Latest / Honey Badger Radio / They tread | HBR Talk 383

Transcript

They tread | HBR Talk 383 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to HBr Talk three eighty three. They
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: tread I'm your host, Hannah Wallen here with nonsense annihilator
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: Lauren Brooks in the personification of perceptivity Mike Stevenson, and
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: we have the dose in charge in the background making
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: sure things happen, Brian Martinez. And good night, good night,
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: and tonight. I'm going to bed now, guys, I got
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: an you know.
• 0:26
  Speaker 2: Hello, Hello, good night everyone, Hello, goodbye, Hey, hello, goodbye.
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: But uh yeah, we're still I'm back on that treacherous
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: ground of the Human Initiative veil with its raging us
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: AIDS infection and the the attempted coup that the us
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: AIDS people tried to tried to enact. They treed. They
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: wanted to change some things. They wanted to change how
• 1:04
  Speaker 1: you vote. They wanted to change how the government works.
• 1:08
  Speaker 1: They wanted to change what you can say. They wanted
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: to change what candidates, how much you can support a
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: candidate as an individual. They really were quite interested in
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: taking over. Wanted to take your place as a voter
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: and usurp it for themselves and keep it away from you,
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: or at least keep you from having the full capacity
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: to judge information for yourself, ensure that you have made
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: your own decisions, and ensure that you have decided which
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: candidates you do and do not want to support. But
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: that's not all, folks, that's not all. For the same
• 1:59
  Speaker 1: low price of funding a non government agency with your
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: tax dollars that has been working against your interests for decades,
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: you can also get sabotage of the Supreme Court that
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: decides which laws are constitutional and which laws are not.
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: This is, of course, for the low low price of
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: your tax dollars. This is of course completely included in
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: the package. No additional charge, no no addiction, additional taxation
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: unless the Supreme Court can be manipulated into deciding that
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: it's constitutional to you know, come up with new ways
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: of taxing you, and and of course no representation. But yeah,
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: so that's where we are tonight. We've been looking into
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: this for a little bit. I will remind you this.
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: This started with oh, come on, article, there we go. No,
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: I don't want notifications from every website on the internet,
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: thank you very much. So their secret signal chats and
• 3:15
  Speaker 1: how their chats documented this plot and the person who
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: exposed it was Data Republican whose account I have been
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: showing you in the videos that the Data Republican has
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: been posting, And the last thing that we were watching
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: was the Stanford University summit where they discussed this project,
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: which is what we are looking at here. The project
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: is referred to the Our Common Purpose Project because it's
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: supposed to be totally inclusive of everyone. Right, we all
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: have this these goals in common. It's not just their
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: goal for controlling us and controlling our country and uh
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: ensuring that you can't stop them from from taking your
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: money and using it against you. No, no, no, it's
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: it's your goal too. You totally wanted them controlling your
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: money and uh using it against you. That was that
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: was totally your absolute goal. This was this was definitely
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: the way to go, right, So with without further ado,
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: let's get into this this thing. The suggestion that the
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: founding fathers didn't know what they were doing when they
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: made their decisions about certain things like gun control, freedom
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: of speech, due process rights, quality under the law, and
• 5:01
  Speaker 1: so on, that somehow they were lacking in information understanding
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: the expectation that in the future there might be technology
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: that didn't exist at present. That seems to be an
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: underlying theme of the left to portray the Founding Fathers
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: as people with no foresight and very little intelligence, you know,
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: people who couldn't possibly recognize that things things change rapidly
• 5:36
  Speaker 1: over time, that as soon as you start developing advancements
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: in an area of technology, you know, such as the
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: entire Industrial Revolution, they were in the midst of that
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: Once one new idea comes along and new discovery comes along,
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: it contributes to a shitload of other new ideas and
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: new discoveries, like the Cultural Revolution that they were at
• 6:04
  Speaker 1: forefront of. Somehow, despite being in the middle of the
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: Industrial Revolution and at forefront of the Cultural Revolution, they
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: had no idea that despite Monoda having so throughout history,
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: throughout its history, it would result in ling lifespans of
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: human beings over time. Because, like I said, you know,
• 6:39
  Speaker 1: the the common theme of complaints about how the country
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: works by by the left is that the the Founding
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: Fathers were just too dumb to realize that changes might
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: happen in the world after they created the Constitute and
• 7:01
  Speaker 1: so on. Oh, I'm getting complaints.
• 7:07
  Speaker 3: Okay, it was only for like ten or fifteen seconds
• 7:10
  Speaker 3: or so.
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: Okay, okay, you have totally back.
• 7:12
  Speaker 3: To normal now. And yeah, you're right. There's this common
• 7:15
  Speaker 3: assumption that people from the past were like the lowest
• 7:20
  Speaker 3: IQ people we have today. And it's not that that
• 7:24
  Speaker 3: the highest IQ people back in the day are much
• 7:26
  Speaker 3: the same as the highest IQ people these days. They
• 7:29
  Speaker 3: just didn't have this wide range of of available encyclopedias
• 7:36
  Speaker 3: that we have today. But just because they didn't have
• 7:40
  Speaker 3: access to knowledge that we have nowadays doesn't mean they
• 7:43
  Speaker 3: didn't have wisdom. I mean, they they had information technology,
• 7:47
  Speaker 3: but information technology doesn't necessarily make people smarter. Before people
• 7:54
  Speaker 3: even had books, do you know what they did in
• 7:57
  Speaker 3: order to remember still worries? They just remembered them. They
• 8:02
  Speaker 3: just stored them in their brain. And because they weren't
• 8:05
  Speaker 3: getting distracted by all these bloody books they had, they
• 8:08
  Speaker 3: had enough space in their brain to actually remember how
• 8:11
  Speaker 3: to how to say these things word for word. The
• 8:13
  Speaker 3: actors who did Shakespeare's plays were somehow able to just
• 8:18
  Speaker 3: remember the entire script with like a few days worth
• 8:22
  Speaker 3: of worth of rehearsal. And yeah, before people had computers,
• 8:29
  Speaker 3: believe it or not, they were capable of just remembering information.
• 8:33
  Speaker 3: And yeah, they and they did. They didn't have Wikipedia,
• 8:38
  Speaker 3: but they had you know, the the the equivalent of
• 8:43
  Speaker 3: such encyclopedias, because they weren't getting their brain rotted by
• 8:47
  Speaker 3: constant tech talk videos, like they were able to devote
• 8:51
  Speaker 3: their time to remembering the most important information. And they were,
• 8:55
  Speaker 3: and they were crucially able to put it together, and
• 9:01
  Speaker 3: they were able to learn from the wisdom of ages
• 9:07
  Speaker 3: in ways that people lack nowadays. And it's it's it's
• 9:12
  Speaker 3: the same graph between the working class of the past
• 9:14
  Speaker 3: and the working class of the present, and and and
• 9:17
  Speaker 3: the intellectual class of the past and the intellectual class
• 9:21
  Speaker 3: of the present. It was about the same. It was
• 9:24
  Speaker 3: about the same. Like I say, there's this stereotype that
• 9:31
  Speaker 3: that that people from the past were like the children
• 9:35
  Speaker 3: of the present day, like they all thought the world
• 9:37
  Speaker 3: was flat and ship like this, but they didn't. It
• 9:40
  Speaker 3: was it was about the same. It might they might
• 9:44
  Speaker 3: have even been generally wiser, because like I said, they
• 9:49
  Speaker 3: they had the available capacity to to learn and remember
• 9:53
  Speaker 3: what they needed to learn and remember, whereas nowadays people
• 9:58
  Speaker 3: are getting their heads filled with completely useless hokey shite
• 10:03
  Speaker 3: that's taking over their conscience and making them arguably dumber
• 10:07
  Speaker 3: than anyone who's ever been. Like going back to the stone, age,
• 10:10
  Speaker 3: even stone age people, but almost certainly in some ways,
• 10:15
  Speaker 3: far more intelligent than people are these days.
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: Yeah, there's a there's a degree to which they really
• 10:23
  Speaker 1: had to be smarter back then then people have to
• 10:28
  Speaker 1: be today simply because of the fact that, you know,
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: fucking up had much more dire consequences and under under
• 10:40
  Speaker 1: certain circumstances. We have a lot of safety nets now
• 10:44
  Speaker 1: that didn't exist back then.
• 10:46
  Speaker 4: Uh many, many in various ways. Sorry, I could go
• 10:55
  Speaker 4: on about that, but i'm your point, so you can.
• 10:59
  Speaker 1: I don't have a problem with that. One of these
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: days we're gonna have to go through and list all
• 11:05
  Speaker 1: of the safety nets for stupid people that you pay for.
• 11:09
  Speaker 4: We can start. Can we start with the medical.
• 11:12
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, we can, because when you think about it,
• 11:18
  Speaker 1: that one's a big one, and it.
• 11:20
  Speaker 4: Is arguably the biggest one.
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: Yeah, you know, it's not even a good safety net.
• 11:25
  Speaker 1: It's a it's more like a leash. It's a leash
• 11:29
  Speaker 1: on the medical profession and the patient that is held
• 11:32
  Speaker 1: by the insurance companies who get to charge you money
• 11:35
  Speaker 1: for not paying for your medical care. But then you
• 11:39
  Speaker 1: don't have that money, so you can't pay for it either. Right.
• 11:45
  Speaker 1: Oh yeah, Okay, the list is exhaustive, but but let's start.
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: Let's start with the fact because Tangled hierarchy said, can
• 11:54
  Speaker 1: you explain some of the ways that there's too many
• 11:56
  Speaker 1: safety safety nets? So I want you to think about something. Historically,
• 12:03
  Speaker 1: our culture controlled our mating habits because failure to do
• 12:14
  Speaker 1: so resulted in starvation. Right, women, if they if they
• 12:22
  Speaker 1: didn't marry, they would be dependent on their father's family
• 12:27
  Speaker 1: for the rest of their life. Or they had better
• 12:31
  Speaker 1: be you know, at least a little masculine and get
• 12:33
  Speaker 1: out there and work. Right, they would work either at
• 12:38
  Speaker 1: home with their family as part of whatever business their
• 12:42
  Speaker 1: family had had created, farming, baking, whatever, and before that
• 12:49
  Speaker 1: it was mostly farming or hunting and gathering, or they
• 12:55
  Speaker 1: would be a working part of their husband's family. And
• 13:01
  Speaker 1: throwing an unplanned baby into that situation through a monkey
• 13:06
  Speaker 1: wrench into the whole works. You didn't eat, you know enough,
• 13:12
  Speaker 1: If you didn't have basically the correct supportive situation for
• 13:20
  Speaker 1: the child that you brought into the world, your child
• 13:24
  Speaker 1: might not survive. And people survived by living in groups,
• 13:29
  Speaker 1: by living in tribes, by having a close community. Because
• 13:34
  Speaker 1: they didn't have antibiotics, they didn't have paid for health care.
• 13:40
  Speaker 1: They didn't have much in the way of health care, right,
• 13:44
  Speaker 1: rbal remedies were it, and the people who knew that,
• 13:49
  Speaker 1: who knew what the herbal remedies were, were greatly revered.
• 13:53
  Speaker 1: It was very much survival of the fittest right. So
• 13:59
  Speaker 1: that was the way that humanity evolved for centuries. And
• 14:03
  Speaker 1: then sometime during the twelfth century, this idea of romantic
• 14:08
  Speaker 1: love started getting inserted into the common ideas by the
• 14:16
  Speaker 1: French aristocracy, the women of the French aristocracy, and you
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: can learn about that on kindescentrism dot com. Peter Wright
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: has done an extensive amount of research into this, and
• 14:30
  Speaker 1: it's quite quite a massive amount of information there, so
• 14:36
  Speaker 1: I would look there for more information on how that developed.
• 14:41
  Speaker 1: But when that started to develop, the entire history of
• 14:46
  Speaker 1: human mating practices in the West, the entire history of
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: families being involved in people's marriage decisions, of women either
• 15:00
  Speaker 1: bringing work value or financial value into their marriage, families
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: unifying over marriage, and so on, just kind of went
• 15:10
  Speaker 1: out the window and it became you meet someone, you
• 15:14
  Speaker 1: fall in love like it's an accident, rather than building
• 15:18
  Speaker 1: a relationship. And shortly after that, in terms of all
• 15:26
  Speaker 1: of human history, but it took a long time in
• 15:28
  Speaker 1: terms of human life spans. The idea of sexual promiscuity
• 15:35
  Speaker 1: being okay developed, and then in the nineteenth and twentieth
• 15:39
  Speaker 1: centuries that expanded. During the twentieth century, we had this
• 15:45
  Speaker 1: idiotic thing called a sexual revolution. So during the sexual revolution,
• 15:53
  Speaker 1: as this is happening because on unplanned pregnancy was increasing,
• 16:00
  Speaker 1: we had the first safety net put into place was
• 16:04
  Speaker 1: welfare in social security. Oh, I didn't realize you were
• 16:12
  Speaker 1: an idiot tangled hierarchy. I'm sorry. I thought I was
• 16:14
  Speaker 1: helping you out. But I'll continue this for the benefit
• 16:20
  Speaker 1: of the rest of the listeners. But in any case,
• 16:25
  Speaker 1: the first safety net was welfare, the welfare system, and
• 16:29
  Speaker 1: that was, you know, sort of ushered in under the
• 16:34
  Speaker 1: guise of protecting people from the type of poverty that
• 16:37
  Speaker 1: occurred after the Great Depression.
• 16:42
  Speaker 4: Although I don't know if that was the first, if
• 16:46
  Speaker 4: we're being technical and literate about it, I don't think
• 16:49
  Speaker 4: that was the very first. I would think what you said,
• 16:54
  Speaker 4: like the introduction of this idea of romantic chivalry.
• 17:00
  Speaker 1: Yeah, that's that's the first safety net.
• 17:02
  Speaker 4: Like the proto first safety net. And then we come
• 17:06
  Speaker 4: to the you know, fast forward hundreds of years later
• 17:11
  Speaker 4: and then you get to welfare where we said, oh, no,
• 17:15
  Speaker 4: women don't need no men, so we're just going to
• 17:19
  Speaker 4: kick them out. Well, women didn't say that, it was it.
• 17:25
  Speaker 4: It was offered to them on a silver platter.
• 17:29
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah.
• 17:30
  Speaker 4: If you just if you have children and you don't
• 17:35
  Speaker 4: have any other person in your home that's going to
• 17:39
  Speaker 4: or the father of the children is going to be
• 17:42
  Speaker 4: in the home to protect and provide for these children,
• 17:46
  Speaker 4: then the government will assist you. Oh it sounds like
• 17:50
  Speaker 4: a great idea. Let's get the fucking government involved, right,
• 17:53
  Speaker 4: because they never do anything wrong. Jesus Christ.
• 17:58
  Speaker 1: Yep. So, prior to prior to the idea of romantic chivalry,
• 18:04
  Speaker 1: one hundred percent of marriages were built around this idea
• 18:11
  Speaker 1: of family unity and family cooperation, so that the brides
• 18:17
  Speaker 1: and grooms families would come together as a team, a
• 18:22
  Speaker 1: larger team that there's usually some sort of business deal
• 18:25
  Speaker 1: around marriages. In the upper classes and in the lower classes,
• 18:29
  Speaker 1: there was at least a building of an extended network,
• 18:34
  Speaker 1: even if it wasn't necessarily you know, all, we're gonna
• 18:39
  Speaker 1: link up our sheep farm with your the the hay
• 18:43
  Speaker 1: and the straw from your wheat farm. Uh, you know,
• 18:46
  Speaker 1: it became a means of families networking with each other
• 18:52
  Speaker 1: to get through tough times. So there's your first statistic.
• 18:57
  Speaker 1: After the idea of romantic chivalry, then you started having
• 19:04
  Speaker 1: this development of people getting together, not because their families
• 19:09
  Speaker 1: could work together and their families could become an inter
• 19:13
  Speaker 1: supported network, but just because they had feelings. And the
• 19:21
  Speaker 1: worst thing about romantic chivalry is that it pretty much
• 19:25
  Speaker 1: turned men into servance of women.
• 19:28
  Speaker 3: Right.
• 19:29
  Speaker 1: The idea was that the woman was the table and
• 19:32
  Speaker 1: the man had to bring everything to it, and that
• 19:35
  Speaker 1: was bullshit. Throughout all of human history, you had a cooperative,
• 19:42
  Speaker 1: collaborative relationship between married couples. They may have a division
• 19:48
  Speaker 1: of labor, but there was labor for the woman too.
• 19:53
  Speaker 1: Not you know, impressed me, make make me feel like
• 19:59
  Speaker 1: you are are special and I should I should look
• 20:04
  Speaker 1: at you instead of some other guy. It was, you know,
• 20:08
  Speaker 1: we've decided to team up together to raise a family.
• 20:11
  Speaker 1: I'm going to do these things and you're going to
• 20:13
  Speaker 1: do those things. In that way, everything gets done and
• 20:16
  Speaker 1: we work together and we build our security and we
• 20:21
  Speaker 1: build our happiness. But now you look at today, most
• 20:29
  Speaker 1: children more children are born out of wedlock than ever before.
• 20:35
  Speaker 1: And if they're not born out of wedlock, there's so
• 20:38
  Speaker 1: many whose parents are divorced that more children end up
• 20:44
  Speaker 1: coming of age in homes that exclude their father, correct,
• 20:50
  Speaker 1: and then do in homes that include their father correct.
• 20:54
  Speaker 4: And then when you look at the divorced statistics, it's
• 20:58
  Speaker 4: seventy percent of women who are initiating these divorces. And
• 21:02
  Speaker 4: why are they initiating their divorces because they weren't happy?
• 21:08
  Speaker 4: They don't they don't feel good, you know. And that's
• 21:13
  Speaker 4: all right, So let's slice it up right, because a
• 21:16
  Speaker 4: lot of the times marriages end up being divorced because
• 21:20
  Speaker 4: of finances. Right, Finances is a very big factor in
• 21:24
  Speaker 4: the reason that couple split up. And you know, I'm
• 21:28
  Speaker 4: not going to go through the whole who spends what
• 21:32
  Speaker 4: we know who it is. It's it's the women that
• 21:34
  Speaker 4: can typically control the finances.
• 21:37
  Speaker 3: Right.
• 21:38
  Speaker 4: But in going back to this topic, it's feelings that
• 21:46
  Speaker 4: tend to lead women to want to uh separate their
• 21:51
  Speaker 4: household even after they have children, right like, I can
• 21:56
  Speaker 4: see if a woman, if you if a couple doesn't
• 21:59
  Speaker 4: have children, right like, that only affects the two of them.
• 22:06
  Speaker 4: And so they may be in an age group where
• 22:09
  Speaker 4: they're young enough to then move on and find, you know,
• 22:15
  Speaker 4: another situation in which they can then move on, get married,
• 22:19
  Speaker 4: pro create, have kids, and blah blah, find that happiness,
• 22:25
  Speaker 4: those feelings that.
• 22:27
  Speaker 1: They were looking for.
• 22:29
  Speaker 4: But the whole idea of marriage has been completely flipped
• 22:35
  Speaker 4: upon its head from what it used to be. And
• 22:40
  Speaker 4: you know, we don't do ourselves any service well because
• 22:46
  Speaker 4: the court system, lawyers have found it very, very very
• 22:55
  Speaker 4: a cash cow in divorcing people and putting them through
• 23:01
  Speaker 4: the court system because we decided to give over marriage
• 23:07
  Speaker 4: rights to the government, so we got the government involved. Okay, great,
• 23:13
  Speaker 4: here we go again. Government fucking everything up. And so
• 23:18
  Speaker 4: now when you decide that you're not happy, or this
• 23:22
  Speaker 4: isn't working, or she just spends more money than I
• 23:28
  Speaker 4: can earn and I can't deal with this anymore, then
• 23:34
  Speaker 4: you have to go and get the government involved. And
• 23:39
  Speaker 4: it benefits no one, no one but the government and
• 23:44
  Speaker 4: the court system and the lawyers who then have to
• 23:48
  Speaker 4: you know, argue against each other. It's ridiculous. You want
• 23:55
  Speaker 4: to talk about a safety net system? Holy shit?
• 24:01
  Speaker 1: Yeah, Well, and and the list of various programs here
• 24:07
  Speaker 1: showing on the screen now like just goes on and
• 24:12
  Speaker 1: on eighty three federal welfare programs, and we are talking
• 24:20
  Speaker 1: about a lot of these exist specifically because of women
• 24:26
  Speaker 1: making the stupid choice to get laid before they get
• 24:33
  Speaker 1: married and establish a family with with a guy. And
• 24:39
  Speaker 1: you know, I don't care if your marriage is legal
• 24:41
  Speaker 1: and you include the government or not. You don't have
• 24:44
  Speaker 1: to do that in my book for you to be married.
• 24:47
  Speaker 1: But all of these programs, like a whole bunch of them,
• 24:53
  Speaker 1: I exist specifically because women don't make use of the
• 25:00
  Speaker 1: tools that they have to prevent conception. They're going to
• 25:05
  Speaker 1: fuck around like a three dollars ho.
• 25:07
  Speaker 4: Yeah, they don't make good decisions, and they lay the
• 25:11
  Speaker 4: blame at the feet of anyone else who's willing to
• 25:16
  Speaker 4: take responsibility for those choices, which is usually men, typically
• 25:22
  Speaker 4: and almost always men.
• 25:25
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 25:26
  Speaker 4: No, and this is why you have this entitlement that
• 25:32
  Speaker 4: you see in this current society. They just I don't
• 25:37
  Speaker 4: have to do anything. I didn't do anything wrong. It's
• 25:40
  Speaker 4: your fault. I had nothing to do with it. They
• 25:45
  Speaker 4: just do not understand it's it's they are incapable of
• 25:53
  Speaker 4: behaving as a responsible adult. Because they've never had responsibility
• 25:57
  Speaker 4: thrust upon them.
• 26:00
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Uh, you know, just just the simple responsibility of
• 26:05
  Speaker 1: maybe using some spermicide and uh and a barrier method
• 26:10
  Speaker 1: to uh double up on prevention, and you know, maybe
• 26:15
  Speaker 1: expecting as a feature of your consent as a as
• 26:18
  Speaker 1: a requirement of your consent, Hey use a condom, right,
• 26:22
  Speaker 1: or or taught me if I sound crazy, not having
• 26:29
  Speaker 1: sex with a guy unless you plan to raise children
• 26:31
  Speaker 1: with him, yeah, right, or unless you have made it
• 26:36
  Speaker 1: so that you can't have children. Right.
• 26:39
  Speaker 3: Uh.
• 26:39
  Speaker 1: You know, there there are a few different things you
• 26:42
  Speaker 1: can do, but in any case, you know, this is
• 26:49
  Speaker 1: this is the problem. We treat women like they don't
• 26:54
  Speaker 1: have any agency and it's not their fault when they
• 26:57
  Speaker 1: do stupid things, and society needs to clean up their
• 27:00
  Speaker 1: mess for them, the mess being the poverty they created,
• 27:03
  Speaker 1: not the child. Although some women do raise their child
• 27:07
  Speaker 1: to be a mess and she ends up being the
• 27:10
  Speaker 1: next single mom, creating a mess of poverty, raising a
• 27:14
  Speaker 1: child to be a mess who grows up to be
• 27:17
  Speaker 1: the next single mom, and sometimes that happens in the
• 27:21
  Speaker 1: space of like sixty years, so many many women will
• 27:27
  Speaker 1: not even become grandparents in that amount of time, but
• 27:32
  Speaker 1: some women will become great grandparents in that amount of time.
• 27:36
  Speaker 1: And when you look at this, like you can see
• 27:39
  Speaker 1: on your screen here just a couple of years ago,
• 27:42
  Speaker 1: which is the data on this is never from the
• 27:46
  Speaker 1: current year, or it's very rarely from the previous year.
• 27:50
  Speaker 1: It's usually from two years or more ago. But federal
• 27:55
  Speaker 1: spending on thirteen largest of these low income programs account
• 28:00
  Speaker 1: for the bulk of welfare spending totaling the way they
• 28:06
  Speaker 1: wrote this is really weird, all right. One thousand, two
• 28:09
  Speaker 1: hundred and forty one billion is one trillion, two hundred
• 28:13
  Speaker 1: and forty one billion. We are talking a huge amount
• 28:17
  Speaker 1: of the federal budget for programs EITC, SNAP, housing assistance,
• 28:25
  Speaker 1: and Medicaid comprise eighty percent of that spending. All right.
• 28:30
  Speaker 1: These are things that are used largely by people who
• 28:36
  Speaker 1: live in poverty because they did not plan out the
• 28:42
  Speaker 1: start of their family. One of the best things that
• 28:46
  Speaker 1: we could be doing for men and women, for children
• 28:51
  Speaker 1: and adults, for old and young, rich poor government non government,
• 29:00
  Speaker 1: is to teach young women that they have that control.
• 29:05
  Speaker 1: And it is their obligation as citizens of a country
• 29:10
  Speaker 1: that spends the tax dollars of other citizens making up
• 29:14
  Speaker 1: for their mistakes. It is their obligation to make the
• 29:17
  Speaker 1: wisest choices they can and then tell them how how
• 29:23
  Speaker 1: to make those wise choices.
• 29:25
  Speaker 4: Yeah, you know, we like to say that, you know,
• 29:31
  Speaker 4: when it comes to risk aversion, that women are more,
• 29:36
  Speaker 4: They're more they tend to be risk risk averted accents.
• 29:41
  Speaker 4: I don't know, but women do not avoid risk. They
• 29:46
  Speaker 4: do not avoid risk, especially when it comes to their
• 29:50
  Speaker 4: reproductive systems.
• 29:52
  Speaker 1: And it's offloaded on other people.
• 29:54
  Speaker 4: Right, And so men's tendency towards risk aversion typically only
• 30:00
  Speaker 4: will involve themselves, Right, They'll jump out of planes, They'll
• 30:05
  Speaker 4: you know, go live in a forest with you know,
• 30:10
  Speaker 4: just like be a survival guy. Right. They love the
• 30:16
  Speaker 4: risk of the adrenaline. Well, women love the adrenaline push
• 30:20
  Speaker 4: that they get from just randomly fucking guys and say, oh,
• 30:25
  Speaker 4: I'm gonna yeah, just leave it in and who knows
• 30:30
  Speaker 4: what's gonna happen. That I believe creates a greater problem
• 30:39
  Speaker 4: for society because you know, I don't know the statistics
• 30:45
  Speaker 4: on how often it takes to get pregnant because I've
• 30:48
  Speaker 4: never been pregnant.
• 30:49
  Speaker 2: So.
• 30:51
  Speaker 1: You know, on the average, throughout the months you have
• 30:54
  Speaker 1: a twenty percent chance of conception every time you have sex. Obviously,
• 31:00
  Speaker 1: although the rhythm method does not work as good prevention
• 31:04
  Speaker 1: if you were trying to have a kid. There are
• 31:06
  Speaker 1: sometimes during the month when that number is lower and
• 31:09
  Speaker 1: sometimes during the month when that number is higher, but
• 31:12
  Speaker 1: on average you start out with only a one in
• 31:15
  Speaker 1: five chance every time you have sex. Right, So obviously
• 31:21
  Speaker 1: birth control affects that as well.
• 31:23
  Speaker 4: Right, So these holes just out here fucking you know,
• 31:26
  Speaker 4: no idea if they're going to have a husband, someone
• 31:31
  Speaker 4: to be there, even someone slightly in the way that
• 31:36
  Speaker 4: is financially able to help support the child, or if
• 31:41
  Speaker 4: the guy doesn't even want to have a child with you,
• 31:46
  Speaker 4: but they are taking that risk, right, And you know
• 31:51
  Speaker 4: how it ends because we have what is it in
• 31:54
  Speaker 4: the black community, something like seventy five percent of children
• 31:59
  Speaker 4: are born into fatherless homes. And then what does that do?
• 32:03
  Speaker 4: It becomes a burden on the rest of society. So
• 32:08
  Speaker 4: who risk to whom?
• 32:13
  Speaker 1: To who go ahead?
• 32:16
  Speaker 3: It's it's it's long term and short term risk is
• 32:18
  Speaker 3: the difference. I mean, in different ways men and women
• 32:21
  Speaker 3: can be described as risk takers. And if it was,
• 32:23
  Speaker 3: I mean, tisosterone is often called the risk taking hormone.
• 32:28
  Speaker 3: And it's and it's and it's what drives men into well,
• 32:34
  Speaker 3: long term risks like like like pursuing certain occupations or
• 32:41
  Speaker 3: pursuing certain big fights like wars, whereas women, possibly because
• 32:48
  Speaker 3: of estrogen, are more into short term fights or just
• 32:54
  Speaker 3: in then men getting into a skirmish with another man.
• 32:56
  Speaker 3: And maybe it explains why men are attracted to long
• 33:01
  Speaker 3: term partnerships with women, i e. Women who are you know, uh,
• 33:08
  Speaker 3: virtuous and low body caunt and women who give them peace,
• 33:17
  Speaker 3: whereas whereas women are attracted to tend to be attracted
• 33:21
  Speaker 3: to men who give them a short term burst of
• 33:25
  Speaker 3: dopamine and serotonin. And that that's why far too many
• 33:31
  Speaker 3: of them are attracted to very erratic, unpredictable but powerful
• 33:38
  Speaker 3: fucking jug heads or whatever. And we have ways, we
• 33:42
  Speaker 3: have ways, we have social and cultural ways of ironing
• 33:47
  Speaker 3: these things out. Uh. Why that's why we that's why
• 33:53
  Speaker 3: we tell women OI, fucking sort yourself out and grow
• 33:58
  Speaker 3: up and learn about delayed gratification. And we we we
• 34:03
  Speaker 3: teach men this too, as as we should, because a
• 34:07
  Speaker 3: lot of men, at particularly younger men uh suffer from
• 34:11
  Speaker 3: from from this ship too that's that's one of the
• 34:14
  Speaker 3: curses of adolescence. Like male and female teenagers alike suffer
• 34:19
  Speaker 3: from from this, from this uh, hot headed impulsive affliction.
• 34:27
  Speaker 3: Yeah and uh and yeah, well well maybe that maybe
• 34:30
  Speaker 3: it is a cultural thing. Maybe we do teach teenage
• 34:34
  Speaker 3: boys two to control themselves, but in the modern age,
• 34:40
  Speaker 3: there's this distinct lack of teaching teenage girls or even
• 34:44
  Speaker 3: women of any age two fucking w Yeah.
• 34:51
  Speaker 1: Yeah. And as a result, right, we have this entire
• 34:59
  Speaker 1: political faction that their whole political platform, everything that they do,
• 35:08
  Speaker 1: everything that they say, everything that is a goal of theirs,
• 35:13
  Speaker 1: everything that they want to change in government, everything that
• 35:17
  Speaker 1: they want to change in the culture. It is all
• 35:21
  Speaker 1: built around maintaining a system of female dependence on government
• 35:30
  Speaker 1: intervention funded by other people's tax dollars. Anytime a woman's
• 35:37
  Speaker 1: stupid choices lead to poverty in a household or risk
• 35:43
  Speaker 1: of poverty in a household, and the result of that
• 35:48
  Speaker 1: is how many again eighty let me see here, eighty
• 35:53
  Speaker 1: eighty three federal welfare programs eighty three not not just
• 36:00
  Speaker 1: a few, not just a couple of things that you know,
• 36:04
  Speaker 1: maybe help out under the rare circumstance that a woman
• 36:11
  Speaker 1: puts herself in that situation and nobody else in her
• 36:16
  Speaker 1: family is willing to step up to help her. See,
• 36:19
  Speaker 1: that's the other thing it used to be. It used
• 36:23
  Speaker 1: to be that if a woman made stupid choices and
• 36:31
  Speaker 1: her children were going to be in that starvation situation,
• 36:36
  Speaker 1: her family stepped up. Her family would take her in
• 36:41
  Speaker 1: and take care of her and the children and give
• 36:45
  Speaker 1: her a pathway to redemption through being a working part
• 36:48
  Speaker 1: of the family. They would band together, and that was that.
• 36:53
  Speaker 1: The hardship was still there, but it wasn't as significant
• 36:58
  Speaker 1: as it as it would be if she was just
• 37:01
  Speaker 1: left on her own right. But now now that we
• 37:05
  Speaker 1: have the government ripping off your tax dollars as a
• 37:11
  Speaker 1: single working person, her family is now daddy government. As
• 37:17
  Speaker 1: Night Motorcyclists just pointed out in the chat. Her family
• 37:22
  Speaker 1: uncle Sam, the only guy who can be a rich
• 37:25
  Speaker 1: uncle and a poor relation at the same time, always
• 37:28
  Speaker 1: has one hand out for your tax dollars and the
• 37:33
  Speaker 1: other hand giving them over to women who make stupid choices.
• 37:39
  Speaker 1: And of course the military industrial contact complex, which is
• 37:44
  Speaker 1: also highly expensive, that's where she turns to for help.
• 37:52
  Speaker 1: And because there are no consequences and nobody to say, hey,
• 37:56
  Speaker 1: there was a dumb idea. You created a poverty situation
• 38:00
  Speaker 1: for yourself and your children. Don't do that again. Some
• 38:04
  Speaker 1: of these women will do it over and over again,
• 38:07
  Speaker 1: not all of them, but enough, and they'll end up
• 38:12
  Speaker 1: with five kids by four different guys, and all kinds
• 38:18
  Speaker 1: of medical issues and all kinds of debt. And the
• 38:24
  Speaker 1: next thing you know, you're spending thousands of dollars on
• 38:28
  Speaker 1: one family that the head of the household is a
• 38:32
  Speaker 1: woman and she can't support her family.
• 38:37
  Speaker 4: Yeah, and it just blows my mind that it is
• 38:41
  Speaker 4: the military industrial complex that is also.
• 38:48
  Speaker 1: Oh yeah, that's one of the most expensive things. I
• 38:50
  Speaker 1: mean that because we have both parties have discovered that
• 39:00
  Speaker 1: they can they can make a lot of money by
• 39:03
  Speaker 1: investing in aspects of the military industrial complex and then
• 39:07
  Speaker 1: voting to send the country to war. Ah Nancy, that's
• 39:15
  Speaker 1: that's led to quite a bit of of a financial
• 39:18
  Speaker 1: financial irresponsibility by the federal government as well.
• 39:22
  Speaker 4: Correct and and as yet.
• 39:26
  Speaker 1: Welfare ship is the primary focus of the Democrat Party.
• 39:32
  Speaker 4: And yet we still have seventy four seventy four, seventy
• 39:37
  Speaker 4: of the homeless people being or the veterans being homeless.
• 39:41
  Speaker 4: I don't want to miss states.
• 39:43
  Speaker 1: Now, it's a seventy five percent of of homeless people
• 39:50
  Speaker 1: altogether are are male, right, And so percent of homeless
• 39:57
  Speaker 1: people who are unsheltered are men.
• 40:02
  Speaker 4: Right. And so our military industrial complex does nothing for
• 40:08
  Speaker 4: our military veterans, or not enough. You could slash these
• 40:13
  Speaker 4: fundings in half and maybe make a big enough dent
• 40:19
  Speaker 4: to take care of our former veterans, not formal, but veterans.
• 40:26
  Speaker 1: Well, you know, there's there's quite a bit that could
• 40:29
  Speaker 1: be done for veterans that you would think out of
• 40:33
  Speaker 1: all people, the Democrats would have, you know, capitalized on
• 40:37
  Speaker 1: that politically, but they really haven't. So in fact, the
• 40:43
  Speaker 1: last person that I know of that ever did anything
• 40:46
  Speaker 1: major for veterans was Trump when he gave them the
• 40:50
  Speaker 1: right to go outside of the system, the veteran medical
• 40:55
  Speaker 1: system if they were not getting the care they needed
• 40:58
  Speaker 1: in that system and still have it paid for. But
• 41:04
  Speaker 1: all of that said, all of that said, the people
• 41:07
  Speaker 1: whose primary focus is maintaining that system of dependence, they're
• 41:13
  Speaker 1: also the ones who are in charge of the entire
• 41:20
  Speaker 1: humanitarian Initiative VEIL and everything that takes place behind it.
• 41:25
  Speaker 1: They are the primary movers and shakers in the US
• 41:31
  Speaker 1: AIDS infection that we have inflicted upon nations all over
• 41:36
  Speaker 1: the world, and they have exported both American sexual promiscuity
• 41:44
  Speaker 1: and stupidity and American welfare, and also, by the way,
• 41:50
  Speaker 1: the American tendency to kill our children before they're born.
• 41:57
  Speaker 1: Being aborted. You compare it to the things that the
• 42:03
  Speaker 1: World Health Organization calls the leading cause of death, it
• 42:06
  Speaker 1: outnumbers them as a cause of human death by almost
• 42:12
  Speaker 1: as much as the total of the second leading cause
• 42:17
  Speaker 1: of death on that list, which would be the third
• 42:21
  Speaker 1: actual leading cause of death. Because abortion is a cause
• 42:25
  Speaker 1: of death for every aborted child, like every single one
• 42:32
  Speaker 1: is a living human organism, and every single one has
• 42:38
  Speaker 1: its life terminated. That is why they use the word termination.
• 42:42
  Speaker 1: We're terminating a life. It is an execution for the
• 42:47
  Speaker 1: crime of being inconvenient to the mother most of the time,
• 42:53
  Speaker 1: so being aborted. Women have made being aborted the leading
• 43:00
  Speaker 1: cause of death in the world worldwide, in the United States,
• 43:06
  Speaker 1: in most western nations, and worldwide. That is quite an accomplishment.
• 43:16
  Speaker 1: No serial killer has ever done as much. Women talk about.
• 43:22
  Speaker 1: Feminists talk about how violent men are, right, they talk
• 43:25
  Speaker 1: about male violence. They talk about how wars are men's
• 43:33
  Speaker 1: fault and blah blah blah, even though female leaders are
• 43:38
  Speaker 1: bigger warmongers than male leaders and have been throughout history.
• 43:43
  Speaker 1: But yeah, they you know, oh, men, men are at
• 43:47
  Speaker 1: fault for war. Men are the reasons for violence in
• 43:51
  Speaker 1: the world. Men are the perpetrators of the majority of
• 43:55
  Speaker 1: violent crime. If you counted aborting your child as a
• 44:00
  Speaker 1: means of violent crime, because abortion is a violent act.
• 44:04
  Speaker 1: It kills the target, right, women would be the perpetrators
• 44:09
  Speaker 1: in something like ninety nine percent of criminal cases worldwide. Worldwide.
• 44:22
  Speaker 1: They are They're creating a leading cause of death. And
• 44:27
  Speaker 1: this is the majority of this is elective abortion. By that,
• 44:33
  Speaker 1: I mean abortion that takes place not because there's a
• 44:35
  Speaker 1: health condition at stake or you know, not because the
• 44:43
  Speaker 1: the fetus isn't viable because of its health conditions, but
• 44:50
  Speaker 1: because the woman finds the pregnancy inconvenient. That's it.
• 44:57
  Speaker 3: And it's not as though any of it's not as
• 45:03
  Speaker 3: though if abortion was made illegal and no one ever
• 45:06
  Speaker 3: had any abortions ever again, that would mean we would
• 45:10
  Speaker 3: be left with the now often statistic that most deaths
• 45:16
  Speaker 3: are at the hands of males, because it would still
• 45:20
  Speaker 3: only be the direct hands of males. It's not as
• 45:24
  Speaker 3: if all these all these war deaths, and all these
• 45:28
  Speaker 3: murder deaths are purely at the hands of males, especially
• 45:33
  Speaker 3: given that we have women in charge of governments just
• 45:39
  Speaker 3: as much as we have men in charge of governments,
• 45:42
  Speaker 3: and women are just as responsible for the military industry
• 45:47
  Speaker 3: of complex and sending all these men to die. And yeah,
• 45:52
  Speaker 3: once again I'm thinking of the near future of what's
• 45:55
  Speaker 3: going to happen to the men in the UK when
• 45:57
  Speaker 3: they all get sent off to die in Russia like
• 45:59
  Speaker 3: the Ukrainians did. But then we have to think about
• 46:04
  Speaker 3: men who kill because women told them to kill, not
• 46:08
  Speaker 3: just on the government level, but all the way down.
• 46:11
  Speaker 3: And once again I have to go back down to
• 46:14
  Speaker 3: the Stone Age and beyond. Frankly, because this hasn't been recorded.
• 46:20
  Speaker 3: There's really not not any reliable way of recording this,
• 46:27
  Speaker 3: Like how many times do men kill other men because
• 46:32
  Speaker 3: they were spurred on to do it by women? A
• 46:35
  Speaker 3: lot of people will call me a misogynist for even
• 46:38
  Speaker 3: asking that question, but it is a thing. It's a
• 46:41
  Speaker 3: thing that quite that happens very often. Now, maybe it's
• 46:45
  Speaker 3: men's fault that they fight over women. Maybe it's nature's fault.
• 46:50
  Speaker 3: I mean it happens in all kinds of species, like
• 46:54
  Speaker 3: it does seem to be part of natural selection that
• 46:59
  Speaker 3: men fight over women up to and including the.
• 47:03
  Speaker 1: Death well Hack. Our fifth episode, i think fifth or sixth,
• 47:08
  Speaker 1: was on proxy violence, a woman's not so secret weapon,
• 47:13
  Speaker 1: and we gave examples of different news stories at the beginning,
• 47:19
  Speaker 1: and then we talked about the phenomenon. But when when
• 47:25
  Speaker 1: you look at statistics on partner violence where the partner
• 47:30
  Speaker 1: violence leads to the death of a partner, about sixty
• 47:34
  Speaker 1: percent is perpetrated against female partners and about forty percent
• 47:40
  Speaker 1: is perpetrated against male partners when the killing is direct.
• 47:44
  Speaker 1: So that's forty percent of intimate partner and family. Because
• 47:50
  Speaker 1: the statistic is always shoved together, and then when they
• 47:53
  Speaker 1: talk about it, feminists only say intimate partner. But forty
• 47:58
  Speaker 1: percent of the time the orpetrator is targeting a male victim,
• 48:04
  Speaker 1: not a female victim. And yet women look at those
• 48:10
  Speaker 1: statistics and they don't want to talk about the fact
• 48:15
  Speaker 1: that eighty percent of homicides target a male victim. They
• 48:21
  Speaker 1: only want to talk about the fact that sixty percent
• 48:24
  Speaker 1: of family, intimate partner and family homicides target a female victim,
• 48:31
  Speaker 1: which isn't really as significant of a statistic, and it
• 48:39
  Speaker 1: is the only category of intimate partner and homicides where
• 48:44
  Speaker 1: female victims outnumber male victims, and we don't necessarily have
• 48:51
  Speaker 1: proof that all of that is accurate because of the
• 48:57
  Speaker 1: fact that when a woman wants to engage in violence
• 49:02
  Speaker 1: against a man, she will often do something more covert,
• 49:06
  Speaker 1: like use poison where you know, she might not get
• 49:10
  Speaker 1: caught because the guy maybe dies from what looks like
• 49:16
  Speaker 1: a drug overdose, you know, or or is otherwise his
• 49:23
  Speaker 1: his poisoning is not detected, there's no suspicions so there's
• 49:27
  Speaker 1: no testing, or it's something that could have happened without
• 49:33
  Speaker 1: being administered by the woman. Women will drive a man
• 49:37
  Speaker 1: to suicide deliberately, and then you know, he becomes a
• 49:43
  Speaker 1: suicide statistic rather than an intimate partner homicide statistic because
• 49:49
  Speaker 1: you can't prove that she did that. Women will hire
• 49:54
  Speaker 1: a hitman and then his homicide becomes a stranger homicides
• 49:59
  Speaker 1: to t stick unless the hit man gets caught, and
• 50:04
  Speaker 1: women will manipulate a next partner into eliminating the previous partner,
• 50:13
  Speaker 1: and that homicide becomes a male on male interpersonal conflict
• 50:21
  Speaker 1: statistic because the woman's role in it isn't isn't isn't
• 50:29
  Speaker 1: counted in the statistics, so that twenty percent difference between
• 50:36
  Speaker 1: men and women, it may be much closer, and may
• 50:41
  Speaker 1: be extremely small in comparison to what we actually know.
• 50:49
  Speaker 1: And unfortunately, there's no way to some of that, there's
• 50:54
  Speaker 1: no way to really measure it because there the evidence
• 50:57
  Speaker 1: is very difficult to obtain, if possible at all.
• 51:03
  Speaker 3: It's like this meme of don't teach women to defend
• 51:06
  Speaker 3: themselves from rape, teach men not to rape, Well, we
• 51:11
  Speaker 3: already do. Literally everyone everywhere teaches their men not to rape.
• 51:17
  Speaker 3: And how about this thing of don't teach men not
• 51:21
  Speaker 3: to kill? Again, we already do every society enough, there's
• 51:27
  Speaker 3: some kind of moral code where they teach men not
• 51:30
  Speaker 3: to rape. But how about teach women not only not
• 51:33
  Speaker 3: to kill men, but not to teach men to kill
• 51:36
  Speaker 3: each other? Is that a thing in any of our
• 51:44
  Speaker 3: modernists societies, or even in any of our religions. I mean,
• 51:50
  Speaker 3: I'm thinking of one or two religions in particular, where
• 51:55
  Speaker 3: where they where they teach all kinds of things, but
• 51:57
  Speaker 3: they never teach women not to teach their men and
• 52:01
  Speaker 3: boys to go and blow themselves up for the sake
• 52:06
  Speaker 3: of killing mainly other men than it is mainly other men. Again,
• 52:11
  Speaker 3: it's not just religions. It's all over the world where
• 52:14
  Speaker 3: we do teach men not to kill other men, let
• 52:17
  Speaker 3: alone other women. But we all seem to keep neglecting
• 52:21
  Speaker 3: to teach women not to teach men to kill each other.
• 52:27
  Speaker 3: It's layers, you see, people, it's levels. What about teaching
• 52:31
  Speaker 3: people about teaching people? What about when that crosses over
• 52:34
  Speaker 3: the genders if you thought about that, No, not when
• 52:37
  Speaker 3: it means teaching women basic morality.
• 52:42
  Speaker 1: No, and in fact teaching women basic morality. This is
• 52:46
  Speaker 1: what I say said on Tuesday. Misogyny is not real.
• 52:50
  Speaker 1: There is no such thing as misogyny. Women use the
• 52:55
  Speaker 1: word misogyny as a thought terminating cliche every time the world,
• 53:00
  Speaker 1: or the culture, or any individual within the culture in
• 53:04
  Speaker 1: the world attempts to teach women basic morality or ethics
• 53:10
  Speaker 1: and hold women accountable for the impact of their behavior
• 53:17
  Speaker 1: on the people around them, the people that it affects.
• 53:22
  Speaker 1: As soon as you say, you know, if your behavior
• 53:27
  Speaker 1: causes a poverty situation, it's not just the guy who
• 53:31
  Speaker 1: is responsible. You know, it's not just the person that
• 53:35
  Speaker 1: you're involved with that's that's responsible. Your choices matter, your
• 53:44
  Speaker 1: actions matter. You are at fault when you do a
• 53:49
  Speaker 1: thing and it sets off a chain of events, and
• 53:54
  Speaker 1: the end result of that chain of events is somebody
• 53:58
  Speaker 1: else having a law or getting hurt or experiencing an
• 54:03
  Speaker 1: adverse condition or circumstance. That is your fault. And when
• 54:11
  Speaker 1: men do that, we impose remedy. We impose punishment that
• 54:18
  Speaker 1: involves restitution of some sort child support, finds alimony, confiscation
• 54:27
  Speaker 1: of property, imposition of labor. Sometimes, you know, you could
• 54:36
  Speaker 1: even call it forced labor, because men do go to
• 54:40
  Speaker 1: jail if they don't pay child support, if they don't
• 54:43
  Speaker 1: have a job. When they get divorced, a judge will say, well,
• 54:49
  Speaker 1: you have to earn minimum wage. You are obligated to
• 54:56
  Speaker 1: have an income of at least that much, and if
• 54:59
  Speaker 1: you do not find a way to obtain it, we
• 55:02
  Speaker 1: will put you in jail. So it is under threat
• 55:05
  Speaker 1: of incarceration that he goes out and earns that money.
• 55:10
  Speaker 1: And it doesn't matter whether you think there are moral
• 55:13
  Speaker 1: reasons for it or not, whether you think it is
• 55:15
  Speaker 1: ethical for the state to do that. Or not, it
• 55:17
  Speaker 1: is still forced labor. That doesn't change the condition. You
• 55:23
  Speaker 1: can argue justifications, but it is still forced labor. They
• 55:31
  Speaker 1: do not do that to women unless the child is
• 55:34
  Speaker 1: in foster care and the state wants their money. They
• 55:38
  Speaker 1: only do it to men if the father has custody
• 55:42
  Speaker 1: and the mother is not working and she can't find
• 55:44
  Speaker 1: a job. I've sat in a courtroom and listened to
• 55:47
  Speaker 1: a judge excuse that we can't put her in jail
• 55:51
  Speaker 1: because she can't find a job. That's not fair, really,
• 55:55
  Speaker 1: because you do that to men all the time. Well,
• 55:58
  Speaker 1: there are men are responsible, right, Men have responsibilities, women
• 56:04
  Speaker 1: have rights. That's the way the law works. So, like
• 56:09
  Speaker 1: I said, the people that we're talking about today, the
• 56:13
  Speaker 1: people that came up with this, the people that want
• 56:16
  Speaker 1: to decide how you vote for politicians because they don't
• 56:20
  Speaker 1: like who you voted for. The people that want to
• 56:23
  Speaker 1: decide how you fund political advertisement to get your message
• 56:30
  Speaker 1: out because they don't like the fact that other people
• 56:34
  Speaker 1: might agree with you. They're the ones that their entire
• 56:40
  Speaker 1: political ideology is wrapped around paying women to make stupid
• 56:48
  Speaker 1: choices and then keeping them dependent on government funding that
• 56:55
  Speaker 1: pays women to make more stupid choices so that they
• 56:59
  Speaker 1: can stay in political power by maintaining that dependence. It
• 57:06
  Speaker 1: is essentially economic drug dealers and running the government that
• 57:17
  Speaker 1: want women to be addicted to these social safety nets,
• 57:22
  Speaker 1: the welfare system, the medicaid system, the Medicare system, the
• 57:28
  Speaker 1: social security system, every little or large program. Government paying
• 57:36
  Speaker 1: for your birth control, government paying for your childcare, so
• 57:40
  Speaker 1: you can go to work as if the expense disappears
• 57:45
  Speaker 1: because you offloaded it to somebody else, you know, government
• 57:49
  Speaker 1: paying for your food and your electric bills, and your
• 57:53
  Speaker 1: housing costs, and your car repairs and your refrigerator, but
• 57:57
  Speaker 1: then also giving you a financial stipend because you totally
• 58:01
  Speaker 1: need that on top of everything else, and giving you
• 58:06
  Speaker 1: free medicine and free supplies for your children. So what
• 58:15
  Speaker 1: happens to that welfare check? The night I gave that
• 58:20
  Speaker 1: homeless woman a ride home and ended up in a
• 58:24
  Speaker 1: section of town where two baby boomers came out. Two
• 58:29
  Speaker 1: male baby boomers came out and stood on either side
• 58:32
  Speaker 1: of me and guarded me because I was a white
• 58:34
  Speaker 1: girl and they thought I would get shot for being
• 58:36
  Speaker 1: white in that neighborhood. One of the things they told
• 58:41
  Speaker 1: me was that the reason I couldn't find any of
• 58:43
  Speaker 1: this woman's friends who she was CouchSurfing with because she
• 58:48
  Speaker 1: was homeless, but she had shelter with other women who
• 58:53
  Speaker 1: took pity on her. Was because those women had all
• 58:56
  Speaker 1: gotten their welfare checks, so they were all out at
• 58:58
  Speaker 1: the bars.
• 59:02
  Speaker 3: It's about to ask, how do you give a homeless
• 59:04
  Speaker 3: woman a ride home? But I see what you mean now, Yeah,
• 59:09
  Speaker 3: whatever sofa she was surfing on at the time.
• 59:12
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, it's not possible to give a homeless man
• 59:14
  Speaker 1: a ride home. But it is possible to give a
• 59:17
  Speaker 1: homeless woman a ride home because she can qualify as
• 59:21
  Speaker 1: homeless and and still have a place indoors where she's
• 59:27
  Speaker 1: safe to sleep every night, whereas a lot of homeless
• 59:34
  Speaker 1: men do not and will not, And and that's not
• 59:40
  Speaker 1: going to change because the way the system is set up,
• 59:44
  Speaker 1: it prioritizes first women with children, then women with no children,
• 59:51
  Speaker 1: then men with children, and finally, if there's any space
• 59:57
  Speaker 1: left at all, men with no children who are not
• 1:00:03
  Speaker 1: addicts and not mentally ill. So you end up the
• 1:00:09
  Speaker 1: men on the street are the ones in the worst circumstances,
• 1:00:13
  Speaker 1: with the worst problems. And and that's how that is,
• 1:00:18
  Speaker 1: how that so that that you know, helper party, the
• 1:00:22
  Speaker 1: Party of Welfare and Compassion for your fellow human being. Uh.
• 1:00:29
  Speaker 1: They they don't really care about men. They really only
• 1:00:35
  Speaker 1: care about they don't even really care about women. They
• 1:00:37
  Speaker 1: only really care about keeping a set of people dependent
• 1:00:42
  Speaker 1: on the government in order to use the addiction to
• 1:00:47
  Speaker 1: those safety nets to keep them voting for that party.
• 1:00:55
  Speaker 1: And so now we've had this election, the twenty twenty
• 1:01:00
  Speaker 1: four election, in which the men of the country that
• 1:01:06
  Speaker 1: you know, fuck, you know, we're not doing that anymore.
• 1:01:09
  Speaker 1: We don't like it. We don't want having our money
• 1:01:14
  Speaker 1: taken by the government to be the norm. We don't
• 1:01:18
  Speaker 1: want our income to be used to fund stupid choices.
• 1:01:23
  Speaker 1: We don't want to be ripped off to the detriment
• 1:01:30
  Speaker 1: of the people that were supposedly helping. And so we're
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 1: going to vote in this populist who is going to
• 1:01:37
  Speaker 1: tear down your systems and throw them out the window.
• 1:01:40
  Speaker 1: And as soon as he got in there he started
• 1:01:43
  Speaker 1: doing that. What happened, well, they reacted to him like
• 1:01:48
  Speaker 1: they would react to a virus. So this summit and
• 1:01:54
  Speaker 1: this our Common Purpose Program was designed by the makers
• 1:02:05
  Speaker 1: of the welfare system. The eighty three different social welfare
• 1:02:10
  Speaker 1: programs that are used mostly to pay women to make
• 1:02:16
  Speaker 1: stupid choices, to keep people dependent on the government so
• 1:02:19
  Speaker 1: that they'll continue to vote in these people. The system
• 1:02:28
  Speaker 1: they created is run by bureaucrats who know that their
• 1:02:33
  Speaker 1: bread is buttered on the side where they don't solve
• 1:02:36
  Speaker 1: any problems. They just keep people addicted. And they've expanded
• 1:02:39
  Speaker 1: this model all over the worlds the US AIDS infection
• 1:02:46
  Speaker 1: promoted unwed, unwed motherhood, abortion and the substitution of birth
• 1:02:57
  Speaker 1: control for common sense actual behavior, circumcision as a preventative
• 1:03:04
  Speaker 1: method to avoid getting AIDS as opposed to being very
• 1:03:10
  Speaker 1: conservative sexually and using barrier methods that prevent transmission bodily
• 1:03:17
  Speaker 1: fluids between people. All that stuff in nations all over
• 1:03:23
  Speaker 1: the world, First World, second World, and third world nations.
• 1:03:27
  Speaker 1: Their actions have resulted in an increase in STIs all
• 1:03:34
  Speaker 1: over the world. Their actions have resulted in war and
• 1:03:38
  Speaker 1: poverty and famine, and they're very upset that the current
• 1:03:44
  Speaker 1: administration has decided to stop them from doing that, and
• 1:03:49
  Speaker 1: that's why they're doing what they're doing now. So, as
• 1:03:52
  Speaker 1: we talked about last week, like I said, they wanted
• 1:03:54
  Speaker 1: to change funding, They wanted to change how you vote
• 1:04:00
  Speaker 1: they wanted. They wanted that system where your vote can
• 1:04:04
  Speaker 1: be overridden by someone else's second choice, and so on.
• 1:04:09
  Speaker 1: And then this one established through federal legislation eighteen year
• 1:04:12
  Speaker 1: terms for Supreme Court justices, with appointments staggered such that
• 1:04:16
  Speaker 1: one nomination comes up during each term of Congress. So essentially,
• 1:04:21
  Speaker 1: they want judges even if they are the best judge
• 1:04:25
  Speaker 1: that ever sat on the bench. Rather than us using
• 1:04:28
  Speaker 1: impeachment and other other legal means other legal recourse against
• 1:04:35
  Speaker 1: judges when they do bad things, they wanted us to
• 1:04:38
  Speaker 1: be able to remove good judges that are simply judging
• 1:04:43
  Speaker 1: whether or not new laws are constitutional. They wanted those
• 1:04:51
  Speaker 1: to be removed and replaced. And of course, their argument,
• 1:04:58
  Speaker 1: like I said, is that our founding fathers were too
• 1:05:02
  Speaker 1: stupid to recognize that modern medicines improvements in people's health
• 1:05:09
  Speaker 1: and lengthening of people's lifespans, that that pattern might continue
• 1:05:16
  Speaker 1: in the future and accelerate even in the future, as
• 1:05:22
  Speaker 1: opposed to stopping at the point in history where they
• 1:05:27
  Speaker 1: were in the moment and never progressing any further. The
• 1:05:33
  Speaker 1: Supreme Court holds tremendous power in American society. It is
• 1:05:38
  Speaker 1: a check on the two other branches of government that
• 1:05:43
  Speaker 1: also hold tremendous power in American society. So there's nothing
• 1:05:48
  Speaker 1: wrong with the level of power that the Supreme Court has.
• 1:05:52
  Speaker 1: But they talk about it as though the Supreme Court
• 1:05:56
  Speaker 1: is a threat to the sovereignty of the judicial and
• 1:06:03
  Speaker 1: executive branches of government. They talk about it like it's
• 1:06:07
  Speaker 1: a bad thing that the Supreme Court can go through
• 1:06:12
  Speaker 1: and say, no, you can't. You can't put that law
• 1:06:15
  Speaker 1: into effect because it violates the civil rights of the
• 1:06:18
  Speaker 1: American people. That is their objection, that your civil rights
• 1:06:25
  Speaker 1: might be protected by a body of judges who are
• 1:06:31
  Speaker 1: highly experienced, whose appointment was agreed upon by the other
• 1:06:36
  Speaker 1: two branches of government, the duly elected officials in the
• 1:06:41
  Speaker 1: other two branches of government. That is their objection. Because
• 1:06:48
  Speaker 1: apparently inventor Ben Franklin was too stupid to recognize that
• 1:06:54
  Speaker 1: maybe in the future, the current pattern during his lifetime
• 1:06:59
  Speaker 1: of modern medicine improving human lifespans might result in even
• 1:07:06
  Speaker 1: longer lifespans than it had resulted in by the time
• 1:07:09
  Speaker 1: he was alive. No wonder they're paying women to make
• 1:07:16
  Speaker 1: stupid choices. They're stupid, and they think you're stupid. H
• 1:07:25
  Speaker 1: like that. That's the entirety of it. They're so dumb
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 1: that that was their main argument. Here is, let me
• 1:07:35
  Speaker 1: see if I can find it with increased lifespans since
• 1:07:43
  Speaker 1: the eighteenth century. Right there, That is a justice may
• 1:07:49
  Speaker 1: serve for a generation longer, often decades more than the
• 1:07:52
  Speaker 1: Framers are likely to have imagined. How do you know that?
• 1:07:59
  Speaker 1: How do you know that Ben Franklin might not have
• 1:08:02
  Speaker 1: figured out that? Gosh, you know, or George Washington? You know,
• 1:08:08
  Speaker 1: the fact that people can can get false teeth now
• 1:08:13
  Speaker 1: means that their nutritional needs can be better met in
• 1:08:18
  Speaker 1: middle and old age, maybe they might live longer. Right.
• 1:08:23
  Speaker 1: The fact that science and technology have given us ways
• 1:08:28
  Speaker 1: to have cleaner water, the fact that they have given
• 1:08:33
  Speaker 1: us ways to more effectively grow food. We now have
• 1:08:37
  Speaker 1: medicine that treats things that we didn't have medicine for
• 1:08:41
  Speaker 1: one hundred years ago. We understand things about the human
• 1:08:45
  Speaker 1: body that we didn't understand one hundred years ago. Gosh,
• 1:08:49
  Speaker 1: we live longer now than we did one hundred years ago.
• 1:08:52
  Speaker 1: Ye think that might continue to happen in the future. No,
• 1:08:55
  Speaker 1: there's a cap at seventeen seventy six and life of
• 1:08:58
  Speaker 1: expectancy will never get any longer. After seventeen seventy six,
• 1:09:02
  Speaker 1: people are only going to live to be in their
• 1:09:05
  Speaker 1: sixties or seventies throughout the entire rest of history except
• 1:09:08
  Speaker 1: for a tiny percentage, like ten percent of the population.
• 1:09:13
  Speaker 1: And that's it. Everybody else is gonna die.
• 1:09:15
  Speaker 3: And allow me to paraphrase, but four score and twenty
• 1:09:21
  Speaker 3: years ago something something, all men were created equal. Some
• 1:09:29
  Speaker 3: bitches be crazy, I mean some bitches to be crazy,
• 1:09:34
  Speaker 3: and yeah, and some shit never changes. That shit is
• 1:09:39
  Speaker 3: never going to change. You need, you need, you need
• 1:09:42
  Speaker 3: some kind of contingency in place for the undernoable fact
• 1:09:49
  Speaker 3: that some bitches be crazy.
• 1:09:50
  Speaker 4: Do you know.
• 1:09:53
  Speaker 1: Yeah, We used to uh, you know, handle the situation
• 1:09:58
  Speaker 1: by the community stepping in and assisting the family in
• 1:10:04
  Speaker 1: various ways. And if the children were in a bad
• 1:10:07
  Speaker 1: situation because the parent was a bad parent, then the
• 1:10:13
  Speaker 1: family would rescue the children from that situation or the
• 1:10:18
  Speaker 1: community would rescue the children from that situation. Now we
• 1:10:21
  Speaker 1: have children being stolen from good families and sold to
• 1:10:24
  Speaker 1: rich families. But if the children are not pretty enough,
• 1:10:28
  Speaker 1: they get left in bad situations. And that's basically how
• 1:10:33
  Speaker 1: child protector services works. It's really awful, and we are
• 1:10:40
  Speaker 1: supposed to fund that too. By the way, guys, your
• 1:10:43
  Speaker 1: money goes into that. Your money pays people to run
• 1:10:49
  Speaker 1: that system and make that happen. Kind of scary when
• 1:10:54
  Speaker 1: you think about it, very and again they think you're stupid, right, And.
• 1:11:02
  Speaker 4: I just I want to say, because you know, we
• 1:11:05
  Speaker 4: say things like that and people will automatically think that
• 1:11:10
  Speaker 4: it's like some uh, you know, some shadow government governmental
• 1:11:16
  Speaker 4: agency that's like sex trafficking kids and you know, doing
• 1:11:20
  Speaker 4: bad things to children. No, it's it's the Child Protective
• 1:11:24
  Speaker 4: Services right in your own state.
• 1:11:29
  Speaker 1: YEA.
• 1:11:29
  Speaker 4: That they are. I'm not gonna say that they're overworked
• 1:11:33
  Speaker 4: or whatever. I'm pretty sure that they are. However, they
• 1:11:38
  Speaker 4: are overlooking cases in which children are absolutely.
• 1:11:46
  Speaker 1: Just just.
• 1:11:48
  Speaker 4: You know, not only abused, but vulnerable. And there are
• 1:11:56
  Speaker 4: sometimes there there are times when they can stay in
• 1:12:00
  Speaker 4: and they don't. You know, there's very obvious cases where
• 1:12:05
  Speaker 4: you know, the mother's on drugs, but you know, for
• 1:12:09
  Speaker 4: whatever reason, they just all, well, you know, we'll just
• 1:12:12
  Speaker 4: give the mother custody back of the child because the
• 1:12:16
  Speaker 4: child is in better off care with the mother than
• 1:12:19
  Speaker 4: the father, who may be off in prison. But the
• 1:12:22
  Speaker 4: mother is still a fucking drug addict. Yeah, you know,
• 1:12:27
  Speaker 4: it's it's the child protective services system in this country
• 1:12:33
  Speaker 4: absolutely needs to be overhauled. I just I fear for
• 1:12:41
  Speaker 4: any child that has to go into the system. And
• 1:12:45
  Speaker 4: you will see, like if you watch a lot of
• 1:12:48
  Speaker 4: body cam police bodycam videos, like I uh, you know,
• 1:12:54
  Speaker 4: the police will make every attempt to try to get
• 1:12:57
  Speaker 4: someone else to take a child in a situation where
• 1:13:01
  Speaker 4: the parent has to be incarcerated when there's no other
• 1:13:07
  Speaker 4: parent or you know, familial the person around to take
• 1:13:14
  Speaker 4: care of the child, or any other responsible persons to
• 1:13:17
  Speaker 4: take care of the child. You know, so the police
• 1:13:20
  Speaker 4: kind of know that they don't want the kids going
• 1:13:24
  Speaker 4: into the system. Get it is something that they use
• 1:13:28
  Speaker 4: as a threat to try to get some kind of
• 1:13:31
  Speaker 4: cooperation from these criminal fucking parents. And it's just it's sad.
• 1:13:40
  Speaker 4: It's sad all the way around.
• 1:13:42
  Speaker 1: At the same time, they don't the state doesn't prioritize
• 1:13:50
  Speaker 1: the father and situations when the mother is you have
• 1:13:55
  Speaker 1: this and this is not just the US, by the way,
• 1:13:57
  Speaker 1: the UK does this as well. A woman loses custody
• 1:14:00
  Speaker 1: of her kids because of her lifestyle choices and putting
• 1:14:05
  Speaker 1: them in danger, and usually it's after a child has
• 1:14:10
  Speaker 1: been injured, not just you know, somebody calls the cops
• 1:14:13
  Speaker 1: because the kids are playing outside, but the hospital calls
• 1:14:19
  Speaker 1: the police because the kid came in with an illness
• 1:14:23
  Speaker 1: or an ailment, a broken arm, you know something. Or
• 1:14:29
  Speaker 1: an educator has reports abuse because the kid is covered
• 1:14:34
  Speaker 1: in bruises, or neglect because the kid is coming to
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 1: school hungry, and then there's an investigation. Even if the
• 1:14:44
  Speaker 1: parents don't live together, the father has to fight for
• 1:14:47
  Speaker 1: custody in that circumstance. They don't just automatically look at
• 1:14:52
  Speaker 1: him and say, well, maybe the father should take custody
• 1:14:56
  Speaker 1: of the children while this is getting sorted out. And
• 1:15:01
  Speaker 1: in fact, it can be proved that the mother is
• 1:15:06
  Speaker 1: an abuser or a neglector or combination thereof, and the
• 1:15:11
  Speaker 1: father can get protective custody after filing for it, and
• 1:15:16
  Speaker 1: he might still have to fight to keep it. Look
• 1:15:21
  Speaker 1: for a story titled seven Years in Hell by me
• 1:15:25
  Speaker 1: Annah Wallen on a voice formen dot com and you'll
• 1:15:28
  Speaker 1: see what I'm talking about. But Rachel, you'll be ready
• 1:15:33
  Speaker 1: to get angry as fuck when you read that story
• 1:15:36
  Speaker 1: that happened to one of my best friends.
• 1:15:38
  Speaker 4: By the way, and in the meantime, how long does
• 1:15:41
  Speaker 4: it take before the state gets involved where the child
• 1:15:45
  Speaker 4: is still stuck in some of these horrific situations.
• 1:15:50
  Speaker 1: Well, in that family, the ex had gotten together with
• 1:15:55
  Speaker 1: a new guy. In fact, that's how the divorce occurred.
• 1:15:58
  Speaker 1: She had a baby by another man, so that was
• 1:16:02
  Speaker 1: that was the end of her marriage to the father
• 1:16:05
  Speaker 1: of her child, her first child, and they had fifty
• 1:16:12
  Speaker 1: to fifty shared parenting that they had agreed on. But
• 1:16:15
  Speaker 1: when she moved in with this other guy, their lifestyle
• 1:16:19
  Speaker 1: was entirely different than the lifestyle she had with My
• 1:16:23
  Speaker 1: friend whose name is Roger in his story because I
• 1:16:26
  Speaker 1: didn't I didn't give you guys his real name. Roger
• 1:16:31
  Speaker 1: had to deal with the fact that his daughter was
• 1:16:35
  Speaker 1: going back to a house that was not clean, that
• 1:16:39
  Speaker 1: the adults were high quite frequently, that there were illegal
• 1:16:43
  Speaker 1: drugs in the house, and cps wouldn't do anything for him.
• 1:16:48
  Speaker 1: The cops wouldn't do anything for him. The cops called
• 1:16:50
  Speaker 1: him one day to come and get his daughter because
• 1:16:54
  Speaker 1: they had been called to the house by step dad's
• 1:16:59
  Speaker 1: six years year old child. Because none of the kids
• 1:17:03
  Speaker 1: could wake up any of the adults, they were so
• 1:17:06
  Speaker 1: stoned that they had all passed out and the kids
• 1:17:09
  Speaker 1: were hungry, and so the six year old dialed nine
• 1:17:12
  Speaker 1: to one to one.
• 1:17:13
  Speaker 4: Jesus Christ yep sixty years old.
• 1:17:18
  Speaker 1: Yeah, well, the daughter was four at that time, and
• 1:17:21
  Speaker 1: there was an infant, and so Roger went and got
• 1:17:26
  Speaker 1: his daughter, and he duly went to Child Protective Services
• 1:17:30
  Speaker 1: filed for protective custody, and they said, well, we don't
• 1:17:33
  Speaker 1: have a police report. So he went to get the
• 1:17:36
  Speaker 1: police report and there was none. The cops showed up,
• 1:17:39
  Speaker 1: handled the situation and filed zero paperwork because they were
• 1:17:43
  Speaker 1: so busy dealing with so many other problems in the
• 1:17:46
  Speaker 1: Dayton metro area that that one just sort of slipped by,
• 1:17:50
  Speaker 1: like it was taken care of. The kids were safe
• 1:17:52
  Speaker 1: because the daughter had been sent to the father's house,
• 1:17:56
  Speaker 1: you know, and other family members had done all the pickups.
• 1:18:00
  Speaker 1: So a few months later, the stepdad calls Roger up
• 1:18:06
  Speaker 1: and says, come get your fucking daughter. Turns out that
• 1:18:10
  Speaker 1: he had beaten her black and blue. And so step
• 1:18:17
  Speaker 1: mom in in Roger's household, who is bridget in the
• 1:18:25
  Speaker 1: in the story, she uh she had the wherewithal to
• 1:18:30
  Speaker 1: take pictures of the child's battered and bruised face while
• 1:18:34
  Speaker 1: she was still tear stained and you could see the
• 1:18:38
  Speaker 1: fear in her eyes because an adult had just assaulted her. Yeah, like,
• 1:18:44
  Speaker 1: this wasn't discipline, this, this was a beating and uh,
• 1:18:51
  Speaker 1: that's what got him custody. And for the next seven years,
• 1:18:57
  Speaker 1: the the biological mother of this child, drag that family
• 1:19:01
  Speaker 1: through the court system, the bowels, the underbelly of the
• 1:19:05
  Speaker 1: family and criminal court systems, with a combination of false
• 1:19:10
  Speaker 1: criminal allegations and ridiculous motions. That's the case where I
• 1:19:16
  Speaker 1: sat in the courtroom listened to a judge say the
• 1:19:20
  Speaker 1: mother didn't have to pay off her eight thousand dollars
• 1:19:24
  Speaker 1: in arrears for child support.
• 1:19:26
  Speaker 3: Wow.
• 1:19:27
  Speaker 1: The child support enforcement agency had threatened to go after
• 1:19:32
  Speaker 1: the father for not paying early one month because he
• 1:19:39
  Speaker 1: changed jobs and he could only pay on time on
• 1:19:42
  Speaker 1: the due date for his child support instead of early.
• 1:19:47
  Speaker 1: They threatened to go after him and jail him for
• 1:19:50
  Speaker 1: not paying early over like one hundred and fifty bucks.
• 1:19:55
  Speaker 1: A payment of one hundred and fifty bucks, but she
• 1:19:57
  Speaker 1: could be eight thousand dollars in and it was, you know,
• 1:20:03
  Speaker 1: not really that big of a deal. And so you know,
• 1:20:09
  Speaker 1: that's not the only case. A couple of years ago,
• 1:20:14
  Speaker 1: I had somebody write to me, and I was going
• 1:20:16
  Speaker 1: back and forth in communication with that individual, trying to
• 1:20:23
  Speaker 1: help him navigate the legal system in New York as
• 1:20:29
  Speaker 1: he tried to get protective custody of his child because
• 1:20:32
  Speaker 1: the mother was crazy, and I mean she was hallucinating
• 1:20:39
  Speaker 1: and dealing with delusions and all kinds of crazy, right,
• 1:20:44
  Speaker 1: And the court, instead of giving him custody and having
• 1:20:50
  Speaker 1: the mother go get help, ordered him to let the
• 1:20:54
  Speaker 1: mother live in his home even though they were separated,
• 1:20:58
  Speaker 1: they were no longer together, and while he was at work,
• 1:21:03
  Speaker 1: that mother stabbed the daughter to death. I like that.
• 1:21:10
  Speaker 1: This is this stuff that happens in these kind of
• 1:21:13
  Speaker 1: court cases where the state doesn't intervene because the abuser
• 1:21:20
  Speaker 1: or the threat to the child is the mother, and
• 1:21:25
  Speaker 1: the mother ends up doing something horrible or exposes the
• 1:21:30
  Speaker 1: child to something horrible. Yeah.
• 1:21:33
  Speaker 4: I just watched a video, like an interrogation video, which
• 1:21:41
  Speaker 4: just took the fucking soul out of me. So this mother,
• 1:21:48
  Speaker 4: if in scare quotes just to make a long story short,
• 1:21:57
  Speaker 4: she's she's a drug addict. I think think the whole
• 1:22:00
  Speaker 4: family really was, you know, involved in drugs, meth to
• 1:22:04
  Speaker 4: be particular, but she uh, basically shot her six year
• 1:22:13
  Speaker 4: old child nine times in the backseat of her car.
• 1:22:19
  Speaker 4: They pulled her over, rear window, shattered blood all over
• 1:22:24
  Speaker 4: the place, child was in the trunk, and she when
• 1:22:30
  Speaker 4: they fast forward. So when they went to interrogate her,
• 1:22:38
  Speaker 4: her response was, well, I was raped. I told you
• 1:22:41
  Speaker 4: I was raped, and that's why she she was that's
• 1:22:44
  Speaker 4: the excuse she was using as for as as far
• 1:22:47
  Speaker 4: as like the blood splatter inside of the car, whereas
• 1:22:51
  Speaker 4: there was also brain matter.
• 1:22:56
  Speaker 1: And uh, the rapist fucked your brains out.
• 1:22:59
  Speaker 4: Well, there there was no rapist. There was no rapist.
• 1:23:03
  Speaker 4: I am fully sure of it, not believing that there
• 1:23:07
  Speaker 4: was any kind of rapist. But yeah, no, So they
• 1:23:12
  Speaker 4: went back to the apartment. She put a load of
• 1:23:16
  Speaker 4: clothes on. I mean, they found like the child's booster
• 1:23:21
  Speaker 4: seat in one garbage dump and like with homework that
• 1:23:28
  Speaker 4: had the child's name and her name written on it.
• 1:23:32
  Speaker 4: And so even they had all of this, and they
• 1:23:35
  Speaker 4: had all of this, They had all of this, and
• 1:23:37
  Speaker 4: so they're sitting there talking to this woman and she's like, well,
• 1:23:42
  Speaker 4: you know, but I was honest with you, and I
• 1:23:45
  Speaker 4: told you I was raped. I was raped. I was raped,
• 1:23:48
  Speaker 4: and it was just like the.
• 1:23:53
  Speaker 3: This just.
• 1:23:56
  Speaker 4: I don't even know if entitlement is the right word
• 1:23:59
  Speaker 4: for it, but it's just this excuse that I was raped,
• 1:24:03
  Speaker 4: something happened to me, nothing happened to my child that
• 1:24:08
  Speaker 4: she and she actually was the one who shot the child. Yeah,
• 1:24:13
  Speaker 4: it's nine times.
• 1:24:14
  Speaker 1: It's like Ali Ali income free. Right, women women think
• 1:24:20
  Speaker 1: that or no tag backs, you know say calling calling
• 1:24:24
  Speaker 1: rape is an action and thought terminating event. That Well,
• 1:24:31
  Speaker 1: if if I cry rape, you can't you can't do anything.
• 1:24:36
  Speaker 4: Yeah, you can't.
• 1:24:37
  Speaker 1: You know, you can't hold me accountable for anything. Yeah,
• 1:24:40
  Speaker 1: even if it's not related to my my claim, even
• 1:24:45
  Speaker 1: if it has nothing to do with my claim, whether
• 1:24:49
  Speaker 1: or not the child was shot had went nothing to
• 1:24:52
  Speaker 1: do with whether or not she was raped, and it's
• 1:24:56
  Speaker 1: certainly not an excuse like even if she had. Women
• 1:25:00
  Speaker 1: do this with abortion too, well, they want the ability
• 1:25:04
  Speaker 1: to abort the child if they've been raped, and that's
• 1:25:07
  Speaker 1: that's an excuse to kill the child because you know
• 1:25:13
  Speaker 1: they were they were a victim of sexual violence. The
• 1:25:16
  Speaker 1: child didn't rape them, mhm, Right, the child's not guilty
• 1:25:20
  Speaker 1: of anything, so the child should not be sentenced to
• 1:25:24
  Speaker 1: death for that right. But but yeah, so this argument,
• 1:25:32
  Speaker 1: this argument regarding Supreme Court, that judges have too long
• 1:25:37
  Speaker 1: of tenure in the Supreme Court, and it means that
• 1:25:42
  Speaker 1: we can't get rid of judges that are bad, judges
• 1:25:45
  Speaker 1: that shouldn't be in there. Let's just do a simple
• 1:25:52
  Speaker 1: Google search for some information. Congress has the sole authority
• 1:25:56
  Speaker 1: to impeach and remove Supreme Court justices, as established by
• 1:26:03
  Speaker 1: the US Constitution. So if Congress puts the judge into
• 1:26:12
  Speaker 1: in a place, the President nominates the judge, the judge
• 1:26:16
  Speaker 1: gets voted in, and that the judge is making judgments
• 1:26:21
  Speaker 1: and engages in behavior that is unconstitutional, unethical, arbitrary as
• 1:26:31
  Speaker 1: opposed to following the law and so on. Congress can
• 1:26:35
  Speaker 1: then take back you know, no takebacks, well not in
• 1:26:39
  Speaker 1: this case. Congress can decide that a judge is behaving
• 1:26:45
  Speaker 1: so badly that they have to be removed. The House
• 1:26:50
  Speaker 1: votes to impeach, the process moves to the Senate, which
• 1:26:54
  Speaker 1: has the sole power to try all impeachments. They need
• 1:26:57
  Speaker 1: sixty seven out of one hundred to convict and remove
• 1:27:01
  Speaker 1: the justice from office. It's a high threshold and it
• 1:27:04
  Speaker 1: makes it extremely difficult, but it is a process for
• 1:27:10
  Speaker 1: removing bad judges. This idea that the judge's tenure is
• 1:27:20
  Speaker 1: too long because if we get a bad judge, there's
• 1:27:24
  Speaker 1: nothing we can do about it. It's bullshit. So there's
• 1:27:27
  Speaker 1: already a check on these judges. So this lifetime appointment,
• 1:27:34
  Speaker 1: there's no reason to change that. There's no reason to
• 1:27:41
  Speaker 1: object basically, and then what do they say, because the
• 1:27:47
  Speaker 1: judges are not all in lockstep, that's a good thing.
• 1:27:55
  Speaker 1: It is a good thing that you have to work
• 1:27:58
  Speaker 1: hard to convince the judge is that there shouldn't be
• 1:28:02
  Speaker 1: an overwhelming majority in most rulings. But yeah, Michael, what
• 1:28:06
  Speaker 1: were you going to say?
• 1:28:08
  Speaker 3: I mean, in light of all this is not looking
• 1:28:10
  Speaker 3: good for Kintangi Brown Jackson. If you want to if
• 1:28:14
  Speaker 3: you if you want to be a competent judge, you
• 1:28:18
  Speaker 3: need to be able to tell me what a woman is. Yeah,
• 1:28:24
  Speaker 3: that without without being what a biologist is. Given that
• 1:28:27
  Speaker 3: like literally half of your cases involved at least one woman.
• 1:28:32
  Speaker 3: If most of your cases involve at least one woman,
• 1:28:36
  Speaker 3: So before you pass judgment on on either a defendant
• 1:28:42
  Speaker 3: or a plaintiff who happens to be a woman, you
• 1:28:44
  Speaker 3: should be able to tell me what one of those is.
• 1:28:47
  Speaker 3: But I get the feeling this is this is going
• 1:28:52
  Speaker 3: to get twisted in directions that that that people generally
• 1:28:56
  Speaker 3: don't want, much like Trump has tried to get all
• 1:29:03
  Speaker 3: sorts of ship pushed through, and he keeps getting some
• 1:29:07
  Speaker 3: judge somewhere in some state, not even a Supreme Court justice,
• 1:29:12
  Speaker 3: just any judge anywhere in any state can be like, nah,
• 1:29:16
  Speaker 3: that hurts my feelings, so we're not doing it. And
• 1:29:21
  Speaker 3: that makes me think if anyone wants to, if anyone
• 1:29:27
  Speaker 3: wants to impeach a Supreme Court justice, I presume it's
• 1:29:30
  Speaker 3: going to come down to some other judge anywhere in
• 1:29:34
  Speaker 3: any state who's going to say, no, it hurts my feelings.
• 1:29:38
  Speaker 1: And they won't be able to do that one. This
• 1:29:40
  Speaker 1: power has been in existence since the start, and in fact,
• 1:29:44
  Speaker 1: as Mayredith G. Pointed out, it used to be regular
• 1:29:51
  Speaker 1: practice to impeach Supreme Court judges, federal judges and so on.
• 1:29:56
  Speaker 1: All federal judges can be impeached and they don't have
• 1:29:59
  Speaker 1: to come a crime. So if a federal judge tries
• 1:30:04
  Speaker 1: to rule that the Senate impeach a Supreme Court judge,
• 1:30:10
  Speaker 1: the Senate can then the the the House can then
• 1:30:14
  Speaker 1: vote to impeach that judge as well, and the Senate
• 1:30:18
  Speaker 1: can then have a hearing on that judge. And if
• 1:30:21
  Speaker 1: that judge is then removed from office, then the point
• 1:30:25
  Speaker 1: is moot, isn't it. So they do have that power,
• 1:30:29
  Speaker 1: they do have that capability. It's not easy. You have
• 1:30:32
  Speaker 1: to get most of them to agree. And it shouldn't
• 1:30:34
  Speaker 1: be easy. It should be very hard because you don't
• 1:30:37
  Speaker 1: want them doing it at the drop of a hat.
• 1:30:39
  Speaker 1: But uh, I mean, hell, they did it. Did it
• 1:30:42
  Speaker 1: to the President of the United States, like like like
• 1:30:45
  Speaker 1: they were sneezing in response to an allergen Right, all
• 1:30:51
  Speaker 1: he does walk into the room and all of a sudden,
• 1:30:53
  Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi has a fit. Peach, peach, meach, bless you, Nancy,
• 1:30:58
  Speaker 1: bless you, bless you very very much.
• 1:31:03
  Speaker 4: I just have to say it. Can if I can
• 1:31:05
  Speaker 4: just take a second and say, Meredith g I love you.
• 1:31:10
  Speaker 4: I love everything you have to say.
• 1:31:12
  Speaker 1: You are just.
• 1:31:15
  Speaker 4: You are a bright spot on humanity. You make me
• 1:31:20
  Speaker 4: believe again that there are people. I mean, not that
• 1:31:24
  Speaker 4: these people don't you know, my co host and.
• 1:31:27
  Speaker 1: Whatever, but sometimes chat.
• 1:31:39
  Speaker 4: Because I don't care she is or is it I
• 1:31:43
  Speaker 4: love her and I'm going to take her home and
• 1:31:45
  Speaker 4: I just love her.
• 1:31:47
  Speaker 3: You're the other kind of woman that gives us hope
• 1:31:49
  Speaker 3: for the future of humanity.
• 1:31:50
  Speaker 4: Yes, absolutely to.
• 1:31:53
  Speaker 3: HBr, because there are a scant few women over here
• 1:31:57
  Speaker 3: who give us hope for humanity.
• 1:31:59
  Speaker 4: Yes, and you are absolutely one of them. So I
• 1:32:02
  Speaker 4: I just appreciate you so much. And yeah, I don't
• 1:32:09
  Speaker 4: I'm not glazing. I'm not glazing.
• 1:32:12
  Speaker 1: There we go. But yeah, that's it is nice. It
• 1:32:20
  Speaker 1: is nice that we do have some women in our
• 1:32:22
  Speaker 1: audience who are not Carly Ellison, Yes, who are like
• 1:32:27
  Speaker 1: the exact pullar opposite of Carl Ellison. Intelligence God, yes, yes.
• 1:32:34
  Speaker 1: So so they want life life terms abolished and term
• 1:32:39
  Speaker 1: limits to be imposed. So what what are term limits
• 1:32:44
  Speaker 1: for in terms of elected officials. They're to limit the
• 1:32:48
  Speaker 1: power of the people to keep in position individuals with
• 1:32:55
  Speaker 1: whose service they are happy. That is the the point
• 1:33:00
  Speaker 1: of term limits. They want the establishment to be able
• 1:33:06
  Speaker 1: to switch out players in the government in order to
• 1:33:12
  Speaker 1: impose their will more easily on the people and prevent
• 1:33:18
  Speaker 1: the people from striking back by putting populists into position
• 1:33:25
  Speaker 1: that might give more power to the people, thereby taking
• 1:33:32
  Speaker 1: more power away from the political establishment. This is the
• 1:33:36
  Speaker 1: ultimate sin where the establishment is concerned. They hate the
• 1:33:42
  Speaker 1: idea that that might happen, and they want to do
• 1:33:47
  Speaker 1: everything in their power to prevent it, and the more
• 1:33:51
  Speaker 1: power they have to prevent it in their minds, the better.
• 1:33:55
  Speaker 1: One of the means by which they the power to
• 1:34:02
  Speaker 1: prevent it is by limiting your ability to keep someone
• 1:34:08
  Speaker 1: in position who does the job you ask them to do.
• 1:34:13
  Speaker 1: Supreme Court justices included, but also senators, congressmen, presidents, your
• 1:34:19
  Speaker 1: state politicians, your local politicians, all of them. But you
• 1:34:23
  Speaker 1: know who doesn't have term limits? Whose terms that these
• 1:34:27
  Speaker 1: people never propose limiting and that one guess. It should
• 1:34:34
  Speaker 1: only take one guess, and I will tell you the answer, right.
• 1:34:39
  Speaker 1: It is the people who write shit like this, the
• 1:34:43
  Speaker 1: bureaucrats that you didn't vote for, that are appointed by
• 1:34:48
  Speaker 1: elected officials to do a job that then they then
• 1:34:52
  Speaker 1: keep for thirty to fifty years or in the military
• 1:34:57
  Speaker 1: possibly longer, and then advance in their their their department,
• 1:35:06
  Speaker 1: or their agency until they develop a level of political
• 1:35:11
  Speaker 1: power that is beyond any of the branches of government
• 1:35:16
  Speaker 1: and often often is out of the reach of any
• 1:35:24
  Speaker 1: of the branches of government. All they can do is
• 1:35:27
  Speaker 1: defund or eliminate the entire branch the individual is in.
• 1:35:33
  Speaker 1: It is difficult to fire a Washington bureaucrat, it is
• 1:35:38
  Speaker 1: difficult to remove an appointed official, and it is difficult
• 1:35:45
  Speaker 1: to eliminate a job that has been created as payment
• 1:35:52
  Speaker 1: for somebody getting elected into office. Uh. And at the
• 1:35:56
  Speaker 1: same time they have this condition. For instance, after Title
• 1:36:03
  Speaker 1: nine was established. Title nine is the law that says
• 1:36:08
  Speaker 1: that you cannot discriminate against one sex or the other
• 1:36:14
  Speaker 1: in the school system. After that was established, there was
• 1:36:19
  Speaker 1: an office for enforcing it within the Education Department, and
• 1:36:24
  Speaker 1: that office had to maintain its usefulness and necessity. So
• 1:36:32
  Speaker 1: once it was pretty much clear and present that discrimination
• 1:36:38
  Speaker 1: in schools in terms of you know, women not being
• 1:36:42
  Speaker 1: able to take certain types of courses or certain majors
• 1:36:46
  Speaker 1: in college and stuff like that, well that was over
• 1:36:50
  Speaker 1: and there wasn't really anything for them to enforce. They
• 1:36:53
  Speaker 1: went into enforcing it in sports all of a sudden.
• 1:36:57
  Speaker 1: It's not about whether women can become doctors. It's about
• 1:37:00
  Speaker 1: whether women can become basketball players. And rather than enforcing
• 1:37:09
  Speaker 1: the elimination of quotas to discriminate against one sex, they
• 1:37:14
  Speaker 1: began enforcing quotas to discriminate against the opposite sex. So
• 1:37:19
  Speaker 1: they eliminated throughout the nineteen nineties in a lot of
• 1:37:24
  Speaker 1: universities men's Olympic wrestling and men's Olympic gymnastics because they
• 1:37:29
  Speaker 1: couldn't get enough women interested in athletic participation at the
• 1:37:36
  Speaker 1: university level to offset to equal the number of men
• 1:37:43
  Speaker 1: participating in sports. They didn't have women's tackle football, and
• 1:37:48
  Speaker 1: they couldn't get women to play powder puff football, which
• 1:37:54
  Speaker 1: is not tackle usually it's like flag football or touch football.
• 1:38:02
  Speaker 1: So they had to come up with something to offset
• 1:38:05
  Speaker 1: the numbers on the football teams. But there was a
• 1:38:11
  Speaker 1: men's gymnastics team and a women's gymnastics team. Volleyball didn't
• 1:38:17
  Speaker 1: get enough people involved all of the other sports that
• 1:38:22
  Speaker 1: they had both sexes participated in, so the only way
• 1:38:28
  Speaker 1: was the elimination of some male sports. And they weren't
• 1:38:30
  Speaker 1: going to eliminate the football teams because most universities take
• 1:38:33
  Speaker 1: in money from that. They profit from that, so it
• 1:38:38
  Speaker 1: goes to pay for their other athletic programs existence. You
• 1:38:44
  Speaker 1: almost you owe your football and your basketball teams at
• 1:38:47
  Speaker 1: your university for the existence of your volleyball teams. Your
• 1:38:54
  Speaker 1: baseball teams and softball teams, unless your university is a
• 1:38:57
  Speaker 1: big baseball school. The entirety of women's sports is paid
• 1:39:04
  Speaker 1: for by men's men's men's football, basketball, maybe baseball, maybe
• 1:39:14
  Speaker 1: hockey at some schools Night Motorcyclists mentioned ice hockey, but
• 1:39:20
  Speaker 1: it's paid for by tickets sold to men's competitive sports
• 1:39:27
  Speaker 1: where at that particular university, scouts for professional athletics might
• 1:39:33
  Speaker 1: show up. And it's been that way throughout the history
• 1:39:37
  Speaker 1: of women's sports, right, but a lot of men's sports
• 1:39:43
  Speaker 1: got eliminated or reduced. A lot of schools just don't
• 1:39:47
  Speaker 1: have a men's gymnastics team or a men's Olympic wrestling team.
• 1:39:51
  Speaker 1: And I say Olympic wrestling because I don't want people
• 1:39:55
  Speaker 1: thinking of world wrestling entertainment, but actual grappling. And as
• 1:40:04
  Speaker 1: a result, you know, we've we've lost a lot of
• 1:40:06
  Speaker 1: competitive competitiveness among young adults going into competition for the
• 1:40:14
  Speaker 1: actual positions in the Olympics on the Olympic team. But yeah,
• 1:40:21
  Speaker 1: they to justify their their jobs. They did that, and
• 1:40:26
  Speaker 1: once it got to the point where there there wasn't
• 1:40:29
  Speaker 1: enough for them to enforce in sports, they had done
• 1:40:32
  Speaker 1: their damage. Then they went into the sexual relationships of students,
• 1:40:37
  Speaker 1: and the Dear Colleague letter came out twenty eleven. Before that,
• 1:40:43
  Speaker 1: there was the Clariact, forcing schools to document and and
• 1:40:49
  Speaker 1: track sexual conflict essentially between students at the schools, even
• 1:40:56
  Speaker 1: when the behavior wasn't criminal. So yeah, yeah, night motorcyclists.
• 1:41:05
  Speaker 1: I could just differentiate by calling it real wrestling as
• 1:41:08
  Speaker 1: opposed to w w E, but that would make some
• 1:41:12
  Speaker 1: w w E fans mad.
• 1:41:14
  Speaker 4: It's the w w F. Now, sorry, I didn't No, no, no,
• 1:41:20
  Speaker 4: I'm sorry, I'm sorry.
• 1:41:21
  Speaker 1: I'm sorry.
• 1:41:23
  Speaker 4: Yeah, w w I'm so used to it being called
• 1:41:27
  Speaker 4: the w w F because I'm old.
• 1:41:31
  Speaker 1: Yeah, a lot of us when they were forced to
• 1:41:35
  Speaker 1: change their name. We I have a shirt that was
• 1:41:38
  Speaker 1: my husband's that has two pandas on it, and one
• 1:41:41
  Speaker 1: of the the other one.
• 1:41:46
  Speaker 3: Somehow were considered more important than than the progress.
• 1:41:51
  Speaker 4: Yes, yes, well they were there first, Okay, they the
• 1:41:56
  Speaker 4: pans were there first, so they deserve I don't know,
• 1:42:01
  Speaker 4: whatever kind of a detection.
• 1:42:04
  Speaker 1: They don't bounce basketballs, they don't ride barrels over Niagara Falls.
• 1:42:11
  Speaker 1: Die they must die. The pandas must die. Except for.
• 1:42:17
  Speaker 3: That, they're going to like I I know we often
• 1:42:21
  Speaker 3: go on about how humans are the next extinction event
• 1:42:29
  Speaker 3: that a lot of species have died out because of humans,
• 1:42:33
  Speaker 3: but and a lot of them I am going to
• 1:42:35
  Speaker 3: feel sorry for because it probably was our fault as
• 1:42:39
  Speaker 3: a species, but not pandas. Pandas just can't fucking figure
• 1:42:44
  Speaker 3: out what the fuck to do.
• 1:42:47
  Speaker 1: Literally, the only reason they haven't died out is because
• 1:42:53
  Speaker 1: of human intervention.
• 1:42:56
  Speaker 4: And that goes right back to my comment about the
• 1:42:59
  Speaker 4: soul safety net, right like, because if there wasn't human
• 1:43:03
  Speaker 4: intervention with all of these medical things, right like, it
• 1:43:09
  Speaker 4: just nature would just take its own course. Yeah, And
• 1:43:15
  Speaker 4: who's to say that that's wrong? Right Like, if you
• 1:43:18
  Speaker 4: believe in a god, like isn't don't you believe that
• 1:43:21
  Speaker 4: that's God's will? Right? I Mean, so it's just crazy
• 1:43:29
  Speaker 4: like it happens all of the time.
• 1:43:32
  Speaker 1: So there's I'm not going to say that human intervention
• 1:43:36
  Speaker 1: in nature is against God's will. That's like, if you
• 1:43:41
  Speaker 1: read your Bible, you know that God gave human beings
• 1:43:46
  Speaker 1: dominion over nature. That was that was part of the deal,
• 1:43:51
  Speaker 1: and it's it's why it's not a sin to take
• 1:43:55
  Speaker 1: medicine when you get sick, and why it's not a
• 1:43:59
  Speaker 1: sin to farm animals and to use breeding to genetically
• 1:44:07
  Speaker 1: modify them over time and so on. Right, But there
• 1:44:12
  Speaker 1: comes a point like, if you are endangering human life
• 1:44:17
  Speaker 1: to protect and preserve species that that evolved to survive
• 1:44:24
  Speaker 1: in a environment that no longer exists in a world condition,
• 1:44:30
  Speaker 1: a worldwide environment that no longer exists, that's I wouldn't
• 1:44:36
  Speaker 1: call it a sin, but it's it is stupid. It's
• 1:44:39
  Speaker 1: not a moral thing.
• 1:44:41
  Speaker 4: It is.
• 1:44:44
  Speaker 1: It's just showing, you know, doing it for show, trying
• 1:44:50
  Speaker 1: to look good instead of actually being good. But this
• 1:44:54
  Speaker 1: is this is essentially people fall for that kind of
• 1:44:59
  Speaker 1: argument all the time. It's why the people making these
• 1:45:04
  Speaker 1: arguments regarding the Supreme Court think that they can talk
• 1:45:08
  Speaker 1: you into the idea that the Founding Fathers were wrong
• 1:45:13
  Speaker 1: when they when they made that a lifetime appointment by
• 1:45:18
  Speaker 1: arguing that the legislators could you know, can't do anything
• 1:45:26
  Speaker 1: about it if the judges are bad, that the Founding
• 1:45:29
  Speaker 1: Fathers didn't anticipate that the pattern of human lifespan expansion
• 1:45:37
  Speaker 1: that modern medicine of the time was achieving would continue
• 1:45:42
  Speaker 1: in the future, and that it's better to have the
• 1:45:48
  Speaker 1: Supreme Court shuffle going on all the time than it
• 1:45:51
  Speaker 1: is to have stability in the Supreme Court once judges
• 1:45:55
  Speaker 1: have been appointed, as if the process of appointment isn't
• 1:46:02
  Speaker 1: very careful, their entire argument, in other words, relies on
• 1:46:09
  Speaker 1: you being too stupid to figure out that the argument
• 1:46:12
  Speaker 1: is full of holes.
• 1:46:16
  Speaker 3: It's clever of you to pull it back to the
• 1:46:19
  Speaker 3: main topic. While I was sat here thinking of continuing
• 1:46:23
  Speaker 3: to talk about patterns, but I'm going to I'm going
• 1:46:27
  Speaker 3: to make a series of oscillations.
• 1:46:31
  Speaker 4: Eventually almost there too bring you a lot.
• 1:46:36
  Speaker 3: I'm going to make a series of oscillations and also
• 1:46:39
  Speaker 3: bring it back to the main topic. Right, Species die
• 1:46:45
  Speaker 3: out all the time, right through throughout the course of
• 1:46:48
  Speaker 3: the Earth's history. Of the species whoever existed have have
• 1:46:54
  Speaker 3: have gone extinct. But that doesn't mean that that we
• 1:46:59
  Speaker 3: as humans should go ahead and kill a bunch of species,
• 1:47:04
  Speaker 3: because it takes millions of years for a species to evolve,
• 1:47:08
  Speaker 3: and evidently it takes tens of years for a species
• 1:47:14
  Speaker 3: to die out like Yangshi river dolphins, like the black rhino,
• 1:47:19
  Speaker 3: like evidently pandas eventually, and yeah, that does kind of suck.
• 1:47:24
  Speaker 3: It does kind of seem offset that it can take
• 1:47:30
  Speaker 3: decades for a species to go extinct, whereas it takes
• 1:47:35
  Speaker 3: millions of species of years for other species to fill
• 1:47:40
  Speaker 3: that niche. So that does seem kind of offset. And
• 1:47:46
  Speaker 3: the environmentalists among us will say, well, the fact that
• 1:47:52
  Speaker 3: all these species are going extinct on the watch of
• 1:47:58
  Speaker 3: humanity and it's domination of the Earth suggests that the
• 1:48:06
  Speaker 3: broad range of animals existing on Earth is the diversifying,
• 1:48:12
  Speaker 3: like that there will be so fewer different kinds of
• 1:48:17
  Speaker 3: species on Earth than there were before we we took over,
• 1:48:23
  Speaker 3: before before this conquest of human beings. But then you
• 1:48:27
  Speaker 3: have to ask, okay, well, yeah, you're you seem to
• 1:48:30
  Speaker 3: be assuming that diversity is a strength, and you can
• 1:48:34
  Speaker 3: see you can see how I'm slowly drawing back to
• 1:48:42
  Speaker 3: why do we need such a diversity of species? And
• 1:48:47
  Speaker 3: you can say, well, for its own sake, I mean,
• 1:48:50
  Speaker 3: it's it's kind of it's interesting that we have pandas
• 1:48:55
  Speaker 3: and humpback whales and that all these obscure speed species
• 1:49:00
  Speaker 3: of spring bok across Africa. But at the same time, right,
• 1:49:05
  Speaker 3: what happens if they do disappear? What what exactly what
• 1:49:08
  Speaker 3: what would be the worst possible outcome if like a
• 1:49:12
  Speaker 3: thousand different species of the of the weakest organisms on
• 1:49:17
  Speaker 3: Earth happened to die out. Like, what's the worst that
• 1:49:20
  Speaker 3: could happen. It'll get filled with another niche. Yeah, it
• 1:49:22
  Speaker 3: might take a million years for other species to fill
• 1:49:28
  Speaker 3: those niches. But in the meantime, there's actually other species
• 1:49:31
  Speaker 3: that are quite willing to fill those niches. I mean,
• 1:49:34
  Speaker 3: someone else is going to eat the bamboo if it's
• 1:49:37
  Speaker 3: not the pandas well, I guess no.
• 1:49:39
  Speaker 1: I mean humans. You've ever been to a Chinese restaurant.
• 1:49:45
  Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, we eat bamboo all the time.
• 1:49:47
  Speaker 4: I think I think it's such a short sighted argument
• 1:49:50
  Speaker 4: when we talk about, oh my god, this animal's gonna
• 1:49:52
  Speaker 4: go extinct. Well, you know when the the other people
• 1:49:59
  Speaker 4: like the less I don't want to say that, I
• 1:50:02
  Speaker 4: don't want to like generalize them, but you know, you'll
• 1:50:05
  Speaker 4: have the global climate ast people saying oh my god, Well,
• 1:50:08
  Speaker 4: you know if we don't if the cows don't fart,
• 1:50:12
  Speaker 4: then you know, we're just gonna It's ridiculous because you
• 1:50:18
  Speaker 4: are arguing against so it's going to happen anyway, and
• 1:50:25
  Speaker 4: so the world will not stop existing if humans don't exist.
• 1:50:36
  Speaker 4: Right the earth. Everybody is arguing against like or for
• 1:50:43
  Speaker 4: their placed on this earth. Right, we don't. We don't
• 1:50:48
  Speaker 4: own it. We're just here. So if the conditions of
• 1:50:54
  Speaker 4: Earth becomes so untenable for human life to exist, then
• 1:50:58
  Speaker 4: humans just won't exists and it might just not include
• 1:51:02
  Speaker 4: any other animal that that is here. The if if
• 1:51:08
  Speaker 4: the sweet Meteor of Death hits New York City, then
• 1:51:16
  Speaker 4: there will still be cockroaches, there will still be insect life,
• 1:51:20
  Speaker 4: there will.
• 1:51:20
  Speaker 1: Still be the size of the meteor.
• 1:51:23
  Speaker 4: Well, I mean correct, and I mean that you have
• 1:51:26
  Speaker 4: to pray harder, Hannah, it really doesn't.
• 1:51:31
  Speaker 1: Yes, But but potential extinction events that would turn the
• 1:51:36
  Speaker 1: earth into a molten uh ball of fire.
• 1:51:42
  Speaker 4: So but but if if we're if we're playing in
• 1:51:47
  Speaker 4: my playground.
• 1:51:51
  Speaker 1: And its environment and its conditions only matter to humans
• 1:51:55
  Speaker 1: in so far as human existence continue, correct, if you
• 1:51:57
  Speaker 1: are no longer here, and then it doesn't matter to us, right,
• 1:52:01
  Speaker 1: So what I'm saying, right, the thing is, when it
• 1:52:07
  Speaker 1: comes to environmental stuff, what matters to humans is the truth,
• 1:52:14
  Speaker 1: what is real, what is factual, what is solid, what
• 1:52:17
  Speaker 1: is documented and so on. And what we're dealing with
• 1:52:23
  Speaker 1: in terms of these environmental arguments is differences of ideology
• 1:52:29
  Speaker 1: between scientists, and so when you when you look at
• 1:52:38
  Speaker 1: statements made on the authority of environmental science, you have
• 1:52:45
  Speaker 1: to also look at the associations, the where the money
• 1:52:50
  Speaker 1: comes from, what the individual is advocating as a solution,
• 1:52:54
  Speaker 1: and so on. Because you have two distinct groups of people.
• 1:52:58
  Speaker 1: You have the people that say, hey, it is a
• 1:53:00
  Speaker 1: problem that there is an island of plastic in the
• 1:53:04
  Speaker 1: middle of the ocean, and we know most of the
• 1:53:07
  Speaker 1: plastic comes from China. We need to make China more
• 1:53:11
  Speaker 1: responsible for how they're trashing the ocean. And that's reasonable
• 1:53:18
  Speaker 1: as long as they can prove that that's true. Then
• 1:53:20
  Speaker 1: you have the people who have been telling us every
• 1:53:22
  Speaker 1: ten years for the last like one hundred years or
• 1:53:25
  Speaker 1: so that in the next ten years all of the
• 1:53:28
  Speaker 1: fish in the ocean are going to die and you
• 1:53:30
  Speaker 1: need to become communists to solve that problem. And yet
• 1:53:35
  Speaker 1: there are still fish and the world is not communist.
• 1:53:39
  Speaker 1: And they're the same people that say, well, just because
• 1:53:42
  Speaker 1: all the plastic comes from China, doesn't mean that people
• 1:53:46
  Speaker 1: in California shouldn't have to give up their plastic in
• 1:53:49
  Speaker 1: order to put a stop to that. As if it
• 1:53:53
  Speaker 1: will have any effect, you have to look at. What
• 1:53:59
  Speaker 1: are they offering Is a solution to the problem, is
• 1:54:02
  Speaker 1: the solution related to the cause. Is what they are
• 1:54:05
  Speaker 1: suggesting based on evidence or based on I actually had
• 1:54:12
  Speaker 1: the argument told to me that the entire world should
• 1:54:17
  Speaker 1: be on a system of carbon credits. That you use
• 1:54:24
  Speaker 1: up your carbon credits, you can't have more meat, you
• 1:54:27
  Speaker 1: can't drive your car, you know, you can't heat your house,
• 1:54:30
  Speaker 1: and stuff like that. Accept developing nations like India and
• 1:54:36
  Speaker 1: China should get a pass, even though they're the ones
• 1:54:39
  Speaker 1: producing the most pollution during their development. So it wouldn't
• 1:54:44
  Speaker 1: really make much of a dent in the problem if
• 1:54:48
  Speaker 1: developed nations that are not producing a significant amount in
• 1:54:54
  Speaker 1: comparison reduce their amount by an insignificant number by nine
• 1:55:00
  Speaker 1: people normal things like food and heat and transportation. But
• 1:55:09
  Speaker 1: they want that to be the solution because it's fair. Well,
• 1:55:13
  Speaker 1: it doesn't solve the problem, it won't reduce the humanity
• 1:55:20
  Speaker 1: based carbon footprint, and it won't change the future, even
• 1:55:27
  Speaker 1: if doing so would change the future. But it will
• 1:55:34
  Speaker 1: what's it for?
• 1:55:35
  Speaker 3: It will?
• 1:55:36
  Speaker 1: It's not if it's if the purpose isn't to change
• 1:55:41
  Speaker 1: the future, because clearly they're not achieving that by what
• 1:55:45
  Speaker 1: they're doing, so the purpose has to be something else.
• 1:55:47
  Speaker 1: What is that purpose? Well, the purpose is control over people.
• 1:55:51
  Speaker 1: That's not sciific, but they presented as science. So you
• 1:55:54
  Speaker 1: really have to be careful when you get involved in environmentalism.
• 1:55:58
  Speaker 1: And I learned this growing up simply because I was involved.
• 1:56:03
  Speaker 1: You know, I was one of those kids that would
• 1:56:06
  Speaker 1: go out with a group of people pick up all
• 1:56:08
  Speaker 1: the trash at the park and you know, make sure
• 1:56:11
  Speaker 1: that it all went to the proper places recycled. When
• 1:56:15
  Speaker 1: when I could, you know, eventually learn that relying on
• 1:56:19
  Speaker 1: industrial recycling doesn't actually solve any problems.
• 1:56:26
  Speaker 3: Right.
• 1:56:26
  Speaker 1: Not throwing things away because you can still use them
• 1:56:30
  Speaker 1: solve some problems. Not buying disposable things when you can
• 1:56:34
  Speaker 1: buy things that last solves problems. But sending things to
• 1:56:39
  Speaker 1: a recycling plant to have them broken down and made
• 1:56:43
  Speaker 1: into other things doesn't necessarily solve any problems because it
• 1:56:49
  Speaker 1: results in further pollution in the process of recycling that plastic. Well,
• 1:56:57
  Speaker 1: so yeah, it's definitely not as simple discussion to.
• 1:57:03
  Speaker 4: How it really isn't And I'm sorry you dark go.
• 1:57:06
  Speaker 3: Ahead, okay. And on the subject of extinction events, which
• 1:57:14
  Speaker 3: very often happened because of asteroids or meteoroids are anything
• 1:57:19
  Speaker 3: hitting us from space, which is not something that happens
• 1:57:22
  Speaker 3: with regulated frequency. It could happen in the next hundred years,
• 1:57:26
  Speaker 3: the next thousand years, the next million years. If a
• 1:57:30
  Speaker 3: massive asteroid hits the Earth like it did in the
• 1:57:33
  Speaker 3: dinosaur times in theory, we're all mammal species are dead,
• 1:57:37
  Speaker 3: almost all, and it'll all start back up from microbial
• 1:57:43
  Speaker 3: filth all over again, and that'll take fucking billions of
• 1:57:46
  Speaker 3: years to get back to where it wor was. And
• 1:57:48
  Speaker 3: do you think the pandas are going to stop that?
• 1:57:51
  Speaker 3: Do you think the fucking helm back whales are going
• 1:57:52
  Speaker 3: to stop an asteroid from hitting the Earth. No, the
• 1:57:56
  Speaker 3: only species that can prevent that kind of extinction event
• 1:58:03
  Speaker 3: as human beings, especially in the next hundred thousand million years,
• 1:58:09
  Speaker 3: were the only species the technology actually prevent that from happening.
• 1:58:17
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I don't know.
• 1:58:19
  Speaker 3: So if the pundits have to die, if the humpback
• 1:58:21
  Speaker 3: whales have to die so that humans can live, it's
• 1:58:26
  Speaker 3: going to be a net positive, isn't it.
• 1:58:28
  Speaker 4: Well, I mean, then again we go back to what
• 1:58:30
  Speaker 4: an extinction level event even means, or are we talking
• 1:58:35
  Speaker 4: about extinction of the human race? Or extinction of any
• 1:58:39
  Speaker 4: life on the planet, right, because the planet is going
• 1:58:43
  Speaker 4: to survive whether or not we are here. And that's
• 1:58:46
  Speaker 4: just a fact.
• 1:58:48
  Speaker 1: Well it's not a fact, right, That's the thing. There
• 1:58:53
  Speaker 1: have been instances in history where the entire Earth was
• 1:58:58
  Speaker 1: covered in ice. There have been instances in history and
• 1:59:03
  Speaker 1: there will be Earth was covered in land and then
• 1:59:06
  Speaker 1: the water was all underground, right, and things have survived.
• 1:59:10
  Speaker 1: But there's been no instance in history where all of
• 1:59:15
  Speaker 1: life has survived the entire planet becoming a molten ball
• 1:59:21
  Speaker 1: of burning, burning land, burning substance. And there are objects
• 1:59:28
  Speaker 1: moving in space that can cause that, and there are
• 1:59:34
  Speaker 1: there are objects moving in space that come close to us,
• 1:59:41
  Speaker 1: uh in terms of space, not in terms of obviously
• 1:59:46
  Speaker 1: your house being close to the next door neighbor, or
• 1:59:48
  Speaker 1: even us being close to the moon, but close enough
• 1:59:51
  Speaker 1: to be scary eventually correct. And there have been simulations
• 1:59:58
  Speaker 1: and explanations like I I'm fascinated by this stuff simply
• 2:00:02
  Speaker 1: because there is some evidence that the comet that killed
• 2:00:08
  Speaker 1: off the dinosaurs and caused god I can't think of
• 2:00:12
  Speaker 1: the name for the time period when the weather was
• 2:00:17
  Speaker 1: so extreme that it was damn near impossible to survive
• 2:00:21
  Speaker 1: and if you didn't live on a mountaintop or have
• 2:00:24
  Speaker 1: a safe in an underground place to live, you were fucked.
• 2:00:30
  Speaker 1: But there's a comet that's its tail contains smaller particles
• 2:00:42
  Speaker 1: than itself, that comes around periodically, like every ten thousand
• 2:00:48
  Speaker 1: years or so, that if that has more of a
• 2:00:55
  Speaker 1: direct interaction, not even a full impact, it doesn't even
• 2:00:59
  Speaker 1: have impact that that could cause that or if it
• 2:01:04
  Speaker 1: does impact, the planet is gone. There is no survival
• 2:01:10
  Speaker 1: of the planet. It's not just humans going extinct because
• 2:01:13
  Speaker 1: we died off and didn't reproduce. It's everything is gone.
• 2:01:18
  Speaker 1: There is no Earth, there is no moon, there is nothing.
• 2:01:23
  Speaker 1: There is an asteroid belt.
• 2:01:25
  Speaker 3: And just to oscillate this right back to the main subject,
• 2:01:30
  Speaker 3: it's not women who are going to save the Earth
• 2:01:32
  Speaker 3: from any exist It's gonna be men. It's not women
• 2:01:37
  Speaker 3: who build that true, the fucking spaceships who are going
• 2:01:40
  Speaker 3: to blow that asteroid apart and send it in several
• 2:01:43
  Speaker 3: different directions is going to be men. So I mean,
• 2:01:46
  Speaker 3: to quote Camille Palia, if women were in charge, we
• 2:01:50
  Speaker 3: were all we would all still be living in grass huts,
• 2:01:53
  Speaker 3: and we would be no more use to the Earth
• 2:01:56
  Speaker 3: than the fucking pandas.
• 2:01:59
  Speaker 1: Yep, if if uh such a threat comes along, it
• 2:02:05
  Speaker 1: will be men that will engineer a way of deflecting
• 2:02:10
  Speaker 1: whatever body and space is hurtling toward us that that
• 2:02:15
  Speaker 1: might destroy the planet. And it'll also be men that
• 2:02:19
  Speaker 1: will injure engineer away to survive whatever apocalyptic events occur
• 2:02:24
  Speaker 1: because of the near myth.
• 2:02:26
  Speaker 4: I'm sorry, but Katy Perry and Gail King and whoever
• 2:02:32
  Speaker 4: the rest of these bitches are, they have something to
• 2:02:34
  Speaker 4: say to you, Mike. It's that it's they women, and
• 2:02:39
  Speaker 4: they yes, yes, they are going to save humanity and
• 2:02:47
  Speaker 4: want to save us all.
• 2:02:49
  Speaker 1: From you know, women, women going into space, and and
• 2:02:57
  Speaker 1: the hullabaloo about women going into space happened after it
• 2:03:03
  Speaker 1: was so commonplace to go into space and do space
• 2:03:08
  Speaker 1: walks and so on, that we have living environments in
• 2:03:12
  Speaker 1: space where people stay for not just a few weeks,
• 2:03:16
  Speaker 1: but more than a year, sometimes more than two or
• 2:03:20
  Speaker 1: three years. And also the first person with a mobility
• 2:03:28
  Speaker 1: disabilities I believe someone in wheelchair in fact, went into space.
• 2:03:32
  Speaker 1: So we're talking, you know, like it's it's an accomplishment
• 2:03:37
  Speaker 1: when men do it, right, Men went into space when
• 2:03:41
  Speaker 1: they weren't sure if they could survive coming back, and
• 2:03:45
  Speaker 1: they weren't sure if the things that were provided to
• 2:03:48
  Speaker 1: them to help them survive outside of the Earth's atmosphere
• 2:03:53
  Speaker 1: would work. Like they were relatively sure, but they weren't
• 2:03:58
  Speaker 1: one hundred percent were and where one mistake could result
• 2:04:05
  Speaker 1: in a horrible death. And they didn't know what they
• 2:04:09
  Speaker 1: were going to find on the Moon. They had ideas,
• 2:04:13
  Speaker 1: they didn't know what they were going to run into.
• 2:04:15
  Speaker 1: They didn't know what was going to happen when they
• 2:04:18
  Speaker 1: tried to take back off from it, for sure, right, Sorry,
• 2:04:23
  Speaker 1: we never went to the They didn't know if they
• 2:04:27
  Speaker 1: were going to be irradiated to death in space, but
• 2:04:34
  Speaker 1: yet they went, and you know, they made it easier
• 2:04:39
  Speaker 1: and easier to survive. They went somewhere, but they made
• 2:04:44
  Speaker 1: it easier and easier to break the Earth's gravity hold,
• 2:04:52
  Speaker 1: and they made it easier and easier to take the
• 2:04:55
  Speaker 1: next step, which was building the space station and people
• 2:04:58
  Speaker 1: living in the space station. Made it easier and easier
• 2:05:01
  Speaker 1: to do experiments in space and to learn from people's
• 2:05:06
  Speaker 1: experiences in space. And then after all of that was accomplished,
• 2:05:12
  Speaker 1: women were like, yeah, we could do this every single time.
• 2:05:18
  Speaker 1: And then of course there's all this hullabaloo. Oh, look
• 2:05:21
  Speaker 1: at what strong independent women they are. They did a
• 2:05:25
  Speaker 1: thing that men have been doing for decades, that men
• 2:05:29
  Speaker 1: paved the way for at the risk of death. But yeah,
• 2:05:37
  Speaker 1: they're totally totally strong independent women who don't need no men,
• 2:05:42
  Speaker 1: right except all the men that came before them and
• 2:05:45
  Speaker 1: paved the way for them to do the thing that
• 2:05:47
  Speaker 1: they're getting such great credit for. And I hate to
• 2:05:51
  Speaker 1: be like that, but let's put things into perspective. Okay,
• 2:05:58
  Speaker 1: it's not that it's not special to be an astronaut.
• 2:06:01
  Speaker 1: I fucking couldn't do it in a million years. But
• 2:06:07
  Speaker 1: it's not suddenly more special today than it was yesterday
• 2:06:10
  Speaker 1: because the person doing it is a woman.
• 2:06:14
  Speaker 4: Okay, there we can't agree.
• 2:06:17
  Speaker 3: I'm glad we've got this whole tangent because of the WWF. Yeah,
• 2:06:24
  Speaker 3: they say pro wrestling doesn't help, are you getting it?
• 2:06:28
  Speaker 1: One of the best outlets for frustration. It's a soap
• 2:06:31
  Speaker 1: opera for men and and masculine people, people with at
• 2:06:35
  Speaker 1: any level of masculinity.
• 2:06:37
  Speaker 4: Do you remember glow wrestling? Do you remember the glow Lady?
• 2:06:40
  Speaker 1: Yes?
• 2:06:42
  Speaker 4: What happened to them? For some reason, we only focus
• 2:06:47
  Speaker 4: on the WWF it must be the patriarchy.
• 2:06:51
  Speaker 1: Ah, well, yeah, it's totally the patriarchy. But yeah, So
• 2:06:58
  Speaker 1: to bring it back around here, what we are looking
• 2:07:01
  Speaker 1: at right, what we looked at last week, the the
• 2:07:08
  Speaker 1: enlarging the House of Representatives, right, altering the electoral college, uh,
• 2:07:17
  Speaker 1: inducing or introducing ranked choice voting, amending or repealing and
• 2:07:24
  Speaker 1: replacing the law mandates single member districts for the House.
• 2:07:29
  Speaker 1: And uh and then reducing oh yeah, changing the way
• 2:07:38
  Speaker 1: that redistricting is done is they have more control over it.
• 2:07:42
  Speaker 1: Then also regulating spending and making it so that you
• 2:07:53
  Speaker 1: risk retaliation if you donate to a political campaign as
• 2:08:00
  Speaker 1: an individual. Uh, like and and right now, if I
• 2:08:06
  Speaker 1: were to go to the Republican Party website and I
• 2:08:10
  Speaker 1: wanted to buy and make America great again, hat, not
• 2:08:13
  Speaker 1: only do I have to give them my name, my address,
• 2:08:19
  Speaker 1: my phone number, all my identifying information, all all of
• 2:08:24
  Speaker 1: which except for things like my financial information or Social
• 2:08:28
  Speaker 1: Security card or anything like that, but the rest would
• 2:08:32
  Speaker 1: be published. It's you know, on it's it's available to
• 2:08:36
  Speaker 1: the public. Also, would have to disclose my employer for
• 2:08:45
  Speaker 1: some reason. And uh, you know, they want to increase
• 2:08:53
  Speaker 1: the transparency there, which what what they're saying means they
• 2:08:58
  Speaker 1: want enough information to retaliate against you for supporting a
• 2:09:02
  Speaker 1: candidate they don't like. And they want to make it
• 2:09:07
  Speaker 1: so that Supreme Court justices are not appointed for life.
• 2:09:10
  Speaker 1: So they basically want to change everything because they're mad
• 2:09:15
  Speaker 1: that men voted in a populist that began reducing the
• 2:09:21
  Speaker 1: size of the bureaucracy, the unelected bureaucracy, and preventing it
• 2:09:29
  Speaker 1: from using your money, your tax dollars, laundering your tax
• 2:09:35
  Speaker 1: dollars through the Humanitarian Initiative VEIL by inflicting usaids on
• 2:09:44
  Speaker 1: other countries to do jack shit for the people there
• 2:09:48
  Speaker 1: and retain quite a bit of money while interfering in
• 2:09:52
  Speaker 1: their local cultures in a way that is detrimental to
• 2:09:56
  Speaker 1: the people they are purporting to serve there.
• 2:10:02
  Speaker 3: You have it.
• 2:10:03
  Speaker 1: That is how that works. That is what this initiative
• 2:10:06
  Speaker 1: is that they were talking about here. So next week
• 2:10:10
  Speaker 1: we will continue to wrap it up with how this
• 2:10:18
  Speaker 1: traces back to the billionaires that Data Republican is talking
• 2:10:22
  Speaker 1: about is accusing not regular folks like you and me,
• 2:10:30
  Speaker 1: but people who make their money by controlling large swatches
• 2:10:34
  Speaker 1: of the population, controlling what you spend, how you spend
• 2:10:39
  Speaker 1: it and how you live in order to benefit as
• 2:10:46
  Speaker 1: much as humanly possible from your labor and the compensation
• 2:10:51
  Speaker 1: you receive for it, and.
• 2:10:55
  Speaker 3: Just a differentiates from the mindless communists who who categorize
• 2:11:02
  Speaker 3: the billionaires as as a singular category of people who
• 2:11:08
  Speaker 3: should all be opposed. Yeah, it's no. You've seen the
• 2:11:14
  Speaker 3: meme of the diagram, Like the wrong enemy is the rich.
• 2:11:19
  Speaker 3: The right enemy is is this other axis of the
• 2:11:22
  Speaker 3: rich and the poor who want to use the government
• 2:11:24
  Speaker 3: to control us. There are some rich people who don't
• 2:11:28
  Speaker 3: want to use the government to control us. They just
• 2:11:31
  Speaker 3: want to do honest work for honest pay. Some some
• 2:11:34
  Speaker 3: billionaires got there through honest work for on his pay.
• 2:11:38
  Speaker 3: I don't want to name any because because honestly, I
• 2:11:41
  Speaker 3: don't fucking know. You know, there's a we're talking about
• 2:11:46
  Speaker 3: the rich people who who are using their their influence
• 2:11:52
  Speaker 3: for evil. And yes, there are poor people who use
• 2:11:56
  Speaker 3: what influence they have collectively for evil and everything in between.
• 2:12:01
  Speaker 3: It's it's it's the people who use their influence for
• 2:12:04
  Speaker 3: evil who are your enemy. They're called communists. Well they
• 2:12:07
  Speaker 3: call a whole fucking bunch of things, But it's you know,
• 2:12:10
  Speaker 3: that's one of the rich. Isn't the enemy the fucking
• 2:12:14
  Speaker 3: control freaks of the enemy. Yeah, it's still not as
• 2:12:20
  Speaker 3: simple as that, because some people want to control for
• 2:12:22
  Speaker 3: good reasons. It's I I have time to get into it,
• 2:12:25
  Speaker 3: you know what I mean.
• 2:12:27
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I've got a reminder in the chat to read
• 2:12:31
  Speaker 1: the super chows, and I responded. But I'm looking at
• 2:12:35
  Speaker 1: the Superchow channel and nothing new is showing. So if
• 2:12:38
  Speaker 1: you sent a super chow while I was given my enspiel,
• 2:12:44
  Speaker 1: it hasn't come through yet. It's it's been stopped for
• 2:12:49
  Speaker 1: some reason from from going through. And I don't understand
• 2:12:53
  Speaker 1: why nothing has come through. Actually, not even the super
• 2:12:59
  Speaker 1: chows we usually get. I have not seen a single one,
• 2:13:03
  Speaker 1: and I haven't seen any super chats either. No paid
• 2:13:08
  Speaker 1: Rumble rants. A lot of activity in Rumble.
• 2:13:13
  Speaker 4: But.
• 2:13:15
  Speaker 1: Not very much in terms of financial activity. So I
• 2:13:19
  Speaker 1: don't know what's going on there, and I don't I
• 2:13:25
  Speaker 1: don't know how long it will take to go through.
• 2:13:28
  Speaker 1: If one has gone through, I can read it off
• 2:13:32
  Speaker 1: in an after show if it does, and then read
• 2:13:36
  Speaker 1: it off in the main show next week. But there's
• 2:13:41
  Speaker 1: there's nothing. Nothing is in the discord. I don't know
• 2:13:46
  Speaker 1: if Brian can see something in the background that I
• 2:13:49
  Speaker 1: can't see, that he could send me. But and Discord
• 2:13:56
  Speaker 1: just updated on my computer right before the show, so
• 2:14:00
  Speaker 1: there should not be a problem. I should have that
• 2:14:04
  Speaker 1: and it's not coming through. So that's two people that
• 2:14:08
  Speaker 1: said that they sent. So Brian says there's no new
• 2:14:12
  Speaker 1: supershow showing either. That's bizarre. Why aren't they going through?
• 2:14:18
  Speaker 1: That's so what we'll do then is in the after show.
• 2:14:24
  Speaker 3: You guys could just post it as a regular chat
• 2:14:26
  Speaker 3: and we'll just trust you that it's the one you
• 2:14:29
  Speaker 3: paid us for, unless you waiting until the office show.
• 2:14:34
  Speaker 1: I don't know. Yeah, you could do that. I will
• 2:14:39
  Speaker 1: be I will definitely though if they show up, I'll
• 2:14:42
  Speaker 1: read them in the after show. This is what we're
• 2:14:43
  Speaker 1: going to be going over in the after show because
• 2:14:47
  Speaker 1: I like to torture the patrons occasionally. So this is
• 2:14:52
  Speaker 1: from Japan today, from violence to sexism. The manisphere is
• 2:14:57
  Speaker 1: doing real world harm. So there we go. Feminists want
• 2:15:03
  Speaker 1: to tell you what's good for you, and yeah, they
• 2:15:11
  Speaker 1: want to tell you what's good for you because they
• 2:15:14
  Speaker 1: know better than you do what's good for you. And
• 2:15:19
  Speaker 1: and of course we all know that that feminists have ments.
• 2:15:26
  Speaker 3: I can't do it. They can't do it.
• 2:15:31
  Speaker 1: Guys. Sorry, we all know that feminists have been's best
• 2:15:39
  Speaker 1: interests in mind.
• 2:15:42
  Speaker 4: If they were so, if they were so good at
• 2:15:46
  Speaker 4: fixing men's problems, then why are they still complaining about men?
• 2:15:51
  Speaker 4: But patriarchy hurts men too, more patriarchy.
• 2:15:57
  Speaker 3: But just don't have enough power or enough influence. So
• 2:16:01
  Speaker 3: we just need to give them more power and influence
• 2:16:04
  Speaker 3: and money and money then and then they'll finally help men.
• 2:16:08
  Speaker 3: How much influence, Well, they won't tell us. We just
• 2:16:11
  Speaker 3: need to keep giving them more. Yeah.
• 2:16:16
  Speaker 1: With that, I it's this stuff still hasn't come through.
• 2:16:19
  Speaker 1: I'm just gonna I'm I'm just gonna call it where. Well,
• 2:16:23
  Speaker 1: we'll have to read them tonight later tonight and next week.
• 2:16:29
  Speaker 1: Uh and and we'll figure it out because I I
• 2:16:32
  Speaker 1: Am not seeing a single.
• 2:16:37
  Speaker 3: Next next Thursdays Christmas Day, isn't it.
• 2:16:39
  Speaker 1: Oh we might not have a show then because I
• 2:16:44
  Speaker 1: might be working a sixteen hour shift from eleven thirty
• 2:16:49
  Speaker 1: pm to three pm on Christmas Eve, so and.
• 2:16:51
  Speaker 4: Then and then New Year's is going to be on
• 2:16:53
  Speaker 4: the same schedule.
• 2:16:54
  Speaker 1: So yeah, yeah, why does it? This is seems this
• 2:16:59
  Speaker 1: seems like, well, then then next year, I believe Tuesday.
• 2:17:06
  Speaker 1: I think it gets in a day earlier every year,
• 2:17:08
  Speaker 1: if I remember.
• 2:17:08
  Speaker 3: Right, do we have a show on Tuesday? Brian? Are
• 2:17:11
  Speaker 3: we doing a show on Tuesday?
• 2:17:12
  Speaker 1: I don't know. Candy respond, You can respond, but the
• 2:17:16
  Speaker 1: audience can't hear him. So if if we don't, we won't.
• 2:17:25
  Speaker 1: We won't have an HBr talk next week because I
• 2:17:27
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna call it now because I'm I'm relatively certain
• 2:17:32
  Speaker 1: there's there's been a not a coup at my workplace,
• 2:17:36
  Speaker 1: but one manager moved on to another company and we
• 2:17:40
  Speaker 1: got a new manager, and in the interim we had
• 2:17:43
  Speaker 1: a snaffo with the application that the managers used to
• 2:17:50
  Speaker 1: put names on the schedule. And most of the time
• 2:17:52
  Speaker 1: that's not a problem because most of the time the
• 2:17:54
  Speaker 1: schedule is the same every two week period, and you
• 2:18:00
  Speaker 1: already know when you're going to be working because it
• 2:18:03
  Speaker 1: was the same schedule you had the last two week period.
• 2:18:06
  Speaker 1: But since it's the holiday, and I work with intellectually
• 2:18:11
  Speaker 1: disabled adults, and intellectually disabled adults that live in care
• 2:18:14
  Speaker 1: homes usually go to some sort of daytime activity, whether
• 2:18:18
  Speaker 1: it's a job or a day program, those clothes on
• 2:18:23
  Speaker 1: the holidays, and so there's usually a first shift that
• 2:18:26
  Speaker 1: comes out of nowhere on the holidays that you know
• 2:18:30
  Speaker 1: about a month ahead. They get somebody to fill that shift.
• 2:18:35
  Speaker 1: And at my workplace on Thanksgiving, we discovered that didn't
• 2:18:41
  Speaker 1: get done. It didn't happen, so it the manager had
• 2:18:48
  Speaker 1: that shift filled, but nobody owned up to taking the shift.
• 2:18:54
  Speaker 1: So I picked it up and did work. And that's
• 2:18:57
  Speaker 1: probably what's gonna end up happening on Christmas too, So
• 2:19:00
  Speaker 1: there you go. It's possible that I might not and
• 2:19:05
  Speaker 1: if that happens and there is a stream, I might participate.
• 2:19:09
  Speaker 1: But there will not be an HBr talk next Thursday.
• 2:19:12
  Speaker 1: So two weeks from now we'll pick back up with
• 2:19:16
  Speaker 1: the rest of the video. I'll remind you guys where
• 2:19:19
  Speaker 1: we are again, and then we will get to find
• 2:19:24
  Speaker 1: out more about this tweet and the represented video. So
• 2:19:32
  Speaker 1: we will not see you next Thursday, but we will
• 2:19:36
  Speaker 1: see you next Tuesday. Merry Christmas, Christmas, Merry Christmas, Happy Hanukkah,
• 2:19:43
  Speaker 1: happy kwans. I love you all to all a big fight,
• 2:19:46
  Speaker 1: I mean a good night idol, and that y'all us