Latest / Brian Thomas / Steve Goodin - Legal Matters and Executive Sessions
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: He talks Station seven forty nine. I think about PARCV
- 0:04Speaker 1: talk station Happy Tuesday inside Scoop with Wright Bart and
- 0:06Speaker 1: his plus that Daniel Davis Deep Dive for the next
- 0:08Speaker 1: hour and Dusty Rhoades on how property taxes work and
- 0:12Speaker 1: Ken's School, Zoo's and first responders survived without them Without
- 0:14Speaker 1: further ado though, God bless you, welcome back to the
- 0:18Speaker 1: fifty five Kersey Morning Show. In matters involving legal questions,
- 0:21Speaker 1: not good to rely on me anymore. It's been a
- 0:23Speaker 1: while since actively practice law. Steve Gooden, though with the
- 0:27Speaker 1: outstanding law firm, Reporter Wright joins the program to explain
- 0:30Speaker 1: these matters formal counselmen. He is Steve Gooden. They went
- 0:33Speaker 1: into executive session yesterday to talk about we think maybe
- 0:37Speaker 1: the settlement of this lawsuit, the Hinton family lawsuit, which
- 0:41Speaker 1: hasn't been filed, but to talk about settlement. Cheryl Long,
- 0:44Speaker 1: it was revealed, was in settlement discussions with the Hinton family.
- 0:47Speaker 1: Their son, eighteen year old was killed by a police
- 0:50Speaker 1: officer because while he was in a stolen car fleeing
- 0:53Speaker 1: police and then he turned around with a gun pointed
- 0:55Speaker 1: in an officer and ended up losing his life. They
- 0:57Speaker 1: think that is a settlement worthy Now well, Christopher Smithen
- 1:01Speaker 1: was on the program this morning saying, if you go
- 1:03Speaker 1: into executive council, you must let the public know the
- 1:06Speaker 1: subject matter, not the substance of what goes on in there,
- 1:09Speaker 1: but at least the subject matter before going into executive
- 1:12Speaker 1: council and said someone should file a lawsuit because they
- 1:15Speaker 1: didn't do that. Steve Gooden, legal expert, is that a
- 1:19Speaker 1: justiciabal controversy?
- 1:23Speaker 2: You know what sure is? I did take a look
- 1:25Speaker 2: at the agenda. Brian, First, good morning, and second Smitherman
- 1:29Speaker 2: is typically the case is correct and under a high law.
- 1:33Speaker 2: There are only two reasons you can go into executive session.
- 1:36Speaker 2: One is to discuss potential litigation, which is apparently what
- 1:40Speaker 2: happened here. And number two, you can go in to
- 1:43Speaker 2: discuss a personnel matter, particularly a sensitive personnel matter regarding
- 1:47Speaker 2: someone who may have to be fired or what have you.
- 1:49Speaker 2: I mean, those are reasons you're allowed as a public
- 1:52Speaker 2: official to go in and talk with your legal counsel
- 1:56Speaker 2: and your city manager off the record, as it were.
- 2:00Speaker 2: There's an attorney client privilege that attaches, so that in
- 2:02Speaker 2: and of itself isn't illegal. That is just that's a
- 2:06Speaker 2: place where state law trumps the local law. But that said,
- 2:09Speaker 2: there's two big things about executive session. Legally. Number one,
- 2:13Speaker 2: you have to state which category it is that you're
- 2:16Speaker 2: talking about. Yesterday's agenda did not do that. We know
- 2:21Speaker 2: because of all the various leaks at City Hall that
- 2:23Speaker 2: they were talking about a potential hidden settlement, but they
- 2:27Speaker 2: didn't acknowledge that publicly. That's number one. Number Two, you
- 2:31Speaker 2: can't vote on the settlement, or actually vote on anything
- 2:35Speaker 2: during executive session. The ultimate decisions have to be made
- 2:39Speaker 2: out in a public forum. So for instance, this eight
- 2:44Speaker 2: point one million dollar travesty of a settlement they gave
- 2:47Speaker 2: to the George Floyd protesters earlier this month. I mean,
- 2:50Speaker 2: they did have to actually go into regular session to
- 2:53Speaker 2: vote on that. We presume they had had prior executive
- 2:56Speaker 2: sessions about it. We didn't know. They're not doing a
- 2:59Speaker 2: very good job of putting out there that the executive session,
- 3:02Speaker 2: you know, what the subject matter of them are. But
- 3:07Speaker 2: I mean that's really where this is. I mean, they
- 3:09Speaker 2: really should be telling people at least the general subject
- 3:14Speaker 2: matter of what's going on here. It's a horrible look,
- 3:18Speaker 2: but I guess, good thing for the taxpayers. City hall
- 3:21Speaker 2: leagues like a sieve and always has.
- 3:23Speaker 1: Yeah, it does. And thankfully we have outlets that let
- 3:25Speaker 1: us know actually what's going on behind the scenes, because
- 3:27Speaker 1: they apparently are talking and coming out of the closed
- 3:29Speaker 1: door session, the executive session. No single city council member
- 3:33Speaker 1: of these spokespeople for the city manager or the city
- 3:35Speaker 1: manager or the mayor set a peep. They just refused
- 3:38Speaker 1: comment to the enquire and of the local reporters on
- 3:40Speaker 1: what they what they They could have said, we were
- 3:44Speaker 1: talking about a potential settlement. They're allowed to say what
- 3:47Speaker 1: the subject matter is. They just couldn't talk about what
- 3:48Speaker 1: specifically happened in the meeting, right.
- 3:52Speaker 2: Yeah, that's exactly right. I mean, look, I mean, like
- 3:54Speaker 2: I said, there's only to mine. I mean, look, and
- 3:57Speaker 2: I've been advising the municipalities on and off for twenty
- 3:59Speaker 2: five five years. There's really only two reasons why you
- 4:03Speaker 2: have an executive session. And you're really supposed to put
- 4:06Speaker 2: that at least in the record, if not on the agenda.
- 4:09Speaker 2: You know, I actually pulled the paper agenda off the
- 4:12Speaker 2: city's webside. It just says executive you know, session pursuant
- 4:15Speaker 2: to Ohio a biased code section. Blah blah blah. That's
- 4:18Speaker 2: all it says. So, you know, particularly if they're considering
- 4:22Speaker 2: doing something this sensitive, this unpopular, I mean, just to
- 4:27Speaker 2: be very clear, what apparently is being contemplated here, you know,
- 4:31Speaker 2: is you know, a settlement with this Hinton family where
- 4:33Speaker 2: the father is currently facing trial for murdering a sheriff's deputy,
- 4:38Speaker 2: a totally innocent sheriff's deputy, purportedly because he watched the
- 4:43Speaker 2: video of his son being shot by police Cincinnati police
- 4:48Speaker 2: and goes off and does this like senseless, horrific crime.
- 4:51Speaker 2: So I think one of the big issues is we
- 4:52Speaker 2: don't really have a law in Ohio as some states
- 4:56Speaker 2: do that would ban the father from getting some of
- 4:59Speaker 2: the pro seeds. Now, in all likelihood he's going to
- 5:01Speaker 2: be in jail the rest of his life. But I
- 5:03Speaker 2: think it will be major Hartburn. Even if this was
- 5:05Speaker 2: a band shooting of the young hunt and kid, which
- 5:10Speaker 2: every indication I've heard is that it is not. The
- 5:12Speaker 2: prosecutor's office declined to prosecute the police officer, the city
- 5:16Speaker 2: has taken no action. I have not watched the video,
- 5:20Speaker 2: but I am told that you can see that the
- 5:22Speaker 2: young man had a gun and was fleeing from a
- 5:24Speaker 2: stolen car, classic circumstances, and which use of force would
- 5:28Speaker 2: typically be justified by a police officer. Why they would
- 5:31Speaker 2: be trying to settle that in the first instance is
- 5:33Speaker 2: a big question mark. And then a huge question mark
- 5:36Speaker 2: is how and why would they be looking at giving
- 5:39Speaker 2: money to a family where the father has all but
- 5:44Speaker 2: admitted to murdering a police officer. Well, I mean it's
- 5:48Speaker 2: a politically sentative situation times ten.
- 5:51Speaker 1: Well, since this idea that there was a settlement going
- 5:53Speaker 1: on behind the scenes came out of the blue question
- 5:55Speaker 1: I had the other day and I've been told, yes,
- 5:57Speaker 1: the city solicitor does she have the authority to sell
- 6:00Speaker 1: I mean, the city solicitor apparently has the authority to
- 6:02Speaker 1: settle lawsuits. They don't need council's approval. City solicitor works
- 6:05Speaker 1: for the city manager. Does that mean that if the
- 6:07Speaker 1: city manager and the solicitor decide they're going to write
- 6:09Speaker 1: a check for X amount of the hitting family, that
- 6:11Speaker 1: the council really has no control over that.
- 6:15Speaker 2: Well, it depends on the circumstances. On Alan Brian, I mean,
- 6:19Speaker 2: there are I recall under the city's current administrative code,
- 6:25Speaker 2: the city manager can settle smaller lawsuits, but I can't
- 6:28Speaker 2: remember what the exact monetary cutoff is. The council must
- 6:32Speaker 2: approve a lawsuit, certainly anything in the seven figures, which
- 6:36Speaker 2: is typically what happens in a wrongful death scenario. So
- 6:41Speaker 2: there are some smaller suits that the city solicitor and
- 6:45Speaker 2: the city manager can settle, but nothing like this. So
- 6:50Speaker 2: if you're going to actually move bigger amounts of money,
- 6:53Speaker 2: council has to approve it. Well, they're allowed to. I mean,
- 6:56Speaker 2: they routinely settle small thunder bender case with city vehicles
- 7:01Speaker 2: and things of that nature. But the big things they
- 7:03Speaker 2: have to get approval, all.
- 7:04Speaker 1: Right, And I know right of time, Joe, But I
- 7:06Speaker 1: got to ask this one question. The Bell's been wrong.
- 7:08Speaker 1: They went into executive council sais without mentioning why they
- 7:11Speaker 1: were doing it. If that is an actionable offense, what's
- 7:13Speaker 1: the legal recourse, what's the remedy for that? Because the
- 7:17Speaker 1: Bell's been wrong, they had the meeting.
- 7:20Speaker 2: Yeah, you're right, I mean, I mean typically what someone
- 7:23Speaker 2: would do would be a taxpayer would file aolitical a
- 7:26Speaker 2: taxpayer lawsuit saying that they feel that their rights have
- 7:29Speaker 2: been violated, and you try to get into the Common
- 7:32Speaker 2: Police Court locally and see if you could convince a
- 7:34Speaker 2: judge to award some sort of damages to that taxpayer
- 7:39Speaker 2: as a deterrent to these guys. You know, my concern
- 7:43Speaker 2: is that that really they don't seem to be all
- 7:45Speaker 2: that interested in being deterred, and they don't really seem
- 7:48Speaker 2: to be paying any political price right now the way
- 7:51Speaker 2: the city voters are responding. So you file a lawsuit,
- 7:56Speaker 2: but what good would do I really don't.
- 7:57Speaker 1: Know, Maybe just to make a point judgment suitable for framing.
- 8:01Speaker 1: That's why we have legal expert Steve Goodin from the
- 8:03Speaker 1: law firm Reporter Right to help us out with these matters. Steve,
- 8:06Speaker 1: thank you so much for gring to join the program
- 8:08Speaker 1: late in the game. And you're always welcome here, and
- 8:10Speaker 1: you know we're going to be calling you anytime we
- 8:11Speaker 1: need sound legal advice and explanation.
- 8:15Speaker 2: Hey, anytime, Brian, you guys take care.
- 8:17Speaker 1: Happy New Year, my friend, Happy New Year. Five to
- 8:18Speaker 1: seventy or seven fifty seven fifty five K see the
- 8:20Speaker 1: talk station. I'm going to hear the inside scoop with
- 8:22Speaker 1: John Carney telling us