Latest / The Slippery Slope / Australian Defence Force Adopt Gender-Neutral Language

Transcript

Australian Defence Force Adopt Gender-Neutral Language · The Slippery Slope

• 0:10
  Low. All right, Jay Fallon, if you're
• 0:13
  listening, well, then you're listening to the slippery slope.
• 0:15
  Thanks for listening. So listen, the story had come up
• 0:18
  and I I find it, I find it a little weird for where we're
• 0:21
  going as a nation. When you look at something you
• 0:26
  always want in your nation, OK? No matter what's happening, what
• 0:31
  other kind of civil, what's happening in the civilian world,
• 0:35
  what kind of civilian rests or unrest might be happening.
• 0:40
  Like at the moment, we've had, we've had some protests, we've
• 0:46
  had some process going on about the like pro Palestinian
• 0:49
  movements and all this kind of thing, and we've had some weird
• 0:52
  things going on in the nation. However, I always thought that
• 0:56
  no matter what's going on. What kind of civil unrest may be
• 1:00
  going on. What you need to be able to rely
• 1:03
  on in a nation that I think is well structured is you need to
• 1:07
  be able to rely on the stability of your of your of your
• 1:13
  military. And at the moment I'm not I'm
• 1:16
  not convinced that we can rely on this.
• 1:18
  Let's look at this this article here.
• 1:21
  Now it's talking about how Liz Storer, who's a She's a from the
• 1:25
  Sky News Liz Storer Storer. Criticizes ADF That's Australian
• 1:30
  Defence Force's decision to adopt gender neutral language.
• 1:36
  So anyway, it goes down stores. Criticism of the ADS decision
• 1:39
  represents A viewpoint opposing linguistic modifications that
• 1:43
  promote gender neutrality. Her critique invites questions
• 1:48
  about the implications of altering established
• 1:51
  terminologies. In traditionally male dominated
• 1:55
  fields such as defense and military operations, it also
• 1:59
  underscores the ongoing social debate on language, gender, and
• 2:03
  inclusivity. Look, I'm I'm all for
• 2:07
  inclusivity when it comes to the military.
• 2:09
  As in, as long as we understand that there is only male and
• 2:13
  female in this world, there is no non binary.
• 2:15
  There's no such thing as non binary.
• 2:17
  There's no such thing as, you know, whatever name you want to
• 2:20
  make up for your supposed gender.
• 2:22
  You are only male or female, so I'm all for inclusivity.
• 2:27
  Inclusivity can't talk probably today when it comes to that, but
• 2:30
  we've got to keep it within the realms of reality and not some
• 2:35
  someone's fantasy anyway, so it goes on.
• 2:38
  The IDs initiative represents a broader trend of adopting gender
• 2:41
  neutral language in various professional settings, the
• 2:45
  adoption of gender neutral terminology in defense.
• 2:50
  A military context is a departure from traditional
• 2:53
  language. The ADF aims to foster
• 2:55
  inclusivity within its ranks, signaling a commitment to
• 2:59
  modernizing its language and practices.
• 3:01
  However, as Stora's criticism highlights, this linguistic
• 3:04
  shift has its detractors who argue that such changes could be
• 3:08
  detrimental to establish practices and traditions, goes
• 3:14
  on talking about the implications of language
• 3:15
  choices. So the debate surrounding the
• 3:17
  ADF terminology changes. Raises questions about the
• 3:21
  impact of language on perceptions, traditions and
• 3:24
  inclusivity. The ideas commitment to
• 3:27
  inclusivity and diversity reflected in its language
• 3:30
  choices aligns with the broader efforts to address gender bias
• 3:37
  and equality within the armed forces.
• 3:40
  The criticism, however, indicates that adoption of
• 3:42
  gender neutral language may be perceived as a departure from
• 3:46
  established norms. The the debate over gender
• 3:50
  neutral language serves as a reflection of wider societal
• 3:54
  discussions about representation, equality and the
• 3:57
  rule of language and shaping cultural norms.
• 4:02
  Now, why the the main reason why I'm talking about this?
• 4:07
  Like I said, if there's one thing that you want in a nation
• 4:10
  that's you know, a stable nation, nation that can run even
• 4:15
  no matter what else is happening in their in their world, no
• 4:17
  matter what. And who's protesting?
• 4:19
  Who's getting up and talking about what?
• 4:21
  What other ideas are out there floating around?
• 4:23
  You want a military that is stable in there thinking.
• 4:26
  You want a military that's still just very steady going along,
• 4:31
  minding its own business no matter what else is going on, no
• 4:35
  matter who's in government at the time.
• 4:36
  And military is always the same. Military just keeps doing what
• 4:40
  it's doing, no matter who's in government, no matter what silly
• 4:45
  little ideas are out there in in society.
• 4:48
  Military doesn't change if if our our military and and the
• 4:57
  police ranks, they've had a lot of issues with with with their
• 5:02
  recruitment in the last couple of years and so they've decided
• 5:07
  both areas have decided well hey we want to be more inclusive.
• 5:11
  We want to bring all these other people in who mightn't feel,
• 5:14
  maybe in the past they mightn't have felt.
• 5:17
  Included in our workforces. So we want to be able to bring
• 5:21
  these, these people in. The problem I say is, is this
• 5:26
  the kind of person that you want to bring into your military?
• 5:30
  Do we really need someone who is that who is that fragile, that
• 5:36
  sensitive that they're actually considering that they're
• 5:40
  actually concerned whether something is has the term the
• 5:44
  the word man? In its title, when when we're
• 5:49
  talking about aircraft that don't have a crew, drones, we
• 5:54
  have to call them uncrewed and not unmanned.
• 5:57
  I I tell you, when I was, when I was in the place, especially
• 6:00
  when I was in general duties, there was some people you'd be
• 6:03
  going to a job and you knew it was maybe going to be a little
• 6:07
  violence or that were if I'd had experiences with these people
• 6:11
  before. You thought you sit there going
• 6:12
  there are some people you want. Sitting in the car next to you,
• 6:16
  or at least knowing that they're in the next car and they're on
• 6:19
  their way because you're sitting there going, OK, I can rely on
• 6:22
  these people to have my back. Things are going to go down.
• 6:26
  You know, I'm not a I'm not, I'm not a big guy.
• 6:30
  I'm not a small guy, just average.
• 6:32
  I always try to keep fit. You always, you know, you always
• 6:35
  want to keep on top of things and think, well, if things go
• 6:38
  down, at least I'll be able to handle myself, protect myself,
• 6:41
  and I want the guy next to me or the person next to me.
• 6:44
  Being able to protect themselves and maybe help me if I get in
• 6:47
  trouble and not and vice versa. The trouble is sometimes they'll
• 6:50
  be sitting next to people and thinking, man, I wish someone
• 6:54
  else is here because and and it wasn't always a like, it wasn't
• 6:59
  just because like if they don't think I'm thinking of females
• 7:02
  only, it's not females, it's the person itself.
• 7:06
  Because sometimes you'd be sitting there going, I'd prefer
• 7:10
  a female, a certain female there, because I know.
• 7:14
  How they can handle themselves and what they're like.
• 7:16
  You don't want someone who's sitting there and they are.
• 7:21
  If they. I would not want someone who is
• 7:24
  so consumed with language and with terminology that that is at
• 7:31
  the forefront of their mind and they can't concentrate on the
• 7:36
  task at hand, especially when with you.
• 7:42
  Especially when violence erupts when you end up in a hard
• 7:45
  situation, you want someone that gets in there and gets their
• 7:47
  hands dirty, not worried about what's the terminology that
• 7:51
  you're using, what's the language that you're using.
• 7:54
  I guarantee you, the Chinese and the Russians, they're not
• 7:59
  sitting there talking about gender neutral language.
• 8:04
  What are they talking about? What are they thinking about?
• 8:06
  They're thinking about how to how to make their weapons
• 8:10
  better, bigger. Faster How to How to train their
• 8:15
  their personnel to become the best soldiers, the best military
• 8:19
  people that anyone will ever find.
• 8:22
  That's what they're concerned about.
• 8:23
  They're not concerned or whether people feel included in the
• 8:28
  language, regardless of whether you're male, female, or you
• 8:31
  identify as some other illusion, imaginary illusion.
• 8:36
  That's not what they're thinking about.
• 8:38
  They want to be the best and the biggest and the strongest and
• 8:41
  the smartest. And at the moment they look at
• 8:43
  Western society, they look at militaries like Australia's.
• 8:46
  And you know, we're thinking about, Oh well, someone, someone
• 8:49
  in there is sitting there thinking we want to rename our
• 8:54
  drones to uncrewed instead of saying unmanned because we want
• 8:59
  to be inclusive if this is the kind of personnel that you are
• 9:03
  looking to bring in. To the military?
• 9:06
  Well then no wonder why you're having problems.
• 9:10
  No wonder why police are having problems because they are not
• 9:14
  the kind of personnel that will have the back of the soldier or
• 9:19
  the police officer next to them. They won't.
• 9:22
  They are too worried about. They're too worried about
• 9:29
  hurting people's feelings. And don't get me wrong, I think
• 9:32
  we need to be polite. We need to be polite.
• 9:35
  We need to be. You need to be able to get along
• 9:39
  with people. You need to be able to, you
• 9:42
  know, you know you don't want to.
• 9:43
  I don't want to go out of my way to insult, to insult people.
• 9:47
  And I believe it's it's actually pretty arrogant of us, not, you
• 9:52
  know, of Western culture in general, but it's pretty
• 9:55
  arrogant of their defense, our defense force.
• 9:58
  To think that, well, this is the most concerning, the most
• 10:02
  concerning thing we have at the moment is inclusivity in our
• 10:06
  language, not do we have the most well trained military
• 10:13
  officers, military personnel that we can possibly find in
• 10:16
  this nation? Do we have the best?
• 10:21
  And it's arrogant of us, it's arrogant of our military to
• 10:24
  think that this doesn't really matter.
• 10:28
  But, you know, have some having someone who was so fragile, so
• 10:32
  mentally fragile, that they'll become unhinged because because
• 10:37
  their drones are referred to as unmanned aircraft, well, we're
• 10:43
  just on the wrong path, aren't we?
• 10:45
  Anyway, that's just my opinion. Let me know what you think I've
• 10:48
  said before. You know, I don't particularly
• 10:50
  like carrying on too much about the the gender, the gender thing
• 10:54
  that the transgender thing, because I think it's.
• 10:57
  In a way, it is kind of punching down because you got these
• 10:59
  people who I think they've got mental issues and they need
• 11:03
  mental help. But when you have people out
• 11:05
  there like the military, when you have people who are
• 11:08
  supposedly setting the standards for our society and they come up
• 11:13
  with these crazy ideas like this, that's just it's
• 11:17
  bombastic. It's ridiculous.
• 11:23
  Anyway, you let me know what you think.
• 11:27
  Jade Fallon, thanks for listening to the slippery slope.
• 11:31
  They just fuel the