Latest / IMI Podcasts / Innovation Doesn’t Require a Track Record; it Requires Conviction
Transcript
- 0:00SPEAKER_00: Many institutional investors understandably favor funds that have already completed several cycles.
- 0:05SPEAKER_00: Accumulated experience conveys security, and predictability, or at least the perception of it, remains a decisive criterion when allocating capital to an asset class that is, by definition, risky.
- 0:18SPEAKER_00: Even so, this preference, while intuitive, does not always reflect the reality of what generates the best opportunities.
- 0:26SPEAKER_00: Performance in venture capital does not follow a linear logic.
- 0:30SPEAKER_00: Past success, although relevant, does not guarantee a repetition of results, especially in a market where technological, economic, and competitive conditions change rapidly.
- 0:41SPEAKER_00: Teams that enjoyed privileged access to certain opportunities in one cycle may face a completely different context in the next.
- 0:49SPEAKER_00: New managers, meanwhile, often emerge better aligned with the current moment, closer to new entrepreneurs, and with an execution capability shaped by more recent realities.
- 1:00SPEAKER_00: Multiple studies document the pattern.
- 1:02SPEAKER_00: The Kaufman Foundation found that first-time funds outperformed established venture capital firms by an average of 3.1 percentage points annually between 1997 and 2011.
- 1:13SPEAKER_00: A Prekin study reached a similar conclusion.
- 1:17SPEAKER_00: Emerging managers outperformed in 22 of the 28 vintages the firm assessed.
- 1:24SPEAKER_00: Makina Capital Management, analyzing over 1,100 private funds across two decades, found that emerging managers achieved average returns approximately 250 basis points above their established counterparts.
- 1:39SPEAKER_00: Visit IMI's Portugal Golden Visa Fund page to find, view, analyze, and compare golden visa eligible investment funds.
- 1:49SPEAKER_00: Emerging managers assume a role that the market does not always recognize.
- 1:54SPEAKER_00: A first fund often demands a level of focus and discipline that larger structures struggle to replicate.
- 2:00SPEAKER_00: A smaller size forces careful choices, incentive alignment tends to be more direct, and the need to prove value creates a culture of high standards that shows in how the team analyzes and supports its opportunities.
- 2:13SPEAKER_00: A human element rarely appears in the metrics, yet it weighs heavily on access to deal flow.
- 2:18SPEAKER_00: Many of these managers remain deeply embedded in the ecosystems in which they operate.
- 2:24SPEAKER_00: They do not rely solely on brand recognition or formal processes to originate investments, but rather on relationships, constant presence, and credibility built within specific communities.
- 2:36SPEAKER_00: This proximity often allows them to identify talent and projects before they become consensus opportunities, precisely when the potential for value creation is greatest.
- 2:46SPEAKER_00: The very functioning of venture capital depends on renewal.
- 2:49SPEAKER_00: Without new management teams, new theses, and new approaches, the sector would tend to concentrate capital in fewer hands and increasingly homogeneous strategies.
- 2:59SPEAKER_00: Innovation, the object of the investment itself, also requires innovation on the investor side.
- 3:05SPEAKER_00: Emerging managers contribute to this diversity by exploring underfunded sectors, geographies beyond the main hubs, and business models that the broader market has not yet validated.
- 3:17SPEAKER_00: Despite this, a gap persists between the relevance of these managers to the ecosystem and the ease with which they can raise capital.
- 3:26SPEAKER_00: Part of this difficulty is structural.
- 3:29SPEAKER_00: For an institutional investor, the risk of backing a fund without a track record is visible and easy to explain.
- 3:37SPEAKER_00: The risk of not investing, of missing access to a new generation of managers who may lead the market in the coming years, is more diffuse, harder to measure, and therefore seldom part of the conversation.
- 3:50SPEAKER_00: This is, to some extent, the paradox.
- 3:53SPEAKER_00: By privileging only established funds, many investors end up entering larger vehicles with more competition for the best opportunities and less flexibility to invest at early stages.
- 4:04SPEAKER_00: The concentration is stark.
- 4:06SPEAKER_00: In early 2024, just two firms accounted for 44% of all LP capital allocated to U.S.
- 4:14SPEAKER_00: venture, according to Pitchbook.
- 4:16SPEAKER_00: At a time when venture capital is going through a period of greater discipline and selectivity, these dynamics become even more evident.
- 4:24SPEAKER_00: Less exuberant markets tend to favor focused, agile investors with strong conviction in their theses, characteristics that describe emerging managers well.
- 4:35SPEAKER_00: Smaller teams adapt more quickly, make decisions with less inertia, and maintain closer proximity to founders and operating teams.
- 4:44SPEAKER_00: In the long term, supporting emerging managers is not merely a portfolio decision.
- 4:50SPEAKER_00: It is a choice that influences the vitality of the entire ecosystem.
- 4:55SPEAKER_00: These are the investors who test new ideas, challenge consensus, and often discover the companies that will define the next decade.
- 5:05SPEAKER_00: Ignoring them does not eliminate risk.
- 5:07SPEAKER_00: It merely shifts it.
- 5:09SPEAKER_00: And in a sector where value often emerges before anyone can measure it, that shift can be decisive.
- 5:17SPEAKER_00: This episode first appeared as an article by Fernando Ferreira on imidaily.com.
- 5:23SPEAKER_00: Subscribe for free to the IMI newsletter for breaking news and updates from the investment migration industry.
- 5:30SPEAKER_00: And upgrade your membership to IMI Pro to get access to our exclusive professional community, citizenship catalog, investment migration company Rolodex, private briefings, and more members only content.