Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Two Countries That Don't Know What the F*ck They're Doing | HBR News 508

Transcript

Two Countries That Don't Know What the F*ck They're Doing | HBR News 508 · Honey Badger Radio

0:04
Speaker 1: This is HBr News number five oh eight two countries
0:08
Speaker 1: that don't know what.
0:09
Speaker 2: The fuck they're doing, where we discuss the news of
0:11
Speaker 2: the week and give it the badger treatment.
0:17
Speaker 1: Hello everybody, and welcome to Honeybatcher Radio. Hope because they're
0:20
Speaker 1: doing well this week and that you're laughing at all
0:22
Speaker 1: of this absurdity so that you are not consumed by it.
0:25
Speaker 1: I am your host, Brian. I'm joined by doctor Randamercam.
0:29
Speaker 1: Hannah Wallen is not here this week. She had some
0:32
Speaker 1: kind of a I don't want to like alarm anybody,
0:36
Speaker 1: but her husband messaged me saying that he is admitting
0:40
Speaker 1: her to the hospital and that she's not gonna make
0:41
Speaker 1: it to the show. I mean like to the show,
0:45
Speaker 1: not like not gonna make it. Make it, so, you know,
0:48
Speaker 1: just keep her in your thoughts. And I asked, you know,
0:52
Speaker 1: if she's okay, and I haven't heard anything yet, so
0:54
Speaker 1: I assume that yeah, yeah, yeah, That's what I'm saying.
1:07
Speaker 1: Don't don't get black piled by it, just like, you know,
1:10
Speaker 1: just keep her in your thoughts and just understand that
1:13
Speaker 1: she's not able to make it. And her husband didn't
1:15
Speaker 1: seem too alarmed because he was just informing me she's
1:18
Speaker 1: not gonna make it because I'm admitting her to the hospital.
1:20
Speaker 1: So if you're going to the hospital, that means that
1:24
Speaker 1: there's a chance that they can save you, know, do
1:26
Speaker 1: something for you. So anyway, without without that said, though,
1:31
Speaker 1: it's just gonna be me and Mike. So might be
1:33
Speaker 1: a little bit of a shorter show today because we
1:35
Speaker 1: won't have Hannah's takes and uh, that's okay. We'll just
1:40
Speaker 1: have to manage without So. And then with all that said,
1:46
Speaker 1: despite that, today's show is gonna have a bit going on.
1:49
Speaker 1: We're gonna be talking about the developments regarding the Minnesota
1:53
Speaker 1: assassin pictured here.
1:56
Speaker 2: Oh for people who don't see it, yeah, I picture
1:58
Speaker 2: it's pictured there.
2:00
Speaker 1: Jack Thorne, who is the scriptwriter for Adolescents, the series
2:04
Speaker 1: that had everybody talking about boys and men, he was
2:07
Speaker 1: on a BBC question show of some kind and he
2:11
Speaker 1: said some things that some people might find revealing but
2:15
Speaker 1: I found pretty predictable. And of course we have the
2:19
Speaker 1: heat in the Middle East and what everybody's got everybody
2:23
Speaker 1: talking and more so stick around.
2:24
Speaker 2: It's gonna be a good time.
2:26
Speaker 1: Ambishita Jonahs afterwards for the Patron Only show, and I
2:29
Speaker 1: just realized I don't have that website up, but I
2:32
Speaker 1: will tell you what it is.
2:34
Speaker 2: So the Wall Street Journal.
2:38
Speaker 1: Just put out an article recently that I thought was
2:41
Speaker 1: interesting insofar as we now have a wig toow phenomenon,
2:48
Speaker 1: I guess happening, or at least that's the claim. So
2:52
Speaker 1: American women are giving up on marriage. Major demographic shifts
2:55
Speaker 1: have put men and women on divergent paths. That's left
2:59
Speaker 1: more women designed to being signal. The numbers aren't netting out.
3:04
Speaker 1: So we're gonna get into that a little bit, and
3:06
Speaker 1: maybe we'll talk a little bit about whether or not
3:10
Speaker 1: you know this is even like going to be a
3:12
Speaker 1: problem or or whatever. So be if you want to
3:16
Speaker 1: join us for that, you have to become a Badger
3:18
Speaker 1: yourself by going to feed the Badger dot com and
3:20
Speaker 1: setting up a monthly subscription that's feed the Badger dot
3:23
Speaker 1: Com forward slash subscribe. To do that five bucks a months,
3:26
Speaker 1: we'll get you into discord where you'll be able to
3:27
Speaker 1: watch all of the lovely additional content and plus you'll
3:33
Speaker 1: be able to watch all of the like hang out
3:35
Speaker 1: with us, and if you give it higher levels, you
3:36
Speaker 1: can be a part of the conversation itself. So please
3:39
Speaker 1: consider supporting and joining us by going to feed the
3:42
Speaker 1: badger dot com.
3:43
Speaker 2: Forward slash subscribe.
3:45
Speaker 1: Okay, So with all that said, I think then yeah,
3:49
Speaker 1: oh well, one more thing before you get into the stories.
3:51
Speaker 1: If you don't want to wake up on more to
3:52
Speaker 1: find that our content's been removed the Internet, go to
3:55
Speaker 1: badgerfeed dot com. That's badger feed dot com, all right,
4:00
Speaker 1: So that's where our content lives, all right.
4:01
Speaker 2: With all that said, let's get into today's stories.
4:05
Speaker 1: So in Minnesota there we covered last week the case
4:08
Speaker 1: of Vance Bolter, a fifty seven year old man who
4:12
Speaker 1: is suspected of assassinating state Representative Melissa Hortman and her husband,
4:16
Speaker 1: as well as attempting to murder State Senator John Hoffman
4:19
Speaker 1: and his wife. Initially drew significant attention last week. We
4:23
Speaker 1: covered it on the story on the news show I'm Sorry.
4:27
Speaker 1: Early reports suggested that Bolter, who had been appointed to
4:30
Speaker 1: a state board by Governor Tim Walls, was driven by
4:33
Speaker 1: maga Republican ideology, fueling a narrative of politically motivated violence. However,
4:38
Speaker 1: a letter found in Bolter's vehicle revealed he believed he
4:41
Speaker 1: was acting on Walls's orders to kill Senator Amy Klobuchar
4:45
Speaker 1: to pave the way for Walls's Senate run, indicating his
4:49
Speaker 1: action stemmed from delusional thinking rather than a coherent political agenda.
4:55
Speaker 1: This revelation shifted the understanding of Boltra's motives, pointing into
4:59
Speaker 1: mental instability rather than partisan ideology. The rapid drop off
5:03
Speaker 1: in media coverage following the discovery of Bolter's letter suggests
5:06
Speaker 1: an unwillingness to engage with the updated facts, which contradicted
5:10
Speaker 1: the initial narrative tying to the crime to conservative politics.
5:15
Speaker 1: Minnesota authorities, including Walls, faced criticism for not quickly clarifying
5:20
Speaker 1: the situation, allowing misinformation to persist. Bolter's letter, described as incoherent,
5:26
Speaker 1: highlighted his fractured mental state, undermining claims of clear political motive.
5:30
Speaker 1: The case underscores how quickly narratives can form and fade
5:33
Speaker 1: when they no longer serve a particular agenda, leaving the
5:35
Speaker 1: public to see clearer perspectives through unfiltered sources. In addition
5:39
Speaker 1: to that, one of the things that they also learned is, oh,
5:43
Speaker 1: your microphone is doing all kinds of stuff right now. Sorry, yes,
5:51
Speaker 1: it stopped. Yeah, oh no, it's okay. The other thing too,
5:55
Speaker 1: I wanted to add to this as well, is that
5:58
Speaker 1: apparently Bolter's wife, who had no idea this was happening,
6:05
Speaker 1: was asked by the authorities when they were investigating for
6:08
Speaker 1: her car, to be if they could like search her car,
6:11
Speaker 1: and they allowed her. She allowed them to do that,
6:13
Speaker 1: and they found I think it was like ten thousand
6:15
Speaker 1: dollars and a bunch of passports for her and her kids,
6:19
Speaker 1: and like a note that but from Bolter saying that
6:22
Speaker 1: he was terribly sorry and that she would never understand why,
6:26
Speaker 1: you know, like why he had to do what he did,
6:28
Speaker 1: and this was you know, like a guess obviously put
6:31
Speaker 1: here before he committed these acts. So but you can't
6:35
Speaker 1: hear Mike. Oh shit, Okay, hold.
6:36
Speaker 2: On a second.
6:37
Speaker 1: I just realized that's something I didn't do, which is
6:39
Speaker 1: probably why you're not getting the static.
6:42
Speaker 2: I gotta make the panda talk, and I forgot to
6:44
Speaker 2: do that.
6:44
Speaker 1: So give me just a second here, not a problem.
6:48
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna give the panda a voice so that Mike. Yeah, well, they.
6:57
Speaker 3: Should be able to hear you now, okay, good, yeah, yeah,
7:01
Speaker 3: can you help me? So I assume you ken yes.
7:04
Speaker 2: Yes, they should be able to hear you.
7:05
Speaker 1: I'm looking at it and it looks like you're getting audio,
7:08
Speaker 1: sou But I was. I was able to hear Mike,
7:12
Speaker 1: but I didn't pipe his audio out to you guys.
7:14
Speaker 1: But the other day he didn't say anything until just
7:16
Speaker 1: like wow, when when his Michael folks started doing that.
7:18
Speaker 1: So anyway, my point is this is just a follow
7:20
Speaker 1: up story. Vance Bolter apparently was not acting on any
7:27
Speaker 1: ideological grounds, and was I guess he was. He had
7:30
Speaker 1: a list, he had a hit list of people that
7:33
Speaker 1: he was going after, and they were kind of all
7:36
Speaker 1: over the place, I guess, but he did. He was
7:39
Speaker 1: at least coherent enough to prepare by leaving ten grand
7:43
Speaker 1: and a bunch of passports for his wife and kids
7:47
Speaker 1: before and as far as I know, I think that
7:49
Speaker 1: I don't know if he's arrested yet. I think they
7:52
Speaker 1: may have. He may be in custody now or he's
7:55
Speaker 1: still on the run, but I think they got him.
7:58
Speaker 1: So anyway, I don't know, might if you have any
8:01
Speaker 1: thoughts on this, but yeah, no, it's so.
8:05
Speaker 3: It's it's much like that guy who brained Nancy Pelosi's
8:10
Speaker 3: husband with a hammer, right, the Democrat. The Democrat run
8:14
Speaker 3: media pounced on it in the assumption that anyone who
8:17
Speaker 3: attacks a Democrat must be some kind of crazed maga chud,
8:21
Speaker 3: when in reality it's just someone who was well, either
8:26
Speaker 3: someone who was driven insane by sheer proximity to Democrats,
8:30
Speaker 3: or someone who has simply drawn too Democrats in the
8:33
Speaker 3: first place because they were already insane. It's not even
8:38
Speaker 3: a prescribed result of any tactic. It's just an inevitable
8:43
Speaker 3: an inevitable result of the komodo dragon instinct. Let me expand.
8:49
Speaker 3: The evolutionary niche of the komodo dragon is, well, they
8:53
Speaker 3: are man eaters. They're extremely dangerous to humans, but not
8:57
Speaker 3: in direct combat. They're not quite big enough or strong
9:00
Speaker 3: enough to actually overpower a human being, or anything as
9:03
Speaker 3: substantial as a human being. What they do to their
9:05
Speaker 3: prey is simply bite them, perhaps on the ankle or
9:09
Speaker 3: the leg. At that point they run away and so
9:12
Speaker 3: do their prey, and in all likelihood those two individuals
9:15
Speaker 3: never meet again. But the thing about the komodo dragon
9:18
Speaker 3: bite is it's riddled with infectious diseases, once to which
9:23
Speaker 3: the dragon itself is immune, but its prey is not.
9:27
Speaker 3: I mean, most animals have a mouth that is a
9:30
Speaker 3: petry dish of germs, but the Komodo dragon in particular
9:34
Speaker 3: has made this its evolutionary niche. It actually harbours these
9:38
Speaker 3: germs as a form of chemical warfare. So all it
9:41
Speaker 3: needs is one well placed bite anywhere near the circulatory
9:45
Speaker 3: system of its target, and that bite will soon go
9:48
Speaker 3: septic and result in acute blood poisoning or something else
9:55
Speaker 3: without modern medicine. If you get bitten by a Komodo dragon,
9:58
Speaker 3: you're going to slowly succumb the sepsis and you'll eventually
10:01
Speaker 3: collapse and die in a random location. At that point,
10:06
Speaker 3: your dead body is lying there as a free meal
10:09
Speaker 3: for any carnivorous scavenger that happens to wander in its
10:13
Speaker 3: general direction, and on the island of Komodo. That scavenger
10:18
Speaker 3: is very likely to be another Komodo dragon, the one
10:22
Speaker 3: that bit you. It's probably miles away by that point,
10:26
Speaker 3: but it is. It is probably busy eating a different
10:30
Speaker 3: animal that was killed by a different Komodo dragon some
10:33
Speaker 3: time ago. That is the evolutionary niche of the Komodo dragon.
10:37
Speaker 3: One can't really call it a tactic because they don't
10:39
Speaker 3: really know what they're doing. They just bite something then
10:43
Speaker 3: eat something else. But it works out because there are
10:45
Speaker 3: so many of them wandering around on the island, biting
10:49
Speaker 3: anything they come across, thereby ensuring that at all times
10:52
Speaker 3: there is a constant supply of dead and dying creatures
10:55
Speaker 3: in their vicinity on which they can snack. You've been
11:00
Speaker 3: paying attention, folks, and I have to ask, at what
11:03
Speaker 3: point in this analogy did the penny drop as to
11:06
Speaker 3: how it's analogous to democrats. They don't know what they're
11:10
Speaker 3: doing either. They are no more cognizant of any tactic
11:16
Speaker 3: than a komodo dragon is. They just wander around their environment,
11:20
Speaker 3: poisoning whoever they come across, and then they leave them
11:24
Speaker 3: for dead. Then eventually they happen upon a dead body
11:28
Speaker 3: and they go, huh, why would maga do this? And
11:34
Speaker 3: then they consume the soul of that dead body and
11:36
Speaker 3: use it and use its nourishment to continue poisoning every
11:40
Speaker 3: hapless animal that come across. People often like to call
11:44
Speaker 3: democrats lizard people, and to be honest, I get that
11:48
Speaker 3: you're being rhetorical in your attempts to dehumanize them, but
11:52
Speaker 3: to be quite frank, you're not dehumanizing them enough. They're
11:57
Speaker 3: not lizard people. They're not even people. They're not even
12:02
Speaker 3: ordinary lizards. Most lizards are harmless to human beings. These
12:07
Speaker 3: creatures are man eating dragons, all right, and not even
12:10
Speaker 3: the cool kind of man eating dragons that will fictitiously
12:14
Speaker 3: face a human in direct one on one combat and
12:17
Speaker 3: defeat it fair and square. They're not tank units like alligators.
12:21
Speaker 3: They're not stealthy units like skinks. They are dark, use
12:26
Speaker 3: social zombie units who max out their poison attack stats,
12:32
Speaker 3: and to the detriment of everyone, the devs have never
12:36
Speaker 3: nerfed those stats. They have only buffed them, turning the
12:40
Speaker 3: Democrat build into a horrifically op option that makes the
12:44
Speaker 3: game frankly unplayable in the current meta. It's an S
12:49
Speaker 3: tier build, no doubt, but it doesn't deserve to be.
12:53
Speaker 3: The game is rigged quite obviously. You'll like how I
12:56
Speaker 3: was channeling tiers Zoo. The tiers Zoo is an awesome
12:59
Speaker 3: channel too. He's probably a Democrat. He has the stocky
13:02
Speaker 3: Guly voice of a woke democrat, but whatever, still a
13:05
Speaker 3: good tantel credit with credits jee hardest tangent ever.
13:12
Speaker 2: Fun tangent. But and again it was just a follow up.
13:15
Speaker 1: And of course, yeah, vance Bolter was apprehended near his house.
13:21
Speaker 1: It took him forty three hours to find him though,
13:23
Speaker 1: So yeah, they got him. He's facing state and federal
13:26
Speaker 1: charges two counts of second degree murder and two counts
13:29
Speaker 1: of attempted second degree murder for the fatal shooting of
13:32
Speaker 1: those Minnesota state representatives and senators. So but and apparently
13:38
Speaker 1: also yeah, just kind of unhinged. Could he be a
13:43
Speaker 1: Manchurian candidate.
13:44
Speaker 2: I don't know.
13:45
Speaker 1: Sometimes, like I'm I'm open to like the conspiracy theories.
13:49
Speaker 1: I'm open to the idea that this guy was activated
13:53
Speaker 1: like in a Jason Bourne movie, like they just turned
13:56
Speaker 1: him on. But I mean, maybe they just wasted their
13:58
Speaker 1: resources on a fifty seven year old, pudgy politician instead of, like,
14:03
Speaker 1: I don't know, like some kind of Olympian athlete. That's
14:07
Speaker 1: what I would have done for my Manchurian candidates. I
14:10
Speaker 1: want them to have good stats. But anyway, let us
14:12
Speaker 1: know what you guys think about this one in the comments.
14:15
Speaker 1: We're gonna move on to the next story now, and
14:18
Speaker 1: I look forward to your thoughts. All right, So I
14:21
Speaker 1: have a video here I want to show you guys,
14:24
Speaker 1: but I'm also gonna summarize a little bit of the story.
14:26
Speaker 2: So on June.
14:27
Speaker 1: Nineteenth, twenty twenty five, on an episode of something called
14:31
Speaker 1: BBC Question Time, I don't know who watches it. I
14:34
Speaker 1: guess people who have licenses and don't have a choice
14:37
Speaker 1: host it by Fiona Bruce.
14:39
Speaker 2: Boomers, Yeah, mostly Fiona Bruce.
14:43
Speaker 1: In Greenford, West London, a special panel discuss the challenges
14:47
Speaker 1: of growing up in the twenty first century, with the
14:49
Speaker 1: focus on pressures facing young people. The panel included screenwriter
14:53
Speaker 1: Jack Thorne, head mistress Catherine Berblas Berbal, sing tuber Tommy
15:01
Speaker 1: in It. Tommy in It, I understand that he said
15:05
Speaker 1: some things that are really cringe as well, Science and
15:08
Speaker 1: Technology Secretary Peter Kyle m p and Lord Willetts. Thorn
15:12
Speaker 1: known for co writing the Netflix series Adolescents, highlighting the intents,
15:16
Speaker 1: societal and online pressures on young boys to conform to
15:20
Speaker 1: toxically masculine ideals, particularly through exposure to manosphere and in
15:26
Speaker 1: cell culture on social media. And so I want to
15:30
Speaker 1: just play this short clip, It's about a minute and
15:32
Speaker 1: thirty six seconds long of Thorn's commentary, and I want
15:38
Speaker 1: you guys to think about what kind of person this
15:40
Speaker 1: guy is.
15:41
Speaker 4: Okay, in cell culture and the manosphere are terrifying things
15:46
Speaker 4: that are coming for young men, and they and they
15:48
Speaker 4: want to involve them in it. In terms of what
15:51
Speaker 4: healthy masculinity looks like, you know, I get questioned as
15:55
Speaker 4: my own masculinity all the time because.
15:58
Speaker 3: Of the show.
15:58
Speaker 4: I may because I don't looked like a certain type
16:01
Speaker 4: of man, and that worries me.
16:03
Speaker 3: Not that what do you mean?
16:04
Speaker 5: What do they say?
16:06
Speaker 3: Well, if you.
16:07
Speaker 4: Looked at the comments in terms of when I was
16:11
Speaker 4: announced for this panel tonight, there was about thirty or
16:15
Speaker 4: forty questioning the way I look and the sort of
16:22
Speaker 4: person I am and whether I'm a soy beard twat
16:25
Speaker 4: I think was one of the things that was said
16:28
Speaker 4: about me. I think the really troubling thing and the
16:32
Speaker 4: thing that I found talking to young people is that
16:36
Speaker 4: pressure to look and behave in a certain way. And
16:39
Speaker 4: I do think that's something that I didn't experience growing up.
16:42
Speaker 3: You know, my hero growing up.
16:43
Speaker 4: Was Jervis Kkker, a skinny weirdo, and I was able
16:48
Speaker 4: to play to that skinny weirdo within me. And there's
16:52
Speaker 4: a lot of people that say I need to get
16:54
Speaker 4: to the gym. I need to get I need to
16:55
Speaker 4: get fit, I need to look a certain way because
16:58
Speaker 4: that is the only way I'm going to live normal life.
17:01
Speaker 4: And that threat of abnormality is a huge threat. And
17:05
Speaker 4: I do think we need to be helping boys through
17:08
Speaker 4: that because it's a difficult, difficult age for them, and
17:12
Speaker 4: this particular crisis that I do believe we're in in
17:15
Speaker 4: terms of social media is only exacerbating that.
17:20
Speaker 2: All right, So.
17:25
Speaker 1: The discussion sparked various reactions. Thorn called for legislative action,
17:30
Speaker 1: such as the smartphone ban for under six scenes to
17:34
Speaker 1: protect young people from harmful online content like the Manisphere,
17:39
Speaker 1: a view echoed in his earlier statements about needing radical
17:42
Speaker 1: action to address the crisis of male violence. However, some
17:46
Speaker 1: criticized the panel's composition, with an average age of forty eight,
17:50
Speaker 1: for lacking sufficient young voices, as only Tommy in It
17:53
Speaker 1: was under forty five. Social media posts reflected mixed sentiments.
17:56
Speaker 1: Some praise Thorn's focus on toxic masculinity, while others, like
18:01
Speaker 1: user at Jenny Tyrrell thirty one, felt he downplayed the issue,
18:05
Speaker 1: missing an opportunity to directly address young boys. So even
18:08
Speaker 1: the reactions now, granted, the comments are full of friends
18:12
Speaker 1: of the men's movement that we have had on, like
18:15
Speaker 1: Phil Mitchell and well, I forget some of the names,
18:21
Speaker 1: but a lot of people that we have had on
18:23
Speaker 1: have had things to say about this. But Mike, I
18:26
Speaker 1: don't know if you want to. I know you've seen
18:28
Speaker 1: this clip and there's a Tommy Innitt clip too that's
18:31
Speaker 1: been going.
18:31
Speaker 2: Around, but I don't know if you want to say
18:32
Speaker 2: anything about that.
18:33
Speaker 3: You have you finished the write up?
18:35
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, all right, it's all yours.
18:38
Speaker 3: I'll just repeat something got tweeted almost exactly a week ago.
18:42
Speaker 3: Ah quote take it to the bank. The grooming gangs
18:47
Speaker 3: are going to be blamed on the manisphere. I won't
18:51
Speaker 3: name drop the sigh up in question, but you'll notice
18:54
Speaker 3: the government won't let us criticize any Muslim except one
18:58
Speaker 3: the one that teaching school Chill and to fear end
19:02
Speaker 3: quote and sure enough, right on cue. As soon as
19:08
Speaker 3: the case report reared its ugly head, the BBC, as
19:13
Speaker 3: you can see here, when all guns are blazing against
19:16
Speaker 3: the quote unquote manisphere. But it's not as though they're
19:19
Speaker 3: explicitly blaming the manisphere for the Muslim grooming gangs. They're
19:24
Speaker 3: not even mentioning the Muslim grooming gangs. They're just continuing
19:28
Speaker 3: to pretend they're not happening while they laser focus their
19:32
Speaker 3: efforts on demonizing British males and social media. It's no
19:38
Speaker 3: surprise that the old media will always and forever blame
19:42
Speaker 3: everything on the new media for the same reason medieval
19:46
Speaker 3: scribes blamed everything on the printing press. It's their competition.
19:52
Speaker 3: It's the innovation that is going to put them all
19:55
Speaker 3: out of work unless they make every effort to stamp
19:58
Speaker 3: it out or control it completely. And it stands the
20:02
Speaker 3: reason they will blame the men of their own nation
20:06
Speaker 3: for everything, because they have long since been taken over
20:10
Speaker 3: by miss andric orucophobic communists who cannot conceive of any
20:14
Speaker 3: other narrative. So, in a way, my tweet was not
20:19
Speaker 3: as prescient as one might think. This is not a
20:22
Speaker 3: new development. The BBC and the British legacy media in
20:26
Speaker 3: general has been doing this for as long as the
20:28
Speaker 3: Muslim grooming gangs have been a thing, and for as
20:31
Speaker 3: long as the quote unquote manosphere has been a thing,
20:34
Speaker 3: if it even is a thing. Frankly, it's not people
20:39
Speaker 3: discussing the plight of men is not a sphere any
20:43
Speaker 3: more than men are a sphere. It's not a niche subject,
20:48
Speaker 3: like discussing the flight habits of European swallows. Men exist
20:53
Speaker 3: all over the world, and so do people who give
20:56
Speaker 3: a shit about men. We cover the entire planet, and
21:00
Speaker 3: we cover every conceivable aspect of human life, because every
21:04
Speaker 3: aspect of human life involves men. If we are a sphere,
21:09
Speaker 3: it's a sphere the size of the Earth. It just
21:13
Speaker 3: happens to be a sphere that is rather thin on
21:16
Speaker 3: the ground. What we are is rare. There are relatively
21:22
Speaker 3: few of us, at least compared with those who unthinkingly
21:26
Speaker 3: and ideologically fawn over women. But that's because we're living
21:30
Speaker 3: through the late stages of Romantic chivalry, where women are
21:34
Speaker 3: pedestalized as beacons of purity and innocence, while men are
21:40
Speaker 3: demonized as subhuman, pot bellied hobgoblins. This narrative, this narrative
21:46
Speaker 3: seems normal to most people, but it's not normal. It's
21:50
Speaker 3: just typical, very important difference, and it's only in the
21:55
Speaker 3: last century or so when this social narrative was codified
21:58
Speaker 3: into politics. That we call feminism, where women are not
22:04
Speaker 3: just purer than men and more innocent than men, they
22:08
Speaker 3: are oppressed by men. And it's only in the last
22:12
Speaker 3: fifty years or so when feminists conceded to themselves that
22:17
Speaker 3: if women are oppressed by their own men, then foreign
22:21
Speaker 3: men must also be oppressed by their own men. And
22:26
Speaker 3: I do mean their own men. Modern women are like
22:30
Speaker 3: modern governments. They're not interested in helping women or minorities.
22:34
Speaker 3: They're only interested in controlling their property, I either men
22:39
Speaker 3: of their nation through constant punishment. In the case of Britain,
22:47
Speaker 3: they cannot countenance any solution to anything other than punishing
22:52
Speaker 3: British men forever. That's why British women will even turn
22:57
Speaker 3: a blind eye to the abuse that British go girl's
23:00
Speaker 3: face by foreign men. Because foreign men do not belong
23:05
Speaker 3: to British women. It's not their place to control foreign men.
23:09
Speaker 3: Their only conceivable response is to punish their own men,
23:15
Speaker 3: even when they've done nothing wrong. And it's not just women.
23:18
Speaker 3: It's Jack Thorne here. He's the one good man, don't
23:22
Speaker 3: you see? So he too has taken it upon himself
23:26
Speaker 3: to punish every man who would dare to wear the
23:29
Speaker 3: same white male's skin as him. So please don't take
23:35
Speaker 3: his bait when he talks about his appearance, when he
23:40
Speaker 3: talks about the way the so called manisphere judges him
23:43
Speaker 3: solely on what he looks like. And I've seen this
23:46
Speaker 3: from some commentators. I've seen some of them snapping at
23:49
Speaker 3: the bait like adolescent guppies, going, well, you are a diminutive,
23:53
Speaker 3: emaciated manlet. That's exactly that's exactly what you would say.
23:57
Speaker 3: Look at you, you pathetic halflings. Think something physiognomy check
24:02
Speaker 3: m Please do not fall for this people. I know
24:08
Speaker 3: how tempting it is to knee jerk into criticizing someone's appearance,
24:13
Speaker 3: but you're only making a rod for your own back,
24:16
Speaker 3: a rod designed by your enemies, a trojan horse of
24:21
Speaker 3: shallow esthetic irrelevance. I do not care what this man
24:25
Speaker 3: looks like. I know plenty of manlets who look just
24:30
Speaker 3: like him, but they talk perfect sense. And I know
24:34
Speaker 3: plenty of hence gigachads who talk the same ridiculous bullshit
24:39
Speaker 3: as this cunt. And you know plenty too, I mean
24:43
Speaker 3: everyone in Hollywood, for instance. They're selected for those you
24:48
Speaker 3: know attributes. This is one of the hundreds of hills
24:52
Speaker 3: that I will indeed die on. Folks, what many of
24:56
Speaker 3: you call a physiognomy check is just a convoluted code
24:59
Speaker 3: for I don't like this person's politics, and so I'm
25:03
Speaker 3: going to bitch about their appearance. You never do a
25:08
Speaker 3: blind experiment where you judge a person's looks before you
25:12
Speaker 3: know anything about their politics or their opinions. It is
25:17
Speaker 3: always the other way around, where you hear about someone's
25:21
Speaker 3: political opinions and then you make fun of their appearance.
25:25
Speaker 3: When you do that, you're playing right into this cunt's hands.
25:29
Speaker 3: It gives the distinct impression that you'd rather preoccupy yourself
25:33
Speaker 3: with surface level esthetics than the substance of any actual arguments.
25:37
Speaker 3: When Normis see you doing that, you lose them. They go,
25:42
Speaker 3: see he's right. The manisphere is just a bunch of
25:45
Speaker 3: shallow retard who have no interest in substantive intellectual pursuits.
25:50
Speaker 3: And yeah, you've handed the victory to your enemies. Eyes
25:56
Speaker 3: on goal, people. This man is evil because he is
26:00
Speaker 3: He is spouting evil, because he sees men as his property,
26:06
Speaker 3: as slaves to be controlled and punished and hated. It
26:11
Speaker 3: does not matter what he looks like or how he
26:16
Speaker 3: holds himself or how he talks. What matters is what
26:20
Speaker 3: he is saying. What matters is his behavior. What matters
26:24
Speaker 3: is the fucking proper gander he pumps out like adolescence.
26:29
Speaker 3: So yeah, I'm not just talking about optics and talking
26:32
Speaker 3: about principle as well. They happen to align perfectly on
26:36
Speaker 3: this matter. If you fall for this bait, you will lose.
26:43
Speaker 3: And frankly, if you fall for this bait, you deserve
26:46
Speaker 3: to lose. Please, for the love of God, just do better.
26:54
Speaker 1: Yeah, and yes, he is definitely doing the one good
26:57
Speaker 1: man thing he is. Essentially, this is the way this
27:00
Speaker 1: guy competes with other men. He writes stories where he
27:06
Speaker 1: takes the men he dislikes and places them in a
27:10
Speaker 1: certain light so that he can make the case that
27:13
Speaker 1: he is a better person than those other men. So
27:17
Speaker 1: he is banking on you using your you know, like,
27:22
Speaker 1: using his appearance against him, because it only supports his
27:26
Speaker 1: ultimate claim, which is that you know, I'm different and
27:30
Speaker 1: therefore I'm better because I don't fit their mold. And
27:34
Speaker 1: if you attack him on his looks and you're basically
27:37
Speaker 1: you're you're falling into that trap. But he is the
27:42
Speaker 1: he is the weak man. That not because of the
27:46
Speaker 1: way he looks, but because of what he is doing.
27:49
Speaker 1: It is his way of competing, It is his way
27:52
Speaker 1: of He is still engaging in the kind of male
27:56
Speaker 1: competition that he accuses the manisphere of doing it. He's
27:59
Speaker 1: just doing it in a different way. He's doing it
28:01
Speaker 1: with his with his propaganda. So and this, this kind
28:06
Speaker 1: of exposes the truth is is that I don't think
28:09
Speaker 1: this guy gives a shit about boys and men, even
28:13
Speaker 1: if he claims it. And it also proves that you know,
28:15
Speaker 1: a lot of people have watched the show and they've
28:17
Speaker 1: tried to like analyze it in other ways and say, well,
28:20
Speaker 1: maybe it's not about toxic masculinity. No, no, no, he
28:23
Speaker 1: is telling you explicitly. Now, maybe he didn't do it,
28:26
Speaker 1: maybe he didn't pull it off, but he is explicitly
28:28
Speaker 1: telling you what the purpose of his series was and
28:32
Speaker 1: it had the impact.
28:33
Speaker 2: I mean, they're calling it a documentary.
28:36
Speaker 1: It's he's doing the press tours like it almost doesn't
28:39
Speaker 1: matter if it was a completely shitty story, because the
28:42
Speaker 1: entire apparatus is gonna get behind him and they're gonna
28:44
Speaker 1: put him in front of every camera and they're gonna
28:46
Speaker 1: hope that somebody criticizes his appearance because that will be
28:50
Speaker 1: used to fuel their propaganda further. So I would be careful,
28:54
Speaker 1: but what I would do is point out that he's
28:56
Speaker 1: actually trying to be the alpha through this, and I
29:00
Speaker 1: say the alpha in the manisphere sense, in the sort
29:03
Speaker 1: of straw man that he would create, you know, for them,
29:06
Speaker 1: in case people get triggered by me using the A word.
29:08
Speaker 1: But this is his way of competing, is what I'm saying. So,
29:13
Speaker 1: and speaking of that, let me show you guys a
29:15
Speaker 1: clip from Tommy in it. Who's I guess a British
29:19
Speaker 1: influencer probably like intended.
29:21
Speaker 3: To take this on, this guy on because the Guardian
29:24
Speaker 3: wants did an article kind of championing him. Oh yeah,
29:27
Speaker 3: as the antidote to the Manisphere.
29:30
Speaker 2: Oh of course, like the Harry Sisson of the UK.
29:33
Speaker 2: Sure yeah, sure, yeah, yeah, yeah, Okay, let's like, let's
29:36
Speaker 2: give this listen. I have not heard this yet.
29:38
Speaker 5: So, I mean, one of the things that people talked
29:41
Speaker 5: about before your series, but also your series highlighted hugely
29:44
Speaker 5: was misogyny and young men feeling shut out from the world.
29:52
Speaker 5: That is, it's more bias towards women and towards girls
29:56
Speaker 5: and that there is an element of society they cannot
29:59
Speaker 5: access unless they behave in a certain way. Is that
30:02
Speaker 5: something you are aware of online?
30:03
Speaker 6: I'm very aware of and it's very prevalent. And I
30:06
Speaker 6: think healthy masculinity is the absence of that, you know.
30:09
Speaker 6: It's it's men being kind and also having esteem in
30:13
Speaker 6: themselves and not needing to put other people down. That
30:16
Speaker 6: these things can coexist. I think it's he's.
30:18
Speaker 3: Literally putting them down.
30:22
Speaker 1: What he's doing, Yeah, putting it down while saying, ounce
30:27
Speaker 1: of self awareness in your fucking soul, dickhead.
30:31
Speaker 6: It is on the internet who are getting the roles
30:33
Speaker 6: of teachers, you know, and speaking to people like as
30:35
Speaker 6: young as like below ten, you know what I mean,
30:38
Speaker 6: who maybe aren't growing up now you can feel good
30:43
Speaker 6: about yourself, and then you've got these people, you know,
30:45
Speaker 6: the Andrew Takes of the world, going hey, here's how
30:47
Speaker 6: you can be good and girls will like you and
30:49
Speaker 6: do all this stuff and everyone will think you're cool.
30:52
Speaker 6: And it's just this super wondering panel.
30:55
Speaker 3: I think, anything, what is any one of this panel
30:59
Speaker 3: going to point out that Andrew he is a Muslim?
31:01
Speaker 3: They're not. No, that's that's what I meant at the
31:04
Speaker 3: top of my.
31:05
Speaker 2: Now, I know what you wasn't going to name drop him.
31:08
Speaker 3: But they keep doing this. Like I said, the only
31:12
Speaker 3: Muslim they're allowed to criticize is the one.
31:16
Speaker 2: But they don't.
31:17
Speaker 3: They crowned is the King of the Manisphere. And that
31:20
Speaker 3: mentioned that he's a Muslim.
31:21
Speaker 2: No, because it's the King of the Manisphere, right, because.
31:24
Speaker 1: He's not a Muslim to them, he's the king of
31:26
Speaker 1: the Manisphere first because if they if they make him
31:30
Speaker 1: a Muslim, then they become Islamophobic. But if he's just
31:33
Speaker 1: Andrew Tates, then they don't have to address that, right. So,
31:39
Speaker 1: but yeah, it's just a couple more.
31:40
Speaker 6: Seconds here, you know, that could be put in place
31:43
Speaker 6: to stop that, because that only came about in the
31:45
Speaker 6: past two years and it's been quick, and I think
31:48
Speaker 6: that's the most concerning thing for me.
31:51
Speaker 3: All Right, I'm coming to you, Tommy, give me your
31:54
Speaker 3: best video. I'm gonna fucking tear it apart.
31:57
Speaker 2: Does he make video, Well, he's an influencer. Yeah, he's
32:00
Speaker 2: probably on TikTok or something.
32:03
Speaker 3: He says YouTube Simons.
32:05
Speaker 2: Oh, okay, well, I guess with the look.
32:07
Speaker 3: I did briefly look at his channel, but I couldn't.
32:10
Speaker 3: I need one video to response to. I don't want
32:12
Speaker 3: to go through a bunch of them.
32:13
Speaker 1: And are they short or are they like forty five
32:18
Speaker 1: minute tirades.
32:19
Speaker 3: No, they're quite short, but there's loads of them. Somebody
32:22
Speaker 3: requests something, somebody else like look through his back catalog
32:26
Speaker 3: in fight because I don't want to have to. Yeah,
32:28
Speaker 3: it's just fucking depressing, all right.
32:31
Speaker 2: So but anyway, that is that.
32:36
Speaker 1: Uh yeah, the guy, like I said, Tommy and it
32:39
Speaker 1: also they're both just they're just doing what men do.
32:42
Speaker 1: They're trying to show that they're better at protecting the
32:45
Speaker 1: women than the other men. It's it's the same crap,
32:48
Speaker 1: different day and different styles, that's it. It's like different.
32:51
Speaker 1: It's like, you know the writer guy Jack Thorne, he
32:54
Speaker 1: does you know tai Chi and and Tommy in it
32:58
Speaker 1: does like you know, hungar or some thing. But they're
33:00
Speaker 1: both fighting against other men and competing with other men
33:03
Speaker 1: for the favor of women. They're still engaging in the
33:06
Speaker 1: same song and dance, even the same one the Andrew
33:09
Speaker 1: Tate and and the pickup artist guys in the Manisphere
33:12
Speaker 1: do themselves. They're all playing the same game. They just
33:15
Speaker 1: have different ways of doing it, and they accuse each
33:17
Speaker 1: other of you know, the bad intentions on the other side,
33:21
Speaker 1: like you're not doing it the right way because I'm
33:23
Speaker 1: doing it.
33:23
Speaker 2: The right way.
33:24
Speaker 1: You're all engaged in it. You're all playing the same game.
33:28
Speaker 1: But anyway, but I at least can respect the Manisphere
33:31
Speaker 1: guys because they are being direct and they're not being
33:34
Speaker 1: sneaky fuckers like these guys are where it's like, oh, no,
33:36
Speaker 1: I care.
33:36
Speaker 2: About women, I respect them.
33:37
Speaker 1: Watch Watch how hard I respect this woman until of
33:41
Speaker 1: course you disagree with them, and then they're gonna probably,
33:44
Speaker 1: you know, tell you to make them a ham sandwich.
33:46
Speaker 3: To be fair. A lot of the manus FA will
33:48
Speaker 3: do that. It's it's so tempting just to fall back
33:51
Speaker 3: on Oh my god, the women are the victims.
33:54
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, for sure, Yeah they are. They're
33:56
Speaker 1: the biggest victims of feminism according to the Manisphere.
33:59
Speaker 2: Yeah.
34:00
Speaker 1: Anyway, let us know what you guys think about this
34:01
Speaker 1: one in the comments. We're gonna move on to the
34:04
Speaker 1: next story. It is a weird one. Hannah sent this
34:06
Speaker 1: one to me, and I thought she was gonna have
34:08
Speaker 1: a lot to say on it, but unfortunately she's not here,
34:10
Speaker 1: So this might be a short one, but I will
34:13
Speaker 1: tell you because this is kind of weird anyway. So
34:16
Speaker 1: in Beverly Hills, Texas, so not Beverly Hills, California. In
34:20
Speaker 1: Beverly Hills, Texas, a forty two year old man discovered
34:24
Speaker 1: that he was unknowingly married when he received a package
34:27
Speaker 1: from his ex fiance, thirty six year old Kristin Marie Spearman,
34:33
Speaker 1: containing a photo of her holding a marriage license and
34:36
Speaker 1: a filed certificate. The couple had obtained a marriage license
34:40
Speaker 1: together on June second, twenty twenty five, but broke up
34:43
Speaker 1: shortly after with no wedding ceremony taking place. Spearman allegedly
34:48
Speaker 1: convinced the pastor to certify the marriage without the man's
34:52
Speaker 1: presence and filed the certificate with the McLennan County Clerk's office.
34:57
Speaker 1: After the man reported the incident, police with a sistance
35:00
Speaker 1: from the Hewitt Police Department, arrested Spearman at her home
35:03
Speaker 1: near Hewitt on charges of third degree felony stalking. She
35:08
Speaker 1: was booked into McLennan County Jail with a ten thousand
35:11
Speaker 1: dollars bond. This bizarre case described by Beverly Hills Police
35:14
Speaker 1: Chief Corey Martin as unprecedented highlights Spearman's elaborate deception following
35:19
Speaker 1: this breakup. So she did this after they broke up.
35:24
Speaker 1: The man's discovery of the fraudulent marriage came days after
35:27
Speaker 1: their split, prompting an investigation that led to her arrest.
35:30
Speaker 1: The incident has drawn attention on platforms like x with
35:33
Speaker 1: users expressing shotgun amusement at the unusual nature of the crime.
35:38
Speaker 1: So so she was like thirty six, and I think
35:42
Speaker 1: that she was like when they got broke up, she
35:47
Speaker 1: probably freaked out, Oh my god, what am I gonna do?
35:50
Speaker 1: So she just had to pass her marry them and
35:53
Speaker 1: he didn't even know. But anyway, where are you gonna say, Mike?
35:59
Speaker 3: I wonder what's going to be talked about this story
36:02
Speaker 3: in gender studies classes all over the world. I mean
36:06
Speaker 3: probably it's probably not part of the syllabus. Gender studies
36:13
Speaker 3: courses aren't really in the business of highlighting any of
36:17
Speaker 3: the instances in which women force men into legal bindings
36:21
Speaker 3: without their consent, And if they ever do, they twist
36:25
Speaker 3: it into a narrative about how women are the victims.
36:28
Speaker 3: That's been the stance on marriage for as long as
36:32
Speaker 3: feminism has existed, marriage is a patriarchal, misogynistic, ceremonial institution
36:38
Speaker 3: in which women are treated like men's property. So I
36:42
Speaker 3: have to wonder what's going to happen if someone in
36:46
Speaker 3: one of these gender studies classes puts their hand up
36:49
Speaker 3: and goes, professor, what do you make of the case
36:52
Speaker 3: of Kristen Spearman. She went so far as to break
36:56
Speaker 3: the law somehow to enforce a marriage on a man
37:02
Speaker 3: without his consent. I don't think men can do that.
37:05
Speaker 6: We go.
37:07
Speaker 3: Why would she do that? Why would she force a
37:10
Speaker 3: man to institutionally oppress her against his will? How does
37:17
Speaker 3: that even make sense? Professor? And the obvious knee jerk
37:22
Speaker 3: response is you are hereby expelled. That did not happen,
37:26
Speaker 3: that would never happen. You are a misogynist. You sound
37:30
Speaker 3: like some kind of mra in cel, and we do
37:32
Speaker 3: not tolerate that kind of hate speech. Get out before
37:34
Speaker 3: we throw you out. That would certainly be the case
37:38
Speaker 3: if a male student brought this up, or even a
37:41
Speaker 3: male professor. But what if like a rich, affluent female
37:45
Speaker 3: student or professor brought it up and she presented the
37:50
Speaker 3: receipts that proves the story to be true, it would
37:56
Speaker 3: result in some heads exploding at first, no doubt, but
38:00
Speaker 3: I would imagine the way they would spin it would
38:02
Speaker 3: be what she was arrested. She was jailed on a
38:06
Speaker 3: ten thousand dollar pond for what.
38:09
Speaker 2: What is the charge?
38:11
Speaker 3: Enjoying a contract? A succulent Chinese contract. This is an outrage.
38:16
Speaker 3: A woman should have every right to enter into a
38:19
Speaker 3: contract with a man without being brutally imprisoned by the state.
38:25
Speaker 3: I will take this up with my local government representative
38:27
Speaker 3: as soon as possible, and it'll go the same way
38:31
Speaker 3: it went with babies. Babies do not belong to themselves.
38:36
Speaker 3: Babies belong to women. Their lives belong to women up
38:40
Speaker 3: to an including birth. And in the same way, men
38:44
Speaker 3: do not belong to themselves. They belong to women, not
38:47
Speaker 3: just men's bodies, but men's legal status. A woman should
38:50
Speaker 3: be able to do anything they like to men and children.
38:55
Speaker 3: Otherwise it's oppression. Yeah, when has it gone too far?
39:00
Speaker 3: That's what I keep asking, And the answer is never.
39:03
Speaker 3: Literally never. We will keep going until it's legal for
39:07
Speaker 3: women to kill men for any reason. This is not
39:12
Speaker 3: a joke, folks, it is a prediction. Mark my words,
39:16
Speaker 3: and please don't burn me at the stake. When my
39:18
Speaker 3: words come to fruition, as they frequently do, I despair,
39:24
Speaker 3: But I only despair because it's funny when I despair
39:28
Speaker 3: like this. I'm not sure how that works, but it does.
39:35
Speaker 1: Yes, yes, well yeah, I mean it's wild like to
39:39
Speaker 1: find that. I mean, apparently again, you know this is
39:42
Speaker 1: a kind of well, it's definitely sucking, but I think
39:47
Speaker 1: this is what happens when you get involved with women
39:49
Speaker 1: and they're getting older.
39:50
Speaker 2: Because they get really possessive. So it's it's wild.
39:54
Speaker 4: Bro.
39:55
Speaker 1: I got a super child that I forgot to read
39:58
Speaker 1: from before and a super chat. I go to read
40:00
Speaker 1: those out, so mereth G top G gave us five
40:05
Speaker 1: dollars and said age per news number five aweight.
40:07
Speaker 2: The only people who.
40:08
Speaker 1: Should be concerned about what children are consuming on social
40:11
Speaker 1: media are their parents. And I'm going to say this
40:14
Speaker 1: more laws, less justice. We don't need to ban kids
40:18
Speaker 1: with social media. We need to We need parents to
40:21
Speaker 1: actually do their jobs, yes, one hundred percent, and don't
40:25
Speaker 1: and don't let your kids fall for peer pressure. I mean,
40:27
Speaker 1: I know I know lots of people who they just
40:30
Speaker 1: don't let their kids have social media until they're adults,
40:34
Speaker 1: not even like sixteen, you know, years old, but like eighteen,
40:37
Speaker 1: when they get out, when they have a job, their
40:39
Speaker 1: own place. I think that that might be the best
40:42
Speaker 1: move because there's really no way to police social media itself.
40:48
Speaker 1: You have to, like you have to you know, parent
40:50
Speaker 1: your kids, just be parents of your kids. But how
40:53
Speaker 1: do you do that when so many kids are born
40:56
Speaker 1: in the homes where their father is not there and
40:58
Speaker 1: it's just a single mom. You know, even if she's
41:02
Speaker 1: doing her best, she just can't control that situation. So
41:06
Speaker 1: they end up making the devices don't just become something
41:09
Speaker 1: they get access to, it becomes the way to like,
41:13
Speaker 1: you know, essentially occupy the children. They get the hand
41:16
Speaker 1: them an iPad and then they call that parenting, and
41:19
Speaker 1: that's what happens a lot unfortunately. So all right, but
41:23
Speaker 1: thank you for the super chow, Meredith. And then somebody
41:27
Speaker 1: in the vertical chat I am looking at the vertical
41:30
Speaker 1: chat named Guts gave us two pounds. Pretty sure that's
41:34
Speaker 1: two pounds and said men of Culture shout out from Newcastle.
41:38
Speaker 1: Thank you Guts, and thanks for acknowledging us. Oh, I
41:42
Speaker 1: know why you're saying that it's because of the gameplay.
41:44
Speaker 2: I have on the vertical chat. Yes we are men
41:47
Speaker 2: of culture though.
41:48
Speaker 1: So all right, but anyway, thank you for the super
41:53
Speaker 1: chats and your comments. We're gonna get to the last story,
41:58
Speaker 1: which kind of like got added on at the last
41:59
Speaker 1: minute because I was originally gonna only have three stories
42:02
Speaker 1: and then this kind of broke. So we're gonna talk
42:05
Speaker 1: about this all right in the write ups. Thank you
42:09
Speaker 1: to Mike J for doing this right up. I did
42:11
Speaker 1: the other ones, but he did this one. So a
42:13
Speaker 1: new ceasfire deal has been put into place, and now
42:16
Speaker 1: the war at least for now, seems to be over
42:19
Speaker 1: between Iran and Israel, at least if you believe President
42:23
Speaker 1: Donald J.
42:23
Speaker 2: Trump's version of events.
42:24
Speaker 1: After Trump announced the ceasefire through truth Social he did
42:29
Speaker 1: the media around, telling NBC, it's a great day for America,
42:33
Speaker 1: it's a great day for the Middle East. I'm very
42:36
Speaker 1: happy to have been able to get the job done.
42:39
Speaker 1: A lot of people who are dying, a lot a
42:41
Speaker 1: lot of people, and it was only gonna get worse.
42:44
Speaker 1: It would have brought the whole Middle East down. I
42:47
Speaker 1: think the ceasefire is unlimited. It's going to go forever.
42:50
Speaker 1: End quote, but forever wasn't long enough, it seems at
42:54
Speaker 1: first Iranian government sources flip flopped on whether they would
42:57
Speaker 1: respect such a ceasefire without addition Israeli terms. Just hours
43:02
Speaker 1: before the ceasefire was to go into effect, a fresh
43:05
Speaker 1: round of Iranian missiles were launched at Israel, to which
43:08
Speaker 1: Israel announced plans to retaliate, with an exasperated President Trump
43:12
Speaker 1: stating the following on his Truth social platform, Israel, do
43:16
Speaker 1: not drop those bombs. If you do it, it's a
43:19
Speaker 1: major violation. Bring your pilots home now.
43:23
Speaker 2: Donald J.
43:23
Speaker 1: Trump, President of the United States. He like signs at
43:27
Speaker 1: the end, and he also posted, Israel is not going
43:30
Speaker 1: to attack Iran. All planes will be turned around and
43:33
Speaker 1: head home while doing a friendly plane wave to Iran.
43:36
Speaker 1: Nobody will be hurt. The ceasefire is in effect. Thank
43:40
Speaker 1: you for your attention to this matter.
43:42
Speaker 2: Donald J.
43:43
Speaker 1: Trump, President of the United States. President Trump later spoke
43:46
Speaker 1: to the press, stating, these guys gotta calm down. It's ridiculous.
43:52
Speaker 1: I didn't like plenty of things that I saw yesterday.
43:55
Speaker 1: I didn't like the fact that Israel unloaded right after
43:57
Speaker 1: we made the deal, and I didn't like the fact
43:59
Speaker 1: that the retaliation was very strong, and then this happened.
44:05
Speaker 2: Earlier today.
44:06
Speaker 1: I'm totally gonna you know, I'm gonna play the clip yes,
44:09
Speaker 1: because I'm gonna quote yes because famous this is. This
44:13
Speaker 1: is the SoundBite of twenty twenty five. I don't think
44:16
Speaker 1: anything's gonna get better than this. And it's kind of
44:20
Speaker 1: low at first, so you're not gonna hear it right
44:22
Speaker 1: off the bat.
44:24
Speaker 6: See I do.
44:26
Speaker 7: They violated it, but Israel violated it too. Israel, as
44:31
Speaker 7: soon as we made the deal, they came out and
44:33
Speaker 7: they dropped the load of bombs the likes of which
44:35
Speaker 7: I've never seen before, the biggest load that we've seen.
44:39
Speaker 7: I'm not happy with Israel. You know, when when I say, okay,
44:42
Speaker 7: now you have twelve hours, you don't go out in
44:44
Speaker 7: the first hour. It just drop everything you have on them.
44:47
Speaker 7: So I'm not happy with them. I'm not happy with
44:50
Speaker 7: Iron either. But I'm really unhappy if Israel's going out
44:53
Speaker 7: this morning because the one rocket that didn't land, that
44:56
Speaker 7: was shot perhaps by mistake, that didn't land. Happy about that.
45:03
Speaker 7: You know what we have, We basically have two countries
45:06
Speaker 7: that have been fighting so long and so hard that
45:09
Speaker 7: they don't know what the fuck they're doing. Do you
45:11
Speaker 7: understand that?
45:17
Speaker 3: All right?
45:18
Speaker 1: So I obviously very frustrated, and I get it, you know,
45:23
Speaker 1: trying to work with people. Trump's all about making the deal,
45:26
Speaker 1: and obviously like, well, you know, Israel is not easy
45:31
Speaker 1: to work with. But I'm gonna let you say what
45:34
Speaker 1: you want to say about it, Mike.
45:36
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's uh. It's been entertaining to stand on the
45:39
Speaker 3: sidelines and watch the the the narrative whiplash over this
45:44
Speaker 3: whole rigmarol. This time last week, it was, oh mg,
45:48
Speaker 3: we're going to world with around over some dubious claims
45:51
Speaker 3: about WMDs. Hey we go again. Trump was just another
45:55
Speaker 3: George Bush, all along, thisavow, this avow I never liked
45:59
Speaker 3: Trump anyway, and anyone else whoever did, you'd be groveling
46:02
Speaker 3: at my feet in eternal shame. Apologize to me. Apologize
46:06
Speaker 3: to me right now, and now a week later, as
46:10
Speaker 3: if by magic, it's he achieved a cease fire. I
46:14
Speaker 3: knew it would be all right in the end. Trust
46:16
Speaker 3: the plan, guys, Just trust the plan. I always trusted
46:19
Speaker 3: the plan. I was never in doubt. Shame on you
46:21
Speaker 3: for not trusting the plan. You should be groveling at
46:24
Speaker 3: my feet for I was always loyal to the cause.
46:27
Speaker 3: Like I'm glad people aren't just automatically toadying to Trump
46:32
Speaker 3: no matter what they absolutely shouldn't. But at the same time,
46:38
Speaker 3: have some goddamn impulse control.
46:40
Speaker 2: People.
46:41
Speaker 3: I know you're all scrambling to be the first on
46:43
Speaker 3: the scene, but you don't have to commit to a
46:46
Speaker 3: hard line every time. This is This is one of
46:50
Speaker 3: the handy things about being a commentator that doesn't do
46:54
Speaker 3: all that much commentating, Like I don't have to jump
46:58
Speaker 3: on every big story as soon as it ends is
47:00
Speaker 3: the news cycle and offer an impassioned sermon about it
47:04
Speaker 3: within twenty four hours. I'm lazy, and people expect me
47:08
Speaker 3: to be lazy, so I can go ahead and sit
47:11
Speaker 3: on my hands all week thinking I don't know. I
47:16
Speaker 3: literally don't know. I don't know if anything we're being
47:20
Speaker 3: told is even remotely true. So I'm keeping my mouth
47:23
Speaker 3: shut except for the occasional cagey joke, you know, especially
47:29
Speaker 3: when it comes to war and the fog of war
47:32
Speaker 3: that always accompanies war. In fact, the fog of war
47:36
Speaker 3: invariably appears before the war itself and during it, and
47:41
Speaker 3: it continues for several lifetimes after it, even if there
47:45
Speaker 3: isn't even a war. At the moment, it looks like
47:50
Speaker 3: there isn't a war, not a proper war at He's
47:53
Speaker 3: not one that's going to involve boots on the ground
47:56
Speaker 3: and the pointless deaths of American and European soldiers dancing
48:00
Speaker 3: in the desert, blowing up the sunshine for several decades.
48:04
Speaker 3: But you never know, I mean, that's exactly what we
48:08
Speaker 3: would be told so as to shroud us in the
48:11
Speaker 3: fog of war. On last Thursday's show, I equipped that, yeah, no,
48:18
Speaker 3: you were never going to get a president that doesn't
48:20
Speaker 3: suck Israel's dick. But according to Trump's now infamous statements,
48:26
Speaker 3: it appears even my little quip was not exactly accurate.
48:30
Speaker 3: Trump appears to be publicly treating Iran and Israel like
48:35
Speaker 3: misbehaving children, bashing their heads together and going, if you
48:39
Speaker 3: two don't behave yourselves, I'm turning this car around and
48:43
Speaker 3: we're going straight back home. That's what they tell me.
48:45
Speaker 3: That's what they say. But that's just what he's saying.
48:49
Speaker 3: It doesn't necessarily align with what he's doing behind the scenes,
48:54
Speaker 3: behind the smoke screens, behind the fog of war. Even
48:58
Speaker 3: the most honest president than ever would not tell you
49:01
Speaker 3: the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth
49:04
Speaker 3: when it comes to the war effort, because they're not
49:07
Speaker 3: supposed to. It's supposed to be top secret. And that's
49:13
Speaker 3: I think, that's all I can say about it. I
49:15
Speaker 3: don't know anything for sure, because I'm not supposed to
49:18
Speaker 3: know anything for sure. And even if I did know
49:20
Speaker 3: anything for sure, everything can change with the wind at
49:24
Speaker 3: a moment's notice, and I'm kind of.
49:26
Speaker 2: Fine with that.
49:27
Speaker 3: It's it's times like these when I remember the Taoist
49:32
Speaker 3: parable of the Chinese farmer. Some of you may know it.
49:37
Speaker 3: Oh my god, Chinese farmer, your horse ran away. This
49:41
Speaker 3: is awful. Chinese farmer says, maybe, oh my god, Oh
49:48
Speaker 3: my god, Chinese farmer, the horse came back, and it
49:51
Speaker 3: brought a bunch of wild horses with it. Now you
49:54
Speaker 3: have more horses, Chinese farmer, this is awesome. Chinese farmer says. Maybe,
50:02
Speaker 3: oh my god, Chinese farmer, your son was injured by
50:06
Speaker 3: one of the wild horses. This is awful. Chinese farmer says, maybe,
50:14
Speaker 3: oh my god, Chinese farmer. War has broken out and
50:18
Speaker 3: all of the young men are being conscripted to the war,
50:21
Speaker 3: but your son has been spared conscription because of his
50:25
Speaker 3: injury from the wild horse. This is awesome, Chinese farmer says.
50:32
Speaker 3: Maybe the moral of the story is pretty obvious. You
50:38
Speaker 3: never know, and just like it's important not to lose
50:42
Speaker 3: yourself in lament over your misfortunes, it's important not to
50:47
Speaker 3: lose yourself in elation over your good fortune because you
50:51
Speaker 3: never know. You never know in general, and you especially
50:56
Speaker 3: never know when it comes to war. So yep, stays in, brothers.
51:03
Speaker 3: Don't allow yourself to be flustered all over the shop
51:06
Speaker 3: like a rag doll. It's not good for your health.
51:10
Speaker 3: I feel free to repeat my advice back to me
51:13
Speaker 3: next time I'm getting into a furious, drunken rage over
51:16
Speaker 3: something that doesn't even affect me. These things are so
51:20
Speaker 3: easy to forget, all right, thank you for coming to
51:25
Speaker 3: my ted talk.
51:27
Speaker 2: Nothing ever happens, that, nothing ever happens. Shut is back.
51:32
Speaker 2: The only the only thing I'll say about this is
51:34
Speaker 2: that you.
51:35
Speaker 1: Know I mean I when I I think that, like
51:42
Speaker 1: getting out of staying out of a war is a
51:44
Speaker 1: good thing. Generally, I don't want that. I don't think
51:48
Speaker 1: Trump he's been against that forever. But he's also been
51:50
Speaker 1: pretty consistent on saying that Iran should not own or
51:55
Speaker 1: be able, you know, should not have a nuclear weapon.
51:58
Speaker 1: He's been saying that for decades. So like when when
52:03
Speaker 1: I voted for Trump, which I did, and I'm not
52:05
Speaker 1: ashamed of it, because the alternative was what you think
52:08
Speaker 1: that would have been better? I voted under the knowledge
52:12
Speaker 1: that that, you know, there were going to be people
52:15
Speaker 1: trying to get him to do things in the Middle East,
52:17
Speaker 1: like it's always been. But that but that's been a
52:20
Speaker 1: thing that we've had forever, like going back to Clinton,
52:25
Speaker 1: you know Bill Clinton, right, so that that's never that's
52:28
Speaker 1: always been a shadow that we have to deal with.
52:32
Speaker 1: And I think that if you want to like live
52:34
Speaker 1: in a world where that could completely reverse in one
52:37
Speaker 1: presidential term, you're not living on planet Earth. You're not
52:41
Speaker 1: being realistic. So like, if we can stay out of
52:44
Speaker 1: a war for four years, that would be great. I
52:47
Speaker 1: think that'd be great. And so like that looks like
52:50
Speaker 1: that's what his goal is. And I think that the
52:54
Speaker 1: fact that he is concerned about like how he will
52:57
Speaker 1: be seen and using that as a motivation, you can
53:01
Speaker 1: call it narcissism or whatever. I don't think that's what
53:03
Speaker 1: narcissm is, but that doesn't matter to me. That is fine. Like,
53:06
Speaker 1: if your ego is what motivates you to do the
53:09
Speaker 1: right thing, then okay, I guess your ego makes you
53:12
Speaker 1: do the right thing.
53:14
Speaker 2: Right, So I'm glad that there's peace now.
53:19
Speaker 1: Now With regards to the actions of Israel, Trump is
53:23
Speaker 1: not the president of Israel, he's not the president of Iran,
53:27
Speaker 1: he's not the king of the Middle East.
53:28
Speaker 2: He's just a president of the United States.
53:30
Speaker 1: And if he says don't do this, and they do
53:33
Speaker 1: something anyway, just like Ukraine when he said don't stop,
53:37
Speaker 1: you know, stop messing around with Russia Ukraine, and then
53:39
Speaker 1: Ukraine sent drones to try to assassinate Putin after he
53:42
Speaker 1: said that.
53:43
Speaker 2: That's not Trump's fault. That's Ukraine's fault.
53:47
Speaker 1: So when when Israel dropped bombs after he said, let's
53:50
Speaker 1: not do that, that's what That's not Trump's fault, that's
53:53
Speaker 1: Israel's fault. That's how it should be because he's not
53:57
Speaker 1: the king of the world, and we're not the world police.
53:59
Speaker 1: That's what I voted for for us not.
54:01
Speaker 2: To be the world police.
54:03
Speaker 1: So it doesn't I mean, yes, people are gonna try
54:06
Speaker 1: to nudge him because the truth is is that a
54:09
Speaker 1: lot of other countries in the world are depending on
54:12
Speaker 1: the United States in some way or they have become
54:14
Speaker 1: accustomed to the US being involved in foreign policy for them,
54:19
Speaker 1: from the European Union to NATO to the fucking the
54:24
Speaker 1: E Though I already said the European.
54:26
Speaker 2: What's the other one?
54:26
Speaker 1: The United Nations and all and and all these other
54:30
Speaker 1: and Israel, et cetera. That you just got to navigate that,
54:34
Speaker 1: you have to walk that line and try to, like,
54:37
Speaker 1: you know, do what is best without getting entangled. And
54:41
Speaker 1: isn't it weird that as soon as he gets into
54:44
Speaker 1: office a bunch of chaos just starts happening. We get
54:47
Speaker 1: like riots in California, and we get like assassinations, and
54:51
Speaker 1: there's like rumblings of war in the Middle East. All
54:53
Speaker 1: of a sudden, it's almost like people don't want us
54:56
Speaker 1: to get anything done here at home, which is what
54:59
Speaker 1: we voted for. So I understand it's frustration, but I
55:04
Speaker 1: think that I think that it's naive to think that
55:08
Speaker 1: we can just reverse shit that's been in place for
55:12
Speaker 1: multiple presidencies on both sides of the aisle in one term,
55:18
Speaker 1: but on the and this is the thing that I
55:20
Speaker 1: think for me is extremely white pilling the conversation around.
55:28
Speaker 1: In particular, Israel's involvement in our government is becoming so
55:34
Speaker 1: ubiquitous and it's beginning so widespread that there is it's
55:39
Speaker 1: an inevitable conversation that we're going to have to have
55:42
Speaker 1: and I'm here for that because I've been seeing it
55:45
Speaker 1: everywhere and I've been aware of it for a long time.
55:48
Speaker 1: But I don't really like this particular platform is not
55:51
Speaker 1: the place for it because we're here to talk about men.
55:54
Speaker 1: But since this is dealing with war, that is where
55:57
Speaker 1: I think the men's issues comes in, because if we
55:59
Speaker 1: get into a conflict, it's men's lives are gonna be lost.
56:02
Speaker 1: And that's But by the way, it's not just American men,
56:05
Speaker 1: but it's also Middle Eastern men of various types, Israeli men,
56:10
Speaker 1: those are all men too.
56:11
Speaker 2: I don't know if you think.
56:12
Speaker 1: That, But just like with the Rush Ukraine conflict when
56:14
Speaker 1: I covered it before, guess what Ukrainians are men and
56:17
Speaker 1: Russians have men. There are men on both sides of that,
56:20
Speaker 1: and they're the ones that'll be used in these conflicts.
56:23
Speaker 1: So I think that we have to stay frosty and
56:27
Speaker 1: stay chill on this, and we have to understand that
56:31
Speaker 1: this guy is he's flying the he's driving the bus,
56:35
Speaker 1: and what we want to do is make sure he
56:37
Speaker 1: gets to the destination with as little damage as possible.
56:40
Speaker 1: And everybody wants something from him. So I think that
56:44
Speaker 1: it's good that he said that we'll see what, you know,
56:49
Speaker 1: what comes out of this later and you know what,
56:54
Speaker 1: but for now, we have peace, so we should be
56:57
Speaker 1: I don't know why people are so mad that we're not,
57:00
Speaker 1: Like I don't know, like that that this is like
57:03
Speaker 1: not turning into a war, like they were mad that
57:05
Speaker 1: it was or potentially could have been, but then it didn't,
57:07
Speaker 1: and they're still mad like they're.
57:09
Speaker 2: Oh, well, they're up to something.
57:11
Speaker 1: Something's gonna happen, there's gonna be Yeah, it's coming, it's coming,
57:15
Speaker 1: you know, And and it's like, calm down, dude, like
57:18
Speaker 1: let's see if something actually happens and then have an
57:21
Speaker 1: opinion on it.
57:22
Speaker 2: How about that? How about that? Is it okay that
57:24
Speaker 2: we have peace even if it's just for a day
57:26
Speaker 2: that's there? Can can like is that okay? Like I don't.
57:29
Speaker 1: I don't get it, Like, what are you four? Or
57:32
Speaker 1: or do you just want Israel wiped off the map?
57:35
Speaker 1: Because that's a different conversation. If that's your if that's
57:38
Speaker 1: what you want, then you can put a comment in
57:41
Speaker 1: there and then and then explain like your position and
57:43
Speaker 1: how you know that is actually like somehow gonna be
57:45
Speaker 1: in service to anything.
57:47
Speaker 2: So let me know in the comments, do whatever. I
57:50
Speaker 2: don't give a shit. Uh, let me see if I
57:52
Speaker 2: got any uh super chats or super child's.
57:55
Speaker 1: I think that's it. I think we're done. So you know,
57:59
Speaker 1: you either want peace, you want war. It's gotta you
58:01
Speaker 1: gotta pick one. I don't know which one it is.
58:03
Speaker 1: So I'm I'm for peace personally, Let's let's do the
58:06
Speaker 1: peace thing. I'm cool with that. I'm cool with that.
58:09
Speaker 1: So anyway, any final thoughts, Mike.
58:14
Speaker 3: There is no peace with Islam. We must destroy it.
58:16
Speaker 3: I didn't say that. That was a joke.
58:19
Speaker 2: Oh wait, now we have to choose between Islam.
58:23
Speaker 3: No. So like in my position, I'm surrounded by people
58:31
Speaker 3: who want to kill the Jews and other people who
58:33
Speaker 3: want to kill the Muslims, and I'm like, we all
58:35
Speaker 3: just get along and kill them both. I tweeted that
58:40
Speaker 3: once and then I had to delete it when I
58:42
Speaker 3: came back to the UK because it would have got
58:45
Speaker 3: me arrested. Yeah, I might be applying for refugee status
58:50
Speaker 3: when I come to American which will be this time tomorrow.
58:53
Speaker 1: Oh, Mike has coming to the US tomorrow and yay,
58:59
Speaker 1: and and so that'll be cool. I think Alison has
59:02
Speaker 1: plans for a meetup this summer. Hannah also, well, at
59:06
Speaker 1: least like we'll see how she does after she gets
59:08
Speaker 1: out of the hospital, but she is hoping for a
59:10
Speaker 1: meetup as well. And there's this guy in North Carolina
59:14
Speaker 1: that watches our show. He's not too far from here.
59:16
Speaker 1: He wants me to have his He wants to give
59:19
Speaker 1: us his brisket. And I've been wanting to go out
59:21
Speaker 1: there and get his brisket. And now I have a
59:23
Speaker 1: car that can.
59:24
Speaker 2: Make the trip.
59:25
Speaker 1: So I don't know if you guys know, but I
59:26
Speaker 1: just got a new well it's a used car, but
59:29
Speaker 1: it's a new used car. I mentioned this on the
59:31
Speaker 1: show the other day twenty nineteen. Toyota Corolla, very reliable,
59:36
Speaker 1: only sixty thousand miles on it.
59:37
Speaker 2: It's awesome.
59:38
Speaker 1: And I've named it Israel, which means you have to
59:41
Speaker 1: give me money when I ask for it. So I'm
59:44
Speaker 1: gonna need some I'm gonna need help with my car payments.
59:46
Speaker 1: And if you're if you bless my car, you will
59:48
Speaker 1: be blessed in return, so you know, consider doing that.
59:52
Speaker 1: Go to my PayPal as a Beemartinez thirty seven at
59:55
Speaker 1: hotmail dot com support Israel my car. But anyway, so
1:00:01
Speaker 1: but yeah, I might be going down there. And another thing,
1:00:03
Speaker 1: somebody in the vertical chat I think it's Heaven. Lay
1:00:06
Speaker 1: Sky asked me if there's gonna be an ICMI this year,
1:00:12
Speaker 1: and I in the ICMI as far as I know,
1:00:15
Speaker 1: I don't know the details because I'm not arranging it,
1:00:17
Speaker 1: and Paul Elin retired from organizing those things, and I'm
1:00:21
Speaker 1: not sure if Mike Buchanan is doing it. But last
1:00:23
Speaker 1: I heard about the ICMI, it was gonna be in
1:00:26
Speaker 1: Australia this year, and.
1:00:29
Speaker 2: That means that it might have been.
1:00:31
Speaker 1: If it's true, then I think one of our Australian
1:00:34
Speaker 1: MRAs would be organizing it, but I don't know for sure,
1:00:38
Speaker 1: so I have to get back to you on that.
1:00:39
Speaker 1: But Alison is planning on doing a little Mini Badger
1:00:43
Speaker 1: meetup in Calgary, Alberta in September of this year. So
1:00:49
Speaker 1: we got we got things coming up and I welcome
1:00:53
Speaker 1: us opportunity to like hang out in person, so you know,
1:00:57
Speaker 1: that would be cool and then you can like.
1:00:59
Speaker 3: Maybe maybe is to commemorate the tenth anniversary of the
1:01:02
Speaker 3: first time we met up in Calgary.
1:01:04
Speaker 2: Remember, Oh yeah, it is the it is. It is
1:01:06
Speaker 2: gonna be the tenth anniversary.
1:01:07
Speaker 3: Of its pasted it by a few months.
1:01:10
Speaker 1: But it's not Bine six sixty six. It's not Bain.
1:01:13
Speaker 1: It might I think it's it might be. I don't
1:01:15
Speaker 1: want to dox him, but there's a guy named Brian
1:01:19
Speaker 1: who is an MRI that's been doing a long time
1:01:22
Speaker 1: in Australia, and I know he was involved with the
1:01:24
Speaker 1: last time we did it in Australia, so it might
1:01:26
Speaker 1: be him, because I think somebody else we worked.
1:01:29
Speaker 2: With was she was she was involved with setting it up.
1:01:32
Speaker 1: In Australia and I can't remember her name right now,
1:01:35
Speaker 1: female m RA, older woman, very feisty.
1:01:39
Speaker 2: I don't know.
1:01:40
Speaker 1: But anyway, so, yeah, so that we got plans to
1:01:44
Speaker 1: do meetups this year. I didn't know Paul retired. Well,
1:01:47
Speaker 1: I mean he retired from the organizing of the m
1:01:49
Speaker 1: r M. He still runs his his you know, his channel,
1:01:54
Speaker 1: and he does he has a x Y Crew, which
1:01:57
Speaker 1: is his little you know, it's like a little men's
1:02:00
Speaker 1: community that you can join on subscribe star Look it
1:02:03
Speaker 1: up x Y Crew on subscribe Star so and yeah,
1:02:07
Speaker 1: he's still active there. But anyway, got a lot of
1:02:10
Speaker 1: good shows coming up this week. I as will tell you,
1:02:12
Speaker 1: since we're like ending early, I'm gonna be speaking on
1:02:15
Speaker 1: Wednesday to a guy with a YouTube channel called It's Complicated.
1:02:19
Speaker 1: He's a man on the street guy and he talks
1:02:22
Speaker 1: to people. He's got a very big channel and he
1:02:24
Speaker 1: actually reached out to us, and he was recently on
1:02:27
Speaker 1: Pearls Audacity Network and I've.
1:02:30
Speaker 2: Been in coordinating.
1:02:32
Speaker 1: With him on having him come out. And there's another
1:02:35
Speaker 1: gentleman I'm gonna be doing a show with. I think
1:02:37
Speaker 1: it's on Sunday nights, so kind of a weird time
1:02:40
Speaker 1: because he's in Australia and he's been doing a lot
1:02:44
Speaker 1: of research into funding that the un women has been,
1:02:49
Speaker 1: where they get their money and what they what they
1:02:52
Speaker 1: use it for. So that's gonna be really interesting as well.
1:02:54
Speaker 1: He's a researcher that looks into men's issues. And also
1:02:58
Speaker 1: there's a guy named this is Shah who you probably
1:03:01
Speaker 1: have seen doing the rounds. I'm gonna be getting him
1:03:03
Speaker 1: on as well. So we got lots coming up. It's
1:03:05
Speaker 1: gonna be a big year for us, hopefully, and maybe
1:03:08
Speaker 1: we'll even get noticed and put on like a Jubilee
1:03:11
Speaker 1: panel or something. So anyway, thank you Mike for coming
1:03:14
Speaker 1: on the show with me and hanging out. Thank you
1:03:17
Speaker 1: guys for watching. If you guys liked this video, please
1:03:20
Speaker 1: hit like subscribe you can not already subscribe to the
1:03:22
Speaker 1: BELF notifications. Leave us a comment, let us know what
1:03:25
Speaker 1: you guys think about what we discussed on the show today,
1:03:27
Speaker 1: and please please please share this video because sharing is caring.
1:03:30
Speaker 1: Thank you guys so much for coming on today's episode
1:03:32
Speaker 1: of HBr News, and we'll talk to you guys in
1:03:33
Speaker 1: the next one.