Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Women who hate women who hate women who hate men who hate Furries from Alpha Centari | Rantzerker…

Transcript

Women who hate women who hate women who hate men who hate Furries from Alpha Centari | Rantzerker… · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:01
  Hello everybody, and welcome on pat Your reading a maintaining frame, no worries.
• 0:08
  Uh, okay. What happened with Karen was last time we dealt with
• 0:11
  this individual Professor Sam Vaknin, and Karen became despondent. She because it's one
• 0:21
  thing to listen to people who you know, either have no reason to get
• 0:26
  it or just are incapable of comprehending. But to listen to somebody who should
• 0:34
  be able to, you know, just get that one last step towards a
• 0:40
  conclusion that makes a reasonable sense going forward, instead of continuing to think in
• 0:45
  ideological terms. It's it can get really frustrating. So she's she's taking a
• 0:51
  mental health day. She's taking a mental health Yeah, she's just gonna she's
• 0:56
  gonna chill, She's gonna be with her dogs. She's not. I'm the
• 1:02
  quiet one, not you. Yeah, that's that's a that's a there's a
• 1:07
  turn about the switch. Yeah, it is not sure if right, But
• 1:12
  I'm testing the levels now is that better? I may have? We are
• 1:22
  we are always doing this sounds sort of in blind in some ways, you
• 1:29
  know, like is apparently we can't really test the sounduntil we start live,
• 1:32
  so all right, not not for each individual person in the all so to
• 1:38
  get get people up to speed, because we didn't put this out on YouTube,
• 1:42
  but the Twitter people would have watched the previous episode. I just don't
• 1:47
  know if they actually I don't know where it goes? Like this is this
• 1:49
  is one of the problems with Twitter and the streaming. Where does it go?
• 1:53
  What? Twitter? What? What are you talking about? Well?
• 1:56
  The Twitter streaming, the Exeter streaming? What the exter streaming? The xer
• 2:05
  right now? Yeah, I know when when he stream to x you know,
• 2:08
  while the stream is live, people can see it. But then when
• 2:12
  it ends, it goes somewhere, and I just does it sink into the
• 2:19
  swamps of sadness? Does it just disappear into the void? Where does it
• 2:23
  go? I still don't know. Yeah, I didn't know that that happened.
• 2:29
  That's kind of strange. Yeah, maybe there's like some kind of like
• 2:34
  chasm with all these What you can try to do is is grab the Twitter
• 2:38
  link and and just put it somewhere and then after the show is over,
• 2:42
  see if that link works. Where does it go after the show is done?
• 2:47
  Does it does it go to like a electronic heaven? Who knows?
• 2:53
  All right, so before we continue, let me do the things we are
• 2:59
  Oh yeah, yeah, I was supposed to set up the okay, never
• 3:00
  mind, Well I can't do that because I didn't set it up. I
• 3:04
  forgot. But usually you can support the show monthly a feedbadger dot com slash
• 3:07
  support. I was going to set it up a little bit earlier because this
• 3:10
  is a request and the individual who requested it, well, it's a thank
• 3:17
  you request for his pledge, but there's no fundraiser to pledge too. So
• 3:22
  yeah, but anyway, if you're listening to this apple the show, yeah,
• 3:25
  he'll I don't know, yeah, I'll he'll watch it. He'll watch
• 3:28
  it, definitely, and I'll get that all sorted. But if you're listening
• 3:31
  to this later in like the week next week, there should be an option
• 3:38
  at feedbadger dot com slash support to support the show for the month. And
• 3:43
  also if you want to send us a message, which is great because we
• 3:46
  love to hear from you, you can do so it feed the badger dot
• 3:47
  com slash just the tip. We get this full benefit of whatever funds you
• 3:52
  wish to dispense, and you get the full benefit of not sending your comment
• 3:54
  through the YouTube comment die fusion machine, I wanted to say something different.
• 4:01
  I don't even know if that works. But you know, like the Qtube
• 4:04
  comment entropy system, whatever you want to call it, the uh the thing
• 4:10
  that they put comments through to determine whether or not they are good or bad,
• 4:15
  which no doubt will be a job for AI in the future, so
• 4:18
  it'll get even more weird. But anyway, if you want to avoid all
• 4:21
  that, if you prefer to talk to a human, you can do so
• 4:24
  at feedbbadgery dot com slash just the tip, and then we will determine whether
• 4:29
  or not we want to read your comments out loud. Sometimes. I actually
• 4:32
  know there has there been any comment aside from someone sending war in peace once
• 4:38
  where we were like, no, we're not reading this. I don't think
• 4:40
  so. Nope, no, I've never not read a comment. Yeah,
• 4:44
  yeah, except except the ones that were. I mean, I guess if
• 4:46
  they send something super vulgar with the intention of getting us banned from you,
• 4:50
  I mean we might have to beeper whether or not that's a great idea.
• 4:55
  Yeah, I'm sure that there are people who are like, you know,
• 5:00
  I just want I just want to sabotage your operation. Funny while giving us,
• 5:04
  you know, giving us a lot of information, which generally people don't
• 5:10
  really want to do if they want to sabotage something. You know, it's
• 5:13
  just it's it's a good bar of entry. Shall we say, But anyway,
• 5:16
  you can send your messages to feed the Badger dot com slash just the
• 5:18
  tip. We appreciate whatever you send, and also we appreciate knowing that we're
• 5:24
  not yelling into the void, because sometimes it feels like that, especially since
• 5:28
  you know, you listen to someone who's obviously smart, obviously understand certain things,
• 5:32
  and then they just fail. Like it's just like they get to the
• 5:34
  they get almost to the finish line, you know what, they're like inches
• 5:39
  from the finish line, and then they just I don't know, stab their
• 5:43
  own thigh and fall backwards and scream, you know, because they just can't
• 5:48
  make that last little bit of a leap across the chasms. Shall we say?
• 5:55
  Well, Okay, I'm mixing my metaphors, but you get what I
• 5:58
  mean. I think you guys do, all right, mm hmm. Okay,
• 6:01
  So we were saying before the show, you want to like to say
• 6:04
  that like about oh this guy, Professor Zam Sam veaank and back nin.
• 6:13
  No. He seems like a smart guy, but he seems to be like
• 6:18
  missing you knowing that last little bit that he's not taking that last step.
• 6:24
  And I think it begs the question why, Like, I mean, don't
• 6:33
  I don't know that it's I don't know that it's ignorance. I don't don't
• 6:38
  I don't know that it's ignorance, not if you're really trying to be objective
• 6:41
  cowardice. Okay, here's the thing, the last step on the last inferential
• 6:46
  step in this whole chain, which is, you know, recognizing that there's
• 6:50
  an issue with parabonding, recognizing that that does not bode well for human society
• 6:58
  in particular, it doesn't bode well for those societies that aren't engaging in parawanding
• 7:02
  and family formation anymore. Because the societies that are, they're going to be
• 7:06
  the future. So if that's what you want, you can kiss your liberal,
• 7:13
  egalitarian, feminist democracy goodbye, because it's just not going to go in
• 7:17
  the future. And that's such an irresponsible attitude to take. If you really
• 7:21
  value the values of secular democracy of the weird cultures they call them the Western
• 7:29
  egalitarian whatever else you value our cultural tradition, you value human rights as we
• 7:35
  understand them. You got you got to attend to the process of family formation
• 7:43
  because otherwise there will be no one to carry those values forward into the future,
• 7:46
  and those cultures that don't have them will be the ones that win the
• 7:50
  future. Okay, And it's like it's so irresponsible, and it really speaks
• 7:57
  to the fact that everybody who say as they value you know, the kind
• 8:01
  of liberal democracy principles that they they value human rights for minorities, They value
• 8:09
  women, being able to have you know, being able to to self actualize
• 8:13
  in the work world. If even if that is ridiculous because work isn't about
• 8:18
  that, But they value all of these things, they don't seem to value
• 8:22
  them enough to ensure that they continue into the future. So how much do
• 8:28
  they really value them versus using them to just get their rocks off in the
• 8:33
  moment. That's that's my question. M Like, even even if you are
• 8:39
  you are one hundred percent like I am an extreme leftist, well yeah,
• 8:46
  but you don't seem to care about the future. You know, you're not
• 8:52
  on the right side of history if you don't actually form families to carry that
• 8:56
  that that belief forward. You know, if you oh yeah, it's you're
• 9:01
  just defeating self defeating ideology. So even if you're the ultimate left, do
• 9:05
  what thou wilt including you know, you're basically just saying, I'm just here
• 9:13
  for myself and that's it. And you know, it's really funny because they
• 9:16
  talk about, oh, you know, we need to to take responsibility.
• 9:20
  You know, you don't. You're just here for yourself. You're not even
• 9:24
  here for the minorities because you're not going to do anything to preserve this cultural
• 9:28
  tradition into the future. You're the ultimate anti traditionalist, including your own beliefs,
• 9:35
  you know. And it's not going to be a situation where everybody else
• 9:39
  in the world is just like, oh yeah, actually, you know what
• 9:41
  self annihilation is where it's at. They're not going to like the cultures that
• 9:48
  aren't aren't interested in our values, aren't going to self annihilate. Okay,
• 9:54
  They're going to be the ones that win. Okay, go ahead, bride.
• 9:56
  Oh I was going to say, I think that people are missing a
• 9:58
  little of the text because we are talking kind of like reflecting on a stream
• 10:05
  we did yesterday on another channel. Oh yeah, but they yeah, because
• 10:11
  people are like what you know, play the video? What are you talking
• 10:13
  about? Okay? All right, Well, first of all, we're already
• 10:16
  nineteen minutes in and he's talking about replacement level birth rates, and he's talking
• 10:22
  about why and how to deal with it. But he still seems to be
• 10:26
  talking about it within the context of a feminist framework, which is, let's
• 10:33
  be honest, when you present men as being undesirable because they're horribly oppressive and
• 10:39
  everything else that's wrong with the world, you are impeding the process of family
• 10:46
  formation because you are basically telling women that men are a bad choice. So
• 10:54
  I don't exactly maybe give a run down on what he said prior to like
• 10:58
  in the nineteen minute he did the time codes this guy, Well, we
• 11:01
  went through it last show, so like some of the some of the main
• 11:05
  points was like, you know this idea that first he starts off by saying,
• 11:09
  you know, misogyny is on the rise, but it's amongst women,
• 11:13
  and then he goes on to talk about how women are, you know,
• 11:20
  more competitive with other women and that they're valuing these kind of like masculine traits
• 11:26
  that are negative traits like competitiveness, like dominance, et cetera, and talking
• 11:31
  about what the problems with that are. Let me see if I can.
• 11:35
  There was one point in particular that he brought up that I thought was really
• 11:37
  interesting, that women became masculinized, that there's a rise in female narcissism and
• 11:43
  psychopathy. And then he was going into the problem of male partners that are
• 11:50
  not At first he says it's not hypergamy, because hypergamy is is a myth
• 11:54
  that, like the red pill MANI Sphere, perpetuates. But then he goes
• 11:58
  on to say that women are not finding men of the of an appropriate you
• 12:03
  know, like level of education, because women are getting better educated than men.
• 12:09
  They're more educated, so they can't find a man. And of course
• 12:11
  he equates he does he makes a few mistakes. He equates education with intelligence,
• 12:16
  so he says women have more degrees, therefore they're smarter, therefore they
• 12:18
  can't find men that can engage them, you know up upstairs, which is,
• 12:22
  you know, it's not true. Women are not Just because someone is
• 12:26
  educated doesn't mean they are necessarily smarter. It just means that they're more indoctrinated,
• 12:31
  in my opinion, especially with what education is. And the other thing
• 12:37
  that he said was that let me see if I can find because it was
• 12:43
  something in particular. Oh yeah, women are are more likely to have.
• 12:50
  So he's saying that women are the one, on the one hand, hickier,
• 12:56
  but that they are also like there are no issues with pair bonding because
• 13:01
  women are having more one night stands, and there is a problem with that
• 13:05
  as well. This is a thing that I see a lot amongst people on
• 13:09
  the left that claim to care about this stuff. They will equate sex,
• 13:16
  casual sex with relationships. These are not the same. They're not. I
• 13:22
  mean, some relationships become like many relationships become sexual, but things that are
• 13:26
  sexual don't necessarily mean relationships. So if a man, if a man is
• 13:33
  looking for a life partner, he wants to pair bond with one woman or
• 13:37
  life and you know and all that a woman that is interested in casual sex
• 13:41
  is probably like they're not likely to run into each other, or if they
• 13:48
  do, then she will essentially ditch him at some point and go on to
• 13:54
  like have casual sex with other men, and that man will keep looking for
• 13:58
  the one. And you know, we know that. I mean that's like
• 14:01
  he's not personally, he's not giving marriage it's due, he's not giving family
• 14:05
  is due. He acknowledges that birth rates are lower, he acknowledges that families
• 14:11
  are you know, fewer families are forming, but he's not and it's not
• 14:15
  about blame per se. But he seems to just put it on men for
• 14:18
  not essentially being like high status enough to attract women. And so it's still
• 14:24
  men's fault, you know, Yes, And I think that's the short.
• 14:30
  Yeah, counterfactual nons Everything the manosphere says is counterfactual, nonsensical myths. All
• 14:35
  right, women have elevated standards, so consequently they are unable to find a
• 14:39
  long term partner. So there is no such thing as hypergamy. And but
• 14:43
  women are not picking them because hypergamy, I mean, because they want high
• 14:46
  status men, which is not hypergamy. That's something different. Okay, So
• 14:52
  let's just sum this up. Ultimately, the problem is that there's a lot
• 14:56
  of commentators who identify that there's a there's an issue she with pair bonding,
• 15:01
  but they absolutely refuse to entertain any kind of criticism about women, any kind
• 15:07
  of sense of responsibility for women for the situation any at all. Period.
• 15:13
  So the real problem with hypergamy is it can be seen as critical to women
• 15:18
  women, we should recognize that they have every right to be hypergamous, but
• 15:22
  we can't use the term hypergamy in a critical way. So that's what they
• 15:26
  really mean when they do something like, oh, the menisphere is wrong about
• 15:31
  hypergamy, because what's really happening is women are right to pick men that are
• 15:35
  better than they are because they are the table and men need to bring something
• 15:39
  to the table. And you see what I'm saying, because they cannot they
• 15:43
  can they can't. Well hypergamy suggests blame. Yeah, so they can't.
• 15:46
  They can't. They cannot condone any kind of criticism towards women. And here's
• 15:52
  the problem. Women are at least half the problem. So if you cannot
• 16:00
  criticize, actually, if you cannot criticize half of who is contributing to the
• 16:03
  problem or you know, then they become the biggest problem. Do you see
• 16:10
  what I'm saying? Like women might you know, all things equal, women
• 16:15
  might just be half the problem, right, just half. But the fact
• 16:18
  that we can't criticize them, we can't point out how they're contributing to the
• 16:22
  problem, makes them ninety nine percent of the problem. Yeah, they go
• 16:29
  from half to ninety nine percent because we can't talk about how they're contributing to
• 16:33
  the problem, and every single person who's having a discourse about the disaster the
• 16:41
  demographic collapse will be because it will be a disaster. Not only will it
• 16:45
  be the end of Western secular democracies because we're not the one we're the ones
• 16:49
  who aren't breeding, and also Asians, Asian cultures. It'll be the end
• 16:55
  of a lot of our infrastructure and potentially the end ecological catastroph We need to
• 17:00
  be here to make because the Earth is sort of a cyborg now and we're
• 17:04
  maintaining the cyborg parts, so we need to be here. But they recognize
• 17:10
  that this is going to be a disaster, that something is not good is
• 17:15
  going to come of it, but they cannot condone any criticism of women at
• 17:21
  all, even though right now, if men were suddenly able to earn as
• 17:26
  much as women want to in order to pair bond, in order to become
• 17:32
  husbands, we'd need like three more earths to actually be able to provide the
• 17:37
  material resources that that additional spending power would give. So it's like, yeah,
• 17:44
  okay, you mean that that Western pair bonding now requires the complete annihilation
• 17:49
  of the Earth to continue while that seems to be like we might want to
• 17:52
  criticize women about their excessive desires at that point, but no, we can't
• 17:59
  criticize women on this side. We can't criticize women. It's like absolutely taboo,
• 18:04
  absolutely, and anybody who finds it taboo to simply say, yeah,
• 18:08
  well, you know what, I'm gonna blame women. You know what,
• 18:11
  I'm gonna blame women? Okay? Am I going to explode? Am I
• 18:15
  gonna turn into a puff of smoke? Am I gonna melt? No,
• 18:18
  I'm gonna blame women. And there is nothing you can stop me. You
• 18:21
  just know way you can stop me, all right, and just stand by
• 18:25
  that and say, if there is something that women are to blame for,
• 18:30
  then we hold them accountable. But that there is most of the people who
• 18:33
  are even aware that there's a problem can't even get to the point of doing
• 18:38
  that. That's what makes us different, is what I've noticed over and over
• 18:44
  and over again. That is what makes us different. We are willing to
• 18:48
  hold women into account, even different from red pills, red pillars, so
• 18:52
  called red pillars because they don't hold women to account. They simply say,
• 18:56
  oh, it's female nature, because it's probably easier to simply say, well,
• 19:00
  women can't help it than to process what women are doing and say,
• 19:07
  actually, they are making these moral choices, and apparently one of the moral
• 19:12
  choices that they're making is to hate the other half of the human rights.
• 19:15
  That's really painful. It's easier just to say, oh, they just don't
• 19:18
  know what they're doing. They're they're not really aware, or they're incapable of
• 19:22
  making any other choice. It's easier to hide from that, much harder to
• 19:26
  say, women need to take responsibility. Women need to take responsibility, or
• 19:30
  we are going to lose everything that we have built. Right. That's it.
• 19:36
  That is the bottom line. And most people can't say that they cannot
• 19:42
  do it. Even even men's rights activists have problems with it, much less
• 19:49
  red pillars and certainly not feminists or liberal whatever. This guy is all right,
• 19:57
  let's say, yeah, okay, we're gonna listen to more of this
• 20:02
  guy, right, Yes, And this is what's happening between women. Finally,
• 20:10
  women have subjected themselves to identity politics. There's competitive victim wood among women,
• 20:17
  performative victim wood, AH. Vulnerability signaling kind of virtue signaling is subspecies
• 20:26
  of vulnerability or victimhood signaling, and it's very competitive because women have become men,
• 20:33
  so they have brought male attributes, male qualities, male characteristics, including
• 20:40
  psychological traits. They brought all these into victimhood movements. Women invented victimhood signaling.
• 20:52
  Well just I mean it was either men or women, So it might
• 20:56
  like there's no there's no third option, right, Well, yeah, I
• 21:00
  think this basically boils down to, uh uh, this is something women are
• 21:06
  doing, but men are still to blame. You notice that. I know
• 21:10
  it's like women are engaging in victimhood signaling, but this is because they've been
• 21:15
  they're toxically masculine. I don't know if he uses that term. Maybe it's
• 21:18
  just because this is how women compete. You know, women do engage in
• 21:23
  their own forms of competition. Women's competition tends to be around resources. Men's
• 21:29
  competition tends to be around mating opportunities, but to a lesser degree with human
• 21:33
  men. Because in a lot of cases, a cooperation between human men is
• 21:41
  like is like human men's peacock's tail. Uh, which is why we have
• 21:47
  such elaborate systems of cooperation that enable the entirety of our modern society. But
• 21:52
  anyway, let's it sounds like it. I mean, maybe maybe he's maybe
• 21:56
  we're going to see him go from sort of struggling with just blaming women,
• 22:03
  and maybe he'll actually be able to just say, yeah, this is something
• 22:07
  that women are doing wrong, and it's not because they've incorporated masculinity, or
• 22:11
  because they're toxically masculine, or because the patriarchy has I don't know strings on
• 22:18
  their you know, their their brain parts or something. Well, okay,
• 22:22
  let's find out. All right, I got a super chow. I'm gonna
• 22:25
  read it really quick. Great indoors gave us ten dollars. I think he's
• 22:27
  the guy who sent the video, right, yeah he is. I don't
• 22:30
  know, so thank you, great indoors. Thank you, great indoors.
• 22:33
  And he says, no, I warn you that if you do not tell
• 22:34
  me, we are at war. If you again allow yourself to palliate all
• 22:40
  the infamies and atrocities of this antichrist, I don't know you. In future.
• 22:45
  You are no longer my friend, no longer my faithful slave. As
• 22:48
  you say, I see, I'm scaring you. Sit down and talk to
• 22:52
  me. Quote. These words were uttered by in July eighteen oh five by
• 22:56
  Anna Pavlona sheer Cheerer, a distinguished lady of the court and confidential maid of
• 23:03
  honor to the Empress Maira Fiordanova. It was her greeting to Prince Vasili,
• 23:11
  a man high in rank in office, who was the first to arrive at
• 23:15
  her soiree. An excerpt from war in Peace by Leo Toys Tolstoi. So
• 23:21
  he just gave us work. Thank you, rad indoors. That that was
• 23:26
  that joke. There was a long wind up, but you did deliver.
• 23:33
  The lead in was was stretched. I was like waiting, like where is
• 23:37
  this going? And now it's always yeah, oh yeah, yeah, got
• 23:41
  you in there. You asked for it, You asked for it. Okay,
• 23:45
  just got trolled with Warren Peace. Okay, thank you, bred indoors.
• 23:48
  Thank you for the request as well and the support. Okay, keep
• 23:52
  going. No victim wood movements. It's become the new corporate field victy wood
• 24:00
  movements. So now money spinning, money making enterprises and competitive victim wood is
• 24:04
  actually a competition for relative positioning in a society that makes sense of itself,
• 24:14
  imbuse itself with meaning, not via God, not via dignity, not via
• 24:19
  reputation, not via true accomplishment, not via hard work, not via ethics,
• 24:26
  but via victim wood. Yeah, how did we get here? Are
• 24:30
  you gonna you're gonna ask yourself that like corporate you're saying that it's become a
• 24:37
  corporate branding tactic. Can I agree, Brian? We got here because women
• 24:41
  became more like men and oh it's masculinity's fault. Yes, because because before
• 24:48
  before men took before women became like men, men were the ones cashing a
• 24:52
  un victimhood politics. That's right, That's exactly what was going on. You
• 24:57
  see, he's saying that it's women bringing the victim of politics. But because
• 25:02
  it's combining with men's competitiveness, then it's becoming toxic. Yeah, but women
• 25:07
  never were never competitive before they started, like like the nineth more competitive.
• 25:14
  Okay, but let's let's give him, give him some props at least,
• 25:18
  you know it, he's recognizing women are at the heart of this. Let's
• 25:23
  keep it going. Okay, I got another super child from sir Biggles.
• 25:27
  Thank you, sir Biggles, because it's fifty dollars. Thank you so much.
• 25:33
  At the time. Why you're not at the time and says I appreciate
• 25:40
  the good work you guys do. Here's some money to keep the lights on.
• 25:41
  Well, thank you, all right, thank you, we appreciate that.
• 25:45
  You appreciate that. Okay, let's play some more today. The greater
• 25:52
  thinktive you are, the more accomplished you are, and the higher your relative
• 25:56
  positioning in society. Women plugged into this big time because women have been victimized.
• 26:04
  Really for example, Oh, that's what it is from a historical oppression.
• 26:14
  You know, it's funny. Uh, I was gonna say something about
• 26:21
  that occurred to me. We we as a society today value victimhood. This
• 26:33
  is a problem, but it is a product I believe of a feminine a
• 26:41
  sort of well, a shadow feminine perspective, like like the darkest parts of
• 26:47
  the feminine becoming the normal and and being profitable and getting advantage. This is
• 26:53
  why there are men trying to claim their own piece of victimhood. This is
• 26:57
  why there are men transitioning, I think in some part because there is some
• 27:04
  gain to be had if you are the biggest victim, I would say,
• 27:11
  Okay, you recognize that women compete over victimhood. Have you considered that the
• 27:18
  narrative that women are victimized by the past is also that is also basically another
• 27:26
  expression of that of women competing over victimhood and presenting themselves as victims in order
• 27:33
  to gain control over the discourse and gain control over resources. They I mean,
• 27:41
  can we not? Like, here's the thing. The assumption that women
• 27:45
  are oppressed by men or society is just that an assumption. It has never
• 27:53
  been scientifically proven because it never has been presented as something subject to science.
• 28:00
  It's always been basically an unfalsifiable belief. So unfalsifiable beliefs are optional. So
• 28:07
  he is choosing right now. He is choosing, and people need to realize
• 28:12
  this. He's choosing to exist in a world where women are the ultimate victims.
• 28:18
  He's choosing to exist in a world where that constrains the relationship between men
• 28:22
  and women. People are choosing to exist in that world. It is a
• 28:26
  choice. It's optional. You don't have to You can exit that world at
• 28:32
  any time, and you just all you have to do is apply the standards
• 28:37
  of science, of the scientific method and say, okay, well, first
• 28:42
  of all, how do you falsify this idea that men being in charge equals
• 28:47
  women oppressed? Okay, Well, the way you falsify it is you look
• 28:51
  at the situation for men when men are in charge, men as a whole,
• 28:55
  and you look at the situation for women when men are in charge,
• 28:57
  And if the situation for women is worse, then obviously it's not oppressive.
• 29:03
  Because if men are choosing to give other men the worst, the most dangerous,
• 29:08
  the most difficult, and hold them to the expectation of providing the most
• 29:14
  security and safety for women possible, if that's what men are holding other men
• 29:18
  too, then that is not the exercise of unjust or cruel authority, is
• 29:25
  it? And yet where do you see and this is the basic, the
• 29:30
  very basic, the very first step to having a scientific idea about reality is
• 29:37
  to frame it as falsifiable, very first step. Where do you see this
• 29:41
  in any of the discourse around men oppressing women? Nowhere, because they've never
• 29:45
  done it. It is not in the realm of science. It is firmly
• 29:49
  in the realm of unfalsifiable belief and all unfalsifiable beliefs are optional. He is
• 29:56
  choosing to screw himself over, and we are all choosing to screw ourselves over
• 30:02
  because of this. And you choose, you gotta not choose it. As
• 30:08
  hard as it is, you gotta not choose it. Yep, you got
• 30:12
  to take that last step. You see where we're going to Remember, we're
• 30:17
  talking about the last step. We got to take the last step. And
• 30:19
  of course Karen is super frustrated with this individual because he seems like he's smart
• 30:25
  enough. He's getting all the steps up to the last step, and then
• 30:30
  at the last step he's stabbing himself in the foot and saying who did this
• 30:33
  to me? And falling over. I can't go any further because he's choosing.
• 30:41
  He's choosing to fail. There's only two There's only two reasons this lack
• 30:45
  of the last step. Either he doesn't know, which would make him lazy
• 30:52
  or stupid. He does know, but he doesn't have the courage to say
• 30:56
  it, or he does know and he wants to maintain this elute, which
• 31:03
  is killing. Yeah. Yeah, he's a good man. You know,
• 31:07
  good men do not the idea that that women are defined by men harming them.
• 31:15
  Well, but the last step, you know, the last step is
• 31:19
  like the step in the remember Indiana Jones and the Search for the Holy Grail.
• 31:26
  Uh, yeah, it's been a while, but yeah, he has
• 31:27
  to step into the chasm. Yeah, he has to walk on the invisible
• 31:32
  floor or whatever. On the invisible floor. He has to take the leap
• 31:34
  of faith. He has to take the leap of faith. That's the last
• 31:38
  step. That's the last step. And most people can't do it because it
• 31:44
  requires courage. M hm. And that is one hell of a rare thing.
• 31:49
  Okay, it is in the United States, like African Americans, these
• 31:56
  and like the Jews. So these these groups, these cohorts, these populations
• 32:01
  who have been actually victimized throughout the ages to this or you know how he
• 32:07
  has to say women have been victimized like the Jews, and women have been
• 32:12
  victimized by like the Blacks. Do you know why he has to do that,
• 32:15
  because it's ridiculous to say that the Jews have been victimized like women and
• 32:20
  the Blacks have been victimized like women. Yes, uh yeah, how okay,
• 32:24
  so he has to do it. The other show me the society that
• 32:29
  holocausted women. Uh, show me the society that that enslaved only women.
• 32:37
  Yeah really really no no, but but Alison, women were still viewed as
• 32:43
  chattel. That's bullshit. Okay, no, no, and again this is
• 32:46
  this is the choice you believe this. This is your choice to believe this
• 32:50
  crap. You choose to believe it, and then and then you you enjoy
• 32:54
  the social decay that results. But this is like, but he's doing that,
• 33:00
  and it's like this intersectional thing. Like I said that intersectional intersectionality essentially
• 33:06
  is the process of refining the victimhood of groups away from the males in those
• 33:09
  groups, towards the females, and then towards all women in general, in
• 33:15
  particular the women on top who can best make use of victimhood in order to
• 33:19
  start resources. So the intersectional pipeline is basically the refinement of the victimhood social
• 33:24
  resource to the women who have or are basically are elite, the ones who
• 33:31
  are able to use that victimhood resource to get themselves mansions, shall we say,
• 33:37
  get themselves cushy jobs in NGOs and positions in government and academic careers.
• 33:45
  So the victimhood goes from the most victimized. So, for example, you
• 33:50
  go from a situation where a black man gets shot, and somehow through the
• 33:55
  intersectional pipeline, we go from the black men getting shot to a white woman
• 34:02
  needing a job in an academic capacity in some university. But that's and and
• 34:12
  and that because and the exact method is, Uh, this is a horrible
• 34:17
  oppression of black people, but black women always have it worse because they're women.
• 34:24
  Therefore, the white woman deserves special consideration. Do you see how that
• 34:30
  works? Yeah, And that's what he's doing here. He is appending the
• 34:36
  oppression of legitimately oppressed groups. Now we can discuss what we should do about
• 34:43
  that historical oppression, if it is even functional to continue to perpetuate the necessity
• 34:49
  of arranging our society around it, that's irrelevant. What he's doing is he's
• 34:53
  taking that oppression, that historical oppression that's legitimate, and he's appending it to
• 34:59
  women so that they And this is very satisfying for men because they want to
• 35:06
  feel like they are protecting women. That I want to see women's vulnerability.
• 35:12
  So seeing Jews is vulnerable to a guy like this is probably psychically gross.
• 35:17
  Seeing black as vulnerable because it includes Jewish men and black men. And he
• 35:21
  doesn't like that. It's not interested in that. So what he does is
• 35:23
  he takes that vulnerability, applies it where it should be, where it's most
• 35:29
  satisfying. Man, Just fix you feel good and that is women. I'm
• 35:35
  just saying. I was noticing this last night as well. Me and Brian
• 35:40
  went on a on a a show with some very interesting people. I would
• 35:46
  say that they were very They were very left, like very left, and
• 35:53
  I was listening to it. I think they were standard left. But go
• 35:57
  ahead, Okay, well I've seen I've seen a lot of content on the
• 36:00
  internet, and Okay, they weren't. They weren't really that bizarre, like
• 36:06
  they were pretty standard, but go on. What was interesting is like me
• 36:08
  and John are sorry not Jonathan. Me and Brian sorry uh. We were
• 36:13
  just were listening, trying to figure out something beneficial to say, I think,
• 36:17
  and absorbing what was going on. And I was observing the people around
• 36:22
  me, and at some point I was thinking, because there was these two
• 36:25
  leftist individuals and I don't mean to like dehumanize them or anything, but they
• 36:29
  certainly were playing out a particular role, both men, and I was thinking,
• 36:36
  Okay, so are you here to discuss stuff or are you here to
• 36:40
  identify enemies like are because it seems like concepts to you are gang colors or
• 36:50
  army banners or uniforms. So you're you're you're taking these concepts and you're saying,
• 36:55
  oh, well, this is the enemy based on them, right,
• 37:00
  and so how do you have a discussion with somebody who does that? And
• 37:02
  I was thinking to myself, also, wow, that is so male,
• 37:07
  no offense, And I don't mean that well, I mean the whole process
• 37:13
  of identifying the in group and the outgroup and then wanting to go immediately to
• 37:19
  establishing the territorial defense exclusively getting rid of the enemy. That is a male
• 37:24
  instinct. I'm not saying it's bad, but it's male. Like this,
• 37:29
  this really powerful desire to identify who shouldn't be there and get rid of them.
• 37:35
  Get what I'm saying. It's behind like altruistic punishment, like getting rid
• 37:38
  of criminals, getting rid of military It's that kind of impulse. And I'm
• 37:45
  like, you, guys, you both are both raw dogging that impulse.
• 37:49
  Like you have no conscious awareness that what you're doing right now is simply identifying
• 37:57
  enemies and trying to destroy them. See what I'm saying, Yeah, yeah,
• 38:04
  but they don't. They don't add this is the thing. What I
• 38:07
  what I have observed. That's why I wrote down everything they said that I
• 38:12
  thought was relevant. I told them at the end, this is what you
• 38:15
  think about the people that you claim to oppose. It tells me they don't
• 38:20
  They don't know any other position. They only know what they're supposed to know.
• 38:25
  You know that they are the good people that believe the good things and
• 38:29
  agree with the good stuff. And that's what leftism is, right, It's
• 38:31
  the good things and that's it. And anyone who even like deviates from that
• 38:37
  a little bit is the bad thing. And that's the other team, whatever
• 38:42
  it is. That's why they believe. They fundamentally believe that people who are
• 38:45
  religious, don't they think that they that mental health issue is demonic possession.
• 38:52
  Like that's what they They legitimately believe that, like like we like like people
• 38:59
  who are religious, and only Christians by the way, because they don't say
• 39:02
  this about Muslims or Jews. So Christians are like medieval like dark age people
• 39:09
  to this day. They that's and what it speaks to is what they don't
• 39:14
  know that in those times either. Uh No, of course it wasn't like
• 39:17
  that. I'm just saying like they're they're fed a line like they're they're they're
• 39:22
  obviously products of the education system and they're turning they're turning any kind Uh,
• 39:31
  they're turning concepts into gang colors in in group and out group. That's what
• 39:37
  I was trying to explain, is that they have they don't know what anybody
• 39:43
  outside of what they believe believes exactly. Yeah, that's why they characterize about
• 39:49
  that in this cartoonish way that you're not about understanding them, you are about
• 39:57
  characterizing them as the outgroup. And that's it. It's where it's where discourse
• 40:01
  goes to die. And I was really tempted to say, Okay, well,
• 40:07
  I don't really consider myself on the right, but i'll play your enemy
• 40:09
  today. Now what like, okay, you've identified me as the enemy.
• 40:14
  Now what are you going to socially ostracize me? Probably? Are you gonna
• 40:20
  shoot me in the head? Are you going to gather people like me up
• 40:22
  in camps and put us in ovens? Like? What's your ultimate goal with
• 40:27
  this process of defying discourse or turning it into a means to identify enemies?
• 40:34
  So that's what they're doing. They're turning concepts into ways of identifying enemies,
• 40:37
  like fucking Chromagnon with freaking clubs, going our city, city, our technology.
• 40:49
  Ah cow, Like it's just it's this most primitive attitude. But what
• 40:53
  goes next? What happens next? You've identified me in the as the enemy?
• 40:58
  What's your next move? Right? And this is it? This is
• 41:04
  where thought goes to die. And that, as far as I can tell,
• 41:07
  that is the exact opposite of the very virtues that they claim. Yeah,
• 41:13
  okay, yeah, I got well. On the plus side, we
• 41:16
  can all understand that they don't own any of those virtues. Those things are
• 41:21
  not owned by a camp. They are just expressed by people. Yes,
• 41:24
  we understand that, and this is not going to be a big deal.
• 41:28
  We just have to remind them that they also don't own those traits though.
• 41:34
  Anyway, let's play this more of the video. They find it easier to
• 41:38
  express themselves via victimbood. But this, of course creates a lot of internal
• 41:45
  friction because victimbood is competitive. So women resent each other because of this competition.
• 41:52
  Women become each other's enemies because they vie on and they compete for scarce
• 42:01
  resources. Okay, what do you mean it's scarce resources? How? How
• 42:06
  aren't we in the most resource abundant like time in all of human history?
• 42:09
  Right now? Like you can go, you can leave your house, go
• 42:13
  down the street to a store and get your choice of whatever food you want.
• 42:16
  It's just sitting there on the shelf. Like, what what do you
• 42:22
  mean the scarce resource? I guess is attention. I think I think it's
• 42:28
  I think what what he's I think what it is actually is the the the
• 42:35
  care from a worthy man like that, Like like, it's not like there
• 42:40
  aren't men around, Like, look, there was a dude. There was
• 42:44
  a chick with two heads that married a guy and he was like a military
• 42:50
  vet. So don't give me like that there are there is not a man
• 42:53
  for a woman out there. That's just like a woman with two heads got
• 42:57
  a man. So it doesn't matter what you look like, you'll be fine.
• 43:00
  So it's not that there that there aren't men available. It's that there
• 43:05
  aren't enough men that meet women's standards available, and they're fighting each other over
• 43:12
  those men because it's not resources. We can get that. It's not food,
• 43:15
  not shelter, you know, it's it's men of a certain quality.
• 43:21
  It could be attention, but the but attention I don't think is a goal
• 43:23
  in and of itself. I think there's the the care and affection and commitment
• 43:30
  that is like the real goal, you know, mm hmm, I mean
• 43:36
  that's what I think. No, I got you, I got you.
• 43:37
  But but anyway, it's like a psychological goal rather than like a physical or
• 43:44
  a material goal. And I think that I think that this is not something
• 43:52
  that's started now like that. Right now, the resource that women are competing
• 43:57
  over is victimhood. But the idea that women are doing this because masculinity is
• 44:01
  bullshit. Yeah, female great apes compete over victim over resources. They compete
• 44:09
  over territory that have resources in them, and they're their competition over territory can
• 44:14
  be pretty brutal. This is not something that happened I don't know a couple
• 44:19
  generations ago that women were like, oh, look at all this victimhood.
• 44:22
  It's a resource. And then they were like, and now we can be
• 44:24
  masculine and start clawing each other over this resource. Oh my god, what
• 44:30
  an innovation. It's like, are you kidding? There were epic cat fights
• 44:35
  throughout all of human history? Mm, you know, just epic that's that
• 44:40
  actually changed human history? Right, There have always been competition between women over
• 44:47
  resources, right, This is not new. It's just new that victimhood has
• 44:54
  become such a huge resource. Mm hmm. Okay, let's keep going because
• 45:00
  I want to. I don't want to take this. I don't want I
• 45:02
  want it. I don't want to go more than a day with this.
• 45:06
  Okay, entitlement rights, reparations, money, and so on. Internal competition
• 45:14
  among women in victim wood movements is a major driver of female misogyny. Okay,
• 45:21
  this is women. What about men? How are men reacting? Oh?
• 45:24
  Boy, here we go. Okay, wait a second. This is
• 45:28
  a big driver of female misogyny. You know, women competing over it with
• 45:35
  each other over resources? Is okay? Let me let me just ask is
• 45:37
  men competing over women? Missonry, I would say no, Yeah, I
• 45:49
  think it's just competition, like question, like it's just a neutral Why does
• 45:54
  everything in them this guy's mentality, everything bad have to have a dick attached
• 46:00
  to it? Yeah, okay, yep it's bad. Or actually no,
• 46:10
  in this case, it's everything bad has to have woman hatred attached to it.
• 46:15
  It's pathological. Okay, I'm done. Let's go. All right,
• 46:19
  let's play some more. Oh, before we continue, I just want to
• 46:22
  tell you I did send you the article he discussed. I'm not so sure
• 46:27
  it's going to be a valuable use of our time to listen to him talk
• 46:31
  about the article. Maybe we should just talk about the article. But you
• 46:35
  want me to just go to the article, you know, let's keep going
• 46:37
  and see what he does, because I think I could just give you a
• 46:40
  summary of the article. All right, to all these There's a new study
• 46:45
  from the University of British Columbia and it came up with a few fascinating insights.
• 46:54
  They found out that men, contemporary men post modern men can be classified
• 47:00
  into, broadly speaking, into three distinct categories of masculinity, and each category
• 47:07
  is reactive to female behavior and to modern modern vagaries, vagaries and exigencies of
• 47:16
  life. So the first type of men, I'm just positive for the banana
• 47:22
  there. Yeah, I'm not sure we're gonna get hit with a copy right
• 47:25
  here, but listen, you know, yeah, no, I don't think
• 47:29
  so. It's the neo traditionalist men. It's the guardian of tradition. Okay,
• 47:34
  neo traditionalist sounds like an oxymoron. I'm just gonna say it means new
• 47:37
  old. Okay, I'm gonna, I'm gonna, I'm gonna, I'm gonna
• 47:42
  blow this all out of water. There's only one group of men, men
• 47:46
  who judge themselves based on benefit to women. The only difference between them is
• 47:52
  what they consider to be benefit to women. Okay, the neo traditionalist man
• 47:59
  feels like the great benefit to women is through providing and protecting women. The
• 48:04
  progressive man, oh wait no, the egalitarian man feels like an egalitarian structure
• 48:10
  to the relationship benefits women most. And the progressive man feels like, I
• 48:15
  think that he also wants to benefit trans women, so he includes them in
• 48:21
  his umbrella of protection. Okay, that's it. But every single group of
• 48:27
  men is defined and bye how they want to benefit women. Right, That's
• 48:35
  that's it. And I don't even think that this anybody who's discussing this,
• 48:38
  including this man, is ready to have that conversation like that, this that
• 48:45
  that. Why is it that men are only considered in terms of women's benefit?
• 48:52
  Right? Why aren't we ever discussing how women define themselves in terms of
• 48:57
  men's benefit. I don't think there's ever been any kind of study. Wouldn't
• 49:00
  it be astounding, like I'm gonna study how men women define themselves in relation
• 49:07
  to benefiting men? But this is this study? How do men define themselves
• 49:12
  in relation to benefiting women. And the great irony is that they call out
• 49:19
  traditional men for being bad for whatever reason. And the only reason why they're
• 49:24
  bad is not because they also want to benefit women, but because the way
• 49:28
  that they want to benefit women is ideologically opposed to the other men who want
• 49:32
  to benefit women in different ways. Good lord, can we just grow up
• 49:37
  as a species? Can we just move past this frickin mental trap and like,
• 49:50
  like start thinking about things like a species that can actually start to get
• 49:55
  off its planet, you know, start thinking about ourselves in more realistic,
• 50:00
  intelligent, and pragmatic ways instead of constantly doing this childish bullshit. Okay,
• 50:08
  well, let's become serious people, all right, sure, Yeah, it's
• 50:16
  an archetype. This kind of man perceives himself as a provider a protector in
• 50:27
  relationships, and this is anchored in traditional gender roles. This individual's find fulfillment
• 50:35
  in playing the role of guardian, savior, healer, rescuer, fixer,
• 50:40
  nurturing relationships through the lens of time honored scripts and norms and behavioral Okay,
• 50:49
  stop right there. Every that the entire the entire study is structured in terms
• 50:58
  of seeing men as benefiting women and how they want to benefit women. So
• 51:05
  if that is traditionalism, every single man in that study is a traditionalist.
• 51:12
  It's just that woman A wants her man to protect her with a gun and
• 51:20
  get her a yellow dress. Woman B wants her man to protect her with
• 51:24
  a saber and get her a floral print dress, and woman C wants her
• 51:31
  man to protect her with I don't know, a medieval axe and get her
• 51:38
  a brown dress. Do you get what I'm saying. Yeah, they're all
• 51:45
  the same, They're all identical. And the very structure of the study enforces
• 51:52
  that because the study is, well, how do men define themselves in terms
• 51:58
  of how they arrange themselves in terms of women's benefit. We're just going to
• 52:01
  assume that men should be arranged in terms of women's benefit, that this should
• 52:06
  be how we categorize men, right, Like, that's the that's where this
• 52:08
  whole thing begins. Yeah, this is that's where men and women. That's
• 52:13
  where men begin and end with women's benefit. That's the only real categorization pattern
• 52:17
  we can have for men, right, Okay, whether they benefit men women
• 52:22
  and how they benefit women. Because and this guy can't even see past that,
• 52:28
  He doesn't even see the box that he's in to use Michael what's his
• 52:31
  face Kimmel's is it Kimmel? Michael Michael Kimmel. Yeah, yeah, no,
• 52:38
  but he was like discredited, so I don't know where he is now.
• 52:40
  But Michael Flood has yet to be discredited, so he still has his
• 52:44
  ideas out there. The man box. This, this is the box.
• 52:50
  This is the real box that men do not get out of, and he
• 52:53
  is continuing to perpetuate it. Okay, all right, I got a super
• 52:59
  child for Richard Pierre for five dollars and he says, uh, Alison,
• 53:05
  they don't hate men. They only name everything bad after men. They don't
• 53:09
  hate men, they just named everything bad after them. That was yeah,
• 53:13
  classic Karen, classic Karen. Yeah, all right, let's pa say more
• 53:19
  prescriptions. The problem is this, maybe misogynistic men, especially covert narcissists,
• 53:28
  fit into this neo traditionalist role. Really how regard to women as inferior?
• 53:37
  And actually many other misogynistic men, not only covert narcissists, I'm sure.
• 53:42
  Yeah, why would you serve someone who's inferior? I'm pretty sure narcissists do
• 53:49
  not look at their identities in terms of serving others. And also, why
• 53:53
  is it that only traditionalist men have covert narcissism because even again, egalitarian men
• 54:00
  are in position of providing something to You can't get away from this, dude.
• 54:06
  If men are a positioned to provide things for women, either egalitarianism like
• 54:13
  I guess some sort of equal self actualization. I don't know, but something.
• 54:17
  If women are in position to provide something for women, women are by
• 54:22
  definition inferior. Okay. If men need to bring something to the table and
• 54:29
  women are the table, the thing that wn bring to the table is going
• 54:32
  to make them superior in some way to women. It's just like so frustrating.
• 54:38
  I get I get what Karen. I'm actually starting to feel Karen's frustration.
• 54:43
  It's so frustrating to watch someone. It's like watching a caveman who knows
• 54:52
  astrophysics and is using it to explain how you get berries from a bush or
• 55:00
  something really freaking simple and stupid and basic. He's using it to explain how
• 55:07
  the Great Spirit constructed rocks. Right. It's like, you have these ideas
• 55:15
  and you have these observations that are higher level, and then you immediately drop
• 55:20
  into the grunting idiot stage. Yeah, okay, okay, right, See
• 55:30
  here's more grunting, grunting idiocy. Let's go, and they regard women as
• 55:40
  inferior, they hold them in contempt. They're contemptuous towards women. Can you
• 55:49
  see women as the victims of all of history without holding them into contempt?
• 55:53
  I mean, you don't call it contempt, but you fail to see how
• 55:58
  women have power over anything, how femininity can have any power whatsoever. It's
• 56:02
  always in response to men. It's always subordinate to men. The only way
• 56:07
  that women get out of it is becoming masculine. Right, How is that
• 56:10
  not absolute profound contempt towards women and femininity? Can you tell me that?
• 56:24
  I don't know. I mean, I I think I don't want to get
• 56:30
  to Let's just keep going. I mean, I guess, I guess we'll
• 56:34
  see what he says about the oorial though. No, no, no,
• 56:37
  no, I'm I'm not saying that. What you're saying is I just I
• 56:42
  want to know what he's gonna say about the other two groups. But I
• 56:44
  feel like traditionalists, Okay, here's what I would I'm wondering. So they've
• 56:52
  divided men into three types. But you're right, there's only one type of
• 56:58
  man. There's the way the one type one demand that we one type of
• 57:02
  masculinity that that is measured, which is the ways that it benefits women.
• 57:08
  And when you're splitting into three subtypes, but ultimately you are still talking about
• 57:15
  one type right egalitarian, progressive, and neo traditionalist. And now I don't
• 57:21
  know how the egalitarian and the progressive is different. I know how they are
• 57:27
  different against like against the what he's calling the neo traditionalist, which I think,
• 57:31
  again, I don't like these words. You know, these people play
• 57:36
  word games all the time and you have to like wrestle with definitions. Neo
• 57:42
  traditionalists sounds like like when you look at it, it sounds like it's it's
• 57:45
  a reinvention of an old way of doing things, but it's still just in
• 57:52
  like from what I can tell, like, there's just you know, like
• 57:57
  I don't even like traditionalists by itself. I just think there's like normal men,
• 58:01
  Like there's just normal men, you know, Like they're not trying to
• 58:05
  reinvent the wheel, trying to figure out what is it that women want so
• 58:07
  they can give it to them. That's all it is. It's literally the
• 58:12
  notebook, what do you want? Right? That's what most men do.
• 58:17
  I don't think that's not even I'm not saying that's a bluss or a minus.
• 58:22
  But and they're all trying to provide for women. They just have different
• 58:27
  approaches. But what I'm wondering about is which of those three, if we're
• 58:31
  gonna look at it from this perspective, if we accept this guy's acceptance of
• 58:37
  the framing of this study, which of the three is the most likely to
• 58:45
  result in a marriage and family because if he's because I have a feeling that
• 58:55
  egalitarian men might run into problems because one thing that's left out of this is
• 59:00
  what women actually want. Like there's like essentially, what he's saying is that
• 59:05
  men are all trying to give women what they want, and then there are
• 59:07
  three different types of men, and they're all trying to figure out which way
• 59:09
  is the way that's gonna work, and they're trying these out right. So
• 59:13
  I think egalitarian men, I don't know if he's going to say this,
• 59:15
  I haven't I haven't watched this far yet, are going to be like,
• 59:19
  well, I treat my wife like an equal right and we're going to share
• 59:22
  everything. I mean, that's what I assume progressive men are probably gonna be
• 59:28
  like, oh, if she makes more money than me. That's okay,
• 59:30
  I guess right. Maybe it includes trans women, but that's kind of like
• 59:34
  that's already a non starter when it comes to family. Okay, so let's
• 59:37
  just let's just okay, let's watch what he has to say. All right,
• 59:40
  Well, it's not really what he has to say, it's what the
• 59:43
  the what the yeah? His his his take. What the study has to
• 59:47
  say that allows them to feel good with themselves, to feel comfortable with their
• 59:54
  own racist if you wish. Oh, okay, it's traditional as men bad.
• 1:00:04
  Well, that's that really escalated. They're sexists and racist, misogynistic,
• 1:00:07
  old fashioned, retrograde. Yeah, narcissistic and narcissistic. Yet they say I
• 1:00:16
  regard women as inferior, I hold them in yes, so you dude,
• 1:00:22
  Yeah, something's wrong with them. Not because they're even, not because they
• 1:00:24
  are, you know, but simply because they are childlike. They're undeveloped,
• 1:00:30
  the primitive. They are not like men. Men are evolved, Men are
• 1:00:37
  developed, Men are mature, men are adults. Men are responsible for ninety
• 1:00:45
  nine percent of human progress, at least a lot of it, a lot
• 1:00:52
  of it since the industrial evolution. I'm really sorry, sir, that is
• 1:00:55
  the truth? Yeah, like God, I mean, but are we just
• 1:01:00
  scapegoating women so that we can usher in transhumanism in the Handmaid's Tale? Alison?
• 1:01:06
  Are we just scapegoating women? I okay. I will say that maybe
• 1:01:14
  women could be responsible for human progress if women were held responsible, but until
• 1:01:22
  they are, they're not. Okay, you see how you see how that
• 1:01:27
  works? Now, this guy treats women with contempt because he regards femininity and
• 1:01:32
  being a woman to be some kind of handicap throughout all of human history,
• 1:01:37
  even though women had control over well over the process of raising children in every
• 1:01:44
  culture I've studied, they are the primary socialization. And get this, most
• 1:01:50
  of our decisions are made based on emotional habits laid down in childhood. So
• 1:01:54
  women basically imprint the motherboard. It's probably why it's called a motherboard. And
• 1:02:00
  yet they have absolutely no control over the computer. Bullshit. And to believe
• 1:02:06
  that requires believing that women are inferior, That women have no ability to project
• 1:02:14
  their interests if they are feminine, no ability to have any control over women
• 1:02:22
  if they are feminine. Femininity is the lesser form of gender expression in his
• 1:02:30
  estimation. When you say that women are victims of history. That's what you're
• 1:02:34
  saying about femininity and women, that they are the lesser gender and they are
• 1:02:37
  the lesser form of gender expression, and that is contempt. You're not calling
• 1:02:44
  it contempt, just like he says, well, women want men that are
• 1:02:46
  better than them, but that's not hypergamy. They play these name games.
• 1:02:52
  You treat women with contempt, dude, you do, and you are completely
• 1:02:59
  unaware of it. Okay, all right, I got a super chow from
• 1:03:07
  Richard Beere again gives five bucks and said, Alison, are you feeling an
• 1:03:10
  overwhelming earth to seek out and talk to a manager? Okay, I'd like
• 1:03:17
  to speak to the manager of the human race, our childlike they're infantile,
• 1:03:22
  they're incapable of taking care of themselves, they're incapable of defending themselves, so
• 1:03:28
  I need to protect them. Yes, that's what you believe. He is
• 1:03:30
  a combination of misogyny, perhaps the most egregious, virulent form of misogyny.
• 1:03:37
  This guy's an ideologue. He's not a professor. Yeah, but these these
• 1:03:42
  are ideological things he's saying. If you believe that women have no power and
• 1:03:46
  patriarchy, what is your role as a man but to protect them? He
• 1:03:50
  doesn't have self awareness, doesn't have an interest in the truth. He has
• 1:03:54
  an interest in spreading. He has an interest in feeling good about himself.
• 1:03:59
  That's yeah, it's it's a it is it is. I mean that's I'm
• 1:04:02
  sorry, but like, you can't call yourself a professor and you're just doing
• 1:04:08
  this what you're doing, you're spreading your religion like this is this is the
• 1:04:13
  feminist sermon on the mount. It's you know, women are victims, men
• 1:04:16
  are narcissists and abusers, but only the traditional men. This is why,
• 1:04:24
  this is why, like I, I have a feeling that progressive and or
• 1:04:29
  you have egalitarian men are either going to be just as bad or they're gonna
• 1:04:31
  be much better, even though the probably less likely to result in family.
• 1:04:35
  And Okaly, he's just attacking what he's calling neo traditionalist men because it sounds
• 1:04:42
  like neo kan and that's and that makes him feel good in his nethers.
• 1:04:46
  Mmmm, let's keep going. I was gonna say something, but you know
• 1:04:50
  what, we got a lot of ground to cover and I am not doing
• 1:04:56
  this again, okay, which invo loathing coupled with all compulsive aggressive need to
• 1:05:08
  protect women to defend them to rescue them, to save them from hate them
• 1:05:15
  and you want to save them or predators. Mario hates people from patriarchies like
• 1:05:20
  like he's talking about himself. You have an obsessive need to protect women from
• 1:05:25
  other men. You know you are doing that right now. You are doing
• 1:05:30
  the thing that you are saying that other of these traditionalist men are doing.
• 1:05:33
  You are protecting the vulnerable, incapable, childlike uh, non functional women from
• 1:05:41
  the horrible traditionalist patriarchs right now. Do you see what I'm saying? Yeah,
• 1:05:47
  Okay, let's keep going. God, oh man urged danger or whatever
• 1:05:55
  the traditionalist men nowadays is highly narcissistic, misogynistic, contemptuous. Yeah, those
• 1:06:03
  men over there are so bad they should stay away from the women. We
• 1:06:06
  need to protect the women from those men. They're horrible, very invested,
• 1:06:10
  cafected, emotionally invested in the traditional role of men. He's the provider and
• 1:06:16
  he's the defender of the women's physical and mental safety. So are there not
• 1:06:25
  women that want this? If women, if most women said they wanted this,
• 1:06:32
  what would you say to that, Well, they don't want his provision
• 1:06:36
  and protection. Like Brian, he doesn't like women, or he apparently considers
• 1:06:43
  women to have internalized misogyny, so he has. He says that women have
• 1:06:47
  metaphorical penises if they don't like his way of protecting and providing for him.
• 1:06:53
  But every you know, other men are narcissists. Now, this is not
• 1:07:01
  in the study. The study just identified the neo traditionalist type of men,
• 1:07:08
  one of three. I'm adding to it my insights. Now the second type
• 1:07:14
  is my insights. But you know, yeah, my insights. Those men
• 1:07:18
  suck. They shouldn't be able to breathe. We have to stop them because
• 1:07:24
  they're narcissists. Okay, oh, good lord. Type of men. So
• 1:07:30
  you remember, this is a study in British Columbia. They identified three types
• 1:07:33
  of men, postmodern men, neo traditionalists, and now egalitarian. It's when
• 1:07:41
  the men perceives his partner to be his equal. There's a perfect balance between
• 1:07:46
  them. Equality, reciprocity, egalitarianism. A relationship built on shared responsibilities and
• 1:07:55
  mutual understanding, always negotiated, always con centru's building. These men view their
• 1:08:02
  partners truly as equals and believe that relationships should be based on give and take,
• 1:08:11
  even as they navigate the intricacies of modern partnerships and life and so on
• 1:08:16
  and so forth right and just pausing for the banana sounds like houstmen today,
• 1:08:27
  So this is a very healthy approach. The last type of men is a
• 1:08:32
  progressive men, and progressives are focused on gender equity. It's kind of masculinity
• 1:08:41
  which champions gender equity and open communication. These men engage in discussions with their
• 1:08:47
  partners. They try to collaboratively in a cooperative way, define roles and responsibilities.
• 1:08:57
  They forge a dynamic that transcends societal norms and forced as a sense of
• 1:09:02
  empowerment in both parties. The personal is political. The relationship becomes the grounds
• 1:09:09
  of ideological the the the uh, the battleground of the ideology. Oh good
• 1:09:17
  lord, that sounds like a exhausting That sounds like a nightmare, dude,
• 1:09:20
  I don't like. I wouldn't like. I'm sorry, but that like,
• 1:09:26
  being a progressive man sounds like it's a it's a twenty four hour day job,
• 1:09:30
  like you have to constantly be like or do you feel empowered? Baby?
• 1:09:34
  No, I'm sorry no, Like in regards that's and it's so it's
• 1:09:39
  so weird and artificial too, Like that wouldn't do women want that? Well?
• 1:09:44
  Like, do women want that I don't know. Well, let's let's
• 1:09:47
  frame it like we're talking about a man who considers his relationship by as with
• 1:09:55
  a woman to be a part of his political identity. So you're talking about
• 1:10:02
  narcissism. Is that not narcissistic? Like, how you treat this woman is
• 1:10:12
  a reflection of your the level of your political consciousness. It's not just two
• 1:10:16
  people negotiating a life together. You are becoming a hero in your own mind
• 1:10:23
  based on how you treat this woman. And the other thing is that,
• 1:10:26
  how is the progressive that much different than the traditionalist except that they're just providing
• 1:10:31
  different things. The progressive still frames the situation in terms of the woman being
• 1:10:38
  weaker and more vulnerable than himself, all right, I mean the egalitarian probably
• 1:10:43
  does that less, but there's still that idea that that's the woman's needs that
• 1:10:45
  are centered. All right? So how is again, all of this exists
• 1:10:50
  within this framework that men should be judged and divided based on how they benefit
• 1:10:56
  women. But really all three are not that much different from each other,
• 1:11:00
  and they're all being judged by how they provide for women. But also,
• 1:11:04
  like the way that this the way that these things are described, like one
• 1:11:08
  man could probably like move from one state to another state, right at any
• 1:11:15
  point, like even throughout the day, you can go from traditional to progressive
• 1:11:20
  and back. Like, I don't I don't think that these categories are very
• 1:11:25
  helpful unless you're just trying to single out and demonize a certain act. You're
• 1:11:31
  just identifying enemies. Yeah, and again that is a male instinct. The
• 1:11:39
  whole idea that he is protecting women against those awful men over there, the
• 1:11:44
  thing that he just called out traditionalists for doing, he's doing right here,
• 1:11:49
  you know, identifying enemies and keeping them away from your women. Congratulation or
• 1:11:56
  uge, you're doing the thing. You're doing the thing. Yeah. Now,
• 1:12:06
  what's a distribution About one quarter of men identified as neo traditionalists, which
• 1:12:15
  sits well with what I've said by because personality disorders is about fifteen to twenty
• 1:12:20
  percent of men. Oh oh, so neo traditionalist men are they have like
• 1:12:26
  most of them have a personality disorder. Yeah. Yeah, this isn't really
• 1:12:29
  about attacking like you know, regular people, like regular people forming regular monogamous
• 1:12:35
  marriages, regular with regular family. No, no, no, no,
• 1:12:39
  no. Obviously traditionalist men. You can call it neo traditional if you want
• 1:12:45
  to I don't even want to use the word traditional normal men that want to
• 1:12:48
  marry women in a monogamous fashion. In it it like like like take on
• 1:12:55
  the fucking what is it the the marriage right, say the vows and carry
• 1:13:00
  their girl into the you know, into the threshold and have children with him.
• 1:13:05
  Twenty percent of those guys are obviously like dangerously insane. Yeah, yeah,
• 1:13:11
  Well the traditionalists all have personality or like narcissism, presumably anti social yeah,
• 1:13:21
  and they have like a low opinion of women. And the only thing
• 1:13:25
  that really defines traditionalists is that they believe that they should provide for and protect
• 1:13:29
  women. Of course, that also defines the egalitarian and the progressive. And
• 1:13:35
  you know, it doesn't mean that those men don't expect something from those women,
• 1:13:38
  though, Like I think that they're they're still because he's saying the egalitarian
• 1:13:43
  man wants to like have like a fair division of effort and labor in the
• 1:13:49
  relationship, right, Well, I think traditionalists men do too. They just
• 1:13:53
  have different expectations. Even if we're even going to use that framework, which
• 1:13:57
  isn't like I don't say wants a woman to be the empty vessel upon which
• 1:14:04
  he writes his own heroic tale of how he triumphed over patriarchy. So I
• 1:14:11
  mean, like, yeah, everybody wants something from their partner, but again,
• 1:14:15
  they're still all defined and they're all defined, and it's exactly the same
• 1:14:18
  way. The only group that seems to sort of get away from it is
• 1:14:23
  the egalitarian. But let's let's yeah, let's continue here. We're making a
• 1:14:29
  good progress. About twenty percent of men have personality no. No, the
• 1:14:35
  new traditionalist men, even though they have defined themselves in conservative terms protected provider
• 1:14:46
  this and that, they still knew that they have to pay leap service to
• 1:14:54
  third and fourth wave feminism. So the distance distance themselves, uh from the
• 1:15:03
  traditionalist perception of men as superior and women as inferior. So he's saying that
• 1:15:10
  they pay they're neo traditionalists because they pretend to be feminists but they're but they're
• 1:15:15
  secretly patriarchs and psycho is apparent. Yeah, I'm going to say something here
• 1:15:25
  personal experience, but it was pretty impactful. The only anti social narcissists that
• 1:15:34
  I know of in all of my travels in these ranks. And I have
• 1:15:40
  known traditionalist men, and I've known egalitarian men and progressive men, the only
• 1:15:46
  one that I would say was a real frickin psycho, was a feminist.
• 1:15:51
  Do you remember? You know who I'm talking about, right, Brian?
• 1:15:55
  Never you I will Russian Deadpool. Never forget this man. He literally believed
• 1:16:00
  that he owned the women in his life, and he saw them I'm not
• 1:16:06
  kidding. He saw them, as far as I can tell, he saw
• 1:16:09
  them as empty vessels upon which he wrote his own heroic, progressive narrative.
• 1:16:14
  And then when one of those empty vessels said, you know, I don't
• 1:16:16
  feel like getting married to you, he killed her. So shut up.
• 1:16:21
  You don't know what the hell you're talking about. You're just identifying enemies.
• 1:16:27
  You're just indulging that male instinct completely un self consciously, like un self aware,
• 1:16:33
  to identify male enemies and protect your your females, your fragile females.
• 1:16:40
  We need to protect the females from them. That's it. Then this guy
• 1:16:44
  is doing everything he blames other men for with no self awareness. None.
• 1:16:53
  Okay, let's continue. We're getting We're getting there. It's just that we
• 1:16:58
  are better suited to prove and to protect than women. It doesn't make us
• 1:17:02
  superior. It's just a different distribution of skills and capacities. Now, about
• 1:17:11
  about half identified themselves as the egalitarian types and about one quarter is progressive.
• 1:17:20
  So it's an interesting distribution. One quarter a new conservative, new traditionized when
• 1:17:26
  it comes to male roles, one quarter are progressives when it comes to mail
• 1:17:32
  when it comes to male roles, actually denying that there is such a thing
• 1:17:36
  as a male gender role. The progressive don't see any difference whatsoever, not
• 1:17:44
  even by all. I'd like to know. Like, the thing what I'd
• 1:17:48
  like to know is there's a study, Like maybe they can do a longitudinal
• 1:17:54
  thing, longitudinal longitudinal study where they ask they get these results from men when
• 1:18:02
  they're younger, then they follow up with them like in twenty years, and
• 1:18:09
  they find out where they are in life. Like I want to know how
• 1:18:13
  far does being a progressive, egalitarian or trad man gets you, because I
• 1:18:19
  think that is probably the real test. Like it could be the case that
• 1:18:26
  egalitarian men do the best. I don't know, but if we're not looking
• 1:18:30
  at what women want, that now there's what women say they want, then
• 1:18:36
  there's what women actually want. Those are not the same thing. That's why
• 1:18:40
  I say we follow up, because if you just ask women, then most
• 1:18:44
  of them will say whatever they think is going to be the most popular choice
• 1:18:47
  or the thing that will benefit them the most, and they won't think about
• 1:18:51
  like whether or not that's actually what they want, because they always change their
• 1:18:55
  mind about shit. Fight me if you don't believe that that's just the truth.
• 1:18:58
  So the best thing to do is to see follow up with men in
• 1:19:02
  twenty years, see where they're at. Are they married, do they have
• 1:19:05
  children, how many children they have? What is life like? Are they
• 1:19:09
  happy? Like you know whatever? Like how is their situation? That would
• 1:19:15
  be a better way to look at this whole thing then, Just for one,
• 1:19:20
  this video is supposed to be about women who hate women and the men
• 1:19:24
  who love them, which apparently like twenty five percent of men don't love women
• 1:19:30
  at all, so that sucks. And women hating women, well that's because
• 1:19:36
  they're becoming like men. So that that's kind of where he's landing on all
• 1:19:41
  this stuff. But I'm bad, yeah, man bad, Yeah yeah,
• 1:19:45
  especially if they're orange. But I mean, like they keep going after Trump
• 1:19:54
  for being orange, they may't end up inadvertently creating you know, victimhood for
• 1:19:59
  the orange people in the Oops, no there are no but but but there
• 1:20:04
  are no other orange people the only one unless like one of his kids like
• 1:20:10
  becomes orange as they get older, Like maybe Baron Trump will turn orange as
• 1:20:14
  he gets older. I don't know. Yeah, I'm just saying you gotta
• 1:20:17
  be careful with that, because the more you persecute a group of people or
• 1:20:20
  a recognizable trait, the more likely it is to become itself for a a
• 1:20:27
  source of victimhood cachet, which then you know then I mean when when is
• 1:20:33
  it? How much? How much subjugation does a group have to be in
• 1:20:38
  the in the context of correcting the intersectional uh or are balancing the intersectional scales
• 1:20:45
  before they themselves become a victim group? Just just wondering. Okay, let's
• 1:20:51
  uh all right, let's getting really tiresome. Does he like, I don't
• 1:20:57
  know, I haven't. I only like we you and I, you and
• 1:21:01
  I split this video in half. This is your half. I know,
• 1:21:04
  I didn't I know that they're they're I think he just repeats himself for like
• 1:21:13
  ten minutes. Well, let me just get the summary of the other two
• 1:21:15
  types of men and then we can stop it. Okay, logical difference between
• 1:21:20
  men and women different genitalia mean nothing to them. They don't predispose the owner
• 1:21:30
  of the genitalia to any specific trajectory in life, trades, behaviors, and
• 1:21:35
  so so there's no correlation between specific genitalia and anything else. As far as
• 1:21:41
  that concert, let me look at the let me look at the This is
• 1:21:46
  so like, okay, conclusion, Maybe you can just get to the conclusion.
• 1:21:54
  He has a conclusion. Let's look at that. But that, uh,
• 1:21:59
  this is about thirty five minutes in, so I'm gonna jump ahead.
• 1:22:06
  This is called shifting gender roles and mental health. So again we're gonna be
• 1:22:14
  looking at like essentially that men. Men have to be the solution. I'm
• 1:22:21
  guessing they have to shift yet because because like, okay, I don't well,
• 1:22:27
  you know what, I'm gonna see what he says, but my guess
• 1:22:29
  is it's not gonna be let's find out. Let's do a study on women
• 1:22:32
  to find out what they want, which I don't know that you can really
• 1:22:36
  rely on much. It's gonna be well, here's what men have to do
• 1:22:41
  out of the space and point a way forward. Okay. By the way,
• 1:22:45
  there's an online photo exhibition. It's titled Men Building Intimate Partner Relationships.
• 1:22:51
  It's one hundred and twenty photographs from which which kind of depict these three types
• 1:22:59
  of masculine and Doctor Nagao says, one of the participants in the study,
• 1:23:05
  says, there are photos depicting new, traditional, egalitarian, progressive musculinity,
• 1:23:12
  and visitors are invited to take a quiz to decide which images fit with each
• 1:23:17
  musculinity. We are not only highlighting our research outcomes, we're also inviting input
• 1:23:23
  from visitors about how they see themselves and how they do you want to look
• 1:23:28
  at those pictures, Alison? Are you there? Sorry? I was.
• 1:23:35
  I was actually trying to find them, so yeah, sure we could take
• 1:23:40
  a look at them. I don't know where they are. If you if
• 1:23:42
  you find I will I will find them. And if he says anything of
• 1:23:45
  interest, just stop and be like, okay, we'll talk about that,
• 1:23:48
  all right. Do you know what? Do you know what that you want
• 1:23:50
  to go back to find out what it's called? I think I've got no,
• 1:23:56
  I got men building intimate partner intimate relationships. Okay, it's okay.
• 1:24:03
  So they have a three D gallery, why don't they just have the videos
• 1:24:10
  or the pictures. I'll find it. I'll find it. But keep going
• 1:24:14
  all right, I'll keep going build gender equity in their intimate partner relationships.
• 1:24:19
  Okay, the article is titled Neo Traditionalist, Egalitarian and Progressive Masculinities in Men's
• 1:24:28
  Heterosexual Intimate Partner Relationships. And as I said, the lead offer is John
• 1:24:34
  Oliffe or l FFE. I will provide you with citation in the literature section
• 1:24:42
  in the description to this video. But I would like to come to the
• 1:24:45
  conclusion of my lecture by reading to you extensive excerpts from the excellent introduction to
• 1:24:53
  this article. Well I could, Well, he's going to read from the
• 1:24:58
  introduction, I could just read question. So let's take a look, let
• 1:25:03
  me get let me take a look at this. I mean, what's the
• 1:25:06
  point if he's just gonna read excerpts from it? Or I could just play
• 1:25:13
  him. I don't know. No, would you guys read it yourself and
• 1:25:16
  we can just skip over this section because I think he just reads at this
• 1:25:19
  point. All right, all right, so I'll read it forward about seven
• 1:25:24
  minutes because I did, because that was like he was just like repeating himself.
• 1:25:29
  And I looked at them transcript and I saw that he gets to the
• 1:25:32
  conclusion, you know, because otherwise he just kind of repeats himself. Did
• 1:25:36
  he actually say anything in this conclusion, because I didn't hear a damn no,
• 1:25:40
  he's about to do the conclusion of them. But what I'm saying doing
• 1:25:45
  no, wait, did he actually come to a statement that's worth talking about?
• 1:25:50
  No? No, well, I mean he like, like I said,
• 1:25:54
  what he did for this entire time was, well, he has a
• 1:25:58
  okay, those men. The conclusion is he said, to conclude, he
• 1:26:03
  was going to read the introduction to the study. Exerts from the introduction he
• 1:26:09
  thought were excellent. So he is using the study as his conclusion. So
• 1:26:14
  I'm saying, why don't I just read the study then read the introduction part.
• 1:26:17
  That's the part that he says is his conclusion. You see, Okay,
• 1:26:23
  all right, well that's weird. So well, that just means he's
• 1:26:27
  not really thinking for himself. Introduction shifts in gender roles, identities, and
• 1:26:30
  relations since the nineteen eighties are continuing to influence the organization and practices of masculinities
• 1:26:38
  within and between societies worldwide, while women's freer entry into the workforce and access
• 1:26:45
  to birth control continue to be hard fought human rights. You can kind of
• 1:26:49
  see that there is a bias in this right off the bat. Changes to
• 1:26:54
  boys and men's lives indicate both emergent challenges and opportunity, and they are quoting
• 1:27:01
  Kimmel in this like Michael Kimmel two thousand and eight, for example, pointed
• 1:27:09
  to young men's delayed and or absent traditional masculine markers such as career, marriage,
• 1:27:15
  breadwinter home ownership, as entwined with their collective avoidance of adult responsibilities and
• 1:27:23
  fixations on the trappings of boyhood amid trying to prove their manhood. Con Contrasting
• 1:27:29
  these problematics, opportunities for pro social masculinities embodied by promoting gender equality and gender
• 1:27:36
  equity with in intimate partner relationships and more broadly, have surfaced as much needed
• 1:27:43
  new and improved contemporary norms for boys and men Greek and Flood Michael Flood,
• 1:27:49
  twenty Further, men's lobby and actions for gender transformative practices are increasingly visible in
• 1:27:58
  public debates, social activism, and policy development for sad at All twenty twenty
• 1:28:03
  one. Also pushing gender equality and gender equity agendas are promises for mental health
• 1:28:11
  gains to prevent negative downstream outcomes, including intimate partner violence and suicide World Health
• 1:28:18
  Organization. That's the source. Yet within the personal and ordinarily private domestic domesticities
• 1:28:28
  where intimate partnerships tend to operate, masculinities are poorly understood. Hostchild. The
• 1:28:36
  current study maps masculinities in men's heterosexual intimate partner relationships to advanced understandings of gender
• 1:28:43
  equality and gender equity and guide future health research, policy, and practice.
• 1:28:51
  Did you find it men building intimate partner relationships? Hey, I'm just I'll
• 1:29:00
  look at that in a second. Uh, it is five point thirty.
• 1:29:05
  I got like a half an hour before I have to go pick up Lindsay,
• 1:29:09
  so you know, so I'll read more. Though we got we got
• 1:29:11
  about a half. I sent you the I sent you the the photos.
• 1:29:15
  I got it. You want me to read rest of it? You might
• 1:29:17
  find that this withers your soul. Okay, the rest of the Uh do
• 1:29:24
  you want me to read the rest of the intro? It's like one more
• 1:29:26
  section? Think no, It basically it's just the same thing. Every Men
• 1:29:29
  should be just defined in terms of how they benefit women. Uh. Yeah,
• 1:29:33
  I mean I think that the u having we can't consider men as having
• 1:29:38
  a unique value in and of themselves. They always have to be doing something
• 1:29:42
  for women. We can't even recognize that the expectation that men constantly define themselves
• 1:29:47
  by doing shit for women means that we women are inferior to men. Like
• 1:29:54
  you can't. You can't expect somebody to provide something without recognizing that they are
• 1:29:59
  providing something the other person doesn't have. Okay, like so anyway, it's
• 1:30:04
  just it's a bunch of ridiculous double think. Can we just I want to
• 1:30:10
  get to the end when he stops quoting stuff, and I don't remember when
• 1:30:14
  that was. I'm really sorry. It's in Yeah, I'll look, I'll
• 1:30:18
  look. It's like five minutes or three minutes minutes before the ending of the
• 1:30:25
  video. Yeah, yep, all right, let me see. Yeah,
• 1:30:30
  it's somewhere there. It's when he stops quoting the actual article I wrote written
• 1:30:34
  down the time stamp. I apologize, guys, but it's it's it's yeah,
• 1:30:42
  you had to go forward. Are you there, Brian, I'm looking.
• 1:30:45
  Yeah, I'm I'm uh. Oh, you're looking at the transcript.
• 1:30:48
  Okay. So I found the photos and they yet I got them. I
• 1:30:55
  was sharing them on the screen. Awful corporate like soulless photos I've ever seen.
• 1:31:05
  All Right, here we go, I think I think mm hmm,
• 1:31:13
  let's trial. Let's do a little roulette. I think I'm just I will
• 1:31:16
  go on here. This is to see what time? What's the timestamp?
• 1:31:27
  Forty six three? Okay, let's see can also lobby reflexive practices to promote
• 1:31:39
  mental health is upstream contributions communities. I must say the University of British Columbia
• 1:31:46
  is emerging as God. I remember the British University of British Columbia was part
• 1:31:56
  of that whole like scandal with Cafe or the Canadian Center for Men of Families,
• 1:32:02
  like the whole kerfuffle, because they were once again blaming men for their
• 1:32:06
  own mental health issues, which we now know is a contributing factor to killing
• 1:32:11
  people with mental health issues. Yeah. Like literally, the the University of
• 1:32:16
  British Columbia embraces stuff that kills people with mental health issues if they're meant yep,
• 1:32:24
  congratulations. But I guess maybe that's the point. Uh maybe, Alison,
• 1:32:32
  I mean like we're talking about well, like I said, like,
• 1:32:35
  if we're gonna give supposedly intellectual people their due, then whatever, like consequences
• 1:32:44
  come out of what they say. They meant. They must have like meant
• 1:32:46
  that because like what else could it be? I mean, are they look,
• 1:32:50
  you're either you're either you're either malicious or you're stupid. Take your choice.
• 1:32:58
  It's one of those, Like I don't know. I mean, I
• 1:33:00
  would be the humble one and say I'm stupid, but I know these people
• 1:33:03
  would never admit that. Well, it malicious can also be you just don't
• 1:33:10
  care about the consequences. Yes, that's militious. There to walk through the
• 1:33:14
  steps to the concept of what you're plouting. All right, let's let's finish
• 1:33:18
  this off, because I think this is it. This is it movements.
• 1:33:21
  Yeah, I think interestingally, including the victimhood, self identity, including male
• 1:33:29
  female relationships, gender roles. I mean, I would pay attention to this
• 1:33:32
  university. It's at the forefront of many of the hottest button issues nowadays.
• 1:33:43
  So this is the story of men and women today as men, as women
• 1:33:47
  become more like men, men are lost. They haven't found a new identity,
• 1:33:57
  They denuded of their past role. They don't know how they should behave
• 1:34:01
  what they should do? They can I can I can I propose something?
• 1:34:08
  That. I don't think the people answer they say, men have not found
• 1:34:12
  a new identity, why should they have to do that. I'm just gonna
• 1:34:18
  let you don't have to answer the question. I'm just gonna put it out
• 1:34:20
  there. Why these people insist that the way men have been must change?
• 1:34:30
  Because that's what they're saying. Yeah, right, it's like saying, like,
• 1:34:34
  you know, dogs are I don't know, like they they're they're always
• 1:34:41
  looking their own genitals and butthole, and we they shouldn't have to do that.
• 1:34:45
  They should not do that anymore. They have to evolve and change.
• 1:34:48
  Why you know, we should we cats should be on leashes and they should
• 1:34:58
  progress. Yeah, but like, but it's progress because women's women's roles have
• 1:35:05
  evolved, even though they still apparently evolved. No, women have not,
• 1:35:12
  That's what I'm saying. Though women have not changed that much. Yeah,
• 1:35:15
  the world has not changed that much. Like how what like how long?
• 1:35:19
  Okay, how long has the world been here? How long? How old
• 1:35:23
  is the earth? How long have humanity been millionaires? Like, Okay,
• 1:35:28
  so let's say four billion years? How long has humanity been here? I
• 1:35:31
  think two million? Okay, so let's let's go with that. I don't
• 1:35:35
  really know. Depends on why. How could you be so arrogant as to
• 1:35:42
  believe that that that human beings having been here for what four million years,
• 1:35:49
  that they should change completely in like thirty years. Yeah, how arrogant is
• 1:35:58
  that? It's like I'm serious, like why and then and then people like
• 1:36:02
  how absolutely arrogant is it that social social sciences think, Oh, we're just
• 1:36:10
  going to re engineer people in like my lifetime. We're just going to do
• 1:36:14
  that. We're going to do that like in the next fifty years. That
• 1:36:16
  is going to result in the catastrophe that we're now facing. Okay, now
• 1:36:25
  let me put let me go, let me take that from another angle.
• 1:36:29
  How arrogant and completely unself aware is it to ask men to change their identity?
• 1:36:38
  So what this guy is saying is men should change their identity from taking
• 1:36:43
  their identity from protecting and providing for women to taking an identity from protecting and
• 1:36:47
  providing from women. Yeah, like you you say, oh, this is
• 1:36:51
  going to destroy it's not going to destroy humans. It's not going to destroy
• 1:36:57
  human society. It's just going to destroy the weird societies. That's it.
• 1:37:01
  And I hate to say it, but us Westerners were not the sum total
• 1:37:04
  of human existence, and it looks like we're not going to be much.
• 1:37:09
  We're not going to be anything more than a calfart in terms of human history.
• 1:37:13
  So we don't have to continue, and our principles and ideals don't have
• 1:37:16
  to continue, and they certainly won't if we don't actually have children. It's
• 1:37:23
  not going to happen for us. So but ultimately, what he's suggesting,
• 1:37:30
  well, let's change men and women. No, that's not what's going to
• 1:37:32
  happen. Men and women aren't going to change necessarily. I mean, you,
• 1:37:36
  we're pretty damn flexible, I'll give us that, but fundamentally we're probably
• 1:37:42
  not going to change. What's going to happen is you're going to destroy all
• 1:37:45
  of the things that you value trying it okay, And again, what is
• 1:37:53
  hilarious to me is that he thinks he's changing anything when all he's doing is
• 1:37:58
  saying men should be defined by how I think or how I feel. I
• 1:38:02
  provide for the women in my life, and I protect the women in my
• 1:38:06
  life, and I make sure their needs meant how I protect them from their
• 1:38:11
  frailties, because that's the only reason why you would protect the woman because you've
• 1:38:14
  considered her to be lesser than you in some way, either physically or psychologically.
• 1:38:19
  The only reason why you'd provide for a woman is because you consider them
• 1:38:24
  her less able, either physically or psychologically. Right, So this guy is
• 1:38:29
  like, well, I provide for my frail, lesser females and my life
• 1:38:34
  in this way, and those men over there provide in that way, and
• 1:38:39
  that makes them bad men, bad men who should be beaten with clubs and
• 1:38:44
  turned out of turned out of the turned out of the away from the hearth
• 1:38:47
  at the center of the of the freaking campsite. Like it's the most primitive
• 1:38:51
  attitude, and it is not only is it arrogant to think that he's changing,
• 1:38:58
  or only is it air get to demand that men change. It's arrogant
• 1:39:01
  for him to think he's changing a damn thing, because he isn't. He's
• 1:39:06
  just doing more of the same. And the other fundamental thing is what are
• 1:39:11
  they asking when they say men need to change their identity? All right,
• 1:39:14
  they're saying women don't need men, right, Well, how do men change
• 1:39:17
  their identity in a world where women don't need men? Which is total bullshit,
• 1:39:21
  But let's just say it's true. While men have to stop pick caring
• 1:39:25
  about being needed by women the end. But what did this paper do?
• 1:39:30
  Well? How do men define themselves by why women's needs and what those needs
• 1:39:35
  are? Okay, well, you guys do this. You guys eat your
• 1:39:41
  own shit like an ideological human centipede until the end of Western civilization, because
• 1:39:46
  that's what you're doing. Nothing all right? Was there any more? Yeah?
• 1:39:56
  Sure, let's please. I think we've totally annihilated him. But let's
• 1:40:00
  none. I think there's a little bit of ass left to well. I
• 1:40:01
  mean, when you're quoting, when you're basically like using like a paper that
• 1:40:06
  involve like Michael Kimmel, Michael Flood, you're basically putting a bullet in your
• 1:40:11
  own head. Oh good lord, and countrary to what the studies, I
• 1:40:19
  think, heartbreak, depression, anxiety, and mental illness actually increase in marriages
• 1:40:29
  and relationships don't decrease. What are you talking about, you dips. Oh
• 1:40:34
  he's saying married couples are are more more depressed, more like unhappy? Wrong?
• 1:40:41
  Wrong, aren't wrong? Now shut up and shuffle off your child.
• 1:40:48
  Okay, mm hmm. It's sort of sad. You could get this old
• 1:40:55
  but remain this childish. Okay, keep going on purpose. Why these institutions
• 1:41:03
  romantic relationships, intimate relationships and marriages, formalized intimate relationships. Why these institutions
• 1:41:11
  are dying because they're no longer functional and they no longer provide the benefits that
• 1:41:16
  they use. Okay, okay, wait stop, I get the sense he's
• 1:41:19
  happy about this. Okay, he's happy about this. Okay, I'm just
• 1:41:25
  get the sense, and I could be wrong, so we can do a
• 1:41:28
  little a little wager, which is really not going to amount to anything,
• 1:41:32
  but I think that we're about to embark on why he gets to dip his
• 1:41:36
  wick in multiple women with the ideological logic behind that. Okay, let's go.
• 1:41:44
  I could be completely wrong. I don't even remember what he said,
• 1:41:47
  so I'm pretty sure I did read it. But let's see, at the
• 1:41:51
  beginning of a twenty fifth century, we need new models, new institutions,
• 1:41:58
  new arrangements, and then you understanding between what used to be women and who
• 1:42:03
  used to be men. We're heading it's a new era where people with vaginas
• 1:42:11
  would be in control and bring with them a totally different psychological profile and baggage.
• 1:42:18
  Oh yeah, okay, so yeah, once again, let's go back.
• 1:42:21
  Remember he said that women are compete because they became men or something.
• 1:42:27
  Yeah. Women. Okay, but isn't that sort of transphobic? Women with
• 1:42:30
  vaginas are going to be in control? Are you sure? No? No,
• 1:42:33
  No, he's being he's being specific. The fact that he's saying with
• 1:42:38
  vaginas suggests that men women without vaginas, women with penises will will have less
• 1:42:43
  power. Yeah, but isn't that transphobic? Like, aren't we supposed to
• 1:42:47
  not care about that at this point? Oh? I don't know. I
• 1:42:49
  mean, I don't know if I would hold him too that standard because I
• 1:42:53
  don't know if he's a progressive. So yeah, well, we just watched
• 1:42:58
  an entire video about why he should be She should basically be the only man
• 1:43:02
  that that women desire because he's the one that protects and provides for them in
• 1:43:08
  the way that they should be at least that's what it felt like to me,
• 1:43:11
  and feeling, as we all know, feels are reals. Okay,
• 1:43:15
  I'm still curious if the I think we almost got a little bit of the
• 1:43:20
  Uh, this is the justification for why I should be able to dip my
• 1:43:24
  wick in multiple women with the whole we need new arrangements other than uh marriage.
• 1:43:31
  But let's see, let's see if he comes a little bit more out
• 1:43:34
  with it's all right to get adopted to this. We need to develop positive
• 1:43:41
  adaptations, both as men and as women, and we are very late in
• 1:43:46
  doing this. And this is a much bigger risk, much greater threat than
• 1:43:51
  climate change, because the tension and attraction between men and women has been the
• 1:44:01
  driving force, the engine, and the fuel of all civilizations bar none.
• 1:44:06
  Okay, so he basically says what I've been saying for what five years,
• 1:44:12
  But he's in no way equipped to actually take that first step across the chasm,
• 1:44:19
  that that that that search for the holy grail step, that step that
• 1:44:24
  requires courage and a desire not to believe these facile lies. Okay, yeah,
• 1:44:38
  we're pretty close here, Brian. Let's do it. Very constructive civilization
• 1:44:44
  is an outcome of this intricate into plate between the respective charm and magic of
• 1:44:49
  both genders. Okay, so we've taken away gender roles, we've obliterated sex
• 1:44:57
  differences, and now what what's the alternative? All these movements feminism they're fall
• 1:45:08
  from, but not only femine me too. All these movements are about negative
• 1:45:15
  way you just said feminism in me too? Like those are like the same
• 1:45:17
  thing. Like, what are you talking about all these movements? You mean
• 1:45:21
  this one movement and the consequences of said movement. Okay, identity, These
• 1:45:29
  movements know what they want to fight, they know what they want to destroy,
• 1:45:32
  they know what they to reverse. Well they do, but I think
• 1:45:38
  it's much I think it's much more about they know what they want to control
• 1:45:41
  and get money from. We're gonna have destroying it. Yeah, I mean
• 1:45:45
  me me too is about power. It's about money. It always was.
• 1:45:49
  Oh god, me too, Like I'm I'm honestly guys, me too is
• 1:45:54
  just possibly the most cynical cash grab in human history. It is actually pretty
• 1:46:00
  gross. All right, Let's let's continue with a positive identity, with the
• 1:46:08
  vision of the future, with how things might look optimally with a utopia.
• 1:46:15
  And so we've ended up in a dystopia. Okay, so we've ended up
• 1:46:19
  in a dystopia. But is why? It can't be because of the traditionalists.
• 1:46:28
  It's because of the Yeah what that is? Like? Why why?
• 1:46:32
  Then? Well, the traditionalism is bad, So why are you here?
• 1:46:36
  Maybe it's because of these facile lies that you keep clinging to the fact that
• 1:46:41
  you can't take that first step because it requires courage, and the only way
• 1:46:45
  to get over the chasm is to take that first step that requires courage.
• 1:46:48
  So we just mill around, get and making, and everything keeps getting worse.
• 1:46:54
  We mill around constructing ideological human centipedes, and everything just gets worse,
• 1:47:00
  where these with academics just eat each other's shit and excrete more shit into each
• 1:47:04
  other's mouths, and an endless cycle of entropy. I know that looks disgusting,
• 1:47:14
  but isn't Now it's happening, seems all right, all right, yeah,
• 1:47:20
  I mean we're pretty close. Let's finish it and demolished and destroyed and
• 1:47:26
  eradicated and obliterated many many things, many of which were bad, some of
• 1:47:30
  which were good. And we destroyed everything. So now we look around and
• 1:47:35
  need's a wasteland, not a single tree inside, not a brook or a
• 1:47:41
  stream bubbling anywhere. Everything is dead Martian landscape. And no one seems to
• 1:47:48
  have come succeeded to propose a plan for renewal, resurrection, and renovation.
• 1:48:00
  And this might spell the very end of the human species. M I'm pretty
• 1:48:06
  sure the Amish can no, We'll be okay, because there are people who
• 1:48:10
  aren't listening to all this commy gobbledygook, and they're just making babies and homeschooling
• 1:48:15
  their kids. I see it every day. So you know, you guys,
• 1:48:17
  go ahead and pontificate and intellectualize and give your speeches and universities, and
• 1:48:24
  you'll just kill off those generations with your genetic dead end ideas while regular people
• 1:48:30
  are just gonna keep on making babies. And if this is either gonna become
• 1:48:34
  an like basically a fundamentalist society or it's gonna become an Islamic society, because
• 1:48:42
  one of those is gonna win out. So there you go, enjoy your
• 1:48:47
  secular modernist world while at lasts because y'all aren't making babies and they are.
• 1:48:53
  That's what it comes down to. Yeah, unfortunately, welcome to obsolescence.
• 1:48:58
  But all right, this is I mean, you want to really see a
• 1:49:03
  bit of trivia about this guy, Professor Sam Vac Sure, I would love
• 1:49:08
  it, right. I looked him up on Wikipedia. So he is eldest
• 1:49:15
  of five children born to Safari Jewish immigrants's mother from Turkey. Blah blah blah.
• 1:49:19
  There was Oh it was about his relationship In the mid nineteen eighties,
• 1:49:25
  he became aware of difficulties in his relationship with his fiance and that he had
• 1:49:29
  mootswings. In nineteen eighty five, he sought hell from a psychiatrist who diagnosed
• 1:49:33
  him with narcissistic personality disorder. Backman did not accept the diagnosis at the time.
• 1:49:43
  Oh good, so he was diagnosed with narcissism. Prise, What a
• 1:49:50
  surprise that a man that said, basically is saying, well, all you
• 1:49:55
  know, these other men, they're the bad guys and they're narcissists. Oh
• 1:49:59
  god, it's all project. But he's right there, it is. It
• 1:50:02
  is a wasteland. It is a waste land. I mean, I hope
• 1:50:05
  that the people who are breeding can manage to make it work for everybody else
• 1:50:11
  who's fucking up society. I think that ultimately we are going to be dealing
• 1:50:15
  with a massive and very painful collapse if we don't get our act together like
• 1:50:19
  the more. I guess, I don't know if I want to call myself
• 1:50:21
  progressive, but I'm okay with change, you know. I'm okay with civil
• 1:50:28
  rights for minorities, that kind of stuff. I think most can so called
• 1:50:32
  conservatives are as well. Honestly, it's a Christian concept. Guys. This
• 1:50:36
  idea that we care about people for just being people very Christian, that that's
• 1:50:44
  something that comes from the church. Like the the first civil rights movements were
• 1:50:47
  very much religiously based. Oh yeah, so are the so are the abolitionist
• 1:50:54
  movements. Yes, it was all about this concept of us all being one
• 1:50:59
  and gone odd, you know, and the meek shall inherit the earth.
• 1:51:02
  Like the A lot of our so called secular uh, democratic values are fundamentally
• 1:51:11
  Christian values, just dressed up in new clothing, and uh, you know,
• 1:51:15
  I would like to preserve what we have. I think they're they're good
• 1:51:19
  values. The Christianity functionally believes that all all men and women deserve dignity,
• 1:51:27
  and they deserve recognition of their of their personal merits. They deserve a creator
• 1:51:33
  that loves them and wants the best for them. You know, these are
• 1:51:38
  good values. There's a lot of good stuff in that, and we seem
• 1:51:43
  to have just really thrown it out. And and what's hilarious is the people
• 1:51:46
  who are acting out the very thing like these these and Okay, Christian values
• 1:51:56
  is about consette care and concern for the people who are not well off.
• 1:52:00
  I mean there, this is the honestly, like caring about widows and children
• 1:52:04
  isn't is more like a universal social value. But Christianity does take it to
• 1:52:12
  like a higher degree, I think in terms of recognizing the idea that every
• 1:52:17
  person should be treated well and also that people should be judged based on how
• 1:52:24
  they act, not who they are. Right, these are good values and
• 1:52:29
  they inform secular humanism in all of its capacities. It's ridiculous to assume to
• 1:52:35
  say that that isn't the case. Go look at systems of morality throughout history.
• 1:52:41
  Go look at them, like, let me tell you they were very
• 1:52:45
  different. For example, if in many in many cultures throughout all of human
• 1:52:51
  history, if you were conquered militarily, you became livestock, right you literally
• 1:53:00
  like if you were if you submitted yourself, allowed yourself to be submitted to
• 1:53:05
  a greater physical power, you lost the right to call yourself human because you
• 1:53:13
  submitted and humanity, a human was supposed to either overcome or die or kill
• 1:53:20
  themselves in the face of military force. Otherwise you weren't human and they could
• 1:53:26
  do whatever they wanted to you. And also, if you were born of
• 1:53:29
  people, who were forced into slavery. You were a slave because it was
• 1:53:33
  it was a generational thing, okay, And all that happened was that you
• 1:53:39
  lost some ancestor way back then, lost a war, and you lost the
• 1:53:43
  right to call yourself human. You became livestock. Right. That is an
• 1:53:47
  attitude that Christianity directly opposed. And I would argue that I sort of sprung
• 1:53:56
  out of like the Roman attitude, but I won't get into that. So,
• 1:53:59
  I mean, there's all good stuff there. We should preserve it,
• 1:54:03
  you know. It's it's it's something that maybe is trickier, like it's trickier
• 1:54:06
  to make make this stuff work with the normal the human instincts around reproduction.
• 1:54:12
  But it's it's it's a problem that's solvable. The only problem is that individuals
• 1:54:16
  like this enact the same primitive instincts, you know. Like all he's doing
• 1:54:24
  here is saying those men are over there are don't deserve women, they don't
• 1:54:28
  deserve sexual access to the fragile females. I'm gonna protect them. I'm going
• 1:54:31
  to beat my chest and make sure those men stay away, because I'm the
• 1:54:34
  one who can provide and protect for the fragile females. You know, it's
• 1:54:39
  it's like it's just more like elephant sealed bullshit. And yeah, what's his
• 1:54:46
  ultimate conclusion? I mean, unless unless he's unless he's not straight, which
• 1:54:51
  is also possible. I guess that is true. But you know, a
• 1:54:56
  gay man can still act out the same kind of reproductive instinct of any other.
• 1:55:00
  Yeah, but like maybe not because he wants to read. I understand
• 1:55:04
  that. But I'm saying, like, maybe that's maybe there is less cause
• 1:55:08
  to care about women and what happened, well, what not the future of
• 1:55:12
  the species? Yeah, yeah, baby, But so ultimately his solution is,
• 1:55:17
  well, I guess guess what blame men? Men need to evolve.
• 1:55:24
  Yeah, if we do bad things, that's because of men. Okay,
• 1:55:29
  all right, all right, so we're blaming men again. Okay, let's
• 1:55:30
  yeah, let's have another round of that. Let's let's let's just just another
• 1:55:35
  another round of poop for the human ideological human centipede. Surely, surely something
• 1:55:41
  other than ship will come out of that. Mm hmm, Okay, I'm
• 1:55:45
  done. Whatever, All right, let's wrap it up then. Yeah,
• 1:55:48
  indeed, we don't want to look at the pictures, right, they're kind
• 1:55:51
  of crushing. Yeah, there. Well you can put them up and we
• 1:55:56
  can. I did, I've put them up. I mean, like,
• 1:55:59
  what is this ship? This is? This is the men building intimate partner
• 1:56:05
  something. What is this? Oh my god, this is cringe. Is
• 1:56:11
  they're doing yoga together, guys, Like, you're creating men that women will
• 1:56:16
  not find attractive? Like this is the thing, Like you're not You don't
• 1:56:19
  ask what women want. You presume that men and women just have to be
• 1:56:25
  re engineered. And then you tell men that they have to like this,
• 1:56:30
  but you don't say anything to women at all. And when it comes down
• 1:56:32
  to it, women are like, where where are the men? And they're
• 1:56:35
  doing that right now. They're doing that right now. They're like, where
• 1:56:38
  are the miss is It's beyond not creating men that women won't like. This
• 1:56:44
  is soulless. Oh my god, we're are on brunch. There is no
• 1:56:47
  humanity in this. Wow, people, this is all just material ship it
• 1:56:55
  is. It's materialist. Yeah, it's just materialist shit. Okay, there's
• 1:57:00
  a person happy ending, new beginning. I guess they got married. Congratulate
• 1:57:04
  equals this. This is a reference to Mister and Missus Smith movie about a
• 1:57:10
  couple that fought each other. It's at least it's two humans, I guess.
• 1:57:15
  Yeah, Like, what the hell is this? This is just materialist
• 1:57:17
  crap. It is so marketed at women. Let her choose do you want
• 1:57:26
  to work or do you want to use the vacuum? This is bad.
• 1:57:30
  This is like some This is like some art students' thesis. This business would
• 1:57:36
  get an F Brian, No, not not today. They you get an
• 1:57:43
  A just for not even for trying, like just for showing up. You
• 1:57:46
  can just be like, look, my art project is nothing because I am
• 1:57:50
  nothing, and the and the you would be like, oh shit, dude,
• 1:57:54
  that's an A. That's so profound, man, Yeah do you bro?
• 1:58:00
  You can't put that in the gallery? Take that establishment all right?
• 1:58:05
  God? Yeah, okay, I'm I don't even want to see that.
• 1:58:10
  I've lost the will to live. Yeah, I know, Like these pictures
• 1:58:12
  are like I mean, it would be fine if it was just like a
• 1:58:15
  bunch of people having fun or maybe some actual intimacy. But this is just
• 1:58:18
  like most of it is just consumer goods. Are you fucking kidding me?
• 1:58:25
  Yeah? Buy some pots and pans. I know. Well, let's just
• 1:58:29
  start an out for Ikia. We're gonna become dog parents. Oh all right,
• 1:58:34
  I don't know. Like dogs are pretty pretty intensive and they can you
• 1:58:40
  know, they can deepen a relationship, I think. But I love Jojo.
• 1:58:45
  He is is here, laying here on his side, but he is
• 1:58:50
  not a substitute for a real child. Like if I could have a real
• 1:58:55
  child, I would I would have Jojo too. But you know, I
• 1:59:00
  think that I think that when they push the dog thing, I think that
• 1:59:03
  it's not just like, oh yeah, dogs are nice. It's more like
• 1:59:08
  dogs are a sufficient substitute for children. And that I'm telling you this guy
• 1:59:15
  is probably really anti natalist, and I think that is a bias that affects
• 1:59:21
  his work. I mean, he's a using Unitarian unilateralist. Basically he goes
• 1:59:27
  to a Unitarian church and those people are woke as fuck. So I mean
• 1:59:33
  I used to not give a shit about them, but they are woke as
• 1:59:36
  fuck. Anyway, Okay, let's wrap it up. They gotta go pick
• 1:59:44
  up Lindsay Allison dropped. He's back, Alison, are you back? Yeah?
• 1:59:55
  Sorry about that. I was a complete idiot. I just I just
• 1:59:58
  hit the I closed the window. I'm sorry, Oh ship, that was
• 2:00:06
  completely inexcusable, Like god, yeah, No, nothing really happened to me,
• 2:00:13
  although we have been having periodic blackouts, which is why we started a
• 2:00:15
  bit late. But like we always start late, so I guess that's not
• 2:00:19
  really an excuse. But yeah, I just accidentally hit the I closed the
• 2:00:28
  Yeah, well let's let's wrap it up then, Yeah, let's go,
• 2:00:30
  let's let's finish this. Like maybe it's just I lost. I just couldn't
• 2:00:35
  stand it anymore. You know what, I'm gonna just look away from these
• 2:00:40
  photos because they're just yeah, I could stop sharing. That's it. We
• 2:00:44
  don't need. That's so free, a little destroyed, like what, Yeah,
• 2:00:47
  doesn't represent human relationships. It doesn't even know. It's just like yes,
• 2:00:53
  and like Instagram photos of here's a tree, yeah, man, lunches
• 2:01:00
  like oh look I had a milkshake for lunch, and like this, this
• 2:01:03
  has nothing to do with human bonding, you weird ideological fucked cards. Okay,
• 2:01:11
  all right, if you like this content, please consider sending us a
• 2:01:15
  tip at feed the badger dot com slash just the tip. We get the
• 2:01:17
  full benefit of whatever funds you send, and you get to make contact with
• 2:01:20
  an actual human being rather than YouTube's AI, which you know probably won't like
• 2:01:28
  your comment for whatever reason, So feed the Badger dot com slash just the
• 2:01:32
  tip to send us a message. Tell us we're not screaming into the void.
• 2:01:35
  Give us your thoughts. We enjoy we enjoyed talking about them, reading
• 2:01:41
  them, give us something to think about. Feedbadger dot com slash just the
• 2:01:45
  Tip. Eventually we will also be having our monthly fundraiser at feedbadger dot com
• 2:01:48
  slash support. But right now, what I want to do is I want
• 2:01:51
  to suggest that you guys set up a subscription because that really helps us pay
• 2:01:56
  the bills monthly as well. And you can do so at feed the Badger
• 2:02:00
  dot dot com slash subscribe, and you know, you get some you get
• 2:02:02
  some perks. You get access to the archive, you get access to the
• 2:02:05
  community on discord, But the biggest perk of all is that you help us
• 2:02:12
  out and you make sure that we can continue to do this work. And
• 2:02:15
  that's that's important. And really, you guys are the only ones who can
• 2:02:19
  because nobody else can take that first step into the chasm, that that that
• 2:02:25
  that requires courage, that step that Indy took to get over to the holy
• 2:02:29
  grail. Indiana Jones took to get over get over to the Holy Grail.
• 2:02:32
  You guys, if you're into pop culture, you know what I'm talking about.
• 2:02:34
  Anyway, Feed the Badger dot com slash subscribe to make sure to have
• 2:02:40
  an ongoing relationship with us, join our community, see our archive, and
• 2:02:45
  help us out in the best way possible. So back to you, Brian.
• 2:02:49
  All right, Well, before I wrap it up, I did get
• 2:02:51
  one more super chow from Great Indoors. He just gave us five dollars.
• 2:02:58
  He did not include message, but thank you Great Indoors. All right,
• 2:03:03
  So with that said, if you guys liked this video, please hit like,
• 2:03:06
  subscribe. If you're not already subscribed, hit the bellf notifications, leave
• 2:03:10
  us a comment, let us know you guys think about what we discussed on
• 2:03:13
  the show today. There is a link to the full video in the description
• 2:03:15
  so you can look at it yourself. And please, please please share this
• 2:03:18
  video because sharing is caring. Thank you so much for coming on today's episode
• 2:03:21
  of Well. I didn't change it, so I guess it's rand Zerker.
• 2:03:26
  I'm just gonna leave it because I don't think there's enough characters for maintaining frame.
• 2:03:29
  It's gonna make it even shorter, so and We will talk to you
• 2:03:33
  all in the next video. Have a good weekend.