Latest / Honey Badger Radio / X-Space Q & A: Psychoanalytic Feminism will likely cause more harm than good

Transcript

X-Space Q & A: Psychoanalytic Feminism will likely cause more harm than good · Honey Badger Radio

0:00
Speaker 1: Okay, we are live. Hello everyone, and welcome back to
0:06
Speaker 1: Honey Badger Radio. My name is Brian and this is
0:09
Speaker 1: X Spaces, which used to be the Badge Lodge, but
0:12
Speaker 1: I've been using X to do them instead because I
0:15
Speaker 1: can get anyone to call in and you know, give
0:17
Speaker 1: their thoughts and I can moderate the space myself. So
0:23
Speaker 1: Allison is working on a video that has to do
0:28
Speaker 1: with essentially, we're gonna be She's gonna be making a
0:30
Speaker 1: video about silver and why the like, what's happening with
0:35
Speaker 1: our financials and and our medals and everything is a
0:40
Speaker 1: men's issue. So you know, look forward to seeing that video.
0:45
Speaker 1: It might come out on Friday, and it'll be my
0:49
Speaker 1: first time seeing it too. I don't know what it's
0:51
Speaker 1: gonna have in it, but she does have something in
0:53
Speaker 1: the work so that she's very you know how Alison is.
0:55
Speaker 1: She gets obsessive over something and that becomes like the
0:59
Speaker 1: only thing that matters until you know it's done. So anyway,
1:07
Speaker 1: so we're gonna be talking today about feminist psycho analysis
1:13
Speaker 1: or psychoanalytic feminism, and the reason for that is a
1:17
Speaker 1: couple of things we've talked about on this channel. How
1:22
Speaker 1: the American Psychological Association takes their cues, as it were,
1:30
Speaker 1: from feminist theory because it is the mainstream theory taught
1:33
Speaker 1: in universities. And as a result of that, it's going
1:38
Speaker 1: to have an effect on, you know, how we treat men.
1:42
Speaker 1: And you know, you guys probably know that men are
1:46
Speaker 1: less likely, much less likely than women to seek therapy
1:50
Speaker 1: and seek psychiatric help. And I think a big part
1:55
Speaker 1: of the reason for this is that they don't feel
1:57
Speaker 1: like it is a welcoming place for them. And the
2:01
Speaker 1: American Psychological Association's guidelines for treating men are a very
2:06
Speaker 1: good example of why that is. And so we got
2:10
Speaker 1: this paper here by Christina Wolf which kind of goes
2:14
Speaker 1: into psychoanalytic feminism, which I think is like one of
2:18
Speaker 1: the root things behind the way that we do psychoanalysis
2:24
Speaker 1: and therapeutic treatment for men and women. So I think
2:30
Speaker 1: that it's a good thing to look at, and I
2:32
Speaker 1: want to relate it to something else that's happened. I
2:36
Speaker 1: have heard this news in Virginia, my state, which has
2:42
Speaker 1: recently had a change in government. Let's say Lisa Brighton
2:48
Speaker 1: made a post and Lisa Brighton, or I think it's Brighton,
2:52
Speaker 1: it might be Britain friend of the channel, been on
2:54
Speaker 1: the channel once before, back when the med too movement
2:57
Speaker 1: was starting out. She used to be a journalist that
2:59
Speaker 1: worked on I think it was like a Hollywood magazine
3:03
Speaker 1: of some kind, and she's been a very staunch advocate
3:07
Speaker 1: for men, particularly on X she's been she also I
3:11
Speaker 1: believe she runs or at least writes for EV magazine,
3:14
Speaker 1: which is kind of like an at least you know,
3:17
Speaker 1: on paper, a non feminist website for women and kind
3:24
Speaker 1: of like l you know, but like less woke a
3:26
Speaker 1: lot less from what I understand anyway, So she is
3:31
Speaker 1: always advocating for men. And she made this post where
3:34
Speaker 1: she said this was on February sixteenth, so like two
3:37
Speaker 1: days ago, she said. Update. The Virginia Senate passed SB
3:41
Speaker 1: four four seven unanimously thirty six to zero, making way
3:45
Speaker 1: for signaling of the nation's first legislatively created commission to
3:50
Speaker 1: address the issues facing boys and men. Progress hopefully other
3:54
Speaker 1: states follow. I love sharing good news. Now it made
4:00
Speaker 1: me wonder, what is this you know, bill SB Senate
4:07
Speaker 1: Bill four four seven, and in what way is it
4:11
Speaker 1: going to help men and boys? Because you know, forgive me,
4:14
Speaker 1: but when the government says they're going to fix something.
4:18
Speaker 1: I become extra wary of them. So I looked at
4:23
Speaker 1: this the thoughts this is what one of the other
4:27
Speaker 1: MRAs on x posted. Wallace Unchained said that he's a
4:32
Speaker 1: bit skeptical of this, and here's what he wrote. Lisa
4:35
Speaker 1: Brighton's post celebrates the unanimous thirty six to zero passage
4:39
Speaker 1: of Virginia Bill four four seven on February seventeenth, twenty
4:42
Speaker 1: twenty six, establishing the US's first advisory commission dedicated to
4:48
Speaker 1: addressing challenges faced by boys and men in areas like education, health,
4:53
Speaker 1: and workforce development. The bill, introduced by Democratic senators in
4:57
Speaker 1: January of this year, bill on growing recognition of gender
5:02
Speaker 1: specific disparities, with the commission set to report findings and
5:06
Speaker 1: recommendations to the Virginia General Assembly annually. US data highlights
5:11
Speaker 1: urgent needs, including twenty eight percent of boys age three
5:13
Speaker 1: to seventeen facing mental or developmental issues compared to twenty
5:17
Speaker 1: three percent of girls, alongside boys's lower educational attainment and
5:22
Speaker 1: higher suicide rates, underscoring the commission's potential impact. So the thing,
5:30
Speaker 1: the reason why find this all sounds good on paper,
5:35
Speaker 1: but I am extremely suspicious because the important question now
5:39
Speaker 1: becomes how are we going to address this? What is
5:43
Speaker 1: it they are identifying as the problem, or at least
5:46
Speaker 1: what the culprit of the problem is. I mean, they
5:48
Speaker 1: seem to see that there are issues. I think Virginia
5:52
Speaker 1: in particular is doing very poor in education for boys
5:57
Speaker 1: and girls. But then how would the government fix that?
6:02
Speaker 1: Like like this, It's one thing to say here's a problem,
6:06
Speaker 1: but another thing is how you go about addressing the problem.
6:10
Speaker 1: And I have a bit of a concern about this, so, uh,
6:15
Speaker 1: let me let me also finish what war what Wallace
6:19
Speaker 1: basically said, so he asked, if you know of these issues?
6:24
Speaker 1: Was there going to be any indication of addressing domestic
6:28
Speaker 1: violence against men and boys as part of the commission?
6:31
Speaker 1: And this is what he learned. No, there is no
6:35
Speaker 1: explicit mention or indication in the text of Virginia Senate
6:39
Speaker 1: Bill four four seven that domestic violence against men and
6:42
Speaker 1: boys is going to be part of the Virginia Boys
6:44
Speaker 1: and Men Advisory Commission, the scope or their duties. The
6:49
Speaker 1: bill is only going to be focused on the following areas, education, inequity,
6:53
Speaker 1: which concerns me right off the bat. Anytime I hear
6:57
Speaker 1: that we know equality and equity in like in an
7:01
Speaker 1: administrative way or a legislative way. I think that there's
7:04
Speaker 1: cost for alarm because in I think just in general,
7:08
Speaker 1: the government is trying to like move the needle on
7:10
Speaker 1: things or tip the scales. I don't think that that's
7:13
Speaker 1: the way to do it. Economic opportunities, okay, but they're
7:18
Speaker 1: going to do that while not addressing the issues that
7:21
Speaker 1: men and boys face with regards to you know, like
7:24
Speaker 1: how how could you alter that? Are you going to essentially,
7:29
Speaker 1: like I don't know, force companies to hire more men,
7:32
Speaker 1: like by putting in quotas or something like. Is that
7:35
Speaker 1: the way you solve this problem is to basically do
7:37
Speaker 1: more state enforcement, more influence, more coercion, or maybe you know,
7:43
Speaker 1: do something about the immigration, maybe do something about like
7:46
Speaker 1: men losing jobs, maybe make it like easier for people
7:49
Speaker 1: to start businesses. Maybe there are other ways to do
7:52
Speaker 1: it that involve the state removing itself as opposed to
7:54
Speaker 1: imposing itself. And that's why I'm saying that I don't
7:57
Speaker 1: think this is going to turn out as good as
8:00
Speaker 1: Lisa Brighton thinks it is. But you know, I can
8:02
Speaker 1: understand why she got excited, excited for the sentiment disparities
8:06
Speaker 1: in health outcomes, family life again, are you going to
8:11
Speaker 1: do something about no fault divorce, You're gonna do something
8:14
Speaker 1: about child custody laws? Are you going to do something
8:17
Speaker 1: about like presumed, let's say, shared parenting in the in
8:21
Speaker 1: the event of a divorce. I don't think that that's
8:24
Speaker 1: what they're gonna address. I don't know what it's gonna
8:26
Speaker 1: look like. But I brought up the psychology thing because
8:30
Speaker 1: there's the one last thing that I think might be
8:33
Speaker 1: the real big one is what they're calling this is
8:36
Speaker 1: another thing they want to address is the impact of
8:38
Speaker 1: social media use. So Virginia, the government of Virginia, wants
8:44
Speaker 1: to do something about the impact of social media use
8:49
Speaker 1: on boys as a way of helping them. Do you
8:53
Speaker 1: see how that sounds really nefarious? I mean, even if
8:57
Speaker 1: like it's completely intended intent, you know, innocently, there's something
9:01
Speaker 1: very nefarious there. So anyway, I decided to do a
9:08
Speaker 1: little bit of digging of my own into this, and
9:10
Speaker 1: I have a summary of this document we're going to
9:12
Speaker 1: be looking at in a moment. First, though, I want
9:14
Speaker 1: to say, if you guys want to join the conversation.
9:17
Speaker 1: There's a link in the description to this video wherever
9:20
Speaker 1: you're watching it that will let you jump into the
9:23
Speaker 1: call and you can, like you know, raise your hand
9:26
Speaker 1: in the in the Twitter space, which I just had
9:29
Speaker 1: somebody else join, and I will, you know, give you
9:32
Speaker 1: the give you the floor if you want to add
9:34
Speaker 1: something to this conversation. I'm asking you not to derail.
9:40
Speaker 1: I want to talk about this, so you know, if
9:42
Speaker 1: you have something to add to this or something related
9:44
Speaker 1: to this, that would be great. In the meantime, let
9:46
Speaker 1: me say hello to the people in the chat. First
9:49
Speaker 1: of all, Ubiquitous Everyman and Disabled Sell Welcome to the
9:54
Speaker 1: x space. But also the people that are watching Senior Stix,
9:58
Speaker 1: Gabriel gin Bottle, Welcome, zaranxx, Welcome Green Indoors. All right,
10:05
Speaker 1: Zens gave us a super chat right at the top
10:07
Speaker 1: of the show. Also, guys, if you want to send
10:08
Speaker 1: us a super chow at any point during the show,
10:11
Speaker 1: go to feed the Badger dot Com force. That's just
10:13
Speaker 1: the tip to send us a superchow and that we
10:16
Speaker 1: really appreciate it. Just give Badger Chan a tip and
10:20
Speaker 1: I think that she'd like that. All right, So Zarenk
10:25
Speaker 1: says for ten dollars. I'm from the government, and I'm
10:27
Speaker 1: here to help. Reagan warned of the nine worst words,
10:30
Speaker 1: and we still haven't pursued private methods of addressing things,
10:34
Speaker 1: especially with public works for women's results. Shake my head. Yeah.
10:38
Speaker 1: And like the thing is too, is that these like
10:40
Speaker 1: these government bodies that are put together to serve women
10:44
Speaker 1: don't actually help them either. So it's it's not even
10:47
Speaker 1: like a condemnation on the grounds of you know, like
10:52
Speaker 1: it's only benefiting women. It's not really benefiting women in
10:55
Speaker 1: the long run when you think about it, you know,
10:58
Speaker 1: it's actually enabling or incentivizing self destructive behavior, things like
11:03
Speaker 1: the welfare state, et cetera. So Senior Stix gives us
11:07
Speaker 1: two dollars and says, the first error is expecting the
11:09
Speaker 1: government at all. Yes, no one expects the government. So hmm. Anyway,
11:16
Speaker 1: so this commission, so let me see what, Okay, in
11:20
Speaker 1: plain English, the twenty six member commission will research the
11:24
Speaker 1: problems that affect men and boys, then hold public events,
11:28
Speaker 1: then collect data, then write reports, and then hand recommendations
11:32
Speaker 1: to the legislators. So you know, maybe like four years
11:35
Speaker 1: will get some something that looks like a proposal for legislation.
11:40
Speaker 1: The timeline is October of this year, so they must
11:42
Speaker 1: deliver a special one time report with no more than
11:45
Speaker 1: three initial recommendations so we can follow up in October
11:48
Speaker 1: to see where they you know, where they stand with
11:51
Speaker 1: this stuff. I got to tell you, I'm not expecting
11:54
Speaker 1: much because I think the states, if they want to
11:57
Speaker 1: improve things for men, make the state larger is not
12:01
Speaker 1: the answer. It's got to be like the state getting
12:04
Speaker 1: out of the way. It's got to be the state
12:06
Speaker 1: like removing itself. But they won't do that. So what
12:10
Speaker 1: I think is happening here is they're applying a kind
12:13
Speaker 1: of like a placebo to this. So they're saying, oh,
12:17
Speaker 1: we see that men and boys have problems, and I
12:20
Speaker 1: think the government can like do more to help that.
12:24
Speaker 1: And the purpose of this, ultimately, in my opinion, is
12:27
Speaker 1: to make the to make sure the government remains relevant
12:31
Speaker 1: to the conversation. So they basically say, you need us
12:34
Speaker 1: to get this done, so we're going to stick around.
12:37
Speaker 1: And that's that's how I know they're not really going
12:40
Speaker 1: to fix anything, because the truth is is that a
12:44
Speaker 1: family that has a father in the home that's taking
12:47
Speaker 1: care of them needs the government less and they know that.
12:51
Speaker 1: So the government's interest is is itself right. It's a
12:55
Speaker 1: self perpetuating organism that needs like more justification for its
13:00
Speaker 1: existence in order to survive or at least like grow.
13:04
Speaker 1: And that's why when I heard they were going to
13:06
Speaker 1: do something for boys and men, I was like, no,
13:08
Speaker 1: you're not. There's no way. And again I get that
13:12
Speaker 1: there are state solutions, but the state solutions are removing
13:14
Speaker 1: the state or changing the laws that basically remove the
13:19
Speaker 1: state's influence on people's lives. But the state itself is
13:23
Speaker 1: not going to do that, not on its own, not
13:25
Speaker 1: easily right. So anyway, so they have to deliver a
13:30
Speaker 1: proposal on October to the first. Every year after that,
13:33
Speaker 1: they have to give a full annual report and effective
13:35
Speaker 1: summary of the General Assembly and Governor to the General
13:39
Speaker 1: Assembly and Governor. The Commission Sunsets automatically ends on July
13:43
Speaker 1: one of twenty twenty nine unless the legislature reauthorizes it.
13:48
Speaker 1: So what are they going to do? So they're going
13:53
Speaker 1: to try to address what this means. They're going to
13:59
Speaker 1: try to dress essentially radicalization of boys. That's why they're
14:04
Speaker 1: concerned with social media usage. So what the concern appears
14:09
Speaker 1: to be is that men who are in bad shape
14:13
Speaker 1: because their education is not good, because they're not able
14:17
Speaker 1: to find a job, because they're not able to start
14:18
Speaker 1: a family, because they're struggling with you know, mental health themselves.
14:25
Speaker 1: That's why the suicide statists comes up. The government's concern
14:29
Speaker 1: with that is not the well being of those men.
14:32
Speaker 1: It's how those men could affect other people so they
14:35
Speaker 1: could become dangerous. Right at least that's their theory. I'm
14:38
Speaker 1: not saying it's true. I'm saying that's what they believe.
14:41
Speaker 1: Like we have to like tamp this down so we
14:43
Speaker 1: don't get another school shooting or some kind of like
14:46
Speaker 1: you know, vehicular manslaughter incident or or something. Right, Like,
14:51
Speaker 1: it's not concern with men as they are. It's concerned
14:56
Speaker 1: with what might happen if they ignore the problem or
14:59
Speaker 1: continue to perpetuate the problem. And so that's when we
15:02
Speaker 1: get into so, Okay, they're talking about like improving men's
15:05
Speaker 1: mental health, right, and they're gonna like try and like
15:08
Speaker 1: I don't know, spend more money, because that's usually what
15:10
Speaker 1: it comes down to, spend more of men's money on
15:13
Speaker 1: services that are supposedly directed at men. Because men pay
15:16
Speaker 1: into the systems because they're the bulk of the taxpayers.
15:20
Speaker 1: So then that means that they're gonna get psychology. So
15:24
Speaker 1: we're gonna bring in the psychology. Okay, so let's look
15:27
Speaker 1: at this. What is psychoanalytic feminism? I gotta put my
15:33
Speaker 1: glasses on. So and again, if any of you guys
15:35
Speaker 1: that are in the chat want to say something, but
15:38
Speaker 1: I'll give you guys a chance to like raise your
15:40
Speaker 1: hands if you want to speak on anything that I've
15:42
Speaker 1: said so far before I get into the other part
15:45
Speaker 1: of this. So we'll take up We'll stop here for
15:47
Speaker 1: a moment, and I'll look at your comments. All right.
15:53
Speaker 1: So Gradingdoor says, of course, politicians are only looking into
15:58
Speaker 1: solutions that will offer them and they're ill continuous job
16:01
Speaker 1: slash revenue opportunities. Yeah, they can create a whole new ministry.
16:07
Speaker 1: Senior Stick says, isn't tipping badger chan sexist and or
16:10
Speaker 1: a arrestable offense? No, she's old enough, dark as fairy.
16:16
Speaker 1: What's up? Welcome to the stream. Jim Bottle says, translation
16:21
Speaker 1: censorship incoming. Well, maybe for boys gonna be like controls
16:24
Speaker 1: or or surveillance. Probably, I mean they're already doing that.
16:29
Speaker 1: Buzzard says, it's it is in the UK. I don't
16:35
Speaker 1: know what that's in reference to. Sorry, mister three or
16:39
Speaker 1: three says glasses give plus three intelligence? Did they make
16:43
Speaker 1: me look smarter when I put them on? They're my
16:46
Speaker 1: reading glasses. I don't need glasses generally, but I use
16:49
Speaker 1: them for when I'm reading, So I feel like I
16:52
Speaker 1: feel like Clark Kent. Let's see, Buzzard says, psychoanalytic feminism
16:59
Speaker 1: sounds like a strange repackaging of cultural Marxism that screws
17:02
Speaker 1: the pooch on innocuous verbiage. Yeah, obviously, but thank you
17:07
Speaker 1: for that. Yeah, well, I think I'm actually starting to
17:11
Speaker 1: believe the psychology itself is pretty paused, like it is
17:15
Speaker 1: itself bad. But okay, so nobody wants to say anything.
17:20
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna go ahead and read the summary of
17:23
Speaker 1: this psychoanalytic feminism paper, which is about five pages, well,
17:29
Speaker 1: four pages and then one page with references. So what
17:34
Speaker 1: is this basically summed up? Okay? Psychoanalytic feminism is a
17:40
Speaker 1: theory of oppression that locates the roots of patriarchy in
17:44
Speaker 1: the unconscious psyche Men have a deep psychological drive to
17:49
Speaker 1: dominate women while women show minimal resistance. Both patterns formed
17:53
Speaker 1: in early childhood, primarily before age three. So there this
18:00
Speaker 1: this is the assumption that this is built on. You
18:03
Speaker 1: see that this is the foundation of psychoanalytic feminism. I
18:08
Speaker 1: mean it shouldn't be surprising. So like, if you are
18:12
Speaker 1: a psychologist or psychoanalyst, really you have likely internalized that
18:18
Speaker 1: first sentence as the baseline that you're operating from, Like
18:25
Speaker 1: why don't men go to therapy? Why not? Have you
18:28
Speaker 1: ever see that meme of the I should have looked
18:31
Speaker 1: for it, But there was a meme of a wife
18:33
Speaker 1: jack or a a female Wojack, and she's like at
18:37
Speaker 1: a desk and she's smiling and saying, you know something
18:41
Speaker 1: about like you know, why don't you let me take
18:45
Speaker 1: like your normal and rational reaction to the world and
18:50
Speaker 1: psychoanalyze it and put you on medication to like, you know,
18:54
Speaker 1: cause you to deny what's happening something like that. I
18:57
Speaker 1: forget what the actual words were, but it was it
18:59
Speaker 1: was very was very appropriate, you know. So let's see
19:05
Speaker 1: art force feminism repackaging freud Yeah, it is Freudian, it
19:09
Speaker 1: is critical theory. Crap. Yeah, first sentence, and they are already
19:15
Speaker 1: white knuckling the female fetishization of men. Yeah, or just
19:21
Speaker 1: the psycho. Oh, we got more people. What's up, electric
19:25
Speaker 1: electric eye? Welcome to the call. If you want to
19:28
Speaker 1: speak up, or if you want to say something, go
19:32
Speaker 1: ahead and put a request in and I'll i'll try
19:35
Speaker 1: to be on the lookout for it because I'm also
19:37
Speaker 1: looking at this paper. Nova Fan gives a dollar and says,
19:42
Speaker 1: I'm more confident the system will either further cement the
19:45
Speaker 1: problem until it becomes too late, or they'll start noticing
19:48
Speaker 1: patterns and then noticing the real problem will get it
19:51
Speaker 1: shut down. Yes, what if what if I were to
19:54
Speaker 1: drug you with soma? Yeah? Okay, So anyway back to
19:59
Speaker 1: the summer this is that was just page That was
20:02
Speaker 1: just the first sentence, okay, of the summary Emerging from
20:06
Speaker 1: Cultural Feminism. It draws heavily on Freud's psycho sexual development
20:10
Speaker 1: and Lacan's revisions to examine how gender identity, femininity, and
20:15
Speaker 1: masculinity are constructed through parent child relationships, especially mothering. All
20:22
Speaker 1: this is starting to sound a little bit like it's
20:24
Speaker 1: making sense, Like it's almost like there's something here that
20:28
Speaker 1: you're seeing everywhere around us, Like, what just throwing it
20:35
Speaker 1: out there, have we noticed a spike in transgender mass
20:41
Speaker 1: murders from men who are or these young men who
20:45
Speaker 1: are confused about their identity and no one seems to
20:49
Speaker 1: at least a lot of people don't seem to look
20:50
Speaker 1: to see, you know, to what degree does their upbringing
20:54
Speaker 1: have an effect on that? Like is their father around
20:58
Speaker 1: if he's not, or if he is, is is he
21:00
Speaker 1: subservient to the wife to his wife? Right? Is that
21:04
Speaker 1: having an effect? I think in many cases they're not.
21:07
Speaker 1: And a lot of times, you know, just not that
21:09
Speaker 1: this is meant to be like a big segue, but
21:12
Speaker 1: a lot of the time, if not most of the time,
21:17
Speaker 1: these transgender people have abuse in their history because they
21:23
Speaker 1: weren't protected as children or even the younger and it
21:28
Speaker 1: affected them for life and they never dealt with it.
21:32
Speaker 1: And one of the reasons because we can't criticize women
21:34
Speaker 1: who raise kids like that. So anyway, one branch focuses
21:40
Speaker 1: on micro level psychology childhood learning, early sexuality, identity formation,
21:44
Speaker 1: while the other extents a macro level analysis of how
21:47
Speaker 1: these psychic patterns sustained patriarchal institutions such as the economy science, language,
21:53
Speaker 1: and the arts, so childhood learning, early sexuality, identity formation.
22:03
Speaker 1: I mean I knew Freud was a bit of a
22:04
Speaker 1: kook and a degenerate, like sexually, but like carrying it
22:08
Speaker 1: over for several generations into psychology. I mean, you guys
22:14
Speaker 1: know the story of John Money, right, like you guys
22:17
Speaker 1: know about that right. Let me see what you guys
22:24
Speaker 1: are saying. Lacan, I'm out, Buzzard says, if she if
22:30
Speaker 1: she pulls out banana grams ee Bolting Mangaka says, if
22:36
Speaker 1: they noticed that the father isn't around, a lot of
22:38
Speaker 1: them blame it on weak men. No father in the home.
22:42
Speaker 1: Weak men make hard times. Yeah, I know, let's see,
22:49
Speaker 1: uh Aldearian therapy psychology is goal oriented all like all,
22:56
Speaker 1: ad Larian, I'm sorry, ad Larian. Yeah, uh okay, Freud
23:02
Speaker 1: had ideas all right. Central to both is the mother
23:09
Speaker 1: daughter Dynamic theorists like Nancy Chadreau, Dorothy Dinnerstein, Jessica Benjamin,
23:15
Speaker 1: and Jane Flax argue that mothers bond differently with daughters
23:19
Speaker 1: through sameness, producing flexible egos and a need for connection,
23:22
Speaker 1: than with sons through difference, producing abstract masculinity, separation and
23:27
Speaker 1: a drive for autonomy and achievement. This early split creates
23:32
Speaker 1: rigid dualistic gender roles and heterosexual norms, with boys learning
23:36
Speaker 1: dominance and girls learning subordination. So like the again, there's
23:41
Speaker 1: another paragraph that summarizes, but this is this is what
23:44
Speaker 1: I'm talking about, Like, these these are the foundations of
23:50
Speaker 1: much of the of the mental health. Let's say I
23:55
Speaker 1: don't know industry, culture, and and psycho right, I mean,
24:02
Speaker 1: obviously there are there are those that don't follow that.
24:05
Speaker 1: I remember I went to an AMA conference years ago
24:09
Speaker 1: with an MRA guy, old school guy, I can't remember
24:11
Speaker 1: his name now, unfortunately, and he was trying to sell
24:15
Speaker 1: a book there that was essentially trying to challenge the
24:18
Speaker 1: AMA guidelines. This was like right when we learned about them.
24:21
Speaker 1: This is years back, and I mean the AMA guidelines
24:25
Speaker 1: are built on the concept of toxic masculinity and male
24:28
Speaker 1: privilege as like a baseline thing, and this is the
24:31
Speaker 1: precursor to that. Right, So when they say psychoanalytic feminism,
24:35
Speaker 1: I think they just mean psychology, Like that's what it
24:38
Speaker 1: is right now. You know, It's like everyone is to
24:40
Speaker 1: some degree that are that's in the field has come
24:44
Speaker 1: across or run into this, and most of those people
24:48
Speaker 1: have likely internalized most of it, right, so they already
24:53
Speaker 1: believe this, and this is part of it's actually perpetuating
24:57
Speaker 1: the thing that it believes. So like psycho analytic feminism
25:01
Speaker 1: states that men are the way they are because of
25:04
Speaker 1: socialization because of their train this way, and girls are
25:08
Speaker 1: the way they are, which is subordinate to men, they
25:10
Speaker 1: can't help it because of socialization as well. So they
25:14
Speaker 1: are already baking into the cake the idea that because
25:17
Speaker 1: we know this socialization works on men and women, then
25:20
Speaker 1: we're gonna use it on men and women by basically
25:24
Speaker 1: like infecting the entire you know whatever, we call the
25:27
Speaker 1: mental health field with this kind of ideological COMMI gobbledegook,
25:34
Speaker 1: which is what it is. And it makes you wonder,
25:37
Speaker 1: And I'm sorry, but this is just where I'm at
25:38
Speaker 1: with it. It makes me wonder if psychology was ever legitimate,
25:42
Speaker 1: like it just does. Like I've never gone to a therapist,
25:46
Speaker 1: I've never taken anything for my brain, so maybe I'm
25:50
Speaker 1: not the guy to listen to I've never done it,
25:52
Speaker 1: But I don't think that I would even if I
25:56
Speaker 1: thought I was going crazy, I would just go crazy.
26:00
Speaker 1: Just let happen. I'd feel like, because I think that
26:03
Speaker 1: in a world like this, you know, you you're going
26:06
Speaker 1: to get like looked at as though you're crazy if
26:09
Speaker 1: you have a problem with things as they are. Right,
26:12
Speaker 1: So all right, let's see what else you guys are saying.
26:20
Speaker 1: Let's see I know some Scottish art. Buzzard says the
26:23
Speaker 1: predictor for transvestites is forced transvestism at a young age
26:27
Speaker 1: as a punishment or the mother being an awful Yeah.
26:33
Speaker 1: Mangaka says if girls are learning subordination, then they fucking
26:36
Speaker 1: suck at it. Jim Bottle says they're using feminism and
26:40
Speaker 1: stealing Freudian terminology. I don't know if they're stealing it.
26:43
Speaker 1: I think that these things are connected. I hate to
26:46
Speaker 1: tell you that, but I think that there is a
26:47
Speaker 1: connection there. I don't think that they're stealing it and
26:50
Speaker 1: then repurposing it. I think that's where like the this
26:54
Speaker 1: is like where it was going to go, you know.
26:59
Speaker 1: Buzzard says, I I'm pretty sure men are resistance to
27:01
Speaker 1: social normalization, contagion and their voice literally knows women. Yeah, well,
27:07
Speaker 1: that's why they get them when they're boys. So Shoebo says,
27:10
Speaker 1: Why do women absolutely despise male only spaces? Why have
27:14
Speaker 1: they demolished every male only space? Why is single sex
27:17
Speaker 1: education for men not allowed? Well, in some places they are,
27:21
Speaker 1: but it's because men gathering without the oversight of women
27:26
Speaker 1: makes women afraid. There makes women afraid that men are
27:30
Speaker 1: plotting against them because women are generally more paranoid. I
27:36
Speaker 1: don't know how else to put it, like, they are
27:38
Speaker 1: the more vulnerable sex, and on some like deep level,
27:41
Speaker 1: they have this understanding that if men wanted to, women
27:45
Speaker 1: would just be done, like if men just wanted to,
27:48
Speaker 1: So they feel like they need to constantly see what
27:50
Speaker 1: men are up to, and they won't let men congregate
27:54
Speaker 1: on their own. Now, of course men don't have to
27:56
Speaker 1: put up with that at all. They could just say no,
27:59
Speaker 1: you're not joining the space. So the real question you
28:01
Speaker 1: should be asking is that why are so many men
28:03
Speaker 1: willing to let women into their spaces and or you know,
28:08
Speaker 1: or let women into other male spaces. Why do men
28:11
Speaker 1: allow that? Because I think that ultimately that's what it is,
28:14
Speaker 1: right unless they get it from their mom, which is
28:17
Speaker 1: also possible. So okay, so women project their own behaviors
28:25
Speaker 1: on a man. Yeah, anyway, next paragraph or the other
28:29
Speaker 1: part of the summary here. The entry also explores how
28:33
Speaker 1: these psychic structures reproduce larger social divisions, such as the
28:38
Speaker 1: sexual division of labor, male biased knowledge production. That's Carol
28:43
Speaker 1: Gilligan's critique of Kolberg. I don't know who that is.
28:46
Speaker 1: I'll have to look that up, and fallocentric culture while
28:50
Speaker 1: critiquing the framework itself fallowcentric. What's fallocentric culture? Like all
28:57
Speaker 1: the books women like to read? Is that what it is? So? Yeah,
29:03
Speaker 1: so then so this also presumes this has to be
29:06
Speaker 1: insane that men and women's different socializations and upbringings is
29:12
Speaker 1: why men are working in environments that women won't work in.
29:19
Speaker 1: And it has nothing to do with the fact that
29:20
Speaker 1: women can't do those jobs. I guess like they like
29:24
Speaker 1: physically can't do it. Like, well, there's here's why there's
29:27
Speaker 1: so many male firefighters. It's because women are not socialized
29:31
Speaker 1: to be firefighters. Can you socialize someone into having an
29:35
Speaker 1: eighteen strength? Uh? You can't. You can't, Like this is ridiculous,
29:40
Speaker 1: Like we are different on purpose that that's like it's
29:45
Speaker 1: it's so, it's so ridiculous. All right, let me see,
29:50
Speaker 1: is anyone no one wants to say anything, all right.
29:53
Speaker 1: Limitations include heavy reliance on Freud and Lacan. So these
29:57
Speaker 1: are limitations of the of the paper with others more
30:00
Speaker 1: involved in caregiving assumptions of heterosexuality and neglect of race, class,
30:06
Speaker 1: and other intersections of course, because you know, we gotta
30:09
Speaker 1: throw in the multi colored salad in there with our
30:14
Speaker 1: side of like anti male beef. Later scholars address these
30:19
Speaker 1: by incorporating postmodern and post structuralist ideas to make gender
30:23
Speaker 1: more fluid and less binary. Overall, the theory aims to
30:27
Speaker 1: cure patriarchy by reshaping early socialization and unconscious patterns, offering
30:32
Speaker 1: both diagnostic insight and pathways for societal transformation. So you
30:37
Speaker 1: have this is it. This is the load. This is
30:41
Speaker 1: what they're trying to do. This is why they dominate education,
30:46
Speaker 1: the media, and every other place where we get information
30:50
Speaker 1: or we get our entertainment or whatever it is, because
30:53
Speaker 1: they want to fundamentally use words and images to change
31:00
Speaker 1: our biology, like they want to work magic on us,
31:03
Speaker 1: and they're doing it with all of this. But that's
31:05
Speaker 1: what it is, Like magic is using words to shape reality.
31:08
Speaker 1: That's what they think they can do. And it's insane.
31:11
Speaker 1: That's why postmodernism is like there, you know, it's their
31:16
Speaker 1: go to tool for that cure patriarchy. Yes, they want
31:20
Speaker 1: to cure it. People need to be offended at anything
31:25
Speaker 1: critical theory. Yes, it's nothing but destructive. Next, well, it's
31:30
Speaker 1: good to know why this is going on. Gabriel says,
31:33
Speaker 1: Freud and company had worthwhile ideas, but it was more
31:36
Speaker 1: philosophy than science. Well it's being treated like science. So
31:42
Speaker 1: uh okay, so super paused, absolutely terrible, and Buzzard says
31:53
Speaker 1: the issue with all of this is that babies are
31:55
Speaker 1: racist even in the womb. It is surreal, but implies
31:57
Speaker 1: some amount of biodeterminism, wonders about sexual dimorphism. I just
32:02
Speaker 1: want to say that racism is not a real thing.
32:05
Speaker 1: There's no such thing. The allegations of racism or just
32:10
Speaker 1: calling something racist is it's a desire to control. It's
32:14
Speaker 1: a tool used to control people. Having preferences, if you know,
32:19
Speaker 1: that's not racist. That's just having preferences, Like we're all
32:22
Speaker 1: allowed to have them, we all have them. We do
32:25
Speaker 1: it all the time. Discrimination, that's what that is. Discrimination
32:28
Speaker 1: is preferences, right, Discrimination is natural, like we all discriminate
32:32
Speaker 1: every day all the time. I am here doing this
32:35
Speaker 1: show because I discriminated against doing anything else. Right, I
32:39
Speaker 1: had a choice. I didn't have to do the show.
32:42
Speaker 1: I could have just I could have gone to bed,
32:43
Speaker 1: I could have, you know, chosen to go outside for
32:46
Speaker 1: a walk. I could have stayed play video games, whatever.
32:49
Speaker 1: But I chose to do this, so I discriminated against
32:51
Speaker 1: all those other things. Now, some discrimination is wise and
32:55
Speaker 1: some is not. Like going to work is smart because
32:58
Speaker 1: you need money, So racism could exist on some people.
33:04
Speaker 1: I don't agree in group biases. Evolutionary, yeah, right, and
33:10
Speaker 1: you know it's like why are For example, when a
33:15
Speaker 1: woman is on the pill, okay, her body is screwed
33:21
Speaker 1: with because what happens is the pill makes her think
33:24
Speaker 1: that she's pregnant, and her body reacts to the belief
33:28
Speaker 1: that she is pregnant and therefore needs support in pregnancy.
33:33
Speaker 1: So she tends to be drawn to people who are
33:37
Speaker 1: more familial or more familiar as in familial and may
33:42
Speaker 1: even have a closer genetic connection to than if she wasn't.
33:48
Speaker 1: So when a woman is on the pill, she is
33:51
Speaker 1: drawn to men that she would not be attracted to otherwise.
33:55
Speaker 1: That's why when women are off the pill is when
33:58
Speaker 1: you want to be around them, because if they're attracted
34:01
Speaker 1: to you and they're they're not on the pill, then
34:03
Speaker 1: that means it's a real attraction. And I think that
34:05
Speaker 1: there is there's things at work, like mechanisms that are
34:09
Speaker 1: happening that we're not aware of, that we're unconscious of
34:12
Speaker 1: all the time. And I think that it's it's also
34:15
Speaker 1: to prevent us from accidentally, you know, let's say, doing
34:21
Speaker 1: anything incestuous or that could be considered incestuous and bad
34:25
Speaker 1: for the baby, right, And it's like, why do what
34:28
Speaker 1: are pheromones? I think that there's something about that that
34:32
Speaker 1: uh that we're we're not giving the proper amount. And
34:35
Speaker 1: these people who who think everything is socialized, they're actually
34:39
Speaker 1: doing a lot of harm in those in in not
34:42
Speaker 1: letting our natural you know, a state of being be
34:45
Speaker 1: how we move through the world. So buzzard is, yeah, buzzards,
34:51
Speaker 1: you're right. Racism is social contagion invented by Trotsky. Yes,
34:56
Speaker 1: But like having in group preference, they will say that
34:58
Speaker 1: that's racist. I mean, we already know that that's happening now, right,
35:01
Speaker 1: And but like it's not letting people just be right.
35:06
Speaker 1: The pill shrinks the brain by ten percent. Wow, discrimination
35:09
Speaker 1: builds civilization. Yes, Shubo says, male only schools and colleges
35:14
Speaker 1: are also not allowed at all. Women do not allow them.
35:16
Speaker 1: Boys and men are doing incredibly poorly in education. They
35:19
Speaker 1: have for a long time. Yes, I know, and that's
35:22
Speaker 1: what this bill that I was just talking about. One
35:24
Speaker 1: of the things that it is supposedly going to address
35:27
Speaker 1: is that. But the problem is that they're not going
35:29
Speaker 1: to make the changes that are necessary. Because I did
35:33
Speaker 1: substitute teaching for a little while, and what I noticed
35:39
Speaker 1: is that the way that schools are organized now it's
35:44
Speaker 1: all around women's or girls ways of learning and not
35:47
Speaker 1: boys ways of learning. And I know that we've talked
35:49
Speaker 1: about this. I think doctor Warren Ferrell's talked about it.
35:53
Speaker 1: I think Janis has talked about it, and many other people.
35:56
Speaker 1: You know, boys learn best when they are interacting with something,
36:01
Speaker 1: you know, like they use their hands or something like that.
36:05
Speaker 1: They also have a different kind of energy that they
36:07
Speaker 1: need to let out. Right, So at least the schools
36:09
Speaker 1: that I worked at, they allowed recesses, but a lot
36:12
Speaker 1: of schools don't have recess and so boys end up,
36:16
Speaker 1: you know, pent up. They got all this energy, they're distracted,
36:20
Speaker 1: they're nervous, and then what do we do. We put
36:21
Speaker 1: them on medication because they're not acting right. Hence we
36:24
Speaker 1: go back to the psycho the psychology thing. So what
36:27
Speaker 1: are these bills going to do? Are they going to
36:29
Speaker 1: trade try to change the way boys are educated? Are
36:31
Speaker 1: they gonna put more male teachers in schools? Are they
36:33
Speaker 1: gonna make segregated schools? Probably not, because what they could do,
36:38
Speaker 1: but segregated schools if they think it's gonna bring more
36:40
Speaker 1: money to the government, that is an approach they could do.
36:43
Speaker 1: But I don't think they're gonna put male teachers in
36:45
Speaker 1: those schools. I think they're gonna fill them with female
36:47
Speaker 1: teachers anyway. And because there's generally a bias towards female teachers. Right, So,
36:54
Speaker 1: and this isn't even something that's put into like legislation
36:57
Speaker 1: or on paper. It doesn't have to be like people
37:00
Speaker 1: just assume these people who are totally like gender, you know,
37:04
Speaker 1: geners of social construct people, they still prefer women running
37:09
Speaker 1: schools because they think men are predatory, so they won't
37:11
Speaker 1: do it anyway. Did he create tribalism? No, No, But
37:20
Speaker 1: but he you're talking about Trotsky's usage of racism. But
37:24
Speaker 1: that's the thing, Like tribalism exists anyway, Like it's is
37:29
Speaker 1: it is it racist that, like say one people from Africa,
37:34
Speaker 1: like I don't know, Uganda strongly disliked people from another
37:39
Speaker 1: country in Africa, like Nigeria, like they're they're they're African.
37:45
Speaker 1: But if they don't like each other, do we call that?
37:47
Speaker 1: Like in even in in Somalia for example, there are
37:50
Speaker 1: different tribes in Somalia, right, and so like there was
37:53
Speaker 1: a guy that was running for I think it was
37:55
Speaker 1: governor of Somalia in Minnesota, and he lost the election,
38:00
Speaker 1: not because the some you know, like the the white
38:04
Speaker 1: people voted him out or whatever, but it was because
38:07
Speaker 1: the Somalis that were of a different tribe didn't want him.
38:11
Speaker 1: So tribalism, yeah, that's natural, that's like the natural state
38:15
Speaker 1: right of people. And I think that racism is just
38:21
Speaker 1: taking something like in group preference or pattern recognition or
38:27
Speaker 1: tribalism to some degree and then trying to make it
38:31
Speaker 1: pejorative so that you can use the control people. So
38:34
Speaker 1: it's not that these things didn't exist before it was
38:36
Speaker 1: given a name. It's it's that the name is used
38:40
Speaker 1: as a tool to control people's behavior, especially good people.
38:44
Speaker 1: Because if you call a person who is you know,
38:48
Speaker 1: like really has hatred for another tribe a racist, do
38:51
Speaker 1: you think they're going to care that you call them that?
38:55
Speaker 1: Probably not? So what do you Then you use it
38:58
Speaker 1: on people who don't want to be seen that way,
39:00
Speaker 1: and they will change their behavior because they're trying to
39:03
Speaker 1: avoid that label. Like any other ism or phobia or
39:08
Speaker 1: misogyny or whatever it is. All of those things are
39:11
Speaker 1: just like used to control people. That's all it is.
39:14
Speaker 1: So anyway, let's see what you guys are saying. Nobody's
39:23
Speaker 1: raising their hands, so we're only going to go for
39:25
Speaker 1: another twenty minutes. So if you're in here and you're
39:28
Speaker 1: like waiting for your right moment, now is the time.
39:30
Speaker 1: I am looking at the x chat. So and if
39:35
Speaker 1: you were here hoping that you get to talk to Alison,
39:37
Speaker 1: I apologize. It's just me. Okay, Let's see what you
39:41
Speaker 1: guys in the chat are saying. Though, despite the jokes
39:45
Speaker 1: about Europeans being highly inbred, they are most likely to
39:48
Speaker 1: respect or experience the westernmac effect least genetic variance but
39:53
Speaker 1: greatest biodiversity and stability. Yeah, I know, there's jokes about
39:58
Speaker 1: like the era destocracy, right, the Habsburg Jaw people. But yeah,
40:03
Speaker 1: it's definitely a big problem in the Middle East and
40:06
Speaker 1: Africa and also in the urban black community. I've talked
40:10
Speaker 1: about it too, Like there's a lot of accidental incests
40:12
Speaker 1: that happens. I mean even also intentional incests, but like
40:16
Speaker 1: a lot of accidental incests where you have you know,
40:19
Speaker 1: you live in a community, right, and there's a lot
40:23
Speaker 1: of women that are banging the same guy or the
40:27
Speaker 1: same small group of men, and then they're all getting
40:30
Speaker 1: pregnant with those men, and then their kids grow up
40:33
Speaker 1: to be teenagers and they meet each other and they
40:35
Speaker 1: don't know that they're related because they're banging all the
40:39
Speaker 1: same dudes. Right, So like this this is a and
40:43
Speaker 1: it creates you create this problem because of this like
40:47
Speaker 1: I don't know what you even call it, this apex hypergamy. Right, So, Okay,
40:56
Speaker 1: the Arab tribes still haven't achieved unity after all these centuries. Yeah,
41:01
Speaker 1: well there's still tribalism, That's what I'm saying. It's it's
41:03
Speaker 1: like it you know, we're not that far removed from
41:07
Speaker 1: that as Westerners, like we could fall into that easily
41:11
Speaker 1: and in fact, you know, if you look around, you're
41:13
Speaker 1: seeing some of that already happening. Like some people are
41:15
Speaker 1: becoming more tribal because they feel like they need to
41:18
Speaker 1: to defend themselves anyway. But yeah, urban blacks, yes, there
41:26
Speaker 1: they are. They are incestuous there. But again, I don't
41:30
Speaker 1: know that it's on purpose. I think it's because of
41:33
Speaker 1: that hypergamy. Right. If all the if all the women
41:38
Speaker 1: in the hood are banging the toughest drug dealer and
41:42
Speaker 1: they're all getting pregnant by him, and their kids are
41:46
Speaker 1: meeting up with each other not knowing that they're actually
41:49
Speaker 1: like half sister or whatever or half brother, then they're
41:53
Speaker 1: gonna get You're gonna get like incestuous babies, all right.
41:59
Speaker 1: But anyway, so uh, and again you know that's just
42:04
Speaker 1: the that's just the truth of it. So all right,
42:08
Speaker 1: let's see what else can I look up since nobody's
42:11
Speaker 1: saying anything. We got about fifteen minutes and then I
42:14
Speaker 1: gotta like wrap it up. So what happens. Let me see, Uh,
42:22
Speaker 1: how will these issues be Let's say, how will these
42:32
Speaker 1: issues be addressed if the bill passes? All right, let's
42:47
Speaker 1: see what you guys are saying in the meantime, no sponsor, Brian,
42:52
Speaker 1: what do you mean, no sponsor? We don't do sponsors here.
42:57
Speaker 1: But if you guys want to support the channel, go
43:01
Speaker 1: to feed the Badger dot com for sass support to
43:03
Speaker 1: help us continue to do this work. So let's see.
43:17
Speaker 1: The whole mantipredatory thing is a lie sol by feminism,
43:21
Speaker 1: of course it is. Yeah, well it's to keep men
43:23
Speaker 1: from getting getting into basically getting jobs. So here are
43:32
Speaker 1: let's see they Okay, so there's nothing like concrete in
43:37
Speaker 1: terms of how the bill is going to address things,
43:40
Speaker 1: but I will say that according to this the Commission
43:45
Speaker 1: will do the studies and then make recommendations. The General
43:49
Speaker 1: Assembly decides whether to turn any of these recommendations into
43:53
Speaker 1: actual law, budget items, or programs in future sessions. The
43:58
Speaker 1: bill is deliberately designed as a low cost, non binding
44:01
Speaker 1: first step, basically an official task force that puts boys
44:04
Speaker 1: and men's issues on the radar with data and expert advice.
44:08
Speaker 1: Now you know what I think would would be a
44:11
Speaker 1: good thing. And I know they won't do this, but
44:13
Speaker 1: I think that this is what they should do. I
44:15
Speaker 1: would get men's rights activists involve involved in this, people
44:21
Speaker 1: who have done the work. Get Warren Ferrell on the team,
44:25
Speaker 1: and I'll breathe easier because I know that he is
44:28
Speaker 1: at least like first of all, very well informed on
44:31
Speaker 1: the issues, and I think he'll know how to fix
44:34
Speaker 1: them better. Right. So, I don't know what you guys
44:37
Speaker 1: think about that, but if there is going to be
44:39
Speaker 1: an issue, that would to me make sense to be
44:43
Speaker 1: the way to address the issue, I see, someone just
44:45
Speaker 1: join the call. Casually divine Welcome, casually divine blessings from
44:51
Speaker 1: Mother Earth and the stars of Heaven, positive affirmations from
44:55
Speaker 1: the cosmos. I don't know if you want to say
44:56
Speaker 1: anything since you blessed us with your presence, but if
45:00
Speaker 1: you wish, you know, please raise your hand and I'll
45:04
Speaker 1: give you the floor. We got about ten minutes and
45:07
Speaker 1: I got to wrap it up there, so okay, let's
45:15
Speaker 1: see what you guys are saying. In the meantime, we're
45:19
Speaker 1: just talking about psychoanalytic feminism and why it's cancer and
45:27
Speaker 1: also the uh, the fact that this new law that
45:34
Speaker 1: or at least this bill that just passed in Virginia
45:38
Speaker 1: to address men's issues may not be the win that
45:42
Speaker 1: you know a lot of people think it is, or
45:44
Speaker 1: some people think it is, because again, just passing legislation
45:48
Speaker 1: is not really a win, you know. So all right,
45:56
Speaker 1: I got a request. Let's see, casually divine wants to
45:59
Speaker 1: say something. So casually, divine, I've just given you the floor,
46:03
Speaker 1: and you left. Okay, all right, Well, like like a
46:09
Speaker 1: white deer sipping from the pond, she has fled when
46:14
Speaker 1: I went, when I went to invite her, just like
46:19
Speaker 1: something out of mythology, she's gone. I was just giving
46:24
Speaker 1: her the floor. Ah, oh well, maybe she'll come back.
46:30
Speaker 1: Maybe she just disconnected. That bill is likely window dressing. Yeah,
46:34
Speaker 1: my thinging is is at best, it's virtue signaling. That's
46:38
Speaker 1: what I think. It's like a it's it's like a
46:42
Speaker 1: band aid. It's not even a band aid. It's basically
46:45
Speaker 1: like a you know, like a like a declaration, Oh
46:48
Speaker 1: we care about this. See we passed the bill. But
46:52
Speaker 1: I mean, they're just gonna spend money on studies. It's
46:55
Speaker 1: probably not gonna go anywhere. I don't expect any any consequences.
47:00
Speaker 1: So divinely left. Yeah. Yeah, I wasn't close enough to
47:08
Speaker 1: do divinity to get her to stay. So you gave
47:14
Speaker 1: her the floor. Brian, that sounds like simp behavior. No,
47:17
Speaker 1: that would be if I was on the floor, that'd
47:19
Speaker 1: be simp behavior. I gave her the floor. I showed
47:22
Speaker 1: her the floor. I don't even know if it's a woman,
47:25
Speaker 1: to be honest, I don't know why I'm saying it is.
47:27
Speaker 1: I mean, it sounds like some womanly shit to put
47:29
Speaker 1: in your bio though, to be fair, So, uh, you
47:36
Speaker 1: gave her the floor. But she is the table. That's true.
47:40
Speaker 1: That's true. She is the table. All right. Well, I
47:46
Speaker 1: don't know if there's any anything else. I mean, I
47:49
Speaker 1: may have to just wrap it up a little bit
47:50
Speaker 1: early because no one's saying anything. And I think I've
47:54
Speaker 1: like said everything I wanted to say. So see, if
47:58
Speaker 1: you guys have any questions or thoughts or you know,
48:00
Speaker 1: you can still send a super chow to Superchow feed
48:03
Speaker 1: the Bachelor dot Com force slash just the tip. I
48:06
Speaker 1: appreciate it, Bob. The darkest theory says, and they said
48:10
Speaker 1: critical theory wouldn't leave the universities. Oh no, no, this
48:14
Speaker 1: they critical theory is like it's like all the others.
48:18
Speaker 1: It's like critical race theory, right, It's not something that
48:22
Speaker 1: you have to teach. It's baked into the way teaching
48:26
Speaker 1: is done, so it's not it's not that you have
48:29
Speaker 1: to teach critical theory because you don't. It's baked in.
48:32
Speaker 1: Like the people who work at these places, they can't
48:35
Speaker 1: separate themselves from the mindset that critical theory creates because
48:42
Speaker 1: it's in them already. So they are passing it on
48:45
Speaker 1: unconsciously because they they they they've internalized it, so you
48:50
Speaker 1: don't have to teach it. That's why when the critical
48:52
Speaker 1: race theory is going around, everybody was like, nobody's teaching
48:54
Speaker 1: kids critical race theory. It's like, no, they're applying it
48:58
Speaker 1: to teaching. They're not teaching it, right, Critical theory is
49:02
Speaker 1: that's what it is, like, that is It's not a
49:05
Speaker 1: thing you teach. It's the way that you view the world.
49:08
Speaker 1: It's the way that you talk about things. You're operating
49:12
Speaker 1: within a framework. It's a framework. Keep us a praise
49:16
Speaker 1: on that, Senate bill. Yeah, I will when I know
49:19
Speaker 1: when well, well, well let the wait until October of
49:21
Speaker 1: this year to see. Hopefully I remember, so, Chubo says.
49:27
Speaker 1: Feminists hate traditional psychology, sociology, anthropology, history, religious studies, folklore, studies, theology. Yeah,
49:38
Speaker 1: it is baked in like bacon. In your mash potatoes. Well,
49:42
Speaker 1: it's basically the potatoes in your mash potatoes, now, that's
49:45
Speaker 1: what it is. So I hate to tell you that,
49:50
Speaker 1: but it's it's baked in for sure. All Right. Well,
49:56
Speaker 1: I guess as no one else is gonna say anything,
49:59
Speaker 1: I'm gonna like wrap it up here then, So thanks
50:04
Speaker 1: guys for coming on the stream and hanging out and
50:09
Speaker 1: not making fun of me for wearing glasses. We're gonna
50:13
Speaker 1: end the show there and I will see you guys
50:17
Speaker 1: on Friday. We're gonna do a thing with TiAl Deer
50:20
Speaker 1: and we're gonna be looking at more feminist nonsense with him,
50:23
Speaker 1: so maybe that'll be fun for you guys. But yeah,
50:28
Speaker 1: So if you guys don't mind liking this video or
50:35
Speaker 1: disliking it, if you don't like it, subscribing to the
50:38
Speaker 1: channel if you're not already subscribe, hitting the bell f
50:40
Speaker 1: of notifications and leaving us a comment. Let me know
50:43
Speaker 1: what you guys think about what I talked about on
50:45
Speaker 1: the show, psychoanalytic feminism and its relationship to the way
50:50
Speaker 1: that we do psychology, why men don't go to therapy,
50:53
Speaker 1: and the Senate bill that's supposedly going to address the
50:57
Speaker 1: issues and how that relates to those things, and yeah,
51:01
Speaker 1: leave me a comment about that, and don't forget to
51:05
Speaker 1: share the video because sharing is caring. Thank you guys
51:07
Speaker 1: so much for coming on today's episode of The X Space,
51:12
Speaker 1: and we'll talk to you guys in the next one.