Latest / Elon Musk Podcast / Musk sues OpenAI for stolen charity

Transcript

Musk sues OpenAI for stolen charity · Elon Musk Podcast

• 0:00
  Elon Musk gave 10s of millions of dollars to start Open AI as a
• 0:03
  charity and well now he is suing Sam Altman, Greg Brockman and
• 0:08
  Microsoft for over $100 billion, claiming they essentially stole
• 0:14
  that charity to build a massive for profit empire.
• 0:17
  I mean, $100 billion is just a staggering amount.
• 0:20
  And accusing your former partners of stealing a charity
• 0:23
  that is highly unusual for corporate litigation?
• 0:25
  Yeah. It really is.
• 0:27
  Right. And this whole thing is playing
• 0:28
  out right now. It's a federal civil trial in
• 0:30
  Oakland before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers and, you know,
• 0:34
  an advisory jury of nine regular citizens.
• 0:36
  Just 9 everyday people. Exactly.
• 0:38
  And the court is airing everything.
• 0:40
  We are talking private Diaries, secret text messages between
• 0:44
  billionaires, and testimonies that detail the really chaotic
• 0:47
  beginnings of this whole artificial intelligence boom.
• 0:49
  So the question we were trying to answer for you today is how
• 0:52
  did a shared mission to protect humanity from artificial
• 0:55
  intelligence collapse into a bitter courtroom war over
• 0:59
  corporate control? Well, Musk claims he actually
• 1:02
  founded Open AI as a direct response to a conversation he
• 1:05
  had with Google Co founder Larry Page.
• 1:07
  Right? Because Page apparently
• 1:09
  dismissed Musk's fears that artificial intelligence could
• 1:13
  wipe out humanity, he allegedly called Musk A speciesist for,
• 1:18
  you know, favoring humans over machines.
• 1:20
  Wait, a speciesist? That is wild.
• 1:23
  I mean, hearing that term used in earnest among tech executives
• 1:26
  is just fascinating. It really sounds like something
• 1:28
  out of a science fiction novel. It does, but they are literally
• 1:31
  debating the actual value of human life versus digital life.
• 1:35
  So Musk's goal was to create an open source nonprofit to
• 1:40
  counterbalance Google's dominance.
• 1:42
  Right. And he claims he came up with
• 1:44
  the name, recruited key talent like Ilyasutskier and provided
• 1:48
  $38 million in free funding. I mean it was even paying the
• 1:51
  office rent. I hear that, but I have to push
• 1:54
  back a bit on that logic. Oh, really?
• 1:55
  How so? Because funding open AI
• 1:57
  originally, it sounds a lot like funding a Public Library for
• 2:00
  technology, right? Yeah, you build it so everyone
• 2:03
  has access to the books. But is it normal for someone to
• 2:05
  expect a Public Library to remain completely free once it
• 2:09
  requires billions of dollars of computing power just to keep the
• 2:13
  lights on? Well.
• 2:14
  You definitely cannot run a global supercomputer on the
• 2:17
  budget of a neighborhood book. Try.
• 2:18
  Exactly. The cost of training these
• 2:21
  models requires vast amounts of capital.
• 2:24
  And that tension over capital is exactly what makes the nonprofit
• 2:28
  structure so controversial here. Because establishing Open AI is
• 2:33
  a charity, originally it gave the organization a sort of Halo.
• 2:37
  Effect. Halo effect.
• 2:38
  Yeah, think about the economics of top tier software engineers.
• 2:41
  They can command massive salaries at places like Google
• 2:45
  or Meta. Oh.
• 2:45
  Totally. And Open AI just could not
• 2:48
  compete with those salaries initially.
• 2:50
  So that charitable perception helped recruit brilliant
• 2:53
  researchers who specifically wanted to work for humanity
• 2:56
  rather than a corporation. Right, which completely limits
• 2:59
  open a eyes current defense exactly because they actively
• 3:02
  use that charitable mission to build their foundation.
• 3:04
  You attract that initial talent pool under the banner of saving
• 3:08
  the world, you know. And if you change the business
• 3:10
  model later, it creates severe legal and ethical friction.
• 3:14
  It opens them up to accusations that the charity was just a
• 3:17
  convenient mechanism to acquire talent for cheap.
• 3:20
  Which brings us to a really critical piece of evidence.
• 3:23
  Right, the diary. Yes, Greg Brockman's private
• 3:25
  diary internal Notes written by the Open AI president, actually
• 3:29
  suggests that claiming commitment to the nonprofit
• 3:32
  structure was a lie. Wow.
• 3:34
  Yeah. And while he was writing that,
• 3:36
  he privately mused about what it would take for him to become a
• 3:39
  billionaire. That is just incredible and that
• 3:42
  connects directly to the massive shift in the company later on.
• 3:45
  Exactly after they secured a $10 billion investment for
• 3:49
  Microsoft, Musk texted Sam Altman, calling the move a bait
• 3:54
  and switch. And Altman replied, right.
• 3:56
  He did. Altman replied that he agreed it
• 3:57
  feels bad, and then offered Musk an opportunity to buy stock in
• 4:01
  the newly restructured company. Which Musk testified, felt like
• 4:04
  a bribe to secure his silence. Wait, back up.
• 4:07
  Sure. So the president of the company
• 4:08
  actually wrote down in a private diary that their public stance
• 4:12
  regarding the charity was a lie. Yes, he literally put it in
• 4:15
  writing, and having this written evidence changes the entire
• 4:19
  nature of the trial. It completely shifts the
• 4:21
  narrative. Exactly.
• 4:23
  It moves it from a simple business disagreement into a
• 4:25
  documented claim of deliberate deception.
• 4:28
  It opens up the possibility for massive financial penalties
• 4:31
  against the founders. Well, Speaking of the trial,
• 4:33
  Musk's performance during cross examination was pretty
• 4:36
  disastrous. It really was.
• 4:38
  He argued relentlessly with Open AI's lead defense attorney,
• 4:42
  William Savitt. He kept accusing Savitt of
• 4:45
  asking tricky questions, and he just outright refused to answer
• 4:48
  with a simple yes or no right. He even forgot his own testimony
• 4:52
  from earlier in the morning. And then he awkwardly defined
• 4:55
  his chief of staff, Siobhan Zillis, while completely
• 4:59
  omitting that she is the mother of several of his children.
• 5:02
  The courtroom reactions to all of this were incredibly
• 5:04
  revealing, too. I mean, Judge Gonzalez Rogers
• 5:07
  had to repeatedly scold Musk. Which is not a good look.
• 5:10
  Not at all. She reminded him that he is not
• 5:12
  a lawyer and explicitly banned him from talking about
• 5:15
  Terminator extinction scenarios in her courtroom.
• 5:18
  Oh wow. Yeah, and a Verge reporter in
• 5:20
  the gallery noted that Musk's behavior actually made them
• 5:23
  incredibly sympathetic to Sam Altman.
• 5:25
  That is saying something. Jurors were literally seen
• 5:28
  exchanging glances and rubbing their heads in sheer exhaustion.
• 5:32
  See, I don't know. I look at that and see Musk just
• 5:35
  displaying his usual CEO confidence.
• 5:37
  You really think so? Yeah, I mean, he was refusing to
• 5:40
  be bullied by a hostile lawyer who is trying to box them into a
• 5:43
  corner. Cross examination is designed to
• 5:46
  trap you, you know. Well, I disagree strongly with
• 5:49
  that assessment. Treating a federal courtroom
• 5:51
  like a boardroom completely destroys your credibility with
• 5:54
  the jury. You think it's that damaging?
• 5:56
  Absolutely. Jurors expect humility and
• 6:00
  direct answers. When you scold the opposing
• 6:02
  counsel and argue with the judge, you alienate the nine
• 6:06
  regular citizens who hold your fate in their hands.
• 6:08
  So his combative behavior basically limits his ability to
• 6:12
  portray himself as a wrong benevolent idealist.
• 6:15
  Exactly. It hands Open AI the perfect
• 6:18
  opportunity to frame Musk as a jealous, erratic competitor
• 6:22
  rather than a victim. And Open AI took that exact
• 6:25
  opportunity to launch a major counterattack.
• 6:27
  Right, they expose that Musk is currently running his own for
• 6:29
  profit artificial intelligence company XA AI.
• 6:32
  Which is a huge detail. Oh, it gets better.
• 6:34
  On the stand, Musk admitted that his company actually distills
• 6:38
  and trains its software on open AI's models.
• 6:41
  But wait, there's also another surprising piece of evidence
• 6:45
  here, the private text messages from Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg.
• 6:50
  Oh, right. Yeah, Zuckerberg texted Musk to
• 6:53
  offer Meta's content moderation teams to protect Musk's
• 6:56
  government efficiency staff, and they were commiserating over a
• 7:00
  leaked letter regarding the open AI lawsuit.
• 7:03
  Hold on. The guy suing to keep this
• 7:05
  technology as a charity is running a for profit company
• 7:08
  that uses the charity's technology.
• 7:11
  Yeah, that's exactly what the testimony revealed.
• 7:13
  That is like complaining that someone stole your secret recipe
• 7:16
  while you were actively selling cookies baked with their dough.
• 7:18
  That is a perfect way to put it. And that revelation severely
• 7:21
  damages the narrative of a noble crusade it.
• 7:23
  Really does. It opens up the argument that
• 7:25
  Musk is just using the federal court system as a competitive
• 7:28
  weapon to hobble his biggest business rival.
• 7:30
  And then we have Microsoft's role in all of this.
• 7:32
  Right, the corporate bystander. Sued for aiding and abetting,
• 7:36
  and Microsoft's lawyers presented a highly corporate,
• 7:39
  detached defense. They even used vintage Microsoft
• 7:42
  saunts on their slides. Of course they did.
• 7:45
  But internal emails show Microsoft's chief technology
• 7:48
  officer Kevin Scott actually questioning if the original
• 7:51
  donors were aware of Open AI's plans to build a closed for
• 7:55
  profit system. So they knew it was
• 7:57
  questionable, but what is Microsoft's primary legal
• 8:00
  defense then? It hinges entirely on the
• 8:02
  statute of limitations. Their lawyer presented an old
• 8:05
  social media post where Musk publicly complained that open AI
• 8:09
  was captured by Microsoft. So because he complained about
• 8:12
  this publicly years ago, he might have missed the legal
• 8:14
  window to actually sue them. Precisely establishing Musk's
• 8:18
  early awareness changes everything.
• 8:20
  If the judge decides Musk waited too long to file the lawsuit,
• 8:23
  she could throw out the entire case based on that timeline
• 8:26
  alone. That would completely neutralize
• 8:28
  the impact of Brockman's diary and Altman's text messages.
• 8:31
  So ultimately, this trial is a test of whether early promises
• 8:35
  made to the public can legally bind a company once billions of
• 8:38
  dollars are on the line. And it leaves you with this open
• 8:41
  question. If the judge actually rules in
• 8:44
  Musk's favor and forces Open AI to revert entirely to a
• 8:48
  nonprofit, how would the legal system even begin to untangle
• 8:53
  the billions of dollars of corporate infrastructure and
• 8:55
  investments currently powering the platform?
• 8:57
  If you're not subscribed yet, take a second and hit follow on
• 9:00
  whatever app you're using. It helps us keep making this.
• 9:02
  We appreciate you being here. Also, check out our YouTube
• 9:04
  channel for more business and tech updates.
• 9:06
  There's a link in the description.