Latest / Reformed Thinking / Ecclesiology: Doctrine of the Church

Transcript

Ecclesiology: Doctrine of the Church · Reformed Thinking

0:00
You know, usually when we talk about a physical building, there
0:02
is this expectation of precision.
0:04
Oh, absolutely. You look at a blueprint right
0:07
and the architect shows you the load bearing walls, the plumbing
0:10
lines, the electrical grid, and the contractor points to the
0:14
schematic and says, well there it is.
0:16
Yeah, it is a static structure. Right.
0:18
It stays precisely where you built it.
0:20
You can measure it, you can photograph it, But then you step
0:23
into the biblical doctrine of what a church actually is, and
0:25
suddenly that architectural blueprint is just set aside.
0:29
We are looking at a landscape that is organic, living,
0:32
breathing, and quite honestly, a bit startling when you compare
0:36
it to our modern assumptions. So welcome to Reformed thinking.
0:39
I'm so glad you're joining us for this new deep dive.
0:42
It is great to be here for this one.
0:44
Now I want to clarify something right up front for you.
0:47
Both of us sitting at this table are Protestant Christians.
0:50
We hold to Reformed theology and we adhere to the Westminster
0:54
Confession. However, our mission today is to
0:58
impartially layout the facts from today's source material
1:01
without taking sides. Right, even when the material
1:04
discusses viewpoints that differ from our own traditions.
1:07
Spot on. We are looking at Paul Enza's
1:09
chapter on ecclesiology from the Moody Handbook of Theology.
1:13
Our goal for you is to understand what the Church
1:15
actually is, stripping away the modern cultural idea body of the
1:22
living Organism. That distinction between a
1:25
physical structure and a living entity really frames our entire
1:29
conversation today. When we approach a subject like
1:32
ecclesiology, which is the theological term for the study
1:36
of the Church, we have to recognize how centuries of
1:39
cultural assumptions have calcified our thinking.
1:42
We really have a habit of pointing to a building with a
1:44
steeple on the corner and saying, you know, that is the
1:46
church. We do, but the source material
1:49
challenges that notion right out of the gate by taking us back to
1:51
the original languages. To understand the church, we
1:54
have to look at the words used to define it in antiquity.
1:58
The English word church actually has a fascinating lineage.
2:01
I love looking into the etymology of this.
2:03
It really is interesting. It derives from the Scottish
2:06
word Kirk and the German designation kirsch.
2:09
All of these Germanic terms trace their roots back to the
2:12
Greek word kuriaka. Now Korea Khan is an adjective
2:16
that simply means belonging to the Lord.
2:18
So in one sense, the English word carries this beautiful
2:22
historical idea of a people who belong to God.
2:26
It indicates possession. Yes, that homology gives us the
2:30
background of our English word, but it is when we look at the
2:32
specific word the New Testament writers actually use that the
2:36
picture comes into sharp focus. The English word church is used
2:40
in our modern Bibles to translate a completely different
2:43
Greek word, which is ecclesia. Right, and that is a compound
2:46
word. Exactly.
2:47
This word is a compound of two Greek parts.
2:50
You have ink which means out of and Cleo which means to call.
2:55
Put them together. And ecclesia literally means a
2:57
called out group. It is not a building, it is a
3:00
gathering of people who have been summoned.
3:02
The statistics on this are quite striking when you look at the
3:05
text. What?
3:05
Do the numbers show? Up Well, the word ecclesia
3:07
appears 114 times in the New Testament, but here's the detail
3:12
that forces us to rethink our timelines.
3:14
It only appears three times in all four Gospels.
3:17
Wow, just three times. Yes, and two of those times in
3:20
Matthew 18, it is likely used in a non-technical sense, referring
3:25
to a local Jewish congregation dealing with an interpersonal
3:28
dispute. So that leaves only one
3:30
technical use of the Word in the Gospel.
3:32
Correct. Which is Matthew 16.18 where
3:36
Jesus says I will build my church.
3:38
Notice the future tense there. He's making a prediction about
3:41
something that does not exist yet.
3:43
The future tense in Matthew 16.18 provides a massive
3:46
theological clue for us. It really points to a later
3:49
start date for the church. The source text argues that the
3:52
Church did not exist in the Old Testament.
3:54
It's a peculiar New Testament entity.
3:56
So to find its actual beginning, we have to look at the sequence
3:59
of events regarding the Holy Spirit.
4:01
Right there's Corinthians 12.13 tells us the specific mechanism
4:04
of how the church is built. It is the work of the Holy
4:07
Spirit baptizing believers into the one body of Christ.
4:11
So we have to ask, when did that baptizing work of the Holy
4:14
Spirit begin? Well, in Acts 1.5, Jesus told
4:17
his disciples that they would be baptized with the Holy Spirit
4:20
not many days from now. Which indicates it had not
4:23
happened yet, but it was imminent, right?
4:26
Then we arrive at Pentecost in Acts 2, where the Holy Spirit
4:29
descends. And later in Acts 11.15, Peter's
4:32
explaining the conversion of the Gentiles.
4:35
He says the Holy Spirit fell on them just as he did on the Jews
4:37
at the beginning. That phrase at the beginning
4:40
pinpoints Pentecost as the birth of the New Testament church.
4:44
The mechanism of Spirit baptism began there, which means the
4:46
Church began there. That is the logical conclusion
4:49
the text presents. Let me offer an analogy to
4:51
clarify what this summoning actually entails for you.
4:54
I think about the word ecclesia like being drafted into a
4:57
specialized rescue unit rather than just deciding to show up to
5:00
a public town hall. That is a very vivid way to
5:03
picture it. You are living your your normal
5:05
life, doing your normal job, and suddenly you receive a specific
5:09
targeted summons. That summons pulls you out of
5:13
the general population and places you into a highly
5:15
coordinated team with a very specific mission.
5:18
You are called out. But this raises a question for
5:22
you to consider based on a history of the biblical
5:24
narrative. If Ecclesia simply means a
5:27
called out assembly, didn't the Old Testament have assemblies?
5:31
They absolutely did. Right.
5:32
The Israelites gathered together all the time at the Tabernacle
5:35
and the Temple. Why is this New Testament
5:38
ecclesia considered a completely new, distinct entity, rather
5:42
than just a continuation of the Jewish gatherings that had been
5:45
happening for centuries? The text addresses this by
5:47
tracing how the word ecclesia shifted and its usage over time.
5:51
In the ancient Greco Roman world, ecclesia was a common
5:55
everyday civic word. It was entirely non-technical.
5:58
So it just meant a crowd. Basically yes.
6:00
If a city magistrate summoned the free citizens to the town
6:03
square to vote on a new tax or a trade agreement, that gathering
6:07
was an ecclesia. We see this non-technical use
6:10
reflected in the Bible too. Where do we see that?
6:12
Well, in Acts 7.38, Stephen refers to the congregation of
6:16
the people of Israel in the wilderness as the ecclesia.
6:19
Our English Bibles usually translate that as congregation.
6:22
That makes sense. Even more striking, in Acts
6:24
19.32 there is an angry, riotous mob in the city of Ephesus
6:29
screaming at the Apostle Paul, and the Greek text calls that
6:33
chaotic mob an ecclesia. Oh wow, so an angry mob is an
6:38
ecclesia? Yes, it is translated there as
6:40
assembly O. The word itself just meant any
6:43
gathered group. But what happens after Pentecost
6:46
is a radical shift to a highly technical theological usage.
6:50
Under the teaching of the Apostles, right?
6:51
Yes, particularly Paul. Under his teaching, ecclesia
6:54
comes to define a distinct newly born New Testament body.
6:58
It is no longer just any crowd. It is specifically the group of
7:01
believers in Jesus Christ united by that baptism of the Holy
7:05
Spirit we just mentioned. What changes when believers view
7:08
their local gathering not as a voluntary social club that they
7:10
decided to join, but as a specific group summoned by a
7:13
divine calling it? Completely alters the gravity of
7:15
the room. It really does.
7:17
You are not there because you share a hobby, a demographic
7:20
bracket, or a political affiliation.
7:22
You are there because you are part of a divinely called out
7:24
rescue unit. Recognizing the Church as a
7:27
newly formed entity naturally leads us to question its
7:31
boundaries. Right.
7:32
Like who is actually in it and how is it visible to the
7:34
watching world? This brings us to the dual
7:38
nature of the church, the local expression versus the universal
7:42
reality. The source text draws a very
7:45
sharp line between these two manifestations.
7:47
Distinguishing between the local and the universal church
7:51
resolves a lot of structural confusion for people.
7:54
The most common use of the word church in the New Testament
7:57
designates a local assembly. Meaning a visible gathering of
8:00
believers in a specific geographical area.
8:03
Yes, we read about the church in Jerusalem, the church in
8:06
Corinth, the churches throughout Glacia, and even the church
8:09
meeting in the home of Philammon.
8:10
Keep in mind these early believers did not have special
8:13
architectural structures. No, not at all.
8:16
Dedicated church buildings did not become common until the 3rd
8:19
century. They met in ordinary houses,
8:21
often crowded into courtyards or dining rooms.
8:24
But regardless of the architecture, their local
8:25
gatherings had specific identifiable characteristics.
8:29
They did. They came together for worship,
8:31
for intense instruction and doctrine, for the breaking of
8:34
bread, and for the sending out of missionaries.
8:36
This local, visible gathering is where the day-to-day life, the
8:40
friction and the growth of the Christian community happens.
8:43
Now contrast that local gathering with the universal
8:46
Church. The text defines the universal
8:48
Church as all those who in this present age have been born of
8:52
the Spirit of God and have been baptised by that same Spirit
8:55
into the body of Christ. This is the vast corporate group
8:59
that Jesus promised to build. He is the head over it, and a
9:02
primary characteristic of this universal group is absolute
9:05
unity. Whether someone is Jewish or
9:07
Gentile, slave or free, they compose one single body.
9:11
That is a massive paradigm shift from the Old Testament.
9:14
It really is. This requires a better analogy
9:16
than just comparing a local business branch to a global
9:19
corporate headquarters, because a corporation is mechanical but
9:22
the church is biological. I agree the mechanical analogies
9:25
fall short. Think of it more like a massive
9:28
mycelial network. You know, fungal systems that
9:31
grow underground. The largest living Organism on
9:34
Earth is actually a single fungal network in Oregon that
9:38
spans miles across the forest floor, completely unseen.
9:42
That is a fascinating comparison.
9:44
What pops up above ground are individual mushrooms.
9:47
You can see the mushrooms, you can touch them, and they exist
9:50
in a specific geographic spot that is the local church.
9:53
But those individual mushrooms are just the visible
9:56
outcroppings of a vast, interconnected living Organism
10:00
operating beneath the surface. Right.
10:01
And that hidden network is the universal church.
10:04
Exactly. The biological analogy works
10:06
perfectly because it captures the organic, interconnected life
10:10
of the entity. Historically, theologians have
10:12
categorized this dual nature using the terms visible and
10:16
invisible. Who are the main proponents of
10:18
that distinction? The text points out that figures
10:20
like Augustine, Martin Luther, and John Calvin all utilize this
10:24
distinction. The visible church is what we
10:26
experience locally. It is the assembly of people who
10:29
profess faith. But as Calvin and others
10:31
recognized, the visible church contains imperfections.
10:35
It does. It might even contain
10:37
unbelievers who have acquired membership in a local
10:40
congregation but have not experienced genuine conversion.
10:44
Their names are on the local registry, but they do not
10:47
possess spiritual life. The invisible church, on the
10:49
other hand, consists solely of true believers.
10:53
Right. I think the term invisible can
10:55
trip people up though. Definitely can.
10:57
It makes it sound like we were talking about ghosts or some
11:01
ethereal floating concept that lacks physical substance.
11:04
But the text provides A crucial clarification.
11:06
Here. The invisible church is actually
11:08
composed of highly visible physical people.
11:11
You can see them, you can shake their hands, and you can share a
11:13
meal with them. The.
11:14
Only thing that remains invisible to humanize is the
11:17
precise, total, perfectly accurate membership list.
11:21
Only God knows the heart, so only God sees the actual
11:25
boundaries of the true universal Church.
11:28
Because this universal mycelial network is so vast and its exact
11:31
borders are unseen by us, the New Testament authors had to
11:34
give people mental handles to grasp it.
11:36
They utilized physical, everyday metaphors to explain how this
11:41
Organism functions. Let's talk about those
11:43
metaphors. The New Testament writers relied
11:45
heavily on metaphors to illustrate the church as one
11:48
living Organism precisely because a localized physical
11:51
building fails to capture the reality.
11:54
The text outlines 6 specific figures of the church, and each
11:58
one reveals a different facet of its nature.
12:00
What is the first one? The 1st and perhaps most
12:03
prominent metaphor is the body. This illustrates unity and
12:06
universality. Just as a human head has
12:09
authority over the physical body and gives a direction, Christ is
12:13
the head of the Church. He possesses the authority and
12:15
dictates the movement of the body.
12:17
Yes, this metaphor also stresses the biological integration of
12:20
Jews and Gentiles. In a physical body, every part
12:23
is integrated. There is no division.
12:25
A body that fights itself has an autoimmune disease, which is a
12:28
tragedy. That is a great point.
12:30
Similarly, Christ nourishes this spiritual body by providing
12:34
gifted leaders so that it can grow to maturity without tearing
12:37
itself apart through schisms. The body metaphor explains how
12:41
Christ directs the church right now, but it does not really
12:43
capture the emotional intimacy or the future destiny of the
12:47
Church. No it doesn't.
12:49
To understand that, Paul shifts to the imagery of a wedding.
12:52
The second metaphor is the bride.
12:54
Drawn directly from Ephesians chapter 5, Paul compares the
12:58
relationship between a husband and wife to Christ and the
13:02
church. The source material notes that
13:03
this is rooted in ancient Oriental wedding customs, which
13:07
happened in very distinct stages.
13:09
First, there was the betrothal. Right.
13:11
This was far more binding than a modern engagement.
13:14
It was a legal covenant where the bride price was paid and the
13:17
bride receives the promise of future blessing.
13:19
During this time, the bride waits.
13:21
This mirrors the church today, an espoused bride waiting for
13:25
her husband's return. The second stage was the actual
13:28
wedding, when the groom comes, often at an unexpected hour, to
13:32
take the bride to be with him. This parallels the return of
13:35
Christ. And finally, the wedding feast
13:37
follows. This metaphor provides the
13:39
emotional resonance of love, anticipation, and ultimate
13:43
celebration that the mechanics of a physical body might lack.
13:46
While the bride metaphor provides emotional resonance,
13:50
the third metaphor provides a sense of structural stability.
13:53
That is the building. Ephesians 2 describes the Church
13:56
as a building constructed upon the foundation of the apostles
14:00
and prophets, with Jesus Christ Himself acting as the
14:03
cornerstone. In ancient architecture, the
14:05
cornerstone was the primary foundation stone placed at the
14:08
angle of the structure. The architect used it to fix a
14:12
standard for the bearings of all the other walls.
14:15
Christ sets the alignment for the entire church.
14:17
If the cornerstone is off by even a fraction of a degree, the
14:20
entire building will eventually lean and collapse.
14:23
The text notes that the whole building is being fitted
14:26
together, growing as new believers are added as living
14:29
stones. I want to push back on this
14:31
building metaphor, or at least pose a question to clarify how
14:34
we apply it today. Sure, go ahead.
14:35
If the apostles and prophets are the foundation of this building,
14:39
does that mean the foundation is still being poured today?
14:41
Are we still laying foundation stones in the 21st century with
14:44
modern apostles, or is the building just going up brick by
14:47
brick on a base that is already historically finished?
14:50
The text supports the view that the foundation is historically
14:53
finalized. The apostles were given unique
14:57
gifts designed to equip the early believers and establish
15:00
the core doctrine before the New Testament cannon was completed.
15:03
That makes perfect sense. You only lay a foundation once.
15:06
Precisely, if you're constantly pouring new concrete, you can
15:09
never build a roof. After the foundation is set, the
15:13
subsequent work is building the superstructure.
15:15
The current church grows as new living stones, which are new
15:19
believers, are added to an already established base.
15:23
The architectural work continues, but the core
15:25
revelation provided by the apostles in the 1st century is
15:27
complete. That concept leads directly into
15:30
the 4th metaphor, which focuses on the people inside that
15:33
spiritual house that is the priesthood.
15:36
First, Peter calls believers a holy priesthood and a royal
15:39
priesthood. The text draws a very sharp
15:41
contrast here with the Old Testament system.
15:43
It is a massive contrast. In ancient Israel, God called
15:47
the nation a Kingdom of priests, but functionally only men from
15:51
the specific tribe of Levi could actually act as priests.
15:55
If you were from the tribe of Judah or Benjamin, you could not
15:58
offer sacrifices. In fact, when King Uzziah tried
16:02
to offer incense in the Temple, he was struck with leprosy.
16:05
But in the Church, every single believer is a priest.
16:08
We all offer spiritual sacrifices.
16:10
The cultural shift represented by the priesthood of all
16:13
believers is staggering when you understand the mechanism of the
16:16
Old Testament. In ancient Israel you could not
16:19
combine the offices of king and priest.
16:21
You were either from the kingly line of Judah holding civil
16:24
authority, or the priestly line of Levi holding spiritual
16:27
mediation. God separated these roles
16:30
because putting absolute civil power and absolute spiritual
16:33
mediation into the hands of a falling human being leads to
16:36
absolute tyranny. But Jesus Christ, being sinless,
16:40
is the only one who can safely hold both offices.
16:42
Because he unites the kingly and priestly roles, Peter can call
16:46
church age believers a royal priesthood.
16:48
Furthermore, in Israel, an individual believer could only
16:51
approach God through the mediation of a Levitical priest,
16:54
usually while standing outside the Tabernacle.
16:57
Today, the text asserts that every believer has direct, bold
17:01
access to God at any time through Christ.
17:04
This massive shift in mediation is one of the strongest
17:07
indicators that Israel and the Church are distinct entities.
17:11
The 5th metaphor shifts the imagery again to the flock found
17:14
in John 10. This is a tender image of
17:16
intimacy and security. Israel was called a flock in the
17:20
Old Testament, but the unique feature of the New Testament
17:22
flock is the merging of different groups.
17:25
Jesus explicitly says I have other sheep which are not of
17:28
this fold. I must bring them also.
17:30
He is talking about bringing Gentiles into the same fold as
17:33
Jewish believers in the 1st century.
17:35
These two groups were deeply hostile to one another,
17:38
separated by dietary laws, purity codes and centuries of
17:42
animosity. The metaphor shows Christ
17:44
creating 1 flock with one shepherd out of divided peoples.
17:47
The sheep know the shepherd's voice, and they are secure in
17:50
his hand, protected from wolves. And the final metaphor brings us
17:54
to the concept of vital nourishment, which is the
17:57
branches. In John 15, Jesus is a true
18:00
vine, the Father is the farmer, and believers are the branches.
18:04
In viticulture, branches draw all their life, giving
18:07
nourishment from their attachment to the vine.
18:09
A severed branch dies almost instantly.
18:12
Christ's instruction here is to abide in me.
18:15
The Greek word for abide meno means to remain or stay.
18:19
The text explains the to abide in Christ is equivalent to
18:22
believing in Christ, a relationship that begins at
18:25
faith and continues as we walk by faith.
18:28
The goal of this abiding is to produce fruit, and the text
18:31
notes that the Father even prunes the branches.
18:34
Pruning is a violent process for a plant.
18:36
It involves cutting away overgrowth, but this divine
18:39
pruning is designed to enhance the fruit bearing process,
18:42
removing whatever drains spiritual vitality.
18:44
Having defined what the Church is through these organic
18:47
metaphors, you know, a body, a bride, a building, a priesthood,
18:51
A flock and branches, we also have to define what the Church
18:53
is not. That is crucial.
18:55
Theological history is full of confusion when categories get
18:58
blurred. The source material is very firm
19:00
on 2 specific identity distinctions.
19:02
First, the Church is not Israel. The term Israel appears 66 times
19:08
in the New Testament, and the text argues that it always
19:11
refers to the physical descendants of Jacob.
19:14
According to this view, using the phrase New Israel as an
19:17
identification for the church, which is a concept found in some
19:20
replacement theology models, is simply not accurate.
19:23
Based on the biblical text, Paul continues to maintain a
19:27
distinction between Jews, Gentiles, and the church long
19:30
after Pentecost. The second major distinction is
19:33
that the Church is not the Kingdom.
19:35
This is a point where a lot of modern readers get tangled,
19:37
assuming the 2 terms are synonymous.
19:39
The text defines a Kingdom as requiring 3 specific elements, a
19:44
ruler, a people who are ruled, and a territory over which they
19:47
are ruled. The material outlines 2 basic
19:49
forms of the Kingdom. First, the Universal Kingdom,
19:52
which is God's sovereign rule over all creation throughout all
19:54
time. 2nd the mediatorial Kingdom.
19:57
This is the rule of God through a divinely chosen human
20:00
representative on earth. God used mediators like Adam,
20:03
Noah, Moses, and David. But all of them anticipated the
20:06
final mediator, the Messiah, who would rule a physical territory
20:11
with actual subjects. I need to ask a clarifying
20:13
question for the listener who is trying to map this out on a
20:16
timeline. Go right ahead.
20:17
If the church is not Israel and the church is not the Kingdom,
20:21
does this mean God is running two entirely detached programs?
20:25
Is there an intersection between the church age we live in right
20:28
now and the future mediatorial Kingdom that is promised?
20:32
That is a great question. How does the source text
20:35
reconcile these concepts? The text synthesizes this by
20:38
looking closely at how the words are used.
20:41
Out of the 114 occurrences of the word ecclesia, it is never
20:45
once used interchangeably with the word for Kingdom.
20:48
When Jesus began his earthly ministry, he offered the
20:51
mediatorial Kingdom to the Jewish nation.
20:54
The proclamation was the Kingdom of heaven is at hand.
20:57
However, when that offer was rejected by the nation's
20:59
leaders, culminating in the crucifixion, the Kingdom was
21:03
held in advance was delayed. It was only after this
21:06
widespread rejection became apparent that Jesus announced in
21:09
Matthew 16 that he would build his church.
21:12
Therefore, the Church exists in this present interim age.
21:16
It is the entity being built during the delay of the
21:19
mediatorial Kingdom, which the text argues will be inaugurated
21:23
in the future at the second coming of Christ.
21:25
The Church is not the Kingdom, but Church age believers are
21:28
heirs to that future Kingdom. So if the Church is distinct
21:32
from the future Kingdom, how does it govern and sustain
21:35
itself in the present day? We need to look at the anatomy
21:38
of a local gathering. What actually constitutes a
21:41
local church? If a group of friends meets in a
21:44
coffee shop to listen to a theological discussion, is that
21:48
a church? The source text identifies
21:50
several specific functions and leadership structures that mark
21:53
a biblical New Testament local church.
21:56
The first function is worship. Old Testament believers met on
21:59
the Sabbath, the 7th day of the week.
22:01
But the book of Acts shows a massive transition where Jewish
22:05
Christians who would observe the 7th day Sabbath for over a
22:08
Millennium, suddenly began worshipping on Sunday, the 1st
22:11
day of the week. This was a theological shockwave
22:13
designed to commemorate the resurrection of Christ.
22:16
The Greek words used for worship in the New Testament provide a
22:19
lot of insight into the mechanics of what this function
22:21
entails. The text highlights 3 terms.
22:24
What is the first one? Proscumio, which means to bow
22:28
down or prostate oneself. But the text is careful to note
22:32
that the physical act of bowing is meant to reflect an inner
22:35
attitude of the heart, which is submission to God.
22:39
True worship involves the entire being, not just a posture.
22:42
Then there is Lot Trio which carries the basic meaning of
22:45
priestly service. Instead of bringing a dead
22:47
animal sacrifice like in the Old Testament, the New Testament
22:51
believer offers their own living body to God as an act of
22:54
service. Finally, Siba my relates to an
22:56
intense reverence or fear of God.
22:58
New Testament worship must be in accordance with truth and
23:01
involves presenting your entire self, mind, body and will to
23:05
God. Beyond worship, the second
23:07
function is instruction. The early church was absolutely
23:10
devoted to teaching. The text states that teaching is
23:13
the antidote to false doctrine, it produces love, and it
23:16
provides spiritual nourishment. Paul taught publicly and in
23:19
homes, trying to saturate entire cities with Christian doctrine.
23:23
The third function is fellowship, which comes from the
23:25
Greek word quinonia, meaning sharing.
23:28
We have to understand the cultural context.
23:30
Here, this was not just casual chatting over coffee.
23:32
No, the Roman Empire was built on strict social stratification.
23:37
You had the wealthy patricians and the lowly plebeians and
23:39
slaves. But Koenonia involved a radical
23:42
social risk. It meant a Roman master and his
23:45
slave eating from the same loaf of bread during the love feasts.
23:49
They share their money to support the poor breaking down
23:52
economic barriers, and they shared in the suffering and
23:55
rejection inflicted by the surrounding culture.
23:57
The final function is ministry, which includes evangelism and
24:00
toward the outside world, exercising spiritual gifts to
24:03
help one another, and even the difficult task of exercising
24:06
church discipline when there was unrepentant immorality or false
24:09
doctrine threatening the body. To maintain all of these intense
24:13
functions like worship instruction, fellowship and
24:15
ministry, the local church requires leadership.
24:18
The text identifies specific offices, starting with the
24:22
elders. Now, the new estimate uses two
24:24
different Greek words to identify this single office, and
24:28
each word highlights a different aspect of the role.
24:31
The first term is presbyteros, from which we get the English
24:34
word presbyter. This word literally refers to
24:37
someone who is older, and it stresses the dignity, maturity,
24:41
and authority of the office. Elders make doctrinal decisions,
24:44
distribute funds, and offer counsel.
24:46
The second term is episcopose, which is translated as overseer
24:51
or Bishop. This word stresses the function
24:54
or the daily work of the elder, which is to watch over and
24:57
shepherd the flock, ensuring they are fed and protected.
25:00
The qualifications for these elders are notoriously strict.
25:04
First Timothy 3 and Titus One list 15 specific
25:07
characteristics. An elder must be above reproach,
25:10
meaning there is no valid accusation that can stick to his
25:13
life. He must be the husband of one
25:15
wife, temperate, prudent, respectable and hospitable.
25:18
He cannot be addicted to wine, pugnacious or a lover of money.
25:22
But let's look at the underlying psychology of one of these
25:25
qualifications. He must not be a new convert.
25:27
Why is that? The text explains is to prevent
25:29
him from becoming conceited and falling of the condemnation
25:32
incurred by the devil. There is a psychological danger
25:35
in handing spiritual authority to someone who has not developed
25:39
the character to carry it. Sudden power leads to pride,
25:41
which destroys leadership. You must also manage his own
25:44
household well and have a good reputation even with unbelievers
25:48
in the outside community. That is a staggering list of
25:51
character requirements. Focus far more on integrity than
25:55
charisma. Alongside the elders, the text
25:57
details the office of deacons. The word by Akinos simply means
26:01
minister or servant. The origin of this office is
26:04
traced to a specific crisis in Acts 6, where ethnic tension
26:08
flared up between Hellenistic and Hebraic Jews because the
26:11
Hellenistic widows were being overlooked in the daily
26:13
distribution of food. Seven men were selected to
26:16
handle these material needs. This allowed the apostles, and
26:19
subsequently the local elders, to devote their primary time to
26:22
prayer and the ministry of the Word.
26:24
The deacons are subordinate and auxiliary to the elders.
26:27
They handle the physical, logistical and material needs of
26:30
the congregation so the spiritual oversight is not
26:33
neglected. They also have strict moral
26:36
qualifications, very similar to the elders, requiring dignity,
26:40
honesty and good management of their homes.
26:43
I often compare the Elder and Deacon dynamic to the bridge of
26:46
a large ship. That is a helpful way to think
26:48
about it. You have the captain, who stands
26:50
at the front, looking out at the horizon.
26:53
The captain plots the course, watches for approaching storms
26:56
and ensures the ship is heading toward its true destination.
26:59
That is, the elder focused on doctrine, teaching and guarding
27:03
the flock from error. But down below you have the
27:06
chief engineer. The chief engineer ensures the
27:09
engines are actually running, the mechanical systems are
27:11
functioning, the hull is intact and the crew has the supplies
27:15
they need. That is the Deacon.
27:16
If the captain has to abandon the bridge to go down and fix a
27:19
broken pipe in the engine room, the ship might veer off course
27:23
and hit a reef. Both roles are absolutely vital
27:26
for the survival of the ship, but they have distinctly
27:29
different focuses. That analogy clarifies the
27:32
necessary division of Labor now. The text also wades into a
27:35
historical debate regarding the leaders of the church,
27:38
specifically the office of deaconess.
27:41
There are two primary passages considered here.
27:44
In Romans 16.1, Paul refers to Phoebe as a diaconon of the
27:48
church in Centria. The question theologians debate
27:51
is whether Paul is using this term in a technical sense,
27:54
referring to an official ordained church office, or in a
27:58
non-technical sense, simply praising her for being a
28:01
wonderful servant to the congregation.
28:02
The author of our source text leans toward the non-technical
28:05
interpretation, noting Paul's habit of informal greetings.
28:09
The second passage is First Timothy 3.11, which lists
28:13
qualifications for women right in the middle of the
28:15
qualifications for deacons. Some argue this refers to the
28:18
wives of the deacons who would naturally assist their husbands
28:21
in ministering to women in the church.
28:23
Others argue strongly that it establishes a separate, distinct
28:26
office of deaconess. The text and partially presents
28:29
the parameters of this debate. Moving outward from the leaders
28:32
of a single local gathering, we have to ask how these leaders
28:35
interact on a macro level. Historically, church governance
28:38
has fractured into 3 distinct blueprints for how multiple
28:41
congregations are structured and governed.
28:43
I want you to objectively lay out the best biblical arguments
28:46
the text provides for all three models, starting with the
28:49
Episcopal form. How did this model develop and
28:52
what is its textual justification?
28:56
The Episcopal form of government takes its name from episcopos,
28:59
meaning overseer or Bishop. In this model, authority does
29:03
not reside in the local congregation.
29:05
It rests with bishops who oversee a whole group or region
29:08
of churches. The Roman Catholic, Orthodox,
29:10
Anglican, Methodist, and Lutheran churches utilize
29:13
variations of the structure. Historically, this model gained
29:16
massive traction in the early centuries as a way to rapidly
29:20
combat heresies like Gnosticism by centralizing doctrinal
29:23
authority. The distinguishing feature is
29:25
that the Bishop possesses the authority to ordain ministers.
29:29
Roman Catholics trace this authority through a concept
29:31
called Apostolic succession, claiming a direct, unbroken line
29:35
of authority handed down from Peter based on Matthew 16.
29:39
Others, like Methodists, use the structure for its administrative
29:42
efficiency without claiming Apostolic succession.
29:46
Adherence of this model point to the authority of James in the
29:49
Jerusalem church or the regional authority exercised by Timothy
29:52
and Titus over multiple pastors as biblical precedent.
29:56
The second blueprint is the Presbyterian form.
29:59
This word comes from Presbyterus, meaning elder.
30:02
This system has roots in the the ancient Jewish synagogue system
30:06
and emphasizes representative rule by elders who are appointed
30:09
or elected by the congregation. The Reformed and Presbyterian
30:13
traditions use this model. It is organized in a tiered
30:17
structure of courts designed to prevent any single local leader
30:20
from developing a cult of personality.
30:22
At the local level, you have the session made-up of the ruling
30:25
elders and the teaching elder, who is usually the pastor.
30:28
Above the local session is the Presbytery, which includes
30:30
representatives from multiple congregations in a district.
30:33
Above of that is the Synod and finally the General Assembly.
30:36
The biblical support for this model relies heavily on the
30:40
undeniable New Testament pattern of a plurality of elders leading
30:44
the churches, such as in Jerusalem, Ephesus, and every
30:47
single town where Paul planted a church.
30:49
The third blueprint is the congregational form.
30:52
In this model, authority does not rest with a Bishop outside
30:55
the church, nor does it rest solely with a representative
30:58
board of elders inside the church.
31:00
Authority rests with the entire local congregation.
31:03
The two watchwords here are autonomy and democracy.
31:07
Autonomy means no outside authority, like a Bishop or a
31:10
Synod, can dictate theology or practice to the local church.
31:14
Democracy means the members vote to make the decisions.
31:16
Baptists, evangelical, free, and many independent churches follow
31:20
this model. The theological foundation for
31:22
this model is the priesthood of all believers.
31:25
If everyone has equal access to God, everyone has an equal say
31:29
in the governance of the body. Biblically, they point to the
31:32
entire congregation being involved in electing the deacons
31:35
in Acts 6, sending out missionaries like Barnabas, and
31:38
participating in church discipline in First Corinthians
31:40
5. So how does the source material
31:42
evaluate these three models? The text remains quite
31:45
objective. It concludes that the Episcopal
31:48
form relies heavily on the unique, unrepeatable authority
31:51
of the original 1st century apostles.
31:54
Christ gave the 12A unique authority that, according to
31:56
this text, does not have a biblical basis for succession to
32:00
later bishops. However, the text finds strong
32:04
textual support in the New Testament for elements of both
32:07
the Presbyterian and Congregational models.
32:09
The Presbyterian view is supported by the clear mandate
32:12
for a plurality of elders. But the congregational view is
32:15
supported by the clear evidence that the whole congregation was
32:18
involved in major decisions. Like the Jerusalem Council in
32:22
Acts 15, The New Testament seems to hold elder leadership and
32:26
congregational consent in a delicate balance.
32:29
Having established how a church is structured and governed, we
32:32
turn to the visible rights that mark those who belong to the
32:35
community. These are the physical actions
32:37
that symbolize spiritual truths. The text details the ordinances
32:41
of the Church. Even the terminology here
32:44
requires explanation. Historically, Protestants
32:46
recognized 2 rites, which are baptism and the Lord's Supper.
32:51
Roman Catholics holds 7, including marriage, penance and
32:55
confirmation. Catholics and some Protestants
32:57
prefer the term sacrament. This derives from the Latin word
33:01
sacramentum, which was a Roman military oath and was used in
33:05
early Latin Bibles to translate the Greek word for mystery.
33:09
A sacrament is often defined as a right that actively conveys
33:12
invisible grace to the participant.
33:14
Many Protestants, however, prefer the term ordinance,
33:17
defining it simply as an outward rite prescribed by Christ,
33:20
without the connotation that the physical act itself conveys
33:23
saving grace. The theology behind the Lord's
33:26
Supper varies wildly, and it drastically alters a
33:29
churchgoer's experience of communion.
33:31
There are 4 distinct views detailed in the text. 1st is
33:34
transubstantiation, which is the Roman Catholic view.
33:37
They teach that a literal miracle occurs during the mass.
33:40
The substance of the bread and the wine actually changes into
33:43
the literal body and blood of Christ, even though the sensory
33:46
characteristics which they call accidents like the taste and
33:48
texture, remain the same. The text notes that this
33:51
involves A continuing propitiatory sacrifice for sins.
33:55
Propitiatory is a major theological term.
33:58
It means to appease divine wrath or satisfy a debt.
34:03
If the Mass is propitiatory, it means the priest is continually
34:06
offering Christ to God to appease ongoing wrath.
34:10
That creates a massive psychological weight where the
34:12
participant must continually receive the sacrament to
34:15
maintain a state of grace. The text raises several critical
34:19
objections to transubstantiation, noting that
34:22
it views Christ's work on the cross as unfinished,
34:25
contradicting the book of Hebrews, and it ignores the
34:28
localized nature of Christ's human body currently in heaven.
34:31
The second view is consubstantiation held by
34:34
Lutherans. They reject the idea that the
34:36
bread and wine literally changed substance.
34:38
Instead, they teach the ubiquity of Christ's body, meaning Christ
34:42
is actually present in, with, and under the elements.
34:44
Martin Luther used the analogy of an iron bar placed in a fire.
34:48
The heat penetrates the iron and they exist together, but the
34:51
iron remains an iron bar. They also reject the Catholic
34:54
idea of a perpetual propitiatory sacrifice.
34:57
The meal offers forgiveness but is not a re sacrifice.
35:00
The third view is the refound or Calvinist view.
35:04
This view completely rejects the literal physical presence of
35:07
Christ in the elements. However, it strongly emphasizes
35:11
a real spiritual presence. Calvin taught a mystical
35:14
communion where the Holy Spirit lifts the believer to feed upon
35:17
Christ. The body and blood of Christ
35:20
remain physically in heaven, but they communicate a life giving
35:23
influence to the believer partaking in faith.
35:25
In this view, grace is actually communicated to the participant,
35:29
strengthening their faith, just as the preaching of the Word
35:32
does. It acts as a seal of a finished
35:34
propitiation. Finally, we have the memorial
35:37
view, often called the Zwinglian view, after the Swiss reformer
35:41
Ulrich Zwingli. This is held by Baptist and many
35:44
independent churches. This view teaches there is no
35:47
real presence of Christ in the elements, physical or spiritual,
35:50
beyond his normal omnipresence. The bread and the cup are
35:53
strictly figurative. The meal is a memorial to
35:56
commemorate the death of Christ, a public proclamation and a
35:59
demonstration of faith. It is an act of obedience that
36:02
points backward to the cross and forward to the Second Coming,
36:05
but the elements themselves impart no special power to the
36:08
believer. The text provides A similarly
36:11
objective breakdown of the second ordinance, which is
36:14
baptism. Just like the Lord's Supper,
36:16
there are three primary views on what baptism actually
36:18
accomplishes. First, some view it as a means
36:21
of saving grace. This is baptismal regeneration
36:24
held by Catholics and some Lutheran's where the ACT itself
36:27
washes away original sin. 2nd The Reformed and Presbyterian
36:31
view sees baptism as a sign and seal of the covenant.
36:35
It does not save, but it initiates a person into the
36:38
visible covenant community. Because they view it as the New
36:41
Testament equivalent to Old Testament circumcision, this
36:44
view forms the theological basis for infant baptism, bringing the
36:48
child into the covenant household. 3rd The Baptist view
36:51
sees baptism purely as a symbol of salvation.
36:55
It conveys no direct spiritual benefit, but acts as a public
36:58
testimony of an inward change that has already occurred.
37:01
Because it requires A conscious testimony of faith, this view
37:04
restricts baptism exclusively to believers, rejecting infant
37:08
baptism entirely. The debate over baptism also
37:11
extends to the physical mode of the right.
37:13
The text explains that the English word baptism is actually
37:16
a transliteration of the Greek word baptiso rather than a
37:20
translation. There are three historical
37:22
modes. First pouring or a fusion
37:26
Defenders point to early church documents like the DDOC from the
37:29
late 1st or early 2nd century. The DDOC explicitly permitted
37:33
pouring water over the head three times if running water was
37:37
not available, showing that the early church allowed flexibility
37:40
based on water scarcity. 2nd Sprinkling or aspersion.
37:44
This was initially reserved in the early centuries for the sick
37:47
or those too weak to be moved, drawing on Old Testament imagery
37:50
of Levites and the Tabernacle being sprinkled with water or
37:53
blood for ceremonial cleansing. The third mode is immersion,
37:56
which involves completely dipping the person under the
37:59
water. The text acknowledges that
38:00
lexical studies of the Greek word baptizo point to a basic
38:04
meaning of to dip or to immerse. It was the word used in ancient
38:08
Greek recipes for pickling a vegetable.
38:11
You completely submerge it in the brine.
38:12
Furthermore, the theological imagery in Romans 6 of being
38:16
buried with Christ in death and raised to walk in newness of
38:19
life is most vividly illustrated by physically going under the
38:23
water and coming back up. The early church had access to
38:27
large public pools in Jerusalem that could accommodate mass
38:30
immersions, and Jewish prostate washings, which predated
38:34
Christian baptism, were also self immersions.
38:37
All of these structures, like the leadership offices, the
38:39
government blueprints, the ordinances of the Lord's Supper
38:42
and baptism are not just theoretical concepts.
38:45
They are designed to equip the Church for its ultimate purpose
38:48
on Earth. The source material categorizes
38:50
the purpose of the church into a dual function, which is the
38:54
church gathered and the church scattered.
38:56
These two purposes must be kept distinct.
38:58
The gathered Church ministers internally to the body, while
39:01
the scattered Church ministers externally to the world.
39:04
Let's examine the gathered church first.
39:06
When believers assemble, the primary goal is an incubator for
39:09
growth. It is designed to reach
39:11
spiritual maturity. How do they do that?
39:14
Through the functions we discussed earlier, they dedicate
39:16
themselves to teaching, saturating their minds with
39:19
doctrine so they're not tossed around by every new cultural
39:22
idea. They engage in intensive
39:24
fellowship, bearing one another's burdens and supporting
39:27
the vulnerable. The gathered environment is not
39:30
primarily for the outside world. It is the equipping station for
39:34
the believers. But the church does not stay
39:36
gathered. It scatters and this is where
39:39
the external ministry happens. The text shows that the early
39:42
New Testament church did not attempt to carry out its
39:45
evangelism within the confines of a building.
39:48
They went out into the world. Based on the Great Commission in
39:50
Matthew 28, the scattered church is tasked with making disciples.
39:55
Crucially, this ministry of evangelism was not restricted to
39:58
the apostles or a select few elite leaders.
40:01
It was carried out by ordinary believers going about their
40:04
daily lives, crossing rigid cultural and social boundaries
40:07
in the marketplace, in the public square to share the
40:09
message. That distinction exposes a
40:12
modern vulnerability. It asks if modern Christians
40:15
have occasionally flipped the biblical model.
40:17
Have modern churches tried to make the gathered church the
40:20
Sunday morning service inside a building, the primary place for
40:24
evangelism? We construct attractional models
40:27
hoping to invite unbelievers into the building to hear the
40:30
professional leader give the message.
40:32
But the biblical text positions the gathered church as a
40:35
training center, a place of intense edification and
40:38
equipping so that ordinary believers can function
40:41
effectively as the scattered church out in the culture Monday
40:45
through Saturday. The source material aligns with
40:48
that missional reading. The text notes that the core
40:50
message proclaimed by the scattered church is defined by
40:53
Paul in First Corinthians 15.1 to 4.
40:57
The essence of the Gospel is the historical reality of the death
41:00
and resurrection of Jesus Christ for sins.
41:03
The gathered bodies primary function is edification and
41:06
theological grounding, ensuring that when the believers scatter
41:09
into their workplaces, neighborhoods, and families, the
41:12
message they proclaim is historically accurate and
41:15
resilient against cultural pressure.
41:17
We have covered an immense amount of theological ground
41:20
today. We started by defining ecclesia
41:22
not as a brick and mortar structure, but as a living,
41:26
called out assembly born at Pentecost.
41:28
We walked through the dual nature of the local and
41:31
universal church, comparing it to a visible mushroom and an
41:35
invisible mycelial network. We unpacked the vivid metaphors
41:39
that describe its organic life from the body to the bride.
41:42
We distinguish the Church from Israel and the mediatorial
41:45
Kingdom. And then we look under the hood
41:47
at the anatomy of a local congregation, checking out the
41:49
elders, deacons and functions. We evaluated the three
41:53
blueprints for church government, navigated the varied
41:55
historical views on the ordinances of communion and
41:58
baptism, and arrived at the dual mission of the gathered and
42:01
scattered body. It is a highly comprehensive
42:04
framework. Understanding ecclesiology
42:06
prevents us from reducing the Church to a social club or an
42:09
administrative corporation. It demands that we view the
42:12
local assembly as a manifestation of a divine
42:15
reality. The practices, the leadership
42:17
requirements, and the ordinances are all tethered to the
42:20
theological truth that the Church belongs to the Lord and
42:23
it is built by the active work of the Holy Spirit.
42:26
As we wrap up this deep dive, I want to leave you with a final
42:28
thought to Mull over. We look back at the 1st century
42:32
and we see an early church that exploded across the globe.
42:35
They really did. They did this without dedicated
42:37
buildings, without intricate Global Management structures,
42:41
without political sway, and without the social
42:44
respectability we often crave today.
42:46
If the true nature of the church is a living, breathing Organism
42:50
rather than a static organization, how might modern
42:53
believers need to rethink their metrics for spiritual success?
42:57
Are we measuring the beauty of the architecture or the vitality
43:00
of the living stones?