Latest / UK Column Radio / UK Column News - 30th May 2025

Transcript

UK Column News - 30th May 2025 · UK Column Radio

0:08
Speaker 1: Good afternoon. It's Friday the thirtieth and May twenty twenty five,
0:11
Speaker 1: just after one o'clock. Welcome to UK Colin News. I'm
0:14
Speaker 1: your host Mike Rumson joining me in the studio today
0:16
Speaker 1: Patrick Kennison, Welcome to the program. Patrick, great to be
0:19
Speaker 1: with you, Mike, And by video link we have Mark
0:21
Speaker 1: Anderson I letter in the program. Patrick's going to be
0:23
Speaker 1: covering Gaza and the Trump crackdown on visas against anyone
0:27
Speaker 1: criticizing Israel. Mark, for his part, is going to be
0:30
Speaker 1: reporting on a documentary about vaccine injured called Silenced, and
0:34
Speaker 1: rfk's announcement on COVID jabs. We're going to begin today
0:38
Speaker 1: with the kill Web. At now the UK Secretary of
0:43
Speaker 1: State for War here John Healy, has announced the kill
0:47
Speaker 1: web and well, what do we think about that. It's
0:53
Speaker 1: part of the Strategic Defense Review twenty twenty five, which
0:56
Speaker 1: is about to be launched in a couple of weeks time,
0:58
Speaker 1: having already been announced by Starmar in July last year,
1:05
Speaker 1: and he said that that was to consider the threats
1:07
Speaker 1: Britain faces, the capabilities needed to meet them, the state
1:11
Speaker 1: of the UK Armed forces and the resources available. So
1:15
Speaker 1: but this defense review is different. These are normally run
1:18
Speaker 1: by the government, but this time it's being led by
1:21
Speaker 1: Lord Robertson. And while he was once a Labor Defense Secretary,
1:27
Speaker 1: he was also once Secretary General for NATO, and so
1:31
Speaker 1: he's considered, although Labor, an outsider, nonetheless and perhaps perfectly
1:36
Speaker 1: aligned with the NATO agenda. Patrick, but look, the kill
1:40
Speaker 1: web is going to cost the British taxpayer one billion pounds.
1:46
Speaker 1: They don't call it a kill web, of course, the
1:48
Speaker 1: British government doesn't. They use the softer signing Digital Targeting Web.
1:53
Speaker 1: That's the term they use, and they say will enable
1:56
Speaker 1: quick fire targeting of enemy assets, including through offensive side operations.
2:01
Speaker 1: Now kill Web is going to be based at a
2:03
Speaker 1: new Cyber and Electromagnetic Command which they are establishing at
2:08
Speaker 1: the same time, and this is going to lead defensive
2:11
Speaker 1: cyber operations and coordinate, coordinate offensive offensive cyber operations with
2:17
Speaker 1: the National Cyber Force. So we are going to war
2:22
Speaker 1: in that sense without Dodd. Healy says that ways of
2:26
Speaker 1: warfare are rapidly changing, with the UK facing with the
2:31
Speaker 1: UK facing daily cyber attacks on this new front line,
2:36
Speaker 1: and according to the Ministry Defense, more than ninety thousand
2:38
Speaker 1: sub threshold attacks were recorded in the last two years.
2:41
Speaker 1: No evidence for the statistic was provided. Naturally, heally described
2:46
Speaker 1: Britain as a country under attack, increasing attacks, and this
2:51
Speaker 1: is the nerve center of the UK's military that helps
2:53
Speaker 1: us defend against these attacks. The keyboard has become a
2:57
Speaker 1: weapon of war. Let's just put that on screen. So
3:00
Speaker 1: ways of warfare rapidly changing, with the UK facing daily
3:03
Speaker 1: cyber attaxes to say, but the keyboard has become the
3:07
Speaker 1: weapon of war. That's great news, isn't it. The command,
3:10
Speaker 1: the Cyber Command will be this new group will be
3:14
Speaker 1: headed by General Sir James Hockenhall, who succeeded General Sir
3:18
Speaker 1: Patrick Sanders as the Commander of UK Strategy Command in
3:22
Speaker 1: May twenty twenty two, and he also serves as Aid
3:24
Speaker 1: de camp general to the Monarch, so currently King Charles,
3:28
Speaker 1: but previously Queen Elizabeth as well. He's been doing that
3:31
Speaker 1: since twenty twenty two. So the question is what is
3:35
Speaker 1: Kilwebb well. The idea originated with DARPA and Admiral William
3:43
Speaker 1: Owens wrote a paper about a system of systems. He
3:46
Speaker 1: was talking about integrating command and control the intelligence from centers,
3:50
Speaker 1: sensor sorry and weapons together, and he was talking about
3:54
Speaker 1: this in the mid nineteen nineties, but sorry, by nineteen
3:57
Speaker 1: ninety eight, Vice Admiral Arthur h took the next step
4:02
Speaker 1: and wrote a paper that explained how the link system together,
4:05
Speaker 1: and he invented the term network centric warfare. Then in
4:09
Speaker 1: March we'll come forward to March twenty twenty three. Here
4:12
Speaker 1: with this report. This is the US Naval Institute publishing
4:16
Speaker 1: an article with the headline enter the Kill Web, a
4:20
Speaker 1: concept for drone warfare, and they say the potential applications
4:24
Speaker 1: of loitering munitions, artificial intelligence, machine learning, and semi autonomy
4:30
Speaker 1: in a battlefield setting are extensive. Now, if you don't
4:33
Speaker 1: know what loitering munitions are, another term for that is
4:36
Speaker 1: kamakazi drones. So this article goes on the explain that
4:41
Speaker 1: kamakazi drones are launched with an explosive payload, they circle
4:45
Speaker 1: the battlefield, they identify a target, and then they fly
4:48
Speaker 1: into that target and detonate on impact. In the future,
4:52
Speaker 1: command and control of these types of weapons, which is
4:56
Speaker 1: typically managed by a soldier on the ground, is going
4:58
Speaker 1: to expand to me or high altitude, long endurance drones
5:02
Speaker 1: as well. So what we're saying here is a destination,
5:07
Speaker 1: and that destination is autonomous AI controlled weapon systems. As
5:11
Speaker 1: Laura Nolan is pointing out in this article that she
5:14
Speaker 1: on our blog and medium, this is patrick. This is
5:18
Speaker 1: extremely dangerous once we start seeing either remotely controlled or
5:22
Speaker 1: autonomous drone swarms that anybody's a target and these are
5:28
Speaker 1: very hard to deal with, very hard to defend.
5:30
Speaker 2: An AI driven autonomous swarm of drones Mike can be
5:34
Speaker 2: deployed to, let's say, decapitate a government, surround government buildings,
5:39
Speaker 2: kill presidents and prime ministers. We already have our governments
5:42
Speaker 2: involved in a lot of these activities anyway by other means.
5:46
Speaker 2: So this just gives them another tool for disruption, hit
5:50
Speaker 2: and run attacks, assassinations, or what they call decapitation strikes. Now,
5:54
Speaker 2: what's the response going to be from another power? This
5:57
Speaker 2: seems to me, if I'm not mistaken, this is all
6:00
Speaker 2: gated towards state actors, right, Yes, so this is targeting
6:03
Speaker 2: Russia basically. So is this the policy? Because below the
6:07
Speaker 2: military rhetoric there is political beliefs and political policies. So
6:12
Speaker 2: is the policy permanent war? We must destroy Russia, We
6:15
Speaker 2: must have regime change in Russia. We must break up
6:19
Speaker 2: Russia into ten different countries? Is are we married to
6:22
Speaker 2: that policy? Because I don't know anybody that actually voted
6:25
Speaker 2: on that, and I don't know anybody that I've met
6:28
Speaker 2: that wants that. They don't want to be in a
6:30
Speaker 2: constant state of war. But who wants to be in
6:33
Speaker 2: a constant state of war?
6:34
Speaker 1: Well, they wants to be in a constant And the
6:37
Speaker 1: companies involved involved in these products and producing these products,
6:41
Speaker 1: the AI companies want to be certainly.
6:43
Speaker 2: So imagine what we could do together between Britain, Europe, Russia,
6:47
Speaker 2: China for humanity. There's no limit to the potential. But
6:51
Speaker 2: imagine what would happen if these types of plants are
6:54
Speaker 2: allowed to continue going forward? They're going to end in
6:57
Speaker 2: tears because rather than be subject to this type of
7:01
Speaker 2: loitering and decapitation strikes, what's a country like Russia bound
7:05
Speaker 2: to do? Maybe they should spend as much money on
7:08
Speaker 2: defending against erashnic missiles because that's where they're pushing things
7:13
Speaker 2: to an all out confrontation between nuclear powers.
7:16
Speaker 1: This is no joke, no and deed, and there is
7:19
Speaker 1: no defense for erosnic missiles at this point, and they
7:23
Speaker 1: can be armed with tactical nuclear weapons and nuclear weapons.
7:26
Speaker 2: It'd be one thing, Mike and I don't want to
7:28
Speaker 2: be label this point, it'd be one thing to have
7:30
Speaker 2: this conversation. Look at this development while there's diplomacy going
7:34
Speaker 2: on on parallel tracks just to put us the public
7:37
Speaker 2: at ease. But there's no diplomacy, there's only talk more war.
7:41
Speaker 1: Right, extremely dangerous. Well, look, let's move on to Gaza
7:45
Speaker 1: and Patrick. The atrocities there just seem to get worse
7:48
Speaker 1: as the starvation begins to really bite.
7:51
Speaker 2: Yeah, we're going to show you a video clip. I mean,
7:53
Speaker 2: there's just so much shocking material. We are only, you know,
7:57
Speaker 2: showing you a very small sample of this. But go
8:00
Speaker 2: and watch the scene right now in Gaza. So for
8:26
Speaker 2: people who don't know what happened there, So Israel basically
8:29
Speaker 2: struck people who were put into place Palestinians. It looks
8:33
Speaker 2: like probably from the World Food Programmer un or something,
8:36
Speaker 2: who are guarding the aid so that could be distributed.
8:38
Speaker 1: They killed them. Basically.
8:40
Speaker 2: Now you have mercenaries firing on the crowds, the idea
8:44
Speaker 2: of firing on hungree crowds, that's what's going on. They're
8:47
Speaker 2: shooting people are dying. Let's bring this up on screen here.
8:51
Speaker 2: This is the story US Israeli GAZ a humanitarian scam.
8:55
Speaker 2: I can't think of a better word to call this,
8:58
Speaker 2: because that's exactly what it is. And we're going to
9:01
Speaker 2: lay out to you how exactly this scam has unfolded.
9:04
Speaker 2: And this is the company here or the foundation, the charity,
9:07
Speaker 2: the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. We're going to dig into that
9:10
Speaker 2: organization and take a look at it. But so funny enough,
9:14
Speaker 2: the CEO of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation resigned just a
9:18
Speaker 2: few days ago, the head of this controversial organization here. Basically,
9:23
Speaker 2: this is a quote from Jake Wood, the former CEO.
9:26
Speaker 2: The foundation could not adhere to the humanitarian principles of humanity,
9:30
Speaker 2: neutrality and partiality and independence, which I will not abandoned.
9:36
Speaker 1: What we got a bit of integrity here, did we Well?
9:38
Speaker 2: If this is a former Special Forces US for Special Force,
9:42
Speaker 2: I believe it was a sniper in Special Forces, So
9:45
Speaker 2: you know, he seems like he wants to do the
9:47
Speaker 2: right thing. It comes from the military side. I think,
9:50
Speaker 2: you know, when some people like this are jumping ship mic,
9:52
Speaker 2: it's not a good sign. And so we'll go on
9:55
Speaker 2: and take a look at this organization here. This is
9:58
Speaker 2: the organization, and you know, it all looks good on
10:01
Speaker 2: the surface, doesn't it. But let's take a look at
10:03
Speaker 2: who's involved. Look at this on the board leadership and governance.
10:07
Speaker 2: Nate Mook, former CEO of the World Central Kitchen. Now
10:11
Speaker 2: that's a familiar name, isn't it. You remember that peer
10:14
Speaker 2: that the US military built.
10:16
Speaker 1: The one that floated away in the storm, made.
10:19
Speaker 2: That one, the one that cost half a billion dollars. Yeah,
10:22
Speaker 2: he was a CEO of World Central Kitchen. It was
10:24
Speaker 2: using that to deliver these ready made meals that people
10:27
Speaker 2: in Palestine don't actually need ready made meals. They actually
10:30
Speaker 2: have AID and they have kitchen set up with UNRA.
10:34
Speaker 2: We'll show that in a moment there. And there's a
10:36
Speaker 2: few other characters in there that are interesting. We'll take
10:39
Speaker 2: a look at who exactly they are. And let's take
10:42
Speaker 2: a look at the organization here. And so here is
10:44
Speaker 2: Nate Mook. So this guy is an operative that just
10:48
Speaker 2: bounces from one bad show to another. So he's in
10:52
Speaker 2: charge of this Chairman of the board. Jake Wood looks
10:55
Speaker 2: like has some integrity, has resigned, Probably the right thing
10:58
Speaker 2: to do. John Burke for a former COO. He's gone,
11:03
Speaker 2: so who's taking over it. There's the interim CEO, Mike.
11:06
Speaker 2: It is John Acre, former senior manager at us AI
11:11
Speaker 2: d a notorious CIA front. So again adding to the
11:15
Speaker 2: spooks there, and then you've got David Pepassion. There is
11:19
Speaker 2: the founder. Now this is controversial in Switzerland. The Swiss
11:23
Speaker 2: authorities are now basically exerting oversight over Gaza Humanitarian Foundation,
11:29
Speaker 2: which is founded and listed in Switzerland. They've now come
11:33
Speaker 2: into legal trouble there. This whole thing is falling apart.
11:37
Speaker 2: Let's take a look at that as well. Now this
11:39
Speaker 2: is the security company attached to this, Safe Reach Solutions.
11:44
Speaker 2: There's Philip Riley. What's his background. Well let's take a look,
11:48
Speaker 2: oh career CIA. Okay, so more spooks. Is this looking
11:52
Speaker 2: suspicious to you? It certainly is to me, Mike, And
11:55
Speaker 2: so we'll go on here. We've got a video we're
11:58
Speaker 2: going to show you. Now this is pretty shocking. So
12:01
Speaker 2: people are basically trying to get around to the barricades
12:06
Speaker 2: where they have the food stored, and these mercenaries and
12:09
Speaker 2: Israeli soldiers inside are doing incredible things like chucking grenades
12:14
Speaker 2: into the crowd. Watch this, you come back, you come back?
13:05
Speaker 1: Were those stunn granades because you know, obviously people weren't
13:09
Speaker 1: being killed directly by the grenades, but the natural reaction
13:13
Speaker 1: for people is going to stomp paid, right.
13:14
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, And so those are stone grenades. Now, those
13:17
Speaker 2: are the type of things you remember reported on the
13:18
Speaker 2: Yellow vests in France. They were taking off hands and
13:21
Speaker 2: people losing eyes. Those are grenades, so they're just throwing
13:24
Speaker 2: them into the crowd. These are people that have been
13:26
Speaker 2: intentionally starved by the Israelis, by the Americans. They're begging
13:30
Speaker 2: for food. Some people haven't eaten in days or had
13:33
Speaker 2: a substantial meal in months, and these people are basically
13:36
Speaker 2: throwing grenades at the hungry people. Insane. But this is
13:40
Speaker 2: the whole scam of the Gazer Humanitarian relief operation. Here, now,
13:44
Speaker 2: this is a great report and I'm going to point
13:46
Speaker 2: people to this here. Biometrics for food A dangerous shift
13:50
Speaker 2: from humanitarian relief to coercive surveillance. Now, this is the
13:54
Speaker 2: safe and secure solutions that we showed you run by
13:58
Speaker 2: the spook o'reiley and is the report is a damning
14:04
Speaker 2: report by Skyline International Human Rights. The use of biometric
14:07
Speaker 2: surveillance as a condition for receiving food and humanitarian aid.
14:11
Speaker 2: Is a blatant violation of the Palestine's right to privacy,
14:14
Speaker 2: fundamental human rights guaranteed under international law. Why the israelis
14:18
Speaker 2: doing this? Why the American students, They say, it's to
14:21
Speaker 2: prevent Hamas from getting food, So again, using the Hamas
14:25
Speaker 2: card to impose what is clearly quite an incredible system
14:30
Speaker 2: of data gathering and so forth. Here and they go on,
14:34
Speaker 2: just finally, rather than alleviating the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza,
14:38
Speaker 2: this plan institutionalizes surveillance and control over aid access, using
14:44
Speaker 2: rations as a means of enforcing compliance. Hurting people. Will
14:49
Speaker 2: show you where they're hurting them to, because it's a
14:51
Speaker 2: very interesting story, indeed. But this is the whole point, Mike,
14:55
Speaker 2: This is what this whole thing is about. We'll bring
14:58
Speaker 2: this up on screen. This is UNRA, the United Nations
15:01
Speaker 2: Relief and Works Agency. Now, this has been providing aid
15:04
Speaker 2: in Gaza since the mid nineteen fifties to refugees, people
15:07
Speaker 2: displaced from the Nakba people in occupied territories. They have
15:11
Speaker 2: four hundred mini kitchens, they have a network of suppliers.
15:16
Speaker 2: The aid was flowing before October seventh, four hundred trucks
15:20
Speaker 2: a day, Mike. So they had enough to look after people,
15:22
Speaker 2: medical supplies, they even provide counseling, education, education, they're providing
15:28
Speaker 2: for the kids. All of that stuff was taken care of.
15:30
Speaker 2: Israel destroyed it by accusing UNRA of harboring Hamas you
15:34
Speaker 2: remember that story. So the United States got on board
15:37
Speaker 2: with that fraud, Joe Biden, and they've now destroyed UNRA.
15:41
Speaker 2: They've killed a lot of their staff. Israel has targeted
15:44
Speaker 2: UNRA facilities, un refugee facilities in their bombing and this
15:49
Speaker 2: is here's an UNRA facility right now. Look at it,
15:52
Speaker 2: just completely turned to rubble. That's what this is all about.
15:55
Speaker 2: Israel in the US are trying to replace UNRA with
15:58
Speaker 2: their own aid delivery, which which is designed to do
16:01
Speaker 2: something very specific. Now, take a look at this scene
16:05
Speaker 2: from a World Food Program central warehouse in central Gaza.
16:09
Speaker 2: Watched this riot that ensued here. Two people were killed,
16:13
Speaker 2: sixty plus people injured, and I believe there was firing
16:17
Speaker 2: on the crowd. Go ahead and watch this, yeah.
16:22
Speaker 3: George, my George, Yeah, George, my George. Mate, Mudur, I'm rocking,
16:30
Speaker 3: has I'm a rocking Yeah, George, my George, and I'm
16:36
Speaker 3: rocking hostel and I'm lookingaham.
16:46
Speaker 2: But so the US government directly responsible for this, the
16:54
Speaker 2: UK government, Germany, France, the United the European Union, and
16:58
Speaker 2: of course Israel been dragging their feet to create this
17:01
Speaker 2: very situation. What is the endgame though, and we continue
17:04
Speaker 2: to ask ourselves that question. Let's take a look at this.
17:08
Speaker 2: Bring this up on screen. Here's the endgame. Take a
17:10
Speaker 2: look at this map. You see the red dots there,
17:12
Speaker 2: There's one in the middle and three at the bottom. Okay,
17:15
Speaker 2: these are the so called distribution facilities through this Gaza
17:19
Speaker 2: Humanitarian Front organization, that's an intelligence front. And by the way,
17:23
Speaker 2: the Israeli parliamentarians Avicdor Lieberman himself said he said he
17:28
Speaker 2: was upset Masad was funding this operation. He let the
17:32
Speaker 2: cat out of the bag. So this is the CIA
17:34
Speaker 2: and Masad. Now what are they trying to do. They're
17:37
Speaker 2: literally trying to bait people. Take a closer look at this,
17:41
Speaker 2: Take a closer look at this. This is what it's about,
17:44
Speaker 2: kill zones, concentration camps, and ethnic cleansing. That's exactly what
17:51
Speaker 2: this plan is. Take a closer look though, Okay, pay attention.
17:55
Speaker 2: This is the point pushing people south from the north
17:59
Speaker 2: down to the bottom section, and what happens to them
18:02
Speaker 2: at that point they get bombed and what pushed into
18:05
Speaker 2: the Sinai desert, whoever's still alive. This is the Israeli objective.
18:09
Speaker 2: This has been articulated by Israeli ministers over the last
18:13
Speaker 2: couple of months. This is not a secret. So like,
18:16
Speaker 2: we're done guessing about what the situation is. You're watching
18:21
Speaker 2: the operation live, We're showing you how it's done. Just
18:24
Speaker 2: bring that back up on screen so people can see. Okay,
18:27
Speaker 2: that's what's happening, folks, there's no doubt about it. You've
18:30
Speaker 2: seen the pictures. You've seen it. The whole ninety percent
18:34
Speaker 2: of the housing has been obliterated, the hospitals are gone.
18:37
Speaker 2: They're trying to make it unlivable to do the final solution.
18:41
Speaker 2: Israel's final solution. Nettigna. Who's final solution? Donald Trump's final solution?
18:47
Speaker 2: Because Trump is absolutely on board with this. Now, who's
18:51
Speaker 2: the chief envoy for Donald Trump? It's Steve Wikoff, right,
18:56
Speaker 2: So we'll take that graphic away for a moment. But
19:00
Speaker 2: so Steve Wickoff is the chief envoy who does Steve
19:03
Speaker 2: Witcoff work for. Steve Wickcoff does not work for the
19:07
Speaker 2: American people. He does not work for the US government.
19:09
Speaker 2: He doesn't have an official position with the US government
19:12
Speaker 2: who's not confirmed by Congress or Senate. He works for
19:15
Speaker 2: the Israelis. Steve Wikoff works for the Israelis. Look at
19:19
Speaker 2: the results, Look at what's happened since Trump has come
19:22
Speaker 2: in and put this person, Steve Witcoff, a billionaire from
19:26
Speaker 2: New York, very close to the Israeli lobby. He is
19:29
Speaker 2: working for the Israelis to help them achieve their objectives,
19:33
Speaker 2: to help them towards the final solution, which we showed
19:36
Speaker 2: you in the map just previously, and here for any
19:40
Speaker 2: other further questions. If you want to see how really
19:43
Speaker 2: dark this is getting, take a look at this as
19:45
Speaker 2: from the Palestine Chronicle, isis CIA and the GHF Israel's
19:49
Speaker 2: new frontier of control through hunger and what are the
19:53
Speaker 2: Israelis doing? If you thought it couldn't get any worse,
19:55
Speaker 2: the plot again thickens. Israel's now backing Isis linked criminals,
20:00
Speaker 2: rug lords, pilfering aid and food, in some cases dumping
20:03
Speaker 2: food out in the negative desert, and murderers who have
20:07
Speaker 2: They have been working alongside in southern Gaza in the
20:10
Speaker 2: so called buffer zone after their invasion of the area
20:13
Speaker 2: in twenty twenty four. This is documented. That's where we're at.
20:17
Speaker 2: And this is intentional, this policy. It's to disrupt and
20:20
Speaker 2: to create all kinds of chaos and ultimately shortage and
20:24
Speaker 2: make it so Israel in the US have to control
20:27
Speaker 2: all the aid. That's exactly what this is. For anybody
20:30
Speaker 2: who hasn't worked this out yet, you know, I don't
20:32
Speaker 2: know what to tell you.
20:34
Speaker 1: Okay, thank you Patrick. Let's move on then, and let's
20:37
Speaker 1: say if you would like to support the UK Column,
20:40
Speaker 1: the place to go is support dot uk Colm dot
20:42
Speaker 1: or you can make a donation, you join us as
20:45
Speaker 1: a member, and if you do join us as a member,
20:46
Speaker 1: that gives you access to UK called News Extra and
20:50
Speaker 1: so on. Please to pick something up with the shelf
20:52
Speaker 1: if you'd like to. And if you buy some of
20:55
Speaker 1: the clivedcar dot com using this link, we do get
20:58
Speaker 1: a short small commission for that. If you can't do
21:01
Speaker 1: anything of that, then please at least to share the
21:04
Speaker 1: material you see on the UK Column website that helps
21:07
Speaker 1: us get round the censorship regime. Now tonight at seven pm,
21:12
Speaker 1: Germ is speaking to me and to Charles. So this
21:16
Speaker 1: is the live Us in our Banter program, So a
21:20
Speaker 1: bit of a round up of the week and so on,
21:21
Speaker 1: some other topics to discuss there. Join us at seven
21:24
Speaker 1: pm for that and also the supporting Vaccine Injured New
21:28
Speaker 1: Zealanders with Linda Wharton interview that was done that went
21:31
Speaker 1: at one pm yesterday. That is as a non demand
21:34
Speaker 1: version on the UK column website. If you didn't see
21:37
Speaker 1: it live yesterday, please watch it and share it. And
21:42
Speaker 1: staying with vaccine injuries, Mark, let's welcome you to the program.
21:48
Speaker 1: Tell us what has been described by the filmmakers as
21:51
Speaker 1: the hidden story of the human cost of censorship.
21:57
Speaker 4: Good day, gentlemen and UK colum viewers. Yeah, good news here,
22:01
Speaker 4: although there's somber elements to it, of course, but very
22:04
Speaker 4: good news in that there's a new documentary out called
22:07
Speaker 4: Follow the Silence and here is the basic cover of it.
22:12
Speaker 4: You know, the movie poster you might say it already
22:16
Speaker 4: won a Santa Monica International Film Festival Award. The woman
22:21
Speaker 4: there with her mouth covered with the word silenced is
22:25
Speaker 4: mentioned in an article I recently did for UK column,
22:28
Speaker 4: I'll make that note, and so all in all, this
22:32
Speaker 4: is a very positive development. There's a little bit of
22:36
Speaker 4: information that goes with it, of course, from a press release.
22:39
Speaker 4: I'm citing that slightly here. After winning the Best of
22:42
Speaker 4: Festival and Best Director at the twenty five Santa Monica
22:46
Speaker 4: International Film Festival, this powerful film is ready to be
22:50
Speaker 4: ready to debut on the global stage. It reveals the
22:54
Speaker 4: heartbreaking journey that many of many of us have heard of,
22:57
Speaker 4: of course, in this case focusing Americans who trusted the
23:01
Speaker 4: science only to have their lives forever changed when they
23:05
Speaker 4: were chosen to be in the first COVID vaccine trials.
23:09
Speaker 4: So it focuses on those that were guinea pigs in
23:11
Speaker 4: the trials, but they refused to be silenced. And the
23:16
Speaker 4: documentary follows those who were smeared, slandered, and as they say,
23:20
Speaker 4: pushed into the shadows when big pharma and the government
23:24
Speaker 4: wouldn't cover for them or wouldn't help them. They found
23:27
Speaker 4: strength in each other. And I watched about nine tenths
23:31
Speaker 4: of it. It's a very emotional and yet information packed presentation, guys.
23:37
Speaker 4: And here it shows that it's based on thirty six
23:42
Speaker 4: hundred peer reviewed publications on COVID vaccine adverse events. So
23:47
Speaker 4: there's a lot of data behind it, they're saying, so
23:50
Speaker 4: it's not just an emotional outpouring. They've gathered a lot
23:53
Speaker 4: of information for it. Evidently they've done a lot of
23:56
Speaker 4: research and so on and so forth. This is the
24:01
Speaker 4: article I did not long ago that appears on UK Column,
24:04
Speaker 4: and of course it focuses on not just vaccines, but
24:07
Speaker 4: going beyond vacks dangers and looking at other big pharma
24:11
Speaker 4: products that are generating endless lawsuits alleged to have caused
24:16
Speaker 4: cancer and a number of things. And in that article
24:19
Speaker 4: I mentioned Brian Dressen, who co chairs a group called
24:23
Speaker 4: React nineteen is an interest group for people saying they've
24:27
Speaker 4: been injured by the COVID nineteen jabs. She sued Astrozenica
24:32
Speaker 4: over medical expenses and much more, arguing that she's still disabled,
24:37
Speaker 4: unable to work, unable to carry on with her life.
24:41
Speaker 4: And I had mentioned her in the article at UK Column,
24:44
Speaker 4: and it turns out that she's the main protagonist in
24:48
Speaker 4: Follow the Silence in this documentary, so her life is
24:52
Speaker 4: featured a lot in this and I don't know if
24:54
Speaker 4: we'll see her in this clip, but we do have
24:57
Speaker 4: a small clip from Follow the Silence to get you
25:00
Speaker 4: a flavor of it.
25:01
Speaker 5: So let's check that out.
25:03
Speaker 6: I did my part. I got it. I got mine
25:07
Speaker 6: because I wanted to protect myself and my family. I
25:10
Speaker 6: don know undercook clean or even pickup in homed baby
25:13
Speaker 6: for too long before my body begins to shape uncontrollably.
25:17
Speaker 6: I have been called a buyer and a fake, and
25:19
Speaker 6: have even been told by the er doctors this is
25:22
Speaker 6: all in my head.
25:24
Speaker 3: What companies have spent and a half billion dollars on
25:28
Speaker 3: lobbying and campaign.
25:30
Speaker 7: Touch interd is was big bomb. I decide whether you
25:33
Speaker 7: live or die, and that makes them dangerously bomb with
25:37
Speaker 7: the chairman is a sad fact that we regulate industries
25:40
Speaker 7: such as machinery and automobile far better than we do
25:42
Speaker 7: those that affect what we may be placed in our body.
25:45
Speaker 7: Closer received the biggest criminal fine in US history.
25:48
Speaker 4: Mispromoting medicine is a paying kickbacks to compoy doctors.
25:52
Speaker 7: They're getting paid by the pharmaceutical industry, by the very
25:55
Speaker 7: companies that they're supposed to oversee Maria to protect us from.
26:04
Speaker 4: That captures the flavor of the documentary quite well, and
26:07
Speaker 4: it harkens back to some other reports I've made gentlemen
26:10
Speaker 4: about Peiser, for example, being mired in lawsuits going back
26:15
Speaker 4: to two thousand and nine and before and being where
26:21
Speaker 4: verdicts decided and concluded that Pfizer had committed some of
26:27
Speaker 4: the most egregious acts in Department of Justice history.
26:30
Speaker 5: The largest payouts.
26:33
Speaker 4: By Pfizer, They were the largest in Department of Justice
26:36
Speaker 4: history in terms of the court decisions and what Pfiser
26:40
Speaker 4: had to pay in fines and things like that. Now,
26:43
Speaker 4: another piece of the puzzle, or another part of the
26:45
Speaker 4: story here is that Texans for Vaccine Choice went to
26:51
Speaker 4: a recent US Senate May twenty one hearing, a committee hearing,
26:55
Speaker 4: and it was attended by the president of that group,
26:58
Speaker 4: Rebecca Hardy, and the hearing was hosted by one of
27:02
Speaker 4: America's most outspoken critics of the US COVID response, Senator
27:07
Speaker 4: Ron Johnson. The Wisconsin senator was also calling for a renewed.
27:11
Speaker 5: Probe into nine to eleven.
27:13
Speaker 4: And there were other important witnesses there at that hearing,
27:16
Speaker 4: including doctor Peter mccullor, were familiar with that Texas based
27:20
Speaker 4: cardiologist doctor Jordan Vaughn, doctor James Thorpe, and an attorney,
27:25
Speaker 4: Aaron Siri, all of whom delivered data driven testimonies to
27:29
Speaker 4: that Senate committee. And from there, this is the hearing
27:35
Speaker 4: that Rebecca attended. It was called the corruption of Science
27:39
Speaker 4: and Federal Health Agencies, how health officials downplayed and hid
27:44
Speaker 4: mile cardidis and other adverse events associated with the COVID
27:48
Speaker 4: nineteen vaccines. And that was the Homeland Security Government Affairs
27:52
Speaker 4: Committee that Rebecca attended. Another part of the good news
27:59
Speaker 4: of this is to hear was followed by a congressional
28:02
Speaker 4: screening of this documentary Follow the Silence, Follow the Silence,
28:06
Speaker 4: to Excuse Me, which is about an hour and ten
28:08
Speaker 4: minutes long in total, And the film reportedly received a
28:12
Speaker 4: standing ovation from that committee room filled with high level executive,
28:17
Speaker 4: congressional and senatorial staffers. And I did get a quote
28:21
Speaker 4: back from Rebecca Hardy. I contacted her, and I believe
28:26
Speaker 4: we have that quote we can show. I'm not sure,
28:31
Speaker 4: not just here, Mark, Sorry, Oh that's okay. Well, I
28:35
Speaker 4: contacted Rebecca Hardy and she came back and said that
28:41
Speaker 4: things went very well with that and she was pleased
28:44
Speaker 4: to attend that, and things are looking very good. She
28:47
Speaker 4: thinks there's a real change in the direction with the
28:51
Speaker 4: powers of big Pharma that we're seeing much brighter, a much.
28:56
Speaker 5: Brighter future right now. At any rate, that's for now.
29:00
Speaker 4: I'll have more related stuff later about RFK and some
29:04
Speaker 4: of his changes.
29:06
Speaker 1: Thank you for that. Mike M. Patrick, you've been reporting
29:08
Speaker 1: on the Trump crackdown on freedom of speech, right criticism
29:11
Speaker 1: of Israel or protest for Gaza on behalf of Gaza.
29:15
Speaker 1: It looks like things are beginning to wrap up even further.
29:19
Speaker 2: They are, and the first thing we're going to point
29:21
Speaker 2: to is as somewhat encouraging on the free speech front.
29:24
Speaker 2: That is, if you support free speech and the first
29:27
Speaker 2: men and not everybody does in America is certainly not
29:29
Speaker 2: the Trump administration or Mark or Rubio, the Secretary of State.
29:33
Speaker 2: But this is a legal breakthrough here. Federal judge has
29:36
Speaker 2: said that the law used to detain Mahmund Khalil, this
29:39
Speaker 2: is the Columbia graduate student who is being deported by
29:43
Speaker 2: the US government. It's likely unconstitutional. So this is very interesting.
29:48
Speaker 2: So it does look there's two there's two court cases
29:52
Speaker 2: with this particular person, and here it is the so
29:55
Speaker 2: called foreign policy law. This is what they've invoked in
29:59
Speaker 2: the US say that mab Mood Khalil as a student
30:01
Speaker 2: was a danger to US national security or foreign policy
30:05
Speaker 2: because he was criticizing Israel or opposing a genocide. They're
30:09
Speaker 2: saying that the law is unconstitutionally as applied to mister Khalil,
30:13
Speaker 2: who act as solely within the United States. So this
30:15
Speaker 2: argument that somehow it's affecting the US internationally or whatever,
30:19
Speaker 2: it's just not standing up to reality. The judge further
30:23
Speaker 2: said that Marco Rubio has failed to affirmatively determine that
30:27
Speaker 2: Khalil's actions had affected US relations. So this is unprecedented.
30:31
Speaker 2: So I think this is encouraging. This is he's very
30:34
Speaker 2: likely to win on constitutional grounds, exactly as we said
30:38
Speaker 2: when this story broke. But there you are, so I
30:41
Speaker 2: hate to be right about that. But nonetheless, so let's
30:45
Speaker 2: bring up this development here. So Mark Rubio is on
30:48
Speaker 2: a terror You notice he's not doing much internationally, Mike,
30:51
Speaker 2: He's really just chasing students and Chinese students. That's Mark
30:55
Speaker 2: or Rubio's main remit. So the State Department is now
30:58
Speaker 2: halting interviews with students and exchange visas. So that war
31:02
Speaker 2: against Harvard University, which is over speech against Israel, the
31:07
Speaker 2: US is saying this Harvard shouldn't be allowed to have
31:09
Speaker 2: international students, which is obscene if you think about it.
31:14
Speaker 2: So he's basically saying, and they get real specific here,
31:16
Speaker 2: we use all available information in our visa and screening
31:19
Speaker 2: and vetting, says State Department here in a statement, without
31:23
Speaker 2: specifying what could flag an applicant for rejection under the
31:27
Speaker 2: new social media policy. They're checking your social media. The
31:32
Speaker 2: statement noted that visa applicants have been asked to provide
31:36
Speaker 2: social media account information for since twenty nineteen, So if
31:41
Speaker 2: you want to apply as an international student, and this
31:44
Speaker 2: could be extended to tourists, by the way, using probably
31:47
Speaker 2: AI systems provided by Israel, of course. So if you
31:51
Speaker 2: have anything negative about Israel, you can say what you
31:54
Speaker 2: want about the United States. You can say America is
31:57
Speaker 2: the worst country in the world Donald Trump's admon the
32:00
Speaker 2: Great Satan. That's no problem there. But say anything bound
32:03
Speaker 2: about Israel and you will know pass go, You'll be
32:06
Speaker 2: rejected from entries. So it gets even stranger.
32:10
Speaker 1: Look at this.
32:11
Speaker 2: Rubio's order comes under President Trump is trying to coerce
32:14
Speaker 2: Harvard University and other institutions restrict what can be said
32:18
Speaker 2: on campuses, particularly with regards to anti Israel speech. So
32:22
Speaker 2: it's kind of obvious where this policy is coming from.
32:25
Speaker 2: But this is where, Mike, this is where things are
32:27
Speaker 2: really headed.
32:28
Speaker 1: To take a look at this.
32:29
Speaker 2: The US will aggressively revoke visas of Chinese students, says
32:34
Speaker 2: Mark or Rubio. What's the basis for this, Like, how
32:36
Speaker 2: are they going to pick and choose which Chinese students
32:39
Speaker 2: are good or bad? Well, here it is the Trump
32:42
Speaker 2: administration would work to aggressively revoke visas of Chinese students,
32:47
Speaker 2: including those with quote ties to the Chinese Communist Party,
32:52
Speaker 2: who are studying in quote critical fields. So if a
32:56
Speaker 2: Chinese person is studying in stems engineering technology, and if
33:00
Speaker 2: maybe they have somebody in their family who might be
33:03
Speaker 2: tied to the Chinese Communist Party, they're not allowed to
33:06
Speaker 2: come and study in the US now, I mean, were
33:08
Speaker 2: talking about this before the show, Mike, And you know,
33:11
Speaker 2: Chinese students provide twenty percent of all US foreign students internationally,
33:17
Speaker 2: they provide probably a huge chunk of financial aid and
33:20
Speaker 2: help to all universities in America. That's just a reality,
33:24
Speaker 2: and it's really been like that for thirty years. So
33:27
Speaker 2: they want to shut this down. That's the sort of
33:29
Speaker 2: thing you do before you declare war against the country.
33:31
Speaker 2: But you were saying, Mike that it's not easy to
33:33
Speaker 2: get top university places in China.
33:36
Speaker 1: Absolutely, it's extremely competitive, and that's why there's such a
33:40
Speaker 1: diaspora of people coming to foreign countries Britain and the
33:44
Speaker 1: United States in particular for education. I'm sure we're going
33:47
Speaker 1: to talk about this much more an extra.
33:49
Speaker 2: And I'll add in Silicon Valley a lot of the
33:51
Speaker 2: startups are basically founded by young Chinese. San Francisco is
33:55
Speaker 2: the biggest in California, is the biggest Chinese population outside
33:58
Speaker 2: of China in the world, and it has been like
34:01
Speaker 2: that for the whole duration of the existence of that state.
34:05
Speaker 2: So they obviously family connections people coming over. They've done
34:09
Speaker 2: a massive amount of innovation and brain power into our
34:13
Speaker 2: big tech industry and they want to shut it down.
34:17
Speaker 1: So there you are. Okay, Well, look, let's come back
34:20
Speaker 1: onto the topic of COVID jobs. Mark RFK Junior has
34:24
Speaker 1: made an announcement with respect to children.
34:27
Speaker 4: What does he said, Well, it's interesting, as we know,
34:32
Speaker 4: he had a less than stellar confirmation hearing. He made
34:36
Speaker 4: a couple points worthy of remembering, you know, noteworthy things.
34:40
Speaker 4: But it seemed at the time, as Patrick pointed out,
34:43
Speaker 4: that he was largely bowing to the pressure of the
34:46
Speaker 4: deep state he was about to enter, and there looked
34:49
Speaker 4: to be a lot of compromise. The good news is
34:52
Speaker 4: that he is laying down some planks of good policy, evidently,
34:56
Speaker 4: and so one of the things is that he says
35:01
Speaker 4: no COVID vaccines for healthy children and pregnant women. On
35:05
Speaker 4: the twenty seventh of May, Health and Human Services Secretary
35:09
Speaker 4: Robert F. Kennedy Junior, of course, made another sweeping change
35:12
Speaker 4: to the US vaccine landscape. I'm citing different sources, including
35:16
Speaker 4: from the University of Minnesota, and Kennedy said, the Centers
35:19
Speaker 4: for Disease Control and Prevention have removed its recommendation to
35:24
Speaker 4: give the COVID nineteen vaccine for healthy.
35:27
Speaker 5: Children and pregnant women.
35:29
Speaker 4: And an exact quote is I couldn't be more pleased
35:33
Speaker 4: to announce that, as of today, the COVID vaccine for
35:36
Speaker 4: healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from
35:40
Speaker 4: the CDC recommended immunization schedule. That's what RFK Junior said,
35:46
Speaker 4: Flanked by Martin McCarry who's with the FDA and other officials,
35:52
Speaker 4: another one who's the director of the National Institutes of Health.
35:56
Speaker 4: One thing I would note that it's interesting is it
35:58
Speaker 4: says the code for healthy children and healthy pregnant women.
36:03
Speaker 4: And one one would wonder from hearing that if you're
36:06
Speaker 4: not altogether healthy as a child, or you're not all
36:09
Speaker 4: together healthy as a pregnant woman, arguably you might be
36:12
Speaker 4: more vulnerable to vaccine adverse effects. So what's with the
36:16
Speaker 4: language there, Probably we'll find out in the days and
36:19
Speaker 4: weeks ahead, But here's the official announcement from AHHS.
36:25
Speaker 8: Hi everybody, I'm Robert F. Kennedy, Junior, your agh as Secretary,
36:28
Speaker 8: and I'm here today with NIH Director doctor J. Bodicharia
36:33
Speaker 8: and FDA Commissioner Doctor Marty mcerry. I couldn't be more
36:37
Speaker 8: pleased to announce that, as of today, the COVID vaccine
36:41
Speaker 8: for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed
36:46
Speaker 8: from the CDC Recommended immunization schedule. Last year, the Biden
36:51
Speaker 8: administration urged healthy children to get yet another COVID shot,
36:55
Speaker 8: despite the lack of any political data to support the
36:59
Speaker 8: repeat booster strategy in children.
37:02
Speaker 1: That ends today. It's common sense, that's good science.
37:05
Speaker 4: There's no evidence healthy kids need it today, and most
37:08
Speaker 4: countries have stopped recommending it for children.
37:11
Speaker 8: Or now one step close to realizing President Trump's promise
37:15
Speaker 8: to make America healthy again.
37:21
Speaker 4: So on the surface, at least to a degree, that's
37:25
Speaker 4: good news, and probably they'll go further with this. So
37:29
Speaker 4: we're going to wait and see on some of those
37:31
Speaker 4: qualifying words healthy, healthy children, healthy pregnant women. But I
37:36
Speaker 4: also got a response from Rebecca Hardy on this particular item,
37:41
Speaker 4: and when I contacted her and she said the following.
37:44
Speaker 4: She's with of course Texans for Vaccine Choice, she's the president.
37:49
Speaker 4: And this was directly to UK Colin. This wasn't a
37:51
Speaker 4: blanket statement. We welcome the announcement the CDC is reevaluating
37:56
Speaker 4: its recommendation of the COVID nineteen vaccine for healthy chi
38:00
Speaker 4: children and pregnant women, given the growing number of reported
38:03
Speaker 4: injuries and adverse reactions associated with these vaccines. This is,
38:07
Speaker 4: she said, a much needed step toward prioritizing safety, enhancing transparency,
38:13
Speaker 4: and restoring trust in public health. A much needed step,
38:18
Speaker 4: and I think we sense that other steps may be needed.
38:21
Speaker 4: But that's the way it stands as of today, gentlemen, Mike.
38:25
Speaker 1: Just a quick coming.
38:26
Speaker 2: I mean Mark really nailed it there on the healthy
38:29
Speaker 2: qualification because that why was that language inserted in there?
38:33
Speaker 2: And always with RFK there's always some kind of fly
38:36
Speaker 2: in the ointment, you know, it's just common sense. If
38:38
Speaker 2: your child's healthy, of course you're not going to strap
38:41
Speaker 2: them down for an experimental gene job. Okay, common sense obviously.
38:46
Speaker 2: So there's nothing really I think a valuable or novel
38:49
Speaker 2: here other than oh, the government's not going to lean
38:51
Speaker 2: on you, basically, but if you are healthy, if a
38:54
Speaker 2: pregnant woman is healthy, does that mean they need to
38:56
Speaker 2: get the COVID vaccine. The fact that this is not
38:59
Speaker 2: being explain that RFK injected, no pun intended that in
39:03
Speaker 2: there is extremely worrying. And I'm wondering who is bought
39:07
Speaker 2: where's the wizard behind the curtain on this, because it
39:10
Speaker 2: seems like a puppet show with the three stooges there.
39:14
Speaker 1: Yes, but you've got some vaccine use as well here Patrick,
39:18
Speaker 1: with respect to Maderna.
39:19
Speaker 2: Yeah, some potentially good news here, and again we'll bring
39:23
Speaker 2: in RFK us cancels more than seven hundred million in
39:27
Speaker 2: funding for Maderna to develop the bird flu vaccine. So
39:31
Speaker 2: Biden chucked in five hundred and ninety million, and they
39:34
Speaker 2: had another one hundred and seventy six million with Trump here,
39:37
Speaker 2: and so the bird flu vaccine is basically for Maderna
39:41
Speaker 2: has been canceled. Huge shareholder uproar at Maderna. They don't
39:45
Speaker 2: know what to do. They need to find some free cash.
39:47
Speaker 2: And of course the bird population is very upset because
39:50
Speaker 2: they have been demonized for carrying this virus that nobody
39:54
Speaker 2: can basically find under a microscope but only in cell
39:58
Speaker 2: culture and all sorts of complicated processes to claim that
40:01
Speaker 2: something's happening that might be or might not be contagious,
40:05
Speaker 2: that is not deadly for humans, It doesn't even make
40:07
Speaker 2: humans sick. But nonetheless, if there's one or two cases
40:11
Speaker 2: that they claim are around, it's enough to vaccinate the world.
40:14
Speaker 2: And of course, again you know, the birds are being
40:17
Speaker 2: unfairly demonized. All the chickens, the roosters who are laying
40:22
Speaker 2: eggs for us, they're all in jeopardy because of this
40:25
Speaker 2: diabolical plot.
40:26
Speaker 1: It seems, yeah, but okay, we're not at risk for
40:28
Speaker 1: bird flu, but are we at risk for yet? Another
40:31
Speaker 1: COVID variant.
40:33
Speaker 2: Well, big announcement today, folks. And we didn't tell you
40:36
Speaker 2: this at the beginning of the program because we didn't
40:37
Speaker 2: want to surprise. We don't want to spoil, surprise or
40:41
Speaker 2: scare anybody, quite frankly. But lo and behold, Mike, A
40:45
Speaker 2: new COVID variant has been launched. A new COVID variant
40:49
Speaker 2: is here and it's more transmissible. Here are the signs
40:53
Speaker 2: and symptoms. Big press event here and you know what
40:57
Speaker 2: that means, folks, That means Coroni once back onto the
41:01
Speaker 2: main stage. So again, the special thing about the NB
41:06
Speaker 2: dot one dot eight dot one is that they think
41:10
Speaker 2: it's possible it comes from China. It comes from China.
41:15
Speaker 2: So this is particularly dangerous, especially because they claim it
41:18
Speaker 2: comes from China. How did they claim this, How do
41:21
Speaker 2: they find They did what's called biosurveillance through sequencing, so
41:26
Speaker 2: sequencing and PCR tests. They've got this idea that they
41:30
Speaker 2: put the day together and it's a new variance on
41:32
Speaker 2: the loose. This is extremely disturbing announcement and we are
41:38
Speaker 2: just so shocked, and I hope everybody is not scared.
41:42
Speaker 2: It's okay to go out obviously, and socialize with your
41:46
Speaker 2: friends and family and just go ahead with your daily lives,
41:49
Speaker 2: act like nothing is happening, but be careful and you know,
41:54
Speaker 2: stay safe out there.
41:55
Speaker 1: Well ook a extra. I'm going to be talking about
41:57
Speaker 1: mentioning the fact that I was in the United States
41:59
Speaker 1: over the weekend, and well, actually there were quite a
42:01
Speaker 1: number of people wearing masks.
42:02
Speaker 2: Again, Oh no, that's never stopped. Right on the subways
42:06
Speaker 2: in New York and Boston, particularly bad Philadelphia, East coast,
42:11
Speaker 2: basically from Washington, d C. The further you get up
42:14
Speaker 2: the Eastern seaboard, there more masks on public transport. So
42:17
Speaker 2: there's just a lot of people that are still traumatized,
42:20
Speaker 2: and they've learned to love the mask, much like was
42:24
Speaker 2: it Aldus Huxley's brother in that famous interview, they learned
42:27
Speaker 2: to love their servitude.
42:28
Speaker 1: Yes, indeed, right. Well, look at the top of the program,
42:31
Speaker 1: we were talking about the kilweb, we were talking about
42:33
Speaker 1: the potential of AI, drone swarms and so on. The
42:37
Speaker 1: UK government is absolutely doubling, tripling, quad rippling down on
42:41
Speaker 1: AI and so many policy areas at the moment. So
42:43
Speaker 1: let's talk a little bit more about that. And well
42:46
Speaker 1: we're kicking off with Defense yet again because the largest
42:49
Speaker 1: ever UK defense AI trial has been conducted. These are
42:53
Speaker 1: their words, and many of their words here across Land,
42:56
Speaker 1: Sea and Era, building on previous trials known as Winter Mute.
43:01
Speaker 1: Don't know where they get that name from. This trial
43:04
Speaker 1: involved around two hundred scientists from the Defense Science Technology Bordery,
43:08
Speaker 1: a military personnel from the Royal Navy and the Royal
43:10
Speaker 1: Air Force, industry representatives and international partners collaborating at Portland
43:15
Speaker 1: Harbor to develop critic what they describe as critical AI
43:18
Speaker 1: systems for automatic target detection and recognition. So this took
43:23
Speaker 1: place over a five day period using all kinds of
43:26
Speaker 1: technolo knowology and data was recorded from Rowal naval vessels,
43:30
Speaker 1: ground vehicles, manned and nonmanned aircraft and they were operating
43:35
Speaker 1: what is described as mission based scenarios. It also included
43:40
Speaker 1: participation from Australia and from New Zealand. Sorry it's from
43:43
Speaker 1: Australia and from the United States. So this was done
43:46
Speaker 1: within the ORCUS framework. The Ministry of Defense claims that
43:49
Speaker 1: the AI technologies under development you'll be glad to know
43:52
Speaker 1: they're not intended to replace human decision making, but rather
43:56
Speaker 1: the supported Yeah, the systems will quote reduce cognitive burdens
44:02
Speaker 1: burden on military personnel by filtering information and providing clearer
44:06
Speaker 1: battlefield intelligence, ensuring more timely and effective responses in dynamic situations.
44:12
Speaker 1: So but it doesn't end there. It can kill faster, Yes, absolutely,
44:15
Speaker 1: very good. The Foreign Office is also using AI and
44:19
Speaker 1: this time is to detect hostile state activity and the
44:23
Speaker 1: hostile state they're referring to is Russia and the theater
44:26
Speaker 1: of operation since the Arctic. So here's David Lammy in
44:29
Speaker 1: the Arctic a couple couple of days ago. A hostile
44:31
Speaker 1: actor right there. Indeed it is Lammy said, it's more
44:35
Speaker 1: important than ever that we work with our allies in
44:37
Speaker 1: the High North like Norway and Iceland to enhance our
44:40
Speaker 1: ability to patrol and protect these waters. That's why we
44:44
Speaker 1: have today announced new UK funding to work more closely
44:47
Speaker 1: with Iceland and using AI to bolster our ability to
44:50
Speaker 1: monitor and detect hostile state activity in the Arctic. Now,
44:53
Speaker 1: the FCDO didn't go into any more detail about what
44:57
Speaker 1: they're specifically doing with AI as of yet, but in
45:00
Speaker 1: the meantime, the Secretary of State for Education, Bridget Phillipson,
45:05
Speaker 1: gave a speech at the recent Education World Forum twenty
45:08
Speaker 1: twenty five in which she was drawing attention to the
45:10
Speaker 1: Open Innovation Team and their efforts to bring more AI
45:13
Speaker 1: in the schools, and she said working with the Open
45:16
Speaker 1: Innovation Team will be engaging the sector to understand what works.
45:20
Speaker 1: We'll look at how tools including AI can improve things
45:23
Speaker 1: like staff workload, pupil comes and inclusivity. So yes, okay,
45:29
Speaker 1: we won't even comment on that. Evidence must be at
45:31
Speaker 1: the heart of all we do and ed tech at
45:35
Speaker 1: ed tech and right across education. Now. The Open Innovation
45:38
Speaker 1: Team is a cross government unit that sits in the
45:42
Speaker 1: Cabinet Office. It's all about fusion because they're working to
45:46
Speaker 1: bring policy form invested interests outside government right into the
45:49
Speaker 1: heart of government. That they said they've worked already with
45:52
Speaker 1: two and a half thousand experts from nine hundred and
45:55
Speaker 1: thirty organizations to help craft their policy work. And yet
46:02
Speaker 1: another AI related announcement, the government has also announced that
46:05
Speaker 1: the Border Force wants to expand its use of artificial
46:08
Speaker 1: intelligence to help with searching and screening of freight at
46:11
Speaker 1: all the UK sports by automating anomaly detection. They're saying
46:16
Speaker 1: that this automation is going to speed up screening times.
46:20
Speaker 1: It's also going to increase the volume of goods protest
46:23
Speaker 1: sorry processed, and it will free up officers to focus
46:27
Speaker 1: on critical tasks. It's going to reduce false alarms, and
46:31
Speaker 1: it's going to minimize unnecessary secondary inspections. So there we go.
46:36
Speaker 1: They are using the accelerated capability environment that we've talked
46:40
Speaker 1: about before on this program to support all this. And well,
46:45
Speaker 1: what more can we say?
46:46
Speaker 2: If only they could make international trade more quicker and
46:49
Speaker 2: inefficient and less bureaucratically burdensome, Well, great for the economy,
46:53
Speaker 2: wouldn't it.
46:53
Speaker 1: Well, the best way that you can do that is
46:55
Speaker 1: to imposing tariffs which stop the trade altogether. That would
46:58
Speaker 1: because obviously if you reduce the amount of trade going
47:01
Speaker 1: through the ports, and you're reducing the workload on the
47:04
Speaker 1: border force. So you know, we've got to applaud Trump
47:06
Speaker 1: Starff's in this regard.
47:07
Speaker 2: Yeah, and the balls up of Brexit, but we won't
47:09
Speaker 2: go there. It's legiond It absolutely is.
47:14
Speaker 1: Now. Nigel Farage has been speaking recently about the efforts
47:20
Speaker 1: if he would to become Prime Minister, he would be
47:23
Speaker 1: pushing forward with efforts to cut wasteful spending in the
47:26
Speaker 1: British government and so on. He's basically echoing everything that
47:32
Speaker 1: Elon Musk has been saying for the last few months.
47:34
Speaker 1: How's that going, Patrick, Yeah, that'd be great.
47:36
Speaker 2: Let's do what Elon Musk did with the Trump administration
47:39
Speaker 2: not going so well. Actually, let's take a look at
47:43
Speaker 2: this report here. This is an article. This is a
47:46
Speaker 2: devastating article, by the way, written by somebody on the right,
47:50
Speaker 2: just so people know, but Musk is fleeing the Trump
47:53
Speaker 2: administration after DOGE failure, White Genocide hoax, and X melt down,
47:59
Speaker 2: X melted down as a platform the last two weeks
48:01
Speaker 2: totally dysfunctional. People were just losing their dms and timelines.
48:06
Speaker 2: But the big thing here is DOGE. So let's take
48:09
Speaker 2: a look at this. So that was the member that
48:12
Speaker 2: was the battle cry, right, We're cutting waste, fraud and abuse,
48:15
Speaker 2: said Elon Musk, And he made some big, big claims
48:19
Speaker 2: and big promises and pledges at the beginning of this.
48:23
Speaker 2: So let's take a look at where things actually ended up.
48:26
Speaker 2: Musk is out of government and this is the receipts here.
48:30
Speaker 2: Back in March. Just remember, Musk made the wild claim
48:33
Speaker 2: that DOGE was on track to save the US federal
48:36
Speaker 2: government a wopping one trillion dollars by the month of May,
48:40
Speaker 2: without providing any actual evidence to back up the big
48:42
Speaker 2: headline grabbing SoundBite. Well, May, Mike has come and gone,
48:47
Speaker 2: and so has Elon Musk, unfortunately, and we'll go on here.
48:52
Speaker 1: Now take a look.
48:53
Speaker 2: In April, Musk was then forced to admit DOGE may
48:56
Speaker 2: only cut one hundred and fifty billion dollars, spending fifteen
49:01
Speaker 2: percent of his original pledge of a trillion dollars. So
49:05
Speaker 2: already not doing too well there. I'm afraid to say.
49:08
Speaker 2: It actually gets worse, believe it or not. And by
49:11
Speaker 2: the end we'll see how much DOGE actually saved.
49:14
Speaker 1: Here.
49:15
Speaker 2: In February, DOGE claimed it had achieved fifty five billion
49:19
Speaker 2: in annual spending reductions. However, its wall of receipts detailed
49:23
Speaker 2: only sixteen and a half billion in this total. Half
49:26
Speaker 2: of that figure came from a typo claiming that eight
49:29
Speaker 2: billion in savings was terminating an eight million dollar contract,
49:34
Speaker 2: so they rounded up eight million to eight billion. That
49:37
Speaker 2: helped to inflate the total. There's so many examples of this,
49:41
Speaker 2: which are all cataloged in this article, which is a
49:43
Speaker 2: brilliant takedown of DOGE, and New York Times reported here
49:48
Speaker 2: about other such accounting errors, including claims of canceled contracts
49:53
Speaker 2: that had already been canceled during the previous administration and
49:56
Speaker 2: so forth. He claimed that they were saving four billion
49:59
Speaker 2: a day, so that would have been two hundred and
50:01
Speaker 2: sixty billion by now, and there's nothing near that, so
50:05
Speaker 2: verified budget savings, etc.
50:08
Speaker 1: Et cetera.
50:09
Speaker 2: Not much to report there, So total collapse in that
50:13
Speaker 2: one and the mass firing. Now you cut a lot
50:16
Speaker 2: of staff, right, that was in the news. Now the
50:18
Speaker 2: rehiring of those public sector workers could cost up two
50:22
Speaker 2: one hundred and thirty five billion during the end of
50:24
Speaker 2: this before the end of this fiscal year in twenty
50:26
Speaker 2: twenty five. Also the irs, he's done massive cuts there.
50:30
Speaker 2: This is ultimately going to result in less revenue collected
50:35
Speaker 2: by the Internal Revenue Service, and a lot of people
50:37
Speaker 2: are probably happy about that, certain people, but in terms
50:40
Speaker 2: of getting the government is bottom line, it's a disaster.
50:44
Speaker 2: So the whole thing with DOGE, it's going to end
50:47
Speaker 2: up costing and increasing the federal budget. And here we're
50:51
Speaker 2: looking at the actual results. By the way, DOGE is
50:54
Speaker 2: subject to thirty lawsuits out of the two hundred related
50:58
Speaker 2: to the Trump administrations sort of agenda if you will,
51:02
Speaker 2: for you know, cutting waste, fraud and abuse and so forth.
51:05
Speaker 2: So that's all going to get tied up into the
51:07
Speaker 2: courts afterwards. So here's the Ema Kolpa from Elon Musk
51:12
Speaker 2: watched this in this interview just yesterday.
51:16
Speaker 9: So you know, I was like disappointed to see the
51:21
Speaker 9: massive spending bill frankly, which increases the budget deps that
51:26
Speaker 9: not doesn't decrease it, and that reminds the work that
51:28
Speaker 9: the Noche team is doing.
51:30
Speaker 7: I actually thought that when this big beautiful bill came along.
51:32
Speaker 4: I mean, like everything he's done on dose gets wiped
51:35
Speaker 4: out in the first year.
51:37
Speaker 9: I think, I think a bill can be can be
51:39
Speaker 9: can be big or it can be beautiful.
51:42
Speaker 1: But I don't know if it could be both my
51:44
Speaker 1: postal opinion. So he doesn't seem to be in any
51:49
Speaker 1: way a barrist or ashamed by the fact that it's
51:52
Speaker 1: been a massive filure.
51:53
Speaker 2: It is a giant this is this doge was a
51:55
Speaker 2: giant sigh up. As I said from the beginning, I
51:57
Speaker 2: predicted that the budget for this year, the first year
52:00
Speaker 2: the Trump administration, will exceed Biden's last year, and they're
52:03
Speaker 2: on track to do that and really surpass it by
52:06
Speaker 2: leaps and bounds with the new inflatable defense budget over
52:09
Speaker 2: at trillion dollars. So that's the main thing that we
52:12
Speaker 2: need to pay attention to. So go to All the
52:15
Speaker 2: details are here up at this article at twenty first
52:18
Speaker 2: century wire dot com, and the receipts are there all
52:22
Speaker 2: the links. So it's a well researched piece and it's
52:25
Speaker 2: really incredible, absolutely no benefit from DOGE at all. In fact,
52:31
Speaker 2: it's costing the government massive amounts of money.
52:34
Speaker 1: Mark, did you have some thoughts about this?
52:38
Speaker 4: Not much, I thought I read, and this may not
52:40
Speaker 4: be a very pivotal thing, but I thought I read
52:42
Speaker 4: where the DOGE mission was given a timeline and that
52:47
Speaker 4: he reached the time limit at any rate, to say
52:50
Speaker 4: nothing of the spending matters. I don't have time to
52:53
Speaker 4: get into that.
52:54
Speaker 5: Is that true?
52:54
Speaker 4: There was sort of a deadline beyond which DOGE wouldn't exist.
52:59
Speaker 2: Yeah, two years, I think it's it's it's a non
53:02
Speaker 2: governmental commission effectively, it's not a government department, and it's
53:07
Speaker 2: remit is I think two years, So twenty four months
53:11
Speaker 2: I thought it.
53:12
Speaker 5: Was less than that, but about two years.
53:16
Speaker 2: Yeah, two years, and they have to issue a report
53:18
Speaker 2: at the end of that two years as well, much
53:20
Speaker 2: like the Grace Commission did during the Reagan administration.
53:25
Speaker 5: Oh okay, well look Peter Grace, right.
53:27
Speaker 1: Yeah, Mark, let's come back on to RFK Junior. Because
53:29
Speaker 1: it wasn't just the jobs that he was talking about.
53:32
Speaker 1: He was also talking about food ouditives.
53:36
Speaker 4: Yeah, this is important, and this is an ongoing problem
53:39
Speaker 4: GLYFA say coming out of Monsano's products, which isn't hasn't
53:43
Speaker 4: been mentioned yet. But RFK, to his credit, is doing
53:46
Speaker 4: some other good things. This is an extension of what
53:49
Speaker 4: I reported about earlier.
53:50
Speaker 5: Today.
53:51
Speaker 4: RFK Junior pushes to close a food additive loophole, but
53:56
Speaker 4: is a gutted FDA up to the task. This is
53:59
Speaker 4: food Print, a health research organization. I tend to rely
54:02
Speaker 4: on those more than regular media for these sorts of things, especially,
54:06
Speaker 4: and there's an interesting statistic that comes from food print.
54:11
Speaker 4: Ninety eight percent of additives in our food, especially in
54:14
Speaker 4: the United States, we're introduced through what's called the grass pathway.
54:19
Speaker 4: Between twenty and twenty twenty two, Secretary RFK Junior has
54:24
Speaker 4: directed the FDA food print is saying to explore rulemaking
54:28
Speaker 4: with an eye toward eliminating the generally recognized as safe pathway.
54:33
Speaker 4: That's grass that allows food companies to self regulate and
54:37
Speaker 4: affirm the safety of their products, including chemical additives, many
54:40
Speaker 4: of them harmful, without notifiing the notifying the FDA. So
54:45
Speaker 4: under this grass, companies can introduce new food ingredients without
54:50
Speaker 4: a FDA pre market review. It includes things like red
54:54
Speaker 4: dye number three, sodium benzoate, titanium dioxide, canola corn and
54:59
Speaker 4: soybe oils which are all GMO BPAs, and food packaging,
55:04
Speaker 4: which is a liner used in cans to prevent canned
55:07
Speaker 4: foods from spoiling, and BHA and other preservative. But it's
55:11
Speaker 4: interesting that the FDA, out of one side of its mouth,
55:15
Speaker 4: has eyed BHA since nineteen seventy eight, knowing that it
55:19
Speaker 4: causes some harm, but since seventy eight, they're still allowing
55:23
Speaker 4: that additive in our foods. And so that's one of
55:27
Speaker 4: the things that's kind of odd here, guys, is that
55:30
Speaker 4: the FDA has long known that a lot of these
55:32
Speaker 4: things were problems and nothing was ever done about it.
55:36
Speaker 4: Hopefully RFK JR Is serious and he'll pull the trigger
55:39
Speaker 4: and get some of these dangerous additives out of our foods.
55:42
Speaker 4: But again no mention of glyphosate, the active ingredient in
55:46
Speaker 4: roundup which permeates everywhere in our grains.
55:49
Speaker 5: You name it.
55:50
Speaker 4: If we see that, that would mean it's becoming a
55:53
Speaker 4: much more positive step forward. You're showing a graphic here.
55:58
Speaker 4: I don't know if you want to show it here.
55:59
Speaker 4: This is just a comic I picked up on. One
56:02
Speaker 4: superherhero says trust the science, and the indignant other superhero answers,
56:07
Speaker 4: questioning science is how you do science and slaps the
56:10
Speaker 4: other one across the face. Kind of humorous. But that's
56:14
Speaker 4: the latest on that. RFK seems to be making some
56:17
Speaker 4: positive efforts, but it all bears very careful watching at
56:20
Speaker 4: the same time.
56:21
Speaker 1: Thank you for that mark. Thank you. Now back in
56:24
Speaker 1: the UK here then, we have had no rin in
56:27
Speaker 1: the last period of time and that of course is
56:29
Speaker 1: having an impact on the crops that are growing this
56:33
Speaker 1: year and we're looking at absolutely looking at a reduced
56:36
Speaker 1: harvest this year. But in the meantime, in the Environment
56:40
Speaker 1: Agency has declared to dry it for the northwest of
56:43
Speaker 1: England following the driest start to spring in sixty nine years.
56:47
Speaker 1: So they're saying that river flows have been declining along
56:50
Speaker 1: with grindwater levels due to the dry March, April and May,
56:55
Speaker 1: and they're saying the reservoir storage levels in the region
56:57
Speaker 1: are also receding and are currently law than they were
57:00
Speaker 1: at this time during the nineteen eighty four, nineteen ninety
57:02
Speaker 1: five and twenty twenty two drought years. They're saying that
57:06
Speaker 1: the rain that has been in the last couple of
57:09
Speaker 1: weeks is not enough to reverse this strive start of
57:12
Speaker 1: the year, and they're expecting hotter weather in the coming
57:15
Speaker 1: weeks to make the situation even worse. In parallel with
57:19
Speaker 1: that announcement, the Starmer regime has announced that the Environment Secretary,
57:24
Speaker 1: Steve Reid, has seized control of the planning process to
57:28
Speaker 1: build two major reservoirs. For the first time since the
57:31
Speaker 1: nineteen nineties, these two projects, one in East Anglia and
57:35
Speaker 1: the other in Literature, have been awarded the status of
57:39
Speaker 1: nationally Significant and that means that the project is so
57:43
Speaker 1: crucial to the plan that the planning process is escalated
57:46
Speaker 1: from a local level to the Secretary of State and
57:50
Speaker 1: he gets to make that decision. And so it's interesting
57:55
Speaker 1: in their pres lease. They're talking about rapid population growth,
57:58
Speaker 1: crumbling infrastructure that's been left to decline, and a warming
58:01
Speaker 1: climate mean that the UK could run the risk of
58:05
Speaker 1: clean drinking water running out by the middle of the
58:07
Speaker 1: next decade without a major infrastructure overhaul. And I'm going
58:12
Speaker 1: to say that we should note that all of those
58:15
Speaker 1: issues are regime created issues or regime created crises. And
58:21
Speaker 1: you'll understand what I mean by crimate climate change being
58:24
Speaker 1: a regime created crisis because it's imagined. But anyway, that's
58:27
Speaker 1: another discussion. The question is is now the time to
58:30
Speaker 1: be building a massive data centers for AI projects with
58:34
Speaker 1: massive cooling water requirements? And since the government's AI projects
58:38
Speaker 1: are seen as national security issues, who's going to get
58:41
Speaker 1: the priority? Is it going to be the AI or
58:43
Speaker 1: is it going to be the human population? I think
58:45
Speaker 1: I know the answer to that. But look, Mark, let's
58:48
Speaker 1: end with you and the World Health Organized Sorry, the
58:51
Speaker 1: World Health Assembly has now concluded. How did that go
58:55
Speaker 1: in the end?
58:58
Speaker 4: Well, actually it didn't go as well as the Eurocrats
59:02
Speaker 4: and the who Aucrats wanted it to, despite their headlines.
59:06
Speaker 4: This of course, this headline is from the conclusion from
59:09
Speaker 4: the WHO itself. The seventy eighth World Health Assembly concludes
59:14
Speaker 4: Historic Outcomes Consequential Highlights. They're saying, it's a lot of
59:18
Speaker 4: high falutin language, guys, it's a lot of bromides and
59:22
Speaker 4: bragging in a way. They're saying in their press release,
59:26
Speaker 4: I'm just citing some of it so we get own
59:28
Speaker 4: their own words for it. The seventy eighth World Health Assembly,
59:32
Speaker 4: the WHO, the highest decision making body in the UN
59:35
Speaker 4: system in terms of health, convened from nineteen May through
59:39
Speaker 4: the twenty seven. So it just ended under the theme
59:41
Speaker 4: One World for Health. It would have been more accurate
59:45
Speaker 4: had they said one Health for the world, the one
59:47
Speaker 4: health system. We've talked about Member states, they say, considered
59:50
Speaker 4: approximately seventy five items and sub items at this Health Assembly,
59:55
Speaker 4: across health, engaging lively debate, adopting consequences to improve health
1:00:02
Speaker 4: for all. See it's a lot of beaming but largely
1:00:04
Speaker 4: empty language. And here's what our friend Tadros, the WHO
1:00:08
Speaker 4: director Drummer, had to say. The words historic and landmark
1:00:12
Speaker 4: are overused, but they are perfectly apt to describe this
1:00:15
Speaker 4: year's WHA, the adoption of the Pandemic Agreement and the
1:00:18
Speaker 4: approval of the next increase in assessed contributions, along with
1:00:22
Speaker 4: the numerous other resolutions that member states adopted, are a
1:00:26
Speaker 4: sign to the world we can achieve cooperation in the
1:00:29
Speaker 4: face of conflict and unity amid division. But what they're
1:00:33
Speaker 4: not really saying, and that's because it's not true, is
1:00:36
Speaker 4: that they really didn't finalize the agreement. As James Raguski
1:00:42
Speaker 4: is pointing out repeatedly, and he was just interviewed again
1:00:45
Speaker 4: on unredacted News, he's pointed out repeatedly that there is
1:00:49
Speaker 4: an annex within the treaty text that requires that they
1:00:54
Speaker 4: wait about one year to actually sign this thing. So
1:00:58
Speaker 4: it's going to get to whaver seventy nine are very
1:01:01
Speaker 4: close to it before they can actually officially sign it.
1:01:05
Speaker 4: So the good news is all sorts of petitioning and
1:01:08
Speaker 4: other activities can take place. And I'm I'm very inclined
1:01:12
Speaker 4: to submit to UK column very soon an article that
1:01:14
Speaker 4: assesses the whole situation. That's what I'm starting to work
1:01:18
Speaker 4: on a little bit and gives people what actions they
1:01:20
Speaker 4: can take. Some urgency, yes, but we've got about a
1:01:24
Speaker 4: year to work with as I understand it, And there
1:01:27
Speaker 4: is as a reminder also a petition and that is
1:01:31
Speaker 4: posted by James Grigoski to repeal the PREP Act, and
1:01:35
Speaker 4: that will be in the show notes.
1:01:37
Speaker 5: People can text.
1:01:38
Speaker 4: Him at any time, he doesn't mind it three one
1:01:40
Speaker 4: OHO six one nine three Oho five to five, and
1:01:44
Speaker 4: he can direct you on signing the petition to repeal
1:01:46
Speaker 4: the PREP Act, which is a law that protects big
1:01:49
Speaker 4: pharma from liability for their products. And you don't have
1:01:52
Speaker 4: to be an American to do it. He can instruct
1:01:55
Speaker 4: you on how to do it no matter where you live.
1:01:57
Speaker 4: There's also a July nineteen deadline for when the international
1:02:01
Speaker 4: Health regulations will be finalized. That deadline is a little
1:02:04
Speaker 4: more imminent, but.
1:02:06
Speaker 5: That's noteworthy as well. So a lot of good news
1:02:08
Speaker 5: in that.
1:02:09
Speaker 4: There's a lot of big beaming language, but not as
1:02:12
Speaker 4: much substance as the who would like you to believe?
1:02:15
Speaker 5: Thank you some good news there.
1:02:17
Speaker 1: Yeah, thank you very much for that, mark. And as
1:02:19
Speaker 1: you say, the details of fun to sign that petition
1:02:21
Speaker 1: will be in the show notes on the UK column website.
1:02:24
Speaker 1: So so do have a look at that thank you mark.
1:02:28
Speaker 1: We're going to leave it there for today. I'm going
1:02:29
Speaker 1: to say thank you to you and to Patrick for
1:02:32
Speaker 1: your contributions and thank you everybody that's been watching today.
1:02:35
Speaker 1: Join us in a few minutes. If your UK column
1:02:37
Speaker 1: member for UK Called News Extra, just stay on the
1:02:40
Speaker 1: live stream. If you're not a UK COLU member, we
1:02:42
Speaker 1: do need your support. Your financial support is much appreciated
1:02:45
Speaker 1: and if you can't join us a member, then you
1:02:47
Speaker 1: can join us for extra as well. But we will
1:02:50
Speaker 1: leave it there for today. Thanks very much to everybody
1:02:52
Speaker 1: to join and have a great weekend.
1:02:55
Speaker 5: Bye bye
1:03:00
Speaker 2: Everything,