Latest / Fake Love Stories / The Shoebox Full of Crossed-Out Faces: How Kent Lost $10,000

Transcript

The Shoebox Full of Crossed-Out Faces: How Kent Lost $10,000 · Fake Love Stories

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: At 6.40 in the morning on September 11th, a 14-year-old
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: named Leon Price was cutting through a yard on Dunmore
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: Terrace when he saw a shoebox on its side in
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: the recycling bin. The lid had come off. Photographs were
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: spilling out. Every single one showed the same man's face,
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: and every single face had been crossed out in red.
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: Leon did not touch them. He counted them from where
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: he stood. 41, he told his mother at breakfast. His
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: mother called the non-emergency line. By nine that morning, the
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: box was sitting on Detective Kimberly Sanders' desk. Sanders worked
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: financial crimes for Harwick PD. She had been running a
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: romance fraud case for nearly two years. When she lifted
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: the first photograph, she did not yet know whose face
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: it was, whose hand had drawn the marks, or why
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: someone had chosen the recycling bin and not the trash.
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: She counted the X's the way you count something you
• 1:04
  Speaker 1: already know the answer to, but need to confirm. 41.
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: She understood immediately that she was looking at the end
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: of something, not the beginning. What she did not know
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: yet was how far back that beginning went, or how
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: many other people were sitting somewhere right now, still in
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: the middle of it. Kent Baker was 26 years old,
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: and had lived at 414 Dunmore Terrace for three years.
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: He worked for his uncle's landscaping company, a job that
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: suited the way his mind worked. He had near-perfect spatial recall.
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: He could walk a property once and reconstruct its dimensions
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: from memory. His uncle called it a gift. Kent called
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: it just how he saw things. He had grown up,
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: going to Bev's Corner with his father every Thursday morning.
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: His father had ordered the same thing every time. Black coffee,
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: wheat toast, two eggs over easy When his father got sick,
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: the Thursday visits became irregular. After his father died, Kent
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: kept going alone. He never explained this to anyone, not
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: even to himself in any direct way. He simply kept going.
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: Joyce Pauling, who had worked that same booth for 11 years,
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: had his order ready before he reached the counter. The
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: year this story begins, Kent was coming out of a breakup.
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: He described it later as something they did not hurt
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: all at once, but in installments. That phrasing was specific
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: to him. He was the kind of person who found
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: precise language for things he could not otherwise move through.
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: He was not isolated. He had Troy Bissell, a friend
• 2:45
  Speaker 1: and coworker who had known him long enough to notice
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: when something shifted. He had his routine, his uncle, his
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: spatial memory, his Thursday mornings, what he did not have
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: heading into that spring. was anyone who seemed genuinely curious
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: about how he thought. So, the profile appeared in late April.
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: It belonged to a man who identified himself as James Young,
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: licensed architect, deaf since childhood, currently contracted on a restoration
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: project in Aberdeen, Scotland. The photograph showed a man in
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: his early 30s, often in a hard hat or standing
• 3:22
  Speaker 1: near drafting tables. He looked like someone with a quiet,
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: purposeful life. someone who had learned to build things carefully.
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: The first message James Young sent to Kent Baker was
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: not romantic. It was a technical question about soil remediation
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: under concrete foundations. Kent had posted something about a drainage
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: problem on a landscaping forum. Young's question was specific and
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: showed genuine understanding of the problem. Kent answered it because
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: it was a good question. That was the door. It
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: opened inward. From Kent's side, toward something that felt like
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: being seen. What Kent could not have known was that
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: the photographs were not of James Young at all. They
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: belonged to Doug Haas, an architect from Portland, Oregon, who
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: had never been to Scotland and who had no idea
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: his face was being used. Haas maintained a professional website
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: and a LinkedIn profile. His images were publicly accessible. Someone
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: had studied them carefully and built an entire identity around them.
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: By the time spring turned to summer, Kent and the
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: man using those photographs had exchanged thousands of messages. Kent
• 4:34
  Speaker 1: described the relationship as real. Troy read some of the
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: messages and said later that they did not look like
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: a scam. They looked like someone paying close attention. That
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: was the thing. That was exactly the thing. The attention
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: was not accidental. And that, folks, is the first thing
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: to understand about how this worked. By midsummer, Kent Baker
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: and the man using Doug Haas's photographs had built what felt,
• 5:01
  Speaker 1: from Kent's side, like genuine intimacy. The conversations had moved
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: from soil drainage to his father's illness, to the particular
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: loneliness of continuing a Thursday morning routine after someone is gone.
• 5:15
  Speaker 1: The profile had an explanation for everything that might have
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: raised doubt. James Young was deaf from childhood. That detail
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: did the heaviest lifting of the entire scheme. No video
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: calls because the technology was unreliable for someone who relied
• 5:30
  Speaker 1: on lip reading and typed communication. No phone calls for
• 5:34
  Speaker 1: the same reason. And if anyone pushed back or expressed suspicion,
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: the profile had an invisible weapon built in. Skepticism looked cruel.
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: To question a deaf man's inability to appear on camera
• 5:48
  Speaker 1: was to question his disability. The design was not incidental.
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: It was load-bearing. But here's the kicker about that design.
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: It did not start with Kent, 11 months before Kent
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: Baker ever encountered that profile. NCARE entowned that profile. A
• 6:04
  Speaker 1: woman named Evelyn Trask sat across from Detective Kimberly Sanders
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: at Harwick PD and described losing $ 11, 000 to a man
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: she had never met in person. Sanders had been in
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: financial crimes long enough to recognize the architecture of the
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: case immediately. but the trail went cold at the edge
• 6:25
  Speaker 1: of Harwick's jurisdiction. The account the money entered dissolved within days.
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: Sanders kept the file open. She kept waiting for the error,
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: the one thing a disciplined operation eventually produces. The error
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: came in a different shape than she expected. Somewhere in
• 6:42
  Speaker 1: the middle of the operation, a three-second fragment of audio
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: was sent by mistake to a woman in Indianapolis named
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: Phyllis Odom. It was not meant for her, It arrived
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: attached to the wrong message thread. Three seconds. Was that
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: almost nothing? But a forensic audio analyst found enough in
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: those three seconds to characterize the acoustic environment. A large room,
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: hard floors, low ceiling, and the unmistakable wash of simultaneous
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: conversations happening in the background. Not an apartment. Not a
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: home office. A call center. That fragment sat in the
• 7:20
  Speaker 1: investigative file for weeks. before its full weight became clear. Meanwhile,
• 7:26
  Speaker 1: Sanders had been tracking financial transfers. The money Kent sent
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: in August, $ 3, 800, wired during what he was told was
• 7:36
  Speaker 1: a contracting emergency, moved through an account registered to a
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: logistics company that did not appear to exist in any
• 7:44
  Speaker 1: meaningful sense. The registered address was a commercial space above
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: a tire distribution warehouse in Dunmore, Georgia. Kent lived on
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: Dunmore Terrace. Sanders noted the coincidence in her file and
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: moved on. It had no legal relevance. But she wrote
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: it down anyway. The way investigators write down things that
• 8:07
  Speaker 1: feel like they mean something even when they cannot yet
• 8:10
  Speaker 1: say what. By September, the acoustic signature from Phyllis Odom's
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: audio fragment had been matched to the type of environment
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: consistent with the Dunmore address. Not matched conclusively, not yet,
• 8:24
  Speaker 1: but close enough that Sanders had a direction. The second
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: transfer sealed it. $ 6, 200, sent by Kent in early September,
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: during what he was told, was a permit dispute, threatening
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: the Aberdeen project. This transfer followed the same routing pattern,
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: same account structure, same Dunmore address. One step removed, $ 10, 000 total.
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: The second withdrawal. emptied a savings account Kent's grandmother had
• 8:54
  Speaker 1: opened for him when he was 12 years old. He
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: told Troy about it. Troy said the same thing he
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: had said in August, that something was wrong, that this
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: was the pattern. Kent heard him and did not stop.
• 9:08
  Speaker 1: There is a specific kind of resistance that is not
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: about stupidity and not about naivety. It is about what
• 9:15
  Speaker 1: verification would cost. For four months, Kent Baker had not
• 9:20
  Speaker 1: run a reverse image search on the photographs of James Young.
• 9:24
  Speaker 1: He knew how. He worked in a field that required
• 9:27
  Speaker 1: him to identify plants and conditions from photographs. The tool
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: was not mysterious to him. He had simply not used it.
• 9:35
  Speaker 1: When asked about this later, he said that doing it
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: had felt during those months like a betrayal, not of himself,
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: of the other person. That framing matters. It tells you
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: something about how thoroughly the system had worked. On the
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: 9th of September, he ran the search. The results came
• 9:54
  Speaker 1: back in under three seconds. The photographs of James Young, 40,
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: one of them accumulated over months of conversation, belonged to
• 10:04
  Speaker 1: Doug Haas, a licensed architect based in Portland, Oregon, who
• 10:09
  Speaker 1: had never been to Scotland and whose professional website had
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: been publicly accessible the entire time. Three seconds later, Kent
• 10:18
  Speaker 1: printed all 41 photographs. He went through them one by
• 10:23
  Speaker 1: one and drew a red X across each face. Then
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: he put all 41 photographs in a shoebox, set the
• 10:30
  Speaker 1: lid on top, and carried the box to the recycling
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: bin at the edge of his property at 414 Dunmore Terrace.
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: Not the trash. The recycling. He could not explain why.
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: He said he still could not explain it cleanly when asked.
• 10:47
  Speaker 1: but the shoebox went into the recycling bin, and that
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: night he did not call the police. Two mornings later,
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: at 6.40 in the morning, a 14-year-old named Leon Price
• 10:59
  Speaker 1: was cutting through the block when he noticed the box
• 11:02
  Speaker 1: had tipped over on the grass. The lid was off.
• 11:05
  Speaker 1: He could see the photographs from where he stood. He
• 11:08
  Speaker 1: did not touch them. He went home and told his
• 11:11
  Speaker 1: mother over breakfast. His mother called the non-emergency line. By
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: that afternoon, Detective Kimberly Sanders was sitting at her desk,
• 11:21
  Speaker 1: counting the red marks on 41 photographs of a man
• 11:24
  Speaker 1: named Doug Haas. She counted all of them. 41. And
• 11:29
  Speaker 1: she understood. In that moment, that she was not looking
• 11:33
  Speaker 1: at the beginning of something. She was looking at its end.
• 11:36
  Speaker 1: Picture the commercial space above the tire warehouse in Dunmore, Georgia,
• 11:40
  Speaker 1: on the morning of September 22nd. Not as a crime
• 11:44
  Speaker 1: scene yet. As a workspace, if you build the scene
• 11:48
  Speaker 1: from what the audio fragment suggested, large room, hard floors,
• 11:53
  Speaker 1: simultaneous conversations, then what federal agents and Harwick detectives found
• 11:59
  Speaker 1: when they executed the warrant was entirely consistent. Servers' disposable phones,
• 12:05
  Speaker 1: printed scripts organized by victim category, and James Young, 31
• 12:10
  Speaker 1: years old, from Macon, Georgia. seated at a workstation with
• 12:14
  Speaker 1: seven active chat windows open. Seven. At the same time,
• 12:19
  Speaker 1: he did not speak when agents entered. He did not
• 12:22
  Speaker 1: speak during the pre-trial period. His attorney offered nothing. The
• 12:26
  Speaker 1: silence held through every procedural stage until it no longer
• 12:31
  Speaker 1: needed to hold. One version of what happened here is
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: the simplest one. A man built a fraudulent identity, targeted
• 12:40
  Speaker 1: vulnerable people, and extracted money through manufactured emotional debt. That
• 12:46
  Speaker 1: version is supported by the evidence, confirmed by the conviction,
• 12:50
  Speaker 1: and sufficient as a legal account. 14 counts of wire fraud,
• 12:55
  Speaker 1: two counts of identity theft. The jury deliberated for less
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: than eight hours, but the record holds more than that
• 13:02
  Speaker 1: version contains. The mirror system, the detail that every victim
• 13:07
  Speaker 1: received a version of James Young calibrated to their own life,
• 13:11
  Speaker 1: was not the work of improvisation. A nurse received a
• 13:14
  Speaker 1: profile whose mother was a nurse. Kent, whose father had
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: grown ill and lost much of his hearing in his
• 13:21
  Speaker 1: final years, received a profile whose father had lost his
• 13:24
  Speaker 1: hearing first before the son did. These were not lucky guesses.
• 13:29
  Speaker 1: They were constructed parallels, built from information gathered before the
• 13:33
  Speaker 1: first message was ever sent. Someone had studied each person carefully.
• 13:38
  Speaker 1: The question of How many people were involved in that
• 13:41
  Speaker 1: study was never fully answered at trial. The acoustic evidence
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: pointed to a coordinated operation. The printed scripts pointed to standardization.
• 13:51
  Speaker 1: The seven simultaneous chat windows on the day of the
• 13:54
  Speaker 1: arrest pointed to scale. Whether James Young built and ran
• 13:58
  Speaker 1: that system alone or whether the Dunmore location was one
• 14:03
  Speaker 1: node in something larger is a question the conviction addressed
• 14:07
  Speaker 1: at the level of his individual conduct and did not
• 14:10
  Speaker 1: pursue further in the public record. What the record does
• 14:13
  Speaker 1: contain is Young's own account, delivered in a letter to
• 14:16
  Speaker 1: a journalist six weeks after his appeal failed. He described
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: the mirror system in precise terms. He described the deliberate
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: selection of people in grief or transition, and he explained
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: the deafness as a structural choice. It removed every form
• 14:33
  Speaker 1: of real-time verification, and it made doubt feel like an
• 14:37
  Speaker 1: act of cruelty. against a disabled person. He also wrote
• 14:41
  Speaker 1: that he had chosen the name James Young because it
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: was the most forgettable name he could imagine, the kind
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: of name, he wrote, that no one holds onto. He
• 14:51
  Speaker 1: was right about that, and in the end, it did
• 14:54
  Speaker 1: not help him at all. The jury deliberated for less
• 14:57
  Speaker 1: than eight hours, 14 counts of wire fraud, two counts
• 15:02
  Speaker 1: of identity theft. James Young stood convicted on all 16,
• 15:07
  Speaker 1: The sentence was nine years in federal prison. His attorney
• 15:11
  Speaker 1: offered no statement after the verdict. Young himself said nothing,
• 15:16
  Speaker 1: as he had said nothing throughout the pretrial period and
• 15:19
  Speaker 1: every day of the trial itself. Nine of the 16
• 15:23
  Speaker 1: documented victims testified. Each one described a version of James
• 15:27
  Speaker 1: Young that had been built specifically for them. The nurse,
• 15:31
  Speaker 1: whose profile included a mother who was also a nurse,
• 15:35
  Speaker 1: the man whose loneliness after a divorce had been met,
• 15:39
  Speaker 1: within days by someone who seemed to understand it precisely.
• 15:42
  Speaker 1: Kent Baker did not testify. His name and his losses
• 15:47
  Speaker 1: are part of the public record, but he was not
• 15:49
  Speaker 1: among the nine who took the stand. Doug Haas did testify.
• 15:55
  Speaker 1: He described discovering his photographs in fraudulent profiles. He described
• 15:59
  Speaker 1: two years of reporting those profiles to platforms and receiving
• 16:03
  Speaker 1: no response. He answered questions about the photographs calmly, the
• 16:09
  Speaker 1: way someone answers questions about something that happened to them
• 16:12
  Speaker 1: without their consent and without remedy. After the trial, he
• 16:17
  Speaker 1: sent a single email to Detective Kimberly Sanders asking how
• 16:21
  Speaker 1: the case had ended. She responded in one line. She
• 16:25
  Speaker 1: wrote that she hoped people could stop seeing his face now.
• 16:29
  Speaker 1: They could not. The photographs were retained as evidence. They
• 16:33
  Speaker 1: never returned to Kent. They never returned to Doug Haas.
• 16:37
  Speaker 1: They are still in the record. Young appealed. His argument
• 16:41
  Speaker 1: was that the three-second audio fragment had been admitted incorrectly,
• 16:46
  Speaker 1: and that its acoustic analysis constituted expert testimony without proper foundation.
• 16:51
  Speaker 1: The appeal failed. The conviction stood. Six weeks after the
• 16:56
  Speaker 1: appeal failed, Young sent a letter to a journalist. He
• 16:59
  Speaker 1: described the mirror system in precise terms. He confirmed, the
• 17:03
  Speaker 1: deliberate selection of people in grief or transition. He explained
• 17:08
  Speaker 1: that the deafness was a structural choice, not an improvisation.
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: Remove the possibility of video. Make skepticism feel like cruelty
• 17:18
  Speaker 1: against a disabled person. He described the rotation of victims
• 17:22
  Speaker 1: and the use of scripts. He wrote that the operation
• 17:25
  Speaker 1: had run for at least three years before Evelyn Trask's
• 17:29
  Speaker 1: complaint reached Harwick P.D., and started the chain that ended
• 17:32
  Speaker 1: in Dunmore, Georgia. He wrote that he had chosen the
• 17:36
  Speaker 1: name James Young because it was the most forgettable name
• 17:40
  Speaker 1: he could imagine, the kind of name no one holds onto.
• 17:44
  Speaker 1: Sanders kept a photograph of the shoebox in her case files,
• 17:48
  Speaker 1: not as a trophy. She consulted it when new cases
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: came in, a reminder of what an ending looked like
• 17:55
  Speaker 1: from the outside before anyone understood what it was. The
• 17:58
  Speaker 1: Thursday after the arrest, Kent Baker walked into Bev's corner
• 18:02
  Speaker 1: at 7.15 in the morning. Joyce Pauling had his order
• 18:06
  Speaker 1: ready before he reached the counter. He sat in the
• 18:09
  Speaker 1: same booth he always used, the one with the strip
• 18:12
  Speaker 1: of mismatched tape along the back cushion where the vinyl
• 18:15
  Speaker 1: had split. Years ago, he stayed until 7.50. He went
• 18:20
  Speaker 1: to work. He told Troy Bissell afterward that he could
• 18:23
  Speaker 1: not find a clean line between what had been fabricated
• 18:27
  Speaker 1: and what had been real. The four months of conversation.
• 18:31
  Speaker 1: The question about soil remediation that had started everything. The
• 18:35
  Speaker 1: specific technical question that had felt like genuine curiosity, and
• 18:39
  Speaker 1: had been exactly that. In its way, even if the
• 18:42
  Speaker 1: curiosity belonged to a system and not a person. The attention.
• 18:47
  Speaker 1: Troy had read the messages and said, It did not
• 18:50
  Speaker 1: look like a scam. It looked like someone paying attention.
• 18:54
  Speaker 1: Kent had said that was the point. That was always
• 18:57
  Speaker 1: the point. The $ 10, 000 did not come back. The first transfer, $ 3, 800,
• 19:03
  Speaker 1: had moved through a fictitious logistics company and dissolved. The second, $ 6, 200,
• 19:10
  Speaker 1: had emptied the savings account his grandmother left him when
• 19:14
  Speaker 1: he was 12 years old. That money was gone. The
• 19:18
  Speaker 1: account was closed. The balance was zero. There is something
• 19:22
  Speaker 1: in this case that resists a clean resolution, and it
• 19:25
  Speaker 1: is not the conviction or the sentence. Those are clear.
• 19:30
  Speaker 1: It is the question Kent himself could not answer cleanly,
• 19:33
  Speaker 1: the one he raised without intending to, when he chose
• 19:37
  Speaker 1: the recycling bin instead of the trash. He said he
• 19:40
  Speaker 1: did not know why he made that choice. He said
• 19:43
  Speaker 1: he still did not know. But here is what the
• 19:46
  Speaker 1: record suggests, without asserting it as fact. A person throws
• 19:51
  Speaker 1: something in the trash when they want it gone. A
• 19:55
  Speaker 1: person sets something at the curb when they are not
• 19:58
  Speaker 1: entirely sure. The 41 photographs, every face crossed in red,
• 20:03
  Speaker 1: placed in a shoebox, placed in a recycling bin at
• 20:06
  Speaker 1: 414 Dunmore Terrace. not buried, not destroyed, set out. Leon
• 20:14
  Speaker 1: Price found them at 6.40 in the morning. Because he
• 20:17
  Speaker 1: was a 14-year-old who noticed things, his mother made a
• 20:20
  Speaker 1: phone call. The box reached Sanders. The box reached the case.
• 20:26
  Speaker 1: The case reached Dunmore, Georgia. Kent Baker's decision, whatever it was,
• 20:31
  Speaker 1: became the first link in a chain that ended with
• 20:34
  Speaker 1: seven chat windows open and 16 convictions. He could not
• 20:38
  Speaker 1: explain the choice. The choice did not require an explanation
• 20:42
  Speaker 1: to matter. Doug Haas sent one email after the trial
• 20:47
  Speaker 1: and received one line in return. He had spent two
• 20:50
  Speaker 1: years reporting his own face to platforms that did not respond.
• 20:54
  Speaker 1: The trial was the first time any institution acknowledged what
• 20:59
  Speaker 1: had been done with his photographs. He hoped... He wrote
• 21:03
  Speaker 1: to Sanders that the people who had seen those images
• 21:05
  Speaker 1: could eventually see something else when they thought of them.
• 21:09
  Speaker 1: The name James Young will not stay in anyone's memory
• 21:12
  Speaker 1: for long. That was the design. But the shoebox on
• 21:15
  Speaker 1: Dunmore Terrace, the 41 photographs, the 41 red marks, the
• 21:21
  Speaker 1: 14-year-old who stopped and looked, that part stays. This show
• 21:25
  Speaker 1: is made by Oba Media.