for years and years that the
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: world is gonna burn and die in a great heat
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: death if we don't do something, and that is to say,
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: implement the Green New Deal. She thinks that it's it
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: would be child abuse to bring children into this world,
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: and now she's freezing her eggs to save them for
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: I guess after the world respawns, and then she'll have
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: kids after it's destroyed. And I thought we would look
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: at a Slate article because I haven't done Slate in
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: a little while. And when I went to the Slate website,
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: this was the first thing that I that I was
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: gravitating towards. So we're gonna be checking this out and
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: just sort of like you know, shooting the breeze with
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: the patrons and the page from show has it turned
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: out that we have apparently avoided armageddon because AOC freezing
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: her eggs is proof of that.
• 3:11
  Speaker 2: Normally, I hate talking about AOC, like everywhere. Every time
• 3:15
  Speaker 2: someone does it, I'm like, you're only elevating this complete retard, yeah,
• 3:21
  Speaker 2: to the places she doesn't belong, And if we just
• 3:24
  Speaker 2: stopped talking about her, you wouldn't elevate her. But this
• 3:28
  Speaker 2: time I can make an exception because she is talking
• 3:31
  Speaker 2: about a thing that isn't normally talked about. Yeah, and
• 3:35
  Speaker 2: it's important that we talk about how weird this thing
• 3:38
  Speaker 2: is and we will save it fur the after show. Ladies.
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: Yes, we will talk about it in the Patron Show.
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: So if you want to join us for the Patron Show,
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: you'll have to become a Badger yourself by going to
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: feed the Badger dot com and starting a monthly subscription.
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: Five bucks a month will get you into the Discord server,
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: where you'll be able to watch all the additional content,
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: including all of our Patreot shows and other bonus content.
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: You can also look at what Allison has revealed in
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: her let's say, I don't know forays into the nether
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: It's like Minecraft in our server. She goes to the
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: nether to like find uh, to try to learn more
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: about feminism and dig dig the excavate I guess information
• 4:23
  Speaker 1: on its history and its philosophy and all of that.
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: And yeah, she's gotten a lot of that done. So
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: if you want to join us for that.
• 4:32
  Speaker 2: You think you've seen the autistic Internet, ladies and gentlemen,
• 4:35
  Speaker 2: but welcome to Behind the Badger Radio. Jeez, it's it's
• 4:40
  Speaker 2: it was built and designed by the most autistic lady
• 4:43
  Speaker 2: on the Internet.
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: It is it's true.
• 4:49
  Speaker 2: It's so it's why we're still here.
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: It is. It's it's why this hasn't changed that much.
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: So if you want to join us for that again,
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: let's feed the Badger dot com ord slash subscribe, And
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: if you want to send us a message at any
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: point during the show, that's feed the Badger dot com
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: forward slash just the tip. It's the best way to
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: send a message. So the other day, I think it
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: was Monday we did it was yesterday. We did a
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: rebol stream because we do them on Mondays, and there
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: was somebody that was having trouble sending a superchat through
• 5:20
  Speaker 1: or yeah, superchat through, and we said, just use the superchowds.
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: They won't censor them. They tend to just work better.
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: So please consider doing that. And lastly, if you don't
• 5:30
  Speaker 1: want to wake up one morning to find that we've
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: been yeeded from the Internet, then go to badgerfeed dot
• 5:34
  Speaker 1: com or Honey Badger Radio dot com to find where
• 5:36
  Speaker 1: all of our content lives. That's badgerfeed dot com or
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: Honey Badger Radio dot com. Okay, with all that out
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: of the way, let us get into today's story. So,
• 5:45
  Speaker 1: first of all, I've been vindicated. So you guys might remember,
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna give you guys a little bit of a
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: history lesson before we get into this. I did get
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: a Rumble rant right at the top, so I'll just
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: read that now, just because it's not related to this story.
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: Roboto gives us a dollar on Rumble and says, few
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: people get to president of the USA AOC running for
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: president and freeze her eggs to do so only helps
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: us from her reproducing. Yeah, if she runs for president,
• 6:15
  Speaker 1: you know what, I'm not going to do with John
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: Oliver and tell her to do it because that would
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: probably blow up in my face. But that's all again,
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: go to the after show. We'll talk about it.
• 6:23
  Speaker 2: Then.
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: We're not going to talk about that now, but go
• 6:25
  Speaker 1: to the after show. We'll talk about it there. All right.
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: So in twenty twenty one, well actually before that, and
• 6:33
  Speaker 1: I want to say it was around twenty nineteen, we
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: had covered a story of the game development the game
• 6:41
  Speaker 1: developer company I guess known as Blizzard. Okay, if you guys,
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: if you know Blizzard, Blizzard is a very high well,
• 6:49
  Speaker 1: it used to be a really well renowned company that
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: made a lot of very popular, well known games, and
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: they were known for their extremely high quality. They gave
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: us Warcraft, StarCraft, Lost Vikings, Overwatch, World of Warcraft, Diablo.
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: Those are like some of the stuff under their belt,
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: like you know, very very popular games. And there was
• 7:15
  Speaker 1: this civil rights issue that was going on where In
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: July of twenty twenty one, California's Civil Rights Department sued
• 7:26
  Speaker 1: Activision Blizzard. Blizzard was bought by Activision, alleging a quote
• 7:30
  Speaker 1: frat boy culture of constant sexual harassment, gender discrimination, unequal pay,
• 7:37
  Speaker 1: and retaliation against women. A complaint detailed serious claims, including
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: crude behavior, supervisors ignoring complaints, and one case involving a
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: female employees suicide during a work trip. The suit followed
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: a nearly three year investigation and sparked employee walkouts, executive departures,
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: and intense media scrutiny. Vision denied the systemic accusations from
• 8:02
  Speaker 1: the start. Now when I reported the story, when we
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: talked about it on I believe it was the news
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: show years ago. I was saying that this can't be true,
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: this is bullshit, or at the very least, it's not
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: being presented in the way that we were told. Like
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: you know, it was a frat boy atmosphere, people would
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: get drunk and the job stuff like that. These were
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: all complaints being leveled by women that were there, and
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: they were also new to the culture of Blizzard, right.
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: So Blizzard was like a bunch of dudes, like nerdy
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: dudes that were making games, and they had they had
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: a saying, you know, release date when it's done. Right.
• 8:45
  Speaker 1: They were hard working, but they were also very passionate
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: about what they did. And then they started to grow
• 8:51
  Speaker 1: and a bunch of women started working there, and all
• 8:53
  Speaker 1: of a sudden, there are all these problems with sexual
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: harassment in the workplace and frat boy culture and the
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: boys club and all of that. Okay, and the complaint
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: detailed serious claims, Like I already said, the suit followed
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: a nearly three year investigation and sparked employee walkouts. Like
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: I said before, Okay, and guys were fired, like a
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: bunch of the dudes that worked at Blizzard were fired.
• 9:15
  Speaker 1: Guys that worked on games like Diablo and Warcraft and
• 9:19
  Speaker 1: so on, And there was even guys that worked on Overwatch.
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: I remember one of the big stories about that was
• 9:25
  Speaker 1: there was a character in Overwatch. Overwatch was a hero
• 9:28
  Speaker 1: shooter right, and all the characters had names. There was
• 9:30
  Speaker 1: a character named McRee. He was actually the guy I
• 9:32
  Speaker 1: like to play. He was like a cowboy, and the
• 9:34
  Speaker 1: name McCree was one of the employees were at the
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: company and that's where they got the name. And that
• 9:40
  Speaker 1: guy got fired because supposedly he was harassing women at work.
• 9:45
  Speaker 1: So they actually didn't just fire the guy, but they
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: changed the name of the character because that was like
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: they were trying to essentially erase any connection that these
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: employees had with the company, and so they changed the
• 9:56
  Speaker 1: name of the character to Cassidy. And it was after
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: that Lindsay and I said we're not gonna play this
• 9:59
  Speaker 1: game anymore because I knew that they were bullshitting. And in
• 10:04
  Speaker 1: December of twenty twenty three, the party settled for about
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: forty fifty four million dollars, with roughly forty six million
• 10:11
  Speaker 1: set assigned for women who worked at the company in
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: California between twenty fifteen and twenty twenty to address pay
• 10:17
  Speaker 1: and promotion disparities. So the women were claiming that they
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: were being discreted against in terms of that wasn't just
• 10:22
  Speaker 1: sexual harassment, it wasn't just like supposedly driving somebody to
• 10:27
  Speaker 1: suicide or frat boy environment. It was also discrimination. The
• 10:31
  Speaker 1: women felt like they were being underpaid, they weren't getting
• 10:33
  Speaker 1: promotions they were supposed to get, and so they were
• 10:35
  Speaker 1: complaining about this as well. And was during this was like,
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: you know, around the Me Too movement as well, So
• 10:40
  Speaker 1: you have all these things that were happening at the
• 10:41
  Speaker 1: same time. As part of this agreement, the state, so
• 10:46
  Speaker 1: this was a California versus Blizzard case. Okay, the state
• 10:49
  Speaker 1: withdrew its sexual harassment claims, and both sides stated that
• 10:52
  Speaker 1: no court or independent investigation had substantiated allegations of systemic
• 10:57
  Speaker 1: or widespread sexual harassment. They also noted no evidence of
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: wrongdoing by the board or executives or then CEO Bobby Kotik.
• 11:05
  Speaker 1: The court approved the deal in January twenty twenty four,
• 11:08
  Speaker 1: and payments to eligible women have been distributed, So women
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: got paid anyways. The man picture here is Jason Schreier.
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: Jason Schreyer is a Bloomberg reporter played a notable role
• 11:20
  Speaker 1: in the media coverage. Right after the lawsuit dropped. He
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: obtained and shared internal emails from Blizzard president Jay Allen
• 11:27
  Speaker 1: Brack addressing the allegations weeks later, he published an in
• 11:31
  Speaker 1: depth piece based on interviews with over fifty current and
• 11:34
  Speaker 1: former employees, detailing a culture of sexual misconduct, untouchable rock stars,
• 11:38
  Speaker 1: and discrimination. So he contributed to these lies. Okay, that's
• 11:45
  Speaker 1: why I'm featuring him, because he wrote a book called
• 11:47
  Speaker 1: play Nice, where he was basically trying to condemn the
• 11:50
  Speaker 1: entire gaming industry for being a boys club and for
• 11:54
  Speaker 1: basically their part in harassing women and making them feel
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: unwelcome in the workplace, which did a tremendous amount of
• 12:01
  Speaker 1: damage to a lot of developers and a lot of
• 12:03
  Speaker 1: the livelihoods of people who work at these companies. I
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: called it anyway, he published an in depth piece based
• 12:13
  Speaker 1: on interviews with over fifty concurrent and former employees, detailing
• 12:17
  Speaker 1: a culture of sexual misconduct, on untouchable rock stars, and discrimination.
• 12:22
  Speaker 1: He later wrote the twenty twenty four book Play Nice,
• 12:24
  Speaker 1: which covers Blizzard's history, including these events. Now, there was
• 12:30
  Speaker 1: a great tweet that I want to read out, and
• 12:32
  Speaker 1: everyone's been talking about this story now because it's come
• 12:34
  Speaker 1: out that this guy contributed to this problem. He essentially
• 12:39
  Speaker 1: was a major factor in the culture war happening in
• 12:43
  Speaker 1: the gaming industry. Okay, so this guy is the reason
• 12:47
  Speaker 1: why there's a gamer Gate or people like this all right,
• 12:49
  Speaker 1: or there was there still is, so in case you
• 12:52
  Speaker 1: didn't know, all the allegations of sexual misconduct, abuse, harassment,
• 12:56
  Speaker 1: and frat boy culture were entirely fake, and the state
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: of California even admit it that there was no evidence
• 13:01
  Speaker 1: substantiating any of these claims. The entire controversy around Blizzard
• 13:05
  Speaker 1: was set up by California to force the company to
• 13:08
  Speaker 1: stop hiring white men, using me two allegations to strong
• 13:12
  Speaker 1: arm them. They gave those jobs to women. By the way,
• 13:15
  Speaker 1: Blizzard is shit now, just as an aside, some of
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: these accusations were so bizarre and insane that they included
• 13:21
  Speaker 1: theft and consumption of breast milk during work hours, completely unsubstantiated.
• 13:26
  Speaker 1: But they were talking about it a rape room named
• 13:29
  Speaker 1: after kid Bill Cosby, completely unsubstantiated. There was no evidence
• 13:33
  Speaker 1: of this, and this was right after Bill Cosby's allegations
• 13:36
  Speaker 1: came out too, by the way, which is important to
• 13:38
  Speaker 1: point out because that's falling apart as well sexual harassment
• 13:42
  Speaker 1: to the point of an employee ending her own life. Now,
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: there was a suicide, but it had nothing to do
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: with this. It was we don't know what it was,
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: but it wasn't because of this, so it could be anything.
• 13:53
  Speaker 1: All of these claims were essentially a theater performance over
• 13:56
  Speaker 1: the fact that only one in five Blizzard employees were women.
• 14:00
  Speaker 1: As a result, Blizzard agreed to play to pay roughly
• 14:03
  Speaker 1: eighteen million in fines and set up hr hiring practices
• 14:06
  Speaker 1: that would discriminate against white men. Internal messages between California
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: Civil Rights Division officials showed that the entire thing was
• 14:14
  Speaker 1: employed to send a message to the industry to literally
• 14:16
  Speaker 1: ruined video games. It was so fake that Brack and
• 14:20
  Speaker 1: Kotik literally paid their own employees to stage a walkout.
• 14:24
  Speaker 1: So they paid their employees to do the walkout to
• 14:27
  Speaker 1: make it look like they were protesting something they were
• 14:30
  Speaker 1: paid to do it. After Blizzard capitulated and announced it
• 14:33
  Speaker 1: would discriminate in its hiring, the state walk back from
• 14:36
  Speaker 1: the billion dollar lawsuit with fifty five million dollar settlement
• 14:39
  Speaker 1: and announce it all the allegations were false. I was right.
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: I told you this was all bullshit. And there were
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: even people that were pro gamergate that believed this. They
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: were like, oh, well, I heard some things about Blizzard. No, no,
• 14:54
  Speaker 1: So I just wanted to point that out. The only
• 15:00
  Speaker 1: reason why we're this is coming out now is because
• 15:02
  Speaker 1: Schreyer is selling a book, and he spilled the beans
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: when he was doing his sort of book tours. I
• 15:09
  Speaker 1: guess he was doing interviews online talking about the book.
• 15:11
  Speaker 1: Play nice Tryer. Also, by the way, I got, I
• 15:15
  Speaker 1: got an image here. He was a he was been,
• 15:17
  Speaker 1: he had been. He was a journalist. He was criticizing
• 15:19
  Speaker 1: video games all the time. He criticized Dragon's Crown. He criticized,
• 15:23
  Speaker 1: you know, like basically anything that had attractive women in
• 15:26
  Speaker 1: it or involved men. I think he took a screenshot
• 15:28
  Speaker 1: of like a development team and he said, I can't
• 15:31
  Speaker 1: believe it was like a bunch of white dudes, And
• 15:33
  Speaker 1: he said, I can't believe that there are white guys
• 15:35
  Speaker 1: still working like that basically rule the games industry at
• 15:37
  Speaker 1: this point. So I just wanted to tell you, guys,
• 15:41
  Speaker 1: fuck you. I was right. And uh, I'll give the
• 15:44
  Speaker 1: floor to whoever. I'm gonna look for that for that
• 15:47
  Speaker 1: for that additional screenshot, but go ahead and give your comments.
• 15:51
  Speaker 2: I come, my boy's banging it. Have you ever seen
• 15:55
  Speaker 2: my boy banging like this? Did? You see what, Brian
• 15:58
  Speaker 2: just I come, I love you brain right, And yeah.
• 16:02
  Speaker 1: Wait, what did I do? I don't know.
• 16:04
  Speaker 2: I banged it. Okay, you fucking banged it. Just saying
• 16:09
  Speaker 2: all right. And this is for anyone who thinks Game
• 16:12
  Speaker 2: Agate won the war or even the battle. It gives
• 16:18
  Speaker 2: me no pleasure to conclude this, but we did not,
• 16:22
  Speaker 2: And at the time, we weren't even worried about the
• 16:25
  Speaker 2: how the dev teams would be ravaged to death by DEI,
• 16:30
  Speaker 2: which wasn't really quite a thing at the time as
• 16:32
  Speaker 2: far as we knew. We were like, it's okay if
• 16:35
  Speaker 2: you have women on your team, as long as those
• 16:37
  Speaker 2: women are pulling their weight. We just didn't want the
• 16:41
  Speaker 2: games themselves to be advertisements for feminism and the anti
• 16:47
  Speaker 2: white slime that comes along with feminism. But here we are,
• 16:51
  Speaker 2: twelve years later. Not only has every female character in
• 16:55
  Speaker 2: every game been reduced to an asymmetrical dumpster fire of
• 17:00
  Speaker 2: dysgenic freakery, but it's happening because the Deaf team has
• 17:05
  Speaker 2: been systematically replaced with female dysgenic freaks who will not
• 17:12
  Speaker 2: tolerate any female character who is any less dysgenic than them.
• 17:19
  Speaker 2: Were we exaggerating the situation that the literally Who's were
• 17:25
  Speaker 2: enforcing on us. No, we were underplaying it. If anything,
• 17:31
  Speaker 2: the literally Who's made it as far as the un
• 17:36
  Speaker 2: demanding that video games present women as nothing ever greater
• 17:42
  Speaker 2: than the zero out of ten nightmare communist luck chicks
• 17:46
  Speaker 2: who imposed their own image on a medium in which
• 17:51
  Speaker 2: they never indulged. And here we are. Video games can
• 17:55
  Speaker 2: no longer feature women any more attractive than a fat
• 17:59
  Speaker 2: blue head who hates everyone, but they have to feature
• 18:03
  Speaker 2: men attractive enough for Anita to see their butt under
• 18:10
  Speaker 2: Batman's cape. Weirdly, that doesn't sound very feminist at first,
• 18:18
  Speaker 2: blush does it. Male characters should be as beautiful as possible,
• 18:23
  Speaker 2: but female characters have to be irreproachable swamp donkeys that
• 18:29
  Speaker 2: make you vomit on sight. And this same paradigm can
• 18:34
  Speaker 2: be extended to the Netflix interpretations of these games. If
• 18:39
  Speaker 2: you have a female protagonist, she needs to be a
• 18:42
  Speaker 2: giant potato with a tiny face drawn on it. Why
• 18:47
  Speaker 2: do women want this, Well, it's kind of obvious. We
• 18:53
  Speaker 2: want women to be in everything, but under no circumstances
• 18:58
  Speaker 2: are men allowed to enjoy the existence of those women.
• 19:04
  Speaker 2: Women are oppressed if men enjoy their existence. If women
• 19:09
  Speaker 2: are to exist in spaces, then underno circumstances should men
• 19:15
  Speaker 2: get any benefit from women existing in those spaces. So
• 19:22
  Speaker 2: we need women to occupy everything everywhere forever. But they
• 19:26
  Speaker 2: need to be women who look like deformed vegetables, because
• 19:31
  Speaker 2: that's the only way to avert to the male gaze.
• 19:35
  Speaker 2: And like I said, it's not just in the video
• 19:37
  Speaker 2: games themselves, it's in the companies producing these games. We
• 19:43
  Speaker 2: want women occupying these once predominantly male spaces, but they
• 19:47
  Speaker 2: cannot be women who are like nice to men, let
• 19:53
  Speaker 2: alone women who like men, let alone women who are
• 19:57
  Speaker 2: attractive to men. This was never about harmony between men
• 20:04
  Speaker 2: and women. It's about annihilating any possibility of men enjoying
• 20:09
  Speaker 2: themselves or being productive. Nor is it about women enjoying
• 20:15
  Speaker 2: themselves or being productive. Is about men being replaced by women.
• 20:20
  Speaker 2: It's about replacing men's enjoyment with women's resentment. Pardon up
• 20:30
  Speaker 2: to and including the point where the entire dev team
• 20:34
  Speaker 2: has been replaced by women who hate each other and
• 20:38
  Speaker 2: make everything about how much they hate men. It's about
• 20:44
  Speaker 2: abolishing anything remotely productive and replacing it with this neurotic
• 20:50
  Speaker 2: revolution of women hating on men. And when the company
• 20:55
  Speaker 2: inevitably tanks, we'll just blame it on the men who
• 20:59
  Speaker 2: are allowed to be here anymore. This is exactly what
• 21:03
  Speaker 2: we were warning you about twelve years ago. When it
• 21:06
  Speaker 2: comes to video games. It's exactly what we were warning
• 21:11
  Speaker 2: about decades ago when this happened across the board in
• 21:14
  Speaker 2: every industry under the sun. Is that, you know, cleaning
• 21:19
  Speaker 2: the sewers and climbing the trees the ship. That's actually
• 21:22
  Speaker 2: dangerous and unpleasant. There's never been a hashtag sewer gate
• 21:28
  Speaker 2: because women have never demanded an identitarian domination of the sewers.
• 21:34
  Speaker 2: But they wanted to become receptionists, and they wanted to
• 21:39
  Speaker 2: become salespeople, and they wanted to become programmers and digital artists.
• 21:44
  Speaker 2: But they couldn't fucking hack it, so they burned everything
• 21:48
  Speaker 2: down so they could rule over the ashes. That's a
• 21:52
  Speaker 2: cliche that traditionally applied to kings and male leaders. A
• 21:57
  Speaker 2: tyrant king will burn down the country or all over
• 22:00
  Speaker 2: the ashes. But it also happens to this to describe
• 22:05
  Speaker 2: the average woman. Not a tyrant, not an evil king,
• 22:12
  Speaker 2: just an average woman. There is much to admire about
• 22:17
  Speaker 2: the above average woman. Those who will roll up their
• 22:21
  Speaker 2: sleeves and put the work in like the average man does.
• 22:26
  Speaker 2: But no such concessions should be made for the modern
• 22:30
  Speaker 2: average woman. The modern average woman is just as retarded
• 22:35
  Speaker 2: as the modern average man, but in different ways. The
• 22:38
  Speaker 2: average man is a worker, the average woman is a homemaker,
• 22:43
  Speaker 2: and there's nothing wrong with those things. But you can't
• 22:47
  Speaker 2: just put homemakers in the executive positions and expect everything
• 22:52
  Speaker 2: to function normally any more than you can expect. All right,
• 22:57
  Speaker 2: I was about to make a racial analogy, but I
• 23:00
  Speaker 2: don't think I should. You probably get what I was
• 23:05
  Speaker 2: about to say, and so I shall not say it,
• 23:06
  Speaker 2: And so I shall not say anything else, because you
• 23:10
  Speaker 2: know I quite enjoy visiting this country.
• 23:16
  Speaker 3: Well, right, then, there's not much for me to say
• 23:21
  Speaker 3: about gamer date that hasn't already been said. So I
• 23:25
  Speaker 3: will say this once again, do not believe women wait
• 23:32
  Speaker 3: for evidence. Every single time something like this comes up,
• 23:38
  Speaker 3: where there is a allegation or a set of allegations,
• 23:44
  Speaker 3: or a whole set of stories involving multiple allegations that
• 23:51
  Speaker 3: are instrumental in eliminating men who are in women's way,
• 23:58
  Speaker 3: it turns out to be a lie. It turns out
• 24:01
  Speaker 3: every time to be a lie, and everybody gets all
• 24:04
  Speaker 3: up in arms. Oh, this is a terrible environment. These
• 24:07
  Speaker 3: women have been through. Hell no they haven't. None other
• 24:11
  Speaker 3: shit happened. They experienced nothing. They're not victims. They're perpetrators,
• 24:21
  Speaker 3: and they're gonna get away with it. And yeah, this
• 24:25
  Speaker 3: guy elevated their perpetration. He is like the getaway driver
• 24:32
  Speaker 3: for bank robbers. He's just as much one of them.
• 24:37
  Speaker 3: In fact, they couldn't have done the crime without him,
• 24:40
  Speaker 3: and therefore is just as culpable.
• 24:44
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 24:45
  Speaker 3: But this really underscores what I say all the time.
• 24:54
  Speaker 3: If a woman tells you that somebody did something to
• 24:58
  Speaker 3: her for a purpose, like her telling you has a
• 25:03
  Speaker 3: purpose that involves you giving something up or somebody facing consequences,
• 25:14
  Speaker 3: the person that she's accusing getting into some degree of
• 25:18
  Speaker 3: trouble or losing something. You having to do something to
• 25:23
  Speaker 3: that person require evidence. If there's no evidence, then you
• 25:29
  Speaker 3: have to look at her as an individual who tried
• 25:33
  Speaker 3: to do something bad, because it is bad to force
• 25:38
  Speaker 3: a consequence on someone or coerce someone into giving something
• 25:43
  Speaker 3: up or doing something they don't want to do by
• 25:46
  Speaker 3: playing victim. Every single time there is a victim of
• 25:52
  Speaker 3: that situation. It's not the person who plays victim. If
• 25:57
  Speaker 3: someone is lying to you to get what they want,
• 26:03
  Speaker 3: it is fraud. If somebody is lying to you to
• 26:09
  Speaker 3: cause you to suffer a consequence, or lying about you
• 26:14
  Speaker 3: to cause you to suffer a consequence, rather, that is defamation.
• 26:18
  Speaker 3: And it doesn't matter whether or not it's a popular
• 26:26
  Speaker 3: kind of definite defamation. It doesn't matter whether or not
• 26:28
  Speaker 3: people support this kind of defamation. It's still wrong. The
• 26:33
  Speaker 3: only thing about that that matters is that it makes
• 26:36
  Speaker 3: it more frequent. You're more likely to experience this wrong.
• 26:40
  Speaker 3: So when you see it doesn't matter if it's an opponent,
• 26:47
  Speaker 3: a friend, a family member, a stranger. When you see someone,
• 26:55
  Speaker 3: a female in particular, accusing someone of sexual misconduct two harassment, discrimination, misogyny,
• 27:05
  Speaker 3: abuse of women in any way, shape or form, and
• 27:10
  Speaker 3: they're demanding a consequence against the individual that they're accusing,
• 27:15
  Speaker 3: or they're expecting you to do something that you wouldn't
• 27:18
  Speaker 3: otherwise do. No, the answer is no, show me proof,
• 27:25
  Speaker 3: show me the receipts, or it never happened, and now
• 27:30
  Speaker 3: I'm going to think less of you for saying it.
• 27:33
  Speaker 3: That has to be your answer every single time, and
• 27:39
  Speaker 3: at the same time. That needs to be pushed for
• 27:43
  Speaker 3: in workplaces, in law, in policy, in educational institutions, in
• 27:50
  Speaker 3: any type of club or other organization, anywhere that men
• 27:56
  Speaker 3: and women have to be in the same place at
• 27:58
  Speaker 3: the same time in order to do whatever the place
• 28:01
  Speaker 3: exists for people to do. The policy needs to be
• 28:07
  Speaker 3: show me evidence or don't make the accusation, and if
• 28:11
  Speaker 3: there's evidence against the accusation, you get punished for making
• 28:16
  Speaker 3: that accusation. Because this shit needs to stop. It's not
• 28:22
  Speaker 3: just games. It's games and healthcare, and retail, and law,
• 28:33
  Speaker 3: and education, and auto mechanics and the railroad industry and
• 28:44
  Speaker 3: you know anything that else else that you can name.
• 28:47
  Speaker 3: If two percent of the workers in a given industry
• 28:51
  Speaker 3: are women, this is happening in that industry. It's just
• 28:58
  Speaker 3: happening on a bigger scale and there's more women. So
• 29:03
  Speaker 3: don't accept that. And if you're one of the higher
• 29:09
  Speaker 3: ups in a company, you might consider reducing the size
• 29:13
  Speaker 3: of your human human resources department or getting rid of
• 29:17
  Speaker 3: it all together, at least everybody that's not involved in
• 29:21
  Speaker 3: maintaining things like the insurance and payroll and shit like that.
• 29:27
  Speaker 3: But you don't need people to take complaints like this.
• 29:35
  Speaker 3: You need people to not make complaints like this without
• 29:39
  Speaker 3: providing solid evidence. And all you have to have is
• 29:44
  Speaker 3: a policy that if there is evidence, then you act
• 29:48
  Speaker 3: on it. And if there is not evidence, and especially
• 29:51
  Speaker 3: if there's evidence to the contrary, then you treat the
• 29:56
  Speaker 3: accuser as a perpetrator of false accusation. And that's the
• 30:02
  Speaker 3: way it has to be, because throughout history and on
• 30:08
  Speaker 3: into the future, women always have and always will use
• 30:12
  Speaker 3: false accusations as a weapon against people who are in
• 30:16
  Speaker 3: their way. There are stories about that in the Bible
• 30:21
  Speaker 3: for crying out loud. It's so old that it was
• 30:27
  Speaker 3: written about in the Old Testament of the Bible. Like,
• 30:32
  Speaker 3: why are people still falling for this anocentrism?
• 30:37
  Speaker 1: Yeah, it's a sense of chivalry women like they they
• 30:42
  Speaker 1: literally cannot see women as agents that are trying to
• 30:48
  Speaker 1: that can like get in get into underhanded tactics, and
• 30:52
  Speaker 1: men are particularly vulnerable to this, it seems. And I
• 30:58
  Speaker 1: just want to point out also California, they got a
• 31:01
  Speaker 1: payday out of that. They made how much they make
• 31:05
  Speaker 1: out of this. They got it like a settlement of
• 31:08
  Speaker 1: fifty five million dollars just for the Like California.
• 31:13
  Speaker 3: Got to California State of Yes.
• 31:16
  Speaker 1: They got the civil the Civil Rights Division of California
• 31:20
  Speaker 1: got paid by Blizzard for this. Now, I don't have
• 31:24
  Speaker 1: any love for Blizzard at this point because they did
• 31:26
  Speaker 1: go along with all of this, but California successfully grifted
• 31:32
  Speaker 1: fifty five million dollars and they also made Blizzard pay
• 31:36
  Speaker 1: another eighteen million in fines, So you know, that's that's
• 31:41
  Speaker 1: a pretty decent payday for just some women just making
• 31:45
  Speaker 1: shit up. They also again, they got a lot of
• 31:48
  Speaker 1: men fired and women took their place. And Shreyer here,
• 31:50
  Speaker 1: he was like instrumental in that. Okay, that's why I'm
• 31:54
  Speaker 1: featuring him because if it weren't for him and the
• 31:57
  Speaker 1: way he was reporting on this stuff, it wouldn't have happened.
• 32:00
  Speaker 1: And he's also trying to sell a book right now,
• 32:03
  Speaker 1: which I think is probably selling fine because you know,
• 32:05
  Speaker 1: he's in the club. He gets to get promoted and
• 32:08
  Speaker 1: people will probably buy his book. I also want to
• 32:11
  Speaker 1: point out that Schreer, yeah, some of the other stuff
• 32:12
  Speaker 1: that he did. In April of twenty thirteen, he called
• 32:16
  Speaker 1: Dragon's crowns dragon Crown's sorceress design made by a fourteen
• 32:20
  Speaker 1: year old boy, accusing of moral panic over sexualized art.
• 32:25
  Speaker 1: In June of twenty thirteen, he branded Trendy Entertainment a
• 32:28
  Speaker 1: studio from hell over crunch and sexism. Of course, none
• 32:32
  Speaker 1: of this is a substantiated He just said this, or
• 32:35
  Speaker 1: maybe he interviewed someone who claimed it and then he
• 32:38
  Speaker 1: just shared that. In twenty thirteen, Bethesda blacklisted him in
• 32:43
  Speaker 1: Kotaku for years after his internal reporting. In twenty fourteen
• 32:47
  Speaker 1: and twenty fifteen. His game journal pass membership sparked collusion
• 32:50
  Speaker 1: accusations during Gamergate because he was colluding twenty fourteen twenty
• 32:54
  Speaker 1: fifteen is when Gamergate was in full swing. May twenty sixteen,
• 32:58
  Speaker 1: he reported No Man's Sky delay, causing death threats to
• 33:01
  Speaker 1: the developers who basically the Noman Sky guys. That's like
• 33:04
  Speaker 1: one of the best redemption arcs in all of gaming's history.
• 33:08
  Speaker 1: But whatever this guy was, he didn't keep a shit
• 33:10
  Speaker 1: about that. He's a He's an opportunist of the highest order.
• 33:13
  Speaker 1: In twenty twenty, he feuded with Neil Druckman over holocaust jokes,
• 33:17
  Speaker 1: called a built called a bully by other developers. Twenty
• 33:22
  Speaker 1: twenty one through twenty twenty four, he was accused of
• 33:24
  Speaker 1: timing and amplifying Blizzard harassment stories for his book play
• 33:28
  Speaker 1: nice Cause and which, by the way, yeah, he brought
• 33:30
  Speaker 1: he he amplified this up to tell his book, and
• 33:32
  Speaker 1: it turned out to know of it was true, and
• 33:34
  Speaker 1: he knew that, right, and it goes on right. He
• 33:38
  Speaker 1: called Vailguard critics Chuds, admitted that he disliked the game
• 33:41
  Speaker 1: but loved dunking on them, then deleted his posts. He
• 33:44
  Speaker 1: has like he has since after all of this recent
• 33:48
  Speaker 1: news has come out, he left x and he's gone
• 33:51
  Speaker 1: over to Blue Sky Surprise surprise, as the yeah, as
• 33:56
  Speaker 1: the Blizzard story was resurfacing. So he reports he basically
• 34:01
  Speaker 1: created the culture war. He's not hitting create it. He's
• 34:03
  Speaker 1: part of. He's like a fixture of the culture war, Trier.
• 34:07
  Speaker 1: So this is anyway, this is this is the proof.
• 34:13
  Speaker 1: There was no proof. That's the proof. So yeah, Schriyer's
• 34:16
  Speaker 1: a scumbag. And but you know, I'm glad that the
• 34:20
  Speaker 1: truth is out and I was right. That's all I'm saying.
• 34:23
  Speaker 1: So with all that out of the way, let me
• 34:27
  Speaker 1: look at your super chats because I got a bunch
• 34:29
  Speaker 1: of them, and we'll get into the next one. So
• 34:33
  Speaker 1: thanks for the commentary. I'm I'm happy about that, the
• 34:36
  Speaker 1: truth coming out. But yeah, anyway, Richard Vierre gives us
• 34:42
  Speaker 1: five dollars and says, Alexandria occasional occasional cortex freezing her
• 34:47
  Speaker 1: eggs is giving me the flashback to that article about
• 34:50
  Speaker 1: that career woman who had her eggs frozen in her
• 34:52
  Speaker 1: thirties and then later tried to get pregnant at forty eight.
• 34:55
  Speaker 1: Something like eight of the eggs didn't survive the thawing,
• 34:58
  Speaker 1: and out of the remaining two, one didn't become a
• 35:00
  Speaker 1: viable embryo, and she would up she would end up
• 35:04
  Speaker 1: miscarrying the last one. Yeah, well that's it.
• 35:07
  Speaker 2: Imagine the future that's led by Ai and uhh, the
• 35:13
  Speaker 2: frozen embryo baby of aoc mm hmmm. I just want
• 35:18
  Speaker 2: you to imagine that future just for a second, just
• 35:21
  Speaker 2: for a second. It will make you shit yourself to
• 35:25
  Speaker 2: death if you imagine it any further than that.
• 35:28
  Speaker 3: Yeah, she might be a perfectly intelligent person. She just
• 35:31
  Speaker 3: already froze her brain.
• 35:35
  Speaker 1: Yeah right. Richard Bierre then gives us five dollars and says,
• 35:40
  Speaker 1: this is another super child. If you get into a
• 35:42
  Speaker 1: position of importance or prominence, then perhaps you just start
• 35:45
  Speaker 1: identifying yourself as Jewish as a layer of protection. Try
• 35:49
  Speaker 1: doesn't have to identify he is. But that's like, that's
• 35:52
  Speaker 1: neither here nor there, but it is true. Michael Emrick
• 35:56
  Speaker 1: Windberg gives us five dollars and says, can we take
• 35:59
  Speaker 1: a moment to appreciate how George Kea Kamatani, the director
• 36:03
  Speaker 1: of for Dragon's Crown, responded to Schreier's whining about his
• 36:06
  Speaker 1: character designs. It's likely not hard at all to find yourself.
• 36:11
  Speaker 1: Find it if you look that one up. I know
• 36:12
  Speaker 1: what the dwarfs. Yeah, I'll look it up. Maybe I'll
• 36:16
  Speaker 1: share it. At the end, Richard Bierre gives us five
• 36:18
  Speaker 1: dollars and on super Chow again and says, I don't
• 36:21
  Speaker 1: think that women actually want to do the work of
• 36:23
  Speaker 1: programming and or other functions, but rather that they want
• 36:26
  Speaker 1: the recognition of being in those positions for the recognition
• 36:30
  Speaker 1: that is perceived in the community zone. There is a
• 36:33
  Speaker 1: picture of a woman in tech stock photo. Look at
• 36:36
  Speaker 1: how she is holding the soldering iron and what she
• 36:39
  Speaker 1: is attempting to solder on. It's a set of props
• 36:42
  Speaker 1: for a modeling shoot, rather than her demonstrating skills in
• 36:45
  Speaker 1: the field being marketed to women to obtain recognition for
• 36:48
  Speaker 1: being seen. Yes, we know they don't really code.
• 36:53
  Speaker 2: It's learned to learn to code.
• 36:54
  Speaker 1: Yeah, learn to learn to code. Yeah we know that.
• 36:58
  Speaker 1: It's just for the cloud. Has nothing to do with passion.
• 37:01
  Speaker 1: That's why this again, we don't even have to imagine.
• 37:05
  Speaker 1: Look at Blizzard now, their shit, their shit because they
• 37:08
  Speaker 1: fired all the people who knew what they were doing
• 37:10
  Speaker 1: and they hired a bunch of unqualified people who don't
• 37:13
  Speaker 1: and the company's gonna suffer and they deserve it. That
• 37:15
  Speaker 1: I mean does like I don't really have to go
• 37:18
  Speaker 1: to wonder. We can just look at what's going on
• 37:20
  Speaker 1: and this is not just and look, if you're not
• 37:22
  Speaker 1: a gamer, that's fine. You can look at any industry
• 37:26
  Speaker 1: that's been that's had the me too fucking hordes run
• 37:30
  Speaker 1: through it and look at what it was like before
• 37:33
  Speaker 1: and how productive they were and how good the quality
• 37:36
  Speaker 1: of their products were. And then look at it after.
• 37:38
  Speaker 1: Look at Hollywood, look at music, look at television, look
• 37:41
  Speaker 1: at video games, you know whatever, look at social media.
• 37:46
  Speaker 1: I mean you could also look at the reverse of that.
• 37:48
  Speaker 1: Look at what what Twitter was like when it was
• 37:50
  Speaker 1: still in a Jack Dorsey and a bunch of women
• 37:53
  Speaker 1: that had jobs that where they didn't do shit. And
• 37:55
  Speaker 1: now that it's under Elon Musk. I mean, granted, it's
• 37:57
  Speaker 1: a lot more Indian and African than it was, but
• 38:00
  Speaker 1: you know, at least it's got free speech to some degree. Anyway,
• 38:05
  Speaker 1: Official Reverse Traditionalism channel on YouTube gives us five dollars
• 38:09
  Speaker 1: and says, so is the anti feminist Council of Doom
• 38:13
  Speaker 1: in agreement that we can in fact prove the existence
• 38:15
  Speaker 1: of stay at home fathers. Oh, it's another complete digression
• 38:18
  Speaker 1: hundreds of years before feminism easily? In Wait, what so
• 38:23
  Speaker 1: is the anti feminist Council of Doom in agreement that
• 38:26
  Speaker 1: we can in fact prove the existence of stay at
• 38:28
  Speaker 1: home fathers hundreds of years before feminism easily in looking
• 38:33
  Speaker 1: at relationships in the Middle Ages between female cheesemakers, etc.
• 38:37
  Speaker 1: And men who worked a home farm. I'm just not
• 38:40
  Speaker 1: sure if it's meant to be taken literally or if
• 38:42
  Speaker 1: it refers to any manufacturers of dairy products. Well, thank
• 38:47
  Speaker 1: you for that. Nova Fan twenty one gives us a
• 38:50
  Speaker 1: dollar and says tradcocks who refuse to ever hold women accountable.
• 38:53
  Speaker 1: But Joseph from the Bible was falsely accused of grape,
• 38:56
  Speaker 1: and his life only got better after that. There is
• 38:59
  Speaker 1: no concern here, all right, thanks for your super chats
• 39:04
  Speaker 1: and super childs.
• 39:06
  Speaker 3: His life only got better after that, except for that
• 39:08
  Speaker 3: part where he spent years in prison.
• 39:11
  Speaker 1: Yeah wait, it was about the technical or dream coach
• 39:15
  Speaker 1: Joseph or anyway. Richard Rio gives us five dollars and
• 39:20
  Speaker 1: sends an image.
• 39:22
  Speaker 3: We're talking, we're talking, well, we're talking. It wasn't the
• 39:27
  Speaker 3: technicolor coat. It was it's it wasn't about that part
• 39:32
  Speaker 3: of the story it's about, But it was that guy interpreter.
• 39:36
  Speaker 1: Yeah yeah, yeah, yeah, No, I know what you mean.
• 39:41
  Speaker 3: He was imprisoned. He was imprisoned for that, and and
• 39:45
  Speaker 3: it wasn't in a cell with lovely indoor plumbing and
• 39:51
  Speaker 3: you know the amenities that exist in the horrible jails
• 39:55
  Speaker 3: that nobody wants to go to today.
• 39:58
  Speaker 1: Yeah uh. He also became pharaoh. My point is they
• 40:04
  Speaker 1: look for excuses. Yeah, I know what you're saying. I
• 40:07
  Speaker 1: get it, all right, anyway. Um so yeah, so that's
• 40:13
  Speaker 1: basically that story Code of many colors. Yeah yeah, I know.
• 40:18
  Speaker 1: Let's move on to the next one. Let me know
• 40:20
  Speaker 1: what you guys, think about this one of the comments. Okay,
• 40:21
  Speaker 1: we're gonna keep on rolling here. So if it isn't
• 40:27
  Speaker 1: plastic reproductions of male genitilia being lobbed in the court,
• 40:30
  Speaker 1: or white female players getting the piss pummeled out of
• 40:33
  Speaker 1: them by their low impulse control and racially violent opponents,
• 40:37
  Speaker 1: there's always something happening as of late in the Women's
• 40:40
  Speaker 1: National Basketball Association, except for fucking basketball. What's your name is,
• 40:44
  Speaker 1: Caitlin Clark? This time it's the absolute panic gripping the
• 40:48
  Speaker 1: higher ups, as two professional male basketball players have declared
• 40:52
  Speaker 1: intent on joining the twenty twenty seven WNBA draft, and
• 40:57
  Speaker 1: because it must be clarified due to current year reasons,
• 41:00
  Speaker 1: the two men in question are indeed biological men who,
• 41:03
  Speaker 1: to all publicly available knowledge, have not begun any jan
• 41:07
  Speaker 1: any gender transitions of any kind other than showing interest
• 41:11
  Speaker 1: in joining the WNBA. The first man, Royce White, professional
• 41:16
  Speaker 1: basketball player and conservative politician, made the announcement, stating quote,
• 41:20
  Speaker 1: I am transgender. I'm a woman, I identify as sometimes identifying
• 41:24
  Speaker 1: as a woman for the purposes of basketball professional basketball.
• 41:28
  Speaker 1: So I'll be declaring for the WNBA draft in twenty
• 41:32
  Speaker 1: twenty seven as well. I think I'd be unstoppable. But
• 41:35
  Speaker 1: I'm a team first guy. I'm a pass first kind
• 41:38
  Speaker 1: of player. I do the little things. I led my
• 41:41
  Speaker 1: team in all five major stack categories at Iowa State University,
• 41:45
  Speaker 1: so I do a little bit of everything. I'll do
• 41:47
  Speaker 1: whatever the coach needs me to do. I'll do whatever
• 41:49
  Speaker 1: the girls need me to do. I think it's only
• 41:51
  Speaker 1: fair end quote. When asked if he was worried about
• 41:54
  Speaker 1: the WNBA not allowing him in, he said the following quote.
• 41:58
  Speaker 1: I don't want to be discriminated against. I want fair treatment.
• 42:02
  Speaker 1: I'm young black, hopefully United States senator that would be
• 42:05
  Speaker 1: like that, would like a fair chance to participate as
• 42:08
  Speaker 1: a sometimes identifying as a transgender woman athlete. I have
• 42:11
  Speaker 1: to file discrimination lawsuit, right, I mean, that's that's ridiculous.
• 42:16
  Speaker 1: We're gonna have to have a huge legal battle about
• 42:18
  Speaker 1: discrimination if I can't play. End quote. The second man,
• 42:22
  Speaker 1: also a professional basketball player Enie's cantor Freedom that's his name,
• 42:27
  Speaker 1: made a similar announcement in a letter he sent to
• 42:29
  Speaker 1: the WNBA, stating quote, please accept this formal document as
• 42:33
  Speaker 1: my official written notification to the Women's National Basketball Association
• 42:37
  Speaker 1: of my voluntary decision to enter the player pool for
• 42:40
  Speaker 1: the twenty twenty seven WNBA Draft consistent with the current
• 42:44
  Speaker 1: league collective Bargaining agreement. I am submitting this notice to
• 42:47
  Speaker 1: exercise my draft rights and to affirm that I at
• 42:51
  Speaker 1: least at twenty one, twenty two years old, and that
• 42:55
  Speaker 1: I have no remaining intercollegiate eligibility as required by Art
• 43:00
  Speaker 1: eight or our Article thirteen, Section one B. I request
• 43:04
  Speaker 1: that the WNBA League Office verify receipt of this document
• 43:08
  Speaker 1: and direct any future communications to my personal email address
• 43:11
  Speaker 1: lifted listed above. Thank you for your official processing of
• 43:14
  Speaker 1: my registration into the twenty twenty seven draft pool. The
• 43:19
  Speaker 1: WNBA Players Union has addressed the controversy without defining player
• 43:22
  Speaker 1: eligibility in a statement saying, quote, we embrace justice, equity,
• 43:27
  Speaker 1: diversity and inclusion. Hate abuse and demonization of any person
• 43:32
  Speaker 1: or group of people, including transgender people, only fuel fear,
• 43:36
  Speaker 1: division and harm. We will continue to have hard conversations,
• 43:39
  Speaker 1: but we will not be used as political pawns end
• 43:42
  Speaker 1: quote said the people who routinely use themselves and their
• 43:45
  Speaker 1: sport as political pawns behind the scenes. WNBA Commissioner Kathy
• 43:50
  Speaker 1: Engelbert has called for an all hands on deck meeting
• 43:53
  Speaker 1: to discuss and clarify eligibility guidelines for women's participation in
• 43:57
  Speaker 1: the wake of these events. There's one thing clear. It's
• 44:01
  Speaker 1: that White and Freedom are just here to play some basketball.
• 44:05
  Speaker 1: That's the name of the people, not the actual ideas.
• 44:09
  Speaker 1: They aren't here to discuss their transitions. So yeah, so
• 44:12
  Speaker 1: we have a couple of guys. I even have like
• 44:14
  Speaker 1: some video footage, But I don't know if we need
• 44:17
  Speaker 1: to work.
• 44:18
  Speaker 4: The good I mean, I think I'd be unstoppable. Yeah,
• 44:22
  Speaker 4: but I'm a team first guy. You know. I'm a
• 44:25
  Speaker 4: past first kind of player. I do the little things,
• 44:28
  Speaker 4: you know. I led my team in all five major
• 44:30
  Speaker 4: stack categories at at Iowa State University, So I do
• 44:34
  Speaker 4: a little bit of every I'll do whatever the coach
• 44:35
  Speaker 4: needs me to do. I'll do whatever the girls need
• 44:38
  Speaker 4: me to do.
• 44:39
  Speaker 1: M Hey, who am I to judge? That's a woman?
• 44:44
  Speaker 1: If you ask me, Okay, anybody who wants to take
• 44:47
  Speaker 1: the Florida go ahead.
• 44:51
  Speaker 3: I guess it's me on this one first time. Everybody
• 44:56
  Speaker 3: else is quiet unless you have something prepared. Did you
• 45:00
  Speaker 3: want to.
• 45:05
  Speaker 2: Well? When I first heard the statement, I identify as
• 45:11
  Speaker 2: sometimes identifying as a woman going to admit I lolled.
• 45:16
  Speaker 2: I I literally love that loud and I don't often literally.
• 45:23
  Speaker 2: It kind of indicates that he's taking the pace. But
• 45:26
  Speaker 2: at the same time that is actually a thing within
• 45:31
  Speaker 2: this gender cult, it's called being gender fluid. Sometimes I
• 45:35
  Speaker 2: feel like a man, sometimes I feel like a woman.
• 45:39
  Speaker 2: In universities, this is an accepted phenomenon, just as accepted
• 45:44
  Speaker 2: as being quote unquote its gendered, which is a derogatory
• 45:52
  Speaker 2: gen for people who are not mentally ill, you know,
• 45:55
  Speaker 2: normally normal people. But apparently what's good for the goose
• 45:59
  Speaker 2: in the universe is not good for the gander in sport.
• 46:04
  Speaker 2: You know, shit actually matters, or is it? It's important
• 46:12
  Speaker 2: and at the same time hilarious that we are meeting
• 46:15
  Speaker 2: the rubber with the road as we should. Can a
• 46:19
  Speaker 2: person become the complementary sex just by saying so? Those
• 46:27
  Speaker 2: of us on the rational slash common sense side of
• 46:31
  Speaker 2: things will say that, will continue to say no, you
• 46:36
  Speaker 2: cannot in fact change visceral reality just by saying things Otherwise,
• 46:42
  Speaker 2: science is meaningless, right it would you would be meaningless
• 46:47
  Speaker 2: to say I'm not a biologist. You wouldn't need to
• 46:51
  Speaker 2: be a biologist. You just need to be someone who
• 46:54
  Speaker 2: can say things, no experiment required, no observations required. If
• 47:01
  Speaker 2: you say it is so, then it is so, and
• 47:04
  Speaker 2: we call this science. But in practice it's not that simple,
• 47:10
  Speaker 2: not even for the ludicrous quacks in charge of the
• 47:15
  Speaker 2: gender industrial complex. Evidently, you can't just be a man
• 47:19
  Speaker 2: and claim you're a woman, no matter how sincerely you
• 47:24
  Speaker 2: make your case. If you still have facial hair and
• 47:26
  Speaker 2: body hair, if you're still wearing the same plain clothes
• 47:31
  Speaker 2: that a man would wear, if you're still wearing the
• 47:35
  Speaker 2: absence of makeup that a man would wear, then it
• 47:39
  Speaker 2: doesn't count. If you truly wish to denounce your masculinity,
• 47:46
  Speaker 2: then you need to make an effort like esthetically, you
• 47:50
  Speaker 2: need to wear the uniform of women. You need to
• 47:54
  Speaker 2: grow the hair on your head and shave the hair
• 47:58
  Speaker 2: everywhere else, even though women will complain about having to
• 48:03
  Speaker 2: do this and claim that men are pedophiles if they
• 48:07
  Speaker 2: ever express a preference for shaved off body hair. You
• 48:11
  Speaker 2: need to dress in skirts and dresses, even though women
• 48:17
  Speaker 2: will complain that it is oppression for women to have
• 48:20
  Speaker 2: to dress like this. You have to affect a ridiculously
• 48:24
  Speaker 2: unconvincing high pitched voice as best you can, and you
• 48:29
  Speaker 2: need to cake yourself in makeup, even though women will
• 48:34
  Speaker 2: claim it's oppressive that women choose to wear makeup rather
• 48:40
  Speaker 2: than develop a personality or something. And so there it is.
• 48:44
  Speaker 2: You have your answer to the question what is a woman?
• 48:51
  Speaker 2: And the answer is it's nothing to do with biology,
• 48:54
  Speaker 2: it's nothing to do with what you are, and there's
• 48:57
  Speaker 2: nothing to do with what you say. A woman is
• 49:01
  Speaker 2: someone who adorns themselves with unnecessary, narcissistic bling, and then,
• 49:10
  Speaker 2: and then and then perpetually complains that they're oppressed because
• 49:13
  Speaker 2: of it. That is what these people believe, and they
• 49:18
  Speaker 2: are proving it before our very eyes in real time.
• 49:23
  Speaker 2: I'm black. I I officially identify as black. What you
• 49:29
  Speaker 2: don't believe me? Okay, I'll wear black face, I'll put
• 49:33
  Speaker 2: gold in my teeth, and I'll sling my pants as
• 49:36
  Speaker 2: far below my ass as gravitationally possible. Now I'm black?
• 49:41
  Speaker 1: Yes?
• 49:45
  Speaker 2: Is that what it means to be black? Or what
• 49:48
  Speaker 2: I be condemned as a massive racist if I insinuated
• 49:53
  Speaker 2: that a costume constitutes a genetic category. But that is
• 49:59
  Speaker 2: what these people believe. When the rubber meets the road,
• 50:04
  Speaker 2: when it comes to biological sex. Men and women wear
• 50:08
  Speaker 2: different costumes, and if you want to change sex, you
• 50:13
  Speaker 2: just have to change your costume. It Becker's belief that
• 50:19
  Speaker 2: anyone with such a childish mindset it's in charge of anything.
• 50:27
  Speaker 2: Anyone as stunted and deluded as that shouldn't even be
• 50:32
  Speaker 2: in charge of a bedroom, never mind every fucking university
• 50:39
  Speaker 2: and every fucking sports league, not to mention every fucking government.
• 50:46
  Speaker 2: I have run out of notes. That's the end. I
• 50:50
  Speaker 2: didn't know what to do after that. I don't know
• 50:53
  Speaker 2: what anyone is supposed to do after that. Someone else
• 50:56
  Speaker 2: say something.
• 50:58
  Speaker 3: I realize that a lot of people really are up
• 51:04
  Speaker 3: in arms about the so called male invasion of women's sports.
• 51:11
  Speaker 3: And I also realized that about three quarters of it
• 51:15
  Speaker 3: is guys doing what these two guys are doing, but
• 51:20
  Speaker 3: they're serious about it because they can get scholarship money
• 51:23
  Speaker 3: or whatever. It's just, you know, I was a photographer
• 51:29
  Speaker 3: when I was in high school. My first job, where
• 51:31
  Speaker 3: you know a lot of people their first job was
• 51:33
  Speaker 3: at McDonald's. My first job was at a newspaper. I
• 51:36
  Speaker 3: was a sports photographer. I did high school sports, my
• 51:41
  Speaker 3: local high school and the surrounding areas, and I photographed wrestling, football, basketball, golf,
• 51:52
  Speaker 3: all the different things that were available at different schools.
• 51:56
  Speaker 3: I was right around the time soccer was coming in
• 51:59
  Speaker 3: to my area, so there weren't a lot of soccer teams,
• 52:04
  Speaker 3: but the other things. Anytime there wasn't both a male
• 52:11
  Speaker 3: and female team available, like with wrestling or golf, sometimes gymnastics.
• 52:20
  Speaker 3: Most of the time. You know, with gymnastics there were
• 52:23
  Speaker 3: both sexes, but the boys lost out right because you
• 52:28
  Speaker 3: couldn't be a gymnast if you were a boy unless
• 52:34
  Speaker 3: there was a boys team. But you could be a
• 52:36
  Speaker 3: wrestler if you were a girl, even if there wasn't
• 52:40
  Speaker 3: a girls team, because a couple of parents sued schools
• 52:48
  Speaker 3: to force them to allow their daughters to join the teams.
• 52:52
  Speaker 3: And this is during the nineteen eighties. So if their
• 52:58
  Speaker 3: daughter joined a wrestling team and she competed against boys
• 53:02
  Speaker 3: at other schools, there were three different ways that could
• 53:05
  Speaker 3: go right. She could win the match, she could lose
• 53:11
  Speaker 3: the match, or she could win by forfeit.
• 53:17
  Speaker 2: If she.
• 53:19
  Speaker 3: Won the match, legitimately, her opponent would get ridiculed for
• 53:24
  Speaker 3: getting beaten by a girl. If she lost the match, legitimately,
• 53:31
  Speaker 3: her opponent would get condemned for being too rough with
• 53:35
  Speaker 3: a girl. But if she won by forfeit, her opponent
• 53:40
  Speaker 3: would get condemned for discriminating against her, and he might
• 53:47
  Speaker 3: lose his opportunity to rise up in the sport and
• 53:55
  Speaker 3: get to go.
• 53:56
  Speaker 2: To the.
• 53:58
  Speaker 3: League match, the regional match, and the state match. And
• 54:04
  Speaker 3: there was a girl that made it all the way
• 54:07
  Speaker 3: to state that way, every guy forfeited up into the
• 54:13
  Speaker 3: state match. She ended up losing hard at state because
• 54:22
  Speaker 3: that guy wasn't going to give up the championship title.
• 54:26
  Speaker 3: And sure enough, you know, he got treated like he
• 54:31
  Speaker 3: was unnecessarily rough with her. But she shouldn't have been there.
• 54:37
  Speaker 3: She did not deserve to be there, and she didn't
• 54:43
  Speaker 3: have a right to be there. She got there by
• 54:48
  Speaker 3: pushing boys out of the way using social standards that
• 54:54
  Speaker 3: she knew would keep them from wrestling her and make
• 54:58
  Speaker 3: give her the ability to play victim all the way
• 55:01
  Speaker 3: to the top. And when she didn't get all the
• 55:04
  Speaker 3: way to the top, then she played victim of that too,
• 55:09
  Speaker 3: and a lot of other people did on her behalf,
• 55:12
  Speaker 3: And in my opinion, out of the entire state, I
• 55:21
  Speaker 3: don't know what you would call it. I know it's
• 55:24
  Speaker 3: not league at that point at it, but every school
• 55:28
  Speaker 3: in the state, out of every school in the state,
• 55:30
  Speaker 3: she was the biggest loser because she did not have sportsmanship.
• 55:35
  Speaker 3: And this happened with football, and there were girls that
• 55:40
  Speaker 3: got badly injured playing football because the boys couldn't see
• 55:43
  Speaker 3: that they were girls, and they were not more gentle
• 55:45
  Speaker 3: with them on the field, or the previous year they
• 55:50
  Speaker 3: had been able to take it because it was junior
• 55:53
  Speaker 3: high and the next year in high school, the boys
• 55:56
  Speaker 3: were all forty pounds heavier than they had been the
• 55:59
  Speaker 3: year before, and suddenly her bones couldn't take it because
• 56:04
  Speaker 3: she hadn't thickened up like a guy. This kind of
• 56:10
  Speaker 3: thing happened throughout the time that I was a photographer
• 56:14
  Speaker 3: for that newspaper, and I saw this with golf. I saw,
• 56:21
  Speaker 3: you know, with golf, it's not quite the same because
• 56:24
  Speaker 3: you're not the way that you compete is not it's
• 56:28
  Speaker 3: not like that. But you know, if the team has
• 56:34
  Speaker 3: a limited size, some guy doesn't get to play because
• 56:38
  Speaker 3: a girl went out. And a lot of times these
• 56:42
  Speaker 3: girls took these positions, particularly kicker in football.
• 56:47
  Speaker 2: That.
• 56:49
  Speaker 3: They're not going to go on to college and be
• 56:52
  Speaker 3: a kicker. They're not going to go on to college
• 56:55
  Speaker 3: and wrestle. They're not going to go on to college
• 56:57
  Speaker 3: and play golf. But if a guy had done so,
• 57:03
  Speaker 3: you might have gotten a scholarship. And there were guys
• 57:07
  Speaker 3: that were good enough to do that that didn't get
• 57:11
  Speaker 3: to because a girl joined a team that was an
• 57:16
  Speaker 3: all star team that they didn't get to be on
• 57:21
  Speaker 3: because a girl joined the team. It's hard for me
• 57:29
  Speaker 3: today to be arsed, to be offended that guys are
• 57:35
  Speaker 3: doing it now, because the groundwork that for what these
• 57:40
  Speaker 3: women are complaining about, for what they are upset about,
• 57:43
  Speaker 3: for what they're scared over, was laid by lawsuits filed
• 57:48
  Speaker 3: on behalf of women and girls who wanted to invade
• 57:53
  Speaker 3: the opposite sex as sports to the detriment of the
• 57:57
  Speaker 3: athletes involved in that sport. And if that wasn't enough,
• 58:03
  Speaker 3: we also have the bathroom argument, right, oh, we shouldn't.
• 58:06
  Speaker 3: We shouldn't have trans women in women's bathrooms. And I
• 58:10
  Speaker 3: do recognize that there are very disturbed, fucked in the
• 58:17
  Speaker 3: head kinds of men who are taking advantage of the debate,
• 58:24
  Speaker 3: guys that should be in mental health institutions instead of
• 58:28
  Speaker 3: on the street. But the debate, in part, exists because
• 58:34
  Speaker 3: women pushed this issue. Women pushed the trans issue, women
• 58:39
  Speaker 3: pushed the bathroom issue, women pushed the locker room issue.
• 58:42
  Speaker 3: Women sued to get into male athletes locker rooms, and
• 58:49
  Speaker 3: then they sued to force them to talk to them,
• 58:57
  Speaker 3: and then they bitched about twenty years later that the
• 59:00
  Speaker 3: men were using the locker rooms for the purpose that
• 59:03
  Speaker 3: locker rooms were created to be used for, and therefore
• 59:07
  Speaker 3: they're engaging in harassment because a woman is in there.
• 59:12
  Speaker 3: About fifty percent of women will admit to going into
• 59:16
  Speaker 3: men's restrooms when the line is too long for the
• 59:19
  Speaker 3: women's room. But they're upset now that the sexes are reversed.
• 59:26
  Speaker 3: And maybe there are men in women's locker rooms sometimes.
• 59:31
  Speaker 3: Maybe there are men on women's sports teams. Sometimes, maybe
• 59:35
  Speaker 3: there are biological men using women's restrooms sometimes. Is it
• 59:40
  Speaker 3: inconvenient for them?
• 59:41
  Speaker 2: Yeah?
• 59:43
  Speaker 3: Are there instances where you know somebody's actually doing it
• 59:46
  Speaker 3: for nefarious purposes?
• 59:48
  Speaker 2: Yeah?
• 59:50
  Speaker 3: Would it be this easy for them to do it
• 59:52
  Speaker 3: if women hadn't gone where they shouldn't have gone? Hell no,
• 59:57
  Speaker 3: And this is this is the chickens coming home to roost. Yeah,
• 1:00:03
  Speaker 3: So as much as I would like to take the
• 1:00:09
  Speaker 3: position that you know science and science and that's just
• 1:00:12
  Speaker 3: the way it is. I can't help having a little
• 1:00:18
  Speaker 3: bit of a schadenfreud because I've spent I've spent forty
• 1:00:25
  Speaker 3: years arguing that it is wrong for women to invade
• 1:00:31
  Speaker 3: men's naked spaces and men's interest areas when they are
• 1:00:37
  Speaker 3: not wanted there, and force their way in and take
• 1:00:43
  Speaker 3: someone's place on a limited team, or make it difficult
• 1:00:47
  Speaker 3: for the men that are there, boys that are there,
• 1:00:49
  Speaker 3: to do what they were doing before the women came in,
• 1:00:53
  Speaker 3: and being told that I was sexist for arguing that
• 1:00:56
  Speaker 3: now women are experiencing it and now they know that
• 1:01:00
  Speaker 3: it's wrong. Okay, fine, if you want to keep men
• 1:01:08
  Speaker 3: out of women's sports and women's locker rooms and women's bathrooms,
• 1:01:13
  Speaker 3: accept a law that says women can be excluded and
• 1:01:18
  Speaker 3: girls can be excluded from men's spaces and boys spaces.
• 1:01:24
  Speaker 3: No girls on the boys team, no women on the
• 1:01:28
  Speaker 3: men's team, No women and girls in the men's and
• 1:01:31
  Speaker 3: boys locker rooms, No women and girls in the men's
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 3: and boys' bathrooms. If you can't do it both ways,
• 1:01:42
  Speaker 3: then I don't support any effort at all to protect
• 1:01:50
  Speaker 3: women's spaces. You only get my support if you support
• 1:01:54
  Speaker 3: protecting men's spaces. And that's it. That's my dance, and
• 1:02:00
  Speaker 3: I'm sticking to it.
• 1:02:04
  Speaker 1: Who'd have thought that we'd get Joanna Mann in real life.
• 1:02:09
  Speaker 1: I want them to play for the w NBA. I
• 1:02:12
  Speaker 1: think that really the it's the best way to destroy
• 1:02:16
  Speaker 1: all this bullshit is to just follow it to its
• 1:02:18
  Speaker 1: logical conclusion and let the chips fall where they may,
• 1:02:21
  Speaker 1: because they're gonna come out and they're gonna try and
• 1:02:23
  Speaker 1: ban these guys from joining, and they're gonna try and claim, Hey,
• 1:02:27
  Speaker 1: you're just doing this for political you know reasons, You're
• 1:02:30
  Speaker 1: just you're just whatever. Yeah, so what I'm you can't
• 1:02:34
  Speaker 1: deny their identity. So let them play. I want to
• 1:02:37
  Speaker 1: see it. You know what, maybe more people will watch
• 1:02:39
  Speaker 1: the w NBA. I know I will. You know, I'm
• 1:02:45
  Speaker 1: I'm for it. I'm for it. Let's go. Let's see
• 1:02:47
  Speaker 1: how far down the rabbit hole goes. Let's get all
• 1:02:50
  Speaker 1: the pros on there, and they are they are legitimately
• 1:02:53
  Speaker 1: trying to join. Sure, why not. We've seen it in
• 1:02:56
  Speaker 1: you know, powerlifting, We've seen it in mma, We've seen
• 1:03:02
  Speaker 1: it in all these other sports. Fuck it, let's do it.
• 1:03:04
  Speaker 1: Let the boys play, don't I'm sorry, I'm sorry, let
• 1:03:07
  Speaker 1: the ladies play. Don't deny women their rights.
• 1:03:11
  Speaker 2: You're assuming there's a logical conclusion.
• 1:03:15
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I know, I know. Well, I'm just saying, let
• 1:03:17
  Speaker 1: it play.
• 1:03:17
  Speaker 2: Out monkeys type out the complete works of Shakespeare. You
• 1:03:22
  Speaker 2: have to go, well, is is this kind of creature
• 1:03:26
  Speaker 2: necessarily a random number generator? They might just do the
• 1:03:29
  Speaker 2: same thing all the time forever and then it's here. Well, yeah,
• 1:03:36
  Speaker 2: let's get to the last story. We we well.
• 1:03:39
  Speaker 1: We got two more. We'll we'll get there, all right.
• 1:03:43
  Speaker 1: Two more, yeah, two more? All right, So I got
• 1:03:46
  Speaker 1: some superchows. But I do want to show I did
• 1:03:49
  Speaker 1: find the dwarves that. This was what the director of
• 1:03:54
  Speaker 1: dragons Crown did to respond to Jason Schred who criticized
• 1:03:57
  Speaker 1: the the game Dragon's Crown for sexualizing the women. And
• 1:04:00
  Speaker 1: he's like, well, maybe this is more what you want.
• 1:04:02
  Speaker 1: So he sent this one in. So it was. It
• 1:04:05
  Speaker 1: was hilarious and true, all right. The official rut Traditionalism
• 1:04:09
  Speaker 1: channel on YouTube gives us five dollars and says, sorry
• 1:04:11
  Speaker 1: if I go off topic, but I just want to
• 1:04:13
  Speaker 1: give you guys. Sas reports sometimes, but if it's not
• 1:04:16
  Speaker 1: more off topic. Can I get Doc's reaction real quick
• 1:04:19
  Speaker 1: on the UK baseball bat story because it is news.
• 1:04:23
  Speaker 1: I don't know anything about that.
• 1:04:25
  Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah, some kid got arrested because he bought the
• 1:04:31
  Speaker 2: baseball bat from exactly the kind of shops that you
• 1:04:34
  Speaker 2: would buy a baseball bat from, like a sports so
• 1:04:37
  Speaker 2: and then he couldn't even cross the street before he
• 1:04:41
  Speaker 2: got accosted by the British police. What the fuck do
• 1:04:46
  Speaker 2: you have a baseball bat? And this was Yeah, this
• 1:04:51
  Speaker 2: was particularly difficult for people who would recently learned that
• 1:04:56
  Speaker 2: a young man had had been killed by a knife
• 1:05:01
  Speaker 2: that a seque was allowed to just carry for religious reasons.
• 1:05:08
  Speaker 1: You could be carrying a baseball back for religious reasons.
• 1:05:11
  Speaker 2: You can make one up. I don't fancy your chances.
• 1:05:17
  Speaker 2: If there's anything the British government hates more than British people,
• 1:05:20
  Speaker 2: it's American people.
• 1:05:23
  Speaker 1: Yeah. What a shame.
• 1:05:25
  Speaker 2: I don't know why they do this, but they do.
• 1:05:29
  Speaker 1: Mm hmm, all right, well, meriting, thank you for the
• 1:05:34
  Speaker 1: superchow official reverse trad meredithchikis is five dollars and says
• 1:05:39
  Speaker 1: HBr News five six y four, Honey, up the Badgers.
• 1:05:41
  Speaker 1: Thank you. Roboto gives us a dollar and says, at
• 1:05:45
  Speaker 1: this point, women's sports are just a hobby. Women's sports
• 1:05:48
  Speaker 1: is for women, so it is up to women if
• 1:05:50
  Speaker 1: it rises or falls. Right now, it makes no profits
• 1:05:53
  Speaker 1: at all, period. Yeah, women don't watch women's sports. Sorry,
• 1:05:58
  Speaker 1: it's true. Yeah. Roberto gives another dollar and says, keeping
• 1:06:02
  Speaker 1: in mind that women in the USA can try out
• 1:06:04
  Speaker 1: for the teams that men play on. Otherwise it is
• 1:06:07
  Speaker 1: gender discrimination, which is illegal under the law. Yeah. Well,
• 1:06:11
  Speaker 1: look again, we used to have common sense. Now we
• 1:06:14
  Speaker 1: just have to expose their lack of common sense. So
• 1:06:17
  Speaker 1: all right, let us know what you guys think about
• 1:06:18
  Speaker 1: this story in the comments. Is it hilarious? Have you
• 1:06:21
  Speaker 1: seen Juuana? Man? Do you want to? I know I
• 1:06:23
  Speaker 1: do now I've never seen it, but I feel like
• 1:06:25
  Speaker 1: it's suddenly relevant. All right, We're gonna move on to
• 1:06:28
  Speaker 1: the next one, all right. Ireland, The Irish government has
• 1:06:34
  Speaker 1: launched the first action Plan for its National Strategy for
• 1:06:38
  Speaker 1: Women and Girls twenty twenty five through twenty thirty. Published
• 1:06:42
  Speaker 1: on August fifth by Minister Norma Foley, this three year
• 1:06:45
  Speaker 1: plan outlines specific steps across government departments to advance gender
• 1:06:50
  Speaker 1: equality It includes measures like boosting women's participation in local politics,
• 1:06:55
  Speaker 1: recruitment campaigns for women in the defense forces and emergency
• 1:06:59
  Speaker 1: services' awareness, efforts to tackle domestic and gender based violence,
• 1:07:04
  Speaker 1: and a new one million euro fund to help women
• 1:07:06
  Speaker 1: overcome barriers to employment. The strategy specifically addresses concerns around
• 1:07:11
  Speaker 1: online influences. It warns about the manosphere, described as male
• 1:07:17
  Speaker 1: influencers spreading misogynistic views among young people, no misogynistic views
• 1:07:25
  Speaker 1: and hate speech, and trad wife influencers who promote traditional
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 1: gender roles seen as restrictive for women. It links exposure
• 1:07:33
  Speaker 1: to pornography and these trends to rising sexual violence among
• 1:07:37
  Speaker 1: young people, and plans actions like developing pornographic literacy, public
• 1:07:43
  Speaker 1: campaigns against harmful stereotypes, and policies tartening restrictive masculinities. And
• 1:07:49
  Speaker 1: here are the cops that are going to be involved
• 1:07:51
  Speaker 1: in making sure that that happens.
• 1:07:53
  Speaker 2: All right.
• 1:07:56
  Speaker 1: It was the only Irish cop I could find.
• 1:08:01
  Speaker 2: Chicago.
• 1:08:01
  Speaker 1: We all right, So yeah, they're going to try and
• 1:08:09
  Speaker 1: that This is this is what's at the top of
• 1:08:11
  Speaker 1: Ireland's priority list is we have to do something about
• 1:08:15
  Speaker 1: the manisphere and how it's affecting young Irish boys.
• 1:08:19
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I read. I read the first couple of words
• 1:08:22
  Speaker 2: in this headline, and I thought, ah, this is going
• 1:08:25
  Speaker 2: to be about what the new IRA is proposing regarding
• 1:08:32
  Speaker 2: boots on the ground solutions to the immigration issue. But
• 1:08:36
  Speaker 2: I'm glad we can contrast that with this other thing
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 2: that's happening. By the way, the IRA is. I don't
• 1:08:46
  Speaker 2: mean individual retirement arrangement like you'll understand it in the States.
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 2: I mean Irish Republican Army. The men of Ireland have
• 1:08:55
  Speaker 2: always been vehemently opposed to any influence from foreigners, such
• 1:09:01
  Speaker 2: as the English, and with good reason, and God bless them,
• 1:09:06
  Speaker 2: they maintain their consistency when it comes to femingly opposing
• 1:09:10
  Speaker 2: any influence from anyone else. We don't like the fucking English,
• 1:09:16
  Speaker 2: and we don't like any other pastors. Good for you,
• 1:09:21
  Speaker 2: and by that I mean it's good for you, like vegetables,
• 1:09:26
  Speaker 2: even though vegetables might taste like sad in the short term.
• 1:09:30
  Speaker 2: But it remains pretty sad that while the women of
• 1:09:36
  Speaker 2: Ireland are committed to attacking their own men, the men
• 1:09:42
  Speaker 2: of Ireland are committed to attacking other people's men. And
• 1:09:47
  Speaker 2: you can see this trend across a great deal of
• 1:09:51
  Speaker 2: Western countries. That's what the new ira is proposing. If
• 1:09:57
  Speaker 2: the government's not gonna get rid of these foreign men
• 1:10:00
  Speaker 2: through deportations, then we're going to get rid of them
• 1:10:03
  Speaker 2: through other means. Meanwhile, those irishmen will do will pay
• 1:10:11
  Speaker 2: no attention to the Irish women who are only interested
• 1:10:15
  Speaker 2: in destroying Irish men through any means necessary. It's at
• 1:10:21
  Speaker 2: a bit skew with, isn't it. Irish men are being
• 1:10:25
  Speaker 2: attacked by their own women and by foreigners, but they're
• 1:10:29
  Speaker 2: only fighting back against the foreigners, specifically the foreign men.
• 1:10:38
  Speaker 2: If a foreign woman is wearing a heat jab, she's
• 1:10:42
  Speaker 2: just a victim, no dickhead. If a foreign woman is
• 1:10:46
  Speaker 2: wearing a he jab, it's because she thinks you're a rapist.
• 1:10:50
  Speaker 2: She doesn't have to wear it. The government under which
• 1:10:55
  Speaker 2: she lives is not forcing her to wear it, but
• 1:10:57
  Speaker 2: she wears it. Nevertheless, because she thinks you're a rapist.
• 1:11:02
  Speaker 2: She thinks all men are rapists who will rape her
• 1:11:06
  Speaker 2: if she's not wearing it. It's the same mindset beheld
• 1:11:12
  Speaker 2: by all of the women in your own nation, not all,
• 1:11:17
  Speaker 2: but they think men are rapists. The Irish equivalent of
• 1:11:26
  Speaker 2: the he Jab is these feminist zealots who think they
• 1:11:31
  Speaker 2: have to upend the entire legal system and remove any
• 1:11:34
  Speaker 2: trace of men's rights because that's the only way to
• 1:11:38
  Speaker 2: stop you from raping them. You are indeed being invaded
• 1:11:44
  Speaker 2: by bigotry, my dear Irishman. But it's not just coming
• 1:11:47
  Speaker 2: from foreign men. It's coming from foreign women, and it's
• 1:11:51
  Speaker 2: coming from native women. You could expel all the foreign men,
• 1:11:57
  Speaker 2: and that would not begin to solve the problem. You
• 1:12:00
  Speaker 2: can even expel all the foreign women, and that would
• 1:12:04
  Speaker 2: still not solve the problem. Your own women, the women
• 1:12:10
  Speaker 2: whom you love, hate you so much as the foreigners do.
• 1:12:21
  Speaker 2: I would go so far as to say, the reason
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 2: so many foreigners are here in the first place is
• 1:12:25
  Speaker 2: because you are ruled by women who hate you. This
• 1:12:29
  Speaker 2: isn't even an emergent phenomenon. This is what women will
• 1:12:33
  Speaker 2: do if you give them complete freedom, they will indulge
• 1:12:39
  Speaker 2: in their instinct for relational aggression. See men instinctively aggress
• 1:12:45
  Speaker 2: upon the outsider, it's in their nature as hunters and
• 1:12:50
  Speaker 2: as tribe builders, whereas women instinctively aggress upon their own families.
• 1:12:59
  Speaker 1: Because it's all they know.
• 1:13:01
  Speaker 2: As such, women are just as aggressive as men, but
• 1:13:07
  Speaker 2: their natural sphere of influence is within their own family.
• 1:13:12
  Speaker 2: Men police others, women police their own under controlled conditions.
• 1:13:21
  Speaker 2: These are both good things. You should police your own
• 1:13:24
  Speaker 2: and you should police others. But in a society where
• 1:13:28
  Speaker 2: women can do whatever they like while men are restricted
• 1:13:31
  Speaker 2: in their instincts, you will find yourself in a society
• 1:13:35
  Speaker 2: that only polices its own and has absolutely nothing to
• 1:13:41
  Speaker 2: police the other. So yeah, I'm glad that Northern Ireland
• 1:13:48
  Speaker 2: nar an iron it is at least threatening to police
• 1:13:53
  Speaker 2: the foreigners encroaching upon them. But you will continue to
• 1:13:59
  Speaker 2: fight uphill from the low ground until you recognize that
• 1:14:05
  Speaker 2: your own women are fighting against you from the high ground.
• 1:14:12
  Speaker 2: As hard as you fight that war, you will never
• 1:14:15
  Speaker 2: win it. If your women want you dead, you will die.
• 1:14:21
  Speaker 2: So maybe stop teaching your women to want you dead.
• 1:14:28
  Speaker 2: Same goes for the rest of Europe, same goes for
• 1:14:30
  Speaker 2: the rest of the anglosphere and indeed the rest of
• 1:14:32
  Speaker 2: the eurosphere. You're fighting phase two of the communist apocalypse,
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 2: but you've stopped fighting stage one.
• 1:14:41
  Speaker 1: You can't win that.
• 1:14:44
  Speaker 2: If you're doing it backwards. Fight stage one and fight
• 1:14:48
  Speaker 2: it first, or you'll be forever fighting a war on
• 1:14:53
  Speaker 2: two fronts, one of which is destroying you from within.
• 1:15:01
  Speaker 2: In summary, well, I guess, yeah, clean your room. Oh
• 1:15:05
  Speaker 2: I got I guess yeah. I guess. I'm basically saying,
• 1:15:08
  Speaker 2: clean your room. Clean the feminists from your room, or
• 1:15:13
  Speaker 2: you have no business cleaning your room of the mercenaries
• 1:15:17
  Speaker 2: hired by the feminists. Message ins, good luck and god speed,
• 1:15:26
  Speaker 2: and so on and so forth.
• 1:15:27
  Speaker 3: Hannah, all right, Well, just just looking at this, just
• 1:15:36
  Speaker 3: thinking about what they know the reading talked about. I'll
• 1:15:44
  Speaker 3: have to point out, in my lifetime, from the time
• 1:15:48
  Speaker 3: I was a little kid in elementary school in the
• 1:15:51
  Speaker 3: nineteen seventies, so I'm old, there have been concerted efforts
• 1:15:58
  Speaker 3: to get in the United States to get girls interested
• 1:16:05
  Speaker 3: in professions that now get labeled STEM professions. They didn't
• 1:16:09
  Speaker 3: run around, hey, get involved in STEM professions back then.
• 1:16:12
  Speaker 3: They just made it look like it was the coolest
• 1:16:16
  Speaker 3: thing since sliced bread. If a girl was interested in math,
• 1:16:22
  Speaker 3: or if a girl was interested in technology, or going
• 1:16:25
  Speaker 3: into any area of medicine besides nursing, you know, anything
• 1:16:31
  Speaker 3: like that. They tried to push us into welding. They
• 1:16:36
  Speaker 3: tried to push us into getting involved in any of
• 1:16:40
  Speaker 3: the trades, try to get us into utilities work, becoming
• 1:16:48
  Speaker 3: an electrician, getting involved. They actually took us on a
• 1:16:52
  Speaker 3: field trip to a wastewater plant, which really did not
• 1:16:57
  Speaker 3: make the job look any more attractive than it was before.
• 1:17:00
  Speaker 3: Where we went, there were a lot of girls that
• 1:17:03
  Speaker 3: just you know, didn't didn't didn't want to be anywhere
• 1:17:06
  Speaker 3: near that. Right, so you have this long history, lots
• 1:17:14
  Speaker 3: of money has been spent on this, billions of dollars,
• 1:17:21
  Speaker 3: enough enough money that you probably could pay those women
• 1:17:25
  Speaker 3: to stay home that have been exposed to this during
• 1:17:30
  Speaker 3: their lifetimes, and they'd probably make a living wage off
• 1:17:34
  Speaker 3: of that. When they started, less than ten percent of
• 1:17:40
  Speaker 3: women in utilities work and most of the trades, or
• 1:17:46
  Speaker 3: less less than than ten percent of workers were women
• 1:17:50
  Speaker 3: in those areas. Right after over forty years of hard
• 1:17:57
  Speaker 3: work and determination, less than ten percent of workers in
• 1:18:03
  Speaker 3: most of those areas are still women. It's complete worthless effort.
• 1:18:10
  Speaker 3: They achieved nothing because the biggest barrier to getting women
• 1:18:19
  Speaker 3: into these areas is women. The biggest barrier to female
• 1:18:25
  Speaker 3: employment is women. The biggest barrier to getting women into
• 1:18:33
  Speaker 3: positions of leadership and management is women. It's the fact
• 1:18:40
  Speaker 3: that we don't fucking want to. We don't want to
• 1:18:43
  Speaker 3: do those jobs, or we look at those jobs and
• 1:18:48
  Speaker 3: we realize, you know, I really suck at doing that
• 1:18:52
  Speaker 3: with my spindly, little girly arms, I'm not going to
• 1:18:55
  Speaker 3: achieve what that big bulky guy over there is doing.
• 1:19:00
  Speaker 3: Or we think it's disgusting. The job is disgusting. We
• 1:19:06
  Speaker 3: really admire the fact that someone has the balls to
• 1:19:10
  Speaker 3: do it, and apparently it does take balls, because less
• 1:19:14
  Speaker 3: than ten percent and in some areas less than five
• 1:19:17
  Speaker 3: percent of the people who do those jobs are women.
• 1:19:28
  Speaker 3: Starting to spot a pattern here. This isn't discrimination, it's
• 1:19:32
  Speaker 3: not sexism, it's women choosing other jobs. I think that
• 1:19:42
  Speaker 3: we owe the men who do those jobs a great
• 1:19:45
  Speaker 3: amount of appreciation, because most men don't even do those jobs,
• 1:19:51
  Speaker 3: so the men who step in and do them deserve
• 1:19:54
  Speaker 3: a thank you. But instead we have these dipshit feminists
• 1:20:00
  Speaker 3: trying to push a bunch of women into those jobs.
• 1:20:04
  Speaker 3: But first, first they're filling their heads full of the
• 1:20:07
  Speaker 3: idea that the men there hate them and are going
• 1:20:10
  Speaker 3: to be mean to them and don't want them there,
• 1:20:14
  Speaker 3: and they should push their way in in spite of
• 1:20:16
  Speaker 3: all that is not the manisphere that these people need
• 1:20:24
  Speaker 3: to be worried about. It's not the manisphere that these
• 1:20:27
  Speaker 3: people are combating against to try to get more women
• 1:20:32
  Speaker 3: knee deep in raw sewage, trying to break up fat bergs.
• 1:20:37
  Speaker 3: It's women, and they're never going to get past that.
• 1:20:42
  Speaker 3: That is not going to change because most of the time,
• 1:20:49
  Speaker 3: if a woman can't feed her family, instead of calling
• 1:20:52
  Speaker 3: her a debtbeat, instead of putting her in jail, instead
• 1:20:57
  Speaker 3: of taking away or driver's license and putting her name
• 1:21:02
  Speaker 3: on a poster for all to see with the label
• 1:21:05
  Speaker 3: deadbeat so that everybody else will ridicule her, instead of
• 1:21:10
  Speaker 3: garnishing her wages from her employees, they give her welfare
• 1:21:13
  Speaker 3: money taken out of men's paychecks at tax time, which
• 1:21:17
  Speaker 3: is every payday. The very oh somebody, actually, somebody actually
• 1:21:28
  Speaker 3: beat me to it. Very few women who do those jobs.
• 1:21:33
  Speaker 3: Among the very few women who do those jobs were
• 1:21:36
  Speaker 3: women who wanted to go into coal mining. We have, mister,
• 1:21:39
  Speaker 3: we have Roboto one, two, three, four, five sixty seven
• 1:21:42
  Speaker 3: gave us a dollar to point this out. Some women
• 1:21:46
  Speaker 3: do and did until some uppercrust women historically decided women
• 1:21:50
  Speaker 3: should not, thus creating the term women's work in men's work.
• 1:21:53
  Speaker 3: That was during the Victorian era. Women complained, upper crust women,
• 1:22:02
  Speaker 3: upper class women, rich women, hampered women complained that women
• 1:22:08
  Speaker 3: were working in the coal mines in unsavory positions and
• 1:22:12
  Speaker 3: unsavory styles of dress and so on, and so they
• 1:22:17
  Speaker 3: sent men to investigate, and the men were shocked, and
• 1:22:22
  Speaker 3: so they went back and of course informed the queen,
• 1:22:27
  Speaker 3: and laws were passed to get those crusty lower women
• 1:22:34
  Speaker 3: out of the crusty upper women's heads and the coal
• 1:22:38
  Speaker 3: mines as well. So they had to take lower paying
• 1:22:41
  Speaker 3: jobs that were out of the mines and on the
• 1:22:48
  Speaker 3: on the land outside said work outdoors and all kinds
• 1:22:52
  Speaker 3: of weather, but at least at least they weren't in
• 1:22:56
  Speaker 3: the mines, right. That was also back when children worked.
• 1:23:04
  Speaker 3: It's the same group of people, the same folks that
• 1:23:09
  Speaker 3: decided that children should never work. I worked when I
• 1:23:14
  Speaker 3: was like eleven years old. I had started doing little
• 1:23:18
  Speaker 3: bits of work for my family's photo business. Nothing laborious.
• 1:23:23
  Speaker 3: I just numbered picture so that when people wanted to
• 1:23:26
  Speaker 3: order reprints, we could go back and find the correct
• 1:23:29
  Speaker 3: negative to use to to get that picture. But throughout history,
• 1:23:40
  Speaker 3: as long as there has been any kind of industry,
• 1:23:42
  Speaker 3: as long as there has been any kind of service industry,
• 1:23:44
  Speaker 3: for instance, people who shod horses, people who baked goods
• 1:23:49
  Speaker 3: and sold them, people who made other people's clothing, and
• 1:23:55
  Speaker 3: people who taught other people's kids, people who took care
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 3: of other people's horses. There's always been a lower class
• 1:24:02
  Speaker 3: of men and women who did work. And the harder
• 1:24:09
  Speaker 3: and more dangerous jobs, the more laborious jobs, the dirtier jobs,
• 1:24:15
  Speaker 3: the stinkier jobs, those were all done by male workers,
• 1:24:19
  Speaker 3: not always adults. If you really want to see a
• 1:24:26
  Speaker 3: level of work that today, by today's standards, definitely looks
• 1:24:31
  Speaker 3: like abuse, look up the little boys that used to
• 1:24:35
  Speaker 3: be used to assist in chimney sweeping, because that was
• 1:24:41
  Speaker 3: a hell of a job. There were kids that died
• 1:24:43
  Speaker 3: doing that. Boys not girls, right, So not that girls
• 1:24:52
  Speaker 3: never had dangerous jobs. There was. One of the more
• 1:24:54
  Speaker 3: famous cases in the textile industry was a girl that
• 1:24:59
  Speaker 3: got in a machine and it broke every bone in
• 1:25:02
  Speaker 3: her body. She survived, but it must have been a
• 1:25:06
  Speaker 3: hell of a recovery. Night Motorcyclists says. Boys today, boys
• 1:25:13
  Speaker 3: in India are doing sewer work and there are places
• 1:25:18
  Speaker 3: all over the world where boys work today. Boys in
• 1:25:24
  Speaker 3: South America, for instance, handling machetes and breaking open cocoa beans.
• 1:25:34
  Speaker 3: There's quite a bit of child labor still around the world,
• 1:25:40
  Speaker 3: and it is how they learn their trade, and it's
• 1:25:45
  Speaker 3: also very dangerous. Of course, in the US, we had
• 1:25:50
  Speaker 3: child labor laws, and it mainly was to reduce competition
• 1:25:54
  Speaker 3: among adults and get kids into a public school system
• 1:25:59
  Speaker 3: where today they are being taught all about seventy two genders.
• 1:26:03
  Speaker 3: But they have no fucking clue why voting exists or
• 1:26:08
  Speaker 3: where it came from, because nobody teaches them that.
• 1:26:12
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 1:26:13
  Speaker 3: And so it's done them a lot of good. In
• 1:26:18
  Speaker 3: the meantime, less than ten percent of and in fact,
• 1:26:24
  Speaker 3: in many areas, less than five percent of the jobs
• 1:26:29
  Speaker 3: that if they didn't get done we would all die
• 1:26:34
  Speaker 3: from dysentery actually are done by women less than ten percent,
• 1:26:42
  Speaker 3: often less than five percent. So it hasn't been effective,
• 1:26:45
  Speaker 3: it hasn't done anything. And these people don't do this
• 1:26:50
  Speaker 3: because they care about women. They do this because they
• 1:26:53
  Speaker 3: can launder money through the systems that they are going
• 1:26:57
  Speaker 3: to create in women's name, so that they can claim
• 1:27:02
  Speaker 3: to be helping women get jobs that they're not ever
• 1:27:05
  Speaker 3: going to help women get because women don't want them.
• 1:27:12
  Speaker 1: There you go, all right, well, let us know you
• 1:27:16
  Speaker 1: guys think about this. One of the comments, I got
• 1:27:19
  Speaker 1: a super chow and then we'll finish it off. So
• 1:27:24
  Speaker 1: Official Reverse Traditionalism channel on YouTube gives us five dollars
• 1:27:27
  Speaker 1: and says last one on the topic of claiming a
• 1:27:31
  Speaker 1: religious baseball bat, doesn't it violate religious freedom to actually
• 1:27:34
  Speaker 1: create exceptions If you have an assault law, then you
• 1:27:37
  Speaker 1: can make an exception to it for circumcision. That sounds
• 1:27:41
  Speaker 1: like recognizing as in the First Amendment. They don't have
• 1:27:44
  Speaker 1: First Amendment in England. By the way, Judaism and Islam
• 1:27:47
  Speaker 1: has legitimate faiths, which isn't fair to religions that are
• 1:27:51
  Speaker 1: not recognized, which is any religion you made up five
• 1:27:54
  Speaker 1: minutes ago that doesn't get any assault law exceptions. All right,
• 1:27:58
  Speaker 1: thank you for that. Yeah, the UK doesn't have the
• 1:28:03
  Speaker 1: First Amendment. So it's kind of a mood point and
• 1:28:08
  Speaker 1: you could say that something is I don't know, illogical.
• 1:28:12
  Speaker 1: I mean, that's kind of what we do on this channel,
• 1:28:14
  Speaker 1: but doesn't change the fact that they're doing it anyway.
• 1:28:18
  Speaker 1: So it's like imagine being dragged off to jail or
• 1:28:24
  Speaker 1: to be executed or something because you broke a law
• 1:28:27
  Speaker 1: that was illogical. And the whole time you're just saying, dude,
• 1:28:29
  Speaker 1: this is illogical. Technically I should be alive, and yet
• 1:28:32
  Speaker 1: you're still getting dragged off. It's almost like that doesn't matter.
• 1:28:37
  Speaker 1: And that's what it comes down to, you know. So, Yeah,
• 1:28:40
  Speaker 1: people are inconsistent, people are illogical. People don't make sense,
• 1:28:44
  Speaker 1: but they do what they're gonna do anyway because they
• 1:28:46
  Speaker 1: have the power and you don't. And that's what it
• 1:28:48
  Speaker 1: comes down to.
• 1:28:50
  Speaker 3: And also, under the color of law, humanity has been
• 1:28:55
  Speaker 3: executing people for totally irrational reasons for as long as
• 1:28:59
  Speaker 3: law has existed.
• 1:29:01
  Speaker 2: Yeah, you can kill someone with a cricket ball. No,
• 1:29:07
  Speaker 2: they're pretty heavy.
• 1:29:09
  Speaker 3: If you throw a cricket ball.
• 1:29:11
  Speaker 2: Exactly, They're quite similar. But I sort of inverted colors.
• 1:29:15
  Speaker 2: You can kill someone with a ball, get someone with
• 1:29:19
  Speaker 2: a rock. I think I said something along these lines
• 1:29:23
  Speaker 2: a week ago. You can kill someone with a rock.
• 1:29:27
  Speaker 2: Where's this going, Banning the rock? Yeah, banning the planet.
• 1:29:34
  Speaker 1: And they'll do it mm hmmm.
• 1:29:37
  Speaker 2: And and I'll sit here gloating to myself that I
• 1:29:40
  Speaker 2: predicted they will do it, and then I'll get killed
• 1:29:44
  Speaker 2: by a fucking rock. Yeah, whatever.
• 1:29:49
  Speaker 1: Yeah, but anyways, thank you for the superchow. All right,
• 1:29:54
  Speaker 1: let's do the last one. So this is actually not
• 1:29:58
  Speaker 1: a story per se, but there is commentary. I gainst
• 1:30:01
  Speaker 1: people are noticing this trend, and that's why I thought
• 1:30:03
  Speaker 1: I would give this a mention. So a Fox through
• 1:30:06
  Speaker 1: News article published on the twenty second covers a USA
• 1:30:10
  Speaker 1: Today column by Ingrid Jackey or Jacques I think whatever.
• 1:30:15
  Speaker 1: She argued that a growing anti marriage trend, driven by TikTok,
• 1:30:19
  Speaker 1: divorce glow up videos, best selling books that stereotype men
• 1:30:22
  Speaker 1: as toxic or lazy, and celebrities like Elizabeth Gilbert and
• 1:30:25
  Speaker 1: Emily Redatowski celebrating singlehood is fueling heteropessimism, something we've talked
• 1:30:31
  Speaker 1: about in this channel a little bit in the past,
• 1:30:33
  Speaker 1: women's rising disappointment on hostility toward men and relationships. Jaque
• 1:30:38
  Speaker 1: points to declining marriage rates, with US Census data showing
• 1:30:41
  Speaker 1: only forty percent of Hollywood forty seven percent of households
• 1:30:45
  Speaker 1: were married couples in twenty twenty five, down from nearly
• 1:30:49
  Speaker 1: sixty six percent fifty years ago. She cites studies claiming
• 1:30:52
  Speaker 1: married women are happier, live longer, and earn more than
• 1:30:55
  Speaker 1: single women, and notes that liberal women report much lower
• 1:30:58
  Speaker 1: life satisfaction than conservative women. But really, what this is
• 1:31:01
  Speaker 1: pointing out is that this anti like this heteropessimism that's
• 1:31:06
  Speaker 1: been going around culturally is only pushing men away from women.
• 1:31:10
  Speaker 1: So men are checking out more and more and women
• 1:31:13
  Speaker 1: are starting to feel the sting. And now even the
• 1:31:16
  Speaker 1: mainstream media is starting to notice, which is why I'm like,
• 1:31:19
  Speaker 1: you know, I picked this one as a last story.
• 1:31:22
  Speaker 1: It's not so much a story. It's not news outside
• 1:31:27
  Speaker 1: of like people noticing stuff that we've been talking about
• 1:31:29
  Speaker 1: for a while now, but I thought it would be
• 1:31:31
  Speaker 1: like a good thing to end the show on, so hey,
• 1:31:36
  Speaker 1: people can't ignore it any longer. And I'm going to
• 1:31:40
  Speaker 1: say that this is largely due to the effectiveness of miktoo,
• 1:31:44
  Speaker 1: because that's kind of what it is. Even guys that
• 1:31:46
  Speaker 1: don't know their migtao but they're doing the miktow thing.
• 1:31:49
  Speaker 1: They don't know what miktow is. That's this is basically
• 1:31:53
  Speaker 1: that you know, this is the downstream results of that.
• 1:31:57
  Speaker 2: So this doesn't need an identity, that's what this doesn't need.
• 1:32:02
  Speaker 1: No, it doesn't. No, that's my point.
• 1:32:04
  Speaker 2: Yeah, yes, you know how much you hate men. I mean,
• 1:32:09
  Speaker 2: just stop hate, just stop doing it. But it's so
• 1:32:12
  Speaker 2: easy to say, but so difficult to do because people
• 1:32:17
  Speaker 2: in university are being taught to hate men, people in
• 1:32:20
  Speaker 2: the media are being taught to hate men. People in
• 1:32:23
  Speaker 2: the police, they armed forces and so on are being
• 1:32:25
  Speaker 2: taught to hate men. And it's really quite simple, just
• 1:32:30
  Speaker 2: stop teaching people to hate men. But they can't stop.
• 1:32:36
  Speaker 1: No, no, they can't. But now, like I said, it's
• 1:32:40
  Speaker 1: getting to the point where they can't ignore it either.
• 1:32:43
  Speaker 3: So it's all going to depend on how they react
• 1:32:46
  Speaker 3: to it. The bad thing is I talked to a
• 1:32:54
  Speaker 3: lot of conservatives on x because they see my posts
• 1:32:57
  Speaker 3: calling out like single mom and stuff like that, and
• 1:33:00
  Speaker 3: they think I'm going to be automatically on their side
• 1:33:02
  Speaker 3: of everything, and then they find out I'm not, and
• 1:33:04
  Speaker 3: then they get mad. So I talk to a lot
• 1:33:07
  Speaker 3: of trad cons about some different things, and it takes
• 1:33:13
  Speaker 3: a little finesse to get them to understand some things.
• 1:33:17
  Speaker 3: And I seem to be able to get equal amounts
• 1:33:20
  Speaker 3: of men and women to listen, and I also seem
• 1:33:24
  Speaker 3: to be able to get hate and flack from about
• 1:33:26
  Speaker 3: equal amounts. So it's sort of a fifty to fifty
• 1:33:30
  Speaker 3: chance whether they're going to listen or not. One of
• 1:33:33
  Speaker 3: the things that they really bulk on is the idea
• 1:33:37
  Speaker 3: that the problem started with feminists pushing for law and
• 1:33:46
  Speaker 3: policy that discriminates against men and family court and makes
• 1:33:50
  Speaker 3: it so that abused men have no recourse and falsely
• 1:33:55
  Speaker 3: accused men don't have the same due process rights as
• 1:33:58
  Speaker 3: say a man who's a cue used of insurance fraud
• 1:34:01
  Speaker 3: or stranger homicide. And for some reason, the minute that
• 1:34:08
  Speaker 3: you start talking about holding women accountable when women behave
• 1:34:13
  Speaker 3: badly and giving men recourse when women are behaving badly
• 1:34:19
  Speaker 3: toward men, it triggers this idea in them that men
• 1:34:25
  Speaker 3: should be invincible and women should be angels and all
• 1:34:30
  Speaker 3: women are angels. Well, they're not right. Women lie, cheat, steel,
• 1:34:36
  Speaker 3: women are violent. Women will engage in all kinds of
• 1:34:41
  Speaker 3: fraudulent behavior just the same as men will, and they'll
• 1:34:46
  Speaker 3: do it just as much as men will. And yes,
• 1:34:48
  Speaker 3: it's a minority of women, just like it's a minority
• 1:34:51
  Speaker 3: of men. The problem is when a man doesn't, he
• 1:34:55
  Speaker 3: gets in trouble like he should. When a woman does it,
• 1:34:59
  Speaker 3: she gets assisted from organizations with names of ancient goddesses
• 1:35:05
  Speaker 3: that are intended to help women who are being abused,
• 1:35:10
  Speaker 3: but really just choose to not differentiate between women who
• 1:35:14
  Speaker 3: are being abused and women who are using them to
• 1:35:17
  Speaker 3: abuse somebody. And until that is remedied, they're not going
• 1:35:24
  Speaker 3: to fix the marriage trend and they're not going to
• 1:35:28
  Speaker 3: fix the birth rate, and so they don't want to
• 1:35:32
  Speaker 3: hear it. So the difficult thing is at this point
• 1:35:38
  Speaker 3: that trend is irreversible until you know, the left is
• 1:35:44
  Speaker 3: never going to listen. But until the right starts listening
• 1:35:49
  Speaker 3: and recognizing that justice isn't anti biblical and it isn't
• 1:35:56
  Speaker 3: what the left uses the word justice to describe that rights.
• 1:36:04
  Speaker 3: Equal rights aren't bad. It just isn't equal rights when
• 1:36:11
  Speaker 3: you give somebody special treatment. It's only equal rights when
• 1:36:15
  Speaker 3: you treat people equally under the law. Until they start
• 1:36:19
  Speaker 3: recognizing those things, we're still fucked. It is nice that
• 1:36:26
  Speaker 3: they're starting to panic, It just sucks that they're going
• 1:36:31
  Speaker 3: in the wrong direction with it.
• 1:36:35
  Speaker 1: Yeah, well it's it's I guess, like I said, we'll see,
• 1:36:39
  Speaker 1: but they're they're not able to ignore it any longer,
• 1:36:43
  Speaker 1: so it is we'll just have to see where they
• 1:36:45
  Speaker 1: how they react. All right, So I think that's all
• 1:36:49
  Speaker 1: the stories and I read all the super chats and stuff,
• 1:36:52
  Speaker 1: so that's awesome. And we're gonna go into this story
• 1:36:54
  Speaker 1: now about AOC freezing her eggs and Slate's opinion, the
• 1:37:00
  Speaker 1: opinions that people have about it.
• 1:37:03
  Speaker 3: I'll bet they're not going to talk about her freezing.
• 1:37:05
  Speaker 1: Or brain well what brain?
• 1:37:10
  Speaker 3: But well we wouldn't know because it's been frozen since
• 1:37:13
  Speaker 3: before she ran for office.
• 1:37:16
  Speaker 1: We're gonna go into the Patron Show now to look
• 1:37:19
  Speaker 1: at this article. If you guys want to join us
• 1:37:22
  Speaker 1: for that, go to feed the Batcher dot com and
• 1:37:25
  Speaker 1: set up a monthly subscription five bucks a month. We'll
• 1:37:27
  Speaker 1: get you into the discord server where you'll be able
• 1:37:29
  Speaker 1: to watch all the additional content, including this Patron Show,
• 1:37:32
  Speaker 1: and then you can there's also lots of community stuff
• 1:37:35
  Speaker 1: going on the discord. Just go to Badginations online. You
• 1:37:38
  Speaker 1: can see the free parts of it, which is I
• 1:37:40
  Speaker 1: think the majority of it. And so that's still good
• 1:37:43
  Speaker 1: and hopefully we'll see you all there. I got one
• 1:37:46
  Speaker 1: more rumble rant at the last minute. Yep for two dollars, Roboto,
• 1:37:51
  Speaker 1: says Hannah, mentioning trad have you considered the trad lifestyle
• 1:37:55
  Speaker 1: making sour dough bread and going full Martha Stewart.
• 1:37:58
  Speaker 3: So here's here's the thing. And I hate to disparage
• 1:38:02
  Speaker 3: trad wives, but I'm gonna do it all right. I
• 1:38:05
  Speaker 3: did that stuff and had three jobs. I was very tired,
• 1:38:13
  Speaker 3: but that didn't change anything. I did that stuff and
• 1:38:16
  Speaker 3: had three jobs. Women talk like the traditional homemaker lifestyle
• 1:38:25
  Speaker 3: is as much work as a full time job. It
• 1:38:30
  Speaker 3: is not right. Maybe if you're homeschooling your kids, it's
• 1:38:35
  Speaker 3: as much work as a a place that let's you know, well,
• 1:38:42
  Speaker 3: let's use slide at thirty six hours and doesn't make
• 1:38:47
  Speaker 3: you do all the different tasks. But honestly, with all
• 1:38:51
  Speaker 3: of the devices and all of the amenities in the
• 1:38:54
  Speaker 3: home that men have invented to help women do women's task,
• 1:39:01
  Speaker 3: it's not that hard. So I wouldn't give up earning
• 1:39:08
  Speaker 3: money to only be a homemaker because I'd rather and
• 1:39:16
  Speaker 3: I'll leave my husband holding the bag be the only
• 1:39:19
  Speaker 3: person that's responsible for that. But I do those things. Yeah,
• 1:39:27
  Speaker 3: And even if you send your kids to public school,
• 1:39:30
  Speaker 3: you still need to homeschool them because they are going
• 1:39:33
  Speaker 3: to learn that there are seventy two genders, which is wrong.
• 1:39:36
  Speaker 3: But They're not going to learn a damn thing about
• 1:39:40
  Speaker 3: the history of, say, voting rights, and how the government works,
• 1:39:45
  Speaker 3: or what it means when you say adjectives are modifiers.
• 1:39:49
  Speaker 3: They'll learn the phrase, but if you ask them what
• 1:39:52
  Speaker 3: a modifier is and what it does, they will not know.
• 1:39:56
  Speaker 3: So you can't get away from homeschooling your kids even
• 1:40:00
  Speaker 3: if they're attending school. Yeah, I'm just saying.
• 1:40:06
  Speaker 1: All right, Well, thank you for the rumble rant, and
• 1:40:10
  Speaker 1: thanks guys for watching the show. Thank you to Hannah
• 1:40:14
  Speaker 1: and Mike for their commentary. Thank it to Mike Jay
• 1:40:16
  Speaker 1: to helping me with the write ups. With all that said,
• 1:40:19
  Speaker 1: if you guys liked this video, please hit like, subscribe
• 1:40:21
  Speaker 1: if you're not already subscribe, hit the bellf notifications, leave
• 1:40:23
  Speaker 1: us a comment, let us know what we talked about
• 1:40:25
  Speaker 1: on the show today, and share this video because sharing
• 1:40:30
  Speaker 1: is caring. Sorry for the pause. Thanks so much for
• 1:40:32
  Speaker 1: coming hot in this episode of HBr News and we
• 1:40:34
  Speaker 1: will see you next Tuesday.