Latest / UK Column Radio / UK Column News Podcast 19th July 2024

Transcript

UK Column News Podcast 19th July 2024 · UK Column Radio

0:08
Good afternoon. It's Friday, the nineteenth of July twenty twenty four, just
0:11
after one o'clock. Welcome to the UK column News. I'm your host Mirke
0:13
Robinson joining me by video link. Today we have Ben Rubin and Debbie Evans.
0:19
Welcome to the program both. No, I've just noticed we have a
0:22
slight technical problem here, so just give me one second to fix it.
0:27
There we go. So let's bring this on screen, the Brexit without the
0:31
Exit. This is the Blenham Palace event yesterday where all the European leaders came
0:37
over plus Zelenski to meet with the new Prime Minister of the UK, Ker
0:43
Starmer. And this is under the auspices of the European political community. Now
0:47
we'll talk about that in a little second, but just let's have a look
0:52
at some clips of Ker Starmer here. First of all, on the topic
0:56
of Ukraine. We thought a very six us full and productive summer time.
1:00
Please to report bringing together the forty six European leaders, including President Zelensky who
1:07
addressed the plenary this morning. As I think you know, we discussed once
1:11
again our commitment to stand with Ukraine, a very important commitment made again today
1:19
including supporting their energy needs ahead of winter, so getting ahead of this winter.
1:26
Now, I didn't explain why they needed to support Ukraine's energy needs,
1:30
but we were talking about this a few days ago. Let's bring this back
1:33
on screen. This is AFP tweeting out that Zelensky has said that solar panels
1:38
need to be installed in Ukraine's hospitals and schools following a wave of Russian strikes
1:42
and power plants, and they quote them saying solar panels, smart meters and
1:46
energy storage units must appear in every school and hospital as soon as possible.
1:49
And basically, the Russians have been targeting Ukrainian infrastructure, energy infrastructure to the
1:56
point that they are getting very close to not having sufficient for the winter needs,
2:00
if they aren't already at that stage. And so it's interesting that Starmer
2:06
decided to acknowledge that during his opening remarks and clearly continuing with the sort of
2:15
Ukraine support narrative, he went on to say this, now, I mean,
2:20
we need to be clear Ukraine is fighting not just for the Ukrainian people,
2:23
though of course it is, but for the European people, for freedom,
2:29
democracy and the rule of law and our security. Therefore starts in Ukraine,
2:37
so this shouldn't be surprising. Our security starts in Ukraine. And of
2:40
course he's banging the same old drum about the rule of law and so on,
2:46
while he continues to ignore the rule of law in so many aspects of
2:50
life. He went on to talk about the connections with Europe, our relationship
2:55
with Europe, and congratulated Urshila Vanderleyan. It's not just a good idea to
3:04
work with our partners, it's essential. And I said on the steps of
3:08
Downing Street that I would govern for the whole country, including those who didn't
3:15
vote for us, and I meant it. We can only make progress on
3:22
the issues that so many people care about, like illegal migration and national security
3:30
if we have the maturity and leadership to reach out a hand to our European
3:37
friends. And I want to congratulate Slavon de Leon for her reelection today as
3:43
President of the European Commission. So Ursula in players night saw and I have
3:51
a war leader in the European Commission, and we have our war leader in
3:54
the UK. We remitted to be seeing who the war leader is going to
3:58
be in the United States, but probably know who that's going to be.
4:01
But the thing is here, what is this European Political community and what has
4:06
this got to do with He's saying that he's governing for everyone in the UK,
4:12
but he's clearly not governing for people who wanted Brexit. That was the
4:15
decision of the UK because we are in the process of reversing Brexit. So
4:18
let's just look at the House of Commons library here, this is what they
4:23
said from October twenty twenty two. What is the European Political Community? And
4:29
well, here are the key points. The original proposite proposal came from Manual
4:32
Macron. There was a parallel proposal from others within the European Community itself,
4:39
but Emmanuel Macron's idea was moved ahead with It was agreed to by Liz Truss.
4:45
And so this policy of bringing the UK into this new grouping called the
4:48
European Political Community began with the Tories. It's being continued with Labor and so
4:54
nothing changes here for the Prime Minister who claimed that his election was all about
4:59
change and so this is all about strengthening the links between EU member states and
5:03
non EU member states who share the same European values. This is about bringing
5:09
the UK back into the European Union in so many practical ways while claiming to
5:15
respect the wishes of the people who voted for Brexit. So by not bringing
5:20
us back into some new treaty, but by just bringing us into this little
5:25
organization which will basically make a bunch of agreements over the next number of years,
5:30
we will end up in the major infrastructure of Europe again. And we'll
5:35
see what it is that they're talking about in a second. But I just
5:40
thought we should play this clip just to remind ourselves what this is all about.
5:46
Just when I thought I was out, they pulled me back in,
5:54
right, So it's not really a joke, But I just I thought that
5:57
we should lighten the mood slightly there. But my question here is, and
6:02
some people will object to this question perhaps, but my question here is that
6:05
just at the time that Keir Starmer is bringing us back into the European Union,
6:12
where's Nigel Farage? And of course he isn't in the country. Now.
6:17
This is typical of Nigel Farage and his history, and we can talk
6:23
about that a little bit more in extra he has not you know, he's
6:28
got to a point and then he's decided a job done, don't need to
6:30
do anymore. And really this is one of the key meetings right at the
6:35
very beginning of the Starmer regime, and he's nowhere to be seen because he's
6:40
in the United States supporting Trump. Now, let's listen to another comment from
6:45
Starmer and see where this is taking us. So we are going to deepen
6:50
our corporation on defense and security, defense and security. So European Defense Union
7:00
is a topic that the UK column has been talking about for many, many
7:02
years and it is absolutely key to understanding what is going on at the moment.
7:09
So let's look at the King's speech, just very briefly, King Charles
7:13
saying, a couple of days ago, my government will seek to reset the
7:15
relationship with European partners, will seek a new security pact to strengthen cooperation and
7:23
mutual threats faced by the United Kingdom and the European Union. And why is
7:27
this happening, Well, of course it's happening because of the threat as they
7:31
perceive it of Donald Trump, Donald Trump looking increasingly like he is going to
7:35
become the next president of the United States, and of course the European Union
7:42
using that as an excuse to say well, Donald Trump doesn't really like NATTO
7:46
and therefore we've got to build our own defense capability. But many people in
7:51
the UK will say, well, EU Defense, so what, Well,
7:56
here's the point. This is effectively the end of national software. So the
8:01
European Union in so many ways represents the end of national sovereignty. We've got
8:05
banking union, We've got you know, currency union, We've got all these
8:09
various unions within the EU for people who are member states, and this is
8:13
just another one. But think about this command and control of national militaries at
8:20
a European Commission level. This is what they're aiming for. So national military
8:26
is no longer in the command and control of national governments, but that moves
8:30
up a level to the European Commission. Defense procurement also at the European Commission
8:35
level. And if anybody's in any diet about where this is going and what
8:41
the direction of travel here is, just ask yourself the question why does the
8:46
UK not have an independent military capability? You know, the the defense chiefs
8:52
and various other commentators at the moment, and the UK column for that matter,
8:56
talking about the fact that the UK that the UK military can't put an
9:00
army on the field, doesn't have a navy anymore, barely has an air
9:03
force. Why does it not have this independent military capability? And the reason
9:09
is because from a policy perspective, it's not needed. We will be in
9:13
the European Defense Union and a part of the European Defense Union. You've got
9:16
to look at the European Defense Union at plus NATO as a whole to see
9:20
what the overall military capability is. Now, going back to twenty nineteen,
9:26
we already had instances of UK military this man on the left. Here UK
9:33
military personnel wearing e you've badges on their arms. This has already happened to
9:37
many In many cases, we have had a very close relationship between the EU,
9:43
the European Commission and NATO. This is Stoltenberg and Federick of Magherini and
9:50
okay, I chose a particular frame from the video which made it look perhaps
9:52
a bit more salicious than it is, but I wanted to just give you
9:56
an impression of why this is our how close this relationship is. And if
10:01
we look at the map, as far as the European Union is concerned of
10:05
their neighbors, they have two key areas that they're interested in the Eastern neighborhood,
10:11
which is the right, which includes Ukraine, and the Southern neighborhood to
10:15
the south, which includes North Africa. Now, if we look at the
10:18
Eastern neighborhood first, one of the key aspects of this is so called military
10:22
mobility, and this is the ability to move military and personnel and material from
10:28
the west coast of the European continent and from the UK for that matter,
10:33
to the east to the Eastern neighborhood, which is the next battlefront. This
10:37
is the map that they produced for it. And if we just look at
10:39
the text from twenty nineteen, twenty two member states that you can see on
10:43
screen, and you'll notice the UK not listed in that. They set this
10:48
up in twenty nineteen a new program that implements a major part of the action
10:52
plan and military mobility, allowing free cross free cross border surface in their movement
10:58
of personnel and equipment. I joined this about two years later, and so
11:03
we are part of this process. And then if we look at the southern
11:07
neighborhood North Africa in particular, well we see in orange there the northern African
11:13
countries like Algeria and Libya, and so on. But actually this is the
11:16
area that they're particularly interested in. And so just to reinforce this, I'm
11:20
going to play a little bit of video. Again you've seen it before,
11:24
but I think it's important that we keep reminding yourselves of this. This is
11:28
Erschuela, vonder Lean and Tony Blair from different aspects of the Munich Security Conference
11:33
and twenty eighteen. I believe talking about European Defense Union. First of all,
11:41
our collective defense. We are iron klead committed to NATO NATO of twenty
11:50
nine that is collective to defense Article five. But there are problems and issues
11:56
where I do not see NATO. But Europe has to be able to act
12:01
that though this transatlantic alliance with America is extremely important and we need to maintain
12:07
it. The best partnership is a partnership where we have our own capabilities that
12:13
are also strong. I was talking about Africa. This is not a typical
12:18
place for NATO. We are very commuter to NADO on other places, but
12:22
Africa is a place where we need to be able to act as Europeans.
12:26
For example, one of the things that my institute does is work in Africa,
12:31
and at the moment We're particularly focused on the Sahell group of countries.
12:35
That's that band of countries across the north part of Sub Saharan Africa where you've
12:41
got exploding populations, dire poverty, radicalization and extremism. We may well face
12:48
the next wave of migration and extremism from those countries. It makes perfect sense
12:56
for Europe to have the military capability to help those countries is with their security
13:01
and for that we created the European Defense Union to have a comprehensive approach with
13:07
diplomacy, economic development and the military means. And so this is absolutely the
13:15
direction of travel at the moment. I just to finish this off very quickly.
13:18
One final comment from Starmer from yesterday and on illegal migration, where we
13:24
are resetting our approach and that's been central today. As Director of Public Prosecutions,
13:31
I saw the work that can be done across borders to bring terrorists to
13:37
justice and break up their networks. And as the focus continuing to be on
13:41
illegal migration, which as we talked about on Wednesday's program, is a very
13:46
small part of the problem. This is diversionry ignore the major part of the
13:50
immigration issue and focus on the illegal immigration and then he talks about the DPP
13:56
and I just want to put this up from squawk box. Starmer didn't know
13:58
resub postmasters was involved on savil, what did he do as DPP. I
14:05
think these are very good questions and questions we continue to need to ask and
14:09
have answered. So that's it on that, Debbie. Let me welcome you
14:13
to the program, and you've got a little bit more on the King's speech.
14:18
Yes, good afternoon everyone. Well, I've decided to change the language
14:22
because looking at the King's speech and we look at sustainability, don't really sustainable
14:26
goals. Well I've decided to completely change that to unsustainable goals. So let's
14:33
look a little bit at the King's speech. So what does it mean.
14:35
It actually means that the King delivers a speech that is written by government.
14:41
However, I've got a book and it's called in Charles's own words, and
14:46
he says, I'm planning to find out all I can about British life,
14:50
including the government, civil service, the unions and everything. So clearly our
14:56
king is very interested in our government. But not everybody's a fan. And
15:01
during the King's speech there were a number of arrests, there were protests,
15:05
down with the crown, not my king. So once again I have to
15:11
ask our labors policies sustainable. So the first thing I want to draw your
15:16
attention to is water, because I do like to focus on water and we
15:20
will. So there are plans to put water companies into special measures new legislation
15:24
next week. But what I want you to remember is that when it comes
15:30
to water companies, they are not statutory consultees for planning. And this is
15:35
going to become evident in a minute. So we already know that water company's
15:39
infrastructure is hanging. It cannot cope with any more developments. And actually here
15:46
you can see the question asked by Lawrence Robinson who said can they become statutory
15:52
consultees and basically Christopher Pincher MP said no, not unless special circumstances, which
15:58
is why I ask about building and what labor are planning on building. So
16:03
they're saying they're going to build one point five million homes in the next five
16:07
years. Well is that sustainable really when we've got a hanging water infrastructure that's
16:12
already over capacity, I don't think so, So what does that actually mean
16:18
they're going to do? Well? Apparently they're going to unleash mares. If
16:22
we just jump onto the next slide, we're going to unleash mares. We're
16:26
going to have next generation new towns. Now I've found out these are called
16:30
garden towns everybody, So if you've got one in your locality that's being built,
16:33
that's what that means. They're planning passport passport sort of free passes to
16:41
get for urban developments on brown Field and they want to give first DIBs to
16:47
first time buyers. But going back to the immigration and the migration problem,
16:53
we also see that Labour are going to be allowing one hundred thousand migrants to
16:59
apply for a US asylum and as of April twenty twenty four, one hundred
17:03
and two that one hundred and two thousand, eight hundred and eighty eight were
17:07
waiting a decision. But they were talking about a border security bill, which
17:12
kind of peaked my interest. So I went to have a look at Civil
17:17
Service World and they have confirmed that Labor has upped the funding for HMRC to
17:23
a border security command. So what is a border security command? Because by
17:30
my reckoning, if we're going to be having all of these migrants coming in,
17:33
they're going to be taking up a lot of the homes that Labor intend
17:36
to bar tend to build over the next five years. But it seems that
17:40
the Border Security Command is going to the funding's going to go up from five
17:45
hundred and fifty five million to eight hundred and fifty five million. We're going
17:48
to get five thousand compliance officers, We're going to get cross border police officers.
17:53
I'm not quite sure where all these people are coming from. We've got
17:56
a thousand strong body who are going to and to fast track removal of failed
18:00
asylum seekers to save countries, but I'm not quite sure where those are.
18:04
And my question is will any of the successful asylum seekers be border at be
18:11
patrolling our borders in future? That's the question I have for everybody. But
18:15
let's get back to energy. And we've mentioned great British energy before and this
18:19
is the Labour Big Plan owned by the British, built by the British,
18:23
the benefits the British. So you think fantastic, but actually this looks like
18:27
an enabling scam to me for climate change. But how fortunate that King Charles
18:33
himself is diverting the crown estate for the public good. How does he do
18:38
that? How does the Crown Estate work. Well, here's a little diagram
18:42
of how the Crown Estate actually works. Now, the Treasury they calculate the
18:47
Sovereign Grant which stands at the moment of eighty six point three million, They
18:51
give that to the Crown Estate. The Crown Estate makes the profits and gives
18:56
it back to the Treasury. So King Charles is very high up on the
18:59
agenda. Are with wind how convenient? But also thanks to labor and thanks
19:04
to King Charles, Labour have lifted the nine year ban on onshore wind farms.
19:10
So you're going to expect to see wind farms pretty much everywhere. But
19:14
it doesn't stop there because, as we've already reported and Charles has reported,
19:19
we're looking at super giant solar farms and I know that we're going to be
19:25
reporting on those in the future. But it doesn't just stop with solar farms
19:30
and wind farms. We've got pylons coming and for those of you in the
19:36
East of England from Norwich through to Tillsbury, you're going to get one hundred
19:40
and twelve miles of pylons. Now they're thinking of designing them to look like
19:44
reindeer, so they're not so nasty to look at, so that'll be interesting
19:48
to see. And Rachel Reeves has said that apparently all of these pylons if
19:52
we want to get is the only way to get Putin's boot off our neck,
19:57
because we need to invest in home grown renewables. But my question is
20:02
is sustainable now unsustainable? And I believe it is. Debbie, thank you
20:08
very much for that. Ben. Let's come on to you and well,
20:12
we're going to talk about the Phibian Society. Indeed we are, and hello
20:18
everybody. A big question for me is if we just lived through a radical
20:22
Marxist takeover of the British state. And as Mike said, we're going to
20:26
talk about the Fabian Society, the British secret Society in think Tank proto think
20:32
tank. It was established in eighteen eighty four. I don't think the think
20:34
tank term had appeared by that point. But their express aim is to implement
20:40
a global Marxist state and they are incredibly well connected into the top levels of
20:45
the new British government. To start with, let's hear from George Bernard Shaw,
20:48
who was one of the earliest members of the Fabian Society. I object
20:55
to earn punishment whatsoever. I don't love to punish anybody, but there are
21:00
an extraordinary number of people whom I want to kill, and not in any
21:04
unkind or personal spilt. But it must be evident to all of you.
21:10
You must all know half a dozen people at least who are no use in
21:12
this word, who are more trouble than they are worth. And I think
21:18
it would be a good thing to make everybody come before a properly appointed board,
21:26
just as he might come before the Incompax commissioners, and say every five
21:30
years or every seven years. Just put him there and say, sir or
21:36
matter, now, will you be kind enough to justify your existence? If
21:41
you can't justify your existence, if you're not pulling your weight into social boat,
21:45
if you're not producing as much as you consume, or perhaps a little
21:49
more, then clearly we cannot use the big organization of our society for the
21:56
purpose of keeping you alive. BECAUSEU where life does not bems, it has
22:02
and it can't be very much beautiful. It's incredible, yeah, isn't it?
22:10
Just yeah? I mean that's the sentiment at the heart of this movement.
22:14
Ultimately, yes, So I thought we would just have a look at
22:15
a couple of other leaders of the founders of the Phibian Societies. And the
22:19
place to go to have a look at the full list is the National Portrait
22:23
Gallery, and they have quite a number of people there, as you can
22:26
see. But I just thought we taught look at H. G. Wells.
22:29
First of all, he was a founder of the Phibian Society, mostly
22:33
known as a science fiction writer. Of course, the method that must come
22:37
in, must in some cases be called in is death. The merciful obliteration
22:41
of weak and silly and pointless things is very much expressing the same point of
22:45
view that we've just heard on that video clip. And he went on to
22:48
say future humans will naturally regard the modest suicide of the incurably melancholy or diseased
22:55
or helpless persons as a high and courageous act of duty rather than a crime.
23:00
And just a reminder if you read The Open Conspiracy, which is well
23:03
it's supposedly not a science fiction novel anyway, he's talking about various things like
23:07
ending the nation's state, controlling human population. That Russia is a crucial target
23:12
the foreign corporation of the European system, so that's it's g Wells. Let's
23:18
look at somebody else here, Berton Russell, And well, he's talking about
23:21
propaganda mainly and social psychology in this particular quote, but there have been I
23:26
could have chosen a host of different quotes from him. I think the subjects
23:30
which would be most importance politically is mass psychology. Its importance has been enormously
23:33
increased by the growth of modern methods of population of propaganda. Sorry, it
23:38
may be hoped that in time anybody will be able to persuade anybody of anything
23:44
if he can catch the patient young and is provided by the state with money
23:47
and equipment. So Ben that really sort of sums up the minds that established
23:52
this organization in the first place. Absolutely, it's coercive control from top to
23:59
bottom, isn't it. Well, look, we'll have a little look at
24:02
some of the other pieces of the puzzle here so important as we'll come back
24:07
to that. The mascot of the Fabian Society was the tortoise that was widely
24:12
used until the nineteen sixties, and their motto was when I strike, I
24:18
strike hard, which is a tribute to the Roman senator Quintus Fabius Maximus of
24:23
Vorucosis who built his reputation in conflict by avoiding direct confrontation in a war with
24:32
Hannibal. So he would basically attack supply lines, avoid going after the main
24:36
body of troops. But then when he did strike, he would strike hard
24:41
and go very quickly and very forcefully towards the target. And I think that's
24:45
what we're seeing right now. If you look at the way that the Starman
24:48
government has really come out of the gates over the past two weeks and just
24:52
been im implementing, implementing this nebulous change agenda that we don't really understand.
24:57
I think that that's exactly what you looking at here. We also know that
25:02
they are wolves in sheep's clothing. I mean, this is literally their schigils,
25:07
is how they present themselves. They don't telegraph their intentions. This is
25:11
very much in the SAULA. Lynsky school of thought. You don't tell people
25:14
what you're actually up to. You make them think that you're benevolently kind,
25:17
but then you move quickly to implement your agenda once you've got into position of
25:21
power, and they are in a position of power. So we've just had
25:23
one hundred and forty one MPs from the Fabian Society elected into parliament, right,
25:29
they've been boasting about this on social media and that includes they're not limited
25:33
to Angela Rayner who's the Deputy Prime Minister. Rachel Reeves is the Chancellor of
25:37
Ett Cooper who's the Home Secretary, West Streeting who's the Secretary of Health and
25:41
Social Care. And I think if you remember the Blair segment from last week
25:45
when he was talking about the need to force people to change if you love
25:49
them, right, that's that very much that kind of mentality, right,
25:53
that worldview you have to justify your existence. We're going to force you to
25:56
change. That's right in the heart of the health system. Lisa and Andy
26:00
at DCMS, who's going to be censoring everybody. And then Ed importantly Ed
26:04
Milliband, who I'll come back to in a minute, who's running energy security
26:08
in net zero and I think is actually, on closer inspection, a total
26:12
lunatic, right if you really look at Ed Milliband, he's a very very
26:15
stranger guy. Who else in the Labor Party? So Gordon Brown's currently in
26:22
the process of rewriting the British Constitution. He's a Fabian. But also let's
26:26
not forget the arch Fabian. Tony Blair stood here in front of the Fabian
26:32
stained glass window saying prayed about Lee Hammer Stoutley, which actually are quite good
26:36
words to stand by, I think, but not in the context of what
26:38
these people are trying to do. Blair's got an extraordinarily long history with the
26:42
Fabian Society. This was a speech that he gave to an event at the
26:48
Old vic Theater in two thousand and three, so midway through his own second
26:52
term as Prime Minister, and he starts with a reference to the Clement Attley
27:00
government, which was the labor government of the Second World War, and he
27:03
basically says that today we see that great nineteen forty five government as coming closest
27:08
to building a new Jerusalem. Yet immediately afterwards it was routinely attacked on the
27:15
left, but not trying hard enough to form a socialist state as a bulwark
27:18
against capitalism. It's how they understand the state. It's like a counterpoint to
27:23
the markets. Yeah, and he basically says, and once more, now
27:29
midterm in our second term, talking about his own government, the same feeling
27:33
is in the air again. Have we done enough? Are we radical enough?
27:37
Right? So I think what we're seeing now with Blair running Starmer,
27:41
essentially he's pulling the strings behind the scenes. We've demonstrated that, I think
27:45
quite compellingly over the past several months in terms of what Blair has been up
27:51
to, what his institute has been up to. They're now driving a radical
27:53
agenda, radical neo Marxist agenda which ends up leading two places like this.
28:00
This is radical enough for you, Tony Blair, Right, This is the
28:03
S twenty one tor To chamber in pronomen Pen. This is Kahmaier Rouge who
28:07
acted under the same ideological motivations that you're putting forward. Right, What about
28:12
this one Palodomore. Three to six million people perished in Ukraine because of Stalin
28:19
and his communist industrial policies and ideologies, an attack on the industrial base,
28:25
the food supply, and ultimately on the population itself. This is not hyperbole,
28:30
right. I believe that there is the distinct potential for an attack like
28:36
that to be in the pipeline for us here in the UK. Why can
28:38
I say that, Because people who are very close to the current labor government
28:42
are being extraordinarily critical and aggressive towards the farmers for example. So this is
28:48
from Dale Vince, who is a big time labor dona and eco millionaire.
28:55
He's one of these people that Brian talks about that he's a rich guy,
29:00
but he wears T shirts and jeans and talks with a slightly sort of working
29:06
class accent and uses that as a way to disguise his methods and his intentions.
29:10
And he's very much like a lot of people going after animal agriculture.
29:12
They want to transform the food system. They're demanding government intervention in absolutely every
29:19
area of society. There's Belvince himself. We can also see this in the
29:23
Food Farming and Countryside Commission, which is the organization linked into Paul Polman,
29:29
who I spoke about about a month or so ago. This is about delivering
29:33
the SDGs and you can see there again they are calling for the government to
29:37
act on food. The government should have no role whatsoever to play in the
29:42
food system, and yet people close to the current serving government are saying that
29:48
this state needs to enter into the food to Puy, absolutely madness. And
29:52
it's not just food, it's also energy. Let's have a little listen to
29:56
Ed Milliban. We're on a mission. It's going to be a great adventure.
30:00
There are two parts for this mission twenty thirty clean power if you're like
30:04
the north staff of the department, and accelerating to net zero, because both
30:10
of them are sort of absolutely crucial and we've got responsibility for both of them.
30:12
One of the Department's missions is to be bold on climate, on energy
30:15
security, on jobs, on the cost of living crisis. You are my
30:18
team, you are our team, and we need to be one team.
30:22
I genuinely feel incredibly humbled to be working with you. Thanks so much.
30:30
Easy to lampoon Aed miller Band, but I actually think he's an extraordinarily dangerous
30:36
man, and he has his hands around the energy supply and the transformation of
30:41
the core infrastructure that runs the nation. And what's his background. So we
30:45
know that his father swore an oath at the graveside of Karl Marx to deliver
30:51
the means of production back into the hands of the working people. Right,
30:53
this is the lineage that we're talking about right at the top level of the
30:57
labor party. And also bring the tortoise back into things. I said that
31:02
the tortoise was the mascot of the Fabian society, and we've spoken a lot
31:07
about tortoise media I believe that this is a direct reference to Fabianism. I
31:12
believe that they are part of this communist takeover. It's run by this guy,
31:18
James Harding, who's the editor in chief, and as we've spoken about
31:21
earlier in the year, they work at Watersden House, which is owned by
31:26
Yad Hannahdev, which is the Rothschild Foundation. Yad Hannahdev was there at the
31:30
founding of Israel, built the Supreme Court in the Kinesse and actually, as
31:34
it turns out, Lord Balfour himself of Balfour Declaration fame, was a member
31:41
of the Fabian Society. This is what is sitting at the heart of this
31:45
new labor government. Thank you, Ben, thank you for that. No,
31:48
if you like what the UK colm does, you would like to support
31:52
us. The place to go to support dot Ukkolum dot org. A membership
31:55
is a favor a month and if you can possibly do that, it helps
31:57
us out massively. I want to say massive thank you to everybody that has
32:01
supported us in this way. You could help subvert the algorithm by sharing our
32:08
material and so that we can deal with the censorship that we face on a
32:12
daily business. UK coolun dot org and UK column extract so cool a to
32:15
UK are the places to go for that and if you'd like to pick up
32:19
something from the UK column shop, that would help massively as well. Debbie,
32:23
Briefly, your blog is not up yet, but it will be later
32:27
on today blockbuster or a blockbuster. I think it's going to be very interesting.
32:35
We'll see something later on in the news that will link to it.
32:37
But what is the Internet of medical things? Things cannot progress without it.
32:40
And also an MHR update and a few revelations that you might not be aware
32:46
of. Okay, thank you for that. And the interview at Branded with
32:52
Michael Nels is on the website now. If you didn't see that, it's
32:54
there for you to watch, please share that one as well. And Debbie
33:00
John doin. Yeah, John Bodwin, I have to tell you that this
33:04
is irrefutable evidence on excess deaths and vaccine injuries. We have never seen anything
33:09
like this before. This is bombshell stuff. If you haven't seen the interview,
33:15
please do go watch. And there is a part two coming up soon.
33:17
Thank you, Debbie. And finally, a reminder of the date for
33:21
your day, which is Saturday, the nineteenth of October twenty twenty four at
33:24
a venue to be announced in Bristol, and we will have more details of
33:30
this next week, so please keep that in mind. So where does that
33:35
take us, Debbie? You were talking about water earlier on today, but
33:40
over the last number of weeks you've been talking about desalination. So what's the
33:45
latest on this? Well, yes, water, all change and again sustainable
33:51
unsustainable you choose? Do you know what is coming out of your tap?
33:55
I have asked so many people that question, and nobody as yet can give
33:59
me a answer, apart from people saying fluoride, heavy metals, lithium question
34:06
mark, So what is planned? What is in plain sight? And what
34:09
is going on in our water industry? Because it is all change and if
34:13
you live near the coast you'll be particularly interested in this. But already we
34:17
know from the Financial Times that labor are planning a new regulator. Well,
34:22
off, what do what is? What? I say? They want to
34:25
combine off what the EA Environment Agency and the Drinking Water Inspector. I don't
34:31
see any inclusion of consumer counts of water, but hey, what do I
34:37
know? So we're getting a new regulator and we all know what we think
34:39
of regulators. But everybody is interested in desalination. You might not have heard
34:45
anyone else reporting about this, but as we'll come to see, it's a
34:49
bigger genda. Let's listen to what Elon Musk has got to say. Look,
34:54
I'm not just in complacency. We do when we're to a sustainable energy
34:59
economy as quickly as possible. But we're not in any danger of resource collapse.
35:05
But lots of people don't have enough food or water water. We will
35:08
run out of water out We're running out of sand. Now there's earth of
35:14
seventy percent water by surface area, but you can't drink that. Desalination is
35:19
absurdly cheap. Why don't we do it? Then we do? It?
35:22
Is done, you have a lot of free time. It has done cheap?
35:29
Is it? Elon? Well, we'll come to see. And I
35:30
would last like to say that cornwall where I live is not water pool.
35:35
We have so much water we don't know what to do with it. But
35:37
what is desalination? So here's a little diagram to show you what desalination is.
35:43
Basically, it's removing the salt from seawater to turn it into drinking water.
35:47
Or is it? Because it's a big industry. As we'll come to
35:51
see. Grand View Research have valued the global water desalination equipment market at staggering
35:59
fifteenzero point five billion dollars, and that was in twenty twenty two. But
36:02
who else is involved in this agenda? Well, I'm this is really the
36:06
tip of the iceberg. So let's go through them really quickly. So we've
36:09
got the WEF desalination, We've got the World Bank desalination, we've got the
36:15
United States Geological Survey desalination, We've got the World Health Organization desalination. We've
36:23
even got Chatham House desalination. So this is a massively big business. Now,
36:31
I found an article from Waterless called Good, Troublesome and the Future,
36:37
and it seems to be that what they're saying as you go deeper into the
36:42
article is that the pros they're looking at Israel as having the most advanced technology
36:46
and they have twenty percent more water than it needs. And you might remember
36:51
Vanessa's comments on Wednesday with regards to where Israel get their water or leave Vanessa
36:57
to comment more on that, but the cons are that it's very energy consuming.
37:00
You need electricity, petroleum or natural gas to power them. They're costly
37:05
to operate and construct. You need miles of power lines for remote areas,
37:09
and effluent brine is harmful for waterways, but they want solar and wind and
37:15
geothermal of course to power them. There's also even an International Desalient, Salination
37:23
and Reuse Association and they're called the IDRA. They were founded in nineteen seventy
37:30
three. They're recognized by the United Nations and they've got a conference coming up
37:36
or a congress coming up in Abu Dhabi in December. So again this is
37:39
a massive agenda. But what's happening in the UK. What do the UK
37:44
say about desalination? Well, the government are very keen in desalination and they
37:49
say that between twenty twenty five and twenty fifty we're going to need three point
37:52
four billion more additional liters a day, so they're going to be developing new
37:58
reservoirs and desalination. But then I went to look at the Financial Times,
38:02
who have just brought out an article on the wave of Innovation which aims to
38:07
make desalination sustainable. Now they say that already Southwest Water, which is my
38:14
water company, have a desalination plant in the aisles of Silly Thames Water also
38:19
have one, but because of the energy needed to generate, they don't use
38:24
it anymore. It's not operating. So then let's look at the national framework
38:30
from the Environment Agency, because they've got a lot to do with water preservation
38:37
and drought, and they say that the Southeast are pretty much desperate for water,
38:43
and because the West Country has plenty of water, why don't we just
38:46
move it from the Southwest to the southeast. I'll let you read that document
38:51
in full, but you'll see there that it involves moving, as does the
38:54
next slide where you can see a map of England and you can see the
38:59
bottom box is the West Country and we have only moderate pressure on our water
39:05
resources, so therefore it makes sense to potentially transfer to other areas, which
39:09
is very expensive. But I believe there are other reasons as well, darker
39:14
reasons, and I'm going to explore those now. Because Southwest Water say that
39:19
their reservoirs are nearly full, so this is really good news. However,
39:24
we have been pointed a drought director, and the drought director's name is David
39:30
Harris, and he's very pleased that the February was the wettest on record.
39:36
The BBC are reporting that Cornwall will provide desalination, will provide a third of
39:43
the county's water. But there is a lot of resistance. And I joined
39:47
the protest group one day on the beach and the protest group we were waiting
39:52
for fergle SHARKI but shame on him, he didn't turn up. We all
39:57
got blown to bits, but he didn't turn up. But they're very concerned,
40:00
obviously with the desalination effects in our area and sewage. So what does
40:06
Southwest Water say, why do we need desalination? Well, apparently most of
40:09
our water comes from rivers and reservoirs, and yeah, well our reservoirs have
40:15
plenty of water. But then they say they're empty. But where's the water
40:17
going tourists? Climate change is what they're saying. Well, I've got other
40:22
ideas as to where the water might go. So in my area we have
40:28
been told that we are going to be the first desalination plant. That's really
40:32
appropriate because obviously it pricked my interest and I wanted to know what effect this
40:37
would have on the local community. And I got an invite. I got
40:40
an invite to the public consultation and here's a copy of the letter and it
40:45
told me that I was going to see specialist project team to bring my questions.
40:51
And this is David Harris. He's an Australian and he is the Drought
40:54
Resilience Director, so I was really looking forward to seeing him. I am
41:00
going to say very quickly, and I'm going to read off my little list
41:04
here, because when I went to the meeting, I had to register to
41:08
go to the meeting. I wanted to see David Harris. But apparently David
41:13
Harris was on annual leave because he's been very busy managing the cryptos buridium incident
41:17
and he's very tired, so sadly he couldn't be at the consultation. There
41:22
wasn't really anybody in charge at the consultation. We are the second wettest county
41:29
in England, so I struggled to see why we're in drought and I think
41:32
it's probably all a bit of a lie. And I went to the meeting
41:37
but nobody from Southwest Water had their name badges on and when I asked them
41:40
their names, they refused to give me their name or their position. And
41:45
the questions that I wanted to ask, I was told I couldn't now just
41:50
a few quotes from the meeting. When I asked a name, I was
41:54
told no, I wasn't going to be given a name because he got unpleasant
41:58
emails sent to his email address afterwards. He wasn't happy to give me his
42:02
surname because of traffic. And when I asked him about British lithium, which
42:07
I'll come on to in a minute, he says he has nothing to do
42:09
Southwest Water. Have nothing to do with the British lithium, not part of
42:14
the remit, no knowledge about it, can't answer any questions. When I
42:17
asked if we were in a drought, I was told not today. And
42:21
when I spoke to the press officer and asked him for an interview for UK
42:24
column, I was told that I wasn't allowed to film and that if the
42:29
BBC had been there it would be different. So I wanted to know the
42:32
connection between Imeri's and Southwest Water because Imeris have land where the desalination plant is
42:42
going to be placed, and here we can see Imeris are very hot on
42:47
water treatment. But who are Imeri's. Let's look back in history at who
42:52
are Imeri's, Because believe it or not, I Marise started in eighteen eighty
42:55
by the Rothschilds. Would you believe isn't it funny how that name keeps popping
42:59
up up. They combined a metals and mining company and I don't know how
43:04
to pronounce this. I do apologize Penaroa, I think it's called and its
43:07
course now become Imeri's. So I'm living in par and I went down to
43:15
Imeri's to par docs and I did a very short little video just to show
43:19
you the close proximity of Imeri's and Southwest Water and where they want to build
43:23
the desalination plant. Let's have a quick look. And this is again w
43:29
Evans from UK column and I'm at Imeri's. Imeri's docs big just right for
43:38
a desalination plant, a ecobob's boss creating sustainable communities. And as we can
43:49
see, if I swerve around, you can see that there is Southwest Water's
43:54
pumping station right there, right next door to im Mari's. How convenience.
44:02
Oh and the sewage treatment work that's just underneath that bridge. I'm working with
44:14
you with the sewage treatment works. And there is an electricity substation right next
44:17
to Southwest Waters pumping station. So it's in very close proximity. So then
44:22
I was very interested to find that I Maris have partnered up with no other
44:25
than British Lithium. Have a look at this little bit of video. I
44:30
really see only advantages in this partnership. We will need the support of the
44:37
people, the authorities, local and regional. Imri's is very important to the
44:43
Listing Ministry of the UK. They have an unrivaled land position here. This
44:47
is a mess of undertaking. The evolves a wide range of risks of different
44:52
types, but we believe between us we know how to overcome those risks and
44:57
make this project a reality. But the great thing about is the world understands
45:01
the need for it and that it's a solution for pressing climate emergency. Governments
45:07
around the world are united in bringing about electrification, renewable power, electric vehicles
45:14
to reduce emissions, and we're lucky to have joined us today at a number
45:17
of senior civil servants from the UK government to hear the policies that they've put
45:23
in place. They have brought about a critical mineral strategy and other funding initiatives.
45:30
To thank Emergency's government through these organs for the support they gave when we
45:35
found this deposit. There's no known means of extracting in an environmentally sustainable way.
45:42
We had to develop such a thing. And so that was just a
45:45
little bit. And if you want to go and have a little look at
45:47
more and British Lithium CEO speaking, then please do. It's on YouTube.
45:52
So lithium needs a lot of water. Here's just a screenshot just to tie
45:58
up that little bit there of this huge partnership between British lithium. But I've
46:02
also been looking at academic papers because lithium needs a lot of water, a
46:07
lot of water. And here we go lithium recovery from brine seawater desalination concentrates.
46:14
So who is this desalination plant for and where is our water going to?
46:17
Our Southwest Water? Imeris British Lithium and someone else? What will come
46:22
to in a minute Violia Are they all stealing our water? Because Southwest Water
46:29
have announced that they're joining forces with Violia and Violia are a huge French company
46:36
and let's see what Violia are into. And interesting to see that Violia also
46:40
support the lithium industry. So this is all tying up very nicely, isn't
46:44
it, Because we have plenty of water down here, but they don't seem
46:47
to think that we do. And what I want to know is how much
46:51
water is going from our resources to British lithium and also the contamination. You
46:57
know, what kind of leakage are we going to get because lithium is actually
47:00
very dangerous, and it is they're talking about adding it to water to prevent
47:07
suicide. And many people may know that if you have bipolar manic depression,
47:10
many people are medicated by lithium and it's very dangerous. So a drought.
47:16
We're in a drought. And ironically, one hour after being pretty much kicked
47:21
out of the meeting, I flooded. And those are my feet just to
47:24
show you the depth of the water. That's my road. And I've got
47:29
a very short video just to illustrate what we go through and I'll talk you
47:32
through it. So this is a flood of my road. This took three
47:37
minutes of heavy rain, monsoon rain. The reason I am standing in the
47:40
middle of the road is I am trying to stop the traffic from going through
47:45
because every time the traffic goes through, they create a huge bow wave that's
47:51
my hand. You'll see me waving no, don't please come through, because
47:54
every time a car comes through, it creates a massive bow wave that floods
48:00
our homes even more than they're already flooded. There are also open manholes underneath
48:05
that water that is dangerous for cars. This is sewage water. I'm trying
48:09
to protect our homes. I'd like to say to all motorists that abused me,
48:13
shouted at me, threatened me, stuck their fingers at me, and
48:16
tried to run me over, I'm trying to protect you, but I'm also
48:21
trying to protect our homes. So are we in a drought? Is desalination
48:25
a scam? Is it for real? You decide? But there'll be plenty
48:30
more on desalination in the future. Debbie, thank you very much for that.
48:35
Now. The other news that was sort of breaking as we were preparing
48:39
for the news this morning was this massive IT addage globally. So who's been
48:45
responsible for that? Well, it's this organization CrowdStrike, who are apparently one
48:51
of these cybersecurity firms similar to the ones we were talking about the other day.
48:54
There's so much sponsored by unit early two hundred from Israel, Now this
48:59
one not sponsored by eighty two hundred from Israel, but they are funded by
49:04
a former FBI agent, so the connection back to the intelligence agencies again.
49:09
So CrowdStrike a cybersecurity firm that are providing services to many third party companies,
49:16
and apparently what they've done is they've rolled out an update and that update has
49:22
broken windows machines just about everywhere, and well including in the health service.
49:29
I know, Debbie, well, we can talk about this later and extra,
49:31
but the majority of GP practices affected by this. So I slightly edited
49:37
the question slide from the Unit eighty two hundred presentation just to ask a single
49:44
question this time, what is the true nature of the symbiotic relationship between cyber
49:49
warfare and cyber defense? Because, as I say, although this company is
49:54
not is really backed, it is related to the FBI. And my question
50:00
really is here was this a rehearsal for a future Internet shutdown? And of
50:04
course I've got no evidence for that at all, But the Internet and all
50:07
the services which sit on it are being increasingly centralized. The off switch is
50:13
apparently easy to press, and my question is would it not be more sensible
50:17
if we want to have resilience to decentralize and move back to decentralized architecture.
50:23
People may have an opinion on this, but just to understand what's happened here.
50:29
You know, what we're talking about is something has been placed in the
50:35
critical path for critical infrastructure and then was set to automatically update. And when
50:40
they rolled out an automatic update across the world, that has shut down Windows
50:45
computers right across the world. It's affected Microsoft as Your Cloud platform and of
50:51
course many many companies using the as Your Cloud platform to run their systems.
50:57
But the other thing to note about CrowdStrike is that they have been the people
51:01
behind many of the accusations against Russia and China with respect to cyber attacks and
51:07
so on. But unfortunately, going back a number of years now, they
51:14
were discovered to have misread the data, shall we say, with respect to
51:19
this particular Russian hacking charge that they were making at the time, So not
51:23
the best reputation. And now we have the situation where they are effectively causing
51:30
the shutdown of systems which are resulting in travel being canceled, GP surgeries not
51:38
able to function, and a whole host of other banks and a whole host
51:44
of other infrastructure not able to function. I think we need to be questioning
51:46
the types of people that are running our critical infrastructure and the architecture of that
51:52
infrastructure. Okay, let's move on and back to you, Ben, sorry
52:00
and sort of find the right button there. Sure thing. So we're going
52:04
to have a little look at what's going on in the NHS and some interesting
52:10
individuals who've come across my path over the past couple of weeks that I wanted
52:14
to just flag up. So the first one is this fella, Professor Mark
52:19
Britnell, and he is quite a serious person when it comes to UK healthcare.
52:24
He spent twenty years in the NHS and the start of his career rising
52:29
to Director General of the Department of Health and was also a member of the
52:34
NHS Management Board up until two thousand and seven two thousand and nine, so
52:39
that was been under both Tory and Labor governments that he was working. He
52:45
then spent thirteen years and three months at Hang in a minute there, it
52:52
is fantastic thirteen years and three months of KPMG where he worked in eighty one
52:59
country. He's on four hundred and forty separate projects with teams delivering strategy policy
53:06
operations for public private sector healthcare, and he actually grew that to the point
53:13
where healthcare became twenty two percent of total global revenues with fifty five thousand staff
53:21
working across one hundred and forty five countries for KPMG. A really, really
53:25
serious global healthcare guy. He's also now a member of the board of Trustees
53:31
at the Kings Fund, which is one of the primary advisors and thinks tanks
53:35
inside the NHS or link to the NHS. And he is also the professor
53:39
at the Global Business School for Health at ucl OH. Makes me shudder when
53:45
I hear those words together, business and health in the current context, really
53:50
bad news. Now. I came across this guy because someone shared or someone
53:54
commented on that I'm connected to this post. This is one of the things
53:59
I about LinkedIn is these sort of interconnections that you can find. And he
54:04
put this post up saying that it was great to catch up with his good
54:07
friend of thirty years, Sir Julian Hartley. He had the pleasure of establishing
54:13
NHS Providers twenty years ago, which was originally called the NHS Foundation Trust Network,
54:19
of which Julian is now the CEO. We talked about a wide variety
54:22
of issues, including the productivity puzzle in healthcare. Now accounting for forty three
54:27
percent of all governments spend, up from twenty six percent in nineteen ninety nine.
54:31
Health must help power economic growth, which in turn will produce more tax
54:37
receipts for further investment, a virtuous circle. Indeed, this is the argument
54:40
that we're hearing. We heard it from West streeting last week at the Blair
54:44
Foundation, and we're starting to see this crop up absolutely everywhere else. They're
54:47
going to start asking for more and more money to be put into the health
54:52
service on the basis that they've created some models that tell us that if you
54:57
put in a pound, you get ten pounds back. Right, doesn't work
55:00
like that at all. The ideal budget for the health system would be zero.
55:05
Yeah, not putting more and more money in, particularly not given what
55:08
we've seen them do over the past four years. And we already know that
55:13
they have one hundred and ninety five billion. This is him crowing about scale
55:16
of this market. We can get this back behind screen quickly. I We're
55:20
going to look at that final paragraph. Yeah, So harnessing the one hundred
55:23
and ninety five billion spend across the NHS. Unprecedented amount of money. You're
55:29
talking about hundreds about three hundred and fifty four hundred pounds per month per taxpayer.
55:35
Right, this is the kind of budget that we're talking about. One
55:37
point five million people employed, and it's going to be mission critical for economic
55:42
growth across the UK. And these two people, with their long and storied
55:46
and illustrious careers in public and private healthcare are getting together to talk about the
55:52
future of the NHS. And I would love to have been a fly on
55:55
the wall in that conversation. So too with Rich Colbridge, Director General at
56:00
the Department of the Working Pensions, responsible for digitization of the DWP, probably
56:06
working with Tony Blair. We talked about the DWP and Blair program last week,
56:10
who I have actually met a couple of times and he seems to have
56:14
unfriended me on LinkedIn. I can't imagine why that might be anyway. Julian
56:19
Hartley, So we've talked about the professor at UCL, the former KPMG guide.
56:22
Let's have a little quick look at Julian Hartley because to me, we
56:25
talk about public private partnership. This is where it really happens. Yeah,
56:29
you're talking about two individuals, one in the NHS, one in the private
56:32
sector, longtime friends, longtime collaborators, talking about how they're going to stitch
56:37
up the future of a two hundred billion pound captive marketplace, which is our
56:42
health service. Right, this is how they talk about it. So what's
56:45
Julian Hartley up to? So he is the chief executive or actually I actually
56:50
say sir Julian Hartley as well, by the way, right, this is
56:52
a guy at the top level of the establishment. He's the chief executive of
56:55
NHS providers. It describes himself as a membership organization for the NHS hospital,
57:00
mental health, community and ambulance services. I mentioned this organization to someone contact
57:06
of Mind Superintelligence, and he basically said that it was part of the dismantling
57:10
from the inside process. When the NHS Foundation Trust Network was introduced back in
57:15
two thousand and four, that was part of the dismantling of the NHS from
57:21
the inside. It was part of the public Private Initiative agenda turning individual hospitals
57:25
into small businesses so that they could raise capital, sell off assets, do
57:30
all those things that states should not be doing with public assets. Right,
57:35
and this these two gentlemen sit right in the heart of it, and apparently
57:39
they're in London to celebrate between the King's speech and the agenda for the future
57:45
of the health system is also this guy Bruh, neo Marxist. Is this
57:52
video of him talking about White ally ship on which no one in the health
57:58
system should be talking about this. I've talked about healthcare, talk about patients.
58:01
Just leave this neo Marxist doctune behind, please, for the sake of
58:06
absolutely everybody, we know that these public private marketplaces don't work. They deliver
58:10
absolutely no value at all, apart from to the people who were scamming them.
58:15
The actual the Blair PPI scheme, the one that they're referencing, we
58:19
know now in hindsight cost three hundred billion pounds or thereabouts for infrastructure projects with
58:24
the value of about fifty five billion. Yeah, so we paid six times
58:29
over the odds because of public private partnerships. And that's what they placed right
58:35
at the heart of the future plans for the health system. All of this
58:38
is a continuation of the build back Better life sciences vision that was set out
58:44
by Boris Johnson. It's exactly the same agenda. Nothing about it has changed
58:47
at all. And what's that going to deliver for? It's going to deliver
58:51
for big barmceuital companies. This. I've shown this photo a few times,
58:55
Yeah, and I've spoken about Starmer and Georgia Gould in the context. The
59:00
fellow on the right there is Tom Keith Roach. He runs Astrasenica in the
59:04
UK, and he's been very excited over the past couple of weeks because he
59:08
can see that West Streeting and the Department for Health are on a mission to
59:13
bring closer unity between the way Life Sciences and the NHS collaborate. Their ambition
59:19
at Astrasenica is to bring twenty medicines to market by twenty twenty, by twenty
59:24
thirty. In this country. Their COVID vaccine was removed from the market because
59:30
it killed nearly one thousand people, and yet they're hanging around with Keir Starmer
59:34
and talking about putting twenty more novel medicines into the market by twenty thirty.
59:38
And actually when they talk about economic performance in the health service, this is
59:43
a lot of what it's about. It's shareholder returns for UKPLC aka the big
59:49
pharmaceutical companies, and they do that by introducing ridiculous as we've seen with covid
59:54
pandemics. But also I just received this job specification from the Welcome Trust talking
59:59
of about becoming a strategic Engagement Advisor at the International Pandemic Preparedness Secretariat. Very
1:00:06
high faluting name. And basically what's that about. It's about the one hundred
1:00:09
days mission. It's been agreed by the G seven, which says that in
1:00:14
the first days of a pandemic threat being realized, the following interventions should be
1:00:19
in place. Accurate and approved, rapid point of care diagnostic kits. Yes,
1:00:23
so big market in testing, an initial regiment of therapeutics, so big
1:00:29
market in therapeutics, and vaccines ready to be produced at scale for global deployment
1:00:37
within one hundred days in the context of this public private marketplace, the labor
1:00:43
party, and he's perfectly happy to stand behind and welcome as we know run
1:00:47
until very recently, I think it was last year by this fellow Jeremy Farrer,
1:00:52
author of Spike that his book about the pandemic. You can see what
1:00:55
he thinks about it, and actually I think he might. You were saying
1:00:58
earlier he left say because it wasn't aggressive enough in pushing the lockdowns, and
1:01:02
Farah is now at the World Health Organization trying to drum up the next pandemic.
1:01:07
Let's have a little listen. The current outbreak for want of a better
1:01:14
word, in America amongst cows is really concerning as well, and also talks
1:01:19
to this issue of transmission. We have to understand in those cow settings.
1:01:24
It sheds how H five M one is transmitting because it may be learning,
1:01:30
not learning, evolving into transmitting in different ways. Do the milking structures of
1:01:36
cows create aerosols? Is it the environment which they're living in? Is it
1:01:43
the transport system that is spreading this around the country. So this is a
1:01:46
huge concern and I think we have to watch more than watch. We have
1:01:52
to make sure that if H five N one did come across to humans with
1:01:55
human human transmission, that we were in a position to immediately respond with access
1:02:01
equitably to vaccine's therapeutics and diagnostics. The health system is in trouble, yes,
1:02:12
and we will talk a bit more about that an extra as well.
1:02:15
And Debbie, just to finish off, you have a little bit of video
1:02:16
for us I do and this was seven years ago. This is Klaus Schwab.
1:02:23
He's talking to Sergey Brinn, who is the co creator of Google,
1:02:28
and just want to remind people of what he said would happen in ten years.
1:02:31
Bearing in mind that this was seven years ago and for everybody read my
1:02:36
blog, it's very relevant. Have a look at this video, so big
1:02:40
date Ditrial tools at the service of medical and biological progress and advancing very fast.
1:02:51
But can you imagine that in ten years when we are sitting here we
1:02:55
have an implanted in our brains and I can immediately feel, because you all
1:03:02
will have implans I can and we measure you your brain waves, and I
1:03:08
can immediately tell you how some people react or I can feel. Yes,
1:03:15
well that's a very prescient perhaps, but we'll talk about that an extra as
1:03:20
well. So Debbie, thank you very much for that. Thank you to
1:03:22
everybody that's joined us today. Thanks to Ben and Debbie for contributions. We
1:03:27
will see in a few minutes if your UK call a member for extra.
1:03:30
Otherwise, hope you have a great weekend and we'll see you Monday at one
1:03:34
pm as usual