Latest / Sleepy Facts About History / Did the Haudenosaunee Confederacy Inspire the United States Constitution? - Consensus, Clan Mothers, and Wampum in Haudenosaunee Governance | Sleepy Facts About History

Transcript

Did the Haudenosaunee Confederacy Inspire the United States Constitution? - Consensus, Clan Mothers, and Wampum in Haudenosaunee Governance | Sleepy Facts About History · Sleepy Facts About History

0:00
Welcome to Sleepy Facts About History. Before
0:13
European contact, the Haudenosaunee Confederacy
0:16
established a sophisticated federal system designed
0:19
to end cycles of vengeance and manage the deep
0:22
grief that follows loss. This episode explores
0:26
the Great Law of Peace, an oral constitution
0:29
that united the Mohawk, Juanita, Onondaga, Cayuga,
0:34
and Seneca nations. under the metaphor of a giant
0:37
longhouse we examine the mechanics of this indigenous
0:42
political union from the deliberative consensus
0:45
of the grand council to the authority of clan
0:48
mothers who selected and could remove hereditary
0:52
chiefs the narrative also traces the material
0:56
records of the system particularly the wampum
0:59
belts that encoded treaties laws and diplomatic
1:02
agreements like the two -row wampum We look at
1:06
how the Confederacy negotiated with European
1:08
empires, adopted the Tuscarora as a sixth nation,
1:12
and survived the fracturing pressures of the
1:15
American Revolution. Finally, the episode addresses
1:19
the persistent question of whether this Confederacy
1:22
directly inspired the United States Constitution,
1:25
carefully weighing the historical evidence. I
1:29
wanted to understand how a political system could
1:32
treat grief not just as a private emotion, but
1:35
as a structural obstacle to peace that required
1:38
a ceremonial solution, the Holden -Ashorny approach
1:42
to consensus, parallel sovereignty, and matrilineal
1:46
authority offers a profound alternative to standard
1:50
majoritarian democracy. It is a story of constitutional
1:54
design built to endure across centuries, and
1:58
it remains a living, sovereign reality today.
2:04
The Haudenosaunee Confederacy was already a functioning
2:07
federal system when Europeans arrived. It was
2:11
not a loose alliance of tribes. It was a constitutional
2:15
order of defined offices, consensus deliberation,
2:19
and clan mothers with the power to remove chiefs.
2:22
It was built to solve a problem most political
2:25
systems ignore, that grief, not merely violence,
2:29
is the enemy of peace. Imagine a building that
2:33
stretches for hundreds of miles. Its roof is
2:37
made of bark and saplings, bent and lashed into
2:41
a curved frame covered with sheets of elm bark
2:44
that shed rain and hold warmth. Beneath that
2:48
roof run five separate hearths. Each fire is
2:52
tended by families who cook, mend, and talk through
2:55
the night. The longhouse is a physical dwelling.
3:00
a structure up to a hundred feet or more in length,
3:03
with multiple fires down its center. Each fire
3:07
is shared by two families who live back to back
3:10
along the walls. The smoke rises through gaps
3:13
in the roof. The families inside are bound by
3:17
kinship that crosses every boundary between them,
3:20
and the woman who tends each fire, the clan mother,
3:24
holds the power to choose who speaks for her
3:27
people in council. and the power to remove him
3:30
if he fails. This is not a metaphor borrowed
3:34
from somewhere else. This is how the Haudenosaunee,
3:38
the people of the Longhouse, have understood
3:40
their own political union for centuries. The
3:44
Longhouse is both a physical dwelling and a constitutional
3:47
image, one great roof stretching from the Mohawk
3:51
Valley in the east to the Seneca Territory in
3:54
the west. With the Onondaga nation at the central
3:58
hearth, what we are examining is how five nations,
4:03
later six, built a political system durable enough
4:06
to end generations of warfare among themselves.
4:09
It was strong enough to negotiate with empires.
4:13
It was flexible enough to survive into the present
4:16
day. And it did all of this without ever dissolving
4:20
the autonomy of the nations and clans beneath
4:23
that shared roof. The listener likely arrives
4:27
with the fragmentary image. Perhaps Iroquois
4:30
warriors from a school textbook. Perhaps a vague
4:34
claim that Native Americans inspired the United
4:37
States Constitution. Perhaps nothing more than
4:40
the word tribe, suggesting small, scattered,
4:44
informal groups. We need to replace that fragment
4:48
with something more precise. The Haudenosaunee
4:52
Confederacy was not a tribe. It was not an alliance
4:56
of convenience. It was a structured federal system
5:00
with defined offices, procedural rules and a
5:03
constitutional framework transmitted through
5:06
oral tradition and material records. To understand
5:10
how it worked, we must first understand what
5:13
it was built to solve. Oral tradition describes
5:16
a time before the Confederacy when the five nations
5:19
Mohawk, Juanita, Onondaga, Cayuga and Seneca
5:24
were locked in cycles of vengeance and grief.
5:26
A death demanded retaliation. Retaliation produced
5:31
more death. More death produced more grief, and
5:35
grief itself became the obstacle. A grieving
5:39
mind clouded by mourning could not think clearly
5:42
about peace. A family mourning a son would demand
5:46
vengeance. The vengeance would kill another mother's
5:50
son. Her grief would demand its own repayment.
5:55
The problem was not merely violence, but the
5:57
emotional and social consequences of violence.
6:01
Grief hardened into rage. Rage made peace unimaginable.
6:07
A council of mourners could not deliberate because
6:10
their eyes were blurred with tears, their ears
6:13
closed to reason, their throats choked with sorrow.
6:17
The Confederacy's founders understood something
6:20
that political systems often ignore. that peace
6:24
requires not just the cessation of hostilities
6:26
but the management of loss, the restoration of
6:30
the mind's capacity to choose peace over vengeance.
6:34
Into this situation came a figure known as the
6:37
Peacemaker. Haudenosaunee tradition describes
6:40
him as a man of possibly supernatural origin,
6:44
perhaps born among the Wendat to the north, perhaps
6:47
arriving from elsewhere entirely. His historical
6:51
identity cannot be independently verified and
6:55
that uncertainty matters. The peacemaker is not
6:59
a figure for whom we have birth records or contemporary
7:02
documents. He exists in oral tradition as a founding
7:06
presence and the stories about him encode constitutional
7:10
principles rather than chronology. What the tradition
7:14
records is a journey. The peacemaker traveling
7:18
among the nations persuading them to accept a
7:21
new law, a great law of peace. He did not travel
7:26
alone. He found an ally in a man named Hiawatha,
7:31
not the fictional hero of Longfellow's later
7:34
poem, which borrowed the name and attached it
7:36
to an entirely unrelated story, but a grieving
7:40
Onondaga, perhaps originally Mohawk, who had
7:43
lost his family to the violence of the era. Yawatha's
7:47
grief was representative. The Peacemaker's teaching
7:51
addressed it directly, and the final obstacle
7:55
was a man named Tadadaho, an Onondaga chief described
7:59
as a sorcerer, his mind tangled by rage and power,
8:04
his hair a nest of snakes in the traditional
8:06
imagery. The Peacemaker did not defeat Tadadaho
8:10
by force. He combed the snakes from his hair.
8:14
He straightened what was twisted. He restored
8:18
his capacity for reason through ceremony and
8:21
persuasion, a physical act of untangling that
8:24
mirrored the mental transformation. Tadodaho
8:28
became not an enemy but the first firekeeper
8:31
of the Central Council, and his name became a
8:33
title borne by Onondaga leaders ever since. The
8:38
founding narrative establishes the Confederacy's
8:41
central principles, that peace is made through
8:45
persuasion, not conquest. that grief must be
8:49
addressed before governance can resume, that
8:51
even the most opposed can be brought into relationship,
8:55
and that the nations retain their distinct identities
8:58
while accepting a shared law. The Great Law of
9:02
Peace, Gayanashigowa in the Mohawk language,
9:05
is not a written document. It is an oral constitution,
9:10
recited across generations, recorded in woven
9:14
belts of wampum. performed in ceremony. Its precise
9:19
date of establishment is uncertain. Archaeological
9:22
evidence and oral tradition suggest a pre -contact
9:26
origin, perhaps as early as the 12th century,
9:30
perhaps as late as the 16th. Some scholars have
9:34
attempted astronomical dating based on traditional
9:37
accounts of a meteor or comet sighting. Others
9:41
remain skeptical. What can be said with confidence
9:44
is that the Confederacy existed before Europeans
9:47
arrived. It was already functioning when the
9:51
first French and Dutch traders entered its territory.
9:55
Its structure was not a response to colonial
9:57
pressure, but an indigenous political achievement
10:00
on its own terms. The Great Law established the
10:05
Confederacy as a single longhouse with five fires.
10:08
The Mohawk, easternmost, became the keepers of
10:12
the Eastern Door. The Seneca, westernmost, became
10:16
the keepers of the western door. The Onumdaga,
10:20
at the center, became the fire keepers, the hosts
10:24
of the Grand Council. The Wanida and Cayuga occupied
10:28
the middle spaces. This spatial arrangement was
10:32
not decorative. It defined how decisions would
10:36
be made, how nations would relate to one another,
10:39
and how the Confederacy would present itself
10:42
to outsiders. But the founding narrative, however
10:46
powerful, is only the beginning of understanding.
10:50
The crucial question is how this union actually
10:53
functioned across generations. And to answer
10:56
that, we need to examine the machinery of the
10:59
Great Law, the clan system, the selection of
11:03
chiefs, the structure of councils, the practice
11:06
of consensus, the Condolence Ritual, and the
11:10
material records kept in Wampum. The foundation
11:14
of Haudenosaunee political life is the clan.
11:18
Each nation contains multiple clans, bear, wolf,
11:23
turtle, deer, beaver, heron, hawk, snipe, eel,
11:29
among others. And these clans cross national
11:32
boundaries. A Mohawk wolf is related to a Seneca
11:37
wolf in ways that a Mohawk bear is not. This
11:40
creates lateral kinship ties that bind the Confederacy
11:44
together beneath the level of nations. Clan identity
11:49
passes through the mother's line. Property, inheritance,
11:53
and political eligibility all follow matrilineal
11:57
descent. A child belongs to its mother's clan,
12:01
lives in its mother's longhouse, and looks to
12:04
its mother's brothers as male authority figures
12:07
within the clan structure. At the head of each
12:10
clan stands the clan mother, the Goyane, a senior
12:14
woman who holds authority over the selection
12:16
and removal of hereditary chiefs. This is not
12:20
symbolic authority. When a chief's position becomes
12:24
vacant through death or removal, the clan mother
12:28
chooses his successor from among eligible men
12:30
in her clan, typically her sons or nephews, men
12:34
who have demonstrated judgment, oratory, and
12:37
commitment to the great law. If a chief fails
12:41
in his duties, acts dishonorably, or loses the
12:44
confidence of his people, the clan mother can
12:47
remove him. Publicly, and finally, the chief,
12:52
called Rotiana or Royana, sometimes rendered
12:56
as Sason in older European accounts, serves for
13:00
life, but serves at the clan mother's discretion.
13:03
He is not a ruler. He is a representative and
13:07
steward of his clan. expected to deliberate in
13:10
Council without commanding it. The Clan Mothers
13:14
do not sit in the Grand Council themselves. The
13:18
Council is composed of the hereditary Chiefs,
13:21
but the Chiefs' authority derives from the Clan
13:24
Mothers' selection. The Clan Mothers' influence
13:27
extends through advice, social pressure, and
13:31
the ultimate power of removal. They observe Council
13:35
proceedings. They summon Chiefs to account. They
13:39
tend the fires where deliberation happens, and
13:43
their displeasure carries the weight of kinship
13:46
and household. Political authority in the Hardin
13:50
-Ashoni system is distributed, not concentrated.
13:53
No single person, no single gender, no single
13:57
nation holds final power. The Grand Council meets
14:01
at Onondaga, the central fire. Its structure
14:06
reflects the Longhouse metaphor, the Mohawk and
14:09
Seneca. as the Elder Brothers. Deliberate First
14:13
are matters brought before the Council. The Wanida
14:16
and Cayuga, the Younger Brothers. Deliberate
14:20
Second. The Onondaga, the Firekeepers. Listen
14:24
to both deliberations. Confirm whether consensus
14:27
has emerged, and hold a moderating role. If consensus
14:32
is not reached, the matter returns for further
14:35
discussion. There is no vote. There is no majority
14:39
rule. The goal is general agreement arrived at
14:44
through patient deliberation with objections
14:47
addressed rather than overridden. This method
14:51
of consensus requires explanation for listeners
14:53
accustomed to majoritarian democracy. Consensus
14:57
is not unanimity in the sense that everyone must
15:00
be equally enthusiastic. It is a process of finding
15:04
a position that all parties can accept and support,
15:07
even if some would have preferred a different
15:10
outcome. It requires that dissent be voiced and
15:13
engaged, not suppressed. It can be slow. It can
15:19
be contentious. But it produces decisions that
15:22
carry the weight of collective commitment rather
15:25
than the bare legitimacy of numerical superiority.
15:29
The Haudenosaunee understood something that many
15:32
modern political systems forget. A decision made
15:36
by half the group against the other half may
15:39
be efficient, but it is fragile. A decision made
15:43
by the whole group, even after difficult negotiation,
15:46
is durable. The Condolence Ritual is the mechanism
15:51
that makes this durability possible across generations.
15:54
When a chief dies, his nation is plunged into
15:58
grief. Grief clouds. Judgment. A council in grief
16:03
cannot deliberate wisely. The Condolence Ritual,
16:07
performed by representatives of the other nations,
16:10
addresses this directly it is a ceremonial process
16:14
of requikening of raising up the mourners wiping
16:18
the tears from their eyes clearing the obstruction
16:21
from their throats opening their ears to hear
16:24
again the words are precise transmitted through
16:27
tradition wampum strings and belts are presented
16:31
as material expressions of the condolence only
16:35
after this restoration can a successor be installed
16:37
and the council resume its function The ritual
16:41
treats grief as a political problem, not merely
16:45
a private emotion. This is a profound insight.
16:49
Modern political systems often assume that leaders
16:53
can function immediately after loss, that institutions
16:56
are immune to human emotion. The Haudenosaunee
17:00
recognized that institutions are composed of
17:03
human beings, that human beings are affected
17:06
by death. and that the transition of authority
17:09
requires not just the selection of a successor,
17:12
but the restoration of the community's capacity
17:15
to think clearly. The condolence ritual is, in
17:18
this sense, a mechanism for institutional continuity
17:22
through human fragility. Wampum is the material
17:26
medium that records and transmits these processes.
17:31
Wampum beads are small cylinders cut from the
17:35
shells of quahog clams. white and purple laboriously
17:39
drilled and woven into belts and strings they
17:43
are smooth to the touch cool and slightly heavy
17:47
in the hand the white beads pale as bone the
17:51
purple ones deep as dried blood a full belt carries
17:55
weight physical and ceremonial and the beads
17:59
shift with a soft sound when the belt is moved
18:01
in the hodenosaunee context wampum is not currency
18:07
It is not money. It is a system of recording
18:11
and credentialing. Wampum belts serve as mnemonic
18:15
devices. The patterns of white and purple beads
18:18
encode laws, treaties and historical agreements,
18:22
and trained reciters use the belts to remember
18:25
and perform the associated words. When a speaker
18:29
presents a wampum belt in council, he validates
18:32
his authority to speak on that matter. When a
18:36
treaty is made, a wampum belt records its terms.
18:40
The most famous of these is the Hiawatha belt,
18:44
depicting the five original nations as linked
18:47
squares with the Onondaga at the center, a visual
18:51
constitution, a material image of the longhouse
18:54
itself. Another significant wampum record is
18:58
the two -row wampum, or Guswenta, which encodes
19:02
the agreement made with Dutch traders around
19:04
1613. Its design shows two purple rows of beads
19:10
on a white background representing two vessels,
19:13
a Dutch ship and a Haudenosaunee canoe, traveling
19:17
down the same river side by side, neither steering
19:21
the other. This is the principle of parallel
19:24
sovereignty, coexistence without subordination,
19:27
cooperation without absorption. The two -row
19:31
wampum remains a foundational document in Haudenosaunee
19:34
diplomacy. and the treaty it records is still
19:37
invoked in contemporary political discussions.
19:40
The encounter with European empires tested every
19:44
mechanism we have examined. The Dutch arrived
19:47
in the early 17th century, followed by the French
19:50
and the British. Each empire sought alliance,
19:53
trade, and military advantage. Each encountered
19:57
not a collection of scattered tribes, but a coordinated
20:00
political union capable of negotiating with deliberation
20:04
and long -term consistency. The Haudenosaunee
20:08
did not present themselves as subjects. They
20:11
presented themselves as nations with whom treaties
20:14
could be made. Treaties between equals, recorded
20:17
in wampum, confirmed in ceremony. The covenant
20:22
chain diplomacy with the British, developed over
20:24
the 17th and 18th centuries, illustrates how
20:27
the Confederacy extended its kinship -based political
20:30
logic to relationships with empires. The Covenant
20:35
Chain was not merely a military alliance. It
20:38
was a diplomatic framework modelled on the relationship
20:41
between siblings or kin, with mutual obligations
20:45
of protection and respect. The British Crown
20:48
and the Haudenosaunee Confederacy were understood
20:51
as linked by a chain of silver, which required
20:54
periodic polishing through renewed counsel and
20:57
gift exchange. When delegates met, they presented
21:01
wampum belts, exchanged goods, sat in council
21:05
and spoke the words that renewed the chain's
21:08
luster. When the British failed their obligations,
21:12
as they increasingly did, the Haudenosaunee could
21:15
and did remind them of the chain's terms, holding
21:19
them to account through the same ceremonial language
21:22
that governed internal Confederacy business.
21:25
This diplomatic capacity depended on the Confederacy's
21:29
internal coherence. The Grand Council could coordinate
21:33
common foreign policy while preserving each nation's
21:36
autonomy in internal matters. The Mohawk might
21:40
lead in negotiations with the British because
21:42
of their eastern position. The Seneca might manage
21:46
relations with western nations. But no nation
21:49
acted for the Confederacy as a whole without
21:52
council deliberation. This federal structure,
21:56
strong union for common purposes, Strong autonomy
21:59
for particular ones was not accidental. It was
22:03
designed. The adoption of the Tuscarora around
22:07
1722 demonstrates this design's flexibility.
22:11
The Tuscarora were an Iroquoian -speaking people
22:15
from what is now North Carolina, driven north
22:18
by violent conflict with European colonists.
22:21
They sought refuge and affiliation with the Haudenosaunee.
22:26
The Confederacy did not simply absorb them. The
22:30
Tuscarora were adopted as a sixth nation, given
22:33
their own council fire, integrated into the longhouse
22:37
structure without dissolving their distinct identity.
22:40
They became the younger brothers alongside the
22:44
Oneida and Cayuga, with their own chiefs and
22:47
their own place in the deliberative order. This
22:51
incorporation without erasure is remarkable.
22:55
Many political systems expand by assimilation
22:58
or domination. The Haudenosaunee expanded by
23:02
extension of the same kinship and council principles
23:05
that governed the original five nations. The
23:09
listener should understand that this diplomatic
23:11
sophistication coexisted with warfare. The Great
23:15
Law established peace among the member nations.
23:18
It did not establish universal pacifism. The
23:22
Haudenosaunee fought wars with other indigenous
23:25
nations, the Wendat, the Erie, the Susquehannock,
23:29
and with European powers. Their reputation as
23:34
warriors in colonial conflicts is not invented,
23:36
but it is incomplete. The Confederacy was not
23:41
merely a military machine for British or colonial
23:44
interests. It pursued its own strategic goals,
23:48
played empires against one another when possible,
23:52
and maintained internal cohesion under pressures
23:55
that broke many other political systems. The
23:59
American Revolution and its aftermath imposed
24:01
the most severe test. The Confederacy attempted
24:05
to maintain neutrality, but the war divided the
24:08
nations. The Oneida largely supported the American
24:12
cause. The Mohawk and Seneca largely supported
24:16
the British. The Confederacy's council structure
24:20
could not prevent this division because the council
24:22
coordinated common policy. It did not override
24:26
national decisions on matters each nation considered
24:29
vital. The consequences were devastating. American
24:34
forces under General John Sullivan burned Haudenosaunee
24:38
villages and orchards across the Mohawk and Seneca
24:42
territories in 1779, destroying food stores and
24:46
displacing communities. The Longhouse metaphor
24:49
was strained to breaking. Brothers who had deliberated
24:53
together for generations now faced each other
24:55
across battle lines. Yet the council structure
24:59
survived the fracture. After the war, the Confederacy
25:03
gradually reconstituted its deliberative capacity,
25:07
though the division had lasting consequences
25:09
and the pressure on Haudenosaunee lands intensified.
25:13
The Canandaigua Treaty of 1794, negotiated between
25:18
the United States and the Haudenosaunee Confederacy,
25:22
remains in force today, a recognition, however,
25:25
imperfectly honored of Haudenosaunee sovereignty
25:28
and land rights. The Confederacy survived the
25:33
Revolution, adapted to reservation boundaries
25:36
and American and Canadian jurisdiction, and continued
25:39
to meet in council. This brings us to the question
25:44
of influence, the claim often heard that the
25:47
Haudenosaunee Confederacy directly inspired the
25:50
United States Constitution. We need to address
25:54
this with precision, because both celebration
25:56
and dismissal distort the evidence. American
26:01
founders knew of the Haudenosaunee. Benjamin
26:04
Franklin, in his 1754 Albany Plan for Colonial
26:09
Union, explicitly referenced the Iroquois Confederacy
26:13
as a model of union that had maintained peace
26:15
among distinct peoples. Franklin's correspondence
26:19
and the writings of other founders show awareness
26:21
of indigenous political organization. The question
26:25
is not whether they knew. The question is what
26:29
they did with that knowledge. The strongest scholarly
26:33
case for influence has been made by Donald Grind
26:36
and Bruce Johanson. who argue that the Haudenosaunee
26:40
example significantly shaped American founders'
26:43
thinking about federal union. The strongest critique
26:47
comes from Elizabeth Tucker and others, who argue
26:51
that the founders' references were rhetorical
26:53
rather than substantive. They argue that the
26:57
Constitution's direct sources are European. Locke,
27:01
Montesquieu, classical republicanism, colonial
27:05
experience. and that the structural differences
27:08
between the Great Law and the Constitution are
27:10
more significant than any similarities. The Haudenosaunee
27:14
system is matrilineal, hereditary, and consensus
27:18
-based. The American system is electoral, representative,
27:22
and majoritarian. These are not minor distinctions.
27:27
What can be said with competence is this. The
27:30
founders were aware of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy.
27:34
discussed it in the context of colonial union,
27:38
and found in it an example of federal coordination
27:41
among distinct societies. But the evidence does
27:45
not support a direct causal line from the Great
27:47
Law to the Constitution. The Constitution emerged
27:51
from multiple sources, and the Haudenosaunee
27:55
example was one reference point among many, not
27:58
a blueprint. The Confederacy's significance does
28:01
not depend on proving direct influence. It is
28:05
a remarkable political achievement on its own
28:07
terms, not merely as a precursor to something
28:11
else. And a confederacy continues. This is not
28:16
ancient history. The Grand Council still meets
28:20
at Onondaga. The Great Law is still recited.
28:24
Clan mothers still select and remove chiefs.
28:28
Wampum belts are still produced and presented.
28:32
The Haudenosaunee remained sovereign nations
28:34
within the United States and Canada, maintaining
28:37
their own citizenship, their own governance,
28:40
their own relationship to the land. The longhouse
28:45
still stands. The two vessels of the two -row
28:49
wampum still travel side by side down the same
28:52
river, neither steering the other, a principle
28:55
of parallel sovereignty that remains as relevant
28:58
to contemporary diplomacy as it was in 1613.
29:02
What should the listener carry away? A clear
29:06
mental model of a political system built from
29:09
kinship and consensus, designed to manage both
29:12
peace and autonomy, capable of negotiating with
29:15
empires while preserving the authority of clan
29:18
mothers and the distinct identities of member
29:21
nations. The Haudenosaunee Confederacy was not
29:25
a primitive precursor to European federalism.
29:28
not a loose alliance of warriors, not a vanished
29:31
relic of the past. It was, and is, a sophisticated
29:36
constitutional order with its own logic, its
29:40
own mechanisms, its own enduring presence in
29:43
the world. The precise founding date remains
29:47
uncertain. The historical identity of the peacemaker
29:50
cannot be independently verified. The degree
29:54
of influence on American founders remains contested
29:57
among scholars. These uncertainties do not weaken
30:01
the Confederacy's significance. They place it
30:04
where all serious historical subjects belong,
30:07
in the realm of evidence, interpretation, and
30:10
ongoing inquiry, rather than in the realm of
30:13
myth or dismissal. The Haudenosaunee built durable
30:17
federal diplomacy from kinship and consensus,
30:21
a political union strong enough to end internal
30:24
warfare, to negotiate with empires, to incorporate
30:27
new nations. and to survive for centuries into
30:31
a world utterly transformed from the one in which
30:34
it was founded that achievement stands on its
30:37
own terms a parallel and enduring tradition of
30:41
indigenous governance still living beneath the
30:44
great roof of the long house