Latest / Daniel and Kelly’s Extraordinary Universe / What will the next generation of space telescopes reveal?
Transcript
- 0:08Speaker 1: Hey, Daniel, would you rather our government spend money on
- 0:11Speaker 1: a new space telescope or fifty new paper weights for
- 0:15Speaker 1: the I R s Oh, well, tough one, but I'm
- 0:18Speaker 1: gonna go with space telescope all right? How about a
- 0:20Speaker 1: new telescope or brand new gold play in a toilet
- 0:24Speaker 1: seats for the White House? Wow? How many toilet seats
- 0:27Speaker 1: do they really need? I think we need another telescope?
- 0:29Speaker 1: Or and now, how about a new telescope or a
- 0:33Speaker 1: tax break for Elon Musk. I'm assuming Elon Musk is
- 0:37Speaker 1: not going to build this a telescope, so I'll say
- 0:40Speaker 1: let's keep the money and build our own. How about
- 0:42Speaker 1: a telescope or a new particle collider? Oh, don't ask
- 0:46Speaker 1: me that. Yeah, that's a tough one, right, For some
- 0:49Speaker 1: reason you find it tougher. Can we have both? Maybe
- 0:52Speaker 1: both the task break for Elon Musk and a particle collider.
- 0:55Speaker 1: As long as Elon builds us a particle collider, it's
- 0:57Speaker 1: a deal, an incentive. H. I am more handmade cartoonists
- 1:16Speaker 1: and the creator of PhD comics. Hi, I'm Daniel. I'm
- 1:19Speaker 1: a particle physicist and a professor at UC Irvine, and
- 1:22Speaker 1: I will always vote to increase science funding. Oh, I
- 1:25Speaker 1: thought you were going to say you would always vote
- 1:27Speaker 1: for increasing billionaires taxes. If that's what it takes, then yes, Seriously,
- 1:33Speaker 1: I don't understand why we don't multiply our science budgets
- 1:35Speaker 1: by a factor or ten. We could learn so much
- 1:37Speaker 1: about the universe. But it's more than that. It's so
- 1:39Speaker 1: much wasted effort. You know, it's funding season right now,
- 1:42Speaker 1: and so many smart people are sending great ideas to
- 1:46Speaker 1: the government, and the government has to say no to
- 1:49Speaker 1: most of them, even if they're good ideas, because they
- 1:51Speaker 1: just don't have enough money. I guess the problem is
- 1:54Speaker 1: that those things are never on the ballot, right, Like
- 1:57Speaker 1: there's never a resolution or a new men meant about
- 2:00Speaker 1: more science. Yeah, it's pretty rare. You get like a
- 2:02Speaker 1: scientist in Congress, and it's not usually like a wedge issue.
- 2:06Speaker 1: It's further down the list than things like, you know,
- 2:09Speaker 1: reproductive rights or the environment or immigration or something like that. Right,
- 2:14Speaker 1: clearly you and I need to run for Congress, Daniel,
- 2:16Speaker 1: or at least you. I would just ask for more
- 2:19Speaker 1: money for cartoonis. I really don't want to be in Congress.
- 2:22Speaker 1: I just want on Congress. To vote to spend more
- 2:25Speaker 1: money on research. Well, there you go. That's the problem.
- 2:27Speaker 1: Everyone wants change, but nobody wants to be the change
- 2:30Speaker 1: they want to see in the world. All right, I'll
- 2:32Speaker 1: run for Congress. You persuaded me. The universe needs it.
- 2:34Speaker 1: This is the beginnancement. Daniel Whiteson announces is run for
- 2:37Speaker 1: Congress which state? Though? You don't just get to pick
- 2:42Speaker 1: your state. Man, You can't be like, I want to
- 2:44Speaker 1: be a congressman from Florida. Have you not seen how
- 2:47Speaker 1: it's done, Daniel. If you're a celebrity, you get to
- 2:49Speaker 1: pick the state and then you run for Congress. Well,
- 2:52Speaker 1: that's the problem. I'm not a celebrity, and I really
- 2:54Speaker 1: like our congressional representative, Katie Porter from Orange County. She's awesome. Yeah, yeah,
- 2:58Speaker 1: she's great. Well, I guess you'd have to move then,
- 3:00Speaker 1: I guess. So you know, the Katie Porter is also
- 3:03Speaker 1: a professor, you see, Irvine? No way? Really, what is
- 3:06Speaker 1: your teach being awesome? Yeah, I've had over for dinner
- 3:08Speaker 1: at my house. Wow, did you pitch to her your
- 3:11Speaker 1: new particle collider idea to proposing Congress. By the way, Katie,
- 3:16Speaker 1: here's a ten billion dollar ideada I have and for
- 3:19Speaker 1: dessert document that outlines my idea. No, it's the other way.
- 3:23Speaker 1: You don't get dessert unless you're going to vote for
- 3:25Speaker 1: my collider. Oh, I got leverage. Now. I knew Katie
- 3:29Speaker 1: before she was famous, when she was just a law
- 3:32Speaker 1: professor at you see Irvine. Wow. Interesting, And then she
- 3:35Speaker 1: decided to run for Congress. Well there you go. I'm
- 3:39Speaker 1: I'm not sure why what's keeping you back? Daniel? Not
- 3:41Speaker 1: being Katie Porter maybe is what's keeping me back. But
- 3:45Speaker 1: you're Daniel Watson. All right, stay tuned. I want to
- 3:48Speaker 1: ask you for a campaign donation. But anyways, welcome to
- 3:50Speaker 1: our podcast Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe and maybe
- 3:53Speaker 1: you run for Congress as well, a production of I
- 3:56Speaker 1: R Radio, in which we vote that everybody should understand
- 4:00Speaker 1: the universe and that we should do everything we can
- 4:03Speaker 1: to explore it. We know that there are deep questions
- 4:06Speaker 1: about the nature of space and time and black holes
- 4:10Speaker 1: in the very beginning of this whole crazy cosmos, and
- 4:14Speaker 1: that those questions have answers, and those answers can be
- 4:17Speaker 1: understood by me and by you and by everybody out
- 4:20Speaker 1: there who is curious about the way the universe works,
- 4:24Speaker 1: how it all comes together in this amazing cosmic quantum
- 4:27Speaker 1: swirl to make our world. Yeah, because while we may
- 4:30Speaker 1: not be able to vote on the laws of the universe,
- 4:33Speaker 1: we can still understand them and marvel at them and
- 4:37Speaker 1: be part of the collective nation of humans who love
- 4:41Speaker 1: and appreciate how the universe works. We do love and
- 4:43Speaker 1: appreciate how the universe works. You're exactly right. And every
- 4:46Speaker 1: time we look out into the universe and we build
- 4:48Speaker 1: a new kind of eyeball to look further or deeper,
- 4:51Speaker 1: or in a new wavelength or in a new kind
- 4:54Speaker 1: of radiation, we always see something new and not just
- 4:57Speaker 1: something like new and boring or new. And it's always like,
- 5:01Speaker 1: oh my gosh, did you see this latest thing that
- 5:03Speaker 1: hub Will discovered, or that new telescope did you see
- 5:06Speaker 1: what it found? It's mind blowing. The universe is filled
- 5:10Speaker 1: with incredible and beautiful things, beautiful when we understand how
- 5:14Speaker 1: it works. Yeah, because it is a really huge universe.
- 5:17Speaker 1: It's about sixty five billion light years across, and so
- 5:20Speaker 1: there's a lot to see, and a lot of it
- 5:22Speaker 1: is really far away. Most of it's really far away,
- 5:25Speaker 1: actually almost all of it. There's nothing nearby sort by definition,
- 5:30Speaker 1: everything that's close to us. It's a tiny fraction of
- 5:33Speaker 1: the universe, which is pretty frustrating. And the stuff that
- 5:36Speaker 1: we can actually explore, you know, that scientists can put
- 5:38Speaker 1: their hands on, is limited to what's here on Earth,
- 5:42Speaker 1: where we can send people and where we can get
- 5:44Speaker 1: like robots to sample stuff and bring it back to us. Fortunately,
- 5:47Speaker 1: we're not limited to only doing science for things we
- 5:50Speaker 1: can touch. We can still understand the universe just by
- 5:52Speaker 1: looking at it. Yeah, and there's a lot to see
- 5:55Speaker 1: out there. There are trillions and trillions of galaxies and
- 5:57Speaker 1: an immeasurable number of stars out there. It potential planets
- 6:01Speaker 1: and maybe life out there for us to explore it,
- 6:03Speaker 1: if only we could get a good look. I like
- 6:05Speaker 1: that new word you just invented, their immeasurable in measurable. Yeah,
- 6:08Speaker 1: means that you can measure it in how big your
- 6:14Speaker 1: pants these days, Daniel, other immeasurable. Ye know. The universe
- 6:19Speaker 1: is delicious and amazing and beautiful, and most of what
- 6:23Speaker 1: it's doing, most of the information that it's screaming at us,
- 6:27Speaker 1: is basically ignored. You know, some crazy thing happened out
- 6:30Speaker 1: there in the universe and photons from its streaked across
- 6:33Speaker 1: the universe for billions of years and then splat, h's
- 6:36Speaker 1: some piece of the sidewalk, and nobody paid attention. Think
- 6:38Speaker 1: about all the stories of cataclysmic events that nobody is
- 6:42Speaker 1: watching just because we don't have enough eyeballs paying attention
- 6:45Speaker 1: to the cosmos, yeah, or good enough eyeballs, because our
- 6:48Speaker 1: eyes can only see so much resolution out there in
- 6:51Speaker 1: the night sky. But fortunately humans have been clever and
- 6:54Speaker 1: we've invented devices that let us see really far away
- 6:58Speaker 1: out there in space. Yeah, huge space based mechanical eyeballs.
- 7:02Speaker 1: That's exactly how we pitched these projects, too comless, that's
- 7:05Speaker 1: the title of the proposal, Huge space based mechanical eyeball.
- 7:10Speaker 1: What's the acronym there, hsb me shove me how you
- 7:16Speaker 1: pronounced it, s hb emy. But they are really marvels.
- 7:19Speaker 1: It's incredible what we've done. And we have ground based
- 7:22Speaker 1: telescopes which are really really huge, and then we have
- 7:25Speaker 1: these space based telescopes which float above the atmosphere and
- 7:29Speaker 1: see things extra crystal clear. Yeah, because that's how humans
- 7:32Speaker 1: started with telescopes down here on Earth, little handheld ones
- 7:36Speaker 1: back in the day of Galileo. But now we've sort
- 7:38Speaker 1: of upgraded not just huge, big giant telescopes here at
- 7:42Speaker 1: the at the top of mountains, but out there in space.
- 7:45Speaker 1: We can now put telescopes in there. They are not
- 7:47Speaker 1: obscured by the atmosphere that blurs our vision of the stars,
- 7:51Speaker 1: and it's a complementary set of programs. Telescopes on the
- 7:54Speaker 1: ground can do things that telescopes in space can't do,
- 7:57Speaker 1: like be almost arbitrarily big. You know, there's the thirty
- 8:01Speaker 1: meter telescope, there's the extremely large telescope, there's the overwhelmingly
- 8:05Speaker 1: large telescope that would be bigger than anything we could
- 8:07Speaker 1: ever launch into space. But then the telescopes in space
- 8:10Speaker 1: obviously have the advantage of not being blurred by the atmosphere.
- 8:13Speaker 1: So it's a wonderful complementary set of science programs. And
- 8:16Speaker 1: on the podcast before we talked about the future of
- 8:18Speaker 1: ground based telescopes, but there's also an exciting future ahead
- 8:22Speaker 1: for space telescopes. Yeah, there are a lot of exciting
- 8:24Speaker 1: new mechanical giant space eyeballs being built and being planned
- 8:29Speaker 1: to launch in the future, and so do they. On
- 8:31Speaker 1: the program, we'll be tackling why will the next generation
- 8:39Speaker 1: of space telescopes show us, like literally shows right, because
- 8:44Speaker 1: that's what telescopes are for. Yeah, they literally will send
- 8:46Speaker 1: us pictures of the universe, the early universe, the distant universe,
- 8:51Speaker 1: all the crazy stuff that's happening out there that we're
- 8:54Speaker 1: basically ignoring right now. Yeah, I guess, Daniel, you know,
- 8:56Speaker 1: space telescopes are nice, but there they are a little
- 8:58Speaker 1: bit more expensive than ground telescopes, right, And that's kind
- 9:01Speaker 1: of the distinction. Like we can make bigger ones down
- 9:03Speaker 1: here because they're a little easier to build big, but
- 9:06Speaker 1: in space, you know, you have to put them in
- 9:08Speaker 1: a rocket and launch them and they have to work.
- 9:10Speaker 1: They do have to work, that's true. So they are
- 9:12Speaker 1: more complicated and they can't be as big, or if
- 9:15Speaker 1: they're gonna be big, they have to be even more
- 9:17Speaker 1: complicated because you have to do things like fold and
- 9:19Speaker 1: then automatically unfold themselves. So it's definitely a different set
- 9:23Speaker 1: of challenges. I don't know if it's more expensive. We
- 9:26Speaker 1: have a whole range of budgets of space telescopes from
- 9:28Speaker 1: the hundreds of millions of dollars to the tens of
- 9:31Speaker 1: billions of dollars and ground telescopes can be almost as expensive.
- 9:35Speaker 1: It's just sort of a question of where you want
- 9:36Speaker 1: to put your money. And something I love is just
- 9:38Speaker 1: saying yes to all of it because they all have
- 9:41Speaker 1: different strengths and can show us different kinds of things
- 9:43Speaker 1: about the universe. Yeah, I think that's what you were
- 9:46Speaker 1: going to say. You were going to say, we have
- 9:48Speaker 1: a whole range of waste to spend money, man, and
- 9:51Speaker 1: they're on they're all our favorite they're all our favorites.
- 9:55Speaker 1: Let's just do more exactly. You know. I think sometimes
- 9:57Speaker 1: people think that we can spend money on signs, or
- 10:00Speaker 1: we can spend money on gold plated toilet seats or
- 10:03Speaker 1: other stuff. But you know, the truth is we can
- 10:05Speaker 1: do both. It's not a limited amount of money. It's
- 10:08Speaker 1: an investment. When you spend money on science, you're investing
- 10:12Speaker 1: in our future and it's going to pay itself back
- 10:14Speaker 1: in terms of technology and understanding and education and economics
- 10:18Speaker 1: like that. Money doesn't go into space. It's not like
- 10:21Speaker 1: if you spend ten billion dollars in a space telescope,
- 10:23Speaker 1: you literally like send ten billion dollars where the bills
- 10:27Speaker 1: into space. You're buying stuff from companies on Earth, employing
- 10:30Speaker 1: people on Earth, so it's money well spent. Yeah, it's
- 10:33Speaker 1: not flushed down the toilet like maybe those toilet seats
- 10:37Speaker 1: you might spend your money on. So we have a
- 10:39Speaker 1: whole bunch of space sl scopes that we have sent
- 10:41Speaker 1: out there into space, or some that are working right
- 10:43Speaker 1: now and giving us amazing images of the universe. But
- 10:46Speaker 1: there's a whole new generation of space telescopes being built
- 10:49Speaker 1: and being planned for the near future to tell us
- 10:52Speaker 1: more about how this beautiful universe works. That's right, And
- 10:55Speaker 1: a lot of folks have heard about the James Web
- 10:57Speaker 1: space Telescope, which just started functioning and it's already giving
- 11:00Speaker 1: us amazing pictures of the universe. So I was wondering
- 11:03Speaker 1: if people were aware of the next few decades plans
- 11:07Speaker 1: for building new eyeballs. So lots of exciting things happening
- 11:11Speaker 1: in the works, and as usually, we were wondering how
- 11:13Speaker 1: many people were aware of these plans for new space
- 11:15Speaker 1: dollars coopes and what they might be able to show us.
- 11:18Speaker 1: So thank you to everybody who volunteered to answer random questions.
- 11:21Speaker 1: If you'd like to participate and you've been holding back,
- 11:24Speaker 1: today is the day that you write to me two
- 11:26Speaker 1: questions at Daniel and Jorge dot com so you can
- 11:29Speaker 1: hear your voice on the podcast. So we ask people
- 11:32Speaker 1: what do you think the next generation of space dollar
- 11:34Speaker 1: scopes will show us. Here's what people had to say.
- 11:37Speaker 1: The next generation of space telescopes, I would hope would
- 11:40Speaker 1: pick up signals hopefully, and maybe we'll get to hear
- 11:44Speaker 1: what's out there better. The next generation of space telescopes
- 11:48Speaker 1: will show us the oldest light in the universe and
- 11:51Speaker 1: unlock the secrets to the beginning of time. I think
- 11:54Speaker 1: with the new generation of space telescopes will be looking
- 11:57Speaker 1: at far away planets and reallex ease and stars in
- 12:02Speaker 1: different ranges of freeb blengths of light, and we'll be
- 12:05Speaker 1: looking forward how old they are or what they have
- 12:09Speaker 1: in them. The next generation of telescopes, I don't know
- 12:12Speaker 1: exactly where they're at right now, but it would be
- 12:14Speaker 1: really cool if the next generations could act like X rays,
- 12:17Speaker 1: like extra machines and kind of detect what the interior
- 12:20Speaker 1: plants look like and what interior I mean. We can't
- 12:23Speaker 1: escape the Solar System, there's no way that it could
- 12:26Speaker 1: zoom up that big, but never no bigger observable universe.
- 12:30Speaker 1: That's my only guess. I really have no idea, but
- 12:34Speaker 1: I have the expectations that they can be more stable,
- 12:41Speaker 1: and they can they can have bigger lenses so we
- 12:45Speaker 1: can point them on the same direction for a longer time,
- 12:50Speaker 1: so they can pick up the faultons individual faultons spread
- 12:57Speaker 1: across time from very distances. I hope the next generation
- 13:02Speaker 1: of space telescope will be able to measure the atmospheric
- 13:06Speaker 1: content of distant planets and tell us whether or not
- 13:10Speaker 1: there might be alien life. Stuff like that will past it,
- 13:13Speaker 1: possibly gravitational waves that are a lot, a lot more
- 13:18Speaker 1: sensitive than the present telescopes for gravitational waves. Perhaps that
- 13:23Speaker 1: I guess they'll be able to show us more from
- 13:29Speaker 1: the past because they'll be able to accumulate more light
- 13:35Speaker 1: that's coming from further away more accurately. All Right, lots
- 13:39Speaker 1: of interesting ideas here. These are great answers. Mostly people
- 13:43Speaker 1: just said more universe. More. Yes, that's basically You've got
- 13:49Speaker 1: to Congress, you say more, give us another ten billion.
- 13:51Speaker 1: We want to do more more universe, please, Well, the
- 13:55Speaker 1: universe is so awesome. Who doesn't want to see the sequel? Right?
- 13:58Speaker 1: It's like you go to see the Universe. No, I
- 14:00Speaker 1: don't want to see the sequel. That means this universe
- 14:02Speaker 1: is over. No, it's never over as long as the
- 14:06Speaker 1: cinematic universe of the universe can continue. Right, the two
- 14:10Speaker 1: Universe three? The You you do? You see You? I
- 14:15Speaker 1: think you may maybe like the second episode, right, okaya continuation? Yes,
- 14:19Speaker 1: all right, let's maybe pitch it for TV instead of features. Exactly,
- 14:23Speaker 1: we wanted infinite number of seasons. That's it's all a
- 14:25Speaker 1: blur now, you know, streaming TV. What's the difference. We
- 14:29Speaker 1: want to stream the excitement of the universe to you,
- 14:31Speaker 1: and we want to do it forever. Actually, maybe Netflix
- 14:34Speaker 1: should be funding science. Oh they have a lot of money.
- 14:37Speaker 1: They should have just one of their shows just be
- 14:39Speaker 1: like Images of the Universe. Yeah, exactly, And we want
- 14:41Speaker 1: to make a new science show. We have kind of
- 14:43Speaker 1: an expensive camera plan. It costs ten billion dollars and
- 14:46Speaker 1: it's in space. Is that okay? Is that within your budget?
- 14:49Speaker 1: They're like only ten billion dollars. Sure we make that
- 14:51Speaker 1: in one month. Just get Kat to Porter to walk
- 14:54Speaker 1: over there and chew them out. I'll set that meeting up,
- 14:56Speaker 1: no problem, that's right, And then withhold dessert until until
- 15:00Speaker 1: she gets the money. I think she can probably hold
- 15:03Speaker 1: out longer than I can. I'm like, all right, fine,
- 15:05Speaker 1: let's have desserve. Don't even do anything for chocolate. But
- 15:09Speaker 1: it is interesting. I think the idea is that the
- 15:11Speaker 1: universe is literally streaming information and content to us all
- 15:15Speaker 1: the time, from all directions, from the far corners of
- 15:19Speaker 1: the universe, right with interesting things that could tell us
- 15:21Speaker 1: a lot about how things work exactly. We know that
- 15:24Speaker 1: there are stories out there, and the universe is telling
- 15:27Speaker 1: us those stories. We're just not tuning in. And all
- 15:30Speaker 1: we need to do is build the right device and
- 15:32Speaker 1: we can listen to those stories and we can unlock secrets.
- 15:35Speaker 1: And what the listeners are talking about is exactly kinds
- 15:37Speaker 1: of things that we can learn new planets or their atmospheres.
- 15:41Speaker 1: We know that there are discoveries waiting out for us
- 15:44Speaker 1: in the distant reaches of the universe, things that have
- 15:46Speaker 1: happened that we had no idea about. We're just waiting
- 15:49Speaker 1: to learn about them. And we have built a pretty
- 15:51Speaker 1: amazing telescope, Daniel, So maybe to start with, maybe run
- 15:54Speaker 1: us through what are some of the existing or previous
- 15:57Speaker 1: space else codes. We feel, like you said, most people
- 16:00Speaker 1: heard of the James Web telescope and maybe the Hubble,
- 16:02Speaker 1: but there have been others. Yeah, there was a golden
- 16:04Speaker 1: age of space telescopes between nine and two thousand three
- 16:08Speaker 1: when they launched four of them, and they call them
- 16:10Speaker 1: the Great Observatories because there's sort of like a complementary set.
- 16:13Speaker 1: Each one can do something different. They're like power Rangers
- 16:16Speaker 1: they come together, or the X Men or something. And
- 16:18Speaker 1: of course, you know, the star of the show is Hubble.
- 16:20Speaker 1: Launched in ten billion dollars. Everybody's heard about it, and
- 16:25Speaker 1: it's beautiful pictures and it made a lot of important
- 16:27Speaker 1: scientific discoveries along the way. You know, it was used
- 16:30Speaker 1: to discover type one a supernova, which we used to
- 16:33Speaker 1: measure the expansion of the universe. It was used here
- 16:36Speaker 1: in our Solar system to take pictures when Shoemaker Levees
- 16:39Speaker 1: smashed into Jupiter. So it's really been an amazing workhorse
- 16:42Speaker 1: for science. But as you say, it's not the only
- 16:45Speaker 1: star of the show. There are three other space telescopes
- 16:48Speaker 1: in the Great Observatories. Yeah, but I guess what the
- 16:51Speaker 1: question is, what was Hubble's superpower? You know, was it
- 16:53Speaker 1: like the Iron Man of the Great observatories. What was
- 16:56Speaker 1: different about it. Hubble had a big mirror, it was
- 16:59Speaker 1: two point four meters across, and it had a broad
- 17:02Speaker 1: range of abilities, so it could see in the optical
- 17:05Speaker 1: and it could also see a little bit into the
- 17:07Speaker 1: ultra violet and a little bit into the infrared, so
- 17:09Speaker 1: it could do a broad range of astronomy. And also
- 17:12Speaker 1: it took pictures that were easily translated into things we
- 17:16Speaker 1: could see with our eyes because it was mostly in
- 17:18Speaker 1: the optical. The other telescopes and the Great observatories were
- 17:21Speaker 1: sort of in different energy ranges that weren't always traditionally visual, right,
- 17:26Speaker 1: because I guess the light that's coming to us from
- 17:28Speaker 1: the universe is in all kinds of wavelength, right, and
- 17:31Speaker 1: all kinds of frequencies, and so these telescoptes have kind
- 17:34Speaker 1: of a range, right, Like they can't see every range
- 17:37Speaker 1: of frequency out there, just like your eyeballs can only
- 17:40Speaker 1: see in the visual. You need different kinds of optics
- 17:42Speaker 1: to see the infrared, which to see the ultra violet,
- 17:44Speaker 1: or to see X rays. So one of my favorite
- 17:46Speaker 1: telescopes is actually the Chandra X ray telescope launch and
- 17:52Speaker 1: it can see as we say, X rays, which are
- 17:54Speaker 1: also photons right there, just wiggles in the electromagnetic field,
- 17:57Speaker 1: but they wiggle much faster because they have higher energy,
- 18:00Speaker 1: and Hubble can't see them. They just passed right through
- 18:02Speaker 1: Hubble the way they pass through your hand. But they
- 18:05Speaker 1: contain a lot of really interesting information about very hot
- 18:09Speaker 1: things in the universe, like discs around black holes. It
- 18:13Speaker 1: had X ray vision, and how did it do that?
- 18:15Speaker 1: If it don't X rays pass through everything. X rays
- 18:18Speaker 1: do pass through almost everything, and so X ray optics
- 18:21Speaker 1: are very, very tricky. You basically can't build a lens
- 18:24Speaker 1: for X rays in the same way you can for
- 18:27Speaker 1: optical light, and you can only like very gently guide them.
- 18:30Speaker 1: So an X ray telescope instead of having lenses as
- 18:33Speaker 1: like many many concentric shells of metal cylinders which gently
- 18:38Speaker 1: guide the X rays, it's much more challenging than like
- 18:41Speaker 1: traditional visual light optics. If you saw an X ray telescope,
- 18:45Speaker 1: you wouldn't even necessarily understand that it was a telescope. Cool,
- 18:49Speaker 1: So I'll say Chandra is the thor of the great observatories,
- 18:52Speaker 1: because I don't know, it comes from a different place,
- 18:55Speaker 1: different plane of existence, maybe, Yeah. And then even further
- 18:58Speaker 1: up the energy range are gamma ray gammeara is of
- 19:00Speaker 1: a different name, but there again just photons. They're just
- 19:03Speaker 1: like super duper high energy photons. And there's a telescope
- 19:07Speaker 1: called the Compton Space Telescope which cost a billion dollars
- 19:10Speaker 1: and launched in and it's studied gamma ray bursts. So
- 19:15Speaker 1: there's some things in the universe to produce very fast,
- 19:18Speaker 1: short lived, very intense bursts of gamma rays, and we
- 19:22Speaker 1: don't really understand it very well. They're called fast gamma
- 19:24Speaker 1: ray bursts. We've done an episode about them, and Compton
- 19:28Speaker 1: was designed to study them. Well. Obviously this one is
- 19:31Speaker 1: the hulk because it's the text gamma rays on the
- 19:34Speaker 1: Great Observatories. But maybe paints a picture what what does
- 19:37Speaker 1: this one look like? Doesn't look like a dish or
- 19:39Speaker 1: LA tube or or a box. So the Compton Telescope
- 19:42Speaker 1: is not really like a telescope. It's more like a
- 19:44Speaker 1: particle physics experiment. Because when particles have this kind of energy,
- 19:49Speaker 1: you can't really do anything to like deflect them or
- 19:51Speaker 1: focus them. All you can do is detect them. And
- 19:54Speaker 1: so this energy what we do is we just try
- 19:56Speaker 1: to capture the photon. We put some material in there
- 19:59Speaker 1: that the photon will mash into and that create a
- 20:01Speaker 1: shower of electrons and positrons, and then we use that
- 20:05Speaker 1: to measure its energy and a little bit its direction,
- 20:08Speaker 1: and so it's more like a particle detector in space
- 20:11Speaker 1: than really a telescope the way you might imagine. That's
- 20:14Speaker 1: amazing because that means it literally comptroom smash, right, just
- 20:19Speaker 1: like the Hulk, just exactly so you throw in the Hulk.
- 20:24Speaker 1: So these are sort of like brute objects the way
- 20:26Speaker 1: you're describing as no subtlety involved. Yeah, yeah, is it
- 20:30Speaker 1: also painted green? Only when it gets mad if you
- 20:35Speaker 1: don't fund it, it gets bigger too. All right, Well,
- 20:37Speaker 1: then what's the last of the four great observatories. The
- 20:40Speaker 1: last one is the Spitzer Space Telescope, which was recently decommissioned.
- 20:43Speaker 1: It went from two thousand three to twenty and we
- 20:46Speaker 1: did a whole episode about the science of Spitzer, which
- 20:49Speaker 1: is really incredible. This saw infrared lights a sort of
- 20:52Speaker 1: the way James Webb does, and that's good for seeing
- 20:55Speaker 1: cold things like planets or the early universe, or things
- 20:58Speaker 1: that are really really far and have been deeply deeply
- 21:01Speaker 1: red shifted cool. And it tests here it was liquid
- 21:04Speaker 1: helium cool too. Yeah, these telescopes have to be very
- 21:07Speaker 1: very cold because things that are warm give off infrared light.
- 21:11Speaker 1: Like me and you and the Earth. We're all glowing
- 21:14Speaker 1: in the infrared. So if you want to see infrared
- 21:16Speaker 1: lighte from distant parts of the universe very faint, you
- 21:19Speaker 1: have to shield yourself somehow from infrared life from everything else. Basically,
- 21:23Speaker 1: the whole universe is glowing brightly with infrared light. The
- 21:25Speaker 1: way to do that is to cool everything down. That's
- 21:28Speaker 1: like why the James Webb has that big sun shield,
- 21:31Speaker 1: for example. And so in this case what they did
- 21:33Speaker 1: is they use liquid helium to cool the things, to
- 21:35Speaker 1: keep it as cold as possible to avoid it generating
- 21:38Speaker 1: the kind of photons it was looking for, right, right,
- 21:41Speaker 1: So it was frozen in time. Clearly, this one's the
- 21:43Speaker 1: Captain America of the Great observatories because it also has
- 21:47Speaker 1: an exotic metal giant shield, right, doesn't it. Yeah, the
- 21:51Speaker 1: mirror is made out of beryllium, which is pretty cool.
- 21:54Speaker 1: Surprise it wasn't called Steve Rogers. But what did this
- 21:58Speaker 1: one tell us about the universe? What we see in
- 22:00Speaker 1: these wavelengths. So in the infrared you can see things
- 22:03Speaker 1: like the oldest galaxies because remember, things that are far
- 22:06Speaker 1: away are moving away from us really quickly, which means
- 22:10Speaker 1: that light from them is red shifted. So even if
- 22:13Speaker 1: a photon was visual when it left that galaxy thirteen
- 22:16Speaker 1: billion years ago, by the time it gets to us,
- 22:18Speaker 1: the expansion of the universe and its relative velocity has
- 22:22Speaker 1: changed the wavelength to be very, very long. So if
- 22:25Speaker 1: you want to see things that are super duper old,
- 22:27Speaker 1: then you have to use infrared light. That's what this
- 22:30Speaker 1: one is really good at. And also if you want
- 22:32Speaker 1: to see things that are close by but aren't bright
- 22:34Speaker 1: enough to glow in the visual, like planets around other stars,
- 22:38Speaker 1: then you have to use infrared light to see those
- 22:40Speaker 1: things directly. Well, it's it's pretty amazing that you need
- 22:43Speaker 1: all these different devices to capture the full range of
- 22:47Speaker 1: the light spectrum, right because there's so much happening all
- 22:49Speaker 1: across the spectrum, you know, from high energy rays to
- 22:53Speaker 1: low low frequency. It's very different what's happening in the
- 22:58Speaker 1: universe at these different wavelengths. If you look at the
- 23:00Speaker 1: night sky in the X ray, you get a very
- 23:02Speaker 1: different picture that if you look at the night sky
- 23:04Speaker 1: in the infrared and that's very helpful. Like using color vision.
- 23:08Speaker 1: If you looked at an apple tree and you look
- 23:10Speaker 1: at it in black and white, to be a lot
- 23:11Speaker 1: harder to see the apples. But if you can distinguish
- 23:14Speaker 1: between the wavelengths of LIGHTE, then you can go right
- 23:16Speaker 1: for the tasty fruit. And it's sort of the same
- 23:18Speaker 1: story here. If we can look at the universe and
- 23:20Speaker 1: lots of different frequencies, we have a much better chance
- 23:22Speaker 1: at discovering interesting stuff. And we need different technologies to
- 23:26Speaker 1: see all these different wavelengths, right, because some of this
- 23:28Speaker 1: information that's coming at you is sort of invisible to
- 23:31Speaker 1: different wavelength right, Like if you don't even have the
- 23:32Speaker 1: right telescope, you would totally miss it. Yeah, some of
- 23:35Speaker 1: the stuff, for example, can't pass through gas and dust,
- 23:38Speaker 1: and other frequencies can and so some things you can
- 23:42Speaker 1: only see in certain wavelengths. Radio telescopes, for example, are
- 23:45Speaker 1: really good at seeing through the gas and dust at
- 23:48Speaker 1: the center of the galaxy. So it's really helpful. So
- 23:50Speaker 1: you really need all these kinds of eyeballs. Well, these
- 23:54Speaker 1: telescope avengers assembled in the nineties and they've been given
- 23:58Speaker 1: us great data all this time. But now I guess
- 24:01Speaker 1: their phase, their cinematic phase should have ended or is ending.
- 24:05Speaker 1: And so there's a new generation of telescopes being planned.
- 24:08Speaker 1: Some pemen have already launched, and so let's get into
- 24:10Speaker 1: this new generation of telescopes. But first let's take a
- 24:13Speaker 1: quick break. All right, we're talking about the new generation
- 24:28Speaker 1: of space telescope standard. We talked about the four great
- 24:31Speaker 1: observatories that launched in the nineties and early two thousands,
- 24:34Speaker 1: and they revealed a lot about the universe, right, they
- 24:37Speaker 1: sure did. It was really a golden age of science.
- 24:40Speaker 1: We learned so much about the universe, and everybody wants
- 24:43Speaker 1: to do it again. They thought, hey, that was a
- 24:45Speaker 1: big success, Let's do it again. Yeah, it's like Avenger's
- 24:48Speaker 1: end Game made a lot of money. Let's introduce a
- 24:50Speaker 1: whole new set of superheroes, some of them streaming exactly.
- 24:54Speaker 1: And while people are very excited about the James Web Telescope,
- 24:58Speaker 1: they were a little bit frustrated about the time scale,
- 25:00Speaker 1: Like it took until twenty one for James Webb to
- 25:04Speaker 1: finally launch. It would be in the planning stages for
- 25:06Speaker 1: years and then delayed for years and years and years,
- 25:09Speaker 1: and the community was a little bit frustrated. You know,
- 25:11Speaker 1: they launched four space telescopes within thirteen years back in
- 25:15Speaker 1: the nineties, why can't they do that again? And so
- 25:18Speaker 1: the feeling is like, let's go for that sort of cadence,
- 25:20Speaker 1: like instead of one every twenty five years, let's try
- 25:23Speaker 1: to launch four all at once. Interesting. So this was
- 25:26Speaker 1: actually like like on purpose, like these duties were all
- 25:29Speaker 1: planned as a slate of new telescopes. It wasn't sort
- 25:32Speaker 1: of like random. No, it's not random. The astronomy community
- 25:35Speaker 1: comes together about every ten years to make plans for
- 25:38Speaker 1: the future, because when you have these big projects, it
- 25:41Speaker 1: can't just be like individual professors writing grants. Nobody writes
- 25:44Speaker 1: an individual grant to the NSF for ten billion dollars.
- 25:47Speaker 1: Since you have to come together as a community and say,
- 25:49Speaker 1: what's the most important science, how do we think we
- 25:51Speaker 1: should do it? It didn't do that work to make
- 25:53Speaker 1: consensus in advance. These are called decadal surveys because they
- 25:56Speaker 1: come out every ten years, and the most recent one
- 25:59Speaker 1: just came out but was a little delayed. But recently
- 26:02Speaker 1: they came out and they proposed a new Great Observatories
- 26:06Speaker 1: program launching four more telescopes over the next couple of
- 26:10Speaker 1: decades and sort of the same pattern as the previous
- 26:13Speaker 1: set of Great Observatories. And I see, and James Webb
- 26:17Speaker 1: was the first one of this late or is or
- 26:19Speaker 1: was sort of grandfather? Did know? James Webb is not
- 26:22Speaker 1: part of the new Great Observatories. It's already in the sky.
- 26:24Speaker 1: And now they want four more in addition to James Webb. Oh,
- 26:28Speaker 1: I see, because James Webb was just sort of a
- 26:30Speaker 1: standalone telescope. Yeah, it was also recommended by a Decado survey.
- 26:35Speaker 1: But now they're feeling like maybe just pitching one telescope
- 26:38Speaker 1: and waiting for it to launch wasn't the right strategy.
- 26:41Speaker 1: They're thinking, let's go bigger. Let's propose four all at
- 26:44Speaker 1: the same time. Yeah, why not more superheroes better? You
- 26:49Speaker 1: really think that's true, Like you think it more superheroes
- 26:52Speaker 1: in a movie make it better. Like if you had
- 26:54Speaker 1: a thousand characters all with their all backstories and strengths
- 26:57Speaker 1: and weaknesses, that would be fun to watch. Yeah, I
- 27:00Speaker 1: am totally enjoying this news latest superheroes that Marvel is
- 27:03Speaker 1: putting out. All right, you can never be too much dessert,
- 27:07Speaker 1: that's right. Well, so what did James Webb. Tell us, like,
- 27:10Speaker 1: what did it have a specialty or is it just
- 27:12Speaker 1: like an all purpose telescope. So James Webb is an
- 27:14Speaker 1: infrared telescope and it has this famous sun shield in
- 27:19Speaker 1: order to keep it cool, and it's sitting out at
- 27:21Speaker 1: the L two lagrange point and it's awesome new step
- 27:25Speaker 1: in lots of ways. It's new technology. It's got a
- 27:27Speaker 1: really big mirror that's segmented. Its folded up to fit
- 27:30Speaker 1: into the rocket and then unfolded when it went out
- 27:33Speaker 1: into space, and so it sees a particular slice of
- 27:36Speaker 1: the spectrum right the infrared spect It's like a successor
- 27:38Speaker 1: to Spitzer. But you know, James Webb won't last forever,
- 27:41Speaker 1: and these things take decades to plan, and so if
- 27:44Speaker 1: you're going to think about the future and you have
- 27:45Speaker 1: to think about what's going to happen post James Webb. Interesting, Yeah, well,
- 27:50Speaker 1: tell us what are the four new telescopes being planned.
- 27:53Speaker 1: So the four new telescopes, one of them is sort
- 27:55Speaker 1: of the successor to Hubble. It's like a general purpose telescope,
- 27:58Speaker 1: and then there's one that specifically for looking for exoplanets,
- 28:02Speaker 1: one in the X ray and another one in the
- 28:04Speaker 1: far infrared and they all look super awesome and have
- 28:08Speaker 1: cool names. Maybe let's start with a one that's a
- 28:10Speaker 1: successor to Hubble. This one is called louve woir l
- 28:15Speaker 1: u v o i R, which of course is an
- 28:18Speaker 1: acronym for large ultra violet optical Infrared surveyor. I'm not
- 28:25Speaker 1: exactly sure how you get louvoir from that or why
- 28:28Speaker 1: it's pronounced in French. Is it from a French consortium
- 28:31Speaker 1: or something. Now these are all NASSA or and s
- 28:34Speaker 1: F American lead programs. Interesting, So what does louvoir means
- 28:38Speaker 1: something in French or where they're just trying to give
- 28:44Speaker 1: it a French flair. I don't think they're hoping to
- 28:46Speaker 1: celebrate with chocolate croissants when this thing goes up. No,
- 28:49Speaker 1: I don't know if there's a French angle on this,
- 28:51Speaker 1: but really it's it's when people pronounce it in the community,
- 28:54Speaker 1: to say louvois. It's a good question, you know. I
- 28:56Speaker 1: actually spoke with one of the scientists involved and she
- 28:58Speaker 1: pronounces it louvoi. I don't think she pronounced it with
- 29:01Speaker 1: the luvoi exact popular pew accent. But yeah, it's got
- 29:06Speaker 1: a little bit of a French connotation. They're interesting. Well,
- 29:09Speaker 1: guessing since the name ultra violet is in it that
- 29:12Speaker 1: it looks at things in the ultra violet, it's actually
- 29:14Speaker 1: gonna look in the ultra violet and the optical and
- 29:17Speaker 1: the infrared. It's kind of a general purpose telescope the
- 29:20Speaker 1: same way that Hubble was. So it's sort of a
- 29:22Speaker 1: broad range, but sitting right there in the optical so
- 29:25Speaker 1: it'll be able to see things that you can see
- 29:27Speaker 1: with your eyes, but of course much much closer. And
- 29:29Speaker 1: the big step up is that the mirror is going
- 29:31Speaker 1: to be much bigger than Hubbles. Hubbles was two point
- 29:34Speaker 1: four meters. This thing is going to be six meters wide,
- 29:37Speaker 1: which means it's going to have to be segmented into
- 29:39Speaker 1: pieces and unfold the way James Webbs did. Wow. Interesting,
- 29:43Speaker 1: And I guess the bigger mirror gives you and not
- 29:46Speaker 1: bigger images. It lets you kind of focus more or
- 29:48Speaker 1: collect more light. It's all about collecting more light. If
- 29:51Speaker 1: you want to see something that's really distant. Those things
- 29:54Speaker 1: don't send many photons. Imagine if you took our son
- 29:57Speaker 1: and you put it billions of light years away, it
- 29:59Speaker 1: would still admit this same number of photons, but you
- 30:01Speaker 1: would see fewer of them because they'd be spreading out
- 30:04Speaker 1: through the universe more closely you are to something, the
- 30:06Speaker 1: more of its photons you see, the further away you are,
- 30:09Speaker 1: the fewer of its photons you see. But if you
- 30:11Speaker 1: have a bigger lens, you can capture more of those photons.
- 30:14Speaker 1: So things that are super duper far away you can
- 30:16Speaker 1: see more easily if you have a bigger aperture to
- 30:20Speaker 1: collect more light. Right, I guess it's like those zoom
- 30:23Speaker 1: lenses right that they're they're huge, right, I mean they
- 30:25Speaker 1: have like a big lens at the at the end. Yeah, exactly,
- 30:28Speaker 1: A bigger aperture in your camera is going to be
- 30:30Speaker 1: more light in keys of like photography here on Earth,
- 30:33Speaker 1: I think you want to balance sometimes like more light
- 30:35Speaker 1: with less light to get focused if things are in motion,
- 30:38Speaker 1: But in space you basically just want the biggest aperture.
- 30:40Speaker 1: You can get an interesting thing about this if you
- 30:43Speaker 1: google it is that it doesn't look like hubble. Hubble
- 30:46Speaker 1: looks like you know, a telescope. It's a big tube.
- 30:48Speaker 1: And that's because there's only two point four meters why
- 30:50Speaker 1: they could sort of fit inside the rocket. This thing
- 30:53Speaker 1: looks more like James Webb. It's got like a big
- 30:56Speaker 1: hexagonal segmented mirror and it's sitting on top of like
- 30:59Speaker 1: a big sheet field. So when you first look at it,
- 31:01Speaker 1: you think it might be an infrared telescope, but it's not.
- 31:03Speaker 1: It's a lot more like Hubble. And you actually got
- 31:06Speaker 1: to talk to one of the scientists that works on it, right,
- 31:08Speaker 1: that's right, there's a bunch of folks involved. And I
- 31:11Speaker 1: talked to Dr Aki Robert she's a scientist at NASA,
- 31:14Speaker 1: and she's really excited about the science that Louve War
- 31:17Speaker 1: is going to do. Great to hear is Dr Roberts
- 31:20Speaker 1: on why we need this telescope? Well, for me, the
- 31:23Speaker 1: best case scenario is that we've find that little dot.
- 31:27Speaker 1: It's blue, we confirm that it's actually orbiting at the
- 31:31Speaker 1: right distance from the start, and then it has about
- 31:33Speaker 1: the right mass and size, and then we take a
- 31:37Speaker 1: spectrum of it. We take the light reflecting out that
- 31:39Speaker 1: we break it up my wavelength and we look for
- 31:41Speaker 1: the molecules in the atmosphere here and we see water, vapor,
- 31:45Speaker 1: we see oxygen, and then we measure the abundances of
- 31:49Speaker 1: the molecules in the atmosphere, because that's what you really
- 31:52Speaker 1: need to do. If you don't actually if you just
- 31:53Speaker 1: detect a molecule, you haven't or even two, you haven't
- 31:56Speaker 1: detected life. You have to actually understand the whole atmosphere.
- 31:59Speaker 1: It's who chemistry. So you need to measure. Will measure
- 32:01Speaker 1: the amounts of the molecules the atmosphere and look at
- 32:05Speaker 1: how much would be produced by non biol you know,
- 32:08Speaker 1: a biotically without biology, and how much would be sunk
- 32:11Speaker 1: without biology. You know, you know, ins and out, sinks
- 32:14Speaker 1: and sources, and if there's too much of something that
- 32:19Speaker 1: shouldn't be there, that's your sort of smoking gun for biology.
- 32:22Speaker 1: You can't you're going to try to explain it with physics.
- 32:24Speaker 1: You'll try to explain it with chemistry. You can't explain
- 32:27Speaker 1: it physics, chemistry, geophysics. Then you turn to the science
- 32:31Speaker 1: left in the building, so which is biology. And frankly,
- 32:36Speaker 1: what would be ideal is if with het spectrum looked
- 32:38Speaker 1: just like the modern Earth, because then we would understand
- 32:41Speaker 1: it really well. But we have prepared ourselves to some
- 32:46Speaker 1: extent with the understanding that the Earth has been inhabited
- 32:49Speaker 1: for most of its history, but it only looked like
- 32:52Speaker 1: the modern Earth for about a third of that time. So,
- 32:55Speaker 1: for example, during the Archaean period early like four billion
- 32:59Speaker 1: years ago, UM, there was no oxygen in our statosphere.
- 33:02Speaker 1: There was tons of lots of methane because the planet
- 33:05Speaker 1: was ruled by the messanogens bacteria that produced methane. Today
- 33:10Speaker 1: they they're still around today. They live in swamps and
- 33:12Speaker 1: the guts of our livestock. And then but as time
- 33:15Speaker 1: went on, with the rise of photosynthesis and green plants,
- 33:18Speaker 1: the oxygen levels started increasing. And so during the Proterozoic period,
- 33:23Speaker 1: which is actually probably the longest period, it was a
- 33:26Speaker 1: little bit of molecular oxygen, but very hard to detect,
- 33:29Speaker 1: not a lot, but there was ozone, even a little
- 33:31Speaker 1: bit of micular oxygen. You get an ozone layer and so,
- 33:34Speaker 1: which is you know, it's a byproduct of molecular oxygen.
- 33:38Speaker 1: So um, during that time, you could see like somewhat
- 33:41Speaker 1: enhanced methane. Probably couldn't see the molecular oxygen, but you
- 33:45Speaker 1: could see ozone. And then finally, eventually the oxygen is
- 33:49Speaker 1: such to such high levels that you can actually you know,
- 33:53Speaker 1: we have the modern Earth with its abundant you know
- 33:56Speaker 1: O two, which we're breathing, and so this it's almost
- 33:59Speaker 1: like there were like three different earths, three different inhabited
- 34:01Speaker 1: earths over the course of its of its history, and we've, uh,
- 34:06Speaker 1: we've designed our hardware with that in mind, you know,
- 34:09Speaker 1: our our personal goal, the team's personal goal was to
- 34:12Speaker 1: be able to tell that the Earth was inhabited at
- 34:14Speaker 1: any time and its inhabited history. Awesome. So this is
- 34:18Speaker 1: going to be looking for exo planets, right planets and
- 34:20Speaker 1: other solar systems out there exactly. One of the things
- 34:24Speaker 1: this will be able to do is to look at
- 34:26Speaker 1: light from those planets. You can see your light reflected
- 34:29Speaker 1: off of those planets from its star. You can also
- 34:32Speaker 1: see light passing through its atmosphere as like you get
- 34:36Speaker 1: a sunrise over that alien world. And from the frequencies
- 34:39Speaker 1: of light that come and the frequencies of light that
- 34:41Speaker 1: don't derive, we'll be able to tell something about the
- 34:44Speaker 1: composition of those atmospheres, like how much C O two
- 34:48Speaker 1: is there, how much oxygen, how much water, how much methane,
- 34:50Speaker 1: And that would be really cool. Yeah, it's amazing. We'll
- 34:53Speaker 1: get like an actual picture of another planet. I mean,
- 34:55Speaker 1: there'll be a little dot, but it's still be like
- 34:58Speaker 1: light directly from that planet exactly. We'll be seeing pale
- 35:01Speaker 1: blue dots from other solar systems. You know that famous
- 35:04Speaker 1: picture of the Earth from really far away where we're
- 35:07Speaker 1: just a tiny blue dot. We're gonna get to see
- 35:09Speaker 1: those dots from other solar system and that's about the
- 35:12Speaker 1: level we might be able to see them, Like we'll
- 35:14Speaker 1: see like a single pixel. I'm gonna be asking questions like, well,
- 35:16Speaker 1: is it blue or is it red? Or is it green?
- 35:18Speaker 1: You know, maybe some future generation of telescopes will be
- 35:21Speaker 1: able to give us a more in depth is further
- 35:23Speaker 1: zoomed in picture, but it would be exciting even to
- 35:26Speaker 1: see these planets as dots. And I think the idea
- 35:29Speaker 1: is that the changing color of them would maybe tell
- 35:31Speaker 1: you a little bit about its atmosphere and whether or
- 35:34Speaker 1: not we could live in it exactly. And this is
- 35:36Speaker 1: really really hard to do, you know, because these planets
- 35:39Speaker 1: are really close to their stars, and the stars are
- 35:43Speaker 1: so much brighter than the planets, so it's really a
- 35:46Speaker 1: huge challenge to try to make this work, you know,
- 35:49Speaker 1: to see something that's so close to something else that's
- 35:52Speaker 1: super duper bright, and what else is it going to
- 35:55Speaker 1: be looking for besides awesome pictures of the universe. So
- 35:58Speaker 1: it's gonna do exoplanet research, it's also going to do
- 36:01Speaker 1: other stuff, Like it's gonna look in our solar system,
- 36:04Speaker 1: you know, the way Hubble study Jupiter and the impact
- 36:07Speaker 1: of comets. We can turn this thing on the moons
- 36:10Speaker 1: in our planets and get like really close up images
- 36:13Speaker 1: of these moons. What's going on on the surface, how
- 36:15Speaker 1: much tectonic activity is there? What about these cry all volcanoes.
- 36:20Speaker 1: Will be able to study the surface of things in
- 36:22Speaker 1: our solar system at crazy detail. If you look at,
- 36:25Speaker 1: for example, what we see from Hubble versus what we
- 36:27Speaker 1: expect to see from Mouvoir, it's like going from a
- 36:31Speaker 1: fuzzball to a crisp picture. Wow, that's awesome, yeah, he said,
- 36:35Speaker 1: And don't think about maybe using telescopes to look at
- 36:38Speaker 1: our own planets, right, And it's amazing that it can
- 36:41Speaker 1: see things super far away and also super close up
- 36:44Speaker 1: and it's really pointable, and that's gonna be really helpful.
- 36:47Speaker 1: You know, for example, if we find something that's headed
- 36:49Speaker 1: towards the Earth and we wanted to like, oh, what
- 36:51Speaker 1: is this thing, let's get a better tracking on it.
- 36:53Speaker 1: We could point our best space telescopes at it and
- 36:57Speaker 1: understand like what is it made out of? How big
- 36:59Speaker 1: is it? Where is it really going? So that could
- 37:01Speaker 1: be really valuable. Cool And I guess a quick question,
- 37:03Speaker 1: how do you point this telescope? Like does it have
- 37:05Speaker 1: little jets or does it actually move the telescoping like
- 37:09Speaker 1: a robot arm? Well, each telescope has a different system
- 37:12Speaker 1: for how to do this. Some of them have little jets,
- 37:14Speaker 1: and they have gyroscopes of course to keep track. It's
- 37:16Speaker 1: really complicated. Some of them are more complex than others
- 37:19Speaker 1: in terms of rotating. But it's important to be able
- 37:21Speaker 1: to point it in different directions because you want to
- 37:23Speaker 1: see things in different parts of the sky. Cool. Well,
- 37:25Speaker 1: I'm gonna call this one like the maybe the Black
- 37:27Speaker 1: Widow of the new slatest superheroes because it's good at
- 37:30Speaker 1: close up fighting and also the long range fighting. Yeah,
- 37:33Speaker 1: and it's going to be operated by Scarlett Johansson. All right,
- 37:36Speaker 1: who else is on the slate of new telescopes? So
- 37:39Speaker 1: the next one is called have X and this one
- 37:42Speaker 1: is looking for habitable exo planets. So I guess that's
- 37:45Speaker 1: why it's called have X and this one is really
- 37:48Speaker 1: dedicated specifically to exoplanet like Louvre is a general purpose one.
- 37:53Speaker 1: It's also really good at exoplanets, but this one is
- 37:56Speaker 1: just like only going to do exoplanets. Awesome, that's great.
- 38:00Speaker 1: Like it it's dedicated and put up there only to
- 38:03Speaker 1: look for other plants that we could live in, right,
- 38:05Speaker 1: or maybe the where there could be aliens. Mmm. It's
- 38:08Speaker 1: gonna do similar signs to what lu War can do,
- 38:10Speaker 1: but it's very different kind of technology. If you google
- 38:13Speaker 1: a picture this thing, it actually has two parts to it.
- 38:15Speaker 1: Floating in space. There's the telescope itself, and then in
- 38:18Speaker 1: front of it there's a star shade. Right, there's like
- 38:22Speaker 1: a circle in front of it that will block the
- 38:25Speaker 1: light of bright suns near their planets so that you
- 38:28Speaker 1: can make out the planet. WHOA, what do you mean.
- 38:30Speaker 1: It's like literally putting your hand up when you're trying
- 38:33Speaker 1: to see something up in the sky. Yeah, if you
- 38:35Speaker 1: want to see an airplane is flying near the sun,
- 38:37Speaker 1: you put your hand up to block the sun. You
- 38:38Speaker 1: can see the airplane better because your eyes can adjust
- 38:41Speaker 1: there not being like filled with light from the sun.
- 38:43Speaker 1: So this has two pieces. The telescope and then this
- 38:46Speaker 1: big circular shield that's going to float in front of
- 38:49Speaker 1: the telescope to block the light from the star so
- 38:52Speaker 1: that you can see the thing next to the star.
- 38:54Speaker 1: But those things are so far away, Like what's the
- 38:57Speaker 1: idea of having such a big bull you know, shade nearby?
- 39:01Speaker 1: You know what I mean? Like cann't you just block
- 39:02Speaker 1: out the sun with your thumb or something. Well, it
- 39:06Speaker 1: depends on the distance, Right, the closer it is to lens,
- 39:09Speaker 1: the smaller it can be. You actually want this thing
- 39:12Speaker 1: to be sort of further away from the telescope to
- 39:15Speaker 1: keep any of the light from the star entering the telescope.
- 39:18Speaker 1: There's two different technologies you can go with. Here what
- 39:20Speaker 1: it's called a corona graph, where it's inside the telescope
- 39:24Speaker 1: and it can be just like a tiny little dot
- 39:26Speaker 1: to block the light from the star. A star shade
- 39:28Speaker 1: is outside the telescope, it's in front of the telescope.
- 39:31Speaker 1: It's actually better because it blocks the light from entering
- 39:33Speaker 1: the telescope at all. And with the chronograph, the light
- 39:36Speaker 1: from that star does enter the telescope and is blocked
- 39:38Speaker 1: partially by the coronograph, but also bounces around a lot,
- 39:41Speaker 1: and so it's more complicated. And so this is a
- 39:43Speaker 1: star shape which you can put in front of the telescope,
- 39:46Speaker 1: and it's kind of beautiful. If you look at pictures
- 39:48Speaker 1: of this thing, it looks sort of awesome. Yeah, it
- 39:50Speaker 1: looks pretty cool. And I like the name star Shade.
- 39:52Speaker 1: That should be the the title of your next sci
- 39:55Speaker 1: fi book. Yeah, it's very cool. And you're right, it's
- 39:57Speaker 1: very hard to do. I mean, just to put some
- 40:00Speaker 1: numbers on it, Like an exo planet that you're trying
- 40:02Speaker 1: to look at is ten billion times dimmer than the
- 40:06Speaker 1: Sun that's next to it on average, and yet it's
- 40:08Speaker 1: super duper close to it. Right, These stars are like
- 40:11Speaker 1: a million times smaller than our sun appears to be.
- 40:15Speaker 1: So you have to be really specific about blocking these things.
- 40:18Speaker 1: And that's one of the challenges here, Like if you
- 40:20Speaker 1: want to turn this telescope and look at a new star,
- 40:23Speaker 1: you have to not just turn the telescope, you also
- 40:24Speaker 1: have to move the star shade and needs like its
- 40:27Speaker 1: own fuel and its own jets. Oh wow. So it's
- 40:29Speaker 1: actually like a separate thing and they're floating together. They're
- 40:33Speaker 1: not connected at all. They're not connected exactly. So this
- 40:36Speaker 1: thing is like really hard to steer. The advantage of
- 40:39Speaker 1: having like a corona graph just like a little shield
- 40:41Speaker 1: inside your telescope is that it's not that complicated. You
- 40:44Speaker 1: turn the telescope, you're turning the coronograph. If you have
- 40:47Speaker 1: a star shade, it's more effective, but it's also much
- 40:49Speaker 1: more cumbersome and like turning it as a big pain. Wow,
- 40:52Speaker 1: you have to like dance together out there in space. Yeah,
- 40:55Speaker 1: it's incredible that they can coordinate that. You know that
- 40:58Speaker 1: these two things can be like exactly the right relative
- 41:00Speaker 1: angles to each other. You can take days or weeks
- 41:03Speaker 1: to turn this thing. And you said it's going to
- 41:05Speaker 1: look for exoplanets, Like, how is it going to do
- 41:07Speaker 1: that better than um, the Black Widow. It's a good question.
- 41:11Speaker 1: These things will have sort of complementary sensitivity. The truth
- 41:14Speaker 1: is that these two proposals were developed independently by different communities,
- 41:18Speaker 1: and now that they decaytal Servey, he said, hey, let's
- 41:21Speaker 1: do both. The two are sort of in touch with
- 41:23Speaker 1: each other and trying to like tweak their proposals so
- 41:27Speaker 1: they move in slightly different directions so that they're more complementary.
- 41:30Speaker 1: Right now, they're sort of overlapping The biggest difference is
- 41:33Speaker 1: that one has a star shade, any other one has
- 41:35Speaker 1: a coronagraph. But they're gonna work on refining these proposals
- 41:37Speaker 1: make them fit together better. Yeah, I guess the star
- 41:40Speaker 1: shade gives it a huge kind of ability to write,
- 41:43Speaker 1: Like it's probably it's really good at looking the plants
- 41:46Speaker 1: that are close to their stars exactly. So that's something
- 41:48Speaker 1: that Louve War can't do. So you really do want
- 41:50Speaker 1: to have both technologies. I mean, I'm just gonna say
- 41:52Speaker 1: yes to everything. Anyway. You want to tell ask code
- 41:57Speaker 1: for every point two meter of of wavelength right exactly,
- 42:01Speaker 1: and so this thing will be greatly be like a
- 42:03Speaker 1: thousand times better than Hubble at studying distant planets and
- 42:08Speaker 1: their atmospheres. Wow, a thousand times that's awesome. So I'm
- 42:11Speaker 1: going to call this one the Captain Marvel of the
- 42:14Speaker 1: New Slate of Superheroes, because you know she's she kind
- 42:18Speaker 1: of has a star logo on her chest. Well, let's
- 42:21Speaker 1: talk about the last two of the New Slate of
- 42:23Speaker 1: space telescopes that are going up there to tell us
- 42:25Speaker 1: more about the universe. But first let's take another quick break.
- 42:41Speaker 1: All right, we're talking about space Superheroes sort of released
- 42:45Speaker 1: a new new giant space mechanical eyeballs, as Daniel calls
- 42:50Speaker 1: the space science Heroes, Yeah, we're sending a whole new
- 42:53Speaker 1: slate of space telescopes out there to look at the
- 42:56Speaker 1: stars and the planets and all the crazy things happening
- 43:00Speaker 1: in the universe. And so we talked about two of them.
- 43:02Speaker 1: Of these new ones, what are the other two? So
- 43:04Speaker 1: the next one is called LYNX, L Y and X
- 43:08Speaker 1: like the Cat, this one has an ex indent because
- 43:10Speaker 1: it's going to be a special X ray telescope. And
- 43:12Speaker 1: it's also named after Galleos Scientific Society Academia de Lynch,
- 43:17Speaker 1: which is an academy of the Lynx, And so I
- 43:20Speaker 1: think that's pretty cool. And this one sort of looks
- 43:23Speaker 1: like a telescope in the sense that it's like a tube, right,
- 43:25Speaker 1: it looks like a tube with two giant ears kind
- 43:28Speaker 1: of which are this some panels? Right? Yeah, it's got
- 43:31Speaker 1: solar panels to power it. But because this one is
- 43:34Speaker 1: an X ray telescope, it doesn't have optics inside of it.
- 43:37Speaker 1: It has thousands of very thin, highly polished segments of
- 43:41Speaker 1: almost pure silicon. They're stacked really tightly like concentric shells,
- 43:46Speaker 1: and so when an X ray photon comes in, they
- 43:48Speaker 1: will like bounce off at a very slight angle, an
- 43:51Speaker 1: X ray it hits a piece of optics directly, will
- 43:53Speaker 1: just pass right through. If it hits at a very
- 43:55Speaker 1: high angle, it'll bounce off and like reflect in the
- 43:58Speaker 1: opposite direction. So these concentric shells will each like give
- 44:02Speaker 1: it a little bit of bending and then it will
- 44:04Speaker 1: focus the light down on the detector at the end
- 44:06Speaker 1: of it, right, And then how does the detector detect
- 44:08Speaker 1: an X ray? Like don't they go through stuff? Is
- 44:10Speaker 1: it a special metal or X rays go through a
- 44:12Speaker 1: lot of stuff, but they don't go through everything. The
- 44:14Speaker 1: reason that you can make a picture using X rays,
- 44:17Speaker 1: for example, is that you have an X ray camera
- 44:18Speaker 1: at the back of it that can detect those X rays. Right,
- 44:21Speaker 1: the X rays that pass through your body hit the camera,
- 44:24Speaker 1: and so you can detect X rays. Is a variety
- 44:26Speaker 1: of technologies, but for example, when X rays hit a
- 44:28Speaker 1: piece of semiconductor, for example, they can like dislodge electrons
- 44:32Speaker 1: and then you can pick those up as a current
- 44:34Speaker 1: sort of in the same way that like a digital
- 44:35Speaker 1: camera works. And what is this one going to be
- 44:38Speaker 1: looking for So this one is an X ray telescope,
- 44:40Speaker 1: and it's a lot like Chandra. It's basically super Chandra.
- 44:43Speaker 1: Like everything that went well for Chandra, they just did
- 44:46Speaker 1: it again and better. So you know, it's bigger and
- 44:49Speaker 1: has more sense detectors, is going to get more light.
- 44:52Speaker 1: And this one, because they can see X rays, can
- 44:54Speaker 1: do things that other telescopes can't. For example, they can
- 44:57Speaker 1: see the formation of black holes. X rays come when
- 45:01Speaker 1: things are really really hot, and when black holes are
- 45:04Speaker 1: forming in the vicinity of them, it's a lot of
- 45:06Speaker 1: tidal forces that are like grinding the gas together in
- 45:09Speaker 1: the gas in the dust, they get really hot and
- 45:11Speaker 1: it makes X rays. So they hope that like we
- 45:14Speaker 1: can try to see ancient supermassive black holes being born
- 45:19Speaker 1: by looking at the X rays from their birth. They're
- 45:21Speaker 1: not being born from supernova, are they, Because these are supermassive.
- 45:24Speaker 1: These are super massive black holes in the hearts of galaxies,
- 45:27Speaker 1: and if you look back in time you can see
- 45:29Speaker 1: maybe when they were born, like billions of years ago.
- 45:32Speaker 1: And so we want to pick up faint X rays
- 45:35Speaker 1: from the centers of those distant galaxies to give us
- 45:37Speaker 1: the clues to like what was the environment in which
- 45:40Speaker 1: these supermassive black holes were formed. Because remember, we still
- 45:43Speaker 1: don't understand how did those black holes get so big
- 45:46Speaker 1: so fast. We see a lot of really really massive
- 45:49Speaker 1: black holes in the hearts of distant galaxies. In our simulations,
- 45:52Speaker 1: we can't make them that big that fast, so we'd
- 45:55Speaker 1: really like to watch them form to understand what's going on.
- 45:58Speaker 1: It's pretty wild. It's the birth of black holes. It's
- 46:01Speaker 1: amazing because I guess in the university, if you want
- 46:04Speaker 1: to look back in time, you just gotta kind of
- 46:05Speaker 1: look further out. And that's why you have to look
- 46:07Speaker 1: at fainter stuff, because it's really far away, and so
- 46:10Speaker 1: these things are really faint and harder to observe, which
- 46:12Speaker 1: is why you need bigger, more sensitive telescopes than we
- 46:16Speaker 1: have before. Cool, what else is it looking for. It's
- 46:18Speaker 1: also going to see things like star mergers. So neutron
- 46:22Speaker 1: stars when they smash into each other, they make all
- 46:24Speaker 1: sorts of great stuff like gold and platinum and uranium
- 46:27Speaker 1: and all the heavy metals. And just before that happens,
- 46:31Speaker 1: just before they slam into each other, they generate a
- 46:33Speaker 1: lot of X rays because they're accelerating really really fast.
- 46:36Speaker 1: And so we hope by looking at those X rays
- 46:39Speaker 1: to understand a little bit better what's going on in
- 46:41Speaker 1: those neutron star mergers. You know, we don't understand what's
- 46:44Speaker 1: inside neutron stars. We can try to study those using
- 46:47Speaker 1: X rays from hotspots on their surface, but then seeing
- 46:50Speaker 1: them merge together and seeing the X rays that come
- 46:52Speaker 1: out is a great way to understand, like, what's going
- 46:54Speaker 1: on inside these neutron stars? How did they actually merge
- 46:57Speaker 1: into a new object? And a lot of them nation
- 47:00Speaker 1: comes only in the X ray cool Well, I guess
- 47:03Speaker 1: the question is like do these talescopes have to know
- 47:06Speaker 1: what they're looking for or can they just kind of
- 47:08Speaker 1: look out into space, you know, get a scene of
- 47:11Speaker 1: all these stars and galaxies and potential things happening, and
- 47:14Speaker 1: then like, oh, here's a black hole being born, or
- 47:17Speaker 1: here are two neutron stars being merged together. Or do
- 47:20Speaker 1: we need to like point them directly at these things.
- 47:23Speaker 1: That's a great question. I love that, and it's a
- 47:25Speaker 1: bit of a challenge because on one hand, you have
- 47:28Speaker 1: questions you want to answer, so you want to point
- 47:30Speaker 1: this heal scope at specific places to answer those questions.
- 47:32Speaker 1: You know, we know something is happening here. Go look.
- 47:35Speaker 1: On the other hand, you want to be open to
- 47:37Speaker 1: new discoveries, so you want to spend some of the
- 47:39Speaker 1: time just looking around. And some of these discoveries historically
- 47:42Speaker 1: have come from those moments, like the Hubble Deep Field,
- 47:45Speaker 1: when they just pointed the hubble deep into space and
- 47:48Speaker 1: left it there for a while to see like what
- 47:50Speaker 1: the most distant galaxies were. That came from the discretionary
- 47:53Speaker 1: time from NASA administrators who just like had a little
- 47:57Speaker 1: bit of time they got to devote the hubble and
- 47:58Speaker 1: they're like, you know what, just pointed in one spot
- 48:01Speaker 1: in the sky for a while and see what comes out.
- 48:04Speaker 1: So sometimes those are the best discoveries of things that
- 48:07Speaker 1: you don't expect. But everybody's going to be competing for
- 48:09Speaker 1: time in these telescopes. You have to bounce those things
- 48:11Speaker 1: a little bit. Yeah, that's kind of how it works, right,
- 48:13Speaker 1: Like you have to as a scientist. If you want
- 48:15Speaker 1: to look through this telescope, you have to like apply
- 48:17Speaker 1: for it, and you get like a certain night of
- 48:19Speaker 1: the year or something, and then you have to be
- 48:21Speaker 1: there to like monitor it, right. You know, with these
- 48:25Speaker 1: space telescopes, you don't actually have to go out there.
- 48:27Speaker 1: But you do have to apply for time, and there's
- 48:29Speaker 1: limited time and lots more people with good ideas than
- 48:32Speaker 1: there is time on these telescopes, and so you have
- 48:34Speaker 1: to compete for it. You wanted to point at your
- 48:36Speaker 1: star or your spot in the sky, you have to
- 48:38Speaker 1: convince people that's a good use of this very expensive
- 48:41Speaker 1: Eyeball right, clearly we need more more superhero Yes, exactly,
- 48:46Speaker 1: you need more, one for every scientist. Sure, let's do it.
- 48:51Speaker 1: Ela Muska, we're waiting for you. I think with what
- 48:54Speaker 1: he paid for twitters share of Twitter, and they could
- 48:56Speaker 1: have bought a new telescope for everyone, Space Twitter. You
- 48:59Speaker 1: should have been space Twitter. There you go. All right, Well,
- 49:02Speaker 1: what's the last of this new slate of telescopes? I mean,
- 49:04Speaker 1: I give the last one the name Lady Thor And
- 49:07Speaker 1: this one, I'm going to guess it's discard at which
- 49:09Speaker 1: so this one is called Origins. And this one's also
- 49:12Speaker 1: an infrared telescope, but unlike James Webb, this one's in
- 49:16Speaker 1: the far infrared. It's like looking at even longer wavelength
- 49:20Speaker 1: than James Webb can do. And they call it origins
- 49:22Speaker 1: because things that are really really far away, like the
- 49:25Speaker 1: very early parts of the universe. That stuff is really
- 49:29Speaker 1: really red shifted, and so you have to study it
- 49:31Speaker 1: in the infrared, right. It's it's like it it didn't
- 49:34Speaker 1: start out as infrared or or super long infrareded but
- 49:38Speaker 1: because the universe is expanding, it's like literally stretching the
- 49:41Speaker 1: light into those frequencies, right exactly, So everything that came
- 49:44Speaker 1: from a long time ago is now red shifted, and
- 49:47Speaker 1: it used to be visible, but now it's red shifted.
- 49:50Speaker 1: Like even the cosmic microwave background radiation. People say it's
- 49:53Speaker 1: the two point seven degrees kelvin. That means that it's
- 49:55Speaker 1: current wavelength is the same as if you had a
- 49:58Speaker 1: gas at that temperature in eating light. But the gas
- 50:01Speaker 1: was actually really really hot when it admitted it was
- 50:03Speaker 1: thousands of degrees kelvin. So the cosmic microwave background radiation
- 50:07Speaker 1: used to be in the X rays or gamma rays,
- 50:09Speaker 1: and now it's gotten red shifted all the way down
- 50:11Speaker 1: to the far infrared right right, it's not just because
- 50:15Speaker 1: it's moving away from us kind of, it's because the
- 50:17Speaker 1: universe is expanding, right, Although there is some new ones
- 50:21Speaker 1: there in gr about what you mean about relative velocities
- 50:24Speaker 1: and is its space expanding or is relative velocities Is
- 50:27Speaker 1: there actually a difference. Have a whole conversation about that
- 50:30Speaker 1: a couple of weeks ago in the podcast. It's a
- 50:32Speaker 1: complicated topic, but this one is going to study some
- 50:34Speaker 1: really cool stuff like the very very early universe. We
- 50:37Speaker 1: talked once about the dark Ages of the universe. What
- 50:40Speaker 1: happened just after the CNB was emitted, that you had
- 50:43Speaker 1: these clouds of hydrogen gas. The universe became neutral and
- 50:46Speaker 1: it was dark, nothing was emitting light. There weren't any
- 50:49Speaker 1: stars yet, and then slowly star started to form because
- 50:52Speaker 1: of gravity, and then you got light created in these
- 50:55Speaker 1: pockets of gas, and so the dark ages ended. And
- 50:58Speaker 1: so that's what they're going to study. They're gonna try
- 50:59Speaker 1: to see the first light from these stars. WHOA, and
- 51:02Speaker 1: I guess you you would see this dark age kind
- 51:05Speaker 1: of as you look out right, like as you look
- 51:07Speaker 1: back in time. By looking further out, you would see
- 51:11Speaker 1: this kind of dip in activity exactly. And we can
- 51:13Speaker 1: see that right because we can see past the dark Ages.
- 51:15Speaker 1: We can see all the way back to the CNB,
- 51:17Speaker 1: the last light emitted when the universe was still hot
- 51:21Speaker 1: and electrically charged. And then it got dark because everything
- 51:24Speaker 1: was neutral. There's just clouds of hydrogen. And then lights
- 51:27Speaker 1: started to emerge again as stars formed, and we'd like
- 51:30Speaker 1: to understand exactly how that happened, because you know, the
- 51:32Speaker 1: first stars were born in clouds of hydrogen, so they
- 51:35Speaker 1: couldn't just like shoot their light across the universe the
- 51:38Speaker 1: way the Sun does. You have to reionize that hydrogen.
- 51:40Speaker 1: And so that's what they'd like to understand, that process
- 51:43Speaker 1: of breaking down those clouds of hydrogen to make the
- 51:45Speaker 1: universe transparent again. So it's looking into dark stuff, just
- 51:49Speaker 1: like the scart which and so I talked to Professor
- 51:52Speaker 1: Kate Sue at the University of Arizona and asked her
- 51:54Speaker 1: what she was excited about for the Origins space telescope.
- 51:58Speaker 1: So here's Dr Sue talking about Deep Origins telescope. So
- 52:01Speaker 1: for me, it's really about how planetform plane information. And
- 52:06Speaker 1: I studied a second spell at this so basically planetaries.
- 52:10Speaker 1: When I call uh planetary system or solar system, I
- 52:14Speaker 1: think about three different things. One is the star. You
- 52:17Speaker 1: have to have a star a sound right as the
- 52:19Speaker 1: heating source. And you have to have planet because it
- 52:22Speaker 1: is a planetary system. So you have giant planet, there
- 52:25Speaker 1: is your planet ice giant. And the third thing is
- 52:29Speaker 1: what I call debris uh minor body astroid comment although saying,
- 52:34Speaker 1: and it's very hard to study the planet around other star,
- 52:39Speaker 1: but it's much easier to study debris around other store
- 52:43Speaker 1: because they provide much bigger surface area, so it's perfect
- 52:47Speaker 1: to use infrared light to study those kind of the
- 52:50Speaker 1: same um So so to me is to resolve the
- 52:54Speaker 1: debris structure around other star, and you can use the
- 53:00Speaker 1: structure to actually trying to pink down where depending might
- 53:04Speaker 1: be because the structure like Astra Belle have a gap,
- 53:08Speaker 1: their distribution have gaps. All those gas influenced by Jupiter
- 53:13Speaker 1: because there's a Jupiter nearby the creating area that is
- 53:16Speaker 1: cha audit, so the smaller body is not stable in
- 53:20Speaker 1: those bridges, so you will see structure. So resolving similar
- 53:24Speaker 1: structure around other stuff and that would be you know,
- 53:29Speaker 1: to me, that would be the most important, saying. That's
- 53:31Speaker 1: where origin has the advantage because it's going to be big.
- 53:35Speaker 1: Depending on what version we can build six m or
- 53:40Speaker 1: nine meter, the resourceing will be much much better than
- 53:44Speaker 1: what we have in the past. All right, pretty cool,
- 53:46Speaker 1: It's pretty cool. You got to talk to a lot
- 53:47Speaker 1: of these scientists. Yeah. You know, the cool thing about
- 53:50Speaker 1: academics is you can just cold email them and say, hey,
- 53:52Speaker 1: I'm excited about Drew Burke. Tell me more about it.
- 53:55Speaker 1: And because they've devoted their life to it, they like
- 53:57Speaker 1: hearing that people are excited about it. So it's not
- 54:00Speaker 1: that hard to get them to talk. Well, they definitely
- 54:02Speaker 1: sound excited and it is pretty exciting, right, I mean,
- 54:05Speaker 1: when are these telescopes going to be flying up there
- 54:07Speaker 1: in space. Well, we're not sure, but they're proposed to
- 54:10Speaker 1: launch in the mid twenties. Like this kind of stuff,
- 54:15Speaker 1: it takes that long to plan these things, to build them,
- 54:18Speaker 1: to get them up there into space. So we hope
- 54:21Speaker 1: that sometime in the middle of the next decade we'll
- 54:23Speaker 1: have this new sequence of great observatories launching out in
- 54:26Speaker 1: the space and giving us these new eyeballs. Yeah, it
- 54:29Speaker 1: sounds like a long time for now, but the time flies,
- 54:32Speaker 1: you know. The next thing, you know, they'll be launching
- 54:34Speaker 1: this thing and you'll see it in the news exactly
- 54:36Speaker 1: and we'll be covering its new discoveries. On season twenty four,
- 54:40Speaker 1: Daniel and Jorge explain the universe still going will be
- 54:45Speaker 1: in our sixties, Daniel wille I'll be red shifted down
- 54:48Speaker 1: in my fifties. That's right. Your waistline will be red
- 54:52Speaker 1: shifted to immeasurable length. I'm counting on length contraction. That's
- 54:58Speaker 1: why I keep moving fast. Although I here will probably
- 55:01Speaker 1: be a lot whider exactly. We'll be great shifted, all right, Well,
- 55:06Speaker 1: I guess pretty exciting stuff. Stay tuned, um, because pretty
- 55:09Speaker 1: soon before you know it, we'll have all these new
- 55:11Speaker 1: eyeballs looking out into the universe telling us what's out
- 55:14Speaker 1: there and giving us a lot more details, sometimes a
- 55:17Speaker 1: thousand times more detailed than we previously have been able
- 55:20Speaker 1: to look at the universe exactly. And something I find
- 55:22Speaker 1: really inspirational is that a lot of the folks working
- 55:24Speaker 1: on these projects will never use it, like they will
- 55:27Speaker 1: probably retire before these things are up there in space.
- 55:30Speaker 1: So they're building these things for you, for the next
- 55:33Speaker 1: generation of astronomers, for folks out there who are ten, twelve, fifteen,
- 55:37Speaker 1: who are listening now, who will be professional astronomers in
- 55:40Speaker 1: fifteen years. You will see data from the ancient universe
- 55:44Speaker 1: because these folks have built this telescope. And when I
- 55:47Speaker 1: talk to them. They were all inspired by the fact
- 55:49Speaker 1: that people before them build hubble and never got to
- 55:52Speaker 1: use it, and they got to do science with it.
- 55:54Speaker 1: Astronomy is just like passing of the bucket from generation
- 55:57Speaker 1: to generation, where they build the device for the next generation. Wow,
- 56:01Speaker 1: that's pretty awesome. So I guess those of you listening,
- 56:04Speaker 1: you have fifteen years to finish your PhD in physics.
- 56:06Speaker 1: Do you think there will be enough? Maybe they'll make
- 56:09Speaker 1: it just just in time. We better stop listening to
- 56:12Speaker 1: podcast and get studied. No, no, keep listening, keep listening
- 56:15Speaker 1: on discourage her listeners. Daniel, this could be part of
- 56:20Speaker 1: your thesis, right, that's right, yeah, exactly, listening to this
- 56:23Speaker 1: podcast is a crucial part of your preparation. That's right.
- 56:26Speaker 1: In fact, if you listen to all three episodes so far,
- 56:30Speaker 1: and Daniel will give you a PhD in podcast listening exactly.
- 56:34Speaker 1: It's not accredited, it doesn't count for anything, but sure
- 56:36Speaker 1: you'll get a PhD in podcast science. Al Right, Well,
- 56:41Speaker 1: it's exciting to know we'll be learning more about the universe.
- 56:44Speaker 1: We hope you enjoyed that. Thanks for joining us, See
- 56:47Speaker 1: you next time. Thanks for listening, and remember that Daniel
- 56:57Speaker 1: and Jorge explain the Universe is a production I Heart
- 57:00Speaker 1: Radio or more podcast from my heart Radio. Visit the
- 57:04Speaker 1: i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen
- 57:07Speaker 1: to your favorite shows. H