Latest / Early Edition with Ryan Bridge / Camilla Belich: Labour's Public Services Spokesperson on the Government's proposed overhaul
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: So government wants to debloat the public service. Nine thousand
- 0:03Speaker 1: redundancies two point four billion dollars in savings take us
- 0:06Speaker 1: down to fifty five thousand full time public servants by
- 0:09Speaker 1: July of twenty twenty nine.
- 0:10Speaker 2: This is actually about giving public servants the opportunity to
- 0:14Speaker 2: do their work better. They want to serve New Zealanders
- 0:17Speaker 2: in a more joined out modern way.
- 0:20Speaker 1: Nick Carmel about Wich is with US Labor spokesperson for
- 0:22Speaker 1: Public Services, come in a good morning.
- 0:25Speaker 2: Good morning.
- 0:25Speaker 1: So is one percent of the population roughly public servants?
- 0:29Speaker 1: Is that bad?
- 0:32Speaker 2: Well, we have a significantly larger number of public servants
- 0:37Speaker 2: than one percent at the moment. And so what we
- 0:39Speaker 2: don't know is what frontline services will be affected by this.
- 0:44Speaker 2: We don't know what services that New Zealanders currently expect
- 0:49Speaker 2: from their current public services that will be affected, and
- 0:53Speaker 2: we don't know what jobs these are. So it's a
- 0:56Speaker 2: really arbitrary target. I suppose that the government has decided
- 1:02Speaker 2: to put on the public service and it's going to
- 1:06Speaker 2: affect every region in New Zealand. I mean, it's a
- 1:08Speaker 2: significant number of jobs that the government is going to
- 1:11Speaker 2: cut at the same time as we've got decade high
- 1:16Speaker 2: levels of unemployment and this is going to unfortunately hurt
- 1:21Speaker 2: Kivy families and also at the businesses that they utilize.
- 1:26Speaker 1: Camelo, you've been very careful with your language and you
- 1:29Speaker 1: are basically describing what is going to happen rather than
- 1:32Speaker 1: criticizing it. Do you actually think there is good reason
- 1:35Speaker 1: in some cases to go ahead with these cuts?
- 1:39Speaker 2: I think the issue with this particular proposal that the
- 1:42Speaker 2: government has put forward is the fact that there is
- 1:45Speaker 2: no detail on what they're actually going to do, so
- 1:48Speaker 2: that is definitely a criticism. And the fact that it's
- 1:53Speaker 2: such a significant cut to the public service. I mean,
- 1:56Speaker 2: of course that throughout various governments, throughout the last Labor government,
- 2:03Speaker 2: throughout previous governments, we've always had certain restructurings. Obviously there's
- 2:10Speaker 2: been redundancies for some people, but not on a scale
- 2:14Speaker 2: like this year after year. I mean, we have to
- 2:18Speaker 2: really understand that what the government is proposing is quite
- 2:22Speaker 2: a significant, huge change that every New Zealander will see.
- 2:25Speaker 2: I mean, this is a move towards austerity really in
- 2:29Speaker 2: the public service. So I think that's the scale of it,
- 2:33Speaker 2: and the fact that we don't know what we're losing
- 2:36Speaker 2: in terms of the detail is really really consistent.
- 2:39Speaker 1: Can you call it austerity if they're putting the money
- 2:41Speaker 1: into health and education? I mean, should you not be
- 2:43Speaker 1: celebrating that aspect of it? If we can save in
- 2:45Speaker 1: the back office, put it to the front line, good
- 2:47Speaker 1: news story.
- 2:49Speaker 2: I just don't think that there's enough information to be
- 2:52Speaker 2: able to say that it's going to be redeployed in
- 2:56Speaker 2: a way that is more positive than it is at
- 2:59Speaker 2: the moment. I mean, it's just almost unbelievable what they've
- 3:02Speaker 2: proposed in terms of the scale of the reduction and
- 3:07Speaker 2: the timeframe that they say that they want to have
- 3:10Speaker 2: debt done, and when we've had big restructurings in the past,
- 3:14Speaker 2: and you know, there was a smaller two percent reduction
- 3:17Speaker 2: under the last labor government, and we've had significant reductions
- 3:20Speaker 2: already under this government. So that's the context that we're
- 3:24Speaker 2: looking at here.
- 3:26Speaker 1: You're not convinced. You're not convinced, Carmela. I've got time
- 3:29Speaker 1: for one answer, well, basically a one word answer on this.
- 3:32Speaker 1: When the last gave them get labor government increased spending
- 3:35Speaker 1: by seventy percent, you know, triple spending in real terms,
- 3:38Speaker 1: in nominal terms double debt. What's one thing that we
- 3:41Speaker 1: got better out of the public service?
- 3:45Speaker 2: Well, we and I know that this is maybe something
- 3:47Speaker 2: that people don't usually bring up, but the reason that
- 3:50Speaker 2: there was a huge amount of spending under the last
- 3:52Speaker 2: Labor government as we suffered through a historic pandemic and
- 3:57Speaker 2: we had to save lives, and that was the decision
- 3:59Speaker 2: that the the government decided to make, was to prioritize debt,
- 4:03Speaker 2: and that was one of the reasons that there was
- 4:06Speaker 2: increased spending and spending that we hadn't otherwise anticipated. So
- 4:11Speaker 2: saving thousands of lives is certainly an objective that I
- 4:14Speaker 2: think in a certainly a takeaway that I think from
- 4:18Speaker 2: my perspective that we can be proud of and we
- 4:20Speaker 2: can look at that spending and say that that was
- 4:22Speaker 2: put towards a good cause.
- 4:24Speaker 1: All right, coming about it, Labor Spokespersons for Public Services.
- 4:28Speaker 1: For more from Early Edition with Ryan Bridge, listen live
- 4:31Speaker 1: to News Talks it Be from five am weekdays, or
- 4:34Speaker 1: follow the podcast on iHeartRadio.