Latest / Why We Do What We Do / Mini: Fake News
Transcript
- 0:03Speaker 1: You're listening to Why we do what we do. Welcome
- 0:15Speaker 1: to Why we do what we do Mini. I'm your
- 0:18Speaker 1: host Abraham and I'm Shane. We are a psychology podcast.
- 0:22Speaker 1: We talk about all of the things. Oh my gosh,
- 0:25Speaker 1: words this morning, we talked about the things that humans
- 0:27Speaker 1: and non human animals do. And we release these short
- 0:31Speaker 1: form episodes that are just a quick ten to fifteen
- 0:34Speaker 1: minute dive into a topic and that's it, and we
- 0:37Speaker 1: just talk. We do that and these come out on Mondays.
- 0:39Speaker 1: We release full length episodes on Wednesdays. And if you're
- 0:42Speaker 1: joining us for the first time, then like, welcome. This
- 0:45Speaker 1: will be quick. We'll get in here and then we'll
- 0:46Speaker 1: get out, and that's what our Monday episodes are like.
- 0:48Speaker 1: If you're returning, then welcome back. We're happy to have
- 0:51Speaker 1: you here. Either way. If you like to support us,
- 0:53Speaker 1: you can do that by leaving a rating and a review, liking, subscribing,
- 0:57Speaker 1: telling a friend, picking up some merch at our merch,
- 1:00Speaker 1: or joining us over on Patreon. And if you join
- 1:02Speaker 1: us on Patreon, I'm going to read your name at
- 1:04Speaker 1: the end of our full length discussions. But our minis
- 1:07Speaker 1: we just we just get in that topic and then
- 1:09Speaker 1: we get out of there, and I think that's all
- 1:11Speaker 1: the preamble I need before we get started.
- 1:13Speaker 2: Yeah, I think that covers it great.
- 1:15Speaker 1: Well. This episode is about fake news. The episode itself
- 1:19Speaker 1: is not fake news, although I gotta say it is
- 1:22Speaker 1: very truly serendipitous that this is published right before April
- 1:27Speaker 1: Fool's Day, which is like the day of fake news.
- 1:30Speaker 2: Yeah yeah, yeah, absolutely, like what good timing. And we've
- 1:33Speaker 2: been talking about doing something like this for a while,
- 1:35Speaker 2: but it just feels like the right time to cover
- 1:37Speaker 2: this topic.
- 1:38Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, this has been on the list, I think
- 1:41Speaker 1: since we started making a list of topics for minis. Yeah,
- 1:45Speaker 1: finally just sort of got around to it. So, as
- 1:48Speaker 1: I said, this is going to be called fake news
- 1:50Speaker 1: because that's what we're talking about. You could also call
- 1:52Speaker 1: this The Dictator's Guide to Destroy the World, Chapter one.
- 1:56Speaker 1: It's also kind of like a basic premer on misinformation disinformation,
- 2:01Speaker 1: and I do think, particularly after like assembling the notes
- 2:05Speaker 1: and thoughts for this, this is really worth a full discussion.
- 2:08Speaker 1: It's a pretty complex and nuanced issue. We could break
- 2:11Speaker 1: down the distinction between misinformation, disinformation, propaganda, and fake news,
- 2:17Speaker 1: but we will do our best to sort of unpack
- 2:20Speaker 1: a Cliff's Notes version of the idea fake news in
- 2:23Speaker 1: this discussion today.
- 2:25Speaker 2: Yeah yeah, yeah, So I mean let's just go ahead
- 2:27Speaker 2: and just dive into it. I think we've got a
- 2:29Speaker 2: lot to unpack here. We do fake news, alternative facts, misinformation, disinformation, propaganda.
- 2:34Speaker 2: There are a lot of terms that sort of broadly
- 2:36Speaker 2: fit into this category of techniques to manipulate people. But
- 2:40Speaker 2: it's really important to remember that knowledge is power, and
- 2:43Speaker 2: one way to gain, protect or expand power is to
- 2:46Speaker 2: control and even dictate what constitutes knowledge.
- 2:50Speaker 1: So fake news, as we're talking about it here, this
- 2:53Speaker 1: is content that is presented as news as information and
- 2:58Speaker 1: that it is supposed to communicate some information or knowledge,
- 3:02Speaker 1: but it is fabricated in part or in whole and
- 3:06Speaker 1: lacks verifiable sources, quotes, or evidence.
- 3:10Speaker 2: Right. So, for instance, Donald Trump claimed that Ukraine started
- 3:13Speaker 2: the war with Russia. This is one false. It is
- 3:17Speaker 2: demonstrably incorrect, right, It could not be more wrong. It
- 3:20Speaker 2: is the opposite of correct, because of course Russia started
- 3:23Speaker 2: the war, the fact that no one disputed until this bizarre,
- 3:26Speaker 2: belligerent claim emerged from thin air.
- 3:29Speaker 1: Yes. Now, fake news, interestingly is kind of a triple threat.
- 3:34Speaker 1: It can do a lot of bad very quickly. It's
- 3:37Speaker 1: very efficient at doing bad things. First, bad actors will
- 3:41Speaker 1: intentionally spread and proliferate fake news because they can do
- 3:46Speaker 1: this to influence public opinion, like opinion and attitudes, which
- 3:51Speaker 1: and what I'm saying is like they make it up
- 3:53Speaker 1: completely or again it could there could be a like
- 3:55Speaker 1: a kernel of truth, a nugget of truth in there,
- 3:58Speaker 1: but they twist it and pipulate it so that it's wrong,
- 4:01Speaker 1: and they specifically put that information out there.
- 4:05Speaker 2: Right. They also call real news fake news to buias
- 4:08Speaker 2: people against legitimate reporting. So it gets people kind of
- 4:11Speaker 2: questioning the sources, questioning legitimate information, questioning consensus even in
- 4:16Speaker 2: a lot of different places.
- 4:18Speaker 1: And the third prong of this approach is that in
- 4:22Speaker 1: the ensuing chaos of lacking any coherent source upon which
- 4:26Speaker 1: we can all agree, what can happen is that people
- 4:29Speaker 1: start accepting any source that they are biased toward as
- 4:33Speaker 1: the real information and all else as being fake, and
- 4:37Speaker 1: so then they it's easier to implement and use propaganda
- 4:43Speaker 1: when you have discredited people who are highly reputable and
- 4:48Speaker 1: believable and trustworthy, but you've made it so that people
- 4:51Speaker 1: no longer trust them or believe them. Then you can
- 4:54Speaker 1: sort of just put out all the information you want
- 4:57Speaker 1: that whether or not it's accurate, will get some people
- 5:00Speaker 1: leaving it because they know don't know what to believe.
- 5:02Speaker 2: Right, And so this is kind of how it works
- 5:05Speaker 2: dictators dictators in general. This is like, this is like
- 5:08Speaker 2: dictators for dummies, Dictators one oh one. This is the
- 5:11Speaker 2: intro class for dictators.
- 5:12Speaker 1: Yeah, chapter one.
- 5:13Speaker 2: Yeah, what they do is they often start by criticizing
- 5:16Speaker 2: the media as biased, fake or propaganda. Simultaneously, they will
- 5:19Speaker 2: start publishing actual fake news propaganda and call it legitimate.
- 5:22Speaker 2: And people who have authoritarian leanings tend to accept the
- 5:25Speaker 2: narrative being pushed by the dictators, who are nearly universally
- 5:28Speaker 2: right wing, because their preference is for that form of
- 5:31Speaker 2: social control.
- 5:33Speaker 1: Yes, so like they're they're more likely to go ahead
- 5:36Speaker 1: and be persuaded by that because they already have tendencies
- 5:40Speaker 1: in that direction, much like you might we might have
- 5:43Speaker 1: tendencies toward or away from ads. We're back. We've been
- 5:54Speaker 1: just unpacking sort of what fake news is. Let's get
- 5:57Speaker 1: into why this happens, Like what are the motives for
- 6:00Speaker 1: people here? But it's important to remember that this is complicated.
- 6:04Speaker 1: There are a lot of reasons and there's a lot
- 6:06Speaker 1: of nuance. But here here's someone some to consider. There
- 6:09Speaker 1: are very common ways that this appears and what it's
- 6:12Speaker 1: doing and why.
- 6:14Speaker 2: Right, So, first you've got satire or parody, and The
- 6:17Speaker 2: Onion does this beautifully if you are like a punk
- 6:19Speaker 2: in the punk and hardcore scene. Then the hard Times
- 6:22Speaker 2: dot net also does a really good job of this
- 6:24Speaker 2: nice where it's like it seems like it's real enough,
- 6:26Speaker 2: but like it's also meant to be silly. And Toby
- 6:29Speaker 2: Morse as well does a really good job of setting
- 6:31Speaker 2: up parity websites for current politicians and they are so
- 6:35Speaker 2: mad about it.
- 6:37Speaker 1: Yeah nice. Mad Magazine was another one that I think
- 6:40Speaker 1: did a lot of this, where they would sort of
- 6:42Speaker 1: do like intentionally funny satirical pieces.
- 6:46Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, exactly.
- 6:47Speaker 1: Another way this shows up is impersonating real sources. This
- 6:50Speaker 1: is a bad actor who is trying to bias people
- 6:53Speaker 1: against a source of information by pretending to be a
- 6:57Speaker 1: part of that source or representing that source and then
- 7:00Speaker 1: doing it very poorly and making it look bad. So
- 7:02Speaker 1: this would be like if Tucker Carlson started saying that
- 7:06Speaker 1: he worked for Fox News or I worked for CNN
- 7:08Speaker 1: or something and was spouting a bunch of crap. Then
- 7:11Speaker 1: people might be like, wow, CNN is full of it,
- 7:13Speaker 1: like they're really even though he is not even remotely
- 7:16Speaker 1: related to any of their operation right exactly.
- 7:19Speaker 2: It can also be misleading, and this can be used
- 7:21Speaker 2: to control the narrative by leaving out key pieces of
- 7:23Speaker 2: information or presenting a heavily biased version of the information,
- 7:27Speaker 2: so they might report the actual event and then twist
- 7:30Speaker 2: it or change it or alter some factor, not even
- 7:33Speaker 2: alter it, but like just leave out something really important
- 7:35Speaker 2: about whatever that event was.
- 7:37Speaker 1: Yes, there is also, of course fabricating. This is a
- 7:41Speaker 1: narrative that has completely made up, that is based on nothing.
- 7:44Speaker 1: It is almost always used to try and persuade people.
- 7:48Speaker 1: Sometimes it is to stoke fear about something. Sometimes it
- 7:51Speaker 1: is to cast doubt on something. But it is whatever
- 7:55Speaker 1: it is, It has no it is completely baseless, It
- 7:57Speaker 1: is not grounded in reality at all.
- 8:00Speaker 2: Yes, there's also manipulated content, and this is when genuine
- 8:03Speaker 2: information has been manipulated to deceive the audience. It might
- 8:06Speaker 2: be like a snippet or a SoundBite of a particular event,
- 8:10Speaker 2: or a circumstance or something that somebody said, like Howard
- 8:13Speaker 2: Dean during his presidential election campaign, that snippet of him
- 8:17Speaker 2: yelling in front of the crowd was manipulated content because
- 8:20Speaker 2: he was yelling, the crowd was yelling at all stuff, But
- 8:22Speaker 2: they elevated the vocals on him and they only included
- 8:25Speaker 2: that snippet of him yelling and they called it the
- 8:27Speaker 2: Dean Scream or something like that, and it ruined his
- 8:29Speaker 2: entire political career.
- 8:31Speaker 1: Wow. Yeah, yeah, that is definitely a strategy. There is
- 8:34Speaker 1: also false associations. So I'm gonna this one needs a
- 8:37Speaker 1: little bit of context to help unpack it here. This
- 8:40Speaker 1: is supplemental content that doesn't actually support the presented content,
- 8:45Speaker 1: but is intended to mislead. So like it's often like
- 8:49Speaker 1: a picture that goes along with the headline, Well that
- 8:51Speaker 1: picture is not actually the thing that's in the headline,
- 8:54Speaker 1: but it is meant to be evocative and sort of
- 8:56Speaker 1: just push your emotions a little bit. So there's a
- 9:00Speaker 1: specific instance that occurred not that long ago. Fox News
- 9:03Speaker 1: did this when they were presenting on There was this
- 9:05Speaker 1: huge winter storm that hit Texas a couple of years ago,
- 9:08Speaker 1: and that resulted in these major power outages with people
- 9:12Speaker 1: like didn't have heat or didn't have cooling, or they
- 9:14Speaker 1: did you know, their houses flooded what was happening during
- 9:17Speaker 1: this huge freeze. They showed images of these windmills that
- 9:20Speaker 1: were completely frozen over, and then they blamed the power
- 9:23Speaker 1: outages on wind power. However, the images that they showed
- 9:27Speaker 1: were actually from a totally different country, Like they were
- 9:30Speaker 1: not only not from Texas, they were not even from
- 9:33Speaker 1: the United States. And ironically, in this case, it was
- 9:36Speaker 1: the wind power that was more operational than the traditional
- 9:40Speaker 1: coal powered plants that were failing in this storm. So
- 9:43Speaker 1: they were trying to essentially push this agenda that it
- 9:46Speaker 1: was green energy was to blame for the power outage,
- 9:49Speaker 1: even though the green energy what was working more. And
- 9:52Speaker 1: the image that they presented the false association was a
- 9:55Speaker 1: picture that was not even of the windmills in their
- 9:58Speaker 1: own like local area. Yeah.
- 10:00Speaker 2: Again easily easily and demonstrably false, Like you can find
- 10:04Speaker 2: that information so rapidly.
- 10:06Speaker 1: Yeah.
- 10:06Speaker 2: Another thing to do is a false context. This is
- 10:09Speaker 2: when actual information is shared but using false or incorrect context. So,
- 10:13Speaker 2: as an example, the White House released some immigration numbers
- 10:16Speaker 2: comparing rates during Biden's administration and Trump's, purporting that at
- 10:20Speaker 2: a ninety five percent decrease from between the two administrations. However,
- 10:25Speaker 2: the context was incorrect and misleading. The Biden numbers were
- 10:28Speaker 2: an average of a seven day period. Trump's numbers were
- 10:31Speaker 2: from the daily average a one day period, two different
- 10:34Speaker 2: data sets and two different measures. Really, Also, the two
- 10:37Speaker 2: data sets were aggregated, likely strategically from points that reflect
- 10:42Speaker 2: the desired summary, because immigration numbers EBB and flow, and
- 10:45Speaker 2: so the data aggregators seem to have selected a particularly
- 10:49Speaker 2: high sample window from of time for Biden and a
- 10:51Speaker 2: particularly low sample window for Trump. So they basically just
- 10:55Speaker 2: like manipulated the data and provided false context for all
- 10:59Speaker 2: these talking points.
- 11:00Speaker 1: Yeah, so it was like there was a decrease. Even
- 11:03Speaker 1: if you were to like look at the daily average
- 11:06Speaker 1: from that seven day period, there was a decrease. But
- 11:08Speaker 1: they're like, but these EBB and flows happen all the time,
- 11:10Speaker 1: Like they all they had to do was pick a
- 11:12Speaker 1: period of time when it was during a flow period
- 11:14Speaker 1: and a time was during an eb period, and they
- 11:16Speaker 1: could have gotten basically the same numbers for Biden or
- 11:18Speaker 1: for Trump. Right, Instead, they're like, here's a total of
- 11:21Speaker 1: seven days or a total over a seven days for
- 11:24Speaker 1: Biden or a total over one day for Trump and
- 11:26Speaker 1: calling that a ninety five percent decrease, again with the
- 11:29Speaker 1: intention to mislead people. Right, Okay, there's so much, so
- 11:33Speaker 1: much to do, but a summary of all of that
- 11:36Speaker 1: to just get out, get out of here, and we're
- 11:38Speaker 1: just going to have to come back and do a
- 11:39Speaker 1: much deeper dive on this is that calling trustworthy, reputable
- 11:43Speaker 1: media fake news is a tactic to delegitimize good faith
- 11:47Speaker 1: reporting and to create confusion and so discord, to create
- 11:51Speaker 1: an opening to control the narrative, to essentially be able
- 11:56Speaker 1: to manipulate people by having them distrust those so that
- 12:00Speaker 1: are actually trustworthy.
- 12:02Speaker 2: Right, and spreading deliberately incorrect, harmful, and misleading information further
- 12:06Speaker 2: eroads trust in reporting and can influence people who are
- 12:09Speaker 2: hoodwinked by it. It can actually change public opinion and
- 12:12Speaker 2: cause a lot of major major impacts on the communities
- 12:16Speaker 2: at large.
- 12:17Speaker 1: And as far as what we can do about this, well,
- 12:19Speaker 1: one thing is to verify sources, so like fake news
- 12:23Speaker 1: that is fake can be found out because it lacks evidence,
- 12:26Speaker 1: it does not have credible or verifiable sources and it
- 12:29Speaker 1: can be fact checked, like you can go and find
- 12:32Speaker 1: the actual information and be like, oh, that's that's completely wrong.
- 12:36Speaker 1: So like it's a lot more work. And I know
- 12:38Speaker 1: that that's not something that a lot of people are
- 12:40Speaker 1: going to do, but I think that the people who
- 12:42Speaker 1: are committed to trying to help move things in the
- 12:46Speaker 1: right direction, these are things that they could be doing.
- 12:49Speaker 1: Is like to be able to point and Snopes, I
- 12:51Speaker 1: think is a really good example of this. Like that's
- 12:52Speaker 1: a website where they kind of all they do is
- 12:55Speaker 1: debunk false claims that exist out there, right, And so
- 12:58Speaker 1: that's a good a good source to potentially look at
- 13:00Speaker 1: and see is this credible? And they're also very good
- 13:04Speaker 1: at being i think, pretty unbiased and mater of fact.
- 13:06Speaker 1: I think they are much friendlier to some of the
- 13:09Speaker 1: people on the right than they need to be. They
- 13:11Speaker 1: do a pretty good job of just like unpacking any
- 13:13Speaker 1: claim whatsoever and then saying like there is no evidence
- 13:16Speaker 1: for this, or there.
- 13:17Speaker 2: Is right exactly.
- 13:18Speaker 1: All right, Well we went that's about a right amount
- 13:21Speaker 1: of time.
- 13:21Speaker 2: I think, Yeah, it feels good.
- 13:22Speaker 1: We're going to wrap up this discussion of on this
- 13:25Speaker 1: mini on fake news. Is there anything you'd like to
- 13:27Speaker 1: add or anything that I forgot before we close this
- 13:28Speaker 1: one out not the moment. Thank you all for listening.
- 13:32Speaker 1: As I said, you can support us over on Patreon
- 13:34Speaker 1: or do the like, subscribe to a friend thing, or
- 13:36Speaker 1: pick up some merch at our merch store. You can
- 13:38Speaker 1: also leave us a rating and review, and if you'd
- 13:40Speaker 1: like to reach out to us, email us directly at
- 13:41Speaker 1: info at WWDWWD podcast or on the social media platforms.
- 13:46Speaker 1: But we're at our time, so thank you all for listening.
- 13:48Speaker 1: Thank you for recording with me today, Shane, Thank you
- 13:50Speaker 1: to my team and this Abraham.
- 13:53Speaker 2: This is Shane.
- 13:54Speaker 1: So why we Do what we Do? Mini is out I.
- 13:58Speaker 2: You've been listening to We Do What We Do? You
- 14:01Speaker 2: can learn more about this and other episodes by going
- 14:04Speaker 2: to WWD WWD.
- 14:06Speaker 1: Podcast dot com.
- 14:08Speaker 2: Thanks for listening and we hope you have an awesome
- 14:10Speaker 2: day