Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Oh No! The Consequences of my own actions! | HBR News 520

Transcript

Oh No! The Consequences of my own actions! | HBR News 520 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: This is HBr News number five twenty oh no, the
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: Consequences of my own Actions, where we discussed the news
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: of the week and give it the Badger treatment. Hello everybody,
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: and welcome back to Honey Badger Radio. I hope you
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: guys are doing well this week and that you're laughing
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: at all of this absurdity so that you are not
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: consumed by it. I am your host, Brian. I'm joined
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: by my co host Hannah Wallin, doctor Randa mccam appears
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: to be Mia right now, which is why we started
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: a little bit late, because I thought I would give
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: him a little bit of time to show up. It's
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: possible that he's not going to be here, because I
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: know that after the meetup he was supposed to, he
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: stayed in Calgary for a little while longer and then
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: went to Kelvington with Alison and Jonathan to the Badger Cave,
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: and I guess he was staying there for a little
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: while and then he has to return to the UK,
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: so he's been doing a lot of flying around and
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: I don't know if he's like in transit or he's
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: just out there in the flat wilderness, not like basically
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: hooked into some project with Allison, so I will my
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: door is open. He knows how to get in here.
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: If he shows up, I will put a mouth to
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: his cartoon. But for now, you'd have to look at
• 1:08
  Speaker 1: the panda not saying anything. But that doesn't mean that
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: Mike isn't here with us spiritually, so anyway, but that
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: out of the way. I have Hannah. That's plenty. It's fine,
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: and we have a great show lined up for you
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: guys today, so please be sure to continue the conversations
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: in the chat, the live chat which I will be
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: looking at as well as the comments section on this
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: week's HBr News. We're going to be talking about, well,
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: let me see, what do we got. We have a
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: lot going on here. For some reason, I didn't change
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: the description, but we're gonna be talking about the fallout
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: or some of the downstream events and happenings that have
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: occurred since the Charlie Kirk assassination. That would be the social,
• 1:47
  Speaker 1: the cultural, the political, and more so. Stick around. It's
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: going to be a good time and be sure to
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: join us afterwards for the patron only show. So I
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: came across something interesting that I thought would be good
• 1:59
  Speaker 1: to share, So you know that Antifa is one of
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: the central subjects of the topics because they've been coming
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: up this week in the light and light of recent events,
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: because there's a lot of speculation around that, and as such,
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: some people who have been doing a lot of hard
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: work with regards to journalism surrounding Antifa. Guys like Andy
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: no for example, have been doing the rounds and getting
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: onto multiple news platforms and discussing things. And I overheard
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: something really weird, well weird and interesting, and I thought
• 2:31
  Speaker 1: it might be fun to do in the Patron show.
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: Apparently there are anti fascists that make games, and we're
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: going to look at some of the anti fascist games
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: that have been created, and one of them is a
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: video game. There's a board game that's an anti fascists. I
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: think it came out of France, and we're gonna look
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: at that because there are some articles written about it
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: and I'm kind of curious about how it works as
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: a board game, which is funny because Hannah's working on
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: a board game right now. But there are also video games.
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: There is a developer called Wobbly dev and they have
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: a bunch of socialist common games. This one Syndical, These
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: are not jokes. This is like real shit that this
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: guy made, Okay, Syndical Crossing Okay, which is about anarcho syndicalism,
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: syndicalism Antifa the game, which basically is inspired by Mario
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: Brothers and the Conquests of Bread, an anarchist fun game.
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: I'm sure it's a blast and the union makes us strong.
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: So yeah, I think you guys got like a sense
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: of what we're gonna be looking at, and we're gonna
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: be going into the Patron Show to look at these
• 3:30
  Speaker 1: things because I think it could be educational, I guess.
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: So if you guys want to join us for this
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: romp through what I'm certain to I'm certain are extremely
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: entertaining and fun games based on communism and Antifa, then
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: you'll have to become a Badger yourself by going to
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: Feed the Badger dot com forward Slash subscribe five bucks
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: a month. We'll get you into our Discord server where
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: you'll be able to hang out with us and join
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: the community. And yeah, it should be like and there's
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: lots of stuff going on there, you know, works in progress.
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: Alison has writers' groups, and there are game nights, and
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: there are movie nights and all kinds of other fun
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: things there, and yeah, you should probably join us and
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: you'll be don't watch all the additional content and even
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: participate in the discussions yourself. And if you don't want
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: to wake up one morning to find that we've been
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: yeeded from the Internet, then go to badgerfeed dot com
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: or honey Badger Radio dot com. That is where all
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: of our content lives in archive form. Okay, with all
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: that out of the way, let us get into the story.
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: So I have a breaking news story I have to
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: share right off the bat. This wasn't something I had
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: write up for, but I thought it was worth sharing.
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: So the Google has formally admitted the Biden administration pressured
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: them to censor YouTubers and they're going to reinstate all
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: banded accounts, or at least banned accounts. And this came
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: from Representative Jim Jordan on X, who wrote breaking due
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: to oversight efforts, Google commits to offer all creators previously
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: kicked off YouTube due to political speech violations to return
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: to the platform. I'll just read a summary that I
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: hurriedly put together. The Google, through its parent company Alphabet,
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: committed to offering the committed reinstatement to all YouTube creators
• 5:11
  Speaker 1: whose channels were permanently banned for repeated violations of now
• 5:15
  Speaker 1: debunked policies on COVID nineteen misinformation and election integrity content
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: often tied to political speech. This move, detailed in a
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: letter from Alphabet Council Daniel Donovan to House Judiciary Committee
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: Chairman Jim Jordan, follows years of Republican led investigations into
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: big tech's alleged collusion with the Biden administration to suppress
• 5:36
  Speaker 1: dissenting voices. Google explicitly admitted that senior White House officials
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: exerted repeated and sustained pressure to remove user generated content
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: that did not violate platform rules, describing such censorship as
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: unacceptable and wrong, and vowing to abandon reliance on third
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: party fact checkers while prioritizing free expression. The decision could
• 5:58
  Speaker 1: benefit high profile concern figures like Dan Bongino's Theeve Bannon,
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: Sebastian Bolt Gorka, Computing Forever, Stefon Molinu, Alex Jones. You
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: know people like that, who's band stem from pandemic or
• 6:10
  Speaker 1: election related commentary, Signaling a broader shift amid the incoming
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: Trump administration's focus on combating federal censorship. The announcement hailed
• 6:19
  Speaker 1: by Jordan as a victory for oversight alliance with President
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: Trump's Executive Order one four one four nine, which mandates
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: federal agencies to end and rectify pass on unconstitutional speech suppression.
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: Google emphasized that its policies on these topics were rolled
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: back by twenty three twenty twenty three through twenty twenty four,
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: and read statement will be available to affected creators without
• 6:41
  Speaker 1: retroactive content restoration, aiming to restore civic discourse while maintaining
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: other community guidelines. Critics, including civil liberties advocates, have mixed reactions,
• 6:51
  Speaker 1: praising the free speech pivot but questioning the timing post
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: Biden and potential for selective enforcement, while others other outlets
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: like Fox News and Type Art frame it as a
• 7:01
  Speaker 1: capitulation to accountability efforts. So just I mean this, I
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: don't know if this is going to like change people
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: who have been you know, like demonetized, or there are
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: other ways that their visibility has been limited. Like doctor Ranbrackham,
• 7:15
  Speaker 1: I was I was kind of hoping that Mike would
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: be here because his channel was definitely on the rise
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: for a while there it was going to be really big,
• 7:23
  Speaker 1: and then he started getting hit with crazy, like you know,
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: fishy suspicious things like losing subs whenever he uploaded a video.
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: But this is still a victory, and I do think
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: it's good news, So I would say, yeah, I would.
• 7:37
  Speaker 1: That was basically the breaking thing I want to point out.
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: So I don't know, Hannah, if you want to say.
• 7:40
  Speaker 2: Anything, yeah, I would call this a victory. But it's
• 7:43
  Speaker 2: a minor victory because there are things that YouTube has
• 7:47
  Speaker 2: not admitted to that we know are true. We know
• 7:50
  Speaker 2: that the same pressure that businesses, other businesses in the
• 7:55
  Speaker 2: US and other social media in the US was applied
• 7:58
  Speaker 2: to YouTube the same as every other social media to
• 8:01
  Speaker 2: censor all kinds of content, not just election content and
• 8:07
  Speaker 2: content about COVID, but also content about gender issues. And
• 8:13
  Speaker 2: so all of our channels, every one of us that
• 8:15
  Speaker 2: is a men's rights activist that discusses men's issues, all
• 8:20
  Speaker 2: of our channels have been hit with something like my
• 8:22
  Speaker 2: channel was entirely demonetized for the egregious act of pointing
• 8:28
  Speaker 2: out that men have as much right to bodily autonomy
• 8:34
  Speaker 2: and to choose whether to consent or decline sexual content
• 8:40
  Speaker 2: as or contact as women. That was just beyond the pale,
• 8:43
  Speaker 2: apparently for YouTube. Reddit didn't like it either, Like the
• 8:48
  Speaker 2: idea that men can tell women know first x was
• 8:51
  Speaker 2: very upsetting, and the idea that men have a right
• 8:56
  Speaker 2: if you're telling them yes, for there to be clear
• 9:00
  Speaker 2: communication that you mean it and that you're not going
• 9:03
  Speaker 2: to come back later and say I was under duress
• 9:07
  Speaker 2: and that time I consented, you were actually raping me.
• 9:11
  Speaker 2: Like those things were such terrible statements according to YouTube
• 9:18
  Speaker 2: and Reddit, the changes had to be made. Reddit actually
• 9:22
  Speaker 2: changed their platform in response to a combination of that
• 9:25
  Speaker 2: and shuwan heads video where she went down the Men's
• 9:29
  Speaker 2: Rights Movements list of statistics on domestic violence, and like
• 9:34
  Speaker 2: a lot of us, she cited original sources, not the
• 9:36
  Speaker 2: people she heard it from, which that's fine, But the
• 9:40
  Speaker 2: big thing is they didn't like the fact that she
• 9:43
  Speaker 2: drew attention to the plight of abused men, And they
• 9:47
  Speaker 2: didn't like the fact that I drew attention to the
• 9:51
  Speaker 2: plight of falsely accused men and men who don't receive
• 9:55
  Speaker 2: equal treatment from their partner during a sex act of
• 10:00
  Speaker 2: communication and consideration. YouTube was the same way, and they
• 10:03
  Speaker 2: haven't admitted to that they haven't admitted that the same
• 10:09
  Speaker 2: powers that pressured Reddit to censor us, and in particular
• 10:14
  Speaker 2: people who were gamer Gate supporters. No, mister three or
• 10:17
  Speaker 2: three shoo did not get the socialist protection on that
• 10:20
  Speaker 2: Reddit banned political videos from there. There are slash videos. Subreddit,
• 10:27
  Speaker 2: which was their biggest video posting Subreddit created a separate
• 10:33
  Speaker 2: r slash political videos that had a much smaller or
• 10:36
  Speaker 2: smaller following to prevent any video like that or any
• 10:40
  Speaker 2: video like mine from ever making the front page again.
• 10:43
  Speaker 2: And like I would say, probably eighty percent of it
• 10:48
  Speaker 2: was to get rid of the video that she made,
• 10:50
  Speaker 2: and the other twenty percent was my video because her
• 10:54
  Speaker 2: videos routinely get more views than my video got. Totally.
• 10:59
  Speaker 2: That's so she's a bigger YouTuber than me. That's my
• 11:03
  Speaker 2: assumption is that it was a bigger deal. Her video
• 11:07
  Speaker 2: was a bigger deal to them. And this is not
• 11:12
  Speaker 2: a new thing. This is a long standing thing with Reddit.
• 11:14
  Speaker 2: Feminists have been trying to get rid of men's issues
• 11:17
  Speaker 2: discussion that is not feminist controlled on that platform since
• 11:21
  Speaker 2: two thousand and nine twenty ten. Somewhere in there, there
• 11:27
  Speaker 2: was a discussion that yeah, yeah, mister three or three
• 11:33
  Speaker 2: her her channel wasn't shadow band on YouTube, but she
• 11:37
  Speaker 2: got no socialist protection on Reddit. Like that's that's the thing.
• 11:42
  Speaker 2: My channel wasn't shadow she's you know, yeah, yeah, but
• 11:46
  Speaker 2: my channel wasn't shadow band either. They just totally demonetized it.
• 11:51
  Speaker 2: I can't anything I post isn't isn't monetized. It's like,
• 11:55
  Speaker 2: that wasn't why I stopped posting on my channel. I
• 11:58
  Speaker 2: just couldn't keep up with that and the stuff I
• 12:01
  Speaker 2: was doing for HBr at the same time, and the
• 12:03
  Speaker 2: stuff I was doing for HBr is more important. But
• 12:05
  Speaker 2: in any case, yeah, this YouTube has had the same pressures.
• 12:10
  Speaker 2: YouTube has had the same reactions, and YouTube has done
• 12:14
  Speaker 2: the same things that basically came out in the Twitter
• 12:19
  Speaker 2: files that Twitter had been doing, and they've been doing
• 12:22
  Speaker 2: them in response to the same financial pressures, and they've
• 12:26
  Speaker 2: been doing them in response to the same political views
• 12:30
  Speaker 2: of their leadership. So as much as I like, yeah,
• 12:36
  Speaker 2: this is a victory, it's not enough. More needs to happen.
• 12:40
  Speaker 2: More protections need to be put in place, if you know,
• 12:44
  Speaker 2: and not protections where the platforms are told what they
• 12:47
  Speaker 2: can and can't allow on their platforms, but protections where
• 12:50
  Speaker 2: government entities and powerful financial entities have to be told
• 12:56
  Speaker 2: you can't choose your power to censor these platforms beyond
• 13:02
  Speaker 2: what's legal to post and what's illegal to post, you know,
• 13:05
  Speaker 2: like you can't you can't give them some sort of
• 13:08
  Speaker 2: social credit score and say you can't get loans and
• 13:11
  Speaker 2: you can't get funding if you post this kind of
• 13:14
  Speaker 2: content or that kind of content. Aside from the difference
• 13:18
  Speaker 2: between X rated and G rated stuff, there really shouldn't
• 13:21
  Speaker 2: be any differentiation whether it's political or not, whether it's
• 13:25
  Speaker 2: medical or not, and so on, and that should be
• 13:28
  Speaker 2: up to that should be up to the especially as
• 13:30
  Speaker 2: long as the platforms are not liable for if I
• 13:34
  Speaker 2: give medical advice and I say it's rock solid and
• 13:38
  Speaker 2: somebody follows it and they get sick, Like YouTube's not
• 13:41
  Speaker 2: liable for that, Twitter x they're not liable for that.
• 13:44
  Speaker 2: Facebook is not liable for that. I would be And
• 13:48
  Speaker 2: as long as that's the case, there shouldn't be these
• 13:51
  Speaker 2: kind of limitations placed on the platforms where the platforms
• 13:56
  Speaker 2: are told you have to censor people who are doing this.
• 13:58
  Speaker 2: If they still do it, you know, then then they'll
• 14:01
  Speaker 2: fail on their own. But yeah, this this is a
• 14:05
  Speaker 2: small victory and I want to see more.
• 14:09
  Speaker 1: Yeah, for sure. Same, but you know, we just got
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: this announcement. We'll see what happens. I would say, you know,
• 14:15
  Speaker 1: Google should follow its own advice and you know, not
• 14:18
  Speaker 1: be evil, but they haven't had that as their tagline
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: for a long time, so I'm not holy my breath.
• 14:24
  Speaker 1: But let us on, you guys think about this one
• 14:26
  Speaker 1: of the comments again, who would you like to see
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: restored to YouTube? Or should everyone just go to rumble
• 14:31
  Speaker 1: and then we're just like fine, I mean that's another option,
• 14:34
  Speaker 1: right anyway, let me know what you guys think about
• 14:37
  Speaker 1: this one in the comments.
• 14:38
  Speaker 2: Into the amnesty like like X did because there there
• 14:45
  Speaker 2: was too much. YouTube had a major cheese pizza problem.
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: Cheese pizza problem.
• 14:54
  Speaker 2: Yeah, YouTube had a major problem with content, elicit content
• 14:59
  Speaker 2: of underage kids that was specifically targeted to attract a
• 15:03
  Speaker 2: certain type of people. And it's I don't want to
• 15:07
  Speaker 2: see that come back.
• 15:08
  Speaker 1: For sure for sure. Mike, you're back. Did how long
• 15:12
  Speaker 1: have you been here? I didn't know. I didn't notice
• 15:13
  Speaker 1: you until now.
• 15:14
  Speaker 3: I literally just got in. Sorry, I got my time
• 15:17
  Speaker 3: zones mixed up, that's fine.
• 15:19
  Speaker 1: Where got from? What are you in? Are you in
• 15:22
  Speaker 1: the UK right now.
• 15:24
  Speaker 3: I'm still in the budget cave.
• 15:25
  Speaker 1: I see.
• 15:26
  Speaker 2: That's why in your own time zone, to keep track
• 15:30
  Speaker 2: of what time it is in any time zone.
• 15:35
  Speaker 3: So sorry, did you I have?
• 15:38
  Speaker 1: This is the first one. It's not even really the
• 15:40
  Speaker 1: first one because this is a breaking story that just
• 15:43
  Speaker 1: came out today where Google was basically they have admitted
• 15:48
  Speaker 1: that the Biden administration pressured them to censor YouTubers and
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: they're going to reinstate like banned YouTube accounts. And we
• 15:55
  Speaker 1: were just talking about that. Okay, that was yeah, So
• 15:59
  Speaker 1: I don't know if you've seen that, if you know
• 16:00
  Speaker 1: about that or whatever.
• 16:03
  Speaker 3: I did not, so I have nothing to say about it,
• 16:06
  Speaker 3: which is good. We can move on.
• 16:07
  Speaker 2: Are we holding our breath to see if tho?
• 16:10
  Speaker 1: Yeah?
• 16:10
  Speaker 4: Shadow well, uh.
• 16:11
  Speaker 1: Yeah, unshadow banning or whatever is a different thing. But
• 16:14
  Speaker 1: maybe I don't know. Maybe if they're adamant enough, or
• 16:17
  Speaker 1: we keep the pressure up on the current administration, maybe
• 16:20
  Speaker 1: they will look into that.
• 16:22
  Speaker 3: So all right, there's no such thing as shadow banning.
• 16:25
  Speaker 3: There's no such thing as bots, there's no such thing
• 16:28
  Speaker 3: as algorithms. The only thing that's to blame is how
• 16:31
  Speaker 3: irrelevant we are. I have the own good authority. Yes exactly.
• 16:38
  Speaker 1: All right, let's some of you guys think about this
• 16:39
  Speaker 1: one in the comments. Now we're going to get into
• 16:43
  Speaker 1: the stories, all right, the official first story. So before
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: we get into all of the sort of like highly
• 16:50
  Speaker 1: charged stuff, we got to do at least one on
• 16:53
  Speaker 1: women behaving badly. So this is Ali Bardfield. She's a
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: thirty four year old former substitute teacher at Hope Academy
• 17:04
  Speaker 1: in Decatur, Illinois, pleaded who pleaded guilty to predatory criminal
• 17:09
  Speaker 1: sexual assault involving an eleven year old student she taught.
• 17:12
  Speaker 1: The abuse occurred during multiple play dates quote unquote, at
• 17:16
  Speaker 1: Bartfield's home in twenty twenty three and twice in March
• 17:20
  Speaker 1: of twenty twenty four, when the boy and Bardfield engaged
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: in sexual encounters. The boy's mother noticed behavioral changes after
• 17:28
  Speaker 1: the second twenty twenty four visit, and upon checking his phone,
• 17:32
  Speaker 1: found inappropriate social media messages and up to seven hundred
• 17:36
  Speaker 1: dollars sent via cash app from Barfield. The woman. This
• 17:41
  Speaker 1: led her to report the matter to Mount Zion Police
• 17:44
  Speaker 1: in April of twenty twenty four. During police interviews, Bartfield
• 17:48
  Speaker 1: admitted to the sexual intercourse, claiming the child initiated advances.
• 17:52
  Speaker 1: She reached a partial plea deal with prosecutors for the
• 17:55
  Speaker 1: single count of assault Bartfield a schedule for sentencing on
• 17:59
  Speaker 1: September twenty twenty five. The child's parents have also foiuled
• 18:03
  Speaker 1: the lawsuit related to the incidents.
• 18:06
  Speaker 2: So, so before anybody says anything about the plea deal,
• 18:09
  Speaker 2: that's a routine thing that happens with both sexes. But
• 18:12
  Speaker 2: I want you to understand, and I expect comments from
• 18:16
  Speaker 2: both feminists and MRAs on this on your star in
• 18:21
  Speaker 2: I want to say two thousand and nine, her research
• 18:23
  Speaker 2: found that in the same type of circumstances. So say,
• 18:28
  Speaker 2: if if you just flipped her to mail, like there
• 18:32
  Speaker 2: was a gender switch and you could just flip it
• 18:33
  Speaker 2: and she was Mail and everything else stayed the same,
• 18:37
  Speaker 2: the plea deal that he would be offered would not
• 18:43
  Speaker 2: be as favorable to him as the plea deal that
• 18:46
  Speaker 2: she was offered was likely to her. That is confirmed,
• 18:51
  Speaker 2: like documented by her research. And there was a second
• 18:56
  Speaker 2: I want to say her name was Dorner, that that
• 18:59
  Speaker 2: did similar research and found the same thing. So this
• 19:03
  Speaker 2: is definitely not going to have the same impact on
• 19:07
  Speaker 2: her that it would have on a male teacher. If
• 19:10
  Speaker 2: he did the same thing. But all of that said,
• 19:14
  Speaker 2: I'm glad that the parents are suing. Like this needs
• 19:18
  Speaker 2: to happen every single time a student is sexually assaulted.
• 19:22
  Speaker 2: There needs to be a consequence. Schools have this routine
• 19:26
  Speaker 2: behavior where when they find out in particular female teacher,
• 19:31
  Speaker 2: they'll prosecute male teachers. But a female teacher does something
• 19:35
  Speaker 2: like this and they want to sweep it under the rug,
• 19:37
  Speaker 2: they'll do it, especially if the student is older, like
• 19:40
  Speaker 2: high school. This was an elementary school student. Her claim
• 19:43
  Speaker 2: that the student initiated I'm going to get to that
• 19:46
  Speaker 2: in a minute. But if the schools get sued every
• 19:52
  Speaker 2: time this happens, then their insurance companies are going to
• 19:56
  Speaker 2: start pressuring them to apply more consequences to prosecute when
• 20:00
  Speaker 2: this happens, and instead of passing the teacher along to
• 20:03
  Speaker 2: another school teachers that do stuff like this, female teachers
• 20:06
  Speaker 2: that do stuff like this, besides the fact that they're
• 20:09
  Speaker 2: just as sick in a head as male teachers who
• 20:12
  Speaker 2: do something like this get passed from school to school
• 20:15
  Speaker 2: until they get caught like this by parents, and parents prosecute.
• 20:19
  Speaker 2: And it's a serious issue because there usually are or
• 20:26
  Speaker 2: often are a trail of victims behind them. The female
• 20:29
  Speaker 2: that did it at my school came from another school
• 20:33
  Speaker 2: and went to another school. She did not get prosecuted
• 20:38
  Speaker 2: and just like went on to do it again as
• 20:44
  Speaker 2: far as I know. But in any case, this claim
• 20:48
  Speaker 2: pedophiles will do this. Oh, the child initiated it. If
• 20:51
  Speaker 2: you are a reasonable adult and a child comes to
• 20:55
  Speaker 2: you and initiates something like that, not only should it
• 20:57
  Speaker 2: be profoundly disturbing that a child as that knowledge and
• 21:02
  Speaker 2: those impulses toward you, but you should be concerned that
• 21:08
  Speaker 2: something has already happened to that child that needs to
• 21:11
  Speaker 2: be rooted out and helped. The child needs to be helped,
• 21:18
  Speaker 2: and the first thing you should do, the first instinct
• 21:20
  Speaker 2: you should have, is to protect the child. Alert the
• 21:25
  Speaker 2: child's caregivers. This child came and said these things to me.
• 21:28
  Speaker 2: That's very disturbing. Or alert at least your supervisor so
• 21:32
  Speaker 2: an investigator can come in and determine who did what,
• 21:36
  Speaker 2: if anything happened, or if the child saw something on
• 21:40
  Speaker 2: TV or heard something from another kid, or whatever, so
• 21:44
  Speaker 2: that the child can be protected and helped past this
• 21:49
  Speaker 2: function that is happening and allowed to progress in his
• 21:53
  Speaker 2: or her development normally in a healthy manner, as opposed to, Gosh,
• 21:59
  Speaker 2: this child isv one role here comes. You know, molestation
• 22:02
  Speaker 2: time like that is the absolute most predatory thing you
• 22:06
  Speaker 2: can do. So anybody that comes along to defend this woman,
• 22:10
  Speaker 2: well she you know, this is probably her first defense,
• 22:13
  Speaker 2: and she's she was groomed by the child or some
• 22:17
  Speaker 2: stupid bullshit like that. No, only an absolute disgusting predator
• 22:25
  Speaker 2: would respond to a child engaging in this type of
• 22:29
  Speaker 2: adult behavior with anything other than concern and being disturbed
• 22:36
  Speaker 2: and seeking assistance from somebody higher up in helping and
• 22:41
  Speaker 2: protecting a child. There's something profoundly wrong with someone who
• 22:47
  Speaker 2: responds by taking advantage of the child's vulnerability. Whatever they
• 22:52
  Speaker 2: have done, it isn't going to be enough. Whatever the
• 22:56
  Speaker 2: legal system has done with her isn't going to fix
• 23:00
  Speaker 2: the problem. More likely than not, she's going to get
• 23:02
  Speaker 2: a slap on the wrist, and she might do some
• 23:05
  Speaker 2: lip service of going through a perpetrator program where they
• 23:09
  Speaker 2: will treat her like a woman instead of a pervert.
• 23:12
  Speaker 2: And I don't have any faith that this woman is
• 23:16
  Speaker 2: going to come out of this unlikely to re offend
• 23:21
  Speaker 2: when she gets back out into the public so that
• 23:24
  Speaker 2: lawsuit is very important. And like I said, I will
• 23:28
  Speaker 2: repeat this every time something like this happens. The family
• 23:33
  Speaker 2: needs to just sue the shit out of everybody that
• 23:35
  Speaker 2: let it happen.
• 23:36
  Speaker 1: All right, might do you have anything to say about
• 23:39
  Speaker 1: this story?
• 23:40
  Speaker 2: Yeah?
• 23:41
  Speaker 3: I think I've I think I've done this round like
• 23:43
  Speaker 3: a dozen times already, where this shit keeps happening. So
• 23:46
  Speaker 3: let's go around again.
• 23:47
  Speaker 1: Why not?
• 23:48
  Speaker 3: This time we're talking about an eleven year old boy,
• 23:50
  Speaker 3: So I have to ask how young is too young?
• 23:54
  Speaker 3: And I'm asking all this psycho chuckle fox out there
• 23:58
  Speaker 3: who continue to insist that incidents like this can be
• 24:02
  Speaker 3: laughed off because the boy enjoyed it. I realize most
• 24:06
  Speaker 3: of the people I'm talking to aren't listening to this
• 24:09
  Speaker 3: show because you're not in our audience, but you are
• 24:12
  Speaker 3: just about everywhere else. It's it's one thing that seems
• 24:15
  Speaker 3: to unite the right and the left, by and large,
• 24:19
  Speaker 3: they're both saturated with these pedophile apologists who think it's
• 24:23
  Speaker 3: funny when adult women rape underage boys.
• 24:27
  Speaker 2: Mike, Okay, I was just about to type a message
• 24:31
  Speaker 2: and did I just lose you guys? Because I hear anything.
• 24:33
  Speaker 1: I'm here is Mike still here? Did he drop?
• 24:36
  Speaker 2: I think he did?
• 24:37
  Speaker 3: Hello? Hello, Hello?
• 24:38
  Speaker 2: Hello? Yeah?
• 24:38
  Speaker 1: Yeah, what happened? Okay? Okay?
• 24:41
  Speaker 3: What I What was I up to?
• 24:42
  Speaker 1: What did I get? Uh? You were talking about? Chuckle fox.
• 24:45
  Speaker 3: One thing that seems to seems to be common in
• 24:48
  Speaker 3: the right and the left is, by and large, they're
• 24:51
  Speaker 3: both saturated with pedophile apologists who think it's funny when
• 24:56
  Speaker 3: adult women rape underage boys because boys always enjoy it.
• 25:01
  Speaker 3: So what if I gave Heroin to a fourteen year
• 25:03
  Speaker 3: old boy? He enjoyed it, He loved it. It was the
• 25:07
  Speaker 3: happiest day of his life. He was bragging to his
• 25:09
  Speaker 3: friends about how fun it is taking heroin. What's the problem? Okay,
• 25:13
  Speaker 3: So where is he now? How's his life going a
• 25:17
  Speaker 3: few years down the line? I don't know. Why does
• 25:20
  Speaker 3: that matter? I'll tell you. He's on the streets selling
• 25:23
  Speaker 3: ass for heroin. He wants nothing less than to wear
• 25:26
  Speaker 3: a little dress. So how was that mine fault? All
• 25:30
  Speaker 3: I did? All I did was give him what he wanted. Newsflash,
• 25:34
  Speaker 3: ladies and gentlemen, you're not supposed to give underage people
• 25:38
  Speaker 3: the darkest excesses of what they want. Not drugs and
• 25:42
  Speaker 3: not sex, not boys and not girls. Do you think
• 25:45
  Speaker 3: teenage girls don't enjoy sex, especially with attractive adult men.
• 25:51
  Speaker 3: Absolutely they do, and absolutely they will brag about it
• 25:54
  Speaker 3: to their friends. But that doesn't make it okay? Why not?
• 25:59
  Speaker 3: I don't even need to ask, do I. It doesn't
• 26:01
  Speaker 3: matter how much she enjoys heroin. If it was given
• 26:05
  Speaker 3: to her by a teacher, that teacher should be buried
• 26:08
  Speaker 3: under the fucking jail. Everyone knows this instinctively and logically
• 26:13
  Speaker 3: when it comes to men taking advantage of girls, but
• 26:16
  Speaker 3: it falls out of their brain when it comes to
• 26:18
  Speaker 3: women taking advantage of boys. Why because they see female
• 26:23
  Speaker 3: sexuality as pure, as a pure and innocent gift, and
• 26:28
  Speaker 3: they see men's sexuality as a filthy and corrosive blight.
• 26:33
  Speaker 3: And this includes Trump, by the way, he was posed
• 26:35
  Speaker 3: to this question recently and he gave the same sick,
• 26:40
  Speaker 3: psychotic Joe Rogan response, Well, boys enjoy it, so it's fine,
• 26:44
  Speaker 3: it's funny. The leftist legacy media could have run with
• 26:48
  Speaker 3: that like they ran with the grabber by the pussy line.
• 26:50
  Speaker 3: They could have ran every headline as Donald Trump is
• 26:53
  Speaker 3: a pedophile apologist, and in this case they would actually
• 26:56
  Speaker 3: have a point because that's exactly what that is, but
• 26:58
  Speaker 3: they didn't care because they agree they can't find anyone
• 27:03
  Speaker 3: on their side or on the side of their mortal
• 27:06
  Speaker 3: enemies who gives the slightest shit about female pedophiles. This
• 27:11
  Speaker 3: is one of the reasons I can't throw my lot
• 27:13
  Speaker 3: behind the right or the left, behind traditionalists or feminists,
• 27:16
  Speaker 3: because they're both just slightly different flavors of miss andrik
• 27:19
  Speaker 3: dickheads and psychotic beedophile apologists. We have much bigger fish
• 27:24
  Speaker 3: to fry, much deeper levels of rot to disinfect. And
• 27:27
  Speaker 3: so I ask again, how young is too young? In
• 27:30
  Speaker 3: a world where a sixteen year old boy is considered
• 27:33
  Speaker 3: a nons for fancying a fourteen year old girl, how
• 27:37
  Speaker 3: young can a boy be before that pedo apologist mechanism
• 27:41
  Speaker 3: in your brain can switch itself off. Here we have
• 27:44
  Speaker 3: an eleven year old boy raped by a thirty four
• 27:47
  Speaker 3: year old woman. Are you still going to stick to
• 27:50
  Speaker 3: your story? If that eleven year old boy enjoyed the rape,
• 27:53
  Speaker 3: are you going to brush it off like it's nothing
• 27:55
  Speaker 3: and laugh about it? And the sick thing is some
• 27:58
  Speaker 3: of you will, some of you will still be going well.
• 28:01
  Speaker 3: I mean, if he got an erection. Fuck you, dirty
• 28:06
  Speaker 3: fucking nuns like you've never heard of a nervous erection,
• 28:11
  Speaker 3: the first kind of erection boys get when they're anxious
• 28:14
  Speaker 3: and scared. You're really going to act like that counter's consent?
• 28:16
  Speaker 3: Are you okay? Then? I ask again, how.
• 28:20
  Speaker 1: Young is too young?
• 28:21
  Speaker 3: If a one year old boy gets his face shoved
• 28:24
  Speaker 3: up the festering, cancerous kind of a pedophile rapist, is
• 28:27
  Speaker 3: that okay? If he enjoys it, does that make it okay?
• 28:32
  Speaker 3: And I reckon some of you are still gonna say yes,
• 28:35
  Speaker 3: calling it now. Some of you are actually that sick
• 28:37
  Speaker 3: because you're that fucking buried in this paradigm of women
• 28:41
  Speaker 3: can do no wrong to men or boys. I won't
• 28:45
  Speaker 3: even gain to present the gender swap of that sexual
• 28:49
  Speaker 3: scenario are just outlined, because to even mention it would
• 28:52
  Speaker 3: make me sound like a fucking psycho. Well, you people
• 28:55
  Speaker 3: are fucking psychos. I hope you burn for your sins
• 29:00
  Speaker 3: in this life the next.
• 29:01
  Speaker 1: All right, Well, let us know what you guys think
• 29:03
  Speaker 1: about this one in the comments. I mean, the only
• 29:05
  Speaker 1: thing I would add to that is the interesting thing
• 29:08
  Speaker 1: is the only other time they'll talk about an instead
• 29:11
  Speaker 1: of rape, that involves this same boy is in the
• 29:15
  Speaker 1: off chance that because he was raped by this woman,
• 29:18
  Speaker 1: if he grows up and he does not understand consent
• 29:22
  Speaker 1: because of this trauma, and so he goes on to
• 29:25
  Speaker 1: violate someone else's consent at some point in the future,
• 29:28
  Speaker 1: then all of a sudden that matters, and it'll it
• 29:31
  Speaker 1: won't be because of this experience with this woman. It'll
• 29:34
  Speaker 1: be because he's a man, and so that like that's
• 29:37
  Speaker 1: because like the vacuum, the vacuum of of of sort
• 29:42
  Speaker 1: of like you know, cycle of trauma ends when a
• 29:45
  Speaker 1: woman is a perpetrator. So like there was nothing happened
• 29:48
  Speaker 1: then because he enjoyed it, But then why didn't he
• 29:51
  Speaker 1: learn what consent was later? Again, this is in the
• 29:53
  Speaker 1: off chance that becomes an issue. But most people who
• 29:59
  Speaker 1: don't who are that violate other people's boundaries or consent
• 30:03
  Speaker 1: are people who have themselves had their boundaries and consent
• 30:06
  Speaker 1: violated in many many cases as because they don't know
• 30:10
  Speaker 1: what the consent is because that was what it was
• 30:13
  Speaker 1: for them, you know. And I think that when you
• 30:15
  Speaker 1: normalize it by saying he probably enjoyed it, that actually
• 30:18
  Speaker 1: adds to the confusion of that. So like, yeah, you're
• 30:22
  Speaker 1: creating rapists by permitting rape essentially, and then you're pretending
• 30:27
  Speaker 1: like you didn't do that.
• 30:29
  Speaker 2: But anyway, she said, yeah, there's actually a whole bunch
• 30:34
  Speaker 2: of things that happened to boys. Uh, there's there's research
• 30:38
  Speaker 2: that shows that most and by the way, most victims
• 30:44
  Speaker 2: of childhood sexual abuse do not go on to become abusers. Yeah, audience, right,
• 30:50
  Speaker 2: They go on to become poly victims, which is some
• 30:52
  Speaker 2: of them go on to become sexual poly victims where
• 30:55
  Speaker 2: they get sexually abused by the next predator in the
• 30:58
  Speaker 2: next some go on to become poly victims in other
• 31:02
  Speaker 2: ways where they are their boundaries are no longer solid,
• 31:06
  Speaker 2: so they get violated in other ways. And among these things,
• 31:12
  Speaker 2: it becomes easier to talk them into using illicit substances,
• 31:16
  Speaker 2: and boys in particular have been found to be up
• 31:20
  Speaker 2: to forty four times more likely to abuse illicit substances
• 31:25
  Speaker 2: after an incident like this, and it's likely that they're
• 31:28
  Speaker 2: doing it to try to forget or escape, and sometimes
• 31:31
  Speaker 2: they don't even know what they're trying to forget or
• 31:33
  Speaker 2: escape because they are also sixteen times more likely to
• 31:38
  Speaker 2: sort of rewrite it in their head as they're growing
• 31:41
  Speaker 2: up as having not happened, or having not having not
• 31:45
  Speaker 2: been the perpetrator's fault, having been their own fault, or
• 31:48
  Speaker 2: something they chose to do, and it's something that they
• 31:51
  Speaker 2: struggle with throughout their lives. And that's one they become
• 31:56
  Speaker 2: up to fourteen times more likely to commit suicide. So
• 32:01
  Speaker 2: this is this is a very serious issue. Then the
• 32:04
  Speaker 2: part of the reason why I went off about it
• 32:06
  Speaker 2: so much is because of those types of statistics.
• 32:10
  Speaker 3: M h.
• 32:11
  Speaker 1: Thank you for that. All right, So we're gonna move
• 32:14
  Speaker 1: on to next one. Let us know you guys think
• 32:15
  Speaker 1: about this one. I'm gonna read some super chows because
• 32:18
  Speaker 1: I got some superchows that have come in and if
• 32:22
  Speaker 1: you guys want to send one again, it's Beth Batchel
• 32:24
  Speaker 1: dot com Ford slash. Just a tip. I'll be looking
• 32:26
  Speaker 1: for super chest super chows and rumble rants. Okay, So
• 32:30
  Speaker 1: I got a couple that came through yesterday that I'm
• 32:33
  Speaker 1: gonna just read out really quick. So an anonymous person
• 32:36
  Speaker 1: gave us five dollars, added no messaging to that. Thank
• 32:39
  Speaker 1: you to whoever that is, appreciate it. And then we
• 32:42
  Speaker 1: got one from maintaining Frame number one seventy five Cosplayer
• 32:46
  Speaker 1: molested by handbeasts for five dollars, and they say, I
• 32:50
  Speaker 1: bet the guy didn't want to breast charges because he
• 32:53
  Speaker 1: may have felt there was a likelihood of social retaliation
• 32:56
  Speaker 1: by his female feminist friends who were involved with the
• 32:59
  Speaker 1: smut can. Yes, of course, he doesn't want to look
• 33:02
  Speaker 1: like a bad ally, so he just kind of just
• 33:06
  Speaker 1: became apologetic with it basically, or tried to like downplay it.
• 33:11
  Speaker 1: But I'm sure it wasn't really pleasant for him. And
• 33:13
  Speaker 1: then Zara anxious sent us a really big superchow this
• 33:16
  Speaker 1: might be a long sausage, so for five dollars and says,
• 33:20
  Speaker 1: look at the following. I was looking for the article
• 33:22
  Speaker 1: related to the first story mentioned, the one I guess
• 33:25
  Speaker 1: that we just talked about, but because of how these
• 33:28
  Speaker 1: things are reported, I couldn't call it rape, and the
• 33:31
  Speaker 1: AI was using that I was using couldn't find it.
• 33:35
  Speaker 1: I had to say the twenty one year old woman
• 33:37
  Speaker 1: had sex with an eleven year old boy she was babysitting.
• 33:41
  Speaker 1: What the hell? A twenty one year old babysitter, Megan
• 33:44
  Speaker 1: Nicole Hayes, was accused of having sex when eleven year
• 33:47
  Speaker 1: old boy she was babysitting in Cocoa, Florida. Hayes admitted
• 33:50
  Speaker 1: to having intercourse with the child, and investigators reported that
• 33:54
  Speaker 1: she told another person about the incident, who then notified
• 33:56
  Speaker 1: the victim's parents. She was charged with sexual battery on
• 34:01
  Speaker 1: a child under twelve and release on thirty five thousand
• 34:04
  Speaker 1: dollars bail, though authorities expressed concern that she might have
• 34:07
  Speaker 1: had other victims. Her father claims she had low IQ
• 34:10
  Speaker 1: and did not understand right from wrong, but police stated
• 34:13
  Speaker 1: they believed she was aware of her actions. In a
• 34:15
  Speaker 1: separate case, a twenty year old babysitter, Jade Hat, admitted
• 34:19
  Speaker 1: to sexual activity an eleven year old boy she was
• 34:22
  Speaker 1: caring for in the UK in twenty fourteen. The judge
• 34:24
  Speaker 1: in that case, Tim Mouseley, QC, gave her a six
• 34:27
  Speaker 1: month jail sentence suspended for two years, citing her immaturity
• 34:30
  Speaker 1: and the boys perceived maturity as reasons to deviate from
• 34:34
  Speaker 1: sentencing guidelines. Hyatt was also required to register as a
• 34:37
  Speaker 1: sex offender for seven years and was subject to a
• 34:40
  Speaker 1: sexual harm prevention order. The decision grew criticism or drew
• 34:43
  Speaker 1: criticism for downplaying the severity of the crime and implying
• 34:47
  Speaker 1: the victims shared responsibility. These cases highlight the serious nature
• 34:50
  Speaker 1: of sexual abuse involving miners, particularly when the perpetrator is
• 34:54
  Speaker 1: in a position of trust, such as a babysitter. Child.
• 34:57
  Speaker 1: Sexual abuse can have long lasting psychological effects on victims,
• 35:00
  Speaker 1: and such incidents often prompt public and legal sudany over
• 35:03
  Speaker 1: how justice is administered. So Zarians is basically confirming that
• 35:07
  Speaker 1: AI doesn't. It's a language model, so it's just modeling
• 35:11
  Speaker 1: the way people talk about these things all the time.
• 35:13
  Speaker 1: And that's true.
• 35:14
  Speaker 2: Like this is basically to search for a story with
• 35:18
  Speaker 2: rape in the headline, it won't find a.
• 35:21
  Speaker 1: Story because they don't worry at that.
• 35:23
  Speaker 2: Rape in the headline, just the same as Google search
• 35:26
  Speaker 2: engine or any other search engine. It doesn't interpret. But
• 35:29
  Speaker 2: the big issue there is that the people that wrote
• 35:32
  Speaker 2: these news stories did not use the word rape to
• 35:35
  Speaker 2: describe what this woman or these women did to these children.
• 35:39
  Speaker 2: And it's again, this is a regular social attitude. This
• 35:43
  Speaker 2: is a standard social attitude, and I pointed this out
• 35:48
  Speaker 2: on X. But for people that are listening on platforms
• 35:50
  Speaker 2: where they can't see our chat that if it scrolls
• 35:53
  Speaker 2: up in the screen, because we had we had a
• 35:55
  Speaker 2: commentary that said we all want a world world that
• 35:59
  Speaker 2: is safe for children. Everyone agrees, and the problem is
• 36:02
  Speaker 2: everyone does not agree. Mike's rant pointed that out, and
• 36:07
  Speaker 2: I've had extensive arguments on x both with feminists who
• 36:11
  Speaker 2: claim that it's just not the same and it's not
• 36:14
  Speaker 2: a big deal when it happens to boys, and women
• 36:17
  Speaker 2: who are prosecuted for it are victims, and so on,
• 36:21
  Speaker 2: even when the boy is as young as eleven years old.
• 36:25
  Speaker 2: And by the way, the United States has imposed child
• 36:28
  Speaker 2: support obligation on boys as young as eleven years old
• 36:31
  Speaker 2: to pay child support to their rapist who is a
• 36:36
  Speaker 2: pedophile and has custody of a child conceived by raping
• 36:42
  Speaker 2: a child. That has occurred in the United States, and
• 36:45
  Speaker 2: it's been more than once, and there have been multiple
• 36:50
  Speaker 2: cases where women have committed rape and it's been confirmed
• 36:55
  Speaker 2: that it was rape and not consensual sex, and they
• 37:00
  Speaker 2: retain custody of a child conceived by that rape, and
• 37:04
  Speaker 2: the father, who is a rape victim is forced to
• 37:07
  Speaker 2: pay child support to his rapist. Right, So that's one thing.
• 37:12
  Speaker 2: But the other thing I pointed out is that there
• 37:14
  Speaker 2: are a lot of a lot of guys out there
• 37:17
  Speaker 2: who have this mistaken idea that this is fun. That's
• 37:21
  Speaker 2: obviously never happened to them, because if it had, they
• 37:23
  Speaker 2: would know better, all right, And I pointed out some
• 37:27
  Speaker 2: of the statistics and my comments there that I mentioned
• 37:30
  Speaker 2: on the show. But this is that this is a
• 37:34
  Speaker 2: subject that people are very ignorant on and very uncomfortable
• 37:38
  Speaker 2: admitting is as serious as when it happens to little girls.
• 37:42
  Speaker 2: Like nobody would suggest that a rapist who molested a
• 37:46
  Speaker 2: little girl and got her pregnant should get custody of
• 37:48
  Speaker 2: the child, and that she should be forced to pay
• 37:51
  Speaker 2: support or should get visitation or anything like that, but
• 37:56
  Speaker 2: it is routinely done when a boy is the victim.
• 38:01
  Speaker 2: And these problems. People don't like to talk about these problems,
• 38:06
  Speaker 2: but these problems affect real existing children, and they are
• 38:11
  Speaker 2: just as harmful as any other exploitation of a child,
• 38:17
  Speaker 2: whether that child is a boy or a girl. And
• 38:20
  Speaker 2: these perpetrators like you can't imagine how tricky and sneaky
• 38:27
  Speaker 2: and like this woman when she got her picture taken,
• 38:31
  Speaker 2: she's she tried very hard to keep her face neutral.
• 38:35
  Speaker 2: You can see that she tried very hard to keep
• 38:38
  Speaker 2: her face neutral, and you can barely tell that the
• 38:43
  Speaker 2: smirk she's holding is there. It's just barely present. You'll
• 38:49
  Speaker 2: see it, I think on the left side of your screen.
• 38:51
  Speaker 2: It's the right side of her face, the right side
• 38:53
  Speaker 2: of her mouth, and the tension in the cheek muscle
• 38:57
  Speaker 2: on the right side of her face that's not relaxed.
• 39:00
  Speaker 2: She knew she was going to get away with this
• 39:02
  Speaker 2: for the most part, Like the moment that she was caught,
• 39:06
  Speaker 2: she probably knew there were going to be consequences. But
• 39:11
  Speaker 2: it's I don't believe that she didn't understand what she did.
• 39:14
  Speaker 2: And I will point out one more thing, like because
• 39:18
  Speaker 2: he talked about UK cases, in US cases, the United
• 39:22
  Speaker 2: States has executed intellectually disabled men where their crimes weren't rape.
• 39:30
  Speaker 2: There were other things they might have excluded rape.
• 39:34
  Speaker 3: But.
• 39:36
  Speaker 2: They've executed intellectually disabled men for crimes that they've committed
• 39:42
  Speaker 2: in the past. And there have been intellectually disabled men
• 39:45
  Speaker 2: who have been put in jail for their whole lives
• 39:48
  Speaker 2: on allegations of sex crimes. So the idea that a
• 39:55
  Speaker 2: woman should get a pass because she has lower maturity
• 39:58
  Speaker 2: or some degree of intellect disability, uh uh. There's and
• 40:05
  Speaker 2: her parents coming in and saying that her dad coming
• 40:08
  Speaker 2: in and saying that you let her take a babysitting job.
• 40:12
  Speaker 2: If you're now arguing that she shouldn't have been in
• 40:14
  Speaker 2: there doing that and she wasn't mature enough, you should
• 40:17
  Speaker 2: be prosecuted for letting her take that job.
• 40:19
  Speaker 1: All right, thank you for that, really big super child,
• 40:24
  Speaker 1: Ren Sanks appreciate it. And then he sent another super
• 40:27
  Speaker 1: chat for ten dollars and said, regarding the first case
• 40:30
  Speaker 1: with Megan Hayes, what I remember reading is the father
• 40:33
  Speaker 1: was involved with Megan Hayes, and the judge in the
• 40:36
  Speaker 1: case reduced her maturity to fifteen and raised the boys
• 40:39
  Speaker 1: to match. The father of the boy was involved with Hayes.
• 40:42
  Speaker 1: I mean, okay. And then thank you for those super chants.
• 40:46
  Speaker 1: And then I got one from a rumble rant from
• 40:48
  Speaker 1: the Fishcott nukes On Rumble and he says Matt from
• 40:51
  Speaker 1: church self deleted last week. That's suicide. Pray for Matt
• 40:55
  Speaker 1: depression and could not find a marriageable woman. Really good guy,
• 41:00
  Speaker 1: It's a stupefying waste if you ask me, well, that
• 41:03
  Speaker 1: is a shame. I'm sorry that happened. Yeah, and then
• 41:06
  Speaker 1: Mariath she gives us five dollars and says HBr News
• 41:08
  Speaker 1: five to twenty Honey from the Badgers from my lovely
• 41:11
  Speaker 1: vacation location. All right, thanks for joining us on your vacation.
• 41:15
  Speaker 1: Appreciate that. I know that's like you just want to
• 41:17
  Speaker 1: like get away from everything, right, I know I do sometimes.
• 41:20
  Speaker 1: All right.
• 41:21
  Speaker 3: Way, I'm sort of in my vacation home the moment. Yeah,
• 41:25
  Speaker 3: guess that's what the budget cave is.
• 41:26
  Speaker 1: In a way, there's probably a lot of mistake come
• 41:28
  Speaker 1: away from home. It is. It is a home away
• 41:31
  Speaker 1: from home. The tits cake gets you there, all right.
• 41:35
  Speaker 1: But anyway, let's what you guys think about this one
• 41:37
  Speaker 1: in the comments. We got to move on to the
• 41:38
  Speaker 1: next story. Yeah, like I said, this is probably gonna
• 41:40
  Speaker 1: be a long sausage, so ah okay. In a recent
• 41:45
  Speaker 1: executive order signed on September twenty second, twenty twenty five,
• 41:49
  Speaker 1: President Donald Trump formally designated Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization,
• 41:55
  Speaker 1: fulfilling a long standing promise to crack down on what
• 41:57
  Speaker 1: he describes as a radical left wing or as radical
• 42:01
  Speaker 1: left wing violence. The order characterizes ANTIFA as a militarist
• 42:05
  Speaker 1: anarchist enterprise that explicitly advocates for the overthrow of the
• 42:09
  Speaker 1: US government, law enforcement and societal structures. This move comes
• 42:14
  Speaker 1: amid heightened tensions following events such as the assassination of
• 42:17
  Speaker 1: conservative activist Charlie Kirk, which the administration attributes to leftist
• 42:21
  Speaker 1: extremism because it was and I could prove that, and
• 42:25
  Speaker 1: there's basically plenty of receipts that demonstrate that. Antifa, however,
• 42:29
  Speaker 1: is not a centralized group but a decentralized movement opposing fascism,
• 42:34
  Speaker 1: supposedly making the designation controversial and raising questions about its
• 42:38
  Speaker 1: enforceability under US law, which traditionally applies terrorist labels to
• 42:42
  Speaker 1: foreign entities. Steps outlined in the executive Order include directing
• 42:47
  Speaker 1: federal agencies to prioritize investigations and prosecutions related to ANTIFA
• 42:52
  Speaker 1: linked activities, potentially aligned for enhanced surveillance, asset freezes, and
• 42:56
  Speaker 1: restrictions on associated individuals or networks, to be looking at
• 43:01
  Speaker 1: who is it that is paying these groups, And they're
• 43:04
  Speaker 1: going to be looking at education as well, because a
• 43:07
  Speaker 1: lot of the radicalization occurs online obviously in various like
• 43:12
  Speaker 1: online places like Reddit, but also in schools. We don't
• 43:16
  Speaker 1: know like how effective this is going to be, but
• 43:19
  Speaker 1: there are people who are concerned about free speech, supposedly.
• 43:23
  Speaker 1: The critics from civil liberties organizations worn it could broadly
• 43:26
  Speaker 1: suppress dissent and peaceful protests. Legal experts note the order's
• 43:30
  Speaker 1: impact may be limited due to Antifa's informal structure, and
• 43:33
  Speaker 1: it could face court challenges, but it signals a broader
• 43:36
  Speaker 1: push to combat perceived domestic threats from anarchist groups. And
• 43:40
  Speaker 1: I just want to add a couple of things to
• 43:41
  Speaker 1: this before you guys say your piece. One is that
• 43:44
  Speaker 1: Andy no who has done a lot of coverage on Antifa.
• 43:48
  Speaker 1: He has a book called Antifa Unmassed where he's done
• 43:50
  Speaker 1: a lot of research into this stuff, said in a
• 43:53
  Speaker 1: video that in Trump's first term he said he did
• 43:58
  Speaker 1: mention going after Antifa, but he didn't do any It
• 44:02
  Speaker 1: was more of a sentiment that he was expressing at
• 44:04
  Speaker 1: that time. This time, though, there appears that between him
• 44:08
  Speaker 1: and Mike Miller, I believe is are Stephen Miller, Steven Miller,
• 44:11
  Speaker 1: they are actually going to be looking at where Antifa
• 44:14
  Speaker 1: gets its money from however way they can do that,
• 44:17
  Speaker 1: and that's going to be where the vehicle through which
• 44:19
  Speaker 1: they're going to be approaching this. And Andy Nos says
• 44:22
  Speaker 1: that there's a lot more potential to at least like
• 44:25
  Speaker 1: limit antifa's reach and prevent them from acting out. But
• 44:29
  Speaker 1: there are it's it is true that it's not really one,
• 44:32
  Speaker 1: you know, like centralized group. It's more like a bunch
• 44:35
  Speaker 1: of radicalized students that are scattered all over the place,
• 44:38
  Speaker 1: and not just the United States, because Antifa originated from
• 44:41
  Speaker 1: Europe and there's plenty of them over there as well.
• 44:44
  Speaker 1: And the other thing I was going to say about
• 44:46
  Speaker 1: this is that the you know what, I can't remember
• 44:49
  Speaker 1: what I was going to say, go ahead.
• 44:52
  Speaker 2: And take issue with the claim that Antifa is not organized, right, noral,
• 44:58
  Speaker 2: not central Well that at Antifa's not I'm going to
• 45:01
  Speaker 2: take issue with that claim. And here's why. You can't
• 45:05
  Speaker 2: be organized without having some centralized structure. You can't be
• 45:10
  Speaker 2: that organized without having some sort of centralized structure. And
• 45:14
  Speaker 2: by that organized, I'm talking about the fact that every
• 45:20
  Speaker 2: time Black Lives Matter had a protest, Antifa showed up
• 45:26
  Speaker 2: and there were piles of bricks and cement ready for
• 45:30
  Speaker 2: them to use every single time, that every time there
• 45:35
  Speaker 2: needed to be some sort of counter attack against the
• 45:40
  Speaker 2: United States for something that Trump did or something that
• 45:43
  Speaker 2: happened that could be used against Trump or that could
• 45:46
  Speaker 2: be used against conservatives or so on, that Antifa was
• 45:50
  Speaker 2: able to bring in hundreds of people from all over
• 45:54
  Speaker 2: the country on transportation that was expensive buses and so
• 45:59
  Speaker 2: on charge by the way, not like informal everybody buys
• 46:03
  Speaker 2: their own bus ticket and gets there. There is no
• 46:06
  Speaker 2: truth to the claim that Antifa is not a centralized
• 46:10
  Speaker 2: group but a decentralized movement. And I believe that the
• 46:15
  Speaker 2: surveillance and investigation that takes place is going to prove
• 46:20
  Speaker 2: that that there is a higher up funding organization that
• 46:25
  Speaker 2: is pretty much calling the shots by manipulating some probably
• 46:30
  Speaker 2: very dumb people or very ideologically driven people.
• 46:34
  Speaker 1: And Stephen Miller is going to follow the money. I
• 46:36
  Speaker 1: think that was his y. That was what he kind
• 46:38
  Speaker 1: of said in so many words.
• 46:40
  Speaker 2: Once they follow the money and the communication networks, there's
• 46:44
  Speaker 2: going to be no doubt that Antifa is an organization.
• 46:49
  Speaker 1: NGOs are involved for sure.
• 46:51
  Speaker 2: Right And so that's the first thing. Second thing is
• 46:55
  Speaker 2: this goes right along with everything I've said in the
• 46:57
  Speaker 2: past about when you when you use an ideological drive
• 47:04
  Speaker 2: claims that a group of people are murderous and evil
• 47:07
  Speaker 2: and that they're going to uh create an unlivable world,
• 47:14
  Speaker 2: when in fact they haven't killed anybody and nobody has
• 47:18
  Speaker 2: suffered any harm as a result of their actions. You
• 47:21
  Speaker 2: create a circumstance where and a number of young men
• 47:26
  Speaker 2: are going to be feel obligated, by their upbringing, by
• 47:30
  Speaker 2: their social situations, by their belief systems, their codes of ethics,
• 47:36
  Speaker 2: to join whatever army you are creating to fight this,
• 47:40
  Speaker 2: this ideological opponent that you have made up in place
• 47:45
  Speaker 2: of the people that actually exist, and they're going to
• 47:47
  Speaker 2: engage in in crimes and violence that is going to
• 47:52
  Speaker 2: come back on them. They're going to get arrested, They're
• 47:54
  Speaker 2: going to get injured. When people defend themselves. They might
• 47:57
  Speaker 2: get shot and killed when somebody defends their life, or
• 47:59
  Speaker 2: their property or their family. This this, this is actually
• 48:04
  Speaker 2: an exploitation of young college aged men on a grand
• 48:08
  Speaker 2: scale as political canon fodder. And many of them have
• 48:16
  Speaker 2: been so indoctrinated and so manipulated, and probably many of
• 48:20
  Speaker 2: them have been so drugged over the years by by
• 48:26
  Speaker 2: their own schools common tendency in the United States to
• 48:29
  Speaker 2: over drug boys in particular, that you know their their
• 48:33
  Speaker 2: agency in this is is reduced, it's not eliminated. They
• 48:39
  Speaker 2: still know right from wrong. You still know that if
• 48:41
  Speaker 2: somebody didn't do anything to you directly and you attack them,
• 48:44
  Speaker 2: you're in wrong, but it does make it more likely
• 48:49
  Speaker 2: for them to do the mental gymnastics that that and
• 48:54
  Speaker 2: Antifa and their associates do that convinced them that it's
• 49:01
  Speaker 2: okay for them to engage in violence against nonviolent people.
• 49:05
  Speaker 2: And then you also have the other side of that,
• 49:08
  Speaker 2: where young men whose neighborhoods are being attacked and whose
• 49:12
  Speaker 2: families are in danger, or whose family businesses might be
• 49:15
  Speaker 2: in danger, whose friends are in danger, and so on,
• 49:19
  Speaker 2: might feel obligated by their social upbringing and their family upbringing,
• 49:25
  Speaker 2: their moral code, and so on to fight back and
• 49:29
  Speaker 2: defend against this, and they may be wounded, they may
• 49:31
  Speaker 2: go through what Kyle Rittenhouse went through where he had
• 49:35
  Speaker 2: the whole legal ordeal after defending himself against three attackers
• 49:39
  Speaker 2: who were using deadly force. And this is all pitting
• 49:44
  Speaker 2: young men against young men for politics. And when I
• 49:50
  Speaker 2: said in the past that the United States is in
• 49:53
  Speaker 2: the middle of a civil war, it just doesn't look
• 49:55
  Speaker 2: like civil wars from history. This is what I'm talking about.
• 50:01
  Speaker 2: Neighborhoods have been burned down, people have died. People have
• 50:04
  Speaker 2: been held accountable and other people have gotten away with
• 50:09
  Speaker 2: their actions. Some people have been held accountable for things
• 50:12
  Speaker 2: that they didn't do wrong. So this is overall, women
• 50:17
  Speaker 2: who are involved in this, women who are pro one
• 50:20
  Speaker 2: side or the other, are doing nothing to cool it down,
• 50:25
  Speaker 2: nothing to put the brakes on the violence, nothing to
• 50:28
  Speaker 2: protect their young men from getting involved in this, and
• 50:33
  Speaker 2: now we're having to see government action to do it.
• 50:37
  Speaker 2: It's a sad thing for a group like this to
• 50:41
  Speaker 2: have to be designated as a terrorist group in order
• 50:44
  Speaker 2: for the government to put a stop to violence. That
• 50:51
  Speaker 2: these young men's sisters and mothers, girlfriends and wives, if
• 50:57
  Speaker 2: they have them, friends, class mates, colleagues should all be
• 51:02
  Speaker 2: trying to rein in instead of encouraging and a women
• 51:07
  Speaker 2: that are involved. The women that are engaging in violence
• 51:10
  Speaker 2: themselves are not facing the same consequences. They're not in
• 51:16
  Speaker 2: the same level of danger, they're not getting the same
• 51:20
  Speaker 2: level of pushback, and they're getting bailed out when they
• 51:23
  Speaker 2: get arrested. So it's it's really mostly about the men.
• 51:30
  Speaker 2: And unfortunately, you know it's this is a situation where
• 51:35
  Speaker 2: once again women have left the government to do a
• 51:39
  Speaker 2: women's job because they're not doing it.
• 51:42
  Speaker 1: All right, A mike, do you want to say anything
• 51:44
  Speaker 1: about this?
• 51:45
  Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm gonna gonna reiterate a lot of those points.
• 51:48
  Speaker 3: The two most popular defenses I hear against proscribing antifa
• 51:54
  Speaker 3: as a terrorist organization are, well, it's not an organization.
• 51:57
  Speaker 3: It doesn't have leaders or centralization or conferences or whatnot.
• 52:01
  Speaker 3: You can't possibly point to it as an entity. And two,
• 52:05
  Speaker 3: it's literally just anti fascism. Bro, It's just a general
• 52:09
  Speaker 3: declaration of the rejection of fascism. Bro. Shouldn't everyone be
• 52:14
  Speaker 3: anti fascist? Aren't you anti fascist?
• 52:17
  Speaker 2: Bro?
• 52:18
  Speaker 3: If not, doesn't that make you pro fascist? I'm not
• 52:23
  Speaker 3: sure why the following question needs to be asked, given
• 52:25
  Speaker 3: how obvious it seems, But where exactly is this fascism?
• 52:30
  Speaker 3: Can you point to it? This fascism? Who are its leaders?
• 52:34
  Speaker 3: Where are its conferences? Exactly? Well, duh, Its leaders are
• 52:39
  Speaker 3: Donald Trump and Jadie Vance and Elon Musk and that
• 52:42
  Speaker 3: podcaster with the small face who just got murdered by
• 52:45
  Speaker 3: someone who had absolutely nothing to do with us. Well,
• 52:49
  Speaker 3: hold on, you seem to be talking about the Republican
• 52:52
  Speaker 3: Party and its most prominent supporters. They don't call themselves fascist.
• 52:57
  Speaker 3: Of course they don't, but they clearly are. Ah, just
• 53:00
  Speaker 3: because they don't call themselves fascist doesn't mean they're not.
• 53:03
  Speaker 3: I am not a fascist. It's exactly what a fascist
• 53:06
  Speaker 3: would say. Okay, you've already made a mistake there. I
• 53:10
  Speaker 3: don't know if you spotted it. But moreover, isn't antifa
• 53:14
  Speaker 3: a communist entity? No, it's just anti fascist. It's in
• 53:20
  Speaker 3: the name. Can't you read? All right? Interesting? Just out
• 53:23
  Speaker 3: of interest, my dear average card carrying, flag waving, actively
• 53:28
  Speaker 3: campaigning member of Antifa, per chance, are you a communist? Why? Yes,
• 53:34
  Speaker 3: I am. I am a communist, and so is my wife,
• 53:37
  Speaker 3: and so is my wife's boyfriend. What's wrong with that?
• 53:41
  Speaker 3: Real communism has never been tried. There certainly knows this
• 53:44
  Speaker 3: thing as communist terrorism, and if there was, it certainly
• 53:47
  Speaker 3: would not manifest in the form of hired rentor mobs
• 53:51
  Speaker 3: violently attacking any smattering of people whose priorities do not
• 53:55
  Speaker 3: align with our miss andrik icophobic, heterophobic, a gena that
• 54:00
  Speaker 3: I positively do not know what you're talking about. And
• 54:03
  Speaker 3: I will cave in your skull with a bike clock
• 54:05
  Speaker 3: if you don't shut the fuck up, all right, well,
• 54:10
  Speaker 3: just don't do any terrorism. Yeah, can you handle that.
• 54:13
  Speaker 3: I know it's difficult for you, because that's all Antifer
• 54:15
  Speaker 3: has ever done. You turn up at other people's peaceful
• 54:20
  Speaker 3: protests and you terrorize them, and you get away with
• 54:23
  Speaker 3: it because you're communists, and so are the police, at
• 54:27
  Speaker 3: least in Europe. You've got away with it in the
• 54:30
  Speaker 3: US for so long because no matter how heinous your
• 54:33
  Speaker 3: terror crimes are, there's always someone to bail you out
• 54:36
  Speaker 3: of jail, be it George Soros or Kamala Harris, and
• 54:40
  Speaker 3: they're associated coffers of taxpayer money. Well, hopefully they can't
• 54:45
  Speaker 3: do that anymore because that would officially be aiding and
• 54:48
  Speaker 3: abetting a terrorist organization, but they'll probably find a loophole anyway.
• 54:53
  Speaker 3: So pardon my gollbladder if I refuse to cry you
• 54:56
  Speaker 3: a river. You know, after a dozen years of hearing
• 54:59
  Speaker 3: you fuckers chanting men's rights advocates have been declared a
• 55:04
  Speaker 3: hate group by the most illustrious and trustworthy Southern Poverty
• 55:07
  Speaker 3: Law Center. So you deserve the cancelations and the blacklists
• 55:11
  Speaker 3: and the bomb threats. Even though advocating for men's human
• 55:15
  Speaker 3: rights is not an organization, It's literally just a fucking verb.
• 55:21
  Speaker 3: I'm going to enjoy reminding you that your terrorist group
• 55:24
  Speaker 3: has been declared a terrorist group by the US government
• 55:28
  Speaker 3: while you cope and see the insist that the US
• 55:31
  Speaker 3: government is not a reliable good faith actor like the
• 55:33
  Speaker 3: fucking splcs. Eat my balls on rye bread with horseradish,
• 55:40
  Speaker 3: you bunch of dysgenic mutants.
• 55:43
  Speaker 1: Now do BLM.
• 55:45
  Speaker 3: I'm serious that they haven't done a terrorism since five
• 55:48
  Speaker 3: years ago, but I was a pretty fucking big terrorism
• 55:51
  Speaker 3: they did internationally with total impunity, despite the lockdowns, and
• 55:56
  Speaker 3: with the unconditional blessing of the mainstream media. I for one,
• 56:00
  Speaker 3: do not want that to happen again. If declaring BLM
• 56:04
  Speaker 3: a terrorist organization is what it takes for the police
• 56:07
  Speaker 3: to start doing their fucking jobs and for the courts
• 56:11
  Speaker 3: to start doing their fucking jobs, so be it.
• 56:15
  Speaker 1: Do it.
• 56:15
  Speaker 2: Do it.
• 56:17
  Speaker 3: Drag those violent retards into an underground torture garden and
• 56:21
  Speaker 3: lynch the bustards. I said what I said. They're going
• 56:25
  Speaker 3: to accuse us of that kind of ruthless authoritarianism anyway,
• 56:29
  Speaker 3: even when we're in fact treating them with six layers
• 56:33
  Speaker 3: of kid gloves, So we might as well fucking do it.
• 56:36
  Speaker 3: Let's become the ball busting knocks. They want us to
• 56:40
  Speaker 3: be layers, vault get in the back of the van,
• 56:44
  Speaker 3: you muppet in Charah and so on.
• 56:48
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I don't have a problem with any of that.
• 56:50
  Speaker 1: Notice that you mentioned the SPLC. I was gonna mention them.
• 56:53
  Speaker 1: These these groups that supposedly, like you know, identify and
• 56:58
  Speaker 1: catalog and sort of keep trying of all of the
• 57:01
  Speaker 1: hate groups in the United States and elsewhere, they don't
• 57:06
  Speaker 1: see they don't usually list Antifa. That's why they say,
• 57:10
  Speaker 1: you know, all most of the hate crimes are done
• 57:12
  Speaker 1: from the right. But that's because the way these people
• 57:15
  Speaker 1: measure things. Catholics are far right, Paul Elam is far right.
• 57:19
  Speaker 1: He made the list of the the ADL, Citizens United,
• 57:22
  Speaker 1: the SPLC, and so on, So why wouldn't it be
• 57:25
  Speaker 1: the case? What like they're obviously the ADL says Antifa
• 57:29
  Speaker 1: doesn't real, So clearly they couldn't possibly be a real organization.
• 57:34
  Speaker 1: This is why we don't We can't rely on these
• 57:37
  Speaker 1: people because they don't do it. They're they're they're captured
• 57:41
  Speaker 1: or they are in charge of maintaining this like overall
• 57:45
  Speaker 1: narrative of what we how we define extremism. Who engages
• 57:49
  Speaker 1: in it, who doesn't what counts as an organization and
• 57:52
  Speaker 1: so on, and the ADL is one of the worst
• 57:55
  Speaker 1: about that. So yeah, they're the ones that called like
• 57:58
  Speaker 1: what is it called like males premises, But there's nothing
• 58:01
  Speaker 1: for Antifa or BLM for that matter, because those those
• 58:05
  Speaker 1: kinds of terrorisms are useful terrorisms because they're uppunching terrorisms.
• 58:09
  Speaker 1: I guess. So that means that we got to take
• 58:11
  Speaker 1: you know, we got to take things into our own
• 58:13
  Speaker 1: hands to some degree, and I hope that that continues.
• 58:17
  Speaker 1: In fact, I don't know how you start something like
• 58:20
  Speaker 1: in ADL, but I would like to start one that's
• 58:22
  Speaker 1: actually like that actually tracks this kind of thing and
• 58:26
  Speaker 1: doesn't do so along ideological lines. By the way, just
• 58:30
  Speaker 1: as an aside, has anyone ever heard of hola demor denial?
• 58:35
  Speaker 1: I don't think that's a thing. Why isn't it a thing?
• 58:37
  Speaker 1: I feel like it should be a thing. But anyway,
• 58:39
  Speaker 1: let us know what you guys think about Yeah, go ahead.
• 58:42
  Speaker 2: I would say it is fair to call the SPLC
• 58:47
  Speaker 2: a terrorist communication hub, given the fact that they they're
• 58:53
  Speaker 2: naming of specific groups and shaming of specific groups has
• 58:58
  Speaker 2: led to violent attacked against those groups. Yes, that's all
• 59:03
  Speaker 2: I just wanted. That's all I wanted to add.
• 59:05
  Speaker 1: Yes, all right, so but anyway, just something to think
• 59:09
  Speaker 1: about if you guys know a way to start your
• 59:10
  Speaker 1: own SPLC. But you know that's actually like doing the
• 59:14
  Speaker 1: real work. Maybe let us know in the comments. I
• 59:16
  Speaker 1: think it's something worth looking into. We're gonna move on
• 59:19
  Speaker 1: to the next one and let us know you guys
• 59:20
  Speaker 1: thinking about this one in the comments. In related news,
• 59:23
  Speaker 1: this is sort of like bringing together the last two stories,
• 59:25
  Speaker 1: the Antifa political violence story which is sort of like
• 59:29
  Speaker 1: what brought it on and the teachers abusing their student story.
• 59:32
  Speaker 1: So a Toronto based Canadian teacher has been placed on
• 59:37
  Speaker 1: suspension suspension not fired, okay, after showing the death of
• 59:43
  Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk multiple times to students as young as ten
• 59:48
  Speaker 1: years old. The teacher, who was not a school regular
• 59:51
  Speaker 1: and was there only to supervise a French immersion class.
• 59:54
  Speaker 1: I'm sure that was French immersion like the French Revolution,
• 59:58
  Speaker 1: played the video repeatedly and gave a speech to the
• 1:00:01
  Speaker 1: students regarding anti fascism, anti trands and how Charlie Kirk
• 1:00:06
  Speaker 1: deserved this, for his deserve for this to occur According
• 1:00:10
  Speaker 1: to a source, several students from his class went home
• 1:00:14
  Speaker 1: and complained to their parents, traumatized at witnessing the on
• 1:00:18
  Speaker 1: camera death on repeat by the way, which they were
• 1:00:21
  Speaker 1: forced to witness numerous times over. After parents reached out
• 1:00:25
  Speaker 1: to school administrators, the announcement was made that the teacher
• 1:00:29
  Speaker 1: would be immediately suspended with pay. In a letter to parents,
• 1:00:33
  Speaker 1: Corvette Junior Public School principle Jennifer Copty wrote the following.
• 1:00:38
  Speaker 1: During class, students were said to have been shown a
• 1:00:40
  Speaker 1: portion of a violent video in response to questions being
• 1:00:44
  Speaker 1: asked about a recent tragic event in the United States.
• 1:00:46
  Speaker 1: While an investigation must still be conducted to learn all
• 1:00:49
  Speaker 1: of the details, the report of this incident is extremely
• 1:00:53
  Speaker 1: troubling and completely unacceptable. We recognize the seriousness of this
• 1:00:57
  Speaker 1: matter and have taken immediate steps to follow all appropriate
• 1:01:00
  Speaker 1: policies and procedures. The teacher has been relieved of all
• 1:01:04
  Speaker 1: teaching responsibilities pending the outcome of the investigation, and will
• 1:01:07
  Speaker 1: not be at the school. Assistance is being offered to
• 1:01:10
  Speaker 1: any children traumatized by the incident. I also want to
• 1:01:14
  Speaker 1: assure you that our top priority is supporting students. Social
• 1:01:17
  Speaker 1: work support has been made available at the school or
• 1:01:22
  Speaker 1: to the school rather, social work support has been made
• 1:01:24
  Speaker 1: available to the school. I will be visiting the class
• 1:01:27
  Speaker 1: along with a member of our social work team to
• 1:01:29
  Speaker 1: check in with students and provide support.
• 1:01:33
  Speaker 3: I want to check this bitch is hot drive as well.
• 1:01:36
  Speaker 1: Yeah, it was a male teacher, just as an aside,
• 1:01:39
  Speaker 1: but definitely fucked in the head. So anyway, that.
• 1:01:44
  Speaker 2: Also doesn't stop him from being a bitch, right.
• 1:01:47
  Speaker 1: No, for sure, absolutely, Okay, that's anyway, that's the summary
• 1:01:52
  Speaker 1: that is fucked up. Okay, Like if anyone saw the
• 1:01:56
  Speaker 1: unedited footage, the unedited footage of Charlie Kirk getting shop
• 1:02:00
  Speaker 1: in the neck up close, I mean, yeah.
• 1:02:02
  Speaker 2: I actually had some bitch on x posted to my
• 1:02:07
  Speaker 2: feet and a conversation multiple times like.
• 1:02:11
  Speaker 1: She was arguing in favor of that.
• 1:02:13
  Speaker 2: Or no, she was arguing about something else. And when
• 1:02:16
  Speaker 2: she got mad because the people in the thread that
• 1:02:19
  Speaker 2: were on my side of the argument all trumped every
• 1:02:22
  Speaker 2: single one of her arguments, she started doing that.
• 1:02:26
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, anyway, anybody have any thoughts on the teacher
• 1:02:30
  Speaker 1: making their students?
• 1:02:30
  Speaker 2: Yeah, go ahead, Okay, so it's gonna be kind of
• 1:02:34
  Speaker 2: a roundabout thing, right, But jen X ers. You remember
• 1:02:39
  Speaker 2: what RoboCop three parodied. What the sarcasm in RoboCop three
• 1:02:44
  Speaker 2: was about the extended amount of violence, like gratuitous, ridiculous
• 1:02:49
  Speaker 2: levels of gun violence and so on in that movie.
• 1:02:52
  Speaker 2: Why that was done?
• 1:02:55
  Speaker 1: No, I never saw RoboCop three. That's the one with
• 1:02:57
  Speaker 1: the little with the child sidekick and the jet hack.
• 1:03:00
  Speaker 1: So I was like, na, child's side kick come out.
• 1:03:03
  Speaker 2: So there was there was this push right, there was
• 1:03:06
  Speaker 2: this objection in in Hollywood. And I want to say
• 1:03:09
  Speaker 2: it was RoboCop three, It might be, it might have
• 1:03:11
  Speaker 2: been two. But there was this big, I don't even
• 1:03:15
  Speaker 2: want to say controversy. There's a big panic over violence
• 1:03:18
  Speaker 2: in movies that were targeted toward young adult and teenage audiences.
• 1:03:23
  Speaker 2: And the idea and this this this has been a
• 1:03:26
  Speaker 2: long time existing claim that has been debunked over and
• 1:03:30
  Speaker 2: over again, but it's been made by people who uh
• 1:03:35
  Speaker 2: are are similar to this, this individual, this teacher, and
• 1:03:41
  Speaker 2: wanted to control what kids could see on TV, what
• 1:03:44
  Speaker 2: parents could allow their kids to watch, and so on,
• 1:03:47
  Speaker 2: that if you see violence, you will be violent. If
• 1:03:52
  Speaker 2: you hear say rape jokes, you will decide even though
• 1:03:57
  Speaker 2: the rapist is being made fun of you'll decide that
• 1:04:01
  Speaker 2: that's normal, acceptable behavior, because we always make fun of normal,
• 1:04:05
  Speaker 2: acceptable behavior. That's that's how we deem it normal and acceptable,
• 1:04:09
  Speaker 2: as we ridicule the shit out of it, right, Like,
• 1:04:12
  Speaker 2: that's that's what we do. Don't don't pretend that you know,
• 1:04:16
  Speaker 2: people dislike behavior that they're ridiculing. And and of course
• 1:04:20
  Speaker 2: anything that's portrayed on TV must be the same as
• 1:04:22
  Speaker 2: real life, and therefore everybody should engage in it, even
• 1:04:25
  Speaker 2: when the bad guys are the ones doing it. That's
• 1:04:28
  Speaker 2: that's clearly the way that it's looked looked at, right,
• 1:04:32
  Speaker 2: And then along comes this this teacher who decides to
• 1:04:38
  Speaker 2: play a live action, real news story, real video of
• 1:04:46
  Speaker 2: a real person being assassinated using a gun to a
• 1:04:53
  Speaker 2: group of students whose political views that that teacher doesn't know,
• 1:04:59
  Speaker 2: whose future such your attitudes, that teacher doesn't know, like
• 1:05:04
  Speaker 2: either seeing violence normalizes violence all the time or desensitizes
• 1:05:12
  Speaker 2: students to violence all the time so that they'll engage
• 1:05:15
  Speaker 2: in it, or it doesn't, right, It can't be that
• 1:05:18
  Speaker 2: it does when you don't like what they're seeing, but
• 1:05:22
  Speaker 2: it doesn't when you want to show them something that's
• 1:05:25
  Speaker 2: a bullshit kind of attitude to have. Of course, the
• 1:05:29
  Speaker 2: students were traumatized, and of course this is going to
• 1:05:32
  Speaker 2: affect the way that they look at politics and violence
• 1:05:38
  Speaker 2: and people because they're at an incredibly impressionable age. Everybody
• 1:05:42
  Speaker 2: that I know has seen a movie they shouldn't have
• 1:05:45
  Speaker 2: seen when they were a kid, and it gave them nightmares,
• 1:05:47
  Speaker 2: and some of us developed phobias from them. I have
• 1:05:51
  Speaker 2: an issue with porcelain dolls because of Barbarella. Actually, long story,
• 1:05:58
  Speaker 2: but I don't porcelain dolls. I will never like porcelain dolls,
• 1:06:02
  Speaker 2: and it is because I saw a scene in a
• 1:06:04
  Speaker 2: movie when I was a little kid, and it created
• 1:06:09
  Speaker 2: an impression that I can't get rid of. This is
• 1:06:11
  Speaker 2: in a movie. These kids know this really happened to
• 1:06:14
  Speaker 2: a real person. They know a human being experience this.
• 1:06:20
  Speaker 2: Some ten year olds don't even have an understanding of
• 1:06:22
  Speaker 2: their own mortality. Some ten year olds in that classroom
• 1:06:30
  Speaker 2: developed an understanding about death from that video, and they
• 1:06:35
  Speaker 2: may spend their whole life fearing it, even though it's
• 1:06:39
  Speaker 2: inevitable it's going to happen to them at some point
• 1:06:42
  Speaker 2: in their lives because this teacher did that to them.
• 1:06:45
  Speaker 2: People will tell you The worst thing that can happen
• 1:06:48
  Speaker 2: to you is being raped. This teacher raped those students' minds.
• 1:06:52
  Speaker 2: They will never get that image out of their heads.
• 1:06:55
  Speaker 2: They will never get that moment out of their heads.
• 1:06:57
  Speaker 2: There is not a level of therapy that will make
• 1:07:01
  Speaker 2: them unsee that and unexperienced that moment.
• 1:07:05
  Speaker 1: He didn't just show them the video. Remember, he used
• 1:07:08
  Speaker 1: it as an opportunity to educate them on anti fascism
• 1:07:11
  Speaker 1: and others. So well, I'm just saying he didn't just yeah,
• 1:07:15
  Speaker 1: he tried to radical.
• 1:07:17
  Speaker 3: I get it.
• 1:07:18
  Speaker 2: Yeah, he did try to radicalize them. Yes, like that,
• 1:07:21
  Speaker 2: that adds to it, all right, that's an extenuating like
• 1:07:25
  Speaker 2: this makes it even worse. But just the fact of
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 2: showing that, you don't show ten year old gore. There's
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 2: a lot of gen xers that were traumatized by God.
• 1:07:36
  Speaker 2: I can't think of his name. That the hey Man,
• 1:07:40
  Speaker 2: nice shot guy, the guy that song was was inspired
• 1:07:44
  Speaker 2: by that. Damn it. Why can't I think of his name.
• 1:07:47
  Speaker 3: You have to be careful playing Bambi to a child
• 1:07:50
  Speaker 3: because you can can get traumatized by saying a cartoon
• 1:07:53
  Speaker 3: did get killed off screen.
• 1:07:57
  Speaker 2: Yeah, but this was this was a hell of a thing.
• 1:08:00
  Speaker 2: There was a there was a guy that committed suicide
• 1:08:02
  Speaker 2: on on the six o'clock news. Back in the day
• 1:08:06
  Speaker 2: when after dinner the whole family would go into the
• 1:08:09
  Speaker 2: living room and watch TV and the the six o'clock
• 1:08:13
  Speaker 2: news was on like that was that was what was
• 1:08:15
  Speaker 2: was on TV was being watched. And there were there
• 1:08:18
  Speaker 2: were kids that saw that. There were kids that saw
• 1:08:22
  Speaker 2: the incident. I was one of the kids that saw
• 1:08:23
  Speaker 2: the incident where uh it was supposed to just be
• 1:08:27
  Speaker 2: a cute filler story, right, and there was this there
• 1:08:31
  Speaker 2: for for uh jumping out of an airplane with a parachute,
• 1:08:36
  Speaker 2: that that was teaching a student to uh use use
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 2: his parachute, and so they jumped together. So the student
• 1:08:47
  Speaker 2: is protected by the teacher. In case the student doesn't
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 2: parachute correctly, the teacher is able to protect the student.
• 1:08:54
  Speaker 2: Right the news cameraman, there we go, Emery, I think
• 1:09:00
  Speaker 2: that's Callum got it right. It's Bud Dwyer. Don't look
• 1:09:03
  Speaker 2: that up. By the way, it is a horribly gory video.
• 1:09:09
  Speaker 2: If you if you have if your stomach has any humanity,
• 1:09:12
  Speaker 2: you'll throw up when you see it. But in any case,
• 1:09:15
  Speaker 2: this this other video, it goes along for a while
• 1:09:18
  Speaker 2: and you're watching and the student and the teacher are
• 1:09:21
  Speaker 2: doing what they're supposed to do, and then they both
• 1:09:23
  Speaker 2: shoot and and their shoots go up correctly, and all
• 1:09:26
  Speaker 2: of a sudden, you hear this from the from the cameraman,
• 1:09:28
  Speaker 2: you hear no, and it was just this fatalistic oh no,
• 1:09:35
  Speaker 2: And that's when you realize he didn't pack a shoot.
• 1:09:38
  Speaker 2: And then the camera just looks down at the ground
• 1:09:41
  Speaker 2: and and it fades out like it it immediately they
• 1:09:43
  Speaker 2: cut from it because they knew the cameraman hadn't packed
• 1:09:47
  Speaker 2: a shoot, and that was that was another gen X
• 1:09:52
  Speaker 2: trauma where you know, you saw, you didn't even have
• 1:09:55
  Speaker 2: to know or you didn't even have to see what
• 1:09:57
  Speaker 2: happened to the guy. You didn't have to see the death.
• 1:10:00
  Speaker 2: You just knew. And there was the explosion of the
• 1:10:05
  Speaker 2: Challenger that was played in classrooms across the country. Students
• 1:10:08
  Speaker 2: had to get therapy because of that. And again there
• 1:10:13
  Speaker 2: was an explosion. You didn't see the death, There wasn't
• 1:10:17
  Speaker 2: visible gore, and students were traumatized. There were students traumatized
• 1:10:20
  Speaker 2: for life by that. And this is going to be
• 1:10:24
  Speaker 2: this generation's moment. This is not the only teacher that
• 1:10:28
  Speaker 2: got in trouble for this. So I've seen stories about
• 1:10:32
  Speaker 2: other teachers or discussions about other teachers, and this was
• 1:10:36
  Speaker 2: all over social media, and kids were exposed to it
• 1:10:38
  Speaker 2: on social media, and it's just one of those situations
• 1:10:44
  Speaker 2: where you know, parents should be reminded your kids shouldn't
• 1:10:48
  Speaker 2: be on social media unsupervised because of things like this.
• 1:10:52
  Speaker 2: But what this teacher has done to these students is
• 1:10:56
  Speaker 2: at least as bad as what happened to every kid
• 1:11:00
  Speaker 2: that saw the Bud Dwyer suicide, Worse than the experiences
• 1:11:06
  Speaker 2: of the kids that saw those other two incidents I described,
• 1:11:10
  Speaker 2: Worse than the experiences of the kids who did understand
• 1:11:13
  Speaker 2: what was going on when they saw the explosions and
• 1:11:17
  Speaker 2: the towers falling on nine to eleven and their parents
• 1:11:20
  Speaker 2: getting upset and not understanding what was going on because
• 1:11:24
  Speaker 2: this was this was gore in their classroom, And then
• 1:11:27
  Speaker 2: he tried to indoctrinate them on top of that, like
• 1:11:31
  Speaker 2: this person should have not just the book, but the
• 1:11:33
  Speaker 2: whole fucking library thrown at him. And these poor kids,
• 1:11:37
  Speaker 2: they're gonna need years of therapy for this.
• 1:11:39
  Speaker 1: Well, he was suspended, so take that. I hope you
• 1:11:44
  Speaker 1: learned your lesson.
• 1:11:45
  Speaker 3: Okay, Mike, I'm fucking fucking woodchip. What this is?
• 1:11:48
  Speaker 2: Why to see the shit out of them again?
• 1:11:52
  Speaker 3: I suppose this isn't as bad as physically raping the
• 1:11:55
  Speaker 3: kids or physically killing them, but it's still it's one
• 1:11:58
  Speaker 3: leg in the wood chip, just just the right in
• 1:12:00
  Speaker 3: the wood chipper, and then when it gets up to
• 1:12:01
  Speaker 3: the pelvis, you pull them out. You don't even turn
• 1:12:03
  Speaker 3: the word chipper off. Just when it gets to the pelvis,
• 1:12:06
  Speaker 3: you play tugawar with the woodchipper, and you see if
• 1:12:09
  Speaker 3: you can pull them out, that'll do. I don't have
• 1:12:12
  Speaker 3: much of a rent for this. I'm gonna save it
• 1:12:14
  Speaker 3: for the next story, because yeah, I'm gonna I'm going
• 1:12:18
  Speaker 3: to combine my mega rent with this story in the
• 1:12:21
  Speaker 3: next because they are connected and in the interesting of times,
• 1:12:24
  Speaker 3: let's move let's move on.
• 1:12:26
  Speaker 1: Okay, thank you. I got a super chat from Albatross
• 1:12:32
  Speaker 1: for five dollars and he says, when was the last
• 1:12:35
  Speaker 1: time activists were as dogged about someone like they are
• 1:12:39
  Speaker 1: with Kirk. They're seriously singing their teeth into this one. Well,
• 1:12:43
  Speaker 1: every every tragedy is an opportunity if you are the
• 1:12:46
  Speaker 1: right kind of shithead. So unfortunately, that's what this is
• 1:12:50
  Speaker 1: all about. And and also this was in a lot
• 1:12:53
  Speaker 1: of ways, it's it's a very big pr campaign to
• 1:12:56
  Speaker 1: try to alter the optics. Remember when this initially happened,
• 1:13:02
  Speaker 1: the guy who did this was a MAGA guy apparently,
• 1:13:06
  Speaker 1: or first it was we don't know, and then it was, oh,
• 1:13:09
  Speaker 1: he's a MEGA guy, and then it was you know,
• 1:13:11
  Speaker 1: I don't know. Like that A lot of people are
• 1:13:13
  Speaker 1: still running with that, and because it's all about like,
• 1:13:17
  Speaker 1: how is it seen? Not necessarily how bad is this tragedy?
• 1:13:22
  Speaker 1: So and I think it's important because it does tell
• 1:13:24
  Speaker 1: you a lot about who you are dealing with, and
• 1:13:27
  Speaker 1: it's really important that we know that. But anyway, moving
• 1:13:29
  Speaker 1: on to the next story. All right, So, in a
• 1:13:35
  Speaker 1: stunning move, ABC announced the indefinite suspension of Jimmy Kimmel
• 1:13:38
  Speaker 1: Live on September seventeenth, following host Jimmy Kimmel's controversial monologue
• 1:13:43
  Speaker 1: about the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, where he
• 1:13:47
  Speaker 1: made remarks criticizing former President Trump and Mega supporting supporters' responses.
• 1:13:52
  Speaker 1: That decision made by Disney executives during including CEO Bob
• 1:13:56
  Speaker 1: Eiger came amid intense backlash from conservatives, who accused kl
• 1:14:00
  Speaker 1: of insensitivity during a national crisis, also lying about what
• 1:14:05
  Speaker 1: the identity and the motives of the shooter because Kimmel
• 1:14:09
  Speaker 1: said it was one of their one of their own
• 1:14:12
  Speaker 1: that did this. FCC chair Brendan Carr and major affiliates
• 1:14:16
  Speaker 1: like Sinclair and Nextstar threatened to pull the show from
• 1:14:19
  Speaker 1: their stations. Activists on the right celebrated the move as
• 1:14:23
  Speaker 1: a victory against woke Hollywood bias, while media outlets framed
• 1:14:26
  Speaker 1: it as a free speech flashpoint, without lets like The
• 1:14:29
  Speaker 1: New York Times and PBS attempting to highlight the political
• 1:14:32
  Speaker 1: pressures involved. Just kidding, though after widespread outcry, they brought
• 1:14:38
  Speaker 1: them back so reverse course and I think that was
• 1:14:40
  Speaker 1: announce today and announced that the shows will return to
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 1: air on Tuesday, September twenty fourth, Wednesday tomorrow, basically, though
• 1:14:49
  Speaker 1: some Sinclair stations may continue to withhold it. This has
• 1:14:53
  Speaker 1: been a very brief suspension and I wanted to say
• 1:14:56
  Speaker 1: the reasoning behind this though there it appears that I
• 1:15:00
  Speaker 1: don't know if you guys know, but when, because this
• 1:15:02
  Speaker 1: was so short, like it just they put him back
• 1:15:04
  Speaker 1: on the air. He's going to be back on like
• 1:15:06
  Speaker 1: tonight or tomorrow. So this isn't like hardly anything. But
• 1:15:10
  Speaker 1: what I think is funny about it is that when
• 1:15:11
  Speaker 1: it happened, when he was getting canceled, and I talked
• 1:15:14
  Speaker 1: about this on my on my weekend show on my
• 1:15:16
  Speaker 1: own channel, Honey Badger Arcade, I do a weekly culture
• 1:15:19
  Speaker 1: show there, and at that time we knew that Kimmel
• 1:15:22
  Speaker 1: was suspended, but we weren't. We didn't know he was
• 1:15:24
  Speaker 1: going to be back. The way it was being framed
• 1:15:26
  Speaker 1: online by leftists was and I'm just gonna say leftists
• 1:15:29
  Speaker 1: for the sake of simplicity, because I don't want to
• 1:15:31
  Speaker 1: get into like all of the nuance there. It doesn't
• 1:15:33
  Speaker 1: really matter. Their claim was this is an attack on
• 1:15:35
  Speaker 1: free speech. He got fired, he was pressured to get fired,
• 1:15:38
  Speaker 1: et cetera. And I knew because I had looked into it,
• 1:15:41
  Speaker 1: that number one, he wasn't being fired, the show was
• 1:15:43
  Speaker 1: being suspended, and number two, it wasn't because of you know,
• 1:15:47
  Speaker 1: like Trump pro censorship or anything like that. It was actually,
• 1:15:51
  Speaker 1: this is one thing that people did not seem to know.
• 1:15:53
  Speaker 1: I think you guys probably do know this. The ratings
• 1:15:56
  Speaker 1: were in the toilet. So, like, you had a show
• 1:15:59
  Speaker 1: that nobody would I think the average views on it
• 1:16:01
  Speaker 1: were like one hundred and twenty thousand people on average.
• 1:16:05
  Speaker 1: We're watching this for a television show. That's awful. Like
• 1:16:09
  Speaker 1: there are posts of corn dogs on X that have
• 1:16:13
  Speaker 1: more views than this show. Okay. And and there's a
• 1:16:17
  Speaker 1: person who actually posted a corn dog and said, let's
• 1:16:19
  Speaker 1: see we can get more views on this than Jimmy Kimmel.
• 1:16:22
  Speaker 1: So the network saw a show that was failing and
• 1:16:26
  Speaker 1: they were like, they were looking for a reason to
• 1:16:29
  Speaker 1: pull it, but they didn't want to do it because
• 1:16:31
  Speaker 1: they they thought, you know, like they had to appeal
• 1:16:34
  Speaker 1: to their base. Okay. And then when it came that
• 1:16:37
  Speaker 1: Jimmy Kimmel lied about the shooter and was like, you know,
• 1:16:41
  Speaker 1: because he said things about the shooting that just weren't true,
• 1:16:45
  Speaker 1: then the network, the FCC was telling them, you know,
• 1:16:48
  Speaker 1: you guys got to fix this. And the network saw
• 1:16:50
  Speaker 1: an opportunity to get rid of Jimmy Kimmel without making
• 1:16:53
  Speaker 1: it look like they did it, but rather they could
• 1:16:56
  Speaker 1: blame the pressures from you know, the FCC to do it.
• 1:16:59
  Speaker 1: But the truth is, as the show was failing, just
• 1:17:01
  Speaker 1: like Stephen Colbert's show, just like Seth Meyers's show. I
• 1:17:04
  Speaker 1: think Seth Meyers show is doing the worst all of them.
• 1:17:07
  Speaker 1: Jimmy Kimmel, they're all They're all shit, John Oliver, none
• 1:17:10
  Speaker 1: of nobody watches them. Okay, Samantha Bee, I don't even
• 1:17:14
  Speaker 1: think she has a show anymore. They saw now his
• 1:17:17
  Speaker 1: opportunity to get rid of him, and then it also.
• 1:17:19
  Speaker 4: Makes yeah, they saw an opportunity to get rid of
• 1:17:24
  Speaker 4: a guy that wasn't really good for them without but
• 1:17:27
  Speaker 4: also look like the good guys because they could.
• 1:17:29
  Speaker 1: Say, well, you know, censorshit. But it turned out that
• 1:17:33
  Speaker 1: it was probably taken down because he wasn't really pulling
• 1:17:36
  Speaker 1: in any numbers at all, and there was also some
• 1:17:40
  Speaker 1: They've done some interviews with Letterman and Leno asking them
• 1:17:43
  Speaker 1: about this, and I think that they kind of co
• 1:17:44
  Speaker 1: signed on, like like nobody was watching their shit anymore,
• 1:17:47
  Speaker 1: because these guys Letterman and Leno were kind of legends
• 1:17:49
  Speaker 1: of you know, late show television. And the reason why
• 1:17:53
  Speaker 1: they came back though I don't think it's because of
• 1:17:55
  Speaker 1: the right either. I don't think it's I think actually
• 1:17:58
  Speaker 1: is because when they took down a bunch of leftists
• 1:18:01
  Speaker 1: that watched Jimmy Kimmel, and a lot of leftists in Hollywood,
• 1:18:04
  Speaker 1: we're all like, I stand with Jimmy Kimmel. We are
• 1:18:06
  Speaker 1: all Jimmy. They were literally trying to compare themselves to
• 1:18:09
  Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk. You know, we are all Jimmy Kimmel and
• 1:18:11
  Speaker 1: all this right, And but then like the ABC studios
• 1:18:15
  Speaker 1: were attacked by what I guess are our leftist activists
• 1:18:19
  Speaker 1: that didn't that didn't like ABC bending the knee to
• 1:18:23
  Speaker 1: pressures from the FCC, which of course wasn't true because
• 1:18:27
  Speaker 1: it was it was because of the ratings. So they
• 1:18:29
  Speaker 1: like did a drive by on ABC shoot at studios,
• 1:18:31
  Speaker 1: and I was gonna make that a story, but we're
• 1:18:33
  Speaker 1: just so overwhelmed with stories. I thought I would mention
• 1:18:36
  Speaker 1: that in this story because they're related. So there was
• 1:18:39
  Speaker 1: a drive by done in the studios, and so out
• 1:18:42
  Speaker 1: of fear, they decided to bring him back on the air.
• 1:18:45
  Speaker 1: So they're putting Jimmy k this is what they're claiming.
• 1:18:47
  Speaker 1: Who knows what the real reasoning is, but I'm trying
• 1:18:51
  Speaker 1: to paint the picture here. So Jimmy Kimmel's back on
• 1:18:54
  Speaker 1: the air for all whatever. Two hundred people that are
• 1:18:58
  Speaker 1: gonna watch, and I think that they were pressured by
• 1:19:01
  Speaker 1: terrorists in their own camp potentially. And so yeah, he's
• 1:19:05
  Speaker 1: back on the air, and basically his censorship and all
• 1:19:08
  Speaker 1: of this shit around it, all of this victimizing that
• 1:19:11
  Speaker 1: they were doing around censorship and the oppressive regime, it
• 1:19:14
  Speaker 1: amounts to nothing because he got to come back, and
• 1:19:16
  Speaker 1: the one thing that actually put him back on the
• 1:19:18
  Speaker 1: air was probably fear of their own people, probably, you know.
• 1:19:22
  Speaker 1: So anyway, Yeah, that's basically what I wanted to add
• 1:19:25
  Speaker 1: to that before you guys take over.
• 1:19:26
  Speaker 3: So yeah, I've been trying to write something about this
• 1:19:29
  Speaker 3: for the past few days, and I keep having to
• 1:19:32
  Speaker 3: update it because it's gone from Kimmel's been canceled to
• 1:19:35
  Speaker 3: Kimmel's been uncanceled to Kimmel's maybe been recanceled by Sinclair,
• 1:19:39
  Speaker 3: but apparently not to God knows where we go from.
• 1:19:42
  Speaker 3: If I've learned anything, it's not to jump to conclusions.
• 1:19:45
  Speaker 3: Lets you be subject to the narrative whiplash that happens
• 1:19:49
  Speaker 3: whenever any degree of accountability is tentatively applied to the
• 1:19:55
  Speaker 3: to the mainstream quote unquote left. So I'm gonna try
• 1:19:59
  Speaker 3: and approach this generally as I can, and I know
• 1:20:02
  Speaker 3: I keep asking this question in various iterations, but I'll
• 1:20:04
  Speaker 3: ask it again. When has it gone too far? Ladies
• 1:20:09
  Speaker 3: and gentlemen. That is not a rhetorical question. It's an
• 1:20:11
  Speaker 3: important inquisitive question that is not asked enough, never mind
• 1:20:16
  Speaker 3: answered enough. If we want to avoid extremism, and broadly speaking,
• 1:20:22
  Speaker 3: we do, then the very least we can do is
• 1:20:25
  Speaker 3: draw a line somewhere, whatever the subject may be. What
• 1:20:30
  Speaker 3: should be the maximum speed limit seven miles an hour fine?
• 1:20:35
  Speaker 3: What should be the age of adulthood eighteen years fine?
• 1:20:38
  Speaker 3: Which recreational drugs should be legal? Nicotine, caffeine and alcohol
• 1:20:44
  Speaker 3: and cannabis? If you're lucky, fine. These lines are drawn arbitrarily,
• 1:20:49
  Speaker 3: but it's important that we at least draw the lines somewhere,
• 1:20:52
  Speaker 3: and then we can go on to argue amongst ourselves
• 1:20:56
  Speaker 3: if the line should be pushed forwards or backwards. That's
• 1:20:59
  Speaker 3: what laws are full. But it's not just a legal matter.
• 1:21:04
  Speaker 3: Private companies and private property owners can draw their own
• 1:21:07
  Speaker 3: lines regarding anything not covered by the law. If a
• 1:21:11
  Speaker 3: company wants to sack you for saying men are men
• 1:21:16
  Speaker 3: and women are women, sure they can do that, and
• 1:21:21
  Speaker 3: anyone who doesn't approve has every right to express their
• 1:21:24
  Speaker 3: disapproval that people being fired for telling the truth, the
• 1:21:28
  Speaker 3: obvious truth, and I mean the most obvious truth to
• 1:21:31
  Speaker 3: which any logic can be concentrated. X does in fact
• 1:21:35
  Speaker 3: equal X, and why it does in fact equal why?
• 1:21:38
  Speaker 3: But Okay, if you disagree, you are free to do
• 1:21:42
  Speaker 3: so and see how far you get in life. Similarly,
• 1:21:47
  Speaker 3: if a company wants to fire someone for saying, we
• 1:21:51
  Speaker 3: should murder anyone who says X equals X. Wait, isn't
• 1:21:55
  Speaker 3: that illegal? It's excitements of murder. Isn't that already covered
• 1:21:59
  Speaker 3: by the law, especially in my country, where it's effectively
• 1:22:03
  Speaker 3: illegal to say X equals X. No, it's not okay
• 1:22:07
  Speaker 3: to tell the truth, but it's okay to encourage the
• 1:22:10
  Speaker 3: assassination of people who tell the truth. Okay, that seems odd.
• 1:22:15
  Speaker 3: I guess we'll circle back on that. And what else? Yeah,
• 1:22:18
  Speaker 3: if a company wants to fire someone for costing them
• 1:22:24
  Speaker 3: millions of dollars every year, even though all they do
• 1:22:27
  Speaker 3: is mug expressionlessly into the camera with their fat, piggy
• 1:22:31
  Speaker 3: eyed face and reading from a teleprompter flagrantly declaring that
• 1:22:36
  Speaker 3: X does not equal X. That's too far? Is it
• 1:22:40
  Speaker 3: to fire that person? And anyone who's okay with that
• 1:22:43
  Speaker 3: has gone too far? Interesting While an innocent man lies
• 1:22:49
  Speaker 3: dead at the hands of the apocalyptic left, we should
• 1:22:53
  Speaker 3: be outraged that a millionaire mouthpiece for the apocalyptic left
• 1:22:57
  Speaker 3: has to endure the horrific scandal of facing a time
• 1:23:01
  Speaker 3: out from their job for four fucking days. That's quite
• 1:23:05
  Speaker 3: the heart take. It's something I would expect to hear
• 1:23:09
  Speaker 3: from the shameless hyper hypocrites on the far left, but
• 1:23:12
  Speaker 3: it's something we've been hearing over the last week from
• 1:23:16
  Speaker 3: people who are ostensibly supposed to be opposed to the
• 1:23:19
  Speaker 3: shameless hyper hypocrites on the far left. And they do
• 1:23:23
  Speaker 3: this while having the nerve to tell us you're becoming
• 1:23:26
  Speaker 3: the left? Why how are we becoming the left? Because
• 1:23:30
  Speaker 3: attacking free speech is leftism? Okay, first of all, we're
• 1:23:35
  Speaker 3: not doing that, and secondly, no, it isn't. Since when
• 1:23:39
  Speaker 3: was attack something that only the left does? The fuck
• 1:23:45
  Speaker 3: kind of bitch made cut bullshit you're talking about? Oh no,
• 1:23:48
  Speaker 3: don't attack anyone. That's not what we do on this
• 1:23:52
  Speaker 3: side of the aisle. We just have to hide behind
• 1:23:55
  Speaker 3: our shattered shields and whether whatever storm of arrows gets
• 1:23:59
  Speaker 3: thrown at us, How do you do, fellow non leftists,
• 1:24:04
  Speaker 3: are we making sure we never fight back?
• 1:24:06
  Speaker 2: Good?
• 1:24:07
  Speaker 3: Good, No, fuck you, no fucking greamer worm tongue, piece
• 1:24:12
  Speaker 3: of shit trying to tell us attacking is what ORCS do. Therefore,
• 1:24:17
  Speaker 3: we must not attack the ORCS lest we become orcs.
• 1:24:22
  Speaker 2: Bro.
• 1:24:23
  Speaker 3: We're just not going to payroll the OCS anymore. They've
• 1:24:28
  Speaker 3: made it very clear that they want to kill us
• 1:24:30
  Speaker 3: and then blame it on us. So we've decided we're
• 1:24:34
  Speaker 3: not going to pay the ORCS to kill us and
• 1:24:37
  Speaker 3: then blame it on us. Well, then you're just as
• 1:24:40
  Speaker 3: bad as the OCS. All right, good one. You want
• 1:24:43
  Speaker 3: to talk about principles, it's pretty obvious what your principle is,
• 1:24:47
  Speaker 3: and it's roll the fuck over and let the communist
• 1:24:50
  Speaker 3: demon mafia do whatever the fuck it likes. If that's
• 1:24:54
  Speaker 3: what you call free speech, fine, by all means speak it.
• 1:24:59
  Speaker 3: We want try to get you fired for that. Just
• 1:25:03
  Speaker 3: don't tell obvious, flagrant lies and don't incite murdering people
• 1:25:08
  Speaker 3: for their opinions. That's the principle we've always had and
• 1:25:12
  Speaker 3: it happens to align with the law. You can get
• 1:25:16
  Speaker 3: sued for lying about people, and in many cases you should.
• 1:25:20
  Speaker 3: And you can get arrested for inciting murder, and in
• 1:25:23
  Speaker 3: many cases you should. But the only thing that's happening
• 1:25:27
  Speaker 3: is your employers are no longer going to pay you
• 1:25:31
  Speaker 3: on account of the suable slash arrestable offenses you keep committing,
• 1:25:38
  Speaker 3: and in Jimmy Kimmel's case, only for about four fucking
• 1:25:41
  Speaker 3: days before ABC caved in to all the violent terrorism
• 1:25:47
  Speaker 3: that your precious leftists have been committing on his behalf.
• 1:25:52
  Speaker 3: In this case, I am indeed talking to people who
• 1:25:55
  Speaker 3: might be listening to the show, because I've heard this
• 1:25:58
  Speaker 3: from people who really to know better. After all this time,
• 1:26:02
  Speaker 3: you're accusing us of abandoning our principles, but we haven't.
• 1:26:07
  Speaker 3: It's just that we don't have the same principles as you.
• 1:26:10
  Speaker 3: We have drawn a line. That line is murder and
• 1:26:14
  Speaker 3: incitement to murder. When the demons cross that line, we retaliate,
• 1:26:21
  Speaker 3: not in kind, not an eye for an eye, but
• 1:26:23
  Speaker 3: at least something for an eye, like a fucking paycheck
• 1:26:27
  Speaker 3: for an eye. You have not drawn a line, or
• 1:26:31
  Speaker 3: you have drawn a line, but you suddenly get amnesia
• 1:26:34
  Speaker 3: when the demons cross that line. You just retreat and
• 1:26:38
  Speaker 3: retreat and retreat, no matter how much the demons advance
• 1:26:42
  Speaker 3: on you, because you're a weak bitch made punk cass.
• 1:26:47
  Speaker 3: You're quite welcome to be weak bitch made punkasses, but
• 1:26:51
  Speaker 3: don't act like you're better than us, and don't expect
• 1:26:54
  Speaker 3: us to join you in your secret hideout in bum
• 1:26:57
  Speaker 3: foot Pussestan.
• 1:26:59
  Speaker 1: You man, save faggots.
• 1:27:01
  Speaker 3: I said what I said. Don't make me say it again,
• 1:27:04
  Speaker 3: because I will even if I get arrested for it.
• 1:27:08
  Speaker 3: And I have to wonder how much of us stink
• 1:27:10
  Speaker 3: you'll kick up if that happens, because I'm not one
• 1:27:13
  Speaker 3: of your precious fucking leftist teams. Fuck all of you,
• 1:27:17
  Speaker 3: so sick of it?
• 1:27:18
  Speaker 2: All right, I'll stop, Hannah Well, I would just like
• 1:27:22
  Speaker 2: to point out that on your social media, the reason
• 1:27:27
  Speaker 2: there is a report button on x it's because it
• 1:27:32
  Speaker 2: was there on Twitter. The reason it is there on
• 1:27:34
  Speaker 2: Twitter on your profile page that somebody can go and
• 1:27:37
  Speaker 2: not just report a tweet that you tweeted or a
• 1:27:41
  Speaker 2: post that you made, but your entire profile as hateful
• 1:27:46
  Speaker 2: or spammy or whatever, is because of an organized orchestrated
• 1:27:52
  Speaker 2: campaign by a group called Women Action and Media to
• 1:27:58
  Speaker 2: make their the advertis for Twitter pressure Twitter to give
• 1:28:05
  Speaker 2: them that button so that they could report, like mass
• 1:28:09
  Speaker 2: report people and get them get them banned by making
• 1:28:13
  Speaker 2: Twitter's administrators that have to deal with did this person
• 1:28:17
  Speaker 2: actually do what they've been reported for? We have to
• 1:28:20
  Speaker 2: now read their profile over and over again because of
• 1:28:22
  Speaker 2: these reports to say, oh, fuck it, we're gonna ban
• 1:28:24
  Speaker 2: this person because we're tired of having to go and
• 1:28:26
  Speaker 2: look at their profile because of these reports. And that's
• 1:28:30
  Speaker 2: why that exists. And there have been people that have
• 1:28:34
  Speaker 2: been mass reported for completely innocent things, like Janet Bloomfield
• 1:28:41
  Speaker 2: from a Voice for Men, who most of you today
• 1:28:44
  Speaker 2: may never have heard of because she got out of
• 1:28:48
  Speaker 2: a men's rights activism because her family was threatened. But
• 1:28:52
  Speaker 2: she was mass reported for a photograph of a decorated
• 1:28:57
  Speaker 2: cake by an organ or organized campaign done by an
• 1:29:02
  Speaker 2: account named takedown MRAs who got as many people as
• 1:29:08
  Speaker 2: possible to report it as child porn. There are no
• 1:29:12
  Speaker 2: people in the photo of the cake, so there are
• 1:29:17
  Speaker 2: no children. There are also no adults. There's no actual
• 1:29:21
  Speaker 2: human subject in this picture. I've seen this picture. You
• 1:29:24
  Speaker 2: probably have it on one of my hard drive somewhere.
• 1:29:27
  Speaker 2: It is literally just a three or four tiered cake
• 1:29:33
  Speaker 2: with white buttercream icing and some decorations made out of
• 1:29:40
  Speaker 2: icing on the cake. That's it. It's sitting on a
• 1:29:44
  Speaker 2: table in a kitchen. And she took a picture. I
• 1:29:47
  Speaker 2: don't even remember what it was for what, whether it
• 1:29:51
  Speaker 2: was a birthday or a wedding or whatever. She made
• 1:29:54
  Speaker 2: it for a friend or a family member and was
• 1:29:57
  Speaker 2: proud of her work and posted it and a mass
• 1:30:01
  Speaker 2: reported it and got her perma band on X on
• 1:30:05
  Speaker 2: Twitter actually before it was X, because they got that
• 1:30:09
  Speaker 2: ability for posting a picture of a cake. And you
• 1:30:15
  Speaker 2: want to make the comparison between the left's tendency, the
• 1:30:21
  Speaker 2: anti feminist leftists or the feminist left, especially their tendency
• 1:30:25
  Speaker 2: to do that to anti feminists, and Kimmel getting banned
• 1:30:29
  Speaker 2: because his show is absolute shit and people celebrating it
• 1:30:34
  Speaker 2: because he said something that was absolute shit, like you
• 1:30:39
  Speaker 2: have to be kidding me, saying he deserved it, saying
• 1:30:42
  Speaker 2: he deserved to have his show canceled or suspended or
• 1:30:46
  Speaker 2: whatever because a the show itself was not entertaining, and
• 1:30:50
  Speaker 2: b on top of that, he said some absolute bullshit
• 1:30:55
  Speaker 2: that was offensive, and so you don't feel sorry for him,
• 1:31:00
  Speaker 2: for being canceled, for being untalented and lazy. He only
• 1:31:06
  Speaker 2: has a goodfellow putting it this out. He only has
• 1:31:08
  Speaker 2: two jokes. I'll let you go, and now remember to
• 1:31:11
  Speaker 2: put six instead of G when you look him up
• 1:31:13
  Speaker 2: on YouTube, or you won't find his channel. But watch
• 1:31:16
  Speaker 2: his video on a subject and see if you don't agree. Kimmel, Really,
• 1:31:20
  Speaker 2: his show is completely worthless. But there is no comparison
• 1:31:24
  Speaker 2: between that. It is a bullshit argument to say that
• 1:31:28
  Speaker 2: it is an attack on free speech for a media
• 1:31:32
  Speaker 2: organization to stop supporting a product that the public is
• 1:31:39
  Speaker 2: not consuming and that is not making them any money,
• 1:31:44
  Speaker 2: and that the reason they have to continue to support
• 1:31:46
  Speaker 2: it is because people are mad about something that he
• 1:31:48
  Speaker 2: said the bullshit argument. Only an idiot would make that argument.
• 1:31:54
  Speaker 2: And if you're making that argument, you really should should
• 1:31:57
  Speaker 2: take a step back and look at why, because somebody
• 1:32:01
  Speaker 2: else has probably manipulated you into that, and you might
• 1:32:04
  Speaker 2: want to consider the fact that you're not as smart
• 1:32:06
  Speaker 2: as you think you are.
• 1:32:07
  Speaker 1: Said, Yeah, I mean, like I said, like, I think
• 1:32:10
  Speaker 1: that they get power out of being in the victim
• 1:32:14
  Speaker 1: position and this was all they had. Like I'm I'm
• 1:32:17
  Speaker 1: sure that no one who said that they were on
• 1:32:20
  Speaker 1: Jimmy Kimmel's side, actually gave a shit about him or
• 1:32:22
  Speaker 1: even watched the show because it wasn't good. So I
• 1:32:25
  Speaker 1: think it was just about like, oh, my optics. So
• 1:32:28
  Speaker 1: it always comes down to my optics, my marketing. But anyway,
• 1:32:32
  Speaker 1: so yeah, he's back, so we can go back to
• 1:32:34
  Speaker 1: not watching it. Uh, and we'll see maybe it'll just
• 1:32:37
  Speaker 1: get canceled again and then they'll just be honest me, like, look,
• 1:32:40
  Speaker 1: the show is shit, like they at least Stephen Colbert's
• 1:32:43
  Speaker 1: team was honest, you know. But anyway, we're gonna move
• 1:32:46
  Speaker 1: on to the last story. I told you this is
• 1:32:47
  Speaker 1: gonna be a longer than normal sausage, but whatever.
• 1:32:50
  Speaker 2: Yeah, Stephen Colbert was at least meanworthy. Kimmel doesn't even
• 1:32:54
  Speaker 2: have that.
• 1:32:56
  Speaker 1: No, no, no, he but he even Kimmel's better than
• 1:32:58
  Speaker 1: Fallen or Meer because they have nothing, like there's like
• 1:33:02
  Speaker 1: nothing there. It's sad. But anyway, yeah, exactly, yeah, right,
• 1:33:10
  Speaker 1: I'm telling you they just just give give I don't
• 1:33:13
  Speaker 1: know which show, but give one of those shows to
• 1:33:16
  Speaker 1: Craig Ferguson. Don't don't censor him, just let him do
• 1:33:19
  Speaker 1: his thing. Be Scottish it'll be great, don't be he
• 1:33:23
  Speaker 1: won't be political. He'll hit on every woman that goes
• 1:33:26
  Speaker 1: on there. Everyone will love it and then and we'd
• 1:33:29
  Speaker 1: just get on with our lives. But anyway, Zarius gave
• 1:33:32
  Speaker 1: us a super chat for five and says, Mike, we
• 1:33:34
  Speaker 1: can only send them strongly worded letters or fight back
• 1:33:37
  Speaker 1: when we're falling. Falling after following the non aggression principle
• 1:33:41
  Speaker 1: to the cliff's edge, right, It's okay to alienate people,
• 1:33:47
  Speaker 1: to ostracize that. There's nothing wrong with that. We should
• 1:33:50
  Speaker 1: do that, We should that more. But uh, anyway, listen
• 1:33:53
  Speaker 1: what you guys thinking about this one in the comment
• 1:33:55
  Speaker 1: We're gonna move on to the last story. Uh, this one,
• 1:33:59
  Speaker 1: you know, kind of unfortunate but also kind of funny,
• 1:34:04
  Speaker 1: just like a story onlike, be careful of the women
• 1:34:08
  Speaker 1: you associate yourself with, especially if you own your own business.
• 1:34:11
  Speaker 1: So a thirty one year year old San Diego woman
• 1:34:14
  Speaker 1: named Megan Farina ignited widespread controversy shortly after the assassination
• 1:34:19
  Speaker 1: of conservative activist Charlie Kirk at a Utah university when
• 1:34:23
  Speaker 1: she posted a TikTok video stating that she had no
• 1:34:26
  Speaker 1: sympathies for him, accusing him of using his platform to
• 1:34:29
  Speaker 1: spread hate and bigotry. In the video, which a mass
• 1:34:33
  Speaker 1: millions of you is farina contrastic kirks typical thoughts and
• 1:34:36
  Speaker 1: prayers responses to school shootings. This is usually how they
• 1:34:40
  Speaker 1: go after anyone on the right, like the recent because
• 1:34:42
  Speaker 1: they want to take your guns, and that's why they
• 1:34:44
  Speaker 1: do it. Just let's just be real, that's what it's about.
• 1:34:46
  Speaker 1: It's about taking your guns away, like the recent India
• 1:34:49
  Speaker 1: incident at Evergreen High School in Colorado, where a sixteen
• 1:34:52
  Speaker 1: year old shooter injured two before taking his own life.
• 1:34:55
  Speaker 1: With her similar sentiment towards his death. The backlash was swift,
• 1:34:59
  Speaker 1: with online users identifying and targeting her boyfriend, a thirty
• 1:35:02
  Speaker 1: four year old Justin Crinley, who owns a family electrical business.
• 1:35:06
  Speaker 1: This led to a flood of negative Yelp reviews that
• 1:35:09
  Speaker 1: dropped his rating to one star, Accusations of unsafe practices
• 1:35:13
  Speaker 1: and even physical confrontations. Not physical as in violence, but
• 1:35:17
  Speaker 1: there's videos of people confronting this guy and they're asking
• 1:35:20
  Speaker 1: about his wife. Turned out it's not his wife as
• 1:35:23
  Speaker 1: his girlfriend, such as a stranger entering Crinley's office to
• 1:35:26
  Speaker 1: harass him. Farina's family also faced doxing, according to Farina,
• 1:35:31
  Speaker 1: with personal information leaked and protests was leaving notes at
• 1:35:34
  Speaker 1: their homes, turning her life into what she described as
• 1:35:37
  Speaker 1: literal hell. Then, in a follow up video, Farina doubled
• 1:35:41
  Speaker 1: down on her stance, highlighting the irony of being attacked
• 1:35:43
  Speaker 1: by Kirk supporters who claimed to value free speech while
• 1:35:46
  Speaker 1: suppressing hers, and emphasized that neither Crinley nor his business
• 1:35:50
  Speaker 1: were involved in her political views. Public reactions included thousands
• 1:35:54
  Speaker 1: of comments calling her a monster and devil, while media
• 1:35:57
  Speaker 1: coverage amplified the debate on select First Amendment protections. As
• 1:36:02
  Speaker 1: a content creator with over six hundred thousand TikTok followers,
• 1:36:04
  Speaker 1: Farina expressed fears for others in a similar position, warning
• 1:36:08
  Speaker 1: of a terrifying precedent against dissent and calling for community
• 1:36:11
  Speaker 1: support against what she termed fascism. So she's people confronting
• 1:36:16
  Speaker 1: her about her bullshit is fascism? Okay? No resolutions have
• 1:36:19
  Speaker 1: been reported, but the incident continues to impact their lives
• 1:36:22
  Speaker 1: with ongoing threats and defamation. And if you guys haven't
• 1:36:24
  Speaker 1: seen the video, I'm gonna show it off really quick,
• 1:36:27
  Speaker 1: because I have it her original video, so it wasn't
• 1:36:31
  Speaker 1: as bad as some of the other ones out there,
• 1:36:34
  Speaker 1: to be fair, but that doesn't mean that it was
• 1:36:38
  Speaker 1: like okay, so let me just let me just share
• 1:36:42
  Speaker 1: the screen here so you guys can see it. You
• 1:36:44
  Speaker 1: probably remember this video. You probably saw it, but I'm
• 1:36:47
  Speaker 1: gonna show it in case some of you guys have
• 1:36:49
  Speaker 1: not seen it.
• 1:36:50
  Speaker 2: Before you play it. Look at that duper's delight.
• 1:36:53
  Speaker 1: Yeah, well, well this is all about Yeah, this is
• 1:36:56
  Speaker 1: all about that smugness. She's basically like, yop, let me
• 1:36:59
  Speaker 1: show my own audience how much of a better person
• 1:37:02
  Speaker 1: I am. That's usually what it's It's almost like this
• 1:37:05
  Speaker 1: is what women is TikTok and even social media for.
• 1:37:08
  Speaker 2: It's a female. I am about to say something absolutely
• 1:37:12
  Speaker 2: shitty and mean, and I think I'll get away with
• 1:37:15
  Speaker 2: it because I think I'm on the right side of
• 1:37:18
  Speaker 2: the argument.
• 1:37:19
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, for sure. So here we go.
• 1:37:23
  Speaker 2: Oh I can't hear it. No sound?
• 1:37:26
  Speaker 1: Oh you guys don't have any sound? All right? Hold on,
• 1:37:28
  Speaker 1: hold on. Sometimes this happens and I gotta like stop
• 1:37:31
  Speaker 1: sharing it and then start sharing it again. I don't
• 1:37:33
  Speaker 1: know why that is, so hold on a second. It's
• 1:37:36
  Speaker 1: going to disappear, but I'm gonna bring it right back
• 1:37:39
  Speaker 1: here we go. All right, So let's try now.
• 1:37:43
  Speaker 2: Gather around, bitches. Let's all going hands and bow our
• 1:37:47
  Speaker 2: heads in thoughts and prayers for Charlie Kirk.
• 1:37:51
  Speaker 1: Thoughts and prayers for Charlieicer thoughts and prayers, thoughts and prayers.
• 1:38:00
  Speaker 1: Remember he died. I'm just pointing that out, okay. And
• 1:38:03
  Speaker 1: so you know, people were angry about this, and they
• 1:38:07
  Speaker 1: let me just find my posts. She does a follow
• 1:38:10
  Speaker 1: up here. I think this is This is her sort
• 1:38:13
  Speaker 1: of like follow up video.
• 1:38:14
  Speaker 2: Wednesday, September tenth, when Charlie Kirk was shot, I posted
• 1:38:18
  Speaker 2: a video offering him the same thoughts and prayers that
• 1:38:21
  Speaker 2: he offered after every child was whoa hold on a minute, there,
• 1:38:25
  Speaker 2: all right, and the same is a lie. She used
• 1:38:30
  Speaker 2: to phrase the same in there. Okay. There's a huge
• 1:38:35
  Speaker 2: difference between mocking the idea of thoughts and prayers versus
• 1:38:42
  Speaker 2: expressing the fact that you your thoughts and prayers are
• 1:38:46
  Speaker 2: with someone as an expression of sympathy. When you have
• 1:38:50
  Speaker 2: the deeply held, enduring, strong belief that your prayers have
• 1:38:58
  Speaker 2: a solid impact on the lives of the people that
• 1:39:01
  Speaker 2: you pray for that there will be well. No, it
• 1:39:04
  Speaker 2: matters that you believe in prayer. Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk
• 1:39:09
  Speaker 2: was a devout Christian. He had a very strong belief
• 1:39:15
  Speaker 2: that when he prayed for someone that he was sending
• 1:39:18
  Speaker 2: God's goodwill their way, that he was drawing God's direct attention,
• 1:39:24
  Speaker 2: his more direct attention to that person's plight and putting
• 1:39:27
  Speaker 2: in a good word for that person with God. That
• 1:39:30
  Speaker 2: is what Christians believe. When we pray for something, we
• 1:39:32
  Speaker 2: are asking God for favors, we are expressing our worshipfulness,
• 1:39:37
  Speaker 2: and we are begging for a result. The matters right,
• 1:39:47
  Speaker 2: but yes, we finished with I will be done so
• 1:39:49
  Speaker 2: that we don't fuck up and and ask for something
• 1:39:52
  Speaker 2: that's wrong and get it. But the thing is, there's
• 1:39:56
  Speaker 2: a belief system that goes with us that it's very
• 1:39:59
  Speaker 2: similar to witch's belief that they are affecting the world
• 1:40:03
  Speaker 2: when they cast a spell, when which is direct magic
• 1:40:06
  Speaker 2: at somebody for good or bad, you know, whether they're
• 1:40:09
  Speaker 2: blessing or cursing. They believe there's an intent behind that.
• 1:40:16
  Speaker 3: Right.
• 1:40:16
  Speaker 2: They believe that they are doing a thing, that they
• 1:40:20
  Speaker 2: are affecting the individual and that if they are cursing
• 1:40:24
  Speaker 2: the individual, the individual will face consequences that if they
• 1:40:27
  Speaker 2: are blessing the individual, the individual will receive some sort
• 1:40:31
  Speaker 2: of blessing. This woman was mocking shet of a belief
• 1:40:35
  Speaker 2: that her thoughts and prayers song would send some sort
• 1:40:39
  Speaker 2: of good vibes out to help the individuals that she
• 1:40:42
  Speaker 2: was talking about. The family. Charlie himself, none of that.
• 1:40:49
  Speaker 2: So the idea that she was saying the same like,
• 1:40:53
  Speaker 2: that's her trying to shield herself from accountability for what
• 1:40:59
  Speaker 2: she did, which was to mock the death of an
• 1:41:01
  Speaker 2: individual and to mock the beliefs of an individual because
• 1:41:05
  Speaker 2: he died, And she did so gleefully and publicly on
• 1:41:10
  Speaker 2: a large platform to a large segment of followers, with
• 1:41:14
  Speaker 2: intent to upset people, to make people angry at her,
• 1:41:19
  Speaker 2: to turn the knife in the hearts of people who
• 1:41:24
  Speaker 2: were mourning the death of someone who, to them was
• 1:41:27
  Speaker 2: a beloved commentator, the ambassador to the other side. By
• 1:41:31
  Speaker 2: the way y'all killed the ambassador, you'll understand what that means.
• 1:41:36
  Speaker 2: And she thinks now that she doesn't deserve people's anger
• 1:41:42
  Speaker 2: for what she did. Now, I don't agree that people
• 1:41:45
  Speaker 2: should have expressed their anger in the manner that they
• 1:41:50
  Speaker 2: expressed it when they went after her boyfriend. Even if
• 1:41:53
  Speaker 2: he had been her husband, it still would have been wrong.
• 1:41:57
  Speaker 2: He didn't make that video, she did, right, Yeah, And
• 1:42:02
  Speaker 2: I have no problem with them commenting on her video
• 1:42:07
  Speaker 2: and calling her every name in the book, disagreeing with
• 1:42:10
  Speaker 2: what she has to say, any any degree of verbal
• 1:42:14
  Speaker 2: expression of this what you did was wrong. And I
• 1:42:17
  Speaker 2: don't have a problem with you know, if she had
• 1:42:19
  Speaker 2: an employer, them contacting the employer and saying, do you
• 1:42:23
  Speaker 2: know this woman is mocking this, this assassination on on
• 1:42:29
  Speaker 2: uh this social media uh and and and advocating you
• 1:42:33
  Speaker 2: know that this this violence was meaningless, belittling this act
• 1:42:37
  Speaker 2: of violence, like it's it's not her saying I stand
• 1:42:43
  Speaker 2: for this political idealogue, you know, or I stand for
• 1:42:46
  Speaker 2: this political idea person or thought. It's her saying this
• 1:42:51
  Speaker 2: death was okay, this murder was okay. Like that's something
• 1:42:55
  Speaker 2: that you know, an employer should be we're alerted to
• 1:42:58
  Speaker 2: if they don't want to be associated with that kind
• 1:43:00
  Speaker 2: of thing. Promoting crime isn't the same as saying, oh,
• 1:43:04
  Speaker 2: I'm a feminist or oh I'm not a feminist. I
• 1:43:06
  Speaker 2: think feminism is stupid either one of those. Nobody should
• 1:43:09
  Speaker 2: be contacting your employer for that. The minute you say
• 1:43:13
  Speaker 2: it's okay to kill someone and it's funny when it happens.
• 1:43:16
  Speaker 2: That's a totally different story, the totally different behavior than
• 1:43:21
  Speaker 2: just believing in a political idea. But that guy did nothing.
• 1:43:26
  Speaker 2: He did not cause this problem. He wasn't responsible for
• 1:43:31
  Speaker 2: her coverture ended. Feminists protested against it. They took to
• 1:43:37
  Speaker 2: the streets, They got voting rights, they got laws changed
• 1:43:41
  Speaker 2: in every state. They got federal laws changed, they got
• 1:43:43
  Speaker 2: municipal laws changed, They got the banks to change their policies.
• 1:43:48
  Speaker 2: They created a system wherein men are no longer allowed
• 1:43:54
  Speaker 2: to be the shield between the woman and the public
• 1:43:59
  Speaker 2: or the woman and state. Anybody that went after him
• 1:44:05
  Speaker 2: is a moron. Nobody should have done that. I don't
• 1:44:09
  Speaker 2: care what side you're on. But this woman, this woman
• 1:44:12
  Speaker 2: is responsible for that just as much as the people
• 1:44:15
  Speaker 2: who did it. Because we all know that there is
• 1:44:19
  Speaker 2: a tendency in the world for people to go after
• 1:44:23
  Speaker 2: a guy for what the woman that he's associated did,
• 1:44:27
  Speaker 2: or for a guy to get involved, get himself involved
• 1:44:32
  Speaker 2: in a conflict that the woman that he loves is facing.
• 1:44:36
  Speaker 2: Either way. So if a woman creates controversy around herself
• 1:44:42
  Speaker 2: or causes a huge backlash toward herself like this that
• 1:44:45
  Speaker 2: leads to violence, she is subjecting him to this. Even
• 1:44:49
  Speaker 2: though I say everybody that engaged in it was a moron,
• 1:44:52
  Speaker 2: the biggest moron was her. If she gave a ratsass
• 1:44:56
  Speaker 2: about him for creating this situation in the first place,
• 1:45:00
  Speaker 2: and this idea of oh, it's the same, it's the same,
• 1:45:03
  Speaker 2: faced this level of backlash and she's seen this level
• 1:45:07
  Speaker 2: of consequence and she still can't take responsibility for what
• 1:45:10
  Speaker 2: she did. If ever, gentlemen, there was a sign that
• 1:45:17
  Speaker 2: women should not be in positions of leadership as a whole,
• 1:45:23
  Speaker 2: No pun intended. Women should not be in positions of leadership, political, business,
• 1:45:29
  Speaker 2: or otherwise. It is the fact that women react like this.
• 1:45:34
  Speaker 2: So you guys are mean I was doing the same
• 1:45:37
  Speaker 2: thing you do. No, bitch, you were mocking. That is
• 1:45:43
  Speaker 2: not the same. There is no mockery in offering thoughts
• 1:45:47
  Speaker 2: and prayers for people who suffered a tragedy. And you know,
• 1:45:51
  Speaker 2: I have no sympathy for her. I have a lot
• 1:45:54
  Speaker 2: of sympathy for her boyfriend, have no sympathy for her
• 1:45:57
  Speaker 2: experience in this no matter what I think of the
• 1:46:00
  Speaker 2: people that that took it too far, and I don't
• 1:46:04
  Speaker 2: have sympathy for any other woman that experiences this for
• 1:46:07
  Speaker 2: the same kind of behavior. And I actually hope that
• 1:46:11
  Speaker 2: every example of this is understood by men to be
• 1:46:15
  Speaker 2: another you know, straw on the side of the scale
• 1:46:21
  Speaker 2: between can we trust women in positions of leadership or
• 1:46:24
  Speaker 2: can we not? I don't know a handful. I mean,
• 1:46:27
  Speaker 2: like maybe three women in my whole life that that
• 1:46:32
  Speaker 2: I I thought really belonged in positions of leadership, leadership,
• 1:46:39
  Speaker 2: executive type leadership, and one of them is Allison, and
• 1:46:42
  Speaker 2: one of them was related to me, So you know
• 1:46:44
  Speaker 2: that to only one woman I'm not directly associated with.
• 1:46:49
  Speaker 2: But it's it's sad but true. She's not abnormal.
• 1:46:56
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I have a My suspicion is that she doesn't
• 1:46:58
  Speaker 1: have a job, and so they went after her boyfriend
• 1:47:01
  Speaker 1: thought it was her husband, and I do feel bad
• 1:47:03
  Speaker 1: for him, but he better like reevaluate his relationship though,
• 1:47:07
  Speaker 1: because she also said she just said this, maybe I'll
• 1:47:12
  Speaker 1: share this. This is like another TikTok, so she basically
• 1:47:15
  Speaker 1: says it like targets, it was really low for some reason,
• 1:47:17
  Speaker 1: should kick out all straight white men. So yeah, I
• 1:47:20
  Speaker 1: mean long as I'm sorry, but like, the boyfriend is
• 1:47:23
  Speaker 1: a straight white dude, so I think he needs to
• 1:47:26
  Speaker 1: like stop thinking with the wrong head and look at
• 1:47:30
  Speaker 1: the really, like, seriously, do you want to be with
• 1:47:32
  Speaker 1: someone who hates you for what you are? You're not special,
• 1:47:37
  Speaker 1: I mean unless you're a self hating like white dude yourself,
• 1:47:41
  Speaker 1: in which case you need to see some help. But
• 1:47:44
  Speaker 1: I don't know that that's but anyway, but she do
• 1:47:48
  Speaker 1: she good?
• 1:47:51
  Speaker 2: Stop society, I should say from telling men that it's
• 1:47:53
  Speaker 2: misogynistic to judge women for their character, to vet women, yeah,
• 1:47:57
  Speaker 2: her character before dating them, because this guy took that
• 1:48:02
  Speaker 2: to heart. This this woman has no character and he's
• 1:48:06
  Speaker 2: dating her anyway.
• 1:48:07
  Speaker 1: Yep, agree, all right, But anyway, that's all the stories.
• 1:48:14
  Speaker 1: This was a long sausage added a half hour. But
• 1:48:17
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna go into the Patron show now. So we're
• 1:48:20
  Speaker 1: gonna be looking at this website. And this is a
• 1:48:24
  Speaker 1: website called wobblydev dot com where they make antifa slash
• 1:48:29
  Speaker 1: communist video games. I'm not gonna play any but I
• 1:48:33
  Speaker 1: thought we talked about them, and there's also some other
• 1:48:35
  Speaker 1: games on there as well. And speaking of games, we
• 1:48:38
  Speaker 1: might watch the I don't know if you guys have
• 1:48:39
  Speaker 1: seen this, but the Department of Homeland Security put out
• 1:48:42
  Speaker 1: a Pokemon video that is pretty has been making the rounds.
• 1:48:46
  Speaker 1: It is pretty funny, so we'll we'll probably look at
• 1:48:50
  Speaker 1: that as well. Got to catch them all, that's right.
• 1:48:53
  Speaker 1: I want to be the very best. But anyway, we're
• 1:48:58
  Speaker 1: gonna head into the Patron Show now, So what what's up.
• 1:49:01
  Speaker 2: You mentioned at the beginning of this show that I'm
• 1:49:03
  Speaker 2: making a game. I have a prediction. Well, my game
• 1:49:06
  Speaker 2: might not be the most original thing on a planet,
• 1:49:09
  Speaker 2: and I don't know if it'll be good or not.
• 1:49:10
  Speaker 2: I mean, i'll find out if people like it when
• 1:49:12
  Speaker 2: we start play testing. It may never get past that stage, right,
• 1:49:15
  Speaker 2: but I'll bet it'll be better than Antifa games.
• 1:49:17
  Speaker 1: Oh yeah, for sure, because you'll work.
• 1:49:20
  Speaker 2: But it's not political, so yeah, yeah there.
• 1:49:26
  Speaker 1: Well, actually, by not being political, it's political. It's just
• 1:49:29
  Speaker 1: the wrong kind of politics, which is the not political core.
• 1:49:32
  Speaker 2: So I suppose people will find a way to make
• 1:49:34
  Speaker 2: it political.
• 1:49:35
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm sure they will. All right. Well, anyway, with
• 1:49:38
  Speaker 1: that said, we're gonna go into the Patron Show now,
• 1:49:39
  Speaker 1: So thanks guys, for coming on. Thank you to Hannah
• 1:49:43
  Speaker 1: and Mike for joining me. If you guys like this video,
• 1:49:44
  Speaker 1: please hit like, subscribe to not already subscribed, hit the
• 1:49:47
  Speaker 1: bell for notifications, leave us a comment, let us know
• 1:49:50
  Speaker 1: what you guys think about what we discussed on the
• 1:49:51
  Speaker 1: show today, and please please please share this video because
• 1:49:54
  Speaker 1: sharing us carry. Thank you guys so much for coming
• 1:49:56
  Speaker 1: on this extra long sausage of HBr news, and we
• 1:49:59
  Speaker 1: will talk you guys in the next one. See you
• 1:50:02
  Speaker 1: next Tuesday.
• 1:50:02
  Speaker 5: Men's right activists are machines, dude. Okay, they are literal machines.
• 1:50:08
  Speaker 5: They are talking point machines. They are impossible to deal with,
• 1:50:12
  Speaker 5: especially if you have like especially if you have like
• 1:50:15
  Speaker 5: a couple of dudes who have good memory. On top
• 1:50:17
  Speaker 5: of that, too, holy shit, you're fucked