Latest / Reformed Thinking / Monergism and the Masterpiece: Sovereign Grace from Decree to Doxology

Transcript

Monergism and the Masterpiece: Sovereign Grace from Decree to Doxology · Reformed Thinking

0:00
Welcome to Reformed thinking. I am.
0:02
I'm absolutely thrilled that you have decided to join us today.
0:05
For this session, we are embarking on a really rigorous,
0:08
massive examination of the doctrine of sovereign grace.
0:11
We are going to trace his progression all the way from
0:13
God's eternal decrees in eternity past right up to our
0:16
daily doxology in the present. So our mission for this deep
0:19
dive into our curated sources is to distill the vast theological
0:23
literature analyzing how God saves dead sinners.
0:27
And you know, we want to clarify what that reality means for your
0:29
intellect, your affections, and your daily actions.
0:32
We will be looking at everything from the original grief syntax
0:35
used by the Apostle Paul, to the historic battles fought by the
0:38
Reformers, all the way to the practical applications for your
0:40
local church. Our goal is to uncover the sheer
0:43
magnitude of divine sovereignty and salvation.
0:46
I mean, we are talking about a concept that completely shatters
0:48
the default settings of the human mind.
0:50
Every single source we have gathered points to a radical,
0:52
God centered view of redemption that leaves zero room for human
0:55
boasting. But to start us off, we have to
0:59
recognize the cultural air we breathe.
1:00
There is a phrase that almost everyone has heard and frankly,
1:04
many people assume is actually a verse in the Bible.
1:07
It's the phrase God helps those who help themselves.
1:10
It sounds right to our ears because, well, we are wired to
1:13
think in terms of merit and effort.
1:16
But the literature we are reviewing today presents a
1:18
wholly different, vastly more comforting picture.
1:20
Yeah, that starting point is highly necessary to establish.
1:23
In almost every culture across the globe, there is a universal
1:26
human assumption that divine assistance is conditional.
1:30
It's assumed to be based on human effort.
1:32
People naturally think that if they are decent, if they try
1:35
hard, if they clean up their act, and if they are sincere,
1:38
the divine will step in and make up the difference.
1:40
It is the idea that salvation is essentially a joint venture.
1:44
However, when we look at the biblical local text, we find a
1:47
reality that is intensely offensive to human pride.
1:50
Romans chapter 4 verse 5 explicitly states that God
1:53
justifies the ungodly. And then Romans chapter 5 verse
1:56
6 as the Christ died for the helpless, so God does not assist
2:00
the capable. He rescues those who are
2:02
entirely without strength. The sources we are analyzing
2:04
today highlight this contrast brilliantly.
2:06
We really have to define our terms carefully here.
2:09
Justice is getting what you deserve.
2:10
Mercy is not getting the punishment you deserve.
2:13
But grace is something entirely different.
2:15
Grace is God's satisfying his own justice at the cross and
2:17
then freely giving the benefits of that finished work to those
2:20
who have absolutely no claim on Him.
2:22
It is a unilateral rescue operation.
2:25
It is not. It's not God giving you a boost
2:27
over the wall. It is God finding you crushed
2:29
beneath the wall and pulling you out.
2:31
Right. And I want to ask you, the
2:33
listener, a direct question right off the bat.
2:36
Have you ever considered that any perceived spiritual goodness
2:39
in yourself is a product of divine resuscitation rather than
2:42
your own moral effort? That question sits at the
2:45
absolute center of everything we are discussing today.
2:48
To understand the anatomy of this unmerited favor and the
2:51
actual state of the human condition, the articles and
2:55
commentaries direct us straight to the Apostle Paul's letter to
2:57
the Ephesians. Specifically, we are looking at
3:00
chapter 2, verses one through 10.
3:02
This text acts as the core baseline for the entire
3:05
discussion. Paul begins with a stark,
3:07
uncompromising diagnosis of the natural human condition.
3:10
He says, and you were dead in the trespasses and sins in which
3:13
you once walked. He does not say you were
3:15
stumbling. He doesn't say you were
3:17
spiritually ill or that you were treading water but getting tired
3:19
or that you needed, you know, a bit of a push in the right
3:22
direction. He uses a specific term for
3:24
death. And I noticed the sources kept
3:26
lingering on this one specific Greek word.
3:28
In English, being dead in sin sometimes just sounds like a
3:31
metaphor for being a bad person. Is there a reason the author
3:34
spent so much time dissecting the original language there?
3:37
There absolutely is. The linguistic precision here is
3:40
critical because it dictates the entire theological landscape.
3:44
The Greek word Paul uses for dead is necros.
3:47
When we analyze necros in this context, it implies a total,
3:50
absolute inability to respond to spiritual stimuli.
3:53
A corpse cannot hear, a corpse cannot feel, and a corpse
3:56
certainly cannot make a decision to improve its condition.
3:59
The literature explicitly refutes the Armenian notion of a
4:02
human will that is just sick or injured but still functioning
4:05
enough to choose God. Treating the human condition as
4:08
a state of moral neutrality or viewing sin as a minor injury
4:12
departs radically from the biblical picture provided in our
4:14
sources. If the will is necrose, it is
4:17
enslaved to sin and hostile to God by nature.
4:20
The analogy often used in pastoral theology is CPR.
4:23
If you administer CPR to someone who has just stopped breathing
4:26
well, medical assistance might revive them.
4:29
Their systems are failing, but they are not entirely gone.
4:31
But you cannot perform CPR on a corpse that has been in the
4:34
grave for days. Medical assistance cannot help
4:37
in that scenario. You cannot coach a corpse into
4:39
breathing. A literal supernatural
4:41
resurrection is required. God must sovereignly create life
4:45
where there is none, which means the initial spark of salvation
4:47
cannot come from the human Ville.
4:49
That CPR analogy makes the concept so visceral.
4:52
You simply cannot yell instructions at a corpse and
4:55
expected to sit up and follow them.
4:57
It requires outside intervention of the highest order.
5:00
And that brings us to the grammar of salvation, which is
5:03
honestly one of the most fascinating aspects of our
5:05
source material today. Want to look at the syntax of
5:07
Ephesians 2, verses 8-9? The text reads, For by grace you
5:12
have been saved through faith, and this is not your own doing.
5:16
It is the gift of God, not a result of works.
5:18
So that no one may boast when I first read that it sounds fairly
5:21
straightforward in English, but the commentaries we are
5:24
reviewing dive intensely into the mechanics of the original
5:27
language. Can you break down why the
5:29
phrase you have been saved is so grammatically significant?
5:32
How did the mechanics of the language itself preach the
5:34
gospel? Sure, when we conduct a deep
5:36
exegesis of that specific phrase, you have been saved.
5:40
We are looking at a paraphrastic perfect passive construction in
5:43
the original Greek. Let me break down what that
5:45
signifies, because it is brilliant.
5:47
First, the perfect tense indicates a completed action in
5:51
the past that has ongoing present results.
5:55
Think of it like paying off a mortgage.
5:56
The final payment is a completed action in the past, but the
5:59
ongoing result is that you own the house today, completely free
6:02
and clear. The Greek here implies God paid
6:04
the mortgage and you are currently living in the house.
6:07
Second, the passive voice indicates that the subject, the
6:10
believer, is receiving the action, not performing it.
6:13
The action is initiated completely by an outside agent,
6:15
which is God. You did not save yourself.
6:18
Salvation was enacted upon you. You were the recipient of the
6:20
rescue. When you combine the perfect
6:22
tense with the passive voice, it eliminates any possibility of
6:26
human contribution to the act of being saved.
6:28
It is a sovereign imposition of life onto a dead Sinner.
6:31
So the grammar itself is actively fighting against our
6:34
tendency to take credit. But the passage continues and
6:37
says, and this is not your own doing, it is the gift of God.
6:42
Now I've heard debates about what the word this refers to.
6:45
Some people argue that salvation is the gift, but the faith we
6:48
used to believe is our own contribution.
6:50
They say we supply the faith and God supplies the grace.
6:54
But the sources we reviewed push back heavily on that idea based
6:57
on another grammatical rule. Could you explain what is
7:00
happening with the pronouns in that verse?
7:02
Yes, the debate you mentioned is very common, but the Greek text
7:05
provides A definitive answer. When we look at the phrase and
7:08
that not of yourselves it is the gift of God, we encounter A
7:12
crucial grammatical rule regarding pronouns, the word
7:15
that translates the neuter demonstrative pronoun duto.
7:19
If Paul intended to say that only your faith was the gift, he
7:23
would have used a feminine pronoun to match the feminine
7:25
noun for faith, which is pistas. If he wanted to say only grace
7:29
was the gift, he would have used a feminine pronoun to match the
7:32
feminine noun for grace, which is charis.
7:34
Instead, by using the neuter pronoun tuto, he points back to
7:38
the entire preceding concept of salvation by grace through
7:41
faith. The linguistic structure
7:43
confirms that the whole package, the grace, the salvation, and
7:46
even the faith required to receive it, is a sovereignly
7:48
bestowed gift. This destroys any room for human
7:51
boasting, as even the mechanism of belief is supplied by God.
7:55
You cannot boast about the faith you exercise because that faith
7:57
was handed to you by the Holy Spirit.
7:59
Think about what that means for you, the listener.
8:02
It means the faith you exercise to believe the gospel was given
8:05
to you by the very God who demands it.
8:07
That is a staggering reality. It completely shifts the focus
8:10
from our performance to God's provision.
8:13
So if God is initiating all of this throughout history, how do
8:17
we see this concept played out over time?
8:19
Our sources take us on a wide lens view, tracing this
8:22
unmerited favor through redemptive history.
8:25
When we do word studies on the biblical languages, we see the
8:28
sheer weight of what we are dealing with in the New
8:30
Testament. The Greek word is karis, but to
8:33
truly grasp its magnitude we have to look at how it was used
8:36
in the ancient world compared to how Paul hijacked the word to
8:38
describe divine salvation. How would a 1st century reader
8:41
of understood Karis before Paul got hold of it?
8:44
In the Greco Roman world, the extra biblical usage of karis
8:47
operated within a strict patron client social hierarchy.
8:51
The philosopher Seneca wrote extensively about this.
8:54
It referred to a reciprocal favor.
8:57
A wealthy patron would bestow a favor on a client.
9:00
That might be financial backing, political protection, or plot of
9:03
land. But that favor came with heavy
9:06
strings attached. It created a binding social
9:09
obligation. The client was now expected to
9:11
show gratitude, loyalty, and public support for the patron.
9:15
They had to vote for them, praise them in the public
9:17
square, and basically act as their dependent.
9:20
It was a highly transactional relationship.
9:22
The Apostle Paul takes this cultural concept and completely
9:25
offends it. His usage of charis denotes a
9:28
radical, unilateral favor bestowed upon individuals who
9:31
deserve only wrath and judgement.
9:33
There is no reciprocal social contract where the singer pays
9:35
God back. You cannot pay God back for the
9:37
blood of Christ. To find the true roots of Paul's
9:40
understanding, we actually have to look backward to the Old
9:42
Testament, specifically to the Hebrew word cheesed.
9:45
I love how the entire Bible connects on this theme.
9:48
Cheesed is one of those massive theological words that shows up
9:50
everywhere in the Old Testament. The authors connect Paul's
9:53
charis directly to this Hebrew concept.
9:55
They point us to Exodus chapter 34, verse 6 where God declares
9:58
his own name to Moses. Can you set the scene for that
10:00
passage? Because the context of what is
10:03
happening with the Israelites right at that moment makes the
10:05
declaration of cheese so incredibly radical.
10:08
The context of Exodus 34 is vital.
10:10
Moses has just come down from Mount Sinai with the tablets of
10:13
the Law, only to find the Israelites engaged in blatant,
10:16
horrific idolatry with the golden calf.
10:19
They have broken the first two commandments literally within
10:21
days of hearing them spoken from the mountain.
10:23
God's wrath is kindled and Moses intercedes.
10:27
God tells Moses to cut 2 new tablets of stone and bring them
10:30
up the mountain. When God descends in the cloud,
10:32
he does not declare his wrath or his vengeance as his primary
10:35
defining characteristics. Instead, he proclaims his name,
10:39
the lore, the Lord, a God merciful and gracious, slow to
10:43
anger, and abounding in steadfast love and faithfulness.
10:47
That phrase, steadfast love is the translation of cheesed.
10:50
It translates to a loyal covenant keeping kindness.
10:53
It is a kindness grounded entirely in God's own decree
10:56
rather than the merit of the recipient.
10:58
The Israelites at the base of the mountain merited absolute
11:00
destruction, yet God responds with cheese.
11:03
He reveals himself as a God who binds himself to a rebellious
11:05
people by his own sovereign choice.
11:08
This is the root system of Paul's Karis.
11:09
That proves this is not some New Testament novelty that Paul
11:12
invented. Grace is the connective tissue
11:15
of the entire biblical narrative from Genesis to Revelation.
11:19
It is the exact same story of God rescuing guilty people by
11:23
his own initiative. You see it right at the
11:25
beginning with Noah. Noah did not earn his survival.
11:28
The world was utterly corrupt and the text specifically says
11:31
Noah found favor in the eyes of the Lord.
11:33
It does not say Noah achieved favor.
11:35
He found it. You see with Abraham who was
11:38
living in UR of the Chaldeans worshipping Pagan moon gods, he
11:41
didn't seek God out. God invaded his life and called
11:43
him completely by divine initiative.
11:45
But what about the Law of Moses? People often pit the Old
11:48
Testament law against New Testament grace.
11:50
How do our sources resolve the relationship between the giving
11:53
of the law and the concept of unmerited favor?
11:56
That chronological sequence regarding the law is a massive
11:59
point of analysis in the text. The law at Sinai was given to
12:02
the Israelites after they had already been redeemed from
12:04
slavery in Egypt. Let's look at the timeline.
12:07
God did not stand at the edge of the Red Sea and hand Moses the
12:10
10 commandments saying if the people obeyed these rules
12:13
perfectly then I will part the waters for you.
12:16
No, he saved them first through miraculous unilateral act of
12:19
deliverance. They walked through the sea on
12:21
dry ground while they were still a complaining stiff necked
12:24
people. The law was given afterward to a
12:27
people who were already redeemed.
12:29
This sequence demonstrates that obedience is meant to be a
12:31
grateful response to divine favor, never a condition you
12:34
meet to earn it. The covenant at Sinai does not
12:37
nullify the prior covenant of promise made to Abraham, a point
12:40
Paul argues fiercely in Galatians 3.
12:43
The progress of redemptive history shows 1 continuous
12:45
unfolding of God's unmerited favor.
12:48
However, as we synthesize these sources, we must also
12:51
acknowledge the distinct ways this favor is administered
12:53
across different epochs, which brings us to the dispensational
12:56
distinctions highlighted in the literature.
12:58
Yes, the commentaries we are reviewing operate from a very
13:01
specific distance sectional framework that we need to
13:03
clarify for the listener. While the basis of salvation,
13:08
faith in God's provision, remains constant throughout all
13:10
of human history, the administration of God's
13:13
household looks different depending on the era.
13:15
The literature heavily focuses on the distinction between the
13:18
administration of divine favorites, national Israel, and
13:21
its administration to the New Testament church.
13:24
Could you walk us through those distinctions?
13:25
Why is it so necessary to keep Israel and the Church distinct
13:28
in our theology? To lay out the dispensational
13:31
view clearly, we observed that the administration of God's
13:34
favor to national Israel was frequently tied to temporal
13:37
earthly blessings. God made specific unconditional
13:41
covenants with Abraham and David regarding physical land in the
13:44
Middle East, a physical throne, and the preservation of a
13:47
physical lineage that would eventually produce the Messiah.
13:50
God's dealings with the nation of Israel involved a theocracy,
13:54
physical borders, dietary laws, and a physical temple system.
13:58
In contrast, the New Testament church is a unique
14:01
administration. It's often referred to by Paul
14:04
as a mystery that was hidden in past ages but revealed after the
14:07
resurrection of Christ. The church is characterized by
14:10
the permanent, indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit in
14:13
every single believer. Furthermore, it unites both Jew
14:16
and Gentile into what the apostle Paul calls one new man.
14:20
The church is not a physical nation with borders.
14:22
It is a spiritual body drawn from every tribe, tongue, and
14:25
nation. Our sources explicitly reject
14:28
replacement theology, which is the idea that the church has
14:31
permanently replaced Israel and inherited all its promises in a
14:34
purely spiritualized way. They also reject critical
14:37
evangelical scholarship that attempts to blur the lines of
14:40
literal fulfillment regarding the promises made to Abraham's
14:43
physical seed. The dispensational perspective
14:46
maintains that God still has a future literal plan for national
14:50
Israel that will fulfill those original promises.
14:52
And viewing history through that dispensational framework
14:55
naturally leads us into an eschatological frame.
14:58
It points to the end goal of all this redemptive history.
15:01
The sources we are utilizing present a very specific view of
15:04
the end times, a pre tribulational and premillennial
15:08
perspective. For those who might not be
15:10
familiar with those terms, this means the belief is that Christ
15:13
will return to rescue His church in the clouds prior to a period
15:16
of unprecedented global tribulation.
15:19
That period is then followed by a literal 1000 year reign of
15:22
Christ on earth from Jerusalem. What stands out to you, the
15:25
listener, is how this theological stance is supposed
15:27
to impact your life right now. It creates a holy urgency.
15:31
If the rescue from wrath is imminent, it means we should not
15:34
place our hope in fixing a sinking world through political
15:37
pragmatism or utopian social projects.
15:40
The focus shifts entirely to proclaiming the Gospel while
15:42
there is still time. How does this eschatological
15:44
urgency tie back to the systematic theology of sovereign
15:47
grace? The eschatological urgency is
15:49
the logical conclusion of understanding the depths of the
15:52
human condition and the brevity of time.
15:55
We cannot save the world through human systems because the world
15:57
is totally depraved, just as the individual is totally depraved.
16:01
When we look at systematic categories, we have to ask where
16:04
all of this fits within the broader structure of theology.
16:08
For those operating from a Reformed perspective adhering to
16:11
the Westminster Confession, we look specifically at chapter 3,
16:14
which deals with God's eternal decrees.
16:17
Grace is never a divine reaction to human failure.
16:21
God did not watch humanity fall in the Garden of Eden, wring his
16:24
hands, and then scramble to devise a backup plan to save
16:27
whoever he could. Rather, salvation is the
16:30
outworking of God's eternal sovereign decree of election
16:33
made before the foundation of the world.
16:35
He ordained the ends, and He ordained the means.
16:38
This decree is the solid rock upon which the entire structure
16:41
of salvation is built, ensuring that the application of
16:44
redemption to a sinner's heart is a certain as the mind of God
16:47
itself. So if God is initiating all of
16:49
this throughout history based on an eternal decree, how did the
16:53
reformers actually map out that process?
16:55
Because it sounds like there has to be a specific order to how
16:58
this rescue happens in time. The sources constantly refer to
17:01
the ordo salutis, or the order of salvation.
17:04
This is where theology gets incredibly practical by tracing
17:06
the unbreakable chain of events that occur when God saves
17:09
someone. We're looking at Romans chapter
17:12
E here, where Paul says those whom he predestined, he also
17:15
called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those
17:17
whom he justified he also glorified.
17:20
Let's walk through this unbreakable chain step by step,
17:22
because seeing the order highlights who is doing the
17:25
actual heavy lifting. What is the very first link in
17:27
that chain? The order Salutis is a brilliant
17:30
progression to detail, and as you noted, it highlights divine
17:33
initiative at every step. The very first link which occurs
17:37
outside of time in eternity past is election.
17:40
This is God's sovereign, unconditional choice of
17:42
individuals for salvation, based entirely on His own good
17:46
pleasure and not on any foreseen faith or merit in the creature.
17:51
Moving from eternity past into human history, the next link is
17:54
effectual calling. We must distinguish between the
17:57
general outward call of the gospel, which is preached to
17:59
everyone and often rejected, and the inward effectual call.
18:03
This occurs when the outward preaching is paired with the
18:05
inward irresistible drawing of the Holy Spirit, guaranteeing
18:08
that the elect will respond. So the effectual call brings us
18:11
to a next step, which is regeneration.
18:13
We talked earlier about the human will being a corpse.
18:15
Regeneration is the resurrection right though it is the new
18:17
birth. Spot on.
18:19
Regeneration is the supernatural act of God where the heart of
18:22
stone is removed and replaced with a heart of flesh.
18:25
As promised in Ezekiel 36, God imparts spiritual life to the
18:29
dead soul. Once a person is regenerated and
18:32
actually possesses spiritual life, God grants the gifts of
18:35
repentance and faith. These are two sides of the same
18:39
coin. Repentance is turning away from
18:41
sin and faith is turning toward Christ.
18:43
You cannot have one without the other.
18:45
And because of that God-given faith, the Sinner then
18:48
experiences justification. I want to pause the chain right
18:51
there and ask for some clarity on that specific link
18:54
justification. We hear that word a lot, but
18:56
defining it accurately is vital. How does the Westminster
18:59
Confession divine justification? And how does that contrast with
19:02
other historical views? Because getting this wrong seems
19:05
to alter the entire Christian life.
19:07
The Westminster Confession, specifically in Chapter 11,
19:09
clearly defines justification as a forensic legal act of God.
19:13
It is an act in a courtroom. God pardons all of a sinner's
19:16
transgressions and accepts them as righteous in his sight.
19:20
The crucial element here is imputation.
19:23
Christ's perfect righteousness is imputed or credited to the
19:27
sinner's account, and the sinner's guilt was imputed to
19:29
Christ on the cross. We must vigorously contrast this
19:32
forensic declaration with the Roman Catholic error of infused
19:35
race. Can you break down that concept
19:38
of infused grace? Give us a mental picture of how
19:40
that theology actually operates in someone's life, because it
19:42
sounds exhausting. It is entirely exhausting.
19:45
The infused grace model proposes that God pours a spiritual
19:49
substance, grace, into an individual, usually beginning at
19:51
baptism. This infused substance enables
19:54
the person to cooperate with God and perform meritorious works.
19:57
The goal is to eventually become inherently righteous enough to
20:00
earn salvation. If you sin, you lose some of
20:03
that grace, and you have to perform penance to get it back.
20:06
Think about the anxiety of a treadmill, where the speed keeps
20:09
increasing, and if you stumble, the treadmill speeds up even
20:11
more. Infused grace says you have to
20:13
keep running faster, cooperating with God's help to maintain His
20:17
favor. It is a cooperative effort of
20:19
divine favor and human merit. Imputed grace, on the other
20:22
hand. And is someone unplugging the
20:24
treadmill, completely picking you up and carrying you across
20:27
the finish line? The Reformed view insists that
20:29
justification is an instantaneous legal declaration
20:32
based entirely on an alien righteousness, A righteousness
20:36
outside of yourself, namely the righteousness of Christ received
20:39
by faith alone. That difference between the
20:41
treadmill of infused righteousness and the rest of
20:44
imputed righteousness changes absolutely everything.
20:47
One leads to endless anxiety about whether you have done
20:49
enough, and the other leads to absolute peace.
20:53
Let's finish the Ordo Salutis chain after justification, What
20:57
comes next? Following justification is
20:59
adoption, where the justified Sinner is formally brought into
21:02
the family of God, receiving all the rights and privileges of a
21:05
child of God. Then comes sanctification.
21:08
Unlike justification, which is instantaneous, sanctification is
21:12
the lifelong progressive process of becoming more like Christ and
21:15
dying to sin. Finally, the chain concludes
21:18
with glorification, the future reality of a resurrected sinless
21:21
body in the presence of God forever.
21:23
Every single step in this progression from election to
21:25
glorification is guaranteed by God.
21:27
It is a completely unbroken chain.
21:29
No one has lost along the way. Before we move into the
21:31
historical battles over these doctrines, our sources briefly
21:34
mentioned another theological category we need to distinguish
21:38
that is common grace versus special grace.
21:41
If humanity is totally depraved, how do we explain atheists who
21:44
build hospitals or Pagan artists who compose beautiful music?
21:48
This distinction helps answer the question of why we see
21:50
goodness and beauty in a fallen world.
21:53
It is a necessary distinction to make sense of the world around
21:55
us. Common grace refers to God's
21:57
general goodness bestowed upon all people indiscriminately.
22:01
It is the grace that causes the sun to rise on the evil and the
22:04
good and sends rain on the just and the unjust.
22:08
Common grace restrains human sinfulness from reaching its
22:10
absolute maximum potential. It preserves human life,
22:13
establishes human governments to maintain order, and allows for
22:17
the flourishing of arts, sciences, and culture.
22:20
Think of a beautiful Symphony played by a totally secular
22:23
orchestra. The talent and the beauty are a
22:25
result of God's common grace. It is why unbelievers can
22:28
perform acts of outward civic goodness.
22:30
However, common grace does not forgive sin.
22:33
It does not change the human heart's hostility toward God,
22:36
and it does not save. Special grace, on the other
22:38
hand, is the infallible saving intervention of the Holy Spirit.
22:42
It is directed exclusively toward the elect.
22:44
Special grace is what regenerates the dead heart,
22:46
grants faith, and applies the finished work of Christ.
22:49
While common grace improves the world temporally, only special
22:52
grace resurrects the soul eternally.
22:54
This theology of sovereign special grace is incredibly
22:57
comforting. It gives you an unshakable
22:58
foundation. But as the articles point out,
23:01
it is always faced fierce opposition.
23:04
Whenever these truths are proclaimed clearly, conflict
23:06
inevitably follows. People do not like being told
23:09
they have no power to save themselves.
23:12
Let's trace this history of conflict, starting back in the
23:14
4th and 5th centuries, with a monumental clash between
23:17
Augustine and Pelagius. Who was Pelagius and why did his
23:21
teachings cause such an uproar? The conflict between Augustine
23:24
and Pelagius is one of the most significant theological battles
23:27
in church history, and it set the stage for everything that
23:30
followed. Pelagius was a British monk who
23:32
travelled to Rome in the late 4th century.
23:35
When he arrived, he was absolutely disgusted by the
23:37
moral laxity he saw among professing Christians.
23:40
People were living however they wanted and blaming their sin on
23:43
human weakness. To combat this, Pelagius began
23:47
teaching a strict moralism. He argued that human beings
23:50
possess a neutral, untainted will.
23:53
His logic was based on fairness. He argued that if God commands
23:57
us to be holy, we must possess the inherent natural ability to
24:00
obey that command, otherwise God would be unjust.
24:03
In his view, Adam's sin only affected.
24:05
Adam simply set a bad example. Therefore, we are all born as
24:09
blank slates, fully capable of choosing good or evil without
24:12
any special divine intervention. Augustine looking at his own
24:15
life and reading the scriptures saw massive red flags.
24:18
With that logic. Augustine lived a wild,
24:20
rebellious life before God saved him, so we knew first hand that
24:23
his will wasn't a blank slate. How did he respond to Pelagius?
24:26
Augustine recognized Pelagianism as a deadly error that gutted
24:30
the cross of Christ. He insisted, based heavily on
24:33
Romans 5, that the human will is not neutral, but completely
24:37
enslaved to sin as a direct result of the fall.
24:40
He argued that all of humanity sinned in Adam, making us a
24:43
massive perdition. He famously prayed command what
24:45
you will and grant what you command.
24:47
That infuriated Pelagius. Augustine knew that without
24:51
God's prior effectual intervention, no one would ever
24:53
choose Christ. The Church recognized the
24:56
biblical fidelity of Augustine's position and formally condemned
24:58
Pelagianism at the Council of Carthage, affirming that divine
25:02
intervention is absolutely necessary for salvation.
25:04
Fast forward to the 16th century and the battle flares up again,
25:08
this time centering on the Protestant Reformation versus
25:10
the Church of Rome. We see Martin Luther struggling
25:14
under the crushing weight of his own guilt.
25:16
Luther was an Augustinian monk, and he tried everything the
25:19
medieval church offered to find peace.
25:21
He would sleep on cold stone floors, fast for days, and spend
25:25
hours in the confession booth confessing every minor
25:27
infraction, driving his superiors crazy, but none of it
25:31
worked. He hated the phrase the
25:32
righteousness of God because he thought it meant the terrifying
25:35
standard he had to meet. How did Luther finally break out
25:38
of that despair? Luther's breakthrough came when
25:40
he was lecturing on the book of Romans.
25:42
He finally understood the concept of imputed
25:44
righteousness. He realized that the
25:46
righteousness of God mentioned in Romans 1.17 is not a standard
25:50
we must achieve through sacraments and good works, but
25:52
rather it is a passive righteousness.
25:55
It is a gift given to us. It is the alien righteousness of
25:58
Christ credited to us through faith alone.
26:00
That realization was the spark that ignited the Reformation.
26:04
Later, John Calvin provided a massive synthesis of these
26:07
doctrines. Calvin systematized this
26:09
theology, demonstrating how God's eternal decree of
26:11
election, Christ's definite atonement, and the spirits of
26:14
factual calling form 1 Cohesive monarchistic work.
26:18
Monarchism, meaning God acts alone in saving the Sinner, as
26:21
opposed to synergism or God and man cooperate.
26:24
And Rome did not take that line down.
26:26
They convened the Council of Trent to formally address the
26:29
Protestant claims. The sources we read detailed
26:32
just how definitive Rome's response was.
26:34
They didn't just disagree, they pronounced curses.
26:36
The Council of Trent was a multi year ecumenical council that
26:40
formally dogmatized the Roman Catholic position against the
26:43
Reformers. At Trent.
26:45
The Church explicitly and formally rejected the Protestant
26:48
doctrine of sola gratia, grace alone, and solified faith alone.
26:52
They issued canons stating that anyone who believes they are
26:55
justified solely by the imputation of Christ's
26:58
righteousness, apart from cooperative human merit and the
27:01
infused grace of the sacraments, is anathema or cursed.
27:05
They specifically anathematized the idea of absolute assurance
27:08
of salvation. That historical dividing line
27:11
drawn at Trent remains solidly in place today.
27:14
The official teaching of the Roman Catholic Church has not
27:16
changed on this matter. The conflict did not stop there,
27:19
though. Even within Protestantism, a
27:21
massive debate erupted in the early 17th century leading to
27:24
the Synod of Dort. This was the battle against
27:27
Arminianism. Jacob Arminius was a Dutch
27:29
theologian who proposed a system that sounded like grace, but
27:33
actually plays the final deciding factor back into human
27:35
hands. He taught the concept of
27:37
universal prevenient grace. How does prevenient grace work
27:41
in the Armenian system? Arminius proposition of
27:43
universal prevenient grace suggested that God distributes A
27:47
baseline level of grace to every single human being born into the
27:50
world. According to his theory, this
27:53
universal grace neutralizes the effects of original sin just
27:57
enough to restore free will. It brings everyone back to a
28:00
state of moral neutrality, making salvation a possibility
28:03
dependent entirely on human choice.
28:06
In this system, God casts a vote for you, the devil casts a vote
28:09
against you, and you cast the deciding vote.
28:12
It attempts to make grace a cooperative effort.
28:15
The followers of Arminius published a document called the
28:17
Remonstrance outlining their views.
28:19
The Synod of Dort convened in 1618 to address this specific
28:22
teaching. The delegates at Dort mounted a
28:25
rigorous, modernistic defense, articulating what we now know is
28:28
the five points of Calvinism, which were a direct response to
28:31
the five articles of the Remonstrance.
28:33
And those five points are total depravity, unconditional
28:35
election, limited atonement, irresistible grace, and the
28:38
perseverance of the Saints. They systematically dismantled
28:40
the idea that human choice is the final arbiter of salvation.
28:44
Absolutely. They affirmed that election is
28:46
unconditional, not based on foreseen faith.
28:49
They affirmed that the atonement effectively secures the
28:52
salvation of the elect, rather than just making salvation a
28:55
hypothetical possibility for everyone.
28:57
They affirmed the human will is totally depraved, the calling of
29:01
the Spirit is irresistible, and the Saints will persevere to the
29:03
end because God preserves them. This defense was championed in
29:07
later centuries by the Puritans and figures like Charles
29:09
Spurgeon. Spurgeon famously noted that a
29:12
grace that just offers salvation without actually accomplishing
29:14
it is no grace at all. If Jesus simply built a bridge
29:18
to heaven and told dead men to walk across it, heaven would be
29:20
empty. God is the author and the
29:22
finisher. Divine intervention actually
29:24
achieves redemption. Our sources point out that this
29:26
is not just ancient history. There are modern opponents to
29:29
monarchism today. These errors keep returning,
29:31
just wearing different clothes. The literature we are reviewing
29:34
dissects several contemporary threats to this doctrine.
29:37
We see revivalist decisionism, the prosperity gospel, and
29:40
secret sensitive mysticism. Let's look at revivalist
29:43
decisionism first. This traces back to guys like
29:45
Charles Finney in the 19th century.
29:47
How does decisionism undermine sovereign grace?
29:50
The modern eras take various forms, but they all share a
29:52
common root. They elevate human agency and
29:56
diminish divine sovereignty. Revivalist decisionism,
29:59
popularized by Charles Finney, introduced what he called new
30:03
measures. Finney believed that if you
30:05
applied the right psychological pressures, you could manufacture
30:08
a revival. Decisionism reduces the
30:10
supernatural act of the new birth to a human decision, often
30:13
elicited through emotional music, prolonged altar calls,
30:16
the irksis bench, and psychological pressure.
30:19
It treats the will as something that can be coaxed or
30:21
manipulated into submission. It assumes that if you just
30:25
market the gospel correctly, people will buy it.
30:27
The prosperity gospel is perhaps even more insidious.
30:30
It treats divine favor as a utilitarian tool for acquiring
30:33
physical health and financial wealth.
30:35
It treats God as a cosmic bellhop whose primary job is to
30:38
fulfill human desires, completely ignoring the biblical
30:41
realities of sin, wrath, and the necessity of suffering for
30:44
Christ. Then there is seeker sensitive
30:46
mysticism which downplays doctrinal clarity, avoids words
30:50
like sin and repentance, and favors subjective spiritual
30:53
experiences and consumer driven church models designed to keep
30:56
the unregenerate comfortable. I want to be very careful here
30:59
as we discuss the final modern issue raised in the text.
31:02
Now, as we look at this next part of our source material, I
31:05
want to clarify our approach. We were looking at a critique of
31:09
modern sociological frameworks, specifically critical race
31:12
theory. Our goal here is not to endorse
31:14
this critique or to reject it. We are simply reporting
31:17
impartially on what the authors of our sources are arguing.
31:20
The sources we are working from argue that modern sociological
31:23
frameworks like critical race theory act as severe
31:25
distractions from the core message of the gospel.
31:28
The text suggests that these frameworks replace the biblical
31:30
categories of sin and grace with sociological categories of power
31:34
dynamics and group identity. Could you unpack the theological
31:37
critique the authors are making here?
31:38
That is an accurate representation of the source
31:41
materials argument. The authors contend that any
31:44
framework, whether theological, psychological, or sociological,
31:47
that shifts the focus away from the individual standing before a
31:51
holy God functions as an opponent to the doctrine of
31:53
sovereign grace. The critique offered in the text
31:56
is that when society is viewed primarily through the lens of
31:59
intersectionality or oppressor versus oppressed dynamics, it
32:02
obscures the universal problem of human depravity.
32:05
If my primary problem is my sociological status, then the
32:09
solution is political activism. But if my primary problem is
32:12
that I'm a dead Sinner under the wrath of God, then the only
32:15
solution is the imputed righteousness of Christ.
32:18
The overarching theme of the literature is that the purity of
32:21
the gospel must be protected from any system that seeks to
32:23
add human effort, earthly philosophies, or cooperative
32:27
merit to the finished work of Christ.
32:29
The defense of monarchism requires constant vigilance
32:31
across every generation. That brings tremendous clarity
32:34
to why these debates matter. So let's pivot from the
32:36
historical and theoretical into the intensely practical.
32:40
How does this massive theology alter your daily life?
32:42
The articles break this down by looking at how grace applies to
32:45
the head, the heart, and the hands.
32:47
But before we get to those three areas, we have to grasp the root
32:50
distinction between the Law and the gospel.
32:52
If you get this wrong in your daily Bible reading, everything
32:55
else falls apart. How do we differentiate the two?
32:57
Distinguishing between the law and the gospel is the key to
33:00
unlocking biblical application and pastoral care.
33:03
The Law and the Gospel are both in the Bible, and they're both
33:06
good, but they have two entirely different functions.
33:10
The Law acts as a strict schoolmaster.
33:12
Its purpose is to expose our total inability to meet Goddess
33:15
standard. The Law says do this and live.
33:19
It demands absolute perfection in thought, word, and deed.
33:22
It shuts our mouths and leaves us completely condemned before a
33:26
holy judge. The Law does not offer a helping
33:28
hand. It only offers a mirror showing
33:31
us our corruption. The Gospel, conversely,
33:33
announces the remedy. The Gospel says it is finished.
33:37
The gospel is the good news that Christ has perfectly fulfilled
33:39
the demands of the Law on our behalf through His active
33:42
obedience, and suffered the penalty of the Law in our place
33:45
through His passive obedience on the cross.
33:47
Without the terrifying weight of the Law exposing our desperate
33:50
condition, the gospel loses its meaning.
33:52
If we do not understand how lost we are, the gospel simply
33:55
becomes a therapeutic suggestion for a happier life rather than a
33:58
rescue from eternal death. That distinction protects us
34:00
from reading the Bible as an instruction manual for self
34:03
improvement. When we move to applying this to
34:06
the head, to the intellect, it requires renewing the mind with
34:09
sound doctrine. One of the most practical rules
34:12
for reading the epistles of Paul and living the Christian life is
34:15
understanding the relationship between the indicative and the
34:17
imperative. The indicative is the statement
34:20
of truth, what God has done. The imperative is the command,
34:23
what we are told to do. The rule is that the imperative
34:26
must always be grounded in the indicative.
34:29
Can you give an example of how that works in real life?
34:31
That grammatical relationship is the secret to Christian joy and
34:35
obedience. The indicative always precedes
34:38
the imperative. You must know who you are in
34:41
Christ before you can act like a Christian.
34:43
Think of it like marriage vows versus daily household chores.
34:47
You do not do the dishes and take out the trash in order to
34:50
convince your spouse to marry you.
34:51
The wedding already happened. The vow was made.
34:54
You do the chores because you are already married.
34:57
We do not obey God's commands in order to be accepted by Him.
35:00
We obey because we are already fully accepted in the Beloved.
35:02
If you reverse that order, if you put the imperative before
35:05
the indicative, you instantly recreate a religion of works.
35:09
You plunge yourself back into anxiety, wondering if you have
35:12
done enough chores to stay married to God, renewing the
35:15
mind involved, constantly preaching the indicatives of the
35:17
gospel to yourself. You are justified.
35:20
You are adopted. You are secure.
35:22
Only from that solid foundation of intellectual truth can you
35:25
begin to tackle the imperatives of the Christian life with joy
35:27
rather than fear. And when that intellectual truth
35:29
sinks from the head down into the affections into the heart,
35:32
it does something massive. It dethrones our idols.
35:35
The doctrine of monarchism is the ultimate idol smasher.
35:37
It absolutely kills human boasting.
35:40
Paul asks the Corinthian church in First Corinthians chapter 4,
35:42
verse 7. What do you have that you did
35:44
not receive? If then you received it, why do
35:47
you boast as if you did not receive it?
35:49
Understanding that you contributed nothing to your
35:51
salvation produces genuine, grounded humility.
35:54
The impact on the heart is staggering.
35:56
When you truly grasp that your salvation depended entirely on
35:59
God's sovereign choice and nothing in your own performance,
36:02
it destroys spiritual pride. You can no longer look down on
36:06
anyone else, regardless of their struggles or failures, because
36:09
you recognize that you were made of the exact same corrupted
36:12
clay. You were simply rescued by
36:14
unmerited favor. Furthermore, this doctrine
36:17
replaces despair with absolute assurance.
36:20
If your salvation relied on your own consistency, your own
36:23
willpower, or the strength of your own faith, you would never
36:25
have a moment's peace. You would always wonder if you
36:28
had done enough. But because your security rests
36:30
entirely in the hands of Christ, you can rest.
36:33
Philippians chapter one, verse 6, promises that he who began a
36:36
good work in you will bring it to completion at the day of
36:38
Jesus Christ. Your emotional stability is no
36:40
longer tethered to your fluctuating daily performance,
36:43
but to God's unfailing promise. The pressure is completely off,
36:47
the heavy lifting is done, but we also have to address the
36:50
hands, our actions, because there's a very common objection
36:53
here. Some people hear this doctrine
36:55
of absolute sovereign grace and think, Great God does everything
36:57
so I can just sit back on the couch and live however I want.
37:00
But the sources call that a complete distortion.
37:03
They talk about the third use of the law, which means that while
37:06
the law cannot save us, it functions as a perfect rule of
37:09
life for the regenerate believer.
37:11
How does Grace actually produce good works?
37:14
The accusation that sovereign grace leads to license is as old
37:17
as the Apostle Paul's ministry. He anticipated it in Romans 6
37:21
when he asked are we to continue in sin?
37:23
That grace may abound And answered with a resounding, by
37:27
no means true divine favor actively trains the believer.
37:31
Titus chapter 2, verses 11 and 12 explicitly states that the
37:34
grace of God has appeared bringing salvation for all
37:37
people, training us to renounce ungodliness and worldly
37:40
passions, and to live self controlled, upright and godly
37:43
lives in the present age. Notice that it is grace doing
37:47
the training. Grace empowers the obedience it
37:49
commands. Furthermore, Ephesians chapter 2
37:52
verse 10, right after declaring we are saved by grace through
37:55
faith, tells us that we are God's workmanship, created in
37:57
Christ Jesus for good works which God prepared beforehand
38:00
that we should walk in them. The works do not save us, but
38:02
they are the necessary, inevitable evidence that we have
38:04
been saved. A healthy apple tree naturally
38:07
produces apples. Our hands are put to work out of
38:09
immense gratitude for the rescue, not to earn a wage from
38:12
a hard taskmaster. And God provides specific,
38:15
tangible tools to help us in this lifelong process of
38:18
sanctification. Our sources detail the means of
38:21
grace. These are the practical,
38:23
ordinary ways this theology is nourished.
38:25
In the local church context, we're talking about the
38:28
preaching of the Word, corporate prayer, and the sacraments.
38:31
These are not magic rituals that infuse us with substance, but
38:34
they are the ordained channels God uses to strengthen his
38:37
people's faith. How do the authors describe the
38:40
function of the sacraments in the life of a believer?
38:43
The ordinary means of grace are essential for the Christian
38:45
life. God ordinarily works through
38:47
these appointed instruments to strengthen faith.
38:50
The reading and preaching of the Scriptures is the primary means.
38:53
Faith comes by hearing and hearing through the Word of
38:56
Christ. Corporate prayer is the
38:58
expression of our total dependence upon God as a
39:00
gathered body. Then we have the sacraments,
39:03
baptism, and the Lord's Supper. The sources provide a beautiful
39:07
description of how the sacraments function.
39:09
The sermon is the audible word declaring the promises of the
39:12
gospel to our ears. But God knows we are weak
39:15
physical creatures who need physical reassurance.
39:18
So the Lord's Supper is the visible word demonstrating those
39:21
same promises to our eyes, our hands, and our taste.
39:24
When the bread is broken and the cup is poured, it physically
39:27
represents the body and blood of Christ given for us.
39:30
When received by faith, these physical elements nourish the
39:32
soul, reassuring the believer of their vital union with Christ.
39:36
They act as a tangible seal of the promises we hear in the
39:39
sermon. They assure us that just as
39:41
surely as we taste the bread and the wine, Christ's body was
39:43
broken for us. As we draw this massive session
39:46
to a close, let's recap the vast scope of everything we have
39:49
discussed. We started by looking at the
39:52
total spiritual inability of humanity viewing the will as a
39:55
literal corpse requiring a supernatural resurrection,
39:59
entirely refuting the idea that God just helps those who help
40:02
themselves. We traced the continuous thread
40:05
of unmerited favor from the ancient covenants of the Old
40:08
Testament to the distinct promises of the New Testament
40:10
church. Maintaining a clear
40:12
dispensational distinction. We walked through the
40:15
unbreakable chain of the Ordo Salutis, securing believers from
40:19
election before time began to glorification after time ends.
40:23
We reviewed the historic battles fought by figures like Augustine
40:26
against Pelagius, Luther against Rome, and the delegates adored
40:30
against the Armenians defending monarchism against any system of
40:33
human merit. Finally, we looked at how this
40:36
theology practically reshapes the intellect, humbles the
40:39
affections by killing idols, and empowers obedient action through
40:42
the ordinary means provided in the local church.
40:45
You, the listener, are an eternal monument to unmerited
40:48
favor. Redemption is not a joint
40:50
project where you meet God halfway.
40:51
It is a monarchistic rescue from death to life, securing you from
40:56
eternity past to eternity future.
40:58
If your justification and your glorification were completely
41:01
secured by an absolute sovereign decree before time even began,
41:05
how might contemplating that untouchable security completely
41:08
eliminate the earthly anxiety is keeping you awake tonight?
41:12
That is a phenomenal question to ponder.
41:14
Thank you so much for joining us for this deep dive on reformed
41:17
thinking. Keep reading, keep studying, and
41:19
we will catch you next time.